ANNEX I.22
LAW OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA NUMBER 28 YEAR 1999 REGARDING STATE ADMINISTRATORS CLEAN AND FREE OF CORRUPTION, COLLUSION AND NEPOTISM
1
LAW OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA NUMBER 28 YEAR 1999 REGARDING STATE ADMINISTRATORS CLEAN AND FREE OF CORRUPTION, COLLUSION AND NEPOTISM WITH THE BLESSING OF GOD THE ALMIGHTY THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA, Considering:
In view of:
a.
whereas State Administrators have a very decisive role in state governance in order to achieve the state’s objective of realizing a just and prosperous community as contained in the 1945 Constitution;
b.
whereas to realize State Administrators who are capable of performing their functions and duties earnestly with full responsibility, principles of state governance must be set forth;
c.
whereas corrupt, collusive and nepotistic practices do not only occur amongst State Administrators but also between State Administrators and other parties and may damage the pivots of the people, the nation, and the state, and threaten the state’s existence, therefore a legal basis is needed to prevent it;
d.
whereas based on the considerations referred to under points a, b, and c, it is necessary to form a Law regarding State Administrators Clean and Free of Corruption, Collusion and Nepotism;
1.
Article 5 paragraph (1) and Article 20 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution;
2.
The Stipulation of the People’s Consultative Assembly of the Republic of Indonesia Number XI/MPR/1998 regarding State Administrators Clean and Free of Corruption, Collusion and Nepotism; With the approval of THE PEOPLE’S LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA HAS DECIDED TO:
Stipulate: LAW REGARDING STATE ADMINISTRATORS CLEAN AND FREE OF CORRUPTION, COLLUSION AND NEPOTISM.
2
CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS Article 1 Referred to in this Law as: 1.
State Administrators shall be State Officials performing executive, legislative, or judicial functions, and other officials whose functions and main duties are related to state governance in accordance with the provisions of prevailing laws and regulations.
2.
Clean State Administrators shall be State Administrators who adhere to the general principles of state governance and who are free of corrupt, collusive and nepotistic practices and other disgraceful acts.
3.
Corruption is a criminal offense as referred to in the laws and regulations regarding criminal acts of corruption.
4.
Collusion shall be an agreement or cooperation contradictory to the law between State Administrators and other parties, harmful to other people, the society and or the state.
5.
Nepotism shall be any act of a State Administrator contradictory to the law which benefits his/her family and or cronies, disregarding the interests of society, the nation and the state.
6.
General Principles of Clean State Governance shall be principles which uphold the norms of morality, fairness and lawful norms in order to establish State Administrators clean and free of corruption, collusion and nepotism.
7.
Commission for the Investigation of State Administrators’ Wealth, hereinafter referred to as the Investigation Commission, shall be an independent body with the task of investigating the wealth of State Administrators and former State Administrators to prevent acts of corruption, collusion and nepotism. CHAPTER II STATE ADMINISTRATORS Article 2
State Administrators shall include the following: 1.
State Officials of the Highest State Institution;
2.
State Officials of High State Institutions;
3.
Ministers;
4.
Governors;
5.
Judges;
6.
Other State Officials as stipulated by prevailing laws and regulations; and
7.
Other officials with a strategic function in relation to state governance in accordance with the provisions of prevailing laws and regulations. CHAPTER III GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF STATE GOVERNANCE Article 3
The general principles of state governance include the following: 1.
The Principle of Legal Certainty; 3
2.
The Principle of Orderly State Governance;
3.
The Principle of Public Interest;
4.
The Principle of Disclosure;
5.
The Principle of Proportionality;
6.
The Principle of Professionalism; and
7.
The Principle of Accountability. CHAPTER IV RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF STATE ADMINISTRATORS Article 4
Each State Administrator shall be entitled to: 1.
receive a salary, allowances and other facilities in accordance with the provisions of prevailing laws and regulations;
2.
exercise his/her right to respond to any reprimand, action by his/her superior, threat of punishment, and public criticism;
3.
express his/her opinion in public in a responsible manner in line with his/her authority; and
4.
receive other rights in accordance to the provisions of prevailing laws and regulations. Article 5
Each State Administrator shall be obligated to: 1.
take an oath or vow in accordance with his/her religion prior to assuming his/her position;
2.
agree to have his/her wealth investigated prior to, during and after assuming the position;
3.
report and declare his/her wealth prior to and after assuming the position;
4.
not to commit any acts of corruption, collusion and nepotism;
5.
carry out his/her tasks without discriminating against any ethnic group, religion, race and group;
6.
conduct his/her duties with full responsibility without committing any disgraceful acts, without expecting any reward, whether for his/her own personal interest, family, crony or group, and without expecting any compensation of any kind which is contrary to the provisions of prevailing laws and regulations; and
7.
agree to act as witness in any cases of corruption, collusion and nepotism and in other cases pursuant to the provisions of prevailing laws and regulations. Article 6
The rights and obligations of State Administrators as intended in Articles 4 and 5 shall be performed in line with the provisions of the 1945 Constitution and prevailing laws and regulations. CHAPTER V RELATIONS AMONGST STATE ADMINISTRATORS Article 7
4
(1) Relations amongst State Administrators must adhere to institutional norms, norms of civility, decency, and ethics based on Pancasila (State Philosophy) and the 1945 Constitution. (2) Relations amongst State Administrators as referred to in paragraph (1) shall firmly uphold the principles referred to in Article 3 and the provisions of prevailing laws and regulations. CHAPTER VI PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Article 8 (1) Public participation in state governance is the right and responsibility of the public to be involved in realizing clean State Administrators. (2) Relations between State Administrators and the public must be conducted by firmly upholding the general principles of state governance referred to in Article 3. Article 9 (1) Public participation as referred to in Article 8 shall be realized in the form of the following: a.
the right to seek, obtain and provide information concerning state governance;
b.
the right to obtain equal and just service from State Administrators;
c.
the right to convey suggestions and opinions regarding the policies of State Administrators in a responsible manner; and
d.
the right to obtain legal protection in relation to: 1) exercising the rights as referred to in sub-articles a, b and c; 2) being asked to attend the process of investigation, examination and to appear in court as a reporting witness, a witness or an expert witness, in accordance with the provisions of prevailing laws and regulations.
(2) The rights referred to in paragraph (1) shall be exercised in line with the provisions of prevailing laws and regulations and in compliance with religious and other social norms. (3) Provisions regarding the procedure of public participation in State Governance as referred to in paragraph (1) shall be further regulated in a Government Regulation. CHAPTER VII INVESTIGATION COMMISSION Article 10 In order to realize state administrators clean and free of corruption, collusion and nepotism, the President as the Head of State shall establish an Investigation Commission. Article 11 The Investigation Commission as referred to in Article 10 shall be an independent institution directly responsible to the President as the Head of State. Article 12
5
(1) The Investigation Commission shall have the function of preventing acts of corruption, collusion and nepotism in state governance. (2) In performing the functions referred to in paragraph (1), the Investigation Commission may cooperate with related institutions either domestically or overseas. Article 13 (1) Members of the Investigation Commission shall consist of Government and community elements. (2) The appointment and discharge of the Members of the Investigation Commission shall be stipulated with a Presidential Decree upon obtaining the approval of the People’s Legislative Assembly (DPR). Article 14 (1) In order to be appointed as a Member of the Investigation Commission as referred to in Article 10, a candidate member shall be at least 40 (forty) years of age and 70 (seventy) years of age at the most; (2) A Member of the Investigation Commission may be discharged in the event that he/she: a.
passes away;
b.
resigns; or
c.
no longer meets the provisions set forth in paragraph (1) and the provisions of prevailing laws and regulations.
(3) Members of the Investigation Commission shall be appointed for a term of office of 5 (five) years and upon the expiration of this period they may be re-appointed for only 1 (one) more term of office. (4) The provisions regarding the conditions and procedures of appointment and discharge of Members of the Investigation Commission referred to in paragraphs (1) and (2) shall be further regulated in a Government Regulation. Article 15 (1) The composition of the membership of the Investigation Commission shall consist of a Chairperson concurrently acting as a member, 4 (four) Vice Chairpersons concurrently acting as members, and not less than 20 (twenty) Members divided into 4 (four) Sub-Commissions. (2) Chairperson and Vice Chairpersons of the Investigation Commission are elected by and from among Members based on of consultation and consensus. (3) The four Sub-Commissions referred to in paragraph (1) shall consist of the following: a.
Executive Sub-Commission;
b.
Legislative Sub-Commission;
c.
Judicial Sub-Commission; and
d.
State-Owned/Regionally-Owned Enterprise Sub Commission.
(4) Each Member of the Sub-Commissions referred to in paragraph (3) shall be appointed in accordance with their expertise and shall work as a team. (5) In performing its duties, the Investigation Commission shall be assisted by a General Secretariat. (6) The Investigation Commission shall be domiciled in the capital city of the Republic of Indonesia. (7) The domain of the Investigation Commission shall include the whole territory of the state of the Republic of Indonesia.
6
(8) The Investigation Commission shall form regional Investigation Commissions stipulated by a Presidential Decree after consideration by the Regional People’s Legislative Assembly (DPRD) concerned. Article 16 (1) Prior to assuming their respective positions, the Chairperson, Vice Chairpersons and Members of the Investigation Commission shall take an oath or vow in accordance with their religion, as follows: “I swear or vow that I will always carry out my duties and authorities earnestly, honestly, courageously, justly without discrimination against positions, ethnic groups, religions, races or other groups of the State Administrators whom I investigate, and that I will fulfill my obligations to the best of my ability, and be fully responsible to God The Almighty, the people, the nation and the state.” “I swear or vow that whether acting or not acting for performing these duties and authorities, I shall not accept any promise or gift from whomsoever, either directly or indirectly.” “I swear or vow that I will safeguard and implement Pancasila as the State Principle, and that I shall honor the 1945 Constitution and other prevailing laws and regulations of the Republic of Indonesia.” (2) The oath or vow as referred to in paragraph (1) shall be uttered before the President. Article 17 (1) The Investigation Commission shall have the duties and authorities of investigating the wealth of State Administrators. (2) The duties and authorities of the Investigation Commission as referred to in paragraph (1 ) shall be as follows: a.
to monitor and clarify the wealth of State Administrators;
b.
to review reports or complaints from the public, non-government organizations, or government institutions, regarding suspected acts of corruption, collusion and nepotism committed by State Administrators;
c.
to conduct investigations upon its own initiative into the wealth of State Administrators based on indications and reports of acts of corruption, collusion and nepotism committed by the State Administrators concerned;
d.
to seek and obtain evidence and to present witnesses in order to investigate State Administrators suspected of committing acts of corruption, collusion and nepotism or to request documents from parties related to the investigation into the wealth of the State Administrator concerned;
e.
if deemed necessary, in addition to requesting the deed of ownership of part or all of the possessions/wealth of a State Administrator suspected to have been gained from corruption, collusion, or nepotism during his/her appointment as State Administrator, also to request the competent authorities to prove the aforementioned suspicion in accordance with the provisions of prevailing laws and regulations.
(3) The investigation of a State Administrator’s wealth as referred to in paragraph (1) shall be conducted before, during and after he/she assumes the position. (4) The provisions on the procedures for examining the wealth of State Administrators referred to in paragraphs (2) and (3) shall be regulated in a Government Regulation. Article 18
7
(1) The results of the investigation by the Investigation Commission as referred to in Article 17 shall be conveyed to the President, the People’s Legislative Assembly (DPR) and the Financial Audit Board (BPK). (2) The results of investigations into the wealth of State Administrators which are conducted specifically by the Judicial Sub-Commission, shall also be submitted to the Supreme Court. (3) If the results of an investigation as referred to in paragraph (1) shows indications of corruption, collusion or nepotism, the results of such investigation shall be submitted to the competent authorities pursuant to the provisions of prevailing laws and regulations, to be followed-up further. Article 19 (1) The monitoring and evaluation of the performance of duties and authorities of the Investigation Commission shall be conducted by the President and the People’s Legislative Assembly. (2) The provisions on the procedures for monitoring and evaluation as referred to in paragraph (1) shall be regulated in a Government Regulation. CHAPTER VIII SANCTIONS Article 20 (1) Any State Administrator violating the provisions set forth in Article 5 paragraph 1, 2, 3, 5, or 6 shall be subjected to administrative sanctions in accordance with the provisions of prevailing laws and regulations. (2) Any State Administrator violating the provisions set forth in Article 5 sub-article 4 or 7 shall be subjected to criminal sanctions and or civil sanctions in accordance with the provisions of prevailing laws and regulations. Article 21 Any State Administrator or Member of the Investigation Commission who commits collusion as referred to in Article 5 sub-article 4 shall be subjected to imprisonment of not less than 2 (two) years and not more than 12 (twelve) years and a fine of not less than Rp 200,000,000.- (two hundred million rupiah) and Rp 1,000,000,000.- (one billion rupiah) at the most. Article 22 Any State Administrator or Member of the Investigation Commission who commits nepotism as referred to in Article 5 sub-article 4 shall be subjected to imprisonment of not less than 2 (two) years and not more than 12 (twelve) years and a fine of not less than Rp 200,000,000.- (two hundred millions rupiah) and Rp 1,000,000,000.- (one billion rupiah) at the most. CHAPTER IX TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS Article 23 Within 6 (six) months after this Law comes into effect, each State Administrator must announce his/her wealth and agree to have his/her wealth examined in line with the provisions of this Law. CHAPTER X CLOSING PROVISIONS
8
Article 24 This Law shall come into effect 6 (six) months as from the date of its promulgation. For public cognizance, this Law shall be promulgated by announcement in the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia. Stipulated in Jakarta on May 19, 1999 THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA Signed BACHARUDDIN JUSUF HABIBIE
9
Promulgated in Jakarta on May 19, 1999 STATE MINISTER OF STATE SECRETARIAT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA Signed PROF. DR. H. MULADI, MASTER OF LAW
STATE GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA YEAR 1999 NUMBER 75
True copy CABINET SECRETARIAT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA Head of Laws and Regulations Bureau II [Signed and stamped; stamp reads: CABINET SECRETARIATTHE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA] Edy Sudibyo
10
THE ELUCIDATION OF LAW OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA NUMBER 28 YEAR 1999 REGARDING STATE ADMINISTRATORS CLEAN AND FREE OF CORRUPTION, COLLUSION AND NEPOTISM I.
GENERAL 1.
State Administrators play an important role in realizing the state’s objectives. This is reaffirmed in the Elucidation of the 1945 Constitution which states that a very important factor in governance and existence of a state is the spirit of State Administrators and government leaders. For a period of over 30 (thirty) years, State Administrators have not been able to perform their duties and functions optimally, hence state governance has not been carried out in an appropriate manner. This occurred due to the centralization of power, authority and responsibility at the President/Mandate of the People’s Consultative Assembly of the Republic of Indonesia. In addition to that, the people have not fully participated in carrying out its function effectively as social control over state governance. This centralization of power, authority and responsibility did not only have a negative impact on politics, but also on the economic and monetary sector, among other things the occurrence of state governance practices which tend to benefit certain groups and provide opportunities for the occurence of corruption, collusion and nepotism. These criminal acts of corruption, collusion and nepotism have not only been committed by State Administrators and amongst State Administrators, but also between State Administrators and other parties such as their families, cronies and businessmen, damaging the pivots of society, the nation and the state, and threatening the state’s existence. In efforts to rescue and recover national life in fulfilling the demands of reform, a united vision, perception and mission of all State Administrators and the people is needed. This united vision, perception and mission has to be in line with the conscientious demands of the people who desire State Administrators capable of performing their duties and functions earnestly and with full responsibility, effectively, efficiently, free of corruption, collusion and nepotism, as mandated by the Stipulation of the People’s Consultative Assembly of the Republic of Indonesia Number XI/MPR/1998 regarding State Administrators Clean and Free of Corruption, Collusion and Nepotism.
2.
This law stipulates provisions which are related directly or indirectly to law enforcement on criminal acts of corruption, collusion and nepotism specifically designed for towards State Administrators and other Officials with a strategic function in relation to state governance in accordance with the provisions of prevailing laws and regulations.
3.
This law is a part or subsystem of laws and regulations related to law enforcement on corruption, collusion and nepotism. The main target of this Law are State Administrators including State Officials of the Highest State Institution, State Officials of High State Institutions, Ministers, Governors, Judges, state officials and or other officials with a strategic function in relation to state governance in accordance with the provisions of prevailing laws and regulations.
11
I.
4.
In order to establish state governance clean and free of corruption, collusion and nepotism, this Law stipulates general principles of state governance which include the principles of legal certainty, orderly state governance, public interest, disclosure, proportionality, professionalism and accountability.
5.
The provisions on public participation in this Law are intended to empower the people in order to establish state governance clean and free of corruption, collusion and nepotism. With their rights and obligations, the people are expected to be more enthusiastic in exercising social control optimally over state governance, while adhering to rules stipulated by the prevailing laws.
6.
In order to achieve its objective effectively, this Law regulates the establishment of an Investigation Commission the duties and authorities of which are to investigate the wealth of state officials prior to, during and after their appointments, including requesting information from former state officials, their families and cronies, or businessmen, while always observing the principle of innocent before proven guilty and human rights. Members of the Investigation Commission shall consist of Government and public element reflecting the Commission’s independence or autonomy.
7.
This Law also stipulates the obligations of State Administrators, which include the declaration and reporting of their assets prior to and after their appointment. Provisions regarding sanctions in this Law are applicable to State Administrators, the public and the Investigation Commission as preventive and repressive measures and serve to warrant the implementation of the provisions regarding the general principles of state governance, the rights and obligations of State Administrators, and other provisions which are hoped to strengthen institutional norms, individual and social morality.
ARTICLE BY ARTICLE Article 1 Self-explanatory Article 2 Point 1 Self-explanatory Point 2 Self-explanatory Point 3 Self-explanatory Point 4 Referred to as “Governor” shall be the regional representative of the Central Government. Point 5 “Judge” in this provision shall include Judges on every Court level. Point 6
12
Referred to as “Other state officials” in this provision shall be for instance Head of the Representative Offfice of the Republic of Indonesia overseas with the position of Extraordinary Plenipotentiary Ambassador, Vice Governor and Regent/Mayor. Point 7 Referred to as “other officials with a strategic function” shall be officials whose duties and authorities in state governance are susceptible to corruption, collusion and nepotism, including: 1.
Directors, Commisioners and other structural officials in State-Owned and Regional Government Owned Business Enterprises;
2.
The head of the Bank of Indonesia and the Head of the National Banking Restructuring Agency (BPPN);
3.
Heads of State Universities;
4.
Level I Officials and other equivalent officials in the ranks of the civil, military, and the Police Force of the Republic of Indonesia;
5.
Prosecuting attorneys;
6.
Investigators;
7.
Court Clerks; and
8.
Project managers and treasurers.
Article 3 Point 1 Referred to as “The Principle of Legal Certainty” shall be the principle in a judicial state which prioritizes the basis of laws and regulations, fairness and justice in all State Administrator policies. Point 2 Referred to as “The Principle of Orderly State Governance” shall be the principle which serves as the basis for consistency, harmony and balance in the control of state governance. Point 3 Referred to as “The Principle of Public Interest” shall be the principle which prioritizes public welfare in a supportive, accommodative and selective manner. Point 4 Referred to as “The Principle of Disclosure” shall be the principle which is open to the rights of the community to obtain accurate, honest and non-discriminatory information on state governance, by observing the rights of individuals, groups and state secrets. Point 5 Referred to as “The Principle of Proportionality” shall be the principle which prioritizes the balance between rights and obligations of State Administrators Point 6 Referred to as “The Principle of Professionalism” shall be the principle which prioritizes professional skills based on the ethical codes and prevailing laws and regulations. Point 7 Referred to as “The Principle of Accountability” shall be the principle whereby every activity and end result of the activity of State Administrators must be accountable to the community 13
or the people as the highest authority in the state in accordance with the provisions of prevailing laws and regulations Article 4 The implementation of the rights of State Administrators as stipulated in this Article shall be in accordance with the provisions of Article 27 paragraph (2) and Article 28 of the 1945 Constitution and the provisions of prevailing laws and regulations. Article 5 In the event that a State Administrator is a member of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Indonesia or the Police Force of the Republic of Indonesia, the provisions of this Law shall be applicable to the official concerned. Point 1 Self-explanatory Point 2 In the event that a State Administrator intentionally obstructs the collection of data about his/her wealth, a sanction shall be enforced in line with prevailing laws and regulations. Point 3 Self explanatory Point 4 In the event that a State Administrator whose wealth is being subject to data collection by the Investigation Commission intentionally give a false statement, a sanction shall be enforced in line with the provisions of prevailing laws and regulations. Point 5 Self-explanatory Point 6 Self-explanatory Point 7 Self-explanatory Article 6 The “rights and obligations of State Administrators implemented in accordance with the provisions of the 1945 Constitution� shall be the rights and obligations implemented by adhering to the virtues of uprighteous humanity and upholding the uprighteous moral objectives of the people. Article 7 Self-explanatory
14
Article 8 Paragraph (1) Public participation as intended in this paragraph shall be the active role of the people to participate in realizing State Administrators clean and free of corruption, collusion and nepotism, conducted by adhering to the lawful, morality and social norms which apply in society. Paragraph (2) Self-explanatory Article 9 Paragraph (1) The provisions in paragraph (1) sub-paragraph d point 2) shall be an obligation of members of society who are requested by this Law to take part in the process of investigation, examination and in court as reporting witness, witness or expert witness. In the event that the authorities’ request to act as a reporting witness, a witness or an expert witness is intentionally disregarded, a sanction will be applicable in accordance with the provisions of prevailing laws and regulations. Paragraph (2) In principle, the community has the right to obtain information regarding state governance, however this right must observe provisions of prevailing laws and regulations which require certain matters to remain confidential, among others those warranted by the Law regarding The Post and the Law regarding Banking. Paragraph (3) Self-explanatory Article 10 Self explanatory Article 11 Referred to as “independent institution� in this Article shall be an institution free from the influence of executive, legislative or judicial authorities in the implementation of its duties and authorities. Article 12 Self-explanatory Article 13 Self explanatory Article 14 15
Self-explanatory Article 15 Paragraph (1) Members of the Investigation Commission in this provision have to amount to an odd number. This is intended to facilitate decision making by voting in the event that a decision cannot be reached by consensus. Paragraph (2) Self-explanatory Paragraph (3) In order to obtain accountable investigation results, members of Sub-Commissions must have integrity, expertise and professionalism in their respective fields. In the event that there is a suspicion of intervention by other parties such as family, crony and or other parties in acts of corruption, collusion or nepotism, the aforementioned family, crony and or other parties shall be subject to provisions of prevailing laws and regulations. Paragraph (4) Self-explanatory Paragraph (5) The duty of the General Secretariat shall be to assist in administrative service to facilitate the implementation of the duties of the Investigation Commission. Paragraph (6) Self-explanatory Paragraph (7) Self-explanatory Paragraph (8) The formation of the regional Investigation Commission is intended to assist the duties of the Investigation Commission in regions. Members of the regional Investigation Commission need to have the prior consideration of the Regional People’s Legislative Assembly. Article 16 Paragraph (2) Self-explanatory Paragraph (2) The provisions of paragraph (2) in principle also applicable to the regional Investigation Commission. Article 17 Self-explanatory Article 18 Paragraph (1) 16
Self-explanatory Paragraph (2) Self explanatory Paragraph (3) The provisions of this paragraph are intended to further clarify the fundamental difference between the duties of the Investigation Commission as investigator of the wealth of State Administrators and the functions of the Police and the Attorney General. The investigation function conducted by the Investigation Commission prior to an individual being appointed as a state official shall be to collect data, whereas investigation conducted after a State Official has completed his/her term of office shall be in the form of an evaluation to determine whether or not there is any indication of corruption, collusion or nepotism existing. Referred to as “indication” in this Article shall be facts or data indicating the presence of elements of corruption, collusion and nepotism. Referred to as “competent authorities” shall be the Financial and Development Audit Board, the Attorney General’s Office and the Police. Article 19 Self-explanatory Article 20 Self-explanatory Article 21 Self-explanatory Article 22 Self-explanatory Article 24 Self-explanatory
SUPPLEMENT STATE GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA NUMBER 3851
17