4%20geospatial%20technology%20based%20rainfall

Page 1

International Journal of Environment, Agriculture and Biotechnology (IJEAB) http://dx.doi.org/10.22161/ijeab/2.6.4

Vol-2, Issue-6, Nov-Dec- 2017 ISSN: 2456-1878

Geospatial Technology Based Rainfall Precipitation Assessment with Landslides in Mettupalayam – Aravankadu Highway, Tamilnadu Ganesh R1, Gowtham B1, Manivel T2 1

Department of Geology, Presidency College (Autonomous), Chennai, India Department of Earth Science, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, India

2

Abstract— The present study reveals that the relation between rainfall Precipitation with landslides was carried out. The Precipitation data were collected from IWS (Institution of Water Studies) and analyzed for annual and season wise for the period from 2006 to 2015. The Precipitation data were interpret tolated through spatial distribution methods in GIS and correlated with existing landslide locations. The spatial output of rainfall contour shows that larger area of rainfall is covered with higher amount in Northeast Monsoon when compared to other seasons. However, an almost equal amount of rainfall was noticed in Southwest Monsoon. The above data were taken into a GIS. Using this data, spatial interpolation maps were prepared. It clearly reveals that, high amount of rainfall and existence of landslides occurs throughout the Coonoor region and Wellington and Moderate amount of rainfall and existence of landslides in Kothagiri and Ooty region. This paper highlights the application of GIS in spatially locating the relation between precipitation and landslides. Keywords— Geospatial Technology, Aravankadu Highway, IWS. I. INTRODUCTION A landslide is an event of nature that leads to sudden disruption of normal life of society, causing damage to property of nations, to such an extent those normal, social and economic mechanisms available are inadequate to restore normalcy. Landslides are defined as the mass movement of rocks, debris or earth along a sliding plane. They are characterised by almost permanent contact between the moving masses and sliding plane (Butler, 1976; Crozier, 1984; and Smith, 1996). Landslides cause substantial economic, human and environmental losses throughout the world. Examples of devastating landslides at a global scale include the 1972 Calabria landslide in Italy, the 1970 www.ijeab.com

Hauscaran landslide in Peru (McCall, 1992), the 1966 Aberfan landslide in wales, and the 1985 Armero landslide in Colombia (Alexander, 1993). It is estimated that in 1998, 180,000 avalanches, landslides, and debris flow in different scales occurred in China, estimated at 3 billion dollars’ worth of direct economic losses (Huabin et al., 2005). II. STUDY AREA The study area is the Nilgiris district, which is located in Tamilnadu state. The Mettupalaym to Aravankadu ghat section of length 273.30 km2 has taken as the study area to identify the landslide prone areas. It lies in the toposheet Nos. 58 A/15 of survey of India and located in between 76° 48’ 8.34’’ and 76°54’ 2.48’’ E longitudes and 11° 17’ 41.25’’ and 11° 17’ 47.48’’ N latitudes with an area of (273.30 km2 ). The study area is blessed with deltaic system with different active and inactive distributaries and shown in figure 1. The proposed study area is covered include villages like Mettupalayam, Odanthurai, Adatturai, Burliyar, Hulical Drug, Kallar, Killpilur, Marrapalam, wellington, Aravankadu, Lambs rock and Tiger hill. III. METHODOLOGY The base map is prepared from Survey of India (SOI) Toposheets 58A/11 &15 at a scale of 1: 50000. In the present study, the average monthly rainfall of a ten years period (2006 - 2015) have been collected from five rain gauge stations and variation diagrams are prepared. Rainfall contour map has been prepared of rainfall variation is found at all the rain gauge stations. The spatial variability of mean annual precipitation depends upon the topographic factors such as exposure of station to the prevailing wind, elevation, orientation and slope of the mountain (Basist A and Bell G.D., 1994). Page | 2798


International Journal of Environment, Agriculture and Biotechnology (IJEAB) http://dx.doi.org/10.22161/ijeab/2.6.4

