24 minute read

Past Papers

Next Article
Flower Power

Flower Power

About time: the lost ingredient of healing

Kyra Pollitt

Advertisement

The third in our occasional series of excerpts from student papers, this shortened article is adapted from Kyra Pollitt’s dissertation, submitted for the Diploma in Herbology at Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, class of 2020. The complete, fully referenced paper can be found on academia.com. If you have a past paper you would like to share, please contact us at herbologynews@gmail.com.

Archaeological finds from twenty thousand years ago suggest European hunters carved lines and holes in sticks and bones to record lunar phases (Honoré, 2005; MacGregor, 2010). Similar activities were undertaken by the Sumerians, the Babylonians, the Egyptians, the Chinese, the Mayans, and the Aztecs (ibid; Bronowski, 1973; Grun, 1982). Each of these ancient cultures sought to resolve the chaotic human experience of time through observation of external, often inanimate, distant, and regular phenomena— the sun, the moon, the stars, the tides. In Chinese, Hindu, Buddhist, and Shinto traditions, this externalized time came to be perceived as cyclical; in the Western Christian tradition, as linear (Fisher & Luyster, 1990; Young, 2005; Gallois, 2007). Yet, despite what such efforts would have us believe, human time isn’t a single entity, and it isn’t straightforward either.

Our sense of time is composed by ‘separate neural mechanisms that usually work together but can be teased apart in the laboratory’ (Eagleman, 2008). It’s the flexibility of these mechanisms that allow us to feel time passing quickly when we are busy or distracted, and more slowly when we are paying close attention to its flow (Glicksohn & Myslobodsky, 2006; Grondin, 2010). The contentions of this essay are threefold: that illness, dis-ease and injury are states that can distort our lived experience of time by altering the flow of attention; that contemporary digital lifestyles also cause disruptions in our experiences of time, which in turn invite dis-ease; and, finally, that these distortions fuel the modern preoccupation with fast-acting medicines, which themselves can disrupt the body’s ability to heal itself more deeply.

The science bit: how we perceive time

Our sense of time— our chronesthesia —is subjective. It is generated by the brain, using our awareness of the world, called noetic consciousness, and our awareness of ourselves in time, our autonoetic consciousness (Tulving, 2002; Brown, 2008). These temporal constructions are deeply malleable. Within the brain, smaller intervals are handled by the senses and some automatic processing. Incoming signals from each of the senses are processed at different speeds, with our neurocognitive machinery working to a default 3-second ‘temporal window’, so that the brain estimates time according to the number of ‘events’ that occur (Brown & Boltz, 2002; Eagleman 2008). Our feeling of duration mirrors the amount of neural energy used to encode each stimulus, each event (Eagleman, ibid). That’s why, in moments of crisis, the amygdala may form ‘denser-than-normal’ memories, recording more events than usual, and producing that sense of elongated time familiar to fans of The Matrix.

Longer intervals of time are processed by deeper cognition, but there is still great malleability here. We are able to make future arrangements, and to remember and follow time-based plans, by using our ‘prospective memory’ (Glicksohn & Myslobodsky, 2006; Labelle et al, 2009), but ‘the timing expectations of motor acts and sensory consequences can shift in relation to one another, even to the extent that they can switch places’ (Eagleman, 2008). Our expectations of how long things will take and when they will happen, as well as our recall of when things happened and in what order, can easily become confused.

The social bit: how we ‘do’ time

That we presume time to be an objective, external commodity— a thing —is clear from the language we use to classify and describe it. We ‘measure’, ‘mark’, ‘take’, ‘use’, ‘pass’, ‘borrow’, ‘steal’, ‘waste’, ‘spend’ and ‘buy’ time. We equate time with money. We regard time as something ‘precious’ that can be ‘carved out’, ‘set aside’, ‘stored up’, ‘frittered away’, ‘lost’ or ‘killed’. Crucially, all these metaphors fail to recognize what Schutz (1974:48) calls ‘lifeworldly time’:

The pregnant woman must wait until the time of delivery. The farmer must wait until the right time comes for sowing, or for the harvest. In waiting we encounter a time structure that is imposed on us.

This gap between the way we like to talk of controlling time, and the reality of lifeworldly time, perhaps gives rise to the greatest contemporary malaise. We try to increase our sense of control by distancing ourselves as much as possible from those pesky, untameable lifeworldly things— but the sense of security we seek comes at a price. Giddens (1999:46,47) suggests:

A society living on the other side of nature and tradition— as nearly all Western societies now do —is one that calls for decision making, in everyday life as elsewhere. The dark side of decision making is the rise of addictions and compulsions… Where tradition lapses, and lifestyle choice prevails, the self isn’t exempt. Self-identity has to be created and recreated on a more active basis than before…

In striving to create and re-create self in this way, individuals appear increasingly unable to reconcile control of and submission to time. In 2001, the Japanese government recorded 143 deaths caused by overwork (karoshi); a 70% increase in the use of amphetamines was recorded in America between 1998 and 2004; and British government figures reveal the average working parent spends twice as long dealing with emails as playing with their children (Honoré, 2005). Sontag (1998:89) attributes such habits to ‘future-mindedness’— the ‘distinctive mental habit, and intellectual corruption’ of our times.

Time and contemporary lifestyle

Whilst many questions remain about the brain’s co-ordination, its coding of signals, and its ability to speedily recalibrate, two aspects of the brain’s malleability are particularly significant here. The first is that, since duration judgments are created from visual stimuli (Eagleman, 2008; Grondin & McAuley, 2009), our sense of time passing can be altered by exposure to a flickering stimulus, such as a digital screen. Some research suggests that a person’s adaptation to a flickering stimulus can even result in distortions that continue beyond screen time (Johnston et al, 2006; Eagleman, 2008). Even the colour of our digital screens may corrupt our delicate sense of time (Gorn et al, 2004). So, the digital society we are creating is also badly distorting our chronesthesia— both when we are using screens and after we have switched them off. It’s no coincidence that children have difficulty judging how long they’ve been playing their favourite computer game.

The second relevant insight from neuroscientific research, is that for the brain to develop a sense of time, humans need to experience causality by interacting with the real world (Stetson et al, 2006; Eagleman, 2008). Those ancient peoples had it right when they were looking for anchors in the sun, moon, stars, and tides. Meanwhile, we modern folk— and our young, in particular —are becoming increasingly lost in the unanchored, timeless, online, digital stream. Although Western societies no longer recognize it,

people are an essential part of the environment; they are as real as trees, rocks or skyscrapers, and their interactions with each other and with places ...influence their health and well-being. (Lindheim and Syme, 1983)

Who needs time? Time and the human body

The problem with creating a controlled digital world is that, as biological creatures, we remain profoundly sensitive to indicators of real world time. Blood pressure is thought to show sensitivity to the Schumann resonance (Mitsutake et al, 2005); and there is growing evidence not only that human fertility remains tied to earthly cycles (Huber et al, 2004), but that the month of our birth may determine our susceptibility to certain, seemingly unrelated, dis-eases in adult life (Martinez-Bakker et al, 2014; Boland et al, 2015).

Yet more than half the world’s population now live in cities (WHO, 2010), where there is growing ‘desynchronization’ from our Earth’s fundamental rhythms. As Stevenson et al (2015) point out:

humans in developed societies now spend the vast majority of their lives in conditions that mimic ‘summer-like’ environments. These so-called eternal summers are characterized by light and temperature conditions that lack seasonal rhythmicity. Presently, many of us no longer live in accordance with the naturally occurring variation in geophysical rhythms.

The consequences of this seasonal desynchronization include the retinal damage and increased risk of breast cancer caused by ‘ill-timed exposure to artificial light’ (SCENIHR, 2012); cardiovascular disorders (Scheer et al, 2009); respiratory disease, asthma, and allergies caused by particulate pollution (Beggs, 2004); stress, depression, sadness and psychiatric disorders caused by population density and disconnection from biodiversity (Dean et al, 2011); sleep disorders (SCENIHR, 2012), obesity and gastrointestinal dysfunction (Fonken et al, 2010); neurodegenerative disorders caused by the disruption of circadian and seasonal rhythms, light, noise pollution and over-stimulation (Wulff et al, 2010; Kaplan, 1995); and even genetically disrupted immunity (Dopico et al, 2015), increased morbidity and mortality (Stevenson et al, 2015).

‘Privileged’-world, post-millennial generations may be ‘born with a sense of relatedness to their environments’, but ‘through the processes of socialization they acquire a sense of separateness from environments, including the natural environment’ (Phenice and Griffore, 2003). A 2014 survey of 350 American children (Kabali et al, 2015) found:

Most households had television (97%), tablets (83%), and smartphones (77%). At age 4, half the children had their own television and three-fourths their own mobile device. Almost all children (96.6%) used mobile devices, and most started using before age 1. ... At age 2, most children used a device daily...

Amongst this demographic, the effects of desynchronization from the natural world appear intensified (Kasser, 2002), fuelling a host of physical and psychological dis-eases (Lewis et al, 2012; Xie et al, 2015) and promoting unhealthy physical, sexual and psychological aspirations (Saguy & Riley, 2005; Braun- Courville, 2009). Worse, as the natural world is disregarded, it grows endangered by the many insensitive ways in which humans exploit it. The resulting climate emergency is reported by scientists and our daily media as an existential species threat (Mecklin, 2020), and this sense of existential doom is itself increasingly understood to promote an emotional disconnection from the natural world (Buttlar et al, 2017). It’s a vicious cycle.

Faster pharma: time and treatment

Of course, our society’s ‘future-mindedness’ (Sontag, 1998) can also bring benefits. Comparisons of outcomes of cancer care in Western countries have consistently illustrated the advantages of early diagnosis and rapid access to treatment (Berrino et al, 1995; Abdel-Rahman et al, 2009; Brown & Rubin, 2014). It is the medical profession’s belief that:

When a diagnosis is accurate and made in a timely manner, a patient has the best opportunity for a positive health outcome because clinical decision making will be tailored to a correct understanding of the patient's health problem. (Holmboe and Durning, 2014)

Yet, even pre-pandemic, National Health Service practitioners had, on average, ‘about six minutes’ (Honoré, 2004:148) to relate a patient’s presentation to a ‘pre-existing set of categories agreed upon by the medical profession to designate a specific condition’ (Jutel, 2009). Meanwhile, the application of market forces has given rise to such ‘ever-increasing options for diagnostic testing and treatment’ and ‘rapidly rising levels of biomedical and clinical evidence’, that:

The rising complexity of health care and the sheer volume of advances, coupled with clinician time constraints and cognitive limitations, have outstripped human capacity to apply this new knowledge. (Balogh et al, 2015)

Additionally, the ever-increasing variety of ‘profitable medicines for a range of daily activities’ (Fox & Ward, 2008:856) skews patients’ perception of dis-ease by medicalizing solutions to common social experiences, such as the ‘disruptive behaviour’ of children (Fishman, 2004), average sexual performance (Marshall, 2002), or shyness (Lexchin, 2001). Patients now behave as consumers, demanding speedy ‘magic bullet’ solutions (Marshall 2002:133). As medical services increasingly rely on the big data marketplace to hone diagnostic templates and tools (Balogh et al, 2015), dis-ease is re-framed as a fractured series of isolated symptoms requiring speedy, discrete solutions.

For the past three decades, the pharmaceutical industry has consistently been the most profitable business sector in the United States (Angell, 2000). An estimated 20% of its profits is spent annually on research and development; meanwhile, 40% is devoted to marketing (ibid.). This marketing relies heavily on the harvesting of digital data, which becomes the commercial property of the digital platform developers (Lupton, 2014), whilst ‘consumers’ are encouraged to believe that the ‘big data’ to which they contribute

are more powerful and accurate sources of knowledge than other means of collecting information about people’s behaviour, experiences and opinions. (ibid.)

This is significant, critics suggest, because it causes pharmaceutical industries to over-concentrate production on profitable drugs that meet the perceived needs of a particular demographic of digital consumers, diverting global capacity from wider actual and anticipated health needs (Angell, 2000; Kelly- Cirino et al, 2018). There are also consequences for the hapless, digitally engaged consumer. In the United States, an estimated $25 billion is spent annually on the pharmaceutical treatment of wounds, yet these are often symptoms of underlying circulatory disorders, or diseases such as diabetes (Sen et al, 2007). It can be more profitable to treat a range of symptoms than to spend time addressing more profound, underlying conditions. The digital health phenomenon operates to ensure that there is not only ‘a pill for every ill, but perhaps more significantly, an ill for every pill’ (Mintzes, 2002: 909).

On curing and healing: time and tradition

So where does all that leave slower, traditional, herbal medicinal practices? Does herbal medicine have anything to offer? Traditional herbal practices are drawn from ‘indigenous ways of knowing’ (Kimmerer, 2003:100). Rather than standing in opposition to science, these sensibilities and bodies of knowledge themselves emerge ‘from careful systematic observation of nature, from the results of innumerable lived experiments’ (ibid:101). Yet these traditional practices do stand against the pharmaceuticalization of health and medicine, and the rapacious consumption that disrupts our chronesthesia. Fortunately, there is

an increasing recognition that quality healthcare and the delivery of that care need to take a more holistic, patient-centric approach, an approach that emphasizes healing as important as curing. (Firth et al, 2015:44)

Healing is differentiated from cure by engagement with the ‘repair and recovery of mind, body, and spirit’ (Smith et al, 2013) in addition to the eradication of physical symptoms. This focus on wholeness derives from the Hippocratic view of health as a state of harmonious balance between body and soul (McElligot, 2010). Indeed, the origin of the English word ‘healing’ lies in ‘haelen’, Old English for ‘wholeness’ (Quinn, 1997).

Firth et al (2015) determine four ‘defining attributes of healing’: it is a process which evolves over time; it is a ‘dynamic, emergent, and experiential’ movement from ‘an undesired state’ towards ‘renewal’; it ‘occurs’ in ‘mind, body, and spirit’ in ‘expected and unexpected ways, creating a new entity’; and it ‘engages the individual’s innate ability to repair damage and recover function’.

Whilst some consensus emerges about what healing is, there is less clarity on how it might be delivered. To determine relevant qualitative information, physicians must take the time to elicit any ‘changes in sensations and feelings’, ‘changes in self-concepts and values’, or ‘changes in medical symptoms and complaints’ (Firth et al, 2015). Both time and dialogue are central to the ‘construction of meaning’ and ‘cognitive reframing’ recommended by German theorists (Teut et al, 2014). The ambitions of healing, then, neatly reflect the conceptualization of time as a fundamental, integrated, physiological system.

Zahourek (2005:106-7) argues that ‘transformative change (healing) is dependent on intentionality’, which is ‘essential’ to ‘perceiving mind-body-spirit unity’. Within the transformative healing encounter, intentionality is variously understood as ‘focused attention’, ‘mental projection of awareness, with purpose and efficacy’ (Braud & Schlitz, 1991:31), or ‘the influence of one person on another’ (Pilkington, 2000) through attitudes, behaviours, interpersonal relationships, motives, motivation, and actions. To date, literature on the practical effects of intentionality in healing is slight, and embraces concepts unfamiliar to the Western medical cannon, such as acts of ‘quieting’ and affirmation, and a ‘unity of universal life energy’ (Heidt, 1990). Yet these concepts are readily found in Traditional Chinese Medicine (Rosenberg, 2018), in the ‘gunas’, yogic ‘prana’ and ‘chi’ of the Indic traditions (Clark, 2002; Lad, 2002), in the energetics of homeopathy (Kent & Loos, 2009), in Bach Flower Remedies (Barnard, 1987), and beyond. Indeed, throughout traditional herbalism, there is widespread acknowledgement of time physiology manifest as ‘energy’, or ‘spirit’, and this is even considered transferable between plants, humans, and other living beings (Pendell, 2005; Wood, 2016). It’s a perspective that is increasingly validated both philosophically (Ingold, 2011; Lovelock, 2016), and through empirical studies in botany and phytochemistry (Teixeira et al, 2010; Ncube et al, 2011; Jayanthy et al, 2013; Ahl et al, 2014; Li et al, 2015; Gololo et al, 2016; Satyavarapu et al, 2020).

Diagnosis and prescription

So, scientific research is beginning to reveal time as a product of complex, multi-layered interactions between internal chemical-biological processes which have evolved to be responsive to external phenomena (earth processes). These human time systems are delicate, malleable and

are therefore highly vulnerable to changes in the constellation of environmental factors under which they have evolved. (Stevenson et al, 2015)

In the 21st century, our interactions with environmental factors have become so distorted that our internal time systems are malfunctioning. It is now beyond doubt that:

temporal mismatches between the environment and circadian biology…have detrimental effects on health and well-being. (ibid.)

Moreover, the disparity between nature and popular Western conceptions of time creates a ‘frame conflict’ (Wodak, 1996) in which our highly sensitive time physiology can only exacerbate our dyschronesthesia. The resulting dis-ease is increasingly serviced by big pharma:

[P]eople have lost the ability to read the role of a plant from the landscape and read instead the ‘directions for use’ on a tamper-proof bottle of Echinacea. (Kimmerer, 2003:101)

So many interrelated physiological systems are recruited to serve the human time system, that the symptoms of dysfunction may be correspondingly broad. This may have obscured science’s ability to appropriately identify the role of dyschronesthesia in many common disorders. Nonetheless, it follows that the diagnosis, management, and treatment of many contemporary dis-eases could benefit from prioritizing attendance to ‘chronotherapy’ (Li et al, 2013). Repair and restoration are less likely to be achieved by a pharmaceutical ‘magic bullet’ (Marshall 2002: 133), or surgical intervention, than by the raising of noetic and autonoetic consciousness and the reduction of exposure to mechanisms that disrupt or inhibit our vital time system. The failure of contemporary Western medicine to comprehend a diversity of symptoms as evidence of dyschronesthesia simultaneously strengthens traditional herbalism’s claims to the existence of a fundamental, vital, integrated physiology of time that is variously described as the ‘energetic system’, ‘subtle body’, ‘subtle energy’, and the ‘energetic body’.

Thus, in the treatment of dyschronesthesia, traditional herbal practices have more to offer than modern, pharmaceutically-driven medicine. Traditional herbal medicine provides opportunities to reintegrate the chronesthetic and the autonoetic: by holistically framing dis-ease in both diagnosis and healing; by calming expectations and raising auto-noetic consciousness through duration of treatment; and by respecting bio-diverse and seasonal medicinal ingredients that can serve to re-unite the patient with noetic influences.

From the preparation of materials to the diagnostic encounter, traditional herbalism is infused with acts of intentionality, quieting, and affirmation that serve as temporal correctives to chronesthetic disorders. To realize this advantage, however, herbal medicine must maintain the integrity of its tradition and resist the ‘pharmaceuticalization’ (Fox & Ward, 2008) of both herbal products and practices:

it still remains possible, even now, to turn things around: to spin straw into gold, time into eternity, anxiety into ease and inspiration. (McEwen, 2011:14)

References: Abdel-Rahman, M. et al (2009) ‘What if cancer survival in Britain were the same as in Europe: how many deaths are avoidable?’, in British Journal of Cancer 101(S2): S24-S115 Ahl, L. et al (2014) ‘Detection of Seasonal Variations in Aloe Polysaccharides Using Carbohydrate Detecting Microarrays’ in Frontiers in Plant Science 2019; 10: 512 Angell, M. (2000) ‘The pharmaceutical industry – to whom is it accountable?’, in New England Journal of Medicine 342: 1902–4 Balogh, E.P.; Miller, B.T. & Ball, J.R. (eds) (2015) Improving Diagnosis in Health. National Academies Press, Washington DC Barnard, J. (ed) (1987) Collected Writing of Edward Bach. Flower Remedy Programme: Hereford Beggs, P. (2004) ‘Impacts of climate change on aeroallergens: past and future’, in Clinical & Experimental Allergy 34(10):1507- 1513 Berrino, F. et al (1995) ‘Basic issues in the estimation and comparison of cancer patient survival’, in Berrino, F.; Sant, M.; Verdecchia, A.; Capocaccia, R.; Hakulinen, T. & Estève, J. (eds.) Survival of Cancer Patients in Europe: The EUROCARE Study. International Agency for Research on Cancer (WHO) Publication no. 132, Lyon: 1-14 Boland, M. et al (2015) ‘Birth month affects lifetime disease risk: a phenome-wide method’, in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 22: 1042–1053 Braud, W. & Schlitz, M. (1991) ‘Conscious interactions with remote biological systems: Anomalous intentionality effects’, in Subtle Energies 2: 1-45 Braun-Courville, D. K. & Rojas, M. (2009) ‘Exposure to Sexually Explicit Web Sites and Adolescent Sexual Attitudes and Behaviors’, in Journal of Adolescent Health 45 (2): 156–162 Bronowski, J. (1973) The Ascent of Man. BBC: London Brown, S. & Rubin, G. (2014) ‘How might healthcare systems influence speed of cancer diagnosis: A narrative review’, in Social Science & Medicine 116: 56-63 Buttlar, B.; Latz, M. & Walther, E. (2017) ‘Breaking Bad: Existential Threat Decreases Pro-Environmental Behavior’, in Basic and Applied Social Psychology 393(3):153-166 Clark, A. (2002) Illustrated Elements of Tai Chi. Element: London Dean, J.; van Dooren, K. & Weinstein, P. (2011) ‘Does biodiversity improve mental health in urban settings?’, in Medical Hypotheses 76 (6):877-880 Dopico, X. et al (2015) ‘Widespread seasonal gene expression reveals annual differences in human immunity and physiology’, in Nature Communications 6/7000 Eagleman, D. M. (2008) ‘Human time perception and its illusions’, in Current Opinion in Neurobiology 18(2):131–136 Firth, K. et al (2015) ‘Healing: A Concept Analysis’, in Global Advances in Health and Medicine 4(6): 44-50 Fisher, M. & Luyster, R. (1990) Living Religions. I.B. Tauris & Co: London Fishman, J. (2004) ‘Manufacturing desire: the commodification of female sexual dysfunction’, in Social Studies of Science 34 (2):87– 218
 Fonken, L. et al (2010) ‘Light at night increases body mass by shifting the time of food intake’, in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 107:18 664–18669 Fox, N. & Ward, K. (2008) ‘Pharma in the bedroom . . . and the kitchen. . . The pharmaceuticalisation of daily life.’ in Sociology of Health & Illness 30(6): 856–868 Gallois, W. (2007) Time, Religion and History. Pearson Longman: Harlow Giddens, A. (1999) Runaway World. Profile: London Glicksohn, J. & Myslobodsky, M.S. (eds) (2006) Timing the Future: the Case for a Time-based Prospective Memory. World Scientific Publishing: London Gololo, S. et al (2016) ‘Effect of seasonal changes on the quantity of phytochemicals in the leaves of three medicinal plants from Limpopo province, South Africa’, in Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytotherapy 8(9):168-172 Gorn, G. et al (2004) ‘Waiting for the web: How screen color affects time perception’, in Journal of Marketing Research XLI: 215-225 Grondin, S. & McAuley, J. D. (2009) ‘Duration discrimination in crossmodal