Hawkesbury Post February 2025

Is Richmond Bridge A Dud?

The Richmond Bridge Project, designed to ease congestion and improve travel times across the Hawkesbury River, is facing scrutiny after it was revealed that Transport for NSW (TfNSW) based its traffic forecasts on conservative housing development projections - about half the actual number expected in the next decade.

Underestimating the true scale of development could undermine the project’s claimed benefits, particularly travel time savings, external engineering experts told the Hawkesbury Post.

TfNSW relied on figures provided by Hawkesbury City Council, which included only three developments - Redbank, Vineyard, and Glossodia. However, Council is aware of significantly more housing proposals in the pipeline. In June last year, Council presented a document showing approximately 7,000 new homes were planned or undergoing approval. The recent rezoning of land for an extension of the Redbank development for 300 - 350 homes is not included in the analysis. Council did not respond to the Hawkesbury Post’s inquiries on the matter.

Traffic experts told the Hawkesbury Post that underestimating demand leads to underestimating travel time delays, while overestimating demand leads to inflated congestion projections.

“ The question of what future developments to include in an analysis is subjective. Usually, existing and approved developments are considered in shortrun forecasts. The agency could also do scenarios of other possible developments,” one engineering expert said.

In this case, TfNSW did not model alternative development scenarios. It is unknown whether Hawkesbury Council provided any updated information to TfNSW when they became aware of future projections and new rezonings. As a result, the travel time projections in the report may not align with what residents are being led to expect. If the expected congestion relief is overstated, the bridge’s core purpose—reducing traffic delays—comes into question.

TfNSW’s model assumes that by 2029, Redbank will have 1,400 dwellings. Vineyard, currently with 50 homes, is expected to expand by 2,500 dwellings by 2035. Glossodia’s development, slated to start in 2024, was forecast to deliver 580 dwellings by 2032. However, Council documents seen by the Hawkesbury Post show that the number of proposed and approved developments far exceeds the additional 4,480 homes accounted for in TfNSW’s projections.

Continued on page 6

A Lifetime of Service

"I never expected to get an Order of Australia medal," Aunty Edna told the Hawkesbury Post. "It means that Aboriginal people, not just me, are being recognised for what they've done. And I think all Aboriginal people should be recognised for what they've gone through."

Aunty Edna Watson, a Darug Elder and long-time Oakville resident, has been awarded a Medal of the Order of Australia (OAM) for her extraordinary service to the Indigenous community of New South Wales. The recognition, which came as a surprise to Aunty Edna, acknowledges her lifelong dedication to preserving Darug language and culture, as well as her contributions to nursing, midwifery, and community welfare.

Aunty Edna's journey has not been an easy one. Growing up, she and her sisters endured racism at school, where they were segregated to the back of the classroom and told their education did not matter. "We helped each other get through it," she recalled. "Without my sisters, I don't think I would have made it."

Despite these challenges, she built a remarkable career. After leaving school, she worked at the Hornsby

Knitting Company, where she found kindness and a mentor in her employer who herself had survived the Holocaust. She later became a nurse and midwife, dedicating herself to the health and wellbeing of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities. Her work extended into education, where she developed school curricula to revitalise the Darug language, ensuring its survival for future generations.

Aunty Edna is a quiet achiever, reluctant to speak about her many contributions. However, her expertise was widely sought after. She worked with local councils, the NSW Department of Primary Industries, NSW Reconciliation, TAFE, and Western Sydney University, offering guidance on Indigenous protocol and cultural preservation. She is also an artist and storyteller, a keeper of Darug knowledge who shares her wisdom through programs and artworks.

"I want Aboriginal people to be proud of who they are, to stand up for what they believe in," she said. "That’s the legacy I hope to leave."

Continued on page 4

Bridge Focus

Bridge Plan Unveiled

Transport for NSW has unveiled the next major step in the long-awaited New Richmond Bridge and Traffic Improvements project, releasing the Review of Environmental Factors (REF) for Stage 2. This allows the community an in-depth look at the detailed plans and assessments for the project, which aims to address congestion, enhance flood resilience. It also includes plans to provide pedestrian connectivity between Richmond and North Richmond.

The REF contains 13 comprehensive reports, covering areas such as noise and traffic assessment, hydrology, biodiversity, Aboriginal cultural heritage, and socio-economic impacts. Each report includes an executive summary, making it easier for residents to pinpoint areas of personal interest. Transport for NSW is inviting public feedback on the reports until 21 February 2025.

The $500 million infrastructure project announced amidst much fanfare in 2021 by the then Federal Liberal Government will now only partly be built. The real costs of the project means that the focus will be on building the bridge with associated roads having to wait until more funds are found.

The first stage of the project, Stage 2A, is fully funded and includes the construction of a new four-lane bridge over the Hawkesbury River. Planned to be 10 metres higher than the current 8.4 metre bridge, the new structure is designed to remain operational during a 20-year flood event. The bridge will run about 30 metres downstream from the existing bridge, which will be repurposed as an “active transport route” for pedestrians and cyclists, according to TfNSW.

Stage 2A also includes a 1.7-kilometre bypass south of Richmond town centre, designed to ease congestion in the area.

Bells Line of Road and Kurrajong Road will be widened to create two lanes in each direction, while there will be new footpaths and shared paths for pedestrians and cyclists.

While Stage 2A is expected to begin construction in 2026 and be completed by 2029, the second phase, Stage 2B, remains unfunded, prompting concerns

by 400mm at the bridge and 1.9m across the floodplain. The report states that these changes will lead to overtopping of the bypass road in multiple locations, with depths of up to 1.2m, and increase water levels on nearby properties, including Southee Road and Western Sydney University land.

Despite these projections, climate

The $500 million infrastructure project announced amidst much fanfare in 2021 by the then Federal Liberal Government will now only partly be built. The real costs of the project means that the focus will be on building the bridge with associated roads having to wait until more funds are found.

about extra traffic being duped onto existing roads. Stage 2B would include further widening of Bells Line of Road west of Charles Street and at Crooked Lane, as well as a 1.3-kilometre extension of the bypass from Castlereagh Road to Londonderry Road. Transport for NSW confirmed it will continue seeking funding from state and federal budgets to deliver this stage of the project. Climate change poses a significant challenge to the long-term viability of the project and poses a “medium risk”, with flood modelling indicating increased rainfall intensity will heighten flood levels over time. Under one scenario projected for 2090, rainfall intensity is expected to rise by 9.5%, resulting in a 150mm increase in flood levels at the bridge and up to 800mm across the floodplain during a 5% AEP event. Another scenario predicts even greater impacts, with flood levels rising

change has not been integrated into the current design. Instead, the analysis is limited to sensitivity assessments, leaving the road elevation levels vulnerable. The report states that unless changes are made to road levels the increased flood depths and velocities across the floodplain threaten to reduce the bypass’s flood resilience, undermining its intended purpose and exposing the project to a medium level of risk.

For many residents, the new bridge offers hope of relief from daily traffic woes, but the report reveals traffic numbers were modelled on questionable housing projections for the region leading to questions about real time savings for commuters. Concerns also remain over whether the full bypass will ever come to fruition. Without Stage 2B, critics argue that the benefits of the project will be limited, leaving key bottlenecks unresolved. Transport for NSW has assured

the community that it remains committed to securing the necessary funding to complete the entire vision.

For now, the community is urged to examine the REF and have their say. Feedback will play a crucial role in shaping the project and addressing residents’ concerns. The Hawkesbury Post will provide ongoing coverage, helping residents navigate the reports and their implications.

Federal Member for Macquarie, Susan Templeman, highlighted the importance of community involvement. “The release of the Review of Environmental Factors is a crucial step in this journey. This project began with federal funding announced in 2010 to address Richmond Bridge congestion, and now residents can see the proposed design for a new bridge and bypass. It’s vital for the community to provide feedback to ensure the bridge meets our needs for flood resilience and future growth,” she said.

The REF also outlines measures to address environmental concerns, such as minimising impacts on biodiversity, protecting local waterways, and mitigating noise pollution. Transport for NSW has proposed a range of strategies, including the use of sensitive construction techniques and advanced hydrological modelling to ensure the new infrastructure will not exacerbate flooding elsewhere in the catchment.

The socio-economic impacts of the project are another focus of the REF, with assessments highlighting both short-term disruptions and long-term benefits. Some of the routes rural outlook will become more urban while sites including Hobartville and Colo Soccer Club will feel more significant impacts. During construction, local businesses and residents near the worksites are likely to experience increased noise, dust, and traffic delays.

www.hawkesburypost.com.au

www.facebook.com/hawkesburypost

How to get the News

The Hawkesbury Post is available at all Hawkesbury newsagents free of charge and 100 other local locations.

Online

All stories can be found online. www.hawkesburypost.com.au

New stories are added daily.

The Hawkesbury App

Download from the App Store or Google Play

Contacts

Editorial

info@hawkesburypost.com.au

Advertising trish@hawkesburypost.com.au

Design and production

Design2Pro

Publisher Australian Neighbourhood Media

From the Editor

The Richmond Bridge Project, once promised as a solution to long-standing traffic congestion, is now clouded by concerns over inaccurate data. Residents were assured that travel times would improve and congestion would ease. But

recent revelations show that traffic forecasts were based on outdated projections that fail to account for the true scale of development in the region.

We are running a quick, anonymous survey to help shape the

Hawkesbury City Council is at the center of this issue for failing to update Transport for NSW (TfNSW) with more realistic housing development figures. The data used to model traffic projections only included three developments - Redbank, Vineyard, and Glossodia - despite the Council being aware of at least 7,000 additional homes planned or under approval (not including Vineyard). By not passing along this crucial information, the Council allowed a flawed model to guide critical infrastructure planning.

However, the larger issue is one of accountability and trust. The public deserves accurate, reliable forecasts when it comes to infrastructure that directly impacts their daily lives. Most residents do not have the technical expertise to sift through complex traffic models or long reports. They rely on the professionals and decision-makers behind these projects to provide solutions based on the best available information. When these projections fall short, residents are left questioning whether they can trust the process at all.

What’s also concerning is that this issue is not unique to the Richmond

Bridge Project. As development continues in the region, it’s clear that all planning must account for the full scope of future growth. The lack of updated data in this case points to a broader problem of inadequate foresight when it comes to infrastructure projects in rapidly developing areas.

If future infrastructure projects are to succeed, planning and data must be based on real forecasts, not just confirmed developments or outdated projections. Public trust in these projects is at stake. If the traffic savings cannot be delivered as promised, residents have a right to be told. The lack of transparency on this issue makes it harder for the community to have confidence in similar projects moving forward.

This situation should serve as a wake-up call for all parties involved. Clear communication and transparency must be prioritised, and the community deserves to be fully informed of what’s really possible. Only through honest, accurate data and a commitment to accountability can future infrastructure projects regain the public’s trust. The people of the Hawkesbury deserve better.

Editor, Samantha Magnusson sam@hawkesburypost.com.au

A Lifetime of Service

FROM PAGE 1

While her OAM is a moment of great pride, it is also bittersweet. Just six months ago, Aunty Edna lost her beloved husband, Alan. "I wish he was here. He would be so proud," she said, holding close a teddy bear “Poppy”, made by her grandchildren in his memory. "Everywhere we went, people knew Alan. He made Aboriginal tools and shared his knowledge. Every Friday, the shed was full of people making tools, talking, and sharing stories. He brought people together. I miss him, I miss him so badly.”

The family remains at the heart of Aunty Edna’s life. A mother of sev-

en, with many grandchildren and great-grandchildren, she is deeply connected to her loved ones. "We’re always in contact. That’s very important in a family." Her eldest son, Kevin, now stays with her, making sure she is cared for. "He checks on me three times a night," she said with a smile. "I couldn’t wish for a better son."

Reflecting on her recognition, Aunty Edna remains humble. "It was quite a surprise," she said. "I didn’t really think I would get anything like that." But to the many people whose lives she has touched, her medal is not just an honour - it is a well-earned tribute to a lifetime of quiet, powerful service.

Photo credit Peter Haynes Perspectives

Bridge Focus

Climate Change Overlooked

The new Richmond bridge design does not account for climate change impacts, despite predictions that flood levels could rise by up to 1.75 metres during severe weather events by 2090. A hydrology report from Transport for NSW classifies the impact of climate change as a “medium risk” to the project but concedes it was not factored into the design flood event flows, treating it only as a sensitivity assessment.

The report, which spans 164 pages, dedicates just two to climate change, and none of the 95 maps outlining flood scenarios include any for future climate conditions. Despite this, the report acknowledges that “increased rainfall intensity caused by climate change would reduce the long-term flood immunity service level of the bypass,” potentially leaving critical infrastructure vulnerable.

“The potential consequences to the proposal due to climate change is therefore deemed to be “medium” risk. The increased rainfall intensity caused by climate change would reduce the long-term flood immunity service level of the bypass. Presently, climate change has not been included in the design flood event flows and has been presented as a sensitivity assessment only,” the report said.

Two climate change scenarios were modelled - RCP 4.5 (a predicted rise in temperature of 1.86 degrees Celsius and a corresponding increase in rainfall intensity of 9.5 per cent) and RCP 8.5 (a predicted rise in temperature of 3.68 degrees Celsius and a corresponding increase in rainfall intensity of 19.7 per cent. They were both modelled for the 2090 future scenario for both the 5% AEP and 1% AEP events. “This provides a range of potential impacts with RCP8.5

scenario considered as the worst case scenario,” the report said.

Under a high-emissions scenario, where rainfall intensity increases by nearly 20% by 2090, flood levels during a 1-in20-year (5% AEP) event could rise by 400mm at the bridge and nearly 2 metres across the floodplain. These conditions would result in overtopping of the bypass road, with water depths reaching between 300mm and 1.2 metres. Even under a moderate-emissions scenario, flood levels at the bridge would increase by 150mm, while the floodplain could see a rise of up to 800mm.

The report highlights specific vulnerabilities, including around Southee Road and adjacent Western Sydney University land, where flood levels could rise by up to 150mm in the most severe scenarios. It notes that “flood levels at the New Richmond Bridge increase by approximately 150mm” under moderate conditions and “by 400mm to RL 16.0m RL” in more extreme cases. For rarer but more severe 1-in-100-year (1% AEP) events, the projections are even more concerning, with flood levels at the bridge expected to rise by as much as 1.75 metres.

Although the project aims to ensure flood immunity for 1-in-20-year events, the report acknowledges that refining the road elevation levels during further design may be necessary to address climate risks. However, this recommendation remains limited to moderate scenarios and does not account for the more extreme projections.

“Consideration may be given to refining the road elevation levels during detailed design to provide flood immunity for at least an RCP4.5 5% AEP scenario with no freeboard,” the report said.

Bridge Plans Hits A Dead End

A project promised to ease congestion for long-suffering Richmond commuters has been revealed as incomplete and underfunded, raising serious questions about whether it will ever fulfil its purpose. The long-awaited Richmond Bridge upgrade is proceeding in two stages - but only Stage 2A has secured funding, leaving the crucial Stage 2B in limbo.

Without Stage 2B, the project risks failing to deliver on its key goal: reducing traffic congestion. Instead, traffic will be funnelled onto existing roads that were supposed to be upgraded as part of the plan. Without these upgrades, bottlenecks will remain, potentially worsening congestion rather than alleviating it.

Local Councillor Nathan Zamprogno has slammed the funding shortfall, warning that the half-built project will create more problems than it solves.

“This project has shrunk before our eyes, and commuters are no longer getting what was promised by both major

parties. Dumping traffic back into the main street of North Richmond rather than a bypass is the wrong solution,” Zamprogno said.

“Building the bridge without all the approach roads will condemn us to years of further congestion. With a federal election looming, both the major party candidates need to clearly state whether the next government will fully fund the whole project,” he said.

The Richmond Bridge upgrade was first announced in 2021 in a highly publicised event starring then-Prime Minister Scott Morrison and a host of Liberal politicians all vying for a bite of the credit for the project delivery. The $500 million commitment was hailed as a major infrastructure boost, but after the Coalition lost the federal election in 2022, it became clear that many projects - including the Warragamba Dam wall expansion - were unfunded or underfunded.

Stage 2A, which will go ahead, includes a new four-lane bridge over the Hawkesbury River, standing 10

metres higher than the current bridge to improve flood resilience. It also includes widening parts of Bells Line of Road and building a bypass south of Richmond. However, without Stage 2B - intended to upgrade key intersections and extend the bypass - traffic will be funnelled for example, back onto two lanes at Bells Line of Road at North Richmond.

Transport for NSW has confirmed that the second stage is on hold indefinitely. “The timing of Stage 2B would be subject to available funding, and Transport will continue to seek funding in upcoming State and Federal budgets to deliver the rest of the upgrades,”TfNSW said.

For local residents, this raises a fundamental question: Was the community misled? The project was sold as a game-changer for traffic flow, but without Stage 2B, it risks becoming little more than an expensive half-measure.

Stage 2A, which is funded, features a new four-lane bridge over the Hawkesbury River, approximately 30 metres

downstream of the existing bridge. The bridge will be built 10 metres higher than the current structure, designed to remain open during a 20-year flood event. The stage also includes: Widening of Bells Line of Road through North Richmond to create two lanes in each direction.

A 1.7-kilometre bypass south of Richmond town centre, spanning the floodplain between Kurrajong Road and Castlereagh Road.

A new shared path on the southern side of Kurrajong Road for pedestrians and cyclists. Conversion of the existing Richmond Bridge into an active transport route. Stage 2B, currently unfunded, will impact North Richmond and includes further widening of Bells Line of Road west of Charles Street and at Crooked Lane. Parts of the project east of the river will also be impacted - a 1.3-kilometre bypass extension from Castlereagh Road to Londonderry Road, and upgrades to the Londonderry Road/ Vines Drive intersection.

Bridge Focus

Is Richmond Bridge A Dud?

FROM PAGE 1

A surge in development west of the Hawkesbury River could bring more than 7,000 new dwellings in the coming years, excluding the 2,500 in Vineyard.

According to the document, developers have plans to construct housing estates spanning more than 1,500 acres in North Richmond, Glossodia, Freemans Reach, and Grose Wold - all of which would impact traffic on the new bridge.

Based on the limited developments supplied by Council, TfNSW’s modelling predicts reduced travel time. For example it forecasts reduced congestion in Richmond and North Richmond. The model claims that by 2029, westbound travel times during peak periods will drop by over one and a half minutes due to the new bypass. However, if the actual number of new developments proceeds as expected, these travel time savings are unlikely to materialise.

TfNSW told the Hawkesbury Post that it will assess the traffic impacts of additional developments through its normal planning process when referrals are received from Council.

“The traffic modelling includes the developments approved by Hawkesbury City Council at the time the modelling

was undertaken. However, it assumes additional traffic growth in the wider network due to further housing development in the area. The proposed new Richmond Bridge would support future traffic growth beyond existing projections,” a TfNSW spokesperson said.

Critics argue that outdated modelling has created an overly optimistic picture of the project’s benefits. “The problem isn’t just the incorrect data,” the engineering expert said. “It’s that this data is shaping decisions about infrastructure spending and future planning that will affect the region for decades.”

Residents and councillors have raised concerns about the growing disconnect between promised infrastructure improvements and the realities on the ground. Hawkesbury Greens Councillor Danielle Wheeler has long criticised this approach. “There’s this really invidious idea that if you take that development, then you get the infrastructure to cope with the development,” Wheeler said.

“When we know that that never happens, or if it does happen, it happens ten years later. And that’s too late for the people who are already living here. And it’s too late for people who are buying there as well. They have been sold a dummy.”

Bridge Focus

Flood Trade-Off for New Bridge

A hydrology report on the proposed Richmond Bridge and bypass warns that the project could worsen flooding in parts of the Hawkesbury region, potentially affecting some properties and threatening the longterm resilience of the infrastructure itself. The findings highlight both the challenges of building on Australia’s most flood-prone floodplain and the need for further refinement in the project’s design.

The assessment highlights that while the new bridge and bypass are designed to remain usable during a 1-in-20-year flood, some properties in the area could experience increased flooding. The report notes that during a 1-in-50-year flood, up to 15 properties may face water level rises of up to 83mm. These impacts, though described as minor, underscore the vulnerability of the floodplain to development

The report states that while the bridge and bypass are designed to remain trafficable during a 1-in-20-year flood event (5% Annual Exceedance Probability (AEP) flood), with 300mm of freeboard for flood immunity, some homes and properties may experience increased flooding. At least 15 properties could see water levels rise by up to 83mm during a 1-in-50-year flood event (2% AEP), and isolated locations could face greater impacts exceeding 50mm. The report acknowledges these increases as "relatively minor" but stresses the need for refinements to the design to mitigate these effects, especially as floor-level surveys for impacted dwellings have yet to be conducted.

Adding to the complexity, the report outlines how climate change threatens to heighten flood risks over time. By 2090, increased rainfall intensity could lead to flood levels rising by as much as 1.9 metres across the floodplain in a 5% AEP event under certain scenarios. These changes could cause overtopping of the bypass in multiple locations, with water depths reaching up to 1.2 metres and exacerbating flood impacts on properties. While the new bridge and bypass aim to provide improved flood immunity for the road during moderate flooding events, the report reveals a delicate trade-off: “A number of dwellings have afflux impacts of typically 35mm” during certain floods, and “15 properties may have up to 83mm impact” in a 2% Annual Exceedance Probability (AEP) flood. Without mitigation, the report warns these impacts could extend to habitable dwellings, pending further floor level surveys.

“The exact number of affected properties will need to be confirmed with floor level survey and site inspections in future design stages,” the report said. Adding to the concerns, the report highlights the gaps in the flood modelling used to inform the design. The analysis was limited to a single design storm event for each AEP, potentially overlooking other storm scenarios that could pose greater risks. As the report states: “There may be other storm events which are more critical for velocity with lower tailwater levels which may become evident during detailed design when the Hawkesbury-Nepean River Flood Study model and additional storm events become available. Interim INSW model results indicate higher velocities through the floodplain than determined through the NRBS2 assessment. This indicates there may be another critical event for velocity that results in higher velocity changes through structures which may require mitigation.”

The report also identifies higher flood velocities than previously as-

sessed, which could lead to increased erosion and downstream impacts. “The interim model results indicate higher velocities through the floodplain,” the report states, warning that these could become critical during extreme events, requiring additional mitigation measures.

The report paints a sobering picture of the project’s vulnerability to climate change, which is expected to intensify flood risks in the region. By 2090, projected increases in rainfall intensity could cause flood levels to rise by up to 1.9 metres during a 5% AEP flood, leading to significant overtopping of the bypass road. In some locations, floodwaters are expected to reach depths of 1.2 metres, potentially rendering the bypass impassable. The report cautions that climate change poses a risk to the long-term viability of the project and notes that the current design does not adequately account for this.

Efforts to minimise the project’s impact on nearby properties have focused on carefully sizing embankments and culverts to balance flood immunity with preserving natural water flow. However, even with these measures, the report acknowledges that afflux - where floodwaters back up due to structural obstructions - is inevitable. Flood modelling indicates impacts on Western Sydney University land, particularly near the eastern relocated pond, with the report suggesting that optimised detention storage could help reduce downstream impacts, including those at Hobartville. Adjustments to the road alignment near Hill Avenue are also recommended to improve flood immunity and ensure better connectivity during emergencies. The report acknowledges the tradeoffs inherent in the design of the new Richmond Bridge and bypass, noting that some afflux is unavoidable due to the reduced waterway area caused by

bridge piers and deck submersion during major floods. However, it concludes that the benefits of the project - such as increased flood immunity and improved connectivity during larger floods- outweigh the” relatively minor” impacts on flood levels. The report states that there is not expected to be any significant increase in flood damages to properties already subject to inundation and argues that the additional cost of further minimising these impacts would outweigh the benefit of only minor reductions in afflux.

“Some amount of afflux is unavoidable with a new bridge structure due to the reductions in waterway area due to piers and bridge deck (for events where the bridge deck becomes submerged). The additional cost to the proposal in attempts to further reduce the flood level impacts would outweigh the benefit of minor reductions in afflux achievable,” it said.

New areas may become adversely affected by flooding

Hawkesbury River Answers Come at a Price

Transport for NSW is demanding nine times the standard processing fee to provide public information requested by the Hawkesbury Post (HP) under the Government Information (Public Access) Act (GIPA Act). The department claims the request will take nine hours to process, citing extensive review and consultation requirements.

The HP is seeking access to critical information used by TfNSW to assess PFAS contamination levels in the Hawkesbury River - so hazardous that the department has determined workers will avoid exposure during construction for Stage 2 of the Richmond Bridge project. This data was referenced in a December 2024 report by Transport for NSW, yet when asked to release the information voluntarily, the department refused, prompting the formal GIPA application.

Freedom of information, now known as GIPA’s (Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009) are vital tools for holding government agencies accountable. They provide transparency across areas such as transport, planning, and public health. For journalists and newspapers like the HP, these requests ensure that the community has access to information it has a right to know, while verifying claims made by councils and agencies. However, the escalating costs of successive GIPA fees place a financial burden on community-focused journalism.

Correspondence from Melissa Armstrong, Senior Advisor for Access Applications at Transport for NSW, outlined the itemised costs, which include reviewing the application, conducting searches, preparing documents, consulting with third parties, and drafting a decision letter. The total estimated cost of $270 is a significant departure from the typical processing fees associated with GIPA requests. See below for an itemised breakdown of the costs.

The Post initially informally requested the data in December 2024, specifically citing its use in Transport for NSW’s report on the Richmond Bridge project. The report stated that analytical results from the Hawkesbury River showed PFAS concentrations exceeding ecological health assessment criteria under the National Environmental Management Plan (NEMP) 2.0. The findings warned that reusing contaminated water during construction could harm nearby waterways, flora, fauna, and human health. Despite the clear public interest in this information, Transport for NSW declined to provide it voluntarily, leading to the GIPA request. The clear identification of the information sought, the department claims that nearly 70% of the estimated nine hours required to fulfil the request will be spent reviewing 1,500 pages of documents and consulting with third parties, as mandated under the GIPA Act to protect sensitive information.

Here is the GIPA request by the Hawkesbury Post:

“'TfNSW Report published December 2024 titled; "New Richmond Bridge and Traffic Improvements Stage 2 - Review of Environmental Factors" page 366. In this report you reference analytical results from the Hawkesbury River showing PFAS concentrations. See paragraph below. I am seeking a copy of the data/report relied upon by TfNSW to make the comments below. analytical results from the Hawkesbury River show that the PFAS concentration exceeded the adopted ecological health assessment criteria under the NEMP 2.0. If PFAS-contaminated water from the Hawkesbury River is reused during construction (such as for dust suppres-

portfor NSW nuary2025 r ref:25T-0999

Dear Ms Magnusson, Byemail:

On 7 January2025,TfNSW received your applicationfor thefollowinginformation under the GIPA Act: Requestfor an advancedeposit of processingcharges under the Government Information (Public Access)Act2009 (GIPA Act)

sion), this could harm nearby waterways, flora and fauna in the area, and impact human health. This would be avoided. To further minimise PFAS risk to human health, workers constructing the piers for the four-lane bridge from the Hawkesbury River would be in barges," the report stated.’”

The itemised expense provided by Transport for NSW are:

“Action Time Estimate Cost

• Confirm validity of application and assign to officer

• Consider terms of the application

• Assign searches to relevant business area 15 minutes (spent) $7.50

• Searches performed by a subject matter expert from Safety, Policy, Environment and Regulation (SPER) with requisite knowledge of the information identified in your access application. 15 minutes (spent) $7.50

r itled;"New and vironm ntal Factors r " pag a e366. h Hawk w sburyRiver n copy p o the

'TfNSW Report published December 2024 titled;"New Richmond Bridge and Traffic ImprovementsStage2 - Review ofEnvironmental Factors" page366. In this report you reference analytical resultsfrom the HawkesburyRiver showing PFAS concentrations.See paragraphbelow. I am seekinga copyofthe data/report relied uponbyTfNSW to make the commentsbelow. analytical resultsfrom the HawkesburyRiver show that the PFAS concentration exceeded the adopted ecologicalhealth assessment criteria under the NEMP 2.0. IfPFAS-contaminated waterfrom the HawkesburyRiveris reusedduring construction (such asfordust suppression),this couldharm nearbywaterways, flora andfaunain the area, andimpacthumanhealth. This wouldbe avoided. To further minimise PFAS risk tohumanhealth, workers constructingthe piersfor thefour-lanebridgefrom the HawkesburyRiver wouldbeinbarges, " the report stated.

• Review of information retrieved, including considering and preparing information for release (a conservative estimate of 15 seconds per page applied to approximately 1500 pages):

’ Processingchargesfordealingwith your application

A preliminary review of the information reveals the documents contain third party personal and business information that will require consultation together with careful consideration to determine scope and any relevant public interest considerations for and against disclosure. 6 hours (estimate) (incl. 30 minutes spent) $180

Under the GIPA Act, we may charge $30 per hour for each hour of processingtime application. The applicationfee youhave provided counts as a payment toward the of anyprocessingcharges payable. Estimate of total processing charges for dealing with your application So fa l with your application, and I estimate thatit will take afurther I estimate that it islikelyto cost a minimum of $270 to erhour.

• Consultation with third parties (5 third parties have been identified as requiring consultation) under section 54 of the GIPA Act) 1.5 hours (estimate) $45

• Drafting decision letter and providing access to information. 1 hour (estimate) $30

Total time estimated to be spent: 9 hours $270 information under the freedom of information legislation claiming it will take nine hours of work to process the application.”

Development Costs Can't Be Ignored

Our council belongs to the people of the Hawkesbury,” says Peter Ryan, Hawkesbury's newest councillor. Ryan noted, “During the last two election campaigns, I have listened to many Hawkesbury residents, and they have sent me a clear message: they are tired of the party influence in our council.”

“The people own the council. It's not owned by a group or anyone else. It should be 12 independent individuals making decisions in the best interests of the people of the Hawkesbury, and that’s how it should be. There should be no other influences,” he told the Hawkesbury Post.

Ryan’s comments come at a critical juncture for the council, which continues to operate as a Liberal/Labor bloc with support from the pro-development Mayor Les Sheather. This entrenched voting pattern has fueled frustration in the community, particularly as it has driven contentious decisions favoring developers and jeopardizing environmental preservation.

Stepping into this fraught landscape, Ryan was appointed through a NSW Electoral Commission countback following councillor Tom Aczel’s resignation. He brings a wealth of local knowledge and a strong connection to the Hawkesbury. Representing the People Not Parties team alongside Councillor Mary Lyons-Buckett, Ryan aims to champion transparency, responsible development, adequate infrastructure and the region’s long-term sustainability.

“I’m not against development, but the development must consider the existing residents living in that area and the impact on them and our unique environment,” he said. “The issues we address now will affect the future of the Hawkesbury for years to come, for example, the increasing pressure on the stormwater and river management, roads and footpaths up keep, the delivery of essential services and public transport, along with flood and fire evacuation routes to mention a few, we need to keep in mind the ongoing costs of these items. We need open and transparent discussions about all these and development.”

Ryan acknowledged the challenges posed by recent developments, including those at Redbank and Freeman’s Reach, which have sparked community concern. While he has not yet examined every detail, he said there needs to be a coordinated approach.

“We can’t have development without adequate infrastructure and services,” he said. “For instance, you can’t drive across the planned North Richmond Bridge; it needs to be in place first, along with the rest of the required roads and infrastructure, they needs to be fully completed before adding more pressure on the roads from development.”

Environmental considerations are central to his approach. “Our rivers have become stormwater channels rather than the beautiful rivers I grew up swimming in,” he said. “We shouldn’t put undue pressure on everything just to complete a development. If someone approaches me with a development proposal, I want to hear solid reasons.”

Ryan also believes the council must prioritise community engagement and youth opportunities. “We need to understand our community’s strengths and weaknesses and know where to go to find solutions to our problems,” he said. “We are here for the community. We should be working with the Community, we need to be among the

people.”

Ryan’s passion for the Hawkesbury stems from a deep personal connection. A lifelong Pitt Town resident, he’s the fifth generation of his family to live in the area. “I’ve lived in Pitt Town for most of my life. My father grew up here, as did my grandfather, great-grandfather, and great-great-grandfather,” he said. “So, I’m nearly a local at Pitt Town.”

With a 24-year career in the New South Wales Police and extensive community involvement through the Pitt Town Progress Association, Ryan is no stranger to service. As he embarks on his term, he’s committed to making decisions not just for now but for future generations.

Ryan’s experiences in the Hawkesbury, from his childhood spent on family farms to playing football at McQuade Park, along with doing his apprenticeship as a carpenter with a local builder, allowed him to work on several historical buildings in the area. This has helped shape his vision for preserving the Hawksbury’s unique character. His involvement in the Pitt Town Progress Association, inspired by his father’s leadership, being on the committee and president of the Pitt Town Soccer club and Chairman of the Pitt Town ANZAC Day Planning committee underpins his belief in fostering stronger ties between council and community.

Ryan is passionate about creating opportunities for Hawkesbury’s youth. “We need spaces where young people can express themselves,” he said. “Whether it’s bike tracks, sporting facilities or creative hubs, providing positive outlets.”

Married to Debbie, with four children and ten grandchildren, who all live in or around the Hawkesbury, Ryan credits his family’s support as vital to his work. “ They are my greatest supporters and by far my harshest critics,” he said.

Transparency In Tatters Over $213M Resort Saga

Concerns over Hawkesbury City Council’s (HCC) handling of the controversial $213 million Island’s Oasis development in Kurrajong are deepening, as the Council faces accusations of withholding crucial information about the project. Despite a freedom of information (GIPA) request, key documents detailing HCC's communications with the Department of Planning remain undisclosed, raising questions about transparency and accountability in the approval process for the large-scale resort proposal.

Concerns about the project have grown, with HCC refusing to disclose what advice it plans to give the Department of Planning regarding the proposal. The Island's Oasis is a proposed tourist development under the Significant State Development (SSD) process, which allows the project to bypass the Council. Developer Tony Mehri plans to create a sprawling resort in Kurrajong Hills, featuring cabins, lodge suites, camping sites, and other facilities. The proposal faces strong opposition due to environmental and safety concerns, including the destruction of koala habitat, increased bushfire risks, and further strain on already overloaded infrastructure. A similar attempt to rezone the 450-hectare site was rejected by HCC in 2013.

The project is currently in the SEARs (Secretary's Environmental Assessment Requirements) stage, where councils are encouraged to provide input - “advice” - to the Department of Planning to assist in determining the project's outcome. HCC has yet to submit its advice. Initially requested in May 2024, HCC explained that the Department officially rescinded the request on June 25, 2024, after identifying the need for document amendments.

However, HCC did not include this information in the documents provided under the NSW Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (GIPA Act). The Council argued the request was “informal,” rather than “formal,” and therefore not subject to full disclosure. The GIPA application, filed online, sought communications between HCC and the

Department of Planning regarding the SEARs process. The resident clarified the request with an HCC officer, who confirmed the information sought in writing, which included communications between the HCC and Department about the development.

Despite this, the documents provided by HCC were incomplete and failed to tell the whole story. The GIPA response included only a site plan and a single automated email from the Department of Planning, dated May 17, 2024, reminding HCC of the May 30 deadline to submit Council’s “advice” on the development. Notably, the response did not contain any information indicating that the Department had rescinded its request for advice - a claim HCC has used to justify its failure to submit the required advice.

HCC said the resident could submit another “formal” GIPA request to view that information.

HCC defended its decision to release only partial information, citing its ability to determine what to disclose under an “informal” GIPA request. While the GIPA Act provides government bodies with flexibility in determining the scope of informal requests, HCC still chose to withhold relevant documents without offering an explanation. The Council also chose not to grant the applicant physical access to additional documents related to the project, despite the option being available under the legislation.

“Council has satisfied the informal GIPA application submitted by the resident. If further information is sought, the resident is welcome to submit a formal GIPA application,” an HCC spokesperson told the Post.

Adding to the confusion, an email from HCC to the resident accompanying the GIPA response appeared to blame informal communication from the department for the Council’s failure to provide advice by the deadline. The email stated: “Council did not receive any cover letter, consultation letter or

similar aside from the attached automatic email notification. Council has not yet made a submission in response to the consultation.”

However, following the article, Council emphatically denied missing the deadline to provide “advice” about the project to the Department of Planning, stating the Department of Planning withdrew its request for advice due to amendments being made to the proposal documentation. HCC claimed “formal” notice of this withdrawal was provided in June, following verbal discussions. The Post has requested to see this correspondence, but as of publication, HCC has not provided it. HCC has also not stated when its advice regarding the Island Oasis project will be submitted, despite public consultations scheduled for February 1, 2025.

Documents provided under the informal GIPA request were the basis for a previous Hawkesbury Post story, which noted that the Council missed the Department’s May 30, 2024 deadline for input, just days after the formal request for input was made.

Residents continue to express concern that HCC’s failure to act promptly on important issues has become a pattern in recent years. A notable example was the Council’s failure to issue a tender or plan for critical maintenance on the Lower Portland Ferry service in 2023, leading to rushed negotiations and a one-year extension. Another case involved the long-term inaction on the riverbank collapse at Cornwallis, caused by poor maintenance of Council drains and worsened by failed attempts to repair the bank, resulting in a three-year saga. As the questions surrounding the project continue to grow, the developer is moving ahead. Just three days before Christmas, the developer invited community feedback through an online site and announced a “Drop-In” meeting on February 1 at the Kurrajong Community Centre, more than six months after lodging the application.

Artist's impression of the Island Oasis development

Locals Say Redbank Creek Floods Are No Accident

At 3 am on a stormy April night this year, Jeanette Hayden sat awake by her window, watching Redbank Creek rise in a way she had never seen before in 33 years of living on its banks. Within hours, the water surged 15 to 20 feet higher, tearing through the landscape with terrifying velocity. “It was the worst I’ve ever witnessed,” Hayden recalled. “For the water to rise in such a quick time to such a great height, something is wrong upstream, and this report does not cover the rising heights of water levels in flood times.”

For residents like Hayden and her neighbors, this year’s Redbank Creek Flood Study, commissioned by Hawkesbury City Council, has failed to address their urgent concerns about the creek’s transformation. The study was meant to provide high-quality flood data to guide future planning and emergency responses. Instead, it has ignored what locals identify as the primary source of their flooding woes: runoff from the sprawling 442-acre Redbank Estate development.

The report acknowledges that six of the seven residents who responded to its community consultation identified Redbank Creek as the main source of rising floodwaters, with downstream impacts from the development cited as their number-one concern. Yet, according to Hayden, these concerns were not meaningfully examined. “The creek cannot handle excessive stormwater velocity and volume being put into it,” she told a council meeting last year. Hayden pointed to years of changes that have fundamentally altered the waterway’s behavior, from the erosion of its banks to the growing intensity of flood events. Her frustration is shared by longtime Hawkesbury resident Marjorie Hearne, who has lived in the region for 53 years. Hearne said she had never seen flooding from Redbank Creek until after the construction of the Redbank Estate. In two separate incidents, in 2022 and again in 2024, she witnessed what she described as catastrophic water surges. “The only way for water to gush with the height and speed it did was for a large volume of water to have been released all at once,” Hearne also told the meeting. “There was no way that the rain event caused this.”

“Nothing has ever been done, and it becomes a blame game as to who is responsible for it,” she said. “We’re not sure whether it’s state or local government or a combination, but whoever is responsible should be doing this before another rain event occurs, when it will be too late.”

On both occasions, the creek breached its banks, uprooting trees, destroying habitats, and sweeping away fences, retaining walls, and chunks of soil. “The ferocity of the water raging past took out trees, vegetation, and chunks of the riv-

erbank soil and have washed away many animals and their habitats,” Hearne said.

“The creek reached a level never seen before.”

Hearne claims the flood risk assessments were conducted during a drought, which she said failed to reflect the true dangers. “Nothing has ever been done, and it becomes a blame game as to who is responsible for it,” she said. “We’re not sure whether it’s state or local government or a combination, but whoever is responsible should be doing this before another rain event occurs, when it will be too late.”

A spokesperson for Redbank Estate told the Hawkesbury Post that the Estate’s stormwater system is designed to meet all relevant standards and catchment strategies, and they are committed to managing water flows responsibly and safely within the area. “The catchment for Redbank Creek and its tributaries spans over 1,500 hectares, with the majority of water volume originating upstream of North Richmond.

The Redbank Estate accounts for only 180 hectares - approximately 12% of the total catchment of Redbank Creek,” the spokesperson said.

“Flooding in areas adjacent to Redbank Creek has been a well-documented issue predating the development of the Redbank estate by several decades. These challenges have been acknowledged and addressed in discussions between Council and North Richmond residents over many years.

"...We look forward to seeing the outcomes of the Redbank Creek Flood Study and any recommendations that are put forward," he said.

Hearne and Hayden both criticised the study’s limited engagement with the community. The study states that just seven responses from the community were received via an online questionnaire. “The questionnaire of 2023 was so superficial and narrow it did not allow for detail,” Hayden said. She argued that many residents were either unaware of the survey or found it inaccessible due to its online format. As a result, vital local knowledge about the creek’s narrow, winding nature and its ongoing struggles with debris blockages was overlooked. “The government has never cleaned the debris - fallen trees, flood debris, fencing, ladders - ever, to my knowledge,” Hayden added.

The omissions in the Redbank Creek Flood Study are part of a larger pattern, critics say, with other studies similarly downplaying or ignoring the impacts of new developments on flood behavior. The 2024 Hawkesbury-Nepean Flood

Study also failed to examine the effects of increased runoff from developments, despite widespread concerns about how such changes affect evacuation routes and intensify downstream flooding. Large tracts of land on the floodplain are being raised with fill, and overland flooding has become a growing threat, cutting off access to safety and accelerating the velocity of floodwaters.

Residents argue that these studies, commissioned by governments intent on pushing forward with greenfield developments, lack credibility and fail

to protect the communities most at risk. “This is not just an oversight; it’s dangerous,” a resident said.

Both Hayden and Heare called for the Council to halt the study’s public exhibition in its current form and revisit its scope to include the impacts of Redbank Estate and similar developments. The public exhibition of the document retained and was closed in late January.

“Whoever is responsible should be acting before another rain event occurs,” Hearne said. “When it does, it will be too late.”

Residents say Redbank Creek flooding is getting worse.

22 Million Tonnes of Dirt to Bury Penrith Lakes Flood Risk

Developers are planning to dump a staggering 22.7 million tonnes of soil at Penrith Lakes in a controversial bid to raise the flood-prone site by up to three metres. The goal is to elevate the land to protect future developments from extreme flooding, but the proposal is already under fire.

The site, located at 89-151 Old Castlereagh Road, sits within the Hawkesbury-Nepean floodplain, one of Australia’s most dangerous flood zones. The proposed changes would see the site raised by an average of 1.32 metres, with some areas elevated by nearly three metres.

A consortium of major players, including Boral, Holcim, and Hanson, are shareholders in the Penrith Lakes Development Corporation (PLDC) which wants to develop the Penrith Lakes site.

The PLDC wants to develop the site for commercial uses and recreation spaces however, its location on a floodplain has made these ambitions increasingly contentious. In a letter to the HP the developer claimed housing is not a consideration for the site.

In their latest application for a modification to the DA, the developers argue that raising the land levels would protect future development against a one-in500-year flood, a measure far exceeding current planning levels.

“...PLDC is obliged to deliver the Penrith Lakes Scheme as set out in a Deed of Agreement with the NSW Government in 1987. The terms of the Deed identify the commitment on PLDC to repurpose the land for various future commercial, recreational, and public uses, providing a mix of urban living and open space,” documents prepared by the

developer for the modification to the DA state.

The developers said the proposal is not new but a modification to two long-standing consents granted under a State Significant Development instrument. It will be the 12th “modification” to the Development Application (DA) 86/2720 (commonly referred to DA2).

Another DA known as DA3 has been modified 8 times.

Developers already have approval to bring in 13 million tonnes of fill but want to increase this by 9.7 million tonnes, arguing it would safeguard the eastern portion of the site against catastrophic floods while causing “no fundamental change” to existing flood behaviour. However, many remain unconvinced.

Regulators, including the Environmental Protection Authority, Penrith Council, and the Department of Planning, have called for detailed studies, particularly a comprehensive flood analysis.

“The modification application as submitted proposes to import fill to enable part of the Penrith Lakes site to be flood-immune in the 0.2% AEP flood event,” wrote the Department of Planning in a letter to the developer.

“The additional fill is proposed to be over the 0.2% AEP flood level for much of the site, with the fill being more than 2.5m above the identified 0.2% level. The Department requires rationale for filling to such a significant amount above the 0.2% flood level,” it said. The Department added it wanted more information about the proposed final landform at the site.

A spokesperson for PLDC disputed suggestions that the housing was a consideration for the site which it claims

aims to be a leisure lifestyle, business and recreation destination for Western Sydney.

"There has been recent reporting on our proposal to modify two existing and long-standing State significant development (SSD) consents to increase the site’s flood immunity. The report incorrectly claimed that housing is a consideration, which is not the case. Our submitted modifications align with considerations outlined in the Deed focused on flood immunity across the landform. The proposed elevation supports stormwater control principles across the site," a spokesperson for PLDC said in a letter to the Hawkesbury POst.

NSW Premier Chris Minns has publicly opposed housing development on flood-prone land, warning that such developments pose serious risks to safety, insurance, and financial stability. “You’re putting people and communities in danger,” Minns told the Hawkesbury Post in 2023.

Tens of thousands of Hawkesbury residents, living below the one-in-500-year flood level, face heavy fines for importing fill to raise their flood-prone properties, while large developers appear to operate under far more lenient standards. A one-in-500-year flood would reach 20.2 metres at Windsor, surpassing the 19.7 metres recorded during the historic 1867 flood, the largest ever to hit the region.

The developers’ report, prepared by consultants Water Technology, insists the project will have no major impact on flood behaviour at the site. However, the study fails to assess potential downstream impacts on Hawkesbury communities, nor does it consider the effects of climate change or changes to stormwater runoff.

“Given these minor increases which occur in extreme flood events, the model results indicate no fundamental change to the existing flood behaviour at the site,” the report claims.

The Penrith Lakes Scheme, established in 1987 under a Deed of Agreement with the NSW Government, was intended to transform the area into a model of urban living. However, shifting flood mapping and growing concerns about safety have repeatedly challenged this vision.

Former Penrith MP Stuart Ayres, who once promoted the vision of homes “as far as your eye can see,” later reversed his stance, publicly stating that large-scale development was no longer feasible.

Ayres now serves as CEO of the Urban Development Institute of Australia’s NSW branch, a vocal critic of stricter floodplain planning restrictions.

The developer was granted approval in 2014 to bury 23,500 cubic metres of waste - including concrete, tyres, plastics, and demolition debris - on-site rather than removing it. This included 12,000 cubic metres of asphalt and road materials.

The broader issue of flood management across the Hawkesbury-Nepean Valley remains unresolved. Successive governments have failed to deliver meaningful mitigation measures, from the controversial - and unfunded - Warragamba Dam wall proposal to debates over raising flood planning standards. Increasing these standards, such as shifting from one-in-100-year to one-in200-year flood levels, could devastate property values in flood-prone areas, making insurance and banking services inaccessible.

ROBYN PRESTON STATE MEMBER FOR HAWKESBURY

Applications Now Open: Community Building Partnership

Applications are now open for the 2025 Community Building Partnership program, unlocking funds for community infrastructure projects across NSW.

Grant funding is available for community projects of up to $450,000 for each electorate, including Hawkesbury. This is a great opportunity for local councils and not-for-profit groups to apply for the funds they need to deliver projects with social, environmental and recreational outcomes. Local sports clubs, charities, schools and museums are just some of the groups that benefit from this program. If your organisation or club needs extra funding for infrastructure, such as playgrounds, accessible features, equipment or refurbishment, then I’d strongly encourage you to apply.

Since it commenced in 2009, the Com-

munity Building Partnership program has awarded more than $464 million to over 20,900 projects. This program provides an opportunity for community groups to receive support needed to improve the places where people meet, train or play. I urge applicants to take the time to prepare and submit their grant submission so that their community group doesn’t miss out on a share of $450,000.

Eligible applications will be assessed on how they address the following four equally weighted assessment criteria:

1. Enhancing facilities: the project develops a sustainable and inclusive community.

2. Meeting community needs and increasing community participation: the project supports activities and services needed by local communities and encourages community participation.

3. The organisation’s capacity: the applicant has the capacity to deliver the project on time and within scope.

4. Demonstrating value for money: the project delivers values for money when assessing its lifetime benefits against its lifetime costs. Applications are open from Tuesday 28 January and close at 5pm, Friday 21 February 2025. Applicants must read the program guidelines to ensure their club or organi-

sation and proposed project are eligible. More information about the 2025 Community Building Partnership program, as well as eligibility requirements, is available at https://www.nsw.gov.au/ grants-and-funding/community-build-

ing-partnership-2025

If you find you need help in submitting your application or have any questions about the 2025 Community Building Partnership program, please reach out to my office on (02) 4578 0300.

I’m here to help

advocate on your behalf to find solutions offer advice and guidance about Government regulations, services and grants

assist with matters relating to transport, roads, education, health, water, welfare, mental health, veterans, emergency services, housing and Local Government

arrange congratulatory messages for significant birthdays and anniversaries

aid in Seniors Card applications and updating your enrolment provide Justice of the Peace services

PRESTON MP Member for Hawkesbury

Robyn Preston Opinion

SUSAN TEMPLEMAN MP - FEDERAL MEMBER FOR MACQUARIE

Hawkesbury Needs a Medicare Urgent Care Clinic

Picture this: your four year old grandchild trips over while you’re looking after her. She’s OK but the cut is deep and it’s been a little while and the bleeding isn’t stopping. It’s 6pm so your local GP is going to be either booked or closed.

The closest after-hours service is privately run and going to cost a pretty penny, and you dread the thought of going and waiting in Emergency where there will be other more serious needs. You know you could make a phone call and get advice, but you really just want to jump in the car and drive to a doctor close by. Right now.

That’s exactly what you’d be able to do if there was a Medicare Urgent Care Clinic in the Hawkesbury.

Since the closure of the After Hours

GP Clinic at Hawkesbury Hospital, under the Liberal’s watch, after hours care has been even harder to get and more expensive.

The closest after-hours service is privately run and going to cost a pretty penny, and you dread the thought of going and waiting in Emergency where there will be other more serious needs

Our new Medicare Urgent Care Clinics provide medical care in urgent, but not life-threatening, situations.

They’re open for extended hours, including weekends.

You don’t need an appointment.

The services, including x-rays or scans and blood tests, are fully bulkbilled, with no out of pocket costs.

The other positive is that they take pressure off emergency departments and the hard-working staff we have there.

We’ve opened 87 of them and I’ve seen the benefits of the Penrith Urgent Care Clinic.

People have told me that that it’s been a quick and efficient visit, that it saved them hours waiting in emergency to check out a possible fracture, and that having everything covered my Medicare was most welcome.

That’s why I’m calling on the Federal Government to open a Medicare Urgent Care Clinic here, in the Hawkesbury.

You can help me show it’s needed by signing my petition and sharing with me your example of how it could help you and your family.

An Urgent Care Clinic would build on the improvements we’ve made to making Medicare stronger in the Hawkesbury.

We have the Medicare Mental Health Service in Richmond providing free mental health care. We have Headspace, providing targeted support and prevention services for young people’s mental wellbeing. And we have the Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain clinic in Rouse Hill, the first in the west to give women access a dedicated care and treatment options.

And we’ve turned around the falling levels of bulk-billing by tripling the bulk-billing incentive for GPs.

In Macquarie, 82.8% of all GP visits are bulk-billed since our additional investment in Medicare took effect, which means there have been more than 30,000 additional bulk-billed visits to the doctor in the Blue Mountains and Hawkesbury.

And since the Albanese Government was elected, 32 new GPs have started billing Medicare locally.

On top of that, Macquarie residents have saved more than $6.2 million on 695,000 scripts because we’ve made medicines cheaper by cutting their cost, lowering the Safety Net threshold and introducing 60-day prescriptions.

These are significant steps forward in less than three years, and I look forward to Labor continuing to work hard to strengthen Medicare.

Help me keep fighting for improvements to Medicare in the Hawkesbury by supporting an Urgent Care Clinic by signing the petition https://susantempleman.com.au/hawkesbury-urgent-care-clinic/

And we’ve turned around the falling levels of bulk-billing by tripling the bulk-billing incentive for GPs.

Susan Templeman

Hawkesbury Locals Honored at Australia Day Awards

Hawkesbury City Council has honoured seven outstanding individuals and groups at the 2025 Australia Day Awards ceremony held at the Council Chambers in Windsor on Sunday.

Mayor Les Sheather said the winners had made exceptional contributions to the community., “These awards celebrate those who inspire and support others, sharing their skills and time for the betterment of our community. It’s our way of recognising their efforts and encouraging them to continue their incredible work,” he said.

2025 Hawkesbury Australia Day Award Winners

Citizen of the Year – Sarah Cassim

Sarah Cassim, a business consultant and founder of Hawkesbury Women in Business, was named Citizen of the Year for her work to empowering women and fostering professional growth. Sarah’s group has grown from a small network to over 1,000 members, offering mentorship and creating a supportive environment for women in business. Beyond her work, Sarah contributes to mental health advocacy and domestic violence prevention through the Hope4U Foundation, leaving a lasting impact on the community.

Young Citizen of the Year – Andrew Scarsbrook

Recognised for his passion for agriculture, 25-year-old Andrew Scarsbrook has made a name for himself as a champion cattle judge and advocate for rural industries. Andrew, who was the 2024 Hawkesbury Rural Ambassador, shares his expertise with young leaders, promoting the importance of agriculture and food production in the community.

Community Organisation of the Year – The Jeremiah Project

The Jeremiah Project received this award for its work supporting the homeless and vulnerable in the Hawkesbury. The organisation runs a community kitchen, distributes food hampers, and provides essential supplies such as camping gear and hygiene products. Founder Jacky Turano also helps individuals navigate life’s challenges, offering guidance and transportation to appointments and church services.

Sportsperson of the Year – Indy Aquilina

Indy Aquilina, a multi-talented young athlete, has excelled in soccer,

futsal, athletics, and boxing. Representing Australia in futsal and earning accolades in boxing and cross-country championships, Indy’s dedication and achievements have set her on a path to compete with the junior Matildas in the near future.

Local Heroes of the Year – Warren Doyle and Chris Underwood

Warren Doyle: Warren was recognised for his volunteer work with the Hope4U Foundation and the Richmond Lions Club. His efforts include organising events to raise awareness for mental health and homelessness, including the Hawkesbury’s first winter sleep-out.

Chris Underwood: Chris’s years of volunteer work have focused on ensur-

ing the safety of schoolchildren crossing busy roads and maintaining the cleanliness of roadside areas. His commitment to improving both the community and the environment earned him additional recognition with the Environmental Award.

Arts and Culture Award – Richmond Players

The Richmond Players, Australia’s oldest amateur dramatic society, were honored for their 72 years of contribution to the arts. The group not only delivers exceptional performances but also provides opportunities for young people to develop skills in acting, backstage work, and hospitality, enriching the cultural fabric of the Hawkesbury.

Chris Underwood,Hawkesbury Mayor Les Sheather, Steve Wimmer, Andrew Scarsbrook, Indy Aquilina, Jacky Turano, David Rooney, Warren Doyle, Diane Russell (on behalf of Sarah Cassim)

Parcel Fury as Templeman Demands Action

Federal Member for Macquarie Susan Templeman has intensified her campaign for improved postal services following the closure of the Kurmond Local Post Office, challenging Australia Post to address mounting community frustrations.

Residents have reported significant delays and difficulties collecting parcels since the local post office closure in September.

"Residents from the Kurmond and Kurrajong areas have reported very long and frustrating wait times in accessing parcels," Templeman stated in a media release. "I've raised the complaints that I've received with Australia Post. This week, when I met with them in Parliament House, I again stressed the urgency to have this matter addressed."

Speaking to Hawkesbury Post, Templeman said: "The closure of the Kurmond Post Office has thrust the community into a logistical challenge, with residents facing increasingly lengthy parcel collection processes."

"The closure of Kurmond PO has had flow-on effects across multiple other post office locations, and there's no doubt the community deserves greater convenience for their package deliveries," she said.

The bulk of parcels have been redirected to Kurrajong Post Office.

Many people have reported using the Australia Post app to redirect their parcel deliveries to alternative post offices like Grose Vale and North Richmond.

On Facebook, Karen Chapman wrote: "Download (the) Australia Post app and choose another post office to pick up all your parcels. It works well. I go to Grose Vale, no wait.” HP is aware of several others who have similarly redirected their parcels away from the Kurrajong Post Office to ease the pressure on wait times for themselves and others.

On Facebook, Lyndon Russo suggested that "A larger shop front (for Kurrajong PO) might help as well as more staff," anticipating that the situation will only intensify as Christmas approaches.

An excerpt from one email to Susan

Templeman (posted publicly on social media) reads: "There is no need to offer to you this is a disaster - adding to the lack of infrastructure west of "the river". With the increasing population, the strain on the options offered is unimaginable, all of which are overloaded….with the ever-expanding Redbank & Belmont & Grose Vale (over) developments alone, it beggars belief how residents using that outlet will cope."

Kurrajong Franchisee Mark Robinson insists the impact has been minimal. "Kurmond closing has hardly had any effect on Kurrajong PO load. It's about 7% extra work!" he wrote on Facebook on Thursday, 28 November, attributing the current challenges to the peak Black Friday and Christmas shopping periods. Community feedback tells a more nuanced story. Ryan Winter's frustrated Facebook post captures the sentiment of many: "The issue isn't the post office; the issue is the sub-standard delivery we accept in our area. The fact that it's 2024 and we can't get Australia Post to deliver a parcel to our properties, but Amazon can do it for free in 2 days is an absolute embarrassment."

Templeman told the Hawkesbury Post: "I have been advocating for Australia Post to improve access to parcel deliveries and install parcel lockers at various locations well before the closure of the Kurmond post office."

Proposed bespoke parcel lockers promise 24/7 access, but their location is unclear. Mark Robinson cited Kurrajong Post Office, while an Australia Post email mentioned Kurmond BP Station. Not all community members are critical. Kurby Kurby offered a more philosophical perspective on social media, imploring people to "Be kind and think of other people's situations," reminding fellow residents that compassion should prevail even in frustrating circumstances. "Having a parcel sent to you shouldn't be a stressful or inconvenient experience, and Australia Post has the means to make it better in Hawkesbury," Templeman said.

Wisemans Ferry RFS Gets Lifeline Tech Upgrade

When the power went out across Wisemans Ferry during the 2022 floods, communication failures compounded the crisis. With Telstra’s network down and outdated equipment in the fire station, coordinating emergency efforts became nearly impossible. Volunteer firefighter Kim Brownlie recalled how power outages and communication breakdowns, common during fire seasons and storms, deeply impacted the station.

“Power outages in the valley and the flow-on communications failures inevitably impact the fire station as they do with all other residents,” Brownlie said. “During those times, we’ve always

adapted and found ways to communicate with the community, but these disruptions highlight the importance of robust and reliable communication systems.”

Thanks to Endeavour Energy’s 2025 Powering Communities grant program, the Wisemans Ferry Rural Fire Service (RFS) will receive a much-needed upgrade to address these challenges.

The grant will fund the installation of a Starlink satellite communication system and a state-of-the-art touchscreen smart TV, giving the station modern tools to serve the valley more effectively.

The Starlink system will provide reliable communication even when traditional networks fail, while the smart

Train Derailed At Clarendon

A passenger train derailed at Clarendon Station, with no injuries reported. The incident occurred on January 17 when the front of a Waratah A-set train went off the tracks after it overshot the platform while attempting to stop.

The train, which was carrying around 10 passengers, continued past a red stop signal and the platform, leading to the derailment. Thankfully, no one was hurt, and it is understood that a safety trip device, designed to stop the train in such circumstances, successfully brought it to a halt.

The derailment has caused significant disruptions to local train services, with buses now replacing trains between Riverstone and Blacktown in both directions. Sydney Trains has launched an investigation into the incident.

"The incident saw a carriage derailed a short distance past the platform," a Sydney Trains spokesperson said in a statement. "We are conducting a thorough investigation, and the cause will be

determined as the process unfolds."

Officers from the National Rail Safety Regulator and the state's transport safety authority have already started their inquiries into the cause of the derailment. Sydney Trains, in partnership with EDI Downer - the company responsible for maintaining the rolling stock - will also conduct a formal investigation into the incident.

The derailment occurred during a period of industrial action by the combined rail unions, which led to the cancellation of up to 2,000 train services over two days. The ongoing strike action, caused widespread disruption across Sydney’s public transport network.

While the cause of the derailment is still under investigation, authorities are confident that the safety systems in place worked as intended, preventing any harm to passengers or staff. Passengers who were on board the train have been praised for remaining calm during the incident, and no injuries have been reported.

TV will enhance training, After Action Reviews, and community engagement. Brownlie described the TV as a valuable addition: “The new TV will function as a large computer, facilitating training sessions and After Action Reviews. The more we learn, the better we can effectively utilise this information to better serve our community.”

The Wisemans Ferry RFS team, made up of local volunteers, plays a vital role in this tight-knit community. “The majority of our volunteers are local residents, many of whom work within the valley,” Brownlie said. “We all share a strong desire to assist each other. When our neighbours require assistance, we strive to provide all possible support.

We deeply cherish our home and are dedicated to its protection, even during disasters.”

The news of the grant approval was especially meaningful for the team. “I was deeply moved,” Brownlie said. “Sharing this announcement with the team was an immensely gratifying experience. We are profoundly honoured to have been selected for this grant.” Brownlie acknowledged that while the upgrades may not provide an immediate benefit to residents, the long-term impact will be significant. “By enhancing our capabilities, we will indirectly contribute to improved firefighting services and better serve our community in the long run,” she said.

Storms Relief On It's Way

The Hawkesbury region has been granted disaster relief following the severe storms that hit the region in mid-January. The storms brought intense rainfall and strong winds, leaving a path of destruction across the area. Emergency services, including local NSW State Emergency Service (SES) crews, worked around the clock to address the damage, with many homes affected by fallen trees, leaking roofs, and flooding. A number of incidents, including trees blocking roads across the electorate, created further hazards for residents.

The storms also caused significant disruption to the power network,

leaving thousands of residents without electricity at the peak of the storm, with more than 15,600 customers still without power the following morning. In the face of such widespread damage, local emergency responders and volunteers did an outstanding job in difficult conditions.

The disaster relief, which comes from both state and federal governments, is aimed at providing vital support to the hardest-hit communities. Under the Commonwealth-State Disaster Recovery Funding Arrangements (DRFA), the relief includes grants for low-income, uninsured residents to replace essential household items, emergency accommodation for those in need, and concessional loans for small businesses

and primary producers. Local councils are also set to receive assistance to help with clean-up efforts and the restoration of public assets.

Susan Templeman, Federal Member for Macquarie, welcomed the inclusion of the Hawkesbury in the disaster relief package. "I welcome the inclusion of Hawkesbury LGA. The damage was very localised but profound where the storm cells hit," she said. The inclusion of the region in the disaster relief measures reflects the scale of the storm's impact, which has left residents grappling with damage and disruption.

The storm's aftermath has been felt particularly by those in flood-prone areas, with emergency services continuing to warn of the risks posed by wet

soil,and unstable trees.

Both the Albanese and Minns Governments have committed to helping affected communities recover as quickly as possible. Federal Minister for Emergency Management Jenny McAllister praised the efforts of emergency services, acknowledging the hard work of first responders and local councils in the aftermath of the storms. "This assistance will ensure more communities can access essential supplies and accommodation and ensure more councils can clean up and restore assets as soon as possible," she said.

As further councils submit damage assessments, the Natural Disaster Declaration may be expanded to include more areas in need of support.

Hawkesbury Urged to Fight Suicide Crisis

Every day, around 150 Australians attempt to take their own lives - a sobering statistic that highlights the urgent need for suicide prevention training. In the Hawkesbury, Blue Mountains, Lithgow, and Penrith areas, where suicide rates exceed the national average, locals are being urged to step up and help tackle this crisis.

Wentworth Healthcare, the organisation behind the Nepean Blue Mountains Primary Health Network, is calling on the community to complete a five-minute survey aimed at shaping suicide prevention training for 2025. The survey, which closes on 28 February, seeks feedback on how best to address the specific needs of these regions.

“Suicidal distress is a human response to overwhelming suffering, and we all can provide immediate help to people who are in distress,” said Wentworth Healthcare CEO Lizz Reay. She stressed

the importance of involving everyday people in the fight against suicide by equipping them with the tools to make a difference.

Since launching its suicide prevention initiatives, Wentworth Healthcare has already trained more than 1,100 people through 45 workshops, giving participants the skills to recognise early signs of distress and take action. “Community Suicide Prevention training can combat the hesitancy that some people may feel in broaching the topic of suicide by empowering them with the knowledge and skills needed to support those in crisis when the opportunity arises,” Reay said.

Many people avoid intervening because they fear saying the wrong thing. However, evidence shows that properly trained individuals can provide life-changing support. Workshop participants learn how to recognise warning signs, ask someone directly about their intentions, and respond safely.

The issue is often misunderstood. Reay highlighted that suicide isn’t always linked to mental illness. “The factors contributing to suicide are complex and not always related to mental illness. Recent data shows that around a quarter of Australians who reported having suicidal thoughts or behaviours in the past 12 months had no symptoms of a mental disorder,” she said.

The ripple effect of suicide reaches far and wide. Research reveals that one in three Australians aged 16 to 85 has been close to someone who either died by suicide or attempted to take their own life. “If you haven’t been directly impacted, you probably know someone who has,” Reay said.

The figures underline the need for community-wide action. Reay said that whether you’re a parent, teacher, student, volunteer, or someone who frequently supports people in distress, the training can prepare you to make a

difference when it matters most.

Feedback from participants has been overwhelmingly positive. More than 90% of those who attended said they wanted to improve their communication skills with people in distress. After completing the training, 92% reported feeling better prepared to help someone contemplating suicide.

Reay urged locals to take five minutes to complete the anonymous survey and help shape the next phase of this lifesaving program. Those who choose to provide their contact details can also receive updates about future training opportunities.

“We want to ensure that the community training we offer continues to be relevant, accessible, and effective for those who need it most,” she said.

The survey can be found at Visit nbmphn.com.au/SuicidePreventionTrainingSurvey and closes on 28 February.

Photo credit: NSW RFS Wilberforce Brigade

Newly Installed Defibrillator Proves Vital in East Kurrajong Emergency

A community defibrillator installed just two months ago in East Kurrajong has already proven its worth in a medical emergency in late January, just 64 days after installation, highlighting the importance of accessible life-saving equipment in rural areas.

The automated external defibrillator (AED), located at 725 East Kurrajong Road, was installed in November 2024 through the generous sponsorship of Community Bank North Richmond & Districts and Richmond. Local resident Alyssa Pluckè spearheaded the initiative to bring the equipment to the community.

On January 22nd, the device was first used when Good Samaritan Robert Drake responded to an emergency alert through the GoodSam Responder app, a platform partnered with NSW Ambulance. Drake was able to quickly access the defibrillator and provide emergency care until paramedics arrived.

"It was great to have the community defibrillator available on EK Road. It was easy to get it, easy to use, and invaluable with the patient," Drake said in a Facebook post. He praised Pluckè's organisation efforts and the bank's funding support and emphasised the need for additional units in the area.

"Shout out to Alyssa Pluckè for organising it and to Bendigo Bank North Richmond for funding it. It would be great if we had more Defibs available (our community covers a wide area). 2. I was paged because I had signed up to the GoodSam Responder app," he said on Facebook.

The incident has sparked calls for more community members with basic first aid training to download the GoodSam Responder app, and Robert's post inspired at least one person to sign up for the app: "Thanks for sharing. Have signed up," wrote Robert Upton on the post. The platform, which partners with NSW Ambulance, alerts nearby registered responders to emergencies in their vicinity, potentially saving crucial minutes in life-threatening situations.

After a few days out of action waiting for new pads, the defibrillator has had replacement pads delivered, making it ready for action once again.

In Alyssa's Facebook Post announcing the new defibrillator in November, she also called for additional donations to install more defibrillators in the area. All donations over $2 are tax-deductible, and interested community members are encouraged to enquire about supporting future installations at www.communitydefibproject.org.au.

The community AED is designed for 24/7 public access and can be identified by code C2758.

PFAS Spotlight

PFAS Fact sheet

What Are PFAS?

PFAS, or per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances, are synthetic chemicals that have been widely used in industrial and consumer products since the mid-20th century. Known for their resistance to heat, water, and chemicals, these substances have been utilised in a variety of applications across Australia and globally since the 1950s.

Common Uses of PFAS

PFAS are found in a wide range of products, including:

• Textiles and leather goods

• Metal plating

• Food packaging

• Firefighting foams

• Floor polishes

• Denture cleansers and shampoos

• Coatings and photographic processes

• Hydraulic fluids and medical devices Historically, three types of PFAS

- Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS),

Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA), and Perfluorohexane Sulfonate (PFHxS)were widely used in firefighting foams. These foams were employed at defence bases, airports, and firefighting training sites across New South Wales. While some essential uses of PFAS are still permitted, national and international efforts aim to reduce the use of the most hazardous compounds as a precautionary measure.

Where Are PFAS Found?

Due to their widespread use and environmental persistence, traces of PFAS are often present in groundwater, surface water, and soil, particularly in urban areas. Higher concentrations may be found in locations where PFAS were heavily used or released, such as industrial sites or training facilities.

Potential Health Effects

Health concerns related to PFAS exposure are subject to ongoing research,

and findings differ between Australian and international authorities.

• NSW EPA: "There is no consistent evidence of health effects in humans, but laboratory studies on animals have shown impacts. Given the persistence of PFAS in the environment and the uncertainty around potential risks, the NSW Government is taking a cautious approach."

• US EPA: "Exposure to certain PFAS may lead to adverse health outcomes. Research indicates links to reproductive issues, developmental delays in children, increased cancer risks, immune system effects, hormone disruption, and higher cholesterol levels."

Why Is the NSW EPA Investigating PFAS?

The stability of PFOS and PFOA means they do not break down easily, persisting in the environment for decades. The NSW EPA is conducting

investigations at sites where PFAS were used in significant quantities.

Focus Areas for Investigation

The EPA is prioritising sites such as airports, firefighting training facilities, and industrial locations. Investigations assess contamination in soil and water both on-site and in surrounding areas. Commonwealth agencies, including the Department of Defence, are also involved, as PFAS contamination often extends beyond state-regulated boundaries.

How Are People Exposed to PFAS?

Most exposure occurs through food and water containing trace amounts of PFAS or via everyday items such as cosmetics, shaving creams, water-repellent sprays, and non-stick cookware.

The NSW EPA states that its investigation aims to better understand the extent of PFAS contamination and prepare for any future health or environmental concerns.

Image source:

PFAS Spotlight

Hawkesbury River to be Tested for Deadly Chemicals

The NSW Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) will test the Hawkesbury River at Richmond for PFAS chemicals within the next few months, marking the first investigation of its kind in nearly six years. The chemicals, commonly referred to as "forever chemicals," are linked to serious health risks, including cancer, and are notoriously difficult to remove from the environment.

“The EPA will begin a new round of sampling in the Hawkesbury River at Richmond in the coming months as part of the Government’s PFAS Investigation Program. Details of that sampling program, and results, will be shared with the community when they are available,” an EPA spokesperson told the Hawkesbury Post.

The announcement comes amid growing concerns about PFAS contamination in the region, particularly in light of construction work on the new Richmond Bridge. Workers on the project will operate from barges to avoid direct exposure to the river, and PFAS-contaminated water will not be used for dust suppression due to its potential risks to human health and the environment. A Transport for NSW report confirmed that PFAS levels in the Hawkesbury River exceed the ecological health assessment criteria under the 2020 National Environmental Management Plan.

“...Analytical results from the Hawkesbury River show that the PFAS concentration exceeded the adopted ecological health assessment criteria under the NEMP 2.0,” the report stated. It also noted that reusing PFAS-contaminated

water during construction could harm nearby waterways, flora, fauna, and human health, adding to the urgency of addressing the issue.

PFAS contamination in the Hawkes-

bury is a legacy of firefighting foams used at RAAF Base Richmond for decades. The chemicals have leached into the soil, groundwater, and river, spreading further with the tides and during floods. In 2018, an investigation by the Australian Department of Defence confirmed that PFAS had migrated from the base into surrounding areas, prompting precautionary dietary advice in 2019 to around 50 residents about consuming produce grown in contaminated soil or watered with tainted water.

While the EPA conducted fish sampling in 2019, no further testing has been undertaken in the years since, leaving many residents concerned about how far PFAS has spread and the long-term impacts on health and agriculture. Untreated water from the river is widely used for irrigation, livestock, and recreation, raising questions about potential exposure risks.

NSW inquiry into PFAS contamination in waterways and drinking water. There is also a national inquiry looking into sources of contamination, potential health, and environmental impacts, and the role of regulation..

“Richmond residents continue to have access to town (tap) water which is safe to drink. The presence of PFAS in the environment does not necessarily mean there is a health risk. The Australian Department of Defence is continuing work on remediating the RAAF site,” the spokesperson said.

The EPA’s announcement also follows recent scrutiny of its handling of PFAS contamination in other areas. Earlier this month, the authority revealed plans to test Tower Beach in Botany Bay for PFAS substances, despite signage advising against swimming or fishing at the site without providing reasons for the warnings. When the Hawkesbury Post questioned the EPA about the lack of similar testing in Richmond, the agency responded by announcing the new round of sampling.

A spokesperson for the EPA emphasised that the presence of PFAS in the environment does not necessarily indicate an immediate health risk. “Richmond residents continue to have access to town (tap) water which is safe to drink. The presence of PFAS in the environment does not necessarily mean there is a health risk. The Australian Department of Defence is continuing work on remediating the RAAF site,” the spokesperson said.

The announcement comes amidst a

Concerns about PFAS have intensified in recent years, particularly after the federal government recommended lowering acceptable levels of the chemicals in drinking water in October last year. Final guidance is due in April. However, testing for PFAS in untreated wastewater and environmental sources remains limited. Sydney Water only tests for PFAS at filtration plants, as the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines apply solely to treated drinking water and not to raw water from rivers or dams.

The Hawkesbury River is one of Australia’s most significant urban waterways, supplying drinking water to tens of thousands of residents and supporting agriculture, irrigation, and livestock production. Authorities continue to assure the public that Sydney’s drinking water remains safe.

Globally, the health risks of PFAS have gained increasing attention. The United States Environmental Protection Agency has warned that there is “no safe level of exposure” to some of these chemicals, underscoring the need for comprehensive testing and action.

PFAS Spotlight

PFAS Scandal: Workers Ordered Out Of Hawkesbury River

Workers constructing the new Richmond Bridge over the Hawkesbury River will be required to work from barges due to the water being so heavily contaminated with PFAS - dubbed "forever chemicals" - that it poses significant risks to human health and the environment.

The extraordinary revelation, outlined in a Transport for NSW (TfNSW) report, highlights a glaring contradiction: government precautions for construction workers starkly contrast with ongoing assurances from the Premier and health officials about the safety of the region’s drinking water.

The Hawkesbury River, one of Australia’s most important urban waterways, supplies drinking water to tens of thousands of residents and is vital for agriculture, irrigation, and livestock production. Yet, the TfNSW findings reveal that PFAS levels in the Hawkesbury River exceed limits established under the 2020 National Environmental Management Plan (NEMP 2.0). Detailed on page 339 of the Richmond Bridge Stage 2 report, testing undertaken on behalf of TfNSW uncovered PFAS concentrations that breach outdated (conservative) thresholds, which have since been tightened globally to reflect the severe health risks posed by these chemicals.

“...analytical results from the Hawkesbury River show that the PFAS concentration exceeded the adopted ecological health assessment criteria under the NEMP 2.0. If PFAS-contaminated water from the Hawkesbury River is reused during construction (such as for dust suppression), this could harm nearby waterways, flora and fauna in the area, and impact human health. This would be avoided. To further minimise PFAS risk to human health, workers constructing the piers for the four-lane bridge from the Hawkesbury River would be in barges,” the report stated. The document, signed off by senior NSW government bureaucrat Tim Webster, appear to indicate that the government is well aware of the health risk to humans from PFAS exposure while maintaining public reassurances that Sydney’s drinking water

remains safe.

Sydney Water told the HP that it only tests for PFAS at its filtration plants, as only drinking water needs to meet the Australian drinking Water Guidelines (ADWG). Dams and rivers are raw water, not drinking water, and the ADWG doesn't apply to raw water.

PFAS contamination in the Hawkesbury stems from decades of use of firefighting foams at RAAF Base Richmond. These chemicals have leached into groundwater, soil, and the river, spreading further with tides and floods.

Associate Professor Ian Wright, an environmental scientist at Western Sydney University, previously told the Hawkesbury Post:

“A very, very, very small amount of PFAS goes a long way. It’s like one eye-drop in 20 Olympic swimming pools that’s dangerous at that level. And the

RAAF base used a lot of PFAS foams over a very long time.” PFAS bioaccumulate in the food chain, magnifying their impact. “This means that lower-level bugs eat the plant, then the chicken eats the bug, and the concentration builds up at higher concentrations each level you go,” Wright explained.

These "forever chemicals" have been linked to cancers, including kidney, testicular, and thyroid, as well as other severe health conditions. Despite this, the Australian Department of Health maintains that evidence of harm is “limited.”

The Richmond Bridge report also details plans for site inductions to inform workers about PFAS risks, surface water monitoring during construction, and management measures outlined in the project’s Construction Environmental Management Plan.

“...Site inductions would inform workers about the PFAS risk. Additionally, surface water monitoring and/or management may be required during the construction program to manage potential ecological risks where required. This risk would be managed through implementation of a CEMP during construction as well as other safeguards and management measures outlined in Section 6.5.4” The Richmond Bridge Stage 2 report said.

The Hawkesbury is not alone in facing PFAS contamination. Similar issues plague communities around military bases across Australia. The World Health Organisation has flagged PFAS as a cause of multiple cancers and other health issues, yet Australia while having recently updated its drinking water safety guidelines still lags behind global efforts to address the crisis.

Urgent Call to Ban Deadly PFAS

One of Australia’s leading water experts has urged urgent action to tackle global PFAS contamination crisis.

University of Sydney, Head of Civil Engineering Professor Stuart Khan, has called for a far-reaching ban on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) used in products both inside and outside Australia. Speaking at a parliamentary inquiry in Penrith last month, Khan outlined the severe environmental and financial toll of PFAS contamination, warning that the "forever chemicals" pose an escalating threat to water safety, public health, and ecosystems worldwide. Khan’s comments come as concerns mount over the widespread pollution of waterways, soils, food, and wildlife. He stressed that nearly every molecule of PFAS ever created remains in the environment today, with many chemi-

cals breaking down into newer forms of PFAS, continuing the cycle of contamination.

The inquiry comes just days after the NSW Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) announced it would test the Hawkesbury River at Richmond in the next few months for the deadly cancer-causing chemicals. It also follows news that workers on the new Richmond Bridge will be ordered to avoid contact with the water in the river. River water will not be used for dust suppression on the project due to health fears from the river water.

Khan said the persistent pollution caused by PFAS now jeopardises the availability of safe, affordable drinking water, particularly in countries like the United States, where the cost to address PFAS contamination in wastewater alone could run into the billions. "Increasingly low levels of PFAS are

now being deemed necessary for safe drinking water, yet reports of contamination are escalating," Khan said.

"We risk the entire concept of affordable, safe tap water being undermined." The financial cost of PFAS clean-up efforts is staggering. Khan cited a report estimating that removing PFAS from the environment in the US could cost more than $50 billion over 20 years.

In Australia, where treatment facilities are less equipped, the costs would likely be far greater. These costs would eventually be passed on to consumers, Khan noted, calling this practice "the opposite of the polluter pays principle."

To address the growing crisis, Khan urged the Australian Government to expand regulations, particularly by banning a broader range of PFAS chemicals.

"We need to include more substances

on the IChEMS register and ensure better testing of consumer products for chemical residues," he said. He also advocated for the establishment of a national body to regulate chemical contamination and enhance scientific research into PFAS alternatives and removal technologies.

Khan’s proposals also included a call for stronger action on water management. He recommended the creation of an Australian Safe Drinking Water Act to ensure consistent application of best practices in water quality management across the country.

"If we continue to allow these chemicals to be used in products without proper oversight, the cost will be borne by all of us," he warned. "It’s time for Australia to take a much more proactive role in chemical regulation and protect future generations from these toxic substances."

A barge used to clean up flood debris around the Richmond Bridge

Lounging With Lizards Environment

By Sarah Thompson

One of our favourite daily distractions is watching a family of Jacky Dragons from the kitchen window. They sit atop the dense flowering bushes, feasting on the smorgasbord of beetles, flies and other pollinators. With a lunge and snap! a fluttering butterfly is reduced to an awkward mouthful of wing and leg. We have a darker skinned dad, mum with her belly full of eggs and various skittish kids. They’re easily identifiable by their size, colour, bright yellow inner mouth and spiny crest that runs down their back to their long tail. On a lichen covered rock, however, they are almost perfectly camouflaged. Adults are about

25 cm long.

Jacky Dragons are not endangered but many of our scaly friends are in trouble. Urbanization has been disastrous for many of the 850 reptile species that call Australia home, with 25% listed as endangered. Suburban sprawl, over-zealous ground clearing, plus predation by dogs and cats have all taken their toll. The Hawksbury has an incredible diversity of geckos, lizards, dragons, skinks and legless lizards, but we need to look after them.

Reptiles are a key component of a biodiverse backyard. They pose little or no threat to you or your pets, quite the opposite, their presence will enhance the beauty of your garden and provide natural pest control, for free.

Just like us, lizards require shelter, warmth, variety and a water supply. We’ve all heard of bird baths, but I propose a new backyard project for you and the kids this summer. Drumroll please: The Lizard Lounge. As they say, build it and they will come!

1. Select a spot in your garden that already has some bushy plants present, offering sun and shade.

2. Collect broken ceramic pots or pipes, rocks and tree hollows, and stack them to create a solid hide for reptiles and safety from predatory birds (kookaburras and currawongs love a lizard lunch) and from pets that may try to dig them out. Please DON’T remove bush rock to create your lizard lounge – its already someone else’s home.

3. Add Australian plants that include groundcovers and native grasses – these attract insects for the lizards to eat and provide extra shelter. Lizards will also eat the berries on ground covers (bobtails love strawberries!).

4. Mulch the area using a natural mix that contains bark, sticks and leaves for smaller lizards to hide under. This also attracts the grubs and insects lizards love.

5. Install a broad flat rock or bricks in a sunny spot for basking. Lizards need to warm up in order to hunt and digest their food.

6. Provide a water source at ground level in a shaded spot – anything other than plastic (which will perish) works well. If it is deep, add an escape rock

so that smaller reptiles don’t fall in and drown. The water bowl will need to be cleaned and refilled twice weekly, especially in warmer months.

For more ideas, you’ll find videos on youtube on how to build a lizard lounge in your garden.

Once your haven is complete, keep pets away and remember that you no longer need to use insecticides, pesticides or snail pellets. These products can kill lizards directly, as well as eliminate their food sources. Whipper snippers and lawn mowers can also kill or maim larger lizards, so watch out while mowing.

Now sit back on your lounge and watch your scaled friends enjoying theirs!

A Farmer's Daughter Marks a Year of New Beginnings

For over a decade, By a Farmer’s Daughter has been a beloved fixture in Windsor, offering a unique blend of gifts, fashion, and locally made products. Founded by Alicia Goldstein, the store became a community staple, attracting customers looking for something special. But when Alicia decided to step away from retail, the future of the shop seemed uncertain.

That’s when Angeline Noll stepped in. A longtime admirer, Angeline had known Alicia since their teenage years, when they both studied design. Though their careers had taken different paths, Angeline was drawn to the Hawkesbury and, eventually, to the store.

“I knew how important the store was to Windsor and the area,” Angeline said. “When Alicia mentioned she was ready for change, I told her to call me if she didn’t find a buyer. A year later, she did.”

each one helps keep the town vibrant.”

For Angeline, owning the store has been a significant career shift. She had previously managed sales accounts for a major giftware company, but moving to the Hawkesbury with her family four and a half years ago has allowed her to work closer to home.

“We love it here,” she said. “My husband, who’s from a farming background in the U.S., feels more at home than he ever has in Australia. It just felt like one

“Even

people who’ve moved away come back because they love it. Windsor has only a handful of specialty stores, and each one helps keep the town vibrant.”

Since taking over nearly a year ago, Angeline has embraced the shop’s legacy while adding her own touch. She has expanded the range of locally made and Australian-made products, supporting small businesses and artisans from the Hawkesbury.

“We now stock items from the Naked Oil Company, which makes organic balms right here in the Hawkesbury,” Angeline said. “Alicia still creates her signature garments from recycled fabrics under her new Winnie Sisters label, and her hand-crafted quote cards and framed quotes under the Hand Karma label remain customer favorites.”

By a Farmer’s Daughter is more than just a store - it’s a community hub. Angeline often finds herself chatting with loyal customers, some of whom return to Windsor specifically to visit the shop.

“There’s a real loyalty to this shop,” she said. “Even people who’ve moved away come back because they love it. Windsor has only a handful of specialty stores, and

of those life paths that was meant to be.”

Running the store is a full-time commitment, with over 50 suppliers and a constantly changing inventory. But the rewards far outweigh the demands.

“There’s a deep satisfaction in helping someone find the perfect gift,” Angeline said. “Customers appreciate having a local store with unique items, especially when they’ve been frustrated at big shopping centers.”

To celebrate her first year at the helm and thank loyal customers, Angeline is hosting an event on March 1st and 2nda chance to reflect on the past and look to the future.

“I’m incredibly happy with my decision to take on the store,” Angeline said. “Alicia put her heart and soul into this place, and I want to carry that forward. By a Farmer’s Daughter is part of Windsor, and I hope it stays that way for many years to come.”

Hawkesbury Local Business Awards

Roll On Automotive is a family owned business servicing the Western Sydney area and surrounding suburbs. We began operating in 2012 with an ever growing team offering Mechanical servicing and repairs, diagnostics, Rego Inspections, Auto electrical repairs and accessories installation, Air co n d it i o n i n g re p a i r s a n d s er v i c i ng , Bre a kdown assistance and Towing services.

PHONE: 0434 217 614

EMAIL: matt@rollonautomotive.com.au

OPENING HOURS: Monday - Friday 8:00am - 5:00pm (with After hours Emergency Breakdown Service) Saturday - Sunday After hours Emergency Breakdown Service

Local Business Owners Show True Grit

We continue to celebrate the incredible achievements of the local businesses at the 2024 Hawkesbury Local Business Awards. The event provided a chance to recognise the commitment and determination that drive our region’s business community.

As the official media partner, The Hawkesbury Post was proud to present several awards throughout the evening. Editor Sam Magnusson reflected on the courage it takes to run a business, particularly in uncertain financial times.

“Starting a business is never easy - you need to be brave, and the financial risks involved are significant,” she said. “Each of you here has shown remarkable bravery by stepping out on your own and building something from the ground up. Your resilience is what helps our community thrive.”

Magnusson also acknowledged the sacrifices many business owners make, from long hours to personal financial investment. “It takes a special kind of person to back themselves, to put everything on the line for an idea,” she said. “But it’s that passion and persistence that lead to success. Every small business that thrives in the Hawkesbury makes our entire region stronger.”

Event organiser Steve Loe expressed his gratitude to the awards’ presenting partner, the Commonwealth Bank,

along with major sponsors NOVA Employment, Hawkesbury City Council, and Richmond Marketplace. White Key Marketing was also recognised for its support as a valued sponsor.

The Hawkesbury Local Business Awards remain a key event for the region, offering a platform to acknowledge the dedication, hard work, and innovative spirit of local businesses. Even months after the event, the impact of these awards continues to be felt, as winners and finalists use the recognition to grow their businesses, attract new customers, and build stronger networks within the community.

For many local businesses, being named a finalist or winner provides a valuable boost, reinforcing their reputation and highlighting their contributions to the Hawkesbury. The recognition can be a turning point, helping them navigate the challenges of running a business and reaffirming their place in the local economy. As we look ahead to the next round of awards, we celebrate the resilience and determination of our business community. Their hard work continues to shape the Hawkesbury, ensuring it remains a vibrant place to live and work.

Congratulations to all the finalists and winners. Your efforts and achievements continue to make the Hawkesbury a better place for everyone.

1 Who was the first Aboriginal member of parliament in Australian history?

2 In which house did he serve: Senate or Lower House?

3 Which state did he represent?

4 The Mau Mau Uprising was an anti-colonial war against British rule in which African country?

5 Who was the first prime minister of India upon independence?

6 The daughter of India’s first PM also

Puzzle

served as prime minister. Who was it?

7 Nguyen Tat Thành was a Vietnamese revolutionary better known by what name?

8 Which area of land was the subject of dispute in the High Court case Mabo v Queensland (No.2) in 1992?

9 Who starred as the titular Irish revolutionary leader in the 1996 film Michael Collin?

10 Bobotie (pictured) is a national dish of which country?

Tradesman (9)

Savoury meat jelly (5)

Arranged (6)

Drink (9)

Crossing; corridor (7)

Recruits (7)

Ratify (7)

Incinerated (7)

Prison-breakers (8)

Renowned (6)

Mediterranean island (5)

(9)

Stated (9)

(4)

Using the nine letters in the grid, how many words of four letters or more can you list? The centre letter must be included and each letter may only be used once. No colloquial or foreign words. No capitalised nouns, apostrophes or plural words ending in “s”.

ARCTIC BEANIE BLIZZARD FREEZING GUMBOOTS HAIL HEATER HIBERNATION ICE INDOORS

MITTENS RAIN SKATE SKI SLEET SOLSTICE STORMS SUBZERO SWEATER WOOLLIES

Fell; lessened (9)

In this place (4)

Edgeword Drop Down

Place each of the tiles of letters into the blank jigsaw below to create four six-letter words going across and down.

Starting with the seven-letter word, drop a letter and form a six-letter word. Continue in this manner until you reach the single letter at the bottom. You can rearrange the letters in each step, if necessary.

There

Insert each number from 1 to 9 in the shaded squares to solve all the horizontal and vertical equations. Multiplication and division are performed before addition and subtraction.

There may be more than one possible answer.

Lifestyle

Hawkesbury DJs Go Big In Sydney

A group of Hawkesbury-based DJs took over the Oxford Art Factory on January 24 in one of the first major events to spotlight the region’s growing electronic music scene in a city venue.

The night featured a back-to-back (B2B) format, where two DJs played sets together, alternating tracks in a carefully curated performance. The lineup kicked off with Adz B2B Jellings, followed by Cav B2B Vanill, Cmash B2B Dunleaveit, and Mungo B2B Aggie, with Special K closing out the night.

The event was organised by Riley Cavanagh, who spent the back end of 2024 planning the showcase.

One of the DJ's who spoke to the Hawkesburby Post said the goal was to introduce audiences to music styles that are often overlooked in local pubs and bars.

“There’s a real appetite for heavier sounds like techno, hard house, and garage, but in the Hawkesbury, it’s still a struggle to get venues to embrace them,” Cavanagh said. “This event gave us a chance to show what we can do on a bigger stage,” he said.

The event drew more than 100 attendees, many of whom traveled from the Hawkesbury to support their local DJs. The response was overwhelmingly positive, with punters eager for more.

Plans are afoot for an even larger event later in the year, once again at the Oxford Art Factory.

“We’ve proven there’s an audience for this,” he said. “Now we’re looking to go bigger and better.”

New Wine Bar Brings Local Flavour to Richmond

A new wine and cocktail venue has quietly opened its doors in Richmond, promoting a taste of local Hawkesbury produce, wine, beer and spirits in a relaxed environment.

Enniskillen Orchard in Town, an extension of the popular Enniskillen Shed in Grose Vale, launched in early January at 179 Windsor Street in the former Mama Yaki premises. Local owners Angela Maguire and Richard Brough from Grose Vale have created a relaxed community social space that champions the region's food and beverage producers.

The menu features a selection of tapas-style share plates and nibbles, including charcuterie boards, bruschetta, sardines, pulled pork sliders, garlic prawns, and Spanish chorizo.

The drinks menu showcases an array of local wines from Jubilee Vineyard and Tizzana Winery, craft beers from Gypsy Fox Brewery, spirits from Karu Gin, and refreshing Hillbilly Cider. Cocktail enthusiasts can sample expertly crafted espresso martinis, Moscow mules, and Morita margaritas. At the same time, pet owners will be pleased to know that well-behaved dogs are welcome in both the front and back courtyards, making it an ideal spot for casual dining with four-legged friends.

The venue operates Thursday evenings from 5-10pm, Fridays 4-10pm, Saturdays 12-10pm, and Sundays 12-4pm. Private events can also be accommodated by arrangement.

Riverside Gardens is a boutique retirement village offering stylish residences within a safe, independent living community.

Established in 2010, Riverside Gardens consists of 2 and 3 bedroom villas and apartments nestled amongst established gardens and tree lined streets.

On a daily basis, the community centre is a hive of activity and a beautiful space for residents to socialise and enjoy.

Riverside Gardens is conveniently located within walking distance of North Richmond shops, cafes, and endless recreation.

Lifestyle

The World's Most Adaptable Summer Salad

by Fiona Hamann

When the weather is warm, there's nothing quite like the snap of fresh green beans and the peppery bite of young rocket leaves combined with herby goodness. This recipe celebrates the season's bounty, pairing these crisp vegetables with budget-friendly cuts of lean lamb. While premium cuts like backstrap might break the bank, this dish proves you can create something special with more affordable lean cuts. But feel free to use backstraps, chicken breast, or halloumi for a vegetarian option and play around with ingredients. The flavours in this salad work with any protein.

The tender green beans retain their satisfying crunch, while handfuls of fresh rocket and soft herbs bring brightness to every bite. These spring stars are complemented by convenient and cheap pantry staples – tinned Cannellini beans and chickpeas – though feel free to use whatever tinned beans or lentils you have. The same goes for the herbs. A scatter of Middle Eastern Sumac and za'atar (available at Richmond Fruit Market) adds an aromatic flourish that elevates these simple ingredients. Quick to prepare and light on carbs, it's the perfect midweek meal.

Zesty (adaptable) Spring Lamb (or chicken) Salad

Serves 4

350g trimmed green beans

4 lamb small lean lamb steaks (or chicken breast/Halloumi)

1 400g tin cannellini Beans (or any tinned beans or lentils you have on hand)

1 small tin chickpeas

200g rocket leaves (or rocket and baby spinach)

1/2 bunch of dill

1/2 bunch coriander

1/2 bunch mint

1/2 bunch parsley

2-3 spring onions

1 lemon

50ml olive oil

150g feta

1 TB Sumac

1TB za'atar

Balsamic glaze and pine nuts for garnish

1. Depending on size, chop the beans into halves or thirds, and cook in a pot of boiling or salted water for 2 minutes (until they are bright green and crunchy). Drain and rinse under cold water to stop the cooking process.

2. Add the drained tinned beans, cooked (cooled) green beans, herbs (finely chopped), rocket, and thinly sliced spring onions in a bowl.

3. To make the dressing, add 30ml olive oil, lemon zest and juice, za'atar, salt, and pepper. Whisk and stir through the salad ingredients. Add crumbled feta.

4. Sprinkle the lamb, chicken, or halloumi with Sumac, salt, and pepper, and fry in a heated pan. The lamb should be medium rare (3-4 minutes on each side). If using chicken, it should be cooked through, and halloumi should be browned on each side.

5. To serve, divide the salad mixture among four plates and top with sliced lamb, chicken, or halloumi. Drizzle with balsamic glaze and scatter with pine nuts.

Summer Nats

A Hawkesbury local has made his mark at one of Australia's premier automotive events, unveiling a stunning restoration that earned immediate recognition from judges and fellow enthusiasts alike.

Paul Johnstone of Marayla showcased his masterfully restored 1985 Holden VK Commodore at the annual Summernats car festival on 2 January, where the car won a high impact award in its debut appearance. The prestigious recognition results from years of dedicated work undertaken entirely in Johnstone's home garage and marked a significant professional milestone. "Just to get in the section where you can unveil the vehicle is one of my ticks as a mechanic, to kind of kick off my bucket list and say, well, I've done it," Paul told HP.

"Over four years of building a car, you get to a point where you think, is it any good to start submitting it into the hall?" he reflected. "Summernats chooses the Top 60 to unveil. The judges then come around and give you a score."

For Johnstone, the project was about more than just the car itself. "It was actually good to build that car with my son, daughter and my friends and just hang out in the shed together, basically, and just see what we can achieve," he said on more than one occasion during the interview with HP.

Summernats is a four-day automotive celebration near Canberra, with a mix of high-octane entertainment, burnout championships, car parades,

car displays, fireworks, and live outdoor concerts. Against this backdrop, Johnstone's VK Commodore showcased the enduring appeal of classic Australian muscle cars and the craftsmanship required to restore them to mint condition.

Following his success at Summernats, Johnstone plans to display his award-winning Commodore at MotorEx in Melbourne this year, continuing to share his passion project with automotive enthusiasts across the country. Encouraging others to pursue their

automotive dreams, Johnstone said: "I 100% suggest anyone to do it. All they have to do is get on the Summernats web page and submit photos of your build to try and get in there. The volunteers at Summernats are really helpful with advice."

Book A Free Trial Swimming Lesson Today!

Discover your new favourite swim centre at Starfish Aquatics, conveniently located in the heart of North Richmond! With stateof-the-art facilities, crystal-clear water, and a focus on making swimming fun and rewarding for all, we’re here to help you enjoy every moment in the pool. Whether you’re just starting out or looking to improve your skills, Starfish is the perfect place to dive in.

Our Learn to Swim program is suitable for everyone, from four months right through to adults. With no lock-in contracts, no security deposit, no joining fees, and no cancellation fees, we’re committed to giving you complete flexibility and peace of mind. Our goal is to develop knowledge and improve safety in and around aquatic environments. Our staff are highly trained and pride themselves on their ability to create a supportive and safe environment for everyone. Don’t just take our word for it. Check out our countless five-star reviews and discover why so many families choose Starfish Aquatics. We also offer a variety of other services, including Aqua Aerobics, Squads, and even Walking & Swimming sessions for those looking to mix fitness with fun. And don’t forget about Stella’s Café, our standalone café that’s packed full of sweet and savoury goodies as well as all your favourite beverages. Boasting a huge dining area and secure kids' zone, Stella’s Cafe is the perfect place to unwind before or after a splash. Whether you’re interested in lessons, fitness classes, or simply enjoying a day in the pool, we’re here to help you and your family create lasting memories in the water. Still not convinced? Contact us today to book a free trial lesson.

So, what are you waiting for? Dive into adventure with Starfish Aquatics and experience the joy of swimming today! 41 William St (cnr of, Campbell St), North Richmond NSW 2754, Australia. contact@starfishaquatics.com.au | (02) 4571 2683

Wilberforce Rd, Freeman’s Reach (inside Macquarie Park)