Benchmarking and best practices Bettina Tang Tang People Mobility
Benchmarking Total support need met? Partners Quality: 5.8
Not met 38%
(HR) Managers Quality: 6.2 Met 62% Not met 43%
Met 57%
Participants: 580 partners/100 Managers, 2011 Survey Quality: 1 = very poor, 10 = very good Managers: Mix of HR Mangers, Mobility responsible, Expat managers, Service Providers Copyright Global Connection
Benchmarking Critical moments Considered not to go, or to end prematurely => P 36% (M 28%) Pre-departure P : 41% M : 58%
1st half posting P : 48% M : 53%
2nd half posting P : 20% M : 10%
Company example: Total => 41% (38%) Pre-departure P : 78% M : 67%
1st half posting P : 22% M : 56%
2nd half posting P : 0% M : 11%
Source: Impact survey 2011. P = Partners, M = Managers Copyright Global Connection
Key points - communication - Awareness - Understanding the benefit - Early involvement / Pre-decision - Direct involvement - Assessment of mobility readiness - Realistic needs assessment - Follow-up during repatriation + next steps
Copyright Global Connection
Key points - networking Local, Internal Company
Sport, Clubs
SPOUSE
Work (paid/unpaid)
Copyright Global Connection
Local, External (e.g. GC)
Key points – cost allocation Location with major expat population
Hub
HQ
Copyright Global Connection