SPIRITOFST.FRANCIS | ASK A FRANCISCAN
By Pat McCloskey, OFM
Celebrating the Mass in Latin
The other day at Mass, someone told me that the pope has said that priests can no longer celebrate Mass in Latin. Is that true? o. The Novus Ordo Missae, authorized by St. Paul VI in 1969 and implemented in 1970, can still be celebrated in Latin. Since 1970, all the popes in public Masses in St. Peter’s have used this form of the Mass. At issue here are the conditions under which the Tridentine Mass (authorized in 1570 by St. Pius V) can be celebrated and who supervises it. Through “Traditionis Custodes” (“Guardians of Tradition”), a motu proprio dated July 16, Pope Francis annulled similar documents issued by St. John Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI that loosened restrictions on celebrating the Tridentine Mass in Latin. Local bishops now have full authority to oversee its use. An item in Church in the News on page 6 of this issue gives more details about this motu proprio and the papal letter explaining it (both published at vatican.va). After consulting the world’s bishops about the long-term effects of these two papal decisions, Pope Francis wrote, “An opportunity offered by St. John Paul II and, with even greater magnanimity, by Benedict XVI, intended to recover the unity of an ecclesial body with diverse liturgical sensibilities was exploited to widen the gaps, reinforce the divergences, and encourage disagreements that injure the Church, block her path, and expose her to the peril of division.” St. Paul rebuked Christians in Corinth who divided that Church by claiming to belong to Paul, Apollos, Cephas, or Christ (1 Cor 1:12–13). Pope Francis wants to prevent something similar from happening to the Mass.
Father Pat welcomes your questions! ONLINE: FranciscanMedia.org/ Ask-a-Franciscan EMAIL: Ask@FranciscanMedia.org MAIL: Ask a Franciscan 28 W. Liberty St. Cincinnati, OH 45202 All questions sent by mail need to include a self-addressed stamped envelope.
Jews and the Death Penalty
?
The Jewish leaders brought Jesus before Pilate because they said their law would not allow them to put anyone to death. However, earlier in the same Gospel, they were planning to stone a woman caught in adultery. Wasn’t this a death sentence?
WANT MORE? Visit: FranciscanMedia.org/ Ask-a-Franciscan
WE HAVE A DIGITAL archive of past Q & As. To get started, go to FranciscanMedia.org/ St-Anthony-Messenger/ Ask-Archives. Material is grouped thematically under headings such as forgiveness, prayer, saints, sacraments, and Scripture.
T
he earlier incident occurs in John 8:1–10. The second one appears in John 18:28–32. Regarding the woman caught in the act of adultery, the procurator was perhaps not in Jerusalem then. That may also have been the case when a group of Jews stoned St. Stephen to death outside Jerusalem (Acts 7:54–60). Regarding the death of Jesus, the Roman procurator (Pontius Pilate) was already in Jerusalem for the feast of Passover, the most likely time for any insurrection. Jewish authorities did not dare to execute Jesus while Pilate was in Jerusalem. The Romans reserved capital punishment to themselves in order to demonstrate their control of a conquered people. Even so, that law could not be enforced in all places at all times.
10 • September 2021 | StAnthonyMessenger.org
ISTOCK IMAGES: TOP: MARGARITA BALASHOVA/NASA; BOTTOM: BBOSTJAN
Pat McCloskey, OFM
TOP LEFT: MC KOZUSKO/SAM; TOP RIGHT: CNS PHOTO/GREGORY A. SHEMITZ; LOWER LEFT: CREATIVE COMMONS 4.0 INTERNATIONAL
N
