2015 - 2020 The Report of mASEANa project 2019 : 8th & 9th International Conference
“Progressive Once More�: Rejuvenating Mid-Century Modern Architecture in Southeast Asia
Introduction
Foreword
09
Kengo Hayashi / Shin Muramatsu
Part1: “Progressive Once More”: Rejuvenating Mid-Century Modern Architecture in Southeast Asia
- 1. Introduction to the 8th and 9th mASEANa International Conference Opening Address
12
Ho Weng Hin
Opening Remarks for Special Plenary Session
14
Desmond Lee
CONTENTS
- 2. Keynote SpeechRejuvenating and synergizing modern ASEAN architectural Conservation Discourse
16
Johannes Widodo
Our Modern Past is Too Young to Die: advocating for modern architecture in Singapore
18
Chua Ai Lin
The Future of Our Recent Past: Rejuvenating Singaporean Modern
21
Ho Weng Hin
Carrying On Styles / Creating New Phases Jun Aoki
26
Shigeru Aoki
32 - 3. ASEAN #1: Modern Landscape and the Everyday -
The Architectural Turn: Modern architecture and public space in Singapore, c.1973 Eunice Seng
36
The Stage, The Stars and The Crowds: the Life of Gelora Bung Karno Setiadi Sopandi
40
Da lat Market Quarter – An iconic modern architectural symbol of Da lat under transition Nguyen Cam Duong Ly & Tran Mai Anh
44
Moderated Discussion Moderator: Ho Puay Peng
47
Part2: Inventory of modern Buildings
- 4. ASEAN #2: Community and Ground-Up Initiatives Heritage Cinemas Evolution of Phnom Penh Hun Sokagna
- Inventory of modern Buildings in Kuala Lumpur -
50
Community-Led Adaptation in Downtown Yangon
History of modern architecture in Kuala Lumpur Nor Hayati Hussain
97
Inventory of modern Buildings in Kuala Lumpur
99
54
Beverley Salmon
- Inventory of modern Buildings in Singapore -
Moderated Discussion
57
Moderator: Johannes Widodo
History of modern architecture in Singapore - 5. ASEAN #3: Technology and Tectonics Precast Construction and the Megastructure of Amorn Srivongse Pinai Sirikiatikul
Johannes Widodo
109
Inventory of modern Buildings in Singapore
111
Acknowledgment
122
61
Investigation of Precast Concrete Facades in Heritage Buildings - Case Studies from Malaysia Wong Chung Wan
64
Tropicalizing Modernism for A New Nation Gerard Rey Lico
66
Moderated Discussion Moderator: Chang Jiat Hwee
69
- 6. Plenary Session: Rejuvenating Modern Buildings: The Social and Economic Values of Heritage Donovan Rypkema
Rejuvenating Modern Buildings in England Elain Harwood
72 74
Of Structures and Trees: An Engineering Perspective Hossein Rezai
78
Mark Latham
82
Where Values Collide: Heritage, Social Change and Market Lai Choo Malone-Lee
Moderated Discussion Moderator: Sarah Ichioka
86 90
CONFERENCE INFORMATION
The 8th mASEANa Conference in Urban Redevelopment Authority Centre
The 9th mASEANa Conference in Meiji Jingu Sansyuden
The 8th mASEANa Conference Singapore, 31. Oct - 2. Nov. 2019
The 9th mASEANa Conference Tokyo, 15. Feb. 2020
“Progressive Once More”
“Progressive Once More”
Rejuvenating Mid-Century Modern Architecture in Southeast Asia Venue: Urban Redevelopment Authority Centre Organizer (Japan): Docomomo Japan, Japan Foundation, mASEANa Project Committee Organizer (Singapore): Docomomo Singapore Working-Group-in-Progress, National University of Singapore, Department of Architecture, Singapore Heritage Society Supporter: ICOMOS Singapore
Program Rejuvenating and synergizing modern ASEAN architectural conservation discourse by Johannes Widodo (Singapore) Our Modern Past is Too Young to Die: advocating for modern architecture in Singapore by Chua Ai Lin (Singapore) ASEAN Panel I “Modern landscapes and the everyday” The Architectural Turn: Modern architecture and public space in Singapore, c.1973 by Eunice Seng (Singapore) Always something for Jakarta: The 4th & 18th Asian Games Venue by Setiadi Sopandi (Indonesia) Dalat Market Quarter – An iconic moder n architectural symbol of Dalat under transition by Nguyen Cam Duong Ly & Tran Mai Anh (Vietnam) ASEAN Panel II “Community and ground-up initiatives” Biggest financial and technical obstacles in Phnom Penh by Hun Sokagna (Cambodia) Community-led adaptation in downtown Yangon by Beverley Salmon (Myanmar)
Rejuvenating Mid-Century Modern Architecture in Southeast Asia Venue: Organizer: Co-organizer: Sponsership: Supporter:
Meiji Jingu Sansyuden DOCOMOMO Japan (mASEANa Project Committee) The Japan Foundation DOCOMOMO International, ICOMOS ISC20C, mAAN The Toyota Foundation
Program ASEAN Panel III “Technology and tectonics”
Opening Remarks by Kenji Watanabe (Japan)/ Masanobu Ito (Japan)
Prefabrication and the megastructure of Amorn Srivongse by Pinai Sirikiatikul (Thailand)
Keynote
Investigation of precast concrete facade in heritage buildings - case studies from Malaysia and Singapore. by Wong Chung Wan (Malaysia)
Carrying On Styles / Creating New Phases by Jun Aoki (Japan) The Future of Our Recent Past: Rejuvenating Singaporean Modern by Ho Weng Hin (Singapore)
Tropicalizing modernism for the Filipino nation by Gerard Rey Lico (Philippines)
Session "Progressive Once More”
Plenary Session “Rejuvenating modern buildings: the social and economic values of heritage”
Refining Architecture by Shigeru Aoki (Japan)
Encouraging investment in mid-century buildings: the why’s and how’s of incentives by Donovan Rypkema (US)
Restoration of historic (pre-cast) facade - case studies from Malaysia by Wong Chung Wan (Malaysia)
Rejuvenating modern buildings in England by Elain Harwood (UK)
Conservation of Modern Heritage in the Philippines by Gerard Rey Lico (Philippines)
Buildings and Trees: an engineering perspective by Hossein Rezai-Jorabi (Singapore)
Discussion and Q&A
Park Hill: Re-made in Sheffield by Mark Latham (UK) Where values collide: heritage, social change and market pressures by Malone-Lee Lai Choo (Singapore)
Closing and future of the mASEANa project by Johannes Widodo (Singapore) For the International Conference Docomomo 2020 Tokyo by Yoshiyuki Yamana (Japan)
PARTICIPANTS Co-coordinator
Johannes Widodo
National University of Singapore, mAAN, mASEANa, ICOMOS Singapore
Japan
Jun Aoki
Jun Aoki & Associates
Yasuko Kamei Nihon University
Malaysia
Shin Muramatsu The University of Tokyo, mAAN, mASEANa
Shigeru Aoki
Shigeru Aoki Architect & associate inc
Wong Chung Wan MAEK Consulting
Myanmar
Yoshiyuki Yamana Tokyo University of Science, mASEANa
Masanobu Ito The Japan Foundation
Cambodia
Hun Sokagna Roung Kon Project
Arsitekturindonesia.org
Deputy Director, Doh Eain
Philippines
Kenji Watanabe
Tokai University DOCOMOMO Japan chair
Indonesia
Setiadi Sopandi
Beverley Salmon
Gerard Rey Lico
University of the Philippines Diliman
Singapore
Kengo Hayashi The University of Tokyo
Desmond Lee
Minister for Social and Family Development and 2nd Minister for National Development
Vietnam
Chua Ai Lin
Ho Weng Hin
Executive Director, Singapore Heritage Society
mASEANa 2019 Co-Convenor, Docomomo-SG WIP, Studio Lapis
Chang Jiat Hwee
Lai Choo Malone-Lee
NUS Architecture
NUS Centre for Sustainable Asian Cities
Nguyen Cam Duong Ly Docomomo Vietnam
Tran Mai Anh Docomomo Vietnam
UK
Eunice Seng
University of Hong Kong
Sarah Ichioka Desire Lines
Elain Harwood Historic England
Thailand
Ho Puay Peng NUS Architecture
Beer Singnoi
Architectural Photographer
Mark Latham Urban Splash
US
Hossein Rezai-Jorabi Web Structures
Pinai Sirikiatikul Silpakorn University
Donovan Rypkema
Heritage Strategies International
Photo credit: Jeremy San (Singapore Heritage Society Collection)
Foreword Kengo Hayashi / Shin Muramatsu
(mASEANa Project Coordinator, The University of Tokyo)
The mASEANa Project, which entails cooperative research on modern architecture in Southeast Asia conducted jointly by researchers in Southeast
and will conclude in March 2021. Sponsored jointly by the Japan Foundation,
Southeast Asia, Japan, the UK and the US gathered to introduce and discuss
the Toyota Foundation, and Docomomo Japan, it has three goals: 1) To create
the current conditions and initiatives underway in their respective countries.
ing conservation issues in Singapore, while two Japanese architects, Jun Aoki
In FY2019, Inventory Workshops were held in Kuala Lumpur and Singapore, and International Symposiums were held in Singapore and Tokyo. points include new perspectives and new topics that will probably be widely modern architecture in Southeast Asia. In addition, this report concludes with the achievements on the Kuala Lumpur and Singapore Inventory Workshops. -
Photo credit: Beer Singnoi
Part 1: “Progressive Once More�:
Rejuvenating Mid-Century Modern Architecture in Southeast Asia
1- Introduction 2- Keynote Speech 3- Modern Landscape and Daily Life 4- Technology and Tectonics 5- Community and Ground-Up Initiatives 6- Plenary Session: Rejuvenating Modern Buildings: The Social and Economic Values of Heritage
1
Singapore
Opening Address Ho Weng Hin
(mASEANa 2019 Co-Convenor, Docomomo Singapore Working-Group-in-Progress)
Introduction to the 8th and 9th mASEANa International
The title “Progressive Once More”: Rejuvenating Mid-Century Modern Architecture in Southeast Asia” embodies the vision that an alternative mode of redevelopment can and should be found for these large modernist
offering creative spatial solutions for so-called disruptive trends and facilitate
compared to current mainstream practice.
Conference
Heritage value is often assumed to be a function of the building’s age or
to the mid 1970s.
geometric forms of repetitive modular design and standardised material
12
the demolish-and-rebuild tabula rasa approach to urban development.
tainable is that?
potential of these forgotten modernist structures to become progressive urban beacons of our times.
conference presented a compelling case that rehabilitation is a viable and
13
Singapore
Opening Remarks for Special Plenary Session Minister Desmond Lee
(Minister for Social and Family Development and 2nd Minister for National Development)
-
-
Partnering the Community -
-
buildings and structures across our island are conserved.
Welcome -
Our Modern Buildings as Heritage Icons -
-
14
-
-
viable conservation schemes to be generated.
-
15
2
Singapore
Rejuvenating and synergizing modern ASEAN architectural conservation -From The 8th mASEANa Project Conference, 2019-
Johannes Widodo
(mASEANa Co-Founder, Docomomo Macau, NUS Architecture) mASEANa
Keynote Speech
Asian Modern Modernisms & Modernities -
“A History of Architecture� with an
-
-
16
the discourse.
the bottom-up.
-
presence in our everyday lives.” capital.”
The mASEANa Platform Fig.1
-
-
Conclusion
-
Fig. 1: The mASEANa Platform (Source: Johannes Widodo)
17
Singapore
Our Modern Past is Too Young to Die: advocating for modern architecture in Singapore -From The 8th mASEANa Project Conference, 2019-
Chua Ai Lin
(Executive Director, Singapore Heritage Society)
Our Modern Past: A Visual Survey of Singapore Architecture 1920s–1970s
18
-
-
fortunate to have had an independent arts centre providing a small production
Fig.1
(Source: Joseph Nair)
Fig.2
-
ommendations are: for higher standards for the maintenance responsibilities
-
for this is to be more impactful in communicating our message to government Fig.3 (Source: Chua Ai Lin)
Fig.4
-
-
19
a.
b. -
be an important resource. c.
these buildings -
-
put videos online to reach a bigger audience and to be available for access even after the event. Hashtags also help to consolidate material online and
20
Singapore
The Future of Our Recent Past: Rejuvenating Singaporean Modern -From The 9th mASEANa Project Conference, 2019-
Ho Weng Hin
(Docomomo-SG WIP, Studio Lapis)
Introduction
and political values to the evaluation criteria.
Fig.4 -
Fig.5 Fig.1
Fig.2
-
-
and civic groups appealed against the government’s proposal to demolish
Fig.3
Fig.6
21
Fig.8 -
in Singapore.
Fig.7
The post-independence modern built heritage of Singapore embodies
Fig.2: Former Victoria School, with the new 5-storey Singapore Heritage Society Collection) Jonathan)
Fig.3: Jurong Town Hall (Source: Jeremy San, Singapore Heritage Society Collection) later grafted onto the new mall and residential tower. The tiled Shanghai Plaster finish was reinstated. (Source: National
22
was demolished in 1992 for the road-widening of Stamford Road. (Source: Jeremy San, Singapore Heritage Society Collection and the Lee Kip Lin Collection)
(Source: Studio Lapis)
1.
-
-
-
3. aesthetics.
age speculative en-bloc agitation
innovation.
Fig.9 tempts. Besides suffering from deteriorating building condition due to ageing
Fig.10.a -
-
-
Fig.7: Asia Insurance Building. (Source: Jeremy San, Singapore Heritage Society Heritage Society Collection) Collection)
San, Singapore Heritage Society Collection)
23
-
Fig.11
Lessons Learnt characteristic of the building. Surgical intervention such as remodeling of the
centives and dispensations that are coordinated across different government
ings and complexes of special value: 1.
Progress) Architects Planners)
24
-
sensible and sustainable manner are required. 3. -
-
in dialogue, and also carrying out independent research and studies on proposes horizontal intensification in the form of partial reconstruction of
-
and strategic.
-
change crisis to change mindsets and transform modus operandi in the
carried out. This initiative provided a structured and clear rationale for listing recommendations that aimed to enhance the public’s understanding and tion of future infrastructure plans 3.
-
5.
-
of heritage management of post-independence buildings.
-
tate innovative adaptive reuse design
Conclusion
1.
25
Japan
Carrying On Styles / Creating New Phases -From The 9th mASEANa Project Conference, 2019-
Jun Aoki
(Jun Aoki & Associates)
speech.
Fig. 3: The south entrance
Fig.1 Fig.2
Fig. 1: Tairen Kinen Kyoto Museum (Builted in 1933, Architect: Kenjiro Maeda)
Fig. 5: The large display room
Fig.3 Fig.4 Fig.5
Fig.6 Fig.7
26
Fig. 4: The west entrance hall
Fig.8
Fig.10
Fig.11
-
Fig.12
Fig.9
27
Fig.13
Fig.14 Fig. 17: The entrance at the Parasophia
Fig.15
Fig.16
-
Fig. 14: The opened doors at the Parasophia
-
Fig. 15: The grand stairs at Fig. 16: the Parasophia
28
Fig.18
Fig.19
Fig.20 Fig. 24: The cross-section
Fig.21
Fig.22
-
Fig.23 Fig. 25: The new main entrance
Fig.24
Fig. 20: The facade at the completion
Fig.25 Fig. 26: The new grand display room
Fig. 27: The 2nd floor of the display room
the old shoe room is still remaining there. But this is the main entrance at this
Fig.26) Fig. 21: Picture from the proposal competition
made. Fig.27
Fig. 22: Stairsteps to the entrance Fig. 28: The entrance on the east side
29
Fig.28
Fig.29
Fig.30
Fig.31
-
Fig. 37: The Japanese garden
Fig.36
Fig.32, 33
Fig.37
formulated to be able to be reused. Fig.34 Fig.4
Fig.35 things and old things are incorporated.
Fig.38
Fig.39 Fig.40 Fig. 34: Large-sized terrace
30
Fig.41
-
Fig.42 Fig. 38: Recent entrance hall
Fig. 39: The stained glass in the hall
Fig.8
Fig.43 Fig.44
Fig. 41: Under construction
-
-
Fig. 44: The northern display room
31
Japan
Refining Architecture -From The 9th mASEANa Project Conference, 2019-
Shigeru Aoki
(SHIGERU AOKI Architect & Associates Inc.)
-
sistance Fig.2
Fig.1 Fig.3
Fig.4 vated building Fig.5)
32
-
longer Fig.6
Fig. 12: Setting up the model room after phase 2
Fig.7 Fig.8
Fig.9
the exterior Fig.13
Fig.10
Fig.14 -
Fig.11
Fig.15
Fig.12
33
Fig.20
Fig. 15: Old Hamamatsu Sala
Fig.21 Fig. 18: Interior of the
Fig.22 Fig.16, 17
Fig.23 Fig.18
building Fig.19
34
ceiling Fig.24
-
renovated.
perspective.
Fig.25
Fig.26
In case of reconstruction
Material Production (Body)
Material Production (Finishing)
Material Production (Facilities)
Construction (New Building)
-
35
3 ASEAN #1 : Modern Landscape
Singapore
The Architectural Turn: Modern architecture and public space in Singapore, c.1973 -From The 8th mASEANa Project Conference, 2019-
Eunice Seng
(SINGAPORE | University of Hong Kong) Authenticity in heritage discourse is a quagmire of power politics. Let us
to acknowledge the diversity of meanings, types of public and responses,
consider the Merlion statue at Sentosa. The latest version that opened in the
and the changing views and perceptions of the built heritage. This raises the
early 1990s is now closed and awaiting demolition. Following the exchanges
question of aesthetic value. Who are the arbiters of aesthetic value? Who and
by netizens on social media, there was much debate about why it was not
what informs such collective aesthetics?
big a loss, because it is after all not the original Merlion at the mouth of the
2018 poll described as a Study on Perceptions of Singapore’s Built Heritage
and the Everyday
With the exception of the Changi Airport Control Tower, no architecture
Singapore River. These collective echoes of ambivalence connect with the
1
and Landmarks. The Institute of Policy Studies came up with a ranking in
Are older buildings more beautiful, despite the knowledge that they are monuments to colonial power? Instead of an interrogation on collective aesthetics,
three categories, and across Singapore’s history of Pre-Independence, PostIndependence and the URA Conservation Master Plan of 1986. The Changi
“the architectural turn” – that is, a moment in the late 1960s through the mid-
Airport Control Tower came in top as the most important site in the country. In
1970s when modern architecture was thrust into the center of contemporary debates on the forms and spatiality of the state and its global city agenda.
terms of aesthetics, the Botanic Gardens came top for the voters aged 28
One could take the year 1973 as a pivotal point to interrogate archi-
years and below, and the original Merlion Statue topped the voters 29 years
tecture’s role in the creation of state-sanctioned public spaces in private
and above. The three sites that dominated the survey captured categories in
developments. These spaces were appearing in the city center and the com-
an infrastructure, a garden and a statue.
mercial district. The aim here is to insist on the understanding and appraisal
The Golden Mile Complex and other modernist buildings came in rather
of mid-century modern buildings as part of an urban cultural milieu amid a
low in the rankings in the study. Most of these were not even within the top 10, 15, 20 and 25. Why is this so? A plausible conclusion is that there is an inextricable relationship between the general consensus of physical appeal
36
and national identity. Or there is a strong correlation between the value of
anticipating the rise of the global city and the consumer’s city. These buildings
heritage and the sense of national identity for those born during or before
included the Development Bank of Singapore (DBS) building designed by
1990. These are important conclusions insofar as they allude to the need
Architects Team 3, the Overseas Chinese Bank (OCBC) building designed by
Edmund Barker, the Minister for National Development. Barker was declaring
cussed without the state, because it was so deeply embedded in Singapore’s
Team. The People’s Park Complex residential tower just opened and a line-up of new shopping centers were on the drawing board or under construction.
that would be spearheaded by private enterprises.5 The newly established
use of private capital in is initial plans to become the global city. These would meet in the Central Area via the urban renewal program. In his article “Real
Between 1968 and 1973, numerous modern buildings were completed. Taken together, they formed an urbanism that embodied the technologies,
Second: the imagination of the market. This imagination could not be dis-
the private land sales program.6 unveiled a model showing the Golden Shoe District, with large-scale modern
challenges and aspirations of post-Independence years. The year 1973 can be examined through three imaginations of the built
also emerged in the region around 1967, including Asian Building and
developments under construction. They included the forty-story Malaysia-
environment: the state, market andregion. First, the imagination of the state. In
Singapore Airlines (MSA) building by Malayan Co-Partnership completed
Games consisting of athletes from seven participating nations.2 Planned and
treated the city as real estate – the pragmatic economic engine of the nation.
