Child trafficking heinous form of exploitation: HC

When we sought information from the inter-faith marriage committee, we learnt it has not received a single complaint of Love Jihad, Azmi said other religions.

MLA can not go on criticising him.”

Speaking to reporters later, Azmi said, “I have submitted a notice for breach of privilege motion (against the minister) with the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly Speaker. Lodha has given false information and he should be held accountable for misguiding of people.”

First India Bureau Mumbai: While denying bail to a person accused of kidnapping a 10-month-old child, the Bombay High Court observed, “Child trafficking is one of the most serious and heinous forms of exploitation, which not only impacts the child and its family, but also threatens the very fabric of the society.”

House and he should be removed from his post,” the Samajwadi party MLA demanded. Love Jihad is a term some use to refer to interfaith marriages or relationships allegedly done with the intent to convert Hindu girls to

Objecting to the demand, BJP legislators interrupted Azmi’s speech.

BJP legislator Atul Bhatkhalkar said, “If the minister has allegedly given wrong information, a notice for breach of privilege motion can be submitted against him, but the SP

The SP legislator said if the notice is not accepted he will move court.

Azmi also demanded action against rightwing groups who he said have been organising rallies across the state without prior permission and allegedly making anti-minority comments.

The baby was kidnapped in August 2021 when she was sleeping with her mother on a footpath in suburban Bandra.

According to the police, the accused Parandam Gudenti had sold the baby to a childless couple from Telangana for Rs1.05 lakh. A single bench of Justice Anuja

RSS remarks: Mumbai court rejects Akhtar’s plea against summons

First India Bureau Mumbai: A sessions court on Monday rejected veteran lyricist-poet Javed Akhtar’s plea challenging summons issued against him by a magistrate in connection with a criminal case filed by a lawyer over his alleged objectionable remarks against the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS).

The lawyer, Santosh Dubey, had in October 2021 filed a complaint against Akhtar before the metropolitan magistrate court in suburban Mulund under Indian Penal Code (IPC) sections 499 (defamation) and 500 (punishment for defamation).

The magistrate, after hearing arguments of both sides, had issued summons to the veteran lyricist in December last year.

The 78-year-old Bollywood personality, through his lawyer, filed a petition before the sessions court against the summons.

“The session court has rejected the revision application filed by renowned writer Javed Akhtar against the Mu-