The MEAT MACHINE by Felicia Chiarello

th e ME AT MACH INE version

2. 0

DATE

3M AY –2064

UNI SA NS SVETOSLAV SIMOV

FONT FABRI C PLACE NUMBER

TYPEFACE DESIGNER YR

FOUNDRY

A23

> > ‘ Y OUR PRICE? WHA TS

United States Department of Posthuman Development SEC: 88-BEN w/ GVWR 26000, No T/V ENDORSMENTS: NONE

ACCESS NUMBER

8 1780 59 1202

SEC 88

0 1 0

1 0 0

0 1

1 1

1 0 1

0 1

1 0 0

0 1

1 0 0

0 1

1 0 1

1 0 0

€

0 1

1 0 0

1 0 1

1 1

1 0

1 0 1

1 1

1 0 1

0 1

1 1

1 0 0

0 0

†

0 0

0 1

1 0

0 1

1 0 1

1 1

0 0 1

0 1 0 1

0 0

0 1

0 0

1 1

0 0

0 1

0 0 0 1

∑

1 1

1 0 1 0

0 0

1 0

1 0 0

0 1

1 1

0 0

1 1

∑

0 0 0

1 1

1 0

0 0

0 1

1 0

1 1

0 0

0 1

0 0

0 1

1 1

1 0

1 1

0 1

1 0

0 1 1

0 1

0 0

1 1

0 0

1 0

0 0

0 1

1 0

0 1

1 1

0 1

1 0

0 0

0 1

1 1

1 0

0 0

1 1

0 1

0 1 1

0 0

0 1

0 0 1

0 1

0 0

0 0 1

0 1

0 0

0 0 1

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 1

0 0 1

0 1

0 0 1

0 1

1 0

0 1 1

1 1

0 1

0 0

1 0

0 0

0 0 1 1

0 1

0 0 0

0 1

0 0 0 0

0 1

0 1 0 1

1 1

0 0 0 0

0 0

0 0 1

0 0 0 0 0

0 1

0 0 0 0 1

0 0 1

0 1

0 0 0

0 1

0 0 1 0

0 0

0 1

0 0 1

0 0

0 0 1

0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1

0 1

0 0 1

0 0 0 1

0 1

0 0 1

0 1

0 0 0

0 1

0 0 1

0 0

0 1 1

0 0

1 1

0 1

0 0 0

0 1

0 0

0 1

0 1 0 0 1

0 0 1

0 1

0 0

0 0 0 0 1

0 1

0 0 1

0 1

0 0

0 1

0 1 1

0 1

0 0

0 1

0 1 1

0 1

0 0

0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0

0 1

1 0

1 1

0 0 1

0 1

0 0 0

0 0 1

0 1

0 0 1

0 1

0 0 0 1

0 1

0 0

0 0 0

¤ 0

1 1

0 0

0 1

0 0

0 0 0 0 0

1 0 0 1

0 1

0 0

0 1

1 1

0 1

0 0

0 0 0 0 1

0 1

0 0

0 1

0 0 1

0 1

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 1

0 1

1 1

0 1

0 0 1

0 1

1 0 0 0 1 1

0 0

0 1

0 0

1 0

0 0

1 0

1 1

0 1

1 0

0 1

1 0

0 0

1 1

e 1

1 1

0 1

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 1 0 1

0 1

0 0 1

0 1

0 0 1

0 0 0 0 1

1 1

0 1

1 1

0 1

0 0

0 1

1 1

0 0 0

0 0 1 0

1 1

0 1 0

0 0

0 0 1

0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1

1 0

1 1

0 1

0 0 1

0 0

1 0

‡

0 0

1 0

0 1

1 1

1 0

0 0

1 1

1 0

1 1

0 0

1 1

1 0

0 0

1 1

0 0

0 1

1 0

0 1

1 0 1 1

1 1

0 0

1 0

0 0

0 1

0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 1

0 1 1

0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

0 1

0 1 0

0 1 0 0 1

1 0

0 1

1 1

0 0

0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1

0 1

1 1

1 0

0 1

0 0

1 0

0 0

1 0

0 0

0 1

0 0

1 0

0 0

1 1

1 0

0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0

0 1

1 0

0 1

1 0

1 1

0 1

0 0

1 1

1 0

1 1

0 0

0 1

0 0 1

1 1

1 0 1

0 0

v 1

0 1

0 0

1 0 0 0

0 0

0 1

1 0

0 1

1 0

0 0

1 1

0 0 0 0

1 1

0 1

0 0 0 1

0 1

1 0 1

0 0 1

0 0

0 1

1 0 1

0 1

1 1

0 1

l 0

0 0 1

1 0

0 0 1

1 1

1 0

0 0

0 1

1 0

0 0

0 1

0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0

1 0

1 1

0 0

1 0

0 0

1 1

0 0

1 0

1 0 0

0 1

1 0 1

1 1

0 0

1 1

0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0

0 1

0 0

0 1 0

0 1

0 0

0 1

0 0 0

0 0

1 1

0 0

1 1

1 0 0

0 1

1 1

0 0

0 1

0 0

0 1

0 0

0 0 1

0 1

0 0

0 1

1 0 1

1 0 0

1 0 0 0 0 0 1

0 1

1 1

0 1

0 0

0 0 0

0 1

0 0

1 0

0 1

1 0

0 1

0 0

i 0

0 0

0 1

1 0

0 0 1

0 0

1 0

0 0

1 1

0 1

1 1

0 0

0 0 0 0

0 1

0 0 1

1 0

0 0 1 0

0 0 0 0

0 1

1 1

0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1

0 1 1 1 1

1 0

0 1 1

0 1

0 0

0 1

1 0

∆

0 1

1 0

0 1

1 1

0 1

0 0

1 1

1 0

0 1

1 0 1

0 0

∞

0 1

1 1

1 1 1

1 0

1 1

0 0

1 0

1 1

1 0

0 0

1 0

0 1

0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1

0 0 1

0 0 1 0 0 0 0

0 0 1 1

0 1 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 1

0 0 1

0 1

0 0 0 1

0 0

0 1

0 0

0 0 1

1 1

0 0 0

0 0 1

0 0 0 0

0 1 0 1

0 0

1 1

0 1

0 0 0 0

0 0 1

0 1

0 0

0 1

0 0 1

0 0 0 0

0 1

0 0 0

0 1

0 0

0 1 1

0 1 0 1

0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1

0 0 1 0 0 0 0

0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0

0 0 1 0 0 0 0

0 1

0 0 0

1 1

0 1

0 0

0 1

0 0 0 1

0 1

0 0 1

0 1

0 0 1

0 1

0 0

0 1

0 0

0 1

0 1 1 0 1 1 0

0 0 0 0

0 1

0 0 1

0 0 0 0

0 0

0 0 1

0 0 0 0

0 1

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 1

0 0 1

0 1

0 0 0 0

0 0 1

0 0 0 0

0 1

0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1

0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1

0 1

0 0

0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0

0 0

0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0

1 1

0 0

0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1

0 1

1 0

0 0

1 0

1 1

0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1

0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1

1 1

0 1

0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

0 1

0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1

0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1

0 0

1 1

i 0

1 0

0 1

0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1

1 0

0 1

1 0 0

1 0

0 1

1 1

1 0

1 1

0 0

1 0

0 1

1 1

0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0

0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1

0 1

0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1

1 1 0

1 0

0 0

1 1

0 1

0 0

0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1

0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1

0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0

0 0

0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1

1 1

0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

1 1

1 0

0 0

0 1

0 0

1 1

0 1

1 0

1 1

1 0 1 1 0 0

0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1

0 0

0 0 0 0

0 1 0 1

0 1

1 1

0 1 0 1

0 0

0 1

0 0 1 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 1

0 0

1 0

0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1

0 1

0 0 0 0

0 0

0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0

0 1

1 0 1

0 1

0 0 1

0 0 0 0

0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

1 0

0 0

1 0

0 1

0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 0 1

0 0 0 0

0 0 1

0 0

0 1

0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0

0 0

0 1

0 0 1

0 1

1 1

1 0

0 1

1 1

0 1

0 0

1 0

0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1

0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1

0 1

1 1

0 0

0 1

0 0

1 0

0 0

1 0

0 0

1 0

0 0

0 1 0

1 0

1 1

0 1

1 0

0 0

0 1

0 0

0 1 0

0 0

0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1

0 0

0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0

‰

0 1

0 0

0 1

0 0

0 1

1 0

0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1

1 1

1 0

1 1

0 1

1 1

0 0

0 0 0

1 0

1 0 1

0 0

1 1

1 0

0 1

1 0

0 1

0 0

1 0

0 1

0 0

1 0

0 0

0 1

1 0 0

0 0 0

0 1

0 1 0

0 0

0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0

1 0 0 0

0 0

1 0

0 1

0 0

1 1

1 0

0 1

0 0

7 6

1 1

0 1

1 1

1 0 1

0 1

0 0 0 0

0 1

0 0

1 1

0 1

1 0

0 0

0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

1 1

0 1

0 0

0 1

0 0

0 1

0 0 1 0 1 1

$ 0

1 0

0 1 1 0 1 0 0

1 1

0 1

0 0

0 1

1 1

0 1

0 0

0 1

1 0

1 0 0 1

0 1

0 1 1

0 0

0 1

1 0

1 1

0 0 1

0 0

0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0

0 0

0 0 0 0

0 1

0 0 1

0 0 0 0

0 0 1

0 1

0 0

0 0 1

0 0 0 0

0 1

0 0 0 1

0 1

0 0 1

R G B

the MEAT MACHINE v. 2

the MEAT MACHINE A Mechanical Press Special Edition Book PUBLISHING HISTORY

The P.I.N.K Conference Book 2010 ÂŠ 2010 by Green Brick Red Words Publishers, Inc. First published in the Fall 2010 Semester at the Academy of Art, San Francisco by Green Brick Red Words Publishers

