7 minute read

Video games: the same moral panic with a new spin

By Donagh Broderick

The following article deals with themes of an adult nature which some readers may find upsetting.

Advertisement

Video games are a young medium but have still managed to attract their fair share of controversy. Six Days in Fallujah was first teased back in 2009 and is based around the titular battle during the Iraq war. Backlash at the time saw it thrown into production hell until this year. The game no doubt hoped to tap into the same success that Spec Ops: The Line had generated. Despite not doing well on release, Spec Ops has gone on to become a cult classic anti-war game that proved despite what some may think, there is a market for such games. While this controversy has been minor and mostly blown over by the time of writing it is still interesting to see why Six Days in Fallujah is catching controversy now.

Historically, it was mainly the right who attacked video games. Lawyer Jack Thompson became infamous for claiming games were “murder simulators” and absurdly asserted that the vibrations that newer controllers made were conditioning gamers to want to murder. Right-wing news outlet Fox News attacked the first Mass Effect game back in 2007 for “promoting lesbianism” because players could engage in a same sex relationship with an alien female character. Bioware, the developers of Mass Effect, recently admitted that the backlash they received over this caused them to scale back the same sex romance options in the sequel. Donald Trump has made similar claims about video games promoting violence, but you know who else did? Left wing politician Bernie Sanders. Something has changed as time has gone on. No longer is gaming simply scolded by the right but now moral busybodies on the left are coming for gaming too. Where the right is worried games will make children violent, the left is worried games will give children bigoted or regressive attitudes. Mortal Kombat was perhaps the first game to irk both sides’ wrath and can almost single-handedly be held responsible for modern game age rating systems. Gory deaths will turn your kids into murderers! Those women in revealing outfits will turn young boys into misogynists! Because, as we all know, society was incredibly peaceful and egalitarian prior to video games. Six Days in Fallujah was first lambasted by the right as the battle had only recently taken place and was considered disrespectful to the troops that served there, now it’s the left complaining that the game is an “Arab murder simulator”, and have called for its removal from online stores.

This bipartisan panic has extended beyond video games too. Where once it was mainly the religious right burning Harry Potter books now the moral busybodies on the left are attempting the same ever recent transgender comments made by J.K Rowling. Lauren Orsini, writing for Forbes, claimed liking “anime porn” makes you a Trump supporter. Diane Abbott, a member of the UK’s Labour party, laughably blamed porn and video games for an increase in crime. Megan Condis in The New York Times made the somewhat bizarre claim that the popular free to play game Fortnite was being used to recruit people to the far right. Columbine, Christchurch, and a slew of other shootings have all been blamed on video games. While the link between violent video games and real-world violence has long been debunked at this point, anyone who has handled firearms can tell you how poor video games are as a guide to using them.

Now I’m not here to defend gory violence or skimpy outfits in Mortal Kombat, or J.K Rowling’s comments. I’m not even here to defend Fortnite. What I hope to show you is that the moral panic they generate is absurd and baseless at best and, as Bioware has shown, a threat to artistic freedom at worst.

Part of this is that millennials, who tend to lead these new moral panics, were once the counterculture have now gotten old enough to have become the dominant culture and do not realise it, which is why young people are rejecting them. The fact that previous moral panic generators like John Lydon, the singer ‘Johnny Rotten’ from the Sex Pistols, are now conservatives should be an indication of that. Edgy jokes are not ‘rising fascism’ most of the time it’s young people rebelling against the moral busybodies who seek to tell them what they can and cannot find funny.

This moral panic is nothing new. Pornography, comic books, TV, radio, the internet, Elvis Presley, Michael Jackson, The Sex Pistols, dime novels, Dungeons & Dragons, radio dramas, every form of media has been subject to a form of moral panic, the only thing that has changed is the medium in question, the absurdity of the panic and the baselessness of the worries themselves remain the same.

Helpline: 50808 is a free 24/7 text service which offers support for people going through a mental health or emotional crisis – big or small.

Everything You Need!

STUDENTS’ UNION S H P

New Organic Cotton Hoodies Now In Stock Making currency out of controversy

By Caroline Spencer

2021 YouTube was not made with me in mind, and rightly so. According to my cultural advisor and 12-year-old niece, I am “an old”. There’s no stopping it, I never was and never will be down with the kids. I got a searing glimpse into this recently while playing a game of keepy-uppy with advisor/niece (same person!). I asked about the recent David Dobrik’s scandal and his ‘vlog squad’. Her eyes glazed over, she literally dropped the ball and said “Vlog squad? Jesus Christ…” Apparently it’s really old hat to refer to Dobrik’s group. I felt the hand of Mother Time pat me on the shoulder, gently intoning me to sit the next few rounds out.

All of this is to say that perhaps I am not the best person for expounding on Youtuber drama. The niece may be better but she’s at school right now and education is very important. Stay in school, kids.

What I am good at is spending countless hours watching videos about various beefs between Youtubers I’ve never heard of and care little for. The effect is hypnotic. I put these on in the background while cooking, cleaning, painting decking, watering plants, filing taxes, anything. Something about the intricately detailed breakdown of humans with more wealth than sense soothes my frontal lobe.

D’Angelo Wallace is a champion at this. It was through his meticulous oratory that I even know why certain Youtubers are in hot water. There seems to be an abundance of it lately. Ever since Tati Westbrook released ‘Bye Sister’ two years ago, Youtuber drama has become a major algorithm booster. “Cancelling” can have a dramatic effect on a creator’s platform, pushing them into bigger and better financial heights. Once James Charles bounced back from the initial backlash, his success kept growing. He broke out from the beauty bloggers and into the mainstream.

And like a pendulum he’s gone back to cancelled. Due to recent instances of inappropriately messaging underage children, Charles has been demonetised. The same accusations by Westbrook have come back to haunt him and this time there are receipts.

It remains to be seen whether Charles will bounce back from this. While this is happening fellow creator, David Dobrik is facing allegations of enabling sexual abuse and endangering staff members. A clip circulated recently showing a former associate gravely injuring himself at the behest of Dobrik. The legal ramifications of this could be detrimental to his public platform.

All these scandals are unfolding in front of a young, impressionable audience. In the case the injured party was egged on to take part in a dangerous stunt. The more outrageous, the more clicks and views for the creator. With clicks being the true currency of YouTube, some creators have grown a God Complex; they are separate from the unwashed masses. They feel a greater freedom for ‘expression’ because their audience allows it.

Scandal and callouts are not just a hindrance; they can be monetised. They can create content out of their controversy. Yet the tide is hopefully turning. With the waves of scandal facing the likes of Dobrik, James Charles and Jeffree Starr, their market audience may start to unsubscribe and look elsewhere for content from a less problematic source. My cultural advisor has already grown tired of it all, so the hope is there.

This article is from: