The Institute for Domestic and International Affairs
United Nations Environment Programme Water Rights Rutgers Model United Nations 16-19 November 2006
Director: Jorge Barriero
Š 2006 Institute for Domestic & International Affairs, Inc. (IDIA) This document is solely for use in preparation for Rutgers Model United Nations 2006. Use for other purposes is not permitted without the express written consent of IDIA. For more information, please write us at idiainfo@idia.net
Introduction _________________________________________________________________ 1 Background _________________________________________________________________ 2 River Supply Management _________________________________________________________ 5 Early History by Region____________________________________________________________ 6 Africa _________________________________________________________________________________6 Middle East _____________________________________________________________________________8 Southern Asia __________________________________________________________________________10 North America__________________________________________________________________________11
Recent History___________________________________________________________________ 12 Africa ________________________________________________________________________________12 Middle East ____________________________________________________________________________13 Asia __________________________________________________________________________________14 South America__________________________________________________________________________16 North America__________________________________________________________________________18
United Nations Response to Conflicts Over Access to Water _____________________________ 18
Current Status ______________________________________________________________ 19 Key Positions _______________________________________________________________ 23 Regional Positions________________________________________________________________ 23 Non-Governmental Organizations __________________________________________________ 24 Business Interests ________________________________________________________________ 25
Summary___________________________________________________________________ 26 Discussion Questions _________________________________________________________ 27 Works Cited ________________________________________________________________ 28 Works Referenced ___________________________________________________________ 30
Rutgers Model United Nations 2006
1
Introduction With respect to water rights, much of the world is facing difficulty in allotting water resources shared by neighboring states in an effective and fair manner. When states share water, a sufficient division of the resource must be granted to each state and a plan for this distribution must be devised and agreed to by all interested parties. However, the unclear notion of what is sufficient, causes states to dispute what constitutes a fair distribution. Also, the ambiguous definition of the term “water rights” in international law increases misunderstanding over the sharing of water resources. The conflicts that arise from these misunderstanding have great consequences, as disputes over water resources have led to thousands of deaths. While many of these fatalities are the result of a lack of access to water, others are the result of brutal warfare waged in conquest of this precious resource. The constant growth in world population will put water resources in even higher demand, taxing the already strained situation.
This
growing competition for water access dramatically increases the probability of conflict among states. Water is critical to the development of any state. By tapping into a river’s water supply, governments are able to improve the development of agriculture, health, and many other industries. With the possibilities of great gains, nations perceive any sign of competition over this water as a threat to national security. Some states believe that they may tap into rivers freely and not be at fault – if a river flows through their state, political leaders feel that they can exercise
Sovereignty: Sovereignty refers to the power, and the right to exercise that power of self-government that all independent countries have. They can exercise the power of the state without asking permission from another state. Source: www.naiadonline.ca/book/01Glossary.htm
sovereignty over it. The challenge of this situation is when a river crosses a national boundary, and therefore falls under the sovereignty of more than one state. Should a nation in the upper Nile River Basin decide to dam the river for irrigation or power generation purposes, it would have significant affect on the multiples states further downstream that rely upon the river for their very existence.
Rutgers Model United Nations 2006
2
The limited nature of international law regulating the use of water increases the possibilities of a state extracting more water than is their right. It is generally understood that every human being has a right to access water. Unfortunately, many states defend that right for their own citizens, but are less concerned for those of other states further along the water source. They will take measures such as building dams to store excess water or redirect the flow of the river to be more beneficial to their farmers or industry. Such actions obviously cause grave concern to states downstream as the water supply becomes limited, leading their citizens to suffer from malnutrition and poverty. Usually the reason for conflict is due to severe insufficiencies of water in certain areas. Droughts can quickly reduce the amount of water in a region, diminishing the supply of water that precipitation usually brings. Many states store water behind dams in order to maintain a constant flow of water in case of drought. These facilities work very well in storing water, but they are designed to reduce the flow of water downstream, and to states that have similar needs regarding water. The downstream states perceive this as a threat to their national security, leading to the potential for political or armed conflict.
Background Conflict over water has been a fragile issue, especially since rights to water have not been well defined until recently. United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan claims that “access to safe water is a fundamental human need and, therefore, a basic human right.�1 Every human being therefore has the right to water since it is essential to life. A person can live without food for several weeks, but can only survive for three to four days without water. The grave need for water is the leading reason for the current issue of determining how a person should attain his right to water. Approximately eighteen per cent of the world population of six billion does not have access to useable water, meaning that water is unavailable to more than one billion
1
Gro Harlem Brundtland and Sergio Vieira de Mello, The Right to Water. (France: World Health Organization, 2003). 6
Rutgers Model United Nations 2006
3
people.2 The people that do not have meaningful access to water are the same that suffer from poverty and sickness. This lack of access to water is the primary “cause of serious illnesses such as diarrhoeal diseases, which kill over two million people each year [the Desertification: Long-term damage to dry lands caused by drought and by human activities such as over cultivation, deforestation, and poor irrigation practices that turn the land into a desert, unable to grow anything. Existing dry lands, which cover over 40% of the total land area of the world, mainly in Africa and Asia, are most at risk for desertification resulting from drought caused by climate change. Source: www.climatechangenorth.ca/H1_Glossary.html
vast majority of which are children].”3 Also, the lack of a consistent water supply adds to the severity of droughts when yearly precipitation is low. These droughts cause the deaths of thousands and destroy fertile land in a
process called desertification, reducing yearly crops and other sources of nutrition needed address the extreme poverty and malnutrition of such areas. The earth has enough water to provide for its entire population, but precipitation does not allow for even distribution. According to the World Water Council, water covers seventy per cent of the earth. “Ninety-seven [per cent] of this water is contained in oceans, hence salty and unsuitable for drinking or irrigation. Of the remaining 3 per cent of freshwater, only 0.3 per cent [of all water] is found in rivers and lakes.”4 With six billion people in the world, the current amount of renewable water available per person is roughly 5,000 liters per day.5 This amount is an ample quantity for any person, but the problem is that rainfall does not occur evenly or at a constant pace. Some African states, such as the Nile River Basin states, experience flooding some years, yet suffer droughts in successive years. The most plentiful source of freshwater comes from rivers, lakes, and other such inland waterways. The world obtains its necessary freshwater from these waterways, and also from rain collecting facilities. Many areas rely heavily on rivers as their sole source 2
World Health Organization, “Global Water Supply and Sanitation Assessment 2000 Report,” http://www.who.int/docstore/water_sanitation_health/Globassessment/Global1.htm#Top (accessed February 24, 2006) 3 Gro Harlem Brundtland and Sergio Vieira de Mello, The Right to Water. (France: World Health Organization, 2003). 6 4 World Water Council, “Water at a Glance”, http://www.worldwatercouncil.org/index.php?id=5 (Accessed February 24, 2006) 5 same as 4 (above)--(total renewable water is 10,000 – 12,000 km3 per year)
Rutgers Model United Nations 2006
4
of fresh water, as they represent the least costly manner of collecting freshwater, but can also stimulate the rise of conflicts among states. Rivers are traditionally lines upon which geography is based, meaning that these waterways often represent borders between two or more states, making ownership of the water that travels the course of the river difficult to determine. States extract water from the rivers, and in so doing take water from states that lay further downstream. This situation is manageable when the water is in plentitude and sufficient for all the states’ inhabitants, however a river with fluctuating flow rates can cause considerable tension. When water is scarce, the situation becomes complicated and states will potentially resort to fighting to defend what they feel is their right to the product of the river. The conflict over water has been most severe when claims to waterways were not well-defined. It is commonly accepted that any legal right to a waterway is held by the states that lie on any of its banks. Moreover, states through which tributaries flow maintain rights to the water in those smaller rivers. These riparian states hold the claim to utilize the water or the actual waterway to their benefit. The proportional nature to this right, however, is unclear. Upstream states have a
Riparian State: a state bordering an international river or one through which an international river flows Source: http://www.naiadonline.ca/book/01Glossary.htm Tributary: a smaller river or stream that flows into a larger river or stream. Usually, a number of smaller tributaries merge to form a river. Source: mvhs1.mbhs.edu/riverweb/glossary.html
position which grants them dominance over the waterway, as changes to the flow of the river at early stages has a clear affect on the nature of the river the further it flows. The Harmon Doctrine asserts that upstream states hold “the right to do whatever it chooses with the water regardless of its effects on other riparian states.”6 Downstream states usually hold a “claim to the ‘absolute territorial integrity’ of the river.”7 This claim maintains that the upstream states have no right to stop or impede the flow of the river, in an effort to adversely affect states downstream. A third view of how waterway rights should be divided is the “doctrine of prior 6 7
Yacob 362 Ibid .
Rutgers Model United Nations 2006
5
appropriation.�8 This principle entails the right to full control of the water by states that utilized the waterway earliest. This lack of agreement as to how ownership of rivers should be appropriated is the cause of river-related disputes.
River Supply Management Supply mismanagement is the leading causes for the lack of water access. Macromanagement of water supply consists of the methods used to divide water among states, such as through the legal rights of riparian states. Mismanagement occurs when one state decides to extract more water from a system than the amount that allows for an efficient equilibrium of benefits to all riparian states, and can result from the use of flawed storage facilities that have an adverse affect on the entire system. State governments are also responsible for the delivery of water to its citizens, and do so through micromanagement strategies. The schemes require planning the necessary transit of water and sewage and facilities for filtering and, if necessary, desalination. The inefficiencies that occur in the micro-management of water are a major cause of poor water access, but these concerns are typically addressed before the much more important aspects of micromanagement. Appropriate plans for macro-management can ensure the constant flow of water into a nation’s possession, and from their, distribution efforts can be established. Another critical aspect of micromanagement of rivers relates to pollution. Upstream states have a considerable responsibility not to pollute rivers, making them unusable by states further downstream. Upstream states do not need to divert or dam the flow of a river in order to have an affect on populations downstream. By polluting a river, they can cause it to be non-potable, or not useable for human consumption.
Industry upstream is therefore given
Potable Water: Water that is free from diseaseproducing organisms, poisonous substances, chemical, biological, and radioactive contaminants which would make it unfit for human consumption and many other uses Source: www.gulflink.osd.mil/water_use/ water use taba.htm
significant control over the manner in which water is used, and is responsible for the chemical composition of the water as it flows further downstream. 8
Yacob 362
Rutgers Model United Nations 2006
6
Early History by Region Throughout history, interstate conflicts have been common, but not secluded to areas of northern Africa, the Middle East, and southern Asia. These disputes include political, economical, and military threats, and sometimes resulted in armed conflict. Africa The Nile River Basin has been the cornerstone of African culture and life. It is relied upon heavily by the inhabitants of Egypt, the Sudan, Ethiopia, the Congo, Rwanda, Nile River Basin
Tanzania, and Uganda.
As the Nile travels
northward
water
it
collects
from
many
tributaries, including the Blue Nile and the Atbara, which originate in Ethiopia. These two tributaries flow through the Sudan and combine with the White Nile, accounting “for 72 per cent of the Nile’s total flow.”9 The Nile then flows to Egypt and flows into Lake Nasser, an Egyptian made created by the Aswan High Dam.
Finally, it travels across Egypt and
empties into the Mediterranean Sea. In the 1920s, when Great Britain controlled most of the Nile River Basin, a storage plan was devised to counteract the sporadic flooding and drought that plagued the region, and it was to be completed in the upper Nile River region, the area lying south of Egypt. It allowed water to be stored during times of Source: http://www.mbarron.net/Nile/newbigmap.jpg
9
Klare 151
plentitude, and released during times of scarcity.
The problem that impeded its
Rutgers Model United Nations 2006
7
production was the disdain the Egyptians had toward allowing the other riparian states more control of the Nile River waters. Fearing scarcity of water, the newly independent Egyptian state signed the Nile Waters Agreement of 1929 with Great Britain, who at that time had jurisdiction over the Nile and its tributaries, stating that “no works would be constructed on the upper Nile or its tributaries without Cairo’s prior approval.”10 After Great Britain disposed of its colonial holdings in Africa, new states emerged causing more strain on the water resources of the Nile, and the Nile Waters Agreement became obsolete as the new states had access, and therefore control over their sections of the river.