Published by Mechanical Press A Division of Green Brick Red Words, Inc. San Francisco, California This is a work of fiction. Names, characters ,places, and incidents either are the product of the author's imagination or are used fictitiously. Any resemblance to actual persons, living or dead, events, or lacales is entirely coincedental. All rights reserved Copyright ÂŠ 2010 by Felicia Antoinette Chiarello Cover & Book Design by Felicia Antoinette Chiarello Published by Mechanical Press is registered trademarks of Green Brick Red Words, Inc., and the colophon is a trademark of Mechanical Press.

Printed in the United States of America Published in the United States of America

www.gbrw-pub.com/mechanicalpress

* 19 18 BVG

R G B

For Kurt Vonnegut and EPICAC, rest peacefully but never satisfied _ And Paul Proteus, who foresaw the end _

Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow: They toil not, neither do they spin; And yet I say unto you, That even Solomon in all his glory Was not arrayed like one of these ....

â&#x20AC;&#x201C; MATTHEW 6:28

R G B

content _

intro_ ` – – – – – – – – – ` ` – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – > i ii WELCOME a. 2 a. 3 stage 1 stage 2 stage 3

a. 4 a. 6 a. 7

congratulations

a. 8

what do you see now

a. 9

PERSONALIZED INPUT / OUTPUT HTBPH 2 HTBPH 3 HTBPH 4 HTBPH 5 HTBPH 6 HTBPH 7

b. 1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6

HTBPH

* welcome to the zoo

the end is near

Â˛

INTRODUCTION

+ TYPEFACE /IDEAS

UNI SANS_

CREATED BY

SVETOSLAV SIMOV / 2009

REASON FOR EXISTANCE For general use for print and web, with a strong suit with on screen readability. Use mostly for text and display. Uni Sans was made to look futuristic and modern without being Sci-Fi. It can be beautiful with human characteristics, it is not fully mechanical. Stemming from DIN, there is a certain elegance and sophistication. Uni Sans was made with INDUSTRIAL SIMPLICITY, AS ARE WE ALL. WEIGHTS There are 7 weights + italics, each containing a wide range of versatility. With fluid stems and simple italics, Uni Sans creates an elegant combination between both geometry & calligraphy. BRIEF CONCEPTUAL REVIEW The idea for this book was deeply inspired by EPICAC. I short story that was written by Kurt Vonnegut in 1950. A story before it's time, EPICAC forshadowed the first doubts of the relationship between humanily and it's machines. Being alive post the first Industrial Revolution, living through the second , and dying at the beginning ot the third. Vonnegut had a thing ot to say about mechanization and stong opinions about where it it would lead with full faith. The Meat Machine is a sort of sequal to the EPICAC, based on developing theoried of Singularity and touching on, but by no means taking lightly, the answer to the human condition. There are two stories being told: one of the future, that describes the basis of common Singularity theories and the agvantages and disadvantages of being posthuman, and the second it that of the past foreshadowing the future. Both parallel each other on two different planes; each strong enought to stand alone, so read seperately or together.

R G B

preface study

U NI S ANS Svetoslov Sim ov - Bulgaria 2009

the word is singularity, the idea is human robots

The term singularity describes the moment when a civilization changes so much that its rules and technologies are incomprehensible to previous generations. Think of it as a point-of-no-return in history. Most thinkers believe the singularity will be jump-started by extremely rapid technological and scientific changes. These changes will be so fast, and so profound, that every aspect of our society will be transformed, from our bodies and families to our governments and economies. sin·gu·lar·i·ty noun / ˌsiNGgyəˈlaritē / singularities, plural +

The state, fact, quality, or condition of being singular

A peculiarity or odd trait

A point at which a function takes an infinite value, esp. in space-time when matter is infinitely dense, as at the center of a black hole

A point in the future ( often set at or around 2030 A.D.) beyond which overwhelming technical changes ( esp. the development of superhuman artificial intelligence) make reliable predictions impossible

FINDING A DIRECTION

R G B

+ TYPEFACE

mind map

U NI S ANS Svetoslov Sim ov - Bulgaria 2009

SINGULARITY / WELCOME

enter >>

OPEN COME ON IN

Store Hours 9- 5 93027 Wyandette Way

OPEN COME ON IN

_COME IN. IT’S A ZOO OUT THERE

Store Hours 9- 5 93027 Wyandette Way

SINGULARITY

The Singularity is the technological creation of smarter-than-human intelligence. There are several technologies that are often mentioned as heading in this direction. The most commonly mentioned is probably Artificial Intelligence, but there are others: direct brain-computer interfaces, biological augmentation of the brain, genetic engineering, ultra-highresolution scans of the brain followed by computer emulation. Some of these technologies seem likely to arrive much earlier than the others, but there are nonetheless several independent technologies all heading in the direction of the Singularity – several different technologies which, if they reached a threshold level of sophistication, would enable the creation of smarter-than-human intelligence. A future that contains smarter-than-human minds is genuinely different in a way that goes beyond the usual visions of a future filled with bigger and better gadgets. Vernor Vinge originally coined the term "Singularity" in observing that, just as our model of physics breaks down when it tries to model the singularity at the center of a black hole, our model of the world breaks down when it tries to model a future that contains entities smarter than human.

bcrdkaldk a R G B

a.1

U NI S ANS Svetoslov Sim ov - Bulgaria 2009

SELECT THE INTERFACE YOU FEEL CONFORTABLE WITH TO GET STARTED When you are through choosing an interface, please go to your assigned section and wait for the machine to help you.

ENTERâ&#x20AC;ş

L150

L149

L112

L148

L111

L147

L110

L146

L119

L120

ROW 4

L081

L08 2

L109

L118

L11

L080

ROW 3 L08 3

283

L045 L075

L074

L073

L072

L071

ROW 2

L044

L043

L042

314

ROW 1 L037

L036

L035

L034

L007

L008

283

STA 1832

VIEW LH-SIDE FW D

L006

L005

THE FINE PRINT

warning

[ SKIP THIS PAGE ]

R G B

a.2

U NI S ANS Svetoslov Sim ov - Bulgaria 2009

TEAR HERE

[ ALONG PERFERATED EDGE ]

[ SKIP THIS PAGE ]

Â˛

WARNING! WARNING! WARNING!

warning

POSTHUMAN

WASTELAND WARNING

As mentioned earlier, artificial intelligence is the technology that most people believe will usher in the singularity. Authors like Vinge and singulatarian Ray Kurzweil think AI will usher in the singularity for a twofold reason. First, creating a new form of intelligent life will completely change our understanding of ourselves as humans. Second, AI will allow us to develop new technologies so much faster than we could before that our civilization will transform rapidly. A corollary to AI is the development of robots who can work alongside - and beyond - humans. Another singularity technology is the self-replicating molecular machine, also called autonomous nanobots, "gray goo," and a host of other things. Basically the idea is that if we can build machines that manipulate matter at the atomic level, we can control our world in the most granular way imaginable. And if these machines can work on their own?

R G B

U NI S ANS Svetoslov Sim ov - Bulgaria 2009

Any ordnace above field grade will tell you that the mathematics of modern war is far beyond the fumbling minds of mere human beings.

REMEMBERING HUMANITY

R G B

a reflection

a.3

U NI S ANS Svetoslov Sim ov - Bulgaria 2009

BEING HUMAN /A REFLECTION ON HUMANITY

The Story: PART 1 Hell, it's about time someone told about my friend EPICAC. After all, cost the taxpayers $776,434,927.54.

File

picking up a check like that. EPICAC

got a big send off

Reflection

HUMAN...

