Delegates Evaluation Report Zurich 73rd International Session of the EYP

Page 1

Evaluation Results 73rd International Session of the European Youth Parliament in Zurich, Switzerland 19th to 28th of July 2013

This publication does not represent the point of view of the European Commission or any other European institutions. The interpretations and opinions contained in it are solely those of their authors.


Dear reader, T 73rd International Session of the European Youth Parliament in Zurich, Switzerland. As you can see, the evaluation shows that the event has been a success. However, we invite you all to study the document carefully to identify what we can learn for future sessions. divided into two sections: I.) Evaluation overview and II.)

Evaluation by countries. The overview part depicts the evaluation of delegates concerning different aspects of the session. The answers are represented as diagrams and, when thought useful for the purpose of comparison, accompanied by the answers from the previous International Sessions. For a better round up of the evaluation, we included at the end of each aspect the most often stated comments and suggestions. The quotes at the end should give you an overall impression of the

In general, the strong academic focus of this particular International Session should be underlined. This fact is also reflected in the results of some questions, differing considerably from previous sessions (cf. There was a good balance between socialising and serious work, I would have liked to receive more input, The quality of the evening programme). The second part of the of origin. The diagrams represented in this section are meant to provide each NC with the evaluation of their work for the IS in Zurich. For this purpose, questions regarding the preparation for the session and the future engagement in EYP are included. 143 returned questionnaires. Due to the incomplete amount of returned questionnaires from the delegates and the absence of the nationality information on some filled-in questionnaires, we were not able to provide an evaluation for all countries taking part at the IS in Zurich.

us. Karolina Kolenska EYP International Office

1


DELEGATES

2


I. Evaluation Overview 1. Preparation and information It was easy to find information material for my committee topic. 9%

1% No No opinion Yes

90 %

Munich 91 % Amsterdam 82 % Tallinn 82 % Zagreb 87 % Rh么ne-Alpes 85 % Athens 88 %

I received letters and information soon enough. 19 % 1% No No opinion Yes

80 %

I knew what to expect, therefore preparation proved to be easy. 15 %

3% No No opinion Yes

82 %

I could reach the EYP contact persons without problems. 88 %

7% 5% No No opinion Yes

Munich 88 % Amsterdam 67 % Tallinn 68 % Zagreb 49 % Rh么ne-Alpes 70 % Athens 59 %

Munich 81 % Amsterdam 69 % Tallinn 76 % Zagreb 72 % Rh么ne-Alpes 79 % Athens 72 %

Munich 91 % Amsterdam 73 % Tallinn 79 % Zagreb 58 % Rh么ne-Alpes 74 % Athens 58 %

3


I visited the session website before the event.

The session website provided me with all necessary information.

5%

13 % 79 % No

8%

Yes

No No opinion Yes

95 %

I had problems with finding funding and sponsoring for the travel costs and participation fees. 31 %

48 %

I used the links in the research document to prepare my committee topic. 90 %

0% No No opinion Yes

I knew that I was meant to prepare the topic and had informed myself appropriately. 8% 1%

89 %

No No opinion Yes

Compiling a Fact Sheet helped me to prepare for the Committee Work. 73 %

9% 87 %

4% No No opinion Yes

No No opinion Yes

21 %

4%

I do consider the participation fees as reasonable regarding the offerings of the session.

Munich 90 % Amsterdam 90 % Tallinn 90 % Zagreb 80 % RhĂ´ne-Alpes 90 % Athens 89 %

sessions: Munich 89 % Amsterdam 89 % Tallinn 89 % Zagreb 81 % RhĂ´ne-Alpes 89 % Athens 85 %

Preparing Fact Sheets should be mandatory at every IS. 62 %

27 % No No opinion Yes

32 %

6%

No No opinion Yes

4


It should be mandatory to fulfil a second preparatory task at every IS. 72 %

My participation in this session motivated me to get into topics that were new to me.

