E N VI RO N M E N TAL C HART E R SC HO O L SYST E MS RE P O RT H O M EWO O D, P I TTS BURG H PA
Ghalya Alsanea | Chitika Vasudeva 48-432 Environment II: Design Integration of Active Building Systems
48-432 Environment II: Design Integration of Active Building Systems Ghalya Alsanea | Chitika Vasudeva
Page 2
48-432 Environment II: Design Integration of Active Building Systems Ghalya Alsanea | Chitika Vasudeva
Co ntents
OVE RVI E W 4 SYS T E M I NT EGRAT IO N MAT RIX 14 L I G H T I N G ST RAT EGY 15 O U T D O O R AIR + MEC HANIC AL VE NT ILAT IO N
18
LOAD C ALC ULAT IO NS 23 M EC H A N I C AL HE AT ING & CO O LING SYST E M
24
I N D O O R & O UT D O O R WAT E R ST RAT EG IE S
29
RE N E WA BL E E NE RGY SYST E MS 33
Page 3
48-432 Environment II: Design Integration of Active Building Systems Ghalya Alsanea | Chitika Vasudeva
LOCAT I O N SITE
7032-7050 Hamilton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15208
HOMEWOOD WEST
HOMEWOOD NORTH
POINT BREEZE NORTH
HOMEWOOD SOUTH
HOM CHIL EWOOD DR VILLA EN’S GE
YMC
A
N Lan
g Ave
.
OPER BETT ATION ER B LOCK
CCAC
EA LEAR RLY NIN HUB G
CARN E LIBR GIE ARY
SITE
AF AMERRO IC MU AN INST SIC ITUT E
Hamilt
on Ave
.
H SW OME IMM WO ING OD PO OL
HO PLA MEW YG OO RO D UN D
SITE
1000’ radius
community center
0.5 mile radius
places of worship
parking
eatery
railroad
commercial
10 minute walking zone
green spaces
5 minute walking zone
schools
Overview Page 4
OCCUPANCY BY SPACE
Maximum expected occupancy in each space. It is expected that the school will not have more than 350 people on an average daily basis.
Ground Floor Gym/Auditorium 360 Greenhouse Cafeteria Garden 360 Think Lab 35 Admin + Offices 20 Lobby Area 400
Second Floor 6 Classrooms (30 each) Teachers’ Office Media Center/Flex Space + Library/ Gathering Area
180 14
Third Floor 6 Classrooms (30 each)
180
450
ROO F MEP
ELEV
.
48-432 Environment II: Design Integration of Active Building Systems Ghalya Alsanea | Chitika Vasudeva
P LA N S
ELEV GREE N ROO F
ATED OPER GREEN R ABLE O SKYL OF WITH IGHT S
SOLA
R PA
NELS
ROOF
. ELEV
Overview Page 5
UP
MED IA C FLEX ENTER + SPAC E
48-432 Environment II: Design Integration of Active Building Systems Ghalya Alsanea | Chitika Vasudeva
ELEV .
UP
DN
SLID
E
LIB GAT RARY + HERIN G AR EA
MED IA C FLEX ENTER + SPAC E
UP
STUD
IO 7 STUD
IO 8 STUD
IO 9
OCC
UPIA
BLE S
STUD
UNS
PACE
IO 10 STUD
IO 11 STUD
IO 12
THIRD FLOOR
TEAC
HERS
’ OFF
ICE
ELEV
.
UP
UP
DN
SLID
E
GAT
LIBRA R HERIN Y + G AR EA
UP
MED IA C FLEX ENTER + SPAC E
UP UP
UP
STUD
IO 1 STUD
IO 2 STUD
IO 3
OCC
UPIA
BLE S
STUD
UNS
PACE
IO 4 STUD
IO 5 STUD
IO 6
Overview Page 6
SECOND FLOOR
Tenn er W ay
. STOR AG SERV E + ICE
UP
DISP LA
SE
SE
NUR
CE
EREN
CON F
NG
NSELI
COU
STORAGE
VP
ION
EPT
REC
ilton
Ham
CE
RAN
ENTE
Ave
UP
MAIN
EA
G AR
OUT SIDE RAIN GA R SEAT ING DEN + & LE ARN IN
HALF BASKETBALL COURT HOMEWOOD PLAYGROUND & SWIMMING POOL
E BA PTIST
NAZ ERIN
CHU
GROUND FLOOR
RCH
e
BAY SICK CRET ARY
UP
UP
Ln D
rive
BIKE RACKS
IUM STOR AGE EENS
EN
GAR D
Y SCR
ERIA
CAFE T
DISP LA GAT Y AND HERIN G
GREE NHO USE
B
K LA
THIN
RDEN
R GA
DOO
OUT
Park
Av
ng
La
N
BUS DRO OFF P
OUT DO SERV OR ICE AREA
CIPA
L PRIN
ITOR /AUD GYM
lty St
48-432 Environment II: Design Integration of Active Building Systems Ghalya Alsanea | Chitika Vasudeva
GRO
UND PLAY
ELEV HA STUD NDS ON ENT KITCH EN
Nove
STOR
AGE
Y OF
CARN EGIE LIBRA R
ABA
OD
EWO
HOM
D HO SORI MEWOO D MO SCHO NTESOL
NDO NE
Overview Page 7
Stone Coping
48-432 Environment II: Design Integration of Active Building Systems Ghalya Alsanea | Chitika Vasudeva
Flashing Brick Veneer Brick Tie 3.5” Rigid Insulation (R13) Vapor Barrier
IECC 2015 CO MPLI A NCE
CMU Block Reglet Flashing Cant Asphalt Roofing 8” Rigid Insulation (R32) 6” Decking
WALL DETAIL
1/2” Panel W24x104 Beam 6” Batt Insulation (R19) 6" Steel Studs
In compliance with Table C402.1.3 in IECC 2015. For climate zone 5, the code specifies R-13 + R-7.5ci for metal framed buildings. This detail shows 3.5” of rigid insulation and 6” of batt insulation which equates to a total of R-13ci + R-19, and that is not including the R-values of the other building materials in the envelope.
6” Batt Insulation (R19) Weep Hole Steel Angle Gypsum Wall Board (GWB)
LightLouver™ Daylighting System Mecho ElectroShades™ Kawneer™ 8450 TL Double Hung Under Fixed Window Assembly
FDC™ GT1175 Telescope 6-panel Sliding Glass Doors
Exterior Stone Sill Interior Wood Sill Stamped Concrete Flooring
GWB Metal Framing
Kawneer GlassVent™ Project Out Window
Armstrong TECTUM™ Shapes & Clouds Acoustic Ceiling Mecho ElectroShades™ Double Shades
Overview Page 8
Centria Versawall™ R20 Insulated Soffit Panel
SECTION DETAIL 1 SCALE 1’ = 1-1/2”
48-432 Environment II: Design Integration of Active Building Systems Ghalya Alsanea | Chitika Vasudeva
VELUX Ridgelight™ Operable Skylight
Stone Coping Flashing Brick Veneer Brick Tie
3.5” Rigid Insulation (R13)
Soil Filter Fabric
Vapor Barrier
Water Resevoir
8" CMU Block
Sheet Barrier
Reglet Flashing Cant
4" CMU Block Flashing 8" CMU Block Brick Tie Reglet
8” Rigid Insulation (R32)
Flashing
6” Decking
Cant
1/2” Panel
Vapor Barrier
W24x104 Beam
6” Batt Insulation (R19)
6” Decking GWB
Steel Angle
Metal Framing w/ 3.5” batt insulation (R11)
Weep Hole
Beam
Steel Angle
Kawneer™ 8400 TL Thermal Fixed Windows
ROOF DETAIL Steel Truss Atrium Structure
Exterioir Stone Sill Interioir wood Sill
In compliance with Table C402.1.3 in IECC 2015. For climate zone 5, the code specifies R-30ci for insulation entirely above the roof deck. This detail shows 8” of rigid insulation which equates to R32.
Asphalt Roofing
Gypsum Wall Board (GWB) Metal Framing
Mecho ElectroShades™ Double Shades
Kawneer Glassvent™ Project Out Window
FDC™ GT1175 Telescope 6-panel Sliding Glass Doors
Overview Page 9
SECTION DETAIL 2 SCALE 1’ = 1-1/2”
48-432 Environment II: Design Integration of Active Building Systems Ghalya Alsanea | Chitika Vasudeva
ELE VAT I O N S
SOUTH ELEVATION WWR = 38%
Fenestration Type
PF
SHGC Requirements
SPECS
classrooms
< 0.2
0.4
0.05 - 0.40
think lab
> 0.5
0.64
0.05 - 0.53
atrium
< 0.2
0.4
0.05 - 0.40
According to Section C402.4.1.1, “In Climate Zones 1 through 6, not more than 40% of the gross abovegrade wall area shall be permitted to be vertical fenestration, provided: • In buildings three or more stories above grade, not less than 25% of the net floor area is within a daylight zone. • Daylight responsive controls complying with Section C405.2.3.1 are installed in daylight zones. • Visible transmittance (VT) of vertical fenestration is not less than 1.1 times solar heat gain coefficient (SHGC).” TOTAL WWR = 38%
**NOTE: the following spaces are excluded from this section: - the greenhouse - spaces that do not contain conditioned space
SOUTH ELEVATION
Overview Page 10
48-432 Environment II: Design Integration of Active Building Systems Ghalya Alsanea | Chitika Vasudeva SOUTH ELEVATION
EAST ELEVATION WWR = 41%
Fenestration Type
PF
SHGC Requirements
SPECS
atrium
<0.2
0.4
0.05 - 0.40
classooms
<0.2
0.4
0.05 - 0.40
•
Approximately 85% of the net floor area is within a daylight zone (The net floor area is approximately 87,250 sq ft) • Daylight Controls: The design uses ElectroShade, a motorized shade system which enables “controlled solar shading [and] maximizing [of] daylighting and view” as a result of an extensive line of sun screens and blackout shades with densities ranging from 0 to 15% openness factor. Additionally, the system offers controls designed to provide integrated solutions, ranging from sun-activated, to remote and wireless control, to local and group control. • As detailed in the product specifications for the Kawneer 8450TL Window Assembly, the VT ranges from 0.03 to 0.52, while the SHGC ranges from 0.05 to 0.53. Therefore the LSG ratio ranges from 0.6 to 0.98, and is always less than 1.1. Hence, the VT and SHGC values satisfy the code. Since the design meets the above performance criteria, up to 40% of the wall area can be vertical fenestration. In this way, the South, East and North elevations meet the WWR requirements prescribed by the code.
EAST ELEVATION
EAST ELEVATION
Overview Page 11
48-432 Environment II: Design Integration of Active Building Systems Ghalya Alsanea | Chitika Vasudeva
NORTH ELEVATION WWR = 60%
Fenestration Type
PF
SHGC Requirements
SPECS
atrium
< 0.2
0.53
0.05 - 0.53
offices/gym
~ 0.2-0.5
0.58
0.05 - 0.53
U-factor: The ECS satisfies the requirements for U-factor values outlined in the code, as the design uses KawneerTM 8450TL Double-Hung Under-Fixed Window Assemblies for windows and the VELUX RidgelightTM Operable Skylight for skylights. Both of these meet the U-factor requirements as outlined in their respective specifications: KawneerTM 8450TL Double-Hung Under-Fixed Window Assemblies: The glass U-factor ranges from 0.20 to 0.48. In the case of fixed windows, an assembly with a U-factor between 0.20 and 0.38 will satisfy code requirements. In the case of operable windows, an assembly with a U-factor between 0.20 and 0.45 will satisfy code requirements. SOUTH ELEVATION VELUX RidgelightTM Operable Skylight: As mentioned in the product specifications, the U-factor of a double-glazed skylight is 0.2 Btu/h/ft2/F, which is within the code-mandated maximum of 0.50.
NORTH ELEVATION
Overview Page 12
48-432 Environment II: Design Integration of Active Building Systems Ghalya Alsanea | Chitika Vasudeva SOUTH ELEVATION
WEST ELEVATION WWR = 13%
Fenestration Type
PF
SHGC Requirements
SPECS
atrium
< 0.2
0.4
0.05 - 0.40
classrooms
< 0.2
0.4
0.05 - 0.40
WC
> 0.5
0.64
0.05 - 0.53
SHGC values: These assemblies also meet the SHGC value requirements as outlined in their respective specifications: KawneerTM 8450TL Double-Hung Under-Fixed Window Assemblies: -South, East and West Elevations: Both the classroom and atrium glazing have a projection factor (PF) less than 0.2. A range of 8400TL window assemblies, with an SHGC between 0.05 - 0.40 would satisfy the code requirements. The glazing of the Think Lab (south facade) and the WCs (west facade) has a PF greater than 0.5, so the range of 8400TL products with an SHGC between 0.05 and 0.53 would satisfy code requirements. -North Elevation: The glazing on the atrium has a PF less than 0.2, so a range of assemblies with SHGC values between 0.05 - 0.53 would satisfy EAST ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION code requirements The glazing on the office spaces and the gym has a PF between 0.2 and 0.5, so a range of assemblies with SHGC values between 0.05 - 0.53 would satisfy code requirements. VELUX RidgelightTM Operable Skylight: According to product specifications, the SHGC value of the skylights in the ECS roof is 0.27, which is less than the code-mandated maximum of 0.40.
NORTH ELEVATION
WEST ELEVATION
WEST ELEVATION
Overview Page 13 ELEVATIONS SCALE 1’ = 1/8”
ELEVATIONS SCALE 1’ = 1/8”
SYSTEM I NTEG RATI O N M ATRI X
48-432 Environment II: Design Integration of Active Building Systems Ghalya Alsanea | Chitika Vasudeva
System Integration Matrix Page 14
48-432 Environment II: Design Integration of Active Building Systems Ghalya Alsanea | Chitika Vasudeva
L I G H TING ST RAT EG IE S
ATRIUM TOPLIGHTING A skylight is a glazed aperture in the roof of a building, placed there to bring in light incident on the roof and redirect it into the building. An atrium is one of the devices that can be used to redirect light entering a building through one or more skylights. This design for the ECS utilizes 10 VELUX RidgelightTM Operable Skylights. The skylight system consists of two
rows of self-supporting skylights that are placed flush against each other and thus bring natural light in to the atrium below. The linear atrium is approximately 75’ tall and is open on the north and east sides, which helps redirect the light entering through the skylights to the lower floors. The glazing surrounding the atrium enables the light to travel as far as the classrooms and supplement the side-lighting strategies employed there.
+75 FT
+60 FT
+45 FT CLASSROOM
+30 FT CLASSROOM
+15 FT
+0 FT VERTICAL HERB GARDEN
THINK LAB HAMILTON AVE
classroom corridor with most challenging orientation (refer to page 17)
N-S SECTION SCALE 1’ = 3/16”
Lighting Strategies Page 15
48-432 Environment II: Design Integration of Active Building Systems Ghalya Alsanea | Chitika Vasudeva
STUDIO 10
STUDIO 12
STUDIO 11
CLASSROOM SIDELIGHTING
E SUNSPACE
Side-lighting Strategy — Louver System: A louver system is a side-lighting strategy that involves Stone Coping the use of an window-mounted apparatusFlashing that diffuses Brick Veneer and redirects light while reducing glare. Flashing
The daylighting strategy in the classrooms employ Brick Veneer Vapor Barrier the LightLouverTM daylighting system, also used Brick Tie CMU Block in the Manassas Park Elementary School described Rigid Insulation Reglet in Daylighting Design: Planning Strategies and Best Vapor Barrier Flashing CMU Block Practice Solutions by Boubekri. As a result Cant of the Reglet P Asphalt Roofing U classroom windows being on the south facade, a large Flashing Rigid Insulation amount of light enters these rooms. The LightLouverTM Cant Decking system uses its fishbone structure to induce multiple UP Asphalt Roofing Panel
Decking Panel
6" Steel Studs
W24x104 Beam
Batt Insulation
Batt Insulation
Weep Hole
LIBRARY + GATHERING AREA
LIBRARY + GATHERING AREA
Batt Insulation
UP SUSTAINABILITY Passive Solar Strategies UP SUSTAINABILITY SLIDE DN
6" Steel Studs
Steel Angle
Batt Insulation
Gypsum Wall Board (GWB)
LightLouver™ UP Solar Strategies Daylighting System Passive heatingPassive and cooling strategies are utilized by using a combination of: Mecho ElectroShades™ SLIDE DN Kawneer™ 8450 TL Passive heating and cooling strategies Double Hung Under Fixed Window Assembly -floor materials are utilized by using a combination of: -double skin facade -LightLouverTM -floor System materials -operable shades and windows. -double skin facade UP -LightLouverTM System -operable shades and windows. UP
Passive heating and cooling strategies are utilized by using a combination of: floor materials, double skin facade system, LightLouverTM System, operable shades and windows.
Rigid Insulation
W24x104 Beam
S’ OFFICE
+
Stone Coping
Brick Tie Rigid Insulation
reflections of the incident sunlight and redirects all of it deeper into the classrooms, thereby optimizing daylight penetration during both the summer and the winter. Moreover, use of the louver system eliminates glare while ensuring no direct beam light is entering workspaces. This maximizes visual comfort for the occupants (students and teachers).
Weep Hole Steel Angle Gypsum Wall Board (GWB)
UP
LightLouver™ Daylighting System
Mecho ElectroShades™ Kawneer™ 8450 TL Double Hung Under Fixed Window Assembly
UP FDC™ GT1175 Telescope 6-panel Sliding Glass Doors
UP FDC™ GT1175 Telescope 6-panel Sliding Glass Doors
Exterior Stone Sill Interior Wood Sill Stamped Concrete Flooring Exterior Stone Sill Interior Wood Sill Stamped Concrete Flooring
GWB
linoleum flooring
Metal Framing
GWB
stamped concrete
linoleum flooring
Metal Framing
Kawneer GlassVent™ Project Out Window
Armstrong TECTUM™ Shapes & Clouds Acoustic Ceiling
Kawneer GlassVent™ Project Out Window
Mecho ElectroShades™ Double Shades
Armstrong Shapes &
stamped concrete
Mecho Ele Double Sh
STUDIO 3
STUDIO 2
STUDIO 4
OCCUPIABLE SUNSPACE STUDIO 3
STUDIO 6
STUDIO 5 STUDIO 4
Lighting Strategies Page 16
OCCUPIABLE SUNSPACE
STUDIO 5
STUDIO 6
48-432 Environment II: Design Integration of Active Building Systems Ghalya Alsanea | Chitika Vasudeva
ACTIVE LIGHTING When daylighting is not sufficient, Phillips SmartBalance Suspended, SpaceWise luminaire is utilized. With Philips SpaceWise, occupants can enjoy the benefits of controls – e.g. energy savings, visual comfort and personal control – without having to create a wired infrastructure. The light is dimmable not only mannually, but automatically– based on daylight conditions. They relate to presence/movement detection and daylight harvesting. These luminaires would be both in the classroom and the corridor, spaced parallel to the North and South walls– that way the zones of light can be parallel to the amount of daylight that filters into the spaces.
