Dialogical Teaching...

Page 10

prevalent. As individuals transition from school to the world of work and navigating labour markets, they need to be able to thrive in uncertain and changing contexts. This places an emphasis not on structured thinking and simple problems but on complexity, on being confident to contribute to complex naming and solutioning and navigating unknown futures.

1.3 Methodology Research study participants were sampled from two groups of postgraduate students in a Singapore Education Faculty. Students were engaged in the dialogic inquiry of problems encountered in their workplace. They were encouraged to raise questions, to analyse tentative answers and experiment with possibilities, and to question long held assumptions and paradigms. The educators for each group surfaced the idea for this research project with a shared interest in dialogical inquiry (Stack, 2007; Bound 2010) and in knowledge co-construction. As we were practicing these approaches in our own classrooms, we wanted to find out more about how students experienced these approaches and what the possibilities were for expanding the approach beyond the boundaries of our own classrooms in the adult education sector in Singapore. The research questions posed were: 4. How do adult learners in formal graduate courses develop awareness of their inquiry and how do they co-construct knowledge? 5. How do adult learners perceive the relevance and value of dialogical approach to teaching and learning? 6. What are the implications of the dialogical approach for the practices of adult educators?

1.3.1. Profile of Research Participants Participants were recruited from two different Master’s level courses at a Singapore University. Lessons were delivered in classrooms, and online (e.g. forum discussion). The Workplace Learning and Performance (WPL&P) course had 30 participants and Computer Supported Collaborative Learning and Knowledge Building (CSCL&KB) had 14 participants. Workplace Learning & Performance Participants (WPL&P): The 30 participants in this course were aged between 21 years to 70 years, 57% of them were male (Figure 1.1). Ninety percent of participants were of Chinese ethnicity, and the rest were of Malay, Eurasian, and Indonesian ethnicities. About 70% of the participants were teaching and training professionals from both the preemployment and continuous education and training sectors, about 24% were managerial and administrative professionals, and the rest were self-employed. In terms of work experience, the number of years ranged between 5 to 36 (Figure 1.2). Class and group discussions, student artefacts and assessment artefacts were collected by the researchers and sixteen participants were interviewed.

10


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

6.6 Specific Recommendations

1min
page 84

6.2 Developing educator capabilities

2min
page 81

6.5 The need for system change to support approaches such as dialogical teaching

2min
page 83

6.1 Individual educator agency

2min
page 80

Figure 6.2: Roles and metaphors of learning in relation to monologic and dialogic approaches

2min
page 79

Figure 6:1: Continuum from monologic to dialogic

2min
page 78

5.7. Challenges faced by learners and the educators

2min
page 74

6. Conclusion and Recommendations

2min
page 77

Figure 5.2: Concept map of the dialogic teaching and learning model

3min
pages 75-76

5.1. “Rising above’ the two case studies

1min
page 69

5. Rising Above

3min
page 68

4.5. Conclusion: Learning design, inquiry and knowledge building

5min
pages 65-67

Figure 4.5. Frequency count of notes at different phases of interaction for different sessions

6min
pages 63-64

Figure 4.4. Changes in conception of learning

2min
page 62

4.3. Awareness of dialogic inquiry process and metacognition

2min
page 57

4.2. Moving from didactic teaching (direct instruction) to dialogical teaching and learning

13min
pages 53-56

4.1. Learners’ perception of the values of dialogical teaching and learning

8min
pages 50-52

3.6. Conclusion: Relationship between learning activities, inquiry and knowledge building

5min
pages 45-47

Figure 3.7: Neil’s concept map

1min
page 44

Figure 3.5. Relationship between Reflection Types & Course Scores

1min
page 42

Table 3.2: Description for Reflection Types

2min
page 41

3.3. Changes in roles and responsibilities

6min
pages 34-35

3.4. Learners’ awareness of their own dialogical inquiry processes

3min
pages 36-37

3.2. Moving from monologic teaching experiences to dialogical teaching and learning

3min
page 33

3. Workplace Learning & Performance

2min
page 29

2.5. Knowledge co-construction

3min
page 23

2.2. The dialogical construction of meaning, and inquiry

5min
pages 19-20

Executive Summary

2min
page 7

2.3. Dialogic inquiry

2min
page 21

1.3 Methodology

2min
page 10

2.6 Bringing multiple ‘tools’ together

2min
page 24

1.5 Structure of the report

1min
page 16

Recommendations

2min
page 8
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.