1 minute read

Table 3.1 Concept Comparison Framework

ii. The Dryline (previously known as Big U), New York, United States iii. Cheonggyecheon River Revitalisation, Seoul, South Korea

The identified case studies will be analysed in-depth on the intervention that has been applied to combat or adapt flood vulnerability. The comparison between each design intervention analysed,and research parameters from each case study would fulfil the objective of identifying and comparing different approaches of flood-resilient urban waterfront design strategies through case studies.

Advertisement

3.3.1.4 Comparison Instrument

Each data obtained from the case study will be tabulated to compare different approach done within each project. The instrument of tabulation will be as followed:

i. Design Principles and Concept on Resiliency

Case Study Concept on Resiliency Concept and Principles Flooding Context Policy Enforcement

Vietnamese Mekong Delta

The Dryline

Cheonggyechong River Revitalisation

Table 3.1 Concept Comparison Framework Author, 2020

ii. Design Features and Categorization

Case Study Features and Categorization (based on literature review criteria)

This article is from: