SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2013
Vol. 81, No. 5
Teacher evaluations: On your mark. Get ready ...
PLUS: COLLABORATIVE LEARNING • IASB HISTORY PART V
ed, tested, reviewed, and refined.
member memoriams and milestones.
Gaining trust from professionals
“How a bill becomes law” out-
who are used to a very different eval-
lines the state legislative process and
uation process will be difficult, accord-
the labyrinth of tactics and antics
uch has already been writ-
ing to the author of “Opening
that each bill must survive to become
ten and said about the Per-
classroom doors to collaborative learn-
a Public Act. Considering that thou-
formance Evaluation Review Act
ing.” Insulated from peer inspection,
sands of bills are introduced each ses-
(PERA). Much more is forthcoming.
interference and interaction, some
sion of the Illinois General Assembly,
This issue of The Illinois School
teachers claim territorial rights over
this article gives an insider’s per-
Board Journal takes yet another look
the content mastery practiced in their
spective on legislative realities.
at the new state education reform law
domain. Forced to open their doors
“What went right: Telling school
that went into effect a year ago for
as if they belonged to them, the author
stories that don’t get reported” is this
many Chicago Public Schools and
claims that such teachers have diffi-
issue’s Practical PR feature. It exam-
will go into effect over a staggered,
culty articulating what they are doing,
ines the thousands of decisions and
three-year process for the rest of the
let alone how and why they are doing
actions that take place to assure a
state’s 858 public school districts.
it. Two best practices that school
smooth start to the new school year.
The articles chosen for this publica-
boards and administrators should
Another feature, “Turf and track
tion do not dwell on the definition or
consider to encourage the benefits
require research, planning and main-
requirements of PERA. In fact, IASB
of collaboration are learning walks
tenance,” examines the criteria to
has already outlined them in an easy-
and team teaching.
consider when upgrading or replac-
M
to-use FAQ-style document available
Ineffective evaluations are not
on its public website: http://www.
just a waste of time; they are a wast-
This month’s issue also contains
iasb.com/law/PERAoverview.pdf.
ed opportunity to improve student
the final installment of our year-long
(The Illinois State Board of Educa-
outcomes. That’s the conclusion of
series examining the history of the
tion also has a site dedicated to the
our third feature on the topic of PERA,
Association. “Centennial celebration,
subject: http://www.isbe.net/PERA/
“Lessons learned: Improving instruc-
part five” tracks the parallel trends
default.htm).
tion through teacher evaluation.”
of technology, tragedy and training
ing athletic field surfaces.
Still, there are many opinions
The author suggests that piloting new
in the 20-year period of 1993-2012.
being written about the impact of and
evaluation policies before they are
If recently elected school board mem-
preparation for teacher evaluations.
required will give teachers and admin-
bers want to know what the Associ-
“Implementing PERA? Get start-
istrators time to adapt without the
ation does and why, this article will
ed now!” suggests 12 steps that dis-
additional anxiety of potential high-
give them a current perspective on
tricts should begin to review in order
stakes decisions. This anxiety is shared
IASB products and services. Although
to gain the appropriate perspective
equally by teachers and principals
the series concludes with this issue,
on the purpose of the requirements.
but has the potential to be embraced
coverage of IASB’s 100-year anniver-
The author strongly suggests that the
when planned and managed effec-
sary will continue in the coming
“accuracy of the labeling” used in
tively by the administration, and sup-
months, both in print and online.
evaluations will determine in large
ported by the school board.
Many activities at this year’s Joint
part how successful the district’s eval-
For those who may suffer from
Annual Conference will focus on the
uation plan will be. For the new eval-
PERA overload, this issue of The Jour-
centennial, and are designed to invite
uation process to work effectively
nal also contains a variety of feature
participation from districts and indi-
and be trusted by the teachers and
articles on legislation, school public
viduals.
principals affected, it must be pilot-
relations, athletic fields, and board
TABLE OF CONTENTS
COVER STORY 12 | Implementing PERA? Get started now! Although the 2016 deadline for most school districts to implement the Performance Evaluation Reform Act (PERA) seems far away, districts would be wise to start now. Joseph J. Matula
18 | Opening classroom doors to collaborative learning To achieve a more equitable level of success and to enhance learning across the curriculum, teachers must open the doors to collaborative learning. Diallo Brown
22 | Lessons learned: Improving instruction through teacher evaluation With implementation of PERA, districts have a unique opportunity to create a teacher evaluation system that works and leads to improvement in student outcomes. Annie Filer and Sarah Dickson
FEATURE STORIES J
2 | Centennial celebration Technology, tragedy and testing transform educational landscape Three forces combined to make a significant impact on public education and school board governance over the past 20 years. Heath Hendren
8 | How a bill really becomes a law For the vast majority of bills that are introduced to the Illinois General Assembly, the usual course is followed. But, oh, the shenanigans that can happen on the way. Ben Schwarm
26 | Turf and track require research, planning and maintenance The selection of a new track or field and its installation can be fraught with missteps. Not all products are created equal, which is why proper planning, installation and maintenance is essential for safety and value. Jameson Sheley
U
L
Y
/
A
U
G
U
S
T
2
0
1
3
Vol. 81, No. 5 ILLINOIS SCHOOL BOARD JOURNAL (ISSN-0019-221X) is published every other month by the Illinois Association of School Boards, 2921 Baker Drive, Springfield, Illinois 62703-5929, telephone 217/528-9688. The IASB regional office is located at One Imperial Place, 1 East 22nd Street, Lombard, Illinois 601486120, telephone 630/629-3776. The JOURNAL is supported by the dues of school boards holding active membership in the Illinois Association of School Boards. Copies are mailed to all school board members and the superintendent in each IASB member school district. Non-member subscription rate: Domestic $18.00 per year. Foreign (including Canada and Mexico) $21.00 per year. PUBLICATION POLICY IASB believes that the domestic process functions best through frank and open discussion. Material published in the JOURNAL, therefore, often presents divergent and controversial points of view which do not necessarily represent the views or policies of IASB.
REGULAR FEATURES Practical PR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 Milestones . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 Ask the staff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inside back cover
James Russell, Associate Executive Director Linda Dawson, Editor Gary Adkins, Contributing Editor Dana Heckrodt, Advertising Manager
TOPICS FOR UPCOMING ISSUES November/December January/February
Member survey results Poverty’s impact
Cover by Corbin Design, Petersburg
FEATURE ARTICLE
Centennial celebration…
Technology, tragedy and testing transform educational landscape By Heath Hendren
Heath Hendren is assistant director of communications for the Illinois Association of School Boards.
4
W
here the “space race” of the
1950’s and 60’s spurred atten-
tion to the global importance of America’s educational success, the evolution of information access and communication methods in the 1990’s and the beginning of the 21st Century
Part V — 1993-2013 This is the fifth and final part in a year-long series detailing the history of the Illinois Association of School Boards, from its inception in 1913 through its 100th anniversary, to be commemorated on December 13, 2013.
cemented technology permanently into everyday teaching techniques.
for sure is that it will accelerate even
In the same time frame, two other
faster over the next 20 years.
it receives annually. Although much of the online con-
forces made a significant impact on
IASB followed suit and official-
tent is free, IASB also added a vari-
public education: intensified assess-
ly went online in 1995 via “Access
ety of fee-based services delivered
ments of student, teacher and school
Illinois.” The following year the Asso-
electronically, including a bookstore,
performance and a succession of his-
ciation launched its first webpage
meeting and workshop registrations,
toric violence and human tragedies
on the “World Wide Web.” The IASB
policy information and updating ser-
in bigger, bolder and personal dimen-
website grew substantially over the
vices, publishing local school board
sions.
next 10 years – from several dozen
policy manuals, and a paperless meet-
In an article titled “Changing
pages to several hundred. By the
ing and document service.
School Boards in a Changing Soci-
time the content had grown to more
Economic conditions fluctuated
ety” in the 1993 July/August issue of
than 1,500 live pages, a complete
greatly from 1993 to 2013, which, in
The Illinois School Board Journal,
redesign of www.iasb.com was
turn, resulted in a wide swing in state
the author asserted, “We may be just
launched in 2007. This was soon fol-
funding levels for public schools. The
beginning to understand how tech-
lowed by the introduction of a pass-
two decades saw major economic
nology will change us. Or perhaps we
word-protected, members-only
recessions and a financial surge dur-
still don’t have a clue.” The profound
website. The new website gave mem-
ing the “dot.com” boom years. For
nature of this statement accurately
bers access to personal database
example, while public school fund-
predicted the phenomenal impact
information and supplemented oth-
ing rose by a $400 million increase
that personal computers, laptops and
er member services with new inter-
in 1997, more recent state budgets
tablets; the Internet, cable TV and
active tools and features, such as
have been less kind to local school
social media; and mobile phones,
personal conference schedule plan-
budgets, and have pro-rated payments
messaging, and personal applications
ners and downloadable conference
below allocated amounts. The annu-
would have in households and class-
handouts. The importance of the
al push-pull debate over who pays
rooms. Education technology is evolv-
Association’s web presence is reflect-
how much has escalated as the state’s
ing at warp speed, and all we know
ed by the 1 million-plus page views
financial condition has drastically
THE ILLINOIS SCHOOL BOARD JOURNAL / SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 2013
eroded in recent years. Maintain-
mission statement to refine its pur-
ing funding and minimizing mandates
pose: “The mission of the Illinois
has been an ongoing mantra for the
Association of School Boards is excel-
Association and other school man-
lence in local school governance and
agement organizations.
support of public education.” (The
In 1993, IASB joined forces with
mission statement was revised once
the Illinois Association of School
in 2012 to state: “The mission of the
Administrators (IASA), the Illinois
Illinois Association of School Boards
Principals Association (IPA) and the
is excellence in local school gover-
Illinois Association of School Busi-
nance in support of quality public
ness Officials (Illinois ASBO) to form
education.”) The following year, IASB
the Illinois Statewide School Man-
reorganized its internal structure to
agement Alliance. The Alliance was
better align with the mission state-
formed to allow each organization
ment. This included additional field
the ability to better focus resources
support to member districts and cre-
in a collaborative effort aimed at pro-
ation of an advocacy department,
ducing policies that improve Illinois’
uniting government relations func-
educational climate.
tions with public relations duties. In
The Alliance remains in near
addition, the Association combined
constant communication with state
field services, policy services and
government agencies and offices,
communications under the title of
including the Illinois State Board of
member services.
Education, Senate and House edu-
Amid the internal changes, the
cation committees and the gover-
state decided to consolidate elec-
nor’s office. In addition to providing
tions. In 1999, school board elec-
accurate and timely information on
tions were moved from November
legislative and regulatory activities
to April of odd-numbered years,
and providing a cohesive school man-
resulting in the elimination of the
agement voice in the Capitol, the
non-partisan election date. The date
Alliance has helped to forge addi-
change created a lengthy conver-
tional opportunities for each orga-
sion process that resulted in a sev-
nization to share services and extend
en-month gap from the election to
benefits to local school districts. The
seating of board members. In turn,
partnership has grown as the demand
this also meant a seven-month delay
for services expanded, and now
in which unseated members would
includes dozens of sponsored pro-
remain on the board. The change
grams and cooperative ventures.
affected the next two elections, so
Article 23 of the School Code
that the first “normal” election and
states that IASB exists to enable: “The
seating of board members did not
education of school board members
occur until 2003.
as to their duties and responsibilities
The disruptions of school board
so as to improve the management of
elections would pale in comparison
the public schools.” In the early 1990’s,
to the number of violent attacks and
the IASB Board of Directors adopt-
human tragedies that occurred in the
ed a policy governance model for its
last two decades.
governance structure. In 1995, the
In 1995, the federal building in
board of directors adopted a formal
Oklahoma City was destroyed by a
SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 2013 / THE ILLINOIS SCHOOL BOARD JOURNAL
President Carolyne Brooks
Treasurer Dale Hansen
Vice President Karen Fisher
Immediate Past President Joseph Alesandrini
BOARD OF DIRECTORS Abe Lincoln Lisa Weitzel
Lake County Joanne Osmond
Blackhawk Jackie Mickley
Northwest Ben Andersen
Central Illinois Valley Thomas Neeley
Shawnee Roger Pfister
Cook North Phil Pritzker
Southwestern Rob Luttrell
Cook South Val Densmore
Starved Rock Simon Kampwerth Jr.
Cook West Frank Mott
Three Rivers Dale Hansen
Corn Belt Mark Harms
Two Rivers David Barton
DuPage Rosemary Swanson Egyptian John Metzger Illini Michelle Skinlo Kaskaskia Linda Eades
Wabash Valley Tim Blair Western Sue McCance Chicago Board Jesse Ruiz Service Associates Steve Larson
Kishwaukee Mary Stith
IASB is a voluntary association of local boards of education and is not affiliated with any branch of government.
5
Schools played an extremely impor-
ed that one of the most effective defens-
IASB presidents
tant role in bringing normalcy back
es against internal school violence is
to communities, and ensuring chil-
to pay attention to students and heed
1994-95
Stanton Morgan, Bismarck
dren and other residents had a famil-
early warning signs of emotional dis-
1996-98
Jay Tovian, Villa Park
iar, comfortable place where they felt
tress.
1999-00
E. Jerald Eiffert, Mt. Zion
2001
Dennis McConville, Peru
2002-03
Christie Coleman, Geneseo
2004-05
Raymond Zimmerman, Flanagan
tional support for children who
Elementary School in Newtown, Con-
2006-07
Marie Slater, Wheaton
watched the tragic events of that day
necticut, killing 20 kindergarten and
unfold. Many teachers also used 9/11
first grade students and six faculty
More recently, the country was
the 2001 November/December issue
stunned with another mass school
of The Journal, the editor wrote about
shooting. On December 14, 2012, an
schools being the front line of emo-
adult gunman entered Sandy Hook
2008-09
Mark C. Metzger, Aurora
as a learning experience, not only in
members. Both tragedies moved the
2010-11
Joseph Alesandrini, Pekin
a historical context, but as an avenue
national debate on gun use and own-
Carolyne Brooks, Noble
to spur discussion on intolerance and
ership, and the balance of public safe-
hate.
ty and personal rights.
2012-13
bomb placed by a domestic terrorist. The bombing claimed the lives of 168 people, including many young children. The rapid dissemination of images and information made it nearly impossible to shield children from exposure to such material. This prompted a discussion of how schools should inform and address students when such devastating, and obviously emotional, events take place during the school day. Nothing, however, could prepare schools, teachers, students, or parents for the emotional impact that engulfed the nation on September 11, 2001. The international terrorist attacks in New York City, Washington, D.C., and Pennsylvania devastated the country in a way not seen since the Dec. 7, 1941, bombing of Pearl Harbor. But the attacks on September 11th also served to bring Americans together over a common bond. The partisan issues that routinely divided us were put to the side. In its place emerged a new spirit and bond that would show a perseverance that had not been seen for several generations. 6
safe. In “The Front Page” section of
School boards looked further at
Balance is also the watchword of
security measures and the develop-
the third and final trend of the past
ment of new emergency procedures
20 years.
and policies. Many schools looked
The most significant change in
toward security assessments and rou-
classrooms, teaching and learning
tine inspections of school grounds to
has been the ever- increasing demand
identify potential risks. Others focused
for accountability, in order to increase
on new security methods, such as
student achievement and close
video monitors and motion sensors,
achievement gaps. State and federal
and updated their emergency pro-
agencies, responding to a measured
cedures to ensure they conformed
and loud call from political and pri-
with modern day threats.
vate special interests, began to impose
As secure as schools are made to
new demands on performance, test-
be, they remain vulnerable to those
ing and standards. The additional
who insist on invasion and destruc-
pressure put districts large and small
tion. The two most notable school
into a defensive mode that continues
violence events occurred 13 years
to threaten public support for public
apart. The first tragedy came April
schools.
21, 1999, when two students entered
The Illinois State Board of Edu-
a Littleton, Colorado, high school and
cation in 1997 adopted comprehen-
executed 14 children and one teacher,
sive learning standards for what Illinois
leaving another 28 wounded. The
students must learn in English, lan-
Columbine tragedy was examined
guage arts, mathematics, science,
exhaustively and resulted in a height-
social studies, physical development
ened awareness of and training in
and health, and the fine arts. In 1999,
anti-bullying and tolerance policies.
the Illinois Standards Achievement
The Journal published an article in
Test (ISAT) was first administered
the 1999 May/June issue titled, “Vio-
statewide in order to gauge student
lence in Colorado – Could it Happen
learning in relation to the newly adopt-
Here?” that looked at ways to improve
ed learning standards. And in 2001,
school safety. The finding suggest-
all eleventh grade students in Illinois
THE ILLINOIS SCHOOL BOARD JOURNAL / SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 2013
were required to take the Prairie State
(NCLB) Act of 2001 was enacted by
promote non-public alternatives,
Achievement Examination (PSAE).
Congress to support standards-based
such as vouchers and charter schools.
A 1999 feature story in the March/April
education reform, and significantly
In 2010, the Illinois State Board
issue of The Journal titled, “21st Cen-
expanded the federal role in pub-
of Education adopted the new, more
tury Schools,” spoke to the impor-
lic education through annual test-
rigorous and internationally-bench-
tance of performance-based learning
ing, annual academic progress, report
marked “Common Core Standards”
assessments, noting that there are
cards, teacher qualifications, and
in English, language arts and math.
no upper limits on learning achieve-
funding changes. Many states, includ-
Common Core Standards are bench-
ment and emphasized the signifi-
ing Illinois, saw an increasing num-
marks developed by a national con-
cance of what students are actually
ber of school districts “fail” the federal
sortium with the aim to bring more
absorbing versus simply the amount
testing standards and ultimately
consistency and uniformity to what
of time a student spends at a class-
appealed to seek waivers from the
students learn at each grade level
room desk.
mandates. The struggle for many
from one state to another. This led
At the same time, the federal
schools and districts to meet “Annu-
to even greater demands for account-
government was increasing its
al Yearly Progress” benchmarks
ability and classroom intervention,
demand on not only what schools
became the basis for the public to
most recently in Illinois, with the
tested, but ultimately what and how
grade and compare its schools, in
enactment of SB 7 education reform
they taught. The No Child Left Behind
order to create an opportunity to
act in 2011. This law for the first
7 Seven
FRIDAY WORKSHOPS
at the
2013 81st IASB•IASA•IASBO
CORE CREDIT WORKSHOPS • *The Basics of Governance • The Basics of School District Finance • The Board’s First Responsibility: Detecting and Communicating a Compelling Vision • Professional Development Leadership Training (PDLT) and Performance Evaluation Reform Act (PERA) Training for School Board Members
ELECTIVE CREDIT WORKSHOPS • Leading Leaders: The Job of the Board President • Tough Talking: Initiating and Managing Tough Conversations (Half day) • Leadership by Design (Half day)
Joint Annual Conference November 22, 2013 • Sheraton Chicago Hotel SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 2013 / THE ILLINOIS SCHOOL BOARD JOURNAL
7
time mandated school board train-
remains unclear how effective man-
Responding to and anticipating
ing and allowed school districts to
dated training will be, it is apparent
member needs has been a hallmark
evaluate teachers on student per-
that most school board members
of the Association throughout its 100
formance.
were ready to comply with the new
years. One of the most ambitious ini-
IASB responded quickly, offer-
mandates, as new board member
tiatives was launched in the mid-
ing new training options at region-
training numbers in 2013 reached
1990’s, in response to the IASB Board
al workshops, its annual conference
new levels of participation and atten-
of Directors’ policy governance work
and with online courses. Although it
dance.
and the association’s new mission statement. The IASB staff engaged in a comprehensive study of policy governance and other governance models and ultimately developed the IASB “Foundational Principles of Effective Governance.” These prin-
STAFF OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Roger L. Eddy, Executive Director Benjamin S. Schwarm, Deputy Executive Director Meetings Management Patricia Culler, Assistant to the Executive Director Carla S. Bolt, Director-designee Sandy Boston, Assistant Director Office of General Counsel Melinda Selbee, General Counsel Kimberly Small, Assistant General Counsel Executive Searches Donna Johnson, Director Doug Blair, Consultant Thomas Leahy, Consultant Dave Love, Consultant ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Jennifer Feld, Associate Executive Director/Chief Financial Officer ADVOCACY/ GOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS Benjamin S. Schwarm, Deputy Executive Director Deanna L. Sullivan, Director Susan Hilton, Director Zach Messersmith, Assistant Director Advocacy Cynthia Woods, Director
BOARD DEVELOPMENT/ TARGETING ACHIEVEMENT THROUGH GOVERNANCE Dean Langdon, Associate Executive Director Board Development Sandra Kwasa, Director Nesa Brauer, Consultant Angie Peifer, Consultant Targeting Achievement through Governance Steve Clark, Consultant COMMUNICATIONS James Russell, Associate Executive Director Gary W. Adkins, Director/Editorial Linda Dawson, Director/Editorial Jennifer Nelson, Director, Information Services Heath Hendren, Assistant Director/ Communications Gerald R. Glaub, Consultant Diane M. Cape, Production Services Consultant FIELD SERVICES/POLICY SERVICES Cathy A. Talbert, Associate Executive Director Field Services Larry Dirks, Director Reatha Owen, Director Patrick Rice, Director Jeff Cohn, Director Barbara B. Toney, Director Laurel DiPrima, Director Policy Services Anna Lovern, Director Nancy Bohl, Consultant Brian Zumpf, Consultant
ciples established a philosophy that has informed and aligned all Association products and services since that time. The document represents the cornerstone of IASB’s beliefs about the role and responsibilities of the school board. The six principles – clarify the district purpose, connect with the community, employ a superintendent, delegate authority, monitor
performance,
and
take
responsibility for itself – were designed to clearly and coherently articulate the role of school board members as trustees for their communities and serve as an overarching guide to effective school board governance. The principles are used throughout all IASB board training. As IASB services and staff continued to expand from one decade to the next, it was apparent that the Association would need more office and storage space. In 2003, IASB moved its headquarters to a new building on the south side of Springfield. Built entirely with budget reserves, the new facility was expanded again two years later to accommodate new
IASB OFFICES 2921 Baker Drive Springfield, Illinois 62703-5929 217/528-9688 Fax 217/528-2831 www.iasb.com 8
One Imperial Place 1 East 22nd Street, Suite 20 Lombard, Illinois 60148-6120 630/629-3776 Fax 630/629-3940
services and staffing. In fact, over the 20-year span between 1993 and 2013, IASB initiated a wide variety of new services and products. Some of the
THE ILLINOIS SCHOOL BOARD JOURNAL / SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 2013
more notable start-ups include PRESS
recent years. In 2011, 85 percent
(1993), school design data file and
of IASB member districts were rep-
EEE (1996), Targeting Student Learn-
resented at the three-day event. Mem-
ing (1998), Illinois Energy Consor-
bership in the Association is another
tium (1999), Board Governance
measure of IASB’s value to local school
Review (2002), School Board Lead-
districts. As of this report, 852 of the
erShop (2002), The Essentials of Illi-
state’s 859 public school districts are
nois School Finance (2002), School
dues-paying members of the Associ-
Board Policies Online (2002), PRESS
ation.
Plus (2003), BoardBook (2004), Tar-
From 1993 to 2013, IASB has
geting Achievement Through Gov-
been served by three executive direc-
ernance or TAG (2004), “Weighing
tors. Each brought a unique style
Healthier Options” report (2004),
that has allowed IASB to progress
and the Online Learning Center
and grow to better serve the needs
(2009).
of members. The late Wayne Samp-
Over the course of the past 20
son served from 1989 to 2000, fol-
years, the Association has been reg-
lowed by Michael D. Johnson from
ularly surveying its membership. In
2000 to 2012, and Roger Eddy, who
addition to answering questions about
was named the CEO on July 1, 2012
how much time they spend on board
and continues to serve as executive
work and the number of years they
director today. The 100 years of suc-
have served, board members partic-
cess at IASB can be attributed to a
ipating in the survey were asked ques-
number of factors, but a passage from
tions about their demographics, their
the 2012 Annual Report may sum it
district, their reasons for running for
up best.
the board, their views of education
“Continuity and excellence of
and a myriad of questions designed
service is what drives this Associa-
to elicit preferences for receiving
tion. IASB is poised to meet the chal-
information and professional devel-
lenges of the future. But one thing
opment from IASB. Administered
won’t change. ‘Excellence in local
originally in 1993, the surveys have
school governance in support of qual-
been conducted every five years, with
ity public education.’ That’s our mis-
the latest occurring in early 2013.
sion today; that will be our mission
Results of both the board member
for years to come.”
and superintendent surveys have
This concludes the five-part
been posted on the IASB website for
series reviewing the 100-year his-
all to share. (An analysis of the 2013
tory of the Illinois Association of
survey results and previous surveys
School Boards. A commemorative
will be reported in the November-
book will be published in early 2014
December issue of The Illinois School
containing this series, additional
Board Journal.)
interviews, recognition of signifi-
Another measure of IASB’s suc-
cant events and people, a chronol-
cess has been attendance at and par-
ogy of U.S. and Illinois education
ticipation in the Joint Annual
issues, and various lists, photos and
Conference. Initiated in 1915, the
artifacts relevant to the centenni-
annual conference has seen atten-
al.
Welcome New
superintendents
And congratulations on your new position. As you settle in, many questions may arise, including the following: • How are board policies being implemented? • Are administrative procedures up to date? • Are the administrative procedures in alignment with board policy? You will be happy to know that IASB Policy Services offers a process that is designed to help district administrators provide the procedures necessary to assure implementation of and alignment with board policy. An IASB Policy Consultant will provide a draft administrative procedures manual based upon sample procedures and exhibits as found in the IASB Policy Reference Manual, and customized according to the requirements of the district’s policy manual. The Consultant will then work with the administrative team to customize the draft manual to align with district practice. This task can be accomplished in no more than TWO MEETINGS. For more information, visit www.iasb.com/policy or call 217/528/9688, ext. 1125 or 630/629-3776, ext. 1214
dance top 12,000 participants in SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 2013 / THE ILLINOIS SCHOOL BOARD JOURNAL
9
FEATURE ARTICLE
How a bill really becomes a law by Ben Schwarm
Ben Schwarm is IASB deputy executive director and heads the governmental relations team for the Association. His article originally appeared in the Spring 2013 issue of the Illinois Association
“I’m just a bill
Rock bill never came to Springfield
Yes I’m only a bill.
to get mugged by a rules committee,
For the vast majority of bills that
And I’m sitting here on Capitol
stuffed into a “shell bill,” and tacked
are introduced, the usual course is
onto a provision in a 1,000-page
followed. A bill in a spring legislative
Well, it’s a long, long journey
“BIMP” bill that was voted on virtu-
session in Springfield will be:
To the capital city,
ally sight unseen.
• Introduced in either the House or
Hill.
But I know I’ll be a law someday At least I hope and pray that I
Update Magazine.
10
What textbooks will tell you Section eight under Article IV of
• Read into the record on three separate days
the Constitution of the State of Illi-
• Considered by a committee
nois succinctly expresses what must
• Sent to the chamber floor
happen for the passage of bills in our
If approved, it is sent to the oppo-
state. A bill may originate in either
site chamber to repeat the same drill
the Senate or the House of Repre-
there. The process without any expe-
For the most part, the legendary
sentatives, must be “read by title on
ditious treatment will take about three
(at least for folks my age) “I’m Just a
three different days” in each cham-
months.
Bill” skit from Schoolhouse Rock in
ber, and must have approval of a major-
the 1970s is pretty accurate here in
ity of the members elected in each
Illinois. A bill must make it through
chamber before being sent to the gov-
two legislative chambers and be signed
ernor for his consideration. Sounds
Where does a bill
into law by the chief executive whether
simple enough.
really come from?
will, But today I am still just a bill.”*
of School Business Officials’
Senate
It’s a long, long wait While I’m sitting in committee,
and will explore that a little later.
But who wants to hear about that boring process?
in Congress in Washington, D.C., or
Beyond the constitution, there
Sometimes the idea for a piece
in the Illinois General Assembly in
are a few other hurdles for legislation
of legislation actually comes from the
Springfield.
to navigate. Both the Illinois House
legislator who introduces it. Mostly,
But, oh, the shenanigans that can
of Representatives and the Illinois
though, the idea has come from a con-
happen on the way. That School House
Senate have their own “General
stituent who has had a problem nav-
Assembly Rules” that they adopt and
igating the state’s bureaucracy, from
* Schoolhouse Rock, B. Dorough, L.
that must, generally be followed. This
an interest group or lobbyist, or from
Ahrens, D. Frishberg, R. Mendoza, Amer-
includes the use of committees and
some other think tank or organiza-
ican Broadcasting Company, Buena Vista
certain timelines that must be met.
tion that the legislator belongs to.
Home Entertainment (Firm) (2002),
The exception, of course, is when
My favorite is when a legislator
Schoolhouse Rock!, Burbank, California,
the legislators decide that they don’t
says (this is much more common
distributed by Buena Vista Home Enter-
want to follow their rules, which is
to hear from a congressman in D.C.)
tainment.
always an option too. But I digress
that “I wrote the bill that … .”In
THE ILLINOIS SCHOOL BOARD JOURNAL / SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 2013
Well, now I’m stuck in
my 27 years working in and around
committee decides which substan-
the Capitol, I’ve never known a leg-
tive committee to send a bill. Some-
islator who actually “wrote the bill.”
times a bill is never assigned to a “real
And I’ll sit here and wait
Legislators certainly make leg-
committee” and languishes forever
While a few key Congressmen
islation happen, but it is staff, lawyers
in “Rules” or “COA.” This is the first
and lobbyists who usually do the actu-
ironclad gatekeeping device for the
al writing. And in Springfield, truly
majority party.
only the lawyers at the Legislative
The General Assembly Rules also
Reference Bureau (LRB) write the
require that a new bill be “posted”
official bill that is considered in the
for a committee hearing at least six
Capitol.
days before the bill will actually be
committee
discuss and debate Whether they should let me be a law. How I hope and pray that they will, But today I am still just a bill.”
considered by the committee. This
Second reading and
Legislative committees and rules,
is an attempt at transparency and for
legislative time travel
and how to get around them
the public to become aware of leg-
After a bill is discharged from a
islation before the first vote is taken.
committee, it goes back to the cham-
And, really, this works pretty well.
ber floor and is read into the record
The General Assembly Rules in both the House and Senate versions allow for the use of committees.
Amendments, however, only need
for a second time. Second reading is
Standing committees are named in
a one-hour posting notice before a
the amendment stage — the only time
each chamber generally by subject
committee hearing. Things can start
a bill can be amended. Many times
matter. So, for instance, a bill that
to get a little sketchy about this point
the proposed amended language has
proposes to change the provision in
as legislation can be “fast-tracked”
already been agreed to in the com-
the School Code regarding high school
by deliberately attaching legislative
mittee hearing, but officially, the
graduation requirements would like-
language to a bill by amendment, thus
amendment is added on second read-
ly be sent to the education commit-
avoiding the “sunshine” of the six-
ing on the chamber floor. Bills that
tee in the Senate or the elementary
day posting requirement.
the sponsor knows still need some
and secondary education committee
The real problem with the Gen-
additional work could sit on the “cal-
eral Assembly Rules is that they are
endar” (the House/Senate agenda)
When a bill is drafted and intro-
just that: rules. They’re not in the
for weeks waiting to be amended.
duced, it will be “read into the record”
constitution, or in state statute, but
But here again is a time ripe for
in the chamber of origin. In the Sen-
in a resolution adopted by each indi-
questionable antics. The reason for
ate, for example, there will be a day
vidual chamber. So, upon occasion,
the three separate readings of a bill
when the secretary of the Senate (an
the chamber can just vote to “waive
appointed position selected by the
the rule requirement” if a majority
Senate president) actually stands at
of the chamber doesn’t want to fol-
the podium (the “well” as it is called
low that particular rule that day. For
by insiders) and reads the title of hun-
instance, they might want to consider
dreds of newly introduced bills into
a bill in committee that has not met
a microphone before a usually total-
the six-day posting requirement, or
ly empty chamber: “SB 230, a bill
better yet, they just want to send a
regarding education; SB 231, a bill
bill directly to the chamber floor that
regarding transportation” and so on.
has never had a committee hear-
The clerk of the House does the same
ing. If a majority of the members vote
thing in that chamber.
to do it, it is done. That is the pow-
in the House.
After the initial reading, the bill
er of the majority party.
is sent to the committee on assign-
“I’m just a bill
ment in the Senate — in the House,
Yes I’m only a bill,
they call it the rules committee. This
And I got as far as Capitol Hill.
SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 2013 / THE ILLINOIS SCHOOL BOARD JOURNAL
“This is a ‘book satchel.’ Kids used ‘em before there were backpacks ... Now, this was in OLDEN days.” 11
is to ward against someone jamming
and simply correcting a small glitch
to take action on the bill. So gener-
through an idea all in the same day.
in the legislation. But the practice
ally, a bill is introduced in January,
Theoretically, if a bill is amended on
can allow for a deliberate skirting
the legislature meets in March and
second reading, it couldn’t be voted
of the rules by tacking on a new or
April to hold its committee hearings
on for final passage until the next day
controversial amendment and get an
and adjournment is the end of May
at the earliest (when the bill would
immediate floor vote before allowing
when most bills are called for final
have its third reading). But the sus-
the public to comment.
passage. The bills are sent to the governor in June and he has until August
pension of time and time travel is a regularly occurring phenomenon
Shell bills and other
to act. If the governor vetoes a bill, it
in the state Capitol.
questionable procedures
is taken up in the Veto Session in
Many times a bill will be moved
Sometimes the entire process is
November and December. So it takes
from second reading to third reading
ignored from the start. Since there
about a year for the entire legislative
properly, on separate days. But maybe
is a procedure for amendment, and
process. And that is how most legis-
a week later in the sponsor decides
this requires a shorter hearing notice
lation is handled.
the bill needs another amendment
posting and therefore an opportu-
But what about the bill that was
so the bill is “brought back to second
nity for fewer people to see language
written and submitted as a confer-
reading.” Now it can be amended.
before it is adopted, there are legis-
ence committee report (the final agree-
However, and I am not making this
lators who deliberately opt for this
ment between the two chambers when
up, the House clerk merely announces
route.
each had different language for a bill),
that the bill “has been read a second
They will introduce a “shell bill,”
approved by both houses, sent to the
time previously” and the bill can be
a piece of legislation that contains no
governor, vetoed, had the veto over-
amended on second reading and called
substantive language but is moved
ridden, and became a law all in the
for a vote on third reading — final
through the process for later use. It
same afternoon? It really happened;
passage state — not only the same
might change the word “the” to “a”
it was the 2.2 pension enhancement
day but in a matter of minutes.
or “10” to “ten” in the Pension Code.
bill in 1998. And they even had a “bill
Say the bill is approved by a House
signing” ceremony that afternoon
committee and then the full House
when the governor actually amenda-
and is sent to the Senate. It is dis-
torily vetoed the bill? That is when
charged by the Senate committee still
you say “the bill was greased” as it
in the non-substantive form. Then
moves quickly through the process
on the Senate floor, an amendment
with no resistance.
The tactic in most cases is benign
IASB SERVICE ASSOCIATES The best of everything for schools
is added to raise the retirement age in TRS to age 75. The bill is more than half-way through the process before anyone knew what the bill would ultimately do. Granted, it would need a couple of more votes, but in this scenario
12
Yes, I’m only a bill And if they vote for me on Capitol Hill Well, then I’m off to the White House
those votes could be taken in a mat-
Where I’ll wait in a line
ter of hours instead of days or weeks.
With a lot of other bills For the president to sign
What does the governor do? This is not a rhetorical question.
IASB Service Associates provide quality products and services for schools. Membership is by invitation only. A list of Service Associate firms is on the IASB Web site and in this Journal.
Only in Illinois. “I’m just a bill
Once a bill is approved by both chambers, the house of origin has 30 days to send the legislation to the governor. The governor, then, has 60 days
And if he signs me, then I’ll be a law. How I hope and pray that he will, But today I am still just a bill.”
THE ILLINOIS SCHOOL BOARD JOURNAL / SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 2013
COVER STORY
Implementing PERA? Get started now! by Joseph J. Matula
Joseph J. Matula is a Performance Evaluation Advisory Council member and associate professor at Governors State University
A
lthough the 2016 deadline for
the tasks involved. These are not steps
The law has mandated a summa-
most school districts to imple-
that can be passed on to the joint
tive evaluative rating be assigned to
ment the Performance Evaluation
committee or that can wait until 2015.
every teacher. This label must be
Reform Act (PERA) seems pretty far
Districts need to start now!
assigned to each teacher’s performance on a one-or two-year cycle
away, districts would be wise to start now. How hard can it be, you may ask? Well, following is a list of pro-
1. Understand the true purpose of PERA.
depending on tenure status. Therefore, the primary focus of any joint
cedures that will lead to the devel-
The initial phase of any process
committee is the creation of a plan
opment of a district’s plan. It is not
that will lead to the creation of a new
that ends up making the labeling of
all inclusive, as one can think of some-
teacher evaluation plan is to become
teachers as accurate as possible. Don’t
thing else that needs to be done as
familiar with the primary purpose of
underestimate this last sentence: It’s
soon as you grasp the complexity of
the law prompting its development.
all about the accuracy of the labeling! Some districts may want a system that creates an incentive for a teacher to get to the highest rating available. They may want to be stingy with high ratings so teachers will work and work to reach it. In other words, they want a system that will make the rating a reward for which teachers can strive to reach. On the other hand, other districts may want a system that can be used to remove teachers they believe are inadequate. They want a system that gives them the authority to assign a rating that can lead to the termination of teachers who have been identified as unsatisfactory. Neither position represents the purpose of PERA. The purpose of PERA is to arrive at accurate labeling of teachers as either Excellent,
14
THE ILLINOIS SCHOOL BOARD JOURNAL / SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 2013
Proficient, Needs Improvement, or
It brings to light the second pur-
state model is mandated only with
Unsatisfactory. The primary point of
pose of assessment and this is the for-
respect to the student growth part of
PERA is to accurately evaluate teach-
mative one. Using assessments to see
the evaluation model, not the pro-
ers so the consequences of Senate
what students have learned or didn’t
fessional practice part.
Bill 7 can be fairly applied. It’s a two-
learn makes a teacher analyze why
Robert Marzano also has creat-
step process.
students didn’t learn what they were
ed an evaluation framework. They
Recently, the state superinten-
supposed to, and guides the teacher
are similar in that both have four
dent of Idaho, in reference to the
as they make adjustments. Piloting
domains: Planning and Preparation,
national trend of laws diluting the
these assessments will make teach-
The Classroom Environment, Instruc-
protection of tenure, similar to Sen-
ers better and more involved in the
tion, and Professional Responsibili-
ate Bill 7, said, “Good teachers should-
coming process of assessing student
ties for Danielson; and Classroom
n’t be worried.” That is how many
growth.
