Benchmark reference: Biodiversity Overlay Code - Table 8.2.3.3.1 – Assessment Benchmarks Bushfire Hazard Overlay Code - Table 8.2.4.3.1 – Acceptable Outcome 2.
Reasons for the approval despite noncompliance with benchmark: Compliance with Biodiversity Overlay Code – Table 8.2.4.3.1 via endorsed Ecological Assessment Report. Compliance with Bushfire Hazard Overlay Code – Table 8.2.4.3.1 – Performance Outcome 2 via a condition. Compliance with Bushfire Hazard Overlay Code.
Bushfire Hazard Overlay Code - Table 8.2.4.3.1 – Acceptable Outcome 3, 4.1 and 4.2. Bushfire Hazard Overlay Code - Table Compliance with Bushfire Hazard Overlay 8.2.4.3.1 – Acceptable Outcome 5.1 to 5.3. Code – Table 8.2.4.3.1 – Acceptable Outcome 5.1 to 5.3 via a condition. Steep Land Overlay Code – Table Compliance with Steep Land Overlay Code 8.2.12.3.1 – Assessment Benchmarks – Table 8.2.12.3.1 – via a condition. Emerging Community Zone Code – Compliance with Emerging Community 6.2.19.3.1 – Acceptable Outcome 4.1. Zone Code – 6.2.19.3.1 – Performance Outcome 4. Development Design Code – 9.3.2.3.1 – Compliance with Development Design Acceptable Outcome 1.1 to 3.2. Code – Table 9.3.2.3.1 – Acceptable Outcome 1.1 to 3.2 via a condition. Development Design Code – 9.3.2.3.1 – Compliance with Development Design Acceptable Outcome 5.2 and 6. Code – Table 9.3.2.3.1 – Acceptable Outcome 5.2 and via a condition. Development Design Code – 9.3.2.3.1 – Compliance with Development Design Acceptable Outcome 8.1 to 8.3. Code – Table 9.3.2.3.1 – Acceptable Outcome 8.1 to 8.3 10 via a condition. Development Design Code – 9.3.2.3.1 – Compliance with Development Design Acceptable Outcome 13. Code – Table 9.3.2.3.1 – Acceptable Outcome 13 via a condition. Development Design Code – 9.3.2.3.1 – Compliance with Development Design Acceptable Outcome 31. Code – Table 9.3.2.3.1 – Acceptable Outcome 31 via a condition. Landscaping Code – 9.3.5.3.1 – Compliance with Landscaping Code – Assessment Benchmarks. Table 9.3.5.3.1 – via a condition.
Relevant Matters under Section 45(5)(b) of the Act that the Development was Assessed Against: N/A Matters raised in Submissions and Council’s response in dealing with these matters: Submission The Shores Estate The intent of the Shores Estate was for residential lots that had a building covenant on them to ensure minimum development standards were upheld by the purchaser.
Officer's Response The Shores Estate Development Permit was approved to facilitate residential lots complemented by future dwelling houses. The Development Permit did not include a Plan of Development or Code to further restrict Dwelling Houses; this is generally regulated by