Typical Classroom Calculation: IECC 2015
Watts/ft2 Method:
IECC 2018
LPD = 1.24 W/ft2 Classroom Area = 1408 ft2 Watts per luminaire = 31.5 W
LPD = 0.96 W/ft2 Classroom Area = 1408 ft2 Watts per luminaire = 31.5 W
1.24 W/ft2 * 1408 ft2 = 1,745.92 W 1,745.92 W ÷ 31.5 W/luminaire = 55.4
0.96 W/ft2 * 1408 ft2 = 1,351.68 W 1,351.68 W ÷ 31.5 W/luminaire = 42.9
= 55 luminaires
= 42 luminaires
Zonal Cavity Method: CRC = 5(hrc)(l+w) ÷ l*w = 5(9.25)(44+32) ÷ 1408 = 5.19 CU (80% ceiling, 50% walls, 30% workplane) = 1.17 LMF after 50K hours = 1.0 lumens per luminaire = 3500 lm Total lumens = 55 luminaires * 3500 lm/luminaire = 192,500 lumens Foot Candles = total lumens * CU * LMF ÷ area = 192,500 * 1.17 * 1.0 ÷ 1408 = 159.96 fc
Total lumens = 42 luminaires * 3500 lm/luminaire = 147,000 lumens Foot Candles = total lumens * CU * LMF ÷ area = 147,000 * 1.17 * 1.0 ÷ 1408 = 122.15 fc
IESNA RP-1: Using category P for age >65 because the school has community functions, plus the lights are dimmable. Category P = 600 lux ÷ 10.76 = 55.76 fc # of luminaires = (illuminance * area) ÷ (lumens per luminaire * CU * LMF) = (55.76 * 1408) ÷ (3500 * 1.17 * 1.0) = 19.17 = 20 luminaires
Lighting Strategies Page 17
48-432 Environment II: Design Integration of Active Building Systems Ghalya Alsanea | Chitika Vasudeva
OU T D O O R AI R + V E N T I L AT I O N LOCAL AIR QUALITY Ozone and Particle Pollution Data from American Lung Associationâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s 2018 State of the Air Report Ozone and particle pollution are the two dominant kinds of air pollution in the United States. Both have extremely harmful effects on people. Ground-level ozone causes respiratory problems as it aggressively attacks lung tissue
by reacting chemically with it. Exposure to ozone can cause short-term breathing problems, cardiovascular effects and premature death. Additionally, particle pollution is particularly harmful to childrenâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s health.
Particle pollution (PM2.5) - Average 24-hr exposure - Grade: F - Number of high particle pollution days in 2014-16: 24 Orange: 21 Re d: 3 - Average annual exposure - Grade: Fail Ground level ozone - Grade: F - Number of high ozone days in 2014-16: 21
Humidity Pittsburgh is extremely humid throughout the year, with humidity levels ranging from 60-70%, and averaging at 68.6%.
OA + Ventilation Page 18
Atrium View
48-432 Environment II: Design Integration of Active Building Systems Ghalya Alsanea | Chitika Vasudeva
CONSIDERATION OF OA QUALITY IN VENTILATION DESIGN The design for ECS incorporates a number of measures to address outdoor air quality. • The mechanical ventilation system is distinct from the heating/cooling system, both due to the higher energy efficiency of having separate systems, as well as due to the low OA quality (since combined systems rely on fresh air). • An energy-recovery ventilator is the main ventilation equipment. Since these systems do not dehumidify, a separate dehumidifier is used to address the high moisture content in incoming outside air. • All selected equipment possess MERV ratings of 8 or above due to the high particulate content of the outside air. • The placement of operable windows on the on all facades, as well as inclusion of operable skylights, allows for both cross and stack ventilation. Moreover, the use of plants throughout the atrium space, especially along the main central staircase, enables dehumidification, cooling and purification of incoming outside air as it travels up the space.
OA VOLUME CALCULATION - IMC 2015 Second Floor Classroom Corridor Total minimum required OA volume= Area OA volume (corridor) + OA volume (6 classrooms) OA volume (corridor): Corridor area: 2,537.57 sq ft Area OA rate: 0.06 OA volume = 152.25 cfm
OA volume (classroom): Classroom area: Area OA rate:
Occupancy (based on IMC 2015): 0.035*1409.35 = 49 People OA rate:
OA + Ventilation Page 19
Total minimum required OA volume = 4,106.98 cfm Trunk duct size: 22.5” diameter (round) Branch duct size: 11.75” diameter (round)
1409.35 ft2 0.12
10
Minimum required OA volume (1409.35*0.12) + (49*10) = 659.122 cfm Min. required OA volume for 6 classrooms = 6 * 659.122 = 3,954.73 cfm
48-432 Environment II: Design Integration of Active Building Systems Ghalya Alsanea | Chitika Vasudeva
Think Lab (Occupancy Classification: Education - Media Center) Think Lab area: 1957.91 sq ft Area OA rate: 0.12 Occupancy (based on IMC 2015): 0.025*1957.91 = 48 People OA rate: 10 Minimum required OA volume = (1957.91*0.12) + (48*10) = 714.95 cfm
Branch duct size: 12.25â&#x20AC;? diameter (round)
MECHANICAL VENTILATION The design uses an ERV, or an Energy Recovery Ventilator, which is a system that uses the energy contained in air being exhausted from the building to partly condition (heat or cool) incoming outdoor air. ERVs are selected based on a strategy oThe ventilation system is separate from the heating and cooling system, due to the energy efficiency of having separate systems for ventilation and heating/cooling. Moreover, while the design uses an air-based ventilation system, it uses a water-based heating and cooling system rather than an air-based one, due to the high spaceefficiency of water-based systems. Mechanical ventilation equipment chosen based on capacity needed. OA Calculations for Whole Building Loads: Zone 1: Administrative Reception (Offices: Reception Area) Area: 7,257.12 sq ft Area OA rate: 0.06 Occupancy (based on IMC 2015): 0.03*7257.12 = 217 People OA rate: 5 Minimum required OA volume = (7257.12*0.06) + (217*5) = 1,520.42 cfm Offices (Offices: Office Spaces) Area: 1,915.85 sq ft Area OA rate: 0.06 Occupancy (based on IMC 2015): 0.005*1915.85 = 9 People OA rate: 5 Minimum required OA volume = (1361.93*0.06) + (9*5) = 126.71 cfm Total minimum required OA volume = 1,647.13 cfm
OA + Ventilation Page 20
Zone 2: Classrooms Classrooms (Education: Classrooms age 9+) Area: 18,051.2 sq ft Area OA rate: 0.12 Occupancy (based on IMC 2015): 0.035*18,051.2 = 631 People OA rate: 5 Minimum required OA volume = (18,051.2*0.12) + (631*10) = 8,476.14 cfm Zone 3: Multi-use Assembly Includes Think Lab, Greenhouse/Cafeteria, Gym/Auditorium and flex space Area: 23,853.43 sq ft Area OA rate: 0.06 Occupancy (based on IMC 2015): 0.1*23853.43 = 2,385 People OA rate: 7.5 Minimum required OA volume = (23853.43*0.06) + (2385*7.5) = 19,318.7 cfm
48-432 Environment II: Design Integration of Active Building Systems Ghalya Alsanea | Chitika Vasudeva
ERV Product Info + Specs: Zone 1: Administrative Total minimum required OA volume = 1,647.13 cfm Product Name: HE1.5XINH Quantity: 1 Application Type: Indoor Ventilation Type: Static plate, heat and humidity transfer Typical Airflow Range: 375-1,575 CFM AHRI 1060 Certified Core: One L62-G5, One L125-G5 OA Filter(s): Total Qty. 2, MERV 8: 14” x 20” x 2” and 16” x 20” x 2” RA Filter(s): Total Qty. 2, MERV 8: 14” x 20” x 2” and 16” x 20” x 2” Unit Dimensions & Weight: 48 3/4” L x 34 1/2” W x 53 3/4” H, 337-504 lbs. (varies by option) Zone 2: Classrooms Total minimum required OA volume: 8,476.14 cfm Product Name: HE4XINH Quantity: 2 Application Type: Indoor Ventilation Type: Static plate, heat and humidity transfer Typical Airflow Range: 1,000-4,400 CFM AHRI 1060 Certified Core: Four L125-G5 OA Filter(s): Total Qty. 4, MERV 8: 20” x 20” x 2” RA Filter(s): Total Qty. 4, MERV 8: 20” x 20” x 2” Unit Dimensions & Weight: 72 3/4” L x 82 3/4” W x 44” H, 723-1,092 lbs. (varies by option) Zone 3: Multi-use Assembly Total minimum required OA volume: 19,318.7 cfm Product Name: HE6XINH Quantity: 3 Application Type: Indoor Ventilation Type: Static plate, heat and humidity transfer Typical Airflow Range: 1,500-6,500 CFM AHRI 1060 Certified Core: Six L125-G5 OA Filter(s): Total Qty. 6, MERV 8: 20” x 20” x 2” RA Filter(s): Total Qty. 6, MERV 8: 20” x 20” x 2” Unit Dimensions & Weight: 88” L x 113 1/2” W x 81 3/4” H, 2,235-3,099 lbs. (varies by option)
Calculations for the main duct size and the duct size for each classroom. Main Duct: Total minimum required OA volume = 4,106.98 cfm Using the friction loss method and assuming a supply rate of 0.1 WC/100 ft and an exhaust rate of 0.08 WC/100 ft, the main duct size is 22.5” in diameter. Classroom Duct Sizing: Minimum required OA volume for one classroom = 659.122 cfm Using the friction loss method and assuming a supply rate of 0.1 WC/100 ft and an exhaust rate of 0.08 WC/100 ft, the classroom duct size is 11.75”
OA + Ventilation Page 21
O8 STUD
IO 9 UPIA
BLE S
STUD
UNS
IO 10
Layout of ventilation system for classrooms PACE
STUD
IO 11 STUD
IO 12
THIRD FLOOR
TEAC
HERS
’ OFF
ICE
ELEV .
UP
UP
DN
SLID
E
LIB GAT RARY + HERIN G AR
EA
UP
MED IA C FLEX ENTER + SPAC E
Duct MEP coming room from belo w
48-432 Environment II: Design Integration of Active Building Systems Ghalya Alsanea | Chitika Vasudeva
OCC
UP
Branch: 11.75” diameter
Trun k
: 22.5
UP
” dia mete
r
UP
STUD
IO 1 STUD
IO 2 STUD
IO 3
6 diffusers per classroom
OCC
UPIA
BLE S
STUD
UNS
PACE
IO 4 STUD
IO 5 STUD
IO 6
SECOND FLOOR
COU
VP
STOR
ING
GYM
/AUD
NSEL
AGE
ITOR
RO OFF P
SICK
IUM
BAY
ELEV
.
Nove
lty St
This choice for a mechanical ventilation system is sustainable for the following reasons: • An indoor unit is more energy-efficient than a rooftop unit as rooftop units have to contend with heat gain and external climate conditions whereas indoor units do not. • ERVs are highly energy efficient as they utilize heat exchange and are able to redirect some of the heat (or coolth) from exhaust air towards conditioning incoming outside air. Ham iltonallows for more judicious • Additionally, separating the ventilation system from the heating/cooling system Ave use of space and conservation of energy. UP • Since the OA airflow is over 3,000 cfm, a demand-control system is used. This allows for the system to NUR SE operate only when the room is in use and based on the needs of the occupants. MA BUS D IN EN
TERA
NCE
UP
ION
EPT
CON
REC
FERE
OA + Ventilation Page 22
ENS
SECR
ETAR
Y
STORAGE
DISP LA GAT Y AND HERIN G STOR AG SERV E + ICE
UP
UP
OUT
DO
N
Way
SCRE
LF BASKETBALL COURT
AGE
LAY
BIKE RACKS
STOR DISP
PRIN CIPA
L
NCE
48-432 Environment II: Design Integration of Active Building Systems Ghalya Alsanea | Chitika Vasudeva
LOA D C A LC U L AT I O N S
Typical Classroom Load
Note that the classroom loads are really low because of the passive heating and cooling strategies implemented.
Assembly Space: Think Lab Load
Total Building Load
Load Calculations Page 23
48-432 Environment II: Design Integration of Active Building Systems Ghalya Alsanea | Chitika Vasudeva
TEAC
HERSâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;
OFFIC
E
ELEV .
UP
UP
LI GATH BRARY + ERIN G AR EA
UP MED IA C FLEX ENTER + SPAC E
M EC H ANIC AL HE AT ING & CO O LING SYST E M DN
SLID
E
UP
UP
UP
THERMAL ZONES STUD
IO 1
The school is thermally divided STUD into these 4 zones: IO 2 Large Assembly Space - which STincludes Gym/Auditorium, Cafeteria, and Think Lab. UDIO 3 Open Spaces/Atrium - which includes large circulation spaces and multipurpose open spaces in the atrium. OCC STUD UPIA IO 4 BLE SU NSPA CE in the second and third floor. Classrooms - which includes all 12 studios STUD IO 5 Offices/Reception - includes admin and teacher spaces. ST UDIO
6
SECOND FLOOR
Nove
lty St
The reason why these zones are grouped together is because they have similar performance demands and similar spatial qualities.
Ham
ilton
Ave
NUR
SE MAIN
COU
VP
NG
GYM
/AUD
NSELI
AGE
ITOR
DRO OFF P
STOR
BUS
SICK
IUM
BAY
ELEV
.
UP
ENTE
RAN
CE
UP
ION
EPT
CON
REC
FERE
AGE
LAY
ETAR
Y
UP
HA STUD NDS ON ENT KITCH EN
UP OUTD O SERV OR ICE AREA
GREE
NHO
USE
CAFE
TERIA
GAR
DEN
THIN
K LA
OUTD
OOR
B
GAR
DEN
OUTS
R IDE SE AIN GAR D ATIN G & EN + LEAR NING
AREA
Heating & Cooling Page 24
HOMEWOOD PLAYGROUND & SWIMMING POOL
Park
rive
Ln D
ROU
STOR AG SERV E + ICE
ND
STORAGE
DISP LA GATH Y AND ERIN G
PLAYG
ay
SECR
HALF BASKETBALL COURT
er W
ENS
BIKE RACKS
Tenn
SCRE
PRIN
STOR DISP
CIPA
L
NCE
SOLA
R PA
NELS
48-432 Environment II: Design Integration of Active Building Systems Ghalya Alsanea | Chitika Vasudeva
ROOF
ELEV .
UP
DN
SLID
E
LI GATH BRARY + ERIN G AR EA
MED IA C FLEX ENTER + SPAC E
UP
STUD
IO 7 STUD
IO 8 STUD
IO 9
OCC
UPIA
BLE SU
STUD
NSPA
CE
IO 10 STUD
IO 11 STUD
IO 12
THIRD FLOOR
TEAC
HERSâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;
OFFIC
E
ELEV
.
UP
UP
DN
SLID
E
LI GATH BRARY + ERIN G AR EA
UP MED IA C FLEX ENTER + SPAC E
UP UP
UP
STUD
IO 1 STUD
IO 2 STUD
IO 3
OCC
UPIA
STUD
BLE SU
IO 4
NSPA
CE
STUD
IO 5 STUD
IO 6
SECOND FLOOR
elty St
Heating & Cooling Page 25
48-432 Environment II: Design Integration of Active Building Systems Ghalya Alsanea | Chitika Vasudeva
SYSTEM LAYOUT The school uses a radiant floor heating system with geothermal loop (refer to the Renewable Energy section for more information on the use of geothermal energy). Also known as underfloor heating and cooling, this system achieves thermal comfort through convection, conduction and radiation. This particular system is a hydronic one, i.e. it uses pipes carrying heated fluid (usually water) to heat the floor, and then relies on radiation to heat the entire room.
Above is a diagram of how the system works. This system is able to be coupled with the hot water tanks shown in the next section.
Heating & Cooling Page 26
In the school, the heat pump is located in the MEP room in the basement. The distribution pipes are located in the two main water walls.
E STUD
IO 11 IO 12
IO 7
THIRD FLOOR STUD
IO 8 STUD
Layout of Heat & Cooling System for Typical Classroom and the Think Lab IO 9
OCC STUD UPIA IO 10 BLE SU HERS’ OFFIC NSPA E CE
TEAC
UP
STUD
ELEV .
IO 11 STUD
UP MED IA C FLEX ENTER + SPAC E
HERS’
SLID
E
LI GATH BRARY + ERIN G AR EA
DN TEAC
OFFIC
E
UP
UP UP
UP
DN
SLID
E
LI GATH BRARY + ERIN G AR EA
UP
MED IA C FLEX ENTER + SPAC E
Distributed from water wall, which connects to the basement MEP room
IO 12
THIRD FLOOR UP
ELEV .
48-432 Environment II: Design Integration of Active Building Systems Ghalya Alsanea | Chitika Vasudeva
STUD STUD
UP UP
STUD
UP
IO 1 STUD
IO 2 STUD
IO 3
OCC
UPIA
STUD
BLE SU
IO 4
NSPA
CE
STUD
UP
IO 5 STUD
IO 6
STUD
SECOND FLOOR
IO 1 STUD
IO 2 STUD
IO 3
OCC
UPIA
STUD
BLE SU
IO 4
NSPA
CE
STUD
IO 5 STUD
IO 6
Nove
lty St
SECOND FLOOR
Ham
ilton
Ave
NUR
SE MAIN
COU
VP
NG
FERE
Ham
ilton
L
NUR
SE
CAFE
TERIA
ENS
AGE
GAR
DEN
STORAGE
DISP LA GATH Y AND ERIN G
STOR AG SERV E + ICE
UP THIN
K LA
B
UP OUTD
OOR
Heating & Cooling Page 27
HA STUD NDS ON ENT KITCH EN
OUTD O SERV OR ICE AREA
GREE
NHO
USE
CAFE
TERIA
ROU ND
IPAL PRIN C
SCRE
Y
GAR
DEN
GAR
DEN
Distributed from MEP room below
OUTS
R IDE SE AIN GAR D ATIN G & EN + LEAR NING
THIN
K LA
OUTD
OOR
B
GAR
DEN
OU
RA
AREA
ND
USE
UP
ETAR
ROU
NHO
CE
PLAYG
ay
GREE
SECR
RAN
HALF BASKETBALL COURT
er W
AGE
LAY
ION
EPT
REC NCE
ENTE
BIKE RACKS
Tenn
HA STUD NDS ON ENT KITCH EN
STOR DISP
UP
PLAYG
UP CON
FERE
OUTD O SERV OR ICE AREA
VP
HALF BASKETBALL COURT
STOR AG SERV E + ICE
MAIN
E COU STORAG NSELI NG
STOR
DISP LA GATH Y AND ERIN G
SICK
IUM
DRO OFF P
ENS
ITOR
ay
BUS
Ave
Y
/AUD
er W
ETAR
GYM
Tenn
SCRE
SECR
BAY
ELEV
.
LAY
CIPA
AGE
CE
ION
NCE
PRIN
STOR DISP
RAN
EPT
REC
CON
UP
ENTE
UP
BIKE RACKS
Nove
lty St
GYM
/AUD
NSELI
AGE
ITOR
DRO OFF P
STOR
BUS
SICK
IUM
BAY
ELEV
.
UP
48-432 Environment II: Design Integration of Active Building Systems Ghalya Alsanea | Chitika Vasudeva
EQUIPMENT Heat Pump: Bosch WSHP (Water-Source Heat Pump) Model Number: Power Supply: Net Weight: Net Dimensions: Heating Capacity (Water Loop): Cooling Capacity (Water Loop): EER (Water Loop): Quantity:
Floor Pipes: Code: GTIN:
GW/GL/WLSH-100D3A 380V/3Ph/50Hz 620 kg (1364 lbs) 1168mm x 711mm x 1778mm 108.4 kW 80.1 kW 4.07 4
TASSU100S 6418677637797
Sustainable rationale for choice given.
• • • • • •
A radiant heating system is highly-space efficient as it in installed in the floor as a system of pipes carrying heating/cooling fluid. It is also typically about 20 - 40% more energy efficient than an air-based heating/cooling system. Radiant floor systems also prevent moisture damage and allow for healthy indoor air quality (due to reduction of reliance on outdoor air). The use of geothermal as a renewable resource is a highly energy efficient and cost efficient choice. Radiant heating provides greater thermal comfort at a lower temperature set point than forced- air heat. Allow even heating throughout the whole floor, not just in localized spots. The system has less infiltration than other systems.
Heating & Cooling Page 28
48-432 Environment II: Design Integration of Active Building Systems Ghalya Alsanea | Chitika Vasudeva
WATE R S T RAT EG I E S
IPC 2015 WATER FIXTURES
According to IPC 2015, the amount of water fixtures needed for the 400 people in ECS is: • WC 1 for 50 4 for men*, 4 for women • sinks 1 for 50 4 for men, 4 for women • drinking fountain 1 per 100 4 total drinking fountains • 1 service sink *According to section 419 in IPC 2015, you may replace up to 67% of WCs to urinals, hence, I chose to replace 50%.
TOTAL WATER FIXTURES & % SAVINGS The code only requires 8 total WCs, which seems too small of a number for an entire school, especially when accounting for large assemblies and a large amount of people needing to use the bathroom in a short amount of time. Therefore, the following warer fixtures is what makes sense for the types of spaces they are serving.
Ground Floor
Second Floor
9 general WCs 3 urinals 6 general sinks 5 kitchen sinks 1 dishwasher 1 teacher’s WC 1 teacher’s sink 1 nurse’s sink 2 water fountains
6 general WCs 2 urinals 4 general sinks 1 teacher’s WC 1 teacher’s sink 1 kitchen sink 1 water fountain
Third Floor
6 general WCs 2 urinals 4 general sinks 1 water fountain
TOTAL: total # of fixtures
IPC 2015 value
high effieciency
WCs
23
1.6 gpf
Dual flush (1.6/0.8 gpf )
40% (based on 0.96 gpf avg)
sinks
23
2.2 gpm
0.5 gpm
77.3%
urinals
7
1.0 gpf
0.125 gpf
87.5%
TOTAL WATER USAGE According to the Water Use Intensity (WUI) data in the 2012 eia Commercial Building Energy Consumption Survey, an average school WUI is between 10-14 gal/ft2. Because the ECS has a greenhouse and alot of geenery insidwe and outside the building, the WUI would be higher and closer to 15 gal/ft2. Since the total square footage of the ECS is 73, 270 ft2, an estimate of about 1,099,050 gallons per year is used.
% saving
Water Strategies Page 29
48-432 Environment II: Design Integration of Active Building Systems Ghalya Alsanea | Chitika Vasudeva
TOTAL WATER SAVINGS EPA Water Sense data distributes water consumption based on use type (shown on the right). Using the estimated total water usage from the previous section, these are the distributions: • Kitchen/Dishwashing 7% = 76,933.5 gallons/yr • Landscaping 28% = 307,734 gallons/yr • Domestic/Restroom 45% = 494,572.5 gallons/yr • No pool or laundry removes 4% = 43,962 gallons/yr kitchen/dishwashing Using efficient EnergyStar commercial dishwashers saves about 50% of water consumption, according to EnergyStar data. 76,933.5 gallons * 50% reduction = 38,466.75 gallons/year landscaping Use water smart landscaping and irrigation practices, and use low-water requirement plants inside and outside. These practices results in a 50% reduction according to EPA WaterSense. 307,734 gallons is the estimated water use per year, but when using EPA’s Water Use calculator, since the area that needs to be irrigated is 26,150 ft2, it is estimated that the water need would be 42,000 gal/month— with 50% reduction = 21,000 gallons/month = 252,000 gallons/year
# of WC uses
200 female
200*3 = 600
200 male
200*1 = 200
Gallons Used by Code-Based WC
Gallons Used by HiPerformance WC
1.6 gpf*600=
0.96 gpf*600=
960gal/day
576gal/day
1.6 gpf*200=
0.96 gpf*200=
320gal/day
192gal/day
Sustainable landscaping
# of urinal uses
Gallons Used by Code-based Urinals
Gallons Used by HiPerf Urinals
0
0
0
1.0 gpf*400=
0.125 gpf*400=
400gal/day
50gal/day
domestic/restroom Sinks are estimated to be used for 3 times a day for 30 seconds, so for 400 people it would be 400*3=1,200 for 0.5min at a time. Code based 2.2gpm*1,200*0.5min = 1,320 gal/day Energy efficient 0.5gpm*1,200*0.5min = 300 gal/day Total Code Based gal/day Total Energy Efficient gal/day
200*2 = 400
LEED estimates to number of uses per day
= 3,000 gal/day = 1,118 gal/day
If you assume 5 days per week for 52 weeks per year (this excludes holidays) but includes summers due to year round community activities, that would be 260 days and the water used per year would be: Code based = 3,000gal/day * 260 days = 780,000 gal/yr Energy Efficient = 1,118gal/day * 260days = 290,680 gal/yr Total Saved = 489,320 gal/yr = 63% reduction
-sinks are estimated to be used for 3 times a day for 30 seconds
Total Saving = 38,466.75 gallons/year in dishwashing + 252,000 gallons/year in landscaping + 489,320 galons/year in domestic/restrooms = 779,786.75 gallons/year = 70.2% reduction
Water Strategies Page 30
From 1,099,050 gallons per year to about 320,000 gallons/year.
SLIDE
LIB GATHE
48-432 Environment II: Design Integration of Active Building Systems Ghalya Alsanea | Chitika Vasudeva
HARVESTED WATER Harvested water captured from the roof and street run off captured in the rain garden are stored and used to supply year round WC/urinal water loads, plus irrigation loads.
STUDIO 9
STUDIO 10
OCCUPIABLE SUNSPACE
STUDIO 11
STUDIO 12
Rain Garden Catchment
As shown in the drawing on the right, there is a lot of run off water from the south of the site. Therefore, a rain garden was added to absorb and harvest some of that water. The site water is directed to the rain garden which relieves load off the street drains. • Site catchment area goal = 190,000 ft2 • The maximum monthly rain harvesting potential with 80% efficiency is 378,784 gal/month. The lowest monthly average is 274,618.4 gal/month. • The yearly average is 327,490.3 gallons/month Therefore, when using NRCS rain garden sizing calculations, the rain garden needs a depth of at least 30”, since the surface area is 2,000 ft2. UP
TEACHERS’ OFFICE
UP
UP
MEDIA CENTER + FLEX SPACE
DN
SLIDE
UP
UP
UP
Roof Catchment
STUDIO 1
STUDIO 2
2 LOO The net roof catchment area (excluding area of skylight and ND F equipments) is 28,500 ft . Because the roof is SECO a membrane with 90% efficiency, it collects an average of 55,264 gal/month, but only 38,723 gal/month is needed. Therefore, by the end of the year, the cummulative surplus would be 198,488 gallons, which needs 26,536 cubic feet of storage. The surplus water would be useful during dry seasons and when planting and irrigation might be higher in the gardens. STUDIO 3
STUDIO 4
R
STUDIO 5
STUDIO 6
OCCUPIABLE SUNSPACE
NAZERINE BAPTIST CHURCH
The cistern will be located below-grade to protect from freezing, with a height if 8’ for standard below-grade excavation. It will be located below the basketball court for ease-of-access and close proximity to the rain garden and building. Below is the calculation for a cylindrical cistern: V= πr2h 26,536 ft3= π * r2 * 8’ r = 32.5 ft
CARNEGIE LIBRARY O Hamilton Ave
STORAGE N
IO
PT
CE
E
RAG
STO DISPLAY SCREENS
cistern location
ng A
ve
BASK
N La
SECRETARY
ETB
32
CONFERENCE
PLAYGROUND
.5
ft
RE
UP
HALF
STORAGE
VP COUNSELING
RACKS
BUS DROP OFF
NURSE
BIKE
ELEV.
UP
PRINCIPAL
GYM/AUDITORIUM
Novelty St
SICK BAY
MAIN ENTERANCE
OURT ALL C
ELEV.
252,000 gallons/year for landscaping + 212,680 gallon/year for WC/urinals OOR D FL THIR = 464,680 gal/year non potable water needed = 38,723 gal/month
LIBRARY + GATHERING AREA
DN
UP UP
DISPLAY AND GATHERING
STORAGE + SERVICE
ner Way
Water Strategies Page 31
OUTDOOR SERVICE AREA
HANDS ON STUDENT KITCHEN
GREENHOUSE CAFETERIA GARDEN THINK LAB
OUTDOOR GARDEN
RAIN GARDEN + OUTSIDE SEATING & LEARNING AREA
U
GRO
rain garden
ND &
ROU
-
SWIM
48-432 Environment II: Design Integration of Active Building Systems Ghalya Alsanea | Chitika Vasudeva
POTABLE & HOT WATER Potable water would be used for drinking fountains, dishwasher and sinks. Only the dishwasher and sinks need hot water. It is assumed 30% of hot water goes to dishwashing and 70% goes to faucets. • Based on 2015 ASHRAE, junior and senior high schools use a maximum hourly of 1 gal or hot water per person. • Therefore, for 400 people, it would be 400 gal/hour. • 30% - dishwashing - 120 gal/hr • 70% - faucets - 280 gal/hr Applying the water saving strategies from before, there is a 50% reduction for dishwashing and a 77.3% reduction for faucets. 400 gal/hr - [(50% * 120)+(77.3% * 280)] = 123.56 gal/hr
Water Heating Equipment Brand Name: Model Number: Thermal Efficiency: Standby Loss (Btu/h): Energy Source: Heater Type: Rated Volume: Input Rate:
A. O. Smith BTXL 100 96% 430 Btu/h Natural Gas Storage 75 gal 100 MBtu/h
# of units: Size of Equipment:
2 65.25” tall, 27.75” wide
HOT WATER SYSTEM LAYOUT Water wall on the west side of the building stacks up to make water distribution to the bathrooms more efficient and easier. The water wall goes all the way to the MEP room located in the basement.
Water Strategies Page 32
48-432 Environment II: Design Integration of Active Building Systems Ghalya Alsanea | Chitika Vasudeva
R ENEWABL E E N E RGY
PV SYSTEM This Sunpower commercial DC panel is available as 435W monocrystalline cells, 2067 mm [81.4 in] x 1046 mm [41.2 in] in size. As seen in the roof plan, the area available for PV panels is 7245.5 sq ft. Accordingly, the panels are laid out in 4 arrays of 60 panels each on the ECS roof (see diagram), resulting in a total of 240 panels. Nominal Power: Panel Efficiency: PTC:
435 W 20.1% 400.2
ROO F MEP
ELEV
.
Savings Calculations: DC System Size: Module efficiency x Array area = (400.2 x 240)/1000 = 96.048 kW
ELEV GREE N ROO F
ATED OPER GREEN R ABLE O SKYL OF WITH IGHT S
SOLA
R PA
NELS
.
UP
ELEV
Renewable Energy Page 33
4 arrays with 60 panels in each array. The space in between for maintenenace access and to be sure the arrays donâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t shade each other.
ROOF
GEOTHERMAL SYSTEM
Type of Loop: Vertical Closed Loop Number of loops: 60 Depth: 500 - 600 ft Spacing: 16-18 ft apart, and 20 ft from the building
CARNEGIE LIBRARY OF Hamilton Ave
STORAGE N
IO
PT
CE
ve N La ng A
PLAYGROUND
cistern location
BASK
E
RAG
STO DISPLAY SCREENS
ETBA
SECRETARY
LL C
32
CONFERENCE
OURT
.5
ft
RE
UP
HALF
STORAGE
VP COUNSELING
RACKS
BUS DROP OFF
NURSE
BIKE
ELEV.
UP
PRINCIPAL
GYM/AUDITORIUM
SICK BAY
MAIN ENTERANCE
Novelty St
48-432 Environment II: Design Integration of Active Building Systems Ghalya Alsanea | Chitika Vasudeva
NAZERINE BAPTIST CHURCH
UP UP
Geothermal Borefield
DISPLAY AND GATHERING
STORAGE + SERVICE
er Way
OUTDOOR SERVICE AREA
HANDS ON STUDENT KITCHEN
GREENHOUSE CAFETERIA GARDEN THINK LAB
OUTDOOR GARDEN
RAIN GARDEN + OUTSIDE SEATING & LEARNING AREA
UN
GRO
rain garden
& UND AYGRO OD PL G POOL MIN
EWO
HOM
rk
Pa
Ln
ive
Dr
-
SWIM
Renewable Energy Page 34