-
presented as a part of the region, even though it was geographically north of
The majority of the buildings would “range from 22 to 40-story stories and are
dence, Toa Payoh was designated as the Games Village to house the athletes
Southeast Asia and not related to the geopolitical construct of Association of
designed to provide continuous covered with walkways with landscaping to
and participants. A number of sporting events also occurred at the newly built
Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). In addition to newspapers like the Bangkok
Toa Payoh Stadium. Two months earlier in July, the National Stadium was
Post, South China Morning Post and The Straits Times, many mass market
opened for the inauguration of the Southeast Asian Peninsula Games. This
publications portrayed this region of diverse cultures and traditions as one
designed by the Design Partnership.8 The high-rise shopping-cum-housing
intersection of architecture and a sports event positioned Singapore’s modern
undergoing rapid modernization and urban development. Modern architec-
complex ushered in the memory of the previous People’s Park Market (known
public housing program as a tangible manifestation of national progress. The
ture and new construction technologies were unambiguously accepted as
colloquially as “Sin Chew Pasah”). From a landscape of single-story market
SEAP Games and Toa Payoh New Town witnessed the convergent spaces of
the appropriate form of aesthetics, carrying the aspirations of a common
stalls, this southern part of the Central Area expanded into a Modernist
the state and the region.
modernity. The regional readership of such mass media continued to circulate
aesthetic recognized internationally.9 Next to this private complex was the
Meanwhile, city building became a project undertaken not only by the
and popularize the modern aesthetics, as this readership formed the other
state, but by the collaborative efforts of public and private enterprise. By 1967,
unintended public that had experienced the architecture of the city outside of
the processes of state planning and urban renewal were heavily promoted
the intended national public.
by the local government, legitimized by international technical expertise.
7
shops, 74 eating stalls, a crèche and kindergarten on the podium roof, and
Amid the tumultuous 1960s and 1970s in Southeast Asia and the post-Independence years in Singapore, many architects and planners were
old People’s Park Market. The crèche on the roof play deck was an incredibly
“urban renewal does not mean just the construction of low-cost housing. It
envisioning utopian and modern forms. In particular, the Singapore Planning
vibrant place well-loved by the residents.10
means the general improvement of the whole environment including roads,
and Urban Research (SPUR) group explored megastructures of integrated
imagination of a safe space for community participation within the city center.
car parking facilities, the provision of amenities and the construction of a
multi-block buildingsand linear infrastructures of transportation networks that
variety of commercial buildings which necessitates the investment of private
could co-exist with the historic city without demolition or eviction of the existing
Market and the rise of the privately-owned 31-story People’s Park Complex out
capital.”3
city. These large mixed-use strata title developments were architectural man-
of 2.5 acres of rubble. Before major public convention spaces were available in the city, only a few private development projects such as the People’s
In 1967, in an address to students of the Singapore Polytechnic, the
ifestations of planning for extreme density, suitable for an Asian modernity.
Deputy Prime Minister Toh Chin Chye acknowledged that urban renewal
This was in line with the postwar trajectory in architectural discourse towards
was no longer simply a “major political and social problem, but it is one of
an increased understanding of the interactions of socioeconomic and political
were able to host to important nationwide events. From the onset, the notion
economics, town planning and building.” By mid-1967, the government had
forces that produced this Asian modernity. This period marked the beginning
of the shopping complex as the new public space was articulated by the
announced a $90 million urban renewal plan, calling for local and overseas
-
architects and developers of these projects in the late 1960s. They echoed
4
ronmental design.” It demonstrated a new awareness of humanity’s impact on
the state in claiming the ‘People’s Park’ for the people, going beyond a mere
world whereby private participation was promoted by a government at such
shared ecosystems, culminating in a new paradigm in the understanding of
commercialized shopping venue. Even in 1968 when the project was under
a wide scale. Urban renewal “thrives on private participation,” according to
the dialectical relationship between architecture and the environment.
37
own, having every facility a traveler could wish for.”16 That same year, Ming
of plazas and courtyards that introduced the hotel as public space. There
14
Many of these have been demolished, mostly without any protest
in 1971, the Shangri-La luxury resort has been playing host to countless
or debate. The hotel interiors became the space for local arts and crafts, vivid
visiting dignitaries, national and international galas, and conference events,
ous others.
colors, materials and textures collected from the region and curated by the designers. Designed to convey a sense of luxury with a touch of homeliness,
The regional imagination of the mid-twentieth century hotel was predicated
these interiors were very different in their moods and sensibilities from the
on the geopolitical situation and economic expansion that peaked in the 1980s. The transformation of housing complexes to hotels and vice-versa mirrored
and the modern shopping center were conceived as new public spaces for
the development strategies for domestic housing and the tourism industry led by the state and the private enterprise.17 Originally designed by Iversen
activities. The regional hotel operators frequently commissioned established Apr. 1971)
and emerging artists from the region, appropriating the iconographies, tech-
Singapore was redesigned as a hotel when the owners realized that it made
of democratic space, with an intention “to maintain the image of a people’s
niques and materials of batik, rattan cane, teak and various vernacular crafts
more economic sense to build a hotel to capitalize on the burgeoning tourism
in the honing of a regional modernism.
in the region. This interchangeability between a hotel and apartment housing
11
park and that is why we have facilities for non shoppers.”
An artist’s impres-
sion of the air-conditioned interior of the People’s Park Complex showed wide escalators in the atrium space, and these ideas were widely publicized in
was not unusual during this time, especially since the extent of adaptation interior design was created by Don Ashton. The main entrance lobby was
local Chinese and English newspapers, and in numerous magazines.12 The glass tube chandelier was designed by the architect15 (Fig.2). Such hotels
space for the state’s creation of a new kind of public (Fig.1).
were characterized by a combination of the International Style architectural
The state, the developer and the architects planned for the coexistence
aesthetic, with a modern yet indigenous interior. The implications of this
of public and private interests in one site. On the one hand the shop-
double design aesthetic – universal and traditional – have not been fully
ping-cum-housing complex is a privately-owned building in an architectural
analyzed or understood within the canons of modernism. From a heritage preservation perspective, a historical and formal analysis of the modern
On the other, particularly when we direct our attention downwards, the con-
Asian hotel exterior as discrete modernist forms, must be complemented by
testations between the actual occupation of the ground and the symbolism
a historical and material inquiry of its interiors. Such studies must include an
of a universal modernist aesthetic is palpable. It is immediately conspicuous
interest in the origins of the hotel and its patronage, augmented by a lateral
that any genuine discussion on preservation cannot be limited solely to the
study of the economic development and geopolitical ambitions of the hotel
protection of the physical building as an isolated entity. Crucially, the historical
owner, in order for one to fully understand the complex construction of cultural
and spatial relationships between the clusters of modern buildings along Eu
identity in modern Asian architecture.
Tong Sen Street and the Chinatown district should be treated as a whole, as
These hotels embodied the decolonizing, nationalizing and interna-
the buildings and their attendant “public” and “consumers” were conduits into
tionalizing agendas of their time. This pivotal moment was marked by the
the urban genealogies of nation building and economic development.
emergence of the large luxury hotel with a multi-height atrium offering a new
luxury international hotels were completed in Singapore and the region.13
38
-
ample of the impact of regional tourism on architecture. In 1970, a link bridge
private development was adhering to the production of a new national “park”
Third: the imagination of the region. Between 1968 and 1973, numerous
was minimal18 (Fig.3
the understanding and appraisal of mid-century modern architecture as part
situation. It is pertinent that any study of the built heritage must question not
individual building to the past, present and future of the city within and without the national framework. This brief essay proposes the year 1973 as a method of inquiry. It is an attempt to discover the multifarious channels of imagination, in order to educate ourselves about the location of new sensibilities and
1.
2. Vietnam, Burma (now Myanmar), Laos and Singapore – took part in sixteen sporting events. 454 athletes represented Singapore. The Southeast Asian Peninsular Games was changed to the Southeast Asian (SEA) Games in 1977. There are currently eleven Southeast Asian nations in the SEA Games. 3. 4. “$90m plan for a new look Singapore,” The Straits Times, Jun 16, 1967, 5 5. Ibid 6. The URD became an independent government authority in 1974. It was responsible for
ten-story building originally built in 1955 as a service apartment building.19
confound the limited question of authenticity and preservation. In conclusion, it is imperative to examine the socioeconomic and geopolitical narratives surrounding any building project in Asia because of the interconnected histories of the region. The immediate site and other regional contexts of contemporaneous buildings would also shed light on other concealed imaginations. The year 1973 saw the opening of the Singapore Zoological Gardens, the announcement of the Instant Asia Project, the completion of the Cable Car Tower to Sentosa Island. This tower was the ultimate Brutalist form of an infrastructure, that served a nationwide tourism master
of a mid-century building to a public conditioned by economic pragmatism? The study of the built heritage must take into account, beyond national imperatives, public perception, aesthetic appeal and individual memories,
7. Alan Choe, “Real estate development trends in the Central Area of Singapore,” Asian Building and Construction (Jan 1973): 16-22. 8. For a historical analysis of the People’s Park Complex and its complicit role in the making of a new public space as national project, see, Eunice Seng. "People’s Park Complex: The State, the Developer, the Architect and the Conditioned Public, C.1967 to the Present." In Southeast Asia's Modern Architecture: Questions of Translation, Epistemology and Power, 9. Eunice Seng, 2019, 242-44. 10. “US team impressed with our creche facilities,” The Straits Times, Nov 2, 1968, 4. 11. “Old Landmark Goes,” The Straits Times, Jun 18, 1968, 6. 12. “People’s Park Complex,” The Straits Times, Dec 1, 1967, 8. “Space for all in People’s Park Complex,” Far East Builder (April 1971): 21-24. 13. 14. Colombo (1956-2000). For a full analysis of the emergence of these hotels in Southeast Asia as part of the larger modernizing project of the region, see, Eunice Seng. “Temporary domesticities: The Southeast Asian hotel as (re)presentation of modernity, 1968–1973,” The Journal of Architecture 22, 6 (2017): 1092-1136. 15. Far East Builder (Sep. 1968): 27-30. 16. Builder (Nov. 1969): 19-20. 17. Eunice Seng (2017): 1119. 18. 1970): 33-38. 19. Ibid.
39
Indonesia
The Stage, The Stars and The Crowds: the Life of Gelora Bung Karno -From The 8th mASEANa Project Conference, 2019-
Setiadi Sopandi
(Arsitekturindonesia.org, Director & Co-Founder)
This paper describes fragments of the life of the much celebrated Gelora
was no surprise as at the same time Indonesia also launched three national
about the project was superlative. The biggest, the widest, the largest, the
architectural – symbolic – competitions for the National Monument, the
longest, the tallest. The main stadium carried more than a hundred thousand
National Mosque, and the headquarter for central bank – Bank Indonesia. So
spectators. Once it peaked at 150 thousands, well sheltered under the folded
the architectural monumental intent was there already.
oval cantilevered shed. The indoor stadium – named Sports Palace or Istana
during the 1950s and early 1960s. The massive sports complex was planned
The selection of Indonesia as the host for the 4th Asian Games was
and built during one of the most turbulent times in Indonesian political and
made around the time when Indonesia was about to fall into an authoritarian
can host 15 thousands.
collapse. Indonesia proclaimed her independence in a precarious time, in
parliament. There were four cabinets for four years, making the government
and a technical assistance from the USSR. It was always been associated
August 1945, and right away, has to go through wars and diplomatic battles
crippled unable to perform any development nor tackled urgent matters. So
for more than 4 years. Right after, Indonesia had to deal with a collapsed
Sukarno took everything into his own hands, threw a decree to disband the
economy with strategic assets as well as governmental administrations still
democratically elected dysfunctional parliament, and proclaimed his “Guided
controlled by Dutch corporations. In addition to that, we are facing separatist
Democracy”, and announced Indonesia under martial law. In addition to that,
Olah Raga – hosted 10 thousands. The athletic stadium – Stadion Madya –
economic history. By the end of the 1950s, Indonesia was in the brink of
movements, often backed by foreign powers amidst of the global Cold War. But the 1950s was an interesting times. Despite all the hardships, we
territory just had reached a new peak. The long process of nationalization
can still witness so many wonder of the modern global world unrolling in
(of Dutch-owned companies) suddenly break into a massive anti-Dutch
Indonesia – especially in the capital Jakarta. The 1950s saw mushrooming movie theaters catering the urbanites with pop-culture, including home-grown movies, press freedom, and liberal democracy. This was also an era where
Productions stopped, administration delayed, and military-backed mobs run
urban development and architectural projects were placed on a national stage and became symbols of development and national identity.
The design for the sports venue calls for an integrated sports complex to
On May 25, 1958, in Tokyo, Indonesia was appointed as the host for the
host most of the games which was highly regarded by the Olympic Committee.
4th Asian Games in 1962. This was a second attempt by Indonesia, which
Only 5 countries in the world in 1960 had such integrated sports complex.
means by 1954 Indonesia had already been motivated to host the event. This
The capacity set for each venue was staggeringly monumental, as everything
40
with Moscow’s Luznisky stadium which bears similar feats such as the canti-
along the north-south spine.
levered shelter and the oval shape. A group of engineers and architects were deployed to work on it, and directly consulting the site and the design with
anti-colonialism campaign, Sukarno initiated an alliance of independent formerly-colonized countries namely Conference of The New Emerging Forces
Indonesia and its roundabout is topped with a statue gesturing “welcome” to
or CONEFO as the alternating power alliance to the United Nations. The move
Sukarno. On the other hand, Sukarno assigned his trusted architect, Silaban,
was timely with Indonesia’s withdrawal from the United Nations following
to comment and to supervise the project. After considering several options,
Indonesia’s objection on the formation of the Federation of Malaya which con-
Senayan area was selected as the site for the complex.
sisted of West Malaya, Singapore, British protectorates of North Borneo and
The sports complex location was strategically set on a spot lying between the Weltevreden – the 19th century southern extension of old Batavia – and the
villages of Jakarta a shock.
the borders. Including a bomb terror in Singapore. As well as to the streets of
nationally and internationally. It pulled many strings. The 4th Asian Games
Jakarta, along the North-South axis of Thamrin-Sudirman Boulevard. Sukarno
A generous expanse of land was cleared, 240 hectares, for the whole event. The architectural and infrastructural projects set a new footprint for Jakarta.
Sarawak. The confrontation campaign brought some military engagements in
The 4th Asian Games ware indeed very highly anticipated by the public,
then commissioned the CONEFO complex to be built at the north plot of the eventually turned out later as the national television corporation, Televisi
sports complex. The construction was started in 1965 and eventually rushed.
Republik Indonesia, or TVRI – occupying a plot on the northern side of the
But due to the major political upheaval in 1965, It was never used as intended.
of the north-south historic spine but also allowed further expansion towards
complex. Newspapers anticipated the event not only by articles but also
The CONEFO building was then established as the Parliament Building.
the west and the east part of Jakarta. The USA, as an effort to win Indonesian
television advertisements.
sympathy in the midst of Cold War, funded the by-pass roads infrastructure
Many political controversies emerged during the event such as the
development. The west by-pass intersects the north-south Thamrin-Sudirman
exclusion of Israeli and Republic of China (ROC, Taiwan) athletes which
boulevard axis allowing movement of vehicles from the south to the west, and
prevented them from participating in the games. The action caused Indonesia
enabling further western expansion of the city. The east by-pass allows goods
to be suspended from the International Olympic Committee and barred from
and commodities to be transported from the inland directly to the Tanjung
the 1964 Summer Olympics, which subsequently responded by hosting an
Priok at the north east without passing through the inner city. The complex
alternative in 1963. Indonesia initiated the alternative version of the Olympics, bore the name of GANEFO, The Games of the New Emerging Forces. The
with the growth triggered by the blue and the yellow road, these infrastructural
would be in Phnom Penh, in 1966.
developments created stems for the growth of Jakarta metropolitan area. Powered by the Japanese War Reparation funding, few projects were realized
41
Aftermath the 1965 downturn, a new Army-USA-backed authoritarian regime ruled Indonesia for more than three decades. Backed by the military-regime, few strategic companies – especially Pertamina – the state
body acts as a commercial developer which tends to embrace development
approach, resulting in visually attractive spaces and secondary spaces for
of dormant assets for public and commercial activities.
many kinds of activities. The rich articulation of the axes surprisingly incites
Due to the pressure from the president, the Minister of Public Works &
monopoly energy company – had enormous power over Indonesia’s natural resources, including controlling strategic urban assets. The northern tip of the
creative uses by the public. These are four major venues which went through major refurbishment
of architects to plan, coordinate, and execute the renovation design of the
(the Athletic Stadium by Maria Rosantina, Aquatic Center by Andra Matin,
masterplan and the buildings. This includes the refurbishment of the roads,
Tennis Outdoor & Indoor Venue by Adi Purnomo, and the Sports palace by
other strategic parcels were controlled by many developers turned into hotels,
parks, transportation and parking system, security, access, drainage, and the
Boy Bhiwara). Every structure from the 1962 Asian Games were protected and
shopping malls, and other commercial developments. This resulted in the
integration of activities and movements. The designers were also expected to
only slightly renovated in order to be distinct. New elements were carefully
complex being surrounded and overshadowed by the modern development,
conserve the original historic structures as well as to design new buildings.
deployed not to compete with the original ones. The original athletic stadium
inward-looking and isolated into inaccessible islands. Stadiums are isolated
– which was partially sheltered – is now covered by a new roof system, leaving
from each other, preventing people to access their facilities. Each with its own
to be able to accommodate immediate future needs, including creating as
the original elements almost untouched literally by the new ones. The aquatic
authority colluding with ill-managed sports associations.
many attractive spots as possible for free public use. The four main axes lead-
center is now turned completely indoors, as the original structure is retained
ing to the Main Stadium were assigned for total make over, using a thematic
and completely arched by the new roof and structural system. The outdoor
Sports associations – which are often corrupted and mismanaged – occupied spaces in the buildings and made ad hoc and poor alterations to the
tennis stadium gets only minimum intervention and rearrangement of access.
buildings. Uncoordinated upgrading caused more damages to the original
The indoor stadium – the Sports Palace – is cleared from unsightly and intru-
structures. This happened for more than 30 years, unwatched. Gelora Bung
sive additions, and given a friendly and proper interface for the public.
disassociate the complex from the former president Sukarno, lessening the
ticipated. It holds the largest number of spectators and will be the center
importance of the historic sport complex and everything related to it.
of attention during the opening, closing, and every other major event but
As the centerpiece of the complex, the Main Stadium is the most an-
Another chance came in 2012, when Indonesia was appointed as the 18th Asian Games 2018. Jakarta and Palembang were selected as the jointor a principle to guide the architectural development. For the Main Stadium, renovation was only started from 2016, only after President Joko Widodo
whatever necessary taking all responsibilities of renovation, construction, upgrading all infrastructure and facilities demanded by the event. This meant a huge undertaking, allowing the minister to by-pass many administrative procurement requirements. It is a well-known fact that typical Indonesian bureaucratic procedures usually prevents good architects from entering public commissions, because it is full of tricks and almost certainly smeared with corruption. Big state-owned
control the biddings. The practice indeed prevented good design and a well-
to mismanagement, corruption, and the lack of state support. The expansive sports complex was indeed an expensive facility to maintain. Since the estab-
42
the architect set several new approaches on how to manage the crowd
sessions for the public in particular spots. Skateboarders, cyclists, electric
approaching the building. In order to invite more public engagement to the area and to explore activation of the spaces, the architects decided to take
The garden surrounding the main stadium is also generated by many activities enjoyable by the public, thanks to the access, facilities, lighting, and security services.
disruption. Barriers are reconsidered and negotiated between the authority and the
roads as a race track. It has caused an uproar from the users. What I found
architect, to provide the best decision (1) to control the crowd effectively, (2)
interesting about this fact is that the public loves the space and will go a
to provide better security and maintenance, (3) to minimize visual pollution to the main stadium. The architect developed a water barrier, enlarging the drainage system into a moat which also serves as an aesthetic feature.
Complex.
Several scenarios on the physical barrier were developed as alternative as the authority intends to minimize the security risk during the event. The architect
Elizabeth and Daniel Craig as James Bond for the 2012 London Olympics.
proposed the exterior spaces to be activated as commercial spaces, so the
The popular theatrics do not stop there, but also played as the major venue
surface of the main stadium can act as a generator of activities as well as
during the 2019 political rallies, by both contenders. And, obviously, as the
revenue center for the complex.
sports complex (especially the stadium) has been closely associated to Joko
To further enhance the idea, the architect proposed an innovative strategy by adding an extra layer of columns and to place spiraling ramps.
Widodo’s appearances, this has been working out well for him. As a top-down major infrastructure project, obviously we cannot avoid
The ramps are intended to be free public access to the upper galleries, so the commercial and public activities will also be happening there. The similar
and pressure from the top chain of command.
‘covering’ strategy was also applied elsewhere to accommodate the need to -
refurbishment of the facilities can do for the public more than ever before.
ity completely rejected the plan and deemed it as an outrageous proposal. The debate made it into mainstream news media and eventually the proposal
still apparent and preventing the public from being very close to the buildings.
was dropped.
The outer fences and green areas were also enclosing the ring of the Main
My take of this debate is that the main stadium has always been so
Stadium from interacting with the outside. In addition to that, unrestricted
strategic, not only for the event, but also for everyone involved in the process.
access by motorized vehicles at times turned the ring road into parking lot. But now the opening of the barriers – especially in the premise of the Main
centerpiece of the global event, as much as the authorities want their hands
Stadium - enable public use not only during weekends but also weekdays day
on the object to show their power.
and night. With the additional lighting, the place becomes popular for night time uses, even more than daytime uses. Thanks to the operation of Jakarta
indeed important political property for the 2019 Presidential campaign. The ef-
MRT which connects the complex with the Jakarta Central Business District,
forts and special status given to the project were not gone to waste. The 18th
combined with spacious pedestrian area outside the complex, successfully
Asian Games was opened in 18th August 2018 – a day after the celebration
bring more people to exercise and to enjoy the complex.
of Indonesia’s 73rd independence anniversary – featuring Joko Widodo, the
-
president as the star of the show. – the man who gave the special status of the
43
Vietnam
Da lat Market Quarter – An iconic modern architectural symbol of Da lat under transition -From The 8th mASEANa Project Conference, 2019-
Nguyen Cam Duong Ly & Tran Mai Anh (DOCOMOMO Vietnam)
The Da Lat Market quarter - an iconic modern architectural symbol of the
small quarter in the centre and in the west of the city, reserved for the local in-
city of Da Lat since the French and American occupation periods is nowadays
habitants in the Plan O’Neil (1919), proved the continual segregation policies
landscape axes and amenities to create a centre for Da Lat. In this map we
under transition time. Originally land of the ethnic natives, Da Lat was discov-
of the French authorities in Da Lat, is the debut of the Vietnamese quarter for
can also see many migrant communities in the southern and the western and
ered by French Doctor Alexandre Yersin in 1893 under the order of French
the Vietnamese community that serves the city.
northern part, which extends to the eastern side of the city. These migrant
governor Paul Doumer to create a resort town in the South of Vietnam. For a
In 1923, a new plan of Da Lat was proposed by a famous French planner
long time, the city is a summer town for the French colonials, and the local
Fig.1
hamlets (“
” in Vietnamese) came from North and Central Vietnam and most
of them worked in the agricultural sector.
inhabitants - the ethnic native and Vietnamese population - were considered as outsiders in this area. Today Da Lat Market Quarter is considered as one of the most symbolic quarters of Da Lat city which still preserves its identical
power of the Vietnamese community in the centre of the development of Da
urban and architectural images throughout its history. This quarter proves its
Lat City. With the position of the market, the commercial centre of the city
historical values are of the market being considered as the continual economic
position in memories of Da Lat’s inhabitants. The quarter should be well rec-
was an important role for activities besides the resort town and administrative
and service centre of the city. Since its beginning, Da Lat market quarter holds
ognized for its heritage values, not only in its history with memorable events
functions.
the economic power of the Vietnamese inhabitants in the European-style city.
and personages, but also in its architecture styles, construction technologies, urban and landscape heritage values, that are fading under the pressure of the fast urban development of the city of Da Lat recently.
Da Lat city was object of some exploration plans and projects of French
city is the Plan Champoudry in 1906, and later one is the Plan O’Neil in 1919. These two plans considered the Vietnamese population with a minor position in their city as most of the plots were reserved for the European and French population, with only small portions for local inhabitants. Annam Village - a
44
In the plan of 1963 made during the American time, the structure of the
The old French market, built in 1937 to replace the wooden ethnic market at
seen with the use of balconies, eaves, verandas, air ventilating slots and the
planner to protect the panorama view from the hillside towards the city centre
vegetation planting on the facades. The elegant facades of the modernist 59 in the nearby marshy valley. It was also considered as the mainstage for
market and the modernist shophouse using the curve facade, the vertical
Another feature of the Da Lat Market Quarter is its intangible value.
many political events, for example the Revolution in August 1945 or the public
and horizontal division by columns and concrete sun shading, are still well
This is not only progressive architecture but the interesting thing is how
preserved until today (Fig.3). In addition, the architect reproduced the zigzag
these modernist buildings in harmony with the customs and practices of
and chevron motif of the old Art Deco market in the new market buildings,
the local inhabitants. The continuous custom of the local inhabitants to go
maybe to make them more harmonized.
to the outdoor markets to buy local products (foods, agricultural products,
This quarter also has great architectural value with the interesting Art Deco
In talking about construction technology, SIDEC - one of the main contrac-
crafts) is well-preserved in both the old market and the modernist market. The
Style in the French market (Fig.2) designed and constructed by the Société
tors of many markets in Vietnamese cities during French period, had created
harmonization of old and new practices, of the indigenous, Vietnamese and
Indochinoise d’Études et de Construction (SIDEC) and the modernist style
a large open plan space without compartments, supported by reinforced
Western living styles coexists both at the indoor and the outdoor markets. The
in the new market complex designed by the new generation of Vietnamese
concrete pillars for the Art Deco market. This could be considered as pro-
modernist buildings in this context became more friendly while in harmony with the lifestyle of the indigenous people. Today this is also a place of Da
In the Art Deco market, some identical architectural elements of this
structure in other Vietnamese cities. The modernist market’s structure is also
Lat outdoor market, especially during the night, popular for not only the local
style could be found, such as the clean rectangular form, the various simple
by reinforced concrete. The materials used for the modernist shophouses are
inhabitants but also for tourists.
decorative geometric shapes (chevrons, zigzags) and straight lines, featuring
very identical for the whole area with reinforced concrete for structure, pebble
bright colors. The function of these architectural details is also to adapt
dash for facade, wood for doors and windows and iron for balconies.
with local climate and practices - the decorative elements became the air
One of the main values of the quarter is the urban and landscape value.
As mentioned earlier, Da Lat, especially the market center where
ventilating slots, the verandas to open the market activities toward exterior.
The complex of markets, shophouses and boutiques, market places and
located numerous important building and accumulated lots memories of Da
landscape axes in Da Lat market quarter is considered as one of the most well-planned market quarters in Vietnam. The combination of market hall,
detailed master plan to give the downtown area of the provincial capital of Da
transformed it into the city meeting hall surrounding by retail kiosques of
market streets with shophouses and market square, are typical typologies
Lat, a famous tourist destination, a complete refurbishment. (
modernist style.
for many commercial centers of Vietnamese residential quarters, such as
)
According to the plan, the Da Lat’s downtown area, covering some 30
case of Da Lat, this model represents in both old and new markets as the market in Vietnam. This new market complex composed of two buildings of 3
popular model of Vietnamese living style. The design of the slope roof for the Art Deco market hall created an harmonization with the surrounding traditional
a complex center with modern architecture for service and entertainment
-
shophouse while still created an modern image. In the case of the modernist
purposes. In the meantime, the Da Lat Market, covering a 6.95-hectare area,
ment and concert activities. All of these functions are still preserved nowadays.
market quarter planned and designed by Ngo Viet Thu, the green modernist
With the design concept to apply the Modernist style with adaptation to the
esplanade was created with straight lines, the curves of the topography
Fig.5) The
change and the integration of the modernist buildings (market, kiosques, of hotel, travel and accommodation services and public constructions.
low level and the verandas to open the market activities towards the exterior,
buildings, shophouses) in harmony with the topography. This could be con-
which make the modernist buildings more friendly and lively. The interesting
sidered as one of the most well-landscaped market quarter in Vietnam. The
The local government approved the detailed plan with strategy to improve
part of this market complex is the plan made by Ngo Viet Thu - one of the most
architects had well recognized the forces of the site with variations in topog-
the quality of services in the area and create new places for tourists to spend
famous architects of Vietnam, in 1959, with the modernist connecting bridge
raphy height to construct the new complex without destroying the landscape
money. It will also attract more investment into Da Lat, transforming it into a
structure and the 2 or 3-storey shophouses wrapping around the market. The
characteristics of the site. The connecting bridge was an idea of President
resort city of international level The new proposal faced a lot of oppositions from both academia and
or other household activities. The adaptation to the local context could be
local people. According to Ngo Viet Nam Son, son of Mr. Ngo Viet Thu, the
45
Agency). During that time, he was famous for many important buildings
directly under the president of South Vietnam. By this new assignment, he had a chance to make the detailed plan, and also with the existing market, he proposed a renovation design with a new architectural style. The most important features that he was proud of was the new walk-way bridge and stairways that enhance community activities of the Da Lat people (Fig.7). Before, it was in two parts, one in the market and one in the city meeting hall, quite separate with the topography. The stairway not only connects these two areas and shows the idea of connecting with landscape topography that is native, but also brings people together, especially to enhance the community of Vietnamese people as before, it was usually for the Europeans.
The Da Lat Market Quarter with the old and new markets became the iconic landmarks of Da Lat city since many decades. The two complexes prove their progressiveness in the design styles, the construction technologies, the comfort and the urban landscape harmonization. This quarter is a current planning can be equally well implemented in the northeastern area of
the impact of this market center to Da Lat city from “resort city” in colonized
popular destination for visitors, the lively community memories of many Da Lat
Da Lat, away from the city center, where large areas of empty land offer huge
time to a “peace and independent city”
inhabitant generations and the local government should enhance its values
potentials to develop a new highlight for tourism to the city.
Da Lat Center’s new master plan have aroused a huge outcry from the
Da Lat is still a popular destination for visitors, with more than 6.5 million visitors a year, and everyone must come to this place for food and buy hand-
which direction to follow with regards to development, in looking forward to
icrafts from locals and minorities which brings a lot of activities there. Now
share the experience from other places and to have a chance to say at this
even though it looks in poor condition, it is an awareness of how the local
point that it is an important part of Da Lat City.
Internet. People used media to call for the attention of how important it is to Da Lat people. To interview with Local Da Lat people, they mentioned their pride
to integrate the spirit of “new centre market” in the old time to the “new centre
about a modern center of “independent and peace city” in Vietnam during
city” in the future?
the Vietnam war. Many photos were shared by the Da Lat people in their albums, where they remember food stands in the lower ground where they always stopped
Ngo Viet Thu was one of the most famous Vietnamese modern architects.
by to buy cheap and interesting local food, which made the city center very lively. They shared their old memories in old family albums, one includes an
activist for heritage architects. We had an interview with Ngo Viet Nam Son
invitation to the opening ceremony of the market. It is one of the very special
during urban heritage seminar in SaiGon last summer. We discussed what is
photos that they kept in their albums for many years, and people wanted to
the role and how Ngo Viet Thu took part in the detailed planning and building
show that these are old beautiful precious memories (
Da Lat Market.
46
). They never forgot
Moderated Discussion -From The 8th mASEANa Project Conference, 2019-
Moderator: Ho Puay Peng (NUS Architecture) With Eunice Seng, Setiadi Sopandi, Tran Mai Anh and Nguyen Cam Duong Ly interesting in the case of People’s Park Complex, is the idea of a “People’s
often in many cinemas, so it was popularized before. Sukarno took it as a kind
Park” that went through different iterations, from the developer to the state
of political propaganda using architecture as well, using it as a something to
you picture modernism as a kind of architectural style within this socio-political
via Alan Choe and various layers and then somehow reaches a kind of
milieu at that time (e.g. with the independence from Malaya for Singapore, the
explosion where they all came together at the opening. In the subsequent
the archipelago. Everything seems to be channeled through the architecture
‘Confrontation” and leadership in Indonesia) and the idea of moving forward
decade it became a national space, private space and commercial space
so it is not something that is related to our everyday life but something as
simultaneously which we can see in many of these strata projects - Golden
a form of propaganda. Somehow, we still have those architectures or hotel
together?
complexes as something distant from us – quite exclusive at the time – but still : In a way, that is the gist of what I was getting to. The sort
of everyday coincided with an expanding home owning middle-class and also
of formal aesthetic of modernism through my shared archive of forms really
coincided with a serious spurt of tourism in the region. That’s why I looked at
popular that we embrace it to our own conscience. : In the case of Vietnamese cities, we can say
become receptacles or containers for emerging new types of spaces. They
1973, mainly because it sits in the middle and also at the end of many things.
that modernism was a new trend in that moment, as the Vietnamese architects
were new in the sense that they revisited, say, market spaces. What was
There are many levels beyond the national depth that drives the imperative
had education in the French school. To return to the country and try to apply
that really produced this kind of everyday.
it to the context of the cities, the architects have proved that they had many
: I always picture the architecture in Indonesia (es-
considerations about the context, the local inhabitants and local practices.
pecially in the 50s and the 60s) as a massive show that was laden with so
It seems that modernist projects at the time like many works by the architect
many sentiments, even during the early 50s where actually a lot of modern
Ngo Viet Thu, (e.g. the project of the city centre of Saigon and Da Lat Market Place) has shown that he led the idea of modernity but always considered
Project, it was genuinely a Dutch project even thought it was handled by
how to harmonise with the local context and climate. It made the modernist
an Indonesia planner, yet Indonesian society embraced it like our own. It
building more open and friendly and intimate with the local life.
was popularised by movies, by a director who was actually given a Fulbright
: To add on, for the case of Da Lat Market Quarter it is not only about the building itself but also about the surrounding quarters.
promoted Indonesian public pop-culture, using architecture as the back-
The stairways, bridge and especially the shophouses were important factors. Because the French colonies had left, the Vietnamese people wanted their
that is embraced by Indonesia. It was celebrated at the time and appeared
own houses and own businesses. By that time, one may say that it was about
47
because they have moved on, it is my reading (and I may be wrong) that the next generation didn’t relate to that - maybe it is a kind of forgetting. I think this sort of remembering is important, not in one way but many ways because we are reaching so many types of levels and age group is just one way to classify them. But there are many other ways and if we keep cutting them, how many ways can you look at this building? I think that is highly productive. SS: In Indonesia’s case it was about momentum.
Last year, everything
came together: the Presidential Campaign, hosting the Asian Games for the second time. At the same time Indonesian politics until now has been so polarised that we separate ourselves as pro-the president or against-the president. Everything has its gravity and everything adds to the excitement and expectation of the Complex. By the end, it doesn’t have to be like that, but the chance that has been taken by the people and the authorities. There are massive efforts to reconnect. As an architectural piece the Sports Complex
except for the massive capacity of the venue. But somehow, the PR people, the ministry, the architects and everyone involved in the project seems to be successfully connecting whatever he said with the public with the 4th Asian Games, which touched a lot of sentiments from the Indonesian people. A chives have been acquired very quickly in a small amount of time (everything seemed to come without us asking for them) so we managed to compile a lot of documents. It is a very strong association with the 1962 events, something like a huge momentum for us, taken very well by the people involved. individual economics and household economics as an important characteris-
‘modern architecture’ because they lived in them. In the 30s, it was still a
: In the Vietnamese case, we know that modernism was introduced
tic that Ngo Viet Thu considered, in order to create these kinds of shophouses
-
during the war, so modernist buildings mostly adapted to that context by
next to the market.
ture was not such a strange thing any more. What is interesting is that going
building quickly and cheaply. That is why not many spectacular buildings
HPP
back to the polling, I looked further at the different age groups and realised
were built during that time and in talking about modernist buildings, many
Excelsior. In Singapore, people value the Merlion or Sentosa more than Golden
that it was the younger people (aged 29 and below) that ranked buildings like
people did not consider it to have big heritage value. Nowadays new genera-
Mile Complex. In Jakarta, the stadium is reused and the market in Da Lat is
Golden Mile Complex higher. Perhaps its thanks to things like The Projector
preserved. For the “now”, how does that relate? Some of this architecture was
modernist buildings in many cases have two facades like brise-soleils, with
created in the socio-political milieu at the time, but today, do we imagine it
actually reminds me that when we go back to the 70s as a case to understand
differently or reimagine it as it was in the 60s and 70s? Shall we also reposition
that moment in the same way, there is a lot of conditioning going on. Whether
it so that it has a certain value or maybe even a reimagined value for today?
reinvent this type of modernist style to the present day as a response to the
ES: I think all of the above. Conditioning is very important because by
Malaysia, or hanging out at People’s Park Complex, there is a subconscious
the 70s, the population (so to speak) had pretty much been conditioned to
conditioning of a very particular type of experience in space. Over time
48
trend in Saigon, called “neo-Saigon” or Saigonese architecture, trying to
: The reuse of the
possible, so there was no choice at the time in 2016. It was given directly by
last few weeks, I heard authority plans to host a car racing tournament inside
the president, with all the authority given to the Ministry of Public Works. It
the venue and some people were very angry with that. It is very interesting
was an extra procedural process back then which also stirred up a lot of com-
to see people speak up about this, so it is not only about the authorities and institutions and government bodies or architects, but those who actually use
had to be done in time for the Games.
the space. We have a list of rules and “Dos and Don’ts” on how to use the
ES: To add to that, there is a book by the urban theorist Rahul Mehrotra who
space without the government telling us what to do, so we determine what is
describes this phenomenon of needing to quickly utilise the land with the
best for the complex with a recurring theme on what is deemed appropriate
-
and inappropriate. That is what I believe is a good thing for any kind of
dents to Taiwan to look at ruins and sites that just did not get enough interest
rejuvenation of modern spaces.
to be reinvested in - really interesting modernist architecture dating back to was degrading for a long time. After the plan of the authority to demolish it, fascinating because that would never happen in ‘an impatient city’. Now, I
people tried to conserve the building by rearranging and reusing the site for
would say Singapore is in the same situation of needing to always maintain
a short time, raising public awareness about the building and making it more
economic viability. There has to be other paradigms because if we were to
attractive to the public. It became a popular attraction for the younger people
use that only, capital is impatient and it will always require greater Gross Floor
who came for the coffee shops, bookstores. This might be a way to raise
Areas, and so on.
awareness to the authority. : The experience
TMA: It is an important building along one of the main streets of Saigon that
of the stadium with lack of funding to redevelop is a very interesting statement, because that is in contrast to experiences in other parts of the world, such as
Town, at that time for the high-ranking people from the government and army, a residential icon along an important axis of the city. Because it is a high-
trying to reverse the trend of development simply because the economic
class building, the quality itself was believed to be good. After the renewal,
temptation to rebuild and redevelop is too high. Moving forward, do you see
it was occupied by the new government and factory workers became more
that the same kind of economic pressure would be exerted on places like
important so one of the buildings there was transformed for those working
Indonesia and Vietnam? Do you see the same kind of resilience that your
in Bason Port (a factory) so that the factory workers could own units in that
experiences have so far to be able to resist the pressure of developers’ greed
building. The axis mentioned became a walking street from 2012-2013 and is
and temptation to rebuild?
a touristic spot since then. Gradually, people who owned a unit there rented
for the National Stadium. It is interesting how a monument in Indonesia is
SS
it out and the use transformed into coffee shops, cafeterias and shops inside
being reused. Can you give some context on how that came about, because
with what is necessary for the development. A constant battle is between
the building, changing incrementally from 2013 -2019. It is a case from the
the government could have very easily torn it down and rebuilt it to show the
not only these two sides, but also with many parties involved in the decision
community, (as one of the ways even for Da Lat and many other places) to
ambition for the new era. Why do you think it was retained? Was there a lot of
making especially the ones that cannot be controlled by the government.
encourage the involvement of the citizens and the people.
lobbying or was it just political willpower?
There is one group that is careful about the heritage who is given authority, not
SS: Quite easy to answer. It was a blessing in disguise - because we had
by the central government but by the provincial government. A lot of things
limited resources and no time to build a new one, and also because Indonesia
go on at the same time and it has always been confusing but using the Asian
was selected as host of the Games in 2012. Nothing happened for several
Games as momentum bypassed this confusion by poking the higher structure
years until suddenly the new government was pressured to do something
of power. So far, the attention has been turned away because the event is
because there was very limited time and there were stages that had to kept
over and everything now seems very calm. The interesting thing is that the
up. There were also some pressing issues that had to be done as quickly as
people who now use the spaces are beginning to be empowered. Over the
49
4
ASEAN #2:
Community
Cambodia
Heritage Cinemas Evolution of Phnom Penh -From The 8th mASEANa Project Conference, 2019-
Hun Sokagna
(Cambodia, Roung Kon Project) The city that I would like to share about in this paper is Phnom Penh,
Evolution of Phnom Penh. The city Phnom Penh started as the status of capital city from 1865, and the history of Phnom Penh starts from 1432, found that year by a lady named
and Ground-Up
Penh as the legend of Phnom Penh. The Chaktomuk Era was from 1432 to 1505, the French colony or French protectorate from 1863to 1953. Sangkum Reastr Niyum, literally “community favoured by the people,� spans the period
Initiatives
between 1955 to 1970. Republic of Cambodia was from 1970 to 1975. From
Before the French came, people lived along the river and built houses in wooden or bamboo structures along the river bank. In 1863, the map of
had three main districts (Fig.1). The French District had administration buildings. In Chinese District had shop houses, residential and markets such as Central Market. The Royal
During 1955 to 1970, Cambodia realized its independence from France and became a recognized nation-state. Starting in the 1950s, the state engaged in rapid modernization projects and used Phnom Penh to showcase its achievements. The city was to be a modern, clean capital of a newly independent Southeast Asian state. From 1956 to 1962, the head of town planning was
50
locations of cinemas in Phnom Penh. In particularly Cinemas were neighboring each other and walks to each cinema were easily located near their houses.
ghost city and cinemas were abandoned. From 2010 onwards cinemas from
only a couple of audience in the cinemas. By this reason, cinemas shut down one by one. For instance, Capitol cinema was designed by Vann Molyvann, it just got knocked down in 2017 at the same time of some other cinemas that were destructed as well. Currently, the plot of land of some cinemas is under construction for commercial buildings such as hotels or apartments .etc. Obviously with plenty of cinemas destructed, my colleagues and I
of architects and architecture students. It is a multi-disciplinary project that aims to research and document, as well as promote and educate about, all the heritage cinemas in Cambodia: that is, cinemas that were built before 1975. The documentation will focus on multiple different perspectives, such
written documents, and historic maps. All the materials collected and pro-
Mr.Vann Molyvann, he was the chief architect for state buildings and head of
students, artists, architects and urban planners, for educational purposes and as a tool to help promote knowledge about Cambodia’s heritage cinemas,
Telecommunication in Phnom Penh.
with the hope of helping to preserve them (www.roungkonproject.com).
Regarding the book of Cultures of Independence published by Reyum, cinema came to Cambodia during the French Protectorate and thus was
the cinemas in Phnom Penh, for instance most of the approximately 33 cine-
conditioned by colonialism. Cambodian audiences began to go the movies as
mas for instance most of cinemas were located along the Tonle Sap river. In
early as 1909 and saw primarily French but also American movies. Evidence
2018, I have done architectural survey drawings for Lux which is the Art Deco
of photos and documents of French administration in early 1920s came to
style, probably built in 1938 .Unfortunately in 2017 , Lux Cinema completely
Cambodia for example in 1909 was inaugurated a cinema “Brignon� where
closed with preparation to build a commercial building (
Cinema or Star Cinema (Fig.2).
volunteer for the project) and we recruited twelve volunteer architectural
).
students to assist in 2017 for research, survey and make architectural drawing were approved annually for viewing in movie theatre throughout Indochina. Public interest in early Cambodian Films of 1960s, as well as their commercial exhibitions and provided cinema tours as well (if someone requests) (Fig.5).
51
Myanmar
Community-Led Adaptation in Downtown Yangon -From The 8th mASEANa Project Conference, 2019-
Beverley Salmon (Doh Eain)
Doh Eain is a participatory design social enterprise based in Yangon,
Yangon is a very unique city that’s been through a very tumultuous history
Myanmar. Our focus is on the restoration of buildings in downtown Yangon
and is developing rapidly. There are lots of buildings in Yangon which are un-
it faces a very pressing and present challenge in order to grow and develop
and on public space development through participatory design and com-
used and becoming derelict due to the capital moving in 2004 to a brand-new
successfully. Demolition of buildings in Yangon is common (between 1990
city called Nay Pyi Taw. Due to this move lots of buildings in Yangon were left
and 2011, 1800 buildings were destroyed); the rules are not robust and land
Placemaking programme which aims to put girls at the centre of the process
abandoned. Yangon has the highest density of colonial buildings in Southeast
value is high, and ever increasing. Buildings are deliberately left to deteriorate
-
Asia and so it holds a unique opportunity for protection of this built cultural her-
so that new taller, cheaper buildings can replace them (Fig.3). When buildings
ing with youth in public spaces in a project with Save the Children. For both
itage. There is also dense development of late 1980’s mass construction and
are demolished it is not just destroying the built environment, but the green
projects the focus is putting them at the forefront of the design process by
more recent housing developments which dominate parts of the city. For these
environment as well – development removes the 100 years old trees which
using participatory design techniques and co-creation, for it to be ‘owned’ by
buildings, construction quality is not resilient - they have been built cheaply,
line the streets along with the 100 year-old buildings. In terms of responding
them and therefore have greater impact and sustainability. Other examples of
against the building regulations, and are now not maintained well (Fig.2).
to climate change and creating a carbon-effective society, the demolition of
our work are a climate adaptation water security project in Thaketa (a town-
Part of the work that we do is in looking at the protection of the heri-
ship in Yangon), and an urban design project in the heart of downtown (Fig.1).
tage buildings as an alternative to demolition and new build in Yangon – a
buildings affects a lot more than just the built environment. lems within his family - his mother was sick and needed hospital care and there was no money with which to pay the hospital fees. Our founder Emilie Röell
and then rented out to provide a sustainable income for the family. Emilie raised $15,000, renovated the apartment, and used a proportion of the rent to pay back the initial investment over a period of time. Gulam’s mother is now well and he can now afford to send his sons to university. Off the back of this
friends wanted the same. They too had neglected heritage apartments with no capital to invest in the maintenance themselves. This model grew and we started to renovate and rent out many more
52
properties, all of them staying in the original ownership. An apartment on 47th
the money is repaid, the homeowner has full control over the property again –
Street is an example with a similar story: the family had been living in the
though they can also choose to keep us on to manage the property for them.
quickly deteriorating building but it was too much of a challenge to restore
To date, we’ve raised just over a million USD and $750,000 of that has been
building, such as an affordable housing block, results in high demands on
(
adapted building was performing extremely well and the new build was per-
). Through the work of Doh Eain, I go into hundreds of buildings in
invested in properties. We are currently using relatively small portions of the
energy consumption for air conditioning due to the poor thermal envelope
Yangon and the condition (especially around structural resilience) is poor. The
money renovating apartments - between $15,000 and $100,000, so that we
(
buildings are not looked after but people are still living in these spaces - we
can help a number of homeowners. Our aspiration though is to increase the
want to support them and protect the buildings, and we also want to provide a
scale of building and we are moving now into doing more whole buildings
was the other interventions to the building composition which were controlling
sustainable income for the local families. Through all the work that we do, the
rather than apartments. The model has a manageable investment with a
and reducing the energy consumption, such as insulation and double glazing.
In the model we apply social investors lend us money which we use to
we move into bigger buildings, the investment repayment period is getting
expensive than a standard per square meter rate for new construction of
support homeowners in order to carry out the restoration. We then manage
bigger. In the last two years, this has been a very rapidly growing model to
the maintenance of the property (we have our own construction team) and
support local people and protect the buildings: we now have 23 properties
during the rental period we are repaying money back to the investors. Once
in downtown Yangon. The rationale is that it’s an easy alternative for building
properties stay in the locals’ home-ownership.
For the adaptations that we do we acknowledge that renovation is more
then the cost difference would be less because affordable housing devel-
owners; they don’t have to invest any of their own money, we inject capital, look after the building for them and provide them with an income. It’s an easy story to tell local homeowners and in general they have been approaching us to get involved. We used our 47th Street renovation in a research project on the climate resilience of heritage buildings; advocating the opportunity of renovation, over demolition and new build, as a mean to mitigate climate change due to energy use. Environmental engineering and passive design techniques are a real opportunity to reduce carbon emissions. For the research project we took three typologies; an un-adapted historic building, an adapted building (as if renovated by Doh Eain), and a new build construction particularly focusing on affordable housing. The building regulations in Myanmar face many challenges and there is limited environmental protection encompassed within them – this project was, in part, a means to advocate for improved standards. We modelled 47th Street prior and post our renovation and then compared those results, in relation to an affordable housing building as if built to the regulations. We used actual live weather data and looked at spatial arrangements, wall thicknesses and material typologies, etc. We made as-
and air conditioning and electrical appliances. For the weather data we used a weather station that was based at Yangon airport to gather accurate weather data and it really affected the results due to the unique environmental conditions in July, which is skewed due to the effects of the monsoon on summer. The headline result was much more dramatic than I expected: the
53
Eain)
expensive than currently. Buildings need to be designed and built with good
of people from the community. We set up community committees, carried out
quality standards, making construction more expensive.
numerous workshops and initiated community build days - the local people
We believe that the work is most successful when it’s community-led and
participated in transforming their space which enabled them to maintain the
is asset-based. We try not to focus on the problems that exist in the city but
place afterwards (Fig.8, 9).
we try to work with communities to say, “What do you have, what are your
Through our work in the heritage buildings of Yangon we also became aware of the alleyways that connect the blocks of historic buildings. The
dumping sites again is important.
colonial grid of downtown Yangon is very linear, and all of the frontages
Many of these projects are funded through CSR programmes or donors,
have a back alleyway. Yangon suffers from a lack of building services and
for example international Embassies. We always include a maintenance
infrastructure, particularly around public space; it has numerous blackouts,
fund in our proposals - not necessarily to use directly, but to use to grow.
both the communities and the local government are committed to supporting
sewage is a challenge, air quality is poor and congestion is serious. Yangon
We encouraged the communities to make more money in order to support
the movement.
only has 0.3 meters square of public space per person compared to Jakarta,
the sustainability and longer-term maintenance of the alleyway. We have
for example, which has 8.5 or Bangkok with 6 square meters per person.
developed our Yangon Alley Garden programme further and now have 11
Archival images from the 1980s show people outside enjoying their local alleyways as public spaces at the back of these colonial buildings (Fig.7).
over 60 alleyways in Yangon and so there is a lot of work to be done - and
In current times people simply dump their rubbish in these places, causing
there is also a real desire from everyone to change these spaces to make
numerous problems. Doh Eain started an initiative to try and support local
them healthier and inclusive public spaces. It is hard to change mindsets,
communities to clear out the waste and reclaim them as public spaces. It’s
-
been a challenge but it took really working with local communities and the
ing waste and then encouraging people not to continue to throw as they can
people who live around each individual alleyway to develop a sustainable and
use and enjoy the spaces. This is a long process; just little changes in terms
robust approach to ensure we were inclusive and reaching a diverse range
of bringing people together to encourage preventing them becoming waste
54
opportunities?” and let them design and decide on the alterations. It needs
Moderated Discussion -From The 8th mASEANa Project Conference, 2019-
Moderator: Johannes Widodo (mASEANa Co-Founder, Docomomo Macau, NUS Architecture) With Beverley Salmon and Hun Sokagna For Cambodia, it is an interesting initiative by students and young people like yourself because you use cinema as the vehicle
from 50-years ago, the screening is outdoors and because the former king
YouTube etc. My question is not just about restoring the cinema, but also
palace or around the museum. We used to have one time, a screening in the
again, so that people are willing to go to cinemas in Phnom Penh?
artists, and town planners - it’s quite interesting that they came to that.
even then, because the shopping mall cinema is full of people, in the last 2 years Lux Cinemas is now knocked down. Beverley, it’s very interesting to see your effort to make a neighbourhood in Yangon ‘cool’ again, because it used to be a very cool settlement. The
Actually, the cinema right now is mostly in the shopping
potentials are great in the shared economy system with the microcredit
You now have 30 cinemas in Cambodia. Theoretically, if you are able revi-
system that maybe can help to restore. But you have a big challenge now.
HS: The way that we think about the future is probably just a small model and
a lot of money is coming in from Singapore or even locally - there are lots of
then taking a look at how the cinema before looked like. But for preserving, it
speculations. A lot of people are eager to buy the properties and turn it into
is hard because a lot of private developers knock them down and don’t build
something else. Your project is relatively small scale, how do you make it
the cinema again and do something else instead. It’s a sad story.
bigger like a revolution? Is there any way to do that?
malls. Old cinemas do not exist anymore, they are all gone. The way that we can keep the cinema is that we need more people, a larger audience, to
Obviously, it’s something we think about a lot and the same problem also faced by different cities, we used to have a very nice cinema culture in the past, but one of the most important cinemas like
the world. In Amsterdam, there’s an organization that manages and monitors
The Cathay became a shopping mall. Even the Sala Chalermkrung Theatre
a vast array of the properties of the old Amsterdam. It would be an interest-
in Bangkok was lucky to be saved from the wrecking ball because of Chulalongkorn University taking over the ownership. What is the fate of the
approaching, it is often unsustainable, so it’s a grant for buildings, which is
cinemas? Will it just remain as adaptive re-use for something else, or is there
spent on the restoration or protection on some level - and then it stops. So
any hope that the activities are not just looking into the physical form but also
how do you really create a model, which can be scaled and also sustainable?
looking into the economic viability?
The interest from investors internationally is great but we have seen a waning
HS: I think the thing we need is a rich investor, to invest in the cinema and
recently. Managing the impact of that investment is a challenge and is interesting to watch but the protection of buildings is partly going to be through
55
advocacy and understanding the value that you could have or seeing the
Burmese now wanting to rent our apartments which is also a good thing,
economic opportunity of protecting the buildings on a bigger scale. There is a
because it shows their mindset and opportunities, that they want to live in
lot of interest, value and love for the buildings in Yangon. There’s an organiza-
these apartments which is quite unique.
tion, the Turquoise Mountain and they have just recently renovated the Tourist
-
Burma Building. It’s a very big building and it’s open to much acclaim and
oping a model to support buildings that we can’t renovate. We are looking
everyone just loves it. The more you do, the more people see the opportunity
to establish homeowner associations for people who either rent or own their
and want to do more so I think creating the momentum is important. There’s
apartments in a block, where we provide advisory services and we can also get impact investors to support on one-off bases to maintain these properties for them. We are also investigating zero-interest loans where we can use our
private buildings and Turquoise Mountain does public buildings. The reloca-
model but on a proportional basis where we use our normal system, (e.g.
tion of Naypyidaw left a lot of government buildings empty. They are also the hardest ones to approach and work with.
used for the kind of protection of the other spaces. It’s not perfect but funda-
Being able to get the support and will of a lot of different players is a real
mentally one of our aims is to protect the buildings in Yangon, and to that aim
challenge. Land ownership is also a big problem. The buildings are basically
we are succeeding in a very small scale. The potentials in terms of investors
100 years old, built from the 1900s to 1920s so it is passed through three
coming into Yangon and demolishing these buildings is predominantly what
generations now. In one case, one building was divided between 46 cousins.
we see happening. Our investors are mainly international social investors, so
In order to do any work to a building at all, you have to get the signature of
they want a very low return on their money. They are not really interested in
every owner of that building, which was impossible. To be honest, that is one
making a return, they are interested in supporting Yangon, local people or
of the biggest reasons why buildings are being left abandoned and derelict
heritage properties. There are some Burmese investors, but predominantly
now. No one can get permission to actually do anything with them and I can’t
quite a few from Singapore and from Europe as well.
tell you how frustrating that is. It happens on a big scale, and on a really small
Just following
scale as well. There is a beautiful building that we are trying to renovate and we’re just struggling to get that signature in order to look after it.
that the bank loan would not provide; without the title of the properties, they could not have a secure title for a loan. What’s interesting is in terms of having
Who are the typical tenants of your projects and the typical investors of these
this project being seen to be sustainable, as economic viability is important for these investors. What sort of return could you actually deliver to these
interest for investors and people who own the apartment, the other being for
investors and what sort of security could you provide to them?
public interest, e.g. reclaiming back alleys. But private interest can go crazy
you strike a balance between private and public interest? Is it even possible?
actually shows the opportunities for these buildings and the rental market
It’s something we think about actively trying to mitigate in the work we
in Yangon. It won’t stay like that forever so this is potentially a very unique
do. We are a social enterprise but are also a company. Our work is towards
period; while there is very little competition there is very little protection going
a social aim. For the buildings, they always retain in the local ownership; the
on. People, homeowners and investors are interested since there are lots of
local people will always be maintaining the control of their buildings. It is
properties and lots of tenants (we have a waiting list for people to stay in a
important for us as a social enterprise, but rents increase and our typically
Doh Eain apartment). What we really want to do is scale it so it has true honest
renter is an expat to the city. Not all - we are seeing a growth in more wealthy
protection for these people and for the buildings. In my mind, especially as
56
an architect, single one-off apartments are not good enough. We experienced
actually reduce the use of the old cinema? It’s probably the offer, but it’s
of neighborhoods with cinemas as part of it and cinemas can function as
probably what you get from the cinema and the kind of experience. If you can
community centers? Then it can be used by the residents so it comes together
and the roof is broken), so we invest over and above to protect the whole
re-value the experience within an old building, no matter what it is, maybe
as a more interesting package for investment to make this cool again.
building by changing the roof and supports, but it does skew the model and if
there’s an opportunity to save the cinemas of downtown Yangon now. We also
Community centers are quite hard because there’s less commercial value
we could invest more, we could protect more. We do need to be considerate
try; we are trying to diversify from residential commercial but it’s much harder
so it’s hard to build up that capital because if it’s a community center it tends to
what we are about.
think that’s the challenge for cinemas – being able to manage that economic
I think how to make heritage investment cool, is to show them the money
risk through the amount of investment that is required, the length of use and
with a good business proposal : I think for any investor, it doesn’t really matter
Britain, where we have a huge number that are listed but still at risk because
different types of venues, reusing these buildings in different ways, probably
think the key is really how to cleverly craft the package for people who want
they closed the cinema buildings. I wonder if your cinema buildings in Phnom
a demise of cinema-use in some of the old buildings, but maybe a growth of
to invest in the social enterprise, the urban redevelopment, even the cinema.
Penh can be used for live music or drama, because it was conversion of
food and beverage outlets within these spaces.
Revitalisation is like hot cakes and that would be the challenge on how to
have a smaller return within it. I think through multiple use is probably the solution.
I belong to the Cinema Theatre Association which campaigns to save cinema buildings in
cinema buildings in London into live music venues that really got me inter-
make the modern architecture cool again.
ested in the building type all those years ago. What new uses were happening and being considered for cinema buildings in Phnom Penh? HS: Yes, it’s a good idea to transform the cinema for restaurants or some other events there. But in Phnom Penh, it’s hard to do that because the old cinema is not maintained very well. When you change for that, there are problems liked bad smells from the inside because it has been abandoned in the city for around 10 years. When you come back to it, all the problems in the buildings happen even 20 years later and you still have the problem so investors I think, would never change cinemas for bars or restaurants. But in another province
inside was changed to a hotel and restaurant and coffee shop. It is quite
private developers, with not really interest from any investors for restaurants. I think the model in Yangon is very interesting, which we can learn one or two things from, which maybe for Cambodia’s case can be implemented as well. Not
functions) and how as an architect, like what Beverley did with the team, goes beyond looking at the normal service that we do while also thinking about investment. Maybe the cinema can be more vibrant in a way and can support each other? It was interesting thinking about it, because right now it’s kind of the change where there’s growth in cinemas in malls, and existing Art Deco cinemas which are still used. What would happen within the society that will
57
5 ASEAN #3: Technology and
Thailand
Precast Construction and the Megastructure of Amorn Srivongse -From The 8th mASEANa Project Conference, 2019-
Pinai Sirikiatikul (Silpakorn University)
I was asked to share about modern architecture in Thailand, and my
systems of precast elements developed by Srivongse. During the 1960s-1970s
choice is to look at the precast elements - the technique that was gener-
Thailand, he was active in designing provincial universities, where prefabri-
ally supposed to lead building into the industrial age and be operated by
cated concrete components were welcomed because they could speed up
factory-mode of production. What I am interested in is how these seemingly
construction and be produced on a large scale. Srivongse used precast all over
‘industrial’ products were produced under the condition that differed from that
the places, but four buildings and one unbuilt project, in particular, stand out.
ideal industrialisation. Given the constraints under which architects in post-war Thailand worked
Tectonics
productive capacity - none adjusted themselves better than Amorn Srivongse
today is the roof structure of Faculty of Social Science, Chiangmai University,
(1934-2012), as made evident in his system of precast concrete. Throughout
built in 1964, where he used precast elements as a permanent formwork
his career, Srivongse had shown how imaginatively one might use precast
set for the making of the roof slab. The precast block was made onsite and
in a situation in which building technology was not that advanced, and the
installed using temporary scaffolding to hold the precast elements in a correct
labour of building was mostly unskilled; thus their costs were pretty low - very
place, before pouring the roof slab.1
opposite to the conditions that gave rise to the emergence of system building
was removed, while the precast blocks that formed the slab remain, leaving
in Europe.
a clean surface, requiring no need for the time-consuming task of plastering
The question is how a seemingly industrial product could be reconciled
of the ceiling. (Fig.1)
with the limited local means and labour intensity. Unlike in most developed countries, where the precast concrete system would lend itself to standardisation and quality products with the minimum of labour, the precast that I am
Similar methods of precast construction to the building of the roof slab of the faculty of social science, but built some years later, is the Dormitory
that this might offer an opportunity to develop an alternative history of precast
at Prince of Songkhla University, in Southern Thailand designed in 1967
concrete, as something that might be different from industrialised world. All of the architectural works presented are a result of self-invented
58
built using precast elements analogous to the Faculty of Social Science,
All the precast elements - roof concrete dome and valley gutters - were shape of the precast elements into equilateral triangular, taking a great span
instead of, as was usual in Thailand at that time, leaving shop-drawing task
made onsite following the architect’s instruction, while at the same time their
without intermediate support of 12 meters. (Fig.2)
to the contractor. What is more is that the architect undertook a sample test
foundation and concrete columns were being poured, meaning that their
for the precast elements himself, which was again very unusually for an archi-
curing time overlapped. It is in this use of precast elements that it allowed
tect’s practice at that time. Furthermore, when it appeared that the building
simultaneous works between the wet construction like foundations and columns and the precast construction of the roof structure that was key to shorten
A more intriguing precast developed at the same University, at the same
also the architect who helped the contractor to solve the problem to speed
period, as it was part of the programme that Srivongse had collaborated with
up construction. This quotation from his inspection report to Rector of the University revealed just how actively he involved in the building processes:
construction time. In terms of design, Srivongse aligned himself with progressive, modernist architecture, but in building conditions, he was practical enough to invent
to Prince of Songkhla University. What is so remarkable about this building
“The contractor spent more time on site-preparation than expected.
his system of casting method for all the precast elements, apparently made
is the roof structure which consists of a series of precast concrete domes
The building work does not work out as it should be […] therefore I
onsite using earthen formwork. This peculiar method not only proves cheaper
resting upon the space frame, covering the entire site of 150 metres in width
helped the general contractor revising the schedule so that everything
than a complicated formwork, as overall construction cost 15 per cent less
by 150 metres in length. This enormous scale of the building, by far the most prominent space frame of any structure in the country, and the requirement for rapid construction, resulted in the development of precast construction
expensive than the average standard rate, but it also ensures greater contour agreed to be working day and night to chase after the schedule.”3
accuracy, necessary for making the roof components.
