ERIC STERNER
Professional and Academic Portfolio 2010-2015
EDUCATION
PRACTICE
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA
GENSLER
COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING
FIFTH YEAR B.ARCH CANDIDATE FOR ACCREDITED B.ARCH. EXPECTED COMPLETION: MAY 2015
COLLEGE OF SOCIAL + BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES PSYCHOLOGY (MINOR)
JUNE - AUGUST 2014
PHOENIX, AZ
Worked as a member of a design team for Great Hearts Academies - Trivium. Phases of work ranged from programming and schematic design to early permit set submittals. Overall responsibilities included design drawings, renderings and 3D modeling.
ALTA CONSTRUCTORS
UNITED STATES GREEN BUILDING COUNCIL STUDENT GROUP - PRESIDENT 2012 - 2014 Elected as the president of the U.S. Green Building Council Student Group at the University of Arizona. Responsibilities include the organization of lecture/tour series to inform students + faculty about environmentally concious design. Additionally, curating design-build projects on a local level to educate the community about sustainable design strategies, and further, to allow students to gain experience in the physical, built environment.
DEAN’S ADVISORY COUNCIL 2011 - PRESENT
JANUARY - APRIL 2014
TUCSON, AZ
Responsible for assisting with the schematic design for Calle Barille in the Tucson Foothills. Creating presentation renderings and drawings for client meetings as well as making Revit models for subcontractor use.
SHANE PATRICK ASSOCIATES
MAY - AUGUST 2014
ALLENTOWN, PA
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: DESIGNER 2013 - PRESENT
Tasks included: determining constructibility by comparing plans, specifications and drawings to identify any discrepancies or missing details, generating internal budgets and project schedules, issuing RFIs to gather necessary information, preparing scope of work, contracts and job orders to necessary subcontractors, generating, updating and tracking all RFIs, submittals and procurement items with architects, engineers and subcontractors to ensure the project schedule is met, generating internal budgets at project start up, reviewing and preparing all necessary change order requests ensuring validity of pricing and consistence of presentation to owner and creating marketing documents for website and magazine publication.
ARIZONA HIGHER EDUCATION SUSTAINABILITY CONFERENCE - EXHIBITOR MARCH 2014
TEACHING
Peer-elected to serve as the class of 2015 representative to discuss issues and find efficient strategies within the school of architecture, under Dean Janice Cervelli, Director Robert Miller and other members of the faculty.
AIAS STUDENT MENTOR 2012 - PRESENT Serving as a mentor to first year architecture students discussing drawing and presentation techniques.
Exhibited a display of energy analysis on buildings in Tucson to raise awareness of current building practices.
ARCHON PRIZE FINALIST
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA, COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE
FALL 2014 - SPRING 2015
TEACHING ASSISTANT
Arc 441/541 Construction Documents with Andrew Hesse: Lecturer
MAY 2013
One of twelve finalists in the third year land ethics studio to compete for the Archon Prize.
AIAS ARIZONA FREEDOM BY DESIGN: STUDENT VOLUNTEER 2011-2012 Assisted in the design and build of wheelchair ramps in the private homes of individuals who are physically disabled.
INVITED CRITIC FOR ARC 101 + ARC 201 2011-2013 AIAS ARIZONA: STUDENT MEMBER 2011-2013
SOFTWARE PROFICIENCY Revit 2015 dynamo Rhinocerous 5.0 grasshopper, flamingo, vray, geco AutoCAD 2014 Google SketchUp vray 3ds Max Adobe Creative Suite 6 illustrator, photoshop, indesign, after effects Integrated Environmental Solutions Navisworks eQuest
CERTIFICATIONS Autodesk Performance Analysis Certificate
REFERENCES
DON HENNING, Assoc. AIA
RAYMOND BARNES, AIA
BRAD LANG, AIA
MARY HARDIN, AIA
Architectural Designer Gensler Phoenix e: don_henning@gensler.com c: 602.697.1104
ERIC STERNER
1121 NORTH ACUNA AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85705 C: 610.570.5573 E: esterner@email.arizona.edu
Lecturer University of Arizona: College of Architecture e: bradlang@email.arizona.edu c: 480. 570. 5296
Lecturer University of Arizona: College of Architecture e: rbarnes@email.arizona.edu c: 520-575-5518
Professor and Associate Dean University of Arizona: College of Architecture e: mchardin@email.arizona.edu c: 520-621-6751
CONTENTS THESIS & STUDIO SPRING 2015-PRESENT
Bethlehem Steel Co_tec
Thesis Project: Community Vocational College in Bethlehem, Pa. FALL 2015
Exposed Veil
Museum showcasing local and visiting works of art, photography and minerals. FALL 2014
Arizona Center for Information and Collaboration
University Center that provides a platform for group and individual gatherings.
CONSTRUCT SPRING 2014
Trombe Wall House
Residence built by University of Arizona College of Architecture students. SUMMER 2014
Bio_Sit+Re_USE
Recycled building materials re-contextualized for a seating area.
STRUCTURES SPRING 2013
The Denial Twist
Exploring force and form of a three-way span. SPRING 2013
Observation Tower
Recycled building materials re-contextualized for a new purpose.
SPRING 2013
Steel Tower
Recycled building materials re-contextualized for a new purpose.
RESEARCH Fall 2014
Arizona Fly-Roof
Research on energy efficiency of a typical Arizona bungalow home
PROFESSIONAL Summer 2014
Gensler
Summer Intern at Gensler Phoenix
3
(IN PROGRESS)
BETHLEHEM STEEL CO_tec
IMBRICATING THE BETHLEHEM STEEL SITE WITH THE PEOPLE OF BETHELEHEM, PA DESIGN -
Spring 2015
SITE -
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
PROGRAM -
Education - Vocational
SIZE -
64,000 gross sq ft
ADVISOR -
Jason Griffiths
BRIEF -
The current structure of most American cities lies within the interval of opposing movements and trends. Through this evolving nature of a city, I believe that the aspirational equilibrium of the inhabitants of a place, the original impetus and variation impetus, must carefully be balanced to become progressive, while simultaneously allowing future generations to understand and see the past that has created the present. As Henri Bergson theorized, “What we do depends on who we are; but it is necessary to add also that we are, to a certain extent, what we do, and that we are creating ourselves continually.” Architecture must certainly be vernacularly suited for the physical factors of the site; however, it should also be a social response for the issues of the city responding to the people who live there and what they need to evolve. Thus, architecture shall imbricate the varying patinas using context as a material and materials as a way to relate to context. Architecture that imbricates appropriately will resonate within the contrast between the primitive and high tech. The geographic site upon which this shall be tested is one of the largest brownfield sites in the world - the Bethlehem Steel. The redevelopment efforts to date have embraced an architecture of denial - the implementation of ornamental imagery, which merely represents the history of the site. Through a system of simulacra, the redevelopment masks the disappearance of a culturally and economically significant company. This perverse type of simulation - dissimulated authenticity - pretends the steel company is still extant by renovations and the restoration of its remains. The restorative nature of the Gas Engine Blowing House; however, seeks to embrace the remains of the planned demolition of buildings on site and reinterpret the future of the Bethlehem Steel through the careful layering of contextual patina and high tech assemblies over the current primitive state of the Bethlehem Steel.
NOTE: This project will be showcased at the National Museum of Industrial History in Bethlehem, PA for the July 2015 “Bethlehem and the Steel” exhibit.
5
EXPOSED VEIL
CREATING A PUBLIC SPACE THAT SHOWCASES BOTH ART AND THE PEOPLE OF TUCSON DESIGN -
Fall 2015
SITE -
Tucson, Arizona
PROGRAM -
Museum
SIZE -
105,000 gross sq ft
ADVISOR -
Brad Lang
TEAM -
Bernardo Teran, Eric Sterner
BRIEF -
Congress and I-10, also known as the “gateway of Tucson” is an area that is severely underdeveloped and in need of rehabilitation. With a rough history due to the Rio Nuevo project, the site is in need of a project that serves as a catalyst for urban growth. The response to this issue is to create a singular exterior form that veils an aggregated functional architecture underneath – 3 museums under one roof. The veil is both icon, infrastructure, and activator – an iconic and understandable formal gesture at high speed viewing from the highway that supports active and passive system infrastructure for the activation of public space. The project is sited to frame a southern plaza with a gradient matrix of public/private and outdoor/indoor spaces. The project aims to reconcile the needs of access and preservation by operating between the limits of solid and void – an interstitial zone of filters, gradients, translucency, overlaps, and moiré.
COLLECTION INTEGRATION
THE MUSEUM WILL...
The proposed Visual Arts Center is composed of CCP, UAMA, and UMM collections from the University of Arizona. The main issue at hand with having three distinct collections in one space is how they interact with each other. To what degree will all the UA collections be integrated and interacting with each other?
House spaces + galleries that can be both autonomous and dependant of each other in order to allow the museum flexibility + structure.
SEPARATE AND SPRAWL
STACKING THE VISUAL
PUBLIC SPACE CONNECTOR
AUTONOMOUS GALLERY
NATURAL + ARTIFICIAL LIGHTING
THE MUSEUM WILL...
The facade of UAMA does little to draw in visitors or let them know they have arrived at a prestigious institution housing such valuable collections. There is a need for a more inviting entry and lobby space for meeting groups and for public way-finding.
Enforce natural and artificial lighting strategies to allow for social activation and the strategic lighting of art.
OPEN NATURAL LIGHT
8
LIGHT CONNECTION
NO LIGHT
CONTROLLED LIGHT
PUBLIC SPACE ACTIVATOR
THE MUSEUM WILL...
Using the adjacent site and proposal as a cue for the development of space and design, the site provides vectors that shall inform the process of space planning. The site is located in a position of downtown that needs to activate it’s context. What will be the main activators of public space in the proposed Visual Arts Center?
Be a catalyst for a public space that both responds to the existing development and proposed program.
RAISING PROGRAM
PUBLIC SPACE ON PROGRAMMED SPACE
SINKING BUILDING
BUILDING INTERACTION WITH PUBLIC SPACE
ARCHITECTURAL EXPRESSION
THE MUSEUM WILL...
The idea and desire for the museum to not only serves as a public space to house both the people and art of the City of Tucson becomes an opportunity for the building to express itself to the city and the adjacent highway.
Be an exterior expression of the 3 collections housed within, serving as an architectural billboard for the public.
NON-VIEWABLE
HIGHWAY AS DATUM
DECORATED SHED
DUCK
9
10
11
BACK OF HOUSE + FLOW OF ART Concentrating the service cores with the back of house spaces in order to maximize preservation and accessibility of art was first considered.
CORES AS ORGANIZING ELEMENTS Using both mechanical and natural lighting cores as the organizing elements, circulation through the museum will occur among them.
POROUS ORGANIZATION Keeping a porous scheme open to the public is considered.
12
PUBLIC INTEGRATION Incorporating the public on multiple levels, not just the ground floor is implemented.
PROGRAM INTEGRATION
Program is organized with public access and the cores as the central organizing elements of the museum.
PUBLIC + ENVIRONMENT Consideration of shade to control the exterior public environment is implemented- using the architecture as the catalyst for public space.
13
D
C
D
C B
B
A
A
1
1
K
WOR
CE
ROOM
K BREA OUT ROOM
OFFI
E LARG E OFFIC
IVE ARCH ROOM ING READ
GIFT
HT FREIG OR AT ELEV
A UAM Y ER GALL
2
2
A UAM Y ER GALL
A UAM Y ER GALL
P
SHO
HT FREIG OR AT ELEV
H
MEC
H
MEC
WS WS
E LARG E OFFIC
WS
E
OFFIC
WS WS WS
3
3
CE EREN CONF OM RO
LL
T HA GREA
4
4
RING CATE
S SALE ROOM
RITY
SECU
T EVEN E AG STOR
LOBBY
H
MEC
CCP Y ER GALL
HT FREIG OR AT ELEV
CCP Y ER GALL
FLOOR LEVEL 1
14
FLOOR LEVEL 2
M UAM Y ER GALL
5
HT FREIG OR AT ELEV
5
H
MEC
CCP Y ER GALL
D
C
D
C
B
B
A
A
M
IU ITOR AUD
1
1
2
2
A UAM Y ER GALL
A UAM Y ER GALL HT FREIG OR AT ELEV
HT FREIG OR AT ELEV
H
MEC
H
MEC
A UAM Y ER GALL
A UAM Y ER GALL
A UAM Y ER GALL
3
3
4
4 CCP Y ER GALL
H
MEC
HT FREIG OR AT ELEV
HT FREIG OR AT ELEV
CCP Y ER GALL
FLOOR LEVEL 3
M UAM Y ER GALL
5
5
H
MEC
M UAM Y ER GALL
FLOOR LEVEL 4
15
C
D C
B
D
B
A
A
1 1
2 2
OP
GIFT SH
3
3
HALL + GREAT INISTRATION M ADM MUSEU
4 4
CORRIDOR AS AN ACTIVATOR FOR PUBLIC USE
LOBBY
5
Creating an outdoor public corridor reminiscent of the Tate Modern in London, the outdoor public space allows for visitors of the museum and the general public to coexist.
5
C
D
B A
1 2 3 5
The roof of this building allows a relationship to form to the site. Visitors are welcomed by the large veil structure wrapping and covering the program elements. Simultaneously, the roof will provide a filtering of light creating gradients of light and shadows throughout the space.
4
ROOF AS VERNACULAR RESPONSE TO SITE
A
B
C
D
LEVEL 05 60'-0"
08 07
06
LEVEL 04 45'-0"
06 LEVEL 03 30'-0"
INTERSTATE 10
06
09
LEVEL 02 15'-0"
FRONTAGE ROAD
05
LEVEL 01
S. EL PASO AVENUE
0'-0"
01
02
03
04
PROGRAM KEY : 01 SHIP + RECEIVE 02 CONFERENCE ROOM 03 UAMA OFFICE 04 UAMA WORK AREA 05 GREAT HALL 06 CIRCULATION CORRIDOR 07 MUSEUM TERRACE 08 UAMA GALLERY 09 CAFE
A
B
C
D
LEVEL 05 60'-0"
01
03
LEVEL 04 45'-0"
02
LEVEL 03 30'-0"
01
03
LEVEL 02 15'-0"
FRONTAGE ROAD
04
05
LEVEL 01
S. EL PASO AVENUE
0'-0"
10
09
08
07
06
PROGRAM KEY : 01 CCP GALLERY 02 UAMM GALLERY 03 CIRCULATION CORRIDOR 04 LOBBY + SECURITY 05 GREAT HALL 06 UAMM RESEARCH OFFICE 07 UAMM WORK STATIONS 08 UAMM OFFICE 09 WOOD SHOP 05
04
03
02
10 LOADING DOCK
01
LEVEL 05
08
60'-0"
01 LEVEL 04
04
45'-0"
08
05
09 LEVEL 03 30'-0"
02
03
06
06 07
LEVEL 02 15'-0"
LEVEL 01 0'-0"
PROGRAM KEY : 01 UAMM GALLERY 02 CCP GALLERY 03 LOBBY + SECURITY 04 PUBLIC ELEVATOR 05 PUBLIC TERRACE 06 AUDITORIUM 07 PROJECTOR ROOM 08 UAMA GALLERY 09 CIRCULATION CORRIDOR
18
CONGRESS STREET
EAST ELEVATION
SOUTH ELEVATION
NORTH ELEVATION
WEST ELEVATION
20
21
22
ARIZONA CENTER FOR INFORMATION AND COLLABORATION CREATING A PUBLIC SPACE THAT SHOWCASES BOTH ART AND THE PEOPLE OF TUCSON DESIGN -
Fall 2014
SITE -
Tucson, Arizona
PROGRAM -
Education
SIZE -
40,000 gross sq ft
ADVISOR -
Brad Lang
BRIEF -
Situated on the University of Arizona campus, the Co_LAB is a space that explores the open floor plan to allow users to collaborate and define the area in which they choose to inhabit. Furniture and elements for different activities are placed in zones throughout the building to allow for the opportunity to work in a private or public space. As users move throughout the space, they will find themselves moving between exterior and interior spaces as well as large stairways that act not only as stairs, but a place for meeting and gathering. The Co_LAB aims to allow the interstitial space to become an area not just for circulation, but meeting and studying. By doing this, one begins to challenge the current diagrammatic structuring for “collaboration” and begin to think about areas for not only collaboration, but comfortable areas for individuals.
01. THE IDEA OF THE UNIVERSITY
02.
the need for the exchange of general and special information
03.
INDIVIDUALS VS. GROUPS
the university is composed of both individuals and groups
ATOMIZATION OF THE CURRENT UNIVERSITY SYSTEM the university as it is today: buildings isolate individuals and groups
SPECIAL INFORMATION ne e
d
SPECIAL INFORMATION
nee d
DISCIPLINES
GENERAL INFORMATION ne ed
SPECIAL INFORMATION
INDIVIDUAL
SPECIAL INFORMATION
GENERAL INFORMATION
d nee
SPECIAL INFORMATION
isolation g of rin
SPECIAL INFORMATION
GROUP
SPECIAL INFORMATION
04. GROUP IS EVERYWHERE
05.
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INDIVIDUALS AND GROUPS there must be areas for the individual because if there is no individual, there is
06.
MINIMUM ORGANIZATION we seek minimum organization within a framework where the user choses
07. THE REMOVAL OF ISOLATION
08.
GROUNDSCRAPER greater opportunities of community and exchange exist
09.
GROUP IS EVERYWHERE tentative use of a minimum structure where individual and group determine
with the removal of the barrier, exist everywhere and be mixedand withbethe individual with the removal of thegroups barrier,cangroups can exist everywhere
mixed with the individual
the typical skyscraper acts as an isolator between groups. a new system is needed
no group
where he will go
desirable relationships
The typical idea of collaboration can no longer exist. Groups must merge together and overlap in order to make collaboration happen. No groups should be separated from other groups. Rather, people are separated by activity, but all together in one area sharing ideas.
conceptual physical model - overlapping of users and users to define space that allows users to interact
outdoor space
01.
terraces
02.
outdoor cafe
music rehearsal room audio visual lab visiting faculty office conference room small study room large study room
public restrooms reception library reference
collaboration
large study room work room
study pods
01.
public
gallery
01.
open study area
library collection
01.
second floor
02.
fourth floor
04.
meeting room public stair
mechanical closet
01. administration offices
02.
servers storage it coffee breakout
service
administration
02.
first floor
02.
cafe
01.
mechanical
general loading area stairs elevators
02.
general loading area
third floor
03.
27
01
02
04
03
Roof 50’-6”
Level 4 37’-0”
Level 3 25’-0”
Level 2 12’-6”
engineering
center for photography
Level 1 0’-0”
North Elevation 01
02
03
04
06
05
07
09
08
Roof 50’-6”
Level 4 37’-0”
Level 3 25’-0”
Level 2 12’-6”
center for photography
architecture
Level 1 0’-0”
East Elevation
01
02
03
04
Roof 50’-6”
Level 4 37’-0”
Level 3 25’-0”
Level 2 12’-6”
center for photography
engineering
Level 1 0’-0”
South Elevation 01
02
03
04
05
06
07
Roof 50’-6”
Level 4 37’-0”
Level 3 25’-0”
Level 2 12’-6”
engineering
Level 1 0’-0”
civil engineering
West Elevation
PUSHPUSH 01. PUSH 01. PUSH 01.01.
allowing existing flow of people allowing allowing toexistingexisting flow offlow people ofallowing people to toexisting flow of people to naturally flow into courtyard naturally naturally flow into flow courtyard into courtyard naturally flow into courtyard
02. PULL 02.02.PULLPULL 02. PULL
adding to the cut void allows adding foradding to a the cut to the voidcut allows void for allows adding a fortoa the cut void allows for a terrace view of the gardenterrace belowterrace view ofview the garden of the garden belowterrace belowview of the garden below
03. FILL 03.03.FILLFILL 03. FILL
terraces fill the cut to allow terraces for views terraces fill the fill cut the to allow cut tofor allow views terraces for views fill the cut to allow for views of the south of the south of the south of the south
04. CUT 04.04.CUTCUT 04.
cut areas create terraces that cut allow areas cutcreate for areas terraces create terrace that a a unique interior/exteriorarelationunique a unique interior/exterior interior/exter rela ship ship ship
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
A
A
A
A
A
B
B
B
B
B
C
C
C
C
C
D
D
D
D
D
E
E
E
E
E
F
F
F
F
F
G
G
G
G
G
H
H
H
H
H
I
I
I
I
J
J
J
J
30
First Floor
First Floor
Second Floor
J
Second Floor
1
2
3
1
4
A
A
B
B
C
C
D
D
E
E
F
2
3
4
F
G
G
H
H
I
J
J
Third Floor
Fourth Floor
31
01
02
03
04
05
Roof 50’-6”
Level 4 12’-6”
Level 3 12’-6”
Level 2 12’-6”
Level 1 0’-0”
32
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
Roof 50’-6”
Level 4 37’-0”
Level 3 25’-0”
Level 2 12’-6”
Level 1 0’-0”
33
34
1
2
3
8 4
5 7
6
1 TERRACOTTA 2 TERRACOTTA CLIP 3 HSS MEMBERS 4 STRUCTURAL STEEL FRAMING 5 STEEL FRAMED SOFFIT 6 LOCATION FOR ACTUATOR FOR WINDOW SYSTEM 7 SUSPENDED CEILING FRAMING 8 TOPPING SLAB ON DECK
36
37
AWARDS -
AIA Design Excellence Award Spring 2014
PUBLICATIONS - “At the Intersection of Research and Practice in Tucson.” HUD 1 Jan. 2015. Print.
THE TROMBE WALL HOUSE DRACHMAN DESIGN BUILD COALITION HOUSE # 6
DESIGN -
Spring 2013
CONSTRUCTION -
Fall 2014 - Spring 2014
SITE -
614 South Star Avenue Tucson, Arizona
PROGRAM -
Single Family Residence
SIZE -
1,200 gross sq ft
ROLE -
I assisted in the overall construction of the home as well as designing and fabricating elements and drawings for the trombe wall.
TEAM -
Professor/ Contractor - Mary Hardin Project Architect - David Bullaro Students - Abdulla Alnuaimi, Taylor Arnold, Denjie Chen, Andrew Cusick, Adam Ferguson, Enrique Lopez, Brad Meyerson, Andrea Rose, Roshelle Stahl, Eric Sterner, Christopher Waters, Mekael Wesley-Rosa
BRIEF -
The Drachman Design Build Coalition, a non-profit organization at the University of Arizona’s College of Architecture, Landscape Architecture and Planning received grants from both the City of Tucson and Pima County in 2013 to fund the study, design and construction of affordable, sustainable homes for low-income families in south Tucson’s Barrio San Antonio. The Trombe Wall house is DDBC’s seventh completed project since 2006. The house takes its name from a glazed masonry wall that runs the length of the building’s southern facade. During the cool winter months, this trombe wall provides passive heating, storing the sun’s energy during the day and transferring it to the home’s interior in the evening. In the summer, the warm air is vented outside. The trombe wall is also the only exterior wall of the house with masonry construction. Upon completion, Tucson’s HUD office selects a deserving local family to be able to move into the home at an affordable cost.
5
6
4
3
1
2 1
2
3
4
7
KEYNOTES
6
7
EAST ELEVATION
1
WOOD RAFTER WITH STEEL METAL SOFFIT
2
WESTERN RIB CORRUGATED SHEET METAL
3
26 GA. SHEET METAL
4
3’ OVERHANG WITH 1/2” OSB CLAD IN SHEET METAL
5
STEEL HAT CHANNEL
6
LIGHT GAUGE STEEL FRAMING
7
STANDARD CMU
8
DOUBLE INSULATED GLASS WITH ALUMINUM MULLIONS
9
2’ CLERESTORY POLYGAL SHEETS
WEST ELEVATION 1
2
NORTH ELEVATION 1
SOUTH ELEVATION
FLOOR PLAN
40
9
8
7
2
4
6
5
FLASHING - 26 GA. SHEET METAL BENT @ 10-1/8” X 1” X 3/8”
7/8" HAT CHANNEL 2' O.C. MIKEY BLOCK WALL
ALUMINUM GLASS MULLION
1/2" DIAM. ANCHOR BOLT TYP. #4 HORIZ. REINFORCEMENT TYP. MIKEY BLOCK FOAM BUCK METAL SIDING PANEL FASTENED TO PLYWOOD @ 2' O.C. TYP.
8” X 8” X 16” MASONRY BLOCK
J-TRIM
1/2" DRYWALL
DRIP EDGE FLASHING
NUT FOR ANCHOR BOLT COUNTERSINK TO CONCEAL
2”x10” TOP PLATE
PRE-MANUFACTURED SELF FLASHING ALUMINUM WINDOW FRAME w/ INTEGRAL SCREEN- REFER TO WINDOW SCHEDULE FOR DIMENSIONS, OPERABILITY, AND SPECIFICATION
1/8” THICK STEEL BOX
6’ DOUBLE PANE GLASS MULLION
3/8” GROUT JOINT
2”x12” BOTTOM PLATE 1/2" DRWALL FLASHING ABOVE BOTTOM BUT BELOW WINDOW FRAME
J TRIM
NUT FOR ANCHOR BOLT COUNTERSINK TO CONCEAL
GROUT
MIKEY BLOCK FOAM BUCK METAL SIDING PANEL FASTENED TO PLYWOOD @ 2' O.C. TYP.
1/2" DIAM. ANCHOR BOLT
T.O. SLAB 0’-0”
#4 HORIZ REINFORCEMENT
T.O. FOOTING -0’-8”
MIKEY BLOCK WALL 7/8" HAT CHANNEL 2' 0.C.
WINDOW HEAD + SILL SECTION DETAIL
TROMBE WALL - WALL SECTION
41
42
43
44
45
BIO_SIT+Re-USE CREATING SEATING FROM CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND EDUCATING YOUTH DESIGN -
Summer 2014
CONSTRUCTION - Current SITE -
Drachman Montessori Elementary School
PROGRAM -
Recreation - Seating
TEAM -
Dulce Arambula, Eric Sterner
BRIEF -
One of the remarkable characteristics of the Drachman Montessori Elementary School is the amount of open space available to the students. This characteristic is one that is uncommon or beginning to be uncommon as we begin to see great sprawl on our land. Thus, we must teach students about space and what we can do with space before it is too late. Utilizing the materials that are waste products that could otherwise be recycled for a new purpose became the essential position of this project. The result was a bench that not only provided seating for the students at Drachman Montessori Elementary School, but also thoughtfully re-purposes an element that would have otherwise been destroyed.
HOW CAN CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS BE USED EFFECTIVELY? A STUDY OF HOW CONSTRUCTION SITE WASTE CAN BE A CATALYST FOR RECREATION
CURRENT CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION PATHWAYS SEPARATE CONTAINERS ON SITE
C+D WASTE
WOOD
METAL
MASONRY
CARDBOARD
CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS ACCOUNTS FOR 25% TO 45% OF THE TOTAL SOLID WASTE IN THE UNITED STATES
SALVAGE
Samton, LLP, G. (2003, May 1). DDC - Strategies & Responsibilities. Construction & Demolition Waste Manual, 7.
METAL RECYCLER
WOOD RECYCLER
C+D WASTE MIXED WASTE
MASONRY RECYCLER
CARDBOARD RECYCLER
MIXED WASTE PROCESSOR
SITE
NON-PROFIT
WHAT WE DID METAL
WOOD
MASONRY
METAL RECYCLER
WOOD RECYCLER
MASONRY RECYCLER
LANDFILL
The goal of this project was to understand the process of recycling construction waste and develop a product that would allow for the effective and meaningful re-use of that waste. Using precedents and interviewing local builders about their personal methods of recycling debris, the conclusion that a local and vernacularly suited solution for how to dispose of some re-usable byproducts of construction would benefit not only builders, but also the environment.
CONTEXT C+D WASTE MIXED WASTE
MIXED WASTE PROCESSOR
NEW PATHWAY PARADIGM
LANDFILL
According to the AIA, total construction spending is expected to grow to 8 percent in 2015. Subsequently, the amount of waste from buildings will increase. The current construction and demolition pathway leads to toxin-filled, leachate producing, greenhouse gas emitting landfills. In order to reduce problems caused by landfills for future generations, a new paradigm for how we recycle scraps from construction sites is necessary.
RESULTS From organizing and gathering research that gave insight into current recycling methods, a new recycling pathway was developed which would result in doing vernacularly suited projects benefiting local communities. The design for the wattle bench was realized by reaching out to a local construction company and asking for the debris and waste from a project after its completion.
C+D WASTE SORTED REGENERATIVE WASTE
LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS
COMMUNITY PROJECTS
THE PURPOSE OF THIS PROJECT IS TO INVESTIGATE MEANINGFUL RE-PURPOSING OF OTHERWISE WASTED OBJECTS AND EXPLORE NEW FORMS OF RECREATION. 48
1’ DIA. WATTLE
WATTLE (Noun) -
machine produced straw filled tube compacted in seamless flexible netting material creating a densely filled fiber log.
1/2” OSB (varying sizes)
OSB
(Noun) an engineered wood particle board formed by adding adhesives and then compressing layers of wood strands (flakes) in specific orientations.
WHAT IT MEANS The new paradigm for how construction and demolition waste can be used creates less of a demand on landfills and gives opportunity to local groups to create and use products as they desire.
MODELED AND RENDERED IN REVIT 2015
RECREATION (Noun) - refreshment by means of some pastime, agreeable exercise, or the like.
WHAT’S NEXT
RECREATION
The project will be deployed at a local elementary school in order to raise the awareness of both the students and public on current construction recycling practices. The project will serve as a case study for the local Tucson community in addition to serving as phase one for a larger recycling initiative that was created to minimize waste into landfills by the City of Tucson Waste Management. (Noun) - the act of creating anew
EXPECTED COMPLETION: FEBRUARY 2015
ARIZONA FLY ROOF
DEFINING A NEW BUILDING LOGIC FOR THE ARIZONA BUNGALOW DESIGN -
Spring 2013
CONSTRUCTION -
Fall 2014 - Spring 2014
SITE -
1021 S. Colgate, Dr. Tucson, Arizona
PROGRAM -
Single Family Residence
SIZE -
850 gross sq ft
ROLE -
I created the as-built drawings as well as provided thermal analysis of the building that was then sent to engineers for thermal reading.
TEAM -
Project Architect - David Plotkin Eric Sterner, Joe Debenny
BRIEF -
Habitat for Humanity brings people from different backgrounds together to build homes for families. The homes that Habitat for Humanity build are carefully crafted to not only be affordable, but also vernacular. The hope for the homes that Habitat for Humanity Tucson creates are that not only are they providing spaces for people to live, but also providing a product for the City of Tucson that is appropriate and designed to provide a lasting product that the families who live in the homes can afford and maintain. For this project, Habitat for Humanity contacted me with the hopes of solving high cost energy bills with the proposal and design for a fly roof.