17 %

4% 4%

92 % 11 %

No No opinion Yes

No No opinion Yes

2. Teambuilding

Teambuilding helped to build mutual trust and to form a real team. 9% 90 %

1%

No No opinion Yes

Teambuilding helped to develop a feeling for the diversity of cultures and opinions in Europe. 85 %

19 %

3%

No

At Teambuilding, we got to know each other and lowered original hesitancies. 97 %

1%

No No opinion Yes

The mixture of youngsters from different countries in my committee helped me to get an idea of their country, culture and way of living. 11 % 1 % No

No opinion Yes

2%

No opinion 88 %

Yes

Comments & Suggestions: -

-

More Teambuilding. Even though I can honestly say this was my best session so far, I would like to say that I as several of my fellow committee delegates prefer a teambuilding packed with considerably more on action based TB games. A better time sharing and separation of "get to know games" and "problem solving games".

5


3. Committee Work

In my committee, we exchanged very different perspectives and opinions. 12 %

87 %

1%

No No opinion Yes

We have been able to conciliate our different points of view in a common resolution in a peaceful way. 11 % 85 %

During Committee work, I have learned to recognise and respect the different perspectives. 88 %

3%3% No No opinion Yes

I went through a truly democratic decision making process. 14 %

79 %

1% No No opinion Yes

I learned to appreciate democratic decision making processes. 9% 6%

85 %

No No opinion Yes

The committee topics were relevant to me.

No No opinion Yes

My committee topic was interesting. 5% 94 %

11 %

88 %

3%

1%

No No opinion Yes

No No opinion Yes

I felt that the topic was relevant to European Politics today. 5%

3%

No No opinion Yes

I have experienced the advantages of combined expertise from different European countries.

17 % 82 %

5%

93 %

2% No No opinion Yes

Munich 94 % Amsterdam 94 % Tallinn 90 % Zagreb 88 % RhĂ´ne-Alpes 94 % Athens 91 %

6


Comments & Suggestions: - Committees shouldn't have more than 10 people. - Devote more time to it. - A more structured approach to committee work would be appreciated.

Our work was guided by tolerance and respect. 7% 92 %

1% No No opinion Yes

4. Experts Roundtables (Forum Event)

The expert could provide us with satisfying answers to our questions. 44 %

54 %

2%

No No opinion Yes

The consultation of the expert helped my commitee to produce a well established resolution. 33 % 61 % 12 %

No No opinion Yes

Comments & Suggestions: - I think the discussions could have been somewhat better moderated. - I would like to have more time for more discussions with experts as the topics are appealing to me. I would also like to make it literally round, because when people are sitting like in a classroom there's no potential for debates. - Ensure English proficiency of speakers.

7


5. General Assembly (GA) The GA preparation on Thursday was very useful for a good quality of the debates. 20 %

71 %

No No opinion Yes

I have experienced the attractiveness of political debates and active participation. 5% 91 %

No No opinion Yes

4%

13 %

I have experienced in GA how democratic debate works. 9%

I have understood better how a parliamentary debate works.

3% No No opinion

11 % 87 %

No No opinion Yes

2%

Yes 88 %

: It is important that the European Parliament as well as EU Institutions and other political decision makers take our resolutions into consideration.

10 %

88 %

1%

No No opinion Yes

Munich 92 % Amsterdam 89 % Tallinn 82 % Zagreb 94% RhĂ´ne-Alpes 90% Athens 89%

Comments & Suggestions: - The board should receive attack speeches in advance so as to choose the best. - Perhaps a broader sense of Direct Response can be implemented? - The board did a good job by concluding the points made in the debate and thereby preventing oints.

8


6. General Programme

There was a good balance between socialising and serious work all through the session. 38 %

30%

No No opinion Yes

32 %

The atmosphere all through the session gave me the impression to attend a very special and unique event. 22 % 77 %

1% No No opinion Yes

During the session, I have had various opportunities to get to know the fears and visions of the other participants. 17 %

Comments & Suggestions: - The perfect balance between academic work and fun activities. - Very academic but fun. - Academically perfect, sometimes lacking when it came to the evening program, but overall an absolutely amazing time!

Munich 93% Amsterdam 93 % Tallinn 93 % Zagreb 85 % RhĂ´ne-Alpes 68 % Athens 90 %

The interaction during the session has helped me to get to know better the point of view and situation of youngsters in the other European countries. 4%

3% No No opinion Yes

80 %

I feel I have become more interested in Europe than I was before the session. 13 %

78%

Munich 92 % Amsterdam 92 % Tallinn 92 % Zagreb 84 % RhĂ´ne-Alpes 66 % Athens 85 %

2%

94 %

No No opinion Yes

This event and its preparation have improved my knowledge and awareness of cultural diversity in Europe. 5% 2%

9%

No No opinion Yes

No No opinion Yes 93 %

9


I would have liked to receive more input on my topic during the session, e.g. experts, additional information material, etc.

46 %

37 % No No opinion Yes 17 %

I would have liked to have more time for political debates. 47%

47%

No No opinion Yes 6%

Munich 62 % Amsterdam 62 % Tallinn 62 % Zagreb 57 % Rh么ne-Alpes 45 % Athens 55 %

Munich 62 % Amsterdam 54 % Tallinn 58 % Zagreb 60 % Rh么ne-Alpes 59 % Athens 55%

The quality of the evening programme was good. 36 % 60 % No No opinion Yes

4%

I would have wished to have more free time. 38 % No No opinion Yes

55% 7%

Munich 85 % Amsterdam 85 % Tallinn 85 % Zagreb 66 % Rh么ne-Alpes 58 % Athens 53 %

Munich 71 % Amsterdam 84 % Tallinn 82 % Zagreb 77 % Rh么ne-Alpes 87 % Athens 67 %

The total duration of the event was good. 17%

2% No No opinion Yes

81%

10


7. Personal development My participation in this session helped to improve my language skills. 12 %

1%

9% No No opinion Yes

79 %

My participation in this session made me aware of the diversity of cultures, thoughts, opinions and orientations in Europe. 1% 6%

My participation in this session helped to improve my knowledge of the functioning of European parliament. 1% No No opinion Yes

My participation in this session has raised my preparedness and willingness to be and become an active citizen.

Yes

91 %

My participation helped me appreciate cultural differences and diversity. 4%

2%

93 %

No No opinion Yes

My participation in this session helped to have a better understanding of current political developments in Europe. 3%

No No opinion Yes

89 %

My participation in this session helped me to improve my ability to work in an international team. 2% 1%

2%

90 %

No No opinion

8%

93 %

7%

8%

No No opinion Yes

93 %

6%

My participation in this session helped to improve my knowledge and understanding of different cultures.

No No opinion Yes

97 %

No No opinion Yes

11


My participation in this session helped to improve my participation skills. 10 %

My participation in this session helped me to become aware of the active role I can play in European society. 21 %

4% No No opinion Yes

86 %

6% 74 %

No No opinion Yes

8. The Future

I would like to attend EYP-events in the future. 100 %

No No opinion

I will share my experience and insights among friends and fellow students once I am back in my home town. 1% No 99 % No opinion

Yes

I want to start an initiative in my school/city/country to promote the awareness for European issues.

Yes

I would like to get involved into my national EYP-association. 3%

18 %

58 %

24 %

87 %

No No opinion Yes

No No opinion Yes 93 %

I would like to get active as a volunteer. 7%

4%

I raised my readiness to contribute to the development of society through active participation after the session.

