2020-21 Big Ten Leaders

2020-21 BIG TEN TEAM STATISTICS

SCORING OFFENSE G Pts. Avg.

1. Maryland 29 2632 90.8 2. Iowa 30 2583 86.1 3. Ohio State 20 1604 80.2 4. Michigan 22 1657 75.3 5. Michigan State 24 1804 75.2 6. Rutgers 19 1427 75.1 7. Indiana 27 2010 74.4

8. Penn State 24 1740 72.5

9. Nebraska 26 1808 69.5 10. Minnesota 21 1443 68.7 11. Northwestern 25 1684 67.4 12. Purdue 23 1523 66.2 13. Wisconsin 24 1514 63.1 14. Illinois 23 1370 59.6

SCORING DEFENSE G Pts. Avg.

1. Rutgers 19 1097 57.7 2. Indiana 27 1618 59.9 3. Northwestern 25 1528 61.1 4. Michigan 22 1427 64.9 5. Michigan State 24 1650 68.8 6. Maryland 29 2000 69.0 7. Illinois 23 1611 70.0 8. Ohio State 20 1401 70.1 9. Nebraska 26 1822 70.1 10. Purdue 23 1690 73.5 11. Wisconsin 24 1818 75.8

12. Penn State 24 1825 76.0

13. Minnesota 21 1653 78.7 14. Iowa 30 2409 80.3

SCORING MARGIN G Off. Def. Mar.

1. Maryland 29 90.8 69.0 21.8 2. Rutgers 19 75.1 57.7 17.4 3. Indiana 27 74.4 59.9 14.5 4. Michigan 22 75.3 64.9 10.5 5. Ohio State 20 80.2 70.1 10.2 6. Michigan State 24 75.2 68.8 6.4 7. Northwestern 25 67.4 61.1 6.2 8. Iowa 30 86.1 80.3 5.8 9. Nebraska 26 69.5 70.1 -0.5

10. Penn State 24 72.5 76.0 -3.5

11. Purdue 23 66.2 73.5 -7.3 12. Minnesota 21 68.7 78.7 -10.0 13. Illinois 23 59.6 70.0 -10.5 14. Wisconsin 24 63.1 75.8 -12.7

FREE THROW PCT G FTM FTA Pct.

1. Iowa 30 396 495 0.800 2. Maryland 29 451 571 0.790 3. Rutgers 19 227 297 0.764 4. Michigan 22 342 460 0.743 5. Minnesota 21 267 361 0.740 6. Nebraska 26 305 420 0.726 7. Indiana 27 376 524 0.718 8. Ohio State 20 302 427 0.707 9. Wisconsin 24 282 401 0.703

10. Penn State 24 248 362 0.685

11. Purdue 23 257 376 0.684 12. Illinois 23 248 366 0.678 13. Michigan State 24 303 451 0.672 14. Northwestern 25 334 507 0.659

FIELD GOAL PCT G FGM FGA Pct.

1. Iowa 30 949 1849 0.513 2. Maryland 29 972 1961 0.496 3. Rutgers 19 534 1143 0.467 4. Indiana 27 761 1675 0.454 5. Michigan 22 598 1331 0.449 6. Michigan State 24 673 1502 0.448 7. Ohio State 20 583 1335 0.437 8. Nebraska 26 659 1553 0.424

9. Penn State 24 649 1568 0.414

10. Purdue 23 562 1359 0.414 11. Wisconsin 24 565 1398 0.404 12. Minnesota 21 512 1275 0.402 13. Northwestern 25 622 1552 0.401 14. Illinois 23 503 1373 0.366

FIELD GOAL PCT DEFENSE G FGM FGA Pct.

1. Indiana 27 607 1616 0.376 2. Rutgers 19 367 976 0.376 3. Nebraska 26 664 1711 0.388 4. Michigan 22 527 1337 0.394 5. Ohio State 20 513 1277 0.402 6. Illinois 23 579 1432 0.404 7. Maryland 29 742 1824 0.407 8. Northwestern 25 550 1332 0.413 9. Michigan State 24 579 1368 0.423 10. Wisconsin 24 665 1570 0.424 11. Iowa 30 905 2034 0.445

12. Penn State 24 692 1549 0.447

13. Purdue 23 635 1419 0.447 14. Minnesota 21 615 1328 0.463

3-POINT FG PCT G 3FGM 3FGA Pct.

1. Iowa 30 289 709 0.408 2. Maryland 29 237 593 0.400 3. Rutgers 19 132 360 0.367 4. Nebraska 26 185 527 0.351

5. Penn State 24 194 569 0.341

6. Michigan State 24 155 470 0.330 7. Minnesota 21 152 465 0.327 8. Ohio State 20 136 420 0.324 9. Purdue 23 142 446 0.318 10. Michigan 22 119 390 0.305 11. Wisconsin 24 102 339 0.301 12. Illinois 23 116 410 0.283 13. Indiana 27 112 400 0.280 14. Northwestern 25 106 395 0.268

3-POINT FG PCT DEFENSE G 3FGM 3FGA Pct.

1. Ohio State 20 96 386 0.249 2. Michigan 22 126 406 0.310

3. Penn State 24 169 542 0.312

4. Indiana 27 138 442 0.312 5. Northwestern 25 135 432 0.313 6. Illinois 23 152 477 0.319 7. Nebraska 26 185 577 0.321 8. Purdue 23 127 396 0.321 9. Michigan State 24 149 460 0.324 10. Wisconsin 24 175 533 0.328 11. Maryland 29 204 616 0.331 12. Iowa 30 250 725 0.345 13. Rutgers 19 123 347 0.354 14. Minnesota 21 161 421 0.382

REBOUNDING OFFENSE G No. Avg.

1. Michigan 22 928 42.2 2. Maryland 29 1193 41.1 3. Ohio State 20 807 40.4 4. Nebraska 26 1024 39.4 5. Indiana 27 1051 38.9 6. Illinois 23 871 37.9

7. Penn State 24 904 37.7

8. Michigan State 24 886 36.9 9. Wisconsin 24 883 36.8 10. Minnesota 21 755 36.0 11. Iowa 30 1068 35.6 12. Purdue 23 811 35.3 13. Rutgers 19 661 34.8 14. Northwestern 25 861 34.4

REBOUNDING DEFENSE G No. Avg.

1. Michigan 22 691 31.4 2. Rutgers 19 613 32.3 3. Maryland 29 972 33.5 4. Michigan State 24 811 33.8 5. Indiana 27 953 35.3 6. Purdue 23 816 35.5 7. Iowa 30 1070 35.7 8. Minnesota 21 777 37.0 9. Northwestern 25 948 37.9 10. Wisconsin 24 923 38.5 11. Nebraska 26 1014 39.0

12. Penn State 24 946 39.4

13. Illinois 23 912 39.7 14. Ohio State 20 813 40.7

REBOUNDING MARGIN G Team Opp. Mar.

1. Michigan 22 928 691 10.8 2. Maryland 29 1193 972 7.6 3. Indiana 27 1051 953 3.6 4. Michigan State 24 886 811 3.1 5. Rutgers 19 661 613 2.5 6. Nebraska 26 1024 1014 0.4 7. Iowa 30 1068 1070 -0.1 8. Purdue 23 811 816 -0.2 9. Ohio State 20 807 813 -0.3 10. Minnesota 21 755 777 -1.0 11. Wisconsin 24 883 923 -1.7 12. Illinois 23 871 912 -1.8

13. Penn State 24 904 946 -1.8

14. Northwestern 25 861 948 -3.5

BLOCKED SHOTS G No. Avg.

1. Nebraska 26 139 5.35 2. Rutgers 19 101 5.32 3. Indiana 27 128 4.74 4. Northwestern 25 102 4.08 5. Michigan State 24 94 3.92 6. Wisconsin 24 94 3.92 7. Ohio State 20 74 3.70 8. Illinois 23 69 3.00 9. Maryland 29 87 3.00 10. Iowa 30 82 2.73 11. Purdue 23 60 2.61

12. Penn State 24 62 2.58

13. Michigan 22 56 2.55 14. Minnesota 21 53 2.52

ASSISTS G No. Avg.

1. Maryland 29 589 20.31 2. Iowa 30 604 20.13 3. Michigan State 24 406 16.92 4. Northwestern 25 398 15.92 5. Michigan 22 343 15.59 6. Nebraska 26 392 15.08 7. Minnesota 21 314 14.95 8. Rutgers 19 284 14.95

9. Penn State 24 356 14.83

10. Indiana 27 386 14.30 11. Ohio State 20 282 14.10 12. Purdue 23 320 13.91 13. Wisconsin 24 302 12.58 14. Illinois 23 279 12.13

STEALS G No. Avg.

1. Rutgers 19 239 12.58 2. Northwestern 25 287 11.48 3. Maryland 29 260 8.97 4. Ohio State 20 176 8.80 5. Michigan State 24 205 8.54

6. Penn State 24 184 7.67

7. Illinois 23 173 7.52 8. Purdue 23 168 7.30 9. Indiana 27 185 6.85 10. Iowa 30 205 6.83 11. Minnesota 21 129 6.14 12. Michigan 22 122 5.55 13. Wisconsin 24 125 5.21 14. Nebraska 26 120 4.62

TURNOVER MARGIN G Team Opp. Mar.

1. Northwestern 25 285 517 9.28 2. Rutgers 19 256 378 6.42 3. Maryland 29 347 473 4.34 4. Indiana 27 299 412 4.19 5. Ohio State 20 251 327 3.80 6. Michigan State 24 344 412 2.83

7. Penn State 24 370 352 -0.75

8. Iowa 30 436 387 -1.63 9. Minnesota 21 322 273 -2.33 10. Michigan 22 344 285 -2.68 11. Illinois 23 412 345 -2.91 12. Nebraska 26 362 267 -3.65 13. Purdue 23 397 310 -3.78 14. Wisconsin 24 409 283 -5.25

2020-21 BIG TEN INDIVIDUAL STATISTICS

SCORING

GP PTS AVG.

1 Caitlin Clark, Iowa 30 1018 26.6 2 Naz Hillmon, Michigan 22 743 23.9 3 Arella Guirantes, Rutgers 19 709 21.3 4 Monika Czinano, Iowa 30 893 19.3 5 Nia Clouden, Michigan State 24 797 18.7 6 Leigha Brown, Michigan 18 604 18.2 7 Ashley Owusu, Maryland 29 902 17.9 8 Mackenzie Holmes, Indiana 27 823 17.8 9 Diamond Johnson, Rutgers 19 636 17.6 10 Diamond Miller, Maryland 29 799 17.3 11 Sam Haiby, Nebraska 26 887 16.8 12 Jacy Sheldon, Ohio State 20 641 16.8 13 Veronica Burton, Northwestern 25 865 16.2 14 Lindsey Pulliam, Northwestern 25 926 15.5 15 Sydney Hilliard, Wisconsin 24 801 15.5 16 Grace Berger, Indiana 27 919 15.4 17 Imani Lewis, Wisconsin 24 743 15.0 18 Kayana Traylor, Purdue 23 801 15.0 19 Dorka Juhasz, Ohio State 17 513 14.6 20 Jasmine Powell, Minnesota 18 577 14.5 21 Sara Scalia, Minnesota 16 543 14.5 22 Ali Patberg, Indiana 27 921 14.0

23 Johnasia Cash, Penn State 24 577 13.7

24 Isabelle Bourne, Nebraska 22 668 13.6

25 Makenna Marisa,Penn State24 763 13.4 REBOUNDING GP REB. AVG.

1 Naz Hillmon, Michigan 22 251 11.4 2 Dorka Juhasz, Ohio State 17 188 11.1

3 Johnasia Cash, Penn State 24 211 8.8

4 Imani Lewis, Wisconsin 24 210 8.8 5 McKenna Warnock, Iowa 29 232 8.0 6 Kennedi Myles, Illinois 23 184 8.0 7 Fatou Diagne, Purdue 23 183 8.0 8 Jeanae Terry, Illinois 23 179 7.8 9 Mackenzie Holmes, Indiana 27 206 7.6 10 Bella Cravens, Nebraska 23 174 7.6

FIELD GOAL PCT GP FG-A PCT.

1 Monika Czinano, Iowa 30 254-380 .668 2 Naz Hillmon, Michigan 22 197-316 .623 3 Mackenzie Holmes, Indiana 27 202-333 .607 4 Leigha Brown, Michigan 18 114-218 .523 5 Diamond Johnson, Rutgers 19 124-242 .512 6 Diamond Miller, Maryland 29 178-352 .506 7 Ashley Owusu, Maryland 29 199-404 .493 8 Jacy Sheldon, Ohio State 20 123-252 .488 9 Dorka Juhasz, Ohio State 17 103-214 .481 10 Sydney Hilliard, Wisconsin 24 147-307 .479 11 Caitlin Clark, Iowa 30 266-564 .472

12 Johnasia Cash, Penn State 24 136-289 .471 3-POINT FG PCT. (MIN 2.5 3PT/G) GP FG-A PCT.

1 Katie Benzan, Maryland 29 93-186 .500 2 Diamond Johnson, Rutgers 19 50-110 .455 3 Caitlin Clark, Iowa 30 116-286 .406 4 Sara Scalia, Minnesota 16 44-131 .336

FREE THROW PCT. GP FT-A PCT.

1 Arella Guirantes, Rutgers 19 99-114 .868 2 Caitlin Clark, Iowa 30 151-176 .858 3 Madison Greene, Ohio State 15 60-70 .857 4 Jacy Sheldon, Ohio State 20 56-68 .824 5 Sam Haiby, Nebraska 26 120-147 .816 6 Kayana Traylor, Purdue 23 96-120 .800 7 Veronica Burton, Northwestern 25 132-166 .795 8 Diamond Miller, Maryland 29 107-135 .793 9 Mackenzie Holmes, Indiana 27 76-97 .784 10 Nia Clouden, Michigan State 24 103-132 .780

ASSISTS GP NO. AVG.

1 Caitlin Clark, Iowa 30 213 7.1 2 Ashley Owusu, Maryland 29 171 5.9 3 Jasmine Powell, Minnesota 18 98 5.4 4 Arella Guirantes, Rutgers 19 98 5.2

5 Makenna Marisa, Penn State24 121 5.0

6 Veronica Burton, Northwestern 25 123 4.9 7 Grace Berger, Indiana 27 124 4.6 8 Sam Haiby, Nebraska 26 115 4.4 9 Jeanae Terry, Illinois 23 101 4.4 10 Madison Greene, Ohio State 15 65 4.3

STEALS GP NO. AVG.

1 Veronica Burton, Northwestern 25 96 3.8 2 Tekia Mack, Rutgers 16 48 3.0 3 Sydney Wood, Northwestern 25 65 2.6 4 Diamond Johnson, Rutgers 19 44 2.3 5 Arella Guirantes, Rutgers 19 41 2.2 6 Madison Layden, Purdue 23 48 2.1 7 Mael Gilles, Rutgers 19 38 2.0 8 Gabbie Marshall, Iowa 30 57 1.9 9 Jeanae Terry, Illinois 23 41 1.8 10 Jacy Sheldon, Ohio State 20 35 1.8 --