HOW CAN THE ARIZONA BUNGALOW BECOME ENERGY EFFICIENT? COVERED PATIO COVERED PATIO
WHAT WE DID KITCHEN KITCHEN
DINING DINING
BATH BATH
Working with Habitat for Humanity Tucson, the production of as-built drawings to an existing 1920’s bungalow home in Tucson became the base for what would become a model generated for accurate energy analysis drawings. The scope of work included generating models of the existing building as well as defining a new way to reduce energy costs in this type of home so that future tenants will not have such high energy bills.
BEDROOM BEDROOM
CLOSET CLOSET LIVING ROOM LIVING ROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM
ENTRY PORCH ENTRY PORCH
CONTEXT
EXISTING FLOOR PLAN
The Arizona bungalow typified the common styles of the American Arts and Crafts movement. Common features of this home included: low pitch roof lines on a gabled or hipped roof, deeply overhanging eaves, exposed rafters, and a front porch. In the case of this home, to maintain the hipped roof that exemplified the styling of this home, and the neighborhood was necessary. COVERED PATIO COVERED PATIO
BEDROOM BEDROOM
BATH BATH
KITCHEN KITCHEN
DINING DINING
BATH BATH
BEDROOM BEDROOM
CLOSET CLOSET
LAUNDRY LAUNDRY
RESULTS
LIVING ROOM LIVING ROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM
The final result from the research and thermal analysis of the building allowed for the production of a detail that Habitat for Humanity is now using on all of their projects that use a fly-roof design. This new typology serves as a case study for those trying to reduce heat-gain in a small home. In Tucson, this sort of building logic could reduce almost 30% heat gain in a 1000 sq ft. home. For Habitat for Humanity homeowners, this statistic is critical in the potential purchasing of a home.
BEDROOM BEDROOM
ENTRY PORCH ENTRY PORCH
NEW FLOOR PLAN
NORTH ELEVATION
EAST ELEVATION
WEST ELEVATION
SOUTH ELEVATION
ELASTOMERIC COATING OVER 3 PLY BUILT-UP ROOFING ON 5/8” OSB SHEATHING OVER 11 7/8” ENGINEERED RAFTERS @ 24” 0.C. WITH FULL CAVITY (R-38 MIN.)
COVERED PATIO
WEB STIFFNER
KITCHEN
DINING
2X6 WOOD OUTLOOKER @ 24” O.C.
BEDROOM BATH
EXISTING 2X RAFTERS @ 16” OC (TO REMAIN) 2 - 2X6 TOP PLATE ATTACHED TO EXISTING 2X RAFTERS
CLOSET
EXISTING 2X8 TOP PLATE WITH 1/2” ANCHOR BOLT AT 32” OC INTO SOLID GROUTED CELL
LIVING ROOM BEDROOM
WALL TO EXISTING ROOF
ENTRY PORCH
FULL YEAR SOLAR ANALYSIS (NORTH - SOUTH)
SECTION OF PROPOSED FLY ROOF ELASTOMERIC COATING OVER 3 PLY BUILT-UP ROOFING ON 5/8” O.S.B. SHEATHING OVER 11” ENGINEERED RAFTERS @ 24” O.C. WITH FULL CAVITY (R-38 MIN.) INSULATION, TYP.
WEB STIFFNER
RIM BLOCKING 2X6 WOOD OUTLOOKER @ 24” 0.C. METAL DRIP EDGE 2X CONTINUOUS FASCIA
H2.5
FULL YEAR SOLAR ANALYSIS (EAST - WEST)
EAVE BOARD, KNOTCHED INTO 2X FASCIA EXISTING PLANK DECKING (TO REMAIN) EXISTING 2X RAFTERS @ 16” O.C. (TO REMAIN)
2 - 2X6 TOP PLATE ATTACHED TO EXISTING 2X RAFTERS
EXISTING 2X8 TOP PLATE WITH 1/2” ANCHOR BOLT AT 32” O.C. INTO SOLID GROUTED CELL EXISTING 8” MASONRY WALL INTERIOR FINISH
FULL YEAR SOLAR ANALYSIS (WINDOWS ONLY)
WALL TO EXISTING AND NEW ROOF
INTERIOR FINISH ON 2” POLYISOCYLANURATE RIGID INSULATION SECURED WITH “Z” BAR SHOT INTO MASONRY
GRAPPLING WITH MATERIAL INFORMS THE DESIGN IN A WAY THAT ALLOWS FOR THE GESTURE TO BE TECTONIC. THIS EXPRESSION OF FORCE IS THE ESSENCE OF THE MATERIALS ABILITY TO SPEAK THROUGH THE SMALLEST MINUTE DETAIL.
STRUCTURES
TESTING FORCE, FORM AND MATERIAL
THE OBSERVATION TOWER
Experience Volume
PROJECT LOCATION: Portland, OR PROJECT TYPE: Wood Bird Watching Tower PROFESSOR: Chris Trumble TEAM: Joe Debenny, Casey Kell, Eric Sterner
PURPOSE:
Diagrammatic Structural Concept
As an observation tower for nature enthusiasts, the goal is to maximize the experience of engaging the visuals of the site. Users approach the tower, noticing a volume that is simultaneously distinctly separate and integrated into a structural core. Bird watchers ascend a dark volume of space lit only by a 1 foot gap at the floor and are released into the light of the first observation deck and occupy the tree canopy as they search for the local wildlife. As they continue upwards, they emerge from the thick canopy back into the sky at the second observation deck built specifically to view the riparian habitat from directly above and to maximize 360 degrees views.
DISTINGUISHING CIRCULATION FROM STRUCTURAL CORE:
Essential Force Diagram
The architectural experience of ascension could be further emphasized if it were made distinctly abstracted from the structural system and isolated as an experience all in itself. The paradigm of a tower with shear cores and planes at the exterior is turned inside-out with the core centralized and entirely structural in nature, entirely freed of inhabitants. The circulation volume then clutches to the core as it spirals upwards, using the core to brace itself the against lateral forces of its own overturning moment and wind.
Glu-Lam Cantilever
A BALANCE OF FORCES:
The tower attempts to offset its own forces in its form. The dramatic cantilever at the top of the tower is countered by the central core and the mirrored geometry at the base.