Egypt preserved their right to the water through the doctrine of prior of
appropriation, the absolute territorial integrity of the Nile River, but also reinforced their claim with threats of military intervention. Egypt sought to ensure the continuous supply of water from the Nile by constructing the Aswan High Dam. Creating Lake Nasser, the dam holds back much of the water that would otherwise flow freely to the Mediterranean Sea. Giving Egypt substantial control over flooding and drought, the Aswan High Dam provided Egypt with 160 billion cubic meters of water for reserve. While the dam allowed Egypt control over how the water would flow across its soil, it was at risk of states further upriver implementing a similar strategy. The Egyptian government sought to neutralize this risk with military and economic threats directed primarily at the Sudan, but also at Ethiopia. After several years, Egyptians and the Sudanese cooperated and signed the “Agreement for the Full Utilization of the Nile Waters,” in 1959. This ameliorated the situation between Egypt and Sudan, but it did not take into consideration the actions that might be taken by other riparian states that lied further upstream, such as Ethiopia. When Ethiopia was considering plans to irrigate their land with the water from the Blue Nile, Egyptian officials threatened Ethiopia with military force if their actions would result in a significant alteration of the flow of the river. With the fear of attack from Egypt’s
10
Klare 152
Rutgers Model United Nations 2006
8
powerful military and a war being waged with neighboring Eritrea, Ethiopia backed down. Middle East Records of conflict over water in the Middle East date back as far as ancient times when groups feuded over control, or simply access, to the waters in the area. A prime example is the record in the Old Testament’s Exodus, where the Israelites fought for control of the Jordan River Valley. These conflicts have persisted into modern times, and include the fight over control of the major tributaries of the Jordan River that flows through Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Israel, and the West Bank, in addition to the TigrisEuphrates Rivers that crosses through Turkey, Syria, Iran, and Iraq.
These conflicts,
although very similar to those in the Nile River basin, have proven to be both more unilateral and more violent. The Tigris and Euphrates
Tigris and Euphrates Rivers
Rivers originate in Turkey and flow through Syria and Iraq. Iran has a small position in the origin of the Little Zab River, a tributary that leads to the Tigris River. Conflict in this area is mostly due to the construction
of
dams
in
southeastern Turkey and Syria. In 1975 the Syrians completed the Tabqa (ath-Thawrah) Dam and began to fill its attached reservoir. Although the claim was rejected by the Syrians, the Iraqi government stated that there was a significant reduction in the amount of water that was entering Iraq from the Euphrates River.
This occurrence compelled the Iraqi and Syrian governments to
Rutgers Model United Nations 2006
9
reinforce the border between the two states with military units. If it was not for the intervention of Saudi Crown Prince Fahd, war would have been unavoidable. In 1988, Turkey devised the South-eastern Anatolian Project (GAP), which included the construction of several dams that would be used to store water and to produce electricity. Collected water would provide for irrigation in southeastern Turkey improving the income levels in that region. Fearing that the flow of water through their territory would be greatly diminished, Iraq and Syria established an alliance of military force to deter Turkey from altering the flow of the river. In 1990, Turkey stopped the flow of the Euphrates for an entire month, after having been given prior consent to by Iraq and Syria, but this successful diversion caused Iraq and Syria much concern as it demonstrated Turkey’s ability to stop the flow of water at any time. Iraq and Syria saw this
Jordan River Basin
situation as a national security concern and vowed to use force to ensure their access to the river.11 Anticipating a reaction from Iraq and Syria, Turkey signed an agreement in 1987 with Syria to ensure the continuous flow of water at 500 cubic meters per second. Syria in turn agreed to stop their clandestine support of the Kurdistan Worker’s Party (PKK), a terrorist group operating inside Turkey. The Jordan River has arguably caused the most brutal of conflicts in the region. The river, which originates in Lebanon, flows through the Golan Heights between Israel and Syria and later between Israel and Jordan to pour into the salty Dead Sea. The conflict that arose due to this river began when 11
Peter H. Gleick, “Water and Conflict: Fresh Water Resources and International Security” In International Security, Vol. 18, No. 1 (Summer, 1993), 79. (The MIT Press, 1993.)
Rutgers Model United Nations 2006
10
Israel approached the completion of the construction of the National Water Carrier (NWC) which draws water from the Jordan River north of Jordan and carries it throughout Israel. The other riparian states responded with the following actions: Viewing the NWC as an intolerable theft of shared Jordan River waters, Arab leaders …, in 1960, … agreed on a bold and provocative move: damming the Hasbani River in Lebanon and the Baniyas in Syria, and diverting their waters (via the Yarmuk) to the East Ghor Canal in Jordan— thus bypassing the upper Jordan and Lake Tiberias, the main intake site for the Israeli canal system.12
If completed, this undertaking would have undermined the Israeli’s control over the river, not to mention the massive reduction in flow of water that would travel through the NWC. The Israeli government threatened the Arab leaders, “that any move to divert the headwaters of the Jordan River would represent ‘an outright act on one of Israel’s means of livelihood’ and would therefore be regarded as ‘a threat to peace.’”13 During the following seven years various military incidents occurred, including Israeli fighter-planes striking the Baniyas-Yarmuk canal and engaging in several aerial dogfights. These conflicts, although not solely related to the water diversions, escalated into the Six-Day war (1967), where Israel’s victory ensured that the waters would not be diverted. After the war, Israel controlled the Golan Heights, ensuring that the Jordanians could neither dam the Baniyas River nor divert the waters to the Yarmuk River. In addition the Israeli’s occupied the West Bank, home to a large aquifer. The Israeli position after the Six-Day War ensured them an improved flow of water while depriving the Jordanians of the control for which they greatly longed. Southern Asia In the 19th Century, Great Britain had control over the Indus River basin in what is modern-day India and Pakistan. During its control, Great Britain constructed several canals to connect the tributaries of the Indus River tributaries into an integrated basinwide management system. These canals served a dual purpose: while allowing flood 12 13
Klare 168 Klare 169
Rutgers Model United Nations 2006
11
waters to be controlled, they also irrigated the land between the tributaries. This area flourished in agriculture and allowed for the economic success of the region. In 1947, when India and Pakistan divided into two separate states, this canal system was cut apart. The method in which it was broken apart, gave India the control over the tributary headwaters of the Indus River. This determination caused considerable tension between the newly partitioned states, as India was able to control the flow of much of the Indus Indus River Basin
River.
This strain was
reduced
with
Waters
Treaty
the
Indus
of
1960
which divided the various tributaries
among
both
countries.
This
treaty
soothed tensions between these areas, but did not take into account the massive population growth the area would experience.
Since that time, extreme population
growth in India has demanded more access to water, and a growing renewal to old tensions. North America The United States did not effectively negotiate with its neighbors regarding access to, and control of, waterways. In 1895, a dispute grew over whether the U.S. or Mexico should have control over the Rio Grande River. The US won the dispute, and developing what
Rio Grande
Rutgers Model United Nations 2006
12
would become the Harmon Doctrine, stating that “the state [of the US] had the right to Harmon Doctrine: States that riparian states have exclusive or sovereign rights over the waters flowing through their territory.
use the fluvial waters which lie within its territory without any limitation whatsoever.�14
The
Harmon Doctrine was never a broadly enforced
Source: http://www.unu.edu/unupress/unupbooks/80a 03e/80A03E0j.htm
concept, as even the United States often relaxed
Fluvial: of or relating to or happening in a river.
ensure tranquility on its borders.
Source: wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn
its demands over riparian rights to rivers to A 1906
agreement with Mexico granted the state as much access to the Rio Grande as it had had before the
flow was diverted upstream. The United States abandoned the Harmon Doctrine in 1958, and has relied upon the concept of riparian rights to settle river disputes.
Recent History Africa In the 1980s the Nile Basin began to dry out. The drier states of the Horn of Africa, which overlaps with the states of the Nile Basin, had experienced sever droughts for a lengthy period, and in the 1980s as flows in the Horn of Africa ebbed, this drought began to move downstream.
In 1984, Ethiopia, Eritrea, Somalia
experienced a severe drought that killed an estimated one million people through starvation.
Reduced
precipitation caused crops to fail and famine to increase.
International humanitarian assistance in
the form of food and water, much of which came through Live Aid, was sent to the Horn of Africa, alleviating the severity of the drought. This drought brought to light the fragile situation of water scarcity
14
Yacob 363
Rutgers Model United Nations 2006
13
in Africa. While the immediate needs of Ethiopians were addressed, little was done to bring about a quick solution to the drought problem. The international community looked toward the Nile River and sought to solve the recurring drought and famine problems in the region.
With the increasing risk of
drought, the region recognized the need for a basin-wide water management system that would efficiently store and disperse water.
In February 1999, the ten Nile basin
countries, Burundi, Democratic Republic of Congo, Egypt, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, Sudan, Tanzania, and Uganda, formed a cooperative agreement with the signing of the Nile Basin Initiative (NBI), and developed a forum “to achieve sustainable socioeconomic development through the equitable utilization of, and benefit from, the common Nile Basin water resources.”15 Through this initiative, the Nile basin region will cooperate on a strategy to ensure the safe and predictable flow of the Nile, and to promote sustainable growth in the reason. The primary goal of this initiative was to increase the supply of water in order to alleviate poverty, and the NBI sees water as the only possibility for nourishment and economic gain.
This proposal called for the
utilization of Nile waters to alleviate the risk of drought that persisted in Ethiopia, Eritrea, and Somalia, while also increasing the flow of water to other states. This collaboration of states demonstrates the ability to find peaceful solutions to problems that previously proved deadly. Middle East In the Middle East, brutal conflicts over access to water were of serious concern. The Six-Day War, although a victory for Israel, did not amount to a victory for the people or the environment of the region. More than thirty years after the Six-Day War, Israel and Jordan finally realized that cooperation would be the only tool that would assist in their continuous problem of water scarcity. The population in the region grew by about 95 per cent from the end of the Six-Day War until 1990, sharply increasing the demand
15
Nile Basin Initiative, “NBI-About Us,” http://www.nilebasin.org/aboutUs.htm (accessed March 1, 2006)
Rutgers Model United Nations 2006
14
for water.16 Only through cooperation could enough water to sustain the increased numbers of people be brought to the region. On 26 October 1994, Jordan and Israel agreed to the Israel-Jordan Treaty of Peace to end the war that existed between the two parties. In this accord, they recognized the severity of the scarce water supply and the contamination that improper water usage was causing. Although no concrete plan was devised, the first step toward cooperation was taken. Unfortunately, the peace treaty with Jordan and Israel did not take into account the other states that were warring against Israel, specifically Lebanon and Syria. After the Six-Day War, the Israelis occupied the Golan Heights, which to them was a strategic move to ensure their control over the Baniyas River. To the Syrians, this occupation was an attack on their way of life as they used the river for fishing, swimming, and most importantly, drinking water. Also, the relationship between Israel and Lebanon was not in good condition. In 1978 Israeli forces occupied southern Lebanon in retaliation for the Lebanon’s harboring of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO). Israel continued its occupation of the Lebanon border until June 2000. This occupation was due in part to the continuous cross-border attacks by the PLO and later Hezbollah, an Islamic fundamentalist group. These tensions did not allow Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria to form a region wide agreement on water use, and as a result, disagreement and resentment over access to water remains, and is likely exacerbating the already tense relationship among these states. Asia Although a treaty was signed more than forty years ago, India and Pakistan are again in conflict over water supply. The Indus Water Treaty entrusted India with full control over the Ravi, Sutlej, and Beas rivers and ensured the continuous flow of the Indus, the Chenab, and the Jhelum rivers into Pakistan. Since the agreement went into force, India and Pakistan have built dams for irrigation and hydro-power on their rivers. 16
The World Bank, World Development Indicators database, via Countries: Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, and Syrian Arab Republic, Series: Population, total, Years: 1967,1990, http://devdata.worldbank.org/dataonline/
Rutgers Model United Nations 2006
15
In 1999, India began building another dam, the Baglihar, and Pakistan saw this as a direct threat to the promise that was made to them in 1960 with the Indus Water Treaty. Pakistan stated that it left them exposed to Indian control and to a reduction of the current water flow. Pakistan relies heavily on the Chenab River for its supply of drinkable water, and a significant change in flow of this river would result in both economic and humanitarian catastrophe. India’s intention for the dam was to irrigate the land around the Kashmir and to produce hydro-power, however Pakistan held that the proposed plan to take water from the Chenab would violate the Indus Water Treaty. India disagreed and continued to build the dam. Although this conflict seems to be escalating, a peaceful agreement is probable. In the past 45 years, the Aral Sea has undergone a dramatic decrease in size as the flow of rivers in the region was diverted for irrigation and other purposes.17 Until the 1960s, those living on the periphery of the
Aral Sea
Aral Sea depended on it for its wealth of fish.
