Future Farm Magazine Issue 10 April 2012

Page 1

ISSUE 10 april 2012

future

farm

I N N O VAT I O N I N P R O F I TA B L E P E R E N N I A L FA R M I N G S Y S T E M S

in this issue

3 Mallee biomass potential takes off

12 Integrated system provides climate buffer

14 Harvester — from concept to reality

Supported by

Perennial mix creates balance CATplus modelling predicts perennial placement for optimal water flow impacts

w w w . f u t u r e f a r m o n l i n e . c o m . a u


future farm

contents • mallee biomass potential

takes off ....................... 3

• mallees prove

double-edged sword ......... 4

• location of perennials

determines water flows ..... 6

• increasing perennials

improves production and profit ...................... 8

• perennial grass options

set to expand ............... 10

• integrated system provides

climate buffer .............. 12

• mallee harvester: from

concept to reality .......... 14

• The final word —

tall wheatgrass ............. 16

our cover With careful landscape management and tactical perennial plantings, David strong, tarcutta, NSW has boosted profitability and groundcover. • See full story page 8. photo: pamela lawson

8 Future Farm magazine is published three times a year by the future farm industries CrC ltd (ffi CrC) aCn 125 594 765. future farm industries CrC is a unique co-investment between meat, grains and wool industry research corporations, the landmark agribusiness company, and the combined research power of Csiro, seven state agencies and four universities. it was established in 2007 under the Commonwealth government’s Cooperative research Centre program to build on the research of the former CrC for plantbased management of Dryland salinity (CrC salinity).

Workshop paves the way for adoption By Peter Zurzolo Ceo, future farm industries CrC

A

s this copy of Future Farm goes to print, future farm industries CrC and meat & livestock australia (mla) are holding a workshop on pastures, to bring together industry players and decision makers to consider the future of pasture research in australia. pasture research is essential. it provides farmers with access to new pasture varieties, improves farm profitability and productivity and helps farmers stay viable and competitive in the international marketplace. although initiated and driven by the CrC and mla, the workshop will not only cover these organisations’ research. the future of pasture research in australia is much larger than that. at this stage, there are 42 participants confirmed to attend the workshop, representing 17 organisations across all australian states and the aCt. these participants represent all the key industry sectors, including beef, sheep meat, wool and grain. MLA’s Feedbase Investment Plan defines a program of investment in pasture research and development for 2012–16. it is likely that further opportunities for valuable pasture r&D exist and this workshop aims to scope, consider and evaluate those opportunities in line with the federal government’s primary industries standing Committee r&D framework.

DISCLAIMER The information in this document has been published in good faith by Future Farm Industries CRC Limited to promote public discussion and to help improve farm profitability and natural resource management. It is general information and you should obtain specialist advice on the applicability or otherwise of the information in this document. Neither Future Farm Industries CRC Limited nor any of its Participants endorse the information contained in this document, nor do they endorse any products identified by trade name. The information in this document is made available on the understanding that neither Future Farm Industries CRC Limited, nor any of its Participants will have any liability arising from any reliance upon any information in this document. This document is subject to copyright, and the prior written consent of Future Farm Industries CRC Limited must be obtained before it is copied.

Pasture research is essential to keep pace with current challenges. (Photo CSIRO)

several cooperative research centres, including future farm industries CrC, that either carry out or support pasture research are likely to cease during the next few years. We initiated this workshop to help ensure that the end of these CrCs does not adversely affect pasture research. I am confident the workshop will be a catalyst for further discussion and development of australian pasture r&D and will enable us to build on the great progress already made in this area. i look forward to reporting on the workshop and its implications for pasture research in australia.

For further information about the CRC visit www.futurefarmonline.com.au E: enquiry@futurefarmcrc.com.au T: (08) 6488 2505

ISSN (Print) 1835-9906 ISSN (Online) 1835-9914 Published April, 2012 Design & production: Kondinin Group

Supported by

2

ISSUE 10 7 april april2011 2012


future farm i n n o v a t i o n

i n

p r o f i t a b l e

p e r e n n i a l

f a r m i n g

s y s t e m s

Mallee biomass potential takes off T

By Jean Burton

he aviation industry’s confidence in mallee biomass as a source for biofuels continues to gather momentum. since last July’s announcement that future farm industries CrC and virgin australia would work together to promote and develop a sustainable transport fuel industry, energy giant ge has come on board, and now aviation giant airbus has joined the group. the CrC’s aviation partners recently saw firsthand the progress being made to develop a biomass industry in regional australia when they toured two farms hosting mallee research near narrogin, south-east of perth, Western australia. on a hot and blustery march day, the visitors — who also comprised representatives from regional development organisations and government — were shown the work being carried out to evaluate the impact water and nutrient supply has on yield, and the effects of season and harvest frequency. an open forum provided researchers from the Department of environment and Conservation (DeC) and Csiro, both CrC participants, the opportunity to discuss the supply chain from growth to end use in greater detail. Woody Crops program leader paul turnbull (Department of primary industries victoria) stressed the importance of having industry in the paddock to communicate the nature and results of the CrC’s research. “as a result of this mallee tour, the CrC is confident its research is playing a vital role in developing a biomass-to-biofuels industry in australia,” paul said.

future farm industries CrC

aviation industry’s presence at the event and thanked farmers for their support. “it is worth noting that our mallee research, like so much of the CrC’s work, cannot happen without the ongoing support of the farmers across southern australia who allow research trials and field walks to take place on their land. on this occasion, i would like to thank the skerritts and the alexanders for hosting this recent event,” peter said. “the aviation industry represents a huge driver for mallee biofuel development. to see global aviation leaders in a paddock in the Wa Wheatbelt indicates how seriously they consider the work of the CrC and its partners is to help develop an environmentally sustainable source of biofuels. “We also acknowledge the industry will take a number of years to fully develop and we understand some farmers’ impatience for tangible success with a mallee industry. However, the CrC and its partners are pursuing a range of industry start-up opportunities to accelerate development. We are confident the momentum, underpinned by strong research and our airline partners’ ongoing commitment, is making the reality of mallee harvesting and processing not a matter of if, but when.”

Top: Mallee stands on the Alexanders’ property. Above inset: (Front, L to R) Airbus representative Dr Delia Dimitriu, and GE’s Ben Waters. (Back, L to R) Virgin Australia’s David White and the CRC’s Peter Zurzolo in one of the mallee strands on the Skerritt’s farm. Below: CSIRO postdoctoral fellow Rick Bennett (left) explains the research being undertaken at the mallee trial site. (Photos: Peter Garside)

the next step for the CrC’s Woody Crops program team is to conduct a sustainability study for airbus on mallee as an aviation biofuel. it’s essential to know that mallees are sustainably grown and have low greenhouse gas emissions in order to attract the necessary investment for the future commercial production of the mallees-tobiofuels industry.

contact

• Paul Turnbull, Dpi victoria M: 0409 402 179 E: paul.turnbull@dpi.vic.gov.au

“the feedback from virgin australia, ge and airbus leaves us in no doubt that they believe mallees will provide sustainable and renewable aviation fuel to keep their planes in the sky in the future. it’s a very exciting time.” Peter Zurzolo, Chief Executive Officer of the CRC, also stressed the significance of the

w w w . f u t u r e f a r m o n l i n e . c o m . a u

ISSUE 10 april 2012

3


future farm

Mallees prove double-edged sword

D

on and Kim alexander and their sons russell and morgan are mallee pioneers. they planted their first trees during the early days of the mallee industry during the mid 1990s. today there are more than 80,000 mallees on the alexanders’ 4000-hectare wheat-sheep property near narrogin, Western australia. Janet paterson caught up with the Alexanders to find out what the mallees have done for their farm.

farm info . Case study: the alexander family (Don, Kim, russell and morgan)

Location: narrogin, Western australia Property size: 4000 ha Mean annual rainfall: 490 mm Soils: mainly duplex soils and gravel in parts Enterprises: Wheat, oats, barley, merino ewes and cross-bred lambs

“We were initially attracted to mallees because of their capacity to soak up water as we had a big problem with waterlogging on our slopes and salt scalds in our valleys,” Don said. “We have a lot of york gum country with granite outcrops on the ridges and variable soil depths down the slopes into the valley. left unattended the waterlogging can cause serious erosion issues and salt problems in the lower country of the valley floor. the mallees have helped overcome these waterlogging and salt scald problems as well as contributing aesthetically and attracting a variety of wildlife. the trees worked really well in terms of drying out the paddocks prone to waterlogging. they also arrested some of

key points • • •

4

Mallees offer a significant opportunity to manage waterlogging and rising salinity in affected areas. As mallees mature, if left unharvested they can compete with adjacent crops and pastures, reducing yield potential. A key challenge for the mallee industry is to generate sufficient commercial demand and supply of biomass to retain farmer and investor interest and commitment.

ISSUE 10 april 2012

Don Alexander (pictured) is impressed with the ability of mature mallee trees to address waterlogging and rising water tables, but recognises the challenge of investing in a fledgling biomass industry. (Photos: Peter Garside)

the salt problems we were experiencing — today there are belts of green where once there were salt scalds and we are really pleased with the aesthetic contribution the mallees have made to the property.

stopping it from draining into groundwater systems or running down to the valley to contribute to salinisation.

the cost of our initial plantings was supported by landcare money and we established about 10,000 trees per year between 1995 and 2003. We explored many different planting layouts, including narrow belts of mallees 60–100 metres apart across the slope, with the intention of intercepting the excess water causing waterlogging and

Unfortunately the mallees have matured and in the absence of any commercial harvest opportunity, the trees have become far too efficient at extracting and intercepting water. the result is that we are now experiencing competition problems between our crops and pastures, and the mallees in the alleys between the tree belts.

S t o r i e s

f r o m

Managing the competition

A u s t r a l i a n

F a r m e r s


future farm i n n o v a t i o n

i n

p r o f i t a b l e

We have been involved with a research trial to investigate how various harvest regimes and root pruning the mallees can help reduce this competition, but the results of this work are still being assessed. basically the research is trying to determine when and how often to harvest the trees to generate the best returns in terms of biomass yield, potential for carbon payments and management of competition. it is critical this information is gathered to guide future commercial development. there are many farmers with mature mallees eagerly awaiting the capacity to harvest their trees.

p e r e n n i a l

While we have been happy with the environmental impacts the mallees have made on our farm we are frustrated with the lack of commercial demand for our biomass. What the industry needs is a commercial scale mallee biomass plant — be this electricity or biofuel or whatever — so farmers can be assured there is money to be made in mallees. We were happy to see verve’s prototype processing plant being tested in narrogin during 2004, but the absence of any follow-up with an operational plant was disappointing. basically the mallee industry is in a Catch-22 position — without a market for mallee biomass, farmers are not going to plant

f a r m i n g

s y s t e m s

mallees, but until there is enough mallee biomass potential investors in the industry are not likely to commit. i’m buoyed by the interest the aviation industry is showing in mallee biomass and was heartened to hear that they believe biomass is really the only viable way to generate commercial aviation biofuels.”

contact

• Don or Kim alexander M: (08) 9882 4030 E: ringwoodfarm@reachnet.com.au

science behind the story

By John Bartle, Department of Environment and Conservation

• The Future Farm Industries CRC

research being carried out on the Alexanders’ property is part of a larger project being conducted over 18 widely dispersed locations across the Western Australian Wheatbelt. The project aims to show how different harvest regimes will influence yield.

any mallee biomass processing industry needs a reliable year-round supply. Planning a continuous flow of biomass will require an understanding of management choices, such as the season and frequency of harvest, and how these influence mallee health, yield and profitability. Given harvest influences the competition imposed by a mallee belt on the adjacent crop or pasture, this is also being measured across the harvest cycle. We have recently completed analysis of the first five years of data from these trials. this provides the best available information on mallee yield, competition impact and economics. the results revealed that mallee yield is high enough to give confidence in being able to achieve commercial yields. However, the competition cost was higher than expected and the relaxation of competition after mallee harvest was smaller and of shorter duration than expected.

Impact of competition Competition was measured each year across the mallee harvest cycle as the reduction in crop yield out to 20 metres from the belt. the yield reduction in the unharvested plots was 40 per cent, while in the first year after harvest the yield loss was reduced to 20 per cent. by year

four after harvest competition loss had returned to the unharvested level of 40 per cent.

these trials, mallee biomass production only breaks even with conventional agriculture in the wetter western areas of the Wheatbelt.

all yields were corrected to provide estimates for a standard two-row belt (6 m wide with 2 m between rows and a 2 m buffer each side). this was done by making the conservative assumption that, for the half of the trial sites with multiple-row belts, the yield of the outer two rows is the best estimate of a tworow belt yield.

the CrC is planning to establish a series of trials during 2012 to test the assumption that wider two-row belts can produce the same yield as multiple-row belts of the same width. this will allow the evaluation of the economics of two-row mallee belts in drier environments.

