NEXT STOP Place-making along the Milwaukee Streetcar route
Craig Huebner
MILWAUKEE STREETCAR
Master of Architecture Master of Urban Planning Real Estate Certificate
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee School of Architecture and Urban Planning Spring 2012
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROBLEM
4
GOALS
5
THESIS
6
BACKGROUND Project Approach.................................................................................................................................... Current Public Transit Trends................................................................................................................. History of Milwaukee Public Transit...................................................................................................... Project Site............................................................................................................................................
8 10 12 16 20
MASTER PLAN 32 Catalytic Projects................................................................................................................................... 34 Economic Impact.................................................................................................................................... 36
special thanks Thesis Committee Members: Larry Witzling Carolyn Esswein Greg Patin Thank you to all my family, friends and co-workers who have supported me throughout my years at UW-Milwaukee 2
DESIGN INTERVENTIONS 38 Haymarket............................................................................................................................................ 40 Bradley Center...................................................................................................................................... 46 Convention Center................................................................................................................................. 52 Station District...................................................................................................................................... 56 Third Ward............................................................................................................................................ 64 City Center............................................................................................................................................ 74 City Hall................................................................................................................................................ 80 Cathedral Square................................................................................................................................... 86 Downtown Living................................................................................................................................... 98 Lakefront.............................................................................................................................................. 104
thesis abstract The proposed Milwaukee Streetcar provides a modern way for people to connect with their jobs, their homes, and their entertainment destinations. The route is located within downtown Milwaukee, runs 3.5 miles long, and joins eleven different downtown neighborhoods. The route not only connects some of Milwaukee’s existing great places such as the Historic Third Ward, Milwaukee Riverwalk and Cathedral Square, but it also runs adjacent to hundreds of acres of vacant or underutilized land and buildings. In this way, the Streetcar route acts as a bridge to promote development, raise property values, attract new businesses and help keep Milwaukee on track with other U.S. cities moving forward with transportation alternatives. The thesis will identify ten nodes along the streetcar line and propose urban design solutions within each node that embrace the social, cultural and ecological context along the route. The design interventions will not only propose development at vacant parcels, but also show how existing buildings and places can become even stronger with the addition of the Streetcar.
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
3
PROBLEM Lack of connection between downtown areas Physical barriers, psychological separations and an inconsistent, walkable atmosphere all contribute to the prevention of residents, employees and tourists traveling from one downtown area to another.
High acreage of vacant land Downtown Milwaukee is host to not only large tracts of vacant land like the Park East Corridor shown to the left, but also a large number of individual vacant parcels that create gaps within the urban fabric.
Lack of mobility choices With essentially one mode of public transportation within downtown Milwaukee, residents, employees and tourists reside in isolated pockets and find it inconvenient to move from one area to another resulting in a lack of activity within downtown.
4
GOALS Connect Connect underutilized areas as well as already great downtown destinations through a variety of multi-modal options, thus creating a strong network of connected experiences.
Infill Promote development within Milwaukee’s underutilized land that creates new places for transit riders to experience.
Identity Create a new “place” that is the Milwaukee Streetcar route that residents, employees and tourists can recognize as a memorable experience within Milwaukee.
MILWAUKEE STREETCAR
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
5
THESIS
“Streets as Places” Planning for street corridors needs to shift from the more commonly seen technical engineering solutions, to a more comprehensive approach that examines the physical, social, cultural and ecological elements of a street and surrounding context. With the new proposal of a Milwaukee Streetcar line, an opportunity exists to create a new “place” that is the street. The streetcar will undoubtedly support development along the streetcar route. But, it is also necessary to examine how the physical, social, cultural and ecological context along the route (past, present and future) can conversely support the streetcar.
6
[We must]...�see the possibility of re-examining even the most challenging infrastructural landscapes and a new attitude to infrastructure that goes beyond technical considerations to embrace issues of ecological sustainability, connection to place and context, and cultural relationships.� -Elizabeth Mossop, Landscape Architect
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
7
BACKGROUND
8
MILWAUKEE STREETCAR
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
9
Why start Downtown? • • • • • •
APPROACH
80,000 employees 25,000 residents 1.4 million Intermodal Station passengers annually 5.5 million visitors per year 726,500 annual hotel stays 2% of City land but 13.3% of City tax base
Within a quarter-mile of the route the starter system will connect: • • • • • •
100% of downtown hotel rooms 91% of occupied first floor retail space 90% of occupied office space 77% of downtown housing units 77% of downtown parking facilities Lakefront and Riverwalk attractions
ǡ Ǥ Environmental Assessment
ʹͲͳͳ
Environmental Assessment Report required by the FTA completed in October 2011 10
BACKGROUND
Prepared by the City of Milwaukee in cooperation with the Federal Transit Administration
Map showing how downtown route is just the starting point of a future streetcar expansion NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
11
HEAVY RAIL
CURRENT TRENDS Rail transportation comes in many different forms and often gets confused with each other by the general public. The columns to the right show a comparison of 4 different modes of passenger rail systems that operate in the U.S.
12
BACKGROUND
COMMUTER RAIL
• Electrically propelled by electric 3rd rail • Fully grade-separated rights-ofway • High capacity • 4-10 cars • 25-40 mph typical speed
• Sometimes referred to as intercity rail • Diesel-electric propelled • Operates over existing railway trackage • High capacity • 30-50 mph typical speed
Elevated Train-Chicago
Metra Commuter Rail-Chicago
LIGHT RAIL • Electrically propelled by overhead wires • Operates at surface level over exclusive rights-of-way or public streets • 1-3 cars • 20-30 mph typical speed
STREETCAR • Electrically propelled by overhead wires • Operates at surface level within existing travel lanes allowing automobiles to drive in the same lane as the streetcar • 170-240 passengers • 10-25 mph typical speed Portland Streetcar
Phoenix Light Rail
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
13
Top U.S. city populations with some form of passenger rail system listed on the previous page:
CURRENT TRENDS Out of the 30 most populous cities in the U.S., only six (red color) have no passenger rail transportation option.
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16.
New York, NY Los Angeles, CA Chicago, IL Houston, TX Philadelphia, PA Phoenix, AZ San Antonio, TX San Diego, CA Dallas, TX San Jose, CA Jacksonville, FL Indianapolis, IN Austin, TX San Francisco, CA Columbus, OH Fort Worth, TX
*U.S. Census Bureau 2011 Population Estimates
14
BACKGROUND
17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30.
Charlotte, NC Detroit, MI El Paso, TX Memphis, TN Boston, MA Seattle, WA Denver, CO Baltimore, MD Washington, D.C. Nashville, TN Louisville, KY Milwaukee, WI Portland, OR Oklahoma City, OK
Map showing strictly streetcar transit systems across the U.S. that are either in operation or in the planning phases
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
15
MKE PUBLIC TRANSIT HISTORY In the early 20th century, streetcars were the most prevalent mode of transportation in Milwaukee. However, with the invention of the automobile, streetcars were seen as large, slowmoving objects that got in the way of the new mode of transportation and were no longer a viable transit option. The modern streetcar currently proposed for Milwaukee is not the same streetcar of the past. Modern streetcars run smoother, quieter and more efficiently than their 20th century counterpart.
1950’s-1960’s Electric streetcar and bus systems run in tandem
1890-1950’s Privately-owned, electric streetcars were primary source for public transportation in Milwaukee
Wisconsin Ave - 1920 16
BACKGROUND
1960’s-present day Bus is primary source for public transit
2014 •Construction of Phase 1 of Milwaukee Streetcar slated for 2014 •Bus and streetcar system working together again NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
17
MKE PUBLIC TRANSIT HISTORY The maps to the right show Milwaukee’s extensive streetcar, trolley and bus networks. Notice how the routes run along almost every main street of Milwaukee. Compare this to the 2011 proposed streetcar line(in blue) that runs on a majority of current day, non-arterial streets. This creates the opportunity to create a new identity for these previously “unknown” streets in Milwaukee.
1903 map of transit routes in Milwaukee
18
BACKGROUND
1927 map of transit routes in Milwaukee
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
19
PROJECT SITE While the City of Milwaukee has proposed the streetcar route shown to the right, this thesis proposes a slight change to the 4th Street extension. Instead of turning west and connecting to The Brewery development, I have extended the route north to McKinley and then terminating at MLK Drive. The focus area refers to the physical boundary that will be the focus of analysis, impact and intervention of this project. The primary impact zone is within 1-2 blocks of the streetcar route and will have the greatest potential for streetcar related development. The secondary impact zone is drawn to show how even though an area may not be directly adjacent to the route, the opportunity for development still exists.
20
BACKGROUND
City of Milwaukee proposed streetcar route
Primary Impact Zone: •1-2 block adjacency to streetcar route •Land Area: 622 acres (62 Miller Parks)
em nM col
ve.
Lin
Pro
Wa
Ogden Ave.
McKinley Ave.
ct A spe
ter
St.
Far
we
ll A
ori
ve.
al D
r.
Brady St.
Van Buren St.
Jackson St.
Old World 3rd St.
Juneau Ave.
State St. Kilbourn Blvd. Wells St.
4th St.
6th St.
Mason St. Wisconsin Ave. Water St.
Michigan St. Clybourn St.
St. Paul Ave. Milwaukee St. . Broadway Ave
PRIMARY IMPACT ZONE SECONDARY IMPACT ZONE Thesis focus area - notice the slight difference from the City of Milwaukee’s proposed route
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
21
PROJECT SITE Images to the right show just a few of the current physical conditions of parcels directly adjacent to the streetcar route. These parcels have enormous potential for redevelopment, especially with the addition of a new proposed streetcar.
32
52
62 42 1 2
22
BACKGROUND
1
2
32
42
52
62
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
23
PROJECT SITE Downtown Milwaukee is home to 11 different neighborhoods each with its own attractions and personal identity. With the introduction of the streetcar, some of Milwaukee’s greatest attractions will be better connected and allow people to move easily and conveniently throughout Milwaukee’s downtown.
Cathedral Square
Milwaukee Intermodal Station
Wisconsin and Water Street
Historic Third Ward
24
BACKGROUND
Connecting 11 different downtown neighborhoods: • • • • • • • • • • •
Hillside Haymarket Schiltz Park Kilbourn Town Menomonee River Valley Third Ward Juneau Town Yankee Hill Lower East Side Lake Park North Point
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
25
This image below shows a number of red shaded areas. These areas identify a vacant parcel of land or a building that is past its effective lifetime and is prime for renovation or new development.
PROJECT SITE
26
BACKGROUND
The image below shows 10 branding nodes along the streetcar route. The shape of each node is determined by the physical, social, political and economic characteristics of the area. The branding of each node is an important step for the streetcar planning process in that it helps to create a memorable identity for each area.
DOWNTOWN LIVING LAKEFRONT
HAYMARKET
BRADLEY CENTER
CONVENTION CENTER STATION DISTRICT
CATHEDRAL SQUARE
CITY HALL
CITY CENTER
3RD WARD NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
27
PROJECT SITE
Farwell/Prospect & Brady Farwell/Prospect & Albion
Within the 10 nodes identified on the previous page are 20 individual station stops. Each station location was taken from the City of Milwaukee’s plan except for the Haymarket stops, which replace the City’s plan for two stops near The Brewery Development. The map to the right shows every station, each spaced 1 to 3 blocks apart.
Van Buren /Jackson & Ogden
MLK & McKinley
4th & Highland
Van Buren & Kilbourn
Broadway & Wells 4th & Kilbourn
4th & Michigan
4th & St. Paul
BACKGROUND
Ogden & Farwell/Prospect Van Buren/Jackson & Juneau
4th & Juneau
4th & Wisconsin
28
Ogden & Astor
St. Paul & Plankinton
Wells & Jackson Broadway & Wisconsin Broadway & Michigan
St. Paul & Broadway
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
t&
y
ad
Br
ion
DOWNTOWN LIVING
ec
Alb
t
ec
sp
ro t&
ec
sp sp
ro
/P
ell
rw
Fa
ro
tor
As
n
de
Og n& /P
ell
rw
Fa /P
ell
rw
Fa
n&
de
de
Og
au
ne
Ju n&
kso
ac
/J
CITY HALL CATHEDRAL SQUARE
Og
en
n rn
ou
ilb
&K
s
ell kso
ac
&J
n&
kso
ac
/J
en
ur
nB
Va en ur
nB
Va
ur
nB
Va
lls
&W
sin
BRADLEY CENTER CONVENTION CENTER STATION DISTRICT 3RD WARD CITY CENTER
We
ay
n
iga on
isc
&W
ich
y
ton wa
ad
ro &M
dw
oa
Br
ay
dw
oa
Br
ay
dw
oa
Br
&B
kin
lan
l
au
n
iga t. P
&S &P ul
Pa
ul
Pa St.
St.
4th
ich
&M
sin
on
isc
d rn
ou
ilb
&K
u lan
igh
&H
ea
un
&J
ley
Kin
Mc
&W 4th
4th
4th
4th
4th
K&
ML
HAYMARKET LAKEFRONT
29
The diagram to the right shows currently existing amenities that are high activity zones for pedestrians. Each streetcar station stop has amenities that will benefit from the implementation of the streetcar. People will be able to access different areas of downtown with greater ease than pre-streetcar. The addition of the streetcar will also increase the chances for more development at nodes that are currently lacking amenities.
30
BACKGROUND
& McKinle
y
4th
& Juneau
Water St. bars w xyz bar (aloft)
Water St. bars w xyz bar (aloft)
Aloft Moderne
Aloft Moderne
& Highland 4th
& Kilbourn 4th
Old World 3rd St. bars
Hyatt bar
Hyatt
4 th
& Wisconsin
Miller Time Pub
4 th
& Michigan
4 th
& St. Paul
Courtyard Marriott
Hilton Best Western
Pere Marquette Park
Zeidler Union Square
Starbucks
Stone Creek Coffee Roasters
t. P
aul & Plankint
on
PROJECT SITE
MLK
BRADLEY CENTER CONVENTION CENTER STATION DISTRICT S
HAYMARKET
Cathedral Square
Cathedral Square
Bruegger’s Starbucks
Classy Girl Cupcakes
Mykonos Gyro & Cafe
Prospect & A l
os p e ll/Pr ct & B we
Halliday’s Irish Pub Brady St. bars
Shank Hall
Knickerbocker
Burns Commons Veterans Park
Mykonos Gyro & Cafe
ell/
Far
s
Far w
Ogd e
Van B
VanB u
Br
B
Va
Red Arrow Park
Farwell/Pro
y r ad
Astor Hotel
InterContinental
Country Clare
n&
n
Karma
Victor’s
en & Astor O gd
bio
Milwaukee Bagel
Whiskey Bar Mikey’s Taylors Flannery’s Bad Genie
n/Jackson & ure
t
Steamers Coffee The Soup House
/Jackson & J r en
LAKEFRONT p ec
Pfister Hotel Metro
ren & Kilbou nBu
den Og
Milwaukee Marriott
ls & Jackso W el
au une
Milwaukee St. bars
adway & Well
DOWNTOWN LIVING
rn
Swingin’ Door Exchange
Bro
s
3rd Ward Cafe Starbucks
way & Wiscon o ad
sin
Wicked Hop Cafe Benelux
dway & Michi roa
CITY HALL CATHEDRAL SQUARE n
aul & Broadw
g an
t. P
ay
S
3RD WARD CITY CENTER
Burns Commons Veterans Park
Panera Bread Starbucks
Veterans Park
Sphinx Cafe Starbucks
taverns
hotels
parks
cafes
restaurants
groceries
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
31
MASTER PLAN
32
MILWAUKEE STREETCAR
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
33
1 Mixed residential/office/ entertainment-related land use
CATALYTIC PROJECTS
Multi-purpose sports arena with infill 2 tourist attractions 3 Major chain retail store
The images to the right show the master plan for new development adjacent to the Milwaukee Streetcar route. Within each of the ten nodes are a variety of catalytic projects. While each of the catalytic projects help to create an individual destination within each node, it is the overall network of connected places via the streetcar that generates a stronger identity for downtown Milwaukee.
Existing Buildings Proposed Buildings 34
MASTER PLAN
4 Transit hub; mixed-use, adaptive reuse of post office 5 Public art below I-794 freeway
6 Boutique movie theater 7 Infill office and new City Hall plaza 8
Cathedral Square redesign with adjacent mixed-use residential
9 Ogden sustainable transformation 10 Burns commons pavilion
10 LAKEFRONT
DOWNTOWN LIVING HAYMARKET
9 1 8
2 BRADLEY CENTER
CITY HALL
CATHEDRAL SQUARE
7 CONVENTION CENTER 3
6 CITY CENTER
5 4 3RD WARD STATION DISTRICT
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
35
ECONOMIC IMPACT While the costs associated with implementing Milwaukee’s streetcar are typically at the forefront of people’s concerns, what often gets overlooked is the positive economic impact that is possible through new development adjacent to the streetcar route. This development potential far outweighs the construction and operating costs for the streetcar. An estimated $1.05 billion in increased value is possible within the 2-block boundary of the streetcar route. In addition, a new mode of transportation provides an opportunity to re-examine the existing high demand for parking. Reducing the amount of parking spaces for new building projects can decrease total development costs by a considerable margin and generate more opportunity for development.
36
MASTER PLAN
RETAIL
RESIDENTIAL
• 1,636,000 square feet of new retail space • $163.6 million increased value
• 2,472 new housing units • $445.2 million increased value
OFFICE
HOTEL
• 2,472,000 square feet of new office space • $321.2 million increased value
• 832 new hotel rooms • $124.8 million increased value
$1.05 billion in increased value
Streetcar Parking Considerations: EXISTING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
POSSIBLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Retail
Retail
• 1 - 3.5 parking spaces for every 1,000 square feet • 1,636,000 square feet new retail space • Total parking construction cost: $147,240,000
• 1 parking spaces for every 1,000 square feet • 1,636,000 square feet new retail space • Total parking construction cost: $49,080,000
Office
Office
• 1 parking space for every 1,000 square feet • 2,472,000 square feet new office space • Total parking construction cost: $74,160,000
• 1 parking space for every 2,000 square feet • 2,472,000 square feet new office space • Total parking construction cost: $37,080,000
Residential
Residential
• 2 parking spaces for every 3 units • 2,472 new housing units • Total parking construction cost: $49,440,000
• 1 parking spaces for every 3 units • 2,472 new housing units • Total parking construction cost: $24,720,000
Hotel
Hotel
• 1 parking spaces for every 2 sleeping rooms • 832 new housing units • Total parking construction cost: $12,480,000
• 1 parking spaces for every 4 sleeping rooms • 832 new housing units • Total parking construction cost: $6,240,000
Total cost to construct parking $283,320,000
vs.
Total cost to construct parking $117,120,000
$166,200,000 savings *Typical parking garage costs $30,000 per parking space
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
37
DESIGN INTERVENTIONS
38
MILWAUKEE STREETCAR
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
39
HAYMARKET
Throughout Milwaukee’s history, the Haymarket district has had a rich pattern of uses, serving as the support area for much of the brewing industry, as well as housing small businesses, manufacturers, and enclaves of residents. The Haymarket District currently houses mostly light industrial and office uses, though the character of the area has started to shift . New businesses have settled along Martin Luther King Jr. Drive, and the now vacant Park East Freeway corridor has allowed more people to catch a glimpse of the Haymarket District. This increased visibility for the neighborhood has helped more people take notice of the area. Haymarket contains the highest acreage of vacant land compared to all other nodes along the streetcar route. The majority of this vacant land lies within the former Park East Freeway location south of McKinley Avenue. Redevelopment will not happen all at one time. It is important to establish key hinge developments in order to nourish future development of the former Park East Freeway land, as well as land north of McKinley. The urban design solutions shown on the following pages envision a number of entertainment and creative industry uses intertwined with a series of exciting public plazas and pathways.
40
DESIGN INTERVENTIONS
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
Streetcar Station Stops: •MLK & McKinley •4th & Juneau
HAYMARKET
2010 aerial image of node
Development Opportunities: •130,000 sq. ft. of new retail/entertainment [$13.0 million in added value] •430,000 sq. ft. of new office [$55.9 million in added value] •435 new residential units [$78.3 million in added value] •500 new hotel rooms [$75.0 million in added value]
Key Design Interventions: •Entertainment-related land use including hotels, restaurants and bars •Mixed-use office/residential buildings •Network of connected public spaces •Adaptive-reuse of warehouse buildings to residential lofts 42
DESIGN INTERVENTIONS
Existing Buildings Renovated Buildings Proposed Buildings Haymarket Master Plan
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
43
1
Stadium Plaza: •large, flexible space •24/7 activity
HAYMARKET
At each streetcar stop, different types of spaces engage pedestrians and draw them through the entire stretch of the Park East land. Nokia Plaza, Los Angeles, CA
Manpower
Mix of public space types: •plazas •parks •trails •streets •alleys
Time Warner 2
1
The Brewery
44
DESIGN INTERVENTIONS
Haymarket Triangle Plaza: •streetcar stop •public art •cafe •residential lofts
Open space at the NW corner of MLK and McKinley - BEFORE; underutilized green space and vacant warehouses
2
Open space at the NW corner of MLK and McKinley - AFTER; Haymarket Triangle - A new plaza with sculptures, adjacent residential lofts and a cafe
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
45
BRADLEY CENTER
46
Built in 1988, the BMO Harris Bradley Center is one of the oldest active NBA arenas in the United States. An opportunity for change exists. And not just in the form of a new stadium, but an entire entertainment district that includes a multi-purpose arena, hotels, restaurants, museums, theaters, public space and more. The Bradley Center node on the following pages shows a variety of entertainment-related development that creates a 24/7 atmosphere, and could create a positive economic impact of enormous proportions.
DESIGN INTERVENTIONS
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
Streetcar Station Stops: •4th & Highland •4th & Kilbourn
BRADLEY CENTER
Development Opportunities: •803,000 sq. ft. of new retail/entertainment [$80.3 million in added value] •375,000 sq. ft. of new office [$48.7 million in added value] •262 new residential units [$47.2 million in added value] •120 new hotel rooms [$18.0 million in added value] 2010 aerial image of node
Key Design Interventions: •Entertainment-related land use surrounding a new, multi-purpose arena •Visually-stimulating public realm and streetcar stations •New office complex at the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel •Redesign of Pere Marquette Park •Reconfiguration of Kilbourn Avenue to include tree-lined, separated bike lanes
Examples of dynamic lighting that could be located at streetcar stops and main public spaces
48
DESIGN INTERVENTIONS
Existing Buildings Proposed Buildings Bradley Center Master Plan
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
49
BRADLEY CENTER
L.A. Sports and Entertainment District, Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles Sports and Entertainment District (LASED) •Sited on a former blighted industrial area adjacent to the convention center and downtown’s South Park district •Public/private partnership formed in 1997 between a master developer (AEG), the City of Los Angeles, and the Community Redevelopment Agency of Los Angeles (CRA/LA)
50
DESIGN INTERVENTIONS
Phase 1: Staples Center
Phase 2: L.A. Live
•6 acres •$375 million construction cost •20,000-seat arena completed in 1999 •design focused not only on the interior function as a sports arena, but has become an integral part of the urban fabric
•27 acres •$2.5 billion construction cost •Nokia Plaza (2009) •Nokia Theatre (2007) •Grammy Museum (2008) •Hotels and condos (2010) •ESPN Zone (2009) •Regal Entertainment Group (movie theaters) •Multiple restaurants
Milwaukee’s Entertainment District The placement of a new multi-purpose arena within Milwaukee’s downtown is of the utmost importance. Positioning the arena to the south of Juneau Avenue (as shown to the right) provides a number of benefits including the following: • allows Park East land to be developed for entertainment-related uses and be used as more of a transition zone between Haymarket and Downtown • keeps stadium in closer proximity to Wisconsin Avenue and the heart of Downtown
Site plan of a new multi-purpose arena located 1 just north of the existing BMO Harris Bradley Center
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
51
CONVENTION CENTER
52
Milwaukee’s convention center is at the heart of Downtown Milwaukee at the corner of 4th and Wisconsin. Yet when tourists come for conventions, they most likely find themselves questioning where are the Downtown destinations typically seen near convention centers? While the implementation of the Milwaukee streetcar would help to better connect convention-goers to hotels, restaurants and retail stores in other locations around Downtown, the properties directly adjacent to the convention center should look to attract uses that tourists can easily see and access with ease.
DESIGN INTERVENTIONS
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
Streetcar Station Stops: •4th & Wisconsin •4th & Michigan
CONVENTION CENTER
Development Opportunities: •240,000 sq. ft. of new retail [$24.0 million in added value] •343,000 sq. ft. of new office [$44.6 million in added value]
2010 aerial image of node
Key Design Intervention: •Attract major retail at the southwest corner of 4th and Wisconsin
Example of a good, urban retail store design at a major intersection within downtown Minneapolis. A similar retail tenant should be sought after for Milwaukee’s Downtown. Downtown Target, Minneapolis, MN
54
DESIGN INTERVENTIONS
Existing Buildings Renovated Buildings Proposed Buildings Convention Center Master Plan
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
55
STATION DISTRICT
Welcome to Milwaukee...well, kind of. A majority of visitors to Milwaukee enter through our Intermodal Station located at St. Paul and 5th Street. The station is serviced by both Amtrak and Greyhound Bus Service. The Amtrak Hiawatha line brings 1.4 million people annually through the intermodal station and is the 2nd fastest growing line in Amtrak’s national rail network (2nd behind Maine). When visitors exit the terminal they are greeted by numerous parcels of vacant land, empty warehouse buildings and minimal options for reaching other Downtown destinations. The urban design solutions shown on the following pages envision a new transit hub with a mix of office, residential and retail uses. From this point in Milwaukee, tourists should be greeted by multiple transit options (bus, car rental, bike, streetcar) as well as public outdoor and indoor spaces that create both a welcoming atmosphere and a new gateway to Downtown.
56
DESIGN INTERVENTIONS
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
STATION DISTRICT The master plan shows major transformations including the adaptive reuse of the current USPS distribution center into a new residential mixeduse complex. A new public street runs along the Menomonee River creating great views along the waterfront and opportunities to extend Milwaukee’s riverwalk. Land located below the freeway is occupied by a variety of transportation uses including a streetcar maintenance/storage facility and a new MCTS bus layover location.
2010 aerial image of node
Streetcar Station Stops: •4th & St. Paul •St. Paul & Plankington
Development Opportunities: •84,000 sq. ft. of new retail [$8.4 million in added value] •416,000 sq. ft. of new office [$54 million in added value] •600 new residential units [$108.1 million in added value]
Key Design Interventions: •Parking/Office/Milwaukee Transit Center at corner of 5th & St. Paul •Adaptive reuse of existing Post Office into mixed retail/residential/office use •Enhanced pedestrian walkability 58
DESIGN INTERVENTIONS
Station District Master Plan
Existing Buildings Renovated Buildings Proposed Buildings NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
59
STATION DISTRICT A new Milwaukee Transit Center building is constructed at the corner of St. Paul and 5th Street. This building would allow the current MTC on the Lakefront to be demolished and make way for other, more suitable lakefront development. The design of the new MTC is focused on welcoming pedestrians not only through its programmatic uses, but also through a series of physical design components including a plaza, outdoor mezzanines, movable seating, and large billboards.
Existing Milwaukee Transit Center on Lakefront
Vacant land at 5th and St. Paul across from Intermodal Station
MTC
INTERMODAL STATION Diagram showing how the Milwaukee Transit Center is in close proximity to streetcar line and Intermodal Station
60
DESIGN INTERVENTIONS
Southeast view of new Milwaukee Transit Center across the street from the Intermodal Station
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
61
STATION DISTRICT The programmatic uses of the new Milwaukee Transit Center are aimed at meeting the transit needs of Milwaukee residents, employees and tourists. The ground level includes convenience-type retail, a restaurant and car/bike rental stores. The ground level also includes a MTC lobby that would have ticketing kiosks for all transportation options including the streetcar.
Milwaukee Transit Center Ground Floor Plan
62
DESIGN INTERVENTIONS
Milwaukee Transit Center Program: •600 parking stalls •MCTS bus marshall area (8 bus capacity) •4,000 square feet retail •10,000 square foot sit-down restaurant •6,000 square foot car rental •3,000 square foot bike storage, lockers, showers, repair •50,000 square feet of office space
Looking across 5th Street at new Milwaukee Transit Center
7 levels of prime office space public access from 6th Street viaduct onto elevated walkway that wraps building
600 parking stalls with downtown employees occupying the majority of spaces. Employees are able to park in the structure and take an alternative means of transportation to get to work current Milwaukee Transit Center on lakefront moves to site
LED lit advertising mesh screens sit-down restaurant that breaks out into plaza
convenience type retail for grab and go items weather-protected bike lockers beneath terrace seating terrace seating facing active St. Paul Ave.
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
63
THIRD WARD
The Historic Third Ward is a top destination not only for visitors to Milwaukee, but also for local residents and employees. The local shops, eateries and historic atmosphere all make the area a great place to enjoy. However, unless you have access to a car, the Historic Third Ward becomes a disconnected neighborhood with its physical boundaries of the Milwaukee River and Interstate 794 freeway. In an effort to better connect the Historic Third Ward with its neighbor East Town to the north, the following pages suggest a dynamic design intervention that bridges the gap between the two areas and breaks down the physical barriers.
64
DESIGN INTERVENTIONS
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
Streetcar Station Stops: •St. Paul & Water (southbound) •St. Paul & Broadway (northbound)
THIRD WARD
Development Opportunities: •10,000 sq. ft. of new retail [$1.0 million in added value] •50 new residential units [$9.0 million in added value] •212 new hotel rooms [$31.8 million in added value] 2010 aerial image of node
Key Design Interventions: •Boutique hotel at corner of St. Paul & Water •Interactive public art beneath Interstate 794 freeway
18 existing downtown hotels 3 proposed hotels H
H
H H
H HH H
DESIGN INTERVENTIONS
H
H
H H HH
H H H H H H
66
H
Connection between hotels and downtown destinations is of the utmost importance for tourists. The Milwaukee Streetcar route would run within 2 blocks of every downtown hotel.
Existing Buildings Proposed Buildings Third Ward Master Plan
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
67
Kinetic Illumination: Connecting the Historic Third Ward with East Town via interactive public art
THIRD WARD Kinetic Illumination is focused on embracing the different scales of movement or kinetic energy that currently exist on the project site through both passive and interactive lighting displays. The variety of lighting schemes aim at breaking down the existing physical and mental barriers in an innovative way. Kinetic Illumination not only solves the problem of existing barriers, but also creates excitement, utilizes materials that are practical and flexible and addresses long term issues.
Location of public art installation
Existing dark, unwelcoming approach to I-794
68
DESIGN INTERVENTIONS
I-794 cross section showing different lighting elements
Perspective image of the new interactive lighting elements beneath I-794
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
69
POWER IT
THIRD WARD
Kinetic Illumination uses the concrete decking above the Public Market parking lot as a surface for solar PV panels. These panels serve as a renewable energy source for the interactive LED lighting below the freeway.
23,000 SF of solar PV space
An interactive public art piece: Seating with integrated lighting
>power it >observe it >interact with it >learn from it
LED lighting between canvas and freeway
Kinetic Illumination uses the concrete decking above the Public Market parking lot as a surface for solar PV panels. These panels serve as a renewable energy source for the interactive LED lighting below the freeway.
Components: >LED lighting >seating >paving patterns >hanging canvas
OBSERVE IT Motion Sensor
Kinetic Illumination allows for passive viewing of real-time traffic activity on the freeway above. Motion sensors record traffic flow on freeway above and send information to LED lights below freeway. White canvas is hung from the freeway and creates a clean, ambient lighting for the three underpass streets while being able to create a visual connection between cars above and pedestrians below.
Int. 794
Hung canvas with LED back lighting High traffic frequency on freeway above
Water St.
Low traffic frequency on freeway above
Kinetic Illumination allows for passive viewing of real-time traffic activity on the freeway above. Motion sensors record traffic flow on freeway above and send information to LED lights below freeway. White canvas is hung from the freeway and creates a clean, ambient lighting for the three underpass streets while being able to create a visual connection between cars above and pedestrians below.
70
DESIGN INTERVENTIONS
LEARN FROM IT
Kinetic Illumination serves as a learning tool to visitors to the site. Benches provide flat surfaces that open the possibility of inscribing educational information on the seating surface. This educational information could range from Milwaukee settlement history, Third Ward/East Town Facts, etc. The benches could also serve as elements that local companies could purchase and inscribe facts about their individual company.
INTERSTATE 794 Highway construction displaced the close-knit Italian Third Ward community in the 1960's. The trucking industry and suburb growth led to the decline of warehouse operations and industry. Ironically, Milwaukee's first architectural landmark was named in 1967, the Blessed Virgin of Pompeii Catholic Church, the same year it was demolished for construction of the I-794 freeway.
HARLEY-DAVIDSON
MACKIE/GRAIN EXCHANGE
or
Designed by Edward Townsend Mix, the old Grain Exchange Room inside the Mackie Building has been refurbished to its original luster. Its 175-ft. bell tower in the room’s center, soaring ceiling, frescoes, and handsome stonework will take visitors back to the elegance and grandeur of a bygone era.
1912
or
Construction begins on what will become the six story headquarters and main factory building at Juneau Ave. in Milwaukee. A separate Parts and Accessories Department is formed.
1 block North of this point
Top view of bench with inscribed educational facts
Kinetic Illumination serves as a learning tool to visitors to the site. Benches provide flat surfaces that open the possibility of inscribing educational information on the seating surface. This educational information could range from Milwaukee settlement history, Third Ward/East Town Facts, etc. The benches could also serve as elements that local companies could purchase and inscribe facts about their individual company.
INTERACT WITH IT
Kinetic Illumination allows pedestrians to create an artistic lighting display of their own when passing through the freeway underpass. Column LED uplighting is triggered when pedestrians step down on an impact pad that completes an electronic circuit to turn on the LED light for that particular column. Light turns back off when pedestrian steps off of the impact pad. Ambient lighting beneath benches as well as colored concrete strips establish a rhythm along the sidewalks to lead people through the passage.
Column light triggered by pedestrian stepping on impact pad
Light remains off until pedestrian impact
Impact pad waiting for pedestrian impact to turn on column light
Kinetic Illumination allows pedestrians to create an artistic lighting display of their own when passing through the freeway underpass. Column LED uplighting is triggered when pedestrians step down on an impact pad that completes an electronic circuit to turn on the LED light for that particular column. Light turns back off when pedestrian steps off of the impact pad. Ambient lighting beneath benches as well as colored concrete strips establish a rhythm along the sidewalks to lead people through the passage.
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
71
reet
Clybourn St
THIRD WARD
Sidewalk Impact Pad
reet
>power it >observe it >interact with it >learn from it
Broadway St
An interactive public art piece:
Components: >LED lighting >seating >paving patterns >hanging canvas
Site plan
Ceiling plan
72
DESIGN INTERVENTIONS
et Water Stre
Concrete Seating
Milwaukee Public Market
Pedestrians enjoying both passive and interactive lighting elements below I-794
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
73
CITY CENTER
74
The City Center Node is a destination along the streetcar route that perhaps receives the highest amount of pedestrian activity. Employees get off at Wisconsin and Broadway and head to work while tourists look east and west along Wisconsin Avenue and decide which attraction they want to go to first. The City Center node demands a clustering of different modes of transportation (bus, streetcar, bike sharing, etc.) in order to provide convenient options for residents, employees and tourists to reach their next destination.
DESIGN INTERVENTIONS
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
iiiiiiii
Streetcar Station Stops: •Broadway & Michigan •Broadway & Wisconsin
CITY CENTER
Development Opportunities:
The master plan shows a heavy focus on new ground-level retail along Broadway Street. This ground level activation would create a much more walkable street and better connect the City Center to the Historic Third Ward. Streetcar stations are positioned within new curb bump-outs along Broadway that allow for additional space for food vendors and bike sharing stations.
•270,000 sq. ft. of new retail/entertainment [$27.0 million in added value] •120,000 sq. ft. of new office [$15.6 million in added value]
Key Design Interventions:
2010 aerial image of node
Mackie/Mitchell Buildings at Michigan Street
76
DESIGN INTERVENTIONS
•Large, public plazas to accommodate street vendors and bike share hubs •High-end, boutique retail/entertainment buildings
Food vendors at Wisconsin Avenue
Broadway and Wisconsin intersection
Existing Buildings Broadway and Michigan intersection
Renovated Buildings
Proposed Buildings
City Center Master Plan
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
77
CITY CENTER
streetcar stop
The implementation of a bike sharing program in Milwaukee would provide a number of benefits for residents, employees and tourists. Bike sharing systems are often more convenient and affordable than bike ownership for many residents; they help overcome barriers to using a bike in a city, such as theft and storage; they both connect to and relieve pressure on transit; they provide branding opportunities for the city and private companies; and they introduce new audiences to bicycling.
10-min walk
MAM
bradley center turner hall
milw. theater u.s. cell.
marcus center pabst theater
war memorial
public museum milw. art museum
public library
children’s museum
Wisconsin Ave.
discovery world
henry maier festival park
harley museum
broadway theater
Map showing some of the cultural attractions located within the downtown area
78
DESIGN INTERVENTIONS
Bike Sharing in Milwaukee_ how it could work •bike docks located at key streetcar stops and major downtown attractions •meant be used for short trips streetcar stop >annual member fee of around $50-$75 >trips under 30 minutes are generally free for members; low cost to non-members >around $2-$5/additional 30 minutes
5-min ride
MAM
U.S. Cities with Bike Sharing Programs: •Denver, CO •Minneapolis, MN •Chicago, IL •Washington, D.C. •Miami, FL
Example of bike sharing system
•Boulder, CO •Madison, WI •New York, NY •Portland, OR •Boston, MA
Example of bike sharing system
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
79
CITY HALL
Milwaukee’s City Hall was finished in 1895, at which time it was the tallest habitable building in the United States. The city hall’s bell tower, at 353 feet (108 m), also made it the second tallest structure in the nation, behind the Washington Monument. Today the historical structure still stands as one of Milwaukee’s most recognizable architectural icons. What is lacking from the area is a feeling of civic pride. While the beautiful building stands majestic on its site, it offers little physical engagement with adjacent buildings. The following pages suggest a quality civic plaza at the base of City Hall as well as improved streetscaping elements that aim to draw visitors from the streetcar station one block east down to the historical landmark. With these new design elements, a new civic complex is created that residents, tourists and government employees can take pride in.
80
DESIGN INTERVENTIONS
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
Streetcar Station Stops: •Broadway & Wells
CITY HALL
Development Opportunities: •7,000 sq. ft. of new retail [$0.7 million in added value] •190,000 sq. ft. of new office [$24.7 million in added value]
2010 aerial image of node
Key Design Interventions: •Office and retail infill •New City hall plaza with entrance to City Hall museum •Historical information about City of Milwaukee
82
DESIGN INTERVENTIONS
Existing Buildings Proposed Buildings
City Hall Master Plan
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
83
CITY HALL
Milwaukee’s City Hall was finished in 1895, at which time it was the tallest habitable building in the United States. The city hall's bell tower, at 353 feet (108 m), also made it the second tallest structure in the nation, behind the Washington Monument.
Existing view down Wells St. towards City Hall
84
DESIGN INTERVENTIONS
Existing space between municipal buildings and City Hall
New City Hall plaza mixes employee lunch space with tourist attractions
new entrance to City Hall museum located in lower level of City Hall building
curb bump out replaces right turn lane NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
85
CATHEDRAL SQUARE
86
Thursday night jazz music. Saturday morning farmers markets. Carols around the Christmas tree. The attractions of Cathedral Square already make this park one of Milwaukee’s great, urban places. However, when taking a wider lens to the Cathedral Square area, one can see a number of development opportunities both within and adjacent to the park. The following pages suggest a number of new residential buildings as well as a redesign for Cathedral Square that attempts to better connect the park to its surrounding context and provide uses during non-event planned days.
DESIGN INTERVENTIONS
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
Streetcar Station Stops: •Wells & Jackson •VanBuren & Kilbourn (northbound) •Jackson & State (southbound)
CATHEDRAL SQUARE
Development Opportunities: •41,000 sq. ft. of new retail [$4.1 million in added value] •580,000 sq. ft. of new office [$75.4 million in added value] •580 new residential units [$103.2 million in added value] 2010 aerial image of node
Key Design Interventions: •Narrow Kilbourn Avenue to increase public space for pedestrian activity •Better defined northern edge of Cathedral Square >pavilion, cafe, playground, vegetation •Repaving of Jefferson Street •Iconic residential towers flanking Kilbourn Avenue
88
DESIGN INTERVENTIONS
Existing Buildings Proposed Buildings
Cathedral Square Master Plan
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
89
Kilbourn Commons: >A 1-acre linear park connecting Juneau Park and Cathedral Square
CATHEDRAL SQUARE The most notable difference one can see from the existing composition of the park to the proposed design is a new stretch of linear public space on the northern edge of the park named Kilbourn Commons. The new 30 foot wide space would stretch 4 blocks and include a mixture of green space, walking paths, seating, public art and interactive water elements. This new linear park helps to physically connect Cathedral Square to Juneau Park.
nue
Kilbourn Ave
Cathedr C athedrrall S Square
EXISTING •Street takes the form of a boulevard •Central median green spaces are underutilized by pedestrians due to lack of access and no reason to occupy the spaces
Existing photo of Kilbourn Avenue
90
DESIGN INTERVENTIONS
Juneau Paark
Existing photo of Cathedral Square’s northern edge
INTERVENTION
Kilbourn
Cathedra C athedr athedraaal Square
Avenue
Juneau Par ark
•Boulevard has been eliminated •Public space has been created on the northern edges of the blocks adjacent to Cathedral Square •Green spaces are approximately 30’ wide and run the entire length of each block
Kilbourn Commons site plan
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
91
Cathedral Square Redesign: The redesign for Cathedral Square takes a contemporary design approach by improving the current programmatic elements of the park as well as adding some new features that help to better connect the park to its surrounding context. Interactive fountains, a new pavilion and a small cafe are placed along the northern edge of the park that help create a stronger edge to the park that is currently lacking. The introduction of the cafe helps support pedestrian activity during non-performance days at the park. The new pavilion is designed with a main performance stage facing south towards the park as well as a second performance area on the north side of the pavilion that engages Kilbourn Avenue (labeled Joshua Glover Memorial Stage on plan). With the City of Milwaukee’s initiative to bring bike sharing to Milwaukee, Cathedral Square is an obvious choice for one of the bike sharing stations. Such a space has been designated behind the cafe that is partially enclosed and would have room for additional bike storage.
CATHEDRAL SQUARE
Bike sharing/shelter located behind cafe
92
DESIGN INTERVENTIONS
EXISTING AERIAL
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
10 3
4
2 6
1
8 9
5
7
1 Pavilion (stages, restrooms, storage)
2 Cafe
6 Bike sharing/shelter 7 Proposed Streetcar stop
3 Children’s playground 8 Repaved Jefferson Street
4 Joshua Glover Memorial Stage 9 Wood plank boardwalk NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
5 Open green space
10 Interactive water fountains 93
CATHEDRAL SQUARE Cross sections of Kilbourn Avenue show how the existing street configuration favors heavily towards the automobile. The proposed street design replaces angled parking with parallel parking and removes the central median. The narrowing of the street and the new parking configuration creates slower moving automobile traffic and increased pedestrian space.
Kilbourn Commons_ walking across Jackson Street and entering into Cathedral Square park
Bike sharing/shelter located behind cafe
94
DESIGN INTERVENTIONS
New gateway park entrance signage
Kilbourn Avenue Street Sections
EXISTING STREET SECTION
124’ street right-of-way
16’
16’
sidewalk park
11’ 11’
20’
11’ 11’
16’
12’
auto auto median auto auto
park
sidewalk
Cathedral Square
PROPOSED STREET SECTION
124’ street right-of-way
16’
8’ 12’ 12’ 12’ 12’ 8’
sidewalk park auto auto auto auto park
44’ Kilbourn Commons
Cathedral Square NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
95
CATHEDRAL SQUARE
View of the median streetcar stop at Wells Street
The streetcar station takes on a design theme that blends in with the overall, new design for Cathedral Square. A row of columns is shown within the street median that recall the historic colonnade that once appeared at the courthouse and jail located within the park. A colonnade at the northern edge of the green space (shown to the right) is also reintroduced into the park. The columns could serve as structures to host banners and/or sponsor signage during event venues at the park.
1886 photo of Cathedral Square shows former Milwaukee Courthouse and jail positioned at the northern portion of the block.
Walking north along eastern edge of Cathedral Square - notice the new wood plank boardwalk that is reintroduced to resemble the historic boardwalk that once ran in the exact location in the 1800’s
96
DESIGN INTERVENTIONS
Night view of Cathedral Square Pavilion
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
97
DOWNTOWN LIVING
98
The Downtown Living Node begins to transition into more of a residential character along the streetcar route. Grocery stores, schools, Post Office and residential buildings are top destinations within this node. With the streetcar operating along almost the entire length of Ogden Avenue, the street will be transformed into one of Milwaukee’s most ‘complete streets’, a street that accommodates multiple modes of transportation and supports sustainability.
DESIGN INTERVENTIONS
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
DOWNTOWN LIVING
2010 aerial image of node
Streetcar Station Stops:
Development Opportunities:
•VanBuren/Jackson & Juneau •VanBuren/Jackson & Ogden •Ogden & Astor
•40,000 sq. ft. of new retail [$4.0 million in added value] •160 new residential units [$30.0 million in added value]
Key Design Interventions: •Sustainable complete street-Ogden Avenue >accommodates multiple modes of transportation >adds bioswales while maintaining existing street tree canopy >transforms existing, non-permeable parallel parking lane into permeable pavement >streetcar stations have roofs that capture stormwater and pour into bioswales 100
DESIGN INTERVENTIONS
Downtown Living Master Plan
Existing Buildings Proposed Buildings
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
101
DOWNTOWN LIVING
Examples of streetside bioswales
permeable pavement
mixed travel lane
bioswale
bike lane
shelter Astor Street Ogden Avenue
Ogden & Astor Streetcar Stop
102
DESIGN INTERVENTIONS
5’
8’
8’
5’
sidewalk
bioswale
park
bike
11’
11’
mixed- travel mixed- travel
8’
5’
8’
12’
platform
bike
bioswale
sidewalk
Cross section through Ogden Avenue
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
103
Running the streetcar route through the lower east side along Prospect and Farwell Avenues connects some of the highest density of residential properties to Milwaukee’s downtown. Connecting to this high population base is essential for the success of the streetcar. The implementation of the streetcar will allow apartment dwellers to rely less on personal cars and more on public transit, reducing the high parking space demand in the area.
LAKEFRONT
104
DESIGN INTERVENTIONS
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
LAKEFRONT
2010 aerial image of node
Streetcar Station Stops:
Development Opportunities:
•Ogden & Farwell/Prospect •Farwell/Prospect & Albion •Farwell/Prospect & Brady
•11,000 sq. ft. of new retail [$1.1 million in added value] •18,000 sq. ft. of new office [$2.3 million in added value •385 new residential units [$69.4 million in added value]
Key Design Interventions: •Residential and office infill at vacant parcels •Iconic, sustainable streetcar station/pavilion at Burns Commons 106
DESIGN INTERVENTIONS
Burns Commons: unique transit station/pavilion where streetcar vehicle travels off of the street right-of-way and into the northern edge of the park
Existing Buildings Proposed Buildings Portland Streetcar
Lakefront Master Plan
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
107
FINAL THOUGHTS
While much attention has been geared towards the ‘problems’ or challenges of implementing the proposed Milwaukee Streetcar, little attention has been given to the development opportunities that exist adjacent to the route. In particular, a lack of a design vision for development opportunities has left residents, employers, and political leaders skeptical of any positive benefit for implementing the streetcar. What I hope this thesis can provide is a larger vision of what great places, new and old, the streetcar can connect. The streetcar is not just another form of public transit, but one component of a larger network of connected places around Milwaukee that together form a new identity, something that residents, employers and tourists can be excited about.
108
NEXT STOP
Place-making Streetcarroute route Place-making along along the the Milwaukee Milwaukee Streetcar
MILWAUKEE STREETCAR
NEXT STOP Craig Huebner
109
BIBLIOGRAPHY
http://apta.com/resources/reportsandpublications/Documents/Transit_Glossary_1994.pdf http://cityplanning.lacity.org/complan/specplan/pdf/lased.pdf http://web.archive.org/web/20090611111807/http://www.apta.com/research/stats/rail/definitions.cfm http://www.bikesbelong.org/resources/stats-and-research/research/bike-sharing-in-the-united-states/ http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2011/tables/SUB-EST2011-01.csv http://www.dot.wisconsin.gov/travel/rail/milwaukee-intermodal.htm http://www.themilwaukeestreetcar.com/ http://www.themilwaukeestreetcar.com/pdf/Milwaukee-Streetcar-Environmental-Assessment.pdf http://www.vtpi.org/tca/tca0504.pdf Mossop, Elizabeth. "Landscapes of Infrastructure." The Landscape Urbanism Reader. New York: Princeton Architectural, 2006. 163-76. Print
110