Evidence Based Analysis_Daylighting & Energy_Report

Page 1

EVIDENCE-BASEDANALYSISREPORT:CLIMATE6A

Abstract

Thispapercoverstheworkflows,decision-making,and finalresultsofasimulationstudyperformedona shoeboxmodelofanapartmentwithabedroomand officeprograminAugusta,Maine.Afteranalyzingthe climateandsitetoidentifyenvironmentalproperties affectingthemodel,thebaselinecasewassimulatedand analyzedfordaylightandthermalcomfortconditions. Pointsofimprovementwerethenidentified.Basedon thosepoints,variableswerechosentoiterateand determinetheresultwiththebest-balancedconditions Fromthere,multiplestepsoftheiterativeprocesswere conductedbywayofthesameprocess:identifying concernsfollowedbyiteratingimpactful,relevant variablesandthenselectingtheidealoptionwith balancedresultantdaylightingandthermalcomfort conditions Theconcludedversionoftheshoeboxmodel showsoveralldaylightingandthermalimprovementfrom thebaselineandabenchmarkinganalysisisperformedto depictit Theoverallstudywasconductedusingthe followingprograms:Rhinoceros,Grasshopper,Ladybug, Honeybee,andDesignExplorer.

TheSite-Augusta,Maine

AugustaisthecapitalcityofMaineinthenortheast UnitedStates AccordingtoASHRAE,thecityislocated inclimatezone6A,acold,moistclimate.The DepartmentofEnergy’sTMY3filewaschosenforthe studywithdatacollectedneartheAugustaairport Itis importanttonotethatthelocationofrecordeddataisnot thesameasthelocationofthesiteforthestudywhich wouldresultinsomedifferencesinmicroclimatemaking theresultsnotdirectlyapplicable Thesimulationshould beaddressedsubjectivelytakingthosenuancesin microclimateintoaccountandadjustedperaprojectsite nearAugusta

TheClimate-Zone6A

Themacroclimateanalysisforthisclimatefocusedonthe overalltemperaturerangesintheareathroughoutthe year,therelativehumiditylevels,andthesolarangles

throughouttheyear Thewindwasnotconsideredtoo heavilyduetotheficklenatureofwindbeingsohighly dependentonimmediatesurroundingswhicharevery differentfromanydatathatwouldbecollectedonan airportsite Uponinvestigation,itwasfoundthat64%of hoursareoutsidethecomfortablerelativehumidityrange between40and70percent Alargeportionofthose hoursisover70%humidityasidentifiedonagenerated psychrometricchart.Thedewpointtemperaturewas assumedtobeamoreaccuraterepresentationofthe seasonaltemperaturesduetothepresenceofhigh humidityyear-round Theassumedcomfortable temperaturewasassumedtobeanythingabove18oC takingintoaccountthelikelihoodthatindividualsinthis areawouldhaveahighertolerancetocooler temperaturesthanthetypicallyassumedcomfortable temperaturerangeof22oC-26oC) Thesummershave a fewhoursabove18oCandthetemperaturepeaksat around28oC.Itisacceptabletoassumethatthemajority oftheyearhaslowerthancomfortabletemperaturesand thereforehasahighheatingload Basedontheclimate analysis,94%ofhoursarebelow18oCdewpoint temperature.

Image 2.2: Psychrometric Chart with Established Comfort Hours Identified

1

TheBuilding&Unit

Theshoeboxmodelislocatedonthe5 6-storymid-rise,wood-framedresiden fabricofAugusta,Maineislargelylow structureswithinterspersedopenlands tothis,thebuildingissurroundedby2 structures,leavingthe5thfloorunobst elementsineverydirection Thesolar buildingonthesiteisheaviestonthes theeastandwestreceivedabitlessan receivesnone However,evenatthepe onthebuildingisquitelowat25kWh/m2 sowhileit mightnotimpartmuchlongwaveradiationandprovide heat,itwillstillplayabigroleindaylighting.Totake advantageoftheavailableradiation,thebuildingis orientedwithalongersouthfacade

Image 3.1: Building & Site (left)

Theunitonthe5thfloorisa15mx10m,150m2 residentialprogram.Basedonthesiteanalysisthatwas done,theofficeprogramwasplacedontheeastsoit wouldreceivemoredaylightduringoccupiedhoursfor thatprogramtype.Becausetherearefloorsaboveand belowthetestedunit,thefloorandceilingoftheunitare assumedtobeadiabatic Thebaselinewindowwallratios

inthebedroom.UponanalyzingtheUDIdaylightingand thePMVcomfortconditions,thefollowingconclusions weremade:

● TheAverageUDIintheofficeislowerthanin thebedroom Itneedstobeincreasedtoatleast 50%.Duetothenatureoftheprogramandthe occupancybeinglargelybetween8AMand6 PM,improvingusefuldaylightingconditionsin nt

r2000luxis ncethatistoo ce.Infrontof 00lux50%of hichneedstobe mfortable lycool,the 50%ofthe thebaseline nergyusagefor

theunit.Thechartsdepictedthatthelargestloadforthe unitisheatingwhichisaccuratetotheassumption The glareanalysiswasconductedforapersonsittingonthe couchinthebedroomfacingsouthandforaperson sittingatthedeskfacingeastforthebaselinecondition Itwasrevealedthatalargeportionoftheviewsfromthat angleonthecouchanddeskthatwerechosenhavea veryhighchanceofvisualdiscomfort Theglareanalysis forthefinaliterationmustbeconductedforadifferent furniturelayoutoradifferentanglewithrespecttothe southwindow.

TheFirstRoundofIteration

UnitLength,WWR,andWindowU-Value

Theiterationsweregroupedintotworounds:thefirst wouldidentifyacasewithabalancebetweenthermal comfortandproperdaylighting,andthesecondwould focusonreducingtheEnergyUseIntensity.

comfort.ItwasalsonotedthattheU-valueshada negativerelationshipwiththermalcomfortandapositive relationshipwiththeEUIasexpected Thelowerthe U-value,thehigherthethermalcomfortandthelowerthe EUI AnimportantthingtonoteistherangeofEUI increasedfromthebaselinebutbecausethisiteration prioritizedimprovingdaylighting&comfort,theEUIis prioritizedinthesecondroundofiteration

Image 5 4a: Identifying Both Results

Forthe wouldb dayligh Threeb WWRs resultin wallrat dayligh impacti opening radiationlevels.TheU-valuewilldirectlyimpactthermal comfortbyinsulatingthespaceandretaininginternal heatgaininacoldclimate

The81iterationsweredepictedinDesignExplorerand thenfilteredtoidentifythetwobestoptions Forthefirst option,thehighestAverageUDIwasprioritized especiallyintheofficespace Forthesecondoption,the highest%oftimeincomfortintheofficeandbedroom wasprioritized.Uponfurtherinspectionofthefinaltwo options,itwasnoticedthattheWWRcombinationsfor bothwerethesamebuttheunitlengthsweredifferent The20munitlengthresultedinahigherUDIwhilethe 15mlengthoptionresultedinahigher%oftimein

Image 5.4b: Identifying Both Results WindowU-Value

Tomakeamoreinformeddecision,theU-value032and thetworesultantlengthswereiteratedwiththreelower U-values BecauseoftheU-value'srelationshipwith thermalcomfortandEUI,these8iterationswouldhelp establishabestcaseassumingtheUDIvalueswould remainintheacceptablerangeastheU-valuewouldnot impactthedaylighting Oncetheresultswereavailable,

theoptionwiththehighest%oftimecomfortable& PMVcomfortandwinter-timeMeanRadiant Temperaturehasselected:a20munitlengthwitha U-Valueof0.1resultinginalmost20kWh/m2 lessEUI andslightlyhigher%PPDcomfortthantheprevioustwo options Tovisualizethecomfortinthespace(seeImage 5.6intheappendix),thePMVcomfort(anyvalues betweenslightlywarmandslightlycool)wasanalyzed and100%PMVcomfortisachievedinbothspaces

The%oftimecomfortableis6%lowerinthebedroom and2%lowerintheofficethaninthebaselinedespite improvingthewindowU-valueanditerating window-to-wallratiosandbuildingdimensions However,thisnewoptionimprovestheUDIconditions whichareofhighconcerninourprogram.Comparedto thebaseline,theUDIforthebedroomincreasedbyabout 4kWh/m2 whilefortheofficeitincreasedby22kWh/m2 Totrytofindabalancebetweentheimproved daylightingconditionsthatareachievedinthisstepwhile increasingcomfortandreducingEUI,thenextroundof iterationschangesthewallR-value

TheSecondRoundofIteration

WallR-Value

Fromhere,theR-valuesneededtobeassessedfurtherto seeiftheywouldbringdowntheEUI R-valuehasa positiverelationshipwiththeinsulativepropertiesofa structuresoinacold,climateahigherR-valuewould

comfortlevelswouldbebetterthanbefore.Buttherange oftheoutputswasnottoomuchbetterthantheprevious resultintermsofPPD&PMVthermalcomfortandEUI TofurthertrytoreducetheEUIandincreasecomfortand wintertimeMRT,otherfactorssuchasinfiltrationand occupancyschedulesneededtobeadjusted Asaresult, wewilluseR-32forthewallsmovingforward.

InfiltrationRate

ThenextsteptoreducetheEUIandincreasethermal comfortwastoassignalowinfiltrationratetosignifya tightbuildingandassignoccupancyschedulesspecificto thetwoprograms Torecounttheestablishedparameters thatimpactthermalcomfort:thewallR-valueishighat R-32andthewindowU-valueislowat0.1.Theunit dimensionsandWWRswereestablishedthroughthe previousiterationoftheprocesstoimprovetheUDIand DAvalues.Thesebuildingmetricsthatwereconcluded werethentestedwiththreeinfiltrationratestoreducethe EUIandincreasecomfort

Image 6 1: Second Round of Iteration - R-Value

AccordingtothetypicalrelationshipbetweenR-value andthermalcomfort,itwasexpectedthattheEUIand

Theinfiltrationrateshadapositiverelationshipwiththe EUI Thelowertheinfiltration,thelowertheEUI The bestinfiltrationratewasfoundtobe0.0001m3/s-m2 signifyingatightbuildingenvelope.Theoccupancy schedulesindicatedthehoursofoccupancyforthespace informingthesimulationofwhenthespacewouldlikely beusedduringthecourseoftheday,resultinginmore accuratevaluesofenergyloads TheresultingtotalEUI isthelowestithasbeensofarat19604kWh/m2 witha lowinfiltrationrate.TheheatingEUIhascomedownby almost50kWh/m2 However,thecoolingEUIhas increasedbyabout20kWh/m2 Theheatingloadsthat werecreatedbyinfiltrationarenowreducedinthenew unit.Basedonthebalancechart,thesolargaininthe summermonthsiscreatingtheneedformechanical cooling

TheFinalRoundofIteration Shading

Afteranalyzingdaylightingmetricsandthebalancechart fortheresultingoption,aneedtoimproveusefulUDI andreducecoolingend-useloadwasidentified Tomore selectivelyimprovetheUDIandcoolingend-useload,

shadingcouldbeappliedatvaryingdepthstocutoff specificsunanglesinthesummerandspring Because theexcessiveUDIvalues(above2000lux)wereallright infrontofthewindow,itisdeducedthatsteepsunangles inthesummermonthscontributegreatly Tocombatthis, threedepthsforshadingonallfacadesweretested:03m, 0.6m,and1m. The0.6mdeepshadingprovidedthe lowestEUIofthethreeoptions Metricsarecomparedto thepreviousunshadedoptionbelow e months,thelargesolargainand l inlowerheatingloads Inthe s , r,thoseparametersresultina highercoolingload.Becausetheclimateislargely dependentonheatingratherthancoolingformoretime intheyear,thereductioninheatingloadisprioritized Introducingnaturalventilationinthesummermonths wouldfurtherreducethecoolingloadandthereforethe totalEUI Thesolargainintheoptionwithshadesis lowerresultinginalowercoolingEUI.Overalladding shadinghelpedreducetheEUIslightlybutitalsoresults inamorebalancedUDIdaylightinginbothrooms

Image 7 2a: Final Iteration UDI within range

Image 7 2b: Final Iteration UDI above 2000 lux

Image 7.2c: Final Iteration - Thermal Comfort

Theglarewasabigissueinthebaselinecasewithmost ofthepointsintimethatwereanalyzedbeingvery visuallyuncomfortablewithhighglare Inthefinal iteration,theinteriorwasarrangedandtheviewwas rotatedtobeperpendiculartotheincomingsourceof light Withthelargestsourceoflightbeingfromthe southinthebedroom,thecouchisfacedwest Inthe office,thedeskwasturned180o tothewesttoavoid directglarefromthesouthandeast.

Conclusions&BenchmarkingwithBaseline

Parameters

Whencompared,thefinaliterationhasdifferent dimensions,differentwindow-to-wallratios,ahigher R-value,alowerU-value,alowerinfiltrationrate,and shadingonitsapertures. (seeImage8.1)

Daylighting&%Comfort

Thechangesinbuildingdimensionsandwindow-to-wall ratiosbroughttheUDIinthebedroom(over100lux)and office(above300lux)over60%whichisatminimum +10%fromthebaseline.TheUDIover2000lux(too highforacomfortabledaylitspace)isaround12-20% Thepercentageoftimewithover2000luxinboththe officeandbedroomwasreduceddramaticallyfromthe basecaseduetotheadditionofshading.Alsoduetothe shading,theunusableUDIpercentage(below100luxfor thebedroomandbelow300luxfortheoffice,islower For10%ofthetimeintheoffice,theUDIdropsbelow the300luxthatisnecessaryforaworkspace However, itisinthebackcornerofthespacewhichiswherethe deskwillnotbeplaced.Whilethedaylightingconditions forthebedroomimprovedabitthroughoutthecourseof theproject,itisimportanttonotethattheofficesawthe mostimprovementinusabledaylighting.Asfor% comfort,thebedroomhad100%ofsensorswithin thermalcomfortinthebaselinebuttheofficewasbelow 50% Thefinaliterationwasabletoincreasethe percentageofsensorsthatarewithinthecomfortrangein theofficeto100%byreducingthewindowU-value, increasingthewallR-value,decreasingtheinfiltration rate,andapplyingoccupancyschedules.

Image 7 4: Final Iteration Glare Analysis
Image 8 1a: Benchmarking: Final to Baseline Image 8 1b: Benchmarking: Final to Baseline

OverallMetricImprovements

Themetricsfor%timeincomfort,averageUDI,average UDIover2000lux,PMVcomfort,andenergyuse intensitywereanalyzednexttoeachotherforthe baselineandfinaliteration ThetotalEUIimprovedby 14%fromthebaseline ThecoolingEUIincreasedby 17%astheprojectattemptedtobringdowntheheating EUImoredramatically(27%).Whilethemeanradiation

temperaturedroppedby7%and2%inthebedroomand officerespectively,itisnotabletomentionthatthe% timeincomfortandthePMVtemperatureintheoffice increasedby19%and105% Ifthestudycontinued further,reducingthecoolingloadbyincludingnatural ventilationwouldbeworthtesting.

Image 8.2: Benchmarking Daylighting Visualization Image 8.3: Chart Depicting Numerical and Percentage Improvement from Baseline
Appendix Image 1 1: Site & chosen TMY3 File location I Image 3 1: Building & Site (left); Solar radiation studies (right) Image 4 1: Baseline Daylighting Visualizations
Image 4 2: Baseline Balance Chart Image 4 Image 5 1: First Round of Iterations Image 5 2: Option 1 - 20m - Prioritizing Average UDI

Image 5 3: Option 2 - 15m - Prioritizing % Comfort

Image 5 5: U-values & Unit Lengths Iteration

Image 5 6: Final Result of Round 1 of Iteration - U-value 0 1 and 20m length

Image 6 2: Second Round of Iterations - R-values

Image 6 3: Second Round of Iterations - Infiltration Rates

8 3:
Image 6 4: Comparison of Second Round Option with Baseline
(left); Energy Balance Charts (right)
Image 6 5: Daylighting Analysis of Finalized Infiltration Rate Option Image 7 3: Final Iteratio Image
Visually Dep

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.