Acknowledgements:

mallee growers have observed strong suppression of inner-row yield in multiple-row belts and trials confirmed this, where yield of inner rows was as low as 50 per cent of outer rows. such yield contrast within the belt would lead to higher management and harvest costs and provides good reason to prefer tworow belts.

rural industries research and Development Corporation, avon Catchment Council and australian government funding through the second generation biofuels research and Development grant program provided funds for this project.

the large competition impact, both on adjacent crops and on inner rows, demonstrates the strong growth potential of mallees. it is plausible that, in multiple-row belts, if the inner rows had not been planted but the wider belt width had been retained, the yield would be the same.

peck a, sudmeyer r, Huxtable D, bartle J and mendham D (2011) Productivity of mallee agroforestry systems under various harvest and competition management regimes. rirDC project no prJ-000729.

a widely spaced two-row belt configuration would be cheaper to plant, have all the growth accrued on only two rows, but with less harvest distance to travel and trees would be large enough to harvest more frequently and thereby impose an average lower competition cost on adjacent crops.

Economic analysis the economic analysis shows that for narrow two-row belts, with the yields and competition losses observed in

w w w . f u t u r e f a r m o n l i n e . c o m . a u

The project final report will soon be available on the rirDC website: www.rirdc.gov.au

• John Bartle is a researcher with the

WA Department of Environment and Conservation with a long involvement with the mallee industry.

contact

• John Bartle, Wa DeC T: 0408 907 762 E: john.bartle@dec.wa.gov.au

ISSUE 10 april 2012

5


future farm

Location of perennials determines landscape water flows

T

here is little doubt that increasing the perenniality of land use within a catchment will lead to improved natural resource management (nrm) outcomes and a likely increase in profitability. But there has always been a question about what effect increasing perenniality has on catchment water yield, in the form of streamflow and the flow into farm dams and wetlands. to answer this question, the future farm industries CrC has instigated and funded the Catplus project. the project further develops and applies the existing Catchment analysis tools (Cat) model to better predict the effects of perennial vegetation systems on water quality and quantity in a catchment. it models and evaluates the impact of land uses, such as plantation forestry and increasing the perenniality of pasture, on catchment water resources.

key points CATPlus modelling project • The uses historical data and current

measurements to predict the impact of various land use changes on catchment water yield.

have the least impact on water • Toyield, the land use changes must be in the most suitable part of the catchment.

plantations reduce water • Tree yield significantly more than

perennial pastures, so are needed to achieve recharge reduction in some catchment areas.

6

ISSUE 10 april 2012

By Pamela Lawson

Although planting perennial pastures and trees can reduce water flows into dams and streams, the NRM benefits will far outweigh the negligible reductions if the plantings are correctly sited. (Photo: Pamela Lawson)

Study location the Catplus project focuses on two catchment areas — the Wannon River catchment in south-west victoria and the tarcutta Creek catchment in southern new south Wales. Project leader, Aleksandra Rančić from the Office of Environment and Heritage, NSW, said the project team engaged local expert groups in these two locations to define and test the impacts of various scenarios. “the local groups are made up of individuals and organisations that provided a wealth of information and data, including current and historical land use, for the two study areas,” aleks said. “engaging these local experts has increased the understanding and support of model-based approaches to catchment management, and ensures the model outputs back up the activities and outputs of EverGraze.”

Landholder support aleks is quick to point out that landholders from both the landcare groups in the tarcutta Creek catchment have shown high interest and support for the project. “they provided all the information requested, including piezometer measurements, rainfall records and the history of land use on their properties, and some contributed to bore monitoring during the project,” she said. “in the tarcutta Creek catchment, landholders voluntarily provided 90 per cent of the literature and reports produced for this area.

F o c u s

o n

“most landholders are actively involved in landcare and so are aware of problems, such as shallow and rising water tables, waterlogging, salinity and soil erosion. they are often already using practices such as drought feedlots to maintain groundcover, and in the lower parts of the tarcutta Creek catchment, there has been 4–5 per cent increase in native tree cover since 1978.”

The model used originally, Cat was designed to predict the impacts of various land-use scenarios on dryland salinity. it has since been extended to use a range of farming system and forest growth models to link land use, soils, topography and climate data to groundwater systems and streamflows on various time and spatial scales. “the main focus of the modelling at the tarcutta site has been to test the hydrological effects of two potential changes in land use,” aleks said. “the two land uses modelled are agroforestry tree plantations and perennial pasture establishment, with suitable species determined from trials at nearby EverGraze proof sites. “the model for this site has been calibrated to reflect the clearing history and introduction of pine plantations within the catchment. it uses data to create a simulation period of 110 years (1900–2009) and a calibration period of 60 years (1959–2009), as land use in the catchment has been recorded in detail since 1959. this encompasses as much climate variability as possible and provides a wide base for modelling and testing scenarios. this year the calibration period will be extended to

R e s e a r c h


future farm i n n o v a t i o n

i n

p r o f i t a b l e

p e r e n n i a l

f a r m i n g

s y s t e m s

Figure 1 The subdivision of the Tarcutta Creek catchment used in the CATPlus modelling.

410047DS

Stream gauges Zones 1 2 3 4 5

410047BH

this modelled plantation area of 69 hectares represents only a small portion of the actual agroforestry plantings in the area, which are estimated to be at least 10 times larger. the impact of these tree plantations in reducing recharge appears to be very localised, with groundwater trends in Coreinbob being stable, as opposed to the nearby Keajura area where levels are still rising (see figure 2).

410047AH

410095 410058

Kilometers 0

10

20

Source: CATPlus final report

cover 1949–2011, thanks to more funding being available to access records. “for the tarcutta Creek catchment, this should allow us to determine the effect on streamflow of tree plantations and EverGraze perennial pasture systems being adopted by landholders at various rates. We can also use the model to change land use over time to simulate the effect clearing and pine plantations have had on streamflow.”

Streamflow changes according to aleks, the modelling using Catplus has shown the importance of using the right tool or land use in the right area of a catchment, as the impact of land use varies according to rainfall. “in low-rainfall parts of the catchment, the land use impacts are local. but in highrainfall parts they have a general impact on the whole catchment, and even on flows that leave the catchment,” aleks said. “While perennial pastures and trees will indeed reduce water yield, these land uses can be used in areas of the catchment where the reductions in water yield are negligible. the reduced water yield will then be far outweighed by the benefits such as recharge reduction, the prevention of waterlogging and salinity, improved soil health and productivity gains. “the Catplus model has allowed us to run various scenarios and alter the rate of land use change, so we can then provide advice on where in the catchment and to what extent nrm solutions should be applied.”

Recharge results for the tarcutta Creek catchment, the most dramatic results shown by the Catplus

N

the modelling also showed the average flow reduction was 0.8 ML/yr which compares to the total average flow from the Tarcutta Creek of 160,000 ML/yr. The impact of these plantations on overall streamflow was due to the relatively small area of plantation compared with the entire catchment. low rainfall in the lowlands and evaporation from shallow aquifers also resulted in only a small local yield contribution to the total discharge. according to the modelling, if the actual area of new tree plantings is 10 (or even 100) times larger, the reduction in streamflow would still be negligible at 8 ML or 80 ML respectively.

Importance of position according to aleks, the modelling has also highlighted the importance of looking at the various parts of a catchment when considering where the adoption of nrm solutions (such as tree plantations and perennial pasture establishment) has the most impact on streamflow and water yield. the boundaries of the lower, middle and upper parts of the tarcutta Creek catchment as used in the Catplus modelling, are shown in figure 1. “adopting nrm solutions in the predominantly flat lower parts of the Tarcutta Creek catchment (zones 1 and 2) would have a very small impact on the streamflow. However, increasing perenniality in this area of the catchment would create benefits in the form of recharge reduction, prevention of waterlogging and salinity, soil health improvements and productivity gains,” aleks said. “in the mid parts of the tarcutta Creek catchment (zone 3), nrm solutions can have a considerable impact on water yield and streamflow. “about 10% of this section has problems with erosion, waterlogging and salinity, especially during wetter periods.” the Catplus modelling recommends EverGraze perennial pasture systems are adopted at a high rate within the boundary of the problem areas. but a high adoption rate outside these areas, especially in the higher rainfall bands, would have a significant,

w w w . f u t u r e f a r m o n l i n e . c o m . a u

Figure 2 Hydrographs across various groundwater systems in the Tarcutta Creek catchment.

Depth to water table below ground surface (m)

modelling are that 69 hectares of tree plantations situated in zone 2 (see figure 1) would almost halve recharge from 33 megalitres per year to 18 ML/yr.

Main streams

1980 -5

Time (year) 1990 2000

2010

0

5

10

15

20 Coreinbob (water table in equilibrium) Tarcutta Creek near Tarcutta (water table in equilibrium) Keajura (rising water table) Zone 4 — Expanding pine plantations (falling water table) Ground surface

Source: Aleksandra Rančić

negative impact on water yield and so is not recommended. similarly, the adoption of nrm solutions in the upper parts of the tarcutta Creek catchment (zones 4 and 5) would have an extremely high impact on flow reduction and so is not recommended. “if there is an indication of soil degradation due to waterlogging or soil erosion in a specific location, increasing perenniality just in this area may be beneficial, but otherwise the steep country is needed to generate good, clean (low salinity) water yield for the rest of the catchment,” aleks said. the full Catplus final Technical Report is available on request from Aleksandra Rančić.

contact

• Aleksandra Rančić, office of

environment and Heritage, nsW T: 0417 764 115 E: aleksandra.rancic@environment.nsw.gov.au

ISSUE 10 april 2012

7


future farm

Increasing perennials improves production and profit

S

ince 2004, David strong and his family have been involved in some significant projects to create environmental improvements on their sheep and cropping property. but these improvements have also resulted in more profitable and persistent pastures and more productive land, as David recently told pamela lawson.

farm info . Case study: David strong Location: ladysmith, new south Wales Property size: 950 ha Mean annual rainfall: 600 mm Soils: red-brown earth, yellow podzolic Enterprises: Cereal crops (wheat, canola, oats, triticale and lupins), wool and prime lambs

“located in the lower region of the tarcutta Creek Catchment, we have had problems during the past, with issues such as erosion, waterlogging and salinity,” David said. “We have mainly used perennial pastures and native tree plantations to try and mitigate these problems in the long-term, and have used both formal and more anecdotal monitoring to document the changes.

First things first before embarking on any major endeavours, we made a conscious decision to develop a thoughtful, practical whole-farm plan using the best available information. While this was tricky to do at the time, it was definitely worth putting time into this before we started anything else. following our farm plan, we gradually carried out a number of improvements including fencing areas of the property according to land class for erosion control, increasing the area sown to perennial pastures for production and groundcover, fencing and planting active gully-lines to trees, and establishing environmental plantings of trees and shrubs on recharge and discharge areas for salt management.

key points • • •

8

Lucerne-based perennial pastures can help lower water table levels on grazing properties. Native tree plantations not only provide shade and shelter but reduce recharge levels and the incidence of salt scald. Careful grazing of perennial pastures helps maintain groundcover and keeps the pastures productive and persistent.

ISSUE 10 april 2012

As these before (top right) and after (bottom right) photos show, the Strongs (David Strong pictured left) have planted a significant area of their property to trees, which has reduced recharge and resulted in fewer salt scalds in the lower landscape. (Photos: Pamela Lawson and David Strong)

Positive results it appears our water table levels have receded significantly where we have sown lucerne-based pastures. there also seems to be some anecdotal evidence that eucalyptus tree plantings on recharge areas may have resulted in fewer salt scalds in the lower landscape. the species we planted in these areas of the property include Corymbia citriodora, Corymbia maculata, Eucalyptus polybractea and Eucalyptus sideroxylon. these observations can be backed up by Catplus modelling, which suggested an agroforestry planting of about 70 hectares in this area of the catchment would halve recharge levels into groundwater without significantly impacting overall streamflow. in reality, the actual area already planted to trees in this part of the catchment is likely

S t o r i e s

f r o m

to be at least 10 times that, including over 56 hectares on our property alone.

Shade and shelter in addition to the environmental tree planting, we also undertook fence-line plantings for shade and shelter. these have proved their worth, especially during weather extremes. then during 2006–07, we established several forestry plantations on otherwise unproductive land, which has potential timber use. i have been amazed by the growth rates of some of these plantations on gravelly hillsides. However, surprisingly some of the trees on creek flats where the soil was deeper and moisture was less limited have not shown the same growth rates. this may possibly be because of water quality and salt issues.

A u s t r a l i a n

F a r m e r s


future farm i n n o v a t i o n

i n

p r o f i t a b l e

p e r e n n i a l

Maintaining groundcover

Persistent pastures

We have also found that the various approaches to maintaining groundcover we have adopted, such as perennial pastures and careful grazing strategies, have had a significant impact on reducing soil loss.

While lucerne has always been an important component of our pasture, we were delighted to find during the drought years that our own mix of perennial grasses including phalaris, cocksfoot and fescue with sub-clover also persisted well.

the drought forced us to consider the longer-term environmental impact of some management decisions. We started using drought-lots to feed sheep when groundcover was getting low, to minimise soil loss. While the drought-lots were a success and served their purpose, i made the mistake in 2006 of making one on a block of land situated on a hillside that was almost non-arable. i discovered that drought-lots are far better situated on arable areas with only a gentle slope for drainage. this makes supplying feed and water to the stock much easier than on more sloping country, and makes it very easy to re-establish cover on this land (usually crop) when the drought breaks. in contrast, we have found it hard to re-establish groundcover on the hillside.

productive pastures are an important element of our production as we run predominantly fine wool Merino ewes. Depending on their micron and fleece weight data, they are either joined to terminal sires or to merino sires, so we also need pastures to fatten lambs on.

Fenced off as an additional environmental improvement, we have preserved grassy woodland areas of predominantly native pastures and fenced out regeneration areas we considered had environmental significance for biodiversity. a team monitoring fauna reported sighting various threatened species at some of our fenced regeneration areas but it is

f a r m i n g

s y s t e m s

unclear to what extent this is a result of our environmental work.

Into the future While we have no plans for any additional project work at this stage, we will continue to look for ways to improve our property’s environment. fencing according to land class has been a great success. it changes the whole way the farm runs so i would certainly do that again. We are always identifying new areas of the farm we would like to plant trees and shrubs on in the future. We have also got some more difficult landscapes we would like to try to establish some perennial pastures on.”

contact

• David strong M: 0427 284 277 E: dt.strong@bigpond.com

The old bores (GW000841 and GW000863) show that the water table was very deep at the start of the century. Clearing was mainly finished by then and the colonial drought had ended. increased recharge brought out by the wetter spell of the second half of the century, as well as the land being cleared of its native vegetation, dramatically increased the water table level. this was documented during 1991 in a report and local bore survey, prompted by waterlogging and salinity problems, which recommended reducing recharge in the area. since then, the effect of David increasing perenniality on the property is clearly evident. groundwater in the fractured rock aquifer on his property (measured by GW000841) is now eight metres below ground level in spite of heavy rain caused by la nina since march 2010. When compared with the railway 5 piezometer, located just outside his property, water in all David’s piezometers and bores is significantly lower. It also

Figure 1 Graphed readings of bores and piezometers on or local to the Strong’s property 1920 -5

1930

1940

1950

Time (year) 1960 1970 1980

1990

2000

2010

0 5 10 15 20

-5

2009

Time (year) 2010 2011

2012

25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65

GW000841 Old House 4 Railway 5 Isthmus 6 GW000863 Hayshed 7 Lucern 8 Coolbaroo North Coolbaroo South Ground surface

takes longer to rise after heavy rain and recedes faster. this is all because perennials evaporate more water than annuals.

• Aleksandra Rančić is a senior

natural resource officer at Office of Environment and Heritage in Wagga Wagga NSW.

w w w . f u t u r e f a r m o n l i n e . c o m . a u

0

5 Source: Aleksandra Rančić

backed up by measurements we have been recording and plotting of standing water level (depth to water in the bore from the ground surface) at 60 bores and piezometers in the Tarcutta Creek catchment, including those on and around David’s property (see Figure 1).

DTW (m)

• David Strong’s observations are

Depth to water table (DTW) below ground surface (m)

science behind the story

By Aleksandra Rančić, Office of Environment and Heritage, NSW

10

contact

• Aleksandra Rančić, office of

environment and Heritage, nsW T: 0417 764 115 E: aleksandra.rancic@environment.nsw.gov.au

ISSUE 10 april 2012

9


future farm

Perennial grass options set to expand W

hile current seasonal conditions across much of southern australia have seen many producers face endless weeks of water-logged pastures and pugging by stock, it is the long-term patterns that drive suitable species selection on-farm. for producers in medium to low-rainfall environments, choice has been sparse when it comes to productive and persistent temperate perennial grass species. according to Department of primary industries victoria researcher Dr Zhongnan nie, there are precious few cultivars of perennial temperate grasses available in areas with less than 600 mm of average annual rainfall in victoria (winter dominant) and 700 mm in central-northern new south Wales (summer dominant). “While the past few seasons have been favourable, a substantially below-average rainfall year is a significant threat for pasture plants to persist and produce in these areas,” Zhongnan said.

key points • • •

10

New temperate perennial grass pasture options for medium to low rainfall environments are about to increase. Commercialisation is underway for three new lines of cocksfoot and tall fescue. The new pasture varieties could see positive impacts across more than seven million hectares of grazing land in southern Australia.

ISSUE 10 april 2012

By Catriona Nicholls

Above: A group of farmers visiting one of the genotype by environment (GxE) experiments at Eversley, Victoria.

“the inland slopes of the great Dividing range between western victoria and northern nsW are mostly in this marginal zone for perennial grasses. for instance, in the southern nsW livestock-cropping zone, lucerne is currently the predominant commercial perennial but has a number of drawbacks including low groundcover and intolerance to acidic or waterlogged soils.” replacement of annual-dominated pasture with perennials over large areas has the potential to improve seasonal feed supply, increase ground cover and resilience to climate variability, and reduce risk of dryland salinity. “We expect the new grasses developed from this project will significantly improve pasture yield, persistence and nutritive value, and expand the area of improved perennial pastures sown in the target environments where current commercial cultivars do not adapt,” Zhongnan said.

Verge of change

Below right: Improved cocksfoot varieties will offer producers in low-rainfall regions a productive and resilient perennial grass pasture option. (Photos: Zhongnan Nie)

that are well adapted to the medium to low rainfall area (<600 mm) environments. “and while cocksfoot, tall fescue and phalaris have potential for these areas, commercially available varieties just haven’t been persisting during dry seasons.” Decisions on commercialisation of phalaris varieties will be made when more data has been collected from this project.

Facing the challenge to start the search for varieties with the ability to adapt to drier conditions, researchers identified potential accessions from a large pool of germplasm sourced worldwide from areas with similar environmental parameters such as the mediterranean basin and north africa.

after more than eight years of research and development across two project phases, funded by meat and livestock australia (mla) and then future farm industries CrC, the Improved perennial grasses project is on the verge of commercialising two new perennial grass options — improved cocksfoot and tall fescue varieties — with project collaborator Heritage seeds.

“We then established a breeding program (during 2004) using about 80 lines of cocksfoot and 120 of tall fescue at a range of sites across victoria and northern nsW,” Zhongnan explained.

“When you think of the big four temperate pasture grasses used across southern australia you have perennial ryegrass, phalaris, cocksfoot and tall fescue,” explained Zhongnan.

“in one of the sites in central victoria we had about 275 mm annual rainfall and really tested the plants. many died, but some lines survived quite well, so we dug up the best plants, brought them back to the breeding chamber and crossed them.

“but while these options work well in the high to medium-rainfall zones (900–600 mm), there are few cultivars of perennial grasses

F o c u s

o n

“For the first two years rainfall was reasonable across the sites, but 2006 was very dry across much of southern australia.

“from there we developed four cocksfoot lines and three tall fescue lines.”

R e s e a r c h


future farm i n n o v a t i o n

i n

these lines, together with new phalaris lines bred by Csiro, were then evaluated in a genotype x environment (gxe) experiment in phase 1 of the CrC project. phase 2 of the project has seen researchers continue the established gxe experiments to identify the persistence and productivity of these lines compared with commercial cultivars. “We sowed our elite lines (three new tall fescue, four cocksfoot and five new phalaris lines) into five sites in Victoria and southern and northern nsW and compared their performance against relevant controls,” Zhongnan said. “the objective is to identify whether the new lines are doing better than the controls.” Data has been collected for more than two years (see sample data for cocksfoot in table 1), but evaluation of potential new perennial grass cultivars for commercialisation requires the experiments to continue for at least two more years to determine the lines’ persistence. persistence will be monitored annually, and pasture yield and composition monitored at least once per season. seed production of the cocksfoot and tall fescue experimental varieties from the isolation blocks will continue at Hamilton and glen innes. seed increase of the phalaris cultivar selected for commercialisation will be undertaken by Csiro starting in 2013 and continuing until the end of the project.

contact

• Dr Zhongnan Nie, Dpi victoria T: (03) 5573 0791 M: 0429 868 011 E: Zhongnan.nie@dpi.vic.gov.au

Weed risk note: future farm industries CrC assesses the risk pasture species may pose to native ecosystems. CrC researchers have completed weed risk assessments for tall fescue, cocksfoot, and phalaris. tall fescue has a medium weed risk in Wa, sa and nsW and a low weed risk in victoria. Cocksfoot has a high weed risk in Wa and a medium weed risk in sa, victoria and nsW. phalaris has a high weed risk in Wa, sa and nsW and a medium weed risk in victoria. management guides for phalaris and cocksfoot are available on www. futurefarmonline.com.au

p r o f i t a b l e

p e r e n n i a l

f a r m i n g

s y s t e m s

Table 1 Dry matter production (tonnes per hectare) across experimental and control lines of cocksfoot (2009–2011) Cultivar/line

Bealiba, Victoria

Eversley, Victoria

Beckom, southern NSW

Trungley Hall, southern NSW

Inverell, northern NSW

Currie replacement

10.1

15.3

12.0

5.9

11.3

AVH48

12.2

18.3

9.8

1.6

8.7

Cocksfoot fine

7.0

11.7

13.3

6.9

6.1

Cocksfoot very fine

5.8

9.7

12.9

6.1

5.5

Currie

7.7

12.9

6.7

3.2

10.6

Kasbah

4.0

7.6

3.5

2.3

2.3

sendace

5.5

9.7

3.9

0.8

3.5

Note: The table shows the total sown grass herbage production (DM t/ha; 2009–2011) for cocksfoot cultivars/lines from the genotype x environment experiments across five sites in Victoria and NSW (trials were sown during autumn–winter 2009 except the Inverell trial, which was sown during winter 2010). The first four lines are the new lines (Currie replacement, AVH48, cocksfoot fine and cocksfoot very fine) developed by the CRC.

Partnering for success

T

o be successful in the marketplace requires more than just clever genetics and breeding — there needs to be commercial savvy to pave the way to on-farm adoption. This is where commercial seed company, Heritage Seeds comes into the Improved perennial grasses project.

and its team have the ability to do the all-important groundwork.”

Heritage seeds has been involved with the project right from the start and for Heritage seeds product Development manager, Dr John evans, the approach makes perfect sense.

Heritage seeds is now in the process of ongoing field evaluations and bulking up the amount of seed for the two lines of cocksfoot and one of tall fescue, with the aim of having a marketable supply available by 2014, when the CrC winds up.

“our collaboration on this project is a great example of the sum of the parts being greater than the whole,” John said. “in terms of developing genetics and breeding programs from scratch, commercial companies, like Heritage seeds, often can struggle to justify such an investment — particularly with species such as cocksfoot and tall fescue that have limited marketability on a global scale.” “However, in a lot of respects the commercial companies are specialists in taking new products, such as these temperate perennial grasses, to market once the breeding and evaluation has been done. “it’s a case of using the strengths of the different organisations — we understand the commercial realities and have a strong perspective of market need and the CrC

w w w . f u t u r e f a r m o n l i n e . c o m . a u

As such, John believes the CRC benefits from Heritage seeds’ strategic input in the early stages in terms of market knowledge — knowing what the market is likely to want and accept. “We also have the ability to undertake seed production when the genetics have been finalised and the expertise in taking a product to market,” he said.

Bulking up

“We will put the grasses into seed production for the next two years, which will give us a limited supply of commercial seed to work with,” John said. While this seed production process is underway, the CrC team will develop practical agronomy packages to promote the varieties to advisors.

contact

• Dr John Evans, Heritage seeds M: 0413 442 810 E: jevans@heritageseeds.com.au

ISSUE 10 april 2012

11


future farm

Integrated system provides climate buffer

T

farm info .

he highly variable seasons of recent years have prompted Woomargama Station manager, Chris mirams to scrutinise his feedbase. the result has been an appreciation of the true value of his native pastures and the development of an integrated pasture system that matches species to landscape under a well managed grazing strategy.

Case study: Chris mirams Location: Holbrook, nsW Property size: 2700 ha Mean annual rainfall: 750 mm (with great variation) Soils: alluvial and heavy clay flats running up to steep shale Enterprises: fine wool merinos (10,000 hd) and beef cattle (1000 hd)

“Historically our long-term average rainfall is a fairly reliable 750 mm, but during the eight years of drought the average rainfall was 600 mm. the past three years have been extraordinarily variable — in 2009 we had 520 mm and in 2010 we had 1120 mm,” Chris said. “the challenge has been to develop a farming system that copes with this variation and makes the most of any rainfall, regardless of when it falls. the answer lies in an integrated, productive and permanent pasture system and sound, evidence-based decision making.

