ASMC’s Sugar Policy Insights publication – first launched November 2018 - looks at key policy and market issues of importance to the viability of Australia’s sugar industry.
SECTION
7
MILLING AND MARKETING
Public sentiment and sugar O B y Julie Iommi, Director, Communications ASMC ASMC Chairman John Pratt.
Our areas of focus are to: O Enhance trade policy and market access outcomes; O Strengthen our social license to operate; O Advocate industry responsive government policies; O Ensure research strategy and governance that delivers results; and, O Promote industry revitalisation that fuels investment
ASMC members Australian Sugar Milling Council members own and run 18 sugar mills, which produce 93 per cent of Australia’s raw sugar. The current members are: O Isis Central Mill Company Limited; O Mackay Sugar Limited; O MSF Sugar Limited; O Tully Sugar Limited; O Wilmar Sugar Australia Limited; and, O ASMC Board. The Sugar Milling Council Board currently consists of seven (7) Directors including a Chair and two (2) Deputy Chairs. Board members are nominated by the represented member companies.
John Pratt Mike Barry Mark Day Shayne Rutherford Shunjie Guo John Gorringe
(Wilmar Sugar) Chairman (MSF Sugar) Deputy Chairman (Mackay Sugar) (Wilmar Sugar) (Tully Sugar) (Isis Central Sugar Mill)
T
HE public conversation about sugar has changed dramatically over recent years. Sugar has been labelled the new ‘fat’ and is seen by some as a leading cause of rising obesity levels within the community. Misunderstandings about the natural origins of sugar – from the sugarcane plant – and questions about the production and refining process have raised concerns about ‘naturalness’ and accusations of sugar being ‘toxic.’ ASMC and Canegrowers set out to understand the impact of anti-sugar ‘noise’ on the community using an online survey. Drawing on theory from the field of risk communications, the goal of the survey was to determine whether there was a gap between the technical assessment of risk e.g. sugar as a carbohydrate and the public’s perception of and feelings about the risk e.g. ‘is sugar bad for me?’ Working on the basis that sugar is a low risk product, especially when consumed by healthy individuals as part of an active lifestyle, the survey quantified the degree to which consumer confusion has reduced belief in this ‘fact.
Julie Iommi.
Key findings and discussion O Health was the dominant concern when people were asked what they ‘felt about sugar’ (Figure 1): • 49 per cent were negative or very negative about sugar and health; and, • Professional women (over 35 and earning over $100,000) were more likely to be critical of sugar and be ‘very negative’ about sugar and health. O Groups considered to be ‘at risk’ from sugar as it relates to health were identified as: • The overweight; • People who eat high amounts of sugar; and/or. • People with diabetes. AUSTRALIAN SUGARCANE ANNUAL 2019 — 59
