data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b48a3/b48a3c2b9097392457a7d42c4275e2924ea0454a" alt=""
2 minute read
ONE YEAR ON OUR VIEW
ON Friday, February 24 it has been exactly one year since Russia invaded Ukraine, targeting some of its most populated areas, including the capital Kyiv.
Since then, tens of thousands on both sides have lost their lives, cities have been destroyed, and communities changed forever.
In that year, several things have become clear. First on that list is how fragile peace is, and how quickly life as we currently understand it can change.
In that year, we’ve also learned more about the astonishing courage and ingenuity of human nature when it is pushed to its limit.
Even more heart warmingly though, we’ve also seen the kindness of ordinary people all around the globe who, touched by what they have seen in Ukraine, have donated, fundraised and even given their lives to help people they have never met. Many of those people are here in Spain.
While the war has also given us plenty of insight into the darker parts of the human experience its irrationality, its cruelty, and its unfairness it is that light in the dark that we must focus on.
Because it’s only through doing this that we will see an end to this conflict.
IT’S often been said that political careers almost never end well. They do after all generally finish with someone losing an election (and that’s when they don’t end in a call girl scandal/expenses probe/ tabloid expose).
And the reason for that is perhaps one of the most human of all; hope. Which of us, after all, ever quits while we’re ahead?
But like her or loathe her that’s what Nicola Sturgeon appears to have done.
Yes, there are whispers that her abrupt resignation as Scotland’s first Minister had more to do with avoiding a campaign funds investigation than simply a change of career. But let’s assume both for legal reasons as well as for the sake of not being cynical that she genuinely walked away while broadly still at the top of her career.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04447/04447b4e785edc0c36455624b616ebcdba4f2c37" alt=""
Let’s also assume that the exact reasons she gave for resigning were sincere that the ‘brutal’ (her words) world of politics
Certainly New Zealand’s prime minister until just weeks ago, Jacinda Ardern, gave similar reasons.
If they are both telling the truth then, does this say more about the state of modern politics or about them as individuals?
If true, it does at least show an element of selfawareness that you would presumably like to see from anyone within sniffing distance of nuclear codes.
If their jobs really were so tough though, does this tell us what grit both had for sticking it out for so long, or that they ultimately weren’t the right people for the job?
The latter is a much easier issue to resolve; there are already plenty of people waiting in the wings to battle it out for Sturgeon’s role.
But if the issue is the political atmosphere itself then we have a much bigger problem.
After all, if the pressures of 24hour rolling news cycles, constant public scrutiny and an increasingly volatile global backdrop mean we ultimately lose our best candidates, then who are we left with?