Situation snapshot We are faced with highly variable soils across our landscape. about one third of the property is arable and we maintain wellfertilised, improved pasture species. more than half the property is steep, with relatively infertile shallow soils, which maintain various amounts of native pasture and natural timber.

Chris Mirams (pictured) has developed a flexible and resilient pasture system that integrates native (pictured) and improved species to match pasture growth and livestock requirements year round. (Photos: Gill Fry)

about 10 per cent of the property has been planted to interconnecting tree plantations, particularly along creek lines, gullies and in fragile areas.

Managing for potential

key points • • •

12

Integrating improved and native pastures offers flexibility and resilience in livestock systems. Matching pastures species to the landscape yields long-term increases in production and persistence. Timely fertiliser management supports both introduced and native species and promotes desirable species throughout the year.

ISSUE 10 april 2012

During the late 1980s a whole farm plan was prepared, which has been the blue print for much of the property development. most of the property has now been subdivided into land classifications and we manage each paddock to its potential. During the early 1990s our grazing system (both improved and native pastures) centred predominately around spring growth and set stocking. the improved country made up 35 per cent of the country and carried 80 per cent of the stock. our native areas carried mainly dry stock, at 2–4 Dse. the pastures were managed poorly, the stock did not do particularly well and the area contributed little. With low stocking rates and poor pasture utilisation we usually had plenty of residual spring feed to get us through the summer and autumn, supplemented with hay until the

S t o r i e s

f r o m

following spring — we would curse summer rain, as it destroyed the dry standing feed. During the mid 1990s we increased stocking rates significantly and changed from autumn to spring lambing and calving providing more mouths to consume feed as it grew.

Matching pasture with livestock matching pasture availability to lactation is highly desirable, however our summer and autumn periods became much tougher, particularly for the weaners. We were reluctant to supplementary feed — we needed a pasture system that grew grass all year round. our immediate initiative was to sow hundreds of hectares to a wide range of species with varying growth habit, including phalaris, cocksfoot, lucerne, chicory, plantain, winter and summer fescues, perennial ryegrass, white clover — the list goes on.

A u s t r a l i a n

F a r m e r s


future farm i n n o v a t i o n

i n

p r o f i t a b l e

We undertook a major liming program, initially applying lime to the surface and direct drilling an acid-tolerant species, with the aim of sowing phalaris after the lime moved down through the soil profile. This worked well and more than 200 hectares was renovated each year, typically doubling the carrying capacity. We fertilised the improved pastures annually, aiming to build the phosphorus levels to >30 pp (Colwell). We then apply an annual maintenance rate of 0.8 kg of phosphorus per DSE. Carrying capacity currently ranges from 14 to 20 DSE across the improved pastures, with typical superphosphate rates of 130 to 180 kg/ha per year. Despite a move to rotational grazing and the practice of destocking into sacrifice paddocks in tough times, during the course of the drought hundreds of hectares of cocksfoot, fescues, chicory, plantain and perennial rye withered and died. We have discovered there are really only three permanent (perennial) pasture combinations for our system — phalaris and sub clover, native grasses and a bit of lucerne. We also realise how important perennial pasture is and how costly non-permanent pasture can be.

Native potential realised While we focused on sowing the latest cultivar, we were distracted from using what we now know to be one of our great resources — our native grasses. The main beneficial grasses are wallaby grass (Austrodanthonia spp.), weeping grass (Microlaena stipoides) and red grass (Bothriochloa macra). We applied 80 kg of

p e r e n n i a l

superphosphate to stimulate clover growth, which provides nitrogen that feeds both the native and annual grasses improving pasture yield and quality. We initially stocked the area with 4000 wethers, but found prolonged periods of low protein and low digestibility impacted on wool quality and livestock condition regardless of the amount of food on offer. We tried all sorts of supplementary remedies for this, including licks, blocks and lupins — they proved expensive and unsatisfactory. Eventually we came up with the simple solution of integrating improved and native country in the same rotation, with the aim of lifting the average quality of the feed intake. We now have three grazing blocks, one for the ewes, one for wethers and one for cattle — each block includes 15 to 20 existing paddocks, some improved pasture and some native pasture. The native pastures are an ideal low-cost environment for running adult cattle and the hill country helps prevent calving problems. The improved pastures come into play to get the cows to the right weight for joining. Calves are weaned onto the best pastures with maximum growth rates for steers until they are sold during December at about 440 kg. We run heifers on improved pasture until the start of their third trimester (May) when we put them up into the hills to maintain bodyweight and control further foetal growth. For much of the year it is a continuous rotation, however, during spring we graze the

f a r m i n g

s y s t e m s

phalaris heavily, while the native pastures enjoy a rest. During summer, when the phalaris is dormant, the summer-active natives earn their keep. Our rotations are flexible and we focus on what is happening in the paddocks rather than adhere to strict rules. We now manage a suite of drought-tolerant, productive and perennial grass pastures, which respond to rainfall all year round.

Right species — right purpose Phalaris and sub clover pastures are the backbone of our system, providing the bulk of our high-quality feed, but our native pastures now play a key role. The limited area of lucerne makes it challenging to manage a large number of lambs through summer and autumn and our flock structure reflects this. Our wethers provide the flexibility to destock quickly in tight times, even though they don’t match the pasture growth curve well — they reduce the cost of production for our wool enterprise. Perennial ryegrass helps fatten steers, provides high-quality feed for lambs and fills the silage pits. However, these pastures are short lived (and expensive) under our conditions and are limited to small areas of our best country.

contact

• Chris Mirams E: woostat@bigpond.com

science behind the story

By Kate Sargeant, DPI Victoria

• The key feature of Chris’ system is his use of different pasture types and landscapes across the farm for his different livestock systems.

are reserved for growing stock, allowing Chris to run self-replacing and finishing enterprises.

Holbrook Proof Site

Woomargama Station has three main pasture types distributed across the most appropriate landscapes — native pastures and sub clover on steep hill country, phalaris and sub-clover on undulating country, and high-performance pasture (lucerne, short-term ryegrass and brassicas) on the alluvial flats. Interconnected tree lots meet aesthetic and environmental objectives.

At the Holbrook Proof Site, production targets were met by strategically grazing phalaris and sub clover and fertilised native and sub clover pastures in an ‘integrated’ management system. This system was significantly more profitable (in most price scenarios) than running separate flocks of ewes and lambs on phalaris and sub clover and wethers on fertilised native and sub clover pastures.