Cantilever Moment Diagram
Counterweight
Shear Plane Siding
A
B
C
5’- 7”
A
B
6’- 9”
10’- 7”
1
C
9’- 2”
A
D
8’- 6”
4’-10”
4’-10”
4’-0”
8’-10”
4’-10”
4’-0”
3
4’-0”
4’-0”
3
4
4
N
N
N
15’- 14”
First Observation Deck Plan
Ground Floor Plan
Second Observation Deck Plan
7’-
N
Reflected Ceiling Plan
D
8’- 6”
2
2
4’-0” 3
C
9’- 2”
1
1
2
B
6’- 9”
N
6”
Roof Plan
57
THE DENIAL TWIST PROJECT TYPE: Three-Way Span PROFESSOR: Chris Trumble TEAM: Joe Debenny, Casey Kell, Eric Sterner
PURPOSE:
The design/build project involves stress testing where a pneumatic device applies up to 10,000 PSI of pressure in order to learn where failures in a structural system occur. There is an opportunity to apply a more architectural concept alongside pragmattic parameters. The design intent for the three-way span is to induce torsion, and thereby resolve it through the use of both geometric and formal bias. A lightweight and form-specific structure was calculated in order to derive the highest level of performance criteria in preparation for the application of the respected load. The iterative process utilizes an empirical methodology to transform intuition into a critical understanding and knowledge of the threeway structural system. The maximum strength / weight ratio is considered a conceptual objective, it is therefore important to address that the qualitative depth is adequate. The diagramming was a tool used to derive a more specific form with the calculations extrapolated into the more evolved arrangement seen in the axonometric where the tension and compression members are diagrammed.
CONSTRUCTION PROCESS
SYSTEM FORCE DIAGRAM DE
+
=
P1
0F
P2
b 0D 34.88 40.38
a=5,000
c 0E
+
=
45.23
70.38
43.42 34.35
A simple free body diagram was utilized in order to derive three form-specific arms for the three-way structural system, where each was extrapolated into an evolved tension and compression diagram. The span was specifically fabricated, and thus tested on a load applicator bearing force, allowing for an understanding of the system’s proper deformation.
+
=
+
=
=;8-K89<LJ-<J=8J=-765-=; =;56>L;-=;8->98-67-@6=; 9=5>:=>58-OG9-:GA:>AG
In applying these values as a method to determine relative magnitudes, each of the three arms became specific in their relationship to one another. Further, the calculations proved an evolved arrangement, as seen in the axonometric diagram, where tension and compressive members are exhibited.
STEEL TOWER
3 " 16 0'-6
nn
mm
oo
1 0'-7 " 2
nn
0'-8
1 " 4
1 " 2
13 " 16
mm
ll
0'-6
0'-7
kk
jj
ll
kk 0'-9
jj
3 " 4
0'-8
3 " 16
ii gg
hh
ii
hh
0'-9"
gg
5 " 8
ff 0'-8
ee
dd
ff
ee 0'-10
dd
1 " 2
0'-11
3 " 16
cc
bb
0'-10
The structural tower maximizes the inherent stability of the triangle by rotating the geometry upon itself and structuring the bracing to support this transposition. Understanding that the greatest amount of lateral force acting upon the tower will occur at the base, the design compensates for this dynamic load by maximizing tensile rods in the first three feet. Compressive pentagonal diaphragms have been incorporated to further stabilize the tower. Finally, by tapering the size of the triangular steel plates in proportion to the next, an economy of material can be achieved while decreasing the inertial force at the top of the tower.
oo
3 " 8
PURPOSE:
3 " 4
0'-9
PROJECT TYPE: Lateral Force Testing PROFESSOR: Will Peterson TEAM: Bernardo Teran, Erica Blank, Andrea Rose, Lisa Martinez, Eric Sterner
0'-6
96â&#x20AC;?
bb
aa
aa Elevation
1'-0"
cc
1 " 4
Level 09 Unbraced zone
96”
C T
T
T
C C
C
Level 08 84”
Transition zone
C
T
T
T
C
C
C
Level 07 72”
C
T
T
T
C
C
Braced zone
C C
T
T
T
Level 06 60”
C
C
C
C
Level 05
Heavy bracing zone
C
External Structure Isometric
Internal Structure Isometric
48”
T
T
C
C
Level 04 36”
External + Internal Structure Isometric T
C
T
C
PROCESS OF CONSTRUCTION
Level 03 24”
C
Level 02 12”
C
Spacing the Floorplates
Creating the Internal Structure
Adding External Members to Internal Structure
Elevation Deformation
P
Level 01
0”
C
GENSLER PHOENIX, ARIZONA GREAT HEART ACADEMIES
DESIGN -
2014
CONSTRUCTION - 2015 SITE -
Goodyear, Arizona
PROGRAM -
Education
SIZE -
90,000 gross sq ft.
ROLE -
I assisted in the overall production of the BIM model as well as developed renderings for the client.
TEAM -
Beth Harmon-Vaughan, Jay Silverberg, Jason Boyer, Andre Bighorse, Luis Cruz-Martinez, Don Henning, Angela Sullivan, Kyle Houston, Katie Oâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;Donnell, Victor Irizarry
BRIEF -
Great Hearts Academies are a non-profit network of public charter schools dedicated to improving education in the Phoenix metropolitan area by developing a network of excelling preparatory academies. The proposed 90,000sf campus in composed of four buildings organized around a central exterior courtyard, creating a space for community gathering that serves as an outdoor forum for students, teachers and parents to interact, perform, play and learn. Each of the four buildings serves a complimentary function to the whole of the campus reinforcing principals of classical planning. A Great Hearts Academy consists of two schools; an Archway Classical school (grades K-5) and a Preparatory school (grades 6-12), accompanied by an administrative building and a gym building.