16 Shay Hagans, Penn State 24 38 1.6 3-POINT FG MADE GP NO. AVG.

1 Caitlin Clark, Iowa 30 116 3.9 2 Katie Benzan, Maryland 29 93 3.2

3 Maddie Burke, Penn State 24 58 2.4

4 Chloe Bibby, Maryland 29 57 2.0 5 Gabbie Marshall, Iowa 30 57 1.9 6 McKenna Warnock, Iowa 29 51 1.8 7 Diamond Johnson, Rutgers 19 50 2.6 8 Madison Layden, Purdue 23 45 2.0 9 Sara Scalia, Minnesota 16 44 2.8 10 Alyza Winston, Michigan State 23 43 1.9

BLOCKED SHOTS GP NO. AVG.

1 Mackenzie Holmes, Indiana 27 80 3.0 2 Kate Cain, Nebraska 26 72 2.8 3 Arella Guirantes, Rutgers 19 34 1.8 4 Tyia Singleton, Rutgers 19 27 1.4 5 Julia Ayrault, Michigan State 19 24 1.3 6 Julie Pospisilova, Wisconsin 23 27 1.2 7 Aaliyah Patty, Ohio State 18 21 1.2 8 Bella Cravens, Nebraska 23 26 1.1 9 Sydney Wood, Northwestern 25 28 1.1

10 Johnasia Cash, Penn State 24 26 1.1.2 ASSIST/TURNOVER RATIO A TO RATIO 1 Niya Beverley, Penn State 62 16 3.9

2 Katie Benzan, Maryland 96 26 3.7 3 Veronica Burton, Northwestern 123 43 2.9 4 Kate Martin, Iowa 120 48 2.5 5 Madison Greene, Ohio State 65 28 2.3 6 Grace Berger, Indiana 124 55 2.3 7 Ashley Owusu, Maryland 171 76 2.3 8 Tory Ozment, Michigan State 70 32 2.2 9 Braxtin Miller, Ohio State 59 27 2.2 10 Ali Patberg, Indiana 99 49 2.0

OFFENSIVE REBOUNDS GP NO. AVG.

1 Naz Hillmon, Michigan 22 106 4.8 2 Fatou Diagne, Purdue 23 77 3.3 3 Chloe Bibby, Maryland 29 73 2.5 4 Dorka Juhasz, Ohio State 17 72 4.2 5 Mackenzie Holmes, Indiana 27 69 2.6 6 Taiyier Parks, Michigan State 24 68 2.8 7 Aleksa Gulbe, Indiana 27 65 2.4

8 Johnasia Cash, Penn State 24 63 2.6

9 Kadiatou Sissoko, Minnesota 20 59 3.0 10 Mimi Collins, Maryland 29 58 2.0

DEFENSIVE REBOUNDS GP NO. AVG.

1 McKenna Warnock, Iowa 29 196 6.8 2 Grace Berger, Indiana 27 160 5.9 3 Caitlin Clark, Iowa 30 158 5.3 4 Imani Lewis, Wisconsin 24 157 6.5 5 Johnasia Cash, Penn State 24 148 6.2 6 Naz Hillmon, Michigan 22 145 6.6 7 Mackenzie Holmes, Indiana 27 137 5.1 8 Kennedi Myles, Illinois 23 135 5.9 9 Bella Cravens, Nebraska 23 133 5.8 10 Jeanae Terry, Illinois 23 131 5.7

MINUTES PLAYED GP NO. AVG.

1 Arella Guirantes, Rutgers 19 709 37.3 2 Lindsey Pulliam, Northwestern 25 926 37.0 3 Jada Peebles, Illinois 23 814 35.4 4 Kayana Traylor, Purdue 23 801 34.8 5 Veronica Burton, Northwestern 25 865 34.6 6 Sydney Wood, Northwestern 25 861 34.4 7 Braxtin Miller, Ohio State 19 653 34.4 8 Tekia Mack, Rutgers 16 548 34.3 9 Sam Haiby, Nebraska 26 887 34.1 10 Ali Patberg, Indiana 27 921 34.1