The population of the Aral Sea
region supported itself economically and nutritionally with the fish that the sea provided. When the Soviet Union saw the economic potential of the rivers that fed into the Aral Sea, it decided to change the flow of the river to allow for cotton production in the region. The irrigation process was successful, but it relied on the two sole sources that fed into the Aral Sea: the Amu Dar’ya and the Syr Dar’ya rivers. The water that was redirected improved cotton and rice cultivation, but destroyed the fishing in the Aral Sea as the sea life could not be sustained due to the rise of salinity in the water. “The first drastic increase [of salinity] occurred between 1971 and 1975 when 17
United Nations Environmental Programme, “Vital Water Graphics: Will the Aral Sea Disappear Forever,” UNEP, http://www.unep.org/vitalwater/25.htm (accessed March 1, 2006)
Rutgers Model United Nations 2006
16
salinity rose to 12-14 per cent. In the late 1980s the salinity reached 23 per cent.”18 The increase of salinity caused the water to become toxic, destroying the presence of twenty species of fish that existed in the sea. Worse, through evaporation and seepage, the waters receded. The exposed seabed contained salt deposits that were picked up by the winds and polluted the air and land up to 300 kilometers away.
In addition to
contaminating farmland and grazing pastures, the aerosols picked up from the Aral Sea caused the air to be toxic even to humans. Various diseases have developed in the population due to this lack of air quality. Finding a solution to halt the destruction of the Aral Sea has proven to be a difficult task. Some proposed solutions to this problem include the rerouting of the waters back into the Aral Sea.
Unfortunately, this region was and still is very
economically dependent on the irrigation that caused the depletion of the Aral Sea. The economic effects this rerouting would cause are unimaginable. The only solution to ameliorate the negative consequences of this problem is to assist the people that have lost their jobs and have sustained a reduction in quality of life due to this calamity. Such relief, however, proves difficult as the local communities had a substantial reliance on this body of water. Still, through job training and education, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan hope to develop the population of the region while also attending to the management and revitalization of the Aral Sea. South America In terms of water, South America is far more blessed than other regions of the world in that they have a wealth of the resource. The lush vegetation in South America is due to the large amounts of precipitation and plentiful springs that water the land. When untouched, most of this water is potable, but with the development of cities in these areas, water contamination is becoming widespread. Also, the population growth rate in South America, coupled with slow economic growth, has caused the demand for clean water to increase, without an effective strategy to ensure that enough clean water is available for 18
The Water Page, “Aral Sea”, The Water Page, http://www.thewaterpage.com/aral.htm (accessed March 1, 2006)
Rutgers Model United Nations 2006
17
the growing population. Bolivia decided to solve this problem by privatizing the water supply allowing the Bolivian government to pass the burden of piping and other such costs to a company who would in turn pass the costs to the people using the water. The companies could more fully develop the water delivery systems through lower costs, and without the restrictions of the strained budget of the Bolivian state.
In theory,
privatization is good for a developing economy, but without competition or proper guidelines, markets do not portray the actual price consumers are willing and able to pay. In 1997, Bolivia received a loan
Amazon River Basin
from the International Monetary Fund to assist in the privatization of its water supply. The Fund required that Bolivia privatize its water and sanitation to improve the current situation of water contamination and to remedy the lack of access. While the mission was noble, the result of this effort was quite the opposite. Attempting to make a profit, the private water companies increased the price of water by almost 300 per cent, causing water to be too expensive for the poor of the country.19 Protests were held in Cochabamba, Bolivia against the unjust prices the poor of the country had to pay in order to exercise their right to water. The Bolivian government responded by removing the concessions to water from the two foreign companies, Aguas del Tunari and Aguas de Illimani Although water privatization is necessary when underdeveloped states can not afford to develop proper systems, a balance must be set to supply every human being with the water necessary to sustain life.
19
Gustavo Capdevila, “World Economic Forum: Water as a Right, Not a Commodity,� Inter Press Service/Global Information Network (2006). Lexis Nexis Academic. January 29, 2006
Rutgers Model United Nations 2006
18
North America In recent years, the U.S. has been friendly with Canada and Mexico and conflicts over water have not been prevalent. The primary concern has been the overuse of river waters, mostly due to the overproduction of dams. The Rio Grande has begun to dwindle in flow and in 2001 the river actually ceased to exist around El Paso, Texas, only to reform closer to the sea.20 The river was overused and drought in the area hurt the river’s mass. Both Mexico and the U.S. utilize the river for farming, drinking, and washing. Recently the increase in population on the border and the growth in use have caused the river to shrink. This reduction in river waters is also prevalent in the Colorado River as it is also tapped by many communities.
United Nations Response to Conflicts Over Access to Water The United Nations, in 2002, made a major breakthrough that is aiding states in their efforts to achieve access to quality water. This innovation came in the form of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), which hope to “halve, by the year 2015 … the proportion of people who are unable to reach or to afford safe drinking water.”21 By improving access to water, the UN hopes to encourage development, resulting in a reduction of hunger and poverty. By communicating these goals to the various agencies within the UN, the organization hopes to accelerate the achievement of these goals to forward global development, as approximately twenty-four agencies within the UN are involved in aiding the improvement of water access.22 Unfortunately, the complex web of agencies and organizations has found cooperation to be a major hurdle in advancing the MDGs, especially in terms of access to water.23
To bolster in the spirit of
collaboration, the UN Millennium Task Force has suggested options on how to cooperate. 20
Steve Grant, “America's Rivers: Spoken For to the Last Drop”, Los Angeles Times, December 25, 2005, Sunday Bulldog Edition. sec Metro Part B; Pg. 1 21 “Millennium Development Goals”, UNEP http://www.unep.org/dpdl/water/Management/mdg.asp (accessed April 19, 2006) 22 UN Millennium Task Force, “What Will it Take” UN Millenium Task Force http://www.unmillenniumproject.org/documents/What_Will_It_Take.pdf (accessed April 19, 2006) 23 Carius, Alexander, Dabelko, Geoffrey, and Wolf, Aaron “WATER, CONFLICT, AND COOPERATION”, UNGlobal Security Initiative http://www.un-globalsecurity.org/pdf/Carius_Dabelko_Wolf.pdf (accessed April 19, 2006)
Rutgers Model United Nations 2006
19
One of these recommendations is the “[assignment of] UN system task managers [to] the various aspects of water resources and water supply and sanitation.24” This entails assigning the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the United Nations Education, Social, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) the task of increasing water access, while the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) target the task of improving water quality. UNEP is currently assuming its environmental role and advancing the global understanding
of
“protection,
governmental policy to improve the
Desertification: Long-term damage to dry lands caused by drought and by human activities such as over cultivation, deforestation, and poor irrigation practices that turn the land into a desert, unable to grow anything. Existing dry lands, which cover over 40% of the total land area of the world, mainly in Africa and Asia, are most at risk for desertification resulting from drought caused by climate change.
overall access to water, including
Source: www.climatechangenorth.ca/H1_Glossary.html
conservation, and more efficient use of freshwater resources.25” Secondly the agency hopes to aid in developing
technological, legal, and institutional guidance.26 UNEP has also targeted other sources that lead to strife in these areas through additional research, including efforts to ameliorate desertification, a human-induced process that leads to the degradation of fertile land. By targeting this process UNEP hopes to improve the inefficiencies of farming and conserve water.
Current Status Improving the quality and availability of water is the driving force that has led countries to move away from the military conflicts for control over sources of water. Through the process of trial and error, states have come to the conclusion that only through collaboration can they satisfy the need of water for their neighbor while also increasing the chances that their water needs can be reached. States come to realize that water is a right of all people: water is a basic need and depriving an individual of this 24
IBID 24 “Water Policy and Strategy”, UNEP http://www.unep.org/dpdl/water/Policy_strategy/index.asp (accessed April 19, 2006) 26 IBID 27 25
Rutgers Model United Nations 2006
20
vital resource severely diminishes their ability to survive. Military conflict has proven ineffective to achieve a greater control of constant availability of water to all. With the mediation of various international groups, like the UN and the World Bank, most states are able to come to a peaceful conclusion on the sharing of water resources. Through research of regional and ecological capabilities, states have devised plans that aid in the development of the regional waterways. This research has also aided in the exposure of the damage that heavy reliance on any one waterway causes. Of late, much attention has been given to the impact that humans have had in polluting water systems that feed into lakes, and the excessive tapping of non-renewable sources of water. Although water is a renewable resource, the manner in which this renewal process happens does not guarantee equal distribution across the world. The regions that were once in conflict see the opportunity that can only be achieved through a collaborative management among the regional states. Today this cooperation is at its early stages. The immense capital that must be obtained by these least developed countries comes with significant expense.
Legal
groundwork must be made to ensure each state's sovereignty, while assuring cooperation promotes equitable water access. In 2006, the Nile Basin Initiative has finally begun to achieve some forward movement in their efforts to manage the Nile River for the benefit of ten states. Their task is to deliver water sufficient for individual to all parts of the region, and plan on doing this through the Shared Vision Program (SVP), which is “comprised of eight projects designed by the NBI countries to build a strong foundation for cooperative action and for future investment projects.”27 These projects include the formation of an effective management system, and also address the utilization of improved technologies or methods for the storage of water. The SVP hopes to achieve its goal in order to aid the development of the region. The program will construct water storage facilities using local labor supplies. The dams will manage the flow of water, while also storing it for times of drought. These dams 27
Nile Basin Initiative, “NBI- Shared Vision Program Brief,” http://www.nilebasin.org/svpProgramBriefs.htm
Rutgers Model United Nations 2006
21
will store water in areas where evaporation is less intense and will help to control flooding. There are also plans to implement hydro-power dams in the Nile River region to produce power to be used for the development of the area. Proposals have been made to build a hydro-power dam in Ethiopia which would store water while also producing high amounts of electricity, accessible to the people of Ethiopia and Sudan. Through these advancements, states in the Horn of Africa could work toward reducing the civil strife with which they are currently plagued. This region is very underdeveloped and such improvements could also jump-start economic growth. Only through cooperation can this region advance. With the major groundwork in place, the Nile Basin Initiative hopes to speed up the implementation of its plans for regional development, although it has as yet been unable to set a date for the completion of the projects. Recently the possibility of another drought in the Horn of Africa has regenerated concern about access to water. UNEP claims that the increased risk of drought is due to the volatility in the climate, and believes that global climate change is increasing the severity of droughts.28 With the situation in Africa escalating, plans to improve access to water must be implemented immediately. Although interstate conflict is a major concern in this region, with strife in Ethiopia, Somalia, the Sudan, and Chad, drought would bring about even more destruction as people would suffer from malnutrition and famine. The benefits of cooperation continue past North Africa and into the Middle East, where Israel and Jordan realized the great need to find peaceful solutions to water management and look ahead to problems that may cause concern in the future. Like the Aral Sea, the Dead Sea has lost much of its volume due to a redirection of the flow of its tributary rivers. The Jordan River now carries only a small fraction of the water it once deposited in the Dead Sea, due in large part to Israel’s use of the river for irrigation in the north, and Jordan’s routing water from the Yarmuk through the Ghor (King Abdullah) Canal. This reduction of flow caused the level of the Dead Sea to fall 30 meters in the 28
British Broadcasting Corporation, “Environment digest 1 Jan to 7 Feb 06”, BBC Monitoring Africa – Political, BBC 2006. Lexis-Nexis Academic http://web.lexis-nexis.com
Rutgers Model United Nations 2006
22
last 30 years and it is losing more each year. The Dead Sea could hold a fate similar to that of the Aral Sea if nothing is done. The Dead Sea is known to be rich in minerals and many people travel there to bath in its “curing waters.” The region would experience economic difficulties as the Dead Sea, the region’s main attraction, began slowly disappearing. Jordan and Israel have teamed up to solve this problem. The most probable solution is the construction of the Red Sea-Dead Sea ‘Peace Conduit’ (RSDSC), which would act as “a water conveyance system designed to bring water from the Red Sea to Dead Sea.”29 This system would extract water from the Red Sea and direct it towards the Dead Sea while also generating hydro-power.
Additionally some water would be
desalinated and pumped to the communities of both Jordan and Israel. This would restore the wildlife in the Dead Sea, while creating more jobs, and increasing the freshwater supply of the entire region. Israel is excited about this plan, but is troubled by the capital that is necessary to fund this massive $1.3 billion system as such funds are currently unavailable. In order to facilitate construction of the conveyance system, the World Bank announced in May 2005 that “it would jointly fund a two-year feasibility study into the huge pipeline project … The study is to take 24 months to complete and will cost $15.5 million.” This study seeks to find the best manner in which this system could be built without damaging any ecological aspects of the region. Although very expensive, this system will allow a more plentitude of water to be available. In India and Pakistan, increasing tensions that have been caused by the construction of the Baglihar Dam are slowly defusing. When Pakistan saw that India would not cease the construction of the dam, they reported to the World Bank that India was violating the Indus Water Treaty. The Bank, although a mediator of the treaty, had no power to enforce the guidelines; instead it appointed an expert to arbitrate the dispute. Pakistan has communicated with the World Bank, and has changed its position on the 29
Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs, “Israel and Jordan Launch Global Campaign to Save the Dead Sea,” http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/MFAArchive/2000_2009/2002/8/
Rutgers Model United Nations 2006
23
construction of the Baglihar. On 2 February 2006, Pakistan conceded to India “that the construction of the Baglihar Dam in Jammu and Kashmir was as per the Indus Water Treaty, 1960.”30 This crisis has begun to be resolved, but it demonstrates the possibility of continued problems between the two states concerning the utilization of the Indus River and its tributaries.
Key Positions The positions of states will reflect their relative access to water. Those that border considerable sources of fresh water will generally support programs that they feel would benefit their populations, while states without significant bodies of water will strongly advocate that they should have expanded access to headwaters and tributaries. Rather the address individual needs, it is important that future efforts regarding access to water represent the needs of all states.
Regional Positions Water conflicts have caused conflict in Africa, the Middle East and Asia for some time. The arid conditions in these areas have caused states to fight over a scarce water supply, and only recently, have brought about efforts to ensure that depleted waterways can once again flow freely. In Africa, the changing nature of the Nile River is bringing about cooperation as states are coming together to discuss ways to improve the manner in which the river can provide water to populations along its banks. Egypt, once the leading power in the region, has teamed up with Sudan and Ethiopia redirect the waters of the Nile River to achieve development throughout the region. The region views the water scarcity as severe, but they are optimistic of their ability to adequately address the situation. The water situation in the Middle East is similar to that of Africa. Both developed and underdeveloped states occupy this region, but they share the recognition that 30
Hindustan Times, “Pak admits Baglihar Dam as per Water Treaty”, (HT Media Ltd. 2006) February 2, 2006 Lexis-Nexis Academic via “Baglihar Dam, Pakistan, India”
Rutgers Model United Nations 2006
24
continuous access to water is critical for their development. Although the region is not fully cooperating, mostly due to religious divides, they recognize that people throughout the region need continuous access to water. They hope to achieve a better balance of water usage, by finding alternate sources. Israel and Jordan are currently exploring the possibility of major desalinization of water from the Red Sea, while also distributing it throughout the region, which will help replenish the Dead Sea.
This shows the
cooperation that some areas are willing to demonstrate in order to lessen the impact that water scarcity has had on the region. Asia has seen a great influx of growth in development and population in the past ten years, causing states to become even more dependent upon sources of water. Due to Asia’s great size, smaller regional collaborations on water usage must occur. All states in the region realize that some sort of peaceful negotiations must be made with one another to better understand each of their positions. Such is the case with India and Pakistan who have consistently tried to solve disagreements regarding water usage peacefully. South America views their water issue more in terms of cleanliness than scarcity. The tropical environment in this region allows for more than enough rainfall to occur, but the necessary systems to store and distribute the water are not well-developed. The region struggles with implementing privatization of water supplies to form profitable, yet uniformly beneficial, systems for the entire region. This method of water distribution offers improved water quality, but does not take into account the people who cannot afford the higher prices that this entails. The United States and Europe boast a well-developed water delivery system and direct their concerns in aiding less developed regions, like Africa, South America, and some areas of the Middle East. Countries such as Great Britain, France, and the United States have funded programs to bring water to impoverished areas.
Non-Governmental Organizations The International Committee of the Red Cross is a leading organization that addresses the problem of access to clean water. They urge states to develop industries
Rutgers Model United Nations 2006
25
and adopt methods that are efficient in the use of water. It is usually rural communities that lack technological advancements that suffer from the scarcity of water. The Red Cross recommends using the most basic technological tools to reduce costs and improve overall access and quality of water. Through the improvement of water sources, regions will spend less time worrying about water availability, and more time working toward rising out of poverty. Also, they target efforts that can be made to improve gender equality, such as transporting water to villages, so as to reduce the distance women or girls need to travel to collect water. This allows females to spend other time either going to school or learning other skills that will help them in the future. UNICEF supports the Red Cross in its recommendation of improving the situation for children, especially girls. UNICEF stated that “children – and particularly girls – are denied their right to education because they are busy fetching water.”31 Improvements in the quality and availability of water will cause a wide-scale improvement in education and help facilitate development. Although water is necessary for good health, the time it takes to get it does not allow women and girls to improve their social standing.
Business Interests With the ever growing scarcity of water, and the low cost to collect the commodity, private corporations view water as a source of immense profit. They claim that through privatization, states can effectively reduce water conflicts and increase water access to all the states’ citizens. By charging a fee for the water, businesses can make a profit. With the initial investment to improve water systems, and the financial backing of their investors, these companies can reduce the cost of access to water. Also businesses claim that privatization would ensure that government’s water systems were running safely, and with reduced contamination.
