ARMY
Training Transformation Australian soldiers will notice changes to the way they are trained, with Army set to make generational shifts in the way it delivers training into the future. Recently, Commandant RMC-A Brig Ana Duncan, DG Training and Doctrine Brig Benjamin James, DG Army Personnel Capability Brig Matt Patching and DG Future Land Warfare Brig Ian Langford met to reimagine a foundation training model that would support Future Ready Workforce needs. This work will support the development of a Future Ready Training System that is agile, simple and scalable. “It’s clear that Army needs to grow into the future to meet the strategic circumstances presented in the 2020 Defence Strategic Update,” Brig Patching said. “The skills that we need in this growing Army, and ADF, are changing. To meet these changing circumstances, questions around what the soldier of 2030 looks like – Army’s primary capability – need to be explored.” Changes in the strategic environment, within Army and the ADF more broadly, are occurring against a backdrop of the changing nature of Australia’s workforce as employees look for more flexible working options. Soldiers from 1 Armd Regt participate in scenario training as part of the Contested Urban Environment Strategic Challenge, held at the Henry MacLaurin Battle Simulation Site, RAAF Base Edinburgh. Photo: Cpl David Cotton These challenges have led to a review into RMC-A’s foundation training, among other training transformation efforts, to look at what a Future Ready soldier needs in their initial years of learning and through career skilling. “We recognise as Army grows, and as we look to harness the best from Australia’s workforce when individuals come in at different points of a normal career, we need to rethink what is core to soldiering and how soldiers engage
in learning through their career,” Brig Duncan said. “We are looking at how we evolve and support our people to enhance Army’s competitive advantage in warfighting amid the accelerating differentials of our time. What it means to soldier is evolving. Those who’ve deployed on operations in the last half decade alone understand the impact on the mission and the force.” Brig Duncan said she was excited to deliver a Future Ready Workforce and transform Army’s training, career management, HR information systems and culture in a way that recognises soldiers and what they bring as unique individuals. “This is a generational change to our Army, and we are considering how we enable an agile system of continuous improvement where we see greater experimentation, innovation and adaption in all we do,” she said. “We are evaluating what we do to recruit and train Australians to soldier. By rethinking that, for the first time in a generation, I’m excited that we are going to increase and diversify the amount of people who can join their Army. It’s a greater talent pool and our training is going to be fit for our future contemporary and future needs.” Brig Duncan said Army was shifting to a learning culture mindset, which empowered its people and would provide a competitive, cognitive and character edge. “We are flipping [it from], ‘You come to the Army and we do things
to you’, to, ‘You come to the Army and we enable you to be curious and constantly think about what your skills need to be to win’,” she said. “We want our young people who do bring different ideas, in a different context, to be able to have dialogue with our commanders that is professional and respectful, because it will get a better outcome for that team and Army more broadly. “Our competitive edge into the future is just as much the cognitive ability and mission curiosity of our people as it is of the platforms and systems they use to deliver land power effects.” Brig Patching said Army’s work to understand the skills, experiences and contextualisation needed for soldiers in a 2030 Army context was important and added that this work fitted directly into the broader workforce transformation activities happening across the ADF. “The RMC-A Foundational Training Review should see additional capacity opportunities,” he said. “We recognise there is duplication in the Army Training System, and we want to make this experience better for our soldiers. “The repetition and experience might be important for some things but not for others. We are rethinking what those formative foundational things are; what defines us as members of the Army, what enables character development as part of a team and how we are set up for future learning.” Hayden Thomson AUSTRALIAN PEACEKEEPER
21
