TOOTH WEAR & RESTORATION OF ABRASION LESIONS DR HSU ZENN YEW
DDS (UKMal), DCLINDENT (Adel)
Tooth wear
TERMINOLOGY
Caries Subsurface mineral loss
Caries
‘Tooth surface loss/ TSL’ or ‘tooth wear’: refers to the loss of tooth tissue by a disease process other than dental caries/ trauma. (Eccles, 1982) VS
‘Early Enamel Caries’: Subsurface mineral loss beneath relatively intact surface zone.
www.doctorspiller.com
BDJ 2006
“…the human dentition is basically “designed” on the premise that extensive wear will occur…” Kaifu et al
Ungar et.al (2008)
Bailey S & Liu W (2010)
CAVEMAN DIET.. BEST WAY TO SLIM DOWN?..
Is Tooth Wear Physiological or Pathological? Physiological TSL: Wear & tear process
Increased wear in older patient
Pathological TSL: Teeth are so worn that they affect Function: diificulty in mastication, speech
Aesthetics : seriously affect the appearance Longevity / survival of teeth : whether tooth will survive until end of life span Comfort: Exposed dentine -> dentinal sensitivity or pulpal symptoms
CLASSIFICATION
TOOTH WEAR
EROSION
ABRASION
ATTRITION
? ABFRACTIONS
D.W. Bartlett and P. Shah (2006)
EROSION ď‚š Defined as loss of dental hard tissue as a result of chemical process NOT involving bacteria ď‚š Clinical features:
melted appearance (dull appearance)
cupping or grooving on occlusal/incisal surfaces
edges of restorations appear to rise above the level of the adjacent tooth Lussi 2006
EROSION
silky-glazed appearance of the tooth
rounding of the cusps and grooves
shallow concavities coronal from the cementoenamel junction
No occlusal morphology present Lussi et 2006
EXTRINSIC Behavioural: •Healthier diet style: diet high in acidic citrus fruits, fruit juices, vegetables •Unhealthy life style: consumption of designer drugs •Alcoholic •Excessive consumption of acidic foods and drinks: soft drinks, wine, vinegar
Occupation: •Workers chemical industry •Wine tasters •Swimmers exercising in water with low pH •Athletes consuming frequently erosive sport drinks.
Chemical factors • pH and buffering capacity of the product • Type of acid (pKa values) •Citric acid caused more erosion than phosphoric acid
ACID ATTACK
INTRINSIC Medical:
Common causes for the migration of gastric juice through the lower and upper oesophageal sphincters are • Gastroesophageal reflux disease, hiatus hernia, chronic indigestion •Eating disorders: Anorexia and Bulimia, ruminification •Chronic alcoholism •Pregnancy
Pickards’ Manual, Lussi 2006
CAUSES OF EROSION Biological: •Saliva: flow rate, composition, buffering capacity and stimulation capacity •Acquired pellicle: composition, maturation and thickness •Type of dental substrate (permanent and primary enamel, dentin) and composition (e.g. fluoride content as FHAP or CaF2-like particles) •Dental anatomy and occlusion
PROTECTIVE MECHANISM
ABRASION
Pickards’ Manual, Lussi 2006 http://www.teethforbe tterhealth.com Badel et. Al 2007
Defined as ‘the pathological wearing away of dental hard tissue through abnormal mechanical processes involving foreign objects or substances other than by opposing teeth’.
‘Three- body wear’
Clinical characteristics: Commonly present buccally Cervical region Disc shaped ??V-shaped notch (a/w abfractions)
ABRASION Causes: Abnormal habits: Chewing pencils, cigar pipe, thread biting
www.mymuseum.org.uk
ABRASION Causes: Toothbrushing/ Oral hygiene habits Depends on relative dentine abrasivity (RDA) of the toothpaste. International Standards Organisation (ISO) laboratory test. ISO stipulates that the RDA of toothpastes should not exceed 250
Whitening toothpaste containing alumina may have high abrasivity.
“Normal toothbrushing habits with toothpastes that conform with the ISO standard will, in a lifetime’s use, cause virtually no wear of enamel and clinically insignificant abrasion of dentine (a figure of 1 mm in around 100 years is often cited)” Addy et al 2003
ABRASION Causes: Toothbrushing/ Oral hygiene techniques Modified bass and roll technique vs horizontal/scrub technique The effect of acid on enamel and dentine makes the tooth more susceptible to abrasion. Recommendation : delay at least 1 hour after acidic meals Addy et al 2003
ABFRACTION
Pickards’ Manual, Lussi 2006 http://www.teethforbe tterhealth.com Badel et. Al 2007
Controversial Defined as fracture of dental tooth structure caused by occlusal loads of functional and parafunctional force producing stress concentrations around the cervical margin of the crown. Occlusal forces produce the flexion of the teeth both axially and paraaxially. The destructive effect on teeth will be intensified by effects of erosion and abrasion ?V-notched at cervical area
ATTRITION
Pickards’ Manual, Lussi 2006, Badel et al 2007
Attrition is defined as the loss of enamel, dentin, or restoration by tooth-to-tooth contact (Pindborg, 1970). Physical wear as a result of the action of antagonistic teeth with no foreign substances intervening (two body wear) It occurs primarily on occlusal surfaces of teeth or interproximal areas. Clinical features: Flat surfaces Glossy areas with distinct margins
Correspond to antagonistic teeth
ATTRITION Mechanical loss or in combination with erosion Affects non-contacting occlusal
Causes: 1. ? Diet: Abrasive diet (e.g vegetarian) ? contemporary diet
Pickards’ Manual, Lussi 2006, Badel et al 2007
ATTRITION
Pickards’ Manual, Lussi 2006, Badel et al 2007
Causes: 2. Bruxism: diurnal and nocturnal parafunctional activity that includes clenching, bracing, gnashing, and grinding of teeth But.. “Tooth wear is a poor indicator of bruxism..” -> Patients with tooth wear may not have bruxism “Even if a patient is suspected of having bruxism, dental erosion is more likely the cause of tooth-tissue loss than attrition.”
Khan et al 1998
ATTRITION
Pickards’ Manual, Lussi 2006, Badel et al 2007
ď‚š Causes: 3. Iatrogenic: If the restorative material has a greater abrasiveness than enamel (for example, ceramic bridges and crowns and ceramic pontics in dentures), only the antagonist teeth surfaces will undergo tooth wear Materials which are softer than tooth enamel (composite fillings, acrylic pontics in dentures, acrylic facets and occlusal planes in crowns and bridges, etc.) will wear out to a greater extent whereas enamel of antagonist teeth will remain intact.
CLASSIFICATION TOOTH WEAR
EROSION/ COROSSION
Chemical wear
ATTRITION
Physical wear: tooth-tooth surfaces
? ABFRACTIONS
ABRASION
Physical wear
Flexion of tooth
“It is challenging to distinguish between the influences of erosion, attrition or abrasion during a clinical examination.” “..They may occur simultaneously with sometimes similar shape.” Lussi 2006, D.W. Bartlett and P. Shah (2006)
MANAGEMENT
DIAGNOSIS
PREVENTION STABILIZATION
RESTORATION/ REHABILITATION REVIEW / MONITORING
Pickards’ Manual, Lussi 2006 OHI •Avoid tooth brushing immediately after an erosive challenge (vomiting, acidic diet).
•Use a fluoride containing mouth rinse, a sodium bicarbonate (baking soda) solution, milk or food such as cheese or sugar-free yoghurt. If none of the above are possible, rinse with water. •Use a soft toothbrush and low abrasion fluoride containing toothpaste. & proper technique
TOOTH WEAR
MEDICAL REFERRAL
Refer patients or advise them to seek appropriate medical attention gastroenterologist and/or a psychologist) when intrinsic causes of erosion are involved. OHE
• Reduce acid exposure by reducing the frequency, and contact time of acids (main meals only). Do not hold or swish acidic drinks in your mouth. Avoid sippingt hese drinks.
PREVENTION PROFESSIONAL INTERVENTION •Night guard for bruxism •Stimulate saliva flow with chewing gum or lozenges.
•Remineralization:•Topical fluoride (NaF, APF, SnF) •ToothMousse® (CPP-ACP/ Casein Phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate
PROTECTIVE MECHANISM
STABILIZATION Monitor preventions strategies: monitor progression of tooth wear OHE reinforcement. Address symptoms and prevent further damage Eg: dentine hypersensitivity: bonding agent / topical desensitizing agent may be placed temporarily or semipermanently over exposed dentine.
Composites may be placed temporarily or semipermanently over exposed areas Endodontic treatment: irreversible pulpitis necrotic pulp or periapical pathology
RESTORATION ONLY NECESSARY IF TOOTH WEAR IS PATHOLOGICAL Patient complaint/ presented with: Function deficit: diificulty in mastication, speech
Aesthetics problems: seriously affect the appearance Longevity: threat to the strength of tooth
Cause discomfort/ pain/ sensitivity
Function Aesthetic Longevity Comfort
ABRASION LESIONS a.k.a. non carious cervical lesions (NCCL), non carious Class 5 lesions
NOT ALL ABRASION LESIONS REQUIRE RESTORATIONS: When do we restore?
RESTORATION OF ABRASION LESIONS ACCESS & ISOLATION Difficult access in buccal surface of upper posterior, lingual of lower molar Difficult access in subgingival lesion : Non surgical retraction: retraction cords, rubber dam is sometimes useful to retract tissue Surgical retraction: conventional, electrocautery, laser surgery Simultaneus: combined surgical-restorative or Two-step: surgery-> 4-6 weeks for gingival healing and maturation > restoration
Pickard’s Manual www.cdeworld.com
RESTORATION OF ABRASION LESIONS ď‚š SELECTION OF DENTAL MATERIALS RESTORATIVE MATERIALS Non esthetic materials Amalgam Gold foil (not widely used) Gold inlay
Esthetic Materials Resin composite Flowable resin composite Resin composite with dentine bonding systems Resin composite with glass ionomer liner Glass ionomer Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Compomer Porcelain Inlay (not widely used)
RESTORATIVE MATERIALS
Adhesion to enamel
Adhesion to dentine
Poor Requires removal of tooth structure for retention
Poor Requires removal of tooth structure for retention
Poor
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Good
Flowable resin composite
Good
Poor
Excellent
Poor
Resin composite with dentine bonding systems
Good
Poor High Cfactor Esp in deep, subgingival cavity
Excellent
Glass ionomer
Good
Good
Satisfactory
Satisfactory
Resin Modified Glass Ionomer
Good
Good
Good
Satisfactory
Compomer
Good
Poor
Good
Poor
Inferior to CR
Porcelain Inlay (not widely used)
Poor
Poor
Excellent
Good
Requires laboratory
Amalgam
Gold foil (not widely used) Gold inlay
Esthetic
Sensitivity to moisture
Blood, gingival crevicular fluid, saliva affect success
Allow easier sculpting
F- release
Factors: Depth of cavity, remaining tooth structure (enamel/dentine) on margin, esthetic requirement, ability for moisture control,cost, operator preference
SANDWICH TECHNIQUE Defined as resin composite with glass ionomer liner ‘Closed’(enamel margin)/ ‘Open’ (bonded margin) sandwich techniques
Combined benefits of GIC and composite GIC is used to replace missing dentine fluoride release ->Protect gingival margin against demineralization Better adhesion to dentine through chemical bonding/ ion exchange mechanism ->reduce microleakage and increase retention
Composite is used to replace missing enamel Esthetics (compare to opaque GIC) Increased abrasion resistance Good bonding to enamel
Missing dentin is replaced with either a resin-modified or high-viscosity glass ionomer.
This modification of the closed sandwich untilized in cavities lacking enamel at the cervical margin.
Composite resin is used to replace enamel and seal the enamel margins surrounding the cavity
A glass ionomer is used in lieu of composite resin to restore the cervical aspect of the proximal box, imparting optimal resistance to microleakage and secondary caries along dentin margins
Enamel remaining in gingival margin
Bonded base
Clinical trial: 96% survival after 5 years Open sandwich: indicated for patients with good oral hygiene GIC susceptible to surface degradation esp in acidic environment/ high caries risk
Fundamental Operative Dentistry Hewlett et al 2003
Further reading
Bailey S & Liu W. A comparative dental metrical and morphological analysis of a Middle Pleistocene hominin maxilla from Chaoxian (Chaohu), China. Hominin Morphological and Behavioral Variation in Eastern Asia and Australasia: Current Perspectives. 2010;211(1),p14–23
Ungar et.al (2008). Dental Microwear and Diet of the Plio-Pleistocene Hominin Paranthropus boisei. PLoS ONE, 3(4), e2044.
Laser dentistry and prehistoric teeth. British Dental Journal 201, 693 (2006)
Yousuke Kaifu, Kazutaka Kasai, Grant C. Townsend, Lindsay C. Richards. Tooth wear and the “design” of the human dentition: A perspective from evolutionary medicine. 2003; 122(37) p47–61
http://www.ucl.ac.uk/archaeology/research/directory/disease_hillson
Addy M, Hunter ML: Can toothbrushing damage your health? Effects on oral and dental tissues. Int Dent J 2003;53:177–186.
Badel et al. Clinical and Tribological View on Tooth Wear. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2007;41(4):355-365.
Hewlett et al . Glass Ionomers in Contemporary Restorative Dentistry -- A Clinical Update.JUNE 2003 JOURNAL OF THE CALIFORNIA DENTAL ASSOCIATION