31
UNICEF, “Water, environment and sanitation”, http://www.unicef.org/wes/
Rutgers Model United Nations 2006
26
Summary The severity of water scarcity and the probability of conflicts arising due to this scarcity have influenced the actions of states to enact treaties and agreements. These accords highlight the right to water that every individual holds and the possibilities of an improved, constant supply of water to all states in question. With the assistance of international agencies and other NGOs, states have found sources of financial support and innovation that assist in dividing and distributing shared water resources. The greatest concern over water disputes is the possibility of increased tensions. The expected growth of populations and the finite amounts of fresh water increases the probabilities for the occurrence of conflicts to materialize.
States have safeguarded
themselves from these conflicts by forming alliances and other such agreement. Unfortunately the presence of changing state regimes could alter the balance of power and void accords made to improve overall regional water access. The UN and its various agencies and departments provide states asssitance when they encounter problems that they alone cannot solve.
This is why initiatives and
coalitions such as the Nile Basin Initiative and the RSDSC have been formed. With the assistance of international parties, regional programs can be formed to improve the well being of every person. Today the most severe problem with water is aimed at the micro-mismanagements of water, as states must be assisted in developing efficient systems to deliver water. This access is what deters much of the development that could occur in these poor regions. The first step to improve intrastate water access is to complete the process of macromanagement of water. In addition, states must support efforts to conserve. Only through the measures of water conservation, efficient water allocation, and the right of access to water for all individuals, can the world hope to achieve a substantial increase in global access to clean water, thus improved development.
Rutgers Model United Nations 2006
27
Discussion Questions • Has your region experienced any reduction in access to water? If so, how has this lack of access affected the population? Agriculture? Health? Development? • What is your plan of action to counteract the scarcity of water? Has your nation worked with neighbors in any way? • Has any lack of access to water caused your nation to disagree with others? If water rights caused a conflict within your state, how did it end and what where the conditions of the agreements? • How does your nation perceive the importance of global water scarcity? • What agreement or relationships has your state made with other states? • What are the ecological damages that have occurred in your region due to the excessive use of rivers or lakes? • What plans does your nation have to repair these environmental damages? • What is the water access outlook for your nation? Water? Population?
Rutgers Model United Nations 2006
28
Works Cited British Broadcasting Corporation, “Environment digest 1 Jan to 7 Feb 06”, BBC Monitoring Africa – Political, BBC 2006. Lexis-Nexis Academic http://www.lexis-nexis.com Brundtland, Gro Harlem and Sergio Vieira de Mello, The Right to Water. World Health Organization, 2003. Capdevila, Gustavo, “World Economic Forum: Water as a Right, Not a Commodity,” Inter Press Service/Global Information Network (2006). Lexis Nexis Academic. January 29, 2006 Carius, Alexander, Dabelko, Geoffrey, and Wolf, Aaron “WATER, CONFLICT, AND COOPERATION”, UN- Global Security Initiative http://www.un-globalsecurity.org/pdf/Carius_Dabelko_Wolf.pdf (accessed April 19, 2006) Gleick, Peter H. “Water and Conflict: Fresh Water Resources and International Security” In International Security, Vol. 18, No. 1 (Summer, 1993), 79-112. The MIT Press, 1993. Grant, Steve. “Americas Rivers: Spoken For to the Last Drop”, Los Angeles Times, 25 December 2005, Sunday Bulldog Edition. Lexis-Nexis, via Rio Grande, http://www.lexis-nexis.com Hindustan Times, “Pak admits Baglihar Dam as per Water Treaty”, (HT Media Ltd. 2006) February 2, 2006 Lexis-Nexis Academic via “Baglihar Dam, Pakistan, India” http://web.lexis-nexis.com Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs, “Israel and Jordan Launch Global Campaign to Save the Dead Sea”, http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/MFAArchive/2000_2009/2002/8 Klare, Michael T. Resource Wars: The New Landscape of Global Conflict. New York: Henry Holt and Company, LLC, 2001. “Millennium Development Goals”, UNEP http://www.unep.org/dpdl/water/Management/mdg.asp (accessed April 19, 2006) Nile Basin Initiative, “NBI-About Us,” http://www.nilebasin.org/aboutUs.htm (accessed March 1, 2006)
Rutgers Model United Nations 2006
29
Nile Basin Initiative, “NBI- Shared Vision Program Brief,” http://www.nilebasin.org/svpProgramBriefs.htm Pierri, Raol. “South America: Water as Human Right, Not Means to Profit”, Inter Press Service/Global Information Network. 23 September 2005 http://www.lexisnexis.com United Nations Environmental Programme, “Vital Water Graphics: Will the Aral Sea Disappear Forever,” UNEP, http://www.unep.org/vitalwater/25.htm UNICEF, “Water, environment and sanitation,” http://www.unicef.org/wes/ UN Millennium Task Force, “What Will it Take” UN Millenium Task Force http://www.unmillenniumproject.org/documents/What_Will_It_Take.pdf (accessed April 19, 2006) The Water Page, “Aral Sea”, The Water Page, http://www.thewaterpage.com/aral.htm “Water Policy and Strategy,” UNEP http://www.unep.org/dpdl/water/Policy_strategy/index.asp (accessed April 19, 2006) World Bank, World Development Indicators database, via Countries: Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, and Syrian Arab Republic, Series: Population, total, Years: 1967,1990, http://devdata.worldbank.org/dataonline/ World Health Organization, “Global Water Supply and Sanitation Assessment 2000 Report,” http://www.who.int/docstore/water_sanitation_health/Globassessment/Global1.ht m#Top World Water Council, “Water at a Glance”, http://www.worldwatercouncil.org/index.php?id=5 Yacob, Yosef “Equitable Utilization in the Blue Nile River Sub-Basin: Context, Problems, and Prospects.” Diss. York University, 2002. Toronto, Canada
Rutgers Model United Nations 2006
30
Works Referenced Bricheri-Colombi, Stephen and Bradnock, Robert. “Geopolitics, water and development in South Asia: cooperative development in the Ganges-Brahmaputra delta” The Geographical Journal, Vol. 169, No. 1 March 2003, pp. 43-44 Kloos, Helmut “Peasant Irrigation Development and Food Production in Ethiopia” The Geographical Journal, Vol. 157, No.3 (Nov., 1991, 295-306) Revollo, Mario M. “Management issues in the Lake Titicaca and Lake Poopo system: Importance of developing a water budget” Lakes & Reservoirs: Research and Management 2001 6:225-229