http://fiatech.org/images/stories/events/techconference/2010/presentations/bonus/why-and-how-iso-159 by FIATECH

Why and How ISO15926 Must Succeed A Software Vendor’s Perspective

Andrew McBrien, Director, Product Management March 29th, 2010

Agenda   Introducing AspenTech   Standards: Strategically critical to AspenTech   A Personal History with Standards: Lessons Learned   AspenTech Implementation of ISO15926: Philosophy and Approach   AspenTech and ISO15926: Current Status   AspenTech Contributing to the Success of ISO15926

Disclaimer

Aspen Technology may provide information regarding possible future product developments including new products, product features, product interfaces, integration, design, architecture, etc. that may be represented as “product roadmaps”. Any such information is for discussion purposes only and does not constitute a commitment by Aspen Technology to do or deliver anything in these product roadmaps or otherwise. Any such commitment must be explicitly set forth in a written contract between the customer and Aspen Technology, executed by an authorized officer of each company.

Introducing AspenTech

Optimizing Process Manufacturing

Reduce costs, improve margins, increase return on capital

Design the Plant

  Innovate   Optimize capital   Reduce time to market   Increase plant uptime   Optimize throughput and product value   Design for energy efficiency

Operate the Plant

Manage the Supply Chain

  Maximize flexibility and responsiveness   Increase throughput   Increase yields   Reduce energy costs   Reduce inventory costs

  Enable demanddriven supply chain   Reduce supply stocks and run-outs   Reduce transportation and storage costs   Optimize inventory levels

Standards: Strategically critical to AspenTech

Engineering: A Typical Asset Life-cycle

Without standards, life-cycle integration is limited by available proprietary interfaces

Proprietary interface with AspenTech

Vendor 1

Vendor 2

Vendor 3

Proprietary interface with AspenTech

No proprietary interface

Userâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s choice limited

Solution value reduced

Standards: Agility and responsiveness for Users and Vendors

Vendor 1

Standards-based interface

Vendor 2

Vendor 3

Standards-based interface

Flexible choice

Standards-based interface

Enterprise Operations: IT Strategies demand standards ERP

ISA S-95

ISA S-88

Chemical Supply Chain Demand Planning

Supply Planning

Manufacturing Execution Production Scheduling

ProdML

Information Management

Production Management

WITSML

Petroleum Supply Chain Fleet Optimizer

IMOS

OPC

DCS

.. plus many others

Yield Accounting

A Long Personal History with Standards: Lessons Learned

A Long Personal History with Standards

  Data interoperability, asset life-cycle

ISO 15926 Global CAPE-Open CAPE-Open   Integration of models and simulation pdXi   Datathermodynamics interoperability,into process and equipment design ISO 10303/221   Data interoperability, asset life-cycle 1980s

2000s |

Scorecard

ISO 15926 Global CAPE-OPEN CAPE-OPEN pdXi ISO 10303/221

… so what have I learnt?

Productized implementations: Essential for practical standards Development of Interface Standards

“Lab-scale” prototyping

Version 0.9 Delivered

Version 0.93 Delivered

Vendorimplementation starts

Version 1.0 Delivered

Production-scale implementation: Surfaced ambiguity and errors, identified impracticalities Drove significant evolution of Interface Standard

Well-funded, dedicated resource: Essential to develop standards $1.8MM (CY 2010)

ISO 10303 (Part 221)

ISO 15926

Voluntary effort

Significant investment

Strong foundation

Results applied in practice Formal Investment # Applications

It Takes Two to Tango. For Standards to Succeed, it Takes Many “Watson, please come to my laboratory” … but what if the telephone had stopped there?

1995: pdXi data model No other adoption   No interoperability benefits

Zyqad Process WorkBench (now Aspen Basic Engineering)

Adoption differs with need, sophistication

Global CAPE-Open Interfaces

Interface

Purpose

Knowledge

Adoption

Unit Operations

Model proprietary equipment

Core process engineering

All mainstream simulators

Thermodynamics

Model proprietary chemistry

Core process modeling

All mainstream simulators + niche products

“Equation System”

Problemspecific mathematics

Advanced numerics

Niche product

How does ISO15926 Benchmark? Lesson

ISO 15926

Productized implementations essential

  Off-the-shelf support by multiple vendors

Well-funded, dedicated resource essential

  $70k raised in three weeks   Full-time resource in place

Standards succeed only with broad support

  Support of all major process plant software vendors

Adoption differs with need, sophistication

  Multiple implementation approaches available

AspenTech Implementation of ISO15926: Philosophy and Approach

Anatomy of ISO 15926 Implementation approaches Reference Data Library Common vocabulary

XMpLant

•  Part 11

iRing

•  Part 8

Others

•  Part 11

10s of man-years

Organizational Maturity   “Organizations cannot skip stages or the associated activities without introducing weaknesses into their EIM programs, which will cause them to fail later on.”   “Organizations cannot implement EIM as a single project. Rather, it requires a gradual building of skills, awareness and technology. It must happen in iterative phases over time.”

  Gartner, "Introducing the EIM Maturity Model" (2009)

AspenTech: XMpLant Selected

Reference Data Library Common vocabulary

•  Part 11

XMpLant

10s of man-years

•  Easy entry-point •  Already proven when our implementation iRing •  Part 8 started •  Strong network-effect Which should

AspenTech •  Fast – first production-quality implementation in 3 months choose? •  Good platform to contribute enhancements Others •  Part 11Data to Reference

AspenTech and ISO15926: Current Status

Matrix 123 (Proteus) Project: May 2009

P&ID to 3D: Matrix 3



XMpLant-based

Multiple vendors

P&ID to P&ID: Matrix 1



3D to 3D: Matrix 2



Achieved

• On specification •  On time •  On (the vendors’ own) budgets

Example: AspenTech P&ID to AVEVA PDMS Aspen Basic Engineering

P&ID exported to XMpLant file •  Equipment, Instruments, Piping •  Connectivity

Imported into AVEVA PDMS

•  Graphics

AspenTech and ISO 15926: Fully supported, project-ready interface

January 2010: Update (XMpLant v3.3.3) Fall 2009: Commercial release (XMpLant v3.2) May 2009: FIATECH Conference Demonstration

Driving ISO15926 to Success

Calendar Year 2010: Aggressive Goal

“ISO 15926 fully operational for process plant within 2010” Endorsed by FIATECH BoD AspenTech: Funding Steering Team Resource

AspenTech Technical Activities in 2010

Reference Data Library Contribute AspenTech Common Core Data Model

XMpLant

•  Active development of XMpLant schema iRing

•  Project management

•  Part 8

•  Feedback to Reference Data Library •  Ongoing support for productized interfaces Which should •  Element 9 RoadmapAspenTech Champion choose? Others

•  Part 11

Call to Action   Learn more –  Visit project and vendors’ booth in Technology Showcase –  AspenTech: Booth 6

  Strengthen the network effect –  ISO 15926 delivers value today, bake it into your IT strategy

  Make ISO 15926 fully-operational in CY 2010 –  Support FIATECH and POSC Caesar joint project –  Resource and/or funding –  Use Cases, testing and feedback