Unlike in European countries where the precast system became a threat
A closer investigation to the underside of the dome reveals the usage of
to the occupation of the architect, diminishing their role to just a technician, as
local bamboo mattress called lamphaen to facilitate the casting processes. To
the British historian Adrian Forty put it “responsible for little more than setting aspects of its prefabrication system here.2 (Fig.3) At Faculty of Engineering, Prince of Songkhla University, Srivongse designed his system for prefabrication himself, and even more so, he also
out the arrangement of buildings on the site for the optimum deployment of the 4
mould suffered from the drawback of considerable adhesion between earthen
components” , here in Southern Thailand, the precast is evidencing the very
mould and wet concrete. Thus before each concreting operation, the mould
presence of the architect.
was treated with a bamboo mattress to facilitate the casting processes. Once
2019)
59
the concrete was poured onto the woven surface, the excess water quickly
previously at the Faculty of Engineering at Prince of Songkhla University, there
seeped through the surface and then into the pores of the mould, which helped
the Faculty of Engineering, PSU, space frame was adopted as the primary
is a separation between the roof structure made of steel space frame and
to stiffen the concrete by draining the water excess. Moreover, traces of this
structural system here, but with the change of structural material from steel to
the roof blocks made of concrete precast. At Chiangmai, however, these two
woven texture for the concrete dome, removed after the concrete was settled,
concrete. The use of reinforced concrete space frame here is acknowledged
crucial elements are integrated as one. (Fig.5)
are left visible, allowing the evidence of the construction to be visible. (
)
In so far, as we have seen, some of the works developed by Srivongse,
With the precasting process, it meant that each unit, which merged the be pedagogical advantages for engineering students to study directions of
structure and the roof into the single element of the pyramid form, could be
forces as occurring in the building. Srivongse wrote:
laid out and poured separately, while the preliminary foundation and pour-inplace columns were being poured. All roof blocks were cast in moulds that
elemental design into components that could be mass-produced onsite, while
conceive the structure for engineering students to study the direction
were themselves made of concrete whose surfaces were applied with agent
other parts of the construction, especially wet construction, could be carried
of forces from the building itself. Thus I chose R.C. SPACE FRAM [E]
release called “De-ca-dec” to facilitate the casting process.6
out simultaneously. Secondly, human elements, as part of the prefabrication
- a new kind of structure which has never hitherto been realised else-
processes, are not hidden but made visible and displayed.
where. And this may be the case that the new structure is unfamiliar 5
to the contractor.”
their pair of hands to cast the concrete blocks, while more skilled labour, like a carpenter, was concentrated on the forming needed for the columns.
The roof geometry was determined by laying out precast concrete
Because of the size and weight of the precast elements, exactly half the size
blocks in plan. Unlike the Faculty of Engineering at Songkhla where there
of the previous roof element at Prince of Songkhla University, each concrete
Right after the completion of the Faculty of Engineering, Srivongse got
are two families of precasts – roof dome and valley gutter, at Chiangmai
precast at Chiangmai required a smaller crew and lighter equipment. Building
another commission to design another Faculty of Engineering at Chiangmai
University, however, only one type of precast is required. In term of structure,
report made by site supervisor revealed that no more than 7-8 layperson were
60
in operation for the precast production at a time. Moreover, with the size of
viewing cafeteria and bar. With its proposed height of around 700 metres, it
1.25x1.25 meters at its base and 65 centimetres at its height, the pyramid unit
would have beaten the Petronas twin tower, the tallest tower at that time the
remains within the lifting capacity of a derrick and the supporting function of
architect was conceiving the project, by almost 250 metres.
temporary scaffolding.
The tower, planned using triangular coordination, was designed to be primarily constructed out of steel tube space frame, with a total of 3 building
could be recycled many more times than would otherwise have been if using
cores at each corner of the tower, housing lift, spiral staircases and lavatories,
traditional timber formworks, requiring little undertaking in the way of cleaning
whose structure was meant to be pour-in-place concrete using slip forming.
and recasting. Moreover, the repetitive nature of the block also meant that
Thus while concrete would be pouring into a continuous moving form, the
once completed, it could be served as a formwork for the next casting, thus
building of steel space frame structure could be carried out concurrently.
considerably reducing the number of the moulds and also the area required
Moreover, the exterior of the concrete cores is clad with thin sheets of precast
7
for prefabrication.
concrete elements created to resemble motifs found on wall surfaces of the ordination hall of Emerald Buddha temple, as the architect used as an inspi-
precast space frame was astonishing. Looking from the top, the repetitive
ration for modular coordination of the precast sheets. Each precast element
of the precast space frame created a compelling visual pattern. The upper
is approximately 1 meter by 1 meter, so with this size, it could be readily
chords of the space frame made in hot-dip galvanised steel tube connect the
produced and installed by hands. (
)
zenith of the pyramid units, making each of the groups into the larger structural
Unfortunately, the tower remains on drawing board, as it went unbuilt
whole. Equally remarkable is its underside of the precast blocks, where rough
for reasons that need further investigation. But if you want to see how the
while others - especially one that lends itself to standardisation and quality products with the minimum of labour - may lack.
surfaces as a result of hand casting using concrete moulds are left visible as they are light up by ventilation apertures. The ventilation apertures allow not
its reminiscence - a sun-shading device which the architect designed for the house of the City Tower’s engineer, Arun Chiaseri, completed in 1967.
the top part of the unit, creating a series of repetitive bright pattern, whose
The sunshade elements are of precast concrete panels made onsite using
function comes directly from the necessities of ventilation and construction.
plywood formwork. (Fig.7)
With the limited building means and labour, the success of precast here lay
Before ending, I would like to draw your attention to the original question
in the rationalisation of precast production and construction, which allowed
raised at the beginning as to how a self-invented precast by one architect in Thailand responses to a global phenomenon of modernity. All the precast were fabricated in the most uncomplicated possible conditions in moulds
out to be a work of human craft. For Srivongse, both the precasting at two Faculties of Engineering at
made of whatever materials available at hands: timber, plywood, concrete
1. Interview with Arun Chaiseri, engineer, 11th October 2019. 2. See the detailed discussion about this project in Pinai Sirikiatikul, “Onsite precast concrete: A critical approach to concrete at the Faculty of Engineering, Prince of Songkha Voorde, Bertels et al. (London, Taylor&Francis Group): 1229-1235.. 3. "Building inspection report, 25th November 1968, Amorn Srivongse to Rector of Prince of Songkhla University,” Amorn Srivongse Archives. 4. 254. 5. “Amorn Srivongse’s letter to Vice-Rector of Chiangmai University, Okat Palangkul, 1st August 1972," Amorn Srivongse Archives. 6. “Specification for Faculty of Engineering, Chiangmai University,” Amorn Srivongse Archives. 7. Ibid.
and even just soil. Unskilled workers were employed mainly, with a little input from skilled workers nothing more than just an ordinary general carpenter.
tests of his prefabrication principles that would become crucial elements of
Under these circumstances, the work success lay in dividing the complexities
his later thinking.
of the structure, though a site and labour condition, into precast elements that would be manageable by hands of the layperson, whose manual
unbuilt A much later manifestation of Srivongse’s precast principles and structural performance was evidenced in his proposal for a City Tower, a project
application of the precast system, although this does not quite look like an
that further illustrates the conjunction of precast production and pour-in-place
industrial product that people usually talk about system building. It is in this
construction. The tower was designed to function as a sightseeing tower,
61
Malaysia
Investigation of Precast Concrete Facades in Heritage Buildings - Case Studies from Malaysia Wong Chung Wan (MAEK Consulting Pte Ltd)
In Malaysia, there are two world heritage sites (one in Penang, one in
the building with an open mind. Construction began in 1962-1963. It was originally slated to open on
We tried to look at how the precast panels were constructed. The inner glass facade and the precast terrazzo is on the external side with an inaccessible corridor. In essence, the precast terrazzo provided sun-shading and the
National Mosque, shared from an engineer’s and scientist’s perspective to
were pressed for time because of the massive building construction so it was
give a sense on what we do technically, aside from the architectural and
use of frosted laminated glass helps to disperse light internally. The precast terrazzo is made up of white marble chips and white cement. Along the cor-
urban setting. It is important to look into the use of technologies in preserving
and advanced construction technologies to speed up the process such as
ridor between the terrazzo panels and the glass, there’s what we call a gutter
the past to widen our reach not only amongst the urban planners, historians,
precast terrazzo. The architecture of the facade resembles a pineapple and
slab. The precast terrazzo was designed and constructed so that in the event
the precast panels are designed with open joints (no grout) which reduces problems with water seepage (Fig.2).
Malaysia, Tunku Abdul Rahman who felt that we needed a new Parliament Building upon the merger. The new Parliament Building comprised of two parts: a 6-story main building and a 17 story tower (Fig.1). The architect was William Ivor Shipley, who was then attached to the Public Works Department.
here will have to last us a long time. We must look to the further and allow
compared with the essential practical requirements which the building must follow.” When he designed the building, there was no instruction for him at the time to follow Islamic architecture and he had to decide what is the best for
62
captured along the corridor and with gutter holes, the water drains vertically
Fig.3). As a result, there is very little staining on the
there were mechanical bolts and nuts and a concealed steel pipe. At the
that you have a precast screen allowing light and wind to enter that also shelters
precast terrazzo despite being white, except for some natural dirt staining due
bottom, when they cast the beam, they left a boxed up hole for the precast
the building against the heat of the weather. Many columns inside support the
to the weathering of the terrazzo.
panels to be inserted and grouted (
). There was supposed to be two
roof, with the columns typically being smaller at the bottom and bigger at the
We were involved in the restoration and asked to investigate the condition
anchors at the top and the bottom but because of the spalling of the Terrazzo
top to mimic coconut trees. The problem with the National Mosque was that
of the terrazzo panels. Naturally there were some problems; cracks, corrosion
some of the broken, damaged portions needed to be reinstated. We took the
there is a lot of mosaic falling apart on the different roof forms- a domed roof,
(because they are precast) spalling of the panels, and cracks of the frosted
sample and did a petrographic examination to establish what have been used,
a pyramid roof, and a sunken roof (Fig.5). We used infrared thermography to
laminated glass which all required reinstatement. Although there are some
the type of marble that were used, the type of cement, the water-cement ratio,
scan the roof and realised that there were two layers of mosaic (
drawings and sketches to show roughly there are some mechanical anchors
the conditions, the bond quality, etc through ‘material archaeology.’ From that,
mosque underwent a round of restoration in 1997 during which another layer
in combination (for instance) with chemical composition analysis, we came
of mosaic tiles were laid over the original mosaic with adhesive. We found that
out to determine how they were installed and found that at the top of the beam,
). The
up with a mix design for replication of terrazzo fragments for installation. The engineers had their own requirements in terms of compressive strength and
we compared, did a lot of mixes, checked the strength and appearance, the mock-up and trial and we compared against the site conditions.
with layers of white cement. We believe what the worker did at the time was grind the surface to expose the marble chips of terrazzo, as we saw a lot of grinding marks on site. Since corrosion had taken place, the client was
on the corridor, and injections on the ground, we attempted to apply coating.
acrylic) to protect the terrazzo against water ingress and future corrosion (e.g. transparent coating, hydrophobic coating). After several trials, it was felt best not to apply any coating onto the surface of the terrazzo panels.
The National Mosque was designed by a team of architects from Britain and Malaysia. The monument is unique with a 73m tall minaret and an 18-pointed star folded concrete roof. The folded concrete roof resembles a half-open umbrella and the minaret, a closed umbrella. The multi-fold umbrella
shelters and protection to others, with aspirations of the independent nations signifying the unity that people in Malaysia have despite being a multi-ethnic environment. The 18 pointed star symbolises the 13 states of Malaysia and the 5 pillars of Islam. The design is similar to the Parliament Building - very natural in the sense
63
layer. When we looked underneath, there was also a lot of water seepage from the domed roof, the pyramid roof, and the sunken roof. We traced the construction and found that the sunken slab had cracks
Being progressive in terms of conserving the post-war buildings is talked about but we felt that the term ‘progressive’ perhaps should also embrace using technology in terms of practices, materials used, methods of diagnosis, and also in terms of the experimentation of failures and successes from
and found the presence of embedded rainwater downpipes. In the absence
conservation works or past historical designs and constructions. We need to learn from all this because sometimes through our work, we found that the
the downpipes travelled from the roof to the column to the basement and to
knowledge from the past is lost today. We’ve done a lot of work and found what went on in the minds of the builders, contractors and the craftsmen of
mosaic tiles were debonding and there are many cracks and failing sealant
the time. Often, these are not written but they could be fundamentals of the
joints. With scans, we found that the walls behind the mosaic panels were in
knowledge of the time.
reinforced concrete. We inserted probes and found stainless steel anchors
When we talk about documentation of the architecture itself, perhaps
on the sides of individual panels beside. Through some broken corners, we
we should also look into the documentation not only of the external, but the
found the mosaic panels are made up of Precast Glass Reinforced Cement
internal of the building. Through material architecture, we could tell you where
(GRC). Interestingly, we found out that at each panel, there is a U-bar con-
the material came from, how they were used. They can inform on what have
nected to an anchor inserted into the wall (Fig.7).
happened across time, for example, how the materials have evolved due to
Being a mosque, the challenge is that life is ongoing with prayers 5 times
changes in the environment. Through this application of technology we hope to instill interest, not only among urban planners, historians, architects, but also amongst more technical people to be part of the bigger group to protect
remove the loose mosaic and relay another layer of mosaic, this time with
and conserve buildings such as engineers, scientists, theologists, chemists,
a more sound adhesive and using matching mosaic tiles as the original.
biologists. From an engineers’ perspective, while it may be harder to under-
Through this process, we gained a better appreciation of technologies - the
stand the social impact, once the technological part is introduced, there could
radar, the breakout, the microscopy - to determine the composition though building and material archaeology.
documentation.
We have done projects in Malaysia and Singapore and other countries
I would like to thank my partners from Structural Repairs Sdn Bhd, who
so we could sense the differences in practice in different countries. The use
have worked with us and Professor Ghafar Bin Ahmad from the School of
of technologies in conservation works is beginning to be embraced by the Malaysian market. When we started, there was a lot of apprehension on the use of the use due in part to the perceived costs, lack of understanding in the
after working on a number of projects, the buy-ins have increased. The practices in Malaysia and Singapore is different in terms of the skill and craftsmanship. By doing this archaeological research in materials and building, we could understand the differences in how things have been done in different countries. Some could arise from the availability of raw materials in respective countries whilst others could be due to differing skill levels.
64
The Philippines
Tropicalizing Modernism for a New Nation Gerard Rey Lico
(University of the Philippines Diliman)
The Philippines was a colonial territory of Spain beginning in 1565 and the
States and Latin America on a study tour and on their return would rebuild
The pre-war plans to transfer the capital to Quezon City were revived
was institutionalized in the mid-20th century as a derivative of Modernism, an
around the new capitol site designed by a committee led by Juan Arellano, the
adaptation to the tropical climate by incorporating passive cooling techniques
foremost architect of the day (Fig.1). Beginning in the 1950s the new capital
United States at turn of the 19th century. For 333 years, Spanish colonial rule in the Philippines installed an imperial spatial order and architectural production
of cross-ventilation and sun-shading for human comfort. The task of reviving the urban fabric of Manila and its environs fell on the Philippines. Victorious in the Spanish-American War, the United States
the so-called “second-generation” and “third-generation” Filipino architects
acquired the Philippines in 1898 though the Treaty of Paris. Neoclassical archi-
who were eager to embody the ideals of modernism in their works. The
tecture was to emerge, shaped by American imperial ambition and the logic
second-generation architects Pablo Antonio, Fernando Ocampo, and Juan
of democratic apprenticeship. The United States sought to reshape Manila’s
Nakpil—who initially introduced Art Deco and were instrumental in crafting a
urban environment after an imperial image of a well-ordered, healthful, and
Filipino protomodern aesthetic in their designs—produced commercial, res-
beautiful tropical city – aligned with the tenets of the City Beautiful aesthetics.
idential, and institutional buildings in the new language of modernism which
Paradoxically, the Second World War heralded the end of colonialism in the
symbolized an emancipated and progressive nation.
Philippines. From the ruins of war, the new Philippine Republic emerged. The
Modernism provided the means for a new nation in the mid-century to
war provided an empty slate to start anew. Postwar austerity meant straightfor-
craft architecture that did not only represent progress, but also offered a de-
ward and no-nonsense architectural forms which coincided with the modernist
colonizing agenda since modern architecture was perceived as untainted by
disdain for ornament. As Filipinos moved on to post-war reconstruction, they
the stylistic vocabularies and images associated with colonial practice. The old colonial styles of architecture were not acceptable as models for the new
to erect a new nation. As Manila lay in ruins, a new capital city was to be
independent nations; and indigenous or traditional architecture was viewed as primitive, rural, and backward. Modernism therefore became a popular
Modernism ignited the creative imagination of the Filipino architects,
choice, for it provided the progressive images that were sought. Its discourse
who at the behest of the newly formed nation state found inspiration in the
was presented as ‘natural’ determined solely by a purely rational response to
modernism of Brazil. Government architects were deployed to the United
climatic factors, free from ideological or political underpinnings.
65
rose with the buildings of Federico Ilustre and other government and private
spatial and temporal reference points to sustain social continuity and collec-
applied externally to tropicalize and tame the climate-insensitive designs of
architects who began to incorporate localized forms into their interpretations
tive memory and to incorporate peripheral loyalties to the new body-politic.
modernism.
of modernism. This was especially evident in Ilustre’s plans for the new
The state is invisible; it must be symbolized architecturally before it can be
Alfredo Luz and Carlos Arguelles were adept at reinterpreting the high
loved, imagined before it can be conceived. Post-independence architecture
internationalist style to the tropics with exacting geometricized forms. Alfredo
in the Philippines endeavored to dispense an image that stimulates nationalkalasag or shield. This plan however was met with
istic spirit, inspires patriotism, and invokes faith in the unknown future of the
his expert use of geometric forms made tangible with concrete and steel. The
national imagination. eventually being scrapped.
-
By 1953, the Philippines hosted the Manila International Fair as a
Ilustre’s designs for other institutions such as the Department of
showcase in the global arena that it had recovered from war and that it was
of the complex by an ovoid thin-shell concrete dome assembly hall closed off
Agriculture buildings (Fig.2) were realized and continue to be used today. The
undergoing a process of modernization. New building geometries were
by glass curtain walls and surrounded by vegetation. Further down the road,
developed which were made possible by the technological advances in the
) is a seven-storey glass
by precast concrete screens in the form of carabaos, the local agricultural
production of structural steel, prefabricated components, and reinforced concrete.
of the building, which delicately envelope and soften the massive form of the
of a wide triangular base lined with bas reliefs of the life of Manuel Quezon
The younger third-generation architects such as Carlos Arguelles, Felipe
and soaring triangular monument of three pylons sixty-six meters high (corre-
Mendoza, Cesar Concio, and Alfredo Luz, and later on Leandro Locsin and
sponding to Manuel Quezon’s age when he died), is topped with three angels
Francisco Mañosa to name a few, introduced a more tropical expression of
Inspired by Brazilian modernist architecture, Filipino architects used
designed by Francesco Monti. They are holding sampaguita wreaths and are
modernism which made for an internationalist yet uniquely local response to
chiaroscuro in their facades, utilizing geometric patterning of concrete and
garbed in the local ladieswear typical of the country’s three island groups: the
the tropical climate of the country.
pierced screens—allowing a dynamic play of light and shadow that changed
terno and balintawak variations of the traje de mestiza for Luzon and Visayas respectively, and the arbita blouse and malong for Mindanao (Fig.3). The Modern architecture and monuments provided venues to establish
66
tower block and emphasize its horizontality to blend with the low-rise buildings in the surrounding district.
Though evidently modern, buildings in the Philippines then developed
with the movement of the tropical sun. Brise-soleil became ubiquitous devices
surfaces that were Baroque in character through its utilization of brise-soleil.
to refashion modern buildings to suit the tropical climate. These devices,
The brise-soleil
largely made using reinforced concrete, traverse building exteriors with
authoritarian Marcos regime to create a unitary national identity encapsulated in the propaganda slogan “One Nation, One Soul.” (Fig.5
The government-sponsored buildings of Leandro Locsin were some of the most memorable manifestations of the authoritarian regime’s quest for a
local contexts, and unmistakably Filipino. Its contemporary resurgence was fueled by the need to arrest the effects of climate change and the pitfalls of an airconditioned nation. While adopting a neovernacular design philosophy in his works,
brise-soleil supports of the Old Rizal Provincial Capitol in Pasig City by Ruperto Gaite. The tropicalization of modernism however—especially in the 1960s—was
completed at feverish speeds and dream-like costs. Locsin’s design for
Francisco Mañosa was also a forerunner in adopting green architecture
the National Arts Center—a partner institution to his iconic Cultural Center
concepts in his designs long before the idea entered the lexicon of Philippine
of the Philippines—was one of the forerunners of this regionalist approach
-
charged with the politics of identity and nationalist discourse. Tropicalism’s
to modernism (
purpose was two-fold: Maintaining cultural differences in the era of multi-na-
Baños, Laguna, is a large pyramidal structure open on three sides supported
Miguel Corporation (Fig.7), a collaborative project with his brothers Manuel Jr.
tionalism and high-international style; and ensuring that the built-form is
by pairs of large slanted columns at the corners. The composition is capped
and Jose Mañosa, adopted a terraced form reminiscent of the Banaue Rice
responsive to climatic and functional considerations.
by a truncated pyramid clad in clay tiles, reminiscent of the typical hipped
Terraces of the Cordilleras. Its terraced massing is further emphasized by its
). The open-air theater, situated on the mountains of Los
roof the bahay na bato Perhaps. this grafting of a familiar roof form as a tropical and marine-oriented environment. Iconographies and cultural patterns from the tropical locale slowly permeate the modernist buildings of the
in the creation of other state-sponsored spaces around the country, such as
1960s to 1970s. The tropical agenda reintroduced familiar cultural symbols
the Baguio Convention Center and Zamboanga Convention Center, both by
by grafting or pasting them to modern buildings and is expressed in different scales, modes of appropriation, and varied public and critical reception.
Mañosa’s designs for contemporary homes have emphasized the tenets of green architecture (Fig.8). Most of his residential projects are characterized
by Felipe Mendoza.
by their use of wide overhangs, high ceilings, large fenestrations, and con-
From the poetic resonances of the vernacular Filipino house in the buoyant
Tropical Regionalist Architecture in the state-sponsored nationalist
sculptural and brutalist compositions of Leandro Locsin, to the structures clad
agenda, coincided with the oil crises of the 1970s, warranting low-energy
contemporary, yet strongly resonating its vernacular roots. Examples of this
in tropical materiality of Francisco Mañosa, tropicalization was coopted in the
buildings. Local architects were compelled to revive vernacular architectural
are his designs for the Tahanang Pilipino or Coconut Palace in Pasay City, the
67
laced with dramatic plurality as Filipino architects attempted to imprint Filipino identity upon their works, by endowing these with tropicalizing elements, nativist forms, and state-spectacle. Through these mediations and interpretations, we recognize how Filipino architects were able to exercise their ingenuity and creativity in expressing the forms of modernism derived from the West and adapted to conform to the socio-political-economic-cultural-climatic sphere of the local context. These forms range from the absurd, literal pastiche to highly metaphorical design schemes. Details, symbolisms, iconography of design were strategically chosen to imbue and engage the modern building with the discourse of Philippine identity. When analyzed, modern architecture in the Philippines cannot be simplistically reduced to mere faithful facsimiles of foreign counterparts but must be taken as a complex product resulting from the rigorous process of adaptation, mediation, and transformation.
Gaches Village in Las Piùas City, and his own residence in Paraùaque City. In the wake of Marcos’ authoritarian rule, the tropicalization of modernism and cio-economic context continues to be an impetus for local architects to create works which are recognizably Filipino yet responsive to contemporary needs.
The prevailing Architecture of the 20th Century is that of modernist ideology. Yet, modernism was translated in the local architectural production and
68
Moderated Discussion -From The 8th mASEANa Project Conference, 2019-
Moderator: Chang Jiat Hwee (NUS Architecture) With Pinai Sirikiatikul, Gerard Rey Lico, Wong Chung Wan : Gerard, you are also a conservation practitioner, so
: The approaches that both speakers use are similar
Malaysian market, Singapore market and other countries it’s very different.
you are involved in the conservation of a number of very important Modernist
to what we do - we diagnose the building as reinforced concrete because
Although we are tropical, sometimes the raw materials are more easily avail-
and Art Deco Filipino Architecture. I will ask a question that will hopefully
reinforced concrete has its own properties. We do those techniques as well in
able in Malaysia. For instance, in the last 20-30 years, we hardly use lime in
create a dialogue between yourself and the other approaches (which is more
order to assess the fault, and then address them - like a doctor, we prescribe
restoration. We tend to use a lot of cement, although cement is rather detri-
about production, the labour condition, and the technical aspects of architec-
certain measures to mitigate the deterioration as soon as possible. It’s no
mental to some of these heritage buildings. Of course, for post-war buildings
ture). If you take off your hat as the premier architecture historian of Filipino
different for me because I wear two hats now as a conservation architect and
it can use a lot more cement, but sometimes one needs to understand the
Architecture, how does your work involve the practical aspect of conserving
as a historian. That’s why I sometimes cannot distinguish the two.
cement produced in the earlier years and cement produced today is different
CJH: You showed us some of the early examples of Filipino Modern Architecture differently, maybe by sharing the perspectives of Chung Wan
Architecture regarded as ‘imitative’ because they resemble certain prec-
can determine the composition of the terrazzo, in terms of the cement compo-
and Pinai to be more concerned with the more technical aspects?
edents in either Brazil or North America. Pinai would question a category
sition by going back to the actual composition the properties will be different.
like ‘industrial buildings’ produced under non-industrial conditions with very
Whereas in Malaysia, we tend to use more traditional crafts, they tend to go
labour intensive methods and incorporations of traditional craft. What do you
back to a very traditional way of restoring a building, like site-mixed lime. In
think of traditional categories like industrial methods in modern architecture or
Singapore, because labour is expensive we tend to use pre-packed systems. In Malaysia, there is a lot of training to teach contractors, subcontractors, workers, labourers, how to mix lime and how you slake the lime in the ground for months and years before you use it. We cannot afford that over here.
my offer of opportunity is to do something different. I think labour condition is
Aside from lime-based products, you probably have a lot more foundry in
one approach, which seems very promising.
Malaysia - if you want to produce cast-iron and mild steel or also clay prod-
CJH: Chung Wan, I imagine you will be most familiar with questions of labour
ucts, these are a lot more easily available. In Singapore, we have to import
because you are involved in that. You mentioned that there some differences
everything and as a result, sometimes we tend to use the easy way out. What
in labour conditions in Malaysia and in Singapore; could you maybe elaborate
is the most convenient way of using and producing something, with labour
a bit more about these differences? : In terms of raw material usage between the
pared to Singapore. But having said that, there are probably more traditional
69
carpentry works over there while in Singapore everything is machine-made.
variation we expect and for steel we know the pressure aspect. But for brick,
The joineries of windows and doors are very different. We have worked on
it depends on the source of production. It can be handmade; it can be 5
projects where the contractors said, “I think it is easier for me to replace all the
different degrees. Even when using lime for instance, at the bottom part of
doors and windows with new timber rather than replicate them”. If you move to other countries, for example Myanmar with a sub-tropical
brick quality can vary. The challenge when you deal with other buildings is
climate, you have dry and wet seasons. Teak wood there is very different from
you have a lot more variability in trying to re-stock. But for concrete structures perhaps is easier, I won’t say it’s easy, but you can understand the behavior
teak wood because is very affected by dry and wet seasons where you would
of the material much better.
have the growth rings. So assessment of wood in those countries compared
: My
to Singapore would be very different, which is knowledge that will be very
question relates to the earlier question on labour and I was thinking of extending it to Gerard and perhaps even Pinai. I am very curious, in terms of the shift
we have gone through in Malaysia and Singapore, for instance, is the use of
in labour of production, how much of these changes from concrete then later
newer technological products. Of course, it’s nice to use newer technological products, but one has to be very careful. Sometimes the use of some of these
much of it affects their involvement in this nation building, in the sense that
products may result in undesirable outcomes, like the terrazzo panels, (when
not just these particular architects were doing this work, but how much of it
we used hydrophobic coating over the terrazzo, it led to streaking). Perhaps within ASEAN countries this could be shared, how the information can be documented and disseminated amongst members.
: We have an institution called Escuela Taller, a vocational school for out-of-school youths, where they study traditional buildings crafts from brick
: For materials,
making, plastering etc. It’s being re-introduced, the coconut, (the techniques of
we have several types of heritage, such as brick buildings, wood buildings or
coconut are not very well disseminated). Reinforced concrete techniques are
concrete buildings. In order to revitalise the heritage, what is the advantage
very well known in the Philippines, in fact, as early as the American era - in order
or disadvantage of concrete buildings compared to other buildings like wood
to really operationalise colonial modernity, they went to look for the source of
buildings or brick buildings?
cement in the Philippines. They trained Filipinos in the technology of concrete
: I think concrete buildings have certain advantages in terms of strength,
through the Bureau of Science. The use of concrete was really embedded with
durability and structural performance, as compared to brick and timber. We
us in the early 20th century in colonial education in the Philippines, up to now.
have worked on concrete buildings, brick masonry buildings and so on. I am
We use a lot of concrete, which is sometimes not tropical at all.
not so sure about the advantage but I think one of the problems we have in
PS
today’s learning is that in universities and schools, we tend to teach a lot more
at that time, the majority of the labour were emigrants from China and they are
about concrete and steel structures. When it comes to assessment, repair and
quite skilled labourers. They are carpenters so they do very well under the
perhaps eventually restoration of concrete structures are well established.
designs by the Italian architects. But there was major change in the 1950s
We do a lot of diagnosis on concrete and in terms of diagnostic methods and
because the Americans stopped the Chinese from coming to Thailand. The
assessment, investigations of concrete structures are very well-established because they are the more modern material. But if we trace back slightly
East regions. I think concrete is a very peculiar material because on one
earlier (probably with the early post-war years), we still have a lot of masonry
hand, you can make it with very high-skilled people and on the other hand,
and timber structures. The design concepts of masonry and timber structures
concrete empowers people with general knowledge of construction to do a
is very different so the understanding can be very different because concrete
kind of durable structure on a scale beyond their capacity and means. The
is produced as a ready-mix. The quality is controlled, we know the kind of
case study that I showed builds on that kind of unskilled labour entirely.
70
: Why Portland Cement from Aalborg - why that particular cement in your restoration?
variety, from glass, to mosaic, to tiles, to stone and whatnot. In a way, this can make the restoration more complicated in that sense.
Portland Cement is a convenient product. In a lot of little constructions
CJH: Maybe the question could be extended to Gerard, in the sense that in
building? Even now, I have issues on the risk of the presence of down spouts
we used a lot of lime but because the earliest production of lime was hydrated
Architecture history and theory, there is a kind of long tradition of the question
for the building because there was someone who wrote to the agency - it
lime, you had to slake it (which means you take the lime, burn it and then put
of authenticity and what constitutes the authentic way to conserve something.
desecrates the building. What do we choose? Our choice is really to prolong
it into the water and wait for it for months until it stabilises before you use it).
: In one of my recent projects, the Rizal Memorial Coliseum (which would
the life of the building. I told them to treat it aesthetically, but the downspout
For the hydrated lime, hardening takes a long time because it needs to react
be used for the Gymnastics event for the SEA games) is a 1934 building made
is impossible to embed within the reinforced concrete because it will be more
with carbon dioxide in the air so the strength is not as good. Portland Cement
of reinforced concrete, but there were additions of canopies. Everything that
damaging to the building. And then again, with the external appearance of
came in later and became a lot more convenient: it’s easily available, you can
the down spouts, the vertical, we will just make it look like a fake column. But
apply it and it hardens faster. But the problem with Portland Cement when
the question is, am I adding another layer of interpretation of the building? It’s
you apply over the older concrete or older structures, is that it is too hard
tricky part of this conservation project is the integration of the air-conditioning
an issue for aesthetic treatment versus the structural integrity, it’s really hard
and too brittle. If you apply it in too thick a layer, because Portland Cement
system, because the building was not designed to accommodate this utility (it
to strike a balance.
generates heat while curing, when it cools down it will shrink. Portland Cement also contains a lot of soluble salt that can be detrimental to the weaker layers. : So was the original pre-casting of the facade in lime? : No, the pre-cast one was based on white cement. Portland White Cement, which tends to not be as strong as the tradition grey Portland Cement, it is weaker in that sense. : I would like to ask Mr. Wong from Malaysia: I’m interested in the restoration case for Modernist buildings. I am curious to know more about your philosophy when you do the restoration project, between the traditional technique,
keep the authenticity of the project for very modern buildings? Because the old architecture is easy to differentiate between the old one and the new, but for modern buildings it is quite hard. : I thought it would be easier to restore the newer building as compared to the traditional ones because for the newer ones, the materials are perhaps
of restoration are you going for? There is always a debate if something is lost and damaged, should we restore to the original condition or should we leave it as it is - preserve it, arrest the deterioration and leave the damaged part of the
history of the building. This really depends on the taste of the owner, whether they accept that. But you must understand, the myriad of materials used in traditional buildings are simpler. In today’s buildings you have a lot more
71
6 Plenary Session:
US
Encouraging Investment in Mid-Century Buildings: The Why’s and How’s Incentives -From The 8th mASEANa Project Conference, 2019-
Donovan Rypkema
(Heritage Strategies International | US) About Heritage Strategies International -
-
Rejuvenating Modern Buildings: the Social and Economic Values of Heritage
-
Encouraging Investment in Mid-Century Buildings:
-
-
Fig.1
72
-
-
-
-
Fig.2
-
Fig.3
-
-
-
in other non-economic values of heritage buildings that closed through assistance such as incentives.
73
UK
Rejuvenating Modern Buildings in England -From The 8th mASEANa Project Conference, 2019-
Elain Harwood
(Historic England | UK)
In Britain there are over 400,000 listed buildings and a system that grew
Buildings, which became English Heritage and is now Historic England. Its
(Fig.2). The architect, Albert Richardson, had become a reactionary against
out of ‘salvage’ lists drawn up in the war to identify which buildings should be
rapid survey showed the value of research, by looking at publications and
modernism in his later years. The former professor of the Bartlett School of
records from the time and interviewing surviving architects, to convince the
Architecture, he believed in the continuation of the classicism. It is built of pink
1944 and was updated in 1947, 1967 and 2013. Being on the list does not
minister that you have selected the best buildings. I have been very privileged
stone because the Financial Times newspaper is printed on pink paper and
necessarily mean that a building must be preserved at all costs, but requires
to be involved in this work, particularly for buildings erected after 1945.
over the entrance there is a bust of Winston Churchill, the wartime leader. It
any proposed alterations or demolition work to be carefully considered.
A handful of buildings, mainly sculptures commemorating important
was a building that was full of history but when printing and the newspaper
By 1980s, a few buildings built in the 1930s were listed, mainly examples of the Modern Movement, but no buildings from after the Second World War
these was the Newbury Park Bus Station of 1947 by Oliver
could be considered. This meant that modern houses by Connell, Ward &
Hill listed grade II in 1981 (Fig.1). Its austere form indicates
Lucas such as No.66 Frognal of 1937-8, but not Lucas’s post-war work for
that this is a building of the 1940s though Hill had previously
the London County Council. The war was a natural hiatus when little was
made a design in the 1930s, the excuse for it sneaking
built, and the conditions for building changed considerably in its aftermath,
under the net. The structure was immensely popular when
with controls on building materials, a greater public involvement and the
it was built, and won a merit award for architecture at the
introduction of new construction techniques.
Festival of Britain in 1951.
The methodology for researching buildings thematically in England really began when an Art-Deco building (for the tyre manufacturers Firestone) was bulldozed during a public holiday. The Department of the Environment had
under threat. Two examples not then proceeded with were the National Union of Mineworkers by Moiret and Wood and
sign off the paperwork before the holiday, and over the weekend the develop-
the Schreiber House by James Gowan, both in London.
ers took the opportunity to demolish its key features. Perhaps every program the change of policy was Bracken House for the Financial led by the Thirties Society, now the Twentieth Century Society, which was
Times, a traditional building dating from the 1950s that
taken up by the department’s Inspectorate of Ancient Monuments and Historic
pointed to the continuation of classical ideas in architecture
74
Fig. 1: Newbury Park Bus Station , listed grade II in 1981. (Source: Elain Harwood)
industry changed in the 1980s with digitisation, the Financial Times moved
swimming baths and a sports hall into the scheme. The site was also ex-
the campaign for listing showed the growing interest in the brutalist style of the
tended, permitting more buildings and a tennis court. The date of completion
1960s. A scheme for adding to the building was abandoned and it has been
management guidelines determined that the printing press area, which was
also seemed inappropriate because some schemes can take many years to
well restored. The bus station has become a landmark for Preston, talked
the most redundant element, could be demolished. The architects Michael
build, a good example being the same architects’ Barbican Estate, designed
about popularly in the press with need to have that supporting development to support the restoration.
Hopkins & Partners based their replacement element on the proportions used by Richardson, taken from the Palazzo de Castelliano by Guarino Guarini from
One may ask how buildings are and can be regenerated and reused in
option. When we are looking at a building for listing, Historic England can only
was added to the listing in 2013 and has since been refurbished with listed
consider a building’s architectural and/or historic interest. An example of a
building consent.
building listed for its historic interest is one associated with The Beatles, who
Fleming’s villain in the James Bond stories and achieved fame as an architect
How do we determine when buildings should be listed, and when?
incidentally have two other buildings listed: Paul McCartney’s house and John
when the English National Trust took over his own house, a building of 1938
According to the new guidelines issued by a Statutory Instrument in 1987,
Lennon’s house. The Casbah Club was a coffee bar set up in the basement
and opened it to the public as a museum (noted not only for its architecture
buildings can normally be listed when they are more than 30 years of age,
of her nineteenth-century house by Mona Best, mother of the drummer Pete Best, so her lads could be entertained in a safe environment (Fig.4). It is
date of design was not taken as the starting point, since the realised building
now a tourist attraction. It is important to demonstrate to the Minister that a hated working there, for its doughnut plan and large glass windows gave the
can be very different. An example is Golden Lane, the winning design by Geoffry Powell of Chamberlin, Powell & Bon in a competition held by the City
30 years old; it was turned down for listing and might have been demolished,
of London in 1951-2 for housing for keyworkers (Fig.3). The estate erected in 1953-62 was different because of changes in the regulations governing the
due to the fact that Historic England could show its continuing success as a
height of buildings, enabling the architects to make the central tower, Great
bus station and car park, greatly aided by rising enthusiasm from the people
Arthur House, much taller so that they could introduce more open space,
Fig. 2: Bracken House, listed grade II* in 1987 (Source: Elain Harwood)
Fig. 3: Golden Lane, listed grade II and grade II* in 1997 (Source: Historic England)
Fig. 4: The Casbah Club, listed grade II in 2006 (Source: Historic England)
75
block, Carradale House, in 1967-8, the two buildings sharing the central
noise insulation; the result is a sharp contrast between blocks for rich and
planners, and artists, and people who want to live there. The conversion was
heating plant at the top of Balfron Tower, whose enlargement during the
poor, who now live side by side (Fig.6).
done relatively cheaply and with a light touch that retained the two lift lobbies
construction process made it such a dramatic feature. Carradale House has
More people are now working from home or ‘hot-desking’, and in par-
Fig.5).
been carefully restored, retaining its windows, and remains social housing,
ticular cuts in public funding have forced local authorities and government
-
business district of Canary Wharf). The architects Studio Egret West and Ab
ings from the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s are now looking for new uses and many
insensitive scheme of replacement windows. It is a block of social housing
Rogers have made a statement by replacing the windows with consent from
have been demolished. One that has been sensitively adapted to a great
originally built for the London County Council, and was followed by a second
Historic England, even on the west-facing show front, for improved heat and
reuse (even though it is not listed) is the former annexe to Camden Town Hall,
Fig. 5: The glass murals by ErnĂś Goldfinger in the main lift lobby of
Fig. 7: Camden New Town Hall (Source: Elain Harwood) (Source: Elain Harwood)
76
sometimes known as Camden New Town Hall, which was built in 1974 to the
Nobody has really criticised engineering structures such as the Severn
for an age they did not know. They represent an optimistic age that can seem
designs of the council’s architect’s department. It was converted in 2017-19
Bridge of 1960-6, nor the buildings of Sir Richard Rogers or Norman Foster.
very different from the 21st Century and our great concerns with the economy,
with American money to the Standard, a luxury boutique hotel. The brutalist
These were highly regarded when they were built and have never lost
ecology and global issues.
façade was carefully restored and three additional storeys are set back and
their popularity. An example is Foster Associates’ Sainsbury Centre at the
in a different style (Fig.7). The interior retains its original coffered ceilings and the new hotel was decorated in a colourful interpretation of 1970s’ style by the
a grade II* listed building (Fig.8). Most other buildings of the period between
American designers Shawn Hausman, resembling a set from James Bond or
1945 and the 1980s have had a dip in popularity, but are beginning to rise
the television series Man from U.N.C.L.E.
Fig. 8: Sainsbury Centre at the University of East Anglia, listed grade II* in 2012 (Source: Historic England)
77
Singapore
Of Structures and Trees: An Engineering Perspective -From The 8th mASEANa Project Conference, 2019-
Hossein Rezai (Web Structures)
-
-
-
-
(Fig.1) -
78
-
-
Fig.2
79
-
Fig.3
III. Not Good Enough IV. Pearl Bank – A Gallant Effort
Fig.4
-
Fig.5
80
Fig.6
81
UK
Park Hill: Re-made in Sheffield -From The 8th mASEANa Project Conference, 2019-
Mark Latham
(Urban Splash | UK)
-
-
Fig.1
82
-
Fig.3
Fig.2 -
Fig.4 and 5
Fig. 2: “I Love You Will U Marry Me”
83
Falling in love again
-
Fig.6
Fig. 4: Before and After: key elements of the existing concrete faรงade retained
84
85
Singapore
Where Values Collide: Heritage, Social Change and Market -From The 8th mASEANa Project Conference, 2019-
Lai Choo Malone-Lee
(Centre for Sustainable Asian Cities, NUS | Singapore)
Introduction
Fig.2
-
-
Fig.1
86
-
-
Where Values Collide
-
87
-
-
-
-
-
88
Footnotes
-
Conclusion
-
-
-
-
89
Moderated Discussion -From The 8th mASEANa Project Conference, 2019-
Moderator: Sarah Ichioka (Desire Lines) With Donovan Rypkema, Elain Harwood, Hossein Rezai, Mark Latham, Lai Choo Malone-Lee
SI: SI:
EH:
90
-
-
SI:
I -
HR:
-
-
91
-
HR:
-
ML: ML:
-
-
EH:
EH:
Audience Question 5:
92
-
ML:
93
94
Part 2: Inventory of modern Buildings 1- Inventory of modern Buildings in Kuala Lumpur 2- Inventory of modern Buildings in Singapore
95
13
72 74
78
76
77
75
73
79 82
Inventory of modern Buildings in Kuala Lumpur
16
15
83
18
19
84
17
87
35
86
85
88
20
21
89
31 32
46 44 45 49
1
41 40
33 34
3
50 51
4
4748 42 43 52
6
69 70 36
3738
39
2
80
90
25
92
54
53
14
68
23
7
5
24
93 27 26
81
22
91
28
94 95
96
30
29
98
97
55 56 5759 58 10 61 8 9 60 62 64 63
99
67
65 66
11
100
12
Before Independence (1896-1957)
After Independence (1957-)
History of Modern Architecture in Kuala Lumpur Nor Hayati Hussain
western side and the Chinese immigrant business and shophouses on the eastern side of the river, while Malay villages scattered around mostly within the following area. Eventually, these three components expanded and formed the modern
haphazardly built mining town. -
(The Malaysian Institute of Architects)
ernance patterns as well as social culture and development of the design and
History of modern architecture in Kuala Lumpur began as the town transformed from a humble Malay settlement known as Pengkalan Lumpur to the capital city of a nation, a metropolis known globally today for its world’s tallest twin skyscrapers, and
and the town rebuilt street by street using brick or wattle with brick tile in phases till
an eclectic hub for cultures and traditions. Kuala Lumpur, which means muddy estuary
development of Kuala Lumpur with responsibilities to ensure cleanliness, maintain
in Malay, derived his name from a natural
streets, lighting, drains and water supply as well as construct and supervise the town market.
Fig.1: An old map showing the
tin ore in an enormous amount profoundly Malaysia)
were optimistic about the future and large-scale development of new building typology
changed Kuala Lumpur’s character.
Formative Years
responsible for many buildings in Kuala Lumpur at that time were Charles Edwin the tropical climate by using pitched, extensive cantilevered roof and large, operable
necessitated the erection of buildings for various federal departments.
purchase negotiation mentioned about a centre of tin production in Klang upriver
1
. However,
Transformative Years growth and strategic location gravitated regional activities and led to many more Kuala Lumpur grew from a shantytown to a well-policed settlement with brick
97
buildings, piped water, and street lighting. Majorities of its inhabitants were foreign
Progressive Future exposed them to an international array of consumer goods and cultural styles along with a taste of the technologies and messages of modernity. Kuala Lumpur became a multi-lingual, multi-ethnic urban cultural potpourri supported by English-language
with hotels, convention centres, apartments, and shopping complexes. Kuala
city and converted public buildings, schools, churches, and English mansions into
Lumpur leads other cities in Malaysia on modern architecture, which was shaped through political, economic, and social-cultural progressions since that momentous journey in 1857.
Reformative Years -
democratic values for which Malaysia stands for.
peripheral corridors as overhangs and sun shading, rectilinear spatial planning,
of the examples. Other buildings built during this period are the Kuala Lumpur
-
Endnotes
the tourism industry which were on the rise then.
ment of architecture and the architectural profession for the betterment of society.
Reference
Kuala Lumpur.
98
01
Taman Tunku Housing
02
Parliament Of Malaysia
03
Hospital Kuala Lumpur
Construction Year: 1940s - 1970s Architect: Unknown Address: 3.174267, 101.679242
Construction Year: 1963 Architect: W. Ivor Shipley Address: 3.149535, 101.679197
Construction Year: 1950s Architect: Wells & Joyce Address: 3.171604, 101.701845
04
05
06
Hospital Bersalin Kuala Lumpur
Construction Year: 1960s Architect: KC Duncan Address: 3.1710898, 101.7047954
Perpustakaan Sultanah Zanariah
Construction Year: 1966 Architect: Unknown Address: 3.174277, 101.720366
Australian High Commission
Construction Year: 1974 Architect: B. Joyce and W. Nankivell Address: 3.160549, 101.710558
99
07
Wisma Equity
Construction Year: 1982 Architect: Hijjas Kasturi & Association Address: 3.159685, 101.711858
10
Dewan Tunku Canselor
Construction Year: 1966 Architect: K. Loo, BEP Arkitek Address: 3.121447, 101.656752
100
08
International Institute of Advanced Islamic Studies Malaysia
Construction Year: 1960s-70s Architect: Unknown Address: 3.118881, 101.650120
11
Tenaga Nasional Berhad
Construction Year: 1960 Architect: A.A. Geeraerts A.R.I.B.A Address: 3.119815, 101.671002
09
Faculty of Economics and Administration, University of Malaya
Construction Year: 1960s Architect: Unknown Address: 3.119105, 101.652626
12
Wisma Angkasapuri / Radio Television Malaysia
Construction Year: 1972 Architect: R. Pratt of BEP Arkitek Address: 3.1136385, 101.6706830
13
Bank Negara Malaysia
14
Concorde Hotel Kuala Lumpur
15
Federal House
Construction Year: 1970 Architect: N.M. Mahmood Address: 3.152752, 101.692580
Construction Year: 1959 Architect: E. Taylor &Y.T. Lee Associates Address: 3.155419, 101.705957
Construction Year: 1954 Architect: StyleIversen & Van Sitteren Address: 3.146520, 101.693337
16
17
18
Loke Yew Building
Construction Year: 1960s Architect: B. M. Iversen Address: 3.147650, 101.694820
RUANG by Think CityÂ
Construction Year: 1938 Architect: Arthur Oakley Coltman Address: 3.146673, 101.696096
Bangunan Lee Yan Lian
Construction Year: 1960s Architect: E. S. Cooke Address: 3.147919, 101.698018
101
19
Bangunan Yee Seng
20
Dayabumi General Post Office
21
Stadium Bola Keranjang Malaysia
Construction Year: 1960s Architect: Unknown Address: 3.148293, 101.699310
Construction Year: 1984 Architect: BEP & MAA Architects Address: 3.143836, 101.693912
Construction Year: 1971 Architect: Unknown Address: 3.143130, 101.700509
22
23
24
The Federal Kuala LumpurÂ
Construction Year: 1957 Architect: Y.T. Lee Address: 3.144323, 101.708913
102
National Mosque of Malaysia
Construction Year: 1965 Architect: Federal Public Works Department Address: 3.142096, 101.691705
Chin Woo Stadium
Construction Year: 1953 Architect: Lee Yoon Thim Address: 3.141084, 101.699406
25
National Museum of Malaysia
26
Bangunan Koperasi Polis
27
Stadium Merdeka
Construction Year: 1963 Architect: Ho Kwong Yew and Sons Address: 3.137947, 101.687086
Construction Year: 1959 Architect: BEP Akitek Address: 3.139074, 101.696806
Construction Year: 1957 Architect: Stanley Edward Jewkes Address: 3.139909, 101.700369
28
29
30
Stadium Negara
Construction Year: 1962 Architect: Stanley Edward Jewkes Address: 3.140692, 101.702874
Tamil Methodist Church
Construction Year: 1960 Architect: Unknown Address: 3.131216, 101.687573
Dewan Bahasa dan PustakaÂ
Construction Year: 1959 Architect: Y.T. Lee Address: 3.134284, 101.703357
103
31
Arkib Negara Malaysia
32
Pejabat Pengarah Wilayah Persekutuan Lembaga Hasil Dalam Negeri
33
Jabatan Pendidikan Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur
34
Institut Integriti Malaysia
35
Good Shepherd Catholic Church
36
Royal Commonwealth Society
Construction Year: 1961
Construction Year: 1960s
Construction Year: 1970s
Construction Year: 1970s
Construction Year: 1967
Construction Year: 1961
Architect: Chin Kah Tow
Architect: Unknown
Architect: Wells & Joyce
Architect: Unknown
Architect: BEP Akitek
Architect: Kington Loo
Address: 3.177124, 101.676099
Address: 3.174104, 101.673645
Address: 3.170327, 101.674927
Address: 3.168305, 101.673112
Address: 3.190235, 101.711870
Address: 3.151335, 101.660607
38
39
40
37
Wisma MRT
Wisma HELP
Wisma Damansara
Unit Skuad Penyelamat DBKL
41
Bangunan MIC
42
Federal Cinema
Construction Year: 1970
Construction Year: 1970
Construction Year: 1970
Construction Year: 1969
Construction Year: 1960s
Construction Year: 1960s
Architect: Unknown
Architect: Unknown
Architect: BEP Akitek
Architect: Unknown
Architect: Unknown
Architect: Unknown
Address: 3.152506, 101.663362
Address: 3.152920, 101.665257
Address: 3.151094, 101.668229
Address: 3.1707771, 101.6918416
Address: 3.1712093, 101.6922242
Address: 3.1678683, 101.6967206
43
44
45
46
Supermarkets Wan Lee Heng
Institute of Urology Nephrology
Hospital Kuala Lumpur Radotherapy Department
Hospital Kuala Lumpur Radiology Block
47
Institute for Medical Research
48
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Fakulti Sains Kesihatan Kampus Kuala Lumpur
Construction Year: 1947
Construction Year: 1970s
Construction Year: 1962-68
Construction Year: 1970-72
Construction Year: 1959
Construction Year: 1979
Architect: Berthel Michael Iversen
Architect: Unknown
Architect: Unknown
Architect: Unknown
Architect: Unknown
Architect: Unknown
Address: 3.1688268, 101.6951622
Address: 3.1723512, 101.6999808
Address: 3.172038, 101.702864
Address: 3.1720967, 101.7030036
Address: 3.16895580, 101.6993558
Address: 3.1684368, 101.7004190
49
50
National Blood Centre
Telekom Headquaters
51
Wisma JUPEM
52
Dewan Sultan Suleiman Club
53
Wisma Central
54
Plaza Ampang City
Construction Year: 1970s
Construction Year: 1972
Construction Year: 1962
Construction Year: 1970s
Construction Year: 1980s
Construction Year: 1970s
Architect: Wells & Joyce
Architect: Jabatan Kerja Raya
Architect: H.
Architect: Unknown
Architect: Garden City Development Bhd.
Architect: Unknown
Address: 3.173118, 101.706365
Address: 3.172901, 101.716448
Address: 3.170938, 101.717730
Address: 3.161507, 101.701128
Address: 3.158738, 101.714419
Address: 3.159699, 101.748249
104
I. Ashley
55
Seventh Residential College, University Of Malaya
56
Department Of Geology, University Of Malaya
57
The Malaysian Institute of Physics
58
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Malaya
59
Faculty of Science, University of Malaya
60
Faculty of Education, University of Malaya
Construction Year: 1975
Construction Year: 1968
Construction Year: 1960s-70
Construction Year: 1959
Construction Year: 1961
Construction Year: 1963
Architect: Unknown
Architect: Malayan Architects Co-partnership
Architect: Unknown
Architect: Unknown
Architect: Unknown
Architect: Unknown
Address: 3.126283, 101.650436
Address: 3.122253, 101.652303
Address: 3.123067, 101.653160
Address: 3.121222, 101.652779
Address: 3.121975, 101.654588
Address: 3.120256, 101.653145
62
63
64
65
66
61
INTENGAH Federal Government Office
Tuanku Bahiyah Residential College
Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya
Pusat Perubatan Universiti Malaya
International Languages Teacher Training Institute (IPBA)
TNB Generation Building
Construction Year: 1960s-70s
Construction Year: 1958
Construction Year: 1960s-70s
Construction Year: 1968
Construction Year: 1960s
Construction Year: 1960s
Architect: Unknown
Architect: Unknown
Architect: Unknown
Architect: James Cubitt & Partners
Architect: Unknown
Architect: Unknown
Address: 3.119179, 101.649175
Address: 3.117608, 101.657179
Address: 3.115963, 101.653060
Address: 3.113684, 101.652905
Address: 3.1215688, 101.6650175
Address: 3.119734, 101.668782
68
69
67
The China Press Berhad
Tugu Negara
Campbell Complex
70
Sarah Hughes Globe
71
Former Sime Darby & Co. Ltd.
72
Kuala Lumpur City Hall
Construction Year: 1972
Construction Year: 1966
Construction Year: 1973
Construction Year: 1957
Construction Year: 1950s
Construction Year: 1970
Architect: Unknown
Architect: Felix de Weldon
Architect: Lim Thiam Leong Realty
Architect: Unknown
Architect: BEP Arkitek
Architect: BEP Akitek
Address: 3.123215, 101.675391
Address: 3.149849, 101.683764
Address: 3.156290, 101.696708
Address: 3.155155, 101.696491
Address: 3.154531, 101.701138
Address: 3.152188, 101.693974
73
Bangunan Bank Rakyat
74
Amanah Raya Berhad
75
Former Bank Bumiputera
76
Bangunan Dato Zainal
77
Ming Building
78
Sk. St. John
Construction Year: 1964
Construction Year: 1964
Construction Year: 1980
Construction Year: 1978
Construction Year: 1970s
Construction Year: 1950s
Architect: Unknown
Architect: StyleKington Loo, BEP Akitek
Architect: Dato Hisham Albakri designer of Kumpulan Akitek
Architect: Hijjas Kasturi & Associates
Architect: Arkitek MAA
Architect: Unknown
Address: 3.150324, 101.692233
Address: 3.151157, 101.697351
Address: 3.150429, 101.697161
Address: 3.150714, 101.697294
Address: 3.150316, 101.698157
Address: 3.151002, 101.698646
105
79
Wisma Lee Rubber
80
Menara Hap Seng Sdn. Bhd.
81
Wisma Lim Foo Yong
82
Hong Kong and Shanghai Bank Head Office
83
Agro Bank Building
84
KL Mansion
Construction Year: 1980
Construction Year: 1970
Construction Year: 1970s
Construction Year: 1915, 1970
Construction Year: 1980s
Construction Year: 1960
Architect: Kumpulan Arkitek
Architect: Unknown
Architect: Unknown
Architect: Messrs Swan and Maclaren
Architect: Unknown
Architect: Unknown
Address: 3.149629, 101.697162
Address: 3.152938, 101.707237
Address: 3.150614, 101.709266
Address: 3.148179, 101.696210
Address: 3.146632, 101.694603
Address: 3.147024, 101.696753
85
86
88
89
90
Dayabumi Complex
The Rubber Trade Association of Selangor and Pahang
87
Bangunan Cahaya Suria
Hotel Malaya
YWCA
Blue Boy Mansion
Construction Year: 1984
Construction Year: 1971
Construction Year: 1974
Construction Year: 1960s
Construction Year: 1953
Construction Year: 1962
Architect: BEP & MAA Architects
Architect: Unknown
Architect: Unknown
Architect: Unknown
Architect: Unknown
Architect: Y.T. Lee
Address: 3.144909, 101.694027
Address: 3.145379, 101.696791
Address: 3.146122, 101.699055
Address: 3.144267, 101.696935
Address: 3.142828, 121.701801
Address: 3.144904, 101.706161
92
93
94
95
91
Sungei Wang Plaza
Takaful Malaysia
Wisma Pahlawan
SRK Jalan Hang Tuah
Rumah Pangsa Loke Yew Block Meranti
96
Pudu Plaza
Construction Year: 1970s
Construction Year: 1971
Construction Year: 1972
Construction Year: 1960
Construction Year: 1955
Construction Year: 1989
Architect: Unknown
Architect: Eric Taylor Associates
Architect: Unknown
Architect: Unknown
Architect: Unknown
Architect: Unknown
Address: 3.144789, 101.710957
Address: 3.139590, 101.695842
Address: 3.139362, 101.697480
Address: 3.137185, 101.704328
Address: 3.136540, 101.704452
Address: 3.137198, 101.713508
97
Marble Jade Mansion Flat
98
Institute of Diplomacy and Foreign Relations
99
Makmur Malaya Sdn Bhd
100 Sri Pulau Pinang Flats
Construction Year: 1963
Construction Year: 1978
Construction Year: 1950s
Construction Year: 1969-72
Architect: Y. T. Lee
Architect: Kumpulan Senireka
Architect: Unknown
Architect: S.P. Chow
Address: 3.128901, 101.688802
Address: 3.133447, 101.702996
Address: 3.123996, 101.713196
Address: 3.117182, 101.720255
106
Survey Members: Students from Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Unversiti Malaya, Universiti Teknologi Mara, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Universiti Islam, Antarabangsa Malaysia, National University Singapore, University College Sedaya International, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Taylor’s University, City University, the University of Tokyo, and Tokyo University of Science
107
59
57
32
61
58
11
64
63
62 65 67
10
31
Inventory of modern Buildings in Singapore
12
60
66
13
93
94 91 92
90 14
81 15
18
33
19
35
73
96
42
41
43
44
45
5 6
37
38
Before Independence (-1965)
After Independence (1965-)
9
7
4
8
47
98
76 77 22
53
52
46
99
88 89 87 83 84 86 80 23 85 79 78
56
54 55
3 2
97
21
39
1
95
100
72
71
34 40
20
74 75
70
36
82
17
16
24 25
30
28
68 26
69
29
27
48
49
51 50
History of Singapore Modern Architecture
in Singapore in 2002, Singapore’s State Minister for National Development,
rickshaws, trolleys, buses, electric trams, and cars, to create open spaces,
Dr. Vivian Balakrishnan said: “Building in the modern style was also a state-
back lanes, modern sanitation and to develop public housing. SIT built the
Johannes Widodo
Architecture, often seen as a manifestation of a society’s values, thus mirrored
allowed mass production and kept construction costs down. Simplicity,
that break from old values and the warm embrace of the new values and
rationality, and beauty are the main characteristics featured in SIT designed
ideals of an independent and egalitarian Singapore.
apartments. During its 32 years of existence, 23,000 new housing units were
(National University of Singapore)
ment that we were breaking away from the old colonial society, which was riddled with inequality and vast disparities of wealth and living conditions.
built in the Chinatown and Tiong Bahru areas.
Public Works of Singapore architecture and town planning is the Public Works Department grid provided with generous green public open space. Clean and rational “Modern Asia has not developed in a vacuum but has evolved through
to build the infrastructure and public buildings for colonial Singapore. By the
sustained interactions with the West, which has had a constant presence in
1930s, the scope of public works had extended and became a department
ventilation holes gave the place its unique modernist character. The atmo-
our collective consciousness. This shared experience of the world unites us
when Singapore became a British Crown Colony. In April 1999, the PWD was
sphere within the housing complex is intimate and warm, which encourages
as Asians. The history of dealing with the West, with our neighbors and with
residents to mingle outside their houses. The public can walk along footpaths
ourselves, is manifested in the myriad forms of our Architecture. The history of
through the spacious backyards owned and maintained by the residents on
Modern Architecture in Asia is the history of how Asians have become modern.”
to design and manage Singapore’s urban infrastructures and public buildings
(mAAN Macau Declaration 2001)
(hospitals, schools, prisons, airports, seaport, bridges, etc.). Many modern
The block design bears some likeness with the design principles of
style buildings were built during Frank Dorrington Ward’s tenure as PWD’s
the pre-war modern Siedlung in Germany or the post-war New Towns in
Chief Architect.
Britain with the emphasis on creating small neighbourhoods and maximum
Nation Building
PWD designed hospitals, for example, showed modest, rational, simple,
Modernity existed in Southeast Asia ever since the establishment of inter-
and sensitive responses to the tropical climate, such as long and shallow sep-
and to improve security thanks to open views and public surveillance.
national trading ports due to worldwide maritime trade and exchange, at a time
arate blocks to provide proper natural ventilation and lighting, wide verandas,
The block’s design was also incorporated local shop-house typological
when the spirit of free business and innovation thrived. In cosmopolitan cities,
or broad roof overhangs. Another example is the former Kallang Airport’s main
new architectural typologies appeared with the fusion of various elements,
improve the density and hygiene of the overpopulated and dilapidated
materials, and technology, built by culturally mixed communities. Architectural
global modern aviation network. The architectural form is the metaphor of a
shapes such as shop-houses, religious buildings, and palaces expressed a
contemporary airplane with its elevated cylindrical glass control tower centrally
cosmopolitan, entrepreneurial, and inventive spirit. Hygiene and safety issues
placed as the cockpit. The building displays the new modern architectural lan-
Chinatown’s core area, SIT built high-rise apartment buildings on a lot
implemented a similar modern design and local typological elements. The motivated the introduction of modern architecture and urban planning during
effort to preserve these modern housing estates and typology is not easy,
the 1920s and 1930s in colonial Southeast Asia, including Singapore.
due to the demographic changes and economic pressures. The high-rise
Modernism in Singapore related to the nation-building spirit, the country
Social Housing
gained self-government status in 1959 that eventually led into an independent
The Singapore Improvement Trust (SIT) was set up and operated during
state, after it separated from Malaysia Federation in 1965. The application
the colonial period (1927-1959) to deal with the problems concerning the
Private Practices
of the modernist style was a conscious attempt to break with the colonial legacy and in a search for a national identity. In the 2nd mAAN conference
environment, to widen existing roads, to cope with the growing numbers of
109
language of modern architecture with an expression of local identity by using
Bibliography
vernacular construction materials such as timber for the walls and ceilings. Singapore. Singapore, Times Edition, 1995.
educated architects graduated in 1963. The group later expanded to include other professionals from the private sector and academics from various disciplines. They discussed, examined,
5: Norman Edwards and Peter Keys, Singapore: A Guide to Building, Streets, Places. Singapore, Times Books International, 1988.
quasi-Art Deco Kampong Kapor Methodist Church (1920), the hybrid Islamic Mimar 7, Singapore, 1983.
