Appendix A

Patrick Ginnivan

My contributions to this project consisted of:

Exploration of ideas and concepts and related theory Collection of data Determining input factors Analysis and interrogation of data Extrusion of key attributes from data ArcGis work Creation of maps Workflow charts

Having worked together in the previous assignment and having developed our own strengths, it allowed the group to focus on these. For me this consisted of the mapping and ArcGIS work. I believe it may have been even more beneficial to be more involved in the initial research of the task, allowing for possibly greater concepts and relationships to be explored in the data. However the team did a great job of conveying all ideas.

One of the more interesting and seamless projects i’ve done, it allowed the concepts to be explored to a self desired depth. And the practical implementation of the theoretical concepts explored in lectures was a great way to learn.

Shauna Morris

One of the most positive group work experiences I have had made this complex task easier to deliver. The collaboration was key to focus on our intended outcome. More importantly, having had the experience of the first assessment, we were more aware of our strengths and how to apply them for best outcome. My individual contributions to the final submission included:

Coordinating inputs and deliverables, documenting to support accountability nd time management Development of the key messages and metrics in consultation with the team Research to inform reclassification and hazard and vulnerability variables. Data and collection and transformation Support to distil the outputs from the map/datas to target key discussion points Ownership of the methodology, discussion and conclusion sections of the final product, coordinating inputs required and peer review from my colleagues.

Gabrielle Head-Gray

My contributions to this assignment were:

Discussion and development of the key messages and metrics in consultation with the team Professional Layout and outline of delegated work Literature Review, Introduction, Abstract, Key definitions and aid with parameters and knowledge of methodology, Recommendations for response plan Being a communicative and active team member, with coordination and finalising of submission.

Having worked in our previous project together, my teammates and I were secure in knowledge of strengths to produce thorough work output in an efficient manner. With more initial stage research and time and less pressure on results, the division of ArcGIS and literature methodology would have produced greater in depth knowledge on hazard risk mapping. This being said, I believe our team executed tasks and have produced a report highly satisfactory with the time frame at hand. It was also a positive learning environment to be in which made it all the more easier. The more prominent takings were methodology in using hydrology tools that before this project I had little knowledge in. It was greatly interesting in researching the recommendation options that were viable in the Greater Melbourne Region.