20
Inquiry into the 2019–20 Victorian fire season
Opportunities for the future The extensive nature and prolonged presence of the 2019–20 fires in the Victorian landscape resulted in many challenges that hindered or prevented the activation of many well practised relief measures. The relief effort required was on a scale that had not been experienced previously, and the capability and capacity of the emergency management sector and supporting relief arrangements were tested considerably. Given the impact that climate change is having on our environment, the likelihood of similar events occurring in the future is real. There is now the opportunity to learn from the experiences of the 2019– 20 fires and strengthen the relief arrangements by providing a dedicated relief function within the emergency management system that would better support both emergency management agencies and communities. Communities and individuals should be confident that they will receive essential support to meet their basic needs after they have been impacted by an emergency. The 2019–20 fires illustrated the diversity of individual relief circumstances and potential community needs that can arise during prolonged and dispersed emergency events. There are opportunities to build further contingencies in relief planning at the local level which in turn will increase the resilience of the community and the path to recovery. With the development of clearer and more robust relief arrangements for responder agencies and emergency management personnel, improved relief outcomes for the community should in turn be achieved. The 2019–20 fire season saw the establishment of BRV as a dedicated entity to support recovery efforts. While there were some aspects of BRV’s approach to recovery that caused inefficiencies and frustrations across the community and other recovery organisations, most could see the value in its establishment and focus on recovery. The Victorian and Australian governments made some of the biggest investments in community recovery ever seen in the aftermath of a major emergency – particularly to support mental health and environment recovery. However, communities and stakeholders found much of this financial support difficult to access and poorly timed. It is also important to acknowledge that BRV was established as a reaction to these fires and was to some extent learning as it went without the benefit of having functioned through previous emergencies and the learnings that provide. BRV and other government departments discussed and attempted to implement a strong community-focus in recovery – and in IGEM’s assessment, there is a strong reflection of this focus in recovery plans. However, in many ways communities have felt overwhelmed and frustrated by the community-led approach, noting that it seems have different meanings in different contexts and often results in a high workload, but low levels of autonomy for the community. Throughout the Inquiry Phase 2, IGEM has made observations, findings and recommendations in relation to specific relief and recovery strategies, plans, activities and outcomes. One of the most prevalent themes emerging from the Inquiry was the incredible volume of time and effort being invested by government, councils, community service organisations, the private sector and local community organisations to support affected communities, business, families and individuals.
