4 minute read
Editorial
Eradication was the only option
THREE years into the programme to eradicate Mycoplasma bovis statistics show progress is being made. Just four farms are known to have the disease now. It’s still early days given it’s year three of a 10-year battle but the signs are positive.
M bovis and the eradication programme have taken a massive toll on many farmers. In the past three years Farmers Weekly has covered a number of distraught farmers who’ve seen their herds carted off to slaughter. Others then waited far too long for the promised compensation.
Many in rural communties wondered if the effort to eradicate was worth the pain. They argued the production losses the disease would cause if it bedded in here didn’t outweigh the cost of eradication. Studies are still under way to quantify whether that’s the case. Looking to a long horizon, though, it seems like the right decision. M bovis causes mastitis, abortions and other nasty things. For a nation that’s looking to leverage its commitment to animal welfare in an effort to drive up the value of the food it produces being bovis-free is always going to be preferable. Even some of the worstaffected farmers, such as Frank Peters who is quoted in this edition, can see that.
To live with M bovis would have been to tell the world we’re okay with a percentage of our animals getting sick, being uncomfortable and maybe dying. We’d be saying that’s just a cost of our food production system. Increasingly, consumers aren’t buying that story. Sure, there are other areas of the system that need work as well. Live exports and bobby calves are a couple that spring to mind. Our industry needs to show it’s committed to continual improvement when it comes to welfare and sustainability. Our record on these issues is already the envy of the rest of the farming world. But that’s no reason to rest on our laurels.
Bryan Gibson
LETTERS Trees cause irreparable harm
READING Mr Field’s response to my letter, I was struck that there was no justification for pouring taxpayers’ money into helping corporations to destroy farmland in New Zealand.
I never claimed that pasture is the natural state of the landscape of NZ. It is patently obvious that there are downstream environmental impacts from pastoral agriculture.
It is even fair to say that in certain parts of NZ landscape was cleared, which never should have been.
I would, however, note that the worst excesses of this kind of behaviour were undertaken when the Government subsidised it through boondoggles such as the Marginal Lands Board.
None of these concessions hide the fact that rampant afforestation is causing irreparable harm to landscapes across NZ.
Just yesterday, my Facebook feed featured a video of east coast rivers and beaches choked with forestry waste. Waste from trees that I would bet were planted with all haste and government support following cyclone Bola.
More helpful government intervention!
Livestock agriculture has some key benefits to NZ society.
First, it produces food, unlike Pinus radiata. When, in 1861, there was only 70,000ha of pasture in NZ, there were only one billion people on the planet. There are now north of seven billion of us, and rather selfishly, we all like to eat.
If NZ becomes a forest park, the net result will be deforestation elsewhere in the world.
I think it’s a fair bet that burning Brazilian rainforest to produce beef will not feature riparian planting and Environmental Management Plans.
Secondly, livestock must be processed regardless of the market return.
When prices are low, farmers continue to employ thousands of tanker drivers, freezing workers and other Kiwis. When log prices drop, the corporate forest owners will happily leave their logs standing and watch their workforce wither.
This has been graphically illustrated just this year with the impact of covid-19.
If Field thinks that widespread conversion of food production to radiata forest will enhance biodiversity, he is free to plant all the land he likes and see if Moa are brought back from extinction.
I just ask that taxpayer dollars are frittered away on the fruitless exercise, and that foresters be held accountable for their environmental degradation in the same way the farmers are.
The unfairness of taxing farmers to use the taxes to subsidise their competition is staggering, and the fact that forestry is being subsidised while trashing our rivers is just adding insult to injury.
David Skiffington
Cheltenham
Farmers Weekly is published by GlobalHQ, PO Box 529, Feilding 4740. New Zealand Phone: 0800 85 25 80 Fax: 06 323 7101 Website: www.farmersweekly.co.nz EDITOR Bryan Gibson 06 323 1519 bryan.gibson@globalhq.co.nz EDITORIAL Stephen Bell 06 323 0769 editorial@globalhq.co.nz Neal Wallace 03 474 9240 neal.wallace@globalhq.co.nz Colin Williscroft 027 298 6127 colin.williscroft@globalhq.co.nz Annette Scott 03 308 4001 annette.scott@globalhq.co.nz Hugh Stringleman 09 432 8594 hugh.stringleman@globalhq.co.nz Gerald Piddock 027 486 8346 gerald.piddock@globalhq.co.nz Richard Rennie 07 552 6176 richard.rennie@globalhq.co.nz Nigel Stirling 021 136 5570 nigel.g.stirling@gmail.com Riley Kennedy 027 518 2508 Cadet journalist riley.kennedy@globalhq.co.nz PUBLISHER Dean Williamson 027 323 9407 dean.williamson@globalhq.co.nz ADVERTISING Steve McLaren 027 205 1456 Auckland/Northland advertising 09 375 9864 steve.mclaren@globalhq.co.nz Jody Anderson 027 474 6094 Waikato/Bay of Plenty advertising jody.anderson@globalhq.co.nz Donna Hirst 06 323 0739 Lower North Island/international advertising donna.hirst@globalhq.co.nz Ernest Nieuwoudt 027 474 6091 South Island advertising ernest.nieuwoudt@globalhq.co.nz Clint Dunstan 06 323 0760 Real Estate & Farm Machinery advertising 027 474 6004 clint.dunstan@globalhq.co.nz Hannah Gudsell 06 323 0761 Livestock advertising 027 602 4925 livestock@globalhq.co.nz Debbie Brown 06 323 0765 Classifi eds/Employment advertising classifi eds@globalhq.co.nz Andrea Mansfi eld 027 446 6002 Salesforce director andrea.mansfi eld@globalhq.co.nz Steph Holloway 06 323 0142 AgriHQ Commercial Leader steph.holloway@globalhq.co.nz
PRODUCTION Lana Kieselbach 027 739 4295 production@globalhq.co.nz Advertising material adcopy@globalhq.co.nz SUBSCRIPTIONS ISSN 2463-6002 (Print) ISSN 2463-6010 (Online)