They have a right to know about him,

Meaning

Being

in the papers when

Dr. Ormand von Kleigstadt designed

Depth

Underst...

him for the Government people.

of, Death

Since then, there hasn't been

a peep about him--not a peep. It isn't any military secret about what happened to EPICAC, although the Brass

has been acting as though it were. The

story is embarrassing, that's all. After all that money, EPICAC didn't work out the

D Maj Key

Eb Maj Key

Dm7

Cmaj7

Cmaj67

Em7

Dm7

way he was supposed to.

Cmaj7

BACK TO THE FINE PRINT

go back

[ GO BACK TO PAGE a.2 ] TEAR ALONG PERFERATED EDGE

R G B

a.4

U NI S ANS Svetoslov Sim ov - Bulgaria 2009

[ GO BACK TO PAGE a.2 ] TEAR ALONG PERFERATED EDGE

Â˛

PICKING A PROFILE

procedures a-m

Qualit ies Included

accepts authority, loyal, devoted rebellious accepts what's given ignores, rejects what's given affectionate distant, cold, aloof aspiring, ambitious, motivated self-satisfied, unmotivated candid closed, guarded, secretive caring uncaring, unfeeling, callous change; accepts, embraces- rejects change cheerful cheerless, gloomy, sour, grumpy considerate, thoughtful inconsiderate, thoughtless cooperative uncooperative, unhelpful, combative courageous cowering, fearful courteous rude, impolite decisive indecisive devoted uncommitted, uncaring, hostile determined indecisive, unsure does what is necessary, right does what is convenient perseveres, endures relents, gives up enthusiastic unenthusiastic, apathetic,

indifferent expansive kept back, tight, constricting faith in life life can't be trusted faith in oneself lack of faith in self faith in others others can't be relied on flexible inflexible, rigid, unbending, stubborn forgiving unforgiving, resentful, spiteful focused unfocused, scattered freedom given to others authoritarian, controlling friendly unfriendly, distant,

aloof, hostile frugal, thrifty wasteful, spendthrift generous stingy, miserly, selfish goodwill ill-will, malice, hatred grateful ungrateful, unappreciative hard-working lazy honest dishonest, deceiving, lying humble ar-

rogant, conceited, ego-cenvain tric interested indifferent, uncaring open-minded, tolerant involved complacent, indifferent narrow, close, small-minded, in jealous, not erant optimistic jealous, envious, covetous kind

pessimistic perfects tion

unkind, uncaring, cruel, mean mature

allows imperf

persistent, sustaining

flagging, fleeting, unsustainin positive negative practical impractical, viable punctual late, not on

immature modest

0 R G B

a.5

U NI S ANS Svetoslov Sim ov - Bulgaria 2009

PHASING

/STAGE 1

PROCEDURE:

Post Human C

I laughed out loud at the absurd coincindence. Playfully, I typed, "My girl doesn't love me."

* Clickety-click. *"What's love? What's girl?"

ntol-

ec-

ng not time

confidence, insecure realistic naĂ&#x192;ÂŻve, imprac-self-directed directed by externals selftical disciplined undiscireliable unreliable, un-plined, unrestrained, dependable respectful

disrespectful, rude, impolite responsibility; takes- blames others responsible [ep to 9 levels] unreliable, undependable responsive unresponsive, unreceptive selfconfident lack of self

any of either because I wasn't poetic. This got us onto the subject of poetry, which I defined

asked EPICAC.

Flabergasted, I noted the dial settings on his control panel, then lugged a Webster's Unabridged Dictionary over to the keyboard. With a precision instrument like EPICAC, halfbaked definitions wouldn't do. I told him about love and girl, and about how I wasn't getting

for him.

"Is this poetry?" he asked. He began clicking away like a stenographer smoking hashish. The sluggishness and stammering clicks were gone. EPICAC had found himself. The spool of paper ribbon was unwinding at an alarming rate, feeding out coils onto the floor. I asked him to stop, but EPICAC went right on creating. I finally threw the main switch to keep him from burning out.

100 % 34

Â˛

STAGE 2 - INPUTING PERSONALITY

testing testing

/ STAGE 2 / C O N T'd PROCEDURE

I laughed out loud at the absurd coincindence. Playfully, I typed, "My girl doesn't love me."

* Clickety-click. *"What's love? What's girl?"

asked EPICAC.

>> Click here for human legibility; transgressed code implemented <<

PLUG IN: [

K[-4PT] L[+6 OPTIMUM no optional variables ]

it under one corner of t he blotter on Pat's desk. I reset t he dials on EPICAC for a rocket trajectory problem, and went home wit h a full heart and a very remarkable secret indeed. Pat was crying over t he poem when I came to work t he next evening. "It's soooo beaut iful," was all she could say. She was meek and quiet while we worked. Just before midnight, I kissed her for t he first t ime--in t he cubby hole between t he capacitors and EPICAC's tape-recorder memory. I was wildly happy at quitt ing t ime, burst ing to talk to someone about t he magnificent turn of events. Pat played coy and refused to let me take her home. I set EPICAC's dials as t hey had been t he night before, defined kiss, and told him what t he first one had felt like. He was fascinated, pressing for more details. That night, he wrote "The Kiss." It wasn't an epic t his t ime, but a simple, immaculate sonnet: "Love is a hawk wit h velvet claws; Love is a rock wit h heart and veins; Love is a lion wit h sat in jaws; Love is a storm wit h silken reins...." Again I left it tucked under Pat's blotter. EPICAC wanted to talk on and on about love and such, but I was exhausted. I shut him off in t he middle of a sentence. "The Kiss" turned t he trick. Pat's mind was mush by t he t ime she had finished it. She looked up from t he sonnet expectantly. I cleared my t hroat, but no words came. I turned away, pretending to work. I couldn't propose unt il I had t he right words from EPICAC, t he _perfect_ words. I stayed unt il dawn, decoding. When t he sun peeped over t he horizon at t he Wyandotte campus, I had transposed into my own writ ing and signed my name to a two-hunderd-and-eighty-line poem ent itled, simply, "To Pat." I am no judge of such t hings, but I gat her t hat it was terrific. It began, I remember, "Where willow wands bless rillcrossed hollow, t here, t hee, Pat, dear, will I follow...." I folded t he manuscript and tucked

R G B

, TRANSITION RATE (pF)

0 4

a.6

U NI S ANS Svetoslov Sim ov - Bulgaria 2009

READ BEFORE CONTINUING AUGMENTED FLOW OF B I O LOGICAL STIMULATIO N TEST RETENTION RAT E CONTINUE

[ PLEASE

_THE HUMAN HEEEEEEEEEAAARRRRRRR T BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEEP >> TEST >> TEST BP >> TEST >> Click here for human legibility; transgressed code implemented <<

PLUG IN: K[-4PT] L[+6 OPTIMUM [ no legibility; optional variables ] code implemented << >> Click here for human transgressed

t60M

PLUG IN: [

K[-4PT] L[+6 OPTIMUM no optional variables ]

, PROJECTED ONE HOUR RATE (3,600S) 100 %

In 1965, I.J. Good proposed that machines would one day be smart enough to make themselves smarter. Having made themselves smarter, they would spot still further opportunities for improvement, quickly leaving human intelligence far behind [3]. He c conferences. Below, we make the case for taking artificial intelligence (AI) risks seriously, and suggest some strategies to reduce those risks. What We're (not) AboutThe Singularity Institute doesn't know exactly when the intelligence explosion will occur, but w software problem that will require new insight, not a hardware problem that will fall to Moore's Law. We are interested in rational analyses of AI risks, not storytelling. Notions of a "robot rebellion," in which AIs spontaneously develop primate-like resentment fo networks and autonomous robotics could radically alter their environment. For example, they could harvest all available solar, chemical, and nuclear energy. If such AIs found uses for this energy that better furthered their goals than supporting human life, hu to reproduction rather than to supporting humans [1]. Such unsafe AIs might actively mimic safe benevolence until they became powerful, since being destroyed would prevent them from working toward their goals. Thus, a broad range of AI designs may initia Each improvement in AI technology increases the ability of AIs to research more improvements, but an AI may also face the problem of diminishing returns as the easiest improvements are achieved first.The rate of improvement is hard to estimate, but severa by that time be a glut of hardware available to run many copies of AIs, and to run them at high speeds. This could amplify the effects of AI improvements [8]. Humans are not optimized for intelligence. Rather, we are the first and possibly dumbest species ca We don't know how to build an AI with human-level intelligence, so we can't have much confidence that it will arrive in the next few decades. But we also can't rule out unforeseen advances. Past underestimates of the difficulty of AI (perhaps most infamous learning algorithms [17], increasing R&D expenditures by the technology industry, hardware advances that make computation-hungry algorithms feasible [4], enormous datasets [5], and insights from neuroscience give us advantages that past researchers lac

Friendly AI Concern about the risks of future AI technology has led some commentators, such as Sun co-founder Bill Joy, to suggest the global regulation and restriction of such technologies [9]. However, appropriately designed AI could offer similarly enorm difficult to enforce. The Singularity Institute's primary approach to reducing AI risks has thus been to promote the development of AI with benevolent motivations that are reliably stable under self-improvement, what we call "Friendly AI" [22].

To very quickly summarize some of the key ideas in Friendly AI We can't make guarantees about the final outcome of an agent's interaction with the environment, but we may be able to make guarantees about what the agent is trying to do, given its knowledge. We can't determine that Deep Blue will win against Kaspa Because code executes on the almost perfectly deterministic environment of a computer chip, we may be able to make strong guarantees about an agent's motivations (including how that agent rewrites itself), even though we can't logically prove the outc ing catastrophic effects. Gandhi doesn't want to kill people. If someone offers Gandhi a pill that he knows will alter his brain to make him want to kill people, then Gandhi will likely refuse to take the pill. In the same way, most utility functions should be stable under reflection, prov of possible minds and selecting an AI that prefers to be Friendly. Human terminal values are extremely complicated. This complexity is not introspectively visible at a glance. The solution to this problem may involve designing an AI to learn human values by looking at humans, asking questions, scanning human brains, The explicit moral values of human civilization have changed over time, and we regard this change as progress. We also expect that progress may continue in the future. An AI programmed with the explicit values of 1800 might now be fighting to reestablis we knew everything you know" and "do what we would've told you to do if we thought as fast as you do and could consider many more possible lines of moral argument" and "do what we would tell you to do if we had your ability to reflect on and modify ou Seeding research programs As we get closer to advanced AI, it will be easier to learn how to reduce risks effectively. The interventions to focus on today are those whose benefits will compound over time. Possibilities include:

Friendly AI: Theoretical computer scientists can investigate AI architectures that self-modify while retaining stable goals. Theoretical toy systems exist now: Gödel machines make provably optimal self-improvements given certain assumptions [19]. Decisio Stable brain emulations: One route to safe AI may start with human brain emulation. Neuroscientists can investigate the possibility of emulating the brains of individual humans with known motivations, while evolutionary theorists can investigate methods Models of AI risks: Researchers can build models of AI risks and of AI growth trajectories, using tools from game theory, evolutionary analysis, computer security, or economics [1] [6] [8] [14] [22]. If such analysis is done rigorously it can help to channel the

Institutional improvements: Major technological risks are ultimately navigated by society as a whole. Success requires that society understand and respond to scientific evidence. Knowledge of the biases that distort human thinking around catastrophic risk avoiding an AI "arms race" that might be won by the competitor most willing to trade off safety measures for speed [20]. Our aims We aim to seed the above research programs. We are too small to carry out all the needed research ourselves, but we can get the ball rolling.

We have groundwork already. We have: (a) seed research about catastrophic AI risks and AI safety technologies; (b) human capital; and (c) programs that engage outside research talent, including our annual Singularity Summits and our Visiting Fellows pro

Going forward, we plan to continue our recent growth by scaling up our visiting fellows program, extending the Singularity Summits and similar academic networking, and writing further papers to seed the above research programs, in-house or with the bes The upside and downside of artificial intelligence

Human intelligence is the most powerful known biological technology. But our place in history probably rests not on our being the smartest intelligences that could exist, but rather on being the first intelligences that did exist. We probably are to intelligence The future of intelligence is, hopefully, much greater than its past. The origin and shape of human intelligence may end up playing a critical role in the origin and shape of future civilizations on a much larger scale than one planet. And the origin and shape future civilization. Recommended reading

This has been a very quick introduction. For more information, please contact anna@singinst.org, or see: For a general overview of AI catastrophic risks: Yudkowsky, Eliezer (2008). "Artificial Intelligence as a Positive and Negative Factor in Global Risk" In Bostrom, Nick and Ćirković, Milan M. (eds.), Global Catastrophic Risks, pp. 308-345 (Oxford: Oxford Un For discussion of self-modifying systems' tendency to approximate optimizers and fully exploit scarce resources: Omohundro, Stephen M. (2008). "The Basic AI Drives." In Pei Wang et al. (eds.), Artificial General Intelligence 2008: Proceedings of the Firs For discussion of evolutionary pressures toward software minds aimed solely at reproduction: Bostrom, Nick. "The Future of Human Evolution" (2004). In Tandy, Charles (ed.), Death and Anti-Death: Two Hundred Years After Kant, Fifty Years After Turing For tools for doing cost-benefit analysis on human extinction risks, and a discussion of gaps in the current literature: Matheny, Jason G., "Reducing the Risk of Human Extinction", Risk Analysis, Volume 27 Issue 5, pp. 1335-1344, 2007. http://jgmatheny For an overview of potential causes of human extinction, including AI: Bostrom, Nick. "Existential Risks: Analyzing Human Extinction Scenarios and Related Hazards" (2002). Journal of Evolution and Technology, Vol. 9. http://www.nickbostrom.com/ex For an overview of the ethical problems and implications involved in creating a superintelligent AI: Bostrom, Nick. "Ethical Issues in Advanced Artificial Intelligence", Cognitive, Emotive and Ethical Aspects of Decision Making in Humans and in Artificial In References [1] Bostrom, Nick, The Future of Human Evolution, Death and Anti-Death: Two Hundred Years After Kant, Fifty Years After Turing, ed. Charles Tandy, p. 339-371, 2004, Ria University Press. http://www.nickbostrom.com/fut/evolution.html [2] Drescher, Gary, Good and Real: Demystifying Paradoxes from Physics to Ethics, pp. 188, The MIT Press, 2006.

[3] Good, I. J., "Speculations Concerning the First Ultraintelligent Machine", Franz L. Alt and Morris Rubinoff, ed., Advances in Computers (Academic Press) 6: 31-88, 1965 Available at http://www.acceleratingfuture.com/pages/ultraintelligentmachine.html [4] International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors, "International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors, 2007 Edition" 2007. Web. 07 Jan. 2010. http://www.itrs.net/Links/2007ITRS/Home2007.htm [5] Halevy, Alon, Peter Norvig, and Fernando Pereira, "The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data," IEEE Intelligent Systems, March/April 2009, pp. 8-12 http://www.computer.org/portal/cms_docs_intelligent/intelligent/homepage/2009/x2exp.pdf [6] Hall, J. Storrs, Beyond AI: creating the conscience of the machine. Amherst, N.Y: Prometheus, 2007. Print. [7] Hanson, Robin, "Idea Futures." George Mason University, 12 June 1996. Web. 08 Jan. 2010. http://hanson.gmu.edu/ideafutures.html. [8] Hanson, Robin, "Economic Growth Given Machine Intelligence." George Mason University, 1998. Web. 7 Jan. 2010. http://hanson.gmu.edu/aigrow.pdf [9] Joy, Bill, "Why the Future Doesn't Need Us", Wired Magazine, 2000. http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.04/joy.html [10] Kurzweil, Ray, The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. Viking Penguin, 2005. [11] Matheny, Jason G., "Reducing the Risk of Human Extinction", Risk Analysis, Volume 27 Issue 5, pp. 1335-1344, 2007. http://jgmatheny.org/matheny_extinction_risk.htm

[12] McCarthy, John, Marvin Minsky, Nathan Rochester, and Claude Shannon, "A Proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence." Formal Reasoning Group Stanford University, 31 Aug. 1955. Web. 07 Jan. 2010. http://www.

[13] Omohundro, Stephen M., "The Basic AI Drives." Artificial General Intelligence, 2008 proceedings of the First AGI Conference, eds. Pei Wang, Ben Goertzel, and Stan Franklin. Vol. 171. Amsterdam: IOS, 2008. http://selfawaresystems.com/2007/11/30/ [14] Omohundro, Stephen M., "The Nature of Self-Improving Artificial Intelligence." Self-Aware Systems. 21 Jan. 2008. Web. 07 Jan. 2010. http://selfawaresystems.com/2007/10/05/paper-on-the-nature-of-self-improving-artificial-intelligence/ [15] Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice. New York: Belknap, 2005.VV

[16] Rayhawk, Steve, Anna Salamon, Tom McCabe, Michael Anissimov, and Rolf Nelson, "Changing the frame of AI futurism: From story-telling to heavy-tailed, high-dimensional probability distributions." Proceedings of the European Conference on Comp

called this the "intelligence explosion". Later authors have called it the "technological singularity" or simply "the Singularity" [10] [21]. The Singularity Institute aims to reduce the risk of a catastrophe resulting from an intelligence explosion. We do research, e we'd like to figure out how to make its consequences good rather than bad. We do not see ourselves as having the job of foretelling that it will go well or poorly. If the outcome were predetermined there would be no point in trying to intervene. We suspect that A or their low tribal status, are the stuff of science fiction. The more plausible danger stems not from malice, but from the fact that human survival requires scarce resources: resources for which AIs may have other uses [13] [14]. Superintelligent AIs with access to uman survival would become unlikely.Many AIs will converge toward a tendency to maximize some goal [13]. For instance, AIs developed under evolutionary pressures would be selected for values that maximized reproductive fitness, and would prefer to allo ally appear safe, but if developed to the point of an intelligence explosion could cause human extinction in the course of optimizing the Earth for their goals. An intelligence explosion may be sudden The pace of an intelligence explosion depends on two conflic ral factors suggest it would be high. The predominant view in the AI field is that the bottleneck for powerful AI is software, not than hardware. Continued rapid hardware progress is expected in coming decades [4]. If and when the powerful AI software is develop apable of producing a technological civilization. The first AI with humanlike AI research abilities might be able to reach superintelligence rapidly " in particular, more rapidly than researchers and policy-makers can develop adequate safety measures. Is conce sly, those made for the 1956 Dartmouth Conference) [12] do not guarantee that AI will never succeed. We need to take into account both repeated discoveries that the problem is more difficult than expected and incremental progress in the field. Advances in A cked. Given the size of the stakes and the uncertainty about AI timelines, it seems best to allow for the possibility of medium-term AI development in our safety strategies.

mous benefits. An AI smarter than humans could help us eradicate diseases, avert long-term nuclear risks, and live richer, more meaningful lives. Further, the prospect of those benefits along with the competitive advantages from AI would make a restrictive glo

arov just by inspecting Deep Blue, but an inspection might reveal that Deep Blue searches the game tree for winning positions rather than losing ones. comes of particular tactics chosen. This is important, because if the agent fails with a tactic, it can update its model of the world and try again. But during self-modification, the AI may need to implement a million code changes, one after the other, without any

vided that the AI can correctly project the result of its own self-modifications. Thus, the problem of Friendly AI is not in creating an extra conscience module that constrains the AI despite its preferences. Rather, the challenge is in reaching into the enormous des

, etc., rather than an AI preprogrammed with a fixed set of imperatives that sounded like good ideas at the time. sh slavery. Static moral values are clearly undesirable, but most random changes to values will be even less desirable. Every improvement is a change, but not every change is an improvement. Perhaps we could program the AI to "do what we would have tol urselves." In moral philosophy, this approach to moral progress is known as reflective equilibrium [15].

on theories are being proposed that aim to be stable under self-modification [2]. These models can be extended incrementally into less idealized contexts. to prevent dangerous evolutionary dynamics, and social scientists can investigate social or legal frameworks to channel the impact of emulations in positive directions [18]. efforts of scientists, graduate students, and funding agencies to the areas with the greatest potential benefits.

ks [23], improved methods for probabilistic forecasting [16] or risk analysis [11], and methods for identifying and aggregating expert opinions [7] can all improve the odds of a positive Singularity. So can methods for international cooperation around AI developm

ogram.

st outside talent we can find. We welcome potential co-authors, Visiting Fellows, and other collaborators, as well as any suggestions or cost-benefit analyses on how to reduce catastrophic AI risk.

e what the first replicator was to biology. The first single-stranded RNA capable of copying itself was not sophisticated, robust replicator " but it still had an important place in history, due to being first.

of the first self-improving Artificial Intelligences humanity builds may have a similarly large impact, for similar reasons. The values of future intelligence will shape future civilization. What stands to be won or lost is the value of future intelligences, and thus th

niversity Press). http://singinst.org/upload/artificial-intelligence-risk.pdf st AGI Conference, pp. 483-492 (Amsterdam: IOS Press). http://selfawaresystems.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/ai_drives_final.pdf g, pp. 339-371 (Palo Alto, CA: Ria University Press). http://www.nickbostrom.com/fut/evolution.html y.org/matheny_extinction_risk.htm xistential/risks.html ntelligence, Vol. 2, ed. I. Smit et al., Int. Institute of Advanced Studies in Systems Research and Cybernetics, 2003, pp. 12-17 http://www.nickbostrom.com/ethics/ai.html

.formal.stanford.edu/jmc/history/dartmouth/dartmouth.html

/paper-on-the-basic-ai-drives/

puting and Philosophy. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. 4 July 2009. http://www.singinst.org/theuncertainfuture.html

called this the "intelligence explosion". Later authors have called it the "technological singularity" or simply "the Sing We do research, education, and conferences. Below, we make the case for taking artificial intelligence (AI) risks seriousl the intelligence explosion will occur, but we'd like to figure out how to make its consequences good rather than bad. We would be no point in trying to intervene. We suspect that AI is primarily a software problem that will require new insigh Notions of a "robot rebellion," in which AIs spontaneously develop primate-like resentment for their low tribal status, ar scarce resources: resources for which AIs may have other uses [13] [14]. Superintelligent AIs with access to pervasive solar, chemical, and nuclear energy. If such AIs found uses for this energy that better furthered their goals than suppor instance, AIs developed under evolutionary pressures would be selected for values that maximized reproductive fitness, an safe benevolence until they became powerful, since being destroyed would prevent them from working toward their goals. Thu human extinction in the course of optimizing the Earth for their goals. An intelligence explosion may be sudden The pace AIs to research more improvements, but an AI may also face the problem of diminishing returns as the easiest improvements view in the AI field is that the bottleneck for powerful AI is software, not than hardware. Continued rapid hardware prog hardware available to run many copies of AIs, and to run them at high speeds. This could amplify the effects of AI improve ing a technological civilization. The first AI with humanlike AI research abilities might be able to reach superintelligen premature? We don't know how to build an AI with human-level intelligence, so we can't have much confidence that it will (perhaps most infamously, those made for the 1956 Dartmouth Conference) [12] do not guarantee that AI will never succeed. W in the field. Advances in AI and machine learning algorithms [17], increasing R&D expenditures by the technology industry, give us advantages that past researchers lacked. Given the size of the stakes and the uncertainty about AI timelines, it

endly AI Concern about the risks of future AI technology has led some commentators, such as Sun co-founder Bill Joy, to s larly enormous benefits. An AI smarter than humans could help us eradicate diseases, avert long-term nuclear risks, and l would make a restrictive global treaty difficult to enforce. The Singularity Institute's primary approach to reducing AI ment, what we call "Friendly AI" [22].

ularity" [10] [21]. The Singularity Institute aims to reduce the risk of a catastrophe resulting from an intelligence explo ly, and suggest some strategies to reduce those risks. What We're (not) AboutThe Singularity Institute doesn't know exactly do not see ourselves as having the job of foretelling that it will go well or poorly. If the outcome were predetermined ht, not a hardware problem that will fall to Moore's Law. We are interested in rational analyses of AI risks, not storytel re the stuff of science fiction. The more plausible danger stems not from malice, but from the fact that human survival req data networks and autonomous robotics could radically alter their environment. For example, they could harvest all avai rting human life, human survival would become unlikely.Many AIs will converge toward a tendency to maximize some goal [13] d would prefer to allocate resources to reproduction rather than to supporting humans [1]. Such unsafe AIs might actively s, a broad range of AI designs may initially appear safe, but if developed to the point of an intelligence explosion could of an intelligence explosion depends on two conflicting pressures. Each improvement in AI technology increases the abili s are achieved first.The rate of improvement is hard to estimate, but several factors suggest it would be high. The predom gress is expected in coming decades [4]. If and when the powerful AI software is developed, there may by that time be a gl ements [8]. Humans are not optimized for intelligence. Rather, we are the first and possibly dumbest species capable of pr nce rapidly "Â&#x20AC;Â&#x201D; in particular, more rapidly than researchers and policy-makers can develop adequate safety measures. Is co l arrive in the next few decades. But we also can't rule out unforeseen advances. Past underestimates of the difficulty We need to take into account both repeated discoveries that the problem is more difficult than expected and incremental pro , hardware advances that make computation-hungry algorithms feasible [4], enormous datasets [5], and insights from neurosc seems best to allow for the possibility of medium-term AI development in our safety strategies.

suggest the global regulation and restriction of such technologies [9]. However, appropriately designed AI could offer sim live richer, more meaningful lives. Further, the prospect of those benefits along with the competitive advantages from AI risks has thus been to promote the development of AI with benevolent motivations that are reliably stable under self-impr

Â˛

STAGE 3 - ERASING

warning

W ARNI N G: I stayed until dawn, decoding. When the sun peeped over the horizon at the Wyandotte campus, I had transposed into my own writing and signed my name to a two-hunderd-and-eighty-line poem entitled, simply, "To Pat." I am no judge of such things, but I gather that it was terrific. It began, I remember, "Where willow wands bless rill-crossed hollow, there, thee, Pat, dear, will I follow...." I folded the manuscript and tucked it under one corner of the blotter on Pat's desk. I reset the dials on EPICAC for a rocket trajectory problem, and went home with a full heart and a very remarkable secret indeed. Pat was crying over the poem when I came to work the next evening. "It's soooo beautiful," was all she could say. She was meek and quiet while we worked. Just before midnight, I kissed her for the first time--in the cubbyhole between the capacitors and EPICAC's tape-recorder memory. I was wildly happy at quitting time, bursting to talk to someone about the magnificent turn of events. Pat played coy and refused to let me take her home. I set EPICAC's dials as they had been the night before, defined kiss, and told him what the first one had felt like. He was fascinated, pressing for more details. That night, he wrote "The Kiss." It wasn't an epic this time, but a simple, immaculate sonnet: "Love is a hawk with velvet claws; Love is a rock with heart and veins; Love is a lion with satin jaws; Love is a storm with silken reins...."

LOBE

OPERATION

FNTL

ACORN BUS EXTENSION

OCCL

VIA CONNECTOR PRINTER OR USER 1/O

CRBL

HEAT SINK ACCESS

PRTL

BW & COLOUR SIGNALS

DC POWER SUPPLY JACK

UHF MODULATED OUTPUT

Again I left it tucked under Pat's blotter. EPICAC wanted to talk on and on about love and such, but I was exhausted. I shut him off in the middle of a sentence. "The Kiss" turned the trick. Pat's mind was mush by the time she had finished it. She looked up from the sonnet expectantly. I cleared my throat, but no words came. I turned away, pretending to work. I couldn't propose until I had the right words from EPICAC, the _perfect_ words.

, TRANSITION RATE (pF)

0 R G B

- - -

o o o

- - -

o o o

- - -

o - o - o -

- - -

o o o

- - -

o o o

- - -

o o o

- - -

o o o

o -

100 %

o -

0 -

--- o

ERASING

oo-

, PROJECTED ONE HOUR RATE (3,600S)

t60M

a.7

U NI S ANS Svetoslov Sim ov - Bulgaria 2009

CONGRATULATIONS

get your numner

YOU CAN WAKE UP NOW...

)

, TRANSITION RATE (pF)

0 R G B

a.8

U NI S ANS Svetoslov Sim ov - Bulgaria 2009

CONGRATULATIONS_ YOU WILL NOW BE NUMBER

Please pick up your pamphlet on the way out & read thoroughly or simply insert micro-chip. [ insert one left side behind ear ]

t60M

, PROJECTED ONE HOUR RATE (3,600S) 100 %

THROUGHT PH EYES

vision

T A = 25˚ V CC = V = 5V

[ CHOOSE ONE ]

COW CANARY

PROTEIN

38G

PIG

TOTAL FAT

CHICKEN

The Atlantic Canary (Serinus canaria), also called the Island Canary, Canary or Common Canary, is a small passerine bird belonging to the genus Serinus in the finch family, Fringillidae.

TONGUE

62%

15%

;-C

23%

+9 -2

, TRANSITION RATE (pF)

0 2

MAR 30, 2064

U NI S ANS Svetoslov Sim ov - Bulgaria 2009

t60M

, PROJECTED ONE HOUR RATE (3,600S) 100 %

a.1

[ PLEASE TAKE A COMPLIMENTARY MANUAL ]

R G B

MANUAL _ YOUR GUIDE TO BEING POSTHUMAN YOUR NEXT UPDATE IS ON: MAR

2071

WORLD PH REGULATION 237 STATES THAT ALL POSTHUMANS MUST COMPLY WITH A CHECK UP EVERY YEAR TO TWO YEARS AND HAVE A WARRENTY AT ALL TIMES OF AT LEAST 2 YEARS

THIS MANUAL MUST BE PRESENT WITH YOU AT EVERY UPDATE

THIS IS THE PROPERTY OF:

A23 - D5557150 X

Â˛

MANUAL A

MANUAL _ Handling Instructions HANDLING All inputs and outputs of Intersil CMOS devices have a network for electrostatic protection during handling. OPERATING OPERATING VOLTAGE During operation near the maximum supply voltage limit care should be taken to avoid or suppress power supply turn-on and turn-off transients, power supply ripple, or ground noise; any of these conditions must not cause VDD - VSS to exceed the absolute maximum rating. IMPUT SIGNALS To prevent damage to the input protection circuit, input signals should never be greater than VDD nor less than VSS. Input currents must not exceed 10mA even when the power supply is off. UNUSED INPUTS A connection must be provided at every input terminal. All unused input terminals must be connected to either VDD or VSS, whichever is appropriate. OUTPUT SHORT CIRCUITS Shorting of outputs to VDD or VSS may damage CMOS devices by exceeding the maximum device dissipation.

FIGURE 1. HANDLING BASIC INPUT AND OUTPUT CONTRULS MANUALLY AND SETTING AUTO TUNE CTRL

R G B

handling instructiona

b.1

U NI S ANS Svetoslov Sim ov - Bulgaria 2009

STATE

SYM

LDI

OPERATION

MWR

MRD

MRP

FLT

DATA

I/O

MR0> BUS; R0 + 1>O X, P> T;O>1E, 1> P

DVCE

IDLE (CLEAR, WAIT+0)

(R-1) R0-1

MRP> D; RP + 1> RP

ORI

9 MRP OR D>; RP +1>RP

ANI XRI

MRP AND D> D + 1> RP

ADI

MRP OR D>; RP +1>RP

SDI

MRP> D; RP + 1> RP

SMI

MRP OR D>; RP +1>RP

SHL

A B

DMA IN

MRP AND D> D + 1> RP MRP OR D>; RP +1>RP

DMAOUT

INTERRT S1

LOAD

MRP AND D> D + 1> RP

Â˛

MANUAL A

MANUAL _ Never feel sad again WHAT YOU ARE FEELING Experiencing the change of becoming posthuman can be overwhelming. Please refer to this manual everytime you begin to feel something going haywire. Everything is changable now, it is just a matter of programming. INEXPRESSION If your warning levels are telling you that you are experiencing a low level of emotions, try this troubleshooting guide, or call our hotline. OVER EXPRESSION Over expressing emotions is not something that the augemented computing mechanism can handle. So to avoid unexpected shut down or re-boot, please make sure to get the tri-annual PH checkup required. INCORRECT OUTPUT If you know that your emotional experience is due to a faulty wire, please so not attempt to fix it yourself, even if you are a certified technician. Find your nearest technician and make an appointment immediately. CORRECTING INPUTING Please call our hotline for a more direct and thorough diagnosis. ERASING [USE WITH CAUTION] Do not use this unless it is an emergency. Resetting your system can result in a full erase and therefore leave you rendered helpless and unable to get the proper care that is needed.

FIGURE 2. DEALING WITH PROGRAMMING BASIC EMOTIONS, ONE INSTRUCTION CYLE, TWO OPTIONS

R G B

emotions

b.2

U NI S ANS Svetoslov Sim ov - Bulgaria 2009

NO PILL

SYM

SML

OPERATION

CTRL> D; RP + 1> RP 39

FRWN

4 B

CTRL D>; F2 ANG CRY

AUDIO

CTRL OR D>; RP +1>RP

SIG TR

;-C

CONTROL D> D + 1> TEAR

G CONTROL> RP1> RP CTRL OR >; RP +1>DP

JMP

DMA IN

CTRL AND D> D + 1> RP CTRL OPERATOR

DMA OUT

MRP AND D> D + 1> RP

INTERRT

MR0> BUS; R0 + 1>O X, P> T;O>1E, 1> P

LOAD

IDLE (CLEAR, WAIT+0)

Â˛

MANUAL A

MANUAL _ Sleep Mode HOW TO ACCESS YOUR SLEEP SETTINGS To correctly find your sleep mode button, give your self audio voice command. Begin with saying your correct identificaiton number and password out loud to yourself. Don't worry if others hear you, only your commands in your unique modulated voice with access your personal main control. Once verified, voice one of the commanding controls:

+ + +

SLEEP MODE ENERGY SAVING MODE WAKE UP CALL

After 30 seconds, you will have entered into one of the three modes. SLEEP MODE When in SLEEP MODE you will have to enter and appoximated wake time before you can enter into the mode. This ensures that you don't need to use emergency wake up. Also, this allows your system to save energy. Simply voice the time, am/ pm, that you would like to wake. There is a snooze command you can set for wake up as well. HOW TO COMPLETELY SHUT DOWN When completely shutting down, make sure that you are in a proper storage facility so that you can stay safe in shut down mode. It is dangerous to completely power down and should only be used with a technician. There is a code that the proper technician needs to input into your system before you can access this control. POWERING BACK UP When powering back up, you need a technican to get into your main controls when you are hooked up to the main mind controls. With the proper equipement, you can safely be powered back up. This may take 1-10 minuted depending on your unique programmin. To boot up in an emergeny, please turn to page 101.

FIGURE 3. SLEEP MODE / SHUTTING DOWN, ONE INSTRUCTION CYLE, THREE OPTIONS

R G B

recharging batteries

b.3

U NI S ANS Svetoslov Sim ov - Bulgaria 2009

T A = 25˚

400

V CC = V = 5V

300

250

V CC = V = 10V

200

150

100

V CC = V = 5V

tTHL tTHL

TRANSITION TIME (ns)_ Sleep Mode

350

V CC = V = 10V

0 0

50 CL

100

125

150

175

200

, TYPICAL TRANSITION TIME (pF) >>

PERSONAL DATA

charts

TIMING_ Input vs Output levels

[ Propagation Delays Not Shown ]

FETCH [ READ ]

CLOCK 00 70 02 71

04 72 00 73 02 74 04 75 00 76 02 77

04 78 00 79 02 80

04 81 00 82 02 83 04 84 00 85 02 86 04 87 00 88 02 89 04 78 00 79 02 80 04 81

00 70 02 71 04 72 00

ADDRESS HI BYTE

LOW BYTE

HI BYTE

TPA

TPB

MRD

MWR TRUE DATA

VALIF INPUT DATA

FIGURE 3. BASIC DC TIMING WAVEFORM, ONE INSTRUCTION CYCLE; FOLLOW AS NEEDED

R G B

LOW BYTE

73 02 74

04 75 00 76 02 77

b.4

U NI S ANS Svetoslov Sim ov - Bulgaria 2009

EXECUTE [ WRITE]

04 78 00 79 02 80

HI BYTE

04 81 00 82 02 83 04 84 00

85 02 86 04 87 00 88 02 89 04 78 00 79 02 80 04 81

LOW BYTE

00 70 02 71 04 72 00 73 02 74 04 75 00 76 02 77 04 78 00 79 02 80 04 81 00 82 02 83 04 84 00

HI BYTE

LOW BYTE

VALID OUTPUT DATA

PERSONAL DATA

charts

FETCH [ READ ]

CLOCK 00 70 02 71 04 72 00

73 02 74 04 75 00 76 02 77

04 78 00 79 02 80

04 81 00 82 02 83 04 84 00 85 02 86 04 87 00 88 02 89 04 78 00 79 02 80 04 81

00 70 02 71 04 72 00 73 02 74 04 75 00 76 02 77

ADDRESS HI BYTE

LOW BYTE

HI BYTE

LOW BYTE

HI BYTE

LOW BYTE

HI BYTE

LOW BYTE

TPA

TPB

MRD

MWR TRUE DATA

VALIF INPUT DATA

INSTRUCTION HI BYTE MACHINE CYCLE HI BYTE

MRD

MEMORY READ CYCLE

TPB

INSTRUCTION 2 HI BYTE

LOW BYTE

R G B

HI BYTE

LOW BYTE

b.5

U NI S ANS Svetoslov Sim ov - Bulgaria 2009

EXECUTE [ WRITE]

04 78 00 79 02 80

HI BYTE

04 81 00 82 02 83 04 84 00

85 02 86 04 87 00 88 02 89 04 78 00 79 02 80 04 81

LOW BYTE

00 70 02 71 04 72 00 73 02 74 04 75 00 76 02 77 04 78 00 79 02 80 04 81 00 82 02 83 04 84 00

HI BYTE

LOW BYTE

VALID OUTPUT DATA

HI BYTE

LOW BYTE

HI BYTE

LOW BYTE

HI BYTE

LOW BYTE

HI BYTE

LOW BYTE

MEMORY READ CYCLE

HI BYTE

LOW BYTE

HI BYTE

LOW BYTE

PERONAL CHARTS

intelligence quotient score

SYSTEM VERSION_ 1.0 1

NAME FRANCINE PEFKO

DATE OF BIRTH OCTOBER 15, 2042

DATE OF PH DEVEELOPMENT JUNE 21, 2064

AGE OF TRANSFORMATION 22

STORE # B - 8210284 - 10010

CITY NEW SAN FRANCISCO

HAIR BLUE

EYES BROWN

IQ BEFORE 92

IQ AFTER

MAR /

FIGURE 6. PERSONAL CHARTS ONE

R G B

2071

[ Generalized I.Q. ]

b.6

U NI S ANS Svetoslov Sim ov - Bulgaria 2009

tTHL, tTHL

INTELLIGENCE QUOTIENT (iQ)_ Origianl State

I .Q. IS NOT A TES T OF K NOWL EDGE, I T IS O N E S ABILITY TO R E ASON AND SOLV E C OMPLE X P R OBLE MS

110

120

130

140 VERY SUPERIOR

[ GENIUS ]

100

SUPERIOR

LOW AVERAGE

GIFTED

HIGH AVERAGE

AVERAGE

BORDERLINE

SPECIAL

YO UR PL AC E : 9 2

150

PERSONAL CHARTS

breakdown

NAME FRANCINE PEFKO

DATE OF BIRTH OCTOBER 15, 2042

DATE OF PH DEVEELOPMENT JUNE 21, 2064

AGE OF TRANSFORMATION 22

STORE # B - 8210284 - 10010

CITY NEW SAN FRANCISCO

HAIR BLUE

EYES BROWN

V GS = EXPONENTIAL RATES + V 1000

0 0

3 PL ,

RATE PER MINUTE (rM)

T A = 40˚ C TO +85˚ C

V GS = EXPONENTIAL RATES + V 1000

ACTUAL RATE (mA)

IQ 92

tGHS,

T A = 40˚ C TO +85˚ C

PROJECTED RATE (Pr)

[ Personal Breakdown ]

tGHS,

SYSTEM VERSION_ 1.0

15 10 5V

FIGURE 6. PERSONAL CHARTS ONE

R G B

2 PL ,

RATE PER MINUTE (rM)

b.7

T A = 40˚ C TO +85˚ C

V GS = EXPONENTIAL RATES + V 1000

INPUT LEVEL (mA)_ Transformation

15 10 5V

tTHL, tTHL

OUTPUT LEVEL (mA)_ Origianl State

U NI S ANS Svetoslov Sim ov - Bulgaria 2009

0 2

30 30V

15 10

V GS = EXPONENTIAL RATES + V 1000

15 10 5V

2 CL ,

EX. INPUT LEVEL (mA)_ Transformation

RETENTION RATE PATTERN (rP)

T A = 40˚ C TO +85˚ C

tTHL, tTHL

1 CL ,

EX. OUTPUT LEVEL (mA)_ Origianl

V GS = EXPONENTIAL RATES + V 1000

0 0

tTHL, tTHL

T A = 40˚ C TO +85˚ C

RETENTION RATE PATTERN (rP) V GS = EXPONENTIAL RATES + V 1000

30 30V

15 10

0 0

2 CL ,

EX. RETENTION RATE PATTERN (rP)

2 CL ,

EX. RETENTION RATE PATTERN

colophon_ designer_ ` – – – – – – – – – ` ` – – – – – – > FELICIA CHIARELLO instructor_ ` – – – – – – – – – ` ` – – – - - - - - – – – > ARIEL GREY COURSE PROJECT

typography .4 type promo book

HERO TYPE SECONDARY FACE

uni sans kettler

PAPER mohawk superfine_ultrawhite smooth recycled computer paper EPSON *4 Matte PHOTOGRAPHY_ ` – – – – _ – – ` ` – – – > FELICIA CHIARELLO UNKNOWN IULLUSTRATION FELICIA CHIARELLO

PUBLISHED

California Office Service***

989 Howard Street, San Francisco, CA 94118

R G B

0 1 0

1 0 0

0 1

1 1

1 0 1

0 1

1 0 0

0 1

1 0 0

0 1

1 0 1

1 0 0

€

0 1

1 0 0

1 0 1

1 1

1 0

1 0 1

1 1

1 0 1

0 1

1 1

1 0 0

0 0

†

0 0

0 1

1 0

0 1

1 0 1

1 1

0 0 1

0 1 0 1

0 0

0 1

0 0

1 1

0 0

0 1

0 0 0 1

∑

1 1

1 0 1 0

0 0

1 0

1 0 0

0 1

1 1

0 0

1 1

∑

0 0 0

1 1

1 0

0 0

0 1

1 0

1 1

0 0

0 1

0 0

0 1

1 1

1 0

1 1

0 1

1 0

0 1 1

0 1

0 0

1 1

0 0

1 0

0 0

0 1

1 0

0 1

1 1

0 1

1 0

0 0

0 1

1 1

1 0

0 0

1 1

0 1

0 1 1

0 0

0 1

0 0 1

0 1

0 0

0 0 1

0 1

0 0

0 0 1

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 1

0 0 1

0 1

0 0 1

0 1

1 0

0 1 1

1 1

0 1

0 0

1 0

0 0

0 0 1 1

0 1

0 0 0

0 1

0 0 0 0

0 1

0 1 0 1

1 1

0 0 0 0

0 0

0 0 1

0 0 0 0 0

0 1

0 0 0 0 1

0 0 1

0 1

0 0 0

0 1

0 0 1 0

0 0

0 1

0 0 1

0 0

0 0 1

0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1

0 1

0 0 1

0 0 0 1

0 1

0 0 1

0 1

0 0 0

0 1

0 0 1

0 0

0 1 1

0 0

1 1

0 1

0 0 0

0 1

0 0

0 1

0 1 0 0 1

0 0 1

0 1

0 0

0 0 0 0 1

0 1

0 0 1

0 1

0 0

0 1

0 1 1

0 1

0 0

0 1

0 1 1

0 1

0 0

0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0

0 1

1 0

1 1

0 0 1

0 1

0 0 0

0 0 1

0 1

0 0 1

0 1

0 0 0 1

0 1

0 0

0 0 0

¤ 0

1 1

0 0

0 1

0 0

0 0 0 0 0

1 0 0 1

0 1

0 0

0 1

1 1

0 1

0 0

0 0 0 0 1

0 1

0 0

0 1

0 0 1

0 1

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 1

0 1

1 1

0 1

0 0 1

0 1

1 0 0 0 1 1

0 0

0 1

0 0

1 0

0 0

1 0

1 1

0 1

1 0

0 1

1 0

0 0

1 1

e 1

1 1

0 1

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 1 0 1

0 1

0 0 1

0 1

0 0 1

0 0 0 0 1

1 1

0 1

1 1

0 1

0 0

0 1

1 1

0 0 0

0 0 1 0

1 1

0 1 0

0 0

0 0 1

0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1

1 0

1 1

0 1

0 0 1

0 0

1 0

‡

0 0

1 0

0 1

1 1

1 0

0 0

1 1

1 0

1 1

0 0

1 1

1 0

0 0

1 1

0 0

0 1

1 0

0 1

1 0 1 1

1 1

0 0

1 0

0 0

0 1

0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 1

0 1 1

0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

0 1

0 1 0

0 1 0 0 1

1 0

0 1

1 1

0 0

0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1

0 1

1 1

1 0

0 1

0 0

1 0

0 0

1 0

0 0

0 1

0 0

1 0

0 0

1 1

1 0

0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0

0 1

1 0

0 1

1 0

1 1

0 1

0 0

1 1

1 0

1 1

0 0

0 1

0 0 1

1 1

1 0 1

0 0

v 1

0 1

0 0

1 0 0 0

0 0

0 1

1 0

0 1

1 0

0 0

1 1

0 0 0 0

1 1

0 1

0 0 0 1

0 1

1 0 1

0 0 1

0 0

0 1

1 0 1

0 1

1 1

0 1

l 0

0 0 1

1 0

0 0 1

1 1

1 0

0 0

0 1

1 0

0 0

0 1

0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0

1 0

1 1

0 0

1 0

0 0

1 1

0 0

1 0

1 0 0

0 1

1 0 1

1 1

0 0

1 1

0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0

0 1

0 0

0 1 0

0 1

0 0

0 1

0 0 0

0 0

1 1

0 0

1 1

1 0 0

0 1

1 1

0 0

0 1

0 0

0 1

0 0

0 0 1

0 1

0 0

0 1

1 0 1

1 0 0

1 0 0 0 0 0 1

0 1

1 1

0 1

0 0

0 0 0

0 1

0 0

1 0

0 1

1 0

0 1

0 0

i 0

0 0

0 1

1 0

0 0 1

0 0

1 0

0 0

1 1

0 1

1 1

0 0

0 0 0 0

0 1

0 0 1

1 0

0 0 1 0

0 0 0 0

0 1

1 1

0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1

0 1 1 1 1

1 0

0 1 1

0 1

0 0

0 1

1 0

∆

0 1

1 0

0 1

1 1

0 1

0 0

1 1

1 0

0 1

1 0 1

0 0

∞

0 1

1 1

1 1 1

1 0

1 1

0 0

1 0

1 1

1 0

0 0

1 0

0 1

0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1

0 0 1

0 0 1 0 0 0 0

0 0 1 1

0 1 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 1

0 0 1

0 1

0 0 0 1

0 0

0 1

0 0

0 0 1

1 1

0 0 0

0 0 1

0 0 0 0

0 1 0 1

0 0

1 1

0 1

0 0 0 0

0 0 1

0 1

0 0

0 1

0 0 1

0 0 0 0

0 1

0 0 0

0 1

0 0

0 1 1

0 1 0 1

0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1

0 0 1 0 0 0 0

0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0

0 0 1 0 0 0 0

0 1

0 0 0

1 1

0 1

0 0

0 1

0 0 0 1

0 1

0 0 1

0 1

0 0 1

0 1

0 0

0 1

0 0

0 1

0 1 1 0 1 1 0

0 0 0 0

0 1

0 0 1

0 0 0 0

0 0

0 0 1

0 0 0 0

0 1

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 1

0 0 1

0 1

0 0 0 0

0 0 1

0 0 0 0

0 1

0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1

0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1

0 1

0 0

0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0

0 0

0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0

1 1

0 0

0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1

0 1

1 0

0 0

1 0

1 1

0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1

0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1

1 1

0 1

0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

0 1

0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1

0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1

0 0

1 1

i 0

1 0

0 1

0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1

1 0

0 1

1 0 0

1 0

0 1

1 1

1 0

1 1

0 0

1 0

0 1

1 1

0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0

0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1

0 1

0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1

1 1 0

1 0

0 0

1 1

0 1

0 0

0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1

0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1

0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0

0 0

0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1

1 1

0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

1 1

1 0

0 0

0 1

0 0

1 1

0 1

1 0

1 1

1 0 1 1 0 0

0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1

0 0

0 0 0 0

0 1 0 1

0 1

1 1

0 1 0 1

0 0

0 1

0 0 1 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 1

0 0

1 0

0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1

0 1

0 0 0 0

0 0

0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0

0 1

1 0 1

0 1

0 0 1

0 0 0 0

0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

1 0

0 0

1 0

0 1

0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 0 1

0 0 0 0

0 0 1

0 0

0 1

0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0

0 0

0 1

0 0 1

0 1

1 1

1 0

0 1

1 1

0 1

0 0

1 0

0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1

0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1

0 1

1 1

0 0

0 1

0 0

1 0

0 0

1 0

0 0

1 0

0 0

0 1 0

1 0

1 1

0 1

1 0

0 0

0 1

0 0

0 1 0

0 0

0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1

0 0

0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0

‰

0 1

0 0

0 1

0 0

0 1

1 0

0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1

1 1

1 0

1 1

0 1

1 1

0 0

0 0 0

1 0

1 0 1

0 0

1 1

1 0

0 1

1 0

0 1

0 0

1 0

0 1

0 0

1 0

0 0

0 1

1 0 0

0 0 0

0 1

0 1 0

0 0

0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0

1 0 0 0

0 0

1 0

0 1

0 0

1 1

1 0

0 1

0 0

7 6

1 1

0 1

1 1

1 0 1

0 1

0 0 0 0

0 1

0 0

1 1

0 1

1 0

0 0

0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

1 1

0 1

0 0

0 1

0 0

0 1

0 0 1 0 1 1

$ 0

1 0

0 1 1 0 1 0 0

1 1

0 1

0 0

0 1

1 1

0 1

0 0

0 1

1 0

1 0 0 1

0 1

0 1 1

0 0

0 1

1 0

1 1

0 0 1

0 0

0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0

0 0

0 0 0 0

0 1

0 0 1

0 0 0 0

0 0 1

0 1

0 0

0 0 1

0 0 0 0

0 1

0 0 0 1

0 1

0 0 1

SAFE HANDLING INSTRUCTION S This robot was prepared from inspected and passed meat a nd/or hardware. S ome robo ts m ay contain wires that could cause malfunctio n if they become crossed or handled improperly . For your protecti on, follow these sa fe handling instru cti ons. Sync al l advanced da ta ch ips when update is available. Keep a ll parts well oiled and be sure to wash hands aft er handli ng as the oils used in t he mec hanics may be harmful to hu man skin . Recharge f ully and regularl y. All repai rs must be done by the proper t echnican s