Each livestock enterprise is allocated blocks or cells of a combination of native and improved pastures, which are rotationally grazed and rested at strategic times to meet both livestock nutritional demands (especially to maximise reproductive performance) and pasture production and persistence targets. The high-performance pastures

Modest phosphorus applications are important to maintain a sub-clover population and feed quality in the native pastures, meeting nutritional targets of the ewe/lamb enterprise. Running a single flock of ewes and lambs was also important to increase grazing pressure when needed during spring growth on the native pastures and keep the annual

w w w . f u t u r e f a r m o n l i n e . c o m . a u

component (stimulated by the fertiliser) under control. Reducing stocking rates at the end of spring, by selling store lambs in the Proof Site system, meant grazing could be restricted to the phalaris, allowing the native pastures to set seed. The subsequent increase in feed during summer allowed for grazing of the native pastures during autumn or early winter. This approach allows a feed wedge to be developed on the phalaris. In Chris’ system, this same objective is met using the high-performance pastures for finishing growing stock.

• Kate is the National EverGraze Project

Leader, based at DPI Victoria in Benalla.

contact

• Kate Sargeant, DPI Victoria T: (03) 5761 1598 E: Kate.Sargeant@dpi.vic.gov.au

ISSUE 10 april 2012

13


future farm

Mallee harvester: from concept to reality By Janet Paterson

T

he mallee harvester works! the prototype harvester, developed by richard sulman, biosystems engineering, with ongoing support and advice from future farm industries CrC project leader rick giles, has now met all its milestones and work on developing a commercial model has begun. this is a huge boon for the embryonic mallee industry as a harvester is an essential component of an integrated supply chain for woody crops. in this article, we review the challenging road that has taken the harvester from concept to reality.

1 The development of a harvester for the Australian mallee industry started 15 years ago with several years of work by Harley Pederick of Dumbleyung Engineering and the CRC’s Rick Giles, leading to a concept harvester (above). The next challenge, which would take most of the next decade, was to develop a harvester that could cut and chip mallees at a commercially viable rate (left).

3 To be commercially viable, the harvester needs to be able to harvest and chip the mallee stems continuously at a rate of at least 50 green tonnes per hour. This requires the harvester to operate on the move and trees have to be harvested and fed into the chipper while standing up. In conventional forestry systems, individual stems are felled then stockpiled for later processing.

2 The mallee’s form and size requires a unique harvester design. Mallees are not a conventional single-stem forest plantation tree, nor are they a forage crop. Therefore, developing a mallee harvester needed to draw on both agricultural and forestry harvesting principles.

14

ISSUE 10 april 2012

F o c u s

o n

R e s e a r c h


future farm i n n o v a t i o n

i n

p r o f i t a b l e

p e r e n n i a l

f a r m i n g

s y s t e m s

7 Initially augers (left) were used to grab and transport the stems but these were replaced by chain elevators (right), as they proved more aggressive and effective. Richard Sulman, Biosystems Engineering, (right) designed the successful mallee harvester.

4 Designing a system to cut, queue and carry vertical stems along a conveyor to the chipper was a huge engineering challenge, especially given that mallees are multi-stemmed, irregular and have very dense wood.

5

8

The greatest difficulty was engineering the transfer of the vertical tree stems from the elevator to the rollers that feed the trees into the chipper. This required the moving trees to change direction from moving up the incline to dropping vertically down into the chipper. It is imperative the tree stems are not left uncontrolled for even a split second during this process or they may fall from the machine.

Chipping the mallee stems requires considerable energy and minimising the power used by the chipper has been a major consideration during the harvester’s development.

9 After extensive investigations, a chipper was developed that uses 45 per cent less energy than its predecessors. The early-commercial harvester currently being developed will have about 600 kW of power with most of this going through the chipper. The current harvester (pictured above) is based on a 280 kW tractor.

During 2012, the prototype mallee harvester successfully met its final milestone — to harvest at least 20 tonnes per hour for at least an hour. in fact, it achieved a harvest rate of 38 tonnes per hour for 74 minutes. The harvester trials also provided valuable information on the bulk density of the chipped material, which will underpin the design of future transport systems for the mallee industry.

6 Optimising the strength and weight of the saw disc ensured it cut the mallee stems with the greatest possible efficiency. The momentum of the spinning disc is set so it cuts each stem without wasting energy in needless spinning. Improving the operational efficiency of each of the harvester’s components was critical because there is limited power to drive each harvesting process.

the next step is to develop an early commercial harvester to produce the first contact commercial volumes of biomass and promote • Paul Turnbull, Dpi victoria the technology M: 0409 402 179 to commercial E: paul.turnbull@dpi.vic.gov.au manufacturers.

w w w . f u t u r e f a r m o n l i n e . c o m . a u

ISSUE 10 april 2012

15


future

farm

I N N O VAT I O N I N P R O F I TA B L E P E R E N N I A L FA R M I N G S Y S T E M S

The final word t

all wheatgrass (Thinopyrum ponticum) has been officially gazetted a ‘threatening process’ in victoria. the victorian government gazette listed invasion of vegetation by tall wheatgrass as a threatening process in february this year. Weed risk researcher Christine munday (Wa Department of environment and Conservation), said it was not surprising this had happened.

“tall wheatgrass is a productive plant in some agricultural systems but is also an invasive weed in some natural environments in south-eastern australia,” Chris said. “it can be highly competitive, forming monocultures and reducing biodiversity.” the CrC’s formal weed risk assessment showed tall wheatgrass has a high weed risk to native environments in parts of Western australia, new south Wales and south australia and a very high weed risk to some native environments in victoria.

“Where tall wheatgrass is used in agriculture, the most effective way to manage it is to control its spread and seed production. When it is used as a pasture plant, frequent grazing or mowing will help limit seed set and maintain nutritive value and palatability,” Chris said. “tall wheatgrass should not be planted in victoria. in other areas, where the weed risk is still high, alternative, less invasive, and preferably native, species should be considered to fill the agricultural niche.” the CrC’s weed risk assessment and management guide for tall wheatgrass are available at www.futurefarmonline. com.au/about/weedrisk.htm

Subscription/change of address: Make me a free subscriber to Future Farm Do not send me Future Farm Please change my subscription address Title

First name

Surname Position Company/property name Address Suburb/town

State

Phone

Fax

Postcode

Email

Please return this form to: Future Farm Industries CRC The University of Western Australia M081 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley WA 6009 Tel (08) 6488 2505 Fax (08) 6488 2856 Or email: gmadson@futurefarmcrc.com.au

w w w . f u t u r e f a r m o n l i n e . c o m . a u

Supported by


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.