Observer the

Editor-in-Chief Allie Stofer

Managing Editor Maddie Sandholm

Online Editors

Emily Ellis Kreena Vora

Creative Director

Alexa Stegmuller

Advertising Coordinator Luis Castellanos

Layout Editor

Tara Lentell

Asst. Layout Editor Alyssa Shonk

Photo Editors

Alyssa Daughdrill Andrew Dressner Asst. Photo Editors

Aurelien Clavaud Molly Higgins

Head Copy Editors Ana Kevorkian Alyssa Macaluso Nora Reidy Asst. Copy Editor Quincy Reyes

News Editors

Maryam Beshara Insiya Gandhi Asst. News Editors Alexa Villatoro Megan Yerrabelli

First, the TA increases wages for faculty members to address the cost of living as it has risen across the country, and particularly in New York, since the first CBA was signed in 2018. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the cost of living in the New York-Newark-Jersey City area has increased by 6% in 2022 alone.

Second, the TA provides health benefits for part-time faculty members. Under the previous CBA, nontenure-track faculty members did not receive employer contributions to their health care plans, meaning professors were often forced to balance excessive teaching commitments to multiple schools, thus limiting the time and capacity that they were able to devote to Fordham. Although FFU members were able to purchase the university’s health care plan at full price, the lack of an employer contribution made the plan, in many cases, prohibitively expensive. Given the United States’ status as the only industrialized country that does not have universal health care, employers have historically offered as a “benefit” what should be a basic right — and, luckily, Fordham has finally agreed to meet this need for FFU members.

Third, the TA makes progress toward pay parity across schools within the university. The open letter explained that faculty in Fordham’s Graduate

In a Jan. 17 Instagram post, FFU said that the “Fordham administration can end the strike at any time by offering us new proposals that meet our demands,” a claim that was proven true despite initial budgetary concerns raised by the university on Jan. 18, as the university avoided the strike by accepting the union’s proposal. Evidently, the university found a way to “stretch our compensation budget,” which University President Tania Tetlow, J.D., previously implied was impossible in a letter to the Fordham community on Nov. 18.

Over the holidays, I faced a barrage of questions from eager friends and family members about my college experience. And, unsurprisingly, the question of “How do you like your professors?” was significantly more common than “How do you like the administration?”

Fordham professors, the majority of whom are adjunct or nontenure-track, make Fordham what it is; it is high time that they’re paid fairly and equitably. Students ought to celebrate the achievements of FFU and its members — and, hopefully, this situation will inspire students to engage more deeply with labor issues across their lives. Support unionized businesses, and don’t cross picket lines. If the success of FFU has taught us anything, it should be that workers can only achieve what we’re owed — that’s right, “we” — if we organize as a collective.

One thing is clear: Organized labor works.

Sports & Health Editor Gabriella Bermudez Asst. Sports & Health Editors Charles Binn

Aurelien Clavaud

Opinions Editors

Ava Peabody Isabella Scipioni Asst. Opinions Editors Jake Eraca Laura Oldfather Jessica Yu

Arts & Culture Editor

Isabella Gonzalez Asst. Arts & Culture Editors Julia Jaramillo Aditi Praveen Kariyanahalli Avery Loftis

Features Editors Matthias Lai Erika Tulfo Asst. Features Editors Lola Cravath Madeleine Signore

Fun & Games Editor Irene Hao

Social Media Editors Alexa Villatoro Eeshita Wade Asst. Social Media Editors Chelsea Casilla Shelby Williams

Multimedia Editors Lauren Bocalan Alice Moreno Asst. Multimedia Editors Riley Kraus Maria Terzulli

Podcast Hosts Shaily Jani Morgan Johnson Christian Madlansacay

Podcast Producer Brianna Doucette

IT Manager Zayda Bleecker-Adams

Editorial Adviser Richard Rosen

Visual Adviser Jessica Green

Policies And Procedures

No board will do so at its own discretion.

The Observer has the right to withhold any submissions from publication and will not consider more than two letters from the same individual on one topic. The Observer reserves the right to edit all letters and submissions for content, clarity and length. Opinions articles and commentaries represent the view of their authors. These articles are in no way the views held by the editorial board of The Observer or Fordham University.

The Editorial is the opinion held by a majority of The Observer’s editorial board. The Editorial does not necessarily reflect the views held by Fordham University.

To reach an editor by e-mail, visit www.fordhamobserver.com member of the House communicating feelings of “distrust” in McCarthy is enough to put a reelection in motion, how does he plan on unifying the party to vote on anything? sort of organizing power within the group to mediate this tug-ofwar, it is only a matter of time before the band snaps.

The Observer is published on alternate Wednesdays during the academic year.

Printed by Five Star Printing, Flushing, N.Y.

On Jan. 6, 2023, exactly two years after the infamous insurrection led by far-right groups, the House saw yet another unprecedented event — Republican Speaker-to-be Kevin McCarthy fell short of the absolute majority requirement for the 14th consecutive time. Finally, on the 15th vote, McCarthy was elected speaker of the House with 216 of the possible 428 votes (some Republican members refusing to vote for McCarthy were convinced to vote “present,” reducing the number needed for a majority).

Party were first displayed during the 2022 midterms with an abysmal showing in a highly anticipated election cycle. This was an especially telling sign of the party divide, since historical data stretching all the way back to World War II has shown that the presidential ruling party (in this case, Democrats) almost always sees a significant drop in their seats in both the House and Senate.

Democrats maintained their control over the Senate, and poor performances by extremist candidates supported by former President Donald Trump led to a much slimmer GOP majority in the House. The few far-right radicals who did manage to squeak through, who refer to themselves as the “Freedom Caucus,” now hold the most power, as the Republican Party needs to appeal to its demands in order to pass anything on the GOP’s agenda.

Take, for example, the debt ceiling. Every year, the House must vote to raise the ceiling to prevent the country from defaulting on its loans and going into economic chaos that would ripple into the global markets. Extremist members of the GOP have already expressed hesitation to raise the debt ceiling unless the deficit comes out of the few remaining, fundamental social welfare programs in the country, which is something the more moderate members of the party are unlikely to agree with. Add to the mix the GOP’s paper-thin majority, and it is highly likely that the result is a frozen, chaotic House that could quickly create a largescale economic fallout.

Americans gawked at the unprecedented spectacle, and latenight TV hosts had a field day at the expense of the Republican Party. But it’s worth considering: What does a failure to reach consensus at a level unheard of since before the Civil War mean for the GOP?

Before answering that question, it’s important to look at the underlying factors that led to this particular situation. The cracks within the Republican

The caucus already knew that McCarthy would do anything to satiate his long-held desire to become speaker of the House. He was minority leader in 2019, groveled before Trump last year and moved into the office of the speaker well before the first vote for the position was held. This inability to conceal his longing for the position has left him a phantom in power, having already given many concessions to a group who will hold everyone hostage as long as they remain in the political spotlight.

Just like voting for the speaker, all bills that pass through the House need a simple majority to move along the legislative chain — but this may prove to be a difficult task. If only a single

To better visualize what is going on, think of the Republican House as a rubber band, the ends of which are being pulled in opposite directions by its members — the radicals and the moderates. Without a strong speaker, one who holds some

As it stands right now, American citizens are in for a few months of passionate showboating that will see the internal rift between the moderate and radical members of the GOP deepen without an effective speaker.

For obvious reasons, this is a bad situation to be in, not only because an inefficient political system is nothing to be proud of, but also because the 2024 presidential elections are right around the corner. Just as the party had difficulty obtaining a majority in the House and fell short of controlling the Senate, it may be a struggle for radical and moderate members of the GOP to unite around one presidential candidate.

From a purely statistical point of view, McCarthy’s decision to put personal ambition above all else and consolidate power within the hands of the Freedom Caucus does not present a pretty picture for the upcoming elections. Republicans are losing some of their primary voter blocks, including educated suburban individuals and independent voters who lean conservative. Even more telling, split-ticket voting, which is when an individual votes for people from multiple parties, is becoming more prevalent among Republican voters, meaning that the quality of candidates (not just their political party) still matters to voters.

Throw in the public spectacle that the House is going to be over the next few months, and these data points might just get worse. Only time will tell if the GOP will realize its shortcomings out of sheer motivation to do well in the next election cycle.

ANDREW ARMOUR Contributing Writer

The first activity my elementary school teachers would have us work on after winter break was always to make a New Year’s resolution. We would write a goal on a piece of paper and draw a picture reflecting it, then return to the rug and share our answers. Usually, an eager classmate or two would raise their hands and share things such as brushing their teeth, eating their vegetables or cleaning their rooms. Everyone seemed to make the same resolutions year after year. Nothing changed.

In middle school, I made what ended up being my final New Year’s resolution: jogging in Central Park every weekend. In theory, I appreciated the idea of a good workout, but after a few weeks, I realized