Georgia Pogas - Portfolio 2020

Page 1

A

georgia pogas SELECTION OF WORKS

YEAR..................................................................................2018-2020 EMAIL...........................................GEORGIA.POGAS@GMAIL.COM PHONE.....................................................................(317) - 968 - 0739 LOCATION...........................................LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA


A TABLE

Georgia recently graduated from the University of California, Los Angeles, Architecture and Urban Design program, where she earned her Master of Architecture degree. The pages that follow contain a selection of works that exhibit her affinity for playfulness in both architecture and in representational techniques that seek to re-examine and reposition design tropes.

OF

2 - A WELCOME CENTER.........................................................P. 19 3 - A HOUSE TURNED DORM..................................................P. 27 4 - A GUEST HOUSE.................................................................P. 37 5 - A COUPLE OF PIZZA HUT PATENTS..............................P. 43 6 - A MUSEUM OF ROADSIDE ARCHITECTURE..................P. 49 7 - A FIRE STATION WITH A LIBRARY...................................P. 57 8 - A SPORTS CLUB..................................................................P. 65 1

CONTENTS

1 - A LIFE ON THE BACKLOT..................................................P. 3


0

2


PROJECT SITE...............................UNIVERSAL CITY, CALIFORNIA COLLABORATOR................................................MICHAEL DEPREZ 3

BACKLOT

INSTRUCTOR...............................................................NEIL DENARI

THE

YEAR........................................................FALL 2019 - SPRING 2020

ON

In pursuit of the formal heterogeneity found in a manufactured city, the working method became a kit of parts to develop a catalog of episodic massing. We looked closely at methods of filmmaking as architectural precedent and reference to make formal and aesthetic decisions. These episodes merge together to form a network of housing and shared programs that loosely fit within the existing grid. This project analyzes and evokes entertainment without explicitly claiming it as the sole ambition.

LIFE

With the introduction of housing on the backlot, the boundary between the real and the simulated is further confounded. Through the use of the super-generic, the city fragment, and the graphics of media, the project suggests a new and radical condition of living.

PROJECT BRIEF 1.0 This year-long Research Studio asked for the development of mid-rise housing within 400m of an LA Metro station in compliance with SB50 requirements. The design must consist of at least 75% housing, and must utilize mass timber construction. Our project chose to work at a semi-urban scale and developed a 150m x 150m site adjacent to the Universal City/Studio City Metro station.

A

Film studios play an important role in Los Angeles’ culture and history, and in turn occupy a significant amount of real estate. A Life on the Backlot asks, what if the spectacle of simulated cities that exist on studio backlots could merge with the functions of a real city? In this way, Universal City was the perfect site to explore the intersection of film and city infrastructure.


1 FIGURE 1.1 Southeast site isometric 4


FIGURE 1.2 - Site plan 5


A

LIFE

ON

THE

BACKLOT

6


UNIVERSAL CITY / STUDIO CITY

FIGURE 1.3 The “Facade Attachments” borrow a formal strategy from an existing typology that is common elsewhere on the backlot and at other studios. FIGURES 1.4-1.5 Both “Craggy Plazas” are designed for filming, and are important episodes in the project where studio culture most intensely meets the residential and public programs. The use of chartruese and Yves Klien blue are used for the practicality of filming and as a reference to a media aesthetic.

7

UNIVERSAL STUDIOS LITTLE EUROPE (LEFT); WARNER BRO


A

FIGURE 1.6 - This block of lifted housing consists of a sawtooth facade and an occupiable billboard, a typology that exists in both the city and backlot context.

LIFE

FIGURE 1.7 - The “Long Line” lifted housing follows the linearity of the street below and looks to filming technique as a method of producing infrastructure that does not exist at Universal. It’s shape was informed by the long tracking shot in Spectre’s opening scene and plays off the existing “Falls Lake” green screen. FIGURE 1.8 - This midrise tower reaches the max height limit in an effort to match the surrounding office towers.

ON THE BACKLOT 8


FIGURE 1.9 - Site section 9


A

LIFE

ON

THE

BACKLOT

10


FIGURE 1.10 - At ground level are two destination plazas that serve the dual purpose of public space and, at times, an active film set.

11


A LIFE ON THE BACKLOT

FIGURE 1.11 - A chartreuse network of connective catwalks provide entry to housing and allow for circulation even when the ground plane is being used for filming.

12


FIGURE 1.12 The craggy plazas in particular utilize a featureless-ness design strategy, a radical gesture of neutralizing that creates a simulation of urbanity.

FIGURE 1.13 The plazas have been designed with intentional blankness to offer flexibility in anticipation of potential filming opportunities.

FIGURE 1.14 The design process of the plazas involved observing how the building might look onscreen, then adjusting to make spaces wider and the overall form more layered.

13


A LIFE FIGURE 1.15 Featurelessness of Central Craggy Plaza and Long Line lifted housing in everyday use.

ON THE FIGURE 1.16 View of the Central Craggy Plaza occupied for filming.

BACKLOT FIGURE 1.17 Central Craggy Plaza seen through common camera aspect ratios.

14


FIGURE 1.18 - Central Craggy Plaza occupied for filming 15


A

LIFE

ON

THE

BACKLOT

16


FIGURE 1.19 - Facade attachments housing street view FIGURE 1.20 - Linear housing rooftop occupied for filming

17


A LIFE

FIGURE 1.21 - Housing lifted above the existing studio datum FIGURE 1.22 - Street entrance view as seen from Lankershim Boulevard

ON THE BACKLOT 18


PROJECT BRIEF 2.0 This sectionally driven Comprehensive Studio focused on steel construction and the role of the atrium as a shaper of public space. It provoked questions of porous boundaries and observed the relationship between center and edge in the context of a welcome center.

A WELCOME

When organized, the various programs that inhabit a welcome center can be sorted into four groupings of shared similarities: multi-purpose, public resources, recreation, and administration. Each block of grouped program intends to maintain a reading of individuality through the use of distinct colors and organization in order to ease identification. Some blocks gently deviate from the grid resulting in a loose-fit appearance that conveys a sense of relaxed playfulness. While each block possesses an outward appearance of autonomy, they are connected at moments of overlap. All blocks are hinged together by modest atria and vertical circulation, which then form a new program at the center of the site for both public and private uses. Some blocks situate themselves on top of others in order to allow for a permeable edge underneath them. Meanwhile, others burrow into the ground to support the blocks above and serve as a secure yet public extension of the program.

CENTER

YEAR............................................................................WINTER 2019 INSTRUCTOR.................................................................KEVIN DALY PROJECT SITE.....................................WESTLAKE, LOS ANGELES

19


2 FFIGURE 2.1 Physical model

20


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

10

9 127'-8"

19'-3"

A

B

C

93'-1"

D 40'-0"

73'-8"

E

F

G

H

I

30'-7"

FIGURE 2.2 - Lower level floor plan

21

58'-3"

48'-5"


A

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

10

20'-2"

9'-0"

A

19'-7"

B

WELCOME

30'-2" 9

105'-6"

C

77'-7"

D

E

48'-6"

F

G

H

I

29'-4"

8'-3"

30'-4"

CENTER

FIGURE 2.3 - Ground level floor plan

58'-3"

22


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

10

9

A

31'-6"

50'-7"

B

C

D

E

F

H

35'-4"

G

I

127'-11"

FIGURE 2.4 - Third level floor plan

23


A

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

10

A

B

WELCOME

9

C

D

E

F

G

35'-4"

H

I

127'-11"

CENTER

FIGURE 2.5 - Fourth level floor plan

24


FIGURE 2.6 - Exploded wall assembly section 25


A

WELCOME

CENTER

26


PROJECT SITE...................................LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA

27

DORM

INSTRUCTOR.............................................BENJAMIN FREYINGER

TURNED

YEAR............................................................................WINTER 2020

HOUSE

Three boxes of varying sizes tightly wrap around a set of disparate volumes. Their tabs and flaps play an active role, in some instances serving as architectural features, while in other cases functioning as props or structure supporting the volumes underneath. The boxes have been folded inside-out, resulting in typical exterior finishes lining the interior instead. However in one instance, the largest box folds back out, imitating the vernacular of a traditional gable and exposing a panel of standing seam. What appears to be the roof of one household, actually belongs to multiple, acting as a Trojan horse that satisfies the neighborhood by emulating a false sense of domesticity while also satisfying the city by functioning as multifamily housing.

PROJECT BRIEF 3.0 The Advanced Topics Studio, “Boxes, and How to Live in Them with Other People� utilized the formal device of a box and its six planar sides to produce a house for a new kind of family. By using a method of unfolding, new means of domestic inhabitation emerge.

A

This house is designed to accommodate multiple short-term tenants who are in need of a more affordable or temporary home. The plan embodies a dorm-like layout, grouping similar programs together. Many of the programs employ the use of movable partitions in order to allow for flexible arrangements that accommodate to the needs of different renters.


3 FFIGURE 3.1 Front elevation

Elevation 01

0

4

8

16

28


01

04

03

02

01

04

03

FIGURE 3.2 Roof plan

02

FIGURE 3.3 First level plan

29


A

01

HOUSE

04

03

02

TURNED

01

04

DORM

03

FIGURE 3.4 Second level plan 02

FIGURE 3.5 Third level plan

30


Folded Prop 01

Folded Prop 02

Folded Prop 03

Fold-y Flaps 01

Fold-y Flaps 02

Resting Flap 01

Resting Flap 02

Small Tabs 01

Small Tab 02

Tab Detail Condition

FIGURE 3.6 - Inventory of flaps and folds

31


A HOUSE TURNED DORM

Unfolded Box Isometric

FIGURE 3.7 - Unfolded isometric

32


FIGURE 3.8 - Longitudinal section 02

33 0

4

8

16


A HOUSE FIGURE 3.9 - Longitudinal section 03

0

4

8

TURNED

Section 04

16

DORM FIGURE 3.10 - Section 04

34


FIGURE 3.11 - Unfolded section 01 35


A

HOUSE

TURNED

DORM

36


PROJECT BRIEF 4.0 My role in the project included design development, presentation drawings, and post-production editing.

A GUEST

This compact guest house was designed to fit snugly in the backyard of a Brooklyn home. It achieves its small footprint by overlapping five primitive figures and utilizing a Swiss-army knife strategy on the interior. Its Venn-Diagram-like organization emerges from an interest in Set Theory, which deals with collections of objects, or sets. When applied to the Guest House, it creates a duplicity and juxtaposition of program. Despite its size, the space was designed with flexibility in mind by including movable partitions and retractable furniture. On the exterior, a set of attachments puncture the house in order to curate views and lighting in the interior.

HOUSE

YEAR..........................................................................SUMMER 2019 OFFICE......................................................BUREAU SPECTACULAR TEAM....................................JIMENEZ LAI AND MICHAEL DEPREZ

37


4 FFIGURE 4.1 View from the backyard

38


FIGURE 4.2 - Roof plan

12'-3"

9'-0"

7'-7"

9'-6"

7'-2"

3'-0"

7'-4"

"

'-6

38 5'-0"

1'-11" 13'-3"

"

'-3

10

FIGURE 4.3 - First level plan

39


A GUEST HOUSE

FIGURE 4.4 - Exploded axonometric

40


FIGURE 4.6 - View from the carport 41


A GUEST

INTERIOR

FIGURE 4.7 - Interior view

HOUSE 42


43

PATENTS

COLLABORATOR................................................MICHAEL DEPREZ

HUT

INSTRUCTOR....................................................GARRETT RICIARDI

PIZZA

YEAR............................................................................SPRING 2020

OF

For the “Telescopic Roof Vehicle Attachment,” we claim: The ornamental design for a telescoping roof that functions as an attachment to a food truck or mobile food preparation vehicle. The roof attachment mechanically adjusts to a raised position when stationary or lowered position when in motion, serving as wayfinder, branding and chimney.

COUPLE

For the “Telescopic Wayfinding Roof Patent,” we claim: The ornamental design for a telescoping roof that operates as a wayfinder for a pizza fast food chain, in which the roof mechanically adjusts to its context in order to be spotted within a significant radius.

PROJECT BRIEF 5.0 This seminar titled “Pending: Architectural Patent Office,” explored the novel, practical, intellectual and technological application of architectural patents now. A new set of architectural patents were produced by evolving an existing one.

A

With the intent of retaining the Pizza Hut patent’s novelty and identity, we sought to create a set of alternate designs for a Pizza Hut that activates the roof with more exaggerated purpose. Both designs combine the Pizza Hut roof with the readymade technology of the telescoping tower or pneumatic mast. We have developed two related patents: one working with a brick-andmortar restaurant and the other relating to trends of mobility in fast food service.


5 FFIGURE 5.1 Brick and mortar elevational collage 44


FFIGURE 5.2 Front and side elevation of brick and mortar patent at the lowest height condition

FFIGURE 5.3 Front and side elevation of brick and mortar patent at a mid-height condition

FFIGURE 5.4 Front and side elevation of brick and mortar patent at the maximum height condition 45


A COUPLE

FIGURE 5.5 Front and side elevation of the food truck patent at the lowest height condition

OF PIZZA

FIGURE 5.6 Front and side elevation of the food truck patent at the second height condition

HUT PATENTS FIGURE 5.7 Front and side elevation of the food truck patent at the maximum height condition 46


FIGURE 5.8 Brick and mortar street perspective collage

47


A COUPLE OF PIZZA HUT PATENTS FIGURE 5.9 Food truck elevational collage 48


AWARD.......................................................................SEMIFINALIST 49

ARCHITECTURE

COLLABORATOR................................................MICHAEL DEPREZ

ROADSIDE

COMPETITION.................................WALT DISNEY IMAGINATIONS

OF

YEAR..............................................................................2020 ENTRY

The project was conceived by the UCLA AUD Team and created for the 2020 Walt Disney Imagineering’s Imaginations Design Competition. This project is the sole property of Walt Disney Imagineering and all rights to use these ideas are exclusive to Walt Disney Imagineering. The competition is a way for students and recent graduates to showcase their talents and for Walt Disney Imagineering to identify new talent.

MUSEUM

Located in North Hollywood, the Museum of Roadside Architecture gathers these oversized and absurd objects from past and present, consolidating them into an inventory of curios to peruse. The pieces seem to have spilled out of a giant toy box, leaping off the facade, frozen in motion as they sprawl through the city. The museum houses exhibits and the grounds feature a simulated road trip through replicas of some of LA’s most memorable roadside attractions. The two sides of the building facing the freeway are wrapped by a billboard-like facade to advertise its presence, utilizing the same pop techniques as roadside vernacular. A visit to the museum educates, entertains, and sparks discussion about the importance and status of roadside attractions in a culture that should be progressing away from automobile-centric transportation.

PROJECT BRIEF 6.0 Participants were required to create an installation in a location of their choice, that celebrates and educates the community about an iconic part of the site’s history.

A

A critical part of Los Angeles’ history resides in roadside architecture. An ice cream cone that serves ice cream, a hot dog that sells hot dogs: the architecture becomes both an advertisement and a light-hearted joke. As roadside architecture begins to fade from memory, it is important to revisit these forgotten tokens of history.


6 FFIGURE 6.1 Isometric view

50


F

FIGURE 6.2 The west elevation faces the Hollywood Freeway. Like many billboards that populate the streets of Los Angeles, the characters that occupy the facade act as signifiers that peak passerby’s curiosity while also advertising the building’s functional purpose.

F

FIGURE 6.3 Both sides of the north elevation intend to announce the program of the building. The right side uses a densely populated crowd of characters to capture the eyes of fast-moving travelers while the left-hand side employs a bold typeface for a concise reading of what lies inside.

51


A MUSEUM

F

FIGURE 6.4 Opposite of the freeway, the east elevation is most visible to the surrounding neighborhood. While it embraces a more minimal expression due to its adjacency to the neighborhood, it still embodies a sense of playfulness with an oversized sign and a view of the hamburger.

OF ARCHITECTURE

F

FIGURE 6.5 The south elevation opens out onto a village of roadside attractions. The over-scaled objects seem to leap off the facade, inviting guests to delight in their strange otherworldliness.

52


F FIGURE 6.6 - First level floor plan

53


A MUSEUM OF

FIGURE 6.7 - Section cut through the ride loading area

ARCHITECTURE

F

54


FIGURE 6.8 - The site consists of a decorated museum with an outdoor landscape of replica roadside oddities that are scattered like toys spilling out of their toybox. 55


A

MUSEUM

OF

ARCHITECTURE

56


LIBRARY

57

A

PROJECT SITE.........................................GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

WITH

INSTRUCTOR......................................................ANDREW KOVACS

STATION

YEAR............................................................................SPRING 2019

FIRE

This project seeks to reimagine Glendale Fire Station 29 and the adjoining Montrose Library by lending itself to postmodern methods, particularly those used at Reedy Creek, in order to create a distinction between the two programs and to emphasize their presence in their context. In this way, the front facade becomes a crucial device to articulate importance and function. Each piece on the facade builds a language that signifies its function, i.e. large columns and pediment to convey an institutional building, or bright red brick tower to signify a fire department. The use of color not only helps bring attention to two important community resources, but also exudes liveliness in order to be more welcoming than daunting.

PROJECT BRIEF 7.0 The Fire Station Studio mapped and took inventory of fire departments across Los Angeles, in an effort to observe fire department vernaculars and their common programmatic adjacencies. Each project worked at the scale of the building and the scale of a masterplan, in order to incorporate an additional program and to rethink the civic role of the fire station.

A

The fire station is an often overlooked and unimaginative public building, which in turn denies its civic duty by camouflaging itself into its context. However, some fire stations, such as Disney World’s fire station, Reedy Creek Emergency Services by Venturi Scott Brown, choose to pronounce their presence through the use of color, patterns, and form to dramatize the vernacular of typical fire stations as a method to convey its importance and role in the city.


7 FFIGURE 7.1 Elevation physical model 58


FIGURE 7.2 - The back of the building maintains a quieter facade as it faces away from the street towards the neighborhood. 59


A FIRE STATION WITH

FIGURE 7.3 - The highly decorated front facade borrows techniques from postmodern precedents to help express its function and bring awareness to its civil presence.

A LIBRARY 60


F FIGURE 7.4 - First level floor plan

61


A FIRE STATION WITH A

FIGURE 7.5 - Second level floor plan

LIBRARY

F

62


FIGURE 7.6 - Library facade 63


A FIRE STATION WITH

FIGURE 7.7 - Fire station facade

A LIBRARY 64


INSTRUCTOR......................................................ANDREW KOVACS PROJECT SITE.................................BUNKER HILL, LOS ANGELES

65

CLUB

YEAR............................................................................SPRING 2018

SPORTS

Each grid is influenced locally by its specific program, and globally by the anchor programs situated on the bed of columns. This generates a column gradation throughout the plan, which inherently produces a forest-like field of columns with varying clearings and densities consisting of structural, cosmetic, and programmed columns.

PROJECT BRIEF 8.0 This Core Studio used the gym as a way of interrogating the relationship between structure and program organization. With a focus on plan, structural systems were required to contribute to a larger architectural concept as it relates to activity distribution.

A

The column grid, a simple structural solution, has been glorified as a symbol of freedom, flexibility, and order, however, the typology of an athletic club disputes this notion. By unevenly distributing a variety of columns across a field, this sports club seeks to forgo the normative column grid to produce a new gym typology. Rather than deploying a standard field of columns across the site, each program is treated as an individual object that orders its own grid. Each microfield of columns is arranged within the confines of the site to create a larger, misordered and misaligned field of columns, in response to structural need, use, and privacy. This misorder reverses the role of program and structure: the once ordered column grid is now misordered and obedient to that of the program, which is now prioritized and ordered.


8 FFIGURE 8.1 -

Interior/exterior relationship collage

66


FIGURE 8.2 - First level floor plan

67


A SPORTS CLUB

FIGURE 8.3 - Roof plan

68


51'-5" 6'-0"

11"

42'-2"

65'-10"

16'-0"

40'-0" 2'-6" 5'-5"

4'-2" 3'-6" 5'-1"

5'-1"

9'-2"

4'-3" 3'-1"

3'-0"

4'-0"

18'-8"

12'-0"

12'-6"

6'-0"

6'-10" 1'-3" 6'-7"

3'-0"

4'-0"

5'-6"

7'-0"

5"

16'-0"

17'-0"

7'-0" 10"

6'-3"

16'-0"

17'-0"

7'-1"

13'-3"

17'-1" 199'-8"

31'-7"

12'-10"

13'-6"

17'-0"

16'-0"

12'-10"

2'-0"

2'-0"

5'-11"

5'-11"

5'-6"

293'-2"

7'-7"

46'-5"

17'-0"

16'-0"

15'-7"

9'-1"

10'-2"

17'-2"

3'-8"

16'-0"

14'-11"

17'-0"

13'-10"

20'-0"

17'-0" 31'-7" 12'-10" 3'-0"

16'-5"

32'-2"

2'-0"

17'-7"

19'-11"

2'-0"

4'-0"

15'-6"

6'-0"

23'-2"

3'-0"

4'-0"

6'-0"

16'-0"

15'-8"

17'-0"

16'-5"

5'-11"

16'-5"

12'-10" 46'-5" 10'-3"

4'-0" 2'-0"

2'-0"

7'-5" 12'-0"

6'-0"

8'-6"

10'-3"

8'-2"

9'-3"

7'-3"

5'-3"

8'-9"

4'-7"

1'-7"

2'-0"

9'-9"

9'-0"

12'-8"

10'-8"

1'-0"

11'-0"

4'-5"

12'-2"

4'-5"

25'-0"

8'-7"

13'-2"

15'-2"

11'-0"

10'-6"

5'-6"

8'-6"

5'-6"

9'-6"

49'-11"

20'-6"

30'-0"

21'-6"

22'-0"

21'-0"

5'-6"

40'-0"

17'-6"

6'-0"

8'-3"

1'-0"

13'-2"

11'-2"

6'-0"

8'-8"

99'-10" 220'-0"

FFIGURE 8.4 Field of columns structural grid 69

32


A

326'-9"

50'-9"

7'-4"

1'-0"

42'-6" 2'-0"

45'-5"

11'-5"

7'-0"

2'-0"

11'-7"

2'-0"

9'-11"

2'-2"

7'-3"

3"

6" 8"

5'-0"1'-0" 6'-6"

4'-11" 3'-8"

6'-6"

6'-3"

6'-1"

54'-1"

5'-6"

9'-7"

25'-6"

7'-6" 5'-6"

3'-9"

8'-6"

1'-0"

3'-0"

15'-2"

17'-9"

1'-0"

100'-1" 9'-0"

1'-5"

34'-1"

7" 8" 1'-0"

32'-8" 1'-9"

4'-11"

6'-7"

3'-4"

17'-1"

19'-11"

1'-6" 1'-0"

3'-1"

7'-1"

2'-0"

1'-6"

45'-0"

4'-9"

SPORTS

6'-0"

8'-0"

6'-0" 2'-4"

3'-7"

5'-0"

7'-0" 3'-1"

8'-0"

35'-11"

40'-0"

39'-0"

22'-3"

21'-2"

22'-3"

22'-3"

293'-5"

49'-6"

62'-8"

12'-6"

10'-3"

29'-11"

62'-6"

13'-2"

54'-0"

18'-6" 6'-3" 7'-7"

8'-9"

13'-3"

17'-8"

12'-0"

123'-1"

17'-7"

13'-4"

24'-2"

37'-1"

16'-7"

CLUB

23'-5"

24'-2"

18'-8"

28'-5"

37'-11"

12'-4" 33'-10"

10'-1"

51'-11"

39'-5"

12'-2" 36'-7"

23'-0"

70


F FIGURE 8.5 - Cross section perspective 71


A SPORTS CLUB

F FIGURE 8.6 - Site oblique 72


F FIGURE 8.6 - Rooftop track and tennis court collage 73


A SPORTS

F FIGURE 8.7 - Exterior entrance collage

CLUB 74


THANK YOU

YEAR..................................................................................2018-2020 EMAIL...........................................GEORGIA.POGAS@GMAIL.COM PHONE.....................................................................(317) - 968 - 0739 LOCATION...........................................LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.