64
GOODYEAR, ARIZONA
1
“4. E.I.F.S.TYPE SYSTEMS” (PALM VALLEY PROMENADE DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES, 18)
2
“1. USE HARMONIOUS AND COMPLEMENTARY COLORS TO VISUALLY UNIFY THE BUILDINGS” (PALM VALLEY DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES, 19)
5
6
3
“ALL FOUR FACADES OF BUILDINGS SHOULD HAVE WINDOWS.” (COG, CH4, PG16)
4
“BUILDINGS ENTRANCES SHOULD BE ACCENTUATED BY ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS, LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING.” (COG, CH4, 16)
16 18
“ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS, SUCH AS OVERHANGS, TRELLISES, PROJECTIONS, AWNINGS, INSERTS, MATERIALS, TEXTURE, AND COLOR, SHALL BE USED TO CREATE SHADOW PATTERNS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO THE BUILDING’S CHARACTER.” (COG, CH4, PG 36) “...MONOLITHIC WALL FACADES SHALL BE ‘BROKEN UP’ BY VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL ARTICULATION” (COG, CH4, PG34)
17
21
7
“9. FLOATING STEEL TRELLISES.” (PALM VALLEY PROMENADE DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES, 18)
8
“2. AN OVERALL COLOR THEME IS TO BE DEVELOPED WITH COMPLEMENTARY ACCENT COLORS” (PALM VALLEY DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES, 19)
9
10
"13. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, WHETHER GROUND LEVEL OR ROOF MOUNTED, AND OTHER FIXTURES...BE SCREENED FROM PUBLIC VIEW AND BE SO LOCATED TO BE PERCEIVED AS AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE BUILDING." (COG, ARTICLE 343)
11
“A COMMERCIAL COMPLEX SHALL ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN A CONSISTENT ARCHITECTURAL STYLE WITH INDIVIDUAL BUILDINGS DESIGNED WITH COMPLEMENTARY FORMS AND MATERIALS.” (COG, CH4, PG 31)
12
“WALLS SHOULD HAVE VARYING PARAPET HEIGHTS TO SOFTEN THE MASS OF EACH BUILDING AND FURTHER ARTICULATE THE EXTERIOR. PARTIALLY COVERED COLONNADES ARE ENCOURAGED, TO OFFER SHADE AND PROTECTION FROM WEATHER. DECORATIVE HARDSCAPE FINISHES, SUCH AS INTEGRALLY COLORED CONCRETE AND TEXTURAL ACCENTS, SHOULD BE USED TO ENHANCE THE PEDESTRIAN EXPERIENCE” (PALM VALLEY PROMENADE DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES, 17)
“THE USE OF COLONNADES ALONG STREET FRONTING FACADES SHOULD BE CONSIDERED TO REDUCE THE MASSING OF TALL BUILDINGS AND ADD PEDESTRIAN SCALE AND INTEREST.” (COG, CH4, PG 33)
13
14
“EXTERIOR WALLS WILL GENERALLY CONSIST OF STRUCTURAL (“JUMBO”) BRICK MASONRY AND CMU WITH AN E.I.F.S. FINISH.” (PALM VALLEY PROMENADE DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES, 17)
“THE USE OF ARCADES, AWNINGS, OR SIMILAR ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENTS IS ENCOURAGED TO PROVIDE RELIEF FROM THE SUN AND ENHANCE ENERGY EFFICIENCY.” (COG, CH4, PG46) “PERCEIVED BUILDING MASS SHALL BE ACHIEVED BY ELEMENTS SUCH AS LOW PLANTERS AND WALLS, BASE PLANTING, A BASE ARCHITECTURAL VENEER BANDING (WAINSCOT) AND TREATMENTS DEFINED BY A DIFFERENT MATERIAL, TEXTURE OR COLOR.” (COG, CH4, PG 32)
15
19
20
22
23
16
"DEER FEATHER" CLW1047WLRV85 FRAZEE
17 "PEARL GRAY" DEC795LRV49 DUNN EDWARDS
18 "SHOAL" LC3234DLRV31 FRAZEE
19 "TEMPTATION" 1609LRV10 BENJAMIN MOORE
20
21
"WOODCLIFF LAKE" 980LRV16 BENJAMIN MOORE
PERFORATED CORRUGATED METAL PANELSOLAR SHADE SCREEN
22
23
CMUTRENWYTH, MESASTONERUTHERFORD INTEGRAL COLOR TEXTURED MANSONRY UNITS
DARK BRONZE ANODIZED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM. (PG.15)
25 “8. WALKWAYS SHOULD BE ATTRACTIVE AND EMBELLISHED WITH LANDSCAPING, ORNAMENTAL LIGHTING FIXTURES, FURNITURE, TRELLISES, AND/OR OTHER DECORATIVE FEATURES.” (COG, CH4, PG 4)
26
“BUILDING MASS SHOULD BE BROKEN BY DIVIDING THE BUILDING INTO SMALLER COMPONENTS AND CREATING 27 FUNCTIONAL PUBLIC SPACE AND PEDESTRIAN ORIENTED AREAS BETWEEN BUILDINGS.” (COG, CH4, PG33)
28
“12, STORM WATER RETENTION AREAS SHALL BE DESIGNED AS LANDSCAPE FEATURES RATHER THAN LARGE, PLAIN DEPRESSIONS IN THE SITE.” (COG, CH4, PG 5)
“WALKWAYS SHOULD PROVIDE SHADED PEDESTRIAN 29 REFUGE AREAS, WHICH MAY CONSIST OF TREES, BENCHES, TABLES, SHADE STRUCTURES, OR OTHER APPROPRIATE ELEMENTS. SUCH AREAS SHALL BE FUNCTIONAL AND INTEGRATED INTO THE SITE.” (COG, CH4, PG 8)
“THE AREA BETWEEN BUILDINGS SHOULD BE CONSCIOUSLY DESIGNED AND NOT AN INCIDENTAL REMNANT SPACE WITHOUT A DEFINABLE FUNCTION.” (COG, CH4, PG22)
“BUILDINGS ARE GROUPED TO DEFINE OUTDOOR USE 24 AREAS AND WHERE PARKS AND PLAZAS PROVIDE PLACES FOR ACTIVE AND PASSIVE USE.” (CITY OF GOODYEAR DESIGN GUIDELINES, CH4, PG2)
GREAT HEARTS ACADEMIES WEST VALLEY CAMPUS SITE 57.6130.004
DESIGN REVIEW DOCUMENTATION AS NOTED
S:\57.6130.004\BIM\Building Model\_Central Model File\576130004 SITE.rvt
65
67
â&#x20AC;&#x153;All life is an experiment. The more experiments you make, the better.â&#x20AC;? -Ralph Waldo Emerson
610.570.5573
1121 North Acuna Ave. Tucson, AZ
esterner@email.arizona.edu