Dialogical Teaching...

Page 16

Dialogic Inquiry

Moving across different ways of thinking, often experiencing the accompanying emotions and sense of body. Inquiry may range from posing questions and experimenting with possibilities to challenging long held assumptions. Inquiry encounters difference and requires the development of a sense of being comfortable with difference (Bound, 2010).

Knowledge coconstruction

Knowledge co-construction takes place in a problem space. The ‘space’ is defined by an activity’s goals and intent. The aim of knowledge coconstruction is to build shared agreement statements and applications of newly constructed knowledge.

Knowledge building

Knowledge building takes place in a community. The aim is developing understanding to advance knowledge, that is, continual deepening of understanding of ideas (Chai & Tan, 2009). Knowledge building require authentic problems drawing from the “world of human knowledge as its intellectual workspace” (Bereiter & Scardamalia, 2014, p.36).

1.5 Structure of the report The following chapter analyses the literature in relation to our research questions, concluding with some thoughts in relation to the third question – the implications for educators of the dialogical approach. The next two chapters set out the findings from each case – WPL and Performance and CSCL&KB. We titled the fifth chapter, ‘Rising above’ as here we put forward an explanation of how and why it is that students engage in deep learning using the dialogical approach. The concluding chapter sums up the implications with recommendations from the authors.

16


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

6.6 Specific Recommendations

1min
page 84

6.2 Developing educator capabilities

2min
page 81

6.5 The need for system change to support approaches such as dialogical teaching

2min
page 83

6.1 Individual educator agency

2min
page 80

Figure 6.2: Roles and metaphors of learning in relation to monologic and dialogic approaches

2min
page 79

Figure 6:1: Continuum from monologic to dialogic

2min
page 78

5.7. Challenges faced by learners and the educators

2min
page 74

6. Conclusion and Recommendations

2min
page 77

Figure 5.2: Concept map of the dialogic teaching and learning model

3min
pages 75-76

5.1. “Rising above’ the two case studies

1min
page 69

5. Rising Above

3min
page 68

4.5. Conclusion: Learning design, inquiry and knowledge building

5min
pages 65-67

Figure 4.5. Frequency count of notes at different phases of interaction for different sessions

6min
pages 63-64

Figure 4.4. Changes in conception of learning

2min
page 62

4.3. Awareness of dialogic inquiry process and metacognition

2min
page 57

4.2. Moving from didactic teaching (direct instruction) to dialogical teaching and learning

13min
pages 53-56

4.1. Learners’ perception of the values of dialogical teaching and learning

8min
pages 50-52

3.6. Conclusion: Relationship between learning activities, inquiry and knowledge building

5min
pages 45-47

Figure 3.7: Neil’s concept map

1min
page 44

Figure 3.5. Relationship between Reflection Types & Course Scores

1min
page 42

Table 3.2: Description for Reflection Types

2min
page 41

3.3. Changes in roles and responsibilities

6min
pages 34-35

3.4. Learners’ awareness of their own dialogical inquiry processes

3min
pages 36-37

3.2. Moving from monologic teaching experiences to dialogical teaching and learning

3min
page 33

3. Workplace Learning & Performance

2min
page 29

2.5. Knowledge co-construction

3min
page 23

2.2. The dialogical construction of meaning, and inquiry

5min
pages 19-20

Executive Summary

2min
page 7

2.3. Dialogic inquiry

2min
page 21

1.3 Methodology

2min
page 10

2.6 Bringing multiple ‘tools’ together

2min
page 24

1.5 Structure of the report

1min
page 16

Recommendations

2min
page 8
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.