HUANRAN LI SELECTED WORK 2019-2023 MASTER IN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE DESIGN (MLA2) CORNELL UNIVERISY COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AND LIFE SCIENCE
01 PATH DE SIGN - RAVE N NA PARK S U F U R S P RI NG WA LK 02 SPARTAN BURG, MORGAN SQUARE RENOVAT I ON A ND D ES I GN 03 CL IM ATE ADAPTIVE DE SIGN, H UDSON RIVE RFRONT B ROW NF I ELD REM ED I AT I ON 04 TRE E OF LIFE GOOGLE DATA B A S E D ES GI N 05 WORK SAMPLE AUTCAD/RE NDE RING/ P ROJCE T M A NGEM ENT
01 R AV EN N A PAR K S U F U R S P R I N G WAL K
Nestled in the heart of Ravenna Park, the Sufur Spring Walk encapsulates the essence of the wabi-sabi design philosophy, harmonizing the transient beauty of nature with human craftsmanship. The intention was to create a minimalist, aesthetic experience, enabling visitors to reconnect with nature and embrace the impermanent beauty of their surroundings.
SITE STUDY The landscape was initially surveyed, analyzed, and conceptualized. This process involved creating detailed diagrams of site conditions like moisture levels, elevation variations, wind patterns, and visual dynamics, enhancing the user’s experiential journey and informing the final design.
PLAN AND SECTION The plan view reveals a meandering path of wooden planks, panel areas provide consistency, guiding visitors through aggregate, and stone panels, laid beside the capricious river, a sensory journey of changing views, sounds, and colors offering a stark contrast between the path’s stability and reflected in the flowing river. the river’s dynamism. The wooden plank road and stone
2.STONE BRIDGE
4. RIVERSIDE
1.
1.ENTRANCE
3. FOREST 2.
HANDCRAFT INK PLAN
3.
The path broadens into aggregate sections, acting as contemplative nodes that invite visitors to pause, sit, and immerse in the sounds of the rushing water and the subtle color variations of the river. Durable materials are intentionally selected.
4.
CHARCOAL PAINTED SECTION
ENTRANCE
EXIT
HIDING PATH CONNET TO STONE PANEL
DIRECTIONAL WOODEN PANEL
EXPERIENCE DESIGN The Path Design for Ravenna Park’s Sulfur Spring Walk ingeniously juxtaposes the dichotomy of dry and wet experiences.major part of the user’s experience. Crafted with meticulous precision, the path invites guests on a journey that oscillates between arid landscapes and humid
atmospheres through rain season in Seattle, evoking a sense of awe and wonder. On the dry season, the trail meanders through carefully selected drought-resistant flora, their textures and hues conjuring a karesansui styled sideview.
WETSEASON LANSCAPE VIEW
DRY SEASON LANSCAPE VIEW
SITE ALALYSIS The design concept comes from the traditional Japanese Wabi-Sabi shifting view continuously changing riverbank and path’s stability and stone garden, new path comprised by wooden plank road, aggregate, consistency, meanwhile making different sound, light and color of stone panel is opened at the side of the river. The durable choice of flowing river major part of the user’s experience. materials are used to emphasize the dramatic difference between the
FAWN LILY
COMMON YARROW
MALE FERN
SOFT RUSH
GUMMWEED
OAK FERN
BIG LEAF MAPLE
HARD STEM BULLRUSH
STICKA MOUNTIAN ASH
WESTERN RED CEDER
LADY FERN
PACIFIC SILVER FIR
COMMON JUNIPER
02 S PARTAN B U R G, M OR GAN S QUAR E R EN OVAT I ON AN D DES I GN
The City of Spartanburg along with community stakeholders and leaders have been united in a concerted effort to revitalize our city’s central commercial district, drawing over $200 million in new private investment to the area surrounding Morgan Square. Slated to add to that vibrancy is $270+ million in public investment. The design purpose is to build upon the revitalization efforts and economic growth of Downtown Spartanburg. The aim is to attract further private investment, enhance the community experience, and serve as a vibrant focal point for the city’s central commercial district. Project during MKSK internship, responsible for design developemnt, diagam and rendering.
SITE STUDY + COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT The study area is generally bound by Main Street, Church Street, Dunbar Street, and Magnolia Street but also extends to the building edges and their sidewalk spaces around its perimeter. That renewed focus and the historic level of investment have seen Downtown Spartanburg flourish, welcoming hundreds of new residents and more than 100 new businesses along the
way. Slated to add to that vibrancy is $270+ million in public investment, which includes the new Spartanburg County Judicial Center and a planned City/County joint local government facility, both of which will be visible from the square. Additional private investment in Downtown Spartanburg over the coming years is expected to reach well over $100 million.
BR
H
RC
U CH
OA D
ST
We asked the public to place up to 3 green dots where they felt the most comfortable and uncomfortable. the diagram are then generated based on public reflection . The result are gathered from the First
RE
ET
Community Workshop, Online survey and mobile apps. Over 500 Participants activly engaged in the survey. Based on the survey, we generated our design principle and guidelines.
ET
RE
ST
ON
EM
OR
MA IN
GA
NS
QU AR
E
DUN
BAR
IA
OL
RE
ET
ET
RE
STR
EET
EE
N AG M
ST
R ST
T GS
UNCOMFORTABLE MAP
RIN
SP
T
W
N OH TJ
ST
S
“Dunbar not well lit”
IA OL GN MA
T
H ST URC
GS “Safety Related to Homeless”
ANI SD
T
S LL
E
EZ
IN ST
E MA
Study
“Everyday activation!”
“Creative Ways To Move People In Core”
AN ORG
EL M
“Ramp For Wheelchair Accessible!”
AVE
AIN WM
LEGEND
ST
N CH
ST
IN PR SS
R DUNBA
ST “Little Engagement With Pedestrian Experience”
“Site Lines Visibility Issue”
“Clock Tower Blocks main views”
UNCOMFORTABLE POINT
T
DS ROA WB
UNCOMFORTABLE ZONE SOURCE: COMMUNITY WORKSHOP 1
0’
400’
N
COMFORTABLE MAP
N OH
W
J ST
ST
R DUNBA
ST
ST
H ST URC
T GS
N CH
IA OL GN MA
IN PR SS
Extending design to W Main St can create a seamless transition to surrounding Downtown
“Dunbar - SW Love” “Weekly Programming! Musicians + Art”
More shops and development on E Main St create a necessity for safe Church St pedestrian crossing
“Great avenue!”
IN ST
E MA
“Wonderful Spring Fling”
E ANI SD
E
EZ
Study
T
S LL
AN ORG
LM AVE COMFORTABLE POINT COMFORTABLE ZONE SOURCE: COMMUNITY WORKSHOP 1
AIN WM
ST
“Art garden area of Morgan Square near Morgan statue feels safer now that the fences around the triangle are gone”
“Feels safer at Magnolia and Wall crossing steets with crosswalk art and Square closed”
T
DS ROA WB
Opening the Square Slow vehicular traffic and encourages connectivity pedestrian first streetsto surrounding Downtown make the public feel safer
0’
400’
N
DRAWING FROM PUBLIC IMPUT - KNITING INTO THE URBAN FABRIC
REET T S A I NOL
Lines and layers of historical development provide a signature into a new design, both visitors and local residents will have the urban form that informs the arrangement of spaces, movement opportunity to learn and experience the Square in a way that is and circulation. By merging the historical forms of the Square rich with meaning, and uniquely Spartanburg.
MA I
N
CH
O
ONE M
MAG
Establishes a center CH green + event lawn R U
UARE Q S N RGA
Park as aperture to surrounding + historic architecture
Responsive to the downtown
EET
AR
TR WALL S
N
LS
L WA
NB
REET
GA
DU
ET
OR
E TR
ST SPRING
EM
H STRE
ON
ET
CHURC
B
DUN
EET
TR AR S
DRAWING FROM PUBLIC IMPUT - CELEBRATING THE LANDSCAPE
N
Connect points of same elevation for pedestrian accessibility and event
RE
ET
B
DUN
OR
L
NB
GA
NS
QU AR
AR
L WA
STR
EET
E G RIN
ET
S
E TR
MAIN STREET
SP
ET
N AG M
IA OL
S
E TR
EET
DU
EM
T
ET
ON
H STRE
EE
R ST
EET
TR AR S
CHURC
ST
ET
TR WALL S
C
RE
O
MAG
MA I
ST
UARE Q S N RGA
ONE M
REET
CH
ET
OA D
ST SPRING
R HU
Establishes edge condition along church street with
RE
ST
BR
STR A I L O N
EE T
Based on the strong desire of the Spartanburg community safe and comfortable movement of pedestrians into the to make the Square more accessible and welcoming Square and the provision of spaces for daily activity and for people, this design concept is organized around the enjoyment.
DRAWING FROM PUBLIC IMPUT - WAVING TOGETHER
OA D
Expands the pedestrian space along main street to create a heart of the
N
GA
NS
QU AR
AR
STR
ET
S
E TR
EET
E
EE
G
IN PR
R ST
T
MAIN STREET
S
ET
N AG M
O
LIA
S
E TR
Creates welcoming legible entries to the square from
EET
NB
LL WA
EET
TR AR S
B
DUN
TR WALL S
OR
ET
ET
EM
RE
H STRE
ON
DU
ST
REET
S
ET
O
ONE M
CHURC
CH
UR
CH
MA I
RE
ST SPRING
ET
E TR
ST
UARE Q S N RGA
MAG
BR
STR A I L O N
EE T
Morgan Square has been the center of commerce and public life community events.This design concept is organized around the in Spartanburg for centuries. The Square has the opportunity to safe and comfortable movement of pedestrians into the Square recapture its role as a thriving hub of daily business activity and and the provision of spaces for daily activity and enjoyment.
FINAL DESIGN CONCEPT - WAVING TOGETHER The final concept design of Morgan Square embraces a captivating water feature, elevating the senses and creating a soothing ambiance. Enhanced pedestrian pathways encourage leisurely strolls, while multifunctional steps add dynamism
7
to the landscape. The design seamlessly integrates a more efficient transportation flow, making the square an accessible hub of connectivity.
Specialty Pavement
CH
3
T EE
RE
ET
R
ST
O
ONE M
5
C
2 4
OR
GA
6
ET
EM
L WA
ET
E TR
LS
2
DUN
H STRE
ON
B
Raised Street
NS
QU AR
2
E
EE
8
1Vistor Kiosk and Public
ING
R ST
T
MAIN STREET
R SP
4
Lounging Terraces
N AG M
S
8 Dunbar Swings
6
Water Feature
EET
IA OL
TR WALL S
ET
E TR
STR SPRING
EET
Restrooms
5 Performance Green
EET
TR AR S
CHURC
R HU
3 Outdoor Dining Zone
ST
UARE Q S N RGA
MAG
1
OA D
STR NOLIA
BR
EE T
7
03 C L I M AT E ADAP T I V E DES I GN , H U DS ON R I V ER F R ON T BR OWN F I EL D R EM EDI AT I ON
Project in Cornell Landscape Architecture Climate Adapeive Design Studio instructed by Josh Cerra. The Climate Adaptive Design for the Hudson Riverfront Brownfield Remediation champions resilience and adaptation. Situated on a remediation and Superfund site, this design incorporates an engineered wetland system for phyto-remediation, ensuring biodiversity regeneration while combating contamination. Futureproofed against rising sea levels and flooding, the development integrates climate-responsive landscape elements like bioswales and elevated structures. Together, these components work harmoniously, transforming the site into a vibrant, resilient ecosystem, facilitating continuous environmental healing, and reestablishing human-nature connections along the river shore.
SITE ANALYSIS HUDSON RIVER SALT FRONT MOVING PATTERN
The water speed reach lowest from 25fiver miles and reaches its lowest speed at 75 river miles, then it’s going up again. Two high tides and two low tides could occur roughly twenty-four hours. The rise and fall of ocean tides, along with the changing precipitation and freshwater in Hudson River, create one of the Uniqueness in Hudson River is the changing salinity in the river. Salinity reaches it’s lowest during spring and autumn due to the increasement
in freshwater, the salt front are pushed back to 35-40 river miles at Chapman Zee. During summer and winter, the salinity increases again by decreasing of the precipitation and freshwater that changing into ice. The salt front would be push up to 80 river miles at Hide Park. Most of the time it would be pushed to new Newburg located that at 60-65 river miles.
STRATIFICATION BY DENSITY FRESHWATER OCEAN WATER FRESHWATER
SPRING/AUTUMN OCEAN WATER
SUMMER/WINTER
HIGH MARSH CLUSTER FRESHWATER WETLAND
TIDAL FLAT + LOW MARSH
80 M
60 M
BRACKISH WETLAND
40 M HIGH MARSH UPLAND
HUDSON RIVER SALT FRONT SURROUNDING WETLAND SYSTEM PRECIPITATION TREND IN HUDSON RIVER
SALT FRONT ESTUARY ECOLOGY
the stratified water would offer a ideal condition for algae bloom during the changing season. The changing in temperature and sudden increase in nutrition would be the main cause. If pollution were damaging these area, it
would dramatically increase the bio-concentration effect and increase the pollution level in the whole ecosystem and affect local communities.would be push up to 80 river miles at Hide Park.
PRECIPITATION FLOODING POTENTIAL - INCREASEMENT OVER YEAR
SURROUNDING WETLAND SYSTEM
FISHKILL CREEK
LOW SPEED, LOW ALTITUDE
MOODNA CREEK MOUTH
HIGH SPEED, HIGH ALTITUDE
2020
CONTINENTIAL MARSH
LOW SPEED, HIGH ALTITUDE 2040
SECTION PROFILE
2060
SECTION GRID
2080
TOPOGRAPHY
SHADOW
2100
CON HOOK
CONSTITUTIONAL MARSH
MOODNA CREEK
FISHKILL CREEK
FUTURE PROPOSED SOLUTIONCONSOLIDATED IRON AND METAL
SITE SELECTION
MARSH MIGRATION The prediction from Sea Level Affecting Marshes Model (SLAMM) indicates the site would be transition to a high-marsh dominate site.
FLOODING RISK
100 YEAR FLOODING-2020 100 YEAR FLOODING-2050
The whole are are subject to flooding risk and sea-level rise risk. In 2080, 95 percent of the area would be subjected to flooding, and 70 percent of the area are coverd by tidal water.
100 YEAR FLOODING-2080
RESTORATION SIMULATION
CLEAN UP PROGRESS
Inject bentonite slurry before backfilling
Phase 1 including the off-site removal of west part, phased 2 provides the east part off-site removal. The remained polluted soil arecovered with geotextile and backfiled with 6 feet new soil. Install filter layer and geotextile on solidified soil
EXISTING CONDITION The site are currently coverd by grass and simple pathway. The seafront are covered with stone to prevent loss of new-backfilled soil
Backfilliing with clean soil
RESTORATION PROCESS
TOPOGRAPHY the topography on site is flat with sharp seafront angle, which leads to a rapid transition and lost of wetland ecosystem diversity
Step1-clean up debris and extra polluted soil
Step2- New plantation+injecting resin/bentonite slurry
Step3-inject vitality to the ecological circulation
REGENERATE FRESHWATER WETLAND+LOWER PB INSOIL TRANSITIONAL WATER FRONT
PREDICTION AND CHANGE OVERTIME
EXTREME SEASON PROTECTION
The Hudson Riverfront Brownfield Remediation embodies future-proof, climate-adaptive design. Using sustainable, highly-insulated materials, it optimizes temperature regulation, while green infrastructure mitigates flood risks. Elevated platforms and coastal barriers safeguard against rising sea levels. Adaptive vegetation ensures resilience, making this project a robust shield against climatic uncertainties.
EXTREME CONTIDION - SUMMER
URBAN GREENBELT FOR STORMWATER RUNOFF
LEVELED PURIFICATION SYSTEM
ESTABLISHED PHYTOPLANKTON MICROECOSYSTEM LOW SALINITY FRESHWATER HIGH SALINITY SEA WATER
SOLIDIFY POLLUTED SOIL
EXTREME CONTIDION - WINTER
VIEW EXPANSION DURING WINTER
POSSIBLE FOR OUTDOOR RIVER FRONT EXPERIENCE
PROTECT ESTABLISHED ECOSYSTEM TO AVOID ICE ALGAE BLOOM HIGH SALINITY ECOSYSTEM TRANSITION HIGH SALINITY SEA WATER
SOLIDIFY POLLUTED SOIL
REGENERATE FRESHWATER WETLAND+LOWER PB INSOIL SEASONAL SPAN Resilience and Adaptability: The design is conceived to accommodate the variable realities of climate change, with specific focus on flooding and sea level rise. It will include floodable landscapes, adaptable infrastructure, and elevated structures for resilience against water level changes. Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: The project is aimed at biodiversity enhancement and restoration of ecosystem services. Native, flood-resistant plant species will be used to create a natural buffer against sea-level rise and to provide habitat for local wildlife.
PLANT ROATAION BASIN
ECO-PUBLIC SPACE
Community Engagement: The design promotes community involvement and education. Informative installations will be placed throughout the site to educate visitors on the importance of climate resilience and adaptive solutions.Living Breakwaters: Offshore breakwaters using native oyster colonies will help reduce the energy of waves during storms, decrease erosion, and increase overall resilience of the riverfront. Climate Education Center: An interactive center focused on climate change and adaptive design. It will serve as an educational hub for the local community and visitors.
SEAFRONT VIEW PLATFORM
DIVERSIFIED PLANT WALK
SEAFRONT BIKEVIEW
PROTECTION ZONE + RESEARCH AREA
By incorporating these innovative design elements, the Hudson Riverfront Brownfield Remediation project aims to transform a neglected site into a resilient, eco-friendly, and vibrant public space that will not only enhance the local ecosystem but also serve as a beacon for climate adaptive design strategies worldwide.
04 WAL L K I L L R I V ER BEN C H R ES TOR AT I ON
This Interdisciplinary BE project is for students from Architecture, Construction Management, Landscape Design, Real Estate, and Urban Design and Planning work in teams in a collaborative environment to develop and deliver design proposals for a living building data center design (DCD). The target of the project is to satisfy the LBC(Living building challenge). The challenge of the project comes from the conspicuous enegy cost and life cycle cost. To achieve carbon 0, the design team comprised by students from architecture, Landscape architecture and construction management are asked to create a DC at the center of the downtown seattle. To achieve the goal. the project we desgined are comprised of three part: green ground level, data center shaft and roof garden. Our geological reseach are based on the reseach of University of Pennsylvania, Data Center Desgin Studio. Architects: Chen Geng, James Blachard Landscape Architect: Huanran Li Construction Mnanagement: Amit Kumbit
STRATEGY 1: WILDFLOWER TURF PRODUCTION
STAKEHOLDER MAP
05 WOR K S AMP L E AU TOC AD/R EN DER I N G/ P R OJECT MAN GEM EN T
This comprehensive portfolio emphasizes proficiency in AutoCAD, rendering, and project management. It spans a diverse range of initiatives, from meticulous landscape architecture design to comprehensive construction project management. Leveraging collaborative engagements with senior designers, experienced construction project engineers, and specialized consultants, customers are guaranteed with a high degree of efficiency and quality. Throughout this process, the steadfast commitment to precision and keen attention to detail is uncompromised, ensuring an optimal outcome for each project.
AUTOCAD SAMPLE
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE + URBAN PLANNING
F L502
8"
3"
6'-2"
℄
17'-9 1/2" (5 EQ. SPACES)
K
M
AX
2'-2 1/2"
± 3'-5 1/2"
2'-7 1/2"
client / owner
#10 4 21" FLAT HEAD SCREW, 2 SCREWS PER BOARD, PER JOIST
City of New Albany project name
2x6 DECKING, PROVIDE 21" OVERHANG, TYP.
TAYLOR FARM PARK
GUARDRAIL POST TYPE A, TYP. ALIGN WITH DECKING JOINT.
PHASE TWO J
±3'-2 1/2"
TOP RAIL
5526 E. Dublin Granville Rd. New Albany, Ohio 43054
E L502 10x10 POST, TYP.
(2) Ø34" THRU-BOLTS PER BEAM CONNECTION TO POST, TYP.
Architect
Columbus Architectural Studio
BENCH SET ON DECKING, REFER DETAIL D / L505. ATTACH TO DECKING WITH DIA. 41" X 1 21" GALVANIZE LAG SCREWS. PAINT TO MATCH
±3'-2 1/2"
I
405 N Front Street Columbus, OH 43215 p 614 541.2801
I
1'-0"
EMH&T
L5X3X21 WELDED TO POST, TYP. 1 4" FILLET WELDS LENGTH OF ANGLE SECTION IN CONTACT WITH TUBE RAIL, TYP.
5500 New Albany Rd. New Albany, OH 43054 p 614 775.4500 Civil Engineering
4" AX
±2'-1 1/2" VIF
H
EP Ferris
M
27'-9"
1'-0"
±4'-5"
4 1/2"
Jezerinac Geers & Associates, Inc.
Water Resources
PROVIDE ADDITIONAL JOIST AT BENCH LOCATION, TYP.
1'-0"
Structural Engineer
5640 Frantz Road Dublin, OH 43017 p 614 766.0066
C L502
1'-0"
462 SOUTH LUDLOW ALLEY COLUMBUS, OH 43215 614 6212796 MKSKSTUDIOS.COM
1 2" GAP AT TOP RAIL, TYP.
GUARDRAIL ATTACHED TO BEAM REFER DETAIL A / L503, TYP.
6'-2"
3"
GUARDRAIL POST TYPE E
L5X3X21 WELDED TO POST, TYP. 1 4" FILLET WELDS LENGTH OF ANGLE SECTION IN CONTACT WITH TUBE RAIL
J
℄
4"
L3X3X21 WELDED TO POST, TYP. 1 4" FILLET WELDS LENGTH OF ANGLE SECTION IN CONTACT WITH TUBE RAIL
3"
K
℄
GUARDRAIL POST TYPE E, TYP. H
℄ CONSTRUCTION
MELP
Prater Engineering
ADJACENT BOARDWALK, REFER MATERIALS PLANS. DECKING FROM BOARDWALK TO CONTINUE ONTO PAVILION STRUCTURE. PROVIDE WHOLE BOARD AT END OF RUN, TYP.
7 1/2" TYP.
ADJACENT BOARDWALK, REFER MATERIALS PLANS. DECKING FROM BOARDWALK TO CONTINUE ONTO PAVILION STRUCTURE. PROVIDE WHOLE BOARD AT END OF RUN, TYP.
2130 Quarry Trails Drive, 2nd Floor Columbus, OH 43228 p 614 299.2999
6130 Wilcox Rd Dublin, OH 43016 p 614 766.4896
COLUMN, SIZE VARIES
11'-6 1/2"
BEAM SADDLE
2x10 JOISTS MOUNTED WITH JOIST HANGERS, TYP. SPACING TO ALIGN WITH ADJACENT BOARDWALK, TYP.
G
G
2x12 BLOCKING AT 41 SPAN, TYP.
8x8 HIDDEN PIER MOUNTED TO HELICAL PILE, TYP.REFER DETAIL D/L502
VARIES
2x12 JOIST, MOUNTED TO BEAMS WITH JOIST HANGER, TYP. (2) 2x12 BEAM ANCHORED TO POSTS
9'-1" 18'-3"
A
TWO HOLES TO ACCEPT BOLTS
CL
BEAM SADDLE FORMED FROM 3/8" THICK STEEL PLATE
RIM BOARD)
2 34" DIA. THROUGH BOLTS (EACH SIDE)
CL
D L502
DECKING PLAN
SADDLE DETAIL
OVERLOOK DECK
B
SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"
F
PIPE WELDED TO BASE OF SADDLE. PROVIDE 41" FILLET WELD ALL AROUND.
8 X 8 X 21 ANGLE (FULL LENGTH OF
STRUCTURE PLAN E
CL
RAIL POST, TYP.
8'-1 1/2"
SEPARATE PLATE WITH MATCHING BOLT HOLES
7 1/4"
±2'-3 1/2"
(3) 2x12 BEAM ANCHORED TO POSTS
9 JOISTS - 8 EVEN SPACES = 16'-0"
2'-10"
±1'-5 1/2"
2x12 RIM JOIST, TYP. 10x10 POST / COLUMN MOUNTED TO HELICAL PILE, TYP.
4 1/2"
F
HELICAL PILE
(2) 2x12 JOIST, ANCHORED TO POSTS OR MOUNTED TO BEAMS WITH JOIST HANGER, TYP.
1'-0"
±2'-1 1/2" VIF
PROVIDE BRACING AT END OF DECKING TO FASTEN BOARDS, TYP.
NOTE: · HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED PER ASTM A-153. · MATERIAL FOR SADDLE, HOT ROLLED STEEL. · THRU-BOLTS: Ø3/4" HEX HEAD, WITH NUT AND LOCKWASHER. LENGTH AS NECESSARY FOR POST SIZE. SUPPLIED BY CONTRACTOR. · 10,000 LB MAX LOAD, COMPRESSION ONLY. · SADDLE SIZE TO ACCOMMODATE 8x8 OR 10x10 POSTS
HELICAL PILE AT OVERLOOK DECK
E
SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"
8 1/2"
CONNECTING BOARDWALK
D
D
2'-6" MAX.
956.40
C
2x6 DECKING, NO PAINT
2x12 RIM JOIST, NO PAINT
2x12 RIM JOIST, NO PAINT
10x10 COLUMN ANCHORED TO HELICAL PILE SADDLE, TYP. REFER DETAIL D/L502
10x10 COLUMN ANCHORED TO HELICAL PILE SADDLE, TYP. REFER DETAIL D/L502
HELICAL PILE LEAD SECTION TO COMPETENT SOIL, TYP. PROVIDE INCLINED HELICAL PIERS AS CROSS BRACE, AS NECESSARY. 12'-0" DEPTH MIN.
EXISTING GRADE
OVERLOOK DECK
D
SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"
revision
date
issued
EXISTING GRADE
C
OVERLOOK DECK
SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"
TIMOTHY S. SCHMALENBERGER 621
D
R
C
S
956.40
2x6 DECKING, NO PAINT
2'-6" MAX.
2x6 DECKING, NO PAINT
HELICAL PILE LEAD SECTION TO COMPETENT SOIL, TYP. PROVIDE INCLINED HELICAL PIERS AS CROSS BRACE, AS NECESSARY. 12'-0" DEPTH MIN.
2x12 RIM JOIST, NO PAINT
2x12 RIM JOIST, NO PAINT
10x10 COLUMN ANCHORED TO HELICAL PILE SADDLE, TYP. REFER DETAIL D/L502
10x10 COLUMN ANCHORED TO HELICAL PILE SADDLE, TYP. REFER DETAIL D/L502
HELICAL PILE LEAD SECTION TO COMPETENT SOIL, TYP. PROVIDE INCLINED HELICAL PIERS AS CROSS BRACE, AS NECESSARY. 12'-0" DEPTH MIN.
EXISTING GRADE
EXISTING GRADE
sheet name
F
SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
OVERLOOK DECK
SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"
DETAILS BOARDWALKS
sheet number
5
4
3
2
1
L502
D
AR
04.03.2023
A
E
IS T E R E
E
issue date
A
OVERLOOK DECK
EG
AP
T
B
EC
B
OF O TE HI TA
IT
CONNECTING BOARDWALK
O
S
8 1/2"
LA N
P:\2020\c20061.01-Taylor Farm Phase 2\BIM_CAD_GIS\CAD\Sheets\c20061.01_Details.dwg Mar 31, 2023 - 4:02pm-hli
C
HELICAL PILE LEAD SECTION TO COMPETENT SOIL, TYP. PROVIDE INCLINED HELICAL PIERS AS CROSS BRACE, AS NECESSARY. 12'-0" DEPTH MIN.
2x6 DECKING, NO PAINT
C
H
project number
c20061.01
RENDERING SAMPLE
SEATTLE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT + ESTIMATION
ID 1
Task Mode
2
Task Name
Duration Start
Storage Facility
66 d
Mon 9/29/08Tue 1/6/09
0d
0d
66 d
Mon 9/29/08Tue 1/6/09
0d
0d
0d
Mon 9/29/08Mon 9/29/08 0 d
0d
Mon 9/29/08Fri 10/3/08
0d
Phase 1 - Startup
3
NTP
4
Mobl, Site Preop, TESCE, Tc5 d
5 6 7
O/D Brick
20 d
Project Management Phase 2 - Foundation
Finish
Total Slack
Free Slack
0d
Mon 9/29/08Mon 10/27/0827 d
9/14
23 d
October November December January 9/28 10/5 10/12 10/19 10/26 11/2 11/9 11/16 11/23 11/30 12/7 12/14 12/21 12/28 1/4
9/21
66 d
66 d
5d
0d 0d
23 d
66 d
Mon 9/29/08Tue 1/6/09
66 d
Phase 2 - Foundation
10
MEP Sub-Rought-Ins
3d
Wed 10/29/08Fri 10/31/08 0 d
0d
Excavation
MEP Sub-Rought-Ins
4d
Mon 11/3/08Thu 11/6/08 0 d
0d
4d
SOG
13 d
Fri 11/7/08 Wed 11/26/080 d
0d
13 d
Phase 3 - Walls
13
Exteriro Wall Framing
7d
Fri 11/7/08 Tue 11/18/08 0 d
0d
7d
Exteriro Wall Framing
14
Frame & Sihingle ROOF
6d
Wed 11/19/08Wed 11/26/080 d
0d
Fri 11/28/08 Mon 12/29/080 d
0d
9d
Fri 11/28/08 Wed 12/10/080 d
0d
9d
2d
Wed 12/17/08Thu 12/18/08 0 d
0d
19
Electric Work
5d
Fri 12/19/08 Mon 12/29/080 d
0d
20
Phase 5 - Exteriors
16 d
Fri 11/28/08 Fri 12/19/08 4 d
4d
21
Backfilling
2d
Fri 11/28/08 Mon 12/1/08 4 d
0d
22
Run Site Utilities Laterals 10 d
Tue 12/2/08 Mon 12/15/084 d
0d
24 25
Masonry
10 d
Tue 12/2/08 Mon 12/15/084 d
Interior Partitions 4d 2d
GWP
5d
2d
Electric Work
Run Site Utilities Laterals
10 d
Tue 12/16/08Fri 12/19/08 4 d
4d
4d
Landscaping
4d
Tue 12/16/08Fri 12/19/08 4 d
4d
4d
Form/Pour Driveway Landscaping
Phase 6 Completion
5d
Tue 12/30/08Tue 1/6/09
0d
0d
27
Punchout List
4d
Tue 12/30/08Mon 1/5/09
0d
0d
4d
Detention Vault
12 d
1d
0d
Thu 10/9/08 Mon 10/27/0845 d
DV Foundation
7d
Thu 10/9/08 Mon 10/20/0845 d
0d
31
DV CMU Wall
2d
Tue 10/21/08Wed 10/22/0845 d
0d
7d
DV SOG
1d
Thu 10/23/08Thu 10/23/08 45 d
0d
1d
33
DV Top Slab
2d
Fri 10/24/08 Mon 10/27/0845 d
45 d
2d
11
Punchout List Certificate of Occupancy
DV CMU Wall DV SOG
13 d
Thu 10/9/08 Mon 10/20/08
1d
Thu 10/23/08Thu 10/23/08
Duration-only
External Tasks
Task Not Critical
Inactive Task
Manual Summary Rollup
External Milestone
Split
Inactive Milestone
Manual Summary
Deadline
Milestone
Inactive Summary
Start-only
Progress
Summary
Manual Task
Finish-only
Manual Progress
December 11/30 12/7
12/14
12/21
January 12/28 1/4
1/11
Project: CM411 StorageFacilityHW11
53d
Mon 9/29/08Mon 10/27/08
20 d
Punchout List
23
Masonry
10 d
Tue 12/2/08 Mon 12/15/08
Wood, Plastic, and Composites 22d
Fri 11/7/08 Wed 12/10/08
22d 7d
7d
Fri 11/7/08 Tue 11/18/08
14
Frame & Sihingle ROOF
6d
Wed 11/19/08Wed 11/26/08
16
Interior Partitions
9d
Fri 11/28/08 Wed 12/10/08
Finishes
2d
Wed 12/17/08 Thu 12/18/08
GWP
2d
Wed 12/17/08Thu 12/18/08
Plumbing
33d
Wed 10/29/08 Tue 12/16/08
33d
5d
Project Management
66 d
3d
0 h$0.00
Mon 9/29/08 Mon 9/29/08
132 h $7,529.28
Mon 9/29/08
Assist Project Manager
0.25
132 h $6,394.08
Mon 9/29/08
Prj Superintendent
1
528 h $22,281.60
Mon 9/29/08
Indirect Labor Cost
$17,710.20
Mon 9/29/08
Overhead
$8,006.82
Mon 9/29/08
Fees
$4,403.75
Mon 9/29/08
Tax Insurance
$1,479.66
Mon 9/29/08
32 h $1,253.84
Tue 12/30/08
28
Certificate of Occupancy
4d 0.25
Ftg & Fdn
Tue 12/30/08
0 h$0.00
20d
0 h $25,594.00
Thu 10/9/08
13 d
0 h$3,073.00
Thu 10/9/08
4d 3 cy
DV Foundation
32
DV SOG
33
DV Top Slab
Masonry
O/D Brick
23
Masonry
31
DV CMU Wall
13
6d
Frame & Sihingle ROOF 9d
Interior Partitions 2d
Finishes
2d
GWP Plumbing
17
MEP Rough Ins
4d
Thu 12/11/08Tue 12/16/08
5d
Fri 12/19/08 Mon 12/29/08
5d
Electrical
5d
Fri 12/19/08 Mon 12/29/08
5d
Electric Work
38d
Mon 10/6/08Mon 12/1/08
38d
3d
Mon 10/6/08Wed 10/8/08
3d
MEP Sub-Rought-Ins 4d
MEP Rough Ins
10
Earthwork
17
$8,000.00
Thu 10/9/08
0 h$9,000.00
Thu 10/23/08
$9,000.00
Thu 10/23/08
2d
0 h$4,000.00
Fri 10/24/08
$4,000.00
Fri 10/24/08
53d
0 h $8,528.00
Mon 9/29/08
20 d
0 h$1,380.00
Mon 9/29/08
$1,380.00
Mon 9/29/08
10 d
0 h$4,148.00
Tue 12/2/08
$4,148.00
Tue 12/2/08
2d
0 h$3,000.00
Tue 10/21/08
$3,000.00
Tue 10/21/08
984 h$29,041.84
Fri 11/7/08
19
336 h $10,302.48
Fri 11/7/08
3
168 h $4,013.52
Fri 11/7/08
Carpenter Forman
1
56 h $1,598.80
Fri 11/7/08
Carpenter Helper
1
56 h $1,013.60
Laborer Class 1
1
56 h $910.56
7d
Frame & Sihingle ROOF
6d
8
Backfilling
Exterior Improvements
4d
Tue 12/16/08Fri 12/19/08
4d
Exterior Improvements
Form/Pour Driveway
4d
Tue 12/16/08Fri 12/19/08
4d
Form/Pour Driveway
25
Landscaping
4d
Tue 12/16/08Fri 12/19/08
4d
Wed 11/19/08
Carpenter Forman
0.25
12 h $342.60
Wed 11/19/08
Laborer Class 1
1
48 h $780.48
Wed 11/19/08
Laborer Class 2
1
48 h $608.64
Wed 11/19/08
Interior Partitions
9d
Tue 12/2/08 Mon 12/15/08
10d
Utilities
10 d
Tue 12/2/08 Mon 12/15/08
10 d
Run Site Utilities Laterals
Fri 11/28/08
Carpenter Forman
0.5
36 h $1,027.80
Fri 11/28/08
Laborer Class 1
2
144 h $2,341.44
Fri 11/28/08
$1,435.00 0 h $0.00
2d
GWP
2d
0 h$0.00
Wed 12/17/08
Plumbing
33d
0 h $0.00
Wed 10/29/08
MEP Sub-Rought-Ins
3d
0 h$0.00
Wed 10/29/08
MEP Rough Ins
4d
0 h$0.00
Thu 12/11/08
5d
0 h $0.00
Electric Work
Excavation
Backfilling
0 h$0.00
Fri 12/19/08
38d
36 h $2,621.00
Mon 10/6/08
3d
20 h $1,304.00
Mon 10/6/08
20 h $1,000.00
Mon 10/6/08
2d 1
Exterior Improvements
4d
Form/Pour Driveway
4d 3
Landscaping
4d
Laborer Class 1
22
Project Summary
Duration-only
External Tasks
Task Not Critical
Inactive Task
Manual Summary Rollup
External Milestone
3
Split
Inactive Milestone
Manual Summary
Deadline
Milestone
Inactive Summary
Start-only
Progress
Summary
Manual Task
Finish-only
Manual Progress
Run Site Utilities Laterals
Fri 12/19/08
5d
1
Utilities
Task Critical
Fri 11/28/08 Wed 12/17/08
Finishes
LS FPDriveway Cre 25
Fri 11/28/08
216 h $5,160.24
Laborer Class 1
10d
Wed 11/19/08
396 h $9,964.48 3
LS Backfilling Crew
24
$3,603.00
Carpenter
Backhoe Loader
Landscaping
Fri 11/7/08
144 h $3,440.16
LS Backfilling Crew 21
Fri 11/7/08
Wed 11/19/08
3
Backhoe Loader
24
Fri 11/7/08
$2,766.00 252 h $8,774.88
Carpenter
Earthwork
2d
22d
Carpenter
Exteriro Wall Framing
Electrical
Excavation
Mon 11/3/08
1d
LS interior Finish
18
Mon 11/3/08
Thu 10/9/08
LS Frame Roof 16
0 h$1,521.00 3 cy $450.00
0 h$8,000.00
LS Frame Walls 14
Thu 10/9/08
7d
LS Cost
Exteriro Wall Framing
Thu 10/9/08
$2,698.00
Mon 11/3/08
LS Masonry
Wood, Plastic, and Composites
2.5 cy$375.00
Tue 1/6/09
$1,071.00
LS Masonry
Wed 10/29/08Fri 10/31/08
1
Tue 12/30/08
16 h $675.20
LS Cost
3d
11
Tue 12/30/08
8 h$387.52
0.5
LS Cost
MEP Sub-Rought-Ins
2015 -BS00-StorageFacilityTest Mon 9/29/08 - Tue 1/6/09 CSL By CSI
8 h$191.12
0.25
1d
2.5 cy
SOG
30
Wood, Plastic, and Composites
Mon 9/29/08
792 h $67,805.39
LS Cost
Masonry
Start
0 h$0.00
0.25
Punchout List
5
Cost
2,036 h $139,642.99 Mon 9/29/08
Project Manger
27
11
Work
824 h$69,059.23 Mon 9/29/08
LS Concrete Crew
10
Run Site Utilities Laterals
Mobl, Site Preop, TESCE, Tc
6
Concrete
10 d
Exteriro Wall Framing
22
4
Concrete
DV CMU Wall
13
Fri 11/28/08 Mon 12/1/08
0d
9
Assignment Units
66d
NTP
Prj Superintendent
O/D Brick
Tue 10/21/08Wed 10/22/08
2d
General Requirements
Carpenter
Masonry
2d
Duration
Project: CM411 StorageFacilityHW1166d
Assist Project Manager
SOG
2d
Backfilling
Task Name
3
Certificate of Occupancy
DV Top Slab
DV CMU Wall
Excavation
ID
LS Concrete Crew
31
8
March 3/1
Concrete
4d
Mon 9/29/08Mon 12/15/08
Electric Work
2/22
DV SOG
2d
Mon 11/3/08Thu 11/6/08
Earthwork
2/15
DV Foundation
Fri 10/24/08 Mon 10/27/08
53d
19
February 2/1 2/8
1/25
Ftg & Fdn
1d
4d
Electrical
1/18
Concrete
7d
SOG
Utilities
Project Summary
11/23
4d
Masonry
18
11/16
Project Management
Thu 10/9/08 Tue 10/28/08
7d
20 d
November 11/2 11/9
Mobl, Site Preop, TESCE, Tc
13 d
DV SOG
O/D Brick
10/26
9/29
20d
DV Foundation
2d
10/19
General Requirements
Thu 10/9/08 Thu 11/6/08
32
DV Top Slab
10/12
1d
30
DV Top Slab
Task Critical
Huanran Li, Mark Tian
20d
Ftg & Fdn
21
DV Foundation 2d
32
2015 -BS00-StorageFacilityTest Mon 9/29/08 - Tue 1/6/09 Gantt Chart (Aziz)
Phase 6 Completion
45 d
30
Tue 1/6/09 Tue 1/6/09
Masonry
26
29
1d
Backfilling
10 d
0d
0d
Certificate of Occupancy
MEP Rough Ins
4d
Tue 1/6/09 Tue 1/6/09
28
5
Phase 4 - Interiors
Form/Pour Driveway
Certificate of Occupancy 1 d
Tue 12/30/08Mon 1/5/09
11
5d
28
4d
33
Frame & Sihingle ROOF
20 d
GWP
23
6d 20 d
18
Punchout List
9
Ftg & Fdn 3d
27
Concrete
October 9/28 10/5
66d
Project Management
13 d
0d
66d
6
0d
Thu 12/11/08Tue 12/16/08 0 d
Mon 9/29/08Tue 1/6/09
O/D Brick
Thu 10/9/08 Tue 10/28/08 0 d
4d
Mon 9/29/08Tue 1/6/09
66d
9/21
5d
13 d
MEP Rough Ins
General Requirements
9/14
Mon 9/29/08Fri 10/3/08
Project Management
0d
Mon 10/6/08Thu 11/6/08 0 d
17
Project: CM411 StorageFacilityHW11 66d
Finish
5d
66 d
Mon 9/29/08Tue 1/6/09
23 d
Start
Mobl, Site Preop, TESCE, Tc
20 d
66 d
Duration
4
Ftg & Fdn
Interior Partitions
Task Name
Mobl, Site Preop, TESCE, Tc
9
16
ID
Mon 9/29/08Mon 9/29/08
3d
Phase 4 - Interiors
2/22
0d
0d
15
2/15
NTP
Mon 10/6/08Wed 10/8/08 0 d
Phase 3 - Walls
Storage Facility
February 2/1 2/8
3
3d
12
1/25
9/29
Excavation
SOG
1/18
Phase 1 - Startup
8
11
1/11
$304.00
Mon 10/6/08
16 h $1,317.00
Fri 11/28/08
16 h $800.00
Fri 11/28/08
$517.00
Fri 11/28/08
192 h$4,798.92
Tue 12/16/08
96 h $3,237.96
Tue 12/16/08
96 h $1,560.96
Tue 12/16/08
$1,677.00
Tue 12/16/08
96 h $1,560.96
Tue 12/16/08
96 h $1,560.96
Tue 12/16/08
10d
0 h $0.00
Tue 12/2/08
10 d
0 h$0.00
Tue 12/2/08
Finish
Details
Tue 1/6/09 Work Cost Tue 1/6/09 Work Cost Mon 9/29/08 Work Cost Fri 10/3/08 Work Cost Tue 1/6/09 Work Cost Tue 1/6/09 Work Cost Tue 1/6/09 Work Cost Tue 1/6/09 Work Cost Tue 1/6/09 Work Cost Tue 1/6/09 Work Cost Tue 1/6/09 Work Cost Tue 1/6/09 Work Cost Mon 1/5/09 Work Cost Mon 1/5/09 Work Cost Mon 1/5/09 Work Cost Mon 1/5/09 Work Cost Tue 1/6/09 Work Cost Thu 11/6/08 Work Cost Tue 10/28/08 Work Cost Tue 10/28/08 Work (cy) Cost Tue 10/28/08 Work Cost Thu 11/6/08 Work Cost Thu 11/6/08 Work (cy) Cost Thu 11/6/08 Work Cost Mon 10/20/08 Work Cost Mon 10/20/08 Work Cost Thu 10/23/08 Work Cost Thu 10/23/08 Work Cost Mon 10/27/08 Work Cost Mon 10/27/08 Work Cost Mon 12/15/08 Work Cost Mon 10/27/08 Work Cost Mon 10/27/08 Work Cost Mon 12/15/08 Work Cost Mon 12/15/08 Work Cost Wed 10/22/08 Work Cost Wed 10/22/08 Work Cost Wed 12/10/08 Work Cost Tue 11/18/08 Work Cost Tue 11/18/08 Work Cost Tue 11/18/08 Work Cost Tue 11/18/08 Work Cost Tue 11/18/08 Work Cost Tue 11/18/08 Work Cost Wed 11/26/08 Work Cost Wed 11/26/08 Work Cost Wed 11/26/08 Work Cost Wed 11/26/08 Work Cost Wed 11/26/08 Work Cost Wed 11/26/08 Work Cost Wed 12/10/08 Work Cost Wed 12/10/08 Work Cost Wed 12/10/08 Work Cost Wed 12/10/08 Work Cost Wed 12/10/08 Work Cost Thu 12/18/08 Work Cost Thu 12/18/08 Work Cost Tue 12/16/08 Work Cost Fri 10/31/08 Work Cost Tue 12/16/08 Work Cost Mon 12/29/08 Work Cost Mon 12/29/08 Work Cost Mon 12/1/08 Work Cost Wed 10/8/08 Work Cost Wed 10/8/08 Work Cost Wed 10/8/08 Work Cost Mon 12/1/08 Work Cost Mon 12/1/08 Work Cost Mon 12/1/08 Work Cost Fri 12/19/08 Work Cost Fri 12/19/08 Work Cost Fri 12/19/08 Work Cost Fri 12/19/08 Work Cost Fri 12/19/08 Work Cost Fri 12/19/08 Work Cost Mon 12/15/08 Work Cost Mon 12/15/08 Work Cost
October 9/28
60h $5,481.77 60h $5,136.77
10/5
80h $9,544.26 60h $5,136.77
10/12
48h $9,902.38 48h $4,109.42
10/19
60h $21,806.55 60h $5,136.77
10/26
November
60h $7,678.54 60h $5,136.77
11/2
108h $8,129.55 60h $5,136.77
11/9
240h $9,996.55 48h $4,109.42
11/16
282h $12,467.78 60h $5,136.77
11/23
226h $10,262.52 48h $4,109.42
December 11/30
288h $12,990.29 60h $5,136.77
12/7
192h $10,532.27 60h $5,136.77
12/14
12/21
252h $10,350.49 60h $5,136.77
36h $3,082.06 36h $3,082.06
January 12/28
72h $5,049.80 72h $5,049.80
1/4
32h $2,368.17 32h $2,368.17
60h $5,136.77 10h $570.40 10h $484.40 40h $1,688.00
60h $5,136.77 10h $570.40 10h $484.40 40h $1,688.00
48h $4,109.42 8h $456.32 8h $387.52 32h $1,350.40
60h $5,136.77 10h $570.40 10h $484.40 40h $1,688.00
60h $5,136.77 10h $570.40 10h $484.40 40h $1,688.00
60h $5,136.77 10h $570.40 10h $484.40 40h $1,688.00
48h $4,109.42 8h $456.32 8h $387.52 32h $1,350.40
60h $5,136.77 10h $570.40 10h $484.40 40h $1,688.00
48h $4,109.42 8h $456.32 8h $387.52 32h $1,350.40
60h $5,136.77 10h $570.40 10h $484.40 40h $1,688.00
60h $5,136.77 10h $570.40 10h $484.40 40h $1,688.00
60h $5,136.77 10h $570.40 10h $484.40 40h $1,688.00
36h $3,082.06 6h $342.24 6h $290.64 24h $1,012.80
48h $4,109.42 8h $456.32 8h $387.52 32h $1,350.40
24h $2,054.71 4h $228.16 4h $193.76 16h $675.20
$1,341.68
$1,341.68
$1,073.35
$1,341.68
$1,341.68
$1,341.68
$1,073.35
$1,341.68
$1,073.35
$1,341.68
$1,341.68
$1,341.68
$805.01
$1,073.35
$536.67
$606.58
$606.58
$485.26
$606.58
$606.58
$606.58
$485.26
$606.58
$485.26
$606.58
$606.58
$606.58
$363.95
$485.26
$242.63
$333.62
$333.62
$266.89
$333.62
$333.62
$333.62
$266.89
$333.62
$266.89
$333.62
$333.62
$333.62
$200.17
$266.89
$133.45
$112.10
$112.10
$89.68
$112.10
$112.10
$112.10
$89.68
$112.10
$89.68
$112.10
$112.10
$112.10
$67.26
$89.68 24h $940.38 6h $143.34 6h $290.64 12h $506.40
$44.84 8h $313.46 2h $47.78 2h $96.88 4h $168.80
$2,758.48
$5,516.97
$13,324.78
$2,472.77
$1,521.00
$472.77 0.38 $57.69
$945.54 0.77 $115.38
$1,181.92 0.96 $144.23
$472.77 0.38 $57.69
$415.08
$830.15
$1,037.69
$415.08
$1,659.20
$2,074.00
$414.80
$1,659.20
$2,074.00
$414.80
$1,659.20
$2,074.00
$414.80
220h $5,535.82
132h $3,321.49
$1,801.50 44h $1,107.16 24h $573.36 4h $114.20 16h $260.16
220h $5,535.82 120h $2,866.80 20h $571.00 80h $1,300.80
132h $3,321.49 72h $1,720.08 12h $342.60 48h $780.48
$159.44
$797.22
$478.33
8h $658.50
8h $658.50
8h $658.50 8h $400.00
8h $658.50 8h $400.00
$258.50
$258.50
1/11
1/18
1/25
February
2/1
2/8
2/15
2/22
March
3/1
3/8
3/15
April 3/29
3/22
4/5
$1,521.00 3 $450.00 $1,071.00 $2,285.71
$4,571.43
$1,142.86
$2,285.71
$4,571.43
$1,142.86 $9,000.00 $9,000.00 $2,000.00
$2,000.00
$2,000.00
$2,000.00
$3,345.00
$69.00
$345.00
$345.00
$276.00
$345.00
$345.00
$276.00
$345.00
$69.00
$345.00
$345.00
$276.00
$345.00
$69.00
$3,000.00 $3,000.00
48h $1,471.78 48h $1,471.78 24h $573.36 8h $228.40 8h $144.80 8h $130.08
192h $5,887.13 192h $5,887.13 96h $2,293.44 32h $913.60 32h $579.20 32h $520.32
222h $7,331.01 96h $2,943.57 48h $1,146.72 16h $456.80 16h $289.60 16h $260.16
$395.14
$1,580.57
$790.29 126h $4,387.44 72h $1,720.08 6h $171.30 24h $390.24 24h $304.32 $1,801.50
20h $1,304.00 20h $1,304.00 20h $1,000.00 $304.00
170h $5,494.60
126h $4,387.44 72h $1,720.08 6h $171.30 24h $390.24 24h $304.32
192h $4,798.92 96h $3,237.96 96h $1,560.96 $1,677.00 96h $1,560.96 96h $1,560.96
2015 -BS00-StorageFacilityTest
Page 1
UW CM 331
CASH FLOW
Project Meridian Center for Health Location Scope of Work
Actual Cost
Baseline Cost
Remaining Cost
Cost Variance
$0.00
$0.00
$139,642.99 $139,642.99
Description
$16,000.00 $14,000.00
Dimensions W
No
L
3 3 9 1
11.5 21.5 31 26.5 404.5
H
LF W10*12
LF W10*22
Sheet Number Estimator Date
Huanran Li 5/12/2020
LF W14*22
LF W16*26
$8,000.00 $6,000.00
A-B B-C C-D TOTAL
B-C
1
31
3,4 B-C TOTAL
1 1
31.5 31 62.5
1,2 D-E
$4,000.00
1 9
$2,000.00 $0.00
9/28
10/5
10/12
10/19
10/26
11/2
11/9
Cost (Storage Facility)
Name
Start
Finish
11/16
11/23
11/30
12/7
12/14
12/21
12/28
3 1 1
1/4
Cost (Detention Vault)
Cost
Work
1 1 1
Duration
Phase 1 - Startup
Mon 9/29/08
Tue 1/6/09
$69,185.39
792 h
66 d
Phase 2 - Foundation
Mon 10/6/08
Thu 11/6/08
$5,898.00
20 h
23 d
Phase 3 - Walls
Fri 11/7/08
Wed 11/26/08
$19,077.36
588 h
13 d
Phase 4 - Interiors
Fri 11/28/08
Mon 12/29/08
$9,964.48
396 h
20 d
Phase 5 - Exteriors
Fri 11/28/08
Fri 12/19/08
$10,263.92
208 h
16 d
Phase 6 Completion
Tue 12/30/08
Tue 1/6/09
$1,253.84
32 h
5d
DV Foundation
Thu 10/9/08
Mon 10/20/08
$8,000.00
0h
7d
DV CMU Wall
Tue 10/21/08
Wed 10/22/08
$3,000.00
0h
2d
DV SOG
Thu 10/23/08
Thu 10/23/08
$9,000.00
0h
1d
DV Top Slab
Fri 10/24/08
Mon 10/27/08
$4,000.00
0h
2d
LF W16*36
LF W18*35
LF W18*40
LF W21*50
LF W18*55
LF W24*55
Structural Steel Beams
405 10,517
(+11.5 W14*90)
31.5
2 1 1 1 1
4.75 4.7 10.5 6.2 11.5 42.4
1
11.5
2 6 9
17 21.5 26.5 401.5
Assignment Name - Structural Steel and Metal Decking RSM Crew Description Page # No. 277 9,704
35
126 5,040
31.5 31.5 29.5 92.5
9
131 131 132 132 132 133 133 133 133 133 133
40
92.5 5,088
55
295 16,225
42.4 509
12
Structural Steel Beams W10X12 W10X22 W14X22 (USE W14X26 PRICING) W16X26 W16X31 W16X36 (USE W16X40 PRICING) W18X35 W18X40 W18X55 W21X50 W24X55 FYI Total Tons from above (no pricing) 15% Steel Connections & Bolts
Total Structural Steel
55
141
E-4
Steel Decking 3" metal deck, 20 ga. Galv
Total Steel Decking 11.5 253
Qty
Unit
UMH
Man Hours
42 LF 12 LF 402 LF 405 LF 31 LF 63 LF 277 LF 126 LF 93 LF 32 LF 295 LF 28 TON 4 TON
0.093 0.093 0.057 0.056 0.062 0.07 0.083 0.083 0.088 0.075 0.072
4 1 23 23 2 4 23 10 8 2 21
Labor Wage Unit Rate L Cost
83.72 83.72 83.72 83.72 83.72 83.72 76.72 76.72 76.72 76.72 76.72
402 8,844
108.5
Labor Cost
Material Unit Material M Cost Cost
7.79 7.79 4.77 4.69 5.19 5.86 6.37 6.37 6.75 5.75 5.52
330 90 1,918 1,899 161 369 1,764 802 625 181 1,630
17.30 31.50 37.50 37.50 44.50 57.50 50.50 57.50 79.50 72.00 79.50
734 362 15,075 15,188 1,380 3,623 13,989 7,245 7,354 2,268 23,453
2000.00
8,296
3000.00
12,444
Equipment Unit Equipment E Cost Cost
2.79 2.79 3.05 1.67 1.86 2.09 1.88 1.88 1.97 1.69 1.62
14-May Huanran Li
Total Cost
118 32 1,226 676 58 132 521 237 182 53 478
1,182 484 18,219 17,763 1,598 4,123 16,273 8,284 8,160 2,502 25,560 20,740
32
11,501 SF
124,889
0.011
127
58.86
0.65
7,446
2.64
30,363
0.04
460
38,269
12,651
38,269
TOTAL STRUCTURAL STEEL AND METAL DECKING
TOTAL 11,501 0.10
Date: Estimator:
Pricing and productivity from 2017 RS Means You are responsible for the accuracy of all excel formulas Shaded Cells require manual input Bolded unit costs are pre-determined.
22
25,511
133,475
4,173
163,158
22
0.15 106
E-2 E-2 E-2 E-2 E-2 E-2 E-5 E-5 E-5 E-5 E-5
31.5 50 1,575
SLB ON MD 1
Estimate Recap
Meridian Center for Health Seattle, WA NBBJ Assignment 3 - Structural Steel and Metal Decking
31.5 5 26.5 126
31.5
Project: Location: Architect:
63 36 2,250
11.75 29.5 277.25
1
26
31 31 961
$12,000.00 $10,000.00
LF W16*31
60,965 70,110
12,651.10
Page ___ of ___
F-5
ARTWORK
Sketch: "Position" 18x24", Paper
Sketch: "Reflection" 18x24", Paper
HUANRAN LI SELECTED WORK 2019-2023 MASTER IN LANSCAPE ARCHITECTURE DESIGN (MLA2) CORNELL UNIVERISY COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AND LIFE SCIENCE