Strategies and Behaviors, Preparing and Planning, Reflection on Teach-
administrators think. What teachers would like to add to that quote is, “Good teachers shouldn’t be wor-
3. Select or create a professional practice framework.
ing,
and
Collegiality
and
Professionalism for Marzano. They
ried, IF they receive accurate rat-
The professional practice por-
are very different in that Danielson
ings.” What the Idaho state
tion of the whole teacher evaluation
apportions equal shares to each domain
superintendent should really have
process is what teachers are most
while the Marzano model apportions
said is, “Good teachers have noth-
familiar with and what has been used
greater weight to the Classroom Strate-
ing to worry about, IF good teach-
to evaluate them in the past. PERA
gies and Behaviors domain. Thus, the
ers are identified as being good
does not mandate the framework
Danielson model is not the only game
teachers.” Only after the accuracy
or criteria against which teachers will
in town.
of assigning labels to teachers is trust-
be observed other than that it be
Some school districts may con-
ed by the teachers can the conse-
research-based, include a teacher’s
sider tweaking or changing parts of
quences of Senate Bill 7 take effect.
attendance, planning, instructional
the Danielson framework, but keep
methods, classroom management,
in mind it must be research-based.
where relevant, competency in the
If any change to the Danielson Frame-
Before beginning the joint com-
subject matter taught, the standards
work destroys the research-based
mittee’s 180-day bargaining period,
to which that teacher is expected
aspect, a school district could be open
the most productive activity in which
to conform, specification as to the
to a challenge down the road if a dis-
to engage is to pilot assessments. In
teacher’s strengths and weaknesses,
missed teacher says the school dis-
other words, teachers should get
with supporting reasons for the com-
trict did not follow the law. One
together with their grade level or sub-
ments made, and is aligned with the
important thing to note however, is
ject area colleagues and begin to write
Illinois Professional Teaching Stan-
that the research-based aspect is with
common assessments that reflect the
dards.
respect to effective instruction. There-
2. Pilot, pilot, pilot assessments.
most critical skills and content that
The Performance Evaluation
fore, if a district is tweaking Daniel-
their students should know and be
Advisory Council (PEAC) has select-
son and doesn’t lose the connection
able to do. These are Type II assess-
ed the Charlotte Danielson Frame-
to the instructional research, it should
ments. Even though teachers have
work as the one to be used in the
be okay.
been writing assessments their whole
Illinios state model. It is well researched
careers, these are different. These
and a very comprehensive option.
can determine keeping one’s job. This
However, any school district that may
opportunity to pilot or practice forces
end up using the state model because
Although current practicing
teachers to analyze what is really
it couldn’t agree on its evaluation
administrators have been evaluating
important about their students’ edu-
process with its teacher’s union is
teachers for years, using the Daniel-
cation and experiment how to assess
not obligated to use the Danielson
son rubric is different. It can be an
it.
model. For these school districts, the
elusive, subjective, arbitrary, and ran-
SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 2013 / THE ILLINOIS SCHOOL BOARD JOURNAL
4. Practice, practice, practice the Framework
15
dom process. Administrators need
whether the evaluator is skilled in
will be another layer of tests. Just
to know how to accurately code teach-
the grade level or subject area being
how much testing can students take?
ing behaviors and teachers need to
reviewed. Is it possible to tap into the
know what teaching behaviors will
resource of multiple evaluators to
earn certain point values or rating
address this? One state utilizes a pool
dance requirements for the use
labels. The use of this rubric should
of retired educators who are hired on
of student growth.
be practiced and shared with teach-
a per observation basis. Often, these
Since it would be unfair to hold
ers by saying, “Here is what earns
are educators with specialized knowl-
a teacher accountable for something
you a 3 or a 4 score.” For this eval-
edge who can supplement an evalu-
over which he/she has no control,
uation process to work, teachers need
ator’s observation of the teaching with
some school districts may establish
to trust it. For teachers to trust it,
one focused solely on the content.
a cut-off as to what student data will
they must know what teaching behavior earns the point values contained in the rubric. In other words, teach-
be counted. In the principal evalua6. Analyze the definition of student growth.
tion plan, student data will be counted as long as there are two data points
ers need explicit feedback as to what
Review the state’s definition of
using assessments covering the same
they are doing right and what they
student growth. This is a step that
content. Teachers have a much small-
are doing wrong.
should take considerable time. Ana-
er sample. They may likely have sam-
lyze the advantages and disadvan-
ple sizes fewer than 20 students. A
tages of various assessments and
few chronically absent students can
professional practice will be
alternative ways student growth can
be a big chunk of a teacher’s class.
collected.
be measured. The concept of Value
How fair is it to judge a teacher’s teach-
5. Determine how evidence of
16
7. Establish the student atten-
Districts need to establish the
Added Measures should be reviewed.
ing performance when some students
notice timelines for the pre-confer-
In light of the student growth dis-
have only been present 80 percent
ence prior to formal observations,
cussion, another tough issue to address
of the time. One may think that 80
whether more than the minimum
is student motivation. Student moti-
percent is a very high percentage but
number of formal observations will
vation will be critical to ensure all
not when the state’s average atten-
be included, the timelines for the
students put forth the maximum effort
dance rate is 95 percent. In other
post-conference, the minimum num-
in each assessment. Students are not
words, if a child misses one day of
ber of informal observations, the feed-
robots that one can command, “Put
school every week, that’s a tremen-
back method for the informal
forth maximum effort.”
dous amount of instruction to miss.
observations, and the collection,
Students’ effort is best ensured
An idea that may provide some help
analysis, and feedback procedures
if the tests are meaningful to the stu-
with a situation of many student
for teacher artifacts. These teacher
dents. Student motivation to do well
absences is to give some extra cred-
artifacts can be lesson plans, class-
has the best chance of occurring if
it to the teacher who goes beyond the
room tests, student work samples,
there is no significant increase in the
district standard in engaging chron-
student assignments, etc. All these
regular assessment routine. Thus,
ically absent students. This can be
procedural requirements are the
if any assessments that are used for
addressed under Domain 1 and 4 in
details that need to be filled in.
student growth measures are also tied
the Danielson Framework.
This is an opportunity to take an
to teacher evaluations, they must
overview of the first four steps: dis-
look as much like the regular assess-
8. Decide the scoring procedures.
cuss the whole process to ensure there
ment routine as possible. Then stu-
This may be the toughest imple-
is an understanding of how it works
dent motivation will not be threatened
mentation step to conquer. “Who will
and fits together and create questions
by more tests. In other words, stu-
score the Type II and Type III assess-
and hypothetical examples to deter-
dents should be motivated if any
ments?” If these assessments are to
mine if there are any omissions or
assessments are part of a teacher’s
be a part of the regular assessment
duplications. For example, an issue
grading process. Otherwise, assess-
system, then the teacher needs to
districts may want to address is
ments strictly to evaluate teachers
score them to ensure his/her students
THE ILLINOIS SCHOOL BOARD JOURNAL / SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 2013
receive appropriate credit for answers
sional practice part and a high stu-
since it will reflect in the students’
dent growth part, or the reverse, a
grades. Yet, if these assessments are
high professional practice part and
final ratings at the Needs
scored by the individual teacher being
a low student growth part. A matrix
Improvement/Unsatisfactory
evaluated, they will lose their objec-
approach may answer those ques-
levels
tivity as a valid measure of student
tions in a very objective manner
The need for a second person,
growth. If one teacher is evaluated
whether it is 75/25 or 50/50, or any-
someone of the stature and knowl-
by a Type I assessment, scored by a
thing in between.
edge of the superintendent, needs to
10. Create a review stage of all
non-district entity, and another teacher is evaluated by a Type II assessment, scored by the same teacher being evaluated, there will be feelings and perceptions of unfairness. One school
ILLINOIS ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL BOARDS
district in another state created a panel of teachers which has the responsibility for scoring all assessments. Keep in mind the coming Common Core Standards. The joint committee must also address the issue of students with disabilities, English language learners, and students from low income families. The law requires at least a review
Executive
SearchES The Gold Standard of Executive Searches
of whether these factors will necessitate an adjustment to be made to the assessment process. Perhaps these students will most often be assessed using Type III assessments such as portfolios, projects or student work samples. Frequently, special education teachers work with the same students that general education teachers work. A method of apportioning responsibility for student growth between two or more teachers needs to be done. 9. Determine how the professional practice part and the student growth part combine to produce a final, “state-man-
The IASB Executive Search Team… • Provides professional service in all aspects of the search process and beyond • Considers the “big picture” in the search process and school district governance • Acts with integrity and in the spirit of trust • Represents the interests of the client school boards • Assists client school boards build an effective relationship with the new executive
dated” rating. In other words, how will your district join the professional practice part with the student growth part and arrive at a final summative rating? What if a teacher gets a low profes-
For information contact: 2921 Baker Drive One Imperial Place Springfield, IL 62703 1 East 22nd Street, Suite 20 217/528-9688, ext. 1217 Lombard, IL 60148 630/629-3776, ext. 1217
SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 2013 / THE ILLINOIS SCHOOL BOARD JOURNAL
www.iasb.com/ executive 17
be done to ensure ratings requiring
Improvement or Unsatisfactory
since all ratings are confidential.
professional development plans or
rating and the principal making the
nobody but the superintendent/prin-
remediation plans were not the prod-
evaluation is himself/herself Unsat-
cipal’s evaluator would know the prin-
uct of an Unsatisfactory principal.
isfactory? Would that not make one
cipal’s rating. Therefore, a final review
What if a teacher is given a Needs
question the teacher’s rating? Yet,
of certain teachers’ ratings should be a part of the evaluation process. 11. Professional development What other professional development is needed by teachers and
Help celebrate IASB’s 100 years and your local district’s history
administrators (evaluators)? Teachers may need to develop proficiency in writing Student Learning Objectives. Training in writing common assessments or in compiling portfolios of student work samples may also be needed. As for administrators, I mentioned the need to learn the Framework and develop skill in assigning point values to teaching behavior. Administrators may also need training in time management so they will find the time to get into the classrooms and perform thorough obser-
IASB will celebrate its 100th anniversary this fall. This milestone event would not be possible without the support of local member school districts.
vations, not to mention the time needed to both pre- and post-conference with the teachers. This process will need time to be done right.
That’s why we want you to join the celebration. We are inviting each member district to submit a 30-second videotaped greeting that will be posted on IASB’s YouTube page and featured at the 2013 Joint Annual Conference. This greeting is not only an opportunity to recognize the Association’s centennial; it also will honor local board members and the history of their local district. The local videotaped message should introduce each board member, the superintendent, name of the district, and the date or year it was chartered. More information and instructions are available by visiting the IASB centennial website at: http://www.iasb.com/centennial/.
In summary, since this is a new evaluation model for everyone, a process should be decided that will allow for an annual review or time to make corrections, adjustments, etc. Nobody can do this perfectly, especially not the first time. One might say it doesn’t need to be done perfectly to make a difference in student learning. However, if you are a teacher being dismissed based on a rating arrived at a process that’s “good enough” doesn’t seem fair. For this new evaluation process to work, it
We look forward to seeing you on TV! 18
absolutely must be trusted by the teachers affected. Therefore, constant review will be a must!
THE ILLINOIS SCHOOL BOARD JOURNAL / SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 2013
COVER STORY
Opening classroom doors to collaborative learning by Diallo Brown
Diallo Brown is a faculty member at the College of Lake County in Grayslake , Illinois, and a doctoral student at Nation Louis University in Chicago. He is both a certified language arts teacher and administrator.
M
ost educators confine them-
class” as they wish, with limited inter-
cated — the students. Buildings and
selves to the classroom,
actions and directions from others
their contents are designed to be a
ensuring they close the door behind
— even if those interactions and direc-
shared, collaborative environment
them both when class is in session
tions could provide them with oppor-
earmarked to preserve learning. Fur-
and not.
tunities to enhance best practices.
ther, learning — as it pertains to the
Perhaps it’s a force of routine,
In my experience, many tenured
current model of public schooling —
but if we are truthful in analyzing
teachers deem the mandatory eval-
cannot thrive when we have a series
these intentions, most times this act
uation process a highly difficult one
of closed-circuit classrooms that sim-
marks an explicit request to be left
to withstand, because they are forced
ply segregate learning by closing the
alone. Many teachers want to insu-
to open their doors as if those doors
doors to cross content curriculum.
late themselves in their mastered
really belonged to them. These teach-
As a language arts teacher and
content area and classroom because
ers aren’t so much concerned with
administrator, I had often taught a
they do not truly believe that their
how the evaluation process can be
skill called “inference.” Once under-
colleagues in other content areas can
rewarding if provided with adequate
stood, students begin to practice the
benefit from their strategic approach
feedback that they can take, own and
skill with great ease on just about
to educating and engaging students.
apply for the advantage of the stu-
everything.
In order to achieve a more equi-
20
dents they serve.
Our fear as educational leaders
table level of success and enhance
Instead, they are apprehensive
should be that we are promenading
learning across the curriculum, teach-
about their own articulation of what
students to acknowledge through
ers must open the doors to collabo-
they are supposed to have mastered.
inference this selfish and antiquat-
rative learning. School boards should
So they leave the door shut. Some
ed practice of individualizing con-
consistently insist that school lead-
even place bells on doorknobs or dark
tent knowledge that allows teachers
ers play a more active role in the devel-
colored construction paper over win-
to keep to themselves — literally quar-
opment of good teaching. This can
dows to subtly (or in the case of the
antined from other educators who
best be accomplished by examining
tenured professional, unequivocal-
may be able to connect content areas
why these two basic necessities hap-
ly) announcing to others in the build-
to others in significant ways that will
hazardly take place in classrooms in
ing: “This is my classroom. You are
make the learning experience pop.
many school buildings.
not welcomed unless invited!”
Essentially, we are suggesting that
The mere thought of having some-
This notion applies to their col-
ideas in general are not intercon-
one else in the building take a glimpse
leagues as well as the evaluating admin-
nected and stand alone. That does-
into a teacher’s secret domain (bet-
istrator.
n’t sound much like the quality of
ter known as “my classroom”) can
The reality is that the classroom
thinking that will be required of these
cause anxiety. Some teachers would
does not belong to the teacher; it belongs
students once they reach the real
prefer to be left alone to conduct “their
to those who are entitled to be edu-
world of working for a living.
THE ILLINOIS SCHOOL BOARD JOURNAL / SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 2013
Two best practices
Next, teams must agree that they
being taught is important for them to learn.
So how can school boards and
are on a quest to better the teaching
administrators open the door both
in the buildings they serve. Viewing
Having observed teaching teams
conceptually and literally so that teach-
videos of actual classes is recom-
throughout my K-12 career, I have wit-
ers can see the benefits of collabo-
mended so that uniformity in scor-
nessed how students can articulate
ration throughout their buildings?
ing on the upcoming learning walks
what happens in their other classes as
Two best practices to consider are
becomes a best practice in itself.
they wrote in journals, connecting or
Lastly, all eyes need to be opened.
pondering about a particular idea and
Tony Wagner, education con-
As simple as it may sound, the pro-
how it made sense outside of that class.
sultant and the first Innovation Edu-
fessionals on the walk need to be cog-
Students were often on their “A
cation Fellow at Harvard’s Technology
nizant of what they are there to do:
game” when they knew the practice
& Entrepreneurship Center, believes
identify good teaching so that it can
of good writing was not just confined
that building and district adminis-
be duplicated throughout the build-
to a language arts classroom. They
tration benefit greatly from identi-
ing. Absolutely no special treatment
understood they were being held
fying what actually happens in the
should be given to a colleague’s les-
accountable for spelling and gram-
classroom by way of learning walks.
son plan. In order for learning walks to be
a team of teachers, administrators
successful, doors must be opened.
and social service school professionals
These walks should occur on multiple
evaluate what happens inside a class-
occasions and should not be announced.
room unannounced. The premise
Nor should they be taken at the same
is not necessarily to evaluate the
time in order to receive a picture of
teacher but to evaluate whether learn-
students learning versus a snap shot
ing is occurring in the classroom. To
of a particular day’s lesson. Educators share their knowledge
team may opt to speak with the stu-
of a particular content with the stu-
dents in order to process the likeli-
dents they teach. So why is the prac-
hood that they are experiencing some
tice of sharing that same content
degree of learning.
knowledge with team colleagues not
AND!
determine that, the learning walk
ENDIN L G OR AH
In short, a learning walk is when
THANK SF
learning walks and team teaching.
But before this promising best
a mandatory piece of every school dis-
practice can take place, initial steps
trict’s mandate for good teaching? We
School Board Members Day 2013
are necessary.
need to take hold of the ways we look
IASB • 1913-2013
First, good teaching must be
to reach progress and commit our-
defined, and learning walk teams need
selves to making sure accountability
to agree that the defined best prac-
in reaching this progress is at the fore-
tice can be scored consistently through-
front of our agenda in doing so.
out the team. A rubric that breaks
The second best practice that
down how the learning walks will be
building leaders should endorse is
scored should be developed and unfail-
team teaching. Whether it is com-
ing in its correlation to their shared
bining classes such as language arts
definition of good teaching. Building
and social studies, or math and sci-
the definition of what good teaching
ence, or coordinating what is being
is can be complicated. That’s why
taught/learned in one class into the
many different school professionals
lessons of another, this is perhaps the
should be included, so that the def-
single most effective technique one
inition can account for all aspects of
group of teachers can adopt to help
how learning can be impacted.
students realize that what they are
SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 2013 / THE ILLINOIS SCHOOL BOARD JOURNAL
New materials for
School Board Members Day November 15, 2013
will be available beginning Monday, September 16 at
www.iasb.com/sbmd.cfm 21
mar when writing a lab review for science just as they would be held
IASB Policy Services Using technology to enhance your board effectiveness through online services, such as ...
accountable for understanding chronology as it pertained to the order of time in math or a sequence of events in social studies. Again, in order for this best practice to take shape and form, the doors must be opened. When students can make the connection between one class and another, they come to a better understanding of why education is important. They see a picture of the whole and not just isolated classes and subjects. So exactly what are teachers concealing by keeping the doors shut? What is it that they don’t want colleagues and administrators to view? What are school boards and administrators implying to stakeholders when they allow teachers to keep content
PRESS, the IASB sample policy and procedure service — Receive 24/7 internet access to PRESS, IASB’s sample board policy and administrative procedure service. Find the information you need quickly and easily with our powerful search engine and the legal, informational, and time saving links embedded in the policies and procedures.
School Board Policies Online — Let IASB publish your board policy manual online and easily navigate your manual with keyword searches, jumps to cross references, and links to legal references by using the same excellent search engine used for PRESS online. Place the IASB supplied link to your manual on your district website to provide increased community access and awareness of your district’s governing document.
areas shut off to the rest of the hall? Are we not developing and approving highly qualified educators to promote learning in these classrooms? Do we not believe that colleagues with the most direct impact on student learning are entitled to know what the other team of teachers is teaching in their brief time with students? Exploring how to best serve students through collaborative learning beyond team/department meetings may lead in a more successful direction in regards to developing the unprepared student for post-secondary education, job readiness and citi-
BoardBook® — Learn about the advantages of electronic board packet preparation made possible through use of IASB’s BoardBook® service by scheduling a demonstration for yourself, your administrators, or your entire board.
zenship. Everyone involved needs to reconsider how we mandate learning be brought about as well as how learning is observed and evaluated by build-
Contact IASB Policy Services today for information: 630/629-3776 or 217/528-9688 Ext. 1214 or 1125 bzumpf@iasb.com or alovern@iasb.com
ing leaders in order to sustain and maintain the results that are indicative of the atmosphere we seek to create through sound governance of school systems.
22
THE ILLINOIS SCHOOL BOARD JOURNAL / SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 2013
IASB gives you options to receive your
Mandatory Training for School Board Members Professional Development Leadership Training Every school board member newly-elected or reelected in 2013 by law MUST complete this training within one year of taking the oath of office. It includes instruction in education and labor law, financial oversight and accountability and fiduciary responsibilities. Additionally, it will fulfill the requirement for Performance Evaluation Reform Act (PERA) training. Train at the Pre-Conference Workshop Register for a pre-conference workshop on Friday, November 22, 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., in the Chicago Sheraton Hotel. Continental Breakfast and lunch is included. Participants must remain to the conclusion to receive their certificate of completion. For more information contact Judy Williams at 217-5289688, ext. 1103.
Train at Annual Conference Panel Sessions Every school board member newly elected in 2013 also must complete Open Meetings Act Training within 90 days of taking the oath of office. This training is available from the IASB Online Learning Center at http://www.iasb.com/ training/onlinelearning_ courses.cfm
By attending three specific, required panels at conference, participants will fulfill their training obligation. Once registered at conference, they may pick up a PDLT Mandatory Training Attendance Sheet. Only the specific panels listed on the sheet will meet the requirement. After initialing attendance at the appropriate panels and returning the signed sheet prior to the end of conference, they will receive a certificate of completion. For more information contact Judy Williams at 217-528-9688, ext. 1103.
Train in your district IASB staff will facilitate a concise, informationpacked 4-hour workshop in your district for your board or for board members from several districts. It covers all the required material, and consists of a video presentation and interactive activities. For more information, contact your field services director today.
COVER STORY
Lessons learned:
Improving instruction through teacher evaluation by Annie Filer and Sarah Dickson
Annie Filer and Sarah Dickson are current students at the University of Chicago Harris School of Public Policy, pursuing master’s degrees in public policy.
24
hile schools in Illinois have been evaluating teacher performance for years, few teachers or administrators find the results of these evaluations to be particularly useful. With the implementation of the Performance Evaluation Reform Act (PERA), districts have a unique opportunity to create a teacher evaluation system that works and leads to improvement in student outcomes. Teachers and administrators dedicate their time and energy to students, so operating an ineffective evaluation system is not just a waste of time – it is a wasted opportunity. Districts can leverage this moment to reform teacher evaluations and create an efficient evaluation system that provides meaningful feedback and helps schools improve instruction. School board members can play a significant role in this process and contribute to making their school a better place to learn. A report generated by the Illinois Education Research Council (IERC) and the University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research (CCSR) collected data from teachers and administrators in five districts in Illinois, ranging from a rural school district in southern Illinois serving
W
500 students to an urban district in northern Illinois serving more than 40,000 students, who have already begun to incorporate features of PERA into teacher evaluations. These districts are located in northern (Elgin, Evanston/Skokie, Niles Township), central (Olympia), and southern (Sandoval) Illinois and represent urban, suburban, and rural districts. Elgin, Olympia and Sandoval are unit school districts, Evanston/Skokie is a K-8 district, and Niles Township is a high school district. While the five districts are very different in size and location, many of the lessons learned across the districts are very similar. Incorporate PERA earlier Since full implementation of PERA in the 2016-2017 school year will impact high-stakes district decisions such as tenure and compensation, it is important for teachers to feel comfortable with the new evaluation system so that they believe important decisions based on the evaluations are made fairly. The IERC and CCSR study found that teachers and administrators recommended that districts pilot the new evaluation policy before they are required to by the state, or phase it in over
multiple years, at lower stakes than it will have in full implementation. Doing so may give teachers time to adapt to the new system without the added anxiety over potential highstakes decisions. Additionally, introducing new initiatives earlier than necessary would allow districts to incorporate teacher and administrator feedback about the evaluation system and make adjustments. If teachers have an opportunity to participate in the creation and the maintenance of the evaluation tool, the likelihood of its ultimate success as well as teacher support should increase. At first, it may seem difficult for districts to begin having these conversations before it is required by the state; however, in the long run, districts who practice early implementation of PERA would have a more effective evaluation system that teachers trust. Training teachers When employees understand the system by which individual performance is evaluated, they may be more likely to internalize the feedback they receive and use it to improve their performance. Districts have an opportu-
THE ILLINOIS SCHOOL BOARD JOURNAL / SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 2013
nity to improve the performance of their workforce by training teachers on the evaluation system the district is using. For example, the IERC and CCSR study reports that in Elgin, teams consisting of a teacher and an administrator introduced the evaluation system and conducted training in all Elgin schools to ensure that all teachers and administrators were receiving consistent information. Additionally, in Evanston, administrators began communicating with teachers about the new system in the spring and summer prior to implementation in order to ensure that all teachers were receiving the same message and information about the system. Additionally, the study reports that participants in the case study districts recommended that training on the new teacher evaluation systems be mandatory for all teachers. Eventually, professional development sessions can be leveraged to address strengths and weaknesses of both the teachers in the district and the evaluation tool itself. The IERC and CCSR study also reported that higher-level support for the evaluation tool fosters trust in the system; in Olympia, the superintendent was very involved in the evaluation process, i.e. by sitting in on some evaluations and identifying professional development topics from the results. Creating consistency Although by this point most administrators have completed requisite state-mandated training for the teacher evaluation system, it is important to have all the evaluators trained to rate teachers with the same level of expectations. Problems arise in a district when one administrator is too lenient and another is too strict.
Five ways districts can start using teacher evaluations to improve instruction Start early
Implement new initiatives gradually and before they are required by law to allow time for adjustments to be made.
Communicate clearly
Train teachers on the evaluation system to ensure that teachers and administrators are on the same page and working towards the same goal.
Train consistently
Provide evaluators with training on evaluations so that teacher ratings are consistent across schools and across districts.
Evaluate for improvement
Train evaluators to communicate with teachers so that evaluation results help guide improvement at all levels.
Define priorities
Make evaluations a priority for your administrators.
Districts in the study have found ways to train evaluators to rate teachers consistently by calibrating evaluator ratings – defining expectations and standardizing the method of rating. For example, the IERC and CCSR study shows that pairs of evaluators in Niles and Sandoval observed teachers either in person or on video and discussed how to rate each teacher. Elgin evaluators used role playing and mock exercises to determine ratings, including looking at video or real time teaching and discussing how they would rate each teacher. The IERC and CCSR study reported that trainings often continued throughout the year to maintain consistency in evaluations by reviewing ratings multiple times during the school year, using mentoring systems, and having discussions among evaluators as problems arose. Evaluators can use these techniques to keep transparency and trust in the evaluation system. Measurable and actionable feedback After the evaluation took place, many teachers in the studied districts
SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 2013 / THE ILLINOIS SCHOOL BOARD JOURNAL
noted that teachers of all skill levels wanted extensive feedback on how to improve. However, many evaluators found providing such feedback to be challenging. According to the IERC and CCSR report, many teachers reported that they did not get clear feedback on how they can improve. Evaluators who are able to provide constructive feedback and identify areas of improvement will help both evaluators and teachers create manageable next steps. Evaluators need training and practice in order to have these conversations effectively. Principals should practice the technique of a post-observation meeting by role-playing these conversations with other evaluators. Teachers may be more receptive to feedback if their evaluator observes them informally and offers brief, timely feedback more often. Making evaluations a priority The work of evaluation falls primarily on already-overburdened principals, who have many demands on their time during the day. At the same time, the evaluation system, while time-consuming, has the potential to 25
be a great tool to improve teaching and schools. As one teacher in the study stated, “If the administrators truly embrace [the evaluation tool] as an opportunity…that’s a lot of responsibility on their part because that’s going to take more [of their] time.” The study found many principals had trouble managing the competing demands of an administrator, yet some districts found ways to get it done. By evaluating principals’ responsibilities, schools can make sure that principals are doing the most important duties and are supported more strategically by other school staff. Principals can also be trained to best prioritize their responsibilities and delegate day-to-day details so they can focus on giving high quality feedback to their team. Some districts address this by enlisting others to help the principal take on the important task of evaluations. The IERC and CCSR study reported that in Niles, additional evaluators were hired from among their teachers for a Peer Assistance and Review (PAR) program, where master teachers gave meaningful feedback to their peers. Many teachers found this helpful because feedback came from a person with connections to the classroom. The PAR program alleviated some of the burdens of the principal and also increased the number of observations. Alternatively, if financially feasible, schools could also hire staff to work on day-to-day management tasks like lunch duty, allowing the principal to focus on instructional leadership. Technology can also be a tool in relieving some of the evaluation workload. In Olympia, for example, the entire evaluation system was digi26
tized to allow for better tracking and data collection. Elgin also went paperless, which allowed teachers to get real-time feedback and get information more quickly.
bers can help improve their schools by helping their district leverage this opportunity to make thoughtful and purposeful changes to the way schools conduct teacher evaluations.
Conclusion Teacher evaluations are already a part of school districts across Illinois; however, the standards required by PERA will mean that many of the existing evaluation systems will need to change. Districts have an opportunity to make their teacher evaluation systems into useful, meaningful tools that will improve instruction and augment the learning environment in schools. School board mem-
Reference White, Bradford R., Jennifer Cowhy, W. David Stevens, and Susan E. Sporte. Designing and Implementing the Next Generation of Teacher Evaluation Systems: Lessons Leaned from Case Studies in Five Illinois Districts. Rep. Chicago: University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research, 2012. Available online at ccsr.uchicago.edu/publications/designing-and-implementing-n ext-generation-teacher-evaluationsystems-lessions-learned
2013 Robert M. Cole Award “Best School Board Coverage” Quality school board coverage requires a year-round commitment. Thanks to all who entered the Illinois Press Association contest and congratulations to the winners. The Illinois Association of School Boards sponsors the Cole Awards, named in memory of the first full-time executive director of IASB. Entries are judged on how well the coverage helped school districts to connect with their communities, by: • Contributing to public understanding of local school governance • Supporting effective dialogue in major public policy issues This year’s first place winners were: Cheryl Wolfe — Woodford County Journal, Eureka for Life-safety Work and District Consolidation Hillary Dickerson, Jane Holland — The Galena Gazette for School Redevelopment Plans Staff — The Daily Journal, Kankakee for Leaving Behind NCLB David Jackson, Gary Marz, Alex Richards — Chicago Tribune for School Truancy Epidemic
THE ILLINOIS SCHOOL BOARD JOURNAL / SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 2013
Milestones continued from page 32 Knoxville CUSD 202.. Geoffrey F. Grossman, 78. Died June 14, 2013. He was a former school board member in Pleasantdale District 107, Burr Ridge. Salvador J. “Gus” Gutierrez, 82. Died July 17, 2013. He was a former member of the Joliet THSD 204 Board of Education. M. Eugene “Jobe” Hammond, 96. Died July 17, 2013. Beginning at age 21, he sat on the Adair School Board until the district consolidated with Macomb in 1953. Michael H. Hess, 59. Died July 12, 2013. He had served on the Peru and Deer Park school boards. Kenneth E. Kirkenslager, 82. Died June 20, 2013. He served on the Dallas City School Board, and the local city council and was Mayor Pro-Tem for two years. Gladys E. Lauerman, 97. Died June 22, 2013. She served multiple terms on the Mascoutah CUSD 19 Board of Education. Corwin Leeper, 80. Died June 15, 2013. He formerly served on the Illiopolis School Board for 22 years.. Jan Alan Lindeman, 71. Died May 20, 2013. He served on the Oswego School District 308 Board of Education for eight years. Arthur Eugene “Gene” McElravy, 93. Died June 29, 2013. He was member of the Cumberland School board. Darryl E. Mitchell, 72. Died July 16, 2013. He formerly served on the Cherry Grade School board. Earl Fred Murphey, 92. Died June 13, 2013. He served on the Rockdale school board and as a Village of Rockdale Trustee. Melvin Eugene “Gene” Ohnesorge, 78. Died July 23, 2013. He served on the Stewardson-Strasburg School
Board of Directors for nine years. Wilson J. Park, 94. Died July 7, 2013. He was a former member of the Rochester CUSD 3A Board of Education. Steven M. Pfeiffer, 58. Died June 11, 2013. He was a member of the Rochelle Elementary school board for more than 20 years. Charles E. Quartier, 84. Died June 10, 2013. He served on the Westville school board for four terms, and he also served on the Westville Village Board. C. Richard Schertz, 90. Died June 10, 2013. He was a former member and president of the Gibson City school board and member of the steering committee to establish Parkland College. E.B. Smart, 90. Died July 16, 2013. He served on the East Peoria Pleasant Hill school board and was president from 1965-66. Lynda Gault Smith, 67. Died July 18, 2013. A current Niles Township High School Dist. 219 board member at the time of her passing, she was first elected to the Dist. 219 school board in 2001, and had a long history serving educational institutions and advocating on behalf of special education. Richard Walter Sommers, 88. Died July 20, 2013. He formerly served on the Prophetstown Board of Education, where he was involved with the first addition to the high school and its new gym. George Harry Spear, 85. Died June 19, 2013. He was a former member of the Quincy SD 172 school board. David Lee Thomas, 71. Died July 22, 2013. He formerly served on the Lexington school board for two terms.
SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 2013 / THE ILLINOIS SCHOOL BOARD JOURNAL
Harold Thompson, 77. Died June 21, 2013. He formerly served on the school board in Dupo. Walter R. Thompson, 94. Died June 16, 2013. He had previously served on the Liberty school board and was president for several years. Kathleen E. Turner, 91. Died June 13, 2013. She previously served on the school board of Palos CCSD 118, Palos Park. Donald Glenn Warfel, 78. Died June 29, 2013. He previously served 26 years as Cumberland CUSD 77 school board treasurer and board member. Melvin M. Weyeneth, 92. Died July 10, 2013. He previously served as a member and was past president of the school boards for Metamora’s grade school and high school districts. The Illinois School Board Journal welcomes news about or from Illinois school leaders. News may include but need not be limited to accomplishments, changes in position or duties, retirement, death and other milestones related to board/district duties. For more information about submitting news items, phone the Communications Department at 217/528-9688, ext. 1138, or e-mail gadkins@iasb. com.
“I hate reviewing for tests? It’s like watching reruns on TV.” 27
FEATURE ARTICLE
Turf and track require research, planning and maintenance By Jameson Sheley
Jameson Sheley is a certified field builder and certified track builder and project manager for St. Louisbased Byrne & Jones Sports.
L
ast year, within months of one another, two Illinois public high
schools just 12 miles apart in Pinckneyville and Du Quoin unveiled stateof-the-art artificial turf fields and new running tracks. Throughout Illinois, school districts are evaluating their athletic facilities and investing in upgrades as civic assets to express a quality of life attractive to families. But the selection of a new track or field and its installation can be fraught with missteps. There are
As for tracks, the size will be determined by the events the school anticipates hosting. Pinckneyville selected eight-lane tracks suitable for regional or sectional events. Some schools opt for six-lane tracks sufficient for dual league track meets.
innumerable companies with marketers singing the praises of the ath-
the like. Sod fields can be shredded
save money. If you walk on synthet-
letic surfaces they peddle. School
after one game and are more difficult
ic turf and your ankle tends to turn,
districts should understand that all
and costly to maintain. Anyone who
it’s likely the granules are too large.
products are not created equal and
saw the gimpy-legged Washington
Using granules that are too small will
proper planning, installation and
Redskins quarterback RG III in the
make the surface too hard and pos-
maintenance of what’s under foot is
2012 NFL playoffs collapse in a heap
sibly impede drainage.
essential for safety and lasting val-
after planting his foot on a cratered
The safety aspects of choosing
ue.
and torn up natural turf field gets the
artificial or natural turf may become
picture.
a moot point over the next five years.
Let’s start with safety. There are
28
a number of college research studies
But the uniformity of an artifi-
That’s because the NFL is moving to
comparing the safety of natural ver-
cial turf field can also be deceiving if
reduce its liability to injuries by cre-
sus artificial turf. Unfortunately, every
it is not installed properly. When a
ating new rules that could make fields
one of them is under written by pro-
player takes a tumble on a synthet-
unacceptable to play on game day.
ponents of either natural turf or arti-
ic field, he’s falling on a cushion of
Essentially, the NFL is testing all its
ficial turf with outcomes that favor
sand and rubber pellets that serve as
fields for hardness. If a field exceeds
the advocacy. We see one inescapable
the infill at the base of the turf blades.
a safety standard, no game can be
constant – artificial turf, when installed
Sand can get hard over time unless
played and teams will be liable for
correctly, is a uniform surface that
properly maintained, but more prob-
lost revenue. Natural turf fields, which
generally stays in good condition after
lems can occur if the contractor installs
freeze in colder climates during the
countless games, band practices and
the wrong size rubber granules to
winter, will not fare well in this test.
THE ILLINOIS SCHOOL BOARD JOURNAL / SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 2013
These rules to mitigate liability – as
are more expensive systems, but
they so often do – will eventually trick-
no matter what installation is cho-
Permitting can include approval
le down to the high school level. Arti-
sen, reputable installers should fol-
from multiple agencies including the
ficial turf may become the only option
low proper manufacturers’ guidelines
state department of natural resources,
for an uninterrupted season.
for the amount of materials required
the local sewer district, other state,
tion.
Turf and track types Selecting artificial turf is like purchasing carpet. In general, less expensive products tend not to last as long
Most schools want upgrades performed when school is out during
as a more expensive product. Turf
the summer, sometimes putting off construction until mid-June to
design duplicates the bounce of the
accommodate the use of facilities for graduation ceremonies. When
ball on natural turf, so field hockey,
planning an upgrade, schools should first consider that it can take
lacrosse, baseball, soccer and football fields will be different. Addi-
up to five months from the time a school commits to the project to
tionally, highly specialized sports,
putting the first shovel into the ground.
like field hockey, require a “shock pad” underneath the surface to cushion it – a more expensive proposition than sand and rubber infill used for
for the track system. It is important
county and municipal offices, and in
multi-purpose fields.
to require that the construction man-
some cases, levee districts. Permit-
A turf’s life span can range from
ager carefully review the bill of lad-
ting invariably encounters storm
five to 12 years, depending on the
ing to double check the material
water management, water quality,
type of turf installed, level of usage,
amounts installed with the required
erosion control, and other environ-
quality of the base, and diligence of
amounts in the specifications. When
mental issues. Meanwhile, design and
maintenance. So schools should con-
contractors cut corners to pad mar-
engineering requires a thorough eval-
sider the cost of replacing the turf –
gins, the quality of outcomes suffer.
uation of site selection and site geometry (so the surface fits the site),
typically about 50 to 60 percent of the original cost of the entire project.
Construction process
mapping of existing utilities, storm
A $750,000 artificial turf can cost
Most schools want upgrades per-
water retention and water quality
about $450,000 to replace if it has
formed when school is out during the
concerns before finalizing construc-
a properly constructed base that can
summer, sometimes putting off con-
tion bid documents.
be reused.
struction until mid-June to accom-
Once projects start, typically
As for tracks, the size will be
modate the use of facilities for
at the end of May, the timeline for
determined by the events the school
graduation ceremonies. When plan-
completion can shrink even further
anticipates hosting. Du Quoin and
ning an upgrade, schools should first
if a school wants the field ready for
Pinckneyville selected eight-lane
consider that it can take up to five
August practice. A lot of things have
tracks suitable for regional or sec-
months from the time a school com-
to go right – especially weather –
tional events. Some schools opt for
mits to the project to putting the first
if a new field or track is going to
six-lane tracks sufficient for dual
shovel into the ground. This is large-
be installed in 60 days. Construc-
league track meets.
ly because of the design schedule and
tion firms vary in handling a com-
More than 90 percent of schools
permit review process. Engineers and
pressed schedule, but the best
opt for polyurethane surfaces gen-
designers need three to four months
outcomes start with working close-
erally composed of a black mat with
just to create a final plan to price for
ly with schools to manage the sched-
a structural spray coating. It should
contractors. Projects then need to be
ule and expectations while planning
have a life span of 20 years with a re-
bid in late winter to early spring for
spray coating every five years. There
schools planning a summer installa-
SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 2013 / THE ILLINOIS SCHOOL BOARD JOURNAL
continued on page 31 29
PRACTICAL PR
What went right …
Telling school stories that don’t get reported by David Luther
David Luther is assistant to the superintendent handling schoolcommunity relations at Jefferson City (Missouri) Public Schools. His article originally appeared as a Facebook post for the district in August 2012 and is reprinted with permission.
e humans have a bad habit.
This did not happen by accident. Most
We sometimes find ourselves
teachers spend much of their sum-
focusing on the negative things in our
mer preparing for the next school
W
lives and fail to recognize the positives. Our media doesn’t do much to help us in this regard. Bad news is
more likely to get
year so that things start right. Schools were clean and grounds were taken care of (I would say “grass
typically more likely to get published
published and, as
was mowed,” but with the dry weath-
and, as much as we might not like to
much as we might
er, we had a lot less grass than usu-
admit it, we read and watch those stories. Reporters will use sometimes use the terms “soft” or “fluff” for positive stories. That’s a shame, because some
not like to admit it,
al). Our maintenance and custodians spent the summer making sure win-
we read and watch
dows were fixed, roofs were repaired,
those stories.
floors were waxed, and, in general, getting schools ready for kids. Secretaries and other office staff
of those stories are the most remark-
greeted students, and we all know
able. Yesterday was the first day of
that as the year goes along, these peo-
school for more than 8,700 Jefferson
ple will handle thousands of jobs and
City Public School District students,
More than 7,000 students ate
and a few things did not go perfect-
breakfast, lunch or both at school.
ly. Some student IDs were incorrectly
There were healthy choices available
District administrators, princi-
printed, a few buses ran behind, and
(although more than a few cookies
pals and board members spent much
no doubt almost every student, par-
were eaten, too). For some students
of their time making sure the dis-
ent and teacher had something not
these were the best meals of their
trict is focused on doing what is right
go right. But what about the other
day. For some students these were
for students. The coordination of
side of the story?
the only meals of the day. Our cooks
8,700 students, 1,200 staff and 18
are amazing.
school buildings does not happen by
What went right?
30
Bad news is typically
virtually every one of those jobs will in some way impact students.
More than 4,500 students had a
Our 650 teachers, principals and
accident, and it won’t happen at
safe school bus ride to and from school.
other professional staff greeted stu-
all if someone is not minding the
Our buses cover an average of 4,354
dents, helped them find their class-
switch.
miles each day (our district is a big
es, began the teaching process and,
Look, I’m a public relations per-
one — 233 square miles).
in general, did an exceptional job.
son, so I know that people will say,
THE ILLINOIS SCHOOL BOARD JOURNAL / SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 2013
“Well, he’s paid to put a positive spin
Register Now!
on everything.” True confessions: my day did not go perfectly yesterday either, and I spent a little time dwelling on those imperfections. But after I
Contact your superintendent
threw my little private fit, I decided to look for the positive.
Chicago Water Tower 1869
General Sessions
This is a wonderful community in which we live, and we have very
IASB
good schools. Are there problems?
Panels
Of course. Are they insurmountable? No (although some are tougher to
IASA
solve than others). The main thing we need to do is keep our eyes on the
Bookstore
IASBO
ball, and for the JCPS that means
Workshops
always doing what is in the best interest of the student.
81ST
Please feel free to share “what went right” with us from time to time.
Exhibits
Joint
When teachers do a great job — tell them (this goes for all of us parents,
Annual
colleagues, bosses, etc.). When kids experience success — celebrate!
Delegate Assembly Carousel of Panels and
When something needs to be
Conference
improved — tell those involved, and be part of the solution. Am I talking to myself as I write this? Yes, I can’t help it! OK, enough, have a great day!
Networking
November 22-24, 2013 • Chic ag o
M O R E
ILLINOIS LAW in the School 0ffice The Essential Desk Reference Illinois Law in the School Office is intended to be a one-stop, essential desk reference for busy school support professionals. School secretaries, nurses, aides, receptionists, custodians, bus drivers, and a host of others work to assure that our schools are run efficiently and that children are the top priority. This book is an effort to make the life of these busy individuals a little more manageable. Each chapter contains: • Detailed narratives on relevant issues • Frequently asked questions • Commonly used forms and resources To order, call 217/528-9688, ext. 1108, or email tcall@iasb.com, or go online at www.iasb.com/shop SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 2013 / THE ILLINOIS SCHOOL BOARD JOURNAL
2495
$
plus $7 shipping (U.S. delivery, regardless of the quantity or weight of books ordered.) 31
A Directory of your
IASB Service Associates IASB Service Associates are businesses which offer school-related products and services and which have earned favorable reputations for quality and integrity. Only after screening by the Service Associates Executive Committee is a business firm invited by the IASB Board of Directors to become a Service Associate.
DLA ARCHITECTS, LTD. — Architects specializing in preK-12 educational design, including a full range of architectural services; assessments, planning, feasibility studies, new construction, additions, remodeling, O&M and owner's rep services. Itasca - 847/7424063; website: www.dla-ltd.com; e-mail: info@dlaltd.com DLR GROUP, INC. — Educational facility design and master planning. Chicago - 312/382-9980; website: www.dlrgroup.com; e-mail: dbane@dlrgroup.com ERIKSSON ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, LTD. — Consulting civil engineers and planners. Grayslake 847/223-4804 FANNING/HOWEY ASSOCIATES, INC. — School planning and design with a focus on K-12 schools. Park Ridge - 847/292-1039 FGM ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS, INC. — Architects. Oak Brook - 630/574-8300; Peoria - 309/669-0012; Mt. Vernon - 618/242-5620; O’Fallon - 618/624-3364; website: http://www.fgm-inc.com
Appraisal Services INDUSTRIAL APPRAISAL COMPANY — Insurance appraisals, property control reports. Oakwood Terrace - 630/827-0280
Architects/Engineers ALLIED DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. — Architectural programming, site planning & design, architectural and interior design, and construction administration. Springfield - 217/522-3355 ARCON ASSOCIATES, INC. — Full service firm specializing in educational facilities with services that include architecture, construction management, roof and masonry consulting, landscape architecture and environmental consulting. Lombard - 630/495-1900; website: www.arconassoc.com; e-mail: smchassee@arconassoc.com BAYSINGER DESIGN GROUP, INC. — Architectural design services. Marion - 618/998-8015 BERG ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, LTD. — Consulting engineers. Schaumburg - 847/352-4500; website: http://www.berg-eng.com BLDD ARCHITECTS, INC. — Architectural and engineering services for schools. Decatur - 217/4295105; Champaign - 217/356-9606; Bloomington 309/828-5025; Chicago - 312/829-1987 BRADLEY & BRADLEY — Architects, engineers and asbestos consultants. Rockford - 815/968-9631; website: http://www.bradleyandbradley.net/ CANNON DESIGN — Architects. Chicago - 312/9608034; website: www.cannondesign.com; e-mail: kleonard@cannondesign.com CM ENGINEERING, INC. — Specializing in ultra efficient geo-exchange HVAC engineering solutions for schools, universities and commercial facilities. Columbia, MO - 573/874-9455; website: www. cmeng.com CORDOGAN CLARK & ASSOCIATES — Architects and engineers; Aurora - 630/896-4678; website: www.cordoganclark.com; e-mail: rmont@cordogan clark.com DESIGN ARCHITECTS, INC. — Architecture, engineering, planning and interior design. Hillsboro 217/532-5600; East St. Louis - 618/398-0890; Marion - 618/998-0075; Springfield - 217/787-1199; e-mail: rgarber@hurst-rosche.com DEWBERRY ARCHITECTS INC. — Architects, planners, landscape architecture and engineers. Peoria 309/282-8000; Chicago - 312/660-8800; Elgin 847/695-5480; website: www.dewberry.com
32
GREENASSOCIATES, INC. — Architecture/construction services. Deerfield - 847/317-0852, Pewaukee, WI - 262/746-1254; website: www.greenassociates. com; e-mail: greig@greenassociates.com
SARTI ARCHITECTURAL GROUP, INC. — Architecture, engineering, life safety consulting, interior design and asbestos consultants. Springfield 217/585-9111; e-mail: sartiarch@sartiarch.com WIGHT & COMPANY — An integrated services firm with solutions for the built environment. Darien 630/696-7000; website: http://www.wightco.com; e-mail: bpaulsen@wightco.com WM. B. ITTNER, INC. — Full service architectural firm serving the educational community since 1899. Fairview Heights - 618/624-2080 WRIGHT & ASSOCIATES, INC. — Architecture and construction management. Metamora - 309/367-2924
Building Construction BOVIS LEND LEASE — Construction Management/Program Management. Contact John Doherty. Chicago - 312/245-1393; website: www. bovislendlease.com; e-mail: john.doherty@bovislend lease.com CORE CONSTRUCTION — Professional construction management, design-build and general contracting services. Morton - 309/266-9768; website: www. COREconstruct.com
HEALY, BENDER & ASSOCIATES, INC. — Architects/Planners. Naperville, 630/904-4300; website: www.healybender.com; e-mail: dhealy@healybender. com
FREDERICK QUINN CORPORATION — Construction management and general contracting. Addison 630/628-8500; webite: www.fquinncorp.com
HYA EXECUTIVE SEARCH, A DIVISION OF ECRA GROUP, INC. - Superintendent searches, board and superintendent workshops. Rosemont - 847/3180072
HOLLAND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC. — Full service Construction Management and General Contracting firm specializing in education facilities. Swansea - 618/277-8870
IMAGE ARCHITECTS, INC. — Architects. Carbondale - 618/457-2128
MANGIERI COMPANIES, INC. — Construction management and general contractor capabilities. Peoria 309/688-6845
JH2B ARCHITECTS — Architects. Kankakee - 815/ 933-5529 KENYON & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS — Complete architectural services for education. Peoria - 309/674-7121 KLUBER ARCHITECTS + ENGINEERS — Building design professionals specializing in architecture, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, structural, and fire protection engineers. Batavia - 630/406-1213 LEGAT ARCHITECTS, INC. — Architects. Chicago 312/258-1555; Oak Brook - 630/990-3535; Waukegan - 847/263-3535; Crystal Lake - 815/477-4545 LZT ASSOCIATES, INC./LARSON & DARBY GROUP — Architecture, planning, engineering. Peoria 309/673-3100; Rockford - 815/484/0739; St. Charles, MO - 630/444-2112; website: www.larsondarby.com; e-mail: dhenebry@larsondarby.com MECHANICAL SERVICES ASSOCIATES CORP. HVAC, plumbing and electrical design. Crystal Lake 815/788-8901 MELOTTE-MORSE-LEONATTI, LTD — Architectural, industrial, hygiene and environmental service. Springfield - 217/789-9515 PCM+D — Provide a full range of architectural services including facility and feasibility studies, architectural design construction, consulting and related services. East Peoria - 309/694-5012 PERKINS+WILL — Architects; Chicago - 312/7550770; website: www.perkinswill.com; e-mail: mark. jolicoeur@perkinswill.com RICHARD L. JOHNSON ASSOCIATES, INC. — Architecture, educational planning. Rockford 815/398-1231 RUCKPATE ARCHITECTURE — Architects, engineers, interior design. Barrington - 847/381-2946; website: http://www.ruckpate.com; e-mail: info@ruck pate.com
POETTKER CONSTRUCTION — Construction management, design/build and general contracting services. Hillsboro - 217/532-2507 S.M. WILSON & CO. — Provides construction management and general construction services to education, healthcare, commercial, retail and industrial clients. St. Louis, MO - 314/645-9595 THE GEORGE SOLLITT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY — Full-service construction management general contractor with a primary focus on educational facilities. Wood Dale - 630/860-7333; website: www.sollitt.com; e-mail: info@sollitt.com TRANE — HVAC company specializing in design, build, and retrofit. Willowbrook - 630-734-6033 TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY — Referendum assistance, conceptual and master planning, budget assistance or verification, participant in panels, construction management and consulting. Chicago - 312/327-2860; Web Site: www.turnerconstruction.com; Email: ghill@tcco.com
Computer Software SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, INC. — Administrative Software. Tremont - 888/776-3897; website: http:// www.sti-k12.com; e-mail: sales@sti-k12.com
Environmental Services ALPHA CONTROLS & SERVICES, LLC — Facility Management Systems, Automatic Temperature Controls, Access Control Systems, Energy Saving Solutions; Sales, Engineering, Installation, Commissioning and Service. Rockford, Springfield, Champaign: toll-free 866-ALPHA-01 (866-252-4201); website: www.alphaACS.com; e-mail: info@alphaacs. com
THE ILLINOIS SCHOOL BOARD JOURNAL / SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 2013
Division Meetings
Maintenance continued from page 27 each step of the project long before
costs by renting their fields.
construction is started. A lot of over-
A new rubberized track should
time and weekend work will add to
stay in good condition for five to sev-
the cost of the project.
en years before requiring a resur-
Invest one evening, gain benefits throughout the year for ... ✔ yourself, ✔ your school board, and ✔ your district
facing coat. The track should have a Maintenance Maintaining artificial turf is easier and less expensive than natural
total life span of 15 to 25 years, depending on the type installed and the asphalt base.
Attend an IASB division meeting at a location near you. Division meetings provide opportunities for networking, professional development, peer recognition, participation in Association governance and learning about IASB resources.
turf, which requires irrigation, seed-
Community school budgets are
ing, aerating, fertilizing, and replace-
tight, but administrators can find
ment of damaged turf. However,
long-term value in upgrading athlet-
artificial turf needs to be groomed to
ic surfaces. They just need to make
fluff the blades, remove debris and
smart decisions on safety, turf and
swept twice a month under heavy use
track surfaces and understand con-
Mark your calendars now!
and once a quarter with lighter use.
struction timelines and maintenance
Seam repairs are also occasionally
costs. Only then will they get the com-
For spring 2014 dates and locations near you, visit www.iasb.com and click on Events Calendar.
required. Many schools pay for these
munity asset and support they seek.
CTS-CONTROL TECHNOLOGY & SOLUTIONS — Performance contracting, facility improvements and energy conservation projects. St. Louis, MO 636/230-0843; Chicago - 773/633-0691; website: www.thectsgroup.com; e-mail: rbennett@thectsgroup. com ENERGY SYSTEMS GROUP — A comprehensive energy services and performance contracting company providing energy, facility and financial solutions. Itasca - 630/773-7203 GRP MECHANICAL CO. INC. — Performance contracting, basic and comprehensive building renovations with a focus on energy and mechanical maintenance services. Bethalto - 618/779-0050 HONEYWELL, INC. — Controls, maintenance, energy management, performance contracting and security. St. Louis, Mo - 314-548-4136; Arlington Heights 847/391-3133; e-mail: janet.rivera@honeywell.com IDEAL ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, INC. — Asbestos and environmental services. Bloomington 309/828-4259 OCCUPATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC. (OEHS) — Industrial hygiene, microbiological evaluations and ergonomics. Chatham - 217/483-9296 RADON DETECTION SPECIALISTS — Commercial radon surveys. Burr Ridge - 800/244-4242; website: www.radondetection.net; e-mail: kirstenschmidt@ radonresults.com SECURITY ALARM SYSTEMS — Burglar and fire alarms, video camera systems, door access systems, door locking systems, and alarm monitoring. Salem 618/548-5768
Financial Services AMERICAN FIDELITY EDUCATIONAL SERVICES — Educational services specializing in Section 125 compliance, 403 annuity administration, flexible spending accounts, health savings accounts and health care reform education. Fairview Heights 314/504-1525
BERNARDI SECURITIES, INC. — Public finance consulting, bond issue services and referendum support. Fairview Heights - 618/206-4180; Chicago - 312/2812014 BMO CAPITAL MARKETS/GKST, Inc. — Full service broker/dealer specializing in debt securities, including municipal bonds, U.S. Treasury debt, agencies, and mortgage-backed securities. Chicago - 312/4412601; website: www.bmo.com/industry/uspublicfinance/default.aspx; e-mail: jamie.rachlin@bmo.com EHLERS & ASSOCIATES — School bond issues; referendum help; financial and enrollment studies. Lisle - 630/271-3330; website: http://www.ehlers-inc.com; e-mail: slarson@ehlers-inc.com FIRST MIDSTATE, INC. — Bond issue consultants. Bloomington - 309/829-3311; e-mail: paul@first midstate.com GORENZ AND ASSOCIATES, LTD. — Auditing and financial consulting. Peoria - 309/685-7621; website: http://www.gorenzcpa.com; e-mail: tcustis@gorenz cpa.com HUTCHINSON, SHOCKEY, ERLEY & COMPANY — Debt issuance, referendum planning, financial assistance. Chicago - 312/443-1566; website: www.hsemuni.com; e-mail: rbergland@hsemuni.com; rcoyne @hsemuni.com ROBERT W. BAIRD & CO., INC. — Financial consulting; debt issuance; referendum assistance. St. Charles - 630/584-4994; Web Site: http://www. rwbaird.com; Email: whepworth@rwbaird.com; garndt@rwbaird.com SPEER FINANCIAL, INC. — Financial planning and bond issue services. Chicago - 312/346-3700; website: http://www.speerfinancial.com; e-mail: dphillips@speerfinancial.com
SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 2013 / THE ILLINOIS SCHOOL BOARD JOURNAL
STIFEL, NICOLAUS & COMPANY, INC. — Full service securities firm providing investment banking and advisory services including strategic financial planning; bond underwriting; and referendum and legislative assistance - Edwardsville - 800/230-5151; e-mail: noblea@stifel.com WILLIAM BLAIR & COMPANY — Bond issuance, financial advisory services. Chicago - 312/3648955; e-mail: ehennessy@williamblair.com WINTRUST FINANCIAL — Financial services holding company engaging in community banking, wealth management, commercial insurance premium financing, and mortgage origination. Willowbrook - 630/560-2120
Human Resource Consulting BUSHUE HUMAN RESOURCES, INC. — Human resource, safety and risk management, insurance consulting. Effingham - 217/342-3042; website: http://www.bushuehr.com; e-mail: steve@bushuehr. com
Insurance THE SANDNER GROUP CLAIMS MANAGEMENT, INC. — Third party administrator for worker's comp and insurance claims. Chicago - 800/654-9504
Office Equipment INTERIORS FOR BUSINESS, INC. — Classroom furniture and classroom technology services, classroom technology assessment, space planning, CEU’s, and ties to the USGBC (U.S. Green Building Council) for additional environmental assessments. Batavia 630/761-1070
Superintendent Searches HAZARD, YOUNG, ATTEA & ASSOCIATES, LTD — Superintendent searches, board and superintendent workshops. Glenview - 847/724-8465 33
MILESTONES
Milestones Achievements George Rimbo officially took the reins as Lemont’s new fire chief July 18. More than a hundred local firefighters, elected officials and community members gathered at the Lemont Township Community Center to see him sworn in as chief. Rimbo was elected in April to his second term on the Lemont High School District 210 Board of Education, a position he continues to hold. Rimbo began his career with the Lemont Fire Protection District in April 1988 as an on-call firefight-
er, and was promoted to a full-time position the next year. He became a battalion chief in 2009. Prior to that he earned an associate’s degree in fire science from the College of DuPage in 1995, and a bachelor’s degree in fire service management from Southern Illinois University in 1999. Tom Trefilek, a Glenbard District 87 Board of Education member, was inducted into Dominican University’s Hall of Fame in June for his basketball coach-
ing success. Trefilek led the thenRosary College Rebels women’s basketball team to four straight Chicagoland Collegiate Athletic Conference (CCAC) championships from 1990 through 1993, appearing in three straight NAIA Division II national tournaments (1991-1993). His career record of 189-95 as head coach was amassed from 1986-94, and 2000-02. During the most successful five-year stretch in program history, his team posted a 139-27 record. Trefilek was named the Illinois Basketball Coaches Association (IBCA) NAIA Coach of the Year three times (1990, 1992 and 1993) in his career.
In memoriam Omar Edward “Eddie” Allen, 80. Died July 16, 2013. He formerly served on the Mount Vernon Township High School board. Charlene Arnold, 80. Died July 11, 2013. She previously served on the Western School board. Margaret “Peg” Jean Allen Arnold, 64. Died July 21, 2013. She served two terms as a school board member for District 303 in St. Charles. Arnold started her early teaching career at the Elgin Academy before spending 17 years as a counselor at Kaneland Elementary and High Schools, finishing her career at District 94, in West Chicago. 34
Victor W. Bittner, 87. Died June 12, 2013. He formerly served as president and a member of the McLean County Unit District 5 school board for 16 years. Katie Jackson Booker, 71. Died March 22, 2013. She served on the West Harvey-Dixmoor District 147 Board of Education from 1971 until her passing. Steven K. Brown, 59. Died July 18, 2013. He formerly served as a Lexington CUSD 7 school board member for 16 years. David L. Cheney, 82. Died June 6, 2013. He previously served on the Southeastern CUSD 337 Board of
Education in Augusta for 12 years. George William Dennis, 89. Died July 6, 2013. He spent many years on the Seneca Grade School Board of Education and on the Seneca High School Board of Education. Margaret “Maggie” Diskin, 82. Died June 18, 2013. She previously served six years on the Rankin school board. Richard H. Foley, 87. Died July 6, 2013. He served on the Champaign school board, 1966-75. Gerald E. “Jerry” Goss, 72. Died July 8, 2013. He was past president and member of the school board of continued on page 25
THE ILLINOIS SCHOOL BOARD JOURNAL / SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 2013
ASK THE STAFF
How can I meet the state’s new training requirements? by Dean Langdon
oard members are now required
and Towers on Friday, includes a con-
vide our members with one more
to take four hours of Profes-
tinental breakfast and lunch. Advanced
opportunity to attend a live, in-per-
sional Development Leadership Train-
registration is required, so please see
son presentation in order to meet
ing (PDLT) which includes content
the IASB website for further infor-
the training requirements. Details
in education law, labor law, fiducia-
mation: http://www.iasb.com/jac13/
about the dates and locations will be
ry responsibility, and financial over-
PreConWorkshops13.pdf.
announced in the coming months.
B
sight and accountability. In addition,
The 2013 Joint Annual Confer-
In addition to the state confer-
the Performance Evaluation Reform
ence will also feature specific pan-
ence and regional workshops, IASB
Act (PERA) requires board members
els designed to meet the training
field services directors are avail-
to be trained in specific content relat-
requirement. During the conference
able to offer in-district, video pre-
ed to dismissing a teacher under the
attendees will need to pick up a PDLT
sentations of the required training
terms of the new act. This require-
Mandatory Training Attendance
throughout the year. These work-
ment is phased in over time so while
Sheet at either the Hyatt or Shera-
shops, designed to train the whole
your board may not need the PERA
ton conference desk, before select-
board, provide convenience and the
training now, all board members will
ing and attending each of the
advantage of a facilitated discussion
eventually. This detail is important
designated categories (education
throughout. Call your field services
as IASB has embedded PERA train-
law and fiduciary duty; PERA and
director to schedule this training.
ing into all of its four-hour manda-
labor law; financial oversight and
Finally, another convenient option
tory training options.
accountability). After attending each
is the IASB Online Learning Center,
panel session, attendees will need
which is available 24 hours a day.
to return a signed sheet to the con-
While online, members may also wish
So what are the options available to members? Many members attended one of
ference registration desk prior to
to take the Open Meetings Act course
IASB’s initial PDLT training sessions
the end of the conference. Upon
which is required within 90 days of
held around the state in May/June
receipt of the signed form, a certifi-
taking the oath of office. More infor-
2013. If you were in attendance at
cate of completion will be issued.
mation is available on our website:
one of those sessions, you have com-
Although these panel sessions are
http://www.iasb.com/training/online-
pleted their required training. Con-
open to anyone and are included in
learning.cfm.
gratulations!
the conference fee, a $15 process-
Please know that IASB is only a
ing fee will be charged for those want-
phone call away. Members are encour-
ing the course credit.
aged to call us for clarification or ques-
At the 2013 Joint Annual Conference, members may choose to take a pre-conference workshop to meet
In January and February 2014,
tions regarding these requirements
their training requirements for both
IASB will offer several regional PDLT
and any of the training options avail-
of these mandates. This session, to
sessions throughout the state. These
able.
be held at the Sheraton Chicago Hotel
Saturday morning sessions will pro-
Dean Langdon, IASB associate executive director for board development and TAG, answers the question for this issue.
NON-PROFIT PRST STANDARD US POSTAGE PAID ILLINOIS ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL BOARDS
2921 Baker Drive Springfield, Illinois 62703-5929 Address Service Requested
www.iasb.com
common Core may still have work to ensure that their high school course sequence and content is truly aligned to the standards. I am not perfect. I have made plenty of mistakes. I am only able to do this job because many people along the way have forgiven me, given me a second chance, have recognized I am both flawed and precious. Bob Wells, superintendent, Edna Texas, from his blog “One-eyed Bob,” as reprinted in School Administrator, February, 2013
“Even states whose graduation requirements appear to reflect the
● ●
FROM 1913
● ●
“I slept and dreamt that life was joy. I awoke and saw that life was service. I acted and behold, service was joy.” Rabindranath Tagore, Indian poet and essayist, 1913 Nobel Prize for Literature, 1861-1941
IASB Centennial
“Out of Sync,” The Center for Public Education, August 2013
“The United States is the most innovative country in the world, But our leadership could slip away if we fail to properly fund primary secondary and higher education Jeff Bingaman, former U.S senator from New Mexico
The test of leadership is not to put greatness into humanity but to elicit it, for the greatness is already there James Buchanan, 15th U.S president
“The test and use of man’s education is that he finds pleasure in the exercise of his mind.” Jacques Barzum, French-born American historian and philosopher of education
“We stand in the shadow of Thomas Jefferson who believed that a society founded upon the rule of law and liberty was dependent upon public education and the diffusion of knowledge.” Matt Blunt, former governor of Missouri, 2005-09
“Unless we make education a priority, an entire generation of Americans could miss out on the American dream.” Blanche Lincoln, U.S. senator from Arkansas, 1999-2011