Vol-2, Issue-6, Nov-Dec- 2017 ISSN: 2456-1878

Fig.1: Study Area Base Map Arithmetic mean is used for measurements of selected duration at all rain gauges are summed and the total divided by the number of gauges. Arithmetic method is the simplest objective methods of calculating the average rainfall over the area (Basavarajappa et al., 2015a). Thiessen polygon method provides the individual areas of influence around each set of points. Thiessen (1911), an American engineer adopted the polygon method for rainfall measurements at individual gauges as first weighted by the fractions of the catchment area represented by the gauges, and then summed. Thiessen polygons are the polygons whose boundaries are mathematically define the area (perpendicular bisectors) that is closest to each point relative to all other points (Basavarajappa et al., 2015 a). Iso-hyetal method is a line drawn on a map connecting points that receive equal amounts of rainfall. It is one of the convenient methods that views continuous spatial variation of rainfall areas. The main aim of the method, to draw lines of equal rainfall amount (isohyets) using observed amounts at stations (Reed W.G and Kincer J.B., 1917). In iso-hyetal map, the x-axis represents East Longitude, while y-axis represents North Latitude (Basavarajappa et al., 2015 a).

www.ijeab.com

IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The results of post-monsoon, pre-monsoon, southwest, northeast and average annual rainfall data for the period 2006- 2015 were used for the preparation of spatial distribution contour map using geospatial technology and the data’s are given in figures 2 to 11 and in table.1. Pre monsoon Season During the pre-monsoon season, study area recorded an average rainfall of 453.83 mm. During this Season, the highest rainfall of 148.78 mm was recorded in Runneymedu station and the lowest rainfall of 43.79 mm was recorded in Gurrency station. Post monsoon Season During the post monsoon season, study area recorded an average rainfall of 1231.04 mm. During this Season, the highest rainfall of 347.22 mm was recorded in Coonoor station and the lowest rainfall of 162.43 mm was recorded in Gurrency station. South-West Monsoon Season During the South–West Monsoon season, study area recorded an average rainfall of 1435.73 mm. During this Season, the highest rainfall of 403.19 mm was recorded in Hilgrove station and the lowest rainfall of 236.31 mm was recorded in Aderly station. Page | 2799


International Journal of Environment, Agriculture and Biotechnology (IJEAB) http://dx.doi.org/10.22161/ijeab/2.6.4 North-East Monsoon Season During the North-East Monsoon season, study area recorded an average rainfall of 2934.07 mm. During this

Stations COONOOR

Vol-2, Issue-6, Nov-Dec- 2017 ISSN: 2456-1878

Season, the highest rainfall of 953.93 mm was recorded in Coonoor station and the lowest rainfall of 351.38 mm was recorded in Mettupalayam station.

Table.1: Average occurrences of rainfall during various seasons PostPreSW Average NE monsoon monsoon monsoon monsoon Rainfall 72 368 297.4 1430.6 542

RUNNEYMEDU

56

392

346

1292

521.5

HILGROVE

103

397.6

454

625

394.9

GURRENCY

74

450.8

372

1094

497.7

ADERLY

52

312

198

481

260.75

METTUPALAYAM

7

277

107.9

571

240.725

31.6

131.3

2038.1

662.8

715.95

RUNNEYMEDU

85

143.8

773.8

350.9

338.375

HILGROVE

166

348

1714.2

413.4

660.4

GURRENCY

15.8

54

1470

519

514.7

ADERLY

8

206.1

768.2

528.4

377.675

METTUPALAYAM

33

96

173

314

154

352.9

556.5

492.1

509

477.625

499

472

178.6

547.2

424.2

HILGROVE

291.6

329.4

133.7

598

338.175

GURRENCY

136.4

455.8

125

580.2

324.35

236

316

172

422.6

286.65

COONOOR

COONOOR RUNNEYMEDU

ADERLY METTUPALAYAM

44

286

264

300

223.5

10.2

190.9

371.4

1509.3

520.45

RUNNEYMEDU

0

284

264

1473

505.25

HILGROVE

0

257

251

541

262.25

GURRENCY

0

200

142.7

106.4

112.275

ADERLY

0

172

116.1

84.2

93.075

METTUPALAYAM

0

249

153

378.7

195.175

41.6

138.1

342.8

897.9

355.1

COONOOR

COONOOR RUNNEYMEDU

32

96

161.3

1551

460.075

HILGROVE

7

117.5

134

709

241.875

GURRENCY

4

14.8

104.8

438.6

140.55

ADERLY

4.3

44.7

111.6

147.2

76.95

METTUPALAYAM

16

159.2

209.20

603.90

247.08

COONOOR

654.8

262.5

427.5

1239.3

646.025

RUNNEYMEDU

682.8

161.4

273.5

1100.4

554.525

HILGROVE

762.8

174.8

342

884

540.9

GURRENCY

175.7

37

95.4

248.8

139.225

ADERLY

27.2

24.3

24.2

393.1

117.2

www.ijeab.com

Year

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

Page | 2800


International Journal of Environment, Agriculture and Biotechnology (IJEAB) http://dx.doi.org/10.22161/ijeab/2.6.4 Postmonsoon 235

Premonsoon 191.30

SW monsoon 75.90

COONOOR

14

214

RUNNEYMEDU

0

HILGROVE

Vol-2, Issue-6, Nov-Dec- 2017 ISSN: 2456-1878

NE monsoon

Average Rainfall

593.70

273.97

206.6

925.10

339.93

264

194

698.6

289.15

0

196

161

650.2

251.80

GURRENCY

0

128.9

309

625

265.73

ADERLY

5

175.5

294.4

443.5

229.60

METTUPALAYAM

18.40

123.70

126.50

359.60

157.05

COONOOR

45.80

370.20

303.20

417.70

284.22

RUNNEYMEDU

39.00

281.00

211.00

554.00

271.25

HILGROVE

20.00

305.00

140.00

650.20

278.80

GURRENCY

32.00

283.00

33.20

0.00

87.05

ADERLY

36.00

255.50

222.00

501.00

253.63

METTUPALAYAM

63.10

102.40

78.40

393.00

159.22

COONOOR

108.20

283.40

277.60

913.20

395.60

RUNNEYMEDU

94.00

299.00

486.40

1061.00

485.10

HILGROVE

100.00

406.00

403.00

1080.00

497.25

GURRENCY

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

ADERLY

107.50

401.00

225.10

648.80

345.60

METTUPALAYAM

46.40

185.30

0.00

0.00

57.92

COONOOR

9.00

957.30

402.00

1034.40

600.68

RUNNEYMEDU

0.00

800.50

374.00

774.00

487.13

HILGROVE

0.00

500.00

299.00

818.30

404.33

GURRENCY

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

ADERLY

0.00

305.50

231.50

604.00

285.25

METTUPALAYAM

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Stations METTUPALAYAM

Year

2012

2013

2014

2015

PRE MONSOON

POST MONSOON

PRE MONSOON

POST MONSOON

SOUTH WEST MONSOON

NORTH EAST MONSOON

SOUTH WEST MONSOON

NORTH EAST MONSOON

2500

1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0

2000 1500 1000 500 0

Fig.: 2 Annual Rainfall (in mm) 2006

www.ijeab.com

Fig.: 3 Annual Rainfall (in mm) 2007

Page | 2801


International Journal of Environment, Agriculture and Biotechnology (IJEAB) http://dx.doi.org/10.22161/ijeab/2.6.4 PRE MONSOON

POST MONSOON

SOUTH WEST MONSOON

NORTH EAST MONSOON

700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0

POST MONSOON

SOUTH WEST MONSOON

NORTH EAST MONSOON

1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0

POST MONSOON

SOUTH WEST MONSOON

NORTH EAST MONSOON

1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0

POST MONSOON

SOUTH WEST MONSOON

NORTH EAST MONSOON

Fig.: 7 Annual Rainfall (in mm) 2011 PRE MONSOON

POST MONSOON

SOUTH WEST MONSOON

NORTH EAST MONSOON

1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0

Fig.: 8 Annual Rainfall (in mm) 2012

Fig.: 5 Annual Rainfall (in mm) 2009 PRE MONSOON

PRE MONSOON

1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0

Fig.: 4 Annual Rainfall (in mm) 2008 PRE MONSOON

Vol-2, Issue-6, Nov-Dec- 2017 ISSN: 2456-1878

PRE MONSOON

POST MONSOON

SOUTH WEST MONSOON

NORTH EAST MONSOON

700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0

Fig.: 6 Annual Rainfall (in mm) 2010 Fig.: 9 Annual Rainfall (in mm) 2013

www.ijeab.com

Page | 2802


International Journal of Environment, Agriculture and Biotechnology (IJEAB) http://dx.doi.org/10.22161/ijeab/2.6.4 PRE MONSOON

POST MONSOON

SOUTH WEST MONSOON

NORTH EAST MONSOON

Vol-2, Issue-6, Nov-Dec- 2017 ISSN: 2456-1878

1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0

Fig.: 10 Annual Rainfall (in mm) 2014 Fig.: 13 Rainfall contour Post monsoon PRE MONSOON

POST MONSOON

SOUTH WEST MONSOON

NORTH EAST MONSOON

1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0

Fig.: 11 Annual Rainfall (in mm) 2015

Fig.: 14 Rainfall contour south west monsoon

Fig.: 15 Rainfall contour north east monsoon Fig.: 12 Rainfall contour Pre monsoon www.ijeab.com

Page | 2803


International Journal of Environment, Agriculture and Biotechnology (IJEAB) http://dx.doi.org/10.22161/ijeab/2.6.4 It is observed from the figures 12 to 15 that the isohyetal maps of pre-monsoon is lesser than post monsoon. In these maps, the increasing order of intensity is noticed towards the coonoor rain gauge station. However, in NE monsoon isohyetal map shows that scenario is quite high with compare to other monsoons. Though the contribution of pre monsoon rainfall is too low, the intensity increases towards NE in the basin. The rainfall is considered as one of the prime triggering mechanism. Mostly the landslides that are happening in this region as triggered by rainfall so as in any landslides in Tamilnadu. The high hills with steep slopes are controlled by newer evolution of the plateaus probably tectonic plateaus, bounded by N S- N E and SW lineaments. These differently oriented lineaments make the slope of the plateaus very much vulnerable to landslides. Moreover the plateaus are highly dissected, may be as a result of cumulative effects of all the tectonic events in this region. Higher degree of deformation and recrystallization makes the rocks break easily and ready to slide.

Vol-2, Issue-6, Nov-Dec- 2017 ISSN: 2456-1878

on the San Andreas Fault, to be submitted to Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. [5] Crozier M.J.: 1984, Field Assessment of Slope Instability in D Brunsden and D Prior (eds), Slope Instability, , New York, John Wiley and Sons. [6] Huabin, W., Gangjun, L., Weiya, X., & Gunghui, W. 2005. GIS-based landslide hazard assessment: an overview. Progress in physical geography, 29(4):548567. [Online] Available: ppg.sagepub.com [3 June 2011]. [7] McCall, G.J.H. (1992) Geohazards Natural and ManMade, London. Chapman and Hall. [8] Reed W.G and Kincer J.B (1917). The preparation of precipitation chart, Monthly Weather Rev., Vol.45, Pp: 233-235. [9] Smith, K., 1996. Environmental Hazards: Assessing Risk and Reducing Disaster. Routledge, London, p. 478. [10] Thiessen A.H., (1911), Precipitation for large areas, Monthly Weather Revision, 39, pp 1082-1084.

V. CONCLUSION Monthly rainfall analysis concludes that the highest intensity of rain showers is recorded during the month of October, while the lowest intensity is usually recorded during January at all the six rain gauge stations. Analysis of seasonal rainfall concludes that the percentage contributions of rainfall during various monsoon periods are in the following order: NE monsoon (52.34%) > SW monsoon (23.66%) > Post-monsoon (16.70%) > Pre-monsoon (7.30%). Spatial distribution pattern of rainfall indicates that the intensity of rainfall increases towards NE monsoon. Lesser intensity was found in pre-monsoon with compare post-monsoon season. REFERENCES [1] Alexander, D. (1993) Natural Disaster, London, University College Library Press. [2] Basavarajappa H.T, Manjunatha M.C and Pushpavathi K.N (2015a). Mapping and Reclamation of wastelands through Geomatics technique in Precambrian terrain of Mysuru district, Karnataka, India., International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering (IJCSE), Vol.5, No.4, Pp: 379-391. [3] Basist A and Bell G.D., (1994), Statistical relationships between topography and precipitation patterns, Journal of Climate, 7, pp 1305-1315. [4] Butler, R. and H. Kanamori (1976). Long-period ground motion in Los Angeles from a great earthquake www.ijeab.com

Page | 2804


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.