6%

10 % No No opinion Yes

79 %

11 %

No No opinion Yes

12


9. Chairs, Journos and Orgas

Organisers I was always able to find an organiser when I needed help. 18 % 1%

81 %

No No opinion Yes

Munich 97 % Amsterdam 89 % Tallinn 86 % Zagreb 61 % Rh么ne-Alpes 63 % Athens 65 %

The organisers were friendly. 4%

4% No No opinion Yes

91 %

The organisers were always able to give me clear and detailed information. 31 %

65 %

4%

No No opinion Yes

Munich 99 % Amsterdam 91 % Tallinn 85 % Zagreb 58 % Rh么ne-Alpes 64 % Athens 85 %

Munich 94 % Amsterdam 83 % Tallinn 83 % Zagreb 52 % Rh么ne-Alpes 36 % Athens 56 %

Punctuality The events and travels happened on time. 12 % 88 %

1%

No No opinion Yes

Munich 96 % Amsterdam 78 % Tallinn 69 % Zagreb 33 % Rh么ne-Alpes 47 % Athens 9 %

13


Chairs Our chair facilitated our work as a committee. 10 %

1% No No opinion Yes

88 %

Munich 96 % Amsterdam 93 % Tallinn 90 % Zagreb 91 % Rhône-Alpes 93 % Athens 89 %

Our chair was competent and knew what to do. 5%

1% No No opinion Yes

94 %

Our chair spent a lot of time with us.

Munich 97 % Amsterdam 97 % Tallinn 97 % Zagreb 92 % Rhône-Alpes 97 % Athens 94 %

Our chair had adequate knowledge of our topic. 1%

21 %

1%

3% No No opinion Yes

76 %

98 %

No No opinion Yes

Journalists I read every issue of the session newspaper. 54 %

45 %

1%

No No opinion Yes

Munich 50 % Amsterdam 50 % Tallinn 50 % Zagreb 50 % Rhône-Alpes 41 % Athens 57 %

14


The journalists improved the atmosphere of the session. 15 %

84 %

1% No No opinion Yes

Munich 95 % Amsterdam 79 % Tallinn 69 % Zagreb 86 % RhĂ´ne-Alpes 81 % Athens 86 %

The journos were present and involved.

The newspaper contained articles that were interesting and relevant to the session and its participants.

7%

5% 4% 90 %

No No opinion Yes

7%1%

No No opinion Yes

90 %

I would have liked the newspapers and videos to be more entertaining and less informational

The output of the media team was of a high quality. 92 %

The session newspaper helped me understand the theme more.

13 % 10 % No No opinion Yes

27 %

63 %

10 %

No No opinion Yes

I had the feeling that the chairs, orgas and journos treated me respectfully.

I knew who the journalists are and was able to approach them for questions or comments.

7%

14 % 5% No No opinion Yes

No No opinion Yes

7%

The session newspapers contributed to the quality of Committee Work and General Assembly.

81 %

47 %

46 % No No opinion Yes

78 %

3%

93 %

0% No No opinion Yes

15


10. Rating

Teambuilding Low

91 %

No opinion

High

89% 11 %

5% 4% Overall impression - how did you like it?

Importance for the Intercultural dialogue.

Opening Ceremony

Eurovillage Low

No opinion

High Low

93 %

88 %

7%

7% Overall impression - how did you like it?

No opinion

High

93%

87 %

12 % Importance for the Intercultural dialogue.

Overall impression - how did you like it?

13 % Importance to raise my awareness for European issues.

16


Committee Work Low

93 %

98 %

2%

No opinion

High

92 %

95 %

5%

7%

8%

Overall impressionImportance for the Importance to Importance for the - how did you like Intercultural raise development it? dialogue. awareness for of a feeling of European issues. democratic citizenship.

Forum Event Low

86 %

14 % Overall impression

80 %

20 % Importance of the cultural dialogue

No opinion

High

90 %

10 % Importance to raise awareness of European issues

77 %

23 % Importance for the development of a democratic citizenship

17


EuroConcert Low

No opinion

85 %

99 % 1%

High

15 %

Overall impression - how did you like it?

Importance for the Intercultural dialogue.

General Assembly Low

96 %

4% Overall impression - how did you like it?

No opinion

Importance for the Intercultural dialogue.

94 %

97 %

92 %

8%

High

3% Importance to raise awareness for European issues.

6% Importance for the development of a feeling of democratic citizenship.

18


Description Sentences (selected):

You only Zurich once -

Delegate, Poland

10 wonderful days filled with laughter, friends, Europe and politics blossoming in summer. -

Delegate, Netherlands

Broadening horizons, opening young minds and giving me a feeling of being in a group of good friends -

Delegate, Russia

-

Delegate, Austria

Amazing academic quality and

A wild tornado of opinions, emotions, relationships and perspectives. -

Delegate, Latvia

It was a truly amazing and eye-opening experience for me. -

Delegate, Finland

As good as chocolate, as well-timed as watches, as hot as fondue, as amazing as mountains: it was Zurich 2013 -

Delegate, France

Academic excellence suits the session perfectly. - Delegate, Portugal

19


COUNTRIES Number of replies per country: Armenia: 1 Austria: 5 Belarus: 4 Belgium: 2 Croatia: 2 Cyprus: 4 Czech Republic: 3 Estonia: 4 Finland: 4 France: 9 Georgia: 1 Germany: 10 Greece: 7 Hungary: 2 Ireland: 6 Italy: 4 Kosovo: 2 Latvia: 6 Macedonia: 1 Norway: 1 Poland: 6 Portugal: 5 Romania: 7 Russia: 3 Serbia: 3 Slovakia: 2 Spain: 4 Sweden: 5 Switzerland: 1 The Netherlands: 7 Turkey: 4 Ukraine: 1 United Kingdom: 6

20


II. Evaluation by Countries 1. It was easy to find information material for my committee topic.

It was easy to find information material for my committee topic.

100 % 80 % 60 %

40 % 20 %

Yes No opinion

No 0%

21


2. We received letters and information soon enough.

We received letters and information soon enough.

100 % 80 % 60 % 40 %

Yes

20 %

No opinion

0%

No

22


3. I knew what to expect, therefore preparation proved to be easy.

I knew what to expect, therefore preparation proved to be easy.

100% 80% 60% 40% 20%

Yes No opinion No

0%

23


4. We could reach the EYP contact persons without problems.

We could reach the EYP contact persons without problems.

100%

80% 60% 40% 20%

Yes No opinion No

0%

24


5. We had problems with finding funding and sponsoring for the travel costs and participation fees.

We had problems with finding funding and sponsoring for the travel costs and participation fees.

100% 80% 60% 40%

Yes

20%

No opinion No

0%

25


6. I do consider the participation fees as reasonable regarding the offerings of the session.

I do consider the participation fees as reasonable regarding the offerings of the session.

100% 80% 60% 40%

Yes

20%

No opinion

0%

No

26


7. I used the links in the research document to prepare my committee topic.

I used the links in the research document to prepare my committee topic.

100% 80% 60% 40% 20%

Yes No opinion No

0%

27


8. I knew that I was meant to prepare the committee work topic and had informed myself appropriately.

I knew that I was meant to prepare the topic and had informed myself appropriately.

100% 80% 60% 40% 20%

Yes No opinion No

0%

28


9. I would like to attend EYP events in the future.

I would like to attend EYP events in the future

Yes No opinion No

29


10. I will share my experience among friends and fellow students once I am back in my home town.

I will share my experience among friends and fellow students once I am back in my home town.

100% 80% 60% 40% 20%

Yes No opinion No

0%

30


11. I want to start an initiative in my school/city/country to promote the awareness for European issues.

I want to start an initiative in my school/city/country to promote the awareness for European issues.

100% 80% 60% 40% Yes 20% No opinion 0% No

31


12. I would like to get involved into my national EYP association.

I would like to get involved into my national EYP association.

100% 80% 60% 40% 20%

Yes No opinion No

0%

32


13. I would like to get active as a volunteer.

I would like to get active as a volunteer.

100% 80% 60% 40%

20%

Yes No opinion

No 0%

33


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.