Design Partnership was established. Design Partnership (later known as DP Architects) prospered and produced many noteworthy modernist designs such as the People’s Park Complex, the Golden Mile Complex, and St who returned and set up a practice in Singapore in the 1930s. Ho Kwong Yew obtained a structural engineer’s degree and only later became a registered architect in Singapore. Thanks to his civil engineering background, his design was logical, sophisticated, but also artistic, using new building techniques
Postscript Contemporary Singapore is a showcase of the postcolonial economic
and materials such as concrete to play with unique shapes.
-
who returned to Singapore, the architect of the National Theatre on the
ning principles of its built environment undoubtedly follow the CIAM doctrines important symbols of an emerging independent Singapore, constructed to celebrate self-government status in 1963. It was the winner of an architectural
Modern Architecture has become the symbol of the pioneering spirit of
competition. This ground-breaking modernist building featured a dramatic
the generation that built and developed modern Singapore. It is their legacy and the backdrop for two or more generations of Singaporean’s lives. It has formed part of their collective consciousness as a nation. Singapore, as well
to demolish the building due to structural and functional problems, such as
as most cities in Asia, changes rapidly. We are so used to changes that we have lost our understanding and appreciation of what shapes a city. We also tend to forget the past very quickly. The steps which have recently been taken by Singapore to learn from past mistakes and failures, and then to get on
University. In 1960, with some former UK classmates, he formed the Malayan
with the process of identifying, evaluating, debating, and conserving modern urban and architectural heritage should be appreciated and fully supported.
social changes, these young architects experimented with modernism, adapting it to local conditions and using it in their pursuit of a national architectural identity. He designed the Singapore Conference Hall constructed in 1963. It
conditions, inspired the functionalist design concept. It blends the common
110
01
Jurong Town Hall
02
Singapore Polytechnic
03
Pandan Valley Condominium
Construction Year: 1973 Architect: Lim Chong Keat (Architects Team 3) Address: 1.328735, 103.741769
Construction Year: 1979 Architect: Alfred Wong (Alfred Wong Partnership) Address: 1.311385, 103.774403
Construction Year: 1978 Architect: Tan Cheng Siong (Archurban Architects Planners) Address: 1.319938, 103.779565
04
05
06
Unit 8
Construction Year: 1984 Architect: William Lim (William Lim Associates) Address: 1.309713, 103.805839
Singapore Indoor Stadium
Construction Year: 1989 Architect: Vivien Heng; Lee Kut Cheung; Alan Choe; Kenzo Tange; Kazuya Okauchi Address: 1.300766, 103.874347
Kallang Theatre
Construction Year: 1978 Architect: Goh Hock Guan Design Team Architects, Town & Regional Planner Address: 1.301855, 103.8757058
111
07
Singapore Badminton Hall
Construction Year: 1952 Architect: Ng Keng Siang Address: 1.3140113, 103.8807331
10
The Colonnade
Construction Year: 1986 Architect: Paul Rudolph and Chao Tse Ann Address: 1.299647, 103.827531
112
08
Kallang Airport
Construction Year: 1937 Architect: Frank Dorrington Ward (Chief Architect, Public Works Department) Address: 1.306333, 103.884787
11
Far East Plaza
Construction Year: 1984 Architect: RDC Architects Pte Ltd Address: 1.307116, 103.833781
09
Masjid Darul Aman
Construction Year: 1985 Architect: Housing & Development Board (HDB) Address: 1.31793, 103.90452
12
Kandang Kerbau Hospital
Construction Year: 1997 Architect: Tay Kheng Soon (Akitek Tenggara) Address: 1.3108033, 103.8468722
13
Church of the Blessed Sacrament
14
Post-war Tiong Bahru Flats
15
Tiong Bahru Wet Market
Construction Year: 1965 Architect: Y. Gordon Dowsett (Van Sitteren and Partners) Address: 1.294596, 103.830385
Construction Year: -1950s Architect: Singapore Improvement Trust Address: 1.31026, 103.8362
Construction Year: 1950s (renovated in 2004) Architect: Singapore Improvement Trust; CPG Consultants Pte. Ltd. Address: 1.2847477, 103.832479
16
17
18
Pre-war Tiong Bahru Flats
Construction Year: 1939 Architect: Singapore Improvement Trust Address: 1.31142, 103.83995
People’s Park Complex
Construction Year: 1974 Architect: Tay Kheng Soon, William S.W. Lim, Koh Seow Chuan (DP Architects) Address: 1.284198, 103.842549
Chinatown Complex
Construction Year: 1981 Architect: Housing & Development Board (HDB) Address: 1.282696, 103.843048
113
19
Tanjong Pagar Plaza
20
33 Club St
21
OCBC Centre
Construction Year: 1977 Architect: Housing & Development Board (HDB) Address: 1.276944, 103.842867
Construction Year: 1925 Architect: Frank W. Brewer Address: 1.2823975, 103.8463193
Construction Year: 1995 Architect: I. M. Pei & Partners ; BEP Akitek Address: 1.285184, 103.848895
22
23
24
Singapore Conference Hall
Construction Year: 1967 Architect: William S.W. Lim, Chan Voon Fee, Lim Chong Keat (Malayan Architects Co-Partnership) Address: 1.276267, 103.849071
114
Asia Insurance Building
Construction Year: 1958 Architect: Ng Keng Siang Address: 1.2817911, 103.8514035
Capitol Building
Construction Year: 1930 Architect: Keys and Dowdeswell Address: 1.293552, 103.8517166
25
Raffles City Shopping Centre
26
Shaw Towers
27
Masjid Sultan
Construction Year: 1986 Architect: I. M. Pei; Architects 61 Address: 1.293758, 103.853433
Construction Year: 1977 Architect: Iversen Van Sitteren & Partners Address: 1.2966411, 103.8567304
Construction Year: 1928 Architect: Denis Santry (Swan & Maclaren) Address: 1.3022854, 103.8589636
28
29
30
The Concourse
Construction Year: 1994 Architect: Paul Rudolph Address: 1.301068, 103.862679
Crawford Estate (Precinct North 1)
Construction Year: 1969 Architect: Housing & Development Board (HDB) Address: 1.303489, 103.864522
Golden Mile Complex
Construction Year: 1973 Architect: Tay Kheng Soon, William S.W. Lim, Gan Eng Oon Address: 1.302697, 103.865117
115
31
Republic Polytechnic
32
Masjid Assyafaah
33
Haw Par Tiger Balm Building
34
St. Joseph’s Church
35
Choa Chu Kang Crematorium
36
Church of St. Mary of the Angels
Construction Year: 2006
Construction Year: 2004
Construction Year: 1973
Construction Year: 1964
Construction Year: 2004
Construction Year: 2004
Architect: DP Architects; Fumihiko Maki
Architect: Forum Architect
Architect: Ho Kok Hoe (Ho Kwong Yew & Sons)
Architect: Parish Priest Fr Joachim Teng
Architect: CPG Consultants Pte. Ltd.
Architect: WOHA Architects
Address: 1.442923, 103.785494
Address: 1.455713, 103.81937
Address: 1.328056, 103.718716
Address: 1.3676922,103.7667119
Address: 1.376102, 103.754055
Address: 1.34725, 103.759309
38
39
40
37
The Institute of Southeast Asian Studies
Vivocity
Arcadia Condominium
St. Theresa’s Home
41
Bishan Library
42
Thr3e Thre3 Robin
Construction Year: 1998
Construction Year: 1991
Construction Year: 1983
Construction Year: 1938
Construction Year: 2006
Construction Year: 2005
Architect: Cheah Kok Ming and Poon Hin Kong (Public Works Department)
Architect: Toyo Ito
Architect: Chua Ka Seng (Chua Ka Seng & Partners Chartered Architects)
Architect: Ho Kok Hoe (Ho Kwong Yew & Sons)
Architect: LOOK Architects
Architect: Mok Wei Wei (W Architects Pte Ltd)
Address: 1.291343, 103.776646
Address: 1.2644, 103.8222
Address: 1.333466, 103.810619
Address: 1.346825, 103.837807
Address: 1.349922, 103.848684
Address:1.317102, 103.828364
43
United Square
44
1 Moulmein Rise
45
Balestier Point
46
Kwong Wai Shiu Hospital
47
Goodman Art Centre
48
Parkway Centre
Construction Year: 2002
Construction Year: 2003
Construction Year: 1986
Construction Year: 1950s
Construction Year: 1995
Construction Year: 1985
Architect: Ong & Ong Architects
Architect: WOHA Architects
Architect: Chan Fook Pong (RDC Architects Pte. Ltd.)
Architect: Ng Keng Siang
Architect: William Lim (William Lim Associates)
Architect: Akitek Tenggara
Address: 1.317325, 103.843545
Address: 1.319188, 103.847179
Address: 1.322767, 103.851969
Architect: 1.317285, 103.859327
Address: 1.303295, 103.885179
Address: 1.3018671, 103.9061067
49
50
52
53
54
Kampong Kembangan Community Club
The Bayshore
51
Bedok Court
Temasek Polytechnic
Eastpoint Mall
Tampines North Community Club
Construction Year: 2002
Construction Year: 1996
Construction Year: 1985
Construction Year: 1995
Construction Year: 1996
Construction Year: 1991
Architect: LOOK Architects
Architect: Chan Sui Him; Tai Lee Siang; Teo Eng Gee (DP Architects Pte. Ltd.)
Architect: Cheng Jian Fenn (Associates Group Architects)
Architect: Koh Seow Chuan (DP Architects Pte. Ltd.); James Stirling Michael Wilford & Associates
Architect: Tang Guan Bee (Tangguanbee Architects); Team Design Architects Pte. Ltd.
Architect: William Lim Associates
Address: 1.323277, 103.912753
Address: 1.312372, 103.93872
Address: 1.322172, 103.944515
Address: 1.345576, 103.932254
Address: 1.34273, 103.953018
Address: 1.35729, 103.94664
116
55
Expo MRT Station
56
Singapore Changi Airport
57
Camden Medical Centre
58
The Regent S’pore
59
Shangri-La Hotel Singapore
60
Abelia
Construction Year: 2000
Construction Year: 1981
Construction Year: 1999
Construction Year: 1982
Construction Year: 1971
Construction Year: 1993
Architect: Foster + Partners and CPG Consultants
Architect: CPG Consultants Pte. Ltd.
Architect: Richard Meier Architect; DP Architects
Architect: Booty, Edwards & Partners; BEP Akitek
Architect: Seow Lee Heah & Partners
Architect: Tang Guan Bee (Tangguanbee Architects); Team Design Architects Pte. Ltd.
Address: 1.334476, 103.961512
Address: 1.347242, 103.98418
Address: 1.303099, 103.823972
Address: 1.304908, 103.825491
Address: 1.311432, 103.826567
Address: 1.309674, 103.828061
62
63
64
65
66
61
Hilton Singapore
Wheelock Place
The Edge on Cairnhill
Monk’s Hill Secondary School
Cineleisure Orchard
Former Singapore Chinese Girls School
Construction Year: 1970
Construction Year: 1993
Construction Year: 2002
Construction Year: 1958
Construction Year: 1997
Construction Year: 1925
Architect: Booty, Edwards & Partners; BEP Akitek
Architect: Kisho Kurokawa; Wong and Ouyang; RSP Architects Planners and Engineers
Architect: RDC Architects Pte Ltd with Moshe Safdie & Associates
Architect: PWD Consultants Pte Ltd
Architect: Architects 61 with MGT Architects
Architect: Messrs. S. Y. Wong and Co.
Address: 1.305891, 103.82942
Address: 1.304715, 103.83035
Address: 1.308777, 103.837058
Address: 1.309078, 103.841244
Address: 1.301593, 103.836291
Address: 1.3025, 103.83844
68
69
67
Singapore Power Building
Winsland House
Henderson Community Club & Bukit Merah Neighborhood Police Centre
70
College Of Medicine Building
71
(Former) Tanjong Pagar Railway Station
72
Lippo Centre
Construction Year: 1978
Construction Year: 1997
Construction Year: 2000
Construction Year: 1926
Construction Year: 1931
Construction Year: 1990
Architect: Group 2 Architects
Architect: RSP Architects Planners and Engineers
Architect: Tan Kok Hiang (Forum Architects)
Architect: Major P. H. Keys (Keys and Dowdeswell)
Architect: Swan & Maclaren
Architect: Raymond Woo Associates
Address: 1.300168, 103.837295
Address: 1.299338, 103.841228
Address: 1.285917, 103.823354
Address: 1.2803689, 103.8337662
Address: 1.272949, 103.838624
Address: 1.273181, 103.845312
73
International Plaza
74
St Andrew’s Mission Hospital (Former)
75
MND Complex
76
Capital Tower
77
DBS Building Tower 1
78
SGX Centre 1 & 2
Construction Year: 1976
Construction Year: 1923
Construction Year: 1969
Construction Year: 2000
Construction Year: 1975
Construction Year: 2001
Architect: Ang Kheng Leng & Associates
Architect: Swan & Maclaren
Architect: Housing and Development Board
Architect: RSP Architects Planners and Engineers
Architect: Architects Team 3
Architect: Architects 61; Kohn Pederson Fox Associates
Address: 1.2757, 103.84581
Address: 1.28052, 103.845203
Address: 1.278909, 103.845805
Address: 1.277763, 103.847633
Address: 1.278203, 103.849053
Address: 1.279917, 103.850059
117
79
31 Boon Tat St
80
CapitaGreen
81
Old States Court Building
82
One George Street
83
Capital Square
84
Republic Plaza
Construction Year: 1999
Construction Year: 2014
Construction Year: 1975
Construction Year: 2004
Construction Year: 1998
Construction Year: 1996
Architect: Forum Architect
Architect: Toyo Ito
Architect: Kumpulan Akitek
Architect: DCA ARChitect Pte Ltd
Address: Architects 61
Architect: "Kisho Kurokawa Architect & Associates; RSP Architects Planners and Engineers"
Address: 1.281154, 103.84871
Address: 1.2818421, 103.8501115
Address: 1.286866, 103.842685
Address:
Architect: 1.284036, 103.849024
Address: 1.283443, 103.850978
85
86
Change Alley
Hitachi Tower
87
The Clifford Pier
88
One Fullerton
89
UOB Plaza 1 & 2
90
Parliament House
Construction Year: 1973
Construction Year: 1992
Construction Year: 1933
Construction Year: 2000
Construction Year: 1992
Construction Year: 1999
Architect: KK Tan & Associates
Architect: Murphy Jahn Architects; Architects 61
Architect: Frank Dorrington Ward (Chief Architect, Public Works Department)
Architect: Architects 61
Architect: Kenzo Tange Associates; Architects 61
Architect: CPG Consultants Pte Ltd
Address: 1.2841569, 103.8523814
Address: 1.284234, 103.852445
Address: 1.283996, 103.8537
Address: 1.285711, 103.853938
Address: 1.285471, 103.850704
Address: 1.289726, 103.850453
92
93
94
91
Supreme Court
Former City Hall
30 Hill St
Peninsula Plaza Singapore
95
One Raffles Link
96
Esplanade
Construction Year: 2002
Construction Year: 1929
Construction Year: 2000
Construction Year: 1980
Construction Year: 1999
Construction Year: 2002
Architect: CPG Consultants Pte. Ltd. and Foster + Partners
Architect: A. Gordon and F. D. Meadows (Municipal Council of Singapore)
Architect: Kohn Pedersen Fox
Architect: Alfred Wong (Alfred Wong Partnership)
Architect: Aedas; Kohn Pedersen Fox
Architect: DP Architects; Michael Wilford and Partners London
Address: 1.2903981, 103.8509085
Address: 1.29068, 103.851743
Address: 1.293628, 103.849478
Address: 1.292485, 103.85086
Address: 1.292052, 103.855849
Address: 1.289793, 103.855817
97
Marina Square
98
The Ritz-Carlton, Millenia Singapore
99
Millenia Tower
100 Suntec City
Construction Year: 1986
Construction Year: 1997
Construction Year: 1996
Construction Year: 1997
Architect: John Portman Associates; DP Architects
Architect: DP Architects; Kevin Roche
Architect: Kevin Roche, John Dinkeloo and Associates; DP Architects
Architect: DP Architects; Tsao & McKown Architect
Address: 1.291355, 103.857715
Address: 1.290754, 103.860091
Address: 1.2931797, 103.8606995
Address: 1.295891, 103.857904
118
Survey Members: Students from National University of Singapore Students of University of Tokyo Students of Tokyo University of Science
Visiting Architecture Tour in Downtown
Students Workshop on Presentation
Visiting UOB Plaza 1
The 8th mASEANa International Conference 119
Networking Event (Photo credit: Feng Yikang)
Farewell Dinner (Photo credit: Feng Yikang) 120
Endgame Exhibition (Photo credit: Feng Yikang) 121
Photo credit: Beer Singnoi
122
Photo credit: Feng Yikang
Photo credit: Feng Yikang
123
Acknowledgments
mASEANa Project Co-cordinator
With thanks to:
Shin Muramatsu (The University of Tokyo)
Yoshiyuki Yamana (Tokyo University of Science)
Centre for Liveable Cities
Foundation and supported organizations to have “mASEANa Project” made possible. This report is a documentation of the following project:
Japan
We deeply thank everyone who kindly and devotedly gave corporation, especially the Japan
Appreciating Asian modern :mASEANa project 2015-2020 The 8th mASEANa Project Conference, 2019, Singapore The Future of the Past:
“Progressive Once More”
Rejuvenating Mid-Century Modern Architecture in Southeast Asia Term 31. Oct-2 Nov, 2019 Organizer (Japan):
Docomomo Japan, Japan Foundation, mASEANa Project Committee
Organizer (Singapore): Docomomo Singapore Working-Group-in-Progress, NationalUniversity of
Singapore, Department of Architecture, Singapore Heritage Society
Emcee:
Rachel Lim
Venue Partners:
Urban Redevelopment Authority, Zarch Collaboratives , The Projector
Media Partners:
Design and Architecture, INDESIGNLIVE.SG
Supporter:
ICOMOS Singapore
Patron Sponsors:
W Architects, Aedas,
Donor Sponsors:
Royal Institute of British Architects, MKPL Architects,
Supporter Sponsors:
Architects 61, FARM, Breezeway Development, Tierra Design Studio
Singapore, RSP Architects Planners & Engineers, Archurban, Woods
Bagot, Brock Carmichael, Woh Hup, Penta Ocean Construction Co.,
Shimizu Corporation, Mitsubishi Jisho Sekkei Asia, Nomura Real Estate
Development Friend Sponsors:
DP Architects, Park + Associates, HASSELL
The 9th mASEANa Project Conference, 2020, Tokyo, Japan
“Progressive Once More”
Rejuvenating Mid-Century Modern Architecture in Southeast Asia Term 15th February, 2020 Venue:
Meiji Jingu Sansyuden
Organizer:
DOCOMOMO Japan (mASEANa Project Committee)
Co-organizer:
The Japan Foundation
Supporter:
The Toyota Foundation, DOCOMOMO International, ICOMOS ISC20C,
mAAN
Johannes Widodo (The National University of Singapore)
Kenji Watanabe (Tokai University) Kengo Hayashi (The University of Tokyo) Yasuko Kamei (Nihon University) Singapore mASEANa SG 2019 Organising Committee: Ho Weng Hin Jonathan Poh Karen Tan Tan Kar Lin Colin Yip Chang Jiat Hwee Johannes Widodo Imran bin Tajudeen Lai Chee Kien Calvin Chua Sabrina Kuusisto Tashan Selvanayagam
Endgame Exhibition Committee: Vincent Tan Gaius Leong Cheng Ding Yi Leo Lin Zhang Hanfei Jason Lim
Minister for Social and Family Development Desmond Lee Singapore Land Authority Docomomo International UK Department of International Trade Singapore Institute of Architects Archifest 2019 Ana Tostoes Mok Wei Wei Dinesh Naidu Kelvin Ang Mohamed Ismail Muhammad Fauzy Meranda Tang Ying Zi Jerome Ng Alan Tay Jerome Lim Tay Kheng Soon Lim Fong Wei Melody Zaccheus Low Shi Ping Teo Yee Chin Pocket Projects Provolk Architects Studio Lapis
Sponsor
Following corporation gave us support in bringing about “mASEANa Project”, We would like to express our great appreciation.
The Japan Foundation Masanou Ito Koichi Makise Syoya Suzuki Sae Sueyoshi
mASEANa project Secretariat Yuko Nishimura Taeko Enomoto
SINGAPORE ORGANISERS
VENUE PARTNERS
Publication
Design Yu Takahara Yoshiko Takubo Hiroki Osuka Keigo Kubishiro Transcription
Pang Llui Lim Sabrina Kuusisto Photograph Cover Photograph: Chua Shu-Min Ynez Photo: Beer Singnoi, Feng Yikang Printing: TOKYO Print
MEDIA PARTNERS
WITH THE SUPPORT OF
PATRON SPONSORS
DONOR SPONSORS
SUPPORTER SPONSORS
2015 - 2020