1 minute read
International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
from Comparative Studies and Analyses of the Different Mechanical Sand Control Systems: A Case Study
by IJRASET
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Advertisement
Volume 11 Issue IV Apr 2023- Available at www.ijraset.com
B. Methodology
For the purpose of the project, the reservoir was first modelled using MBAL where certain reservoir properties were estimated and analyzed. Such reservoir properties include: reservoir pressure, bottom-hole temperature, fluid type, Original Oil in Place, porosity, bubble point pressure, permeability, type and nature of formation, formation rock compressibility, drive mechanism.
The modelled reservoir was then history-matched to estimate its similarity with the real-time reservoir data. These results, especially results obtained from rock compressibility, aquifer modelling and drive mechanism determine the results of the PROSPER software. Using the PROSPER software, the well was first modelled without any sand control system in place. This is the control. The same well was subsequently modelled with four different mechanical sand control system in place (modelled independent of each other). They include:
1) Cased hole gravel pack
2) Pre-packed screen
3) Wire-wrapped screen
4) Slotted liner
A. Results of Analysis on MBAL
IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The analysis of the MBAL software yielded the following results as presented in table 4.1. The estimated and analyzed properties include: Reservoir Pressure (psia), Bottom-Hole Temperature (ºF), Fluid Type, Original Oil in Place (stb), Porosity (%), Bubble Point Pressure (psia), Permeability (mD), Type and Nature of Formation, Formation Rock Compressibility (1/psi).
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 11 Issue IV Apr 2023- Available at www.ijraset.com
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 11 Issue IV Apr 2023- Available at www.ijraset.com