Assessment For The Changing Nature Of Work: Cross-Case Analysis

Acknowledgements We would like to thank Yang Silin and Millie Lee for their valuable contributions to this report. We are also grateful for the comments, feedback and suggestions received throughout the project and in relation to the reports from Visiting Fellows Professors David Boud and Peter Rushbrook. And last but not least, we thank our colleagues from LPDD Lee Wee Chee and Renee Tan; LSSD Yeow Mun Ching, and Professor Yee Fook Cheong (Singapore Institute of Technology) for their insights and inputs .

Assessment For The Changing Nature Of Work: Cross-Case Analysis

Articles inside

REFERENCES

7.2 Conclusion

Recommendation 4: Key challenges and potentials for future research

6.7 Conclusion

6.6 Preparedness for the “uncertain” future of work

6.5 Assessment as medium for change: a long-term perspective

6.4 Theoretical shifts and discourses of learning

FIGURE 5.6: DEVELOPING JUDGEMENT

4.2.6 Future-orientedness

FIGURE 5.3 MODEL OF AN ALIGNED CURRICULUM FOR A SCHOOL/CLASSROOM SETTING

4.2.5 Judgement

4.2.2 Feedback

4.2.4 Holism

3.2 Conclusion and suggestions

3.1.2 DACE

2.6 Conclusion

2.5.1 Specific assessment and learning practices

2.5 What constitutes “leading” assessment practices?

2.2.3 Work and assessment

2.3 Engaging stakeholders

2.4 The making of assessment judgements

2.2.1. A practice-based approach to learning and assessment

2.2.2 Psychometric approaches

2.2 Shifting the lens on assessment

2.1.1 Forms of production

1. INTRODUCTION

1.2.1 The six cases

TABLE 1.1 THE SIX CASE STUDIES

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

APPENDIX A

2.1.2 Non-permanent work

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY