24 | FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSIT Y COLLEGE OF L AW
MARK B. SEIDENFELD Patricia A. Dore Professor of Administrative Law J .D ., S TANFO RD U NIV E RS ITY , 19 83 M.A., TH E O RE TICAL P H Y S ICS , BR A N DEIS UN IVER SITY, 197 9 B.A., RE E D CO LLE G E , 1975
Book Review, The Limits of Deliberation about the Public’s Values: Reviewing Blake Emerson, The Public’s Law: Origins and Architecture of Progressive Democracy, 119 Mich. L. Rev. 1111 (2021) Textualism’s Theoretical Bankruptcy and Its Implications for Statutory Interpretation, 100 B.U. L. Rev. 1817 (2020) The Bounds of Congress’s Spending Power, 61 Ariz. L. Rev. 1 (2019) The Problem with Agency Guidance – or Not, 36 Yale J. on Reg.: Notice & Comment (2019), at http://yalejreg.com/nc/the-problemwith-agency-guidance-or-not-by-mark-seidenfeld/ A Process-Based Approach to Presidential Exit, 67 Duke L.J. 1775 (2018) Revisiting Congressional Delegation of Interpretive Primacy as Foundation for Chevron Deference, 24 Sup. Ct. Econ. Rev. 3 (2018)
In The Limits of Deliberation about the Public’s Values, 119 Michigan Law Review 1111 (2021), Professor Mark Seidenfeld reviews The Public’s Law: Origins and Architecture of Progressive Democracy and argues that author Blake Emerson’s suggestions for how to achieve American administrative law that is deeply democratically deliberative are unrealistic. The article provides a different theory on the best way to implement deliberative democracy via the regulatory process.