sequences’, in Perception 38: 1542-1559 Grondin, S. (2010) ‘Timing and time perception: A review of recent behavioral and neuroscience findings and theoretical directions’, in Attention, Perception and Psychophysics 72:561–582 Grun, B. (1982) The Timetables of History. First Touchstone Edition. Simon and Schuster: New York Heidt, P. R. (1990) ‘Openness: A qualitative analysis of the nurses’ and patients’ experience of Therapeutic Touch’, in Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship 22: 180-186 Holmboe, E.S. & Durning, S.J. (2014) ‘Assessing clinical reasoning: Moving from in vitro to in vivo’, Diagnosis 1(1):111–117 Honoré, C. (2005) In Praise of Slow. Orion: London Huber, S. et al (2004) ‘Brief communication: birth month influences reproductive performance in contemporary women’, in Human Reproduction 19: 1081–1082 Ingold, T. (2011) ‘Rethinking the animate, reanimating thought’, in Ingold, T. (2011) Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description. Routledge: Abingdon, 67-75 Jayanthy A. et al (2013) ‘Seasonal and Geographical Variations in Cellular Characters and Chemical Contents in Desmodium gangeticum (L.) DC. – An Ayurvedic Medicinal Plant’, in International Journal of Herbal Medicine 1(1): 34-37 Johnston, A.; Arnold, D.H. & Nishida, S. (2006) ‘Spatially localized distortions of event time’, in Current Biology 16(5): 472-479 Jutel, A. (2009) ‘Sociology of diagnosis: A preliminary review’, in Sociology of Health and Illness 31(2): 278–299 Kaplan, S. (1995) ‘The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework’, in Journal of Environmental Psychology 15: 169-182 Kasser, T. (2002) The High Price of Materialism. MIT Press: Cambridge MA Kelly-Cirino, C. et al (2018) ‘Importance of diagnostics in epidemic and pandemic preparedness’, in British Medical Journal (Global Health) 4 (Suppl 2): e001179 Kent, J.T. & Loos, J. C. (2009) Lectures on Homeopathic Philosophy. Watchmaker Publishing: Gearhart, Oregon Kimmerer, R.W. (2003) Gathering Moss. Oregon State University Press: Corvallis Lad, V. (2002) Textbook of Ayurveda: Fundamental Principles. The Ayurvedic Press: India Lewis, S. et al (2012) ‘Non-suicidal self-injury, youth, and the Internet: What mental health professionals need to know’, in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health 6 (13) Lexchin, J. (2001) ‘Lifestyle drugs: issues for debate’, in Canadian Medical Association Journal 164(10): 1449 –51
 Li, X.M. et al. (2013) ‘A circadian clock transcription model for the personalization of cancer chronotherapy’, in Cancer Research 73: 7176–7188 Li, J. et al (2015) ‘Seasonal Variation of Alkaloid Contents and Anti- Inflammatory Activity of Rhizoma coptidis Based on Fingerprints Combined with Chemometrics Methods’, in Journal of Chromatographic Science 53 (7):1131–1139 Lindheim, R. & Syme, S.L. (1983) ‘Environments, people, and health’, in Annual Review of Public Health 4(1): 335–359 Lovelock, J. (2016) Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth. Reprint edition. Oxford University Press: Oxford Lupton, D. (2014) ‘The commodification of patient opinion: The digital patient experience economy in the age of big data’, in Sociology of Health & Illness 36 (6): 856–86 MacGregor, N. (2010) A History of the World in 100 Objects. Allen Lane: London Marshall, B.L. (2002) ‘‘Hard science’: gendered constructions of sexual dysfunction in the Viagra age’, in Sexualities 5 (2) 131– 158
 Martinez-Bakker, M. et al (2014) ‘Human birth seasonality: latitudinal gradient and interplay with childhood disease dynamics’, in Proceedings of the Royal Society B 281: 20132438 McElligot, D. (2010) ‘Healing: The journey from concept to nursing practice’, in Journal of Holistic Nursing 28(4): 251-9 McEwen, C. (2011) World Enough & Time. Bauhan: New Hampshire Mecklin, J. (ed.) (2020) ‘Science and Security Board Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists’ 23.01.20, accessed via https://thebulletin.org/doomsday-clock/current-time/ on 24.3.20 Mintzes, B. (2002) ‘Direct to consumer advertising is medicalising normal human experience’, im British Medical Journal 324: 908– 11 Mitsutake, G.; Otsuka, K. & Halberg, F. (2005) ‘Does Schumann resonance affect our blood pressure?’, in Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 59 (Suppl. 1): 10–14 Ncube, B.; Finnie, J.F. & Van Staden, .J. (2011) ‘Seasonal variation in antimicrobial and phytochemical properties of frequently used medicinal bulbous plants from South Africa’, in South African Journal of Botany 77(2): 387-396 Pendell, D. (2005) Pharmako Gnosis. North Atlantic Books: Berkeley Phenice, L.A. & Griffore, R.J. (2003) ‘Young Children and the Natural World’, in Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood 4(2): 167-171 Pilkington, B. F. (2000) ‘A unitary view of persistence-change,’ Nursing Science Quarterly 13: 5-11 Quinn, J.F. (1997) ‘Healing: A model for an integrative health care system’, Advanced
Practice Nursing Quarterly 3:1-7 
 Rosenberg, Z. (2018) Returning to the Source: Han Dynasty Medical Classics in Modern Clinical Practice. Singing Dragon: London Saguy, A.C. & Riley, K.W. (2005) ‘Weighing both sides: morality, mortality, and framing contests over obesity’, in Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 30(5): 869–923 Satyavarapu, E. M.; Sinha, P.K. & Manda, C. (2020) ‘Influence of Geographical and Seasonal Variations on Carbazole Alkaloids Distribution in Murraya koenigii: Deciding Factor of Its In Vitro and In Vivo Efficacies against Cancer Cells’, in BioMedical Research International: Article ID 7821913 SCENIHR – Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (2012) Health Effects of Artificial Light. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/opinions_laym an/artificial-light/. Accessed 15.03.20 Scheer, F. et al (2009) ‘Adverse metabolic and cardiovascular consequences of circadian misalignment’, in Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106(11): 4453-8 Schutz, A. & Luckmann, T. (1974) The Structures of the Life-World. Trans. R.M. Zaner & H. T Engelhardt, Jr. Heinemann Educational: London Sontag, S. (1998) Aids and Its Metaphors. Allen Lane: London Stetson, C. et al (2006) ‘Motor-sensory recalibration leads to an illusory reversal of action and sensation’, in Neuron 51:651–659 Stevenson T.J. et al (2015) ‘Disrupted seasonal biology impacts health, food security and ecosystems’, in Proceedings of the Royal Society of Biology 282: 20151453 Teixeira, E. et al (2010) ‘Seasonal variation, chemical composition and antioxidant activity of Brazilian propolis samples’, in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine 7(3): 307–315 Teut, M. et al (2014) ‘Perceived outcomes of spiritual healing and explanations—a qualitative study on the perspectives of German healers and their clients’, in BMC Complementary & Alternative Medicine 14: 240 World Health Organization (2010) ‘Hidden cities: unmasking and overcoming health inequities in urban settings.’ Switzerland Wodak, R. (1996) Disorders of Discourse. Longman: London Wood, M. (2016) The Earthwise Herbal Repertory. North Atlantic Books: Berkeley Wulff, K. et al (2010) Sleep and circadian rhythm disruption in psychiatric and neurodegenerative disease. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 11: 589–599 Xie, Y. et al (2016) ‘A comparison of muscle activity in using touchscreen smartphone among young people with and without chronic neck–shoulder pain’, in Ergonomics 59(1): 61-72 Young, W.A. (2005) The World's Religions: Worldviews and Contemporary Issues. Prentice Hall: New York Zahourek, R.P. (2005) ‘Intentionality: Evolutionary development in healing: A Grounded Theory study for Holistic Nursing’, in Journal of Holistic Nursing 23: 89-109

This article is from: