[Title will be auto-generated] by Infowar Books

--------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

""I~' . ~l'f:, ';' i e:

...I'·J ,.if u

.-! t. . . :"J , .... '-: ....... ~ ~ • . D, . r (, l,

'HIAl LJ COliH ,,0#.-. . . . _-_._-

._' ........~._ .._.:- ..- .-...-••_ ,,-- .--..:...----- - ._- ....:....-----.-

J._.......... -

.}_------~-__ \l~~UnNG AND R~C~RD SHEET UBJI:CT: ,

...

__..... - _.-_ .. _.-.-. .-......-..-.-.._--------_.--" .".'r===:\--" .--_. EXTENSION NO. Howa r d J. Osb'or n ( f--. ·Director of SCCUl'i t~) DATE 16 May 1973' I ...

_~~-

FROM:

- .. ....-

_...-.- I _ . _-r---~

TO: (Office, delignolion, ((.10m number, and

(_ ..

-'-"- ..

;(

(Optional)

building)

.-_...-

DATE

~EaIVED

fORWARDED

OfFICER'S INITIALS

COMMENTS (Number each comment to .how ftom whom Draw Q line across column ofter -ecch comment}

to whom.

C'P!'"lI

1. Executive

Secretary, CIA Management Cornmitl.e..e....-.

n~~5 {j

tH: u U~·~ ... I ,"_00

f--,

- - - - --_.- _._-

i J.

J "; I

(b)(1) (b)(3) (b)(5) (b)(6)

.. J

, 7.

APPROVE))' FOR RELEASE DATE: JUN 2007 "

10.

• 11-

00001

12. i

13.

,. ,

14.

15.

,. ~1 I

o U~ClASSIHED

;

---------------MORl DoclD: l45l843

,'.

16 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR:

Executive Secretary, CIA Management Committee

SUBJECT

"Family Jewels"

1. The purpose of this memorandum is to forward for your personal review summaries of activities conducted either by or under the sponsorship of the Office of Security in the past which in my opinion conflict with the provisions of the National Security Act of 1947. 2. These activities cover 'the period from March 1959 to date and represent as accurate a record as is .ava i Lab Le in our files. Those activities which, took place prior to the date of my appointment as Director of Security on 1 ~uly 1964 have been developed to a certain extent through the recollection of the senior people in this Office who were involved or who had knowledge of the activities at the ~irne they occurred. . 3. I have gone back to March 1959 because I believe that the activities occurring since that time st'ill have a viable "flap potential" in that many of the people involved, both Agency and non-Agency are still alive and through their knOWledge of the activity represent a possible potential threat or embarrassment to the Agency. I would be glad to provide clarification or an explanation of any of these activities if desired. You have my assurance that unless otherwise stated each of these activities was approved by higher authority--the

'00002

r..'

_----------

- - - - - -....

MORl DoclD: l45l843

Director of Central Intelligence, the Deputy Director of Central Intelligence, the Executive DirectorComptroller, or the Deputy Director for Support.

Attachments

"00003

. I

-----------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

..,

-.- ..

_-_._

..'

.s r ,

00004

_.-

MORl DoclD: 1451843

(

Attachment A

"FAMILY JEWELS"

Johnny Roselli -- The use of a member of the Mafia in an attempt to assassinate Fidel Castro.

Project MOCKINGBIRD -- During the period from 12 March 1963 to 15 June 1963, this Office installed telephone taps on two l\Tashingtonbased newsmen who were suspected of disclosing classified information obtained from a variety of governmental and congressional sources.

Yuriy Ivanovich Nosenko -- A KGB defector who from the peri"6<t 13 August 1965 to 27 October 1967 was confined in a specially constructed "jail" atr He was literally confined in a cell oenIllU oars with nothing but a cot in it for this period.

Various Surveillance and Support Activities These are briefly summarized and range from the surveillance of newsmen to the provision of specialized support of local police officials in the Metropolitan area. I believe that each one is 'self-explanatory and, therefore, no further comment is needed here. .

Equipment Support to Local Police -- Attached is a iist provided me by ~he Director of Logistics (he will simply report these items in his report) which we have provided local police in the Metropolitan D. C. area over the past four or five years on indefinite loan. During the period when the Agency's installations in this area appeared to be a target of dissident elements

Sf ET E! S 01JlY

____·~O~0005

_ _I

-~------------.MORl DoclD: l45l843

a conscious decision was made by the Agency to utilize the services of local police to· repel invaders in case of riot or dissension as opposed to utilization of our GSA guards, who are not trained in this type of activity. This equipment has been issued over the years to local police, principally Fairfax and Arlington County Police Departments. I do not believe that this is totally illegal under the provisions of the National Security Act of 1947, but I am including it since I am sure that it would be considered as such in light of the recent congressional fuss over our police training activities. 7.

Audio Countermeasures Support to the United States "Secret Service

Test of Specialized Equipment in Miami Immediately Prior to the Political Convention There

00006 2

"- ..

------------'.' MORl DoclD: 1451843

,.~

'-',/

... ;;;~ ~

••

'<,

It!

n' t IF

•

....

•

'.~

" . / ' ."

......

/~ .:, :~.. . :; ~

':"",

::.

00007

••

-".

-."-.-.::-:.::,

._.

_0 • • •

".·., •

••

_._

MORl DoclD: l45l843

00008

SEC T t~£S ~~t~

--......-----~-----_.MORl DoclD: l45l843 I

'.'

....

.; .. ~;,.{

00009 I. I

---------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

,,,

'117 H; 7 nn mIi.,

.. ,

...

..:.;

¥"

-r-

.. "~'~"'a

~~\;'. .'

WSPS'E' P Ii'5

nusn i_ N"l!; 1

; 5

•

'i"

;ii.(,;

0001.0 3

----------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

~~~---_._-_.-_._._

'.. - ....

.._._._ .....-

" --

...

">.

. ~'.. : '

000:11.

"," ~'.,

[

.......

. '

. ,.:. .. ~':

.._.;;

. ~.*G.ki:;;4S¥ ¥4g,,;n;y,IQM.;;:MlitU~~S4((JI U_I!tWli~~··f"t.r'~.o+·.~

.MORI DocID: 1451843 I

....

SUBJECT:

Johnny Roselli '

1. In Augus t 1960, Mr. Richard M.. Bissell approached Colonel Sheffield Edwards to determine if the Office of Security had assets that may as~ist in a sensitive mission requiring gangster-type action. The mission target was Fidel Castro. 2. Because o~ its extreme sensitivity, only a small group' was made privy to the project. The DCI was briefed and gave his approval. Colonel J. C. Kin~, Chief, WH Division, was briefed, but all details were deliberately concealed from any of the JMWAVE officials. Certain TSD and Communications personnel participated in the initial planning stages, but were not witting of the purpose of the mission. 3. Robert A. Maheu, a cleared source of the Office of Sec~rity, ,was contacted, briefed generally on the project, and requested to ascert~in i£be could develop an entree into the gangster elements as the first step toward accomplishing the desired goal. 4. Mr. Maheu advised that he had met one Johnny Roselli on several,oc~asions while visiting Las Vegas. He only knew him casually through clients, but was given to understand that he was a high-ranking member of the "syndicat:e" and controlled all of the ice-making machines on the Strip. Maheu reasoned that, if Roselli was in fact a member of the clan, he undoubtedly had connections leading into the Cuban gambling interests. 5., Maheu was asked to approach Roselli, who knew Maheu as a personal relations executive handling domestic and foreign accounts, and tell him that he had recently been retained by a client who represented several international business £irms which were suffering heavy financial losses in Cuba as a result of Castro's action. They were convinced that Castro's removal was the answer to their

MORl DocID: 1451843

problem and were willing to pay a price of $150,000 for its successful accomplishment. It was to be made clear to Roselli that the United States Government was not, and should not, become aware of this operation. 6. The pitch was made to Roselli on 14 September 1960 at the Hilton Plaza Hotel, New York City. Mr. James O'Connell, Office of Security, was present during this. meeting and was identified to Roselli as an employee of Maheu. O'Connell actively served as Roselli's contact until May ~962 at which time he phased out due to an ov e r se as assignment. His ini tia1 reaction was to avoid getting involved, but through Maheu's persuasion, he agreed to introduce him to a friend, Sam Gold, who knew the "Cuban crowd." Roselli made it clear he did not want any money for his part and believed Sam would feel the same way. Neither of these individuals were ever paid out of Agency funds. 7. During the week of, 25 September, Maheu was introduced to Sam who was staying at the Fontainebleau Hotel, Miami Beach. It was several weeks 'after h:i;s meeting with Sam and Joe"who was identified to him as a courier operating between Havana and Miami, that he saw photographs of both of these individuals in the Sunday .supplemental, "Parade." They were identified as Mama Salvatore~Giancani and Santos Trafficant, respectively. Both were on the list'of the Attorney General's ten mostwanted men. The former was described as the Chicago chieftain of the Cosa Nostra and successor to Al Capone, and the latter,' the Ces a Nostra boss of Cuban op e i-a.t i ons . Maheu called this office immediately upon ascertaining this information. . . 8. In discussing the possible methods of accomplishing this mission, Sam suggested that they not resort to firearms but, if he could be furnished some type of potent pill, that could be placed in Castro's food or drink, it would be a much more effective operation. Sam indicated that he had a prospective nominee in the person of Juan Ort a , a Cuban official who had been receiving kick-back payments from the gambling interests, who still had access to Castro, and was in a financial bind.

000:1.3 2

SEGI..: T

Eyr , ONLY

-------------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

9. TSD was requested to produce six pills of high lethal content. 10. Joe delivered the pills to Orta. After several weeks of reported attempts, OJ;ta·appar~l.1tly got cold feet and asked out of the assignment. He suggested another candidate who made several attempts without success. 11. Joe then indicated that Dr. Anthony Verona, one o f the pr Lnc Lpa L officers in the Cuban Exile Junta, had become disaffected with the apparent ineffectual progress of the Junta and was willing to handle the mission through his own resources. 12. He asked, asa prirequisite·to.the deal, that he be given $10,000 for organizational expenses and requested $1,000 worth of communications equipment. 13. Dr. Verona's potential was never fUlly exploited, as the project was canceled shortly after the Bay of Pigs episode. Verona was advised that the offer was 'vi thdrawn, and the p Ll l s were. retrieved. 14. Of significant interest was an incident which involved a request levied by Sam upon Maheu. -:'

. . - ,. At t he height of the proj ect negotiations, Sam expressed concern about his girl£riend, Phyllis McGuire, who he learned was getting much attention from Dan Rowan while both were booked at a Las Vegas night club. Sam asked Maheur t;o put a bug in Rowan t s : rbomto determine the extent of his intimacy with Miss McGuire •. The technician involved in the assignment was discovered in the process, arrested, and taken to the Sheriff's office for questioning. He called Maheu and informed him that he had been detained by the police. This call was made in the'presence of the Sheriff's personnel .. Subsequently, the Department of Justice announced its intention to prosecute Maheu along

s£cJ16

}YES ONLY

. 00014

MORl DoclD: 1451843

with the technician. On 7 February 1962~. the Director of Security briefed the Attorney General, Robert Kennedy, on the circumstances leading up to Maheu's involvement in the lviretap. At our request, prosecution was dropped. . 15. In May 1962, Mr. William Harvey took over as Case Officer, and it is not known by this office whether Roselli was used operationally from that point on. 16. It was subsequently learned from the FBI that Roselli had been convicted on six counts involving illegal entry into t.he United States. Our records do not reflect the date of conviction, but it is believed to have been s9metime during November 1967. 17. On'2 December i968, Roselli, along with four other individuals, was convicted of conspiracy to cheat members of the Friars Club of $400,~OO in· a.rigged gin rl!-mmy g<;l.me. 18. Mr. Harvey reported to t.he Office of Security of his contacts with Roselli during November and December 1967 and January 1968. It was his belief that Johnny would not seek out the Agency for assistance in the deporta": tion proceedings unless he actually faced deportation. Roselli expressed confidence that he would win an appeal. 19. On 17 November 1970, Maheu called James O'Connell, Roselli's first Case Officer, to advise that Maheu's attorney, Ed Morgan, had received a call from a Thomas Waddin, Roselli's lawyer, who stated that all. avenues of appeal had been exhausted, and his client now faces deportation. Waddin indicated ~hat, if someone did not intercede on Roselli's behalf, he would make a cOmplete expose of his activities with the Agency. 20. On 18 November 1970, Mr. Helms was briefed on the latest development in this case, and it was decided that the Agency would not in any way assist Roselli. Maheu was sp a?vised of the Agency's position, and he was in

00015

-------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

' . ' ,.

complete agreement with our stand. He further adVised that he was not concerned about any publicity as it affected him personally should Roselli decide to tell all. 21. Subsequently, Roselli or someone on his behalf furnished Jack Anderson details of the operation. Attached are two Anderson columns dealing with" this matter. 22. The last known residence of Roselli was the Federal Penitentiary in Seattle, Washington.

Attachments

00016 5

SE T i·f.rS ONLY

MORl DoclD: 1451843

'"pm TRUW

. , ""

'q un tt tlI

, 1%

't $1

...,

{

.~-~-~

-,..-

':~'.," ;"

..: -"

,-,"

, ~.:. : jt;

.......

.»

~-----------_.MORl DoclD: 1451843 ,',

rosr • .:

i:' 'c._' :::,rrr.'-(,·'[O' Tlf .u ".-~. _,

----------'.

• 1~ .''f Nl d"). ~.:;. ", I'?"l •

I I

B)' J(!t:k A nderson.

. (or before the motley invad- iate 4,gabst President

.r-n- \;nmp;ele wil h secr-et ;'Y~~5 at the island. Their' ned}'. . ~ gmteri~g :'Iiiami Beach hotelsLocked in the darkest reo ~ arr-ival was expected to touch! To set up the Castro a~, \, ;j.: and rn i d n i g b t po... ~;boat, i cesses oC the Central Iotelli.! oif a general uprising, which i nation, the CIA enlisted h 0': dashes to ;>;>cret landin~ spots _ !;enre .-\gency is the story Of: (he Ccmmunist militia would: ert :i\I.:!heu, a former ;', '1; on l'::e C:.:~a:J coast, Once, no- " :six assasslnarlon attempts: have had more trouble ut"n"; agent with shadowy contac , I :~e;!i's boat was shoeout fro:>:! _ . against Cuba's -;"idel Castro. I': _. , . ,- ~ '"'.''' who had handled other undo \ : under him. m key I' aown without the charlsmatlc : cover asslsnments for the Ci \ ! For III ve ars onlv For the ~:r.t trv t'ne C"J.J"\..~. ' ~. . . ~;: a 'e i _ o f... J.'; J.;... ..." Ipeople have known the terri··Castro to lead them. :out of .his Washington public "urnlshed Roselll ';ith s'C~ci.!.l'~ l~le secret, Th~y. hav.e sworn After the iirst attempt jrela.tions oiIice; He ~ate~' '.'lison. capsules to ~!lP 'intO::r :ne\'er to talk. let ....e have] failed, iive more assassination jInO\:d. to .Las Vegas t o .r:ea~ ! astro s.rood. The porson was . [learned the details from! t _, t t C b 'I'h ; up billionaire Howard Hughes ' :pposed to take three i:'.ays 10 i sources whose credentials are! earns were sen o. u a. ".e: );i' v ada operations, '. \', By the time Castro died. i ~eyond question. ~ last team reporte-dly made It! :-'Iabeu recruited :!.~£:..:.h', system would t~row off all i We spoke to John :'IIcCone,~lO a rooftop within shooting;sell!, a ruggedly handSQmp.:;t; \ -es of ~he- poison, so he Iwho beaded the C:~A .at the! distance of ~astro b'efo~e they ;==gamo1er ,,:,Hll ,contacts In both l\'>. \ -d appeal' to be the victlm l time' of the assassinatlon at- I were apprehended. This hap·: the American and Cuban un·lo! ~, natural. if mysterious ail. tempts. He acknowledged the I pened around the Iast of Feb·; derworlds. to arrange the a5-1 me, \ : idea had been discussed inside ruary or first of March, 1%3. i sassinatlon. T.ne dapper, hawk-j R.-; -Tl arranged with a [the CIA but Insisted it had, Nine months later, Presl-: faced Roselli, formerly rnar-. Cub» '\ related to one of Cas. i been "r e j e c ted immedi-] dent Kennedy was gunned! ried to movie actress J:une: tro's " "$. to pl.ant the deadlv atelv," He vizorously denied: down in Dallas by Lee Harvey [Lang, was a power in, the !pe.lle!' .. the dictator's food. i1hat the crx had ever partici·l~swald. a fan~tic who pre·in:o\:ie ;n~usrry until hi~ _~0!1'!0!1 :'ILl ,., 1,3,1961, Roselli de' _ I paled in any plot on Castro's: v iously had agitated fpr Cas- vtction with racketeer '.\ Ill ie ] llvered ',. cansules to hlJ .con.' iffe. Asked whether the at·: tro in Xew O:leans f3nd J:ad BioCf ina mil1~oc:-d~lJ.ar HollY·l tacl at : . ,.:ni Be3ch's lilamor. Ilerr.pts <,ould ha"e heen madelmade a myslerIous trIp to ,hepvood labor snaKeaown; The1ou3 ?01l,1 nehle:!u Hotel. o of it~. ~osti A cou~:' ,·r ·... 21:1<:; later, just with his knowl~dse. he re'l C~ban Embassy iIi l\'Iexico crA assig!led i plied: "It could not have hap., CIty. I truslt>d operat.lves. WIllIam! about ,!::' ,·:;:tl lime ior the !pen;d." Among ~hose privy .to .the' H~r\'ey and••TaI?es (Bi~ Jim)! plot 10 ,.'... been !..!l-;-;l'd out, ~ 1,\ e have COlll.:Jl't:te conIl': CIA conspIracy, there IS still a OConnell, ,0 Lie husn.hush; a r;~po": '::1 oi H:a·.4~1'1 l'aid :dence, howe I; e r. in ourl nag gin g suspicion---:-unsup· murder mission. using poony: east~() • H ill. El:~ i,e reo !sources. !ported bY' the Warren Com· names. theY accompanied RO'/coven'd "~':ore the,Ra;. l)i ?igs ; The plot to knock off Castro !r.1ission·s iindings-lhat· Cas- ,.elli on trips to Miami to line ;im"asion .', \prilli, i!i~:I. 'began liS ;Ja,t -(;[ the Bay of! lro became aware uf the u.S, up the assassination teams. i Four n'·" att~m:l~~ '\',;ol't" ;Pi:;s HP~:·.li"n Th~ ;nu·nt.,,·as~rh)t apon. h~ ... U~·~ ~'!~c! .... t:':1~ The;f:zll story r~~ds ~jkl? t~p i:l3dp en .· .. l\t':"o·.~ :;~.a . . tv .t,,·ii:n!:l·~:"~ L~~e '·uoan CHeta·· huw :·t·t :-taH~r! l).. . ..A,a~ i ~~f a··la·.. ':.'j 'f": ::: ~1 Ja:nes ~)onC1 i:10".tJf? :: :':)';~. a...::. :.' 1::;-. ::,..:::-.. ::s.• :::.c ' ers ];Ind"ci on

..... \1,

...

fl'

'.L

• .1

! I

I I

t:v

00018

MORl DoclD: 1451843

<..

.•

---_ _-----. '1--1

- - ~ _ . -_.-.-.~

.- --_._---

'1-:\

.. .r: ."/ .........- -... l........,.i./·:':,·f ._ .... 1...I:v ;j'; :.......'J

'0001.9

Blt

_-_.- ._-

--------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

til!

III W::: ras

m Pl. . . ::osrrmq!: 5

we. 1; I

nnr

~,.

: :'-.~::'"

00020

MORl DoclD: 1451843 ~

....... '-... ... ... '..

...• ,

PROJECT MOCKINGBIRD

Project Mockingbird, a telephone intercept activity, was conducted between 12 March 1963 and 15 June 196'3, and tar geted two Vfashingtonbased newsrnen who, at the time, had been publishing news articles based on, and -f'r eque nt ly quoting', classified 'materials of this Agency and others, including Top Secret and Special Intelligence. Telephone intercept connections were installed at the n ew m e n s office and at each of their homes, for a total of 3. The connections were established with the assistance of a telephone company official who responded to a personal request by the Director of Security, Col. Sheffield Edwa r d s, Col. Edwards' authority for the activity ~vas Mr. John A. McCone, Director of Central Intelligence. The latter conducted the activity in coordination with the Attorney General (Mr. Robert Kennedy), the Secretary of Defense [Mr , , Robert McNamara), and the Director of the Defense. Intelligence Agency (Gen. Joseph Carroll), In addition to Office of Security personnel directly involved in the intercepts and research of materials acquired therefrom, only 3., other Agency officials are on record as witting of the activity: the Deputy Director of Central Intelligence (General Marshall S. Carter), the Inspector General (Lyman Ki r kpa.tr i c k] and the General Counsel. (Mr. Lawrence Houston). t

The intercept activity was particularly productive in identifying contacts of the newsmen, their method of operation and many of their sources of information. For example, it was determined that during the period they received data from 13 newsmen, 12 of whom were identified; 12 senators and 6 members of Congress, all identified; 21 Congressional staff m errrb e r s , of whom 11 were identified; 16 government e mp Ioy ee s , including a staff member of the White House, members of the Vice President's office, an As s i s ta nt Attorney General, and other well-placed individuals. A number of other sources were partially or tentatively identified, but the short span of the activity ,precluded positive identification. It was observed that through these contacts the newsmen actually received more classified and official data than they could use, and passed some of'bhe stories to other newsmen for release, establishing that many "leaks'" appearing under other by-lines were actually from the sources of the target newsmen.

S~v.

-------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

n '1' .r.IRW

P HE n $;0; ;W"RS".,. I 17mll"l

00_ ....0_

__0\'

000 ....

!..

••

•

.......

00022

..'

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.. c,

~...'

SUBJECT:

Yuriy Ivanovich Nosenko

Yuriy Ivanovich Nosenkq, an officer of the KGB, defected to -a representative of this-Agency in Geneva, Switzerland, on 4 February 1964. The responsibility for his exploitation 1vas assigned to the then SR Division of the Clandestine Service and he was brought to this country on 12 February 1964. After initial interrogation by representatives of the SR Division, he was moved to a safehouse in Clinton, Maryland, from 4 April 1964 where he was confined and interrogated until 13 August 1965 when he was moved to a s:e ci all y cons tru~t~d . "j ail" in a. r erno te wooded area atf ~ I The SR Dlvls10n was convlnced that he was a dlspa ched agent but even after a long period of hostile interrogation was unable to prove their contention and he was confined at lin an effort to convince him to "confess."

This Office together with- the Office of General CouIT?el became increasingly concerned with the illegali~y of the Agency's position in handling a defector under these conditions for such a long period of time.- Strong representations were made to the Director (Mr. Helms) by this Office, the Office of General Counsel, and the Legislative Liaison Couns~l, and on 27 October 1967, the responsibility for Nosenko's further handling was transferred to the Office of Security und~r the direction of the Deputy Director of Central Intelligence, then Admiral Rufus Taylor.Nosenko was moved to a comfortable safehouse in the Washington area and was int.erviewed--under---friendly, .sympa the t Lc conditions by his Security Case Of-ficer, Mr. Bruce Solie, for more than a year. It soon became apparent that Nosenko was bona fide and he was moved to more comfortable surroundings with considerable freedom of independent movement and has continued to cooperate fUlly with the Federal Bureau of Investigation and this Office since that time. He has proven to be the most

00023

MORl DoclD: 1451843

• L

•

,".

v~luable and economical defector this Agency has ever had and leads which were ignored by the SR Division were ex lored and have resulted in the arrest and prosecution e curren lvorce from his Russian wife and remarried an American citizen. He is happy, relaxed, and appreciative of the treatment accorded him and states "while I regret my three years of incarceration, I have no bitterness and now und.erstand how it equId happen."

00024

tS Ol~lY

MORl DoclD: l45l843

. . :;.

. , .. ,.....~: ,_: '

•

. ,,:~. : ~ \ ..

.. ., .. ,

-..

.",

" 'r-

00025

~---------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

, "' t.

'1.

SURVEILLANCES

A·I__ During the periods 1-20 February~ 12 April-7 May~ and 9-20 Au~ust 1971, a surveillance was conducted of la former staff employee~ and Lrl-----------,."a".-r-;-;LJu-J..oan na ti on a1 wi th whom [be come professionally and emo~t~~~o~n~aTl.~lY~l'-n~v~o~IT~-v~e~ca~.~Surveillance was predicated upon information thatl I had beeri seeking from employees information ln Information Processing Division fi1es~ and that em~loyees were visiting a photographic studio operated by L ~n Fairfax City, Virginia. In addItIon to phYSIcal surveIllance,' one surreptitious entry of the photographic studio was made, and an attempt to enter the apartment ofl I was aborted because of a door lock problem.

B. Pursuant to a request from the CI Staff, approved by the DCI, surveillances were conducted ofl and her associates "at various times from May:--:it:-;o"":-'S"""e"""p=-=t""'e=-:m:;:-br::-e=r:::1971. ad long been a source 0 IV~Slon an '-,:;-....-::l.....,;;--:;--.~..-J information re.garding a, plot to assassinate kidnap Vice President Agnew and the DCI. Surveillances included coverage of the activities of Miss King during two visits to the United States; technical coverage of debriefings of her by WH Division representatives in New York City, and surveillance, including mail coverage, of several American citizens a.l Leg ed -to be part of the plot. Although most of the surveillance occurred in New York City, surveillance of one of the individuals included extensive coverage of a commune in Detroit. C.

CELOTEX I

At the direction of the DCI, a surveillance was conducted of Michael Get1er of the Washington Post- during

SE ET EY~

OlJLY

00026

MORl DoclD: 1451843

the periods 6-9 October, 27 October-IO December 1971 and on 3 January 1972. In addition to physical surveillance, an observation post was maintained in the Statler Hilton Hotel where observation could be maintained of the building housing his office. The surveillance was designed to determine Getler's sources of classified information of interest to the Agency which had appeared in a number of his columns.

CELOTEX II

At the direction of the DCI, surveillance was con~ ducted of Jack Anderson and at various times his "leg men., II Britt Hume ,.' Leslie Whitten, and Joseph Spear, from 15 February to 12 April 1972. In addition to the physical surveillance, an ob s erv a t i.on post was' maintained in the Statler Hilton Hotel directly opposite Anderson's office. The purpose of this surveillance was to attempt to determine Anderson's sources for highly classified Agency information appearing in his syndicated columns.

BUTANE

At· the direction of the. DCI, a surveillance was conducted on Victor L. Marchetti from 23 March to 20 April 1972. The purpose of this surveillance was to determine his activities and contacts both with Agency employees and other individuals in regard to his proposed book and published magazine articles exposing Agency operations. II. POLICE SUPPORT A. During 1969, 1970, and 1971, on se.veral occasions, the Intelligence Division of the Metropolitan Police Department was prOVided a communications system to monitor major anti-Vietnam war demonstrations in the Washington area. This system consisted of a radio ·receiver and an Agent at the Intelligence Division. Headquarters and several automobiles from the Washington Field Office equipped with radiQ receivers and transmitters and manned by two WFO Agents, as well as a representative of the Intelligence Division, Metropolitan Police Department. The benefit to the Agency was, that the communications over this system were monitored at the Headquarters Building to provide instant notice of possible actions by the dissidents against Agency installations. .

0002.7 ..

MORl DoclD: 1451843

B. During the period from 1968 to 1973, several items of positive audio equipment consisti~g primarily of clandestine transmitters and touch-tone dial recorders were loaned to the Metropolitan Police Department, Fairfax County, Virginia, Police Department, Montgomery County, Maryland, Police Department, New York City Police Department, and the San Francisco, California, Police Department. III. GENERAL SUPPORT A.

SRPOINTER

Since 1953, this office has operated a mail intercept program of incoming and outgoing Russian mail and, at various times, other selective mail at Kennedy Airport in New York City. this operation included not only the photographing" of envelopes but also surreptitious opening and photographing of selected items of mail. The bulk of the take involved matters of internal security interest which was disseminated to the Federal Bure~u of Investigation. This program is now ~n a dormant state pending a decision as to whether the operation wilL be contiriued or abolished. B.

AELADLE

For several years the Office" of Security has provided support to Anatole Golitsyn, a Russian defector of interest to the CI Staff. I

REDFACE I

In July 1970, this office made a surreptitious entry of an office in Silver Spring, Maryland, occupied by a former defector working under contract for the Agency. This involved by-passing a contact and 3

SEt; tC T ONLY

00028

MORl DoclD: 1451843

sonic alarm system, entering a vault, and entering a safe within the vault. The purpose of the operation was to determine whether the individual had any unauthorized classified information in his possession. D.

BUREAU OF NA~COTICS AND DANGEROUS DRUGS

In January 1971, the Director approved a request from the Director, Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs, to provide covert recruitment and security clearance support to BNDD. This has been accomplished through the medium of a proprietary of the Office ofSecurit known as and 0 eratin as I

'----rS..,.u=p"..,p~o=r.."t-

~l'-n~c::--'"u::-:!d-=e-::s:---::c::-:o=-=v-=-e=-r=t---=y:-=e-=c:"::r::7u"""l"""t';:m=e-=n"%tC-,----=l"""l::-:w:-:-e=s=71 -:::g-:=a:"=-::1'-'0=-=n=-----:!,p 01 Ygraph ,

medical clearance, and training. It has been divided into three phases: (1) A CI operation to place individuals in BNDD field offices to monitor an il1e a1 activities of other BNDD employees; (2) )

ecru1tment 0 an 1n 1V1 by BNDD but actually employed by BNDD, although this fact is known only to the Director and Chief Inspector, BNDD. In this case, arrangements were made for all pay and other employee benefits to come from CIA on a reimbursable basis.

MERRIMAC

From February 1967 to November 1971,f I an Office of Security proprietary, recruite~ anu nallulbd several -Agents for the purpose of covertly monitoring-

00029

MORl DoclD: 1451843

r ~

• •

F~f \' O~:l.Y _ .\l dissiderit groups in· the Washington area considered to be potential threats to Agency personnel and installations. One of these Agents so successfully penetrated one dissident group that she wa~ turned over to the FBI for handling. In addition, during this period, the Office of Security field offices were tasked with collecting available'intelligence

on dissident groups. All such information was included in a periodic report distributed to appropriate parts of th~ Agency and to certain outside Government agencies.

G-.~

F.I

.----=======:::::::-_------'-----------,

00030

._1> .

... -

....

.<- ~~. :. .... !'

",'

[ .

:.'

. .. ::,. "

...

.- >:.>::~! . . .'

00031. ..

-----------------MORl DocID: 1451843

MATERIAL REQUISITIONED FROM LOGISTICS BY SECURITY FOR ISSUANCE TO LOCAL POLICE ITEM

gUA_NITY

Gas Mask M-9

200

Gas Mask M-17

196

Steel Helmet and Liners

2'31

Vest and Groin Protector

Vest, Flak M-52

Vest, Protective

Vest, Grenade

105

Execuvest

Emergency Flashing Red Light

*Searchlight, Tear Gas

*Chemical Baton 6 1/2"

*Chemical Baton 12"

"*Chemical Baton 26"

*Mustang 35 Pistol

'~Searchlight with" Shoulder

Strap

*Stun Gun

*NOTE:

Various quantities and types of replacement chemical cartridges, loading kits, and batteries were also ordered for asterisk items.

'---

1032

MORl DoclD: 1451843

..1....

00033

------------MORI DocID: 1451843

SUBJECT":

Audio Countermeasures S~pport to the United States Secret Service

On 2S July 1968, and at the specific request of the United States Secret Service, this Office provided two audio countermeasures technicians to the United States Secret Service in connection· with the Democratic National Convention held in Chicago, Illinois. This was not an official detail although both men were provided with temporary credentials identifying them as being affiliated with the United States Secret Service. On IS August 1968, we detailed the same two men to the United States Secret Service to cover the Republican National Convention in Miami, Florida~ On both occasions, the team members were debriefed upon, their return and it is clear that their activities were confined exclusively to.sweeping the candidates and potential candidates quarters.

00034

MORl DoclD: 1451843

00035 '--

MORl DoclD: 1451843

I 15 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR:

Mr. Howard Osborn' Director of Security

SUBJECT

Identification of Activities with Embarrassment Potential for the Agency

1. In responding on 7 May by memorandum to the DDO's request for the identification of any incident which might conceivably have an embarrassment potential for the AgencYt I cited the equipment test which is mentioned in the attached memo. The test in uestion was related to the development of

in and out of some four hotels in Miami, with radio equipment. This was shortly before the political conventions, and at least one of the hotels was within a block of the convention hall.

~~~~~were

~:1:~·:1 : . :":.,:"_":

h::,'l·: '.

2. Although this completely, innocent--although subject to misconstrual--activity may already have been drawn to your attention by your ,own staff,~it has occurred to us that we should ensure you are awar-£ of it; given the involvement of a Security officer,

Att:

M/R dated 7 Ma: 73 by

qU1pmen ~ Test, M1am1,la., Aug 71

I SUb]: I

-r.

00036

<--I.

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.. ,.

7 May 1973

.1'ffiMORANDUM FOR THE

SUBJECT

A~gl;lst

RECORD IEquipment Test, Miami, Florida, 1971

, The following details concerning ther'~ ~ -=~ ments for Subject tests were provided by I I during a telephone cO·~n::;;v':;"";e::::r~s~·a=-;;---=-:::-='"":l=i. the unaers~gned, 7 May 1973. ~--~~~~~~~r~e~t~i~red, formerly

assigned to for the August 1971 Field l.c;;;r.:::===r====:::;:==;::::;::;::::o=:rL--------I.----------J--------~S ecurity arrangements or e es an e on ehalf of 1....---"'----and the2vis~tors b~1 llin conjunction witli the ~ _ ecur~t~ Off~cer r :vnq w§}s ~ at the DUe. [ nas in daily contact ,-nth I IMiami ~OI ce the course of his officiaI IXaXSo I duties.

L-

Iwas reluctant- to calli

at home to inquire about the specifics arrangements at this point, and suggested ·1----.----ld'======iiSeco.rity Officer by', this time might have ack to Headquarters and be available for

~=-==~~t~e~lephone line.

l f

{ a.ons e

- . -~I,---_-----,. _ _I, The aboVe details were provided by telephone tor--l _______, Chief, Division D at 1650 hours this da~ Distribution: Orig - :

C.signedJ.1

! File

00037.

S--~,..... T L

. 0._-

__.-.

._~

1_-

---------------MORT DocTD: 1451843

LJ (OI~fl ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET -sU1ljEcr:lo;~:~ii--------------------·----·---------·------------1

FROM: "--" -----.-..----.--.-------------..--EY.Tit.,S~Ot~:.~~.~..==~~===~~_-_-_

_[.j ._--_

.__._---Director of Securit

----_._---_._---~

TO: IO!i:<~r cI.,is-·"tion, teem ••umber, cOO building)

~------

I t

I !

fO~W AROEO

INIT!ALS

COMMn.nS (Number "och comment 10 :how From ...hem fa .",hom. Draw a [ine ccros s column after each c"mment.)

------------jf---.--- - - - - --.---+--------------------1

Ex. Dir. -Compt.

i t

DATE

OrtlLtiC.

REalVEO

I+----------_---.:_------~

DATE ! - - --r-r-'- _ . -

-.. _ - - - 1

I I ~

6. /

,r ri

10.

11.

12.

00038 13.

14.

15.

_. .w"

~:: 610 us~Dr:.~~~us~

L. . -__ .__ .!

""UI \( : t ,)I.'

~&.~i!~{L-~:;::;

;__ ._.'~ . _

~~_ ,

0 "._

CONFIDENTIAL __ . .., __.'

INTERNAL o USE ONLY'

o UNCLASSIFIED

------------------MORI DocID: 1451843

, "

(

. '. 15 FEB ';:372

MEMORANDUM FOR: Executive Director-Comptroller SUBJECT

ROSELLI, John

This memorandum is for your inforU1ation only.

2. Reference is made to our recent conver s ati on regarding the Agency's participation in political as sassinations. Attached hereto is a memorandum dated 19 November 1970 which was furnished to Mr. Helms setting forth the circumstances of the Subject's activities behalf of the Agency. Initially Roselli was unwitting of Government interest, but as time went on, he suspected that the U. S. Government was involved and specifically the CIA.

3. Roselli is presently serving a prison sentence for conspiracy in a Federal penitentiary in Seattle, Washington and awaits deportation upon completion of his current sentence •

4. This Agency was aware that Roselli intended to exp9se" his participation in the plot should we not intervene on his behalf. The DCI decided to ignore his threats and take a calculated risk as to the consequences that may occur with the disclosure of his:" story. This was subsequently done by Roselli or someone on his behalf furnishing Jack Anderson details of the incident. Attached hereto are two of Anderson' s az-ti cl e s dealing with "Roselli. Anderson is also Editor of the Washington Bureau of the Washington Post, Sunday supplemental "Parade. " 5. Individuals who were aware of this project were: Messrs. Dulles, Bissell, Colonel J. C. King, Colonel Sheffield Edwards,

00039

--------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

.... ,": . ""

William Harvey, and James P. O'Connell. Also include'd were Robert A. Maheu and'his attorneys Edward P. Morgan and Edward Bennett William s.

6. On 26 February 1971 arrangements were rna da with Immigration and Naturalization Service Comrl1issioner Raymond Farrell to flag any action that may be taken hy his o,rganization regarding deportation proceedings against Roselli. On26 January 1972 James F. Green, ASSociate Commissioner for I&NS, advised that they were deferring' any deportation action for another year and would again call it to Our attention upon expiration of the deferral.

Atts

SEC ET ES OttlY

00040

----------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

MEMORANDUM FOR: Executive Director-Con,ptroHer SUBJECT

ROSELLI, John

.. 1.

·i

This rnernoz-andurn is for your _i.nf~rmation only.

z. Reference is made to our recent conversation regarding the .Agency's participation in politic;!.l assassinations. Attached he r-e to is a rn errro r-a.ndtrm dated 19 November 1970 which was furnished to Mr. Helms setting forth the circumstances of the Subject's activities on behalf of the Agency. Initially Roselli was unwitting of Government interest, but as time went on, he suspected that the U. S. Gove r nrne nt was involved and specifically the CIA. , 3. Roselli is presently serving a prison sentence for conspiracy in a Federal penitentiary in Seattle, \\Tashington and awaits deportation upon completion of his current sentence.

I .

4. This Agency was aware that Roselli intended to expose hiB participation in the plot should we not. intervene on his behalf. The DCI decided to ignore his threa.ts and take a calcuiated risk as to the consequences that may occur with the disclosure of his story. This wall subsequently done by Roselli or someone on his behalf furnishing Jack Anderson details of the incident. Attached hereto are two of Anderson's articles dealing with Roselli. Anderson is also Editor of the Vlashington Bureau of the Washington Post, Sunday supplemental "Parade. It 5. Individuals who were aware of this project were: Messrs. Dulles, Bissell. Colonel J. C. King. Colonel Sheffield Edwards.

'00041

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.....

WilliDm Harvey, and J'arne s P. O'Connell. Also included were Robert A. l..,.~C'\.heu and his attorneys Edward P. Morgan and Ed-ward Bennett Williams. 6. On·26 February 1971 arrangernents were made with I:mn:.igr~tion and N<:ituralization Service Commissioner Ra ymo nd Farrell to flag any action that may be taken b}r his o r ga ni aa tf on regarding deportation proceedings egainst Roselli.. On 26 .January 1972 James F. Creon, .A ssociate Commissioner for I&NS, advised that they were deferring any deportation action for another yea r and would again call it to -ouz- attention upon expfr atl on of the deferral.

nOWa ro J lXJsborn Director of Security

Atta

00042

MORl DoclD: l45l843 -. -.-

- ..-

.. -

Atts ... ~.

00043

.. \. ,

-------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

e °

Co.

MI:n'fORANDUM FOR:

Director of Centz-a l Il1i;elligence

E-:UBJ.ECT

ROSFLLI, Johnny

This memorandum is for inf'onuation only.

2. In August 1960, Mr. Richard 1v'!:. ,Bissell approached Colonel Sheffield Edwards to determine if the Office of Security had assets that may assist in a sensitive mission requiring gangster-type action. The mission target was Fidel Castro. 3. Because of its extreme sensitivity, only a small group was made privy to the project. The ncr was briefed and gave his approval. Colonel J. C. King, Chief, \YH roivision, was briefed, but all details were de lfbez-at.el.y concealed from any of the JM\VAVEofficials. Certain TSD and Cornrno personnel participated in the initial planning stages, but were not witting of the purpose of the mission. , 4. Robert A. Maheu was contacted, briefed generally on the project. and requested to ascertain if he could develop an entree into the gangster elements as the first step toward accomplishing. the d~sired goal. 5. Mr. Maheu advised that he had met one Johnny Roselli on several occasions while visiting Las Vegas. He only knew him casually through clients, but was given to understand that he was a high-ranking member of the "syndicate" and controlled all of the ice-m.aking m.achines on the Strip. Maheu reasoned that, if Roselli was in fact a member of the clan, he undoubtedly had connections leading into the Cuban gambling interests.

00044

MORl DoclD: 1451843

6. Maheu wa s asked to approach Roselli, who knew MahC'u as a personal relations executive handling domestic and foreign' a.ccounts, and tell him that he had recently been retained by a client: who z-epr e s entcd several international busines s firms which were suffering heavy financial losses in Cuba as a result

I I

I i

of Castro's action. They were convinced that Castro's rernoval wa s the answer to their problern and w e r e willing to pay a price of $150,000 for its successful a c cornpIi shrn errt, It was to be made clear to ,Roselli that the U. S. Gove rnrrrent was not, and should not, become aware of this operation. ' 7. The ,pitch' wa s made to Roselli on 14 Septernber 1960 at the Hilton Plaza Hotel, New York City. His initial reaction was to avoid getting involved but, through Maheu's persuasion, he agreed to introduce him to a friend, Sam Gold, who knew the "Cuban crowd. II Roselli made it clear he did not want any money for his part and believed Sam' would feel the same way. Neither of these individuals was ever paid out of Agency funds. 8. During the week of 25 ,September, Maheu was in~roduced to Sam who was staying at the Fontainebleau Hotel, Miami Beach. It was several weeks· after his meeting with Sam arid Joe, who was, identified to hiIn as a courier operating between Havana and Miami, that he saw photographs of both of these individuals in the Sunday supplemental "Parade.' 1 They were identified as Momo Salvatore Giancana and Santos Trafficant, respectively. Both were on the . list of the Attorney General's ten most-wanted men. The former was described as the Chicago chieftain of the Cos a Nostra and successor to Al Capone, and the latter, the Cosa Nostra boss of Cuban operations. Maheu called this .office-immediately,upon ascertai:ling this information. 9. In discussing the possible methods of accomplishing this mission, Sam suggested that they not resort to firearms but, if he could be furnished some type of potent pill, that could be placed in Castro's food or drink, it would be a much more effective operatton, Sam indicated that he had a prospective nominee in the person of Juan Orta, a Cuban official who had been receiving kickback payments from the gambling interests, who still had access, to Castro, and was in a financial bind.

00045

MORl DoclD: 1451843

'/····;·~

l..

JO. content.

TSD was z cque ate dt o produce six pills of high lethal

11. Joe delivered the pills to Orta. Af'te r several w e elcs of reported attempts, Orta apparently got cold feet and asked out of the a s s i gnrn errt, He suggested ariothe r- candidate who made ' several attempts wi thout suc ce s s s 12. Joe then indicated that Dr. Anthony Verona, one of the principal officers in the Cuban Exile Junta, had becorne disaffected with the apparent ineffectual progress of the Junta and was \viIling to handle the rrri s s'io n through his own r e sou r ce a, 13. He asked, as a prerequisite to the deal, that he be given $10,000 for organizational expenses and requested $1, 000 worth of cornrnuni ca.tions equipment. 14. Dr. Verona's potential was never fully exploited, as the project was canceled shortly after the Bay of Pigs episode. Verona was advised 'that the offer was withdrawn, and the pills were retrieved. 15. Of significant interest was an incident which involved a request levied by Sam. upon Mabeu.

1. I

At the height of the project negotiations, Sam expz-e s s ed concern about his girlfriend, Phyllis McGuire, who he learned was .getting much attention from Dan Rowan while both we~e booked at a Las Vegas night club. Sam asked Maheu to put a bug in Rowan' 8 room to determine the extent of his intimacy with Miss McGuire. The technician involved in the assignment was discovered in 'the process, arrested, and taken to the Sheriff's office for questioning. He called Maheu and inform.ed him that he had been detained by the police. This call was rna de in the presence of the Sheriff's personnel. Subsequently, the Department of Justice announced its intention to prosecute Maheu along with the technician. On 7 February 1962, the Director of

3 ~:: •• !

~ ~

'{.:

:.t'

00046'

MORl DoclD: 1451843

(

/ Security briefed the Attorney Gene r a l , Robert Kennedy, on the ci r cum stancc s leading up to 'Maheu's involvement in the wir etap, At our request, p r oa e cutdon wa s ch"oJ?ped. 16. In May 1962, Mr.· W·illiam Harvey took over' as Case Officer', and it is not known by this Office whether Roselli wa s used operationally £1'011.'1 that point on. 17. It was subsequently learned f'r orn the FBI that Roselli had been con.victed on six counts involving illegal en.try into the United States. Our records do not reflect the date of conviction, but it is believed to have been sornetfrne during November 1967. 18. On 2 December 1968, Roselli, along with four other individuals, was convicted of conspiracy to cheat members of the Friars Club of $400,000 in a rigged gin gummy game. 19. Mr. Harvey reported to the Office of Security of his contacts with 'Roselli durfng November and De'cernbe r 1967 and January 1968. It was his belief that Johnny would not seek out the Agency for assistance in the deportation proceedings unless he actually faced deportation. Roselli expressed confidence that he would win an appeal. ~ 20. On 17 November 1970, Maheu called James OIConnell, Roselli's first Case Officer. to advise that Maheu's att.orriey, Ed Morgan, had received a call from a Thomas Waddin, Roselli's Iawyer , who stated that .alLav:eriues of appeal had been exhausted, and his client now faces deportation. Waddin indicated that, if someone did not intercede on Roselli's behalf, he would make a complete expo s e of his activities with the Agency. 21. On 18 Novernbe r 1970, you were briefed on the latest development in this ca ae, and it was decided that the Agency would not in any way assist Roselli. Maheu was so advised of the Agency's position. and he was in complete agreement with our stand. He further advised that he was not concerned about

4 v-

~-': ~f

•• _ -

t t

'. ~'!"'r:

~: L

_ ~_.,

..,' _.' ~

00047 •

----------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

..... ,

. any publicity as it affected him personally s hou'ld Roselli decide to tell all. He stated he would advise us promptly of any developrnerrts that Ire may become aware of in this rnatte r ,

Howard J. Osborn Director of Security

~ 5

... ...., r'

~":'.

"";'.... .. __1."

'.. ;.,.,..,.~..

. J

.. .:...-.

.... ~

00048

MORl DoclD: 1451843

(

,~foudar, .1111I. 18, 1?:1

THE WASUIXGTOX POST

It: . J{i -"'-1't n .,.,,,.~ i n .fl.~

~ fil.Sd.,<GlJl!itIYltCl Bj' ] acl: A lI(r.er.~on

------------_.....:.....:....:..._----- -rr7 "111 I(" 1f),7 f:l;A_ If). 7J ~ 7? .n: ~ (fr-x J.J t;1 . li~7L!l ~u~tL!f UI fU([JL{U!J!, u» 0Jil-1. ~ , I.

, I

: t(or before the motley im'ad',iale 'against President Ken-: complete wth secret trysts at. _

ers landed on the island, Their' nedy, . gllttering :\1iaml Beach hotels, ': Locked. in the darkest re- arrival was expected to touch To set up the Castro assassi- and mid it I g h t powerboat ~ cesse,s of the ?entral Intelll- off a general uprising. which nation, the CIA enlisted P..Qfl: I dashes to l'....crct i::ndln;: !;;lots :.gence Agency 15 the story of I the Communist militia would,....e~~~I~ a fc,rmc.'r -r~Bf\on the Cuhan coast. Once, no- : '\SiX. nss:.ssin:.t!,?n attempts ~ have had more trouble nulling l agent witn sh?dowy contacts, ~ sef li's boat was 0110.t out from:.: ,ilg:unst Cuba's 1'ldel Castro. i .' , _" who had handled other under-lunder him. . _:, For 10 years, only a few key I down WIthout the chartsrnatlc cover ass,lgnmen';S for the CI.A For the finf. try. the CIA:,;' people have known the terri-I Castro to lead them. out ?f hls Wa.shmgton public furnished Roselli with :;pecial'( ble secret. They have sworn After the first attempt relations office. He later Ipoison capsules to sllp IntO: ~'. never- to talk. Yet we have-lfalJed five more assas~ination moved to Las Vegas to head I! Castro's food. The polson Willi learned the details from '. . t C. b T' up billionaire Howard Hughes' supposed to take- :!lre:c cloys to sources whose credentials' are teams \I ere sent 0 u a. ne Xevada operations. act, By the time (';,:;1,0 died 'beyond question. jlast team reportedly marie it. Maheu recruited John ne- his system would t hrcw off ali .We spoke to John. McCone, to. a rooftop within shooting Iselli, a ruggedly handsome traces of the polson, so he ~ho headed the CIA .at the Idistance .of Castro befo~e they I gambler ~ith contacts In both would appear to be the viclim bme·of the assasslnation at'lwere apprehended. ThIS hap:lthe American and Cuban un"lo! a natural if mysterious ailtempts; He -acknowledged the pened around the last of Feb· derworlds. to arrange the as- ment. lldea had been discussed inside ruary or first of March, ]963. . sassination, The dapper. hawkRoselli arranged with . a - .~ ':Ie CIA .but insisted it had Nine months later, l>rcsI'.lfa.red Roselli. formerly mar-] Cuban, related to one of Cas. ' . ..een fir e j e c ted immedl- dent Kennedy was gunned! rled to movie actress JUne tro's .chefs, 10 plant the deadly' at ely," . He vigorously denied1down in Dallas by Lee Harvey'Lang, was a power in the pellets in the dictator's food. that the CIA had ever partlcl- Oswald, a fanatic. who pre- movie industry Until his con'l on 1Ilarch 13,1961. Roselli de. : . pated in any plot on Castro's viously 'had agitated ior Cas- viction 'With 'racketeer..Willie livered the capsules to his con: . life. Asked whether the at' tro in New Orleans and had Bioff ~n a million-dollar Holly-] tact at Miami Beach's glamor- , l tempts could have been madelmade a mysterious trip to the wood labor shakedown. The~ous Fontainebleau Hotel. : '.: with ~is knowledge. he re:lcuban Embassy in Mexico CIA assigned two of its mos t A couple of weeks later just plied: "It could not have hap- City. trusted operatives, William about the right .tirne !o; the pcned... Among those _priv~' to thelHar\'ey and James (Big Jlm>!'Plot to have been carrled OUI We have complete contl-] CIA conspiracy, there is still a O'Connell, to the hush-hush fa report out of Havana r.air/ 'I'dence, 11 0 we v e r, in our'l nag gin g suspi~ion-unsup. ,murder mission. Usin/(. phony Castro was ill. But he r I sources. ported by the \~arrE'n com'lnamE's, they accompanied ne- covered before the Bay of P;i~ The plot to knock off Castro : mission's fin.dings-that Cas- selli on trips to :Miami to line jim'asion'on April 17.1961. ; be:,:an as part of -the Bay of i tro became awa~e of the U ,5. up the assassination tea~s. I Four more attompts \. I. to i Pi~s op"I'::IiI'/1 The intent was, pld upon hls !l!,. aru! ~"m('ol The full story reads hk(' thp 'maet" on Castro's lire, ,III {'lhniu;.;" 'Ih(' Cuban clit'ta·Jllllw, rC'{'l'liitrcl (),\\:lld :.., :I'I;.!. s\'l'i·p~. of a ,lam{'s Bond movie,' ,'; 19~.,Brl:·M<Cluu;;) .. ~.. Llt /..r

_._

__ ....._--_.. _-._- -----------

00049

! ! L

r'. r i

r· r-

V ~

r-·

MORl DoclD: l45l843

(

( ,

THE \\'ASH1:\GTOX POST

---------------

B 11

TUI'$aa.,.,r~b,23,19il

---_._-----.:-

rfY1TA:

VJi

1", Jt,.,· :(,l,T'~I"M1\ ~'.I' .,. Il~ , " ' I L

l,~oh 1'" R':>0 "'r!. :,~;;ii':'I!.;;

I. Ccnt:. -al

•

},ol

"'-

"",'

:,\"1'

.: \.

~('ac;y

v·-;:h

j='\"':'l '""- "-r \t..•..",; • ":·-~p~ri· c·.·..... t::~.s .. J ~1/.t.". ., C· ••• ll"'- .... : t. :,."t .'.

jnr·, ?("~,:,:li

?~:~(\;;'!;::

;::~i:l

on the CIA payrcll,

• ~ ';"_t'_ -·i-:· .... r· to 1"'. - .:,..: .... ~~ r,."\ j -..,:,a zs-r H .1#•••• :.. -' u. I , ,t •• ,.!· . - . . . .... 1"..... . •• jf t _ t,. .:" 15 tlo" he l'-d j;--rlll'd un-t throuah a :,c: arive o·~ Castro's .,.l:". \',_,,:1 ':(... , •• : .Jl• • • ~:_ •• :f.....

- he my;::lfry Tt•.in ·'\/101il,hc'.0n"-" .,t.

IC1L

H:I

let.....

L..

•

;:,·1.. 1

.=-"

•

oQ. • •

"::"

.:,. ....

•. to d:.".:c:..:~s f:1':':r CL\. ;:..·: .. ·.·H1.··S.

1~f' ••C(' • ~f'nc~ .t!"l"Co\·C'r asslcnmonrs for the chef to plant In the d;cta~ors:'1'rv ev said he \-'Id ,;,',1-;-;' reI ,('tIU"rn _ .. " ".f', t ·• • l "I"C"';\'''' -" :. • ! , G '.'. ~ . 0 ~.".""'~ .~."1 - . . . ;'i, .3.("'': \ 'fl"t _{r't:"'~ '-"I'o'-V,:t,- io l'lP- 't ,;c~,..- i'ij;s:- ...·~r"';::r.n ar:ned'O'-"cr- ror TInt-cpt ~ -r-, ..J r"" · r- rI

i. in~"irll'ltheC3:-' a r. .s hC":':l i~:<1 ri:·~.:~:;';" ~ r:" '(i~: rt·~i:;:rT;:~·:. i.~ ~ ~:~ ~ O:.:.~J\h" ;~~~:;.;:lj'''''' I~ :·;d B"("i;ia~ rl- ~ ~;t; Frk:r-',S ci';;!)' c;~~:~·~u. ·:J1;;:in sick ward Qf the Los; same ::\!;,J1CU, inclclt'nt.;;1i:;. who; flcs au ernpted to inliltrate [rap." Said Harvey: "The t

It;·t

! is now involved in a IC':'31 Dat-: close enough 10 bun Castro I Friar's Club incli\:t:-:,('nt is

Anzelcs County jail.

Ire is har;(:~fi:-nc. h,1\',·k.f(s~(*rl: tl~ o ..· rr phantom hiii~rJIia~rC ;co\l,:n.

'. _. :r,!:r,ny·. RfJE~lli had no more to John Rosclh. once a (~a;:;hln:::: 1Ioward Iiughes' ~·~\"oca opcr-] ..\,~l t·):d. :.~x n:;"~"·.~i:"~lr.:l at"·d.) ..I:Hh t;;~~ than Lb ad." figurc. "round Hollywood .:in~lllillions. II;rr,pt5 :-n':-e .-:l;'I.:. t~e~~:'l !:li ·H~.:.~:;i's l::'.'Tilrs :,r~ now Las '\ e;;ils. now a gray, 6er Tlo!'clli was so Ilattereri overltne sprmz of l!lo3. Ihrou;n.·:lrying to 2':r c:li:mr::::::: ;!"ti" :rear.o}d inmate with a resPira'l being asked to perform a out this perio? Roseili wo~~ed! their client, citing our storie:; tory llllmcnt. eret mi~sion for L'1c U.S. gO\" under the d\:"ect supen'\slon!about his secret CL\ sCl'"\"kc•.: Co;;fid.~ntial FBI mcs idC'n-1 crnalent that he paid all his loi two SCCT(~t CIA a;;ents. Wil·' • tify him as ":,I top Alana fig-I ('xpc'IlSCS out of his own I:<1r:l Hilr:e-)' i\:Jd Ja:nes' (Bi,;1 Fl~'L':Inns Fi:l::'co urc" who \'::llc-hed oyer "thc! porkC't ;md risked his neck 10 :Jim) O·Connell. I 1,; I .' f concealed illlNC'sts in Lr.s; I,lnd the assassination teams i I)C er ;Jrcssurc Irom lie Ve~as casinos of the Chicago Ion the Cuban coast. IRo~cili's Rm..; arel . ,firearms lobbr. the Treasury undcrwo!"!d." ..' Tn Jamcs Bond fashion. he Th'e FBI 'which got wind ofiDepartment., has failed to en~~osclh has admll(cd to held whispcred meetin~s in the assassination plot. haS!force a vilal section of the friends ~b:t ,~c \~t1S a. r~m ~un'l ,\Iiami !3~ach hotels wilh, tried t·o pum;> Roselli for in- .lllGS federal fire;;rms act. ncr d\lrln,~ ,oe l\O;)rlll~ T\\('n·! bans wllhn~ to make an at·,formatir.n. But he was sworn I _. , ties. Opel""tin:: :alon:;: the Eal;d tC'mpt on Castro's life. Ont·C'.lto ~j:ence by the CIA and uo i H,e law was 'I'<Jsscd af,er Coast, he IC'arnec! ho\\" to evade; he called on Chiea~o racketj 10 this mcorrient he hasn't bro. i\i;e murders of Sen. Robert Coast Guard culters and po· hoss Sam Giancana to l!:le up iken it. • :r;:er.ned~· and Dr. :.Iartin Lu· licc patrols. a contact. The confidentiall )I~anwhile. the Ju~lIce De.! ther . King: It authorizes ~hc His name later becCime files report. t.hat Giancana had par::ment. as part'of its crack-I Tre;,sur;: Secrcta~' to rcqUJTi' linl_cd \\'it!t the bi;t:cst names "f:ambJing interest and an in-'ldown on pr"anized crime.liull r"'P?~ts of allllrearms and in the ChIC,l~O and Los Allec· tel'est in the shrimp businE'ss tried to nail Roseili. The FBIiammunlllon sales. . les underworld:::. He also de- in. Cuba." Howe\'cr the' Chi· di~co\'ered that his Chica.;o I :Cor the ".\'0 years that ~;;c veloped contac.ls in ,lhe CUba~ I ril!=O gar\~ste'l' tOOk' no direct i binh records had been jorge-d, i law i~;js hcen in for~e._ :~l': Ullden\·oTlcl br,lorc Cas.tr.o tOOh:lpilrt in the assassination plot. that his name was reaily Fi.ITrC'a;u.~·. ~epartmc::t, Ila~_:=-' O.\'C\· the lIa\"iwa ~itmLillllg ca·; Hoselli ·made midnit;ilt lippo Sacco and that he had 1J1()r('~ t'll1>. ,:;,c.y prO.... 51On. :;. :~: smos. ' dashes to Cuba with his hin.'d come to this country from ~un Jndu~try has cQmi'la.~('n, He. }lad the rir;ht back- assassins in twin powe.ooats. Italy as a child.' He was con. it . would be a bookkcc;Jlll~ ground {or a 11ush·hush mis'! Once a Cuban patrol ship victed for failing to register as Inightmare. . si,on~ t.hal 1.!le CIA was rlan·lturncd its !!uns on his, dark-Ian alien. .. I ..~h.e ..federal. . gO\'et:nm;~t~ ntn ... m ID.l1. As part. 0. thn!C'ncd boat. t(\re a hole :n thel He was also cl)n\'lct"d for,"n.rn \\ollici ha\(' to com", . B.3Y (1[ P;:5 j~\":::::;(\n. fhe CI:\ i h':l:lQ:n and ~:.tnk t:-:c 1'Qar. Ro.. '(,,(\::Si11rac~: t:j ri=:- card :jrJ~s: c~l the . ~:i:ps CHI::t" hn:\ :: '., t hopE'ci ':0. ;"i'~"~;':.Off C:lSirO and: f't'Hi ''''as- ilShccl OUt oi the ~ nt LO$ .-\~;eles.· £xi;l:l~i\'l: . ~~~~i r:~:u\."'~c~~: ,"~O .,sT'"!~~.....:~ ..~ 1c:-:... .·e Ll!::~1 j~~~.:.~JE: ..... c~s, 1\\·~IC'l.;.,\,.,.·""lI'\.:"\ . ~ . . ..... -;..:"".~t \I·f·.:c·n:~rl·~l"·~ C',~,~ :,,,,.1.") mu.:on 1...... :..')t.~(. (Ci.'\. I •• o .... "'•• "'''.14" a • "'.1 .. ,. . I cscapr.ct' imo the shadows.. Of Rt'lieUi's two CIA n!'.~O.!c(lmr~:r.~~ ;';ud Sl~;:: to 1'r.:.,:;. 1 H i':- k ~ .;~e('k. In p.ar!it'T ,roltlml1s. w~. Te·. dalC's, .H3nTX has ~(l••: r£'tirt'~~ 'lain the lIrc",rm", fl ..e.;;. . r.O~(!ill \t";l,S tecrllllrd fot' the I poned how t,1e Cl.\ furm:·ned I to Ind:ana;.~o;;s ana 0 Couac.l! ~ :~~!. S!::-~.:,~(':~r~ s:·~~:c:" •.• ,. . -' -.... _... .

se'l' i

, I

cu-l

•

>or'

''£'

••• . , .

.. ... , .

....

- •• '

•• -

"'7-.

.": - .:

·····:.;~"t"'.:-:~-:.--·-r.-

,",~.-~

. ;'"';:'-"-"':' ,.

'.--~--.

:--:;-." ..-..

_--:-.:;"'~"--_

_ - :: :- _..

:'l..----:'.~

---- '-'7''

00.050 , ,"

_.-.

MORl DoclD: l45l843

O·--(. i.'£RNAl ONLY

[J CON( ~NTfAl

_....

ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET

SUBJECT: (Optional)

---FROM:

_. ._._-~--_ ....

EXTENSION'

Howard J. Osborn . 0 D~rector of Secu~

building)

-&,/

IG Staff Attn: I ..:zE=

r>: \"'~'

OMV

.~~

e&L~ ~

J~~ ']'-(

<).D~ 5.

~.l~~c..~~ 4

-·'0

" ~

.--

T)(-p;77

~-'..

COMMENTS (Number each commenl 10 show from wham to whom. Draw 0 line across column after each comment.)

.t :

" ,l ~.

...

~L~ ~ ,*lf~

~,~ t ~ -~ LA ~d .,- -rv ~ ·Wu~

~ ' I ; 1,.1 , }':.._L.':-'" ...-.I. ...,.~ - ~ ("I .~-:. ".':,/.." ." _!,~:~ ....

;':-

17 December 1973

OFFICER'S INITIALS

FORWARDED

RECEIVED

.r>.

DATE

CJ DATE

NO.

.-.

IHqs.

TO: [Officer designotion room number, and

. r--'--- - - - -

•

10.

11.

12.

13. "-'}

1....

00051:

15.

~~::'

....

610 Us~Dm~~~us ~

_. - --.

...... -_ . ..

......

-~~

.... _-~_

CONFIDENTIAL .....- .. _.-..::.__...;:.. .. _.. '

~..

~_.

D INTERNAL USE ONLY...,

._.---... - --_....;.._---_ ....

_-.-

. ,. -'--.'_00'-------------

--------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

. " f!o r:" 1:"1 ."'" ...., S;;''-9r;~ .' 'i.iL~;,;;i ri~.ft. 'r"

...'

17 Deca~er 1973

MEMORANDJM FOR TI1E RECORD SUBJECI':

Recent Activities of the Watergate Special Prosecution Staff

Early in the evening of 10 December 1973 I received.

,..;=a::...-.=:cte=l=eOF~h~efu~;~n~~e that he, m tum, had'receJ.v: a call from ntelligence Division, Washington

'K1f.i1Fi"Rnnr~ffilPrIT~r-n;~'T"'rTl~

2. It SO""" that /had just spent an hour in conversation at his home WI: in the WashingtonMetropo1itanoll.ce DepartiTient Who had reportJ to him on his inteIView that afternoon wi.th a Mr. Martin and a lvfr. Horowitz'lrosecutors of the Watergate Special Prosecution Staff. had been subpoenaed for his appearance and he indicated Ithat the two prosecutors were princ::ipa1~y concerned WJ. h twO matters: . . .

S t:> \

l\11at type of training had. the Agency given members of the Washington Metropolitan Police Departmentf how long were the courses? and how often were they given? .

What support did the Agency provide to the , Washington Metropolitan Police Department during demonstrations occurring in the Washington area in late 1969 and early 19701

II I

I I

3. said that he had been shown a long list of names and asked if any of them had been involved either lilth the training given the Washington J-;Ietropolitan Police Department or the support to the Washington Jo.fetropolitan Polic~ Department during the demonstrations. lcou1d ranernber only three names on the ~ist! They werefl

00052

MORl DoclD: 1451843

4. The three individuals named by did in fact participate in both the training and support during the demonstrations. Ispecial They are only three among others of myl support group who were involved in these activities. Of extreme sensitivity is the fact that these same individuals were engaged in other highly sensitive activities which could cause :the Ag6J."1.C:Y severe embarrassment if they were surfaced. today in the current l'l\"atergate climate. II

s. I briefed the Director personally on this development and he indicated that if the training and demonstrations surfaced that he would' simply acknowl.edge that this had occurred but as he had assured members of Congress J we would not engage in this type of activity in the future •. He agreed wi.th my suggestion that we have the Legislative Cotmsel brief Congressman Nedzi and Senator Stennis on this since they have already been briefed on all activities of this nature undertaken by the Agency in the past. I briefed Mr. Jo1m Warner, Acting General Counsel., and areed with him that we would make no effort to brief members of my tootH and if they are subpoenaed. }Vfr. l\Tamer or members of his Sta f will 1:;I1en cautdon them to only answer questions asked and not volunteer additional infonnation. I am making a copy of this memorandtun available to lof the Inspector General's Staff at the suggestion of the Inspector General, who I also briefed on this development. '

II .

Howard J. Osborn Director of Security

.......-~c:

IG Staff Attn: 1"-

00053

---------~~MORl DoclD: 1451843

:. ..

- - : .....:., ~

.:.

..:: ..

...... B.

. -- . .. . "

-. -. -

'; ":".

·~1EMORANQUN FOR:

I10.J -.- - - - : T _ \

1:.

' 11- - - - - - - - T \

12.

13.

14.

15.

(DATE) FORM J-62

61 0

00054

rxl

USE PREVIOUS ~ EDITIONS ~ •• _.

FORM NO. I

AUG 54

101

REPLACES FORM \0-10\ WHICH MAY 8E USED.

MORl DoclD: 1451843

..... -

0: 'UNCLI\SSIFJE'D' r

'~"

o t ~. IlY

J'''?~At

'-- . . .~

.::

. ''":.-

.... -_ .._...:-.: ..

···~r

~h.. ~'

• • M_

OM_

.~' --::::;.~_---. '.

D .emn (-_'H_'A...,..l----.;

. '.,

:'''-:-~

:';

ROUTING AND ~ECORD SHEET

Ii---------:---------:--~---------_._r . SU5JECT: (Optional)

L fROM:

Howar~ J. Osborn ·d,fo

TO: (Orr;co, designatio,n. room numb.,. ar>d

77 L:.:...:...--J

bu;lding)

Director of Security

EXTENSION

; :

D.;.rE

'fORWARDtD

DATe

INITIALS

. ..

ReCEIVED

NO.

1-----=':,.....-----4 OFFicER'S

••.•

.»

25 MAY 1973

COMMENTS (Numbe, 'each camme,,1 to show from ""ho"" Ora", a line across calum" aff&t eoc" com",,,,,'.)

Icl ...ham.

}.----..:.-:---,.,-,----~--_t_---+_-'-.:..:...-f_---....::_j

! 8. ! 9.

•••••

:":~;:i"

..'

',"

.-. '0'"

.-:::

..,

1--------------+----l----I----t .. ... - ... ." ..::. 110.

.. .

.:»

,.,:'

r--

~ Q

.'..

...... "

I 11.

-+-_ _i - - _ - I -_ _-1

/12. i

~;..=----------------f_---f_---I_---_1

! 13. I

--1-

I •

--1

14.

, I

.00055

1-..

lb.

n CONFJDfNTJAl

INTE:lNAl

.1Il;F O)JIY

D UNCLASSIfIED ;

----------------MORl DoclD: l45l843

(

MErdORANDUM FOR: Executive Secretary, CIA Management Committee SUBJECT

Project TWO-FOLD

1. This memorandum sets forth a recommendation for your approval in paragraph 5.

2. For the past several years, this office has been supporting the Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs (BNDD) by spotting, assessing, and recruiting personnel to form an internal security unit whose primary mission is the detection of corruption within -the BNDD. Subsequent to the recruitrn.entand" training stage, the individuals selected are turned over to the Chief In sp e cto r of BNDD for operational guidance and handling in their various dome stic as sigv.ments. 3. Recently, this Agency has e xterided this activity by supporting BNDD in the covert acquisition of individuals who are hired as Staff Agents utilized under nonofficial cover and directed against the principal international drug traffickers •. These individuals are true employees of the BNDD and, although all administrative details relative to their employment are handled within the Agen cy,' they' are: unaware of any Agency involvement. 4. It is ~elt at this time that a reaffirmation of our support to BNDD in Project TWO-FOLD is necessary and desirable. 5. Therefore, it is recommended that. appr-oval, be granted for the continuation of Project TWO-FOLD. as originally approved by the Director of Central Intelligence on 12 February 1971.

~,9~~ Director oa;:rity

00056

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.° E

'-'y" .···1· '-: .....

(

• "'. ' . '•

. ' ;~ .• JJ ~

,;:.

SUBJ.ECT: Project TWO-FOLD

APPROVED:

>0"

------=---------..,----..,-----

DISAPPROVED:

----------

Di stribution: Orig. - Return to OS 1 - ER

1 - IG

* Per Mr. Colby's recommendation and .0

DCI concurrence, terminate para~raph 2 activity and continue paragraph 3 only as the -activity pertains to foreign assignments to collect narcotics intelligence abroad. Copy furnished IG.

00057

MORl DoclD: l45l843

r:J

- I ' _.

J .

. -'.

- .- - -IJ .. _

- ..·l

.. (;'.lY " - --.

~.. _ ,

- ._ -

1.1 - _.--

.. i t.l

~--_

ROUrfNG AND RECORD $HEET

_._ _... L _: .

\~.,. -~.

,. ,~r

. ..-

. ... ;

J-----.---.----....------..----------------. --------.-------....,_. "'--'SUBJECT: (Op!;onoll .__ ......

_-----.-._.

FROM:

_- -_.

.._._ ....---.._-----_ ....

__ ---- ....

--..,-

.-.-._.

EXTtt~S'ON

NO. -00

-----_._._._----...._-

..._ . _ .

•

_._

. . . .- - _ .

DATE

1-_..!=========::!'-TO: (Officer d.';9MHon, 'Dam number, and

f - - _ _ f-

"r"

DATE

___ .__.._ r ......- .____

building)

RECEIVED

FQ&WA~DED

OffICER'S INITIALS

l~::....:o.;M..::..a_<..y_"1:...:9...;;.7..;:3

-..,

COMMENTS (Number each comment 10 show I,om whom to whom. Draw a line aero .. column after each comment.)

J----------------.-----t--- +------+----+----------------------1 1.

Broe

-----------_._----_._- ------+--_.- +----~

00058 ro.R¥.3~ 6.1"1 Oiu'S!: PREVIOUS 'tor' S;~ET ~.r<i2 ....: i ." ,.... :EOITIONS ~ . • ..

....

INTERNAL o CONFIDENTIAL o USE ONLY

o UNCLASSIFIED

MORT DocTD: 1451843 i, ,..

"".

., .

.,~'May 1973

'.'

MEMORANDUM FOR "THE RECORD

SUBJECT: . G~neral: .. Office of Security Surv.ey . ·1.

.." ..

-:--......-:--:.. --:;.~." ",--:-",--:-..~'.--:-~~---.

-:-."

. . . ' .'::'. ".". '. .

-:-:::-.

;':,.

. "'" ..'f"····

•..

'...

., .

1. At the Director's instruction, and with the concurrence

.. of the thenDD/P, the Office of Security devedopedInfozmanrs in : ".:::~:... RID to report on the activities of RID er.q.ployees on whom security .. :':'~ questions had arisen.... This program, which included upwards of a ... ·· .' dozen informants at its peak, has declined to its present level.of three, only one of whom is reporting regularly on matters of ~urrent . interest. . ':': .~; ....: /..,~~;".:., '. ; ..' . :':' ' '.:. :':'>. '. . .. , ....

l.:.

f j

_c.

":'.'

"'.:

••

'..._

••

•

,:; . . . . . . .: • • •

•

:, •••

_~.~,.

";'

•••••

-",

Z. 'The principal object of Security's interest. through this .~~.-"":" informant is a female who was em.ployed in RID for..a nu.mber oi'yea:r's . until she r·esigned in 1969. Her r~s~gn?Ltion coincid~d with the iniq.ation of a security review on her by the Office of Security, but Security does .not know whether the e:m.ploy~~ waa aware of tbis..~:eC:~t.Y review Jat.,",:.: '.'

the tUne o_~ber r~Si;:::on•. '.,,, ~ :'~~':r~.;~~~:~:~,;;--:.:+:F'

-i I

3. Securit y ' s interest in this em..ploye~ was··occasionedby,. '" ... : reports that she had developed an increasing~y in'f::iixiate a.cquaintance,.,.;:>.:: with a Cuban na.tional. .Reporting. by one in.form.ant~ who Was also.~;·.;. ·¥":;;:~:· be~g de:elope~ bY.the-·~~b~; suggested that. the· ~.uban·migh~h~~e::~;~:~·::),L~;.:.·,. an mtelli'gence lIlteres~.lD. the fem.al~.~.T~e .s~.~. ~~~mant·a~so.;,.s.ub- ~.;·~kY: .' ..", sequently reported that. the Cuban had nl.J:l?3.eroq,s· other:contacts aInong . ;:., ," ". .

.:. ::1 '. '.;::~!

· :~~:!...;.,...

.•,: .•

.,.

:';~~}~; ~; ;::_;~::;;~;;t:;;::~e;;:::::~;~:;:C:::::~~~iP~!~Wilf~~~:_

ex-IUD -..1':;:;'''';';,'.;.:. . . ~;:: .c. ~.-::;::'~;'. :.'. ':: .. •:.::...' ••. .,,:.·.: c:4.:: .. ,'. Subsequent~:to.herdeparture . . . . :.... lrom . . the. Agency,'" . r '• •the " .• ":, .. ._.. :: ';'. . .·employee entered' into a common-Law :marital relc:tion~hip"with.~he~ ',:" ;¥"'; · '.' :-<. Cuban and jo~ned hini·a'S. parbier in' photographic..· b·usiiess.<. :r.n thi~:·';;':i':~:C··. ·.·.1 t :r.,,:'; ", • ->, .,: -.. . capacity. she s.oli.cite~ .busin~ss .. ~mong ·CfA- ~:t;lployees; ·"especi.ally; ;i.~'-";·~·:·:::·; ::..... :.' · ~i . I'·', .:.those requi;ring'p<:tssport photos.:.,' Recently, $he 'and the' Cubansought':-.;·;:;<. ! " ". . '.. .' :.~ 'f ..:..;. . t.o eznp.loy Security~s informan~ in. this busine;ss 'on ·a.part-tim.e b.asis; ';. . :.~:~ .. ".~~.".''':.'

•

~...

•

.1"

• .\.

";.:-

':.

•

,_.

' . . . ,.

••••

....

~...

'."

~I'

•

•• '

:_~'" · '., ~. ;' ':.: ".'.': .·.;:.~E; :t.; .~ ·.'[:~ :.~ , ;.: ' ;.: ·~ . · :. ~.· :'_ ".~ ;.i: > ~:. ;:'. ,~O:.~ _ :."'.t.';_i';~.l.~-·~.;:~·':~ • :~• • 'li::~;~": .' ~~~.·~_.,~",-:.,~._:. 1,·.: ~. ~;' ~-. -

.. :.·:. ..._.·:

.. ... ':., .- :--.' .::.:~--

;.~

.": ~

~.. ....- ~ :. ~ '. ..

. -:;.'•.:.-t r c •• - -

.. .

. :. -~~:. "'..;:.... :-:.

. ... .' ..... '. -, ".' :; .• :.,~-':::;>;;~~.;), 'SECa ..--".",,:~, ,

":.'

-.~-~~;.',.,.:_: ·:::;"i~~~·t~~;¢~i~1~:~i:i12~:~;;~~~h;i:~~t:.,.c~~rJff~:;.:~,., . .:

MORl DoclD: 1451843

. yJ ".

(

• .:.• ~

5. Inforrnation on the backgr oun d of the Cuban is fairly ex! cn s iv e , but it is inconclusive. He is known to have been a rn crn.be r of antiCastro organizations in this countr y, There are also reports that his' rno the r was i mp r i son ed in Cuba at one time, There are other episodes ·in his life that suggest intelligence Involv ernent all. his part with some hostile service, but this is not yet definitely establi.shed.

6. The Office of Security has had at ti me s a second informant in this case. His reporting has tended to confi r m reporting by the principal info r mant,

8. The Offi de of Security has been running this operation for over two years, in an effort to obtain conclusive proof of its intelligence nature. CI Staff has been kept informed.. The FBI, which was informed of the case at an early stage, has declined to take responsibility for it, on grounds that it concerns CIA's internal security. As a result, the Office ofSecurity has been inhihited in the actions it can take against the: Cuban susp-ect. On the other hand, Security has not taken any action against Agency em.ployees for fear of comprorni s ing the operation. 9. It would appear to me that the, Office of Security has dallied with this case long enough. Apparently unable through positive measures to resolve doubts about the case, O/S has followed the course of watchful waiting, hoping the Cuban would take precipitaif action himself that would give us the evidence we seek. In the m.eantim.e, our knowledge of the relationship between the Cuban and the several other current Agency employees with whom he is known to have contact continues

- 2 -

... ~ .

.,',

......

. ;

00060

~~-----------_.MORl DoclD: 1451843 •

."'- r.....

The possibility that the employee. In t)J:) DIVISIon may oe passIng information on CIA's Soviet operations is too great to warrant further delav in moving against her. I

- 3 -

.;;:zr. ,.....-~

, '. ".: t.. . __ ,_" ..

00061.

MORI DocID: 1451843

i·

. "' ....

Hemorandum to: Subject:

Offj.ce of Security Survey - Office of Security Support to B~DD

1. In D~cember 1970 Robert Ingersoll, head of the Bureau of ~ar cotics and Dangerous Drugs, asked Hr. Helnis if the Agency could give him scir:-e ass ist.ance in shoring up the internal integrity of the BUDD. According to Ingersoll, the old Federal Bureau of Narcotics had been heavily infiltrated by dishcnest and corrupt <elements, ,~o were believed to have ties with the narcotics smuggling industry. Ingersoll w~nted us toh~lp him recruit some thoroughly reliable people who could be used, . not only as special agents in his various office~ arotmd the country, but also to serve as informants on the other BNDD employees in these offices.

MORl DoclD: 1451843 .

...

... /

--: '" ..... .. ',o.,f':' /

"'"

-.. ;

JOLawrence

00063

MORl DoclD: 1451843 r'

----_.

""""

-_.

o SECRET

[J CO.. DtJHIf:\l .. ---_. ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET

._--------

SUBJECT: (Optional)

_--_.__._--_.-._---- '--_:'----'---._--_.' _._-- _._----.-_.-.------

.. FROM,

EXTENSION·

Howard J. Osborn Director of Security ._-~

I-

TO, (Offiter desJgflolion. room number, and

----------------------D"TE

I DATE

buildin!!l

9 May 1973

COMMENTS (Number each comment 10 show from whom

OFFICER'S INITIALS

FORWARDED

RECEIVED

._--_.-.

NO.

to whom.

Oro .... 0 tine octose column after eoch comment.}

._---

Deputy Director for Maria g emen t & Service'

---,..

3.~c; ,\ ......---

'-"

--;..-::: ;;"_-r::..;;..' '-_._-".......

......

10.

11.

12.

13. 14.

00064

15.

ADMIN FORM 3-62

61 0 '.

JIll'

USE PREVIOUS EDITIONS

-.....

SECRET 0 "- ..... ". - ..... '.'

M ......

CONFI DENTIAL ... .,..

"0"

. :

.... -

I!J E ONLY .~Al

..... _

.... ,

.~.....

•

UNCLASSIFIED_

• _ • __ ._~.....""'i,.."• .;;.........:.i:c...,I'W.._:.w....._~:.H::a.·.:

MORI DocID: 1451843

9 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR:

Deputy Director for Management &' Services

SUBJECT

Press Allegations re Use of, Agency Polygraph

1. This memorandum is fOT'youT information only and confirms a report I made to you by telephone earlier today.

"., , .

2. On 22 July 1971, an article was carried on American proposals relative to the SALT talks in The New York Times over the by-line of William Beecher. It was devastatingly accurate and contained direct quotes from a Presidential advisory memorandum the White House had sent to Mr. Gerard'Smith, Director, Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, a few days. earlier. The President was alleged to be furious with this unauthorized disclosure of classified information and directed a. sweeping investigation within the United States Government to determine the source of the disclosure.. Investigation was conducted under the. di.r,ectton. ..Q~. Mr. Egil Krogh and Mr. David Young, Staff Assistanf~ fo·Mr. John Ehr1ichman, Counsel to the President for Domestic Affairs. 3. On the basis of investigations conduc~ed by State Security and Defense officials,' four' Tndividuals-"'one individual in the Department of Defense and three individuals in the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency-were tabbed as leading suspects. Mr. Egil Krogh contacted me on 26 July 1971 and requested' that we arrange to polygraph the three suspects in the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency and volunteered the information that the Federal Bureau of Investigation would be asked to polygraph the. one suspect in the Department of Defense.

0-0065

MORl DoclD: 1451843

••

\; ,:\

JJ( bi~Lf

4. I informed Mr. Krogh that from time to time in matters involving the national security the Agency had detailed to Mr. G. Marvin Gentile~ Director of State, Security. a polygraph operator and a polygraph machine for his use in polygraphing State Department employees '~10 were recipients of allegations concerning their loyalty. I emphasized that this procedure had the Director's approval and that State 'clearly understood that the examination was their total responsibility. I further informed him that this was the only way we could undertake to entertain his request and that even then it would require the specific approval of the Director. Mr. Krogh asked me to obtain such approval and work out such arrangements with Mr. Gentile.

s. Later that same day, Mr. Krogh called Mr. Gentile and inquired as to whether the arrangements had been made. Mr. Gentile indicated they had and suggested that the same ' polygraph operator'be used to examine the Defense suspect. Mr. Krogh informed Mr. Gentile that he considered this an excellent idea and that he, would instruct Defense officials to make their man available to Mr. Gentile for 'a polygraph, examination. 6

The' four individual~ werel

I The polygraph '--..e""x'""acwm"'1-:;:n....anl:=-=.1,. . ,o"'n""""'s==--"'r"""e=sU.....l. . -:r:.tl:'",e""'" a """1-:::n:----';c:'-.:tr:,e=a=r=1""'n=g=-~l:rn'""'e'--="" :ro"'udr men and th e resu~ts of the examinations were forwarded over my signature to Mr. Gentile on 29 July 1971. A copy of my covering memorandum is attached. 7., Mr. Murrey Marder, a staff writer for The Washington Post, in ,an article dated 3 September 197T, stated that a State Department spokesman had acknowledged at a news briefing that agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation had polygraphed State Department employees suspected of leaking information on ,the SALT talks in July •. Mr. John Edgar Hoover, then ,Director of the Federal

,SE ONLY

MORl DoclD: 1451843 (

. .... r •

Bureau of Investigation, denied this allegation in a letter to The Washington Post and said that the polygraph examinations had been conducted by another agency. Speculation centered around the Agency, but after a day or 50 7 press speculation in this regard died away_

-S. Mr. Marder apparently has never been satisfied and has been pressing Mr. Charles BraY7 State Department spokesman, for confirmation of Agency involvement. Mr. Bray learned today that Mr. Marder plans to use a press conference to be held at 2:00 p.m. this afternoon to press this point further. Mr. Bray has been given guidance by Mr. Gentile to avoid confirmation but if this is impossible he will indicate the examinations were conducted by State Department Security officials utilizing an operator and a machine detailed to the Department for this purpose. I do not know whether or not the fact that the government-wide investigation was directed by Mr. Egil Krogh is known to Mr. Marder but I suspect that it is and that this is the reason why the matter has been raised again. Mr. David Young was instrumental in pushing my office to conduct an internal Agency investigation of this disclosure and the ·White House was satisfied that no Agency employee was the source.

Directo.r Attachment

00067

•

------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

....

-'1C

.. •

.... '

_._.~._

.....- ..- ....._.... --

.. .. ' "

... -- ..

..'

. - ...-.-- .._-

---.

...

''';:'

. '.' :'.~" (

-:'.:

I i'

00068 --

-.- -

.\ .. '\ ......

. .. ".-

MORl DoclD: 1451843

:;'~:?",)i.:y ..~~$i·5t3.;1t, 5.ecret;::.ry

io: ::)~.c';..1=l~y ~". '_""o_i .:...:.-:-. ~_ ......... ::::"' _~:..:

.-. -... ':0 J_''':.;':.::::1.:':~_~;:-::'.~.L.~

'2....

.:=~....::: !.:::t o;:£le.r c a s e-s i;n.~;nl-vl·2.:5 1::'1.2 1~3e o ; P0~Y~;:"~?~.1'

i=r:.Fi.~::.-ati7·e ~":O I::£.:;:::~nce~:e rna de

i::;'3

to r~ls ";\:1.~.llCY'3 1:l:.:,::)1··:".::1::1:~·~t i::l

~:~~3e .a ct i on s ,

3. 1\.5 you i;"?"il1 not a, the :L3?O~t.:J 3.Z"-:: not ~1.:::t3:;i£i.:;d :2::!.U I 3;"'..a11 de.f.er to jrao.: j~dJn:t~nt i::l !'''e;ard to tb'~ l~·J~~i of cla':;3iiic~tio~.

- - "'"

...".

-- .... - -'"

" = -. ;: ....-

~.;).

. ....- ..- ......

00069

MORl DoclD: 1451843

5 June 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Inspector General SUBJECT

Items in John Clarke Me m o r aridurn to the Director of Central Intelligence, dated 9 May 1973

I. Two items in the attached rne mo r andurn had not previously been reported. The first: "_- Use of CIA funds and facilities to for FBI and provision of technica equlpmen s or use against a l.-.. ----' 2. In a follow-up meeting with Mr. Clarke, he advised that involved here was the use of funds appropriatedfor CIA bein iven to the FBI in cashiers checks for the ur ose of There was also gency help given in Further, other CIA ~ cashiers checks were given to NSAwho. with some ssistance, was working on Mr. Clarke said he thought the only problem here was in the use of funds, not in the operation. He thought the only source of additional information on this subject was Mr.1 lof the DDO/CI Staff. .

3. The second item: "_- Use of CIA funds to help State Department defer Presidential representational expenses of President Lyndon B. Johnson's trip to Southeast Asia. II 4. Mr. Clarke said the total amount of TIlOney requested by State Department was $3, 000, 000 but that the Director would not agree to this amount. The Director did supply funds in tho s e instances where some operational activity was involved or could be inferred, I, e , , "...JI Mr. C larkL.e-w-a-s-n-o""t-s-u-r-e-o'f:-;-;th;---e-a-m-o-u-n--;t-o"f-A"'--:-g=-e-n-c-y--

00070

S[CRET [YES QNt¥-

------------MORl DoclD: l45l843

funds used. He felt that only Colonel White could" supply adrlitional details. He said Senator Russell and Representative Mahon were advised of this Agency activity but asked not to be briefed in detail.

Inspector Attachmen t

00071.

MORl DoclD: 1451843

..../

__ J ..._ A

"-;

I._I.

9 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR:

Director of Central Intelligence

SUBJECT

Per your instructions

1. I have no recollection of specific contacts with the Ellsberg c as e, Watergate, or Young. Dick Helms' instructions at the time regarding discussion of Hunt's previous employment s h ou'[d be a matter of record. 2. Other activities of the Agency which could at some point raise public questions should they be exposed and on which Bill Colby is fully conversant are: --

CI act ivftyof Dick Ober 3 DO/D.

I.,

investments and accumulation of Government capital.

Use of CIA funds and facilities to acquire U. S. real estate for FBI and provision of technical equipments by NSAI p o r use against

t' ./'Y

Use of CIA funds to help State Department defer v', Presidential representational expenses of L. B. J . trip to S E A . . G

L . -_ _

f~....-----..--\ dhn M. Clarke

0007Z

MORl DoclD: 1451843

5 June 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Inspector General IteIns in John Clarke Me m o r-aridurn to the Director of Central Intelligence, dated 9 May 1973

SUBJECT

1. Two items in the attached memorandum had not previously been reported. The first: It __ Use of CIA funds and facilities to acquire U.S. real estate for FBI and provis~on of technical equipments by NSAS ~or use againat a ',-__ .

Z. In a follow-up meeting with Mr~ Clarke, he advised that involved here was the use of funds appropriatedfor CIA belo iven to the FBI in cashiers checks for the purpose of

\ '11ere was also I \ Further, other L..-_.------. CIA monies in cashiers chec s were given to NSA who, with some ~Ssistance, was working onl . '. Mr. Clarke said he thought the only problem here wastnte .us e of funds, not in the ope rat ion. He thought the only source of additional inforxnation on this subject was Mr. the DDO/CI Staff. ~ _

p£

3. The second item: "-- Use of CIA funds to help State Department defer Presidential representational expenses of President Lyndon B. Johnson's trip to Southeast Asia. n 4. Mr. ·Clarke said the total amount of money requested by State Department was $3,000, 000 but that the Director would not agree to this amount. The Director did supply funds in those £nstanceswhere some operational activity :vas involved or could be inferred, i. e •• 1 Mr. Clark-e-w-a-.s-n-o-t'--s-u-r-e-o"'f the amount of Agency

00073

--------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

">".

j I

funds used. He felt that only Colonel 'White could supply additional details. He said Senator ~ussell and Representative Mahon were advised of this Agency activity but asked not to be briefed in detail.

J.nspector Attachmmt

f f

I I I

. I

I I

i !

I I

'."

- 2 -

00074

MORl DoclD: l451843 ,

rt:,i:Al r ;~H (llN IL~ f! t:.L X LJ dE .__.. ------ -.. -....-.. . .-LJ... ._ -- -_.-<..- -----.-_._---_------- ........ _... _._--_._.. . __.OlilY

I 1 :.H:(L',SSlfiEO ...

ROUTlNG AND RECORD SHEET

SUSJECT:

(Optional)

f- - - - - - - - - -.._ - - - - -

.....

_._._-.. ----_._-- ----._,-E).!ENSION

fROM:

D.irector of Finance 1212 Key Building and .

TO:

(Ollicer design02fion, 'oom number, buildingl

~.~

1"'0 ..

I DATE

r--RECEIVED

----- . --_.... .. ---- -"--"-' ---_ ..

NO.

DATE

,. ---""'-'--'

------

7 ~1973

d.ow (,am whom COMMENTS (Numbe, each comment 10 whom. Drow a line acron column afler each cemrnent.]

OFfICER'S INITIALS

FORWARDED

Deputy Director. for Mana ement &Services .- ---

Director of Central Inte 1igenc e I Headquart€ rs I

.. .. 7.

. ..

10.

..,.' .

...

11.

12.

...

.v: ....

. .. -". ,. '"

13.

1.4.

15.

v-,

. -.

.' "

, ..;.:. .

...

":'.

............

....... :

.. .' .. .. ~,p:·I'.rl'i'i

~ ~: _~; :.~

~.~

.. .' .' .

.. ......":

..,

~ i~fF8a

....... . .. , .-

, . ,

..'

00075.. ... ....

-c-

';';4 •

,-'

.. ..

"'-

-,:..:._. "

..:~

;

r'"- ':.,c.· ...... .. -.11 liG0 .tt-'~ ~ ~i';:~i:s " .....

: ~::"

* ....

IIIIIIIIIIIIIII

MORl DoclD: 1451843

-;"

? s:

.. ;

MORl DoclD: l45l843

'..

orl MAY 1973 MEMORANDUM FOR:

Director·of Central Intelligence

VIA

Deputy Director for Management and Services

FROM

Director of Finance

SUBJECT

Special Other Government Agency Activities

IColonel White, Executive Director-

r---_--'2~.'--1,-------...:....---------------=--..:

. 3. Detailees - The Agency has reimbursable and nonreimbursable agreements with the White House, Department of Justice, Defense'Agencies, etc., based on signed memoranda between the Director 'of Personnel and the various Agencies.

4.. pro~ect TWOFOLD - Reimbursement from Bureau of Narco.tics an Dangerous Drugs' for ·training of BNDD agents by a domestic Agency Security proprietary. 5.

l...-----I] 00077

MORl DoclD: 1451843 ,!

......

- 2 -

SUBJECT:

Special Other Government Agency Activities

6. Payment to White House - Reimbursement to White House as approved by Executive Director-Comptroller for $33,655.68 representing cost of postage, stationery and addressing of replies to letters and telegrarn~'received by the White House as a result of the President's speech on Cambodia in May 1970.'

Ie inance

00078

MORl DoclD: 1451843

;

.'. ..' ...i": -'. .

. '::. '~."':: <: ::':.:: '., ::';'~'g~"

'0'1 MAY i373

.:.. . :-:.'

. J.{Ej·l0r~'mm,1 FOR:

Diroctor of Ce~tr~l Intclli~cncc

VIA

••

Deputy Director for Ha:l<li:e::l.Cnt and

Director of Financ~

;:..,

.• .,.,.:.1" .'., .: ~_ .......... _~ .... 1...•• ~ •., .~

2. L I -,

~3. Detailees - 'Tho Agency 'has reimbursable anu'nonrel~btirsablc a:;rcc:ncnts \-li t!l the i'lid.tc r:ouse, Dc~)nrt;:lcnt of

Justice, :;~fe~sc Ag cnc i e s , e tc, , based on s i~~~led' r.i~;.~~r:m;,!a be twe en the Direcr.or of Personnel and .t he various Agencies.

4. Proj oct :r~JFtlL!) • Reimbur-s ement; fron sur-eau of'· Nar.cotics---ailJ. Dangerous Drugs for traini:lg' of B;iDb agents by

a do~estic Agency Security'propri~taI"y'~

't ..:.

-...:..

s£Crrtl -,,=-~ (l:\H V •\ (1[\1... ~. -L-_'--

---'

-----_... _-.-_..- ---- --_._:,-_.-_. --.----_........ __ ......,.-_ - _.. _._.,.._.. ".:.'- _.," .- -."

MORl DoclD: 1451843

- 2 SUBJECT:

Special Other Government Agency Activities

6. Payment to White House - ReLmburs eracn t to \'fhite House as approved by Executive Director-COl:lptroller £or $33.655.68 representing cost of postage, stationery and addressing of replies t~ letters and telegrams received by the White House as a result of the President's speech on Cambodia in May 1970.

(signed) Thomas B. Yale Thomas B. Yale Director of Finance

.....

.00080

MORl DoclD: l45l843

7- ::J.- ;:\ ~ f..; '_' ., ..•• !

.' i 'J

07 MAY 1973

~lEl·:QRA"iDU}.1

FOR:

Director of Central Intolligenco

VIA

Deputy Director for j·!anagemcnt and Services

FROt·!

Director of rin~nce

SiJDJ!;CT

Special Other Government Al;ency Activities

I Colon0l

l';hi te. Lxecutive Director-

---------------------

3. Detailees - The Agency has reimbursable and nonreimbursable ag reemen t s with the 11hite House. Depar-tment; of Justice, Defense Agencies. etc •• based on signed memoranda between the Director of'Personnel and the various ~gencies.

4. Pro~ect tWOFOLD - Reimbursement from Bureau of Narcotics an Dangerous Drugs for training of BNDD agents by a domestic Agency Security proprietary.

s. I

L-

--;-

I~·,

00081.

--------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

.. .

- 2 -

SUBJECT:

Special Other Government Agency Activities

6. Payment; to White House - HeinburSGHcnt to h'hite Iiouse as apl)TQved by Executive Director-ColJptrollcr for $33,655.68 representing cost of postage, stationery and addressing of replies to letters and telegrams received by the White House as a result'of the President's speech on Cambodia in Mdy 1970.

(signed) Thomas B. Yale

Thomas B. Yale Director of Finance

00082

-----------------_.. MORI DocID: 1451843

p ." .u~~lA~SSI FI-ED

--:IlAl 0 U ONLY ._-----

~---.-

._---_.....

SU8JECT: (Oplional)

*----.._--_.-,----_..'------ .----

EY.T~NSION

Deputy Director of Finance 1212 Key Building TO: (Officer building)

'..''"0'....

room

"0';;'. 0""

"'---

FORWARDED

IWE'-'-~'-';--'-

24 May 1973~

,how from whom COMMENTS (Number each comment Draw a line ocross column af'er each comment.)

10 whom,

__J

-----

·rNQ."-------···-------·----··_- -

IHe a4qua r t e r ,s

- - -~~" - - - - - OFFICER'S INITIALS REalVED

. -----~

ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET

FROM:

~'ET

''lTIAl [J CONFI" -. --.'

1lI~

Attached are pertinent d ocumen ts and papers r e La t mj

to Para 6 of the Director of Finance I S memo to the DCI

dated 7 May 1973, Subject : 5.

"Special Other Government -

Agency Activities tl

I I Warren D. MagnussoI

......

Atts

'.'

...

10.

--.

. ...

.' .,'

12.

13.

t- "'" .- ."

.. .": ..

- .-

r ,

~~~o ~10 u~Jft~v~~us r7t'.' .'

':.;-

. ':;:}"

.: '

. '

:...

:.; .....

........ .. .

7~~: t. !!~~':I n -

r;;~'~ ""'f1J"1T

.-:-" .

' ..•-~"

~; :-I;-:::.~:' ..':

...::..

.. :.:.. -::::...'~ .'.

.- :

'.'

;."

:. ''''''0008 .. ....: . ' .~- /~~:~~g~~ ;'~~1~!j: .~ . ,.

.::.:. '. ... CONFIDENTiAl ~ D' INTERNAL :,' .

- r' ~~"" ;: .~:~':,~?~.:~~.: ~..:;~>;.-;;:~. ·~·Z ~~":'.~}".". \~~;~~~:. ~:i~}~?~;.

~\: ~~:;.:i ..

~\: fl

., t.; .'

.. ...... ;

-;'

15. -,

~~. . ··':/t~. ~:"' :: ·~~~~2"::i:i~.:~

14. ...'.,

.. .."' ..;.

.. -:

. -.:

03';;:'

D'-' U·NCLASSI.FIED·?:~;':.~ .

~~~~,..:~:'t~,; .;-:.i.:~~"._~·.::,:~~LL;l;...:.c"":::~...;i;~:2>,,:;;-;~U?;~!'it-~:.~t;i:.~."'"_; ....,:.,.,,'~~~:;;~~~I:~<·~,~:..r~V~~1~ 2:~~~t.~i\·dt

------------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

'.'

..,. '.

/ 141'. Nagnusson' s phone conver satzlon ,'lith ;.~r. John Brown at approxfmat.e.Iy 10: 20 on 26 May 19'10:

13:

Guess we're back together again!

Got more problems?

Yes, don't know how much Watts told you.

I didn't talk to Watts.

Let me explain background. As a result of the Cali'lbodia speech, we I re getting relatively inundated with correspondence and normally all of this is sent to the Department of state for answering. What we're doing -- we're continuing to sen~l1._c..2.!:~ co:r.r_e_i:!pg!!.cl.~!!£~_t.9.~at~ However , the President made, determination he'd like to answer support over his signat~re here and 'we asked the Department of state to support us on this effort. They're in' a position wnere they can provide only limited support at this time. They're committed for $10,000 which would probably handle' in the area of maybe 60;00~ r~_~ponses.' -

How many responses altogether counting pros and cons?

The cons are quite a large group tha~ they're handling themselves also.

Are they going to be handling pros too?

Think he called Colonel vJhite.

....>-$.10 J 0Q'?2:.s .J'~:r:.. J?r_o.s-=- They're doing cons. On pros they c~n pi ck up only ~10,000 wort1i-;-We estimate it will be arounCL~&g.Q....~E 50,~d it looks like at present time we've got over 100,000 responses in and it could go upwards of -150,000 or greater. Looks like we'll need a minimum. of another $l(),c)6o;:p:rotra01.yrnareaoF $15,000z additional. This covers cost of printing, :postage and addressing:'

Just printing, postage and addressing? or anything like that?

Not any overtime for any salaries

13:

No, the posting of the things we'll do ourselves -- by hand. No problem. We're talking about physical costs of job _..:. cost of stamps, cost of envelopes and cards, and cost of having them 'addressed by outside firm. We'll handle putting stalllp on, inserting, and sealing and mailing. Only talking about cost associated with three aspects of the operation.

Postage, address~ng and printing.

Yes, reason I asked NS/f. to see if they could arrange -- depending on how volume goes -- probably another §?10,000 to £],000 ... _

T.i;l.ese are just pros?

state is handling all cons themselves?

(continued)

00084 I

• _

...

MORI DocID: 1451843

• e,

, -,

.... - .

Messrs. Magnusson and Bl'OiVU (continued - Page 2)

Yes, this is just portion of pros we're talking about. My understanding get in touch -,d.th you to vlOrk out mechahics O!~ how we woul.d l1cuid.le the .billing to make sure it's straight and we do i t properly so it fits in with your accounting system.

This is only portion o:f pros.

State doing some too?

Th~~re~QD~'ibuting~~lO.OOO to the pros as well as doing all the C~S. They're picking up quite a load as a 1~t-ofth1S:-0neh-eu of a lot of response c~ning in on this.

Bound to be. Tell you, John, let me give you a call back later today if I may. Have to take a look about where I would fit this stuff in. Al'e you going to be in this afternoon?

I'll be around. as I come back.

I'll give you a call then.

Can't be real definite -- not sure how we're going to peak out. Not sure what backlog is. I'll check into that so When we talk this afternoon I can be little more def'inite. Probably run into that are~, I think.

Okay, 1

Okay, thank you, Warren.

111

1f I'm not in my of:fice I'll get back to you as soon

get back in touch'with you.

, End of Conversation

00085 I .; !.. ,.'.,

- ..

----------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

". -'

•

Nr. Magnusson's phone conversation with Col. vJhite at 15: 40 on 26 Hay 1970: M:

I talked 'vith John Brown today and it seems like -- as you mentioned -as' a result of Ca:rnbodia, inquiries going 'into 1'r'11ite House. The state Depar'tmerrt is doing 'all the work on the, cons -- there are pros and cons. The state Department is going to answer all the cons and the President has determined that he warrt s to answer personally all the pros. However, the state has agreed to pick up some of those too in the amount of $10,000. That. will cover maybe 60,000 of' the arrswez-s, They estimate there I s going to be from 100,000 to 150,000 answers that will have to be put out by the lvnite House. Estimate it's going to cost about $8,000 per 50,000. Think it might go to 150,000. $10,000 to $15,000 additional which the White House will have to pay for. The charges are only going to be. for printing, postage and addr-easd.ng by an outside firm. No salaries for overtime or anything like that. They're going to lick the stamps in the 1voite House, paste the stamps on and insert the message into the envelopes. John Brown said he had requested NSC to see if t.hey could arrange, . presUDlably with us, I guess, for another $10,000 to $15,000 depending on volume. He was tailing as more or less foregone conclusion we would do it. I made no commitment. Told him I'd look into it.

How would we do this?

We would do it by asking them to pay amount and then send over 1080 to us with bill for the postage, bill for the addressing of the envelopes and bill for the printing' accompanying this and we woul.d just send check back. They would send short memorandum lvith it certifying these are the charges. . . .

I think we want to know what we spend our money for but I 'don't think we want tlfe public records to' show' that we paid for it.

What we can do, Sir -- I can ask them to send over a 1080 with certification that these are the charges for classified services per our conversation, and if you're willing to take that we can certainly do it that way.

Will this be an outside firm? .be better? 1 1m not sure.

I think a short memo just saying attached 1080 is for charges previously agreed to between this Agency and themselves and that's all and then we send them. check for that. otherwise, there's always chance that an outside firm might rea1:ize it was us paying for i t ~.

I guess it I s the best way to do it. I'd like to have in our records -nobody else has 'access to -- exactly what it was for -- all about it; their records, which are audited by the General Accounting Office, as' little as possible.

CouIdn't we just pay the firm?

What would

(continued)

00086

MORl DoclD: 1451843 "

. Mr. l'1a;gnusson and Col. vrnite (continued - Page 2)

. M:

Think I can taJ.k to them and arrange that so he just sends unclassified 1080•.

Go ahead

and do it. I'll have to sign off on it, I suppose. You go ahead and arrange it in way that will give us full record. As far as any records of their's are concerned, I would prefer to have minimtun.

I can write memo and John Brown can refer to this and our phone conversation in a memo accompanying the 1080.

Okay, go ahead and do it. said $10,000.

He said $10,000 to $15,000 because they're just pouring in. above $10,000.

Approximately $10,000 but in no case will 'it exceed $15,000 like that. . Okay. .

All right, Sir.

Thank you, Warren.

Put limit on it.

vlhen they talked to me they Might run something

End of Conversation

/t-/11 -

",·f b7

00087

MORI DocID: 1451843

,: '- ...... ~-

\ )

:i ..: ;..,

~.~

gr. 1-1agnusson' s phone conversation with Kr. John Brown at approximately 17: 00 on 26 May 1970: M:

Think we can go ahead and do this. Have' to be careful as to way this is documented -- that I s the only thing. Would like to suggest that I ivrite memo for the record -- kind of co-sign it -- agreeing to amount and so forth and the vlay vie do this. Memo would have in it what it I S for and then you wou.Id send us a 1080 for this, referencing this memo an~ our conversation.

You're thinking in terms of reimbursing us aga.i.n? better for us to have direct charge ~o you?

No, because of public record. In order to have all the things in our hands. It wouldn't look good for us to pay the bills direct for this sort of thing.

It would not?

No, if you people pay the bills

(interrupting) Even to pay a large postage fee? be postage.

Bub we have to document what it's for . then we'll give you money for. it.

What would our memo say?

Say attached is 1080 referencing memo dated such and such.

. What does the memo say -- that we're making reference to? ..

I'll write that up and bring over to you.

What, basically, are we going to say'it's about? .

.Have $10,000 with limit of $15,000 and would be for printing, of these' things and so on..

Just wondering if you have direct biliing it seems to me that serves purpose of memorandum.

The direct billing from, let's say, the printer, the addressograph company or something like that, to us might raise questions ?utside and I think powers that be don't want to have fact that we Ire paying for this sort Qf thing anyplace where it can be dug up. Easiest and cleanest way to do this is you people go ahead and pay and we' 11 rei~burse you immediately.

Do we have to have this memo? (continued)

.' .

----

tb ". .. I ~

i'iouldn't it be

Bulk of expense will

if you people can just pay it,

00088 i..

-'1

MORI DocID: 1451843

Messrs. Magnusson and Brown (continued - Page 2) M:

I'd keep in rr~ safe here.

vlouldn I t i t be adequate to send 1080?

Don't forget, you people keep copies of 1080's -- you have to by law. 1080· would have to cite what billing is for because of that, then that would open up to GAO or somebody else as to who I spaying

for this sort of thing.

1ve have to cite what, it's for?

Let I s say it 's "XYZ Printing Company" and you pay bill. This looks like you're paying it. You send us 1080 which says nothing and we give you money for this. We ourse.Ive s have to have on our records what we're paying for for our 01-vn ~uditors which doesn't get outside of our Agency.

It's for your internal auditors? that sounds all right.

Illl draw the memo up and bring it over there and you can see it.

That sounds good, Warren.

Would next Monday be all righ:t with that memo?

Yes, we'll go ahead and order.

You can get going and so on.

Don It know what final cost is going to be. Hate to restrict ourselves. We figure total cost is going to be around $25,000.. Got over 100,000 already that are just pro. 200,000 that haven It been analyzed yet. Of 200,000· ·they estimate possibly upwards of 50,000 or 60,000 could pertain to Cambodia. Of the backlog of 200,000, 60,000 could be of .type that will be answered in this mailing. Our best estimate would be it. may run over.

I Ive got instructions, John, to indicate in memo that it I S for approximately $10,000 but not to exceed $15,000. If· and when it exceeds $15,000, we'll start over again and 1'11 inquire further as to whether we can cover the other -- okay?

Okay.

Open to negotiation if it runs higher.

It wou.ld' not ~et outside?

Okay,

(continued) F;:~ r-»

5 1.

•

00089

MORI DocID: 1451843 "' • • t

-~,~-----.~--Messrs. Magnusson and Brown (continued - Page 3)

It rr.ay run higher. If' 60,000 letters come out being pro, will taJ~e . ~s ,to $26,000 or somewher-e in that vicinity.

Then I I d have to go back and inquire to see if' powers that be will cover the other part. I think it's best to wait I til that happens ,

Okay, good enough ,

'''nat time Monday?

B:Wny don't you give us call here Monday? M:

Okay.

Thank you', Warren.

My secretary will line it ,up.

End of' Conversation

--i:

Y' ::--';') j . 7 '"'.

r - . .,\-':,. ~-:

00090

MORI DocID: l45l843

\"'L:.I'

.i~L., i,\j-j .:..,_;_iG._, ... \..-;::: hl:>..:. • ., ..... I WASHINGTON, D.C.

20505

JUN ;970

MEMORAi'illl.jM FOR l '} fE RECORD SUBJ"''&CT:

Reimbursement to the White House £or Certain Printing, Postage and Addressing Expenses

.L, Reference is made to the telephone conversataon between 14r. John Brown, Staff Secretary, Wnite House, and the undersigned concerning the accounting and the reimbursement procedure ~or \fl1ite House expenditures in connection with the printing, postage and addressing of replies to certain mail addressed to the President.

2. It was estimated and agreed that these expenditures would amount to approximately $10,000, but not exceed $l5,000, and the request for reimbursement to this Agency would. be based upon receipt o£ a memorandum categorizing the expenses.and certifying to their validity. The memorandum Will also transmit a Standard Form 1081 and copies of the vendors' invoices where applicable.

3. Upon receipt of the above memorandum, Standard Form 1081 and copies of vendors' invoices, a. U. S. Government Treasury check will be drawn and forwarded to the Wnite House.

~'-~-rr---------' Deputy Dire·ctor for Liai'~on and Planning Office of Finance

CONCUR:

.. 0009.1

-------------------MORl DoclD:

24 I~UG lQ/ u" .

SUBJECT:

l45l8~3

Re~nbursement

to the ~fnite House for Certain Printing, Postage and Addressing Expenses

1. On 18 August 1970,' the undersigned received a telepl10ne call from Mr. John Brown (145-2167) advising that the mailing had been heavier than anticipated (increased to 250,000 pieces) and that the dollar requirement for subject purpose had. increased from $15,000 to $25,000. 2. I apologetically advised 1'IJr. Brown that since our records showed that 'prior approval was limited to $15,000 I would have to advise and confirm with my superiors that the increase to $25,000' was acceptable, as I was sure it was.

3. In the absence of Col. White (on leave), Mr. Bush immediately contacted Mr. Clar.ke, r--l who was not in his office. On 19 August, Mr. Clarke telephonicaI:ty--approved the increased level and Mr. Brown was duly informed. .

Chief,

0009Z

MORl DoclD: 1451843

~ I

... )

•

THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON,

September 10, 1970'

Dear Vrr.

V~gnusson:

Pursuant to your telephone call to V~. John Brown regarding the breakdown of costs in connection with the mailing of the Acknowledgement Cards concerning The President's Speech on T!1e Situation in Southeast Asia, the following costs were incurred: Computer Marketing Industries, Inc. Acknowledgement Cards Envelopes Total -

:I>

12,7 46.15 3,185.07 . 1,,051.20 16,982.42

Sincerely yours,

Carson M. Howell . Officer

Administrat~ve

Mr.. Warren D. Magnusson

Deputy Director for Liaison and Planning Office of Finance Central Intelligence Agency Washington, D. C.

00093

-----------------. MORl DoclD: 1451843

tlf..

f '. .

• •

· 0

1-..._ o I • . .. .. .,.

. "

i:e::10l"i.:".~:I.-:.1 :~~).&.~ t:).:: ;\ . . ~';(i:."'"(~) (i~. . t..:::d.· 2'~ /.U.:;iJ.:. t l:./r,:,~ t: :-\;a~ :-;1.':) ~ ~ct

ki:;l;'v::hed h'.::ce-co is exponncs ,

i'tW m::l.iling "

It is l"Cc:':.t1CS.lc£:d t~l::~l; tIle' o7:."5.~:~naJ. voucher- be l1~l:r:ir~L:·i;:""~.. "~~i~i!,,'l.:t

r'l')l"ov-::d and ~~.~rt.i:rie(l ac ..co t!.10 <:'Y':;':L:i.~~bili".:.;:r oJ: i'u~::(J.G fli~ u rctu:;'-IlCtl ~u')

~o;;lfi

o:.:'.fica 'J::Ol" pC.yrr.ST!'{;.

;

;,J'....i....:.~..Ji e • .1) •

.l L LV. .~: ":'.\..'""f

DG]iu'~y Dircet:o:r 'fo.. •. Jsinif;Oil ,md :·l::.."·l1r.~

or.rice: of' Fil'l:lm:e

t l l !)!1=:) fi·or.1 I\!r. Ibi.. .e ll O

(ltd. 10of;cJ:?'~ 1970 f..Ii' 1001 (oris and 2)

00094

MORl DoclD: 1451843

1 5 SEP :070

JV.iEMORAI\'DUM FOR:

Director of Planning, Progrmruning and Budgeting

SUBJECT

Reimbursement to the Vlhite House for Certain Printing, Postage and Addressing Expenses

REFERENCE

Memorandum for the Record; dated 24 August 1970, same sUbJect

1. Attached hereto is accounting submitted from the Vlhit.e House for mailing expenses.

2. It is requested that the original voucher be administratively approved and certified as to the availability of fUnds and returned to this office for payment.

HARREN D. MAGIIJlJSSON

Deputy Director for Liaison an Office of Finance

lanning ~ '. i,l

Attachments

Memo from Mr. Howell dtd 10 Sept 1970 SF 1081 (orig and 2)

00095

MORI DocID: 1451843

.. Sh'nl,iHI~: I'" 'r,u""r.. o, lutil

V~LC:':;:fi '::.:~D SCHEDULE

7 I; \0 WIO 1/'')·101-}0

D. O. X o..... '

'100

.__

I'AID DY

(D. O. 0i'mbo!) .

\0 iSDUiSWi: OGJCCL

You are authorized to effect tho withdrawals and credits indicated below,

-=o.m..... .,"•.Jo~01L·

300

-----L-,':Du'P.iI.:tl101rJriiSJ1SiilTl: lllm cc:r i 1&0'Om

(D, O. Sj"llbol)

.•.

------~--_._-_.

DEl'AilTl.!ii:NT

DEPARTMENT

DI,;HEAU

I I

AnDRESS nUiiltAU RlITi:RENCI:

SU~UURY'

AIolOUNT

ArrllOPRIATION OR FIINO SnlBoL

Bunr..r..u 11.;>;)1:1:88

Executive Office of the P.... cs i.

The vrnite House Office 11-01-0001 Hashin!3 t on t D. c. 20500

- - -

BURE&l1 REFERENCE

--_. -

- -

St;UiIAR\' :

ArPROrat.a.TION OR. Fusn S't"UBOL .

A1l0UNT

~a6t982 •.

1100110.001 ,.

. TOT.LL

TOUL

sis, 9(12.

Dctails of charges or reference to attached supporting documen~

For the printing of ACKnowledgment Cards~ Envelopes, and to Keypuncn names & acidl' and place on magnetic tape ana the preparation of heat transfer labels and affixi to envelopes, in connection with the acknowledging of mail concerning the" Preside speech on the Situation in Southeast Asia.

For use of billing office:

For use of office billed:

I certify F.\N FICATE OF OFFICE BILLED I certify that the iI.ellls llsterl herein arc correct and proper Cor p,t"'UJ.t:JJ..k...LIJuw'-!o.!!!<""!ll!.Io!..!:.!!I!!.~:!.!!.!~v:.~!!i!..!~::!.!:._...,

(AUlhorized admlulstrativc or ccrlll)'iD~ olticer'

Paid by check No.

I I

* u: s,

- ---- .._.-. _..__.-..

_.~~

.dat!J0096

C/D :!\o.

GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE' 11161-607821 ~~

_~_

~._--

-------".--

MORl DoclD: l451843

i'· .~ ,,\.. C"'....1.,.... .L :t

It j.n :l."(.':.1:::~r:~":·." ·~:·I.:-.t \-~ r...::-.---. iT~ ~.~' . c; r .,: :,':,:tc e,r ".ltJ,:·').;l.!iz:' ~~ . oi .~: ~: :.-·{.::.. -:.d :··t,:-:~.t;:;.

l~~~; ..i:~;ll l\··::.,·~n'".~l·:; ~:I.) t.~i.0 ::e..:.·..:::.:.~l~'-· .:1.·

FAH

l·iC::;;

COI;~·Il.-

3. Isll (1oc·l:r.:G;-"l C1xt ·;.·:',.:l CG:j·::'~::i:"'=1::.':1': -::.;lir; tI': l~f~:1ct:Lon in 1)0'111:" ~",::""lL: in t.llis CJifica fo:.... soc..-.:,~·i:~:/· :i.'W~~~:::C;l:; t~:::l iz ~~-lll~:i:r::;.)la to tl\c Ar '_~lCY P

CH.l!}i '(,or Il •

Flc~~~ fOl"'tiard. "th.::! c11C':ck

n?proD~~utc

office for

c~~iciaL.

Kl\r:r.:: ::r D. l·:AGI-;U:':::',CCi DiTcc.l,,-=>r :rc~ I'~uif;Ci"l r:r.d 7·J.rr:.. ni';~r:

D:.;r:l:rt,~r

00097 '.

':;zt-., . . ..,.'

.~;.~ ••. :' -t ::' ~. ,'Po.

••••••

t......

of .....

,•• _~_.

MORl DoclD: 1451843

...

!" ;

i.·~r. John Drown ,S'L"U S~~cretal'Y The Y/liite Ho u s o Office "!ushingt-on, D. C. 20500

z.-- Enclosed is U. S. Treasury Check No. ' -

1in the a rn o ur.t

of $16,982.42 wh ich repi:cse:1tG rcii1-;bursemcnt of nUl"CaU Schedule I

No·IL__-.:..._I.copy

enclose~./ThiS sC!lcdule wa9·.fo~·warded to tilis

·1

10 September 1970. Your-s very truly,

.1JAHREN D. 'lv!.A

Enclosures

OFI

ll Oct. 70)

·1----I

00098

USSON

MaRl DoclD: l45l843 e.

THE WHITt: HOUSE WASHINGTON

Decem.ber 7. 1970 l'

CONFIDENTIAL

MEMORANDUM FOR:

WARREN MAGNUSON

We have finally received the cost breakdown for acknowledging the mail in connection with the President1s speech on the situation in Southeast Asia. By copy of this InemOrandUlTI I am requesting our administrative office to forward that portion of the bill applicable to you. If there are any p r obl.erns in handling this, please let me know.

Thank you.

.:::InA. JOHN R. BROWN III cc: . Carson Howell

00099

..... ... *-~

.._'--.-

._'-~"

"~'

-._.~

.... .. ~_

MORl DoclD: 1451843

- ...... ---- .- ...... ~

_--~_

_- .. __. . _-

Keypunch names, place on magnetic tape prepare 'and affix to envelopes heat ' transfer labels, and furnish printout.

$7,410.35

, Print acknowlecgment Cards

2,244.27

Print Envelopes.

. 728.00

Postage

6,290.64· $16,673.26

.. .. . . ... ..

-._--_..._. __.__ .._-_ ... - .....

_---_._-----~_

... --- --- . _------------_._---_ .. _.. -

--,

"""0'0._. __ 0_"

'"_' _

••. _ •••

" _

._. _ _ •

MORI DocID: 1451843

5,'

I>iEJvJORAl'IDUM FOR:

Director of Planning, ?rogramming and Budgeting

SUBjECT

Reimbursement to the wnite House for Certain Printing, Postage and Addressing Expenses

RE7iRENCE

Memorandum for the Record, dated 24 August 1970, same subject

...

1. Attached hereto is the second acc0U11ting, in the amount of $16,673.26, submitted from the vfnite House for mailing expenses .. Ciieck for the first accounting in the amourrt of $16,982.42 was forwarded to the White House on 2 October 1970. 2. It is requested that the or'Lgd.na.L voucher be administratively approved and certified as to the availability of funds and returned ~o this office for payment.

Deputy Director for Liaison Office of Finance Attachments . SF 1081 (orig & 2 wiatt) Memo from the White House dated 7 Dec 1970 Memo to D/pPB, transmitting - 1st accounting, dated 15 Sept 70 Copy of 1st 1081 Memo from the White House dated 10 Sept 70 Memo for the Record dated 24 Aug 70

Planning

»<. c:J,

..:,.

001.0.1. _","0

• • •- .

~_.

~._• • • • •

•

_..

•••

_ _ •••••• _._

.~_ • •

•

• • •_

••• _

•••

MORl DoclD: 1451843

....."

\:~UGi":~.{ ;~.:·:ZJ SC;·,;::['~i..E

.' )"11.';' .'n. j(lhl

... :~t I .usu

D. O. No.

C? W!TI-I;jRAV.'J::S .~i\D GREDlrS

JO·II-lt'~·U

n«. No.

--.--·-t(}:·~::::J.;i!i~:i;-·

3: -~.j.. au. No. -·---CiJ:r;;~~(:n:;;;)I).)

PAID BY

(D. o.•;;·."bo)

You are authorized to e/Teet tho withdrawnls find credits indicated below,

300__._

(D. O. ~jllIl'lJ-o-J)----

Dr.I'..... nTllENT

Executavo (jf.,.·ice o.c blrc ."n::;L, The ~';h'i t,:! ilou s e (;;.:.::.c'; 1.L-01-0~)()1

Annneas SumIAR" APrRorRIATION OR'Fu"" SVltlJOL

..... rrnorRI...nON OR FUND SnlDOL

110

1110110

-,; 16,6·.. .:;02/,

0001

I i

TOTJ.L

TOT4L

Deto.ils of charges or reference to attached supporting documents

For the prtintdng of Aclm01'1lecigement Cares, Envelppes and PO;3tage f'oz- mnilin:,;, and to Keypunch names, place on magnetd.c t.ane , prepare and afl.·ix to envo Lt.!)OS heat transfer LabeLa, and ;furnish' printout,9 in connection tvi th· the .ad\.noW'led,~;:;.;'Ji... of mail concerning the President1s Second. speech on the Situatton in ::)ou"neast ;'.3iE See attached list ;for breakdoYI.n of cos~s~

For use of office bllled: '- '1" ~ fy funds j" •

For use of billing office: Cl);)E

ERTIFICATE OF OFFICE BILLED

J cortif.)' thnt tho il.cms lister! hereln are correct and proper for payment from tho appropriation's) designated;

l,.-,Yi-U.:-O""'Ili-Cl:-rl----

I·

I I

Paid by check No.

* u.

C/D

~o,

• dated

001.02 _

S. GOVERNMENT pAINTING OFFICE: 1516\-60782\

I J

MORl DoclD: l45l843

...

..-, "

1. it i6 l·cql.C~~"::~ ~~l;:~t a cllcc:~ 'il:" ~b.c ;·.r..n our.t 01- ~~lo, &73. 26 be dr-awn paynbl c to the "Erc;::.;.. Ul"C:;: of t:1C t.r:'''iitcc~· Si;~tC5.

CuJCI

3. .1\11 t1oC~·.1'lC~·r~2:~io).. c c . .icc~"~i~";.~; ~~ji:, tl.·:Lj::.~.;.~ctic,.n ia l~ci . ·&; i;'I.:j ~ ~:'j thl s olfice-fol" s ecu:.. . ity ~(12::;G:.10 c:=-. .d iz r,_"\'~il~blc to the t,~cjJ,-;~r ru.:.. ::..rJ:·~;.

4. Pl.ca ne £or\·~ard ti"~e' C}-iCC~-;' ~.o ·~:1.i::l o~ri.~e .for tr~nGn1it!;f.~i tl:'; ·,i'l ap?l'opl"iate o':liciC:i.l.

OF 1

00103

MORl DoclD: l45l843

...

Mr. John R. Drown III St;l£[ ,S( c r ctar y

The "'{hite House Office W..• s h ington , D. C. 20500

Enclosed is U. S . TTeasury Check No.1

fn the

amount of $16,673.26 whi ch represents r e irnbur sc mcnt of Bur e au

Schedule No. D c o py enclosed. Yours very t r ulv ,

I Dt'

If)ir~~t~r for Liaison and PI .nn inn Office of F'In.i nc e

Enclosures

I '.' _.__.__..

l"-" .

001.04

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.• \' ;.')7)

MEMORANDUM FOR:

Deputy Director for Management and Services

SUBJECT

Special Report

1. This memorandum is in re~ponse to a request to provide information on situations or associations that might appear to be irregular on the surface. 2. Details to the lVhi te House and Government Agencies Background: For many years the Central Inte-filgence.AgencY~as detailed employees to the immediate office of the White House per se and to components associated intimately with the immediate office of the President such as the Council on International Economic Policy and the President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board. We have furnished secretaries, clerical employees and certain professional employees on a reimbursable and non-reimbursable basis. At the present time, we have no clericals or professionals assigned to the immediate White House office, but we do have one young man detailed to their Communications Section. There are detailees to PFIAB and CIEP. I might point out that we had detailed to the White House as late as the fall of 1970 couriers, telephone operators, a laborer assigned to the grounds and a graphics man who designed invitations for State dinn~rs. By October of 1970, more funds were apparently available to run the White House and most of our detailees were hired as bona fide White House employees. 'CIA is not the only Agency furnishing the White House with detailees. ·Levies have been made by this Administration and others on Defense and State and other Government entities whose employees have Top Secret cLeazances • Professional officers have been and are at the present time assigned~ the National Security Council and we have seven clericals on detail to NSC on a reimbursable basis. In addition to the above, we have technical specialists detailed ,to NSA, an instructor at the National War College and security officers detailed to the Department of State to

001.05 .

MORl DoclD: 1451843

-G-\Q' ~! 1--IIJ1_1-'r . I~~ ",' '18."\ __ 1.\, I

I (

_J"",il-l.l~;:'

protect foreign visitors. Recently, lwas detailed to the Secretary of the Treasury alohg With. IO r other Agency cmp'Loyee s . We have cven, in rare insta.nces, detailed our people to Congressional Staffs for short periods of time. 3. petails to the White House and Governm~nt Agencies Discussion: Details to NSC, the White House, NSA and the National War College are probably qu~te defensible. On the other hand, there may be those who would ques tion Agency employees currently working at the Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs and Mr. Peter Peterson having an Agency employee as·his . secretary when he was the .Secretary of Commerce (she also made a trip with him tb Moscow). She is still with him in his present assignment but we expect that she will report to NSC for a new detail sometime this month. r I served for over ten years as Director of the Offlce of PubI1C Safety for AID. This information has been kept "close to the vest" during that entire period of time. He has been approved for disability retirement and is presently on sick leave and will retire automatically at the expiration of this leave. Each detail of an Agency employee to the White House or other Government agency has been carefUlly considered and approval at a higher level obtained when professionals were involved. 4. Project TWOFOLD: I believe the support we are providing to Project TWOFOLD is an activity that should be reported under your guidelines. Since this is an extremely sensitive Project and the Office of Security is reporting on it, I will not repeat the details in my memorandum. 5. Individuals Engaged in Domestic Activities: In a more general sense, Contract Personnel Division prepares and executes contracts with individuals engaged by the Agency to carry out domestic activities. We also process Staff Agents who are domestically assigned. None of these assignments are decided in OP. I really have no way of knowing with any degree of certainty what the specific duties of these individuals will be. 6.

00.10G

-----------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

(

~\L

8. Hunt Requests a Lockpicker: This is a record of External Employment Assistance Branch's action,on a request from Howard Hunt for a lockpicker who might be retiri~g or resigning from the Agency. Sometime in the spring of 1972, Frank O'Malley of EEAB received a call from Howard Hunt who asked Frank if he had a retiree or resignee who was accomplished at picking'locks. Mr. O'Malley sent him a resume on Thomas Amato who retired 31 July 1971. Mr. O'Malley did not document his EEAB record to show the date of this eichange, but I ~who also works in EEAB) opines that it occurred sometlme between March and May 1972. All of the above information was reported to the Office of Security on 4 October 1972 following the FBI's contact with the Agency regarding Howard Hunt.

9. Resume Sent to McCord~, k contract employee who retired in September 19/I, was a client of the E~ternal Employment Assistance Branch in his search for a job as after retirement. One of the leads given tol James McCord's security business. EEAB sent a Iesume to McCord, but Iwas not hi~ed.

In mid-summer 1972,f ~telePhoned EEAB from Chicago. (He had a job there wlth t e Hallfax Securlty Co., a lead provided by EEAB, but until this telephone call he had

00107

MORl DoclD: 1451843

•

·A '

not notified EEAB that he had the job and had moved from the D.C. area.) He said he had been. visited by a Special Agent of the FBI who told I ~hat his resume had been found among McCord's papers. Ine :Agent wanted to know if pad any connection with McCord. I Expla.ined how the resume got to McCord. After the Agent left him, Ios were notlfled ~el7P~lOne~ EEA~. lof OP and lof lmmedlately.

... :'

Harry B.Flsner Director of Personnel

001.08

------------------MORl DoclD: l45l843

-_...._.. ...-_ ..........-- ......- - ._ -- _-_ ....... --_. -_ .., ...

.__._ _ . _ .._ ...._ SUB.JECT: (OptiMol)

....

.....

_.~

.~.

__ __ ... ...... '

....

__.._.-

--- .----- ... _--_.__ ..

._---_.

-----

i t ive Activities Perfor.ned by the Office of Logistics ..._- ...... - .. ._-- -'- _ . - _.._.. - r------ -----Sens .. ---.. _ _ _ _ • _ _•

_--_._-~

EXTENSION

(Officer designation, room number, and

building I

DATE

OFFICER'S

'----

REceiVED

INITIALS

FORWARDED

COMMENTS (Number e oeh comment 10 s.how from whom Draw a line acton column ofleor each comment)

--------

'f!/ ;.:~: Deputy Director·for Hanagef] !j;c/II./. ment and Services ..-.... I

.--

-_._..

10. whom,

--_.-~_

EYES ONLY

. " i_ ..,'---'

..-

----- ---- ----

• __

NO.

f-.------------..------------DATE 1973 14 MAY 2551

Director gf Logis!j.cs . TO:

_ _ _ _ . _ ._ _ _ _ _ 0-

._.-.~-_

fROM:

__._----

ROUTfNG A~'~D RECORD SHEET

.._ _._ ...___..__..__.._r __.___

Director of Central Intelligence -

10.

c·,

. 11.

12.

13. .' _.

14. .,.

15.

00109·, . '.

.,'

. -. ,

I .~~~ 61 0 U5~Dr~~~~us D. . _....._. SECRET 0 .CONFID~NT,IA~... 0 ~~lE~N,ttv 1. _.. .:..... _....-........"'. _. __ ... _:.. ...;;..:;... ~_ ~~_

:a..:-..:;..__ .••

I 0

UNCLASSIFIED .

_~""'-I;;....::",...;4.:···_·;.:.3'J~;;c......~.:.::::·._J :::_;:.r.,;...:....:...~.~:;...... .._ ... .;L..,;,;,••~,.".:..::~::.._~,-..... ~~-

MORI DocID: 1451843

" '

14. MfW 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR:

Director of Central Intelligence

THROUGH

Deputy Director for Man agemen t and Services

SUBJECT

Sensitive Activities:'?erformed by the Office of Logistic~

1. This memorandum contains information for the Director of Central Intelligence. 2. This memorandum is submitted pursuant to advice given by the Deputy Director for Management and Services on 7 May that Office Directors report on activities, either under their cognizance or otherwise known to them, the nature of which could possibly need explanation or justification when viewed within the statutory responsibility and authority of the Director of Central Intelligence. The responsibilities of the Office of Logistics (OL) are such that in all matters herein reported, except two, the actions unde.rtaken were at the request of another Agency component. We have prepared a brief description of each action involved and then have included the name of the sponsoring component. The substantive reason for the requests for action by.this Office will have to be determined by inquiry to the designated sponsori~g component. 3. Facts pertaining to both actions undertaken at the initiative of this Office are as follows':

00:11.0

MORl DoclD: 1451843

l"t

-1) it.... ·{..Jl tl..,.-

-f¥fS '-'l-IL"I - . Un SUBJECT:

Sensitive Activities Performed by the Office of Logistics

\ Il

CJ CJ .VlvLf

00:11.1.

---------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

SUBJECT:

Sensitive Activities Performed by the Office of Logistics

'the DD/O, we will not honor any requisition for surveillance equipment unless it has been approved by the CI Staff of the DD/O. 4. Within the,area of contractual responsibilities, the following items ara p~rtinent: ?: a. In February 1971, Colonel L. K. \'fhite, the then Executive Director-Comptroller, called me to attend a 'meeting in his office, also attend~d by Mr. William Colby. Colonel White explained that the Technical Services Division (TSD) had been requested to provide assistance to the FBI for a sensi ti ve proj ect designated I I(currently designatedl IColonel White did not dis~lose the purpose of the asslstance bei~g provided by TSD but did instruct me to assist TSD on purely contractual matters. Since the Office of Logistics has no information conce rn.irig the mission or pu rpo s e of Proj ect I I substantive questions concerning the subject should be addressed to TSD. Other procurement actions accomplished for the FBI are re orted below. Specific, ment i.on ,is made, however, of ecause of the dollar. magnitude, approximately mll lon, ,and the complex technical equipment that h~s been involved in the undertaking. b. The Procurement Division, OL~ currently has two requisitions in hand from TSD which would involve reimbursable sales ,to the FBI. One such requisition in the ,amount of $36,900 is for two Westinghouse television cameras. The second requisition in the amount of $11,200 is for two wide-angle surveillance probes manufactured by Bausch and Lomb. 'No action is being taken on either of these requirements pending further' instructions which . will be sought from the Deputy Director for Management and Services. c. Over the years, this Agency has often supported other Government agencies from a contractual or materiel standpoint. Upon the. submission of an officially approved request, supported by a transfer of funds, the Agency would either enter into "accommodation procurements" for the requesting agency or support the requesting agency by the issuance'of'materiel from stock. Such actions are legally accomplished under the Economy Act of 1925. This Ac~ authorizes one ~gency to support the needs of, or provide a service for, another Government ~gency when such

001.1.2

MORl DoclD: l45l843

.i"

~r" t J [0 lJTTl:"t--

SUBJECT:

Sensitive Activities Performed by the Office of Logistics

action would be more economical and eliminate the need for one agency of the Government to duplicate facilities readily available from another. A typical example of this procedure is purchasing photointerpretation gear for the Defense Intelligence Agency element located at NPIC. In connection with the current repor;:.!:;ing requirement, however, I have had our records researched for tha past 2 years and Attachment 1 reflects those transactions which appear to be relevant to the subject of this memorandum. d. In connection with the disclosures during the summer of 1971 that the Rand Corporation was not properly safeguarding classified documents, this Office undertook· two acts. I directed the Security Officer from our West Coast Procurement Office at the Moffet Naval Air Station in California to visit the Rand Corporation and satisfy himself tha~ classified material furnished them by the Agency was both properly safeguarded and accounted for. His report was affirmative. On 23 August 1971, the senior Security Officer assigned to this Office forwarded a letter to the Rand Corporation stressing and reaffirming the procedures Rand must follow in safeguarding classified information furnished them by the Agency. Of residual interest in this matter, there is summarized the contents of a memorandum of 2 July 1971 to the Executive DirectorComptroller from the DD/I which is in our possession. Th'is memo r'andum reports that FBIS regularly disseminated reports to the Rand Corporation but that instructions had been issued to cease distribution of classified reports. While no 'other direct diss~mination went to Rand, other USIB agencies, primarily USAF, were passing. "many" copies of DDtI products to Rand as' authorized under USlB regulations. The memorandum also states that Rand personnel had requested searches and document retrieval from the CRS facility. 5. In connection with action taken for the Office of Security, there are three relevant items: a. The Printing Services Division, OL, was requested by the Office of Securi~y to print a book written by Harry J. Murphy, Office of Security. The book was prepared by Mr. Murphy under a Brooki~gs Institution Federal

0011.3

MORl DoclD: 1451843

SUBJECT:

Sensitive Activities Performed by the Office of Logistics

-Executive' Fellowship. The book is entitled "Where's What -- Sources of Info.rmation for Federal Investigators. 1I It is a full treatise on the existence of sources of information that may be useful to an investigator. The book's £irst printing of 300 copies was made in June 1967. Due to demand, a se~ond printing~Qf 600 copies was made in September 1968. The title pate of. the book gives attribution to Mr. ~furphy, Office of Security, Central Intelligence Agency, and the Brookings Institution Federal Executive Fellowship. The book is classified ,Confidential, and it is our unde~standing that the distribution was made to appropriate agencies of the Federal Government. A copy of Mr. Murphy's book can be made available for review if desired. Sometime in 1972, a representative of the Law Enforcement Assistance Administratio~ (LEAA) requested that the Agency give consideration ~o our publishing, at LEAA expense, an unclassified version of this volume. It was the' intent of LEAA to make broad-scale distribution to Police Dep~rtments throughout the country. The Director of Security and I consu1t~d on this matter and jointly determined that the LEAA request should not be honored because the AgenGY should 'not put itself in the position of publishing law, enforcement material for,g~neral and unclassified purposes, and it would be an abuse of our printing facilities. b. On 5 January 1971, the Director of Security requested that I approve his leasing up to eleven motor vehicles for use in connection with a,specia1 support .operation which would last approximately 3 months. The Director. of Security informed me, in his requesting memo. randum of 5 January 1971, that "This support. activity has been undertaken at the specific instruction of the Director .and has his personal approval. II The request was app r oved ; c. From 1968 to date, the Office of Security has requisitioned from this Office a considerable amount of materiel which we understand 'was to be given or loaned,by them to local Police Departments. In certain cases some of this materiel was issued from Agency stocks and, in other cases, direct procurement of the materiel was made by funds furnished by the Office of Security. A' complete 1i~ti~g of such materiel is found in Attachment 2.

_.. .u+'.f.-

0011.4

MORl DoclD: 1451843

SUBJECT:

Sensitive Activities Performed by the Office of Logistics

b. This Office is aware~ although it had no cognizance nor responsibility, that -an apartment was rented in Miami Beach~ Florida, during the period of the Democratic National Convention, 10-14 July 1972, and the Republican National Convention, 21-24 August 1972. The apartment was used as a meeting place I_---.-__---,;-,_._---,=---~_=_-__._--___._--_.____;_--- in liaison with members of the Secret Service and rendering

00:11.5

MORl DoclD: l45l843

SUBJECT:

Sensitive Activities Performed by the Office of Logistics

"assistance in connection with the political conventions that were qeing held. l\'H Division is the cognizant operating component on this matter. 7. The above recitation of facts represents, to the best of my knowledge and memory, those ma'!:tf?rs \Vhich appear to be relevant to subject tasking given by Yhe Director.

I~-=-=--=--2 Atts

cc:

DD/M&S

001.:16

MORl DoclD: 1451843

',: ~

••

•

::.

..: .~...

<;;

... -~:~ -: .

. .. ~

'~""-

...

__ \,

OOtl7 .

- -...

... -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ . - -._-_ ...• _•..... -_ -

...... . ... ' - " " - " - - ' - '

._---

--stttrr

I YES 0f\H:-¥ -

0 0

t:OJ

Requesting Office

Date of Request

3/23/72

TSD

Item

Receiving U.S. Department or Agency

Quantity

Unit Cost

Telephone Analyzer

1,350

BNDD

5/16/72

Transmitters, Radio Beacon

313

BNDD

3/23/72

Telephone Analyzer

1,350

White House Communications Agency

as as as

3/23/72

Telephone Analyzers

1,400

'Air Force

3/23/72

'Te1ephone Ana1yzer~

1,350

State

3/23/72

Telephone Analyzers

1,375

AEC

TSD

11/16/72

Camera Sets

656

FBI

TSD

. 4/17/72

Camera Sets

zOO

FBI

TSD

11/18/71

Actuators, Recorders

'1. ' 488

TSD

4/19/72

Tes s i.na Cameras

700

BNDD

TSD

12/ 7/72

Camera, Video

18,045

FBI

TSD

10/13/72

Tube, Image, Burn-Resistance, Equivalent6f W L 30691

4,639

FBI

TSD

3/26/71

Tubes, Image, W L 30691

·4,607

FBI

TSD

4/20/73

Cameras, Television

18,300

FBI

FBI ~

t:l 0

t:l

f-l

lJ1 f-l 00

L----

8*LY EnS o 0 f;T I. l-f"\

•

.UW::' ~ ~Rg,

Requesting Office

Date of Request

TSD

12/14/72

TSD

Receiving U.S. Departmerit or Agencr

Quantity

Unit Cost

Transmitters, Radio

313

BNDD

10/20/72

Actuators J Recorder

591

FBI

TSD

10/13/72

Tube, Image, Burn-Resistance, Equivalent of W L 30691

4,639

FBI

TSD

5/26/71

Tube, Image, W L 30691

4,639

. FBI

TSD

4/22/71

Transmitters

'1,372

FBI

TSD

4/22/71

Module, Plug-In

1,247

FBI

TSD

4/22/71

Power Supply - UWP-39A

568

FBI

2/25/71

Telephone Analyzers

1,350

Treasury

1/30/71

Telephone Analyzers

1,4 50

Trea~ury

Item

1·'1; ;

8/12/70

Cable, Special-Purpose Electrical

5,000 ft.

.42

White House Communications Agency

:s: 0

TSD

TSD 0 0

~ ~

TSD

1/10/73

6/28/72

7/26/71

Ink, Special Formula

1 lot

Ink, Special Formula

1 lot

Transmitteri Radio Beacon

1,825

Immigration and Naturalization Service

3,700

728

::cJ H

Immigration and Naturalization Service

..t1

U.S. Forestry

I-' !Po U1 I-'

JP.

c.c

•

_._,._-- .

-------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

t'I

001.20 .

----------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

-lJ 1··..1\L" . I .". I

EYES MATERIAL REQUISITIONED FROM LOGISTICS BY SECURITY FOR ISSUANCE TO LOCAL POLICE ITEM Gas Mask M-9

QUANITY' 200

Gas Mask M-17

196

Steel Helmet and Liners

231

Vest and Groin Protector

Vest, Flak M-52

Vest, Protective

Vest, Grenade

105

Execuvest

Emergency Flashing Red Light

*Searchlight, Tear Gas

*Chemical Baton 6 1/2"

1iChemical Baton 12" *Chemical Baton 26 *Mustang 35 Pistol *Searchlight with Shoulder Strap *Stun Gun

*NOTE:

6 36 3

Various quantities and types of replacement chemical cartridges, loading kits, and batteries .were also ordered for asterisk items.

00:12.1

MORl DoclD: l451843

14 MAY 1973 !·fj;i'·IOHAMIUH FOR:

Director of Central Intelligence

TiJJ"OlJGH

Doputy Director for !'·fa;I!'l[.ement and Se rv i ce s

~3UBJECT

Sensitive Activities Performed by the Office of Lo~istics

1. This memorandum contains information for t he Jiroctor of Ccn t r a l In t c L'l Lg cn ce , ---------2. This mer.'oran.dulllis submd tted pursuant to advice g i ven by the Deputy Director for Management and Services on 7 t.iay .

that Office Directors report on activitiBs, either under their cognizance or o t.he rwds e known to t.hem, the n a t ure of l.rhich could liossibly need explanation or justificati.on \f:)en viewed \d thin the statutory responsibility and author! ty of the Director of Central Intcl1i~encc. The responsibilities of the Office of Logistics (OL) are such that in ~ll matters herein reported, except two, the actions undertaken were at the request of another Agen~y component. We have prepared a brief description of each action involved and than have Inclua~d the llama of the sponsoring component. The substantive reason for the requests for action by this Office will have to be cleterr.lined by inqu1ry to the designated sponsoring component. 3. Facts pertaining ti both, actions undertaken at the initiative of this Office are as follows:

001.22

--------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

&UHJECT:

Scn5itive Activities rerfnrw~d by the Office of Lo g Ls t Lcs

00:123

~------------_.MORl DoclD: 1451843

~y SUBJ~CT:

Sensitive Activities Perfo~m~d by the Office of Logistics

·.tho DD/O, 1V'O will not honor any requisi tian for surveillance equipment unless it has beeri"approved by the CI Staff of the DD/O. 4. Within the area of contractual responsibilities, the following it0ns ~re pertinent: a. In February .1971. C91one1 L. K. Khite, the then Executive Director-C()mptroller, called me to attend a meeting in his office, also attended by Mr. William Colby. Colonel White explained that the Technical Services Div·Isian (TSD) had been requested to provide assistance to the FBI for a sensitive project designatedJ I(current1y designated I ICo1onel White di not disclose the purpose of the ass1stance being provided by TSD but did instruct me to assist TSD on purely contractual matters. Since the Office of Logistics has no information concerning the mission or purpose of Project I I substantive questions concerning the subject should be addressed to TSD. Other procurement actions accomplish~d for the.FBI aTe reo orted below. SpeGific mention is made, however, of ~ca~se of the dollar magnitude, approximately m1 10n,. and the complex technical equipmen t that has been involved in the undertaking. b. The Procureinent Division, OL, currently has two requisitions in hand ·from TSD wh i ch would involve reimbursable sales to the FBI. One such requisition in the amount of $36,900 is for two Westinghouse television c ame r as , The second requisition in the amount of $11,200 is for tlVowide-angle surveillance probes manufactured by Bausch and Lomb. No action· is being taken on either of these requirements pending further instructions which will be sought from the Deputy Director for Management and Services. c. Over the years, this Agency has often supported other Government agencies from a contractual or materiel standpoint. Upon the submission of an officially approved request, supported by a transfer of funds, the Agency lV'ould either enter into "accommodation procurements" for the requesting agency or support the requesting agency by the issuance of materiel from stock. Such actions are legally accomplished under the Economy Act of 1925. This Act authorizes one agency to support the needs of, or provide a service ·for, another Government agency when such

001.24:

-------------MORl DoclD: l45l843

SUBJDCT:

Sensitive Activities rarformed by the Office of Logistics

action would be more economical and eliminate the need for "one agency of the Government to duplicate fac.ilities readily available from another. A typical example o··f this procedure is purchasing photointerpretatiol1 gear for the Defense Intelligence Agency element located at NPIC. In connection with the current reporting requirement, however, I have had our records researched for the past 2 years and Attachment 1 reflects those transactions wh i.ch anne ar to be relevant to the subject of ihis memorandum. 0-

d. In connection with the disclosures during the sumof 1971 that the Rand Corporation was not. properly sa fe gua r-df.ng classified documents, t.hi s Office undertook two acts. I directed the Security Officer from our West Coast Procurement Office at the Hoffet Naval Air Station in California to visit the Rand Corporation and satisfy himself that classified material furnished them by th.e Agency was both properly safeguarded and accounted for. His report was affirmative~ On 23 August 1971, the senior Security Officer assigned to t hLs Office fo rwa rded a letter to the Rand Corporatiop stre$sing and reaffirming . . the procedures Rand must follow' in s afe guardIng classified information furnished them by the Agency . . Of residual interest in this mat t er-, there is sumnar i aed the 'contents of a memorandum of 2 July 1971 to the Exec~tive DirectorComptroller from the DD/I which is in our possession. me~

This memorandUm reports that FRIS regularly disseminated reports to the Rand Corporation but that instructions had been issued to cease distribution of classified reports. 1\'hile no other direct dissemination went to' Rand, other USIa agencies, primarily USAF, were passing "many" copies of DD/I products to Rand as authorized under USIB regulations. The memorandum also states that Rand personnel had requested searches and document retrieval from the CRS fac~lity. 5. In connection with action taken for the Office of Security, there are three relevant items: a. The Printing Services Division, OL, was requested by the .Office of Security to print a book written by Harry J. Murphy, Office of Security. The book was prepared by Mr. Murphy under a Brookings Institution Federal

OOi:z5

-----------------_. MORI DocID: l45l843

I..

SUBJECT:

Sensitive Activities Performed by the Office of Logistics

Executive Fcl101~·sh.ip,. The,book is entitled "Where's "WIlat -- Sources of Information for Federal Investigators. II It is a f~ll treatise on the existence of sources of informatio~ that may be useful to an inv.estigator. The book's first printing of 300 copies was made in June 1967. Due to demand, a second printing o£ 600 copies was made , in September 1968. The title page" of the book gives attribution to Mr. Hurphy, 9ffice of Security, Central Intelligence Agency, and, the Brookings Institution Federal Executive Fellowsnip. The book is classified'Confidential, and:it is our understanding that the distr,ibution was made ·to "appropriate agencies of t he Federal Government. A copy of l>Ir. Murphy's book can be made ava i LabLe for review' if desired. Sometime in 1972, a representative of the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (bEAA) requested that the Agency give consideration. to our publishing, at LEAA expense, an unclassified version of'this volume. It was the intent of LEAA to make broad-scale distribution to Police Departments throughout the .courrt ry , The Dd r ec t or of Security and I consulted on this matter and jointly determined that the LEAA. reques't should·not be.hollored because the Agency shoul d- not put itself in :the positLon of publishing law enforcement material for general·~nd un-· . classified purposes. and it would be an abuse of our printing..facili ties. " b. On 5 January 1971, the Diractor.of Security requested that I approve his leasing up to eleven motor vehicles for use in connection with a special support operation which ,...ould last app roxfmatiefy 3 months , The Director of Security informed me~ ,in his r~questing memorandum of, 5 January 1971, 'that' .HThis .suppor-t; activity has been undertaken at the specific jn~tructi6n Df the Director and has his personal approval." The request was approv.ed.· c. From 19'68 to date, the Offi~e of Security 'has , requisitioned from this Office a considerable .amount of materiel which we understand was to be given or loaned by them to local Police Departments. In certain cases some of this materiel' was issued from Agency stocks and, in other cases, direct procurement of the materi~l was made by. funds furnished by the Office of Security. A complete listing of such materiel is found in Attachment 2 •

. ONLY

~[(\.:-"'"

v l·r"·· 0L"':' u,

00126

MORl DoclD: 1451843

SUBJECT:

·1

Sensitive Activities Performed by the Office of Logistics

b: This Office is ~qare~ although it had no cognizance nor responsibility,· that an apartment was rented in Miami Beach, Florida, during the period of the Democratic National Convention, 10-14 July 1972~ and the Republican National Convention, 21-24 August 1972. The a~artment was used as

tnm~~;~~~nP;~~~ II~eilloe~: OJ: tone 5e:re ;~e: v::e :IlCl

l:l1UelollIg

EYES HEY

001.27

-----------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

SUBJECT:

Sensitive Activities Petformcd by the Office of Lo~istics

assistance in connection with the political conventions 't ha t wer e being held. WI{ Division is the cogn i aan t operating cOl:lponent on this matter. 7.

The above recitation of facts represents t to the best

of my know'l erig e and memory t those matters wh i ch appear to be

relevant to subject tasking given by the Director •.

JOlll1

1'.

BIaJ_e

Director of Logistics 2 Atts

cc:

DD/M&S

:.; :

i• I

:I1 I i

-i

1 I

, I

:: I

..j

I :

ONLY SECRE

00128

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.. .'

(

11" J,!

..il.l .·. :

i .

a,~I

~l'

i'.

'1 ,i I

:i .J

........

_-_ - .... - __ ..

...

001.29" .

...........

.....

•

,;i

.~ ;:! ;

.';

.. .... -

. ..

:~".'

---"--------------.;

Requesting Office

Quantity

Unit Cost

Receiving U.S. Department or Agency

Telephone Analyzer

TSD

1,350

5/16/72

BNDD

Transmitters, Radio Beacon

313

.3/23/72

BNDD

Telephone Analyzer

1,350

White House Communications Agency

Telephone Analyzers

1,400

Air Force

Telephone Ana~yzers

1,350

State

3/23/72

Telephone Analyzers'

TS,D

1,375

11/16/72

ABC

Camera Sets

TSD

656

4/17/72, , Camera Sets

FBI

TSD

700

11/18/71

FBI

Actuators, Recorders

TSt>

488

4/19/72

FBI

Tessina Cameras

TSD

700

12/ 7/72

BNDD

Camera, Video

18,045

FBI

4,639

FBI

TSD TSD

10/13/72 3/26/71 .

4/20/73

OJ C

Item

3/23/72

TSD

•

OS OS

0 0

Date of Request

Tube, Image, Burn-Resistance, EqUivalent of WL 30691

:;0 H

t:J

TUbes, Image, WL 30691

4,607

FBI

Cameras, Television

18,30,0

FBI

, I

t:f

I f-l

fl::.

f-l

co fl::. w

Requesting Office

Date of Request

TSD

12/14./72

TS1)

Item

Receiving U.S. Dep ar cme;nt or Agency.

. Quantity

Unit Cost

Transmitters, Radio

313

BNDD

10/20/72

Actuators, Recorder

591

FBI

TSD

10/13/72

Tube, Image, Burn-Resistance, Equivalent of W L 30691

4,639

fBI

TSD

5/26/71

Tube, Image, W L 3Q691

4,639

FBI

TSD

4/22/71

Transmitters

1,372

FBI

TSD

4/22/71

Module, Plug-·In

1,247

FBI

TSD

4/22/71

Power Supply - UWP-39A

568

FBI

·2/25/71

Telephone Analyzers

1,350

Treasury

1/30/71

Telephone Analyzers

1,350

Treasury

'OL

8/12/70

Cable, SpecIal-Purpose Electrical

5,090 ft.

Ink, Special Formula

1 lot

I I I

TSD

TSD 0 0

... C'J.)

1/10/73

6/28/72

Ink, Special Formula

1 lot

.42 1,825

3,700

TSD

7/26/71

Transmitter, Radio Beacon

728

White Hou s c· Communications Agency Immigration and Natural.ization Service

3: 0

t:J

Immigration and Naturaliza.tion Service U.S. Forestry

t:J I-' fi:> U1

I-' 00

fi:> W

-- ---_. --- --------._----------

MORI DocID: 1451843 \.

.. ...

(

','

I /.

00:132 ... .. .

... .. . ... ... - ... '"

...

..----.- . .

" • ---'-" _

- .

. r- -:

MORl DoclD: 1451843

~~TERIAL REQUISITIONED

FROM LOGISTICS BY SECURITY FOR ISSUANCE TO LOCAL POLICE

ITEM

QUANITY

Gas Mask M-9

200

G~s

196

Mask M-17

Steel Helm~t and Liners

231

Vest:and Groin Protector

Vest, Flak M-52

Vest, Protective

Vest, .Grenade

105

Execuvest

Emergency F1ashi~g Red Light

*Searchlight; Tear Gas

*Chemical Baton 6 1/2"

*Chemical Baton 12"

*Chemical Baton 26"

*Mustang 35 Pistol

*Searchlight with Shoulder S.trap

*Stun Gun

*NOTE:

Various quantities and types of replacement chemical cartridges, loading kits, and batteries were also ordered for asterisk items.

MORl DoclD: 1451843

LJ crh.. ;;HHIAl _. - -... Oi~lY _-_ .... -.- -LJ .....5E_--------- . - ... _-- .. - ---------... - :.~.:;Al

.._-

.....

--_ ..__. ----- -

SUBJECT: [OP':",·"II

------'-"-- ---.. __.. FROM: D!OJCS,

building)

---

~1.TENSION

!Hq.

DATE RECEIVED

fORWARDfD

OffICER'S INITIALS

COMMENTS (Numbe, eoch comment 10 lhow f,om whom 10 whom, Draw Q line eeross corumn o'fer each comme-r1f.)

nn!M&.S

IRq.

I 2. 3.

_-._------

- - - ---_.-- _.- ..... _--- - ' ,-----------_.. ---.__ . ------- ... NO. OJC~ ._._.J -- ~ PATE 11 vs« iS73 - ._-

TO: (Officer de-s;gnofion.. room number. and

_---~-

ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET

~CI

Hq.

~, 5.

tPf'1 ~l.o,MI J'U ( ,Je;..t. ( ~e\ &s\:-

~?"'bo7.

ft-or

fu (,\.~........)

\It

C. ~t"-

",b,N~

vJ 01\1~

t"--r

O\CS

~I\J~~

~~-t .

10.

11.

m:fil,*"

.~ '1..3

12.

13.

14.

• f

001.34

15. I

., tl ....... ~~ 61 0 ~J&OUS.... 0 _.. . . _-..-....-_ ..

4 _ J . ... _

SECRET

INTERNAL o CONFIDENTIAL' O USE ONLY

o UNCLASSIFIED

MORl DoclD: 1451843

orcsl

11 r\~AY 1973 MEMORANDUM FOR: Director, Central Intel1i'gence Agency THROUGH

Deputy Director for Management and Se rvl ce s

SUBJECT

Activities whichrnight be considered sensitive issues.

I have listed below computer processing p roj ect s which the Office of Joint Computer Support has participated in or is aware' of and which might be considered sensitive issues. Most Sensitive Projects OJCS Project'Officer Project Organization, & Identification Telephone HYDRA

SANCA

Richard Ober CI Staff

'I los

[L.....------L.uRn

Nature of Project

OJCS Reason for Listing

A specfa.l project initiated by DCI

Type of data being collected.

Machine Ind'ex to security files

Type of data in index.

Information sto.rage & retrieval of drug related data (ORO's project OFTEN)

Type of data in files.

Computer file of drug data.

Type of data in file.

Sensitive Projects

00135

·1

MORl DoclD: 1451843

Sensitive Projects (Continued) OJCS Project Off'ic e r Project Organization, & Identification Telephone

'I'SD

1---1 Sensitivity Unknown, but Pos sibly

Nature . of Proj~ct

Statistical. analysis of psychological data.

OJCS Reason for Listing Source of . data. Contractors are involved with project.

a Matter for Concern Nature of data. Techniques of system discussed with FBI.

SPYDER

I---==--OS

DMVREC

Data on radio frequencies used for support of IrrPlace Morrito r-; ing System, a system to identify unauthorized transmitters. File of automobile license numbers.

Nature of data.

File of Agency applicants who were not hired.

Nature of data.

00.1..36

MORl DoclD: 1451843 (

Sensitivity Ul1kn~~.!._~ut Possihly a Matter for Concern (Continued) Project Officer OJCS OJCS Organization, & Reason for Project Listing Id Cl1tification l' el~hon_CL_ Association with the named organization.

fq..... JOHl'r D. IAMS Director of Joint Computer Support

Ii I

}EYE§

·ILY ~Ell

001.37

MORI DocID: 1451843

.,. f'l \;t.l.t·t..~j .; I J..-.. cc: -'._ ... _--. .. ...._........ - .- ... --- --'-'''-- ---ROUHNG f.·J'\~O rU:CORD SHEET --_._--_... .. ---_.,- -- -- _._--- --_.... _-- --- ----_._.- -------SUBJECT: \C',:.I::,-.ol)

(] ...

_--- . -_....... _.

'''-'

,:.. ' ',L

l.J ...iE .m:LY .......... _---......... _.. . .. --_.-

---_

_-_

-.-.

'---'--"

fPOM:

I_..

nl.l~Le"

to~rn

ond

DATE RECEIVED

fORWARDED

DATE

-'-'--

-- 2.

10 May' 1973

COMMENTS (N"mber each comment 10 show f,om whom 10 whom. O'OW Q line ouoss column af'er eeeh comm~n'.1

OFFICER'S INITIALS

\DDM&S IHq r s ,' .

NO.

1---._-----_.__..__....

Director of Communications Hqrs. .\ TO: (Officer c!sig",ofion, building)

._--

---c-'

EXTENSION

~Ref SCi

1- The attached ~s ~n further response to your request.

_ _ 0.

.c. 5.

10.

11.

12. 13. ,

u. ..

001.38

15.

FORM 3-62

o CONFIDENTIAL

610 U~J~~~US 0 SECRET ......

_ ' 0 _~ _ ' 0

__. ._ •.•• _ _ ~

__ .

..1-:.-.._

INT£RNAL O USE ONLY " -~._-.. _.#

- ._" .. -

o UNCLASSIFIED . _ .........__.. . . . . _-----.

#.~

MORl DoclD: 1451843

DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION

oci

SOURCE:

REGISTRY

CONTROL NUMBER:

8 May 1973

DATE OF DOCUMENT:

OATE D.OCUMENT RECEIVED: LOGGED BY:

COpy NUM8ER (8): NUMBER OF PAGES: two

DOCUMENT NO:

NUMBER OF ATTACHMENTS: FROM:

SCI

one

Special Programs DiVision, OC

TO OFFICE

'DICO

I\n""t ~

DATE: 10 May, 73

NAME

Mr. Jack J

SIGNATURE

IIAtl

Kei'tb

DATE

o .'

o o o Comment o o Information o Direct Replv o Preparation o Recommendation '0 Signature o Return o o Approval

Action

Concurrences

of Repi y

•

Oispatd1 File

.00139

MORl DoclD: l45l843

·~

-_ ... . ~

.. SCI

8 May 1973 MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD SUBJECT:

Summary, Special Programs Division (SPD), 'Office of Communications, Operational Contacts with Other u.S. Government ~gencies o

1. Prior to 1969 the OC COMINT.. intercept unit, which was then in Miami, had relatively frequent contact with the Miami bureaus of the FBI and FCC, Miami Police and the Miami Beach Police. The staff provided support to these activities in monitoring, identification and DB of specific illegal agent transmissions conducted by foreign nationals and American citizens in the greater· Miami area. Arrangements for' this support were made thro~gh the. DDO' s'l I 2. In late Septe~ber 1972, NSA, through Division DI DDO. 'requested that the Special Programs Division initiate a hearability survey of certain HP' long-distance commercial telephone circuits between the U.S. and South America. The circuits carried'drug related long-distance calls of interest to the BNDD and other U.S. agencies. Because of the availabilit of ersonnel and technical ca abilities

....

·3. The Chief and Deputy Chief. SPD and SPD/Special Electronic Operations Branch· have been engaged in·informal technical liaison with operating components 'of the FBI . for a.number of years. Initial contacts and arrangements . for support ·of. specific activities have been made by the Division D/DDO. Support has been provided in the form of

'~JiB""no SECRET

~!e\TllL

.: 1----.

OF ATTACHMENT

_---JI

JJJHft1lfi

, .·:'~~'b~i40

MORI DocID: 1451843

. .".

8 May 1973

exchanges of technical information on techniques, technical assistance and training, and the loan of Agency equipment. r r bJS been r~nd;rjd to In t~e.past sever~l ye!:; sens1t1ve FBI proJects _andl ~ _ Si:port-, has been and is ·presen D g g1ven to FBI pro ects I I These projects are'described in the attache . , sealed envelope. (

:::nn

4. An operational test of an F/DF Iconducted n DO and system was r~ OC-SPD pers nnel 1n the earl ar.o the summer of 1972. A location in Miami Beach, Florida was selected for the tests because of similarity to the actual' target site and environment in Saigon. Receiving antennas were placed on the roof of the hotel being used as the receiving/DF site. A hotel employee asked why the materiel was placed on the roof. A team member in effect told him that the group was an'advance security s~gment for the Democratic National· Convention. No further questions were asked; the tests' were completed and the equipment was returned to the Washi~gton area. .:

Att •

••

------'".~-----, '00"14'1

MORl DoclD: 1451843

. . ..-.

9 May 1973

• .

--.Ji

T~ .

.001.42

MORl DoclD: 1451843

...

..---------------,~..A

...-

....

9 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD SU~JECT:

Organizational Deali~gs with Activities Inside the United States o

1. This MFR records organizational dealings with activities inside the United States known to this office. z , In September 1972, I . Irequested secure communications in the Miami Area w1th local offices of BNDD

commun1cat10ns 1n was never 1ns a e advised in April 1973 that there were plans 4un~~e~rw~aY=-1"-n~.·MEi~a~mTi to combine various Federal agencies antidrug efforts under a new Justice Department Division, and at this time' it was not known where the new anti-drug office would be located. I

,~~~e

1_ _- - - - - - - - - - - - , - - - -

I •

During :he Democratic and Republican conventions, Jsupported requirements levied by ~he Secret Service concerning name traces and other intelligence information relating to subversive influences which might affect those conventions.\ provided some'technical advice and procedural assista~ce 1n establishing a useful means of com-. municating between the two correspondents. WHD should be able' ,. to provide a detailed resume of activities supported in' this matter. 3.

•

~E. /f/7I .'5J

. Thomas 5'~~11 "Chief, America$ Staff, OC

MORl DoclD: 1451843

,. .

_._---_ .....

.'. -.. .......

,.. f...

......

_--_._ _-----------_.- __ _-----.--....

•..

SENDeR. WILL CHECK CL"'.SSIF1C<,\TICN 'rop ;·ND ~jO"i'OM

- r.... ~ :~.~~ ... z: ;:.;-.. ~;-;::-.;:;:-- . '--'-r' -;':-.~::::--:-".:::-- -"-r~'" j ....: •.-.:-.--;.:' --. _L.. _.....I. .. .- - - 1 ... -.- ...,. _.... ..- ...J._.::::...::.L: .• ___ • .'----~_.

OFFICIAL HOUTI;,\G SLIP

._--_._----

NAME ANb ADDRESS

7 1 '

Colby Mr. William E. -_._..

_0_-

...-- ------------

....

. (\ _. _\:\1;..1.)\ _ _ a~~

W.-

&11

-l'=-'~

~.~!"I~.~

DATE

.."...

.) 7 r: t: -----_ _----" C/ ---- --.. .. ( -, -; _-

f·,.A

"'"

_'-...~..:..._..~-.".9'

....

ACTION APPROVAL COMMENT COliCURREHCE

~ ..._ ••" .~ -7"- /:,;..

: ~-

...

'.,

...

.' .

Bill:

.. s: ~ ...........-

DIRECT REPLY DISPATCH

r.: •

... '

.. /"-

• IlECOMr~EHDATIOIi RETURN SIG~ATlIRE

..t.

-t, '-

....~,,-~v- .,.--

.....

. -

----;-

-_ ....--

··r ". ~:~J:.

PREPAlIE REI'lY

. filE ll;fORMATlon

-'. Remarks:

'--'r':""~ 'A

-, .r-,.

..........\.

'---

""'''"

---

f ~

The attached memorandum identifies the funds referred to in Chuck Briggs' notes of 13 and 20'January 1972.

~ .'

FOLD HERE TO RETURN TO SENDER FROM: NAMe:, ADDRESS AND PHONE NO_

Inspector General "

rORM NO, 1-67

237

'"'~ . . .

£L· ... t '

DATE "

30 May 7~

(40)

Use previous editions

** "$ince-these note ss ar e on a' tctally' separate -sensit.ive subject, • pl~"pull'then) from this file '-_: :vEC."

CNo'te t9 C!MPS),'

'.': 001.44

" ~

. .'. ,

MORI DocID: 1451843

,I I

29 May 1973 MEMORANDUM FOR: Inspector General SUBJECT

REFERENCE

: Mr. Colby's Request to Inspector General to Determine Subject Referred to by Two Notes . in a PP/B Memo to DD!M&S D/PPB Memo to DD/M&S dated 23 May 1973, Subject: Watergate Principals - Direct or Indirect Involverrrent

(

I I

001.45 i.

- '----r-'--

MORI DocID: l45l843 ....... ~

•• '

........ --' .-. _.. ' - '

_._~~.

......:..

... ~ :.

_ _. , _ . _

_ _ w.

_ _ ••••

I I

r. SECRET

CONFiDENTIAL

OFFICIAL ROUTING SLIP

-'..... 1';" ,

:OC'";·:.,~~ #l ... :; t : ... ~

• -/.

...

6· i--

ACTIOH

DIRECT fiEPlY

APPROVAl

DISPATCH'

CO'MMEHT CONCURRENCE

IlfFORMATIOH

'A..J..A c-. ~

PREPARE REPLY RECOMMEHDAT1Olf RETURN SIGHATUIlE

. fl,.t4

c,.l-, ~n

Ii.

fiLE

Remarks:.

/:;2.. of .

..y~~./ r r~7..,') " :;>

-3

INITIAl':::

DATE

NAME AND ADDRESS :

.e;.,;" .., . ~~"J

·l-·

I 7- "6 1

00:146 FOLD HERE TO RETURN TO SENOER

DAY,.

FROM: N"MIi:. "ODRE:SS AND PHONE; NO.

w. E. Colby U:,\CLASSIFI ED fOllM NO,

1-61

237

Z3May73

I CO:'iFIDENTIAL I

SECRET (40)

Us. pr,v;ous ,dilio/ls

',' "

••••••,

.. _

nON TOP AND BOTTOM

b£:"'\fOER. WILL CHECK CI..ASSIF..

_ 0 ' " _• •:

_.....

-_ .

---"---"--":,_

l ~l:L.4.SSIFU:D

• I

..... ; .. , ~

." .

...... ".

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.. 1.,_.

.It

•

....

" "

.' ..... ~ -,

;

...

~.,

. -

- " ."... !.. " .... . .. ..

•

gt-

~ ILJ

1- ~

-MEMORANDUM FOR: •

.' 'r :

,-- .

__~ .... _-

"'--'----

,, I

~ .:

'.'

• ._ .....•

_•

q)-0J

-.~

...

......

·1 !

. Co. _ -"~23 MAY 'i~73

(DATE)

'f I

•

101 REPl"C~AY

5 _ FORt.! 10-101 FOR"! NO, WHICH _ ._, USED:•. '.•" . BE ,_,.,_ .•• 1 _J'":' 54 I'~ ',-r- ...., . . _.... .... _~.'~ ,

~ ... AUG ~"

_~ __ '.~'_'_

-(47)

. .. :"',

. "

.. ' \. ...;-: " .. ,,-. '" ", .

......... ... :.

~. "

. .. "

..,.

. :"

,....

MORI DocID: 1451843

, .. \

•

•r

." ..

. ---.-

c--·'--------·-.~·--'-----·------··

"'...._L..._. .'. ·-::1~(j:-~~~1·ii~~7,E~T-S:J:~7:i~·;;{iii~~~?i~i: ._____ ..... _._._.._. _ ...__.."_.' __._'_._.~I-'~:r~~~~ii-El:' _. __._____.

. ' '<;.

.:....i

OFFICIAL nOCTI:\G SLIP .. -'.....0 . -- .

_-_._--_._-_ _.----------_...

. DA.....E

NAME AND ADDRESS

~--

~-~---

1--._---

._ V\T!.-E!~olby _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ti~~

-- ------

·~~U --

.-..

-..... IALS _._INI . ._----

._---- -_.

--_.~_.-

-----

......

_ 6 ..

._..

_---~---

DIRECT j·:EFLY "-'OlSPt.TCli fILE

l,CTlON APPROVAL COMMENT COHCURREHCE

,........•

._- PREPl.iIE REPLY RECOMMENDATlOI{ RETURH SIGIUTURE

IHFaRMATIOH

I .t

Remarks:

S-Ul.'

. lj et..\,.'('

lI..Jb-l

t""(..IQ-k \

~-.),!

""'0

~~.\J

:pc. \ -

Lu..

O-A-..... '"

v.J4·

lolj .(.

11-..; .- Or r s cc..

J!..¥

A.'f '(' ... (;1/ e, l.

v.::. . " . .\ r k""".. . . .

·.A

n.~J

rJO-,

Y\O \ J-::>

(c,-\:- Q<' ~(V-(. v, Q)

c::4;

c..~'j

. .....-

. 6~ -

')l-, e .t\-

c:;..e C. <.'V' ~

r ~ ~ .'-\.u..t'"~ .

FOLD HERE .....O RETURN TOSENDER

FROM: NA",e:. ADDRESS AND PHONE NO.

DATE

5/23/73

Charles A. Briggs, n/PPB

UNCLASSIFIED •

. fORM NO, 1-67

23",

I CO~FI[)ENTIAL I

SECRET (40)

Use previous edilions

.jJ-

.... , ., .

• :

........ a-

.. ,

... .' .. .- . \. ,

....."

·00:148

-r

. ',NT

MORl DoclD: 1451843

~LI

23 May 1973

Do -76

. i

·1 1 I 1

I i.

I·

Watergate Pr-incipnls - Direct or Indirect Involvement

I have had none with Hunt •. Liddy or Young.

3·. My McC~rd contact was indirect and occurred sometime during the late 1960's when I ws s Director. Office of Computer Services. I opposed plans .for Technical Di viaion , Office of Security (under Mr. McCor d) to acquire a separate computer f(;r pf DD/S&T (then ORD) . its In-Place Monitoring System. r W<.1.S the computer individual woLcmg wIllI Ib ClIld,· I think, would have details. .

I .j

SUBJECT:

Deputy Director ]01' Management and Services

1. This memor-an durn responds to the Director's request ~or a r epor t of any Involvement in ;my c apucity since 1 .Iarmar y 1969 with Messrs. Hunt. McCord Liddy Young. or Krogh.

I .I

MEMORANDUM FOR:

4. The Krogh contact also was indirect and involved his request. first through 6MB, that CIA fund foreign travel on behalf of the Cabinet Committee on International Narcotics Control. Individual phone discussions are noted in the attachad , The Agency {oecil points werel land I understand forwarded relevant documentation. Copies of memoranda. from :Messrs. Krogh, land Colby are attached also •

ras

5. I held a staff meeting yesterday to pass the request to all OPPB employees. One officer who was attending a funeral will not be available urrtll vtomor-row ,

O\bhB\Cv·p"q88'z\l:n:.:r: ':~2~(S3V·i!J.i\.1~) J - D\:&bb' EJ,G;:O OJJJJ~ SHG lsI Charles A. Brisgs J - N.' E' COLO)... Charles A. Briggs O~;a f J - ~qq~Ga2GG Dn-ector of Planning. D! 2+x..~p.;Hon: Programming, and Budgeting Attachment As stated

00149

•

MaRl DoclD: 1451843

.'J-

~ .. I

",.

I Attachment 23 May 1973 Call [rom Jim Taylor ~ OMB r-e If Bud" Krogh arrd his deputy, \'h.ltCl~ Minnick. of the Dorneatlc Councfl who p lan foreign

4 Feb 72

travel in connection with thetr nar-cotics interests. Jim was alerting us to their Intention, to ask us for funds for the tr avcl ,

7 Feb n

Follow-up from Taylor: Plan 3-5 trip s fer 3 individuals-all in FY n. Cost probably $JOK. Minnick ready to make first trip. lis plugged in. E:-:Dir said OK r-e 'I'chrxn visit.

7 Feb

See attached memo frcm Egil Krogh. Jr. to Bill Colby and follow-on memos from 1(21 Jul 72) and Colby (2 Aug 72).

12(?) May n

'23 Jun

John Hurley, 01',15 called. menticning possible Krogh/ Minnick attendance at a Latin American (Station Chief?) conference on narcotics. He a)50 said eif ~he}herd. ' .h r \ 'J"h'tte II. ouse , was l ayrng on a-t.v,' .£:¥~~ WIt • . ror hi:nself, Shepher-d arid Mark Algor. OM to Europe.

Icommented on Krogh/Minnick interest

in getting CA- activities, including large-scale PM, on narcotics front. Ipu&hing small-scale PP.

6 Jul 72

~ Aug

Ic<l1led. Notes say only: We will send. If

Icalled re Colby letter (attached). Said,..tra-vel onders ready; need money this PM (No record in my notes as to who was tr aveltng when, but have faint recollection of its bein{; to Mexico City). and

1 Nov 72

"Minnick-Hurley film.

Icontacted by

I ------

JCall. Again notes are cryptic: b1~~;braceL I Survey BNDD problems/ R._:ilated1

001.50

MORl DoclD: 1451843

...

~DC". vL~

13 Jan 72

Ex])ir (Colby) said DCI had approved $30K for sensitive CS proj ect - no details.

20 Jan 72

Reminded ExDil" r-e $32K,he said DCI OK'd.

I !

'-.c::::. -.

.... _-~-- --~

-::::::

00:151 . ........_. __ .. _--

---~._

~._

..-

... -._. . .

MORl Doc1D:1451843

THE WHITE HOUSE

1,"/

VIAS H I'NGTON

J.tcbruary 7., 197?

MEMORANDUM ~FOR }31J..,I~ COLBY

SUBJECT: BUDGETA..."tY SUPPORT FOR THE CABINET CO£vlMlTTEE ON INTERNATIONA;L NA.:.'\.COTICS CONTROL

The Cabinet Cornrni.tte e on Lnbe r.nat.i.ona.I Narcotics Control was created' Sep~e:.nbbr 7) 1971" by the President to centralize hi~ attack on the international drug; traffic. ' ." The Cornrnrtt e e do e s not have a separate budget.

Salary and administrative support for its small) full-tixne staff has been provided by the Executive Offi ce of the :Presid~nt. Other experis e s are being. charged to the constituent agencies and d~partments., .

!<.

: The Bureau of Customs" BNDD, and AID /Office of Public Safety have provided support to date.

f". I. I

The CIA should be prepared to' defray not more than fifteen thousand' " , dollars in overseas travel expelfses fo; 'Cabinet Co:r.runittee staff during the remainder of FY-197Z. ' Walter C. Minnick,,' fh e Cornrrritt.ees a Staff Coordinator, can be contacted for further details.

I I I

Than;k you for you~ assistance.

r;y~0~

-I

Jr.

EgilKrogh, J;:xccutivc Dirccl:or Cabinet Committee on International Narcotics Co:n,trol

I.'

cc: John Ehrlichman Assistant to the President for Domestic Mfaixs Mark Alger _ . QMB) Chief l 'General Govermnent Programs Division colA KcpreLntanve; CCINC Workipg Group.

00:152 ... . .'._'" .. ----'0:--'

,.:.~

,..~.-

....

.~-

....

•••

• _

,..,

.. , _

,._

'": ••••••••• 11"

,': .

MORl DoclD: 1451843

-. . PPB 72-1063

2AUG 1972

(lou-AT I

. i-

I' a

·MEMOR.A.L"lDUM FOR: Deputy Director lot: Plans .

Me~~ to E~lr {rm.&lr:rDP/NAB..CO~did . Zl J'uly 1972; S:ilme ~ubject

,I J

i',I :

Fbc:al Year 1973 .Budgef:ary Support {or tne C:1blnet Corr>..miHee on International. Narcotics ContJ:.ol (eCINC)

SUBJECT:

'. ~b-I

1. This is in response to tha- referenced znezno rega.rding use of CIA funds to cover travel e~penSle~ ior the Whits House Cablnet Committee Staff for Fiscal Ye4.r 1973.

2. : You are authorized to obligated up to $15.0nO Cor the use

.. of the White Hou$e Cabinet Committee Staff tor travel expenae s durlng FY 1973. Oblig:l.tion ~bould be r ecozded against the O/DDP allot.n1ent and trAvel order" issued aga.inst yO':lr own :ttppropria~e fan number~

•

3. To the' e~tent that. jou t!.re unaotc. to <9.9orb this .requirement within your preoen~ allotment.. we will h4l.ve to arrange some reprog·ra:cnming l:lter in the year f.o ccve e ~his 1J.l';lbt:egeted item.

. i

··f !

I--r==================:;--I

I . .

w. E. Colby . Executive Dlrector-Compt.rolle1"

O/PP~ .rhg 2 Aug 72 Dis tribul:ion: Orig &' 1 - addressee 1.- ExDir 1 - ER 1 - PPB Sub} (EMS 1 - OIF

rlRear;rono

..Ll

'00153 i.

~--------~~~MORl DoclD: l451843

. NEHORAUDUN FOR:

VIA i!-,

.•...•.

21 July 1912 .

• I :

., .

. . ~:

. '..

. .

..... ,... •

..~..

.........

.J''''

':.._

. .."

.... :

"'"'

. 1. At our- invitation;> i1i: .. '''alter C.. Ninnick;, sta:fr • i.re!i'.her or the CCINC> is scheduled to attend anc'l-~Jlrtic1pate .' . in. the Regional Narcot-ics Seminar sponsored by L!fH)DivisioP. .....•

on·2r-28.Jul71912~

Executive Director -' Co~troller

.. .....

•f

". Fiscal Year 1973 BUdgetary Support for'· .. . the Cab:fne.t ComIilittee on International Narcotics Cant.rol (ccrsc) .." . .

...

SUBJECT. . ....

':"'~ . .

....

>.. ;... :....., : .

. . . 2; . '. In accordance 1'lith procedures adoptied :for travel :-

or White House Cabinet Committee Staff' in FY 1972;> it is .: .' requested that funds to cover the cost of' ~~ .. MinnickJs : " trip' be relec.s.ed. Attacned herewith is· a copy of' a f'ormal . .request :fror.l j·ir. Eg!l Krogh dated 7 February 1972 to Nr. " 1 Willi~~ Colby. requesting travel· fuhds.for the balance of FY 1972. Hr .. Krogh is now preparing a f'or.:naJ. r-equasf :for '. . $15,000.00 to cover travel expenses for vfnite House Ca~~net .~ . COlilmittee stc.f':f for FYi;.1973.· I will fo:r:ward this request. '.. .. to your .office as· soon as it arrives. . :. ..

.,'!,

.,. ~

e ,

il II .j

Ii II

:1 :!

......

\./

L--...-rrrrnrTT.r!n'ff'nrr---Cj ODP/ HARCOG

! "'~tachmen.t:·

A/S

.---

1 .,

....... -. )J'~ ..'""- ......

.i."'. -=-\~-t . J ~ ·1

-£:"'-~

L . 001.~4 •

•

_J"

{

MORl DoclD: 1451843 \~'i :.,~.; : t ' ~~' t

•

DD/M&S 73-1809

MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director for Management and Services SUBJECT

Contacts with Individuals Named in the Watergate Matter

1. I am addressing this to you instead of to the Director of Central Intelligence since I doubt that the information contained herein is of such signiftcance to warrant his interest and because it has been on record with the Agency since July 1972. However.. if you feel that the information is of such interest that it should be forwarded to the Director I shall put it in the proper format to do so.

2. My only contact with anyone named in connection with the Watergate and related matters was through] la former Agency employee now retired and living in Winterhaven, Florida. In December 19711 Icalled me from Florida and advised that he wanted to get in touch with Howard Hunt. He said that he did not have Hunts home phone number and that it was probably, unlisted but that since Hunt was a former employee, could I contact Hunt and ask him togivel la call. I had only met Hunt once about 10 years before but I agreed to relay the message. I called Howard Hunt at his home and told him that] did not have his home phone and requested he caUl ~ Mr. Hunt thanked me for . relaying the message and said that he woUld ca 11 This seemed of little consequence to me in December 1971 but in July 1972 lof the Office of Security contacted me in regard to the FBI investigation of the Watergate situation. At that time I Informed] lof the telephone call from ., . lin December 1971. Attached is a copy of a Memorandum for the .Record prepared by I [as.a result of our conversation.

3. In the summer of 1972 I took my family to Disney World in Florida and took that occasion to drop in to seel· .~ Itold me in a private conversation that he had been interviewed ree or four times by the FBI in connection with the Watergate affair and he related to me his contact

..,;;.

____------JI-EYES Bill SECR£I [_.

IU01.55

MORl DoclD: l45l843

L, to .. ,3

\, I.. I 'I.; t.

JU·.~·:i \ L

. (2)

with Howard Hunt. On 19 July 1972 after my return from Florida I reported this conversation to the Director of Security and made it a Memorandum for the Record. This memorandum was sent to Mr. Colby and a copy of the memorandum is attached. 4. Other than knowing Mr. McCord through his employment with the Agency and meeti.ng Howard Hunt once in about 1959. I do not know nor have I had any contact with <.lily individual.s named or knowledge of related matters now receiving attention in the press.

:~ ..

. __

/~/~. -::.....-../ "_.«:.»...../ . -<".::"?,~.-.l..._

. .:..·Charles W. Kane Special Assistant to the Deputy Director , for Management and Services Atts

00156

MORl DoclD: l45l843

..------------'--'------,,.-------_.:.... t~' :

\ NH10RANDUtwi FOR: Executive Di r e cto r-, Comptrolle

i I

Per ou.r. cozrve'z s atio n on Mond a.y,

i 1

I, I I

i·

! I

20 July 1972

(DATE)

FOR" NO. 1 AUG 54

101

REPLACES FORM 10'101 WHICH MAY BE USED.

( 47)

.,i

00:157

--------------MORl DoclD: l45l843

19 July 1972

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD SUBJECT:

Conversation wi th]

---.J

1. While on leave visiting Disney 'World in F'Io r ida, I dropped in to see Iwho lives in Winterhaven, Florida. c = J retired from the Agency about five years ago on disability due to a serious heart condition. He was with the Office of Security for about 20 years prior to his retirement.

. 2. During a pr-ivate conversationc=Jtold me that he had been interviewed three or four times by the FBI in connection with the Mc Coz-d Hurrt affair. I asked him why he had been interviewed, andIre told me that in, late 1971 he had been contacted by Howa rd Hunt who suggested that he consider an assignment as Security Officer for the Republican Party. c=Jvisited 'Washington in January 1972 to discuss the' proposed position with Howard Hunt who apJ2arently was acting on behalf of the'Republican Party.. c = J . furnfshed a resume to Hunt and discussed the position with him. Ultimately, he decided not to accept the position because he felt that his heart condition would not allow him to become involved in such activity. c

3. According to during the meeting with Mr. Hunt they discussed some, of the r equi r ernents of the' job. At that tirne they discussed a need for both a positive and a c ourrte r-aud io program and a need for a good security sy-stem both before and du r irig the Nation~l Conven~ion. c=Jindicated that he sincerely believed that the Republican Party did need a security officer and a good security' programmer but felt that he could not afford to accept the job even. though it was a very lucrative offer. Apparently, money was not a problem.

IO~:15a

MORl DoclD: l45l843 , .. ,.1': . , • ,. ..••.

4 • " :.. •

...

c:=J

4. Whc n declined, he indicated that Mr. Hunt a sk ed for any other rccornmendations he might' have. Ac co r-d ing to he told Mr. Hunt that most of·the people he knew' were still in the . Agency, but he did furnish the name off Iwho might be possibly ready to reti.re from the Agen6y.

c=J

5. eJinformed rn e that he as sumed that the' Bureau obtained his name due to the r e s u rn e h e furnished M'r , Hunt. He said that the Bureau had talked to ·him on three or four occasions and that he had written up about a 40 page statement concerning ~-his dealings with Mr. HUl1t. Wilen asked about Mr , McCor.d, , _ - said that he really did not know McCord that well and declined any. knowledge of Mr. Mc Co r-d l s technical capability: ...

6.1

lindicS\-ted that he had not been in touch with Mr. Hunt since the early part of 1972 and knew nothing of the Watergate operation. He stated that he had gained the impression from the Bureau interview that the technical devices were being removed at the time of the arrest and were not being installed as c;>riginally reported. 7.

All of the above information was volunteered b y D

c--~---I and I really did no t get involved in any discussion on the matter other than to cornrrie nt that I hated to see the Agency's name connected with such an incident in any way. The above conversation took place during a 10 oJ; 15 minute period and no other discussion relating to this incident was held. It is being reported for the record and for information of the Director of Security.

00159

~------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

.. 17 July 1972

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD SUBJECT:

Charles W. Kane

1. Last week Special Agent Arnold Par harn of the FBI cop.ta c ted the Acting ,DD/OS. He a s ked whether or net the Subjects worked for-the Central Intelligence Agency. Pr-e viou s Iy, requests of this nature were followed up by the FBI with a.n interview of the subjects. 2. I briefed Mr. Colby who is the Agency's focal point on the "Wa te r-gat;e " case and'the Acting DD/S of, the FBI inquiry. Mr. Colby suggested that "we determine the extent of Lnvo lvcrne nt a nd indicated that we advise the Bur-eau of their employment. 3. 'When Agent Parham was again contacted and advised of the Subjects' employment with the Agency, he bdicated that the -Bureau does not wish to interview them.

;')

6J!-J"~~""v" Co

'4. The office of the DD IPS win inter vi ew I_-.--_ _._--O-........JI i n/4-:v ~..t..P- the same fashion as Iwas previously interviewed.' 7('2,1

I· t;i

5. I called Mr. Kane both at his office and his residence . and learned that he is in F'Ior ida and will return to dUty on 17 July. I called Mr. Kane this morning to advise him of the inquiry. 6. Mr. Kane stated that he has no firm conclusion as to how the Bureau obtained "his name. He stated that he has seen Mr. Hunt' on only one occasion in 1959. At that time Hunt was the Chief of Station~ The m.eeting wa s occasioned

00:16fl

MORl DoclD: 1451843

. by the fact that 1\1r. Kane

Mr. Kane stated further that around LC=·';"'h-:r---;i,. . s""':t·-n-1-a-s-t--;'i-In-e-o"",:£""""I--;9;-;7"""1:;---;]-,e--'· r e c eived a call fr 0 In

who wanted to get ~n touch with Mr. I·I~nt. lasked Mr. Kane how J:1e could get in touch with him. Mr. Kane obtained Mr. Hunt's telephone nu rnb e r through telephone i nfo r ma.tion channels whereupon he passed the number on tol

7. Mr , Kane stated that he has infonnation that 1 has talked to the FBI on several occasions in connection with the current investigation and that he su rrni s e s that the Bureau may have obtained his name from him.

Deputy Director of Security

00:161.

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.. ;: ...

.. :

.. Ir··~···· ._. _-~~=--', t·

. _. . .. -_ .. ._-

._-.- - . -- ----.-----_._-c...... ,..... J :1'JrrOM - __ - - _ fr.iiIT l ":,n.\~"If'/ED ----- - ....... _.. r-_I~<..u-xnj'II':~ f•.i \' J.'- 1 - s,-----

;r.rHI<."',., .'\55 .. .... ..WILL .. CHr::'-'lo(

;~rION·J

OFfICI \L HOCTI:'\G SLIP

-.0 -1

.-. - --_.--,....,---INITIALS DATE ._-- ..........#;''·''is ... -- ... --" ------

NAME AND·,

--_. - _.- -... _-rq~·

DDM&S.I

Hqs. .

-, ~~ 3 -, , %

f-.

no" .- .M: APPROVAL .. - ...

COMMEHT CON,CURRENCE

PREPARE REPLY

!JliiECT REPLY DISPATCH fiLE lKFORMlT/OK

RECOl;1MEHDATlOH R£:rURH SI.GHATURE

..-:. ..

Rcularks:.

~l'""~'.a.~

-. ..

., '.

:... .'

'~~:fi

:~:.;

...~-..

Ie.

:.:..:;.

;

.., e , ,

.:.'-

t' ~

...

. . ... -:"~'

00162

I ,.

. FOL.D HE~E.O RETURN TO SENDER FROM: N ...... E. ACDRESS "'N'o ~t-<ONE: NO.

P/PPB~

II fOl_ 1101-67

FlED

237

Use previous editions

,-v...a-sIJE!'frIA L

CATE:

8 May 73

SECRET (40)

MORl DoclD: l45l843

,..

8 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR:

Director of CentraJ. Intelligence

THROUGH:

Deputy Director for Management and Services

SUBJECT:

Involvement in Sensitive Domestic Activities

"';4

1. As chief of the~DDP Systems Group{prior to 1969, I was involved -=- ~ .:..<' .,. iI1 providing data processing suppqrt for the following sensitive projects: .:.

ter

,.~

a. Staf{(, Mr. Richard Ober's program for processing data, of U.S.-citize~~ beli;;ved to be militants! subversives. terrorists', etc.

c. A Systems Group sponsored program of common concern listing travel of U.S. citizens to and from Communist cou.ntries. 2. In the same capacity my staff and I briefed police officers from New York State and Chicago at the Del's reque;:;t (Admiral Rayborn) on data processing techniques related to biographic intelligence (unclassified).

3. As a member of O/PPB, I have been aware of five programs with possibly sensitive domestic overtones.

\ i

DDS&T/O~'s contract with theJ '. . . r- VIP Beth and BehaVior Predlcfion

i5ystem •.

b. DDS&T/ORD's Project OFTEN which involved the collection • of data on dangerous drugs from U.S. firms. I believe Mr. Helms • ter-minated this' program last Fall.

MORl DoclD: l45l843 .,. ,

5EGFU;T/SENSlTNE

DDS&T/ORD's D~oiect

Q. ' lJJJ~&T/ORD's

use of ERTS-A data to analyze Soviet wheat

.)fields.

~~ogram.

e. ,DDS&T Special Projects Staff -

.---........::=====::::::..:-_----,

bClence and Technology Gl:0Up

O/PPB

.. ,

'I II

2 -

5E6PET'SEN§ITIVE

00164

_ •••

_ .

"".~_'-

.'_

MORl DoclD: 1451843

I i

.fJJS ONt-¥-r-8 MAY 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Central Intelligence

VIA:

Deputy Director for Management and Services

SUBJECT:

Watergate /Ellsberg and Like Matters

1. No personal Irrvokverrierrr, direct or indirect to my knowledge on my part or my s taff, with the Watergate or Pentagon papers cas e s , with Young on security regulations or with classified releases to RAND. I was awar-e , many years back when in the DDI, that certain classified papers were released to RAND from the production . offices. One staff ~ember, while a member of the IC Staff, did have a RAND contact which he is elaborating on separately.

2~ . There are some sensitive activities .or projects of which I am aware, which are ~ghty close to the borderline of legality in terms of Agency rill.s s ion, including:

The CI Staff COber) project

Th1

An Office of Security narcotics cover project

A CI Staff funding-channel project with the FBI

.lpropr;etary,IL'

·1

~~j ~rNSfTIVE 'lYES ONL.

00165

MORl DoclD: 1451843

I JWI,ile

3. One of my staff officersj in OCI was .the briefing officer for th~dAttorney General, bu can recall A nothing in his dealing with Mr. Mitchell whi ch would have any relevance to the current is sues. A couple other staff officers are reporting separately on some sensitive activities in which they were involved prior to coming to this staff.

Director of Planning, Programming, and Budge i ng

00:1.66

..: ..

MORl DoclD: l45l843

W tJ ..... ...

L " J J I I I L.IJ --

L.J J.)E OULY -

•

._.

ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET SUBJECT: (Optional I

FROM:

9. V. S. Roosevelt

r---'I~E-------------·----

Chairman, TSCC IHqs

TO: [Officer de'ignation. room n"",ber; 000 building)

8 May 1973 DATE RECEIVED

fORWI.RDED

OFFICER'S INITIALS

COMMENTS (Number eoch comment to ,how from whom 10 whom. Draw a fine ocrcs s ~oltJmn of tor each comment.)

DCI

-~ 2.

~---1---t---..r ------I

L....-

4. , 5.

10.

11.

12.

13.

1... :,'.:.::.

15. .'.;: ".:\ .;\

... .. '

00.167 . ' ~

.~.f

,t~ '~':~. ~

MORI DocID: 1451843

UNITED STATES INiELLIGENCE GOARD

TECHNICAL SURVEILLANCE COUNTERl\1EA~URES, COitHIITTEE

OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN

TSCC-D-386 8 May 1973,

MEMORANDUM FOR:

Director of Central Intelligence

SUBJECT

Support Furnished to .Elements of the Gov e rnrnerit Outside of the Intelligence Community

The Interagency Audio Surveillance Courrte r m ea su r-es Training Center (ITC) was established at the instigation of this Cornrni tte e and opened in late 1968 under the executive management of CIA. The need for such a school had been recognized by the National Security Council's Technical Subcorrrrnittee as far back as 1962 and was reernpba sfaed by the Security Committee of the USIB in their October 1964 report titled "Damage Assessment of the Technical Surveillance Penetration of the us Embassy, Moscow. JI Membership on the TSCC has been confined to agencies and departments who are represented on the USIB. F'ro.m time to tilne othe r elements of the Government have indicated their concern over the audio surveillance threat and asked for membership on the Committee. In all cases they have been turned down with the sugg e s tion that they take advantage of the TSCC's product either through liaison with the security organizations of the Cornrrrit tee l s members or by nominating students to attend the lTC. During CY -72 the following students were trained at the ITC: Central Intelligence Agency Defense Intelligence Agency Department of the Air Force Department of the Army Department of Justice (BNDD) Department of the Navy Department of State

10 5 25

50 4

5 3

00:168

MORl DoclD:_1451843

Depa r tmerit of Transportation Internal Revenue Service National Security Agency United States Secret Service White House Communications Agency

3 3 1

6 2

117 The ITC has furnished training only to ernploye e s of the agencies and departments of the Federal Government. State and local police departments have not been detailed to the lTC.

Cornelius V. S. Roosevelt Cha{rr.nan

-;..

00169

MORl DoclD: l45l843

Retiremcnt Infonnation - E. HO\vard Hunt;

Date of retircment:

System:

Grade and salary at time of retirement:

Creditable civilian service used in computing annui.ty:

30 April 1970

CIA Retirement and Disability System GS-1S, Step 8 - $28,226

17 ~hy 1948 to 8 June 1948

- Economic Cooperation ArunDlistration

9 June 1945 to 19' February 1949

- State CECA)

8 NOVffinber 1949 to 30 April 1970

...

CIA

Annuity: At retirement - $1,020 per month At present

- $1,181 per month (which includes cost-of-1iving increases since date of-retirement)

At the time of retirement Mr. Hunt did not elect survivorship benefits.

This meant that upon his death, his wife would not draw a survivorship annuity;

By letter of 5 April 1971 he raised the questio~ of changing

his election but. was' informed by the General Counsel on 6 May 1971 that this could not be done.

By letter dated 5 May 1972 Mr. Hunt asked Mr.

Houston to raise with the Director the possibility of being recalled to duty for a short period of time, after which he could retire again and elect survivorship benefits.

By letter of 16 May 1972 Mr; Houston advised

Mr. Hunt that to call him back to duty solely for the purpose of pennitting

..'

him to change survivorship benefits would be in violation of the spirit of the CIA Retirement Act.

00:1.70

MORl DoclD: l45l843

.. 1-

22 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Inspector General

Bill-~ !

Attached are the reports Bill Colby asked to see: ,

Restless Youth (September i968), No. 0613/68, Secret/Sensitive/No Foreign Dissem (Copy 78).

This document was produced in two ver.sions--one with the chapter on radical students in America (pages 25-39) which was sent only to the President, wa.it Rostow, and Cy Vance (former Deputy Secretary of Defense); the other version without the references to the American scene was disseminated ~o twenty people outside the Agency. This document without the material on the US was updated in February 1969 and copies were sent to the Vice President and Dr. Kissinger. A still more abbreviated edtt ion was sent to the Attorney General .in March 1969. 2.

Black Radicalism in the Caribbean (6 August 1969),

r,T;:18i9/Ei-g':- Se~r~t/N~-F'orcig'~'I)issem (Copy 142). Black Radicalism in the Caribbean--Another Look

n?'·i~i·;;8-197D~N~·~-·0517T70:·-S-~ret./NoFor~Tg~-· ])i:..;::;Uf.l1 (Copy 98).

L'Ie as o note tha.t these are our record copies and should

b o t"l·:·j ~'t't{c ~l.~·- .~".'---" .- -.. - - -.-

- -------- --,.-.- ----- - ' -.----.--- ...-

),U'~ .. ILU

V'i.

LUeL,,)(

Deputy I )in:du!' Io r Inklli.>.. . r1;:·(: A ttachm -: Ill:.:::

001-71.. Ot::::~·~

n I

.. 1

MORI DocID: 1451843 . '-.. _..

• CLASSIFICATION TOP AND BOTTOM

5.ENDER WIl.L.CH:

OFFICIAL ROUTI~G SLIP

INITIALS

DATE

NAME AND AODRESS

',; .... ..-;.=1,.,.""

M..-

. f

I I

s 6 I

DIRECT REPLY DISPATCH FilE INFORMA'(ION

ACTION

APPROVAL CO~EHT

CONCURRENCE

"Remarks-:... . -

001.72

FOLO HERE TO RETURN TO SENDER FROM: NAME. ADDRESS AND PHONE NO.

J FO./II 110.

1-67

.,"'..... OIDCI

237 Us. previous editions

PREPARE REPLY RECOMMEHIlATIOH RETURN SIGNATURE

D"TE

•

12/24/7L

MORl DoclD: l451843

, 'i

1)i'>::$(·!~in;-·,th-·u

t o t bc

C~:b'i.li0t

~!'~d

\d.thir; ·chf.'

I ~~ t ( 11 t~ .o:~~·i~:~·~~·:~Cl·;~'"i-~· . . . _1;: fllf.1 i';~P:" 1- E~:::.: i1·fSS--r"'::'t\.~ tfi is !:.I~rl~·.1. t i vo [-~··~~,·~~i:;f··--rt ~;--~·,,:·t:··~·(.:·ct l~.~ t t. ~"l" t t.;:·':2 i~"~~;-0:r'-"t:i:: l-:i}~·~;: 1·!. t:c")(}d t..h:.\t i"\ul}lic o

~')\:::~::Ui"~~

tLt·.~:<r·?:-:t

ttH.'.: A.l;'.:·";.:':.:1 t:,

t.h~~ IlrCit:l~'!;1

of 8tud~nt diEsidcllce ~ould r~~ult in cO~5idcx·ablc r~Qloriety) part~c~la~l~ in the unIversity world, a~d b~cause pursu~nt to ~!r. 110:3tO'i:'S illstructloo.~" the author Lnc Ludod in his t.er.t a :<:t~d:r cd': btUGNlt. r~dict:ls in t.he Unite-a Stnt~:<:, tl\\.'reby L~:.ce!:c'ir·.~;

tEl'" l'ig:{>OCy'!;l c!Hl.:rt1".:r. WD h av e Sr\.l":.itb.ea th~ pnpei" 1r>r ci~·.~:;:'Dil:ttt-:on to th.e r..J{;J<>o,'rs of the Pr~:;;i~lO'!jt "s Cab Ln e t a r.d ~.>. th il: t he IHt~~lliG(H}ce Oj~~unity by elit=ir.n t'ing Ziltoft?th.::.r" t he ('h~ptf!r \Yrd.c:h dh.cuss,es Students for·:\ Deraoc r a t Lc Soci~t~ (5DS) ~nd . on 0:[ :-:[;5.

~trikillg

the-

COl1l;~lAt1ity

from

th~ Prosp~cts s~ctto~

all

;~.:.:: t

Oi.,t.s~(e

but. within tb;:: G:...... ,:'n,l2,trit··-

~Te

hel i~ V~.: t.n a tv l:l'e bf}.sic t.e;:t sho\ilo t;e 1urtner .i:~Cl 'tpCi for tht- ptn·p~}:-'.e of. € 1 imiml.ti~g ev en tho !!&OS t c aau e L r<:f~r::: nee to tb~) COl::,'stic sc~nc--1E':;;:t SO~eonc i:r.ier fron SUch a c na nc e rFfereDc0 th~t tbe originsl p£por h~d contai~~d ~ ~~ctio~ on l'.!~i:'r i.C!:H1 ~; t uden t:::. Tbo n i.uo tc e n c oun t ry ('h.-:ptt'~S ''d.iic.h form F:n-t: II o I f":'::'f.le!~~ Youth c an b,~ di~;~;--'",;il:~d'.'.·d v Lt h i n thf.l CoYernm~nt, prcvlded.that th@ cODtrolti nppro?ri~t~ ~o th~1r cln.s;~Uicat.ton ~re ob$erv.~d. To do the f'di.tin~ ~no rcpripting r~·uir~d would take several Qnys at l~a~t.

_>.

n£,l\' .£s~ to the

~cs.dcmic ;;'or) a

For

th~ reR30CS,9~t iorth.abo~e. W~

tb~

vnsic

t~~~ ~ould

Dr to tlH" pUbl ie-thaL rcIeasp of

b~~~evp

harm the A~ebcy.

The country chgpt~rs

cou Ld no t be relea~ed 'Wi'thou't first be'ing rc:'\;:ritter: ·to ~liminv.t{~ e.ll

cla$eiiied

inform~tiQn.

Once this. ...as done,

001.73

MORl DoclD: 1451843

...

: l.c y ":'.J~\ 1 d C:L< l)l.tca te1::.1" t)D·::'. t. 10 n r, h'", r tty t v a i l~; L le i 1'. tb:: 1; ~'.1.";'~~;q. 'rr;'i':.f'(J is }·.O 1::{";~ (":if c ve r.. t lit{~r:-~t~~r(~ l."n "tl'.:4~ ~: ~\ ~:,;'-' c t c.•f. :::- t l)f~ rw t CiSf, uit,; v b: t.u ~.1l:)' ev er y pL: Ll:t sh.. . l' ~!;.. ~J:;.:;~~":, ~.:t InR~t O!>:::~ title en his c u r r o n t; lh:tiI;~_~. i,;:~;:j':<"V{:t~, . ::L,i~::-l' n.:;('·~·.ci{;s (,Jf 2~~·v·~. .lrnJ~;ent, auc b t:,.s Ih:t:..1th, -:·'::1~.:C~4t~:"·~d ~ l\d ti~~lf;'-:.re, Il£l·e ~Vl).nS:i!4C=d la.(:~C:E..rcl3 o n f.,l.e E"u17j~·. . c t :~.nc i·.1."C r~r·t·r~r;.rr.·(! t o r)\.~t~l t s h tb(-ir·.1 1 r~diJ~Js. C~.:.rt~~r-:!.t~~.ntly I \ [~ r't~:-t"C-;I~ ':".~""pd l..:.:.::~.~.i:!·:t f,.>':.:t1;1f.c J>:"lE:g~·n .. (:'i)

OOl.74

MORl DoclD: 1451843

( "

MORl DoclD: 1451843 .,

Restless Youth

SEPTEM BER 1%8 No. 0613/68

00176 ..... ---~

- 78 ~

MORl DoclD . 1451843

...

,..-_""'-'r~_

~.~• •

~ ~ .: .:....::::~! ':. .: • •

'~'9

·{3·1/ q 1

_._~-------:...--~~_ ..

. r '. ~ ~

rs Lt. r.. «: !\ ~y

I~. ~: I- ''..

:;.

•

-~": '

001.77 .

MORl DoclD: 1451843

14 Hay 1973

r~40RANDm1

SUBJECT:

FOR THE RECORD Research Project on Robert Vesco

1. On 16 October 1972 Messrs. Ereckinridge andI in the course of a Survey, were briefed on activitie OJ: Glle Atlantic/Pacific Division of the Office of Economic Reoorts. One project cited was a query from the Director, apparently at the request of Secretary Shultz, to the effect, ""../ hat do we know about Vesco,," the man then running lOS. Two of OER's analysts were assigned to the project and; working through the Do~estic Contact Service, spent a day going over the files of the Securities and Exchange Commission. There apparently was some contact also with EUR Division of the Deputy Directorate for Plans and with the Office of Current Intelligence.

2. The in:formation above is based on rough notes and obviously is sketchy. It is cited now not to suggest any wrongdoing but because of the current publicity about Vesco and the probability of continuing probes into the "subject by the press and the courts. Scott D. Breckinridge

00178

MORl DoclD: l45l843

Director of Central Intelligence

Please handle in this channel due to classification of attachment.

WARNING This document contains classified information affecting the national security of the United States within the meaning of the espionage laws, US Code, Title 18, Sections 793, 794, and 798. The law prohibits its transmission or the revelation of its contents in any manner to. an unauthorized'person, as well as its use in any manner prejudicial to the safety or interest ot the United states or for the benefit of any foreign government to the .detrirnent of the United States.

THIS DOCUMENT MUST BE KEPT IN COMMUNICATIONS INTELLIGENCE CHANNELS AT ALL TIMES It is to be seen only by US personnel especially indoctrinated

and authorized to receive COMMUNICATIONS INTELLIGENCE information; its security must be maintained in accordance with COMMUNICATIONS INTELLIGENCE REGULATIONS. No action is to be taken on any COMMUNICATIONS .INTELLIGENCE which may be contained herein, regardless of the advantages to be gained, unless such action is first approved by the Director of Central Intelligence.

TOP SECRET

00:179

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.. 8 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Central Intelligence FROM

Deputy Director for Intelligence

SUBJ:ECT

Activities Possibly Outside CIA's Legislative Charter

1. This memorandum responds to your instruction to report any activities which might be cons ider-ed outside CIAt s legislative charter. 2. All Office and Staff chiefs in the Intelligence Directorate have reviewed the past and present activ.ities of their components. I have received responses from all of them, and none reported any activities related to either the Watergate affair or the break into the offices of Ellsberg's psychiatrist. Although contacts with three of the people allegedly implicated in these incidents were reported, these contacts were on matters other than the two improper activities:

Hunt:

Col. White, Richard Lehman, and I talked to Hunt in late 1970 regarding his preparation of a recommendation in support of the Agency's nomination of R. Jack Smith for the National Civil Service League Award."

Mitchell:

While Mr. Mitchell was Attorney General, an ocr officer was assigned the task of providing him with daily briefings on foreign developments.

00180

~ET CIA INTERNM>uSE ONLY

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.. Young:

Harry Eisenbeiss an¢1 CRS had frequent contacts wlth Young during the summer of 1972 in connection with Executive Order 11652 and the implementing NSC directive. This involved visits by Young to CIA to discuss information storage and retrieval and several meetings of an interagency group dealing with the implementation of the Executive Order and directive.

3. In accordance with mytnstr-ucttons , several Offices reported domestic activities which might appear questionable to outsiders. Their responses are attached. Most of these activities are clearly within the Agency's charter. but there are a few which could be viewed as borderline.

DCS accepts information on possible foreign involvement in U$ dissident groups and on the narcotics trade when sour-ces refuse to deal with the FBI and BNDD directly.

DCS. for six months in late 1972 and early 1973, was acquiring teiephone routing slips on overseas calls.

NPIC and COMIREX review satellite imagery from NASA programs to identify photography too "s enarttve" for public release. " -,

.= " -2-

SE ET CIA INTERNA USE ONLY

0018.1

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.. NPIC has examined domesti,p coverage for special purposes such as natural catastrophies and civil disturbances.

ocr. in 1967 and 1968. prepared intelligence memoranda on possible foreign connections with the US anti-war movement and world-wide student dissidence (including the SDS) at the request of the White .Hous e,

FBIS has on occasion supplied linguists to work directly for another agency. e. g .• to the FBI to translate Arabic in Washington. FBIS monitors radio press dispatches and reports covered by copyright. These are circulated. within the Gover-nment and stamped "Official Use Only" • . This has gone on for three decades without problems. FBIS has monitored and reported on foreign radio broadcasts of statements and speeches of US citizens such as those by US paws in Hanoi. "Jane Fonda. and Ramsey Clarke.

l::JD WEnD VV. r n o c 1'0""1\'---

Deputy Director for Intelligence Attachments

-3-

S~ET

CIA INTERN~USE ONLY

001.82

MORl DoclD: 1451843

I·

I \

I I

00183

MORl DoclD: l45l843

7 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR:

Deputy Director for IntelligelJ.ce

SUBJECT:

DCS Domestic Activity

To the best of my knowledge, DCS has not engaged in any activity outside the CIA charter or ,that could be construed as illegal. Some of the functions that we perform under HR 1-13f (i) of providing operational support within the US to all elements of CIA and to the USIB-member agencies, however, are perhaps borderline or could be construed as illegal if misinterpreted. For example:

Collect information on possibl~ foreign involvement or penetration of US dissident groups, but only in'a passive manner and only when the source has ,refused to pass the information directly to the FBI.

Collect information on the narcotics trade, but again only 'in a passive manner when the source has refused to pass the information directly to BNDD or the FBI.

001.84

MORl DocID: 1451843

·'

SUBJECT:

DCS Domestic Activity

10 • .Acquire routing slips recording the fact of overseas

telephone calls betwe~n persons in the US and.persons overseas and telephone calls between two foreign points routed through US switchboards. This activity lasted for. approximately six months but has ceased.

. 00185

MORl DoclD: 1451843

II'"

. \I

I i !

00186

"MORl DoclD: 1451843

~T EYES~

7 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR:

Director of Central Intelligence

VIA

Deputy Director for Intelligence

FROM SUBJECT

Director of Current. Intell~gence Activity Related to Domestic Events

1. OCI provided current. intelligence briefings to John Mitchell as Attorney General~ With the approval of the DCI, this practice began in the pre~inaugural period in New York and continued until Mr. Mitchell's resignation as Attorney General; The OCI officer assigned to this duty had a daily appointment with Mr. Mitchell in his office at Justice; 2. The briefings provided were strictly on foreign intelligence, and were a legitimate service for CIA to . provide to an official advisor to the President. who sat on, among other bodies, the 40 Committee. It must be presumed, however, that our man's daily visits were known and speculated on elsewhere in JustiQe. The problem come s in the potential p.re s's treatment: "CIA Officer in Continuous Contact with Mitchell."

A:L:CZLdL U

nellllldil

Director of Current Intelligence

00187

MORI DocID: l45l843 . SEe~':f CTA

INTERN;!, rISE ONT y

7 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR:

Director of Central Intelligence

VIA

Deputy Director for Intelligence

FROM

;

Director of C~rr~nt Intelligence..

SUBJECT

Activity Related to Domestic Events

1. OCI began following Caribb~an black radicalism in earnest in 1968. The emphasis of our analysis was on black nationalism as a political force ~ the Caribbean and as a threat to the security of the Caribbean states. Two DDI memoranda were produced on the subject: "Black Radicalism in the Caribbean" (6 August 1969), and "Black Radicalism in the Caribbean--Another Look ll (12 June 1970). In each a single paragraph was devoted to ties with the US black power movement; the discussion primarily concerned visits of Stokely Carmichael and .other US. black power activists to the Caribbean and other overt contacts. 2. In June 1970, Archer Bush of OCI was asked to write a memorandum with special attention to links between black radicalism in the Caribbean and advocates of black power in the US. The record'is.not'c1ear where this request originated, but i t came through channels from the DCI. The pape~ was to be treated as especially sensitive and was to include material provided by the Special Operations group of the CI Staff .. The CI Staff material was voluminous but did not provide meaningful evidence of important links between militant blacks in the US and the Caribbean. This, in fact, was one of the'conc1usions of the paper. The memorandum was produced in typescript form and given.to the DCI •

00188

MORl DoclD: 1451843

SECMJ':l?

3. For several months in the first half of 1968 the Caribbean Branch wrote periodic typescript memoranda., on Stokely Carmichael's travels abroad during a period when he had dropped out of public view. Our recollection is that,the memoranda were for internal CIA use only" although a copy of one was inadvertently sent to the FBI.

L<ICIlaLU nelllUdlI

Director of Current Intelligence .".

00189

MORl DoclD: 1451843

~F.T

.:r ..

.....

EYES~

7 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR:

Director of Central

Inte11~gence

for Intelligence · Deputy · Director of Current Intelligence Di~ector

VIA FROM SUBJECT

Activity Related to Domestic Events

1. In late spri~g of 1968 Walt Rostow, then Special Assistant to the 'President for National Security, Affairs, tasked the DCI with undertaking a' survey of worldwide ,student dissidence. Confronted by ~mult at campuses like Columbia and mindful of the violence accompanying student outbursts at Berlin's Free University' and elsewhere, Rostow sought to learn whether youthful dissidence was interconnected: spawned by the same causes; financed and hence manipulated by forces or influences hostikto the interests of the US and its allies; or likely to corne under inimical sway to the detriment of US interests. . 2. The paper was p~~pared byl 10f OCI with the assistance of the CA and CI Staffs. -The DDI, D/OCI, and ~et with Rostowto elicit the reasons for his or cue FLesxueht's. concerns and to agree on the sources to be examined,'the research methods to be followed, etc.

3. Written during the summer of 1968, the most sensitive version of' 'Re's=t:le:ss- YO'u·th comprised two sections. The first was a philosophical treatment of student unrest, its motivation, historY, and tactics. This section drew heavily op overt literature and FBI reporting on Students for a Democz'a't.Lo Society and affiliated, groups. . In a. sense, the survey of dissent emerged from a shorter (30 page} typescript study of SDS and its fore~gn ties the same author had done for Mr. Rostow at ,the 'DCI' s request in 00190 December 1967. (We no long~r have a copy.l .

MORl DoclD: 1451843

4. Because of the paucity of information on foreign student movements, it was necessary to focus,on SDS which . then monopolized the field of student action here and . abroad. , A second section. comprised 19 count.ry chapters--' ranging from Argentina to Yugos1avia--and stood by itself as a review of' foreign student dissidence. 5. Because, SDS was a'domestic organization, the full paper' 'Re's't:l'e'ss' You'th~ including the essay on worldwide dissent went only to nine readers. A copy may be in the Johnson Library. . 6. Following the 'pqper's favorable reception by the President. and Mr.' Rostow, the DCI briefed the NSC on student dissent. The sensitive version 'subsequently was updated and sent to the White House ,in February 1969. 7. The less sensitive text was disseminated in September 1968 and then updated and issued again in . March 1969 and August 1970.

Rlcnaru Lenman Director of Current Inte11~gence

OO:l91.

MORl DoclD: 1451843 r .'"

.'.

WARNING This document contains classified information affecting the national security of the United States within the meaning of the espionage laws, US Code, Title 18, Sections 793;794, and 798. The law prohibits its transmission or the revelation of its contents in any manner to an unauthorized person, as well as its use in any manner prejudicial to the safety or interest of the United States or. for the benefit of any foreign government to the detriment of the United states.

THIS DOCUMENT MUST BE KEPT IN COMMUNICATIONS INTElLIGENCE CHANNELS AT ALL TIMES . It is to be seen only by US personnel especially indoctrinated and authorized to receive COMMUNICATIONS INTELLIGENCE information; its security must be maintained in accordance with COMMUNICATIONS INTELLIGENCE REGULATIONS. No action is to be taken on any COMMUNICATIONS INTELLI~ GENCE which may be contained herein, regardless of the advantages to be gained, unless such action is first approved by the Director of Centr,al Intelligence.

TOP Se;CIXET

001.92

MORl DoclD: 1451843

- TOP SflSP~

. ,

EYES ON

7 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR:

Director of Central Intelligence

VIA

Deputy Directpr for Intelligence

FROM

· Director of Current Intelligence · Activity Related to Domestic Events

SUBJECT

1. In late: 1967 OCI participated in the preparation of several short intelligence memoranda aealing with the . foreign connections of US organizations and activists·involved in-the anti-war movement. The main purpose of these reports, prepared at the request of the White House, was to determine whether any links existed between international Communist elements or foreign governmen~s and_the American peace movement. The conclusion reached was that there was some evidence ox ad hoc contacts between antiwar activists at home and abroad but no evidence of direction or formal coordination. 2. In October 1967 President Johnson expressed interest in this subject and ordered a high level interdepartmental survey. " In response to his personal request" to the DCI, Mr. Helms. asked the CI Staff to collect whatever information'was available through our own sources and through liaison with "the FBI and to pass i t to OCI, which was directed to prepare a memorandum from the DCI to" the President. 3; A book mess-age requirement was sent to all stations to report whatever information was- on· hand relevant to this subject. Although ·agent reports on Communist front operations overseas were-of some value, the prlmary source of information on the "activitieS of US activists--and that was quite limited--was sensitive -intercepts produced by NSA, which had been similarly tasked by the ·White House.

~TD EYE"S~

00.193

MORl DoclD: 1451843

~~RETII EY~

4. A draft memorandum was jointly Prepared by OCI and CI Staff. and forwarded to the ·DCI. He passed this typescript memo, dated 15 November 1967, to the President personally. The White House copy is now in the files of President Johnson's papers at the library in Austin. 5. Brief follow-up memoranda were prepared and . forwarded to the White House on 21 December and 17 January 1968. According to our best recollection, no further finished intelligence reports on international connections o£ the peace movement were produced.

XC:::z:;

1L;CC:: c:c

Director of Current Intelligence

TO~PRRT/I EY .

ON~ . '.

00194

MORl DoclD: l45l843

00195

--.-......-

..... ,.~......

MORl DoclD: 1451843

7 May 1973 MEMORANDUM FOR:

Deputy Director for Intelligence

SUBJECT:

Contacts with David Young

VI.,:f

1. In the summer of 1972, I had frequent contacts with David Young. He was in this building under my control once. These contacts related solely to Executive Order 11652 and the NSC directive concerned therewith. Young was apparently at the time in the process of drafting the NSC directive. The visit to the building un~er my control was for 'a briefing on CRS processes for storage and retrieval of documents. and is apparently reflected in the paragraph of the directive concerned with the Data Index. I visited him in his White House office at least twice in the company of an inter-Agency group concerned with the Data Index. 2., In August of 1972,f lalso visited Mr. Youngfs office ill cae company of an inter-Agency group to'discuss CIA compliance with the data index instructions. To the best of my knowledge no one in CRS had any contact with Mr. Young in his role as a "plumber."

,R. c. EISENBEISS Director, Central Reference Service

00196

MORl DoclD: 1451843

7 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR:

O/DDI

SUBJECT~

Involvement In Domestic

1. This memorandum responds to the DDI's request for a listing of any questionable involvements in domestic affairs. I do not believe that CRS is doing anything that a reasonable man could construe as improper.

2. oGRS does, of course, have several programs to acquire still pictures, movies, videotapes

. 3. CRS files do not generally.bear on U.S. citizens or organizations. The biographic filebuilding criteria specifically excludes u.S. nationals unless the person has become of such major importance in the political life of a foreign country that the file is essential. To m knowledge, onl 2 ersons so ualif

have no way to U.s. defectors

00197

MORl DoclD: 1451843

1 )

SUBJECT:

Involvement In Domestic Affairs

4. The CIA Library has several informal snag files intended to aid the librarians in answering the kinds of questions that they .know they will get on a continuing basis. An appointments file is a collection of ' clippings on appointed federal officials: who holds what job when and what is his background? The extremist fil~s are a coll~ction of folders on a variety of organizations and a' few p~ople with intricate organizational links. Any sort of extremism is grist for these particular files., And a fe~ persons, e.g., Rap Brown and Eldridge Cleaver, have dossiers consisting almost exclusively of clippings from public media. These files are unclassified and consist mostly of clippings from the public press: U.S., foreign, underground, scholarly.

5. I am not aware of any other kind of involvement in domestic activities that is not related to development of techniques or logistics

or legitimate traininr of CRS personnel.

n. c. EISENBEISS Director, Central Reference Service

00198

MORl DoclD: l45l843

/ .' ~ ,

00199

MORl DoclD: 1451843

,.:.'.:,

Ie tionable

! ,

NP C Pro ects

:..

,"0

1. .:. /' . . : '.

....

Leaks of Jack Anders

In January 1972. NPre erformed Im ze enhancement techniques on~'IV tapes of" a Jack Anderson s 0'1'1. The· P se was to try to identify . serial ntiIPher's of GrA do ents Jn And rson' s possession. The request was. ~evB1.,on WIG through he Office 0 .Security.·" '.

. '' ,-' . ". -,;' 0"

,2. The PoppY. Project : •• f. .•

,~ ~IC .I~' p;oVi.ded the' ernces" of ne PI ~sis,~ an interagency' , .' ~ . effort to dttect poppy cu1 ivation. II addition the Center has provided the QIDtractual mechanism support 0 the Bureau of Narcotics and

Dangerous Drugs for a mu~t spectral c:r p study by a private company. "

','

•

. :

.. .

'! ..

': " '.:, ,;" ,NPIC has been request to provtde nunber of 1001<5 at domestic :: , coverage for special purpo es •. F.xc:--upl - Include: . ' ' ~ Santa Barbara 01 Spill . , , - Los Angeles Earth ake "

". .,.

,',

':f" "

. .' ":"

,I'·.

. - Sierra Snow (£10 threat), - Current Mississi i Floods

~ :Hurricane Cammile Danage on· t e' Coas·t of the Gulf of Mexico

-. Civil Di5turhan~e in Detroit - 0El? u. S. Data Bas

", I ••

~" '; -:!: .-;.... . ; .~" ':

. .t , •

.. .

:."

. -,

"':

. .'

00200'

MORl DoclD: 1451843

oozo~

MORl DocID: 1451843

8 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR:

DDl

SUBJECT

Sensitive Activities

1. FBIS has been engaged in no activities related to the Ellsberg and Watergate cases.

2. FBIS operat~ons occasionally extend to the domestic arena. From time to t~e, FBIS linguists are made available to DDO or Office of Communications components for special operations (usually abroad) involving close-support SIGlNT work or translation of audio take. On one occasion ' recently DDO, on behalf of the FBI, requested the services of several FBlS linguists skilled in Arabic to work directly, ..for the FBI on a shortterm project here in Washington. The arrangements were made by Mr. Oberg of the DDO Cl Staff~ He said the project was very highly classified and that FBIS participation was approved by Mr. Colby and the Director. FBlS participation was approved by the Director of FBIS after a check with the ADD!. Other examples of sensitive linguistic support work are help in the handling and resettlement of defectors, the recent assignment of an employee to the Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs to transcribe recordings in a rare Chinese dialect, and the detailing of another Chinese linguist on two occasions to assist in the U.'S. military training of Chinese Nationalist cadets. 3. Within its responsibility for monitoring press agency transmissions for intelligence information, FBlS publishes and distributes some material which falls in a "gray" area of copyright protection, libel, and privacy international communications. Pre~s services controlled by national governme~~s and transmitted by radioteletype without specific addressees, e.g. the Soviet TASS service and the PRC's NCNA, are monitored by FBIS'and the material is disseminated without restriction. The legality qf this has been affirmed by decisions of the Office of General Counsel.

00202

SftJSiTIV£ ,

MORl DoclD: 1451843

,! ~ -. ':~..

4. The routine FBIS monitoring of foreign radio broadcasts often involves statements or speeches made by u.s. citizens using those radio facilities. Examples are statements made or allegedly made by American POW's in Hanoi~ by Jane Fonda in Hanoi and by Ramsey Clark in Vietnam. At the request of FBI and the Department of Justice, and with the approval of the CIA Office of General Counsel, we have on occasion submitted transcripts of such broadcasts to the Dep~~tment of Justice as part of that Department's consideration of a possible trial~ In such cases, we have been required to' submit names of FBIS monitors involved, presumably because of the possibility they might be required as witnesses. (In one case in 1971, an FBIS staff employee was directed to appear as an expert witness in the court-martial of a Marine enlisted man charged with aiding the enemy in a broadcast from Hanoi.) FBIS views all this . with misgivings. Monitoring of such broadcasts is incidental and we ru~ attribution of their news to FBIS, and we should not be considered policemen maintaining surveillance of' traveling Americans.

1 ·1

J!;.

!i.

Director Foreign Broadcast Information Service

-2-

'SfCBET SENSItlVE-

00203

MORl DoclD: 1451843

~-,

....J •••

". _:~

•• ••••

'OM,..

,.:

-:_.......

',_.

~.~.

......

.... j ' \

o i f j l:;"

":~,., ");Ji c~

v J r':"

- _-.__

r';:;~TE"

-..

_-~.-

_.'"

L;~~~~·,:~=:~~:;;;"~';;~;'·-j~~~=1;~~~~~~~Ji)~:=~;-;~~-'::~i: ~.::-';;~;;~~ I-- .'~7 J

,..., .uDO

1 I

:~., L. i

'.;"'"

~1j: ~:' : .·' ;

1(;

1{j\ J

S.t > :-.r.Y " . . ." -/..-/' . 'J _ _ /1 . . 'r··... ' ... -------.--- .._-.. ..-:-J..- i j C- -- ••....•. - • . . -- ----'f"I.~··l_<.__ :..-<.;..:_.~";....... : j ../.--~. I :;;~".: .., -,:7./.. -. \ . /~~

_:_..:::.

':-

. .

-, IY--;'jl--l •.

-r-r.;»

.;':,. i._

--------------,.,.-,-._---,;------- ----------'--:

.... . ,

T 14.

15.

.'., ....'.

. .:'

____ •

INTERNAl USE.ONlY

61 0u~oir.~~~sD""""'S"!"'E,.CRI'PIE~i---El· COIUIDEnTIAl

fORM 3-62. •

••• _

•••• _-:--_

;-._.

_ ..

' . .

••

•••

•

•••

".'

'."

"._

''''

....

• •

._.

•••••• _ .

.... - --.... -_....

-~....-...~ ---;-~---

MORl DocID: 1451843

1_-

SUBJ}~CT :

D:x;u::Jen t11. 1.:10n S1.':..:Fort for Use in the , Un.l t e d Stv.tes

:.1.. As you ;,:1,:;:0 awace -I.:h:1.8 c;: Jic:; pl'ov:Ldes docl.::::<cnt support for a variety,of covert activities.

L.-~-----;-:;--:;-:;----;---~-:-----;;-;:;-;-------c;---' Specif i c use is 110 t always available to this office a.nd should pr-oper-Ly com.e from

the requesting office who' can provide the details. U.S. alias documentation use in the United Sta~es is approved by the Office of Security and normally -ha s the concurrence of .. Central Cover Staff or FI and.CI Staffs. Requests received by this office 'from outside the Cls.ndestin.e Service are approved by an appropriate office q:f' thaDDO.

2. A r.eview o£ this Officers document support files £or 'the period 1 January 1972 to date,indicates that the following number- of U.S. alias document r-e que s ts wez-e fulfill,ed for 'probable use in the United States. ''l'he statistics below are broken down by requester:

OOZ05 ".

MORl DoclD: 1451843 f..

·-oozu~

MORl DoclD: 1451843 ,

·.A ft 0'£.1.'","' :,.\j V tr~\:'J<Jif

MORl DoclD: 1451843 ..

. .'

! '.

0020'8.

MORl DoclD: l45l843

~~'

Director

Off5 c.e of ·Tt;:chnie2.1'Sf;:1.'vice

cc : lJD/Sg:T

-:..:.

MORl DocID: 1451843

O'IB/D

.-;.

, ,

1 :

.r·.

". -,

,. 9.

10.' LTSD"]MPS:FUer----'--'--,·· I

faJ

\.'V\.t

11.

I-

12.

-->

L-

13.

14.

15.

002.10'

-'-...

FORM

EJ C8fiFiBEliTIAL

3-62 ___ R

._~...

••• _

•. ,

•••

__.• '. __ 0'._

••_ ...... _ .... _

. _........_ ...._••. _.

INTERNAL O USE ONLY

D UN(lASSIFlED

MORl DoclD: 1451843

IL.--_ _I

" '. '.:'.:. ::. ,1.•.: .J;..a.1;'?~~i:n-·197.1· (;DeG~m:9~r > .. r. q-#li~v:'e) :fh,e; ]J;eputy -, Dire,ctor ."":. f0i.::~(~B:e ;,~p.a;s,~itt2b£fice > ~Be;J?a4~~nt;"O;(State, (lYfr•.RQbertJo!:U::'s;on)

.. ....:

c·'

. - .:~.iP£~~a).l:Y~;~~;~~.e., o.n.~~he;#i~~~I;rat ~Q:ffi.c~ ·.;mignt..D.o:r:ro,v.a ;'sr:!1all

~~{~:~ ~

~~~:~~'~i~

·:I;i~'ff;,.:s;~tativ.:..e's:'of,.a£oreign:,goV'e~.nnl:ent~ .. '":. '.

:'"

. ....

I conv,eyed this. requ~st the.the~~hief>D and.subsequently held severa s i on s .V4:1;~_1z~~esenta.tiv.es of QUI' I Pf£t:c~. 'It was ~~cided to loan :f:tI;e:':iJ?,;a;-~~P.'o-J,':t.Qffi.·ce.', a- small cornrne-r ci.a'L.r ecord'er . (N oraleo . c.a·.s·s~tte·Re·corder> Model.150), which we had in stock. , .' . ", '2.

A' ·r..e;'p:r,~s~ntati.ve"-Qi"a~r Train~ng B~·an~h. [ land I·'de:1.i~r:e.d);be·'::Ij':ecorder. to ',lyfiss J$1:'1igh~ ~ :=zx.!.lce ~ ; I·:iiemonstxa:ted. the recorder I 5 capabi.lrti.es and::instructed ~r in its us e, -She did not seem: too pleased at tl:re:"J.?~kcirding quality; however> the :recordex Wa's."lett with her. .. ....

,:0,.

,I:

. 4. On ..t his date (21 May 197-3) I asked Mr. Johnson. to .qh:e:ck:.0p.the:status of.~,the r;e,~o:t'ii~1:':. He said it Was.never used i'n. any 'way. I ,therefor-e . retrieved it from.. the-Bass·port Office 'arid c;i:elivered it"to Tr.aini:qg Branch

0021.1. •• I

.... :"f-:.. .. _.. __.

MORl DoclD: 1451843 ".~

.....\.

~ ~.-'

"'.,

-- .

.' ". .:.;

.' ',....

-',

"; ~

.4··.·:.

-r-.

-r,

.5A ;~./ _.';', :;;.

. ....

::.::

. ..-:...... : '.:'.'.,:.. .

'.,

-.~

~'.

'r:

. . " .....:. ","

.·t ... · "

,. . -::.

" , ':.~.' ··~:~7 .~-'

.._-~_._~-_._-.~------'--~" (~ •• >

._----_...._. __ .•.

.. "---'-.,---_

....

"'-.

-._-'C---,

1·

.. -- ...... "ORM NO..

.....Y ""

.:-=--..-_- ...

It.:;PLACCS P"O"M :lSot

238

WHICH IS OQSOI.ETE

R_'.

._ ...

... 'I~EC'-C'-rORIGI';'-

DATE: OF DOC

DATE REC'D

...

CONTROL NO,

~EF'~RENCE: .·POINT· 0'1" 'FILING

S U S P E N 5 E .O A T E 'CROSS

DATE OUT

TO FROM

ROUTING.

DATE: SENT

SUBJ.

I I.

'i1 l!

00212

'::::==:::-:-:-:::-----;.:....;-,~=~~--.-=::-=-:==-=-----I-----I---NO"REPLY COURIER NO, ANSWERED

... 1

MORl DoclD: 1451843 .. ,

./ .

"",

....

»: : " MEMUriMWUM FOR: '

. ,

.\ .

..).

'Cart" Duckett brought this up and ~.aid. he is very uncomfortable with what. Sid Gottlieb is -reporting and thinks the Director . w ould be illadvised to say he is acquainted .with this program. Duckett plans to scrub i.t down with Gottlieb. but obviously cannot dOft this afternoon.

1 I

BeJi"'t'vans .8' MaX 1973

FOR...

Ho.

I ·AUG 5C

(DATE) .

0021.3

REPLACES FoORM fO'IOi '01 WHICH MAY BE USEO~

{C7. " ,'.

.. ....

. 'I

.',

","l,..:~ ~~.::~:;-.:.. - ..- _.-.. __ ,,_ "_ . .,: ;}: -;

. ...

,;. . ....,~ , ..••.:....:.:...--

. ..• .._

.. ' , ' ..

~..

'~~~f/~-:-"'"

.,-

.....

~-";

~ '.

~'"

: . ~ '"

•

...

':',

'. ;.:i·::~!~:··~·~:.:.:t '.:'.' . ...

.. <.. ;... L.

",.

:,::_~:.,

...

'. -. ~.~/~ ..-:-

----------

MORl DoclD: 1451843

_-_.-._-_._.- ... - . _.---. -.-.. . -------. .-- .-.-.-...--------......

S:dr;c¥ G,~;_tlieb C:1':fO'f, TSD

:'.~E

'----

------------------+-------J---------.---'-

12.

13.

14.

15.

FOIfM

3-62

61 0 us·io~:.~~~us 0

SECRET

00214 INTERNAL o CONFIDENTIAL o USE ONLY

·0 UNCLASSifiED

MORl DoclD: 1451843

::,,;,,~

~ i •• t;

11EMORANDU~ . .1 }"OR:

. De puty Di r c c to r for ,Science & Technology ,

1. 'I'e c hn i ca.I Services Dlvi s ion.l s charter (CSI 1-8) requires that it provide technical assistance to both CLl\. operations and other activities as may be directed by tl-..c Depu tyDi r e cto r for Operations.

2. Over the years the chief non-CIA recipients of this support have been the Depart:ment of Defense, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs, I:mrnigration and Natura.lization Scrvi.ce , De pa r trrie nf of State, United States Postal Service, Secret Service, Agency for In te z-na ti ona.I De've Iopm errt, and the 'White House. ,_, 3. 'While vary-ing widely among the,different recipients, these services have included training and rn a te r iaIs , and in a few instances participation in the fields of audio and visual surveillance', secret writing and related cornrnuni ca ti orrs , .pe r sona.I protection. aHas docurnen tafiou .and questioned docu:ment exa:mination, di s gut se , conceahnent de-vices;' electronic beaconry, illicit narcotics detection, and counte;r-sabo'tage!ter;rorisln. 4. In :most instances requirements fo r-fhi s-rsuppor-t are "re cerved by TSD through higher echelons (Office of the Director' or Deputy Director for Operations). Uril e s s the service involved is a t r i vi a.l or. continuing one, the request is referred to the Foreign Intelligence Staff Departmental Coordination Group for coordina ti on and approval at the app r-op r-i a.te Agency levels. Approval within TSD 'by the Chief of Operations or Development and,Engineering and the Chief of TSD or his Deputy also is required. 5. The .attachment lists the primary services provided to the organizations named in Paragraph two.

E2 IMPDET CL BY OS909~

002:15

------------------MORl DoclD:1451843

...

-. 2 -

of f,,);.~;;,:·d ~-l:·:t.~o:1:!.lldr:..;ntity '·~~lt"tz!r:\.:1-!t:11~{)11 by {V-,-. of J i: C z,:(: i: C ~ ~ I': J.; <11H:1 ty pc of d C'C"t.il :'li": ~:: La ti(,. -1 r (":tl;':(:3 i·(~d.. .:\ r ,;,;r.1 ~.! » s t for dl~n;. c d ar ca dO(,,1l1Ylerd~i.t~ollf i crn a. D})O Avc a j)iv·1:::::")jl1.;; !10110r(~d ;:t[t:er p r cp e r vaIi-Ja ri on. }""'rec . .v o r Id (~I.}-.-·t.~:"C(·:'l!'..\i.?.Ol1. Ina>," l'equil'c ~OD'le extra coo:c('E~~ation !loWGver. \ J::.::;::::tl)CC

'),3D):; c or' l i..r, olI -,/,1 ,-"""-';'/"';"'.f 1''/0 b ro ac d cr;",-·,·;.,l.· ' ..... t .... ..... ~, 'J I..':;) '0 1. .. ~. ~ - J . . . . ., . " i. t

(/;

-r

7. Unless ordered o rhc zwi s e by higher Agency au~~".)rity.' no U. S. do curriezrta ti ori is issued by TSD Headquarters without, prior coordination with the Office of Security. and the Central Cover Staff. TSD Regional Bases require at least the va.Iida-, tron of U. S. documentation requests by the COS. or his designated r cp r e s en ta ti ve , of ~!lC requesting Station. Because it could be usedl . ' : lno U~ S. Birth Cer'tiflcate 'IS Issued WllhOOL approval 0 me uud, ' via Central Cover Staff. Backstopped major credit cards are issued by Office of Security, not TSD.

8. Provision of forged documentation to non-DDO requesters, whether they be CIA or other Agency requesters. a lways requires' approval of rrori-v'I'S'D offices. Support to the military for instance would be validated by PI Staff/Departmental Coordination Group at HeaCiquarters or by the COS overseas having responsibility"for coordination of the operation. BNDD requests a r-e coordinated' with DDO/NARCOG. Requests for documentation oflnimigration and Naturalization Service is coordinated via the Alien Affairs Staff. 9. Authentication items are is sued on .a loan basis and must be returned to TSD or acco~nted for. After any documentation has been issued. TSD'retains photographs and records of such support until the documentation has been returned to TSD. If the material is not returned 'after a reasonable time. the requester is z-errrinded of the outs tand-ing documentation. r" '

/ -.

/.., ' /,;' ",/ - 1'/ , ':>:/--1 A '/: ,~i.(' , -7"";'

." --I, I...: . . -. ..' .. :,.,... -:; ,K..../_ .: . , '

Attachment D'istribution: " o & 1 - Addressee,w!att

","...,

.; SidneY,.,Gottlieb Chief Technical Ser'vi ce s Division

00Z1.6

MORl DoclD: l45l843

Do o urrre rrt s , di s:bu1.se, '~O)1Ct:·;:r.J.11·~._~n.t dev-!.ces 7 Se';:l·c;t "\.vr . i ti ng , f~~lr.~S a r . d sC1.!.lSi c o u n t e r ir.:... i r g e r i c y (~{:(l CQ1.1:r:.tl';X ~~2:.bo!:~.ge c c u r s e s be ahe to all g t=10111.i;~11tS of tl1e trnorrt of Defense and certain e Lerrre nt s of the Special E'o r c e s , All requests are eoordinated wi th the FI De pa r-trn ent.al, Coo r di.nati.on Group' at . Headquarters and ,...r ith the Chief of Sta t i on s ovez s e a s , In turn these elements fur ni s he d TSD wi th e xe rnpl.a r s of foreign identities documents, foreign cachets, foreign intelligen.ce secret writing. systems, foreign' intelligence .concealment devices. SeleCted audi o r equi r ernent.s have b e err.fu r ni s hed overseas for CI -t yp e cases. j ..

have

eufurni

i.nt c

Il.i

en c

De pa r

Fe-de-ral Bureau· oi Investigation .At th~··r.~quest of the FB(we cooperate with the Bur~au in a fe"\v audi.o-, Eiu:n-eillance ope r a ti on s against sensitive foreign targets i~ :t;b;~·.United States. BU:i:".eau of .Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs Beacons... cameras, audio and telephone devices for ove::seas:op~r.ations, identi.ty docurr.ent s , car-trailing devices, SRAC, flaps and 'seals and training of selected pe.r s ormeL . . responsible for use thereof has been furnished this Bureau. All.requirements are sent to DDO/NARCOG for coordination with area divisions and for action by TSD If appropriate. Requests Overseas are coordinated wi th the COS or his designee before action by TSD is taken. I'rnmigration and Naturalization CI analyses of foreign passports and visas, guidance in developing tarnperproof alien registration cards, Ihave been furnished the SerVlce.Requests are forwarded dlrectIy to TSD for coordination within TSD if technical, with the FI Departmental Coo rdinati.on Group if oper-

ational.

00217

MORl DoclD: 1451843 ',;;.

D:;])arhilel'J!; of S:,a~:c _ OM "'_ '_'_'h _ _ " _ ••. __ ....... • _ ._ ~

_ _ ••

. "erl;cJ~r:l'''';·:.l :S!:·"1:1·.; •. .s :~·:.1.i:.I:..;..n~·:~ f;~l dr-;'Ij·:.·}.oi,;1r.tg a nC\\t.TJIli~\;d. i.~... .. ~ 'J n f.::3 L,f :G T ,-: j :~ 11 :-.;:-,\ -s ~:t) 1. ;:5, I,.::::. r ..;;1. I ?::.'l,);:iug

:~..:~: .. ",I::!; J.'?d.:~ ~·l)Oj... t J

c I.:>::~ ~ L·:'" :';l (~)f~;'> .::011 s) f(JL ../'-,:U":~~':::,s S ;;.do s :;: i.."i~)~)lietl tb e St.:? ~:e D':·:e,-:..:rf"::1:1c::ut. In a(~c1it.:i'011 ,a:naly s e s and (;;:-~posure b l a c1, l:..:.d:.t(:r f)l:-e:L"'=1i:io:.ns a 6 c.i n s t tIle Urii.t e d States :,.l.b:r.o~~d rria _~~.11 gj:~:11)11ics j:";''';':;!:Le:rflJ::::.ts ~o:r~::."2_:L"'(!r::d to J.'SD fo r f'ur tlve r ":;.::()r'~~~;';·.·:t~.!)11 -·,,::!:'·.~rl 1}1e :81.,.:-is10n. 'I'h e Depa r-trne nt of St.a.te i\Lt:nish~s (::i~j:'-;2h:,l'S of ,foreign pass?orts, fo r e i gn visas andintl-:eFast passports orr.a priority basis. :1 J

.,1

~:ler ~I onnc

h a

v c

b e

e n

a r e

a r

Postal Seryice The Offi ce of Chief Postal Inspector has had selected personnel attend basic surveillance photographic courses, has been furnished foreign postal information and has been the . recipient of letter bornb analyses, furnished t==]typewriter a na.Iy s e s , Re qui r ern ent.s are coordinated with the DDO and ~DDO:lEA. The, Post Office 11:as furnished TSD ' with exempl"ars of letter bornb s ~ird , . ". IWe al~o have an arrangement wrrn crre l .... OS~ Uillce 1-0 eXdHlute .'J.nd reinsert a 'lo,\y yolUIne ~f certain foreign mail arriving in the United Stat.e s.,

Secr'et Service Gate passes, security passes, passes for Presidential campaign" ernbl ern.s for Presidential vehicles; a secure ID photo sys tern have been furnished this Serv-ice. Blanket. approval for graphics support has been granted to the Deputy Di r e ctoz--fo r 'Operations. In each case TSD requests approval from the noo.'

U. S. Agency for International Development We furnish instructors to a USAID-s onsored,Technical Investigation Course (Counter Terror) at

- 2 -

0021.8 \.

MORl DoclD: l45l843

(. ; •

~, .'

• I

White E·..r us e Statioll l :: r y , spedal H1ClllOrarJcla,

\ .

11"101d5

of the Gz o at

~31::;;"1 have b e e n f·\:.: r}1.i.:=; lJ !:;Q th I:: ~?oci2..1 Sec r\~ta~r'/. r:Plj ~ }:'.; ~!1.lt)r J)i.cecto1.'" for Ol).:~:r:~t~C:)l1S 1::; '.~·'~)J~1.~i·;d of -;"b...;~eMrecr.::.i:L""(;1"(ft'3nts.

Police Respresenting Washington. Arlington. Fairfa~ld Alexandria . During the period 1968 -'1969 a series of cla s s e s reflecting basic' and sui:veillance photography. basic audio, locks and picks,' countersabotage and surreptitious entry were given ~o selected rn erribe r s from the ab ove rrie rrti.on e d cities. Overall training was approved by the' Director of Centeral Intelligence and -in turn validation was required for each course fr-orri the Director of Security.

00219·

---------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

:...j ,

...

j :0': • • •_

• • _.~._

_.,

':'(T:

. . ,}> ~.

.....

i ..l

'"-

~._

•

t ....

I. i, ..

':; . : :.'{

l•

- .. ., ~

••••

...

.....

•••

.'"

.,.

•• 4'

:<.

_ •• ';:-•••

.,...

-.. _ ... _.. -.. .-,. ..- ' - - '." -.-

:'::-•.•... '::1)

'... '. .: f

i ..~. '., '". / :'.i... .' .

I ._~

~..

I. r.:~}~::.1.?~:1:-tti·Jl1.S of rt'SD su;)port to other U. S. Gov e r nrn errt ag cnc i es ,

-.tr.r !'Crt rr . 6~~-Ut~LIt

J-------------+---f----=-j,--:---t -

14.

00220

15.

fORM 3-62

INTERNAL o CONFIDENTIAL o USE ONLY

o UNCLASSIFIED

MORl DoclD: 1451843

-----,--

. . . .- . _• • •

••••

• • • , , _•

• _ _ •• _ . _ _ A ••••

... _ _ . . . _

. _ .. _ _ • • • •_

~rSD has h.ad a

close ·.~/orking r cta ti on ship w ith the F~:I e-:f;r tl:.e IJi!·st levY yc a c s . ·.r~1e i:",l:·I is' the on.l)r organj:;~;)..tit)ll that ha s been fully b r ie Icd on. TSD aud i o techniques a nd e qu i prn cn t, The fo How i ng are situations where TSD equipment and guidance we r e involved in operations:

OOZ21.

MORl DocID: 1451843

•

; ...•.. i: -

I I

- 2 -

SteRR- .-

0022Z

'."

MORl DoclD: 1451843

"';';DD,.::;:o P.33 ..-rs 8 ; ~·0.y 1:973'

EXGcu~ive

SUBJECT:

Offic2r

.Contacts with Dome s t Lc Police Organiza:t.ions

1. In Dec. ,:ber 1~63, July 1969 and December 1970, SDB provided ba.sic countersabotage familiariza.:tion training for selected members of the Washington metropolitan area police departments. The traini?g vlas. given at the Fairfax County, police pistol and rifle range. Authorization for the trainj,ng carne from mjp and Ch:tf~f, Office of Secur-i·ty.

2 •. o~ occasion dpring the 'past few years, under the auspices ·of ~he Law Enforcement Assis~ance Administra~ion of the Departmeht of Justice and with the approval of CI Staff and Office of. Sec-uri ty, SDB provi.ded -c:raining and familiarization ~o police officers of several domestic police deparDuents'in the uses of the Explosives Residue Detection Technique and Trace Metals Detection Technique. These techniques had been decla'ssi£ied and are ·currently available to the law enforcement community. The National Bomb Data Center pUblishes periodic: guidance in their uses. ,

3. In order to augment the SDB mission responsibilities in. the field of countersabotage and counterterror, .SDB officers have in the past two years visited, under appropriate covers, the explosives disposal units of the New York City police department, Dade County (Mifu~i) Florida Dept. and the Los Angeles Police Dept. Also, in March 1973; two SDB officer.s attended ·.the· Explosives' and Ordnance Disposal Conference in Sacramento, California, sponsored by LEAA~ When the recent letter bomb menace began in September 1972, our liaison with the NYCPD bomb squad paid off in that we had complete information letter bomb construction in hours, 'enabling the ~gency to make worldwide disseminatio "thin a da .

00223

MORl DoclD: 1451843

Ij.1 ::'1.d(1it:ioJl t'J r)l'tillt:~n:.,{ o f ' ':: . . .1. 1C·1.15 r~G.s:;.:cs n nd i cT.:? 11 t, j. f 5. c a t:: t:~ 11. r> :.:~ b J.. (~!:1~3; ·i\~)·}) : .. ::~:; ill :-:'1) s~11:'1) 1.5- rd -~;:e s ec i-e t S (~j." v 5~ c o \\:i t h SC~~:'1 e 1J. S. ,1.]. :.::.s ;~:o c u ·t:J;l.-~ :1.. t i .:-1i1 : 1

00224

MORl DoclD: 1451843

...

. .

f"d:C

'.P::.:! r.i.:.·~.t :'(';;-',::11: of ';~:':(;]:);:i( ;,1 "i.·!i~~(:';l;B hy r:r:.';·i).';g ?.r~!"h::h 1\·~~.:.; ·~::~":.!:.:cte(i (1.1,.:c5 i:a =.. ;le ·t-·\,.....~~,::.l ""j' Oc t ob e r - 26 :-~:.". ,.::::G.t':I"· J.~16'8. 'fhe J"oJ.l,c:·:ij·ig sch\:I:~tl:J,.] ,'}lfl ::::'i)jCi.:ts :·.-(;l'"C i.~~·.C;tJ iiI

the.tniining of s Lx pc::,lJc:::.:s o f the 2';c:t:c:(~polit;li1 Po Li.ce Dcp artr-cn t , A.

7-].8 OctobeT -

C,:· .. f."t e~n t

Sljr~·,~ptitf~\Js ~~ :.:: :Lh. t :

0 1':· ~3 ub j c: c t

Entry .

Familiarization and identity of American locks.

Hetho·d of :il2.nipulatioH of Loc ks .

Methods and techniques of conducting Surreptitious Entry Survey.

21-29 October - Photo Survei11anc~ Content of Subject taught: 'I.

Fimiliarization with cameias: 'Pentax Spotmatic, Leica, Nikon F, Robot and Polar~id.

Lens, telephoto and wi de angle.

Exposure Meter, Tripod~; Bowum, etc.

Film, film, processing and print processing.

Document copy exercises.

Night Photography and nigh~ exercises~

. 7.

TV· Surveillance.

18-23 November - Audio Surveillance Content of Subject taught: 1.

Microphones, wire Lmp ed.arrce.s and line amplifiers. (Shure MC-30, Sennheiser "MM-22, RCA - BK - 6B and RCA BK-12a all commercially available)

RF commercial transmitter. (Research Products, Tracer Inc., Scientific Research Corp.)

00225

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.:s.

:~.

t_,_

···.t1 .1

"r •

:r C 1. r ',P!: :'..•~ 'r': ~)s. fo)."c.-

;. :.d

.. '~ t.'j;~ l

(>.',

...

~}~ -'l

;. L] '.' ~" . c t , ·:·~",::\:t r'i~ll):-.) ((~~.":~'I)J0·~.C

;:··-'·t~~::l

:::.},,-- 2 l~"~:j 1.

.l,'

:!t

f:\':·.il:·1;]e ~'l) .~,..'\.:c~;·":~:·~\;r1t '~'."7{.l l· . . c -,:~:'.

v-: 11:i r: 11

(:.;~; 3,:.. i)~

i . ..: :S.

>.~

:"Ilt

~ ... ~ i.~ ",1...: 5) .

RC:C: ....· :rI?!..: .. ::; (:!\':r,c:x.-GOl-2 Stereo, ~~_.:;; .)TC 'T-~:04 ?,~(}',a, :":~','_:1' "~OGOL, all CGTi:J;1(;.rd.al1y obt,:-,5]'~:.~.:)J.~).

e n d i\'all t,,::s t or f: t5. on.

1. This prDblem entailed an operational cicrcise ag a ln s t t h r e e of our S;:,fc-sties. The StUr}(-71tS had to s urv e y , case and pe e t r ot c t1~,(:se Lo c a t i cn s using surreptitious entry, photography and audio surveillance,. - - - - - 2. -,

All

been terminated.

atl- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

II.

After this first NPD group other police departments personnel trained using the identical safe sites and enp Loy Ln g the s arne s ub j e c t matter and commercial cqu i p merit as i.ndicated above were taught on the f o Ll ow i.n g dates'. The Fairfax Police Department and Arlington Police Dep~rt mente Date - 21 October - 10 December 1968. Six officers, 4 from APD and 2 from FPD.

III. In 19~9 additi~nal offi~ers from the Metropolitan POlice DeparL~ent, FaIrfax PolIce Department and Arlington Police Department received identifical training as that stated • abo~e: .In total 24 police officers were trained in our facIlItIes.

OOZ26

---------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

.J, .

.,-/

,I • • •• ~

... ,

i."

>" ·C: -

: ·1 ..J

'.'

...

~.,;

. ',' .:" ,.'

~.:.".

,.", ",: l

Ia:---:--~---J-------l---+-,-..---l

. -.;.

'- 1 .. '~J.' ~-

,,_.

... ........

\., '\

---- -

__ ~ '.

-' "---.

__ ,-_

. l

..'

r.' ._-( \ ~-;:~. \, ,--..;.

.--_.~~-

1. ... \:... . c.

" ...

cI '-; --,-C~,-,.,

00227

'610

INTERNAL CONFIDEHTrAl o o USE ONLY '"noH' [xl ~

USE rRfVlOUS

UNCUSSIHED

MORl DoclD:

~.;::.:~.~:-- ·~.n~:):··I

F(jR.:

. ~~;.~:,~jtl

·':i:t·i...~~:t.c·.t"

~:Cl."

Sc·j '·.J.;I.~.~

1451~43

z"._~li

T(;t.:!·;.:' 1,:: Ic,sY

SUBJECT

Repeated Survey of ORD for NonForeign Intelligence ~ctivities

The, 7 May survey has been repeated and refined with respect to all ORD services or dealings with other'a~encies on domestic, non-foreign matters. In ~ddit~on, this report covers all our'acti::rities.deallng wlth the research 2n~ develop2ent of lnteillgence eq~ipment for foreign ~se Khich has been tested in the United States and mi ghz have collected d omes t i c information. Again, each-member of ORD available today was asked either. directly or "through his supervisor to provide the above requested information, vhe the r he wa s directly Lnvo Iv ed OT not. 1\'e have used'all diligence to search our records available to us during' this' time period to. ensure this is a complete and factual :list. .

I.· ~ayre .,5te3enS

I .

Director of Rese.arch &- Development Attachments: 1 Contacts with Other Government Agencies 2 Domestic Tests

00ZZ8

---------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

CONTACTS WITH OTHER 'U.S. GOVER~~ENT AGENCIES WHICH COULD OR HAVE RESULTED IN USE OF CIA-DEVELOPED . TECHNOLOGY IN ADDRESSING'DOMESTIC'PROBLEMS

Executive Office of the President ORD represents DD/S&T on the R&D Sub-Committee . of the Cabinet Conuni ttee for International Narcotics .. Control that is concerned with research support of 'the narcotics control problem. (Dr. Leonard Laster, OST) Office of Telecorrununications Policy Techhiaal surVeill~nce. cotintermeasures and phys Lca I s ecur Lty .i.nfo rma tion \·r a s exchanged ,d th

them.

Bureau of Narcqtics and Dangerous Drugs (BNDD) Techniques and equ Ipmen't for n av i ga t Lor; and tracking was discussed ,with BNDD.

IBNDD)

IDi'it,_')

n ,.. l.'1 .'", 't}t . ..... _ r> Lr we r e p r cc e s s e d t n• _~l'liJ ....... Th e 50 1.1: ( ( > . ' 0 ~ t, I.'::: t c'l.irC ~ \.;a s u t°i.:·::(L!J ~·ti:.. '-I.

L-

BNDfij

~, ,

002.cg

MORl DocID: 1451843

iJ. S. (',. ;-.:; ~'."-"':'lt ~~ I.; :;,!..i 11 c; d .;;1 1.: s C of CTAD:.:: "~.-.:~ 1 C iii,.:(1 '.1'_' c ': J: (~ 1 iJ S=, y'" .; 11. '\ ·.~,~1 :t' .... .: ::; .~ ~1.S D c=--:~ t: st.: l: i"', ,.. . ]-;1:::(;1$

r.:-:T:n (cG::lt d ) \ 1

::~hDD ··.·e.5

given ·P~·"'TI.i-:,S.\C':l i.n tho L,J]. of 1972

°t.o :c"~r-(:i\"'(~ r~1.·~·:1)o::::'1.1s ':E'}~(::1 ,:. t:~i~I:· .. r::,:.' . c,

a. Ra d a r Pc o p Le Dct e c t o r

d~::\ ,·;J.t::i}(·~l

IBNDD)

for

Tn c , ,

c:c:i:.(:(::Ti1l11g

(;:~o.

~NDDJ

'-----------,-----'

USIB Technical Surveillance Countermeasures Committee Continuing contacts wcire maintained with the Lnt e l t i gence COTIIIi1Unity regarding technical surveillance countermeai~rs and physical security. This exchange of infol~ation, reports,·and equipment has been conducted und e r the auspices of USIB TSCC and involves State, FBI~. Secret Service, NSA~ DIA,. Army, AF, and . Navy.

State Department. Two contracts for development of countermeasures funded jointly. with the State Department.

techn~ques were

00230 -.

-----------------MORl DoclD: l45l843

~~ : . ~. .

~iJ 9,:;J:r:l':

Ccn t:~ .:;r~'l:lr:}l

I •. :

s L' 3 ~:1

(~·~··]f.1

~)'l~

(~"i..!: o r :Ii~\"e

])C:..~~\:·l,:,i."jcll ''cq<.;;",.;1f)}.I,:g>r

t,r S. It

G~:'·& ':.";0 __, ::::",It' ;"..~.g '.:;"'11": j ,'." S

l".:(,.:.~:! ";-,:::<}

j 11

TIl ;.~~e

. \·~~!:r~s s ij:.i

of (~J.:\' l)C';j~~;.:.:;t -;.. c

P;'I~' 1". .1. ..:) S

S{):::e of rhc l\n(~ I.:l1:.:)·~·~~."COL :L:.~~) e.:;. ~ S~:..-i.·c.~~~l~~]l a r c ~~·l.~·;~l;i)·.ctc~(.l =---=y t~l,,:\ to c.... ·~~Je.]. ou radio nuclide sampling a~d detection techniqu~s ~nd ~~i\""er L,zl:··_~.i.;.~,:tory·,

devices. These Laboratories have used sampling techniques developed fOT CIA to mea sur e cems nuclear p l ant; r0J.(;3.Ses. , . (Ivlr . B. Bens on, ABC)

At the request of.AEC Security Officer, Mr. Richard Cowan, the walls of the office of the Chairman of the ABC (then Mr. Schlesinger) wc r e X-rayed. The operation occurred,one evening and Has an attempt to resolve some anomalies', .created by the us.e of the )

< - - - L-

(Mr. Richard Covan, AEC)

. I

--------

Lal" Enforc'ement Ass 1.stance Agency (LEAA)

Reports and information about the ORD-developed Adhe-sive-.Restraint, Non-Lethal Incapacitation System we re- made available to Department of .Jus t Lce , .LEAA in Augus t 1.97"2. If zhey developed the sys t em , it would be used for civilian cr owd and riot' contro.l. (Mr~

Les Schubin, LEAA)

Technical surveillance countermeasures and physical .securi ty infcrma tion wer e exchanged wi·th· LEAA •

'--------

00231.

MORl DoclD: 1451843 ... ~ ~'~'::. '.'~:' .'. .

. '. ;.,

:;-..:.... : ':.

.: . . ' .

.',

. ".

:f:·r:

(~,:·l1i:,;C1.:;

~.'::;·;~11

(.J;.~_,:.~..

iJ.S.

.. -: .,' -

<:.<-:

:";:'

.: '. .' .. , '.

'.;

;'::,:'

_.-:;,.--

~~: . .;:~:fJ ..

,.....' -

::':'.

....

t'~\~':·..t·\r:::·~i.";~1.t

..\i::".~:·~cIcs

1'.1dt:h CC:i)J.tl -:>1" E:.,·,-e ~~(~S:.TItJ·<l In Us e oC.CIA-· T~ Co ,:-C! Lc 1"': d. r~; C" ;:.TAO1.:..1 ~~}- '; ~1 ~\.: ~ ~'.! :,.. . :.;S S 1.;1 g DQ;:1C~ t ic . Pro bJ.'e:',.\S

~~~:::~:.~1 ~:.\lEl.

,:: :. :. : = =--- - - '.·15· 1",,,';',,,, ~·:.1·;J]·""-·d "0 '1""(';1~1l"V "'·~n·"'1--j·J'\"'~'.A. ...... .: '::.:" ",~L"? _.C"-:i . -. J \. . C. .t .1.'. ';lll. J

..\..!.'

\.. •

t._

.••••••••

•

a .5,.,....,..,-~"'J.7-s...,.t~J".n-'---=:~7'{)).· }:1'1,.1 J. a t :~ -:1 g t 1'1 e J_ I" ::~ ~ D 1) '.t." t~.: g i' ~t::1 :-:_11 d o '1.' £; t;: n 1. Z r1 t 1 (111 in arrtLc i.p a t i on of JL!,C c s t c b l ishncn t of the 110\'; dr ug -;:0

enforcement administration. was made.byl na.t o r. I\Jr.

The request for his services

I.th:· Agency's Narcotics Coordi-

tdlSC1.J,SS(~(i tEG r c qucs t and cleal'cd the detailing tnrougn ''''. COlby. I '------------

Customs/Treasury De~3rtl~ent Technica~ discussions i~eTe held ~ith'Customs relating to detecting illic'i t n i gh t.t i.me aircraft intrusions over the Il , S. -Mex Lco border.

(Nr , Ha.rtin Pera, Customs)

Alc'ohol' & Tobatc'o "Tax DiY/IRS ,

. " About five -years ago, assistance ,,,,as ,..r eques t ed in doraes t.Lc'<s.ear'ch of "mocns hd ne" stills using:.·.~IA infrared s canne.r-s;"...·This '...as turned down. , .. .-~-------

Secret .Servi'ce .. We ·have had numerous discussions ivi th .the .'Secret Service" .r e ga.rdf.ng navigation and tracking- ~.:t.echniques and ·equipment.

I- --;---..,..,-------4

OO~32

MORl DoclD: l45l843 ,','

..... :' ':,'

-:..

. ::.:..: ..

,',

.. :

:.~LrB.]j:(~~r:·

.~ _

~.,

•

~. ~ : 01 • • _

. .,.'

.., : .,. '. . :'

(:o~j,t.·'\:1:s ~·:.i ;~';l f)lflU): "!J . S.

rt;· ...i .. ·!·:.!.~(:r'l.t· ;\~:~(:l:C.·i.cs O£' i'I~::\:-c' ~;::·)t.lJ.tj':(.1· Tj1 Use o f Cl~\. Jlr··,;"':.~ .·····(:·(·1.. T ..:•.·.1.... :..,_.()1 .i n ..:~"~/1'J"i""()"SJ"'1'fr • t ..... \ ~ .... '" 1" -" _ .•. .I.".l.·,\.r _.I , ...... ~ .... , "-'-0 .•1~P"I·it··"·.1·';C " -: : .......... ... - . ~·th.5.,.:.h

C,,:'·,!l<.l

. p:.:.(.hl,.... ls·

.".. . '.

.". . '

. The xe s u l t s of our r r-s c o r ch \;'Yfk in the d e t e c t Lon f -, :.-,,<> I':'e"l';'; ·)·:-,·.:-,~·,~<-r.(] ','0 ...'(:,\.!\ .!=,,-,-"'S :.:.~ ':'.-, ~ us e jJ~4:: (.. c; Is v ._ J! ..} . . \.. _ 1 . , -l..... •.... VJ.. i::'!"'/" :"}':- •.• v_\-' in the de te-"C-~-'~l:-l-0-n-of h i.j e.cke:c i·;'.:-:::'_pc;~ls.

t,o

National Institute

ofJIe~lth'r~~H)

: ",At the -requcs t of O~D, . oes as s i.gned 'avs t af'f ··.technician to unde rtake to wr i t e a compute r program for·th.e: Wiss,vesser ·Line."Not.ation·CWLN) chemical notation method; -: , 'This wo rk was d one cf.n co op e'ra t Lon 'Kith NIH. " .

1----'-'-----

,..

(Ms,' ·Coniver· NIH) . .... ',:

.,)

AT·ms ClintI'o! and Disarmament Agency (.~eDA) .. D ."ORDmet frequently lvit]~- ACDA pei-so'n~el i~ order to . ture ORDfs "~1YCW research p r ogr amsv t o 'Support _.ACDA ,ne eds , .

•

.. '. ":·'1

. :.....

;" o'

-:---------

• 'j

Environmental Prot-ection Agency .(EPA)· .·Technical 'information relating to detection· of radio nuclides 'in the environment was exchanged with them.. -.....

(Mr ~ .· ..Char-Les 'Weaver) EPA) '

...

.. ~ ... ;::::.. . .,

MORl DoclD: 1451843

I:· . . .,.

. ... : ...

... ".

~;,".;. ," ".

::~:'StJr:.(:'l'9:

. (~\~;:.J.t:,:,"·;-S :;·j.';·11 .C:·;.:~:;.JJ." U ..S. O.~;\i:-;,~·.:·::lt ,:".~:';;:·(:·;.t:·:5 1,'h.1Ch C':··.l:l.rl 1.11' ;r,iVe n.:~s\)~'i:f;d In r~,c 0f ·C1.:\~{. ···5 t r._"--1,. _ ··,·1·: .. ' ..;-: c'.... ')r ..'i;l _ ,.~. d(.3y.(~ _ _ •.~ S] :".' _j:.! .... _ -,.. . .,... ,! "\./C.-.~ \.;'· i.•• "',' ; ••••_,.,!._ \·1 '1'1.. ~

f' ' .

~:.

P:co:)} c;;;S

·trf~ ... h·1·1r·31

d I sc.us s Lon s ·........ J·.. t.!··lg t o lJ'--i-lg

TH~

Sc .. ·q ... )-;·pg'"

: cqu i~W~!~~~J t:;' :~1 e';: ~:.;~:t.'·~'~;li~~, 2·J.-:':·~~";d· 1;5.:::•• i~/~J S';3~~ ;i. t<l~-;"7 ';;~d . fill have been conducted. . "

. '. (Mr. ·Gene James, EPA) '.

Federal Bureau ~f. In~~~t}~~ation At their r-eque s t , we described .. -Image ry Enhancement ·..t echn.i ques ge rmane to removing dd s t o r t Lons from some .·photogr·aphy. they had on an alleged' ·bank robber •... Request for specific support in processing . the .imagery ..,·ras· turned down,

'. .: Secret Se~:vice

'. 'FBI ': lJ:S. Customs

.1. ItO't~l contact ..with oth:r. agencies an terms' of assl.stance 'In th d ome.st Lc ope rat.t ons has be-en . ;·in. the ;field.. of audio su rve i Ll ance -c.ourrt e rme asures ~ arrt i.> hijacking~ or drugs. ." . ....

.' '1

.. '(Mr. Robert Burnell, SS)

(Mr. Thomas Allen~ FBI) (Mr. Martin Per a , Customs) .. NASAand USDA 1

:---,==========;-

,.-

We have an on- zo i.na DrOQ"ram .'

Ito

ear tn resources as s'essmen t s ~

····IL..--~ ,"

.'.

00234

MORl DoclD: 1451843

j- .: : :,

.•..

. .... '.:

'-.,

'1'1.,,:> _i.::> "')("7"'{"" i,- 1.. ,y,···'··-, z a.. ·"I·!·(,-"·''':~.J I'o r an ·e·'-u":';rl·-· .... _ .. ) - -J:.; a ..... r in •. .. .:> 1·· .. l . . v ..... "'" - --, _......... mental program to aid in 6st~fi2ting·the Sovi~t wheat . crop. A part of the .information would be obtained fTOfu a satellite Lau.ich c d for o t he r an·uo1.iJ1ced"p:cograi;Js. Groundt rut.h data h'ill be collected 0]1 No r t h Ainer i can c.rop s , .... J ...""

.~~:>

\:~

'u.s. Department of Agriculture' a'h.'d".Bureati 'of Narcot:ics a~a

:gan.,gerOll.?

D~'u~s

.CIA has requested the e s t ab'L'i-shmerrt o.f a t";o-acre 'plot of opium poppies at a USDA· r esearch site in Washington ... ". s t a t e , to be used for tests of pho to-tre cogn.l tion of opium poppies ...

I--------------------------~--:-::-------:-------:~".,

·.·.:·Army~ MilitaT'~ Police Agel'!5:YLJ-t~ ':Gordon . Air Force, 01; ice o:t. the Illspe'ctor Ge':ieT3l . '.:..:Army, Offlce: of· Prov'ost Marshall General ..

We have exchanged technic·al··:sllr\n;illance . c~untei.·measures and physical security information with them.

_I . ·U. S.· Army

Rocky' Moun·tarn Arse'naT, Ne\\rport· Army AmTIit,'ni t'io.n Plant~ .ToeIle Ordnance Depot

Do'RD tested environmental' samples from testing~

sto~age,and production £acilities

in the U.S.

-_--:.-_--:.---:.-_---

.1_00235

MORl DoclD: 1451843

,~rj;~:! . .';. . ._. -.'..' .:.

. . :

< ... :.

. .....-:~ .. -:;:': ...~ . .

~ .

{'"

'•

:.::. ~'

','

. " , '.

..; ".'

-;.'

(~\~I; \ f. ~ ~ C. i s ' ~!l: i t.11 t.~ ';, : i c r . L1

S. f? ov .:j " .. : ,"\ ~_''':: t "::'."j i:.~) c :~ c s . ·,':'}1-i.CJl t\·~~;.1.l1 IJ'l' f!\l1,"~"·Fr~,~';~;.J'rc:J In LT$(: : j [ (YA;)(.v (.~ Ij;,:.\··(l 'f"~'l~I~~lolog}r .i n . ~:1 ,"'1 ~;~·.s~·ng ~;}:)l::stic

-,--'.

F10!:Jl,::,.jS·

'." .:

u.: S.._~~E~~_LB_~_$.,~:~:_~~.:?_~.. .h_~:,:?~~:~~ l~.!

__~Do;:UJ i~:; .';!Jilr5.:1g' ,,::,·.;':-;j·?SCS 1,;:i.th

:Cii~ld

u. S._ Navx,

I u.s. Coast Guard . Abnut six years ago, CIA infrared equipment was made available for USCG tests t.o evaluate IR as a means £Oar night search of life boats. . . (then-Lt. James McIn t osh ," USCG)

Sa.n Mateo County Sheri£f's' Of£ice

ORD conducted polygraph tests qn.a11·app1icants. Polygraph security findings were compared with the Sheriff's own security f~ndi~g5.

(Sheriff) A study was. 'made on .con-men techniques and assessment methods in 1967-68. (Sheriff)

00236 '.

MORl DocID:' 1451843

/ ","

':.

;>;.~ .., ~:Cl':

"'.: ;:: .

(~i>'L:.I:::=; ;:J t h JJ-':]}':;l" 1J. ~~ (',_~ '.: ·,-::·;·:"pt "'~::;':':11;.f.,::s ·>·1~11:..Jl (~.:·~!]<.l o r 1:::·.. 0 Rc~;~:ll·~··rl T 1 Us c o f (':1;\:')' .'.·t·; :.t';. -,~.il ~r'I:'CJ~!1 (lJ.I;~:)T' ~7 11 .' :.::.~i."': :~::,;··j.~lg 1~ :~!::: ..'~::~: .ic ::~.~. ,)h! _. ~s

li ()1-- s ccu r it y :c,:,rso;:1$, the Cl1i:~f ~\:~s :.~;':(·]r.'~ ;::-.',:'iil'''C o f r.:

...... I (' Y

·':.it·!.

,..

'.> .... , ':j i' e .) J. ~·~'I" <:: o "'\'.,J'._~_ •.,I.l.C.,.!-,L... . ' ~ ' .... ' ,

1 " ' " ' ' J . J'"

.•. e

.e".:.L';t..<.tL;,.

Isocial groups. (1967)------------~-_---------

(Police Chief)

0.0237

MORl DocID: 1451843

":.': :... ;

.... "

~•...• : •• _. I

. " .

.' :~:.

':' .. ..:

DOMESTIC. TESTS FOR

. AGENCY RES~ARCH AND'DEVELOP~ffiNT EFFORTS:

',. -,

:''f~, '~:"

2. A revlel,,"of··.t:he' surve I t Lance equipment or -t e chn i.qu es which have at some' time or other been exposed

t.O

domestic ~.tes~ing is as f'o l Lows :

•

',1.-

••

. :', .'

- About "r-----'-~---'---=------'---'------J

eIII tercepts

,~""-""""""""",,,....,----l

we r e

des t r oye d ·s8\'-.eral

" ..\ .. r: .;:.

y car s ago ,

,'"

,:,'

:.'

.',

a. Laser Probe ~ About 1967, ~he laser probe' developeCft.)}r~-ORD was tested by TSD in San Francisco under "very c l o s e-Ly controlled conditions. '. The: .OR}), Proj eC,tOfficer lvi t ne s s ed portions'" of the "t e s t." 'Recordings that we r e made of La se r probe ;·ou·tput were -c a'r e fu Tl y controlled' as c Lass Lffed material and. it is believed. ·that the.:.tapes. have long since been des-trayed ~';.:.' ..

I'. -l'.'l·'j\ ('1'-"'\ r~-·.':"'I'·? _\ . ~~ .• ! ... "i...l. . . . . . .-

.t')..

.:.

',':

1. ,As a normal part 'of ORD f S efforts in the research and development of equipment and techniques' .Eo r Agency" app Id ca.t i ons .Ln foreign intel1igence~ we conduct experiments 'and tests in the United States .. Clearly, the design and development of our intelligence equiprnents can .be done more economically and more securely in this country. Although most of ". the tests of our R&D equipments are performed in .closed laboratories or, in secure areas simulating the foreign environment, some. of the te s t s and expe r Lmerrt s, 'of' necessi t y , "reveal dome st i c information. . .

:~.,

. :.~.

MORl DoclD: 1451843

··..· · · · · I . . ~,

'.'

"",."t, :.

- ." .:"

.. ,

'.:.r' ,:<.!~\;:;:~:~~~:,?:;.::

. , '..: .....

. '. -;: '..~..:.':' '. ,

:; .....

.: .: ,'. v • •

...::.

'.:"

. -': ;'" -,:

' f t) 'f' ."<; '..'! 1_ Y ;":f.F U .t"t s

~) C:'::" t'; 5 i .i.C. ~.:.':..;: t 5

Jti\~i~l;. :F::·· _·".i i:

. "'::"; . . . \'".

-,:

". ":'

. ';-',~ r-, i"\ 1· •-. ~.... "'), . ¥ . J_.: ~ ~...:: .; ,0, . .. 1 L' <,;; J. .L)(.I •. ~ ll

.' t_ese are patterne

f o r "-lli S ..1.·,.''''1 ~O]l , ". _.\,.._ t lie op e r a tion of

...

L.~.

United Statcs is Message content 1.S -;. .:' '. be r ec orded ; . .Ove r> : .. seas testin~ is planned at a subsequ~nt date.~: . To dat·e~·:·;,soVle domesti.c tcsting of this concept; ',' h.as .bcerrvcar-r i ed 'out at the' contractor' s ·plant~::'-. No recordings have been made of such data.·->Ex'-··. t r eme Ly.. .b r Le f tests .exercising U. S. and foreign t e Lephone is y s t.ems I ~ ave. b een ""c""a""'r""r""1.·.""e""'d""··. ,. ,o·"'u"t."..---~t""'O"""""'\i""'" e"""'r.....l""'f"yrr -1. ....n"""'?-"""t~l.a.... . I.---~- '-=c... o=n,....,c"""e"'p=·t=.=s ~ .i:...The dura t i on of 't.es t i.ng was less . ·' . ;than -one- 1+a.lf hour. . . .

L.-...,-"--n-o~1.~n-.t-;-.-e-r~e-s--'t;-.-a-n--,--...........,.----lnot

'.' :'"

..,~.".<i.~' :~~Dther Sensor res ting

Examples of"\':.S'~: ..: '. engirieering',development test's of special' s erisocs.'. 't..ri th'I1i. th~· ..Uni ted states 'include and ...· ..

n a ese cases, ~ e testing has been used for engi.ne er i.ng deve Icpmerrt .andthe content .has been restricted t.o : ." dissemination to those in Government involve.d wi t h rt.he '~mgineering d e sLgn , :i ... ~

.. / "

':.: .

00·239

MORl DoclD: 1451843

". '.,'" "':,~'~.:, ., ::._-~

", '

";.-

" ',,' £. .Pe r s ona Ld ty Structure of Defectors Study - (m:D-W1(reT{o-oY-:;c-o-"dcTci-nlIll~-fhe :-personari~y structure of defectors dur~ug the' period 1966- 69.' The -wo r k primarily involved an analysis of the open literatpreou', known . . defectors. An ancillary effort'was concerned w:ith' a, 'study of the phenomenon of .def'ec t Lorr its~lf~"i.e., leaving one religion,fo~ another, or changi~g one set of political belief~'for anot.her,' The 'Kork ",'as conducted' at Stanford Un i.ver s'Lt.y ,

"h~"'" Communications

Link Loadin

, :~/ J

n eT care u y contra e con 1t1ons~ some U. s. microwave communications were recdrded and passed through the intercept system under, test to 'prove , .quality of performance. All intercept:material , connected wi t h this was destroyed wit,hin a few weeks of'the,ti~e of intercept and the material was never '~hecked for ~ubstantive content. \

I--,----_--=------:--~-:-'~. :;

-~_

_.._.- -" - '. . ,

00240,

--------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

,.. t. : ,'l

. . ' .-~:..::.:...;' :.~,\'.,; /':, ::'

. . J~: .

;:": .

••

.....

.C I.·:~·.:) .:: y

j) i L-t';C t o r

Technology

{en" Sc i.cn ce

SUBJECT

Survey of ORD for Non-foreign Intelligence ~ctivities .

At 11 a.m. todaY,eich division and staff chief or his representative was ins.tructed ·to que ry all, of

his people, and report back by this, ~f.ternooll Khetller orn.o.t· t.hey had provided any services

or de aLt; wi th

.any', o.ther .ageric i e s on domes tic, non-Tor e i.gn matters. The..a.t.r ached 'list is an inventory o( .. ai r items we

were', able "t o uncover.

If addi tional 'information on

a:~y:·''of' :th~~e t.op fcs is desired, we,"c·aD. ,.proYide either a .verbal'-or a written report on very ·short.notice.

SClentlI1C AUVISOI '.',·to. Director of Resea'rch '& Development Attachment: ks: s t a't'ed

00241.

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.. :,' . ... ~;.: .. "

: •...

..'

. .'~. ,

:.,,'

.'.:.'

~; "'1 "'1" . .' - . .l.'lOllLt,., " j .. , . . I.~\._. 'C) •• " ';rJ.vJ' .. 1..,-",

"I·

• i

....

~,.: •... ; •... "!

' ... s:

r: " 'i ..,'.-r oJ')·:Jl,::,

. ~ (.",

1) ]' c_J'1 1"~' v~ g.',' A p r c-pc s cd {JFH. ·.":;'·eat e s t imat o r1. _ c.am \0.oJ,.,.

pnlitical1y sEnsitive. ~arcotjcs--our ~

fo~cjgn

activities

ar~

Kell kno~n

in Dl;lS&T.

....

A negativ~ report from the Support Staff. ORD's wor k l~as r?P?rted to the-.,·FAA abou~ . t.hre e years ago. No ac t a.on was t aken,: to ~ur know'Ledg e ,

~ Performed intelligibility enhanc emerrt

----".,o-,f-·-a,-u-d..,..l~·-:-o--:.-.t-::a-:-:p-::e-::s for

BNDD.

Source of. tapes unknown;

1- At .t h e r~q~est of FBI, we described

.imagery bhhancement Techniques 'germane to: removing, distortions from some photography,theyhad'on an alleged b~nk robber. Request for spe~ific support in processing the imagery was turned down • . .

I, I

I I

.-'

.,' "

----------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

, . :. :'. :, . j. :.;...:<., . -.". .., " ...?:: .":. .

~.,

.~.

;

...' .' ": ~.:.; ~~.::. . ,. : ','. . ~

,,:-

',', "

."':

.. '

:.~ "

.: 1,"

',:-' -.

. " ; ......•....:

. 'I ~~:~y. 19/3

'.'

,:,.

;'lY total contact with o th e r ag enc i e s 5.n ~C'~Tr.JS o f va s s Ls t a nc e .'".r~ .i•.;. '- h.

'"-~. (.y..••,

,':>

5 t; _i. C"· " »: -1 0 n <:" t .. "J... ..."-,' \. .L.~l~

e e "1

1) q '" . 1, J_~,.; U."

; .;1. . _. . ' .h , , _.", :,

./-._

-c i ~., 1 d r»v f

_. __

'n t._U

di 0 _

veil1anc~ countermeasures, anti-hij~cking,' or drugs.

". i I r -.

Speci-

.fically, I participated Ln TSCC and R&D Sub CQi':i;:J it t e e me e t ings which included technology exchanges and some equipment

ex~

changes. on a temporary bas~s ostensibly ior testing or trial'.

:1' also- a'ssi.sted in x-raying t he vo ff i ce Halls of the Chairman ..

~f . the AE.C '.(then I'll'. Schlesinge.r). at ..t he. request of Mr. Richard ,'.

Cowan of AEC security.

The op e r a t i on occurred one evening

. (date unkno:m). and 'HaS an attemp.t to resolve. some anoraa.Li e s created byvt he 'use of th~·1

Other.persons·contacted over·the·years have· been: :.

.. Hr. Robert Burnett, Secret' Service Mr~:Martin Pera, U. S. Customs·

Mr. Ma-rvin Beasley, DASA

Mr. Thomas Allen, FBI . Major Jack Nelson, OSI!US~F Major John Langager, ONI/USN Mr. 'Richard Cowan, AEC

......

00243

.. I

MORl DoclD: 1451843 .

'.~'

;,.:.

.. ' :.

-:'. '.:.:.\ : -.: ,'.';

. .

~. :.,

.....

. '.

r , :' . .' ....:.:< ,:

-"." :

·····<.',;J;>;"I~?\;::·>~';·\·~:·· ~

"',,-'.::~.<., ....

5/7/13

..... '. ,': .'

c:;·~(:jl':'='~1ge

.inf(~'t~r:-i':it:i.ol1

State

Navy

ld.r Po:cce

us Secret· Service

Army

NSA

... -: ..

.'>

•

II i

.'.

DIA

:. ",

FBI 2.

Joint 'funding o'f'two ·contracts ''lith State Depart.

rnent (TR~·l/LLL).

to. State Depa.rtment for .test pu.cpos e s ,.' '.

", _. ~ . _..:. ..~_.: .",.-:=<:

one contract with NSA' (Sandia). ',C'_

:.~~~-

_'"

Two elec.tret microphones were furnished"

•

Joint funding of '.

Participation in ~NA/DQD'

contract .(Bureau of StanFtards)·. . . -3.

Other DOD and Governnlent contacts for information

collection or exchange .on'Ly.•

ARPA LEAA/Dept. of Justi~e DNA/DOD O£fic~ Tetecommunications Policy

Office of Army/Provost Marshal General Army/Military,police ·Agency, Ft. Gordon Air For~e/Of£ice.of·the Ins.pec.tor General Air Force/Electronic Systems Division

. "~~~ .~~''''!

----------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

.. '. ':. ~. "

","

":"':

..•.-

.'.

.:~:·!cl

-i·"r.r::c~~~:; .i"J"!.

.'.

o(lZ45 .:'

:t.

MORl DoclD: 1451843

...J•••• •:

.......:;.J.~.)~(.

. :.. ::

.. ',"

." .

-, ~.;:

:~.~)- c ~}~;L J1g o

o f ·;:-f' C~: n.:L f~ 8.1 :~': ~ .~~):. .:.1 at i o.i ~r C}.. ~1 t: l'.::1.g *t f) clctcC-· . ti611 of J:2.dio nuc l i drs ;"1 ';,l,,-, 1"7n·'i ... n·~·' ·.nt " ., ~.' ~ .'. - v •• -',--'_'_'t:_._. _

'f, .,J)Jl-J. C <11 d f~,; Cl :',;S i c:n s ~.;: '\ :;i, U, j1 g t () :.lS ~':lg ] R s c:'~TlI1j,ng' equ 5.1);:: CJ'i t to (.Ie tee t . ",:. ':l~ ,; ':::,; :'-0;,)7': d- fi .c.c s in a s an i t<:iry

land fill.

ENDD

Exchan~e,'6f techri{cal information relatirig'to developmen't of I

:'~

-. .

USDA & BNDD CIA has l:equested the establishment of a'tw'o-acre plot of:6p~um,poppies at a DStiA research site in Washingto.~ state, to be used' for, tests of pnotor e cognd t Lon of opium poppies •

. f~.

:',;:-

US COAST GUARD " :;,. :: I

- About s'i~ ,:,'years ag o , CIA infrared equipment was made available~for USCG tests to evaluate IR as a means for night search of life boats.

ALCOHOL &TOBACCO TAx DIV/IRS - About 'five: years ago ass i s t ance was r-eque s t ed in domestic search of "moonshine" stills using CIA infrared scanners. This ",as turned, dmm'. ' ,

I T ' S~T JLVli~

I. O(j"?46 ------,..,----

MORl DoclD: l45l843

Ii ' / ....." :<' '" .... : ......::-: ';,' <~; ~;, r::;':f-J:U:" Y 'liE i)'i.' • -v

, i

'.,:

-f' •

. ; .

'·'.t..

. '.

'-'."

_.. .

.- .'. .

- *- . . ·.0· :":

.•__ "0".: ~

_~..

._ _•

. ':

..' . ':.

.; T··{ hn~l:aJ.· (.HS;·:::·:·::7·:,:S -..-::,'1.-..;.:;.:-.; 1.0 -.~.~t;.:\::-·;.'·! .: 11~(.j.:: :.;.i:.;lltt:;.:e :.;:L:I·.;:.;:t .;!l~:,,·,.;:;J.:.:~; ::-"'1;1' 1:";,; U.S.'· ":::':-:"'0 ~) (j.l ,1\'..: 1~ •

co f ,;,omc 0-

'l_"}) - e

./\_.;.~C T·, t.. ... ...... , .. • ....:-I.,,)).:.l.f.CI1CS

I~..:) .• [ ; .

c:·~ -, "'.'.~ ~ .. :.. " . ii\.lvl~r l e , _... '';<~''",u.l1,.1l

L~boratory, sre supported by CIA to Jevclop radio 1

~o:.:d detection 1:':cjmi(i.~'ti-s nrid T11E:Se L;;:00T<·1 1: c: :d . c s h:::ve us e d s;3:::p}i:i1g t(;chni.q.i.lcs dc"\-cloped for CTA '::0 :ill:~,;suxe COXUS nuclear plant releases~ nuc Lf d o

S.::1D,p] Llg

(}.;\rices.

----'--__I..

:.'

:-::.: .

.'.:. -:. .''.:.: :

•'

.::. '~.: -.

00247 .....

---------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

"_.

.: ,

......

(

.. ..

. -,

", , , ' .

.: v.'

. . '.

, :

. ,'.

~. ,"

';"'~

. .....

:SliDD(C::e.:cJ.,"S Cc;;;~d.!1) :'::':.:3 iL-,.'11 ;-"-:2::,dssi.en to l".;c..:eive developed from Aerospace, Inc., concerning a Radar P~op1e Detector for ORD. TiI;:Je: Fall of' 1972. Action vas app:wved by DjOPJ). _. p r olx) s al s

J .

.".

. 3. Dei...~loped Adhesive Restraint, Non.,..lethal II:1capaci tation System. Reports and inf'or.mation was made available to Department of' Justice, LEP~ in August 1972. If·they de-..:eloped the system, it would be use<;l f'or' . civilian crowd and riot control.

'.,

------:-:-::::-MORI DoclD: 1-451-843

,.", ......

. ~

:':

.-:.- .. ,

.'~

'.',

",:,.

....-...

••• ~

.-:,' .... ".. .. ~

:t:J 7].

'1 ..':.0

!:;...:t:;~;;.:::Gn:::

::::-- ~

r;;':.~_~:J

:::~·;2..:-:-1~:~:·; f;!.:-.;~.f..;::..'5"

:"':i."~-.~_,~:t;::·~·~

::.- .:~ ...: .:..,:} t::. ~".:':~.; J:';,:: ~~;t·:-:;,/ :~.:"" ~/, .:'~. .: :j .~.: ';J ~.:"~·:::;?:··::;-i _~

..::~~ ~_:~..-.2; :::~~~: ..: :..:t~~

"::';~!_l==:d .~~:) ::"'::~~:.":::--~.;?it.

"'::::;.:l in. t:?> 1.!.i ,.::5.. ::J;'L].i t7 .:;:-c

.:-::.;.";-;' "';;~::::~;i ~.:i·-;:::1::» •

.:::i:"£)loy:::c ::.-:::'- 7:.>;~~ ::-·].:.J.u::::.y ~ .. n t ..:J~

;1a4 l:.(~~:i..::r::..~ ,:1:';ia::e ~.f

SJ.. :.q

~.:~-.') : )r;; tC.tr}.l"

t:.!:l):o·u~~ ~1..t:.::;,

j)~±~lg 1:::'0 t.~:':':;:~:"3 ()i!

~:o

';~:l;1a~~~\.::i.~!~?- t:..:-:..\;~

7-::c~:':li':::3;1

5-£:;:uri·t.y Ci"t;::t,::3i.an ':ind 5. .:2." ~~-:~~~~

~~e :3;.1eat:~h prccf'::..;si~~q' =.a-?t?~L.il:t·ty

:t:·;4.:;ncy ::~{~:\;;~..

:;t~S"";£;:;";~~f~ ·t~;.s::' .~1;~

~.::~~.~ l";;}::;f:;;:-,:~{;:.Jry ·:;0 /;~:;,i:;::;:3i:1".o·t:1C £{o;'Z:~;i'::'i:i.i~:j

:::;i_~!JjZ::1.G-t

c.;c~:-~~.;~.::r..s4;5.-::;_~~:.t"",

en. 2 Iro"!;o~::ber l~ 71". l·~t=

G;~5~in.:" .;icpear2.u fJt t!le 8:'.J;1 . :_~ • .: ,..... ..: _ ~.' ~ 't..~'S... ...... . . : ... .a J~ of -:.. ......,,_ t-n.. . ~. ·~. .c.pe crJ"'~ ~_::l·..:...".,:...l~Y ~ .1Ut.~;;-:.-'t'::';"': o~ '-c.... ~ t"~.:-.;:-:..a ~·.. t;__ :.~ .z:.~~orc:3d th.rongh l~·6al '·Jir.;::tar?i:;g ~ . ;r~~ ~:~?e ~;;:"tS 'CO l:? :":5-G-tl i'n ~l"!.:s Ej:::"O~~cut'~c·n e,f ,:=:~:e..()~: ~.i-:.~ ··J·n::;--!.~:...;-'J~ s:::-eu:,:;!:;,1.:"'~ on ox: 2.~10U·C

2...

•

.,t."

. !.~:,jc:::.,~:,.\-o;:-;l

.:. :~Gv:;:::.!.:(~r 1971~ L1.-e t:Ci'\~~.9r3atic!ls

~';2.

9'.

-¥"

.......... _ _ • •k

j~. C:::':'--:;C7.:'f .~.n;~l:t~~s"'·L':~:.:c,='-::'.30d t:~at ~03t of

G::::~..11·t: ~p-rc~s3i;'lg' ~:r;tai.lzibl;3 in

bG' .r:r~:aG~ ~o;:.e ·~:~;ltc:-lli§i;:'le t~~::;u-:;h t~a t:="2 l~~Qrato-::-.! ~ .l:l ~i8Vl cf t'j,e -ci~.;: ..:~it:icai ~3.tur= of ·t.~e :c;;q.t:.~stl ;J'::::GC~~.s5.l.'ng -;,·rag· ~.:::sg~~ j_~:=::;:31:.;~:~:: ··Eo~~"\7'ers: .1:~r~· C~'1Sk.iz~3 ~;.q3 i.r-~fc;~-:"~::(l. ~::1;:.t fIlt.:.:..::a IJ:=OC$~35,i~-.,:-; :t1il~r-J.t :l::~'ud cO JJ~ ;"tZ£T:.C1."2C. I'~_Oj:--J i,.Jr!~c.lly! .1."1" ~. z .: -:.,.;it:h E~?r.Q"t;a'l f~om

otccri~q en ~

I ! I

;:;i·=:;:.e-,r l~'i.]e:!..:-;

~:':.it.:1in t.~e J=.ge:nc:1_ Xf .s5_:.:;il.u.r '!:'~qt:a':;i::; ~.,oul'::: be fr~G~e~t uasis I 3u~a~st~d ·t~at AJ~ t~~PD ~A~c~~~l ~. "~-7 _

c.c~l~ t')e -t=ai..~a·~1 in ~~ :lse

......

-' _ ,

•

;;;-

os: "£11a :i?rQcssr;~n9' .s~lstej;1 ..

00·249 ,,'

. -.. -" .. ,-

•

------------------,. MORl DoclD: 1451843

. ."':

: :'.

". :,' ··t

.-.' . .

.' .

. .:

~JJ3Jj~:':CT:

o c

.;:~:;::;,!r:g of ..:\

u d

i 0 T ;.{?;~ for DllZ-,::?U. "~f

N a

... .' . ",

c o t . i c

J::\:~:·:b.::ro~'. 3 }..J:"*·'.1.Z ~)!~/i~li)n

.'.

On 13 i\pril 1972 .r.h.' CharlesGa~kins of the Bureau of 1·~2t:rcoti(:;3 arid D~·:.·l~~g~.l. . O\.lS D r ug s l04~q1,.:'C ste d SJ:._ \'t..,,! I:":. n / C'.:{D 2 s s i s ta nc e to, imp::o-~c tl~e inte!ligib!.lit y'" of a n Zltldio tape t!~'at had been ac qu i r e d by BI"IDD 2gC:n~:J ..

.:.

00250

','

MORl DoclD: 1451843

. ',

:: t.'.• :/

<,;:

...........

";':" .....

';"

'."

,'--'"

. ...

.~. '.,:. ~ ,"I

v '

0025:1','

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.....

.•. .:< :->'.; : ( .,.,:: •...:

.....

...., .. :-. -."

. '.'

.........---...:...:

f'"

- .: ..

~ :":£J

l~_S!::.~ ~:r;'i:;~~.~G

t.o

~~:::f.".'~l.l. of :\i... ~·(:c-t;~c~:

1-. . : =i. 0 #1."";: i"' e ::. ;:.~: c Z"C1.7.::[, E: t

'(rsc)

~:F.~q'U~:st:eG. the

):e:-~e;:r.~l Sci.:~nti.fic Ccz p, )··~.rc R_ cc:ope::a1:.:to:,l· of S..l J.( :~.:r.: t.:·tf;"~ ·p71.)r.J;;:";:::::_~·:f.; c::: :::. :-::·.:-.~t.-:;r

~i,~~o

t..s.pe lie r:cG. rS:::Ct..:.i"'ifed fro;!! tIH?_ Bal-t::t.1'::,:;:C; .John 'Bulla.rd, RegiQn.c.l Di-;e:c tor, h6.G. CO;.~t:ac: t.ed 1-:::-. hcisG to .eid El\DD i.n the i:Zl:.encenent of the, -conve r.se t Lons on thr:; .tepa ::-e.co!:"cing "hich "rere t"-",_sked b:r backgz-cund ' music. The r€s~lt s of thep::-oces6ing ,,"':l.1.1"he": used in e. g:=8t'.d jury inv~stisa.tion a n 4 2,:"!s"sihle follo,>\'-on -trial. }fr". d· . • .. ~. ..". t. ' . , ... 1-' .c ,,(. 1 Jjtll.:.i.~:;:· c.~c. not J...n:J2cate ~·~OYi '·ne !12:U veco~c aWG,!:e c~ :·..r .. t·.e~ss s expez-l~fr.

:-..

1..

T'1"

tise in t'i:i.5 ar ea ,

"",

rs C) Fi , II f Po"

00252

7..\ : •

.........

•

';.'

MORl DoclD: 1451843 :

.;"

.....

.:.:"

.....( t":', .. ; ''3

.. ::::::-, :>'..;~l: :":t:

(~.~~

!;.:.:.~£~)_ .

.. " . ~

•

• : "•• <

...:

--JJOKD! DDI ss'r

L -_ _

:~~ .,

.J:

'.:-

... •:c

'0025.3.' .j

$7=r-..

~·

•• __ ......

MORl DoclD: 1451843

/::j:.:-..:.

...•.,

'.'

.'.'" •

."',

:'., .;: .'.

.' ~':.

if:····· .'.;

. :

",;,

:.,

: C'.~.~ ji' I'

,"::.

. oJ'_e_(:("I)rl 1 t'DIS . J:.:O . .:;!J.,;~; CO:.iC'_:.t"d_:,..[;, . .... '-,' ··'1·"rr "~.d) , r O·~ ... · .'l";"-1..

(OP-~J""(~T ',)'.'),"'), .i':.. J :

a c ti.v it.ie s \\·11 ~CJl (·c''llld.l)U.t 1':1e J.~gl~rlCY· in.to a n erriba r r a s sing s i tuat iorr,

1•. There 'are no rrri s s ion s wh i ch we have flown. during the last four years with.which.I:Can associate the result di r ectlyto any activity' .' . po terrti al ly ernba-rr a s s Ing to the Agency. There were a number. of rrri s s ions flown that indirectly:hav~ the potential for this. ernba.r r a s srn ent,' .' Bear. in mind th at, once we tu r-n the fiII11 over to NPIC or any o thc r- agency, we' have no ·con:tr~l ov:er.subsequent distribution. . '. . ...:', '~':~ ~ :.'. 2.

The .rr:d.~~{o:~.s listed on the 'attaclnnent are in three ~ategories:. . . .;' ... :~: .;.

~~'-"¢~'t:egory A: These Cire rrii s s i on s flown in the U.S~. that' aF.e ve:ry -sirnf.l a r to the pot en ti a.Ltlaat you discussed with me u smg the example of the Santa Ba r ba r a oil disaster. ,.. . .

...... - -: .

b<.::::<:;:~.t~~<:lr;·. B/ The ~detection illicit . . popPY 'gr~~;}'i-s.a-separate c"a . .t""c"-;·g=o"'r=y=-b=-e=c=a"'='u""s=e~of the h~gh sensitivity ." of Q.lis supJect.:

. ,';,.

',,~"

of'

• ::./ '0:-:,.:. - ',

c. 'Cc:t~g6ry C;

cnowl edge not mg sensitive was pre ce this :activitycould be labeled illegal. .. :'.-

. .... "':

.'"

3. Lhave-spectfical ly looked to see where our U'~2'·s.were operating du.r,ing the Watergate break-in discovery.. Democratic National

, ;pgp Sli:cp ET :'i'

-------------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

..,

., '

'"'

.....

~ ••

:>'

. :.

....' t. ~

'..

• "

. ',"':.

(~OJ1\. C.lt·r(:;n 3.?;(1 Rer' ~1)Jj';,"n l\.r;:.t!I·IU~J. C...···.1\ r:· ~i~J~,n .. 1"'s.!1 th.c·al)t)\.·t~ ~:",·,.:nts oc cu r r cd i'n the l:-:i:l.::t: ;:ll"~r1 o n r ::.j.l·f.~r:·:.ft f.~·! ~"']cj'r :'}!i~;slon's di.. trJ:~g :J!i:j t im e ~.fJ;l'5.t"(.1 \'::-i$~.u the ";:1·\·~~.~{,.lorn l:-:",.. j·t I,ll fhe I} .. S.

Brif,::.-:1iel- G'eneJ:al, USAF Director of Special .l\ctivities . At ta chrn.ent - 1 As n ot ed above

',' "

,.;',

I~I

TOP 6EOftEY ....

00255

l:'~' TOP ~~CRB:f

·.r

POS'SIB'LE' IMPLICA;'i':~ON"'

'7'ASK

e ;.

"."

.--

CATEGORY A Santa Barbara Oil Disaster

Dept. or'Interior.; Fe'1;>' 1969.

Potential for pr-ovi.ding ba.si s iOl' criminal law surts , Pj.;e~ suse 01. oil company to change ope r a.. t i or..

HILLTOP (. : \..' )

ORD/NASA Eal~th Resources Programs.', Spring/Fall 1969

, Po s s ible 1.1:';(; £01' i;.-.d-.:.. ::;t:;:ic=.. L explo itauion. Crop' P:::OL~..~ct,~or. control & e s tirn... a.t e s i"'""·~\.t:~...c 'rr··Id.:i.·,itCl:.

,. j'

I Snow Survey (Ii ;, ' . ' i

Environmental Science Services Admfni.s tr-at.ion (ESSA), Dep~. of Commerce th ru COMlREX.

Induet.riaf ex:?::'oita"i:ion,. r e s cur-c e a.Il.ocatio n,

'WC:L"~Cl'

Spring 1969. Hurricane, Bas e Line Earthqtlake Darnag e r.!.' 'J

Ii '-', '._ l • ~

, Mi~neapo1is -

;', .Kansas 'Gity

bince b"! Econom:ic'Pre,pC\.red-

ness. Spring 1970.

'Self generated, NPIC processed. Feb 1'971.

OSI/.A:EC Division.

Jan - Mar

1972.

PQli~icalleve;L'age'£01' di.sa stea-

a r oa funds '. Political Lcvc.cag o, '(::'l·il~!~li:"i~il neglig.ence suits. ~~<.: C-:'l~.S;;:..·l~ctiv. . . cxpl.oi.tafion, En.viJ:o'nmcntal apllli.ci.I,t.i,.)i::.s, uzban planning; e xpl.o it., l,~0i'1.

..-:'

.. -;.~ :

o o

.......

H tj

o N

8;;

o:;d

I--' ~

....

TOP SlrCRiiT

. [iii:

In I--' ill ~

'~~ yOP snORE'%' ~

',,'

". ~ \',

';' ..~.

.; .

TASK "

BY WHOM/WHEN . .

POSSIBi..E Ii:VIPL:::Cl\.TIO:'\

CATEGORY A (9 0 n t i nu e d ) "RIVER BOAT(~\~""""jll" ~q NRO -.·IeRs. 1 ~ '.. t , '>

April 1973.

Political leverage. Lclu<';l;l"i<.;.l exploitation, civil d:a-r..- iCi;;O suits.

West Virginia Dam Site Coverage

NRO - Army Corps of Engineers. Jan/reb 1973.

Pot~l1tial fo:: :;:cal·c::,J;.:;.ti::

exploitation., wat c r cent:..'ol.·.

'j -.

CATEGORY B

I (Puerto. Rico) , Multi I

BNDD, DDI/CIA, NPIC, ORb. Dept. 9~ ;Agriculture. Fall 1972.

Spectral Sensor

erA extension of clOi)'~ t.i·::,...~·t~cldnb fl'om SEA to CON1:,s. 3d;t<::::t' 'techniques to avord clot.:::ction or growth.

CATEGORY.C . LONG SHAFT

NSA/ CIA COMINI' collection.

o ::u H I

'. ~

o o

c N

CJl .-J

f-l

'];'0'2 S];CHTi'=C

r::····:>. '.

.~.

;'.

fl:>. In

f-l

co fl:>. W

MORl DoclD: 1451843 :"

:. .:'., . ......

· ,'.

.' -. .; .

'.:

.. ":' ~~ ..:..., .>--

... " . :. . -, ~:

(-C~jltr~.c.:t,;·-;d. :311 i n 1- e So U 1 t s ~: t? S d t 'i_"",' C

,)ffic'c' . wi t h

e.:\1:Cllt.l:)11 "i-E r:',Ul" (!~1 "fDY--

L-_~--I- contacted all but t wo who were on leave-·-n,:;gative. Parangosky

negative on those he could contact. people he could not reach:

FolloKing ar~

said FMSAC:has negative resul~s.

00258

MORl DoclD: 1451843

•

'110

. :, . :

'.:':

..•

. . .' ,.' ~

'''':, -:

.. ...

....

.' \.

:•••• :'';' .:. :' .::~:{~\'~ ~'iL~r

..' :

:.-

.1.

. .. ,

.;.••• '"<" ~

:'.

13 0535' '. . ,:··r~ '/i

i:'. .: ,"Ot C

'. '.'

:"~' :'<. •~ • •'

...... . ::.;

.':'

•

... :.,

•,.

• • -'to

_' • •:....

.,......... . .. '~.' .::.:

FOR:-.

....

.~. '.

':.. .

".::'.:'" '.,

;

:::::~?;~:~;:~:~:l~~r::::1:beL:,:./,g~~1".}.'.'

",1 .

... .,.. ,....,.... :.:.. . .., ':

:..

. i·io'l;~sC Arme:d .Se.i.v.l'ces .Con>.mittee,. Conce-:rning' . ~?;:./.<;:;.

·'-:.:'·:e·;· ....

. ' ~ ' . . • • ~ ••., ::'

.'.

..'

. . :i.;::::,~~:~UM .. .,

'.'

•

----,..,-------....,...,..,~=--=~ ·••• c • .,.'::•

'.'-;.,

.>, ; :., :;. -;

~.' -"

. ··f~i. ;t\~;;.·t.)-~olut~ry no res·po·~T~'~. t-o··i-Iebe·J.... t',~ l ..~~·t..:··r·~is ~l')i:acted .

." - ,.• ~, ~

. - .

...~. . ' C'- ~

t: :-.-.::::~';... -~.~~~"~.

...,'

..,.-

.. ,.

. ;::~';'

. . .... ·.i\.i:t:: ....

.;.'

:',"

.... ..

. ..:

'".'

: r: :

".;'

.".:' .: NOTE:" .

\. /

'.':

':.' -,

. .' . ' . .

Thi~ '~mo 'dt~ ~.' June' ;3:tn)Lc'::73-0635).(pgs:;;.~·~9· thru .265) was"" .

...._ sent. to the IG for hi 5 i nforma ttgn ",and was 'not ·.~onsid~re<I: a part of the.' . DDSg.r components," slibmissions··:to')'[,the :lGin response to the. Director's'" requ~st on "Questi.onable Activi·:e,'e~',r:and, therefore,' it is beli.eved . not lle'::included in the Halperin request•., .. tha-t""these. documents should .... . . ... ,,":

'."

: 0··. .

..'-..

;,- ": .... ;:·OOZS5i:.· .:"'

.. -.......

~.-. "~

. ._ ....... '_., .. \.,......- ...... .... --..... - .-...

-:.-

;

''''-..''

':j(f;!:~~~"

MORI'DocID: 1451843

.. . ~

,,'

'.. "OLe- 13-0935·.. · ..

.....

'.,

,':

~.,.

.....

'" .

:. ".

'.'

~.:.:'

. ~.:. ';.' . "

....

e .•

..~

. :,' .......

.'}:

. .'. :~

.. ; .:'

'", .

. -, . :." ":" .

. . .... ·.l\..~t:: ,,' .

.." . . ;.>

....

'.,: ~

.'."

;.'

Thi~

'dt~ ~

;3·_:(O·i.C'::73~~635f·(pgs:~~59

~as:.·

.'''. ,: NOTE:" .memo June 'thru .265) . :...._gnt to ..the IG for his informatiQn:.,and was not.canstdeeed a part of the.' . DDS&T components' sObmissions·-:'l:o:~th:e -IG in response .to the Director·s ... requ~st on IIQuestionable Acti"itj't!s·...· and, therefore, it is beli.eved. . . thp-trthese documents should n~~ J:)e<iric;:ludedin tQe Ralperin request•

'~',.

... •..

. ::::. .

' "

.::.. ..

•••

..: '~.. \

. •••• _ • • ' 'N, ............. -.....:_ .. '.. . •• lJ>....._•••_ ... __ • • • • _. __ •• _ _,

MORl DoclD: 1451843

........

~" ;i..:t".'1:...,••~".,_>(~. . '..

.".'

:'.: ..

:. ': ..: ';: ... ~..:~::. ~:' ••

;,··.

...~-. .: '.'...~:-,~~~:.~.:. ,"

. ~ .--

;.TN"l!J<7lot~S-""""1:'"N:lc.:' :.: .

/.'

.'!

..:.'

, . . ..

. -7 :-..'

", ','

" .••.. ":._ •. ,.: •

".4

':~;.. . :. :.. /:[.?.~,·~!~\, ~:,.:·.;~.:i : , - ~-~.: ......,:.:,~, .-;~

-':': ;..:

~ -::.; :.:...:.:...... :~. ..

~. ;", ·1'7r:.DlIVARb H ....a... R •• CHA!~.dAN

':~""",~, .•~.- '~-.. <'<"''''.,.

"":-;-;i:;'':'i<:;~~tlt:~1;~i~E~ft{€'~~~{~i~~~, ;'..

. "i';';

Cen.l.ral.··TntOUJ.genr-.,. Ar.onMr :.'

< ..•••, -c. "

f:<T-~~~ ;"·;;';"'~~::i,;.i.G~;~ ..tib''''~' ';l>.at:e"e:..-';,e&;;. ~~:f;!:\,,";,*;,; .'i ~ ,.,~." ::.':....-'.::-;.

.-:.

t:, -.

-:~

...... ~-"

',_:'

•.:......:••••

,.'

.':.~ .:.

':••t.-.

• >:

'::

• -t -

..•.

.:'.,.:.:

-.. ..'~ ..~.:

't . . "

-:'-- -.:

.. .:.. ::". :';:';";::::.'

".:.:;~'. . -

•

••~

•• 1

--'-

~.: .

:' :·~':..l..·.~:

~' ...':::" ":.: . ·..F.Eif:'t·:hb·· ..

. ., .t . ;

. ..':_' ..~ .",

\~ .. f:' •

.....

..... :.: : -r. :.

. ' ..: "."

al •

"•• :

.,.'

·,"r

...,.... - ..

....

.,.

'::' . : '.;; ~

:,';' '",

. ~:.,: /. ~.'"

. .'.~ ::. ~. .. '.

. ·"t; ,.:::.,".;

. ..:.~. '.

..',

......

. :.... , "

.. .

... "" ;. .'-

..... -:... , ..... "".\

.""

":'

:.:

.~ '.

".,- .;'" ,::

MORl DoclD: 1451843

~'.

'.,

. ', ~

.:: ....

-. ";

"."

... r

MORl DoclD: 1451843

. '.

-',

:< "

":-.;

MORl DoclD: l45l843 .: ..

-: •• t

00263 , \.

MORl DoclD: 1451843 ,

....

::'" ~!;~i

.;':::: i':!' :"';:.. ;," :< :}:;.

':::'"

. . .

)

. '.' '..~ ;

...

00264

,',

...... "0

'. "0

MORl DocID: 1451843 .----------'-------------,,--~--~~~"'---""-'-----'-----'-'----"-~'--------'-----'-~-~I.~:'f ·:c,:~.;' .

~/f-:'

'00265 ..

..-. .,

~'.

:.". ..~

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.:: .

,:.'

: .>...

' .:

SUBJECT:

FOR:

.. : . . .:::"

:'lE·10R..,;~·m\JM

: ...... ,.,' ':

Deputy Director for S,:ic11'ce an.d Techn.?l()gy :

Policy Rega~·d.ing Ass Ls t an c e to i\gencies Outside" the En t e Ll i gen ce" Communi ty on

.. ,.'. "

Spe9ch Processing .Proble~s .

~.:

':'

. .... : .. :;,::: : .

1. Re cen t putilic':f'6:~;~~rn over ",Age.ncy . af£i~iatio:ns .:..... with law enf~rcement activities has made me warf of offeririg.. sp.ee ch p ro ce s s Lng as s.I s.t ance .to various other governaen t ..... . agencies. :My concern herevis restricted to government .. :. act i vi ties .cu t s Lde the' 'int:elligence' communi t.yio· . Because . of a'. scientific commun i-ty .awarenes s vof the' expertise. of . .memb.ers of..O:pL in speech -p'r'oces s Lng .p r.ob Lems , we are .often . as ke d by individuals in .g ove r'nmen t for help o.n various . speech·problems. The.requests are 'usually informal on a person-to'-person basis. lvhile most' iof these contacts ',.:". involve only' an exchange. of 'unc l as s Lfd ed Ln fo rmat.Lon , .severa.l, 'have ~nvolved. th(t.use .,of laboratory r es our-ces,

-' ,::" '.

:-r' ':. .

, 2. cO'~~acts hav~·::,:~'~:he ':£~om t~e FBi, A~to;~~y . .. General's office,. Bur eau.iof .Nar-co t Lcs 'and Dangerous .". prugs (BNDD), Post O£fic~".:'a.nd ·the .Treasury Department • . Of the above , assistance' ·.toBNDD had been. spec i fd caj.Ly san.ctioned by Mr. Helms. In one recent instance wher-e a" noisy tape was· to be used ,.. in a cour-t case, care was t aken.:' t o i.nsurethat -t.he vp ro ces sLng of the t.ape was idone. entirely' '.' by. a BNDD .employee:even·:t:hough it was done' in an Agency,", ,'. . laboratory. 'us in.g the.:·Ag:en.~y's .Coherent Spectrum Shaper ... equipment.' ." .

.. ' ,:'...

'.'

~.-

'.'

. .......~: . .. . .... : . .. '

,~'..

. s:.• -,

" ,

". ;

~ltTIf\ll .L GU.i:H l~---"---------'c------_.....J . .. , . .

';"'~'

. ..i-

'.'

00266

MORl DoclD: 1451843

~~~;:~::( ;- .

......

..... <: '. .. :.'

...... : ....

"'.;.

.~.

...

OEL-OJ.Q-73

r... gc 2 "?

.s ,

has no t

~ l'

•

. .

1}·OV.i.('J.ng S(;YVJ.i:.:::S 0: r n i s ;\1.;i(~ to ()tn'er';:'~::'e:nc:Tii;~ ')

(IS

•

Y0t .irq:;o$f;d· a

si~)!if5.c(~i1t i';orkl'~&d on.. ~saii~."':':"_:

to us in t ha t such ccn t ac t erHioles .:

there is a benefit

the staff' to test tec;hFliqilGS an d t::'-t1.1ipr,wnt en avariet.y' . of speech pr-oblC'::ns. InFt.)l'j;l:Jl '.ntc;-;::cU.cms at the tcch!Hc.i!l' .. ~ 7 l.. e_,veI. ,~~ ':1. ' ;> [1'1"1";-:)"ll] J n ~L-("l';;'S o f ;'I(,1r';"'~J '\'5" t o ;'('C('~"'"'-T-'i<,;:'ll' .'. _., \_. "'--' •... ~~ ., -1'-,.,,- '.'

~gcncy goals.

Hence we ~ould be ~il1ing to continue.to ., support other departments on an ad hoc basis ~ . but ',-"oul,d":' . appreciate your guidance re the wisdom of OEL's involvement

in ltdCl:lestic" activities.

.' .,.....'

. '0 OnN IV.

MCMAHON .

Director of ELINT

DD/S&T

:.-';

. .

.. .. \

...::

MORl DocID: l45l843

·i \.

: ;"

f ,

_._ f&~. kj:,?1AI£j:Ze'7""~' {. ~ e .e.._._-_ ~.~. .~e-.-:~"'. -'. .: -, ~::~~:.t'~·.'j.~,;.<.:

••

t' .v • ~

f1J;jj{i _,<ud

·.. cJ1"f:.:r lC--tt,t1

:£'f'I.1,?

. '" " .., ;

;..,.,-- .: -,. " " . .

•

...... ~.. -

::~

'. .. . '-

.~. -_..-. -~ _.-::' ... ':.. : ...~.."'.- ..

. :....- .. ',... ~ i;·'~..:······ .-.'..."... .~_...:..-_

.~._._

---_._~

,.,-

. '.'

... __... .. :'.-.~-

"-"'"

.. :...

. - .. _.......':': ._.

. ./"

''''._:.'' ',_.:__.. _._._.;_.•_ .• _ •• _

••• •••••

",-...

--~_

._,-_._-~.

__ ._-_ .. _ . .. .... '

,~ .~

_-_. __

._---.-------~.--

.__

-r .••• '-,,':.';"'. '0',

·':.-----:7 -:-.:...._.....-:-.... "', '; - .'._...'~.:., ." '." .

.. ...

_....... _-.

_._.:.-..-

__--_.

."--------_..-.--------_._- -

.- ._..-"'---.';" ... :.. ~.-.._.....:.::.. :.-' ...

-'-"~'

...

... _•••••••_. _ ••• 0":'

--_... -------

Co,'

... ._,.' ..-

.. -""'~"~~"-' -.-., .,' ..-: .. ,._.-~_ ....:. .. :._.

•

/-iI'V?f:'·A'4::.. _~ .., ...... fO .. l.JUrl~'7-::'· ,,1'2

S-e~t-:CI~<-( -Jo' I

.-_ _~_.~--_._ .,'; :~.-._._ .

tc-o~j?f47-"AY-

..,,:....--,.. . --._---,....... _... .. --., _.~

.: ~>'

~'.;.

....

'.:

MORl DoclD: 1451843 r '.~;'

.,.<.: .

:Jt " .,

.. . : ~~ .-:.'. ~-.:' ::-..l!. .,~. . ..'

: . ' ;:'

,.'

..':. '.: .,<. ';'.: .. ....\ ..

".~

:'~

.>:.. f.~ :'Ag~inst whom '40 theseag~.nt~· ;b~~; '.cin,.wh~t:··C1~··thei·. .'::

\ ,I"

.... ~ report.1 . arid' ~o whom?

. '.

, IGe.t copies. of' the repcrtis 'on "Restless Youth'.' :aIia. black radicalism. .....~:--..

I ~, How. is the cryogenic magnetometer used, on whom, and f'or'what ~.

<c-

purpose?

..,"2-: ;'Get copies of the reports on ros, ..---

lr Why does DCS:collect information on I .'

I I What is done with it? '~Y is DCS. getting I '.purpose?

1..:.----

-----,-----------

l.f.O~.~~.Om.1 and for.·what c-: ". .,

I v " .'::

_.(:de~·a· ~cio~'onl

:;~~"'G~~e me a c.6uple of paragraphs on TOfte •. ~.

..3 Inc~ude the: submiSsion of FR Division.~. '.

c.. .

..:-~. Get ~he ful~.:story on providing a~ias dOcu.m~~tation to 'the 'Secret 1..--.....'/. servi.ce , . . ' .. '

t~.' ... "WhY did :we' pay. the costs of" the respon~es:·.to letters received I~r-.l:!-bout the

PresJ.de:o,tls .speech on CambodJ.a1

';:{i{~tipPiying ~e~c~~s 'to Ambassadors seems ~i~;~.:~·.gOOd idea. Eowmany ---

:.:'. .'.'

are' ..t here in use' and where?

; ~i

-',

'..,':~y.' is' 'Logistics procuring~police-type-_equi.J;Jinen.t·f 'or local .police v·· , -forces? '

.·.I!r What is' .a. telepho~e .analyzer?' ,,/ ~

~-":::"'-"':'_---'--

:·j;~:t./,f.hY is it necessary Ii! 'to continue L.._~ :":;4' '~ore on Vesco. How did it get started? . What.·was done? .

:.: it. stoppe~'l . .....

' - - - 1

Why was ,..--

v- ,':

:.;.::.2 What were the .mUltiple channeis to CIA .on: .the .. IOS matter? ~

.'-

.... .

...

»:.. : . :.

...... ~. . .~

...:

;.,

....

00269

MORl DoclD: 1451843 / ,

',~'. ~. .:.' .;; :":" '.,;

'~';:;'t::~~;:;-''::' . ~

'!..-

.: . :.(~ j) : .~ -~:., ,' ., . _... .. . :::.£.. L.bo;J-"..• .... ... ..... . ~cf-(> r-erf ~......,-y, '" e@)~·. .... • . . . . ._. _._ . _.:_~. .... .Br;;;.~(!.~ n~.s -Ill}' A-/11- k.·~i r.~r"·d.d-Y--S·

---"---.~~lf1?-:

~.0c~~'::i.~~

~ . _ . _..~, :__~.. . . . " " .. _.- .-

~"~'-

...

LL_ _-

ips" ...;....

.. ...~S-N() ........ -..... ," .... ...tJ.(b~:S .~ S. - '-1/ lv-...i. .. ...

o..-.C!..g'-"~' .~,;;., 'fjl~.J,p·e, ~~?- -

_.~.:

J).lJ.. I -

- ..

'~....

.,... ...

D. ~ R:.' c::;;:;. _.~ ~..:.-:._-_. ._.~ ..

'.' .. --

d-~n.-f ..". ~ <.<

._- ..__... .--.... --.... V ~ ...C!' 0 , _~.-

. . ~/t

. _.

.. /

~_.

I/t,j!L.r;;f

r··':-.' ."''.' :" . . ./-.Q:. '.' ..

I. -~"-'.'._

_- -_. '.

..;S:.: ~. . .. . .. .}

. _ •• _ .

•

. . . . . .~_

••

•

~_.

LV·c-/ "(}

c./

-._.-......_._..

'-_'-" ...

A<\.~<-:.({ ;~/e.; (I-·tt~f~~·'~··l1 e ..f~ .

~ ,:.t6'fll

~ G."

# -;

;

:.. :.. -.:.-

"~-~

~.,

(

'f!' l"VI.

tl h

.....

----- .._----_.- - - -

:--

------_..... .- ._ __ .- _._- ..

_~----~-------_.

__._-,..._---,.

~.,.- ..: .... -". - ..

J_"":'"

- .~,

;

[: >""'''-

......-- . .

F·

L~·.....-- . . f ..

f.": .

~.-

-.~.

i~_·_"'~ ,_i. -

- - ..... , -"_' '"_'M,••• ~"~" •••• ""._.~.

,,---

...... ;

!-:......r-' (, " '. '- c::> ::;

----'--

'. ~I

.............

(.~~7'

I-f.~ . .

u5 ~

!,: ':. ~ . . :'. . . "

4'!A.,L. CL'/

! ._..... , . -.- '. :.... '" ...

..j-.. ~I't:#l.-~ ... ,. ., ~

1(......

• '" •••••• _

~.,- •• _".~ -'-"-~' •••.

"--~"

M ~.

• '_'M_~ •• "

• •_ .:_. __,_"__ ,,._,

MORl DoclD: 1451843

:": l~;':\'

...:._--..-'-.. - ..; ....-._ ...--_ .....:. _.- -- "" .....

: :: · .

--: ·,·,: , .

. fl$~ .. .

';':

,I ~. . r-".",...,

•....•

- - ......-.. ...__..._..

. ...

-'-"-"-'.~.-

...._-----

...

..... ~

:i:' ----~-

~::

".... _",;,-.~:_..·_..C_~;'\':- •.

"."

._-------._---.--_.... _._._._. __ ..-: '; .

',,~

' " ,"~

.f:" :~',., . . ..;..,- .... ~ - ." ,

'--"-~-

.,------_.~

...~ -'--'-;----.--.--'-

:-:.

.. ":-,"-':' • '

.--:-.~

.. _.:..- .... _..... -... _.....

.-._- _. -._-_ .. '-:-'~'''''-' .- ... .-...._--.. , (':" ..-,"

~;. t

_._----_.....- ------_.._.

._-~.;-._:. _._._._._~ ~._.:,,-:,. '.",-,

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.~ . . 1

...." -. ,-~...:2-.....,.':;:7:"--:-:-'

.-- -- -----_. ---_._._._-=-'-..:.:,"'.:,-~~--~_ .._--_. -----..._-----_.._----

.: . :.,~ .:;

v l:.'~·::

-.- ~.'

...

".'

,',- ,..".. • -0.- .

:.,

,------_....._---.----------------------_.._---:-.- --...---- -.---------------_._---...,-----....,. ~ _.~. '"

"."

_.~

_-.. -- _~

---- :.

..:

...... - .... _.: .... ".

{

_. _

..... _' .. _....

". - - '--:;,r.' ""

'._.".'-- .....

..,.-

-v

......

{

-... _..

00272

_-.~

.._...

~ ... .:.--:--:~ ."

------------·---------c -------.-:-.-:::-----' .'"

------ -_

- . _.'

.----~--~-_.--;.,

..----- ..- . ---~

. -'-

,__

... :...: ..... _~. __ ...--

.. .:..

. . :_

MORl DocID: 1451843

,:',.1· '.:: ,· ·,.:,·;~ 't.(~: t':.: . ·."".l; ....:

'.~.

.1 .'1

_ <2.''''' .'.

_. ....:..,.

-.----.- -'''--''''''- --'-;'-:~·=-."""+-t~':_'_'__:"_··-"_·-.

--.--------

o.s ((

e.-~

da-u-~

_ _.- -- -.,- .. -.- . ~

.._..

..~.e-.::

{]~~~~-

~-ed

.- -------_..._._---

-- .. '

:..

- --.__._- "'"''''''---''' -

_._

_._ _ . _....,._.,.,..C',_+_.:-:__.;__ .-.._

--------..,,------.---_.- ...

__._ -.- _ :---------' __ --------:-.

_-----

--.-

'.i 1:

.1:, -;:: ... _. -~.'

-, ,~'

...

:.-.__ ._-\i •• _ .

i.. :-----:--:,j

__ .

••

_,.

..... __

. . ._ ...

---.. . --.. . ----.------..---.--.---.-.. -

••

~ _ _ _ "

.........

~ - _ , .

.~.:::·~'h0273· -..... .. , . .-:.._",';,-,.~

------------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

••..';

' ' .. ,.' ~

r".

.__._. _._. _k .r:... .:

I .f I .-

: ..~ :.~. 1;:.· .. , . •

H'//

.;;,;;...* t.O e.-- '" .. _ ~ .,

••

._ • •

,_",L~-:

•

••

t.--- ..

:.. :~'!.' ..

_ .. -......

....

•

/DoL. oJ

.a./-: "-'" '"

'- -'- -,~~-_~:~-~-f-'-~~~:J::c-:~- -;; -i~ ~~':.~~~ --, J:h I

1;'V",-~.J1Vt-

lv, ~}4 'e'i-+/~cz.-r;.

':>

...- . ...

•

.... -..

F.¥41.:-r:q~~.··/)~~_. .·. ,

• Op

•

..;\: ......

":.".

.M'

•••_ . ; .

_ ,•••

-:--

\. .. :

.. ..

. -": .

, , I/:Vt~t f1.,

i ..

.- -.

;L~~I" U >1 _ .

t{),~

(;:>i-f

-rJ,-U

"''ffo.t/~ / """'y7~ '" ;,;, .

~._

pS,.5. .. -tr C -t PJ.·:.:··r-.:6l .::....... .. '-.'

: .... ~".;'

..: - - I-~. Q·~ .ti_,-~---c-k: ~ --;~~~J---:-~=-:;..----'ll ,

-, .••_ ..._ _•• __•__ ••.•.

Q-

'_0- _. .

•

•••• ~

••

__ •

•

•••• _.

••

...' .....

rn " ' "

: 00274 .: rr

MORl DoclD: 1451843

·,···..,.;0.'''··· .., •...

. ..... - -.,_ .

.. _

~_._

..__ ..

_..

.._

,,':,,-

;

~_.

,:. ...

....

~_ ~

__ ..~ .. _

_., .

_..:.,' -;--_.__ _,._ ,.

'":":::.:.~::~c::-~

'. ":'l>::t" .:.:."

.... -.-.... - ..... ~_._..-:.:;~'"'I'-..,,- .. -"::"_., - - "." ~ . . .,_ ...,..~.

........

.• _'::•• .• v- ' •. ~

-',' " _,'- - c'

;.-. .

--...... .

-- .. -..

....... -_','-.- ...::'..:'-. ,;

-------.-- -.. ---------:-----""7'"-.- ...

-:-.~-

------_._-...

. ....

•. ·P.... _....0- ...._..... _

. ;

I'"

._-~

t .

_._-_. -

'~-".'~ --~.~ ,

,~" ""

.._~_.'._--- ..- _..".-.--._-- ..:.- .....;"'.....:77:...:,._:...._-:'"....

',.. ;-

~ ~

,..

:..

. _...

" '!'~,\~:.::;,~. :~ , }t~:" ..,... _--

---:--"(:7"~?;

...._" ..-. :.. ~ ':!{".;.:: .

;

_.:

.. -.:.. - ...

MORl DoclD: 1451843

·~~. __T;~i--; ': 71:;_ .UJ~~~~':';~ -c<!'?~ c-~

.r:

.(i)~:.~ ~"Q./'~)\"-'" i'J'~~Q- tvpu9'f-:> I d(.~, '. .. . '.' ..

("\1\. ... . .;

/::,;.:..~Il U ~~(tG"

.... • ...

..., . _..... :...-: .-.- .,

-: -: " .

.. . .. ,

- ....

;..;.~

.._... :. ..

':".

_--------,--_ .....-_.- ..__ ........ _-_.- ....._--_...--------_.-....

.. -

.-...

...-_.-.-.- - " " ' ' ' - - ' '

......

---~---_

.. _.-~ .. ..:.. ~...

"":."

• • • • • • • • :. • • _ c

.1'"

, : ••••: - . . • • • • • •

:""

.•:-... ::-.:.,-..- .. ..' -

_----.~

~'-

_ _- --'-"-'-'---'-- --'" ......

---~-------------MORl DoclD: 1451843 ..._...

__._-------'--

. -.:'.

.; _.:

-"'-

.- - ' . .

,~ _

~ .. : ~

." .• _ '" ..•~..

"'': - "

•

••

.......... _

:-.$'. •

-'1"

'; -~_. (~~".~';~=:'_ __ ..

. -. i

.'~.

'.:

"'.

-"'-..~

~""

•

"':."

• ".1".'• .; ••

"._

' ••_ _ '.~._.~. . . . _

.,·u. _

' .•__ .._ ._

, •••

_ - .. _-

-. --_ _._ :..-.._. --_._- . "'-'

.....

_.- .,.,. . ~

....

._.~--~._._

~.,

" . ' _ _ , " _ ' • • _ _• • • .' • • • • • ' _ ' "

'~"-

~--

- ..-

_ ••

-'..

._ . . . . . . . ~ • • _

..-

••••• _

. . . .'

_ .- ._.- ..

.._'----... -.- -- ."" - ..... ...0. . ~_

-_:_'---'-:---.- ...... __..- -_......- ...._,- ...._- - ----------: . ,.t.:: .

•

•• -.

. -.::, .......: ',.

'. ..

•. ~ - -t

'.. ;.: .'.'.-

I _.~-::---~.

'-'-'-

---'-"'-... ...:.. ... - - -

00277 ..

.~-----~--._

- .. __ ..-..

_-_._-.....-.._~

__.--:--~ ..- "'.--'

.............. F

MORl DoclD: 1451S43

:..:....-._-:-.---:--•.... ..

_, --:;.._~

· · .".· __._..,._h

,.•..: .' . " . .I •

_.__.-.... -.._.....

_._--._. ..

,-".

__ .."__.._

.. -.

._~._.

__.__ ..;_. - -------.

..... ~"""- ...

-;-

""-

.._------. __

_ ,. _.. - .

- - -. -.- ... ..

. ....

., ......

· ~";.,

. .'. -. .

..............., . -." _. . •: •• :

_,,"

->,

-_..

- ..-

. _.' .

;....... ,.

,"'

·_.'.- _.:.- .._-- .'----_.- -"-- .-..-._ _-_ --_._-----:. -- -._

:-'._',.,.:.., :-

-- -.•_

'-'-"~"

~._

_---_ _-- _--------

_ .. --.'.--._._- --- .. "

.'-

·::l--.. •

OJ..

". ;.t

~.,, .. .: .:..:~:~_ ~. ".-_..- .- _,

- . ~:L.. :: .

-, -"-'

.. _ - .-~ .

••- •• R_ ••••••• __•••• _ •• ~~,,_'. R._..

R"_'

•

••• _

. - .... ...•

. ....

... .

... _.

;

;~ .••i , ~ • •

.:} v!

"." •

.~i .'. :'.. ,!:--"~,.,.l.

,r",. . . . .

,""

. ...

"_". _

:- .. ... ::

;I ':' ..., , .:1---. . "'._--.- .._-._----_._ --_._. .~._- --"-- --_.. . "' d',,·:·:·' ~_ .._. " _ _. .

. ._ .. "

__ . __ ,..:.. _':.. '00278 . :. . .

.~~"

. rr-• J'_

MORl DoclD: 1451843

:":.:

:'~

·_-...._ ......~-,~;."":--r •..,----_•.• ,.•

(J).,'~/¥,.'$. ~-e;:i-~;"

'Cl~~-?- '~6c/,.-',&;/./" 4~' "

:.;

....

~'6-.; »sr: ~~

n'.,'L.t<

, --~"'-:~,;__ ,'e:

k~:

:';~-.£'e-

:i .."..;'•. _•...

- .'~': .

- .. ...

'"~.-

. .." :..-•.. ......

.:.-.~

--.

:~: '.

.c '::'

..: '--.-----------'--.-'-'------------'~------'--.--~----: ,-------,--- .. _----~--.~--.----,,-- ---. -------,

.... , ' . . ,....:.. -",

-,,'.;,:_~/".:';,.' J;:~

.'J./

-.:..-._ _-,,. .."

:..'~

-:...

.... '

',;:1"

,_.

::-:).. ... :"'

-,.~-_. ---------- :,-----, ,

--,------- ._--.. '-'- -.---._,--

l:;~c-c=-,; .~---'-_..:-.__._"- :-:- .-._- : - ---- .- -. _. - - - - '. .~_-:- - - -,:.c. t··..:·":·_;-·-.... ~ ·--:-~·:-··-:':.7·~··--:~··,·.':"·,·

__; ..

'._..• _..._ ..

MORl DoclD: 1451843

'n'"

: __

~X .·"~-~;;}'\k~~ ,.

~"". il1.-~, k 1'7~,

~/..~".

.---'''

~ :::Afl··a;u·~.-:·

.: ..- .~~.-I!.~ ~ ..

d C-I jJ;iJ~~ , ;.. .

q.#'F'.

P.,·f~~ ;;£tlj4i~·;;_ . _...~ _ .

,:i-:-::f.~'~:'.'~~..',""' ' ' ~':",

--"'--e:::z:a...

'~VY( 14..-~.f(

:,1

.-. 'i

~.,

·.,1·· ·.., ,..: , ·1

ULJ

" \ /",.

. :·;··t·~·;-~·····-.·~-~--"':f....:....._._t;:5_;~ ;~.-.~.- . -•• t-

;C.~~:~;; ::,(;...e: ' - . t.u.,; tl

~'#'~'

.~J.4"~~

.. '

vs '71... _

.-.' .' .. '()-::~ C> (;).i 1l9~1 (/l

----.-.---.. .~.,-:..-."_;.,Jr:.:.-~~£t:l- II ~~<>::.r-.zL-etd: 4-+~/l:l_~.5!LQ .. ." Col

~,f,}f£yif,tfr---~-"~i~}fl~~~J~: . :~'>~::'~::,~~~;;~;k··:·lt-: ', ·::';~/~~~.d(~;~~· .'

,' '"

- . " - ••.• - • ~

! ; --- ......:,:.'~

." '.

.•...,._ .• ,0_,'0_-

•

....•"--;:,.

.....

'~"

.;.'

_.:

. ,.:.-."

...•. ..• ,.'-.:

--,---.."--------_._--

. . .-. -.,-

,....• '" ••;.,..,f;';o"

:-/

.. --.

_-~. ~~-:-.-.~_._.--.-:

~.,.-

_.. .•._-.:_.~

'.' -,~7_."-: ,..

,-._ _'r-r- -. '. __

MORl DoclD: 1451843

....

! .(

• j

·-1 :"

':.

\ ..... .' " r

"'~

i,~ ....

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.'.'

<.: ." ~.,

..~ .,,," :...:..: :..... ' :$

9 July 1970 .: . .

Di·~~tqr. ~civised

·~taii~;'~!;~~i~·~~:~ . ':

" . The the' .DD/I "tha'tWbite House and .Pres:Ldentia.f"COl.;msellor·Pat Moynihan' thought well·,.of ·t4e.: ...-. memorandum' on "Black Radi'calisniin the C!3-ribbean~II ' 10 July 1970 .;"..

". Mau~i'bl'i~'~e~"'6~"hiS meeti~ yesterday wi thC6ngreS'sm~n' ·Richard. Ichord"Chairm~n of'.th~. House Internal Secur~ty Commit~ee, .wbo.had asked woot' Me are doing "to .investigate "securf,ty Leaks." .connected with press, accounts' of .Lon Nol's having sold rice to the Communists and having engaged in .an attempted deal with Hanoi. Maury briefed on his explanatiop.of .why we are doing nothing, since such reports are not exclusively·,confined. tio ..o ur information. 1 September A1970 :

. ·t·, . ....... -:.,.;.-

"';'.

MaurY :~bted. that the Director sent a letter to' C~ilg:reBs~an Moss on',~tet~p'hone monitoring practice;3 •

;'"

The Director' noted a 1 'Septembermemorandum from' Jphn .Bross on. . Daniel E.ls~rg '·(sic).· He:~sked the. DDS ·to lift his cl~~raiJ.~es and ". to make this';;f'act mown in security channels. <':{}t'..· ",· . 15 October 1970 ." ,. "'.. '. :' .'.:. . .• :.:i:j;~·"·~:<· ~': .. :'.... '. : ';:~~::~{~~1:i~~;:'· ."" -; ~ DDS ··reported that· the Weathermen have declared" tn:tsiilonth for their falL;"offe'n:sive and have.' ~entionedthe Agency' as;;~at?ta:rg~t .for bombings ·ap.d.·'.kiaD.apping. He briefed on precautio~ri\m:easures adopted' ~nq:<aske'q,<senior:officers to :vary their route/,tQ::~nd..from work, 'and .to·:rep.ort· any pecuLiar telephone calls oruriusual"events around their residence. 28. Octo~r' '1970' .

·D~P.:::·~~o·~~ed

.!"

-:-:'.2.

for'·.ii~~rprints

that the FBI desires to check on all·: ci;'Yptogram messages .mailed to high Goveznmerrt officiaLs. The messa~~6.~11 then be passed to ·NSA for exploita~ip§~1 DDP requested;·:that Agency:personnel 'who receive such messagl?$ pass them to him :.for transmittal to the FBI. . \./.'

/' '.

·OO~82·

~ .

. ..

...

-.:....

MORl DoclD: 1451843 c- ....

...'. .

/'.... \ I

r :

': :":;\'.~.;., !.i:.~.'.~.:.;.~:.'..~ .:'.:"

I, "

" ,

.-: :.. :;<;~.}?<> : : - ,

". 10 ;De~emb~r·:1970·:.-

.,/:\" "

.,:·,:;:~!'~ t~ i-?;: ,',

~,; ..,' ,":_~ "'~. : ,~ : .~:, :~.:

.:.'.:',",' ,:':.:• ,•:. ...•... .•.'...:. ... :'.:.' ..• '.,:.,;..

....

... :.:..

. - . .',

·····;···\:>;i!i;i~:;·:;;/:/:·

.:...: ~ .' ':.. Db±.. preas accounts Of' ~I Direct~rJ,-"E~~g<ko'over ,;'s··· " 19 No~eni~r. statement that th~ Biack .Panthers are·s1ipp~rted:.by': terrorfst:9rg~nizations. He said. th~t ..we have: e~:i,*~d:the" F1;iPs related"ffles-, and .our own data Q.nCi find no indicatton::;'of',.any. '. relation~h:ip be.tween .the. fedayeen and the Black ·Parithers. ·He provided:.. th~ Di'rector"with a memorandum on' this t9pic~.

nbted.·

':Exe.cutive Dire:ctor called attention to the President's .21 December memorandum on "Discloaares of Classified:Information . ~ . -' . .an~::q9.'?;t'c;ination .and.·CleaI/(tce at· Official St9.~e~~~~~i-!:\;which i~ ..;,:', . be1ieve.d·..: to.be the result of'. represemtations by'.'t;l;i ";; Trector and.:' A~~ra:W.wA~~erson~.:::.;E?,~.cutiveDirecto:( said tlia~;T:;"'~\' '4,~~km~et~:~i:i;:, -. ' ,seJ.ected::··EXecutive·.. Committee Members next week.:t ;. "s'cuss the '..' .'c' ..:': memoraridUin's·inlplfea.tions and to- develop' recommen~tions.f6raction . bY:.tb;if~.D:i:~ctorin: :view of' the special :ies:ponsi:bi:ii;Bi~~>placed':on:: '. 'hi1n'?~:~~~~eV:resi~~:nt·•. '., . . "<';~";;t;t~)~1~~~'?\::':"";' ">:::i::::;'~':',: , "

29 December 1970

." . . ;. ;::>:"-~,:

.,. .

:~:::.:

.-.,

,.. . ~": .

: '.'

····ji?x.e·c~ti'Ve Dire~tor reminded Executive committ~E1;~·,participa~ts·. " '. . about··::.-t1ie·":in~eting· involving most of them this mor:i:tlng' 'on: the Prwsident. 1 sdirective .on disclosure of classified::,:hiformat10n. ,"

.3o,.~:i~~~·r,. 1970 ..... :'. ,.'

'. .. ~·):i«t.;.:.::~:. r"'>:' ":'

'. .•... .'

:~:~:.Ji~~'~~~ive Director ·briefed·on the re~u1ts '~t~'~st~'rdaY's meet:irig--; on.":what the . 'Direct~r now .needs to do in' .~ur§uab:ce of' the: . ":, Presidenc,'s: directive .on disclosure of classi:fi~d;:i:iri.form~tion..'.:-.He:~ will' outliri~ 'in the pirector I s brie:fi~ book actions'·-wid.ci:r:iare to' 'be .'-;.. .'. taken. '.'<

.:.

:."

.: : ',.:. ~...., -,

..'

.....

. .. '. -.~

•

.....; ....

•..0: ,~

. (.

....

00'253'.'

MORl DocID: 1451843

.' .f~ ~':;,!"'i.;.': .'.. , ,

.... ~ ':'~:'.'."'.'

",-

II ,,,.-

..'.... \

., "~:: :'':1/

':·.(>,:;;;l~;.·~:({:·;· ':

·;·.:::i4',>January 1971, . ..

'. ~~' :;:f :' ~ .. . . .

., . Bross said·.that 1;l~.and· Bronson Tweed~r.wii;t},h!i:ve.:lunch today with . . :aen.eral Bennett, Director of' .DIA. The Directoi":said that 'he might ask .: 'Bross to take along a copy of' his letter .and guidance on the Dis'closures ,. ::o£::Caassified 'Information and Coordination and :Ciearance' of Official· .. Statem~nts but :that he firstvdshes to ciarify' with: the Exe.cutive . "Director 'some of the' -Language in the guidance ·section•

.' .: ·-. is "Janua'ry 1971

~ ,'~'."

. Maury said.· that he antdcfpate a-a number of' questions from the ..Hill on the .at.tached article by Jack Ande rsondn today"s,Washington , . ::..Post, "6 Attempts .to Kill Castro Laid to CIA." .

'.'~.:~:~; ;,<:;: :.' '~~uSt4~re4tted that 'he .will havel~~~\;~~~;::wit~Assistant

:':.>Attorney 'General Robert C. Marclian to discui;is~~j;ii~>riirector.rs.guide.', :.'(tiJieson the disclosure of' classified inf'omai:lpn. .

;,:i~:i~i{~;;:::'B'r6ss

wi~hG~ri~~~:\~~~hnett re~iew

". ·rehted. that Pa;rott met to .·.: ..) :'¥'€/:',Director'S 'letter on dis'closu~ ?f c~£3~'iti~~.~nf'o:rI+lationand ·:said that. Gene.ral Bennett will now d~scuss '.~ t·,:w:J;t.h. Deputy Secretary . .'J;lackard, who may in turn 'review it with Secre.tary~ird. .The /'" ·.;Directorasked to be·.advisedof' Secretary Pac~rdrs. reactions and. :. ["6~~d:·that he 'wants to -check the. final guidance.:w;ith .Secretary" . · ··::Laird and with someone in ,the" White Housebefore:it is issued. . "i••

·.·. :~ir:f~~;:~:~e.~rua~ .1971 -. :

.:.~":.~;:;~;}/

:,;::.::i:~.:. DD/P C!llled attention to' Jack Andersoni~'~"~o:iUmn'in'today"s .::: ... ",Waspirigton Pos t , "Castro Stalker Worked For.··.The.CIA. 1f . • . : ' . :.

;';

,,:'.:.",.

•

' . , ' "

'.":

.. ,. . .,'.. ..

.. , .

. . . . .: '>:

".~

.... :

.. -. ~ :".

.,"

•.•.

. ,

:."

. .'

:~.. ~

.oo~B4.~

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.J~g~;R;91j:}~ f ;

••• ':'

: ,:~:. ~ ... :

••

•

'; • • • •::::."':,.....: . , . : . .- .

:~,' :"~

•

(-- "'y' .,,··:t·july·1 971 ...' .' ~ .....'~...;: :.'. .

•••

,..

.....

.' .

••

. . . ,.':;:;!~:~:(':::'"

..'

. '., "'::"::' .'

::.; :\'.J;;:;:.::.:.~:.; (,:: . ~'Ca.rver noted that SecretarY Lciir4~'tR.'ad·:re.quested: thatour printi.ng;·;>: .' . ..'. :.. ·:\.pl~nt .as sist "iIl reproducing .the.forty-s·eVb~Y~lUi.nesec~e{ Pentagon ~~dy'''<:, '. ::. on: :Vietnam io'r distribution to the'.' pre.s~·,:aI{a·: ~t~ rs ~his .m.or!;ling.·, This -. , : . . . )r.equesf:.. was aborted by the Prbsident. 7'.: " ....." .. ' . ·'''''''''lD,.l?C?~~:ht':t1i.e 'chair) .

'. 2 July 1971

.. "':;":' . "I:!D/S said that in the abse~~~,.ofl

. :>'~p~ .•... lat~end.eq< ..... 'arne etingat the White Hous e ye:sterday.ofthe interagency group which is',· reyiewing c la s sdffca rion and de c Ias sffication policy. The President spent' an hour with the group and said that he wants': ••• and (6) the revocation of all c leaz-ance s and the retu·rn. .of all classified rnat e ri.af held at.Harvard, ·Brookin.gs~· Rand, and Cal Tech r : as :well. ·the' withdrawal of Q' clearances .:.heldby·the Regents o:f'the U;niversity··o{Ca,lifo·rnia. A brief discussion .. .: . :.··fo~t.ow~d~.?~ni:f the Exe4=utive Diredoi'·nottid·.that DOD bas asked' us to provide .. inform~tion on all our cont racrs With: Rand,'. as well'as all clearances held ' . .' <·by,·Ranq. p~rsonn'el for our Pu~pos.es.·. ·Ading.'Dir~·ctorasked that we asse~ble ; . ....: ... .:·data.:pe·J:tainmg,to the ~reside~tls:r'~ma.rks,btifi:~twe'tai;te no action until . . " : .the President's guidance bas. been confirmed, andthe DDls:ha.s provided a .memoxandum on it. I I " ' .. (DDClin the chair)

. : -:' '.

'.'Carver 'reported that they will; probably complete their detailed reView

'..of. the secret Pentagon papers by 6 July. . . .

II . , . -

...'. "'Viari:t~r,:.called attentio~i:6:Seq;¥.'eta:~i·R~gers'·requ~st that the p:res~: .:··:·,pe·rm.it the. Govermnent to. review i.n~civahce p.otentially daInaging documents ;":" .£rom,the ~entagon papers." "., -, ' : :,;.' ..... '.: ..... ' .... . . . - . .'''' ". ~ .: '':'.' " . -. -" . :"..

6 JUlv 1971 .'.' ... '. ' . .ItCa'rve.r said that their re.vi~w:·o~.Jhe se~ret Penta on stud 0 .' ..... .: . : .v1.et~a~ has a lmo st been completed•.'.'::', . . . . g y. n

...

~'.,"

':' ..

\.'

, .....

00285 :. )"'":"

MORl DoclD: 1451843 "

. _

'I ....

.......

.•.....

..". ~.": .~."' .... ,

':~.: ':

~ -. ;" r:

.... :

...

'.'

7 July 1971 ,JlCarver' said that he will be atte~ding a meeting toca.y called by As. sist~nt Secretary of Defense' for Public Affairs Dan~erHEmkin. He added that· he' . -, : ',: as surnea it will concern the de~~assi£ic~tiono~ some' of the' secret Pentag6zi. '. ' papez-s andfhat, if it does, he will s e ekehe DirectorJs advice•. " (DDCI-'in c.:hai r,

"At the Executive Director's requ~st, the DD/S.aareed to 0aet too-ether . with the DD/S&T and General Counsel to prepare a briefing paper for 'the ' Director on where we stand with res'p~C~ to classified rnatez-ia'Is at Rand ~nd, efforts to' safeguard t hezn, Ii ". ,

., . :

.:.)',

(;>

" ','Maury reported .that CongresBm~n Mahon would like to meet with the" Director on 9 July to discuss t?-e Pentagon papers and various world hot's'Oots Carver said that he will prepar:e a briefing paper fo!:, the Director. on the • Pentagon study. II

~oncern ov~J:

. "Carver briefly notedl . the revelations in the Lansdale ~z:n=-=e=m=-=o-=r-=a-=n:-:'d!:'w:n==-. -,~w.:::;hi;-'·;-:,c"h~.-\V-a-s-s-u-r£"'aced·as part of the Pentagon p~pers. "

;d'··

" -t

I... : . ,

1.IDD/S.reported that a DOD s ecu rdtyEearn is goi.n.g to Santa 1vlonica , to repossess classified De.fense·ni.a~aria:ls held at Rand, He 'suggested that, ,,

8 July 1971

..!

." ..... _4 __ .'

<11 ....: ,}.

I'- '. '.

'...:1 .. ','

.'1, .. J

• :

... ' .."..: .

..;:. .,.~ .:~.

, . rather than take, parallel actfon; .we s end ,a' Security Officer to observe the' opez-attouand inventory Agencyrriatezia'Is thepossessiori of Rand• .In response ta the Director's question he expbined that we have seven contracts With Rand; only oneLs .cl.as·si:fied, and it is with Randts Washing-' bon officer although some material could have been sent to Santa Monica•. The Dire.etor concurred and requested a review todete rrntne the essen- . tiality of cu'rrent prC;;posed·.contracts w-ith.·Rand. Houston commencedthat; according to Dab General Counsel Buahardt, DOD.~s technically under instructions to lift 'the secur;ity clearances of Rand con.tractors but has . taken no action. nDCr repo::-ted'that John E}l.l"lic~":nSE:...heg.J~~~s.~~,P-'.~g: ~dviS~_':.~.Jl:;!!..!h2...'tThi!~!!9~,~~ __!tL~.P.2..m!}P:gj'R~~~...f1-1:...~m'p',lHY~~-.fi92.~~d , ,,: ·Hunt as a securipl cons~~tE':.I!-.t., .Lat~r·in the meeting the Director a sked a'll Executive Committee members to review their .lists of consultants to de- . termine whether each is really needed•. Ii

. ,/

"Garver briefed: on his rne'etmg'yesterday with Assistant Secretary . ' .:

/ . '0£ Defense for Public .Aifairs Daniel Henkin and noted that any further :

i·

exc~sions from the text of thes ecr'et Pentagon' papers :rp.ust be p.rcvided

f..... ;.':' . I:. • .

'f'

by ,Monday. He added that no. decision .has yet been made on wherhe r ..1:o release to the. public the volumes .o·r a version fhe zeof; The Director noted that we should oppose any such course of act'ion, II '

00286

MORl DoclD: 1451843 .:-.,:.:~ ....

-::': .r: . .

;~~~0m&l~tr~Wji[;;i;lt~;.:.;~J:~g~;~~1~t~~*;:;!;~J", .'",'. . .',. -' ..•.

'..

t·•.

'16 July 1971

Ca~~r said that )fu~ most ,a~:Pre·ciative 0:( the -tim~ 'which Houston SIlent WJ.thhiril"yesterday•

(""'.'Y' "..

.::.. r·

.' :;.

'~.

,.1"•

...

'",

... '.~ '

·...

I, ,:'\.

.~~I' •••• .~.:

..:

00287:

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.._.... ,..--'" ~

,. ,R"~ '0.

. '. ",

. .'

; .,,::~).

"In

I';'

. .f.,,:"

. '9 July 1971 .

. l,

~-:

.. ,' . "

~.~

'respo~se't~'1:h'~:~pi;~ctO~f~'qu~st~o~ Carver r~ported'i:li~i~:~one:,:~:(.~·..

';e;ew xork:!;!:t::~!iZ:&:t ~:~:~e~~~~'7::;::~\1~:~'!'fs~e~'

.. a complete copy of the..:for·ty·~seven volumes

I . '.. . - ,

16 July 1971

"Carver reported that the book which General Lansdale has 'been ,writing for a year and 'a,h~if is now in:- the hands of the publisher. With' some minor changes being made.in light of .reve1ations resulting·from. the publication'of the secret Pentagonpape re , In 'response to· the PD/P' S question Carver said that he mig:Q.t·',be: able ·to· ar:l':ang~ for ua to read the teXt;~!I.. ';".", .f (DDCI in the chair) .,.,.· '.'

. ·i·";~/ .'.;:-:' .... .' "\,'

trTweedy noted th~t:~twiute Hci~se ·~e.quest a PFIAB co~itte·e". com:~ posed of Franklin Linc;p~;:d)r. William Baker, aid Frank Pa~e wiil'~~:fer"; tak,e·a damage assessni~nt;rifthe publication of' th~ secret Pe~tago.n··~~p~.rs• . He added that the committee will.want to -near from. us and spoke of plaIts for Houston and Carver to unde.rtake this .task. II , ~'.:

.." ...,._~:.~_..• _.. ,'--

'" ..

20 Julv 1971 . ,',';.

'ITweedy repo;t·~.d}6.~.~.telephone c'~ll' from. 'AndY Marshall a~d;1~~Jid.: that Marshall and Ran&.i?~~:side~tHe~ry., Rowen are brooding ab6ufth~~~:: .. ,:. secur ity pz-obl.em in Rand/;' Marshall exp re s s ed a. de s'i r e to talk ·Witl,:(bTfe.. :of our senioi- security.oI£lcers when he next visits Washington ~n or9:e£·'t6 get. a feel for securitjr':p*a::ctites in' general.' Executive Director .~4Th~:~d a'gainst our getting out front in. term.s ofadvi.sdng a major DODconf.r;;Lctor . on security. The Dir~ctor approved and requested that re ze apond to ¥.r'. Marshall's request in loVi key and that 'the meeting be held.in,thi.,~· 'b~i1qing~l\

. ..' .... ': ........ '. ": ." .'~' .:' . . ... ' : , : , . ,

'..

."~:

'.','

... .... . -. :.. .

. : ..

.' . '

(the dayHowa rd Hunt came to see· General Cushman)

ca.r,ve;::...highligh~·f;'d. bi s., s."':3 I'd r)P~~eJ:da,.Y_\Yitb..li§..Q s:taiie r ':D~:rid .

.?2 J-u.ly'1971 II

.-·...,..Yo-u.ng, ·~~ho is ~s s iatingJ o'w}_lfht!J.EJEp~~!-..i~_~Y.i,"~g,J,~~~~:s-:;:.~.t;~~nt:;·gon ./ papers., II : : ' < . ~

..--,. __ .._. ... ..

,. ,

.:, ": " ...":.' . :

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.:.:;.. .:'

',-'-'

......

.: '~;""~M.'~':':~~ i;,.-.. ·· ;~:~.;:,.,

"",\"

~ ~

'«t ','

, riCarve.: high,l~~hte~ his, .Houstou' 5,: and 1se s ston with. t1i'~~:"'" . ~FIAB cor.r.unlttl\'~:.:~p.i,<;:,h 13, undertaking a damage as s es srnent. oithe publfca,~~;:1'~~ th~ ~ec~et.:~;~~~'7go"n,papers., (See, ~~orn~ng Meeting M~ut~~ of, ,~6 July !'"

'''--''-.''

6 August 1971 The Directi;):l' cai1ed attention to the article by Michael Getler in t odayt s VTashil+gton J:>o~t" "CI:A,patrols'Into China Said Halted, ", and di z-ected (1) that Maury write a letter, io» his s Igna.tur e to Senator Stennis making it clear that Senator Case wa sb rf efed on t~s topic and obViously leaked it; (2) that Maury brief Carl March 'on the background, including the fact that these operatiOU$ were not te rmmatedbecaus e of the Pz-es identrs projected trip. to Com:munist China butl;>ecau's~,certainaspects of the:m were preV:iously exposed in the press; ,(3) that theD,ll.·ector';of Security (who was present at the Morning Meeting) get additional backgr-ound from Maury and see White House staffer' David Young;(4} ,thatGo~dWiil.,rep1yto 'queries by saying that we know nothing about ,this ~atter; (5 ):,th~t,,~ousto,riand Maury utilize this incident in any rnat.e rfal p repaz-ed for his' u se in,opposing the Cooper biil; and (6) that the ODeI brief Dz, Ki s s irige x or .Gen era.I Haig on this :matter today. ....

.....

.::* 13 Augus,t,'1971 :<'

'.,

, Knbch'e'cail¢datteriti.6n:to the .artiCle by Tad Szul~,in. todayt s New York Times, "Soviet Mqy-e,:t6,Ayert ,War Is Seen in Pact with India, II and 'said that the material contained' therein' on the reason for Foreign -Minister Gr.omyko's visit to New Delhi is ,cleariy,froIn highly c1as'suiedCS'materia1. 'TheA-DDP noted.hi's concern ove.r this breach of security. ..; .

16 'August 1971

, i

-1

'A-DDP n~t~lthit"~hearticl~ b T ' " '. . . .' ' , "Attempted Pr6-'SoVi~t Coup in y Y - ,ad Szulc In Sundayrs'~~ Times, from a TDCS. Th~:Diredo k e;en 18 Reported, " contains information ',~o~se stafi~r ~a-rid~oung•.r as, e that he call this to the"attention of vVmte , .:

.....

00289"

MORl DoclD: 1451843

i.:.:' ." ,,-

....

··1 <

18 August 197'~ -: ,~.:',:

,'.

.:..<:;. r "

A-DDP riot~d that. he has reported to 'l,v-hite Hou~e :sta£f;;~ b:~vici'YounO' " .'. . ",;,:,__/ . 0 'on the re-:>ults,().£th~,Deputy'Directorof Security's'survey of'~lio-s'~,~,W};o saw' the classified, a ss e sament upon which Tad Szu.Ic, based ,h\s'13;::i\b.g~i#:,:article. (~ee Morning Meetbi.g Minutes of I? August 1971}.· ,'::."((;:::;:i:' .: :. " ".'~'

~,~;

: '.:~: " , '

" '."

t \

r-..

19 AUQ;us't 1971,'

'IIMaury hriefed Qn,.vynite House s~ai:fer Jo1:'.:1 Leh..-na~'s::~equ'est'fo::' ~~r '. ' '. d" t . . a"W'on'a t four volumes of the secret .Pentagcn paper", aSslstance ln e errrllnm o , ,,' ° • H ' . G 1'" t dly provided to Beacon Press, for pu,bhc,atloll· e, Senator' rave ,repor. e , , ' " b noted thatP~u1 Chretien pf'o.TR,is an acquamtanc e ()~'t4:,'S.en.at~r~n~ n:~y .e able to assist. "Carver said that the four v'oluro.es probao~'y pertal:" to e1!or~~ to ne otiate a sett,lement and outlined the sensit~ve ~aten:l'contaln,e~ther~ln. Hous;on re,"ommended against our involvement ln, th7.: rn.at..e~, a~d su:gested ' , tm nt of Justice que ry Beacon PresS • .',Ma:ury sa:~d that.Fhe , that t h e D epar e ~ , 'It' "'th Cl k 't ;""l'ni:itructed that we dc),nothing unti11Jlaury c.(;m~,u ,5 ~ ar. . D ~rec 0 .... , - , ' .' dC' ional M O"e;or' CoU:nsel,to' the, Presi.dent for Legislat1ve"a~,' ongr-e s s , ::teo ~,c, h" . ,,' 't £ town 'and will not return until the first;9 f next week. Affalrs W 0,15 OU 0 ' hm In the ~'~ariti:m:e" :Mau'ry noted tp.at hl:: will dete~ine,..f.ro,m, !ohn..Le a~., n whother,'th~y have considered consulting the Depa:r,tment of JU5tl:e °h ~!l!.hs. ) ,(DDCr l.n t e c alr rnatte r ••. -,

, "

',',

,',

..' ..

20 'Augusi:' 197 1 ,

. ,~

' : ' .

4.'

",rM:aury safd that he called '\V4ite Hous e stafI~'r ,J 000 Lehman yesterday

and cite4:;~ih'~.Code :which would' p ezmit the Justice "D~p'~:r:tnlent:i:o go 9-fter' the four' vohlines':,?£,the, sEicr~t,Pentag6npapers report~'d{y:'gi:v~n:~oB'eacon Pres s; Lehman "s', reaction .wa's .that, since there is an, exi.stingpoiiCy',preventing the use of su~po~nason this matter, he'stiU hopes we wntass,ist ,{n'det'erm.ining 'what Senato:r Gra:\reI may have given. Beacon Press~:":Th-e,DDC(a5kedMaury not to ut~lize,' Paul:Chretien's entree 'to the Senator ~th.out prior consultation With the Director, and Carver commented that he is' opposed to our'involve- " ment (see :M~rning,MeetingMinutes of' 19 August 1971. it '" (DDCr in'the chair) "

~;)~< . . '::' .'

23 Aug'.l,st'1971 ,

" ' t:TiwDirector reviewed ior Houston a conversation he had with a' , <o,uug la~\~'Y:er who has reviewed the secret Penta,go,r(,pap'ers' -in'response to' ,..-_tIle Jl~stlce Department's efforts to pzo s ecute, Ace'ordina :to' thi'· tt '<:a.. J .... did ' . ' 0, sa o rney, . us ..rce ,,1 .. ~ot c ibe the: approprlate proVJ.sions of the Code audhaa ze sent d lots case poorly. /-I , p e ~: i·

".:-.,;;:

00280'

MORl DoclD: 1451843

•

. .~. . .'

,:"

.... ' • -.~ :,;~:,

I"~

l:~~=,::that thi.i."~aaY;.in the~lti'~itand

called:i:l.tt·~rition·to the foiloWing article's: .I1Maci".li?Hedi, Linj '_",i- ,.,Apparently Out in Powe·r·,shuffle" by Stanley KB.rn9i,1}'."Nqrth·Vi'etnam's· Next MO~e" 'by Evans/Nova,k,' and "lin Piao 'is iFinisli~41.':'1,JY Joseph Alsop (a ttached}. He noted 'that,while the artic:i.e:J~y':Stanley . Karnowprovides good coverage of the topic, it· has :'8, 'State. Depar-tment; flavor. He also recalle'a that on 25 October we'dis'seminated in~ormation simiJ..8.r to that corrtadned in 'the EVel!lf!/}lo:va~.article • ·He.·tnentioned that .the Alsop .article is ·probably.the m:ost damagin'g, since' it inciudEii!3.,materiall . ...... '"

IThe..Director noted.. :p;JJ.:l.~,s,.to. do S.omething t,

La--'b·o"""u-:t·.-.t"h--'i'-:s::--C::pC::-r:-::o'i:b""l-=-e:-m~:b=u:Lt-a=-d3':v~ised the A-DDP to . cope ':Wi th any adverse..

fbY

..re~ctionT -. 'noting ~he la:ge··~~()~~e.:01'. repor;ts onithe·pol1tica:I",situation in Commum.st· ChJ.na~:·,::·· ';'.: ..... --::. .",

. ."

11 _,November 1971

. .

±~, .response ·to the. Director's .question . ca;;~·~::~~~d'.~hat~some work . requested. by ·.John 'Ehrlichman is pending. The Director asked to be .' ·filled in later .on the detai1:s. . . ..::'. . '. : .. '.~

;.'

... '.. 'Lehman . said. tha;t Jack"Anderson' s column inj;o~y' sWashiDgton :. ~pa:t;::-J!Hu·sse:l;tl.:·.;:I:S;elp . or I'll Go on' a:' Ghazol1.~~~;~~LcC!ri:tairis. ver'bS;tiin . . . ')~il.guag~. '!'rom ),Ul:': ExDis mes sage 1'rom'King' H}ui,~,¢;p.ij~~cf:the.·,~s 'fdent·· , ·.and adq.edthat.: he ~ d.s 'looking into the' distri:Du'tiori Qt'. this message • '~ ~.' .

':"

.',

" . - ,'" '. .

'<':.:

'.-.

.. . ~

,'.

;

.... .

. . A-DDI ca].led attention to Jack Anderson's columns .inyesterday's 'and today's Washington Post (attached). Henqted .th~t the 27 December .- piec~ .contained material frc:lIll.three SALT ExDis. .memcons and added ·.tliat·toaay' s column contains quotes from a state.: Ltiillis. eabf,e and :\~:~Q::'~CSS. 'A bde1'.:'discussion 1'ollowed, ..th,~>P.R;;'[()bs.erving that, .' . .;.:. if·'.these security.breaches continue, we wil~·:li~ve·.t·o· limit severely '" ·the·. distribution of sensitive .intelligenceinformat1on. •

' :

.. :', :'.,.;''.,~ -': '. . . ,.',',

.....

?ct":#'., •

~.,,...

•

: • '~~.:..::

• t'

• •

' ,.~

• ' ,',

0029.1.

.MORI DocID: 1451843

.. :.__ 1

. !; '1

. . . . . . .t•• ' · · " '

','

.l.

: -,' . '

•

". ';(

·'i,.·

•

<.:!" .

.'. " "~i" January -1972. .",

; 1:

.....::::.: .. Maury said that "acc::ording to Frank Slatin;she·k,.·Cha'~piJan . . ':Nedzi' will rely on' us ratb.e;r::heavily forsuPPol;t· dur.ing his.hearings '. on the problen"t.of classification and handling:'.of.Governtnent·.· . . "'1rifprmation (see Morning Meeting Minutes of 6' January .1972). . The . Director encouraged Maury to ,see Chad.rman Ned·z.i next.:week, and ." nouston suggasted that. the Chaiman be provided with ·the Rehnquist .study. ': DDP briefed on .work under ,~y to limit··distribution of. reports ~and\noted that· C/FI ·is completing a review of ---=s""'t-=-e=p-=-s-w"""hL:J.""'·c="h=-=m...-:li""'g=Ulfi=t:--t::Q=e--=t/iken to re strict di sseminationof sensitive reports from ·all·sources.

..' .....·.Ll.. January .1972

,,:,: . Maury: ~'lated' that Frank: SlatinsheK' ii;;;~~'~Sing for.'';~Ckground . '. . ;:·materials pertaining to Pas:t efforts or.·studies·: related' to :the classification and control of informatipn~.:{',1Ie added that he and .>, !':'HoU!:Jton will meet with' the .Director later' ~¥aY ·t9 discu~B the ,.' '.' availability ·of .the Rehnquist. study. ! ' '. ' i2.January i972

...::',

;:.

": .r:';.. :-.:

'....." Mat:t!y)tBriefed: onhis·anf!. Houstontssession with Frank ' . . ' ' :.:". SJ.atinshek and their provision of a. large ,volimJe of material on . '. .. .. past eiforts tq develop ei'fec-cive espiona:g~·:!(·laws. ,0.

'.'

' .

•

',"0)",-';;"-;"','

Hou~to~ ri6ted' the Pre'sident t ~ nOnii~~ig~,':'~f HenrY E~. ". Peterse~ ..... : : ·tobeceme Assistant Attorney' General in ;:Chlirg~·,o.f.,the diminal .. _ . 'Division ot the Justice' ·Department. He ol)se'rved ,that ·Mr•. Petersen :.:..... ..' :has 'been ,m-os~ helpful to the Agency in:the",:~~t~:,~r.ticu;I.arly , . on: the Itkin case. .

., ,.:: '.>'.

13 January .L972 . . , , :'. Maury .n~ted ·.that the draftrevision,'bi 'Executive .Order 10501, ,: ...: ."Security.Classification Procedures," .whicp.::'iB 'be,ing circulated '. '. by the .NSD staff fot comment, isa follow:on to the Rehnquist study• .::00

'. .: ·DDI calied'attention to the article: intOday's New YO~k:.Times, .. -."Nixon 'Acts to End' Security Leaks." (Excerpt: "last ·July,.. two " '. 'members of the White Rouse 'staff, ·DavidR. Young of the Ne:t~ona.i " . . ~ .8ecurity councr), and Egi.l Krogh Jr. of the. ;J;)omestic Council" were /., " asked to investigate 'earlier leaks and prevent recurrences.") . ,.~·I~

. '.

O.o.29~

MORl DoclD: 1451843

I>· ,

......

;

/!~.

' '. ,~:"

"'~'.,

"'. . -~ ,

, ":"

.;.':'

.: . ::'~.' _.... " ~..

·1, February 1972

..;- " ." :>-.. . '

...;A/DpS reported "the Rouse ;Appropriatio~s COl!JIll±ttee "re~uest :for " a finance of'fi·cer ~oa.ssist them in }lork':."0Il: .tne budge t, '''-'~~ added " that we have provided such assistancein·tlie past l and the Director interposed no objec:tion. . . 7 February 1972 .' . "H9ustonexplained that no actzton wi~1 be taken in the near future with "respect to 'the Rans Tofte" case I" since the Judge! has been 'stricken with hepatitis. tl February 1972

DDI noted the article by Michaei·:·.c¥:t~er in 'Today'S Washington Plan.ned.:;:idr'C1ea"rerl" :rnstluit Pi~tures." Later 'inthe meeting the Director. asked: the DDS to advf.se the ,.' Director of Security to undertake an·~nvestigation at this leak :;.,' 'EOI-related information "and to convenerthe USIB "Security Committee • '.::'. • " . ' .• '; ->, - . ' : ' .... Pos~.; ."New Spy Satellites _

•'

. ','

: 11 February 1972 Carve.r -noted his hand.Hng of Wbii;e"' H9use staffer Sven Kraemer I s ze quesf to' .FBIS f'or material cQncerriing;""U~S. FOW's.". The Director reminded Executive Committee members of'"Dr. Kissinger's :reCJ.uest that any inquiries. from elements" of'the Wbiteo House staff. be re:ferred to .his staf'f' for conveyance to :the Agen:~y ~ " : ,. . . .,

..'

,.,

,,'

Houstonhigbl:ightecithe:meetirig.~i~.JOhn Ehrlicbman on the NSC : "draf't Exec~tiveOrder on security Classifi~tion" "He" noted the _ 'related articLe by Sanford Ungar in today'sWashington Post, "liSe" ." Urges: St;tff'er. raw On Secrets.". ".. ." 16 February 1972 Lehman noted plans to continue' briefing Attorney 'General Mitchell, .whose resignation is :e:t:fective 1 :March". :" . .

. .. '

'.".: ", '.

Houston related that Wbite:Hou:~e'~taffer David Young has invited him to review another ~ draft of the 'new Executive Order on security classification.::.. .

',':

,. .

r..

. ,.

....

. "t"."·

.' ..,,' .

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.,:. . /

..::'. ".:.

.. ~.. ."

... -A: .

..:

.. .. 2e February 1972

:.,

". :i,:·;:,:::,: :

. ~o~ston. SS:i'd th,~t he. andJ .:,;::.'.,::.... , DePuty Director ?:f Security, recommend the DJ.rec-f;or;concur ·.J.n·.the M new ExecutJ.ye Order on classification, in light "pt tbeir under'\and:Lng with NSC staffer David Young, that some of the ':features df the' Executive Order may not materialize. A bri~fdiseussion followed and th~ Director asked lIouston to 'review the matter with him.

2 ~rch 1972

....j

. .i

Houston reported that the draft Executive Order on classif'ication has undergone a few minor changes•.. ~e noted Director's letter to John Ehrlichman, dated 7 December '-19.71," wit~ respect .to our position on problems related·to declassifica'tfon:and, suggested that a .copy be provided David Young, NSC stiffier~';.After a brief discuss1:0n, the D:l,rector Lrrte rposed no objection~:< . b March. 1972

." r •

.:.. ' .

.,..

The Director noted his memorandum fo ·the Deputies' and Independent Office Heads, subject: "Allegations: of ·Assassinat.ions." He asked that it be mentioned at. Staff'. Meetings. . .

21 March 1972

". : "

. '. The J)irector said tha:t.:tb~",~s.ident he-so seen his 17 February memorandum on reducing: disclos:\.tres v.of: classified 'intelligence and directed the White -House staff to pre~re.a memorandum urging ·that all agencies comply with pr<;>per'di·sclosl1re·.procedures.

~.,

22' March' 1972

'; ~ ;"

.: .

Houston reported that he fS·.scheduled to meet with John Ehrlichman this morrdng •

: ":.-

.:):~:{~<: -"':' ~":':'

23 March 1972 Maury reported that, after' checking with 'Egil Krogh of the Whi.te House staff, he has .nia.~earrarig;ements to brief Congressman Le~r Wolff' of New York on·tbe:·AgenGY's role in international ' narcotics control. .,: ... '. . . ' .

.. '

...•. ~..

,; .'

.....(:

.....:, ... ~.

00294'

MORl DoclD: 1451843

1 May 1972

':..::,.y

"~'

t~e~i::~;~;o~':'~:~ti~ity

DDS 'related that has received a requ~st···· ..': of . . ..... -. from the· .Becre t Service 'tC).provide .two .technicians Ln .support the Vice' President' s trip to ::TokYo. The Director concilrred. 2 May 1972. DDS reported that the..Director .01' 'Security has received a request' from the .Becreb Service fPr'c,otinteraudiotechnicians to support the President's trip to Mos"cd>W:The Director concurred, . 11 May 1972 Houston noted his.~orre~ponderic~··Wit h White House.' staffer David Young' pertaining' t.o,:'::·.C>jJ'r.propleJ;lls.:With Exe cutive "brder li652 and addedvthat; Mr. YOllDg',:lias.accepted :bUI- position on about 90 percent of our problems :w1:tp· the. ·impleme:q.ting draft· directive.

!. t. .: ! .

2LJ. May 1972

." ...

....

. Houston explained that'he bad obtain,ed vlhite House. Staffer .' . David Young'·sunderstanding tbat'wewi;Ll not meet the l.:rune deadlio,.e/' for producing internal Ag$ncy regulations .implementing the NSC' .. ' . directove on Executive .:Orq.er: 11652.'. A~brie1' discussi(>ll.foliowed on r ': the cumbersome bookkeeping, and 'declassif'ica·tion a'uthbrities which· . may be required. The Director obserVed ·that the topic: was 6uff'icien.tly .i~portant.for.~. uq:;:t.o,be in .no great rush, to meet a 1: June 'deadline and Houstb#::~ssui'ed hfm thai; Mr. 'Yo:ung understands .:::'. b June 1972 0.;'

TllUermer explained..,thafhe.will continue._working with the" ..... r • . . -" . . General Counsel in response to Charles Nes'son' s efforts to serve a subpoena on him in connectaon with tbe Ellsberg case. He noted the related article by Rober;t.,A. Wright .Ln tqday's New XorkTimes, "Hearing Is Asked In Eli'sperg Case. It . . ~

7 June 1972 .

~~i~1~tI'~'~::::' '.

'.' .

.' ;": .:

. Houston noted a.:let~r. from the Just:tc~ Depar-tment; conveying a .. , subpoena dire.cted to ·Ariiu.s: Thuermer .iIi connection ·with the Ellsbe:rg'::;:·::'·:·-·: case •. He highlighted tbe'~schedule of documents .requested, most, of ':":::'" which' were mentionediIi'·,:footilOteS·.to the Pentagon papers. He ncted :...'; . . 'plans to ask Justice to :decJ.B.re the materia~ i,rrelevant to the ease ;;:'.',; . "

. ':'}. ' ..

...~:

;

• •0

MORl DoclD: 1451843

, ' , , , ."

-,..i".·: r;

M June 1972

. Houston said tha~h~,1ri.ll,~~attending a meeting called 'by~' DOD General Counsel 'Buzl1ardt;"wlib"'ls recommending ~ba~ Justice drop,' . the' case against Daniel ·.E·llsberg. 19 June 1972 <.

~. . . .

The Director noted ·the -17 June arrest of James W. McCord and four others who' were apprehended at the Democratic National Committee', headquarters at the Watergate~. With·,the Director .of Security presEint to prOVide biographic details,· the Director made it perfectly clear that responses to any inquiry with respect to. McCord or Howard Hunt, who may be implicated, ~re to.be limited to a statemen~ that they. are fomer employees: who. retired in.MMill1 August and ~il 1970 .: .... :.: ,:., respectively. The. Director asked·:th.at this guidance, dissemiDEl'ted via ·sta.ff meetings"·'~:'·:a;'l:ie.Directorasked that any inquiry from other·.:.:;": e Lementis of" the gov~~E;nt"be ref'erred.to the Director of' Security::'" who is to be the f'ocal.·point. InquirieE? f'rom the press are. to be'; •. ref'erred to Mr., Unumb)Who"may say that·"McCoxd worked in the Of'f'i.ce~.\,··',::·,-

~~:e~~~~~t t~:nD~~~:~~g~~~~~:~~:piet~a~::s~~:~~~:i~~l~~r:~.L};':\\';\:· .'.

EM FBrrs request f'or name .traces. It.vias' noted that Howard' Hurrt. ;. . ' . may have done some "\fork since retire~eJ;lt in connection with the'. ... ! preparation of' supporting -, material f'or'some awards. The' Executive ..."" \. Direct"or was asked·'··~9 ,review this topic 'and .repo.rt to the Director'~ '." , .....

20 June 1972 .'ii~:·.:.~:.~:.

..".~ ... ~~-~.; . ~'." :

In response to·.;:the·Director' s. request, the Director of' Security.· highlighted deve Lopmentis over the .past twenty-f'our. hours .with ' . . respect to 'the McCord/Hunt·, et ale, situation. He noted that the·,,:-... late edition of'· the ;Ne'W' "Yqrk. Times-car;ries a dif'f'erent story. by. Ta(i': -. :··~: . . Szulc than that wh~ch~ppe,ared in the edi.tion received here ~ . (attached). The Director ·of. Security anticipates some inquiries on···.'· Bernard L. Barker's. situation, and it was noted that Mr. Barker. . was hired ·by the Agency in 1960 andteminated in 1966. The .DirE~c'l,;oi·· / complimented Unumb on':'his handling of' incil1iries and asked that.:f\iture . inquiries be met::w:Lth.;a .response confined to the f'act that,now::·,t~at . we have acknowledged that .bo'th 'McCord and Hunt are fOrnier Agency. '. . ., employees, we know" n,otid.ng more ().bout the case and the caller 'should I be referred to the~:FBI -. as appropriate. . . ". .

.:' .:" .,_

'.'.

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.. ::'. ;~

:, .'

mr 20 June 1972

The Dir~:cj;q;r'noted :recei,pt. of a. papar on a safehouse in· :.:, Miami which isoeing made avad.Lab.le to the Secret Service :tn'. support of its work in connection with the Republican and Democratic' National Conventions. He asked the ADDP and the DDS to make. i t absolu.tely . cl;~~r.1 . I. that ou: coopezatd.on in ~~i~:;:_J"-' ' .. undertakingis..::~.o beconf~ned to. provfsf.on of the sa:ee40u~~:r~.~n~·:,· ~ ·that it. is not:·;to.1?e. used as a site for investigations, inMti;ogations, or llwa lk- i ns n , ··:e't¢;. . The·.Direc;:tor added that 'we will not 'ioan>~',:;::;," . people to the'F!3± or::Secret Service in connection with thei,:r:.'::':.·.' .:, responsibilit:i;~s;,at .the Conventions nor will we provide.:eqii:lpme,·nt unique to t~.~::G\:~~ilc,y" ::_::~:~1~{;:::;~'

:'..:.

. .';: :';'~;. ~~'."

21 June. 1972 . . -t-

.:',

'In view: of.>·the:. coverage in todayJ's New York Times and wa:shirigton Post, Maury re~oimne'nded. that Chairman Nedzi be, briefedontJ:i~"McCord affair and that'·this briefing include all our information abouf the c@-he,rs inv()lv~Q.~· "The'Director as;ked Maury t.o touch b~se ,wi~h·the . 'Director·pf.Se.c'grity,and.prepare·El. briefing 'paper on t.his·t9P:i.c'for his review~"Citing '-the ·numbe;r.·of distorted rumor~ about;;tli~'fiY\:'<. matter, the'Exe~tive:'Dire'ct'or said that. during the couis~o:::q:f~the day he hopes .. 'to:.,proi.'ide a .sugge,ated Headquarters Bulletin 'fQr'lali employees fqr. ~he 'Director's review.' " :' ..... '. : ,-.

•

'~'~I~

Unumb 'hoteda ·U1.iIiJber of inquiries from the press witli;:;~spect .to the Cuban-Americans ~volved in the bugging atte~pt.atthe . Democratic Natiopal Committee headquarters and their alJ,.eged· . . involvement· in the.:Bay of Pigs, etc •. The Director as~ed',that.such inquiries 'pe met With an explanation that we are not prei;>aredto be helpful ori.·'this··matter. ' ' .::; .. '-: '. . ':':. .: ".

.-,:"

','

.. -,.".:

. '" ,/

.~.

. ,......

':'.::.'

..... -;'

MORl DoclD: 1451843

........ . .~

'.'

.....

.._..~~;.,;~~~".; .., I':

-;""

linUmb'obse~ed that 'inCluiri~s on the'~;Mccord/Htintsit~~tion seem to be::~la9kening off. ' '_ The Director called D/oCI I s attention to coverage of the McCord affair in .the Metro Section of today's Washington Post and asked that future issues' of the "CIA Operations Center Morrting New$paper Highlight~" inclUde press items on this topic. ' ' Maury noted that he briefed Chairman Nedzi on the McCord/ Hunt situation and on a security case'• ."':.: 26 June. 1972 ,Houstonnote.d the Fenst'erwald Freedom{Of Irif'oi'inatiori: .case , 1"he Dire'ctor' endorsed his plans to concur an the FBI 's'. release of three 'photOs;.one being of' Lee Harvey Oswald, which wei'e..'B,cCluired in Mex:lc~',and;: .previously :f).lInished..to the Warren comiIiis'sion.

'. ,

. '

.....

. :-:.,,,.

", -,

0029S, .......

J"-,'

MORl DoclD: 1451843

',,'

~'.,. :-.:·k~~~~:~;.;\'.~~ ...:; ... '. .·::ibtis~~n.~cal1E:ld atte'ntionto the judge;s rul,irii{{ii :ih~':EiJ,sbergl

Jtiiy<i9't

2 '

.'...:.__. :

Russo ..ease de~zig the ~ defense motion for):l,??-:~yidentiary hearing~': as.. are'suIt of which ·the subpoena directeq.:.f!.tCIA:·ls .. euspended , ..... ". .

'-,

: 1.1 July 1972 DDI noted-presa attention atrtached to $ecre~:r::Y of ,Com~erce

.Peter/?,?n~s.·planned trip to the .. Soviet Union and observedvthati r - - - - - ,

secre

ry'ass~gne

'-nr~JHE""""'SS-J:"Sl=n:;-'to the..Pre siq,ent

for Internationa;t. "Economic Affairs, continues to,wo:r1'\:.•.f.or,.him .andmay go td'.:the·. Sonet·:tJnion". She will be in a LWOP sta,tu.s::during "the. remalnder:·of·he·r:tenure with . the' Secretary•. :-,:. ·;:·:i,'t:;: .. .':= ,". ' . ,. . . ' . '. ?:":".'.~: :: ~: ",; ........

.l4'July; 1972'

''- '... ·.Jca.rver-"re·called that we have providEid some ~~.:[e~nis· t~·Senator· Eagleton ·:on,::Vietnam. The Director .saf.d that in tiine ·.we will' receive instructions . from the White House on briefing Sena.tors McGovern' ~~~~. .:

:".~I ' .'

."...':,

. " . .' ,~

•.

,I . .

... ' . ". .....

.-.

. ·...Houabon, reported that the Justice'D=partment is anxious that ,·no>~ommen1l.be,.made· on the Ellsberg/Russo trialand.tliat any '.' .: : .inquiries f1hoUld be re ferred·. to the Justice', DePa~ent"s ·.PUblic . .... "'" ' Re1S.tions .Office. . . .. ",

24 July i972

't' '. .

.,'':., ,Hous.ton noted that he' had called David 'YoungI s 'attention" to the. fact that the White House (NSp Stafi') is not'\.ltilizing the new ~~ssii'ication procedUreS • .. : .

.i,:,~25·\ru~. '1972

: ('::;~~~'~';:/ '{' ..: .

. :. :5lr·.·.\~~·rep~rted that according to WhiteHous~,Staffer'John . ·'.;·:~bn!an" DaVid. Young is of the opinion t~t EstiImites.-are subject to '. declassi'i'ication after ten years. Houston wi:ll :'see, Mr. "Young to strai~ten him out on this t o p i c . ' " :-:-" . .. '.' ..

.. . .." '

., ;

iI II.,

.~i\

"::".

",.

... ' . ,.....

._ .. ' ::: .'

.,.j ~.b..

" ' . \ :": ' : .

\ "I';'/.'

.....:.:

00299 • '. '.~ ;0 ••

-t'. :

.. ,

MORl DocID: 1451843

'.' l'

.~'. '. "~l Juiy .1972

..... . ,.:.'::.•... ... '.~

: ~

... -"

The Di~ctor ..••• went on to ask:th~·DDS.:i'or .theba.'ckgrqund '01' decision to have 101' the Off:Lce'ijf ·Se·C~:ity.'.accompany . Fred Flott on a White House survey of the . di:'ug scene -an Southeast : Asia.'· The D~rectorsaid that in the fu:tlll7e'J;li·~·.CrthePDCI's . 'prior" approval will be required in all caseswhere rthe Agency .. 1s asked by the White House or any other element of the G<;>vernrnent .'to·send an Agency officer on anarcotic~-co~ected mission.

27·July 1972 . DDP reported :that Cord Meyer advised Bud Krogh of the White .Ia~com~ny a new House .~~~f of. our unwillingness to h~vel. narcotics survey team to Southeast ASJ.a . and·;:thepossJ.bihtythat . " "'..Krogh .may' call the Direttor to reclama. '. ,ThEr. J)irector b;riefed on . -:,:-.. '- ··the backgroUnd of this .deci·sion·and notea::;ilis ·~conver.sati'on with ..... Al :Haig on this. topic. '. .' ';" .1 August i 9 7 2 . . 0 , " "<"... ,'

. '. DDS related that MrJ-----lclfthe· ':di:g~ffrec~'i~ed a call fr~ the Se'cret Service re~ our. training film on ·defensive drivirig. The'Director interposed no obje.ct10n. to 'zriakini?; this .. film available • . 8 August 1972 HOUS'tqIl reported that· Judge McArdi~;~~~hted'amotion for : summary juc1gPJent in the Tofte case". .... ;;>~i:;\.; -: :.. . ." :>::.-.,•

.'21· August 1972

.::

Houston 'noted a tele.phone call fr~~"'tt~~d~~i~~:~\explained that his atrtorney 'Was with him and had ·a·question about, a friend's .' . past affiliation with the Agency. JD1?/sec, .has . . . reviewed the. employment, and Houston reporte.d '{;at he replied .'::':'.. directmyto: ~unt' s friend, thaf-l:li s old . >'" affiliation should create no·probl~.ms·iri:;co~ectionwith· his " .... :' appearance' before a grand jury. . ':. :.:.... , ...

Mr.1

.. ;::.

. . '~.(.; ~: . ... ' . ~;: .. : .

00300 '.. .

MORl DoclD: 1451843

I: I I

' " : I':

-'-

-::

.. :.

.r:..... "

,~_.~

.J, . :'.

22 August 1972 '~ ", • <.

•

Thuemer reported on a call from a ·Mr. Crewdson of .the New York Times who said he was Ilfomally re'luestirig" a photograph of Howrd Hunt. The DDP observed that we are unde;r no obligation to provide a photograph, and Thuenner said he had de c.l.Lned, 23 August 1972 DDI noted a letter from the McGovern campaign headquarters reque atdng the FBIS ImMliI ditily white book and any recent studies on Southeast Asia. A. brief discussion followed and the l~ter will be disregarded. .~ . 14 September 1972

Maury reported on his conversation with Messrs •. 'Flug and Epstein of Senator .Kennedy's staff in response to the ~Senator's 18' August letter to the Director alleging impr.~r ~ontact.r J{ for detail~~s""ee""urrL\jT"T'"""n' 5,,---Memorandum I or the Record) • . '

Thuerrner noted that WhiteHouse staffer David Young will hold a meeting today to brief the press on the .implementation of Executive '. Order 11652 • .21 September 1972 Warner reported that Marchetti's la\f.Yers have been in touch with Justice in connectzton with ACLU's. fil~Iig' a. secret oriefwith the . Supreme Court and said that ·the Office of .Securi"ty wi.ll· pick it up as a convenl:tence to J u s t i c e . , . . Warner noted that the Director is one of severaf, defendants in ~ a civil-case filed by Ellsberg and Russo.

. I

Unumb Illoted a re'luestfrom the National Observer for biographic data on Howard Hunt and James' McCord. inconriection with a. story they are doing on the Watergate incident. The Director endorsed his ... having prmcided only the dates these individuals left' the Agency. 25 September'1972 The Director noted a caJ.-l from Assistant Secretary,of State _S{sco/ -:

L--l

---;---_

-,.

·00301.

MORl DoclD: 1451843

... ./~.

(

',' -l..

_.. >. '.

, 18 October 1972 Maury noted his response to a request from CSC General CoUnsel Anthony Mondello, who was reacting to a' request for the personnel files of those former Agency officers involved in the Watergate i~cident from Senator Kennedy's Subcommittee on Administrative Practices and Procedures. He added that we are exempted from related CSC regulations, and the Director endorsed his plan to p~ov~ only the ~ates of their departure from the Agency in the event'the Senator's office calls us-on this matter•.

3 November 1972 Houst9n recalled that last August he reported on·a call from Howard Hunt and his subsequent, ~idan~e~ Ion how to handle affiliation with the Agency, .1 t,

The Director highlighte<:l his conversation with: David Kra;ldw of, the Washington Star News and his flat denial of a proposed 'story thatih~,'Agency was asked to rellort on •.t he Democratic' :Party which led to'the Watergate incident ana others. The Director' noted his. plans to issue a statement of denial if such a storY,were to appear and su~g~stedthat Thuermer consider drafting one for contingency use. ',' 15 Novembe:r 1972 DDP noted a report from Chfef, WE Division that on.9 October a . Mr. Harper of the New York Times 'WaS working on a story which tries , to link the Agency with Cuban emigre s , the break-in at the Chilean ,Embassy, action against Daniel,Ellsberg, andrthe Watergate case. , Tbbermer, observed that this,is the first,he has hea~ about this topic, and the DDP concluded that such,a story could have no Oasis in fact and it would be i'nadvisabletotryto straighten out 'Mr. Harper. 20 November 1972 _.

"DDjI called attention to Jack Anderson r s column in today· s Washington Post and the quotes' contained therein from an Agency report .on a famous singer. The Director highlighte.d his brief conversation with Jack Anderson and explained that ,the Director 01' Security is looking into .this.matter. ·

00302

MORl DoclD: 1451843 -.,'",

r·

., .'

r·

. ;:."-"

r: .... ~.

22 November 1972. Warner .related that accordfng to Assistant Att~rney General Henry Petersen,"U-,S. Attorney·Earl Silbert has several' questions on the Watergate case. The Director indicateihe will review this matter later • . 12 December 1972 Thuermer noted ,~n inquiry from. Dave Burnham of the New York Times, who appears to be writing a story on the twelve New York Police officers who were briefed by the Agency on information processing. A brief discussion followed, and Thuermer will advise Burnham that we have occasionally provided briefings at the request of various police organization~, but theie are exceptional cases. 13 December 1972. The Director noted the' article .by Thomas B. Ross in yesterday's Evening Star-News, "New Watergate Dhnension?," and the impression left therein that the Agency wa~'involved'in the' Watergate incident because a passport bear-Lngrthe. name Edward Hamilton was found on Frank Sturgis. Any inquiries from the' press or elsewhere are t.O be met With a "bhf.s is nonsense" .reply. The Executive Director noted work under way to identify the genesis of the passport st.ory,' .

.j"

29 December.1972 Unumb J;'eported that.. SeYmour Hersh of the New York Times, who is preparing a story on the Watergate incident, had asked. if Martinez had been emploYedoy th.€! Agency. Acting DC! recommended that 'the Agency not assist Mro"'Hersh's efforts.

, . ~":"

.-,

00303

MORl DoclD: 1451843

. ~ .,.~..

.' ._".. "... ~: 1._;

10 January 1973 Maury related' that we will be on firm ground in respon,di.i:Lg 'to Congressman Koch if- we indicate' that our assistance to the NY Ci.ty . Police Dept. 'WaS not training but a' briefing on an essentifj,lly unclassified basis undertaken in response to the suggestion of a . consultant to the N.Y.P.D. Thuermer reminded those concerned that _____________--'1 is a former Agency employee. 12 January 1973

15 Janua ry 1973 Maury noted.press. st~ries that. Watergate defendant Martinez'· was on the Agency pay roll until 17 June and anticipated some . in~uiry on this topic. The DDP endorsed his view that'M Whereas Martinez was inten;oittently used as a .source to. report on Cuban exile mateers,' this relationship should cause no serious difficulty. 17 January 1973 The Director. called .attention to the .article by James Reston "The Watergate Spies,.r: contained in the New York Times, and won.dered how Reston .got the errOfteous impression that Hunt was " •. Operational head .of the' CIA":;; Cuban Bay of Pigs • •• " 18 January 1973 . ~~ry reported that when he and Dave Blee, Chief/SB, saw Chairman Nedzi with respect to the Chairman t s forthcoming trip ::to . Finrtand, leningrad, .Sofio..and Aghens, Chairman Nedzi briefed .' his November conversation with New York Times correspondent Seymour' Hersh. MaurY went ()n'to highlight the several t.opics and allega:-tions Hersh claims he has wi.th respect to Agency activities,' . particularly allegations tha.t we. are' enga,ed in extensiye dOlllesiic' operations. 'Maury will circulate a .memorandum on, the information. ' . Hersh claims he has. ." The. Director explained that we should assemble .a ~senior team ·to meet with Chafzman Nedzi and clearly outline what we . do and do not do i.n the United States. The Executive Director. ;:,'" called attention to his 29 February 1972 memorandum to the 'deputies, :Subject: Allegations of Agency involvement in the US, and ·suggested. that it might serve as an outline for 'ma,teria,l to be covered with' Ghairman Nedzi. . ",

<~~

••.•

on.'· :..

...

::00304 ~..

:. '.

MORl DocID: 1451843

. ;L8 January 1973 Maury·noted .that·in response to Tom Korologis' (Special Assistant t1l1M to the Presiden:t for"IBgisl.a,tive Affairs (Senate)) request·for materials on instances where classified information had been leaked to the press, he assembled a paper on this topic and provided it with a nqte than an examination of most. leaks reveals that ~ the White House and Executive Branch are the guilty parties.

19 January 1973 Maury reported that Chairman Nedzi would like .the full Subcommittee on Intelligence Operations to hear a presentation by us on Agency activitity .in the United states sometimei~ mid-February. The :Director noted.:that· his decision of yesterday to tu:-n out a senior team for ·this briefing stands. .. . 22 January 1973 General Walters noted Howard Hunt's appearance on television last night. Tbuermer wj.ll obtain a transcript of the program, and 'tbe Executive Director noted his concern over Hur(;.t IS suggestion.that he is no longer bound by his secrecy agreement. . . .

23 January 1973

Executive Director noted that the termfnal secrecy agreement which Howard Hunt signed said. that he will be· a cknowl.edged as an Agency employee. ·His· ass{tion that he is not bound by "the· agreement because we dd.d in fact acknowledge his employment here is therefore ill-advised. The Director noted a call frbm Elliot Richardson asking about some Lnf'ormatdon that Seymour Hersh has developed to the effect that. HEW automatically provides the Agency.with travel orders on its .employees and that this agreement was made in Secretary Ribicofi" s time. The DDI ·will determine what this is about and advise. . 24 January 1973 ...

}.'.

MaUry noted that he met with Congressman Koch on our minimal assistance in briefing the .New York City pCl)lice officers. The. Congressman ·would like something in writing on this, which Maury will prepare and sign:.

'.~

00305

MORl DoclD: 1451843

... ;:.-: "-.:__.~~ ..: :-:;-- ..__.:.,. .... .

.' ".,

-: .

,24 January 1973

,,"'Thuermer noted advf.ce from a former Agency enipf.oyee that' ';~""'-'" Seymour Hersh has been assigned full time to the Watergate story, but in the meantime" Mr. Hersh claims he has evidence of Agency interest in an arsenal in the Midwest, a map-making facility in Vermont" and in Camp Peary. 26.January 1973, The Director noted he has'ao-vised the Director of Training of Mrs. Lyndon Johnson's request for Marie Chiarodo to handle the large volume of mail she has received. DDt reported that he lias been unable to turn up any information which would·:).ead·8.eymour Hersh to allege that we have a map-making facility in Vermont. 30 January 1973 Thuermer reported' that the Vi:rginia Gazette seems rto be . persisting in its efforts to embarrass cale Peary and has. been in touch with Victor Marchetti and Patrick McGarvey" who have' tended to confirm allegations t~at the Phoenix. program was supported by contract assassins .

. Maury noted that Mr. Helms, is appearing before the Senate Foreign.Relations Committee this morning on police tI'i:iining" KJfIH ITT" and the. Watergate incident. He also noted that he has solicited the, support of Senators Humphrey" McGee, and Scott .tio make appropriate public statements following Mr. Helms' 'appearance . Mary advised that in response to Chairman Holifield's investigation of Agency training pf policemen" he will meet with Herbert .Robaek; Counse L of the House Government Operations . Committee" ·to explain our briefing c;>f various poli,ce depar-tmerrts , 8 February'1973 ~

The'Direc.tor noted his scheduled meeting tomorrow:with Defense .secretary Richardson and asked Executive Committe~ members to give him.·a, note on any item they' wish him to rai,se with the .. Secretary. Canq,idates are •••. Secretary RiCbardsons' earlier .co!1cerns'·With respect to HEW providing the Agency with travel plans . of officers going to Communist Bloc countrieS. On the ,~tter item the DDIexplaineq. that since Secretary RiCthardson,'s .inquiry -to Mr. Helms (see niinutes of 23 Jan 73)" a survey had been 'undertaken and reviewe,d'with H:EW; which had no problems with these old arrangements but is shiftirig the point of pickup to its J?ublic ',affairs s'taft where such information is available to anyone. \

...

()0306

MORl DoclD: 1451843

...." . M; "",

~~M~

•.: r·

•._ ._ ."

,.-c,_._,~

.: ....'..

..,-,;.-:--._

__.

.. .

.'::.1

. ..

-v.:

e " .:.:- .'

~ •

.~ .'

"-:":

.• <";:'"'" •••

•

".-. .

':.,

.' . . . . . Ma~ry· noted :the statE)ment. by Senator Full.light follOWing Mr. Helms' appearance yesterday before the Senate Foregin'Relations Committee' in which the Sentator expressed his opposition to·the whole concept of the Agency getting involved with the. police 'even Lnan innocuous way.. Maury added that he will 'see Chairman Holifield's staff assd.starrt Herbert Roback today. Maury said that a stement had been transmitted to the White House yesterday for John Ehrlichman's possible' use. (a:t~ched) • The Dire ctor asked that ',a .contingency document be prepared along the . lines that we will cont-inue to comply with the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 which approves of·our assistance to various police forces when ~ authorized~by the Justice Department. In' response to the·DDI's suggestions, . the DDS will review what assistance to.police.··.forces had been giyen pr:lor .t.o 1968 and advise. . ,... .' , .

Manry concur-red in the Director's judgment that·, it· is' ;Dmpossible to keep all·:congressional elements happy and that we :face a period of increase.d 'cri"ticism from this quarter which must· bernet with firm aasurancea.itbat; what we are bef.ng criticized for··is. fully authorized ·andjustified. Unless the facts justify such a 'statement, we would be well advised to terminate .the $tivity in ques'td.on, . ,Maury.~eea,lled· that we are obligated to sit:dowD. ·W:f.th . Cha,irman',Nedzi and review what we do and don't do 'in the 'U'-S. (see MOmling Minu.tes of ill9IvlM 18' and 19 January). The Director" concurred':' .·,The DDI suggested that we undertake an-In-house review of what .it.::t:s·we are doing wi thin the U.S. and·. identify. and. eliminate :the :ma:r;-ginal.· .

9 FebruarY 1973 , Maury, said he spent an hour yesterday with C'ong~ssman Holifield - arid they decided to have the"ir re spective staffs work' on a letter for Holifie~d to send to the Director suggesting restrictive,' but not prohibitive,..guidlines regarding such activities "in .tne future. Maury noted Chairman .Nedzi ' s cur-rent- concerns. about.' ,this .·topic and said' 'the 'proposed. IlOOifM letter may satisfy hiswo:t"r~e·s.• 14 February 1973 . Thuermer noted advice from Hicholas Hor-rock-of' Newsweek that a '.'soft 'story'" is floatihg' around Newsweek On the"gEme~l topic of .pq;Litical espionage and' e~-CIA agents. Mr. ·Horrock asked what . constraints .we. have-on former empioyees •. A . lengthy '-discussi.on followed, noting in particular that the onlY·leg~lconstraint imposed is the terminal secrecy 'agreement as' reinforceq. by the MMMMM co~s:tn··the Marchetti case. Other than this, there are no constraint except moral ones. Th£rmer m.ll advise .Horrick that .thous~ds of . employees have gone through CIA, and it is a.matter .01' consJ.derable T1ridethat only a: handlllul have deported themselves imllroperly. . , ~

00307

MORl DoclD: 1451843

...

.'. "

•

...

(

.. '

." ."

i5. Februai:x..1973 .

• • • ~:;,\.,.,~aury added that he went over (With' Nedzi) Seymour Hersh's chargee with respect to tlte Agency and.our position oneach , DDI recalled our obligation to brfJe~ Chairman Nedzi on Agency activities in· the US. 20 February 1973

Maury re·J.ated that Herb EM Roback of Senator 'Holifield's staff is being asked. by David Burnham of the New'York Times for the names of those city police departments we have briefed in the past. The DDS called attention to our obligation to clear with these police departments any merrtd.on of their having beerr-br-Ie.fedv .!n response to the Direct6r's sllggestion that the AgencY'issue'a press release on this ··.topic,a lengthy discussion· followed"and the Director asked the'DDS ··to report to him oil wha"t our undezatandfng .with.. various 'pOlice departments ba s been prior to our .agreement to brief·!3ame.•· He also asked thai:; editorial comment .on any past .Agency briefing. of the press or press reI.eases be aasemb'Iedvand ex:PJ.ained. that in principle we should from time to time im.ke it known tli~t we" are part of the U.S.Government. 23 February 1973'

Ho"

. '. t'!-hury 'noted that Herb Roback of "Senator ;llifield is .staff and Chairman' Nedzi have concurred in'a letter for~the Director's signature~which.will indicate that we will undertake training of U.S. pibli·c~".~nly for the most compe.t.Lfng reasons. ltJ!brief' . . ·.discussion followed and the Director .observedthat it is' important for us ·to de.cidt:: what we do and then advise' t1;l.e Rill accordingly. 21 February j973 The Director noted a call from· Senator Jackson, who asked him to meet :with Senator McClellan sometime next week with regard to '. Congressman Holifield's inquiry.concerning Agency training of U.S. .. police 'departments. . . . :',.

r .

1 March 1973 :.

. Maury related that· former DirectorRicha~d HeJins has been: asked by Senator Fulbright to reappear before the Senate Foreign Re~tion~ Committee. Maury said that Mr.: He~s would .pr~bab~ 'be .... "queried on the Watergate incident, Agency .t!'ainirig· of police, and _ITT and w~nt on to describe Mr~ Helms' anti~ipated.reponse •.

....

00308

~-------------------------------~

MORl DocID: 1451843

i7~-'-

._~

I '

.... _'_'

-vl'

or, :

.:' "

",' ".".

','

: .... -._

' M •• _,. . . . . . & _ _ ' • •

_.~._-.-

..-.- .. ,",.-:"-.

/.: -.

':.:.:" ~\

r ' "

:.-

.......

1 March, 1973 Maury reported 'that' Congressm'8.!f~Rolii'ield's staff is anxiously awaiting a lett~r from the Director in response to the Congressman's written inquiry on police training. The Director noted plans to' foward it. 2 March 1973 Maury highlighted yesterday's LIG meeting at the White House, and his recommendation that we not provide .examples of Congressional leaks of' classified information 'for Wbit~ Rouse use in reacting to Congressional criticism of the Administrmtion's "indiscretions." The DDS advised that the Office of Security is keepfng .a reasonably complete record of obvious leaks of intelligence information in , the' press 'and elsewhere.

5 March 1973 , ',Maury highlighted the statement Congreasman Rolifield, will introduce, into the Congressional Record today on Agency briefing of ,U.S. p&lice forces. He also noted a'related news release that will be issued by the Congressman's office.:

6 March 1973, Maur'y highlighted Congressman Koch's reaction' to our~sponse to Congressman Holif;i.eld's letter concerning poliCf;J training, as reported in today-'s press. MautrY' noted that Congressman 'Koch plans to ask ',GAO ;t'or a ruling on this matter, and the Director suggested that Colby provt"de 'same guidance', to Comptroller ,General Elmer Staats.

/C\Iviee

The Director noted that Hugh Sid~y of Time magazine plans to write a story alleging that Howard Hunt -was employed by a cover organization, ~., Robert R. Mullen Company, when he left the Agency. Colby noted 'that this company is a completely private concern but has provided cover for one or two officers ovesseas , The 'Director asked Thuermer .to be prepare~ to co~ wi th'any inquiries when the story appears.

00309

MORl DoclD: 1451843

. 9 March 1973 DDI called attention to Joseph Alsop's article in today's Washington Post, "Analyzing the CIA's Analysts," wbich erroneously refers to Sam Adams as a former employee. later in the meeting, Houston explained why the allegation tbat the Agency bas tried to muzzle Adams is false. He went on to brief onJ communications wi tb Justice and tbe fact tbat ne Juuge rUlea Adams' material was not exculpatory. In response to tbe Director's question, the DDI reported that Mr. Adams bas not been placed on probation. The Director found" this unsatisfactory.

Houston explained tbe legal illplications of tbe subpoena served on Tb~rmer for documents related to the Ellsberg case and -. advised that the Director may bave to claim executive privilege.

15 March 1973 Houston said that tbe judge squashed the subpoena served on Thuermer (see Morning Minutes of 7 March).

0031.0

MORl DoclD: 1451843

Included in this folder are miscellaneous items, including the following: Chuck Briggs' submission, including support of the Committee on narcotics Review of Minutes of Morning Meetings

Agency funding of heroin st~dy.

Tom Parrott's involvement with David Young Cary's memo on briefing of Special. Subcommittee on Intelligence Of House Armed Services Cc:mnnittee (this relates to the McCord letters to the Agency) Brae's report of his and Colby'smeeting with Nedzi

0031.:1

MORl DoclD: 1451843

1:1 ONctAssl~leD

~ CONFr '-\'TIAL

t;] SECRET

ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET f

SUBJECT: (Oplionoll

e of Disguise Materials and Alias Documentation Within the U.S.

FROM:

Director of Training

EXTENSION

NO. .

. ! ..•.

\,' , room number, and

DATE

buildinll)

RECEIVEO

Inspector General

:'/;~ ,-

fORWARDEO

)

--", •

COMMENTS [Number each comment 10 show from ...mom to whom. Draw a line aero.. column after each comment.)

~r1 ~

\~ J\,J r.J. \,

OFFICER'S INITIALS

\-"\

C\'Stv'\':p

~'..€ •

j....

I ,

, l~·-,

10.

11.

12.

13.

loC. I---

FORM 3-62

INTERNAL

USE ONti

0031.2

MORl DoclD: 1451843

,1 S JUN 1973

MEMJRANDUM FOR:

Inspector General

SUBJECT

Use of Disguise Materials and Alias Documentation Within the u.s. Memo dtd 30 May 73 to IJfR fm ~ubj : Issuance of Disguise Materials for Probable Use Within U.s. ' or It's Territories

REFERENCE

, 1. The Associate Deputy Director for Operations has asked that we give you a detailed report of the actual use that the Office of Ttain:i.n,g has made within the u.s. of all disguise materials and alias docUmentation we have obtained for our staff members and students. 2.

Disguise ~~terials

,OTR has obtained from ars disguise materials - including glasses, wigs, mustaches , and special shoes to increase height - for . 12 staff instructors at the Domestic Training Station. The purpose of these materials is to increase the difficulty that students in the Basic, Operations Course and Advanced Operations Course will have in recognizing instructors during problems and exercises conducted lnear urs. Exercises include surveillance, countersurveH ance; Drusn passes, and dead drop problems in which instructors monitor student activity. These exercises are run under carefully controlled conditions only in areas where adequate liaison exists with local authorities to avoid any flap should difficulty arise during an exercise.

00313 ~

uu nnU[.l1llML

MORl DoclD: 1451843

... .

The sole use of disguise materials by .these instructors has been or will be in support of the training exercise noted above. At no time have the materials been used for other purposes. 3.

Alias Documents

u.s. alias documents ,consisting primarily of busmess and social cards, but also including drivers' licenses and social securi cards, have been used for more than a year by students

e cone US1.on 0 e course, tea aas cumen s are co ecte rom the students and returned to ars. Again, these documents are used only Under carefully controlled ,conditions in an ' environment It:rhere adequate liaison With local authorities exists to contain any flap; and the docenents-areused only for the purposes stated,

4. A thorough canvass of all elements of OTR discloses no other instance in recent years in which we have used disguise materials 'or alias documentation within the U.S. or obtained such materials for that purpose.

I~~ Duector of Tra~g

cc: ADOO

-2-

0031.4

MORl DoclD: 1451843

. ''

...

.',

40RANDUM FOR:

0031.5 (DATE) rORM 1(0. I AUG 54

101

REPLACES FORM 10· 101 "" I CH MAY BE USED.

MORl DoclD: 1451843

J .

DUNCLASSI FirED

o CONFr .TlAl

o US JNLY IN .~ ~Al

o SECRET

ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET

r"BJECT: (OpiiollCll)

£XJfNSlON

FROM:

I I Deoutv Chief WB Division TO, (Offieer de.ignalion, room number. and

REClIVEO

(lAWrl,YJ

i:,v

IJDDO

DDO

i~V:/

OFflCerrS INlTI-'\lS

COMMfNTS (Number eoeh comment to $how from whom 10 whom. Prow 0 line aer.,.$ eolumn oher eaeh comment.)

{J\1Y \J\ 1:/

'- .'

/.). '>

/7..-

Executive Secretary, CIA Management Commi tee

b/~

____- . .--.--0

):/

.i. I 0M dol

VVC {-

:;\j

I..

FO~WAROEO

J IN 1973

20 June 1973

JUN 1973' !j..J:;:/

OATE

DATE

buildin;)

NO.

h./ 'I

.~ ~":~.I c:::.i t

Return to O/IG

r.:>; !

·tt

~€:W~\...~ 8. 0

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

00316

.~.

fORM 3-62

61 0 u~Dr~~s 0

SECRET

o CONFIDENTIAL

n INTERNAL ~."'P

lIurl ACCII:,rn

MORl DoclD: 1451843

' '

.. Executive Registry T

'7'--< -' /. ~,) / 20 June 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD SUBJECT:

John Dean Allegations to Newsweek Magazine

1. Mr. William Jorden, the Latin American referent on Dr. Kissinger's Staff, called today in reference to State cable' No. 1'12189, dated 11 June (attached). He said that he had specific reference to paragraph 2 of that cable and would like to have "everything and anything we know" on that subject in the Agen cy. 2. The undersigned indicated to Mr. Jorden that he had checked 'out the allegatiqn that some low level White House officials had considered assassinating Torrijos when the story first appeared in Newsweek an~ despite checking outside WH Division also, could find flo 'one in the Agency who could recollect or find anything relating to such a plan on the part of any poz-Hon of U. S. officialdom. I told him that I felt sure that nothing of this nature had ceme to WH Division's attention because f~r the period in question I had been Deputy Chief of WH Division and had heard nothing about any such plan. Mr. Jorden asked if the Agency knew anything about Howard Hunt having had a team in Mexico. "before the missfon was aborted"· and I indicated that as far as I knew, the Agency had no information on Hunt being in Mexico on such a mission. I also indicated, however, they could have been and the Agency might well not know it simply because he could have used an alias and he is an American citizen, which is outside the Agency's province and really the FB.I's business. I suggested that it might be best if he checked the FBI on that particular angle. Subsequently I checked with Mr. William V. Broe, the IG, and Mr. John Horton, recently returned

'-----;================----

0031.7

MORl DoclD: 1451843

, .. r

. r'

•

and .both indicated that they had not run across any information concerning this latter al.lagatton of Hunt and.a team in Mexico on a mission related to Panama. 3. It was apparent that Mr. Jorden was under some pz-e s sur e to refute these allegations and was casting about in all directions to make as certain of his ground as he possibly could before he. tried to do so;

Deputy C ie ern Hemisphere Division

Attachment: As Stated Above

00318

MORl DoclD: 1451843

•

.' r"

NG 027.76'-.

. : :.

'. TOR:·111326.i: JUN 73

::' . ..

..~ . ::..

...

--::---'------::--....---...:-----.--.---~-----------------I.~:

'. '..

RUE AI 18 '." .:

....~.:.~.:

_. ' . '.' '., .' .

R UUUUU.toc S1 ATE~.1!H<:;: -, ' .... ,~ .. ':.',' RUESVA .RU,LPALJ,.'.:..:, .:/,:,:..,:: '. ";',." ~ RUEHC r.:2189~ 162·1.3'22:.·:·· . '::.. ~. ":.:'~.:.~' .: .~~

UUUUU1!1:H

'. '.

;:-0 f)tl~PALJ/P t.NCANAL .II-HiED! ATE '. :.' LPA.... iUSSOUTHCOH ItiMED.tAT-e.: . . • . : .: , .... ..

~.,.

,_ :•..• '..::'

....

...

. ',"

. :' , . '

. .- .;:

N:. ''';:

.".

•

';".

.•

. '. . . .:_ . " . •

-I

.....':.' , .". . .. ' . . ct AS- ..S TATE . 1 12189.· .. : .. :.·· .. ·.. ·.· . .... . .. .. . • .4 . .. .. ~. ~ -~ :::~.:: ":: ... -' .. o 11652 r Nt A . ·..· . .:'..:..... ,:':.: ~'. .:. ,..• ' .. . ....

:~ .

~..

-, :.".

....

~~~~~~~~ LE ~~ TI ~1I§}~ti,; ;~!"A~~_llE'\~'·TOllEW$WE~K riA G~~:1~2·::. THE' F'OLLOWIN'G rs··:e:<c··ERPrED··fROM.A FRONT PAGE ARTICLe'::::" .:,.. O~1 TODAY'S NEW YORK ;T:!·HES ·t-HHCH REPORTS 'ON ALLEGATIONS:"":':.:' Dc BY JOHN DEA:N TO ·NEWSWEEK. HAGAiHNE. .

"SOME

.'"

.'-:. _:. : ': '.

l11312i:.·JUN 73 ,;.'. . . .' '-.:: '.: , . . .... '.": -. . .. S::CST A'T.E HASHDC' --, .' ,': . RUESV;\II~}J~HaASSY .PA·NAHA' "1 lit-tED!A TE 2592 •

. :.' .

•. ..,; '.'

:~... ,:;-;.:;. , ' - : .i!

:,:.. ~.: ri . .:. .

"LOW~LEVEL" HHITE 'HOU'SE .OFFICiAlS CONSIDERED';;S-:' n~··

SSINATING PANAHA'S RULER OHAR TORRIJOS. BECAUSE THEy···.:' '.· ni" '" SPEC TED iHE INVOLVE~'E~r.OF' HIGH PANAHAN tAN AU·p-tOR I TI ES: . . ;:I?,l. ~OIN TRAF'r'IC AND .BECAUsE TH~Y tELT iHE GOVERimENT HA"D.· .·.:·,···~·:.·'ti .' ::i:': UNCOQPERA T i VI: ASOUT. RENEGOi! ATI:-iG THE PAi'lM·t.\ CANAL.':' -. ::': .~~i· ::ATY • . E, HOWARD .HUNT.JR.~.·. A L.EADER OF THE l~A·rERGAiE. :'::>'l:-~'.' ./ :~Q.LARS. HAD A TEAH .IN HEXICO·· t1 8 EF QRE THE MISSION HA?.· ,,,::.:-t Oil TElD. 11 NEwS WE EK.SAID. 11. RU SH:.;}':~

i ,

.. ,....

1 -·-/

..fii;v t;···~fi:l t r_ 003:19

"J:

. . "'.'-

,.'~'

, ,

... . . '

....... -.~.I·

... ",".,'.

~·-·-····-7·-'·-:.-·

MORl DoclD: 1451843

(

.~.

.:",-

,':

DIREct REpLY DISPATCH

.FiLE· . INFORMATION

·r I·r

~ .~' .

., . •. '. . ~

. r

.: " .,~

: '

1',

. FOLD HERE T.O RETU RN·TO :~E FRQM:NAM£. ADDRESS AND PHONE·NO:';

. Ul';"C,LA$!:!IFIED . -; ...,' ....: ...i I

..;

':.,

", .'

,.1. .':

••

.~.

MORl DoclD: 1451843

..~

• "~."'P .• _ ' - ; . ; "

,--

:,{:)~;; ..;:~",

, :,i;7';;,

.i":.:~:;.

•••

. .:.

....;:~:: .

.; , . : .

.:"?k". :\ :::,~,' ,;~;:;' "' ,,'"

;g:'~~t~(:,

..'.

MEMORANDUM FOR:

rCe··

~ L/7/71

(DATE) FOR'" NO., I AUG 54

101

,'471 • • ~.~.

~ • • , . "y

••• .,;

....lo.•

• ,y

REPLACES FORM 10-101 WHICH,NAY BE USED.

••••

y •• ,-

....

••••

MORl DoclD: 1451843 _. .

.;.... ... _.-..':':..-:._-,-. _._-':--,~ ~ . '.

liEW,......YORK ......... ' ' .. ,.:. '

__..r'::....~ I

-.-~

. ' .....

..-

2 9 'M4v1973"

·l . Brea· 1:'l...['ns.Puzz ,. '-l's» !r C'{.: ' Ch lean , ...... ·I · ~, ;.W '. a'.terga:« I nuesiiuators •

:rms

•

. -. "'>""

.,t'"

.::.::~• •

•

No evidence has turned up I diat members of the team that broke into the Watergate were involved in the entries, 'although hints that s?~e of . .., ",-to to I them may have participated ~ . • '. . ./ have come. from the' authorities ~. In Florida.. : , ~ By MICHAEL. C. JENSEN . First reports about a break'One unsolved puzzte that!' The next break-in was saidli" at the',Chilean ~n1ba~sy .be. Watergate mvosugators are! to have taken "lace' six da 'S gan to Circulate In Miami a !tttd)~ing is the jdenti~y of in-! later at .the E:/st 38th Strc~e~l'veek.?r so after W~er?;ate ·truders who ...!>rokl' mto the; apartment in :\Ianhaltan of Ja.1 break-in of June I? 19!2. and . . off.ices ~nd res!dences. of; vier Urrutia•. resident of thet there \~'as sp('cula.tlOn tnat the Chilean diplomats In Wash!ng.! Chilean De\'elgpment Corpora.' t:\'o mlf.hl have oeen related. s- " ,• ••,J!>" and New \,prk at least lOur:_t-icm and a close ..economic ad.ll,h~} link nevcr. ~as. been .times from April, J971 to May, viser to Chile's' president, Dr.l proved. and. son~e tn\ esugators .. .. 1972. ., . Salvador Allende Gossens. . doupt that It..ex!sts. • ' . One .explanatlon. offere.~ for Four. break-Ins aaalnst 'Chileans took place in the 14 months Pistol Stolen the Chilean break:m was t~~tl Immediatelv preceding the Mr. Urrutia told the police if cU~Y Cuban-Americans p.arttc\-i break-in at the Democrats' 1hM a .:?5-caliber Bernardelli pared, as was the c~se in .the' Watergate headquarters last pistol had been stolen. How- :Wat'~r~ate,. they might have June. Thev also occurred at a ever, a fur. coat in a closet been 10oklO~ ~or, aocume!lls time when the Chilean Govern- was reportedly untouched, Gov-. that would ~n~lcale. coltuslOnl ment was 'negotiating with the ernment papers were said to' between the Chilean and castro/ International Telephone and have been disturbed. and chew- governments. . Telegraph' Corporation over] illg gum was edged into the' Shortlyafter the spec~ compensation for Chile's take-l apartment's Iock, a. familiar Ilion began in :'-·liami. Chilean] o\;er of the hu~e .conglomerate's practice of .pl'ofes.sional .intrud-' oificia!s acknowledged the telephone subsidiary, CI'S that. gives tnem time to break-In and reported it 'to the! . Ileca\15e or far more scn~a· e5c.~lre ,If they arc surprised 'city·, pol!ce, who started an in-l ; tional disclosures, Watergate m· dut mg the course of an entry. vestigauon that has been :1. vestlgators have not actively The third reported break-in conclusive. . pursued the Chilean case ·in took place on Feb. 10; 1972, Earlier this month, a Cuban: recent weeks. beyond asking a investigators said. at the New/ nam('d Felipe de Dieao was' luestion or two. about the, York residence on East 46th Interrogated' by State Attorney .ireak-ins rl!lrin~ interro;~ationsl Street of Victor Rioseco, for- Richard E. Gerstein in 'Florida ,..- ...: of theWatergate burglars. mcrly a Chilean official atthe regarding participation . in -the \ . However, Senate investigat- United Nations. A radio and break-in at the offices of D:-: '." ers have informed both the! television set were ,reportedlYf Daniel El!sberg'S psychiatrist Senate Watl'r;late committee] taken and papers' disturbed. in Los Angeles.' . . ' and the Watergate prosecutors] Tile fourth and most pub. He and his allorn,,\' indicat;: In' Washington "bout the dctailsl Hclzed break-in took place over ied that, if' granted Imrnunltv [. r, of ,the four break-ins At the 'the weekend of :Vlay 13. '1972, Mr. de Diego might Shed l1e:;;' ! . offices and residences of t:he at lim Chilean' Embassy in ligh], on other surreptitious opChileans. Washington, Files of the Am- eratlons in Washin;:lon. Inves3 Occurred In New Yorkbassador and his Jirst secre- tlgators in Miami hiler indicat. tary, Fermm?o Bachelet, were ed that these operatlons might Fl!rth.C'rlllore, a member of t~e reportedly rifled and two -ra- !.:Jclude the Chilean break-in 'specl3:1 tntelHgcnce Unit of- .tne dios taken. . or' break.ins•. New Y?l:k Police Department Chilean officials have been i '. was scud to have, con,c1l1de~ ordered by their Government;' " that the, three break-ms loat OC-I not to discuss the maUer, bud curr~d tn :'I1an!13ttan w,ere n?/ snurces close to the case said' routme burg lanes. And. mve:;lI- that the former Chilean Am-l ~ators in \Vash.ington s,aid that. l>ilssador, Orlando l.eteHer, had I t:le .four brf.'ak·ms had lOl/OWed confirmed that the Washington! slOlIlar pattern.>. inlrliders ap'llarently wer~ seek-! The~' were arparenliy done ing sensitive Govern'ment noeu-, b~' rroff:'ssionals. \\ill! a' irwi ments. ". Hems tak!.'n to make tll(! .bre~k.i .spl,culatiClll b" III\'e~tinators .. Ins appear to he burglarlcs. 10·1 ~." \,estigators said. Olht'r ,'aillablej . Capitol Hill investi;;:ators itcnlS w('t'e left 'behind, how. have spccul<Jted that the in· e\'er, and sl"nsitivf.' papers were I trudrrs might haye been seek· f~ dislurbed. .possibly in tile ,: ing p.l'idcnce. of links b~tween, course of being photu<,raphed Cuba and Chlle. or lookmg for ]nvestigatQrs '1eronstruct pnHt!cally sensitive documer,ts break-ins a.:; fc,ilows: mlallng to the take-over. by Then, first known b.:eak-in oe- Chile of J.T.T. properties• . curred' on the afternoon of . pri! 5, 1971 3t th<: :'Ilanhaltan asidence on Lcxin~ton Ave· nul' of Humberto Diaz·Casa. ('. . nuevll. Chile's J\mbassador to . th,e Uniled Nations... The Am· bassador reportedly tolc! the police that the intruders hildl stolen such iems liS a hair·drver and a nair of hOlliS ami tli~IIIl·.1

.tile

in-,

' l

'II)(;!

00322

..•

MORl DoclP: l45l843

-,'

...... '

...5

ACTION".

OlREC.T REPLY·

:fILE . INfmiMATlOH

;.,l'

%If~:j~S:.~~~~:;·:'l;.:.~.:'~.,':·

••

-. -•.•. .;,,': re >

',~ .

}\/'::·::.·:;\l~otli~'lig,·startling.1

";."

: .•'

. ".

R.ETlJRH.·.'",: ·SlliHATUaE:

but something

pe~f.;I3.:PI{should. be aware of'.

~-:{;~.:::.' ,:

.:L.:' - :'.. 0~v ....\. . .

.'.-'.. L:~,_._,x..~·~~·:· :' ~.

,~J.:'

.~~,t>

)., .

-' '~:. .,. .

-'_.' ---'~,

FOL.O HERE. TO RE.TURN TO S::NOE:R :.

FROM: N""'E:. AOORESS ANO PHONE: NO.

COl"FIDENTIAL . fORM NO.

". 2-61-

237

Use previous' editions

: ....

. : "'.

(y j.- .

.A.

" $:ECRET

MORl DoclD: 1451843

. .·~~t~{,.; " . •.

. MEMORANDUM FOR.T>HE..R};:CORD :·:·)D:';:(l'~:

. ;'.:·

'.",/"

SUBJECT: Di spo s a.l- 9.r~Cla·ssified Ti-a,sll for the :i'I-a.tio~al Security,

. '.

C~~;f:~~~~ .'~- .' "~j,;~;ir

,:....

,";:1. Amemor.<:uid,Uin·for the record by the -Executive Of.ficer,·:.:'::·i'·:~;<-." o{the. Office ·of L~gi~Jt~:~'i>oints out..that this Agency isdisposing-:;::~;:':,::~:::/{,;.. .' .,... o.f·cla:~sified .tr-a s '.' " ·'~S:C. :>:J::h¢(m,aterial. contams doc'.l'· " .. , ' , . ' .,;;::< ·:i".~(~ .

.' ~.

.,.;.. : -.

~~~2:~~:·.:~::!f~::~::~;E~:~:;~,

is made each Thtir: . .' '.

. ' .

,:- :,"

.: ·'2.

~h~

Under"~d

matt&r would.;"~t}b :. :. the ·ci€s·tru~tibkbf3;" .;.

•

",'

Gra·Y:.W·is· felt'·tif~.

further consid~r:at ......' .

.~.i~

:~.1. ;~. :'.':;.::;:

e~a:ri'a.; c1;rcUm.stanc~~ such a: ':routiii~:

i, .. but iiv~ll: the recent furor ca us ad.ib

t,s by·the'::.fS.'~t~ng 'FBI-Diredor Patr{s,' :ler: shouil:i~at·least be' highlighted foff. . .

" ' : .

" ..

r :. .

.""

.. ' .

.'.~:

.....

,,~:

..:,':......

....

". .\ . "

'.~

';'~;~ft

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.'URCE·

·O/IG· DOC, NO. DOC. I1":TE

30. Ma 'l~

HUMBER OF ~AGES NU""B"ER

OF' ATTACHME/(T'S

·2

fTS 18sZz.aI7Z!Z .&:: .': _, '..

.,,'

......

() "

.t')·;\I·

c.'

•

,....

. .

. . " , ::

~.TrENT10N: T1<I3 ·/ON/l.· uri blt pIeced oit,,·,top of end :iJtt4ched to e'a.ch ,Top Secrt;t do ment, I't:cl!.!"e<t till" th'e.Cettti'et' Irtt.eIl.:VIlTCCI!.' AI1~J: . or Cla3$i,'1(<! Top Secret· lllWtin . ·the., .CI" ,aild will remain attache:! to, 'the :document !Lntfl "",7'., ti""e 'oU it b .. t!~t;':ng>'<l<!~c!. c!es:r~~'. Of' -, tr4n3"t!:led oUI$it!~. Q"l.~., AC::.tfu, '(~'l'~,S7ert't .ml%t.t~~ lfmitt'd:to To'!Jl,irli/tcrt't Control 1l1l~~.. (!1: a~ :tn,··61~,~..<t!$-Ulho.ie c..1fclat . dU2~el"t4 to th4l ~'m'U-•. ' 'Top S4lf,r'e'f''(fO'n'traf. Ot/tcdr3,' who" rl!.ceiu· and/or. release .the 4ttadU<! ·T0p, ·~~cr~t. m;4t"ii<t! ,lCill· ~ thl$· form .. .4nd (ndlcat.· period.: of ..custod1ld1l. ;·t~.lt""Il(~~Jt..='#d col,.mn" ·lIro7l£t!et!. Each. fndhildu4Z . who . 3ee~," the '.TOp, i·St;~r:.ct..:' ~~. lQUf . .ng ... : ~rut . indicate the dat., of IllJni!.I:~".S1·.f..; til'. ::'':,fg,~f~~q~IL~o~.. t,nn3. . ' .' ,_ " " ....:';- ," .;.....:.'.' '.: . ':

Re:le::A~e:O "

SEEN.,BY· OF,F tCE'.fo I'V •

S I GPO. T.URE

. :.)(

··l··

b-:-t~_1.:.ttJ_~". '

.1:

l---:_ _

• .: / : ( ".!: • •

-'.-'

,'.",

'.' ~~~}:Z~~E .;~~~.-:.. ('.

______ • __ 0 _'_ _ '. _ _.;.-:

•

~ ,-'

, ...

MORl DoclD: 1451843

~. • ...

". ••

'.' .. '.~

'},O, ,May 1973 :::t?~·:::·:

. ~. ..J. . . ';'-".~' '. " .. ..' ~.~;_.'

.:.. ~ ': :;,~ .

'.'

.""

';.

MEKi.6t(ANriUM FOR: : Mr. William E. . >'\ ;' .~

:~;.

v ,,~ /"~:' .." ',' ~ .~ "" ." ,,'. .e-

........

" ..,

. -~.

•

.1,

,'.r;'""" :!call . .:t.p....Y.pur attent!pn..!7 ~ atf;Q.~4ed sensitive annexes to our ~ 972, r!'!po:rt, '~6~ survey of{EUR:'Division:~, ,y bti.h,a:v,~;',seen,them:before, but a fresh:16ok .:\.t, th~m mi ht' be in order in Ii 'hb:>f ~tirrent

developments.

e recent revelations about the activities uati<?n Committee a,Z:~,c,getting clos;e):o,our program. vr« are' '~'~,9;a~~~,:.,~~,::;t~~::highdegree of resentment'\~o/~~Brie:t:.:a,mong"~any Ag~~cY:'~mpl~yees at their belng expected',~o:pa.·i-ticipate init... ~ ,

~':;HAbs •

particu1arlY'~6h6't;:diedabout:~'tHAOS

c' .:' : ; •

• ".

,! ,!.

.i,

•

....

I '

...

.r : I' "

, 'j ',' I i

,":

.'.

) ",

•

"";

•

~...t

, ,.~~~~.~~~,~,~~~"t5"c=.c~r;.trr::.~~ F"OI-f)e-;e) '::'';TS,'18,S4:28?7'ZI2,~' 9 Nov 72 ' .:.' TS'l8. l,8/. 72/.. 3, "9 Nov 72 . . . .52 ....

"."

.'.""~: ~. .. ,"

......

.•..

- \",1. . ···.;·1

, ,"Y~~:::7~':-:-~""-'-' "',"?,, ,7-'' ',' ~,~:, '.. ':~'<._ . ~'~--"--.~ .

-e..

.~.~;. ,".;4.:: ~

~·",,:,t;-~~· .

: .. _

-.' ",

,.:

.0.0326

MORl DoclD: 1451843

: f" .:.. ~:'": '.:..;;.' ·'""ilir.,;..o...Q& ';;..- ·I.vu..;; .-- ~;<"': . ' ..

....

,.,

. ':1'-"':'" '. ~.::

':(:: :

.. ... ~

'.'

'",

:~l<h?-,lt{~~~.r.~.:.[',i.:.

~~ ':~'Ii'-f'''r' '~~ .

.I-------'-'--~-+__:....:...r-_:_l . ..•. '.

.C<., " ; / '

.,'

::,:,,,:~,

. :1f:;t..

,;.

,':'

'-.

,,/.

~1~.::-:::~L9.",'f" \

'\"

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.:....

8 JUN 1973·

. '.'

MEMORANDUM FOR:

Deputy. Df.rec'tor for Managemen t anc1Services.

... ·Di,recto·r. of Security.

FROM

.,~'\.

'DD!M&S ·R.eq~irements:"·;i~: lVa:tergat.ej,..l.ncid~nt '

SUBJECT :

This memor-andum is for in"f'o'rm'a't'i'on only

.....:,"'~~

Juit

2.' In 1971, t.he' .NeW' YO'~k Tim·es. featured an. article under, the by-line otl1illiam Beecher whdch . contained an' expos i t.Lon iof 'the then current status of·" the" Strategic Arms Limi t at-i on. Talks '(SALT).' It· was .: ': ", evident ',from rhd s: de.l.dneat Iori of these' talks that ',.,,: ':.'. "i-,"' '.' William Beecher had obtained. the information·froni:hJ.ghiy": classif~ed u.s. Government documents or from a person or' persons' havfng had access' t.o.vsuch documents 0

•

. 3!"' In this regard, Mr, Egil E. Krogh"Jr o f the. White' House ,.tele.ph6~ically contacted the Director .of Se'ctirity::of:this' Agency. and. requested that this :Agency provide a polygraph examiner to' conduct polygraph' t.es ts on 'four Depar-tment; of State. employees. In conjunction. with 'Mr~' .Go: ~Iarvin Gen t i Le',; Deputy Assistant Secretary. for Security,'. Department' of' Stat e, this Office 'arranged for' a polygraph examiner to" conduct these. examinations, . but :with no CIA.' involvement to be acknowle dged ..... In ' .. othe'r words, .thds Office loaned the polygraph: examiner" to: the,:'Department of St.at.e. and the 'polygraph. examinations werec~>nducte,d 'for -,Mr. Go Marvin Gentile. . .

'4;. This. Of;fice Ln 1970,-. requested app rovaI 't o have disguis'e ki·ts", issued to approximately fourteen people. The"di~guise kits, were never 'issued for operatdonaf

. :"'..-.

,".

• ......

.... """'-~"'""-;:"'''-'''''~

MORl DoclD: 1451843

. ,

".",

...

r·,:.h_ ',: .

.." ".

··: ..

..',

" '

.,"

I. •

....

".:.-

... .

. ;.'

. -',

. ':.,-.' .

'N" _ _ ' .

••••••••

•

. 'purposes' ,': .but. :.they were. '~ssued. for, pract.i.ce 'sl1rve:hiahc~ '.", to'. train local ficHd office' ersomiel' . in' th'eir·,Use',· L"...,~~~----.,,--=---..;;---------~--=----, Of tihe.se our teen isgul.se its,' .four were returned to the Office' :of Technical· servd ces.

• ••#~.,:

•;,"'1-.'.

~"'"*

\l:~~

•

,'"

. . S.~ . In regard to' otheracti.vitiestrrat ·.this Office' has conducted' domestica11y,'the following two' projects: . are· sUbmitte.d: ' .' " , -. ,. . : A. ' P'ro'je'ct; WESTPOINTER: In September 196.9, February 19'(0., May 1970." and october 1~71, a·,·· proj'ect,: si~i1ar to- Proj ect BRPOI1.1J'ER,.·, was . conduct ed ·bY,the Office of' Secur Lty.," Ea.'st·Asia· ..'. Division ~ 'and' the Office of Te.chnical: Se rvd.ces in -" , the San Prancds co, California, area. The tiarge't :' .. wa's','inail to, the. United States froaMainJ,and China.

. :: 6; ", Tan Office of Secur i ty emp Loyee ; who will re t rr e e±fec-cive ,29 'J~e'1973, had a .:-

chance .mee t Lng with Mr. James W. McCord, Jr •. on Z4, M~y ,'-' - 1973:near the Senate Office Bui1ding~ ,A~cording to: Mr • t he :ubstance of the. chance mee.ti~g.' ~~s 'an exchange of 'pI~a antra.es , ,

t ~

..'

{

1 ',-

. ,t.,

00329

/,,"oJ<.

MORl DoclD: 1451843

( f~·~..-- '

f·

7 L

SD3

'~' .•

and other student activist groups

s zeques't -a

, ',0;1 :p.roduced in December- 1967 at Halt RostOt-l'i.

30-page·t~r'pescript study of the SDS and its i'oreign: ties.

I~ the StU'!l!:er or.~ 1968 eCl produced-o-agaf,n at. RostOi{f s request-a pape~ on,Restless Youth. ~~e first, and most sensitive section, ':las a ~'J!li1C1s'.)!lhical tree. t;nen-t of studen-t unre su, its trotivaticn) ~"':-"'~ ·~}1istor~{. :;~l overt lite:-ca. ture and . . . anu'~tac·tics.· :.#It· dre~'i l"1ea~:il"!r " ' . . FBI· reporting on SDS and affiliated groups. Toe second section comprised 19 chapters on foretgn student dissidence.

,.;~.

Fages 11 Z: 12

Black radicalism

ocr began i'ol10·rTing Caribbean black radicalism i::J. earnest in .1968. T';/O papers' were produced on the subject; -one in August 1969 ana the other ~n June 1970. ocr was asked in. .rune 1970 to write a memo t~th special'

attez:lt~on to

linlts be-tween black radicalism in ,the CaribbeC!.n and advocates of black power in the US. 'l'he memo. 'tYas;produced,: in typescript and give~ to the DCI.

ocr in 1968 wrote pe~iodic type3cript meoc~ 'on. .Sto}~ly

C~rrnichaelfs

·travels abroad during a p=riod when'he had dropped f'rom public view.

00330

MORI DocID: 1451843

....

~.,

','.'

...;-- ...... "

.' . '..,

•

.'.'

Page 23

.Frohioition 'against cor·ITNT vs. US ci:ti~ens

.... In Se~tember 19721 Icoomo to' conduct hearability tests of certain H? 10:t1..g-uJ..si:ance co~ercia~·:te1ephon.e circuits . bet~roell the US and South k!;erica. Tne circtiits' carried drugrelated trai'fic.

,t"

......

_<,.}la.s ter.:.!:Lp,.a.veg: en 30 ..'viere '.. illegal. .

\fe conduct an radio telephone

!targe'ted ci-tizens.

.: Testing 'in the US of' O?";)-d~veloped elec.t.ronic· colle.etion. ...s ;ystems occasionally result in the collec.tion domestic t.e1,e-::?hone ..' conversations. 'i'men the tests are cOr::Jplete"the inter:::epted . ' ..materialis destroyed. .

. .'. crs! lteChniCians c~ndu~ted t~s~s).n the. Miami 'area in .August i971 aI' D,f gear intended :for use against a Bovf.e t agent in .Boubh Vietnam. ~'lhile whol;Ly' Lnnocuous, the tests preceued the 'holding' of ·.the converrtd.ons there and could. be. construed as being somehow related to them. Ln Februar'J 1972 CIA asked an ofi'icial of AT&T :for copies of

.,tel~phone" call:·slips

relating· to US-Chit::a Calls. The· o'Oeraticn lasted foi' three or four months and then d:i:-ied up. CGC stated its belief' that the collection of' these slips did not.violate·tbe COIZlUnications Act since eavesdroppfng ws::noti.?-lvolved. Page 29

- ,.

Mail coverage

. Since 1953, CL~ bas operated a mail intercept progra~ of incoming. and out~oing Ru~sian:l!!ail and, .at various tbes, :other . selected mail at .Kennedy Air:Port in 1'Ie~·r .YorkCi~y•. 'Ynis progran ;':. is nov dormant pending de'cision on ,·rhether. to continue or to . abolish it. ' :: .'

.' " , .

,..

..... '1

vL·,:: .:. ~ ..... e . 'J .

0'0331.

MORl DoclD:1451843

'., .eo' ;.~ ':~~" "

.... ~: : ..~ ',_':. ..

",Z.,

"~' ..:;.:..::.....-

-:4<.~' ~.;:~.' k"c{:;t ~:[.:~.;/' ..

'.: ••:, .»

':":.',

. :. '.'~ ....... .... '. . ':.. , '. ,,:'"

:,'

. :.

f "

"""

.. :.:-.::... ..

(:::',::"

...... ATTACH~1'ENT ..f.:.. ".

. , .'

.t....

. . ..

. : ....

i .

.':":,'.

r:-

--."

.....' .

. ."~ ",,, ~ :"." . :':" :(.... ..::.;.:::.;..-?'.:. ;' /: -.

~::.'-'.~

•.

z .....

•

' .

. '

' .

•

• t

, -",

':-

•

:.":'. '.' . ," r : .:: .':'\ ...,

. ..l•

.:: ~ -.

,:",:=.:'

....,'.: '

. ,. ~

" ,~~, ".'

;

:. -:.... ;

1 I i

.'. ...

:. '.::'

-.' .. ", .:,,~:

~,'"

c : '. :"; .:. ~.~

-r , ":'

.... .. ,~,:

00332' . ". :;.....;. ...

.' :.-::. •

>i:\.,

. ,.

.....

'.-::.;X.~:·

. ....I-.. TSD ~~s had a close worklng with. the. FBr ove . ;~l?-tiOrtship: ' . . "r-, .,~:.:.; the past few years:' . The .rEI is .t~e only-organizatio.n.thathas . ,', ':..;.. . . ""'. be!''; fullF.l;>riefew.-l!:S§; a uqi6~£~~eS'~ equipin:ent. "Thilr.• . . :. .follo'vV:ing a're si:tuations 'where tfS!?leqt4;j..rn~tand· guida.n.~ w~re . \,:.{ ~:; i'. ': involved.in ope'rations:' .' ~ _. ::....;:::: i'~·:" ~ .r ;. ;.... .- ;~.' " . ..;,' . ... "'.... .,~

... ,.:' ::

; ,':.

-, ..... ~~

MORl DoclD: l45l843

.:~(~~:""."'?""fT! f"~~'I~~0~~;l;F.~:,~0:j~:}~i~0fT," ". I.:..,..... :.•..~;

"-:', " :'

":-

.. "

....

:'.'

"".,

",:." .~~.\. ..

i· f

.' "

.'O

':.,: .

. -./"

, j:

.... ;

...•

•

:,,:>~.:: .;

f" t

•• 0

.: ";'::

.. ' -~ :. ~.

...

....:..•:-

. ..". ,

.~.:

.... ;,-

..... "••. "•.•••:' :-.eo:.

.: :'7. '..: ': .•°:'7. ~..

".':

':,

..;~

':..:=... "0 .. ::...

: ...

.. -".'" .

," ':' .... ,

':.

:-':-, . ..:. '. :"

'.~

...

v ,

7·.~··

.•

.' '-.

-.2

~'.

... :., ~.

'00-333

.~"

MORl DoclD: 1451843 •

·f

. :."

. :; 'I:

i ( "

• 1

I i

I I

•. .'

:: ...: ....... :.

..••.

: .:' ."

MORl DoclD: l45l843 ~

.,"

-.: .'

: ....

.. ~~.

.. -

.. ':.

'0... '.'

~j;:;"""~ t:~..-:~:.

~'r~:~_=

., 1

. :~"

'."

{

.. ..

,. ,

~.:

.....

'., ~

_--.-..,-_:_.~.;.J --:'..;

. : '."

..........

',:

MORl DoclD: 1451843

\.:-.~;--:::

::-

....• .:

~-;~ .

.";--

... . ~

2 .

. . ::.,...r:

~~ '.

_-"

. li

.~.l.t..

32.i:c;~ radi~2.1~sn~ -.',:

.r:~~!. 't~;ar!' ±"'~ll6~';:l~:~'" C~·r"!.:~jb-=:~n... c2..2:~:: r~;":'i..~a·l:;3~ :'.:1

.;.,

::..

(:9-r:c~st.

:.'. '

in-: .. I"~

~.j68.: -::;c ~~jers' ::el"e;·.pr~::lu(:~d_ on t.i';e 5U":)j.-=C7t~ one in ;'\1.lgust .·l969 ::: ~:r:J.' ;-;,.;.' o'~:,-"-r -; ..-:(\ ..:. "10',.", ......"- _ _ :J ~

.,~-"':"

\,.1.

..."....,.

OCl <-ras aSkel,·i.~ ..j~n.e: 1970 ,'rritg a menlo '"iit)ls:pecial:5,~. '::.~.': . a-ttent~on. to Itn.1tS;~!1);i;i~ieen, :black. radicali'sm .Ln the Carihbean:':~hd .:> .

i\:XP/<

~~~~~~;to:~~~:~~\~~ ~~ .": TIle neno "asprQduee<l ("',~I :La ·.:i-9~3jfi~ji~;:::9.::~io,iiCi~'::f:=3cri:Yt :·:e~-::;; en ;-):::.,-.}~~iJ:::·:3";~~;:

::~. . n:i ~l.:l.:ll s "'G!"a1:-j~<.~·s~ ',a:prcs:a.. cb.ll"'ing a p.;r:'c-:l ·;r:.1~n 1'\~ h-..,,1. drOp~~:d.:·

'~~ro.:n 'lJublic -.;i~,.,~"~;I:;-,,~~.·

.:.... .

'.' P:"""

,: .., .'·i·

• :~.

0:/ ·..:.· ..

,'-..

:.- --_.. . -.: :- "".. ';-;-,,;-,',' -.

.': .·--;':.f -, :~.

.:." r >:

'--...... _-..-....

:,1

.....

·;~;;~(i~~3.6

:'::~ 1 .

», :-

......: -.

"--.-"::.: <::---._-:. /:'

v-' :-;

~."

....

MORl DoclD: 1451843

,·.;~:~~;:>:;;~~~~:;i:~~:::··:·!t··~.::;+~~;·\Y;·.~·~:/; :.'~.' '.,

.'.. .. :

•••

# ••••

~ .. -...:·:... ..•.' M'" :>.t:.;.;,,#-L~.\l -

-'.. -

~ 10

o .. ~

:::.:;''::::;;''...57: _#

::.,

;

":'

.: •

-'.'

....';,;.

. '-'-'-"

".1 :';.. :.:....

i;':.~:·~:,#:' ~."~. _# _ #__ #.._ __ . _ .#0 #~ .._~.:

a ·.:t·i:~!i t.~i 1):.3. t t::r: J

-;'. .. 1,'·

~e~t~ng i~ tn~

US of (?d-a~velop~d electro~ic collectia~

~7~t~~3 Qccasio~i+y r2sul~ in t~~ ~~llection 0: a0~=s~ic tel~phone c;:;;:l.':ersations.~· . :~iileh·the tests are cor.::plete,1 the il!.tercep£ed .....

l:J:3.teriai:is .destr?3·ed:~ . . '.. .. : CL4~ . ]t~~""~iciU~S ccnduc ced tc.:sts. in the ;·;iani area in AlJ.511st -1. :r 1 OI', ;0-,.,' g-=ar. inte~ded :for use against a Soviet· 2.gen:t in SOt.lt!! '''C:; et,..,~~ .. r.r~'i" 11'..,("\1 1~:, i n~'-I""POljS tee tes t:~ pr,ec~,c~'?c1.: .......,h~ :":'l:li:l~ - a-:·~.;~ .- ~·~.~.~~;~~~~~-tc; r~ -;!~~. c~111o. C·? c.):,::;·~r:;·:d C!.:';" 'c-= Lng sO:!~hm-1. ·~e ~a.' ~'e~: to the:~.

.=,

:'.'

Iu ·;~~':':<',~~/"J,9j2 cr.:;, as}:-.:Q. an of:ficial of ~;7&T for co~ies of: 'teler;lO:l::" call 51-1:99' 'relating to U3-Chi::::a calls. The oDer:ition. . b.s~ed ·'fo!" .three· or_·~~our !:l0::lths, arid tee!! dried up. cae stE;.ted its belief that. the "col'iection of these sliDs did n':}t' 'Vio.late the', C:)::;Junicatio~s·.Act.·.~inC'e:e?Yesa.roPPing ~"3.S not in-.,rol'fed.·· .' ", . . • • : : ,.' ~. "#., :....... -: • • ~'

·. - .:.

'.~

2) /

•

S;i.ri-::e 195;3, CIA. has ogerated a mail Lrrte r cept; p::-ogra1: .o;i'·,.. inc~~in6 a~d o~tgoing Russiau;cai1 and, at varioJs t~~s~ other f.::~l~cl;e\:l :"1~il a"t !(:r_~ec1y .4ir2?·,jl-.t· in 1;-.:\·( Yorl-: City. ?r·his E!"ogrc.t=l is ItO';; do==~.c.t I:~~ding de cf.s Lon on ':i1:cf.,~ler to c(:::t-:ini·.i-: or to . a'b')li::;h it.

·,

· -L I

.: ..

Po i

· ;,

", ._.' 10....

00337

i._ !

·1·..· t

, • •\

....*.,

.."

#_.---;r~-

MORl DoclD: 1451843

-:.,

.F~ I~' I) ;!: r·tj'_ "Lr e f~;I:. ~.~: .:\ (.1" .,_)~, l?',t· t/ ~;:'5~t[(; l\",;rI t")':~' . ------_._--_._--~---_."_.

,. .. "

,.,.. ....

", .' .

·;TSD 11<>.5}-:;:;.,1 a dose ,.,.'or~;;:n~ r e Ie.t i oriship \,:,~:th th c FBI.o"iler . . ."..;... ,. '. . . "r.... •..--,-. . . &." .. ,. tne. pa s tTew ye a r s . _ !~~ . .1: £:1 1S u.e b~1J.~r 01"'g2,n'l'za1:lon t;:1.2t.. !1;aS . been fully b,,~,r ie fe d on TSD aud io .~~. tech..rri o ue.s and eoubr;:tent. The ·~r_. . · ..... . f~iloW:ing' e s i tua.ti ons whe e TSD and -gu.tda:i<:e were .;'::; , o ...oe r ",n ..·~~~~·olv··ed __... .... _-u . . ::>-: l'

"'..

",.

. ,. "r

-1"--,

a'r

_.u.·~._

~.c::

'..

'.. •

"''''.'

.:\

equiprnerrt

"...

......... . ~~:~.

"..

• "

~1.·

-.:.. ....-

, ~~.

......

':' .

'~':" .......s

.... :.

". ~. "

.:.

~-.s

,: ...

,--

. ..' '

o::~r .

MORl DoclD: 1451843

".._'

...

.....

'-" : ~

:"..::

-:"."-.....

..;.,,~

---------------------------'t!1'~

-t-r-

(G) T5D has fuzni sh e.d. equipment It.e-n s 'which constitute . an on-the-:;h,clf ca-pabilify to erlgage in photo and a udi o s u rv e i l ian ce op:eratiofls which rn ight not be kriown to the Agency., In one case it is known that a r e Ia five Iy un s ophis ti ca te'd device wa s us e d against a dorrie s ti c target.

t",

c...,

v', .-.,.

. :....!

.....

2 -

< •

,I•

00'339 ----. .. ' ......

-' -..:-

---. .-,----

•

..":;":"v-.

MORl DoclD: 1451843

....

'P:'-

•

.,'

./ ,

·0'<'" ,r~..

".:

,~ ,

,,' .

-....'\

...

--_._.~:.

._--'---'.

- ..,;- ",,':;;::T

---,--"\: :

MORl DoclD: 1451843

':c~v:r ':thOS~"';'i;~:in~;tnot

~n+a~~.h:. _.:rn::~t~r·.:~. .n~;'.~c-~.J.J.·..:ge·d~o:~" -': j:., :,.; ~.·,:. :.;: .~i.';,i:".: ,~. :._~; :._~~L, ·_:. -~: and.r:-~:t..j·~.~;':~-:3 7.he ;7,::-:'5inals -:~ I'--~

section vou Ld inCIUc1Sd -; He got -:the .~ough.;.no.tesdic~~~;by:)1r. "CoIGy On •

I 1'ls.d xerox ,,~':

l,,~~n ,

Dppa!'e~t'

\·~'i.':'

"....,

copi.~s ...;;::c

•

" \ : . ' ~ .;:~.,

__ .:'.; ....:,::'..

.... _

l.i

__ hI. _

,".

1¥.~1~!~y;ed the C61by nqt:etl~ i+. became

t;;a't ::he' ~as i"uif\':15' :~h~·:t:f:'u.tticn~ on una t to do 'with::- he .';:

; -V?lr~ouR" it~~s·~:··-~:'7n:!.~:,. iJt.\.7:~~~'~~;:( pr~-£·~lptad •

t ..

•: .':'

'.'

:',~

.-'

•

l' ~

SDB

•

~t.. . ':-' '.:~ : ',:_

;.: \; \.: :;.:~.~ ;. ~;,.,

'. .:,'~'"

-I

. ~.

.a '

::;

th'e status.r"eport we

,'.

. _.

...;.,_.,:.:• . ••.

MORl DoclD: 1451843 -';

: .. ,

.~: ' f '

.: .

. ..

~ ;'

. I

.,»,. :'.'

'"".: .~

,. ~

'.'

~. '.",

..: ".

.....

t, " '

... :

,.'

"t..'; .

.".

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.'.

.....

".:

.' .j. .{ /.

'( .

: ~

',. ":.,./ . i -,

.. ..

.: ..... :.:;.

:·';~.!'-':.:~ ..~:· __ :'~.~D

J..~:,] .•

1__-_

"1 I

: 1. /. "i

(- '.

. .-;:1':' ~'. s: .-.

'":

.... :

r .,;

';"'\~ ''',.

J L. -__I

"..J

' -

i .:»./ '_" .... ...~'.'..... '. :':< ...

~" ",.~;

: ;. ~

.J ~~_

J~_ '. _ _~__.._.. ..__ ._.

r1. . --- . .

r;" .

L:"

~.'

.. -'- ..

-..

"-'

. . . ----------------------------1---------'-- l-.': ." . I· -'~ I

""'r'g__ ~CTJO/f.

. ,._._

I.-

d~~~~.\'·:?ErIYE

.,.

.)~~!:!:.:.:.!~~:=r:.=

...

f.:_~

:.".".

.. ..

.. .. .. L"o..~ ~.

~ : :'.'

~"'O

s: \~.\J

"'I.e"\-

Q..t.'-'1

... cf'? ;:s Ct-- n..)'

r .u..L ~ : 4u-('- L ..' ., ,-, :

- ... .. ..

00343

FROM: NAME, ADDRESS AND PHON!!: NO.

I·

U:!. pre',ious tdilions

CO~FIDE!'iTIAL

. ..

FOLD HERE TO RETUR'N TO SENDER

UNCLASSIFIED

DAn;: "

. .'5(23/73 ..

t.U~:

~~4'

;:tCh~'rl~~ A. Briggs, n/PPB ... -:;.'.: '

:c.

.k",-.,,-...v'" .... :

.. '(' "'(.~-l.

Dc.

Lv..

'.'

. -.:.: :.... .

r"t-k-\-t.. ~

- ll..r ~·: :~;: ~;~!~\;i: ·: ~.

.-.:yc..\

-o,_

'-uC-\

rE- .'.. . -. .. .,,.-

...

:?________.._._____.... ')~ .;242-~ cC-' Y\ul ~_ ..:_."~-- . __ (.-;....t ~:-._~r"-<- \ v .<) .'

-c.

c..-:y j

-,.1

:;}""h:)

_ '~ -7 •_ . _<::'--?'

...' ....:';,.;t "-1.......,.

• '" .. ,-_,

~.':' :,'

S:i~E

J:-,")' .... -,"')"

.Remarks: .. '.'

!( . .

•.___ .._•._.L~i.!-~..._ _ ...._. _.=t1:::,;;;RH

CO}/,l',:EiiT

r"'-

r • !

··-i-····------·.·· ..- · ..._.._L.:...:::'':::''-':'~:::''--_ I :"""" "'0""""_,"''',

f - -...._ - _ . . . _HI)

~...._J.E.~~.gI... RE~!_ .._..__ . pnE?~E REPL'L.:_ _

SECRET

.......

. (':0)

MORl DoclD: 1451843 i.

: . : ".

:.;,., .r

.;:'

,",

.",l~>i:~,,~;~;:,~t:i. ;

\·::·'I{~·:;:~~;.t(; r)~·::'e~~)~ils - ~:~;l'i;ct t)l' .J.::·c:i:.... ect

SUBJ'SCT:

:'T'"l ': ,";!"lo- (:"/'·::.':-t t ~

.......-

ilH;l:lor;-,ndum r-eaponds to the Dircch>j;"'s req~~st fQia .....,{·-~,-t ,.,.F ...y ;,..., in -.,..---'''',d'';~';' "':',,1,·'1 ,·:·.,·-r ......_ ..,..1....... _""_ -; ,.-.l.r'·'''''r··,..,t _ .. CL __ J - -. - " J .. - ..... - ... ..T·· a_ ... :to 1".;!··9 _ ,,:::-ith }~r~ss.rs. Hurit , !.f;:Col'"d~ :r..;i·~(~YI Yourig , "e:t- ;::-r:~gl1.. 1.

~his

£~:-I'...

2. 1 .

'-".~

'to _ ......'....

J::

I have had none ...vi th Hunt. Lidcly 01" Young • . ",

3. ,My 'McCord contact was indirect 'and occur-r-ed sometime during the late 1960's when. r WE-<S Dil"ector, Office of Computer Services. I opposed p laris .f01" 'I'echrrical D.i•.'i~ion., Office of Security (under Mr •. !-.fcCord) to r.c.qui~e .a soparate computer [C.;l' its In-Pla~e.: !"f0nito:ring Syste=~'1 DD/S&T' (th~-,n ORD) was the coroputer- individual wOl"Rmg \'lltll ID and , r. think, would hav e c1etail~ .. · . -

10£

4. The Krog h 'contact also ..v as rndir-cct arid invoived his request. fUtst through O}!JB I that CIA fund 101.'"(:i.[:n tr~vel on bchalf : of the Cabinet. Committee on Jntcc-national Narcotics Control. Individual phone discussions. are noted in the atta ched , . The Agency

I=:~or w~re I land I . has ~ci:rward~d n::le\.'ant documentation , . • also.

n 3..:from Messrs. Krogh.

-II under-stand Copies .of.: .

land Colby 'a:rc:_iltta~bed .

5. I held a staff meeting yestea-day to ?;;.:;:s· the r-e-que-st to <.Ill OPPB employees , One officer- who was attending a !uncl':"Ll will not be avaflab'le untfl tomorrc.w • .:J\bcB\CV-EF-lB5'=V-::r.. ti: r!-:;~~ (:)3:;:i~j·~3) J - ::'\1:::'2 El.G2 CUT;~ ::.:TJGJ :-. 1°'-1. E· C OTP1--

lsI Charles A. BriZ~5

Charles A .. Briggs' . Director Planning.

Programming. and·~udgeting Attachment As stated

00344·

MORl DoclD: 1451843 . '0'./:. ':! : ,

~:.

','

<::: : : .... .: o'

....;

'.'

r ••• •••••••

r'''::~:l

..:'~'

... :

:G~lJ·f:·:·:·~1

(:~~~~:3 :-.:: l'T:t~~'i~~ r·:~-~-:·:";l1.:~::::~i ;'.~~ -:i\'.;~~~iJrJl ;.;( iO~1e L)!·;;·~:o::tic C:j:"\.:.l-:il \l;:..o 1:,~0'11 ·;;~::"(..ir.~n : tr o vr-l i!l 'L.;;r.:ni".-:ct~(:~n '..;:i!11 ~;L::il"' r1Ercr,~i('s. i:&:tt~:1·"':5tS. Ji}:Tl was p!",":'r°t:ing us to tl.,e:il" ir:tt::l-:tir,..Jl"i. to ::'!:..:J.t trs . fe,i'" ;Ul'lOS [(:11'" ~:~e

7.2:...

':·!.1·1 '11; ..y!(~.t·,

~Otr:':.1~~~l~ '~:~1~0~~ . ick,

1.1.-;-:.'''1:".1.".-':': F011ov~-U'Ft

11·Gln 1'~~y·l(,l.-; ,;':'I:_n 3-5 b.-1i)S fer 3 in(!i~;-i(!ounl=.- a11 hi FY 72 C~st pr-obably SiCK. Mtrmick r-eady to m:tke first t-ipo lis p9ugGcd In , E:·:Dir said OK l"e t(::hr~l1. '/'i~it •

7' F,,:b .72

7 Feb 72

See attached' raerno fl"c.m Egil KroSh, J1', to Bin C"lby and foltcw-cn Tr.t=;10S !rC}m·I'--I(~l Jul 72) and Colby (2 Aug 72). -

12(?) ?·..~o.r :7~ J'ohn Hurley, O:\f2, celled , z:wntiv,,-hlg possfbl o l(l-Cgh/ Minni.ck atterrdanco itt a L;:;::i:l Al~.....;ric:tn (St<.tiorl Chid?) .~ ~:.' :~;.:,f.i?~e!<::ncc on nar-cofics He ,ds~ said .Jei! .Shp.}herdl' ..(.:. ~I ous e , wa.s 1nYlng on a-t~ 'th . . '. "·hOt ; 1 e _' ~f ';(1 or . hfmself , Shepher d and l','oal"k Aker. Ol.1B to Euz-one ,

•

~__-:-:-.--_-=.-_Icolnmcnt(:d on ¥0..ogh/~;H·11~iCk:interest

23 Jun n

in g cttirig CA activ'itl es , including l;;,,:>ge-scale PM,

~n :~arc.C?tics f;ont 6 J~i..7i"·

!'I--;'::-;-_-=:!~al1~do

T~' '';'i!l send. II '.' '. ,.l~e

Notes say only:

ni·,lin~icl~-:"l~·Ul·l€;y film.

.:~.

1 Nov 72 •.e:-:1CO.

." ,"

00345

.'.

MORl DocID: 1451843

' •

•

. :... ".

., '.:" ~~:.:::

. . ..

: ~ .• j .

....... ... .. :" ..... .-. . . : .:. :.~

. , ':' t -,

20 Jan .72·

RLn'hlded ExDh" r e $32K he said DCI OK'd ..

-.-: ....

.j:

;

......-, : ..

',. '

..... :'.

MORl DoclD: 1451843

'.: ~ : ..

':' .

. .

Th'· ,-,...,) s:»: ce ")11 17,'[· t'·"'n::-, r'~'''1~''(N~· CO·,)·f·.. ro L '.'.!;> ,.' CJ.-~;) r.... d.. .' . \::. 'j=,".,. y.c\ bi-'et ".L CO";~ ~"'.--.-""-'_.\ ' .•. I •• r: ':COJ'iCS' 1.. _ .1;. : .. ;:>. '. _ ••" 0 "1 .I "I 1 ~ ·},c·.!."·/e P1-"'<'';:~';'111~'-O' C':'-";['r':>l'i';"" ··,;-[· r:... ~~.:,~)L-·.,.nb<.r·7 ...... '1·11.t.:_ '""" 1 •.-) Ll_ ....... - t: ........ t.J__ ~.... ..... ..:..<._:-_ ...... __ .~'11'" G.~ _ C'-. _'"\" ori ,~ J.1,,.,, LL':'~ ~.;:.., ..l4-. ...te·l::rHl.tio~lal drug L.-affic. <.o..

i:>

·.'The' 'Col'mnittee

.. Salary and ad~inistraHve.support for arna'Il , full-time' ':;;taff ha s b e eri :: provided,·by.the E,.:ecutive~£Hceof the J?residenf;~: qther.expens'es.aie .' ':.., being..ch;;p;ge·d to the 'constituent agen.cies.:.i:tnd d~partments. '. .'.:'

'its

. ..~..'. .

: '.

pro\7.ided.'l?-upport~od~te. .. ~ .

.. '. :The.

":':' . <.. :.:.: :. :,;' ''',,~:'' ...:

....

.i '.: Th~ ·.Bu.rea:~ of CU5tO:mS~ BNDD

:'.'

.,/

••••

2.':nd:f\..iI;j 16f.fi-ce. of. PUbiic S;:...ie·t:i have . .' .., . ' . ' . .... ... ',:

::,:~'.~' '.' ~""

",....

.,,'::

CIA. s!t ou1d. bep.repar·ed to defray, ilot more than ·.§ft:een t1:lous

and .:

' " ..dollars :in 'over e'e'as fra vel' e:>:.'P en s e s .fOJ;'C ab.inet . Go:m....--n,ittce staff'du.ring ···..~··;}j;e-remainq~r of FY--1972. .. ., .:". ,'. . . " '.

.1V~lter C_· .1vfi1U"'-i.ck,. the Com.mitl:ee's Staff..Co~T.di:ri.ator,. .. . ., .:' '..' '. .. . :..' .': ' .. ".. "'~"'''~ L~<· ....~.: .' '; ...: .::' " . . .' : :. . . . .

.. . .'..::..:£01." furth'ex- details •. -. :..'. ~:.

:-.:. ..

~.:

',.,

- ..

...

:::'"

:...

',.

". ,.'

.fjYq9r: Egil·:E{rogh., .r-;.

B.xCC~ltivcD.lrcctor· . 'Ca:bi~et Gommitt.ee on: .Int:er'riatio:nal Narcotics Control

.. ,

..:GC:: :John Eh:tlichman .' .... '.

;

". Assi~tant· to the President for D~:m:e;stic '.lufa-irs.

. CIA I

cp~'esenf:ati-vel CCINC v/b~id.tig·. drm~'p "'. v,

•

• '.,:

." .

003-41

r; ',-:.

:)~I ', ~ • • • • • ~'

, :

.-r:"

;:Mark. Alger . . ". ":"'." '" . . ___ ....•..•. ·1 .. OMB; Chie(, General G6Vernm~~t.:ro~"am:$Ilivjsion .....,;: ': .':: .... .. ,,-:-.

,',. ~

;' .. : -

•• :

~ "0

' .. .. ;:.

MORl DoclD: 1451843 ". "

·t., '", ~

. :,.,

"'...:

::::"""\l~c:".f. .-~~~:.:... :c: 1~):':3 l};.J~;Z;:;~:~~':'~1'· ~:~:J~)L:~.)~~t 'f:-j"i: i..!:i;z C:.'.".:: :;:~:;t (:O:::2.r:-~lf:t~~) ':::;1. 2:::.t:t.:: ;;.... r~tr.~·;:~al

_ .•.•.1!,'.:~ .• r-._...•~" ~: "' -__ •. _.,., t.

·7... ~ t~ .. _ ~• ....:: ,:..... n/~.1'!t R£-,-:;-: .:....., ~.J]..;.. ·k....L.m "'" ..... ,_..}.,..al,. ,;.".... -.;:.. ....-.-~ ..._

:.-..-J....

~~!"1 ._"""

t" ••

21 ;rt.~I.y 1972; s arrie .~u'bj:?:ct "., .

... -

. 1" Thia is in l"esponse. .t()·:tha.refe:t'ence~ rnezno r~g.a.rdin,S ..... ,. '\ .:;.U}~·1S. r' , .' . ' . '., -H" • -';" -us e. .0 !' vJ..,i; to cove-r trave'.l e:~pe~5e$ lO~ tila \1- n.lte l.-:ouse Cabi.n~t Comr,,11ttee Staff fo~ .z""Iscal ).~r::.;.\r 1973.. .:

:'.' 2~

You~.r$ .::.ut:.~o;i.Zed .iQbbligate~f lJP !:o $15 .. O!iO for fb.e 'Use ··,of the \Vhit.eHouie Cabhi~t' Committz.e StaHfor ~r~vel ex~enses .

.. clu~in;g 1:"'Y 1973~ O.bl!g3.tton.. ~bo:}ld tl~' Lecol:'d~d ,-;;.g-~!'n.3t 1~e O/DDP : ~al!6~:-=1~D.'t and 'E:ra'V~l order3' is.Gu'ed "~b':::"'.' --.. . . inI4·~·"t.,..O· ..,"""' o--n "'~-"":"'at-Ory~;::>!-..::a fa.n ~ ....... ,T.~ ..:p~ <C:""r'::- l.-L ...... number-, lr'_

.. ~ 3.. To.U\c· e~~eMt i:ha.~y~~ are .tU1a~Ie:·G·ab~o!:hthis requl..l"emcnt 'wlthin'yourpi;e:senf: aUotmetit;::'vie\::"lU hav&·to,·a.rrange some 'repro-' g·rah:-..rnbg b.ter-· i::1 the y.~ar:··f:o:cove~ :'his unb.udgeiea item. o

W.·E. Colhy Ezecu1:iye' Dlt'ecto:"'-Co~.."pt:ol1e~

o IPPB~,-:-=--

....i!

~ist~ibution:

, . ·Or.ig &.1

-I

.;*,"'

~ ...,

:'j' i

0034-8

: '1. -'PPB Sp.bj(~MS

I i

a:ddre;;se~

1 - ·;ExDir 1 :Ir:R 0

!hg ·z A~~'72

-,. 1. "'OlF. .:. Readinz :

'.'

b--. r - l - <:> , l'~hrono,

.1·

, ,.' ,~...;

MORl DoclD: 1451843 .....

'. '-;'.. ........

'.:"

i::.~ :.,'.~'""

....

.:.

. ,,/ .~ ...

:.: :r~:~;;;~:~:~;:;-:~.~·

r{:i~~_~:~:0~!·

. ,....:-.. :;. .(

EXt"':

';ll-;:;·.~.v·~'·t)~~.t:,..:(:t~l~ <: ·C(;~;;ij·;';.~:·():u.cr '<

VIA. :

Ha:ccotics '9<;m"t:r'oT (GCINC) .j ,

..:.

.' .

At our ii:.lvit·ation·:> I.-Ii:. ~'T21t~r C.. Binniek:> Sta.:fI'" 'Merr~er of the CCINC:> is;s~heduled to ~ttend and participate in the Regi~n2.1 Narcotic~·.:Senrl.nar sp.onsored ·by l'lH Di1Ti:;:;ion ... 1'.

':'" i·._ . '.

on' 27-28 JUly' 2972.: '.

·:r .

.-". '.

....

,...

'- .

... .; .

2. In accordance with procedur~s adbpted ror irave1 of ·\rnite Hou.se C2binet Gommit;"tee StafY in FY 1972.) it is ...~' .. r~quested.thc.t runds to·. cover- t.he·cost·.·of'Jilr. NinnickJs - ' . : ."'i:. trip be ·rel~2sed... Attached:.lierei'lith is. a copy .0Ta :ro:rma~ requ~st :from r·~.,...~ Egil Kr~ogh·d·ated '.1' February 1972 toNr •. ';. U:l"lli&'i1 Colby requesting' t~2.vel fU:hds. :for :.the balance' or :py ·197:2'. r;Ir,;. K(~0gh is' riow preparing a formal reque.st :for. '. $15,000.DO to cover tra.vei' 'expenses ror \fnite House Cab.inet .. : GO?ihl1itte.e sta.fr "par FYi:.,19.73.~. I.. will TOI';1ard this request.~ .. ~. to ~·ou1!o:frice:2.:5_ .s.con as -.i1;··a·rr~ve5~ :. ' - : 0 , "_. 0.: .

.:... "

., ..: '

Attachment:

....

.003;49' • ......»

. .... ,. ~

~-;

.....

HElJuRIJ f}BPJ

.... ! . . .

MORl DoclD: 1451843

,::~er yo,i>"C~~'~'

, '. ' " ,:~.:;.\i1.,~.~t~s·o£ the .Dh·e'; "~\ " :::1·J'w.y:J970 through,

.)·:~~:~~r::; in; ~~Y'jiv.ay tP·:'~Vf.~~~' ;:,":"?:", .'

:;:,;.;oo;;"<":\.:"Jf:,: ..

" : :"'i,!\:~~~,nonnn~tm~ con ve,n't~~, .0

.. .

: ;:. b~~Jn;~~rand~ ':ii" :~l~h .He asked the DDS'; ~th(fi 'lact known insecu ,Z .~~;;&i:,:.:;:.':.- ·.. ';:,H';.:·~:N.;;;~;;~·:,!: .>:.,,'

:::~:.7;{1::~'~;<:;E;c~~·i.

rl-~l':': :;fl(~;5 ~!\S;~:;':tt~~ti';n .~. ;.,..•-:.,:.~,E.~_. ~:. :~.:;~.; .:.;:.,:~ .:,-i.~;.:_,.·~.: f.·~:.;~·\~.: ,~;.,L.: : '

;'21 Deceml?'·:. ::·::·Iit:f'ormatio··

ifa:'Cl~ar'~nh~'oiOff{cii

-: ','"

. :.

. .:

to tli'¢ )?resid

:JDi's:closures>o[·Clas·s'f

. Staten1en:t'~~'\"":':'7"'_ . ~" "., .".'" ':f16>~e' tfi~· re~:.111t:bf ~~~t ".sentations by::t~e;~~:Dlfe~·i:or.·a:n}i·.,Aan.;.iral Ande·rson.... Exec.

:,.

:.: .u~ve 'Dire,ct4r:~~~¥'~d:that

he y,rill:~~~t withsel~~tecl.Ex~4;'

.f -: " .::·.;><.CoD:1niitte,~~ ";'''':''''~:'~~:¥.:~~~~~, w:e:~'kto'.4is~uss~:t~~·mem~~ -: ·:·: '.::." :::'-, .' ,·,:/:j.m:plic~t·:;~."c;i~(a·e'Velop':~·ec(jn:inlend~.ti.oiui for. acti' .' '. ,':;::",::' the ,Dhect: .of.the·:sp~Ci~l resp.onslbiiUies.pl

MORl DoclD: 1451843 t·····":···

.; .. "

.r,

' , - .. ~

ee-..... '~l": ~.: -:.~ . : ... ~ • • .

.'.

;.,li0:;~'(1t;:~:-":;:';l~$:~l~~W"'" ,,'. . ,: !t~$!t~~~l~{t);',~~l~~~~~~?~~~~'i:j.· >. :;-,

",}?;Q.Cf~eported· t~t Jo1mEhrllchma~' had telephoi:1f~a.';to·:adVise.':·".~:/.,-, "

usthat·the.:,Wh1.te House' is appobiting fOrxner CIA e~pl~yee !-towa.rd ..... :":.

H~t:':7 . ~t;f~{~dty ~o~~.~tant •. : -:. ". . ,:' .~.~: .i-, :...

::~~.S,;:·;,~~!,~~~~}},~~·:::::::'·::·:.·... ".::'~::: :':

, :>··.:·':·~4~pth~r account of the Mo.rrong .Meeting Qf.tb.!~~j,~1;~;'·~ea.ds: .: '..

I~:'~·~~.:~i·~~;n~~tin~'edt~t~~~rdH~-~~::;'~~'l~:~~~~'d:"s~'~~i~':<. :"

consultane to the White House. GeIier~f.Cu~hma.n:told "Ehrlicmnan' . '-" that :Mr~ ". Hunt would have full co?peration. from C~.,· '~. '~:, :.:' .:.' . . .' . . . ... 16.July.i9·71,. .. . ..' _," :" ':'::':~. _., . ".....

......

. ..

:~~.~

•

'.:,.'.

.:;

.' •

".::.

•

:.'

• • • ••• '

. '....; l·'·

~.~

"-'

C'a;~~~":~~idth~~l'

mo·~t'~~?~eci~ii~~-::~~.th~·~~ :;; -':

. '. Was. which HOll.ston spent W1th nun yesterday.'

...... - -. "':,' .

.... , : .\.

".~

.~:

22 July 1971 (the day Ho.\Va.td Hunt came t~ see: General·CI,i·~·hm.cin)', ..': .: -. :~"~/.~::'<. '-,: .',..

...:..

.' . -

...~\: .... ,

•

" • •'

...

:'-::::!~~::')~{::'.::{-::::.~:.':..~'.:. -,: ';:'"

>.. .

....

' ..·:Carver'highlighted his session yesterday with'~~Cstaffe:r. David Yo'uug,:';who is a.ssisting John Eb.rlichman in ~'¢~ewing -':he·. " ;: · secret..P entagon papers . · . " ':: ,;~::;~,;:,>~~,;::}~?-::'. . ".:>.:..":

18l~E~;~~71·. " , .": .: .

. .1it~I~f:ft;:~'~:':'

. A.J?DP noted that he' has reported to White, Housestaffel' David' .... Y0l;lng c)nJhe results of the Deputy Direttor of Securi~yls':'surveyof ,;,,:, ":: . those w"ho ·sa.,V-the classified a s s eaernent upon whid~··Tad.Szuk b~aed'.··"::~,.

-~ ': .~..-

•. '

t·',-

·:;~~::tl::Cle.:: . . ..,:,." ., ,<?i.J~~I~~t;i" '. -. .r" . t e r ::::ff::: on ~e ~U..·, :',;,;if~{t~.., '.' I~' ~~;~~ns'e ~'. the 'Directo~' s 'questio~ ca~v~~'~~#~{~~{~~~e ~:.: ':-:' workr'equested by John Ehrlichman is pending;' . X1ie;plr~ctoJ," a.sked :.':

';. '.

: 7

· '. :<,:",DD;l:~lled attention to the article in today's·New York Times, .

',' "Nixon Acts 'to End Sec'urity Leaks.. Il. (~ret!'t '£'r()~ the'.~rticle: :. " . IllAst J'uly, two rnembea-a of the WhiteHouse s~ff.· -,ba:vj.d R. YoUng.:·':.

:.of the'Natio~l Security· Council and Egtl Kroghr.Jr~:~. of·~he Domesti¢;., . CouncU~:-'w,ere asked to investiga.te.earlier leaks .. p~ev:ent ·recur:- :~:::-:' -. renc~s.·'.') . . . . . . . '. ···c.. : .,...,;:,-.. ~ . ~ . '. . '~:,' ... ~.: . ~ ~ ','

"'.

~ "

;;

.. '

;

r. .::

.:. .. 2 ..

•

: -• • ' :• • • •

U'::- • • _

...

t ...

• ••

_ ..... _ •.__ .. ~.'- ~"'" ....;

.: .•;;: __ ._,

,'_.

I:..

MORl DoclD: 1451843

i;~~i~i{~l'i~~j{f;:'1);~~!J,1~f~~i~~I~~~;~~,:;--i?-g;~'-;!\,;:';'1't~lt~~rl~r~:t:$I~~iC<' . , ' s'

:.:;.:' ;~'."':'!::.' ~"'" . i:: :::

::. :':;''-:', .:.::' .;.DP~ noted. 't}ie :artiCle by-Michael G~tler in tod~y' Wai'lhi~g'fon,,::····: .... ~ ·.Post,. ·'.'New SpY·$a.tE:il1ite$ Planned for Clearei"~·.;'InstantPi¢tures.·I~ . ' ..

'..</ \.:;.,. ,. <: .:.. :~:. Lat(;i:'in the meeting the Director askedthe PPS'to' advise the":'. . '. :-:;"Di~ector of Sec~rity to' under-take an ln~estiga,.t~.o~ofthis leaIi of . ':··/;EOI-re1a.ted info~matioIl: and to convene the ~B Security::'.' '''..

: ·':· i·.·lCl·'·~F·~e: ·':b': ·;r:·:~u·'~a·:er':_;9": :7{ -'

.!.. J.:

':_'0.l".~.~.;.;~.··.:~.;'-t--_/ '-''-.,.:--, ,

-,,'.,"

:.... :.

'".

:""::~.::~:: ·""i :.:". .•..

'." ..

. ' ;;~ :: •. ~~ , ;=.

:··::::::·;':;'h~:'n{·~~a~~ re~i~d'eci Ex~cutive 'co~~i~e '~~~~e;:s ~f

: .":'" . ..: '. ~::.:: :. '. . :'.:. '.:': D~:~ ··Kissi.nge~ls r equeatthat any inquiries fr~:rh elem~nts the .' ,. :~:~'~". ., .White·Hotis·~··sta.ffbe referred to his staff for .conveyance to the . ". -Agency, . .... ... ,:.,::; .. -,

c;i

,. ,

:.:

,;..

·5····· . .:.: : .....

-,'

. ' . "': '. i6: Febrriary '1972 •

..... ".:" .

. ,".-

:...",.. , '. '.:', ::': '<Lelunan:''noted plans to continue briefing Attb'~ne'y G'~~er~l ..' '.,::: >·Mi.tchell, ..~hose resignation-is efiective i :M:ar·c;h.·.·:,~. ',:- ',.,::' i:.. r: :..... ':."' .' .. ". ' • • • -.

'",

, ' . '::,

•

.' .t·

•

. ", '.~" .': . 6 March"197Z

'/ ..:.' '.'

•

••".

.•••.

•

' . r.r

:"-.,'

. 7, .:.'

.."

-t..

~.:.::

. :.:.:: .::

l' ..,~

. hidepe~dent Office Rea "s, subject:. "AllegationS .of Assas~in~tio:ris~II 'He 'a~ked .that it be mentioned at Staff Meetings~:'·::'.i·," .:' :.. ' . :.. ' ;

':~l /~-' -.( .~

"!'~.' ::~.T~iD~re·~tor noted his memorand~··'to·:·the.ri~~rit~es ~cl, .....

.. , .r. '.' .: .'-, ,

."'. ~ .>~ ' ', .

..' . .

.:-:

...... ".

•

...... . . . :

The l:>irector 'said that the Presi~e~t has '~e'~~ his·.17.,

~:..::

"':':'.. ' '" :,~ .::-::::'February rnernozandum on reducing disclosures of clas~ified. '. :. , .... :. . 'intelligence .anddl reoted the White Hous e stafrio pr-epar-e ·a'.: ...memorandum urging that all agencies comply'·with proper dis'; :.c1o·~ure procedures. . ',.. ..... '. . ..... ... . ':-'

....... :

: / . :••

.",

~::' . , ' • • '.

"::'~:" l' •

, ',: '- '.

'':'

:.... ;.~.: :,.~, ..,: ..:

....

' . ' :~.

...

:.':..

•• ,

"' • • '

:.'.)

•

. .'.' :. :', '.. '.

. . . .. ....

'.~

. "

. '.'-'

.... ::.

. ... . ':

. ..

;•.

"."

...

1.'

.•••.

00.352'" "

"'-~' >: :.,:::,:;:~~:::~.:~~; ::L::~-~o ,~~<:~ :, ':

~'.

'.\':::'.:J:.... ' "..:

. '. . ~:.. '::. ~.';:". . .. . .. . . :.:: .

.. I"

,:.. ,:

"'~"

• . • ;.

.,: :....::: Houston, said that he will be attending a meeting called . wno is recominending that Jus~ic(;.,drop the case against I?aniel.'.~l1sberg.· . :' . . ' '. . .

',:-.-~,;o::(

. '

•

·:·i ':/by 'DOD General GOWlsel Buzhazdt,

" . ,.

::.~

.": .....

8 ·.rune 1972

.. ',

,,'

....

'-';'"

;,.

MORl DoclD: 1451843

1?~'·/:,:",;.'. ':~~9S~~'i9~~;0'i"";,, .:' ., . .-;;:;~~~~~~~i~l~t,

, ,:." .''. Th~ Director noted the 17 June arrest ot James \V. MeCor.ti' ~n~:t:\ ,~l":. :, .' .. '":>: .four others who were apprehended at the Democ:rati~ National Cori1·.·::;it:,~~:~(r.:{.

:...:;. .

. ' . :-./. mittee he2.dquarters a.t ~he Watergate.'-:i··'W.ith the Director of SecUritj':.~~;:;i-·:;::'·::;. ....:-, ":' ;':'. presel;lt ·to provide 1?iographic details~ theDire~tor made it.perfectly·'t~:i:.'S:··.. .' . . .i. c~ea.r that ·l'espC?nses to any- inquiry..w?-th, .r~speCt to McCord or .Ho~rd:.:?{:.:·:::' ·ltUnt~··.who maybe'lmplicated, are to be lirpitec1 tc? a.. statement that.>t~·XH(· , . '.. they a~e fC)rmer employees -\vho'1"etired in August and AprU·197.0 re•.::':::.;;~;?·:'.; spectively. 'r~e Director asked that' this gl,lidarice be dissennn.ated:L::·· .>~"'::" ......,' .-.:'. via.' staff meetings•. The Director a.sked that any inquiry ii-om. other ": {.,:-.:. ~ :". .' ;:.:-',: elem.ents of the govermnent be referred to the Director of Secllrity . ~: : ,.: . ......: : who is to be the focal polrtt. Inquii-i'es. from the pres s are to b~' re- . "; . :~ .. '. '. terred to Mr. Unumb who may say that McCord worked. in the Office.·. .. "')'''0£ Security. The DirectQr noted ·trui.t we. have no responsibilitY·with·...:,,·::;·: resp~ct to an investigation except to be .responsiya to the FBlt's re- ...• ".:: : quest for name traces.. It was ncted that Howard Hunt may have done": ".:':. . '. som.e work since re.tircment in .connection with the preparation of : . '. :":,": <, ">supporting matedal!or some awards.:' The ·Executive Directorwa:s: . ::. ; . -: /:··.··:::~skedto review this topic and repo~to:the Dir~ctor" L

. .. ,

. ~ :.

. . ;"'. .

., "

;

.. ,

•~ ~'., .. -z .

. '.....20 ·Jlme 1972

.... , ....

.....:."

. . :" -.. ~

:::':" '. :

'. '. .:.': .::.' .:..' :' ':- In response to the Directorf's r;ci~est, the Director of Se~urity:· . '. -. h1ghUghted developments over the past twenty~four hours wi~h resp~ct '" ;~. . 'to the McCord/Hunt_ et "'.1.. situation. He noted that the late edition .'.' .' of the Ne\v York Times carries a difier'ent story by Tad Szulc than ", ·that.whiehappeared in the edition..received here. 'The Director ot : .v-;;.: :-, -. Security anticipates s~m.e. ~nquiries on·B·ernard.L.. Barker's situation,. .. · . . and it was noted .that Mr. Barker was hired by the Agency in i960 and .~/~ . ~. ..... ~: .~" '":. terminated in 1966. The Director complimented Un~b o~ his han~g" ~ . .. ' ':, .:.... ::. <: :: ofinquirles and a sked that future inqUiries beznet with'a; response :~);?:.;, .. ' .. '.. > : .>.;'::' confined to the. fact that, now that we have acknowledged that both "... ,:.~::.: ""': . .'. McCord and Hunt·are former AgencY employee~,. we know nothing: . ::.:-:':;". . ". "'." . ' '. . ': more abolit..the-~se.and the caller should be referred to the FBI ~~ :.::; '!<~.::'.: a p p r o p r i a t e . :.; ...' ~

20 June 1972

.. ,

-: : ..: .,~' :.' ~.... ' . ::. . . . ' T~e T:i:rectornoted receipt o!'a'Pal::e;- on a safehouae in Mia~ :;:':'. which is being made a.vailable to: .the 'Secret Service in support of .:' . ..' .: .. '. .... its work in connection with theaep.~bncanandDemocratic Nationa..l . . Conventio;ts. lie a..sked·theADD~a,.nd the DDS to ma.~e it absolutely,' :':.:"';' .... :. ';'

. ":;".

'.~'

'...

. . ","

... ;...

.:4 .... '

... ,. ;

• :" ....-.7"-.-.1 •.-~•• , .....

... '

";'~

'::

MORl DoclD: l45l843

k!{;·<:ii;f·'·:!::~t<~::)~::1:,\;:~:>gl~~~J.' ."

,', .'. ".

t.·th;~~.H·.~2::;~ggg;~.~f:~~9.tf:~.5t!,:y~,i?~~~%·{8~~·~5~~.lq~g··,

.:"

I.: 3-, ~ .:.'.: ~l..:. :'::.:;.'( ,!;.: ;".•):~. :.:1 S" tc);'be 'corifltied tQ' P rovts1o~~\Qf·:·~h'«·.:: s.afehp.us·e·::Ci~~::t.h~'.t:):tlS .not to .

rA;-:t>:;f;'<\~~ '::::."::.~.~,::·'·)::':;~{be\ '~~'~'ci:'~~ :~k:::~1t.~j~r 'inY~$~ig~'~i~~~/"i~te~rog~H:~~~):'~Vyw~l~:-in~!'~.

....::. :. etc." ·.The ·Director..added 'that we. will not 'loan people to .the .FBT or' . '.' Secr.erServic~.ih connectton With i:.h~~r· resp~msibilities.at-the:' . :. :'.:\.'(. .',.: , .. Gonvenfions nor wjll we provi4e.:e·q~~pmeritunique to the .Agency; ;~:

! ;":.:'.'

1·::·'· ....,.·.: ..· /

;::;."~':

. • n.d:e

~::

Offuecoverage'

~i~~f;SN. ; and·; Times

I )1::

..... . .....: '. '.' .... 'Washington Post;.... MCJ-ury recommended that Chairman ~edzi be . : .,. . briefed on the McCord affair and that this briefing include all . .... . our information'about tile others···involved•. The .Director asked .'. :::~.. :.;:~.:' -: ,::: .. ...... .Maury to .t.onch base with the Director of Sec~rity' and prepare . .·ilf.il··· .' ~'.'\""'Ii"'.::' .·:·a ·~iug<papfril.-~on this:·:topic.,for hisr~yiew.· Citing the 'nurnbe r . of distorted rumors. about this matter , the Executive Director . /".: .:.:: .: ::' ..: ': ' .: said that during the co~rse of theda y he' hopes to provide a . . suggested Headquarters Bulletin fo.r all employees for the' . . ': ' . '.: .... :'. '. . :;: '. .: .' .' . . ' Director's review.' . .. '

.~~':.'

~'"

..:.,;--: ;":: :. :. •

,:",., I

'. '. Unumb·nofed a number of inquiries from the press with . .: ;espect to the 'Cuban-Ameri'caiis'tnyolved ui the'b~gging' attempt .... at the' Democratic National co~i.ttee Iieadquaz te r s and thedz .' '. ::.alleged involvement in the Baio[!)igs, etc. ,.·The Dtr ector asked 'that such inquiries be met with anexplanati~n.that-we are not. .prepared to be helpful on thism#ter•.· . '.,~. . • : . . ' . ;. .":. ·::~'r··>:· .::'. 23 June 1972 . ...:.. -/.::, ::: .... . ".

." "

'.',

• • :.;

. . :':-'Maury noted that "~ 'briefe(fCh~irmanNedzi··on the McCord! .. Hunt s i t u a t I o n . :.''... c.; ~;,:,:_: -,,:_ : .:- .

.t", '

.....

21 August 1972 ,

.. ..... Houston noted a tel.ephone .·call.from Howard. Hunt who" .. :. .;.: ':.' .' . " ···e~pbiined that his attorney. wa$ with hirn a:nd had a' question' '. . ":'.::". '. '.: . . about. a· friend's past affiliation, ~th the Agency•.1 1 .... .. .... DD/Sec,~as reviewed the employment, and Houston reported .'" . .'~.)':' '. .: .: that he replied directly to Hunt's friend, e • '. thatthis old affiliation should create I!-O proble~i:n~·-s~.i;-"n-c-o-nn-e-c~t:-;i-o-n--with his' appearance before a grand jury. . . ;.. 18 October 1972

.. ': . . ...

Mr.1

v •

Ma ury noted his response t6 a r.equest [r.om CSC General Counsel Anthony Mondeflov'who -wa s rea~ting. to a request for the personnel files of those ·forme~ :Agency officers .involyed in the

. .;

... :." .

'.' "

..'., - 5 .. ·

,i.:.:': ..

..,.-:

;':

-. ,:.

,~~I.:" ~'.:. ., .. • ..: :':::" :" "

• • • • J.

.,',

.:.... "': .

. '00354

. -r·-_:---.. . -· . c

. ' ..

.::.~ :.:.

.i· ::,;/..(.1 ..:. :,:.

:' -. 1-

MORl DoclD: 1451843

1;~{Jt~~;'i"i!r~!;;~tlj:'(~~~11i\h~1~t~:~:r8~g~rf~~~~~~:i~~:~~f}~~;\'1\:!:;; ., ,.:'. ·Administ~ative Practi'ces'~nd Procedur~s .: 'He added that ~~·:.::;:~~·.,:··;'.··;:J~L(~>· .';.... are ·.exempte~rfrom relate4 t::.SC regui~tions, and the·.Directo~<.::.~::i:~G.~i;::~~~::{~· ' . endcr.sedhfs-pfan to. provide only the 'dates of their d·epartur~.:··>:::·~~:,:~;;t~~~~:?f;,: from the Agency in}he event the Senator's office ca.Il.s us. .on this:::·;~;:·Yf~fgl:~U:\.

!·::t i .:· ','.',:";'.'.;./

'.:;' .. ',.

.. '

•

: -. : ":"

•

' . ','"

"N~ ••

. . -, :::~ . . ' '.: ..' .::'..... 3 November 1972 .. ", . '. . . · . ::'~.' '. '. ~ :". ' " Houston recalled tliatl~stAugu~t'he'repO'rt~d'ona call ( ',~ :'from Howar(l' ~un~ and his :s~~se~ue'nt~guidance to) " ...~ pn ho'W t9 handl~"afflliahonWJ.th '~he 'Agen~ '

-';

.:.

t ~"' .•

'., . . . . . . .

..:..' .; ,-

'.'

'. , ' " "

......:.:

. .

"". .:-;':

.... "

:.'

:' :.

, \.. ,

. ·Th~ Di.rector highlighted hi~,conver.sationwith David K~~sio~ · .of.the Washington Star News and his flat denial pi a pr'op~sed:" '.. ' .. story that the Agency was asked to report on the Democratic .: ; . .~ . Party which led to th~ .W.atergate incident and others. The ";"."'.., Director 'noted his ·plans·t~.Jssue.a statement of denial if such:.:,:' a. story wereto appeaz-andeuggeated, that Thuermer .considet.:,'·:,:}'::::~:~;;\t~l;~;~;:~t:, 'dl:afting one for conti:ngency:use., ' ..... -, " .

. ~

. ~ .; ..:':.:' '

t· .

.' "l

.", . .,. ".:.

.15 November 1972 :

...'. , -'

'."

. DDP noted 'a rep~r~ from Chief, WH Division that on 9 .', ('~:".' .October a l\.1~. Harper of the New York Tinles was working on a. .. '.:: . -.: ,'. :,:'" . story' Which·tries to link the ·Agency with Cuban emigr es ; the "}:;,:",,:~\;,,, i ::'::.: .' ,: ...... .... ..;' .. "break-iii at the Chilean Embassy, action against Danfel EUsbe:~'~}1j;:: :.::: " theWatergat'e case•..'·Thuermer observed that this the'first'" ··i -', ...... ". : he has heard about this topic', and the PPP concluded that such';;!.,:,:' !. ;~'.' " " story would have no basis in fact and it wouldbe inadvisable ·~o. "{: try to straighten out Mr. Harper. . " . ;. ;"

and

;

is.

2Z November 1972 . .., ..

. .,

.:'

. '.

.. '; .

~'",

, ....

';', ..... .",.

. .;.

'Warner rei~ted. that according to A s,sistant A tto rney G~~~~a:l" .; .-,' ". Henry :·)eterson,· .U. S. Attorney Ear1Siibert has several questions :'. on the Watergate case. The Director indicated he will reviewtms matter later'. . ,'., '. ',..... . .,;. :,:

\: ..:.', ........ .

:>',:<.',;.',,",T.'

- 6-

" l'

...........

. '

..,: .

~': :.~._-

...:-

, ~

._,. ~,.~ ....: .. .'~ ...... :-~_.

....

.'- ....•'

.,...:

'."'.~

, ~

'.--~'

. _.. c,:,.••..,",,:,.;,.:.. """._' ",:,;,_..,.;.~_ r ..

MORl DoclD: 1451843

!1~:1:~~~c;~~~1~~~i~i1~~:1:ilI~~!~tt~;;·!:·~j;~:1~~~"~;~~1~A';rtit~1i!-m~~~~MJ~~~' . . / . . ~.;.::: ..... ' "<:".', ':'. 'The "Directo;"~oted the a~ticle by Tho~~s. B.' 'Ro~~ 'i~"": ..:·.:,··..i:\,.=-.. ': -'. , .: , : .'. ',:. yester'day's Eveniiii Star-:-News, "~New Watergate··I)imensipn?·~~:·:\..~ ..·· . ..:- . 1'.'. ..... and the Impr es sfon left therein that .the Agency was involved'·':·\:> ,:",:: ..,. . r:.; .: ".:' .. in .the ·Watergate·~nc.id·ent-beGausea i:assport bearing' the na!ri~.···.'.(~···:.:.. , f:::~:;.: :.... :' :' .:., .: ~EdwCl:~d Hamiltmi\va:s .found on Frank' Sturgis'.' ..Any. inquirie~·.··< . ':'. " :: ."; ., :. '.:.' :..,'.,: '. . from the press ·elsewhe.re- are to be met with a "this is ··:···i.:·: .-:' :.:. :~ ';, . -: -v. '.:'::. ~.:' '. '. . ...: nonsense1'·.r:ep'ly.·· The: Executivei Director noted wozk under .:.:' . .:, way to i.dentify the genes'is of the passport story. .. . . . , .. .. . . .~: . ~.~ .': .: -"; ,::' .' . ". '.:' ~.'

or,

~.~~~~::~. ':""~ .~

.15 Jan~a:ry 197.3"':. -,"..::":• -. .. ;""',::".....~: .

.::~: ..:j~;. '.. :

• ·l ....~..

....

.....

difficulty".:.:

'>", "'. . ".,

18 ·January 1973·'

.",

•

i _.~~ \. .

. : ~.: .. ::-: . '.

.:'

... ' : .....' ', :

:'.

. .: .

;

....

.... ~

.. .,

.' .. ;

........

. .'

"':".

',' ,.?:~:~;·1-.J~J~:i:};": .:.. .

. ..

. ::':. ;,.; . : '

i-:

: ,:-." :'....':', .'.', .' \': '\~~:.\.~..~'.".;'.': .: ".'",,: ,:'. ,', .

:' ~ Maury·.rep·oi:t;ecfthat·~enhe and Dave Blee, ChieilSB~:?'~~w: Chairm,an Nedzl·with.respect to the' Chairman's forthcomfugtrip . to Finland,. Leningrad; ·:«5o£ia., and Athens, Chairman Nedzf ',: ..' ., ..... briefed on his' November conversation with New York Times:,;:.,,:" r.·, . coz-zeapondent Seymour Her~h. Maury went on to highlight;the ;:'" sevez-af topics ~ and allegations Hersh claims he has with re:S:p'ed -:: '.';" ,. '. '. to Agency activities, :particularly allegations that we ar~ engaged'.:" ·in extensive ~o-mesti,c: operations. M~ury will circulate atmi3mo:-.: ':::;: ~\ -randum onfhe information .Hersh claims he has. The 'DireCtor .' :.:<" ~ " explained that-we. should assemble a senior team to m~et With .... :'.:. .. Chairman N edzi a:hdclearly outline what we 'do and do not do ip." J .' the United States. ':.:: :..c.... . :. ";:):.:.' ", ..

'. .

... '

':",.~,

. Ma~ry noted.pzeaa storie.s :that Watergate defendant;.,'::·.·.·,: Martinez was on·tl~(;fA.gency:payrolluntill7 June and antfctpated .5. :' . . . . . . some inquiry on this topic.: The DDP endorsed his view that, . ". '. whereas Martinez wa's-dntez-rnittently used a~'1(ource to.report .. '. on Cuban, exil.e matters,thi-s .relationship should cause no ..seJ::~ous .

...

. ,,: '.

·t.:~i

•

.-:.

<' :

..... ':' =.. :'

~ •• ":'~ .... '.:r :,;

19 January 1973

'. : ~ -'i :>'" .-.~. Maury reported' that Chairman. Nedzi .would like'the full' :.: . , :. . Subcommitte'e' oiiIntelligence Operations to h~ar a presenta~on· by ·us 0ll Agency-'activity in the Unitet: States sometime mlci- ." February.:.'-The Dir·eCtornoted that hi's decision 'of Yeste'i·daY-··i'.~·.' to turn out a 'senior tea:in for this briefing stands. . . . . ... :....

... . :.. :.... ...:.... ~ . :;. ..~..:.:..

.',

:.~.

;

'';''

"'::'.,

- 7-

.. .. :.'

" .....

--~

....

-~--'-":-.

....

.;.~

~.:.

. ..: ...... ........ _ . .'.., .... . ... .v.._ ~

~r.N?~~ " .- _,=~'~:.:~;'~ 1··:1~:

:'"

.::'-- ;-.-

MORl DoclD: l45l843

·ft;ii,'{!: •. <·~~::.·\'f1;Vj2~~~Jt;~~9~;A,;'

... ::~':.:.' ~: ,:-, .:....~..... : :·:t~·~····:l;:~· :".~ '.. ':. ',....

.. ' >.'.:.: /.~:: "':';,::".'~ .:(:')': t:·:·:··~ : : . : " " ,

;...

!.:': ~:.' '.': .: :. " -, ':: .: ":'.~. >: ~.; ::. d'e~~~~l :W~it~'i'~ 'ri~~~'d ;{o~a:rd ir~t' s appea~~~ce '~n l:e.le···:>

...' :'<":'visi'~n 18,st,rdght. :'. 'l'hue'rmer will obtain a·tran's·c;;.iptoi.. the " .'::: .. , : ;<>, pr·ogram.. · .and the Exec·\:!-tive 'Director 'noted his concern ·over.·' ':' '. ..' . : 'H~t's"sugge'stion that he is.no Ionger bound by his.:.sec;,~c.Y.· : ,;c' '.\ .' ;;. ,'.

::r;:~:;;1973';\ ", ,', ',.. ," , :;:"'<~;'~1;tl1f;-~:;,-<:.

" E~~cutiv:e'.Director noted that the terminal secrecy·agreement·· : :,,:.. 'which Howard Hunt 'signed said that he Will be acknowledged as an '. :Ag.ency 'empioyee.:Hi.s assei-tion that he is not bound by the ~gree,.. .'.. -...• . . : ment because we·di.d iri"fact acknowledge his employment here is ',: .' therefore . i l l - a d v i s e d:.:... . . .-: '.. . ~'. :', . ,: . :. .... ". . . '.:' -: ,,:.' . .;: : . , . .. 7 February 1973 ,'" ;.:. . .... ,,'

'~",,~,~,

:.~,.;..

'_.,,'

, '

_:,

'.,

'.'~

.' ,

; :.' M~t.lry noted.tha:.t Mr. Helms is appearing before' the 'Sen~te f. For~ig:n'Relations .Committee this morning oil po~c'~'training; .~' ....:. ITT;.and the 'Waterg~te incident.' He also noted that 'hehas .:.: :'.' soliCited. the suppor-t- of Senators Humphrey, M~Gee~:"a~d .Scott .. to makeappzopz-Iate pubfic statementefolfowing Mr~'i:Ie1ms:' :. ~ppear.an¢~. . '.' .' . .,' . .

:.,

:'f

8 February 1973

.:. -.' .'

. .

-":':

:~ :

.•

':'.

,.'., .Ma·U:ry recalled that we are obligated to sit down, w:i,th.,,;· " ~:" '. ·.. Chairman N~dzi and review what we do and don't dotn' the U.'S~·:". "" ..... ':::~'. Th: Director co~curr.ed. T.he. DDI sugges:e~eund~rtake .::-... ~.~n .1n-house r evtew-of what l.t 1S we ar:e domg ),!rth~: ~~ and, -', . 1.1:'. :'. identify. and eliminate the marginal•. ' . . {-~~'\;:h::-:'~:; •. .., "': '.

<>:

.y.

. ,.'

.' . " •...'

::>-: .... :.,~.~'.'::!~ ;': ";':'.':

,".

~::zt:~:1:oted advice from'Nicholas H2~2L~iws;e]·.";.·';;·

14· . that

' . . , ~"soft. story" is floating around Newsweek on the general ... :. . '

topic of political espionage and ex-CIA agents •. ":';"\>..: ·.'i , .. ' ". ". ;';

,',

:. '

. ',.. ~

.;.'.i~;,t'.• / · '

'. '.

.' . .. '

::'

:" .....

-: .

. :, .. ;".

,','

.... : ... '

. ----:---

;~..

.',

•

cti'

e- ".'

.0 ~1il.l«

- ,- •• 7" ','

.....;-.':..: .... . ......-:.

...... '.':: . -." .~:'.{' . . ' . ,

MORl DoclD: 1451843

: :.:. /

t··:. ';.) ;, : '...: C:[:..:Matiry 'related that former Director Richard Hehns·. has been" .:' ....' ':. :.: ~ ·.·~~~eaj:>y Senator' Fulbright to zeappear before .the·S~nate 'Foreign '. .: .:: ' •. ' ->,' . : - Reia.ti~>ns 'Committee~ Maury said that Mr. He4ri~:Y.'oiiJ.d..probably' .. '" . be"'4ti~ried ontheWate.rgate incident,' Agency trathiiJ.·g.of polfce, ':. . .... .':. :and~i'T:and went: on to. describe ¥r•. Helms'. a~ti~.ip#e4·.r:~spons~.

~., ..

r~a~~ki~73

r. " .~.

'. .... .. '

••••

·.;:t.X~··' ;.;.

•••.....

.. .

} '

.'.. ::~:'~::'''.'. '".....;.. "::':"'M~~r'; highlight~d yest~rday's .~IG me~ti~~·~tth·~·::White··; ::.:(. ;... :~;; Hous'e.~nd·his··recomrnendatiol1- thatwe not provide 'examples of • ". ':" "":;"":':0", • .....:t· -':'<..,.,.... .. . , ';"":f;::r,,," -. " . . Congr.essionalleaks of classified information for ·Whi.te House' -.:.. , . .: :"us'e 'hi reacting to Congressional criticism: of the Agministration's' . ,. . IImdisc·r~tions. 'II The DDS advised that the Office ~f Security is· .' keeping.a r easonably complete record of obvious 'Leaks ,of intel:r~...; , gence information in the press and elsewhere.. ..: :... ,: ',:" ..:. " -. :"":I;;lJ;_~1

., ',."

~.,

':.:

_." ...

6.~f:~·:i~ctor noted that Side;':1~~l:~b~~me

. ....

advice Hugh 'pl~nf; .to write; a' story alleging that Howard Hurit.was.:eriiployed . , by.;a,.: cover. or.ganization,. i. e., Robert R. Mulle#.::CoD:1p~ny,'when "hel~ft the Agency. Colby 'noted that this companyfs 'a,. completely private concern but has provided cove.r for one or.two tifficers '.' , .overseas. .:The Director asked Thuermer to be p~ep~red to cope wi,th.. any inquiries·whe.u. the story. appears. . .>" ..., '::.' .. ::', :. ":."/~.~ .' ~ . . .: . ::. ~, ; "

:";"

.....'.'

'::\~;':~J;.:;~/t.:'·... ..;.~. . : ... ,',' ' (Si/in'od) WilI1e.m;·:V /:B~oe .'.: .• :.:, >:": .'.':. .. .. . ; . . . .:" . William V.' .Br~e··:.;·· ;." ..". ..;' ~. ,. 0 .. '

; .....

.....

.-.

......1.;.

Inspectpr. Genezaf -"-:.' .. '. .. .- .

. '::::·<..~.F~~/;:; .:": . "

.....-

.....

'. : ..

. -. ',' -".: . .:~ . :"::.

:.' ...':

e, •

... ...

. , '.

. -:

~ .~,.,

. . -:

", "

......

. '

. ..

". •,':., '"f ' ,... • '.' '.:: ~:'. " ..

.. -' .. '" :: ...... ,.,. '

." .

- 9-

."",

..-

-, •

. ,"

.... : ..

"',-

....

~.: '

",':,

'.;.,

'.,

: ..:

.. ••

.. ." '., ....... ......... ..:...,..: :..,.... ......,.. ,_...

;.'

.'" -,' ""~.-

• • ',

......... _....:...__

t ...

.:-

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.:\~?~~~~e~ '.' .. I:: ,:( \,~y:::::.~;;~~~~~!~~y., :'.: "".. : ,.~. :. .,;;-" I ;~~l~~"¢~;,j,"Pt~. WVJ3:I)aily Log of 30 May 197·$('

!·"::.·K~'~':l.~•s:.;fs·: .;l~:n .lg.

·.·s~·.k· e· l

'e"'1" h'a·.·.s·.-.'t:.a ..

eWpVa:Bp·.~e;';.~ts:o ;hbe.·~.·~·. .

.,:..1~..

< •.

"0-':;:.';,"

"'.

'fa:'ct.t~~~,

d.' foCr''alslo'emd .L.~diii~·s1-lmrn·e:r:··0{:';i:9i7;(ft . . •,. . \tention .the .

. n'Ow·.wants.;to·s~e·them again. One;.. Restl~~f§ a~,wh~le:set Qfcolintr.y·bhppters; and ;q'IA):;.~;:r.'oteamq.re "sensiJiv:epiece drawing.:~ ,.:.il. ..' exan1:p-l:e,s 'to'mak~"its point. l'jOCI balke d-' ...·~n '.

. ".

.....

•

• ". ~

•

....

,,~.

_'.,"~"".

lith:,' june: .1:970'). 'OOI;:'1'rote ofthe GS'(sin¢e1eft t"~y.. other countr-ie.s . for '\.tr(.. ~. ~

,"w~nt to do arryth'ing on the r

'·::)l,,'J·U~ sid~":":'~he wh~le~roject'ev~~ual1YI w'a~~~eci.·o~:e"t·~to CA. 1......'..: w~~~e.d. u~der I , Isupervi~ion "" J~t.~.,?,1eft--in Boston).'. ", ::'. ;,;o-y' ~.';:

The reafter ~KiX. in August 1970~ bec~i.1i~·e we had done so much work we· publfshed a' aepaxate paper "Student UnresfAlJroad"-'::.-compilatiori of the coun~ry, S t~9:i~ s •

.;'i~~~'~~~;::".i

a3rd - - -on

the.Caiib~r

..-WV:B'iis':famii'iarwith the 3---but . . . dIdn't' . .. . ,a~p,.~#;ts'. , ' . '

,··.~':"';·;~·;':(:f:~:·~·

'<~~,~'~I

IKis·.s·~ger

tOlciL~t~¥5::.,..\tys.sent

a.p~

had . me paper; I s:¢nt it 6ackwith' some nice words on. it-:-.-.\V;0 ',.. .ike to see. again" .. (not a .' di~:ect q~.oter~::"wv.:a·said' he had' the DD·~.~,i;::~<?:~YK'~Whitm.ansays' Lat.irne r ~a~ .copies ofbothzepozts •. His .'rec·o~~~f~~~~'~!.r.t;.th:at pa:pAr::~ as ·ca.r;riedto San ~1.'ementeperhaps by Gen·:~:t~',·.ushman;but·.'ga,.the,red " .. ·.<.O:!+~ij,.rn.an· had-been u'nable to deliyer 'it t,'''':< ".. :.:~.: Could be thatt·{iss:inger. ,: : '~/':;':{~~~~~~!~' seeA lonly the other. " ( f o : not confirin~ this:;iri' ' ·2 .. c:·de~t3;il~ La·hmer 1S struggling with Kis.s 'est. . . "'.. . . .. \....

:· t,

'.~

~ ..

-".? .r...' ," :,: ';

" e'

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.~._

···1·- :

..:.

"'~ ':

......-._,

!-----------,--------+---~------

..·.1

..-

. - _........

:.:.~:---_

.._..

5.'

..__ •. ----:-..:--,...----~~-_.

-.-----;-

","

.. ..-

1----------~-:----.,.__-+_--~+_,__--7__:_-

. .. 9.

10.

,..

... ":" "

~:.\

- ..

..-r •

.:.:

11.

12.

13. I------~-------_l,.._---+---+_--__l

1.4.

".0036.0

15.

•

FORM

3-62 . . :

61 0 USE .

·PR!vtOUS !DITIONS

SECRET' ~

...

INTERNAL o CONFIDENTfAL. :'.: 0 USE ONLY •• ;

'.t

0·. UNCLASSIFIED ....... ..

MORIDocID: 1451843

. ~"':"."

MORl DoclD: l45l843 ,,,' .. '. :.....:. ..., ":"~ i;,. ;.~:::.. ;~.. .; .

. ';,.1::"

';.',.

'. '. . . ." . : .: ::. . ". ;' .....'

'~.

',r'

........

..... ::,,:.

.. .

~ ,

.1.

:.:

:",

MORl DoclD: 1451843

f/ ', . ', , "

.. , .;:. .... .: "

.........

':'.,

,-"'.,'

' :'

',.: . , '

:. ::..

;

..... . .....

,.'.

','.:

- Z",

.. h

=) _

-·F.

..: . .... .~ .~ ,;.' ':'"

OQ363

MORl DoclD: 1451843 •

~".

".'

,. ./

.{-o

":'_

....

_eo.'

•••••

MORl DoclD: 1451843

,. 'f ',', . . . ~

".,'

DO.3SS·

L-_..,...-

,. ." "',,~ . "' .....

- - - - - - - - - - ' , ~," , ~ . . . . .!

•

MORl DoclD: 1451843 ..- .... :.. ". ....: . ~:. '.:~'.! ~ .'::..:'.. . . ~ ... '.:

":'.

:'.'

<: '~','

.. "

: ..."::

::.

"::

. I

00366

. I

MORl DoclD: 1451843

,-: ....

:."

....; ..

. ,:.'"f··

.,,. :\ ...•

", v-;

'.'''0 . '"",

.:.: .

00367

MORl DoclD: 1451843

0'036:6..: ....

...... .... .

":.:":

• if ..».. / .

: ..

". . ...

MORl DoclD: 1451843

....

. '

" •

.";

.::;

......

.;..

"""'"

MORl DoclD: 1451843 -. ;: .... . ..."..

:.r .:

......

:.;:".. ,. ~:

MORl DoclD:.1451843 '.:

:,'

.,'

~.~.

'.- .~ ~

".:.

..•. <:> .

..•..

00371.

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.,.... ",

.- ..... --...-

•

.,":

.. ~

.' "

" ','. ~t

." ~

.. :::...~

"\,"

...

, .'

-t:'

00372 ;.~

.' ..... i.-:.~~ j ~ ~:-:-

MORl DoclD: l45l843 ..... t .....',.

...t:.

;~',:.:[

. .:~-:1,,::~:1.=:'!1·~:::; Ci;.1

·:::.. . . . :.'...:;.. 1 C:,.)i.:.~:~l·;l ~~..i"~:::!..l.:.- 5. ~:3

<).l

:.T·"L~:;~

:~:)~:: I::J :~ t

l"ilI Di'ifisio'!.l 11:lS r ev Lewed

_:~'. 'i(~.':-:~':.;(}j,'

'::::"'~·:.::~~1

~~~jl:.; ..: !D

l·iJ't:.~:

.;:~.:; '.':1:.:~:.rt~=·f

i:ll~ i"'2:(:e.i":~~;~;f~tl !.:::)It:.:''lll

(C~)P:l n·ttrt(;ll~,:i)

by ·J~cl{. .t!.11d~==.!.~;30n and fii16s t~;,rrt j_Jc CO~l taii1S no new info.l:':natio!l.•· '£0 -;;·.h~ bes't 1::no'.'710G.ge. of' th·~

- .' .. '

Divi.zion, there is no' fm,me,.a"t-ion to the all€gn.tion that

'E .. EO'\7:\l"'d 1-{tlht' wa s }etlgng~(~ on baha Lf t;:>:f ITT in b-l"a~l{ing:: i!ltO Chj.]_eSln (liplorn~tic insta~l~;tiO!lS ill ~Vas~lj..!1g·~0!l a!2<1 I"~:~·~N

YO!'j-c.

2. Any conn2~~ion between ITT and these br~a~~ins' ~s pnrely'conjectural ~nd.th~ column tak2S care t6 p';:d~t

this out.

_.:.....:...-

-'"-' ...

.~---;.

-..;;-

, on this or any IT~. r:l,.;\ttel:'o He had anticipated ~~' that Anderson. f:1i:~ht .·imply such a relationship in his

:1 column and ~ad assured us 'that this was not true. ," .

Theodore G. Shackley Chief Weste~~ H~mispbere Division

. '.

....

MORl DoclD: 1451843 " .

. ......

I ,:.:

00374 F~OM;

u;-tCLASSWI£D. f(ia;:, ·~O. 1-07

.':.

237

NAME, AQP

OATS:

A R .~ 12M1·973 I

Use previous editions

,~O

MORl DoclD: 1451843 ..

....

,.; "'.'=. . • •

• ,P"

: ".... :': ..,-" ': :.. : ~ .: •..• :.:. :....;.. :~.:~~'~ ! :

. '" :t' ",:r

.' ':: •

••••

:J'; I

••: ~:)

·l••

":. \0 ,:t:::)." ....;l ':::,.:·~r"I\;!. ., .•

,I; ,'., l '..:: -.'

;1'

_)';; ;(..{_~:~ / l.iS Z:1 :~. ;':J

,:~ ;',1, .,'.' ..i,:· ._fr

'i : l

.._

,,::",,::,·.~i:-:·I~ ;'"t't.-:':: .:;.~.. .. ::~~.. ,:1~:'t :::.-; {,;' i:;v~'~: ~! 't::... ;::~!~~.:'~~t'"

I, '/,' "";: :~,:~:\ \? ;,~' :U:i;):/;:t:;~+:,~~;'~f:i';,;::::;

;c, ,I.

!~!;~ ,;;,',: :;~''',~~

,,"

....

vr r-:

I·.. ·-~·· .... -

I,,-:···'·"1l'lS

In a 1:':(';';10 lnt€'nd?d for the.

1° ..-~ . ,: . .oz::'11uie~r l',.t._.! States, -ron. ~ 4~.~ 1. <",. ( " .

.....- ....... l.

1:' "'·of..

_,.1

,,!t.. 1i""""

(',.,1,':'("<

'i y,.,. , .

I ~..l;;'~ C'" ~an ~ .

rU..

.c.:n:':!E.i.!:

b:..::-..

1,:1;:.-; \,:,5 ":>'t:~~;"":''''~ ~:: .;;'"

!~:~~i~)~::'I;ri!~~ S;~~;;;~;'~::,~~~~i; !fl'~~;,:~~~;a~~,l:~ ~~01~~:~~~~~;~::~f~!~ i.e ~T~~ :;;~;;)~r~:=~' ~:'~:l:':t'~ on I~;:~~: ~~;~cl~t~;~t:1~~.~,i~~)~.~:~ ~(,aC-z director L~\:"·r·:l ,\~..tU.:" '~"""V -"-"~: ~1"~nr.~ l)·~L'\.'~":.n f('p':3:",r0~ f 'I ;''I :\ ::-'" --,,,,,,~ .. ".-

Jerrv . .l "I) l. ..•._ 1\.1'&<'00_ li-"-·t,.. ..... r .- .:."J ln .....:: ... - ........ -I- a!.nl:t..· .· ·l ... ~~:,.&. .u':.I~·n .... t:"'\·...·_:i'.I~t._l _lll ..• ;::t_ .:_~;;) ::.t.. "'·....·1.·.. ·.:- ':" . -- ..... : .. ::. t.. t..;.'-.~.f,.'''':'fln r·'\:lo~€'d· u~ ~r:·irf"A!:S""'..1 assembled 6..... ".> , •• ,1" "' L ..._ L \ •••• .::> I q .. ~ I rr and "{\:Oaf ~- ....... ~ ;;r':-ln t'or: o· t,'1:'11o c~-etl-.:::l"':"),"""'--'-: -.. .. - - - -...~f\.··f::-C to- onera . . 11_ a.I" ...'_.=:<:".;,.. ..... hl·! ..... -.:.h._~... _....~~ wlth excellent contacts in tn..~! r. . . . . " .::::-e .. ;.~ .Ja' - ':. ':.._u"It!;#!S. \re noted, for- exr:mn!c.tle~~I.'.4..i US'" to th~ conclusi;ln,n 'v '-:..-:;'n·--c·::l-n-rn:;n-·!'t·\-;.. ·t·;·lt . I . -t' ·1-1...·" Hans. only on'! or perhaps two ! '~-a' • c"ln;" -::-BI chief I p'... ~.I Levinson wrote "[""'" l'~_ ,.,.,,_ u.... VI •• t.. .. v b k .... ,1 \. ....:> ... : L~. ~L ..." _ .... • ... _ , .___ J"~'::' SUb(OI:i~)t.t~ef:~sfi:il!Tii;rFran!.qmeL:l. ers cnew ~:no J"~<!Cl :;e. ri::k G.ay· and convictedl n ot l'otltine. .' ...... .' Sturgis IJ:!d t~id Citl:<.>r· :P~Ol;lc'lqt:c:ste~ ar.d waS'.Ima~.eing tna 1""ilt~r-!'2te [(·Ion E. HDwiircJ i. "Vl!lu;:ble o:Ilc'1 "";';'I:>m<'nt -~n;tt·..· -t..... --~~· .. -~r ..- -... • G - uoet',"i~10n.· . f 'Pr .~. • ., ~_ .. I d" .. . i - ... -- .. n~ i:rUl ':\:.:lIL!neZ \':rl:"J ::In-;....... •. ..' :i':unt f:i1d o-::::1jn·1'-;)~\:::n. H! ;:~liar:_ (":;i;.n '".c:=e !e:'l ~"'~CJ!.~~h~d.. I .. . ,

.......

.... -

.:.

.....

'''.:.l.

!g~il~~ti~~:~';;~~X~{~~};;;j-(:~~i~~'~i ~};;~~i.~~t~~~~~e~~~~;~;~ 'l:;{~'~ i~~::~l~:~:'/·~f~~~ .[~.~;.~~r<:;'i:.~,:~;:~~ I~l;;:~::;i~~'~::;~:l~~~\.~~~~s~~~:;,

!c:;-:!Jzssy to yJ!otU.;;:·:rPil daC~~'lldbO.~\. !:"!;Jh:. mo~~n;), be.:o~e t~~ h.:;J:1 r:h lzed [! :';ooo£oOO.Ot:O POI!tu~:lll·t;l::-Y' t,:er~' o·oth s~arch~d' :ll!d lrr.r.. n.t ~... . . . .. " . V;at,c:1·Z,lte :'lITes•.E. HO~\'a!"d j pirG~~ from ITT wHh a. settle· .!il~:>" 'wen~ ::-:sll~c~ea.. . 'The l . !:~·l::!$r,a ,r.2S c::-tUtiO':.l5, ~10·.~~-~}I~n~~Jet It b~ ]~nl)\vn ,araJ~nd.:;i;eni: (if its ;tntitrust trol~hle5 i~11it:'t'es \.."a.l::cd .p::st sc;:c:-.3.t l~l';£:r, "O;)i:t impi1c::,ting ITT inFhe.. clty that he hnd .a 'lear::' I Th':l .".~'nshi~:::~on Post re./ mo,',: :ttt:,)!:.h-e of::Ce.ii to get

l ":·~l:. :;;~J.r~~f .h~.!~~;Lc.~~}~~~~i~~i-!!:~;~,~~;~.;~i~~;;;~ n~.~?~~~ 1~r~~~;~~set~~~!~ ;;t:~~~:~~~}~~!J~'~'i~: I;~.:~~~~r;~S\~}:;-~~~~·:~·~~:i:~~ ! ~il.:,: C.:l·'-i:·I'r~e)Hn_~':i)uld1:;<: ,wo;-k: wt:n~ !'th.~y w~!'e ·f.~e

l'':-i;:'rted •. wuhng I O:J'::Q :'1 nttr.1ue, of .k2~~'; strg-iIo.r p.r~\'.lte c!ien~s. .• Jl(:

In:!S

to D?i:v<':!" to talk to 2\rr5.

'.0

g.)!!:;;."

nu:.-,f::OH:-

f Be"rd rro'.lut rer:on;;cb~ !h~ l izmg 'of the ':-:"'01.' Y"r'k :lpart. ~C 3ti !.~; a :r:~!~~io~::hip :H·::"Jve~.n I ..~~' is p05si:::!e th~t E. 1To".;- r:~::n:o. \rca .!"epo::t~·d !~;!t. G!'~y. nl:=ntS £if C!.il-:2a:a. (H:~:,:vr..a::"~:;; . I1-T :tnd _the te:lm \t-hich ~\:as tard i{unt, ~ctL'"!g :lS the Con·. :rnean'.vhHe, turned- th~ ori;Ji:'i\\:erc· d~ECrn)~d hI t:1C 111C:':'o arr~st~d at .the l}jl1~..r~~1~.~~t'tr:!.ctor· for the :.'team.' had! n:il .memo o\'e, to IT!' for· itS/'·as "simi!2.1" c!ei!ll brea,k.!ns." Btjt he s!rc::sed "that the easel'more' than: one' dient 21~d t!mt le:;;pe:!s to try to discredit. " Footl)otc: Jcrrs . LC\:!ll;;on ~lu~1i:Jt'd h~ -this. n1~I:'1O:~cl~i:rJ:l.$·r;:ona ciie-nc ~'a~, l°r-T. \\hicn! "G:-ay r~fused to cC~!l:nE:nt! r4!r~.s~:i ~~ .C't~l;:'lei\~_ on . h!s JJ~ c!rcums~:lnt!tll .z:nd' tnnt·!""·!2S i;"~e-.:·:;+~d in o:;-,u"ijp'1 'r:: _ v..O.. . ,t'e ('''1lTcd t;,n. FBi ior hts! n1~,;.r:sQ. "-'."!llCit n~ ;:-:ni1 •.' ·:!S:t t • ~ll~'~'e is ::0 h::rd e\'j,~~;;!:<: ,,1' li~t:l:;ti:,;~~';:jO"lt· ~~:J~ti:l~; r~5;~n;e. 'Cl~!!~ti(;~-ed b~' sCt:~.; i~:l(;i:d pll;;:i;:-~~i'cn.. ..\ n '!1'T i:wcl';(:ment;· ,'tions·o.,er.tbc f~te or its ir.·itor:s :mder oath. !lowi!\'er, hail i.,!. .. ~;:>?"~~I:1;;n c::H~d. t.~e \"estment in the Chiluan 'fel",·ltestified that' be . tr.d'· J~ot!·nI~~g'ttlcns q·.·."p;C~ .... ~lS £"Ll_';~ I "'1 -,..,1 . . ~hout . . . ..11 ht.::!~ •... "'::'0•. ~ v, ... 'f iphone Co:n!'::lny.. 'fhe mem.iturned the nero!> 0.£:1" to ITTI~' ;:''''::-' _~:-'l .,0,:1 :l-"'. u::",=:.:e,. H;:"e. howflve:--, is the dr- lbers of the' team mil)' ha;;e Idirec..! j· but had delh'ered it to' rIc s~ld l1r nad n~;.·. :'. In.y, · ""}lHe lrol.;~ ,..'!~~t"'l···("·l ""\".~ 'l\·;1·1'·~ "h""'!;"~~It ··t... . li,r...,t.. :;],,.:'t ",l'l" ................. • l to. ....... ~ .. ~ •• \;,;:. l _ . u...... _.::"'l·l.~C1 l~.. ~ ""£." ..... .1.. I _ ... _ 2idn • _ John. . D(a,'1 . , . . . . . .i.Fiuni. !0:7 :i!l)"' ..our;lose• I • ..... '1 S\I·::>t'(J:"r::nrit·~e stnii h::; p~?cec. =werc coin~ ri p.:lt:riotj~ thili';; to 'n WJ3 lhe V;hitc House. in' ~ 1;<.3. t..::~~~ F:-'~::~"S;:r:~:=,,~~

it;'

':"I

P:":

•

1.:--------_·_----

...

••

._-----,--------...;:.......;'-----------~-~---

-:........_ ..

00315

MORl DoclD: l45l843

s•

.... :

-, ~

.j"

}

:.'~

'. .': '

.... .

. ;:

...........:

~.:

:,.:

: ..

FROl'r': NAME. AOOrtgSS AND PHON=: NO.

-r i""\ ;...., ,/,.)(.

)

CO:-;FIDE~TIAL

r:..pof ::'). 1~c7

237 "

..... .

OAT€:

SECHET

MORl DoclD: 1451843 ;

. ::.: ..~"

•. ~• ..;

r../iJ.!

.... ".

_~.

-;,hI·11 ..urs icsJlI'''' ___ !:..-__._'.

".w' '0

:i!A

-ia,

::~Y1.~~'

. Wil NESS

-..-~-- __ :.~~.~.:.:.. ·___'..··h_ s e : ~-

};fA

19. "j~RCSS

"'~e,

.1.20. ws

xc...e: f'~::"£

n/A

'H/A

•

-""

~-"'C-r.~s£ ~r~~i~

1. -_._----. 1.\

-i:?~ILs OF' l!iCIDE/'tT 16i<l£fL.... C(5;~NC-,;EST. cc;;-ru;u£ ~.~~, . r rr EMS"...5 ~ECE5.s,l,!lY' i!oi)~c ...nliG. IT::M} I

••• ••• .....

<":

At"apnrox;7T;atehr IDO hours, l';ond~\r , 1.fa~y· 13". '1972,. Forc;gn }i'j c.R-T Q~S myi~1cn-

Control Cpnfeer xas pdyjRPd b~T 'M. P,D,C , 3D, that' a b~:1J:'[;l~ry- h::fd-t:;!~g~~e ::t J,;h-eChancetv of: Chile,-1736 Has~::!'chn.ful.tt.s Avenue". tJ.Jo~ 1 Rnmp.t.ime bptri'EfID llO-,,(L~":-:~ ~ Friday, Yay· 13 ' 1972, and on 0855 1:on1'3 this dabe ,

;

------.

B.ez:gnan t Ri1 sY,}of. Pi chazdaon anrl the )}'nd~Tsigned ;!:,:err.> dj spaf,ched Cl,t Gp~rori;,.,;>-!:C\);y, .133$ hours in Cruiser IfJ.!. 2~.

.' d ,l~2.S' :?t10,"J.se ~ .' d _bv· 1~;£.~ rL0l~.rr.r:J1._(l'J·ro·· !~.\.-al~:roL_l;.c~~ini.s.trat~1@~Ql:n~~~ -,9;",~.:... The und er-sxcne of'the Embas sv of' ChiJ.e, that'the Chc.;"!cer:;-- of .. Chile Has entered and ~l .:th2 of.fi~~s .... , v:D..S, -tiffie the Eev[;OQ of' ent.roy or ite::;.~s· taken i.s unknown; ·riCra ransacked.. At -'-1,." l-rr. ,lIavarro"adrises that he ..rill 'contact the. Foreign}~iss;ons Di'td..s ion-;·...a 'tch . C01;T,iOlnC . 'llhen deteriniuati on otmJ:::sing art.i c) AS j::: made, (cont.i nn Ed) 23. PHOTOS

,,'

O.M

o YE.S

-.'

-r--.

jam

. IIISE: I:P~ FO!:M 10-2 ; SUPPLEMENT fOR Ao::aTl.l;l'lAL DETAILS)

2'1. SUSPECT'AI'Il~/C?RARRes.TEe PERSONS. I051lTIfT OY IIAIoI;;. "'ODR£SS. SEX. fiACE. SOCIAL. SECURITY IIU"'SI:R. DOS. E.YEs~ ETC. LAST NAME

P'r

ACE

FIRST

• rEX

fEIGilT

~2) rA,C£

,WflGHT

("'IR

. rEX

rEI~~T

WEIGHT

I~"'IR

-I Ui. ,l,R'IO;ST NO.

25, ARREST PO

: 3D. INCIDENT STATUS

. '~'l'ffeant stevens E. Butler 33. $TAT~D[PI. OFFICIAL 110TlflEIi

f-" "

~rH"

'0,

N/A

"'~~F.ESS

EYES

DATE; HOUR

"."

Or:;-·I.~-?2

l~OO hrs ,

...-

Ii,l,T1CNALlTY

I,SOCIAL SECURITY NO.

28,.. D"TE OF J.P.!!E.ST

UtlFOUNDEO

32. APP~OVIlIG ~~S'GN"'TURE)~A1.\

,.,:. -:' . ' \t\ \\'1(1\ DATE': JlOUR:

129~H;;;-it -

C(.EARED aT, "'''?EST 0",1'1:

,.{~L HOUR ,Ot;:..it;,,7

Cal tain Pete N. Hanthos ": ";

I:.I~T

1.....T10,; ..

SOCI~L SECURITr HO.

DATE O~ ~"F~ .:

CLOSED

-r.../A

,l,P.REST CHtC-~R ':"AM~ MID a..~GE 1<0.1

B.}{

A.~OP£H .

::;;;;Jr:;;/GNAT~H°tri l~~<:;;'1 <?: )l~, , 1 ~ ' • r,l;.'\" ,

ADDRESS

~IOOL£

,IRST

L"'Sl' I1A.ME

""IDOLE

FS:

34. usS$-ID CASE so,

N/A.

003~

MORl DoclD: 1451843

. ..

::',,";1--1 (", ~.::i n i~ ";·.. c=:z... ,J, l:-'J"t:'··::' :': ~:,I:r C~J ':".;:.:; r:-..: .:: ~ ': :~~: I~ ('j:'Ci~;~!":t C} 5.:Ct::""1 () ...• ern, s: c.: •::> ;) C, !,D'!d C::~·:t '1. :'; i .z- ~.:.~ r;h<"ieJ.. .. ,:,: ;~.~: :.. \-~ '~~.1. J;'1. s 3:"'(';i~C it 3(' ;'0 J ~L,:?.J~.G., . •1:h~(:2;' ~:·.t·~:.~~~ .~:. if T:.:i5, '.,":_' . . ,- . .. .., '.~~J"::

.s»,

" ~

},'" ~3·.:::r;C FI".... ';......-e :;

.:»,

~;;.} ;;"\"~ 1·:~.P .:

t.',,:: ~

I· FC'·O..~TD c' .

~::/~ :

•

. "1

--"-1 _

""--"~h) ,

);Ckr,;i~~l

J,. •••••

:.... lcri:.:Lfiod ,

1-":'.....,..

1..,;.1. . .:_~1..

vr ...>.~

. .

. ,

:..'

;

•

- ..

-:"..

ri)'

.. "

jam

;

, ,

8. SUSPECT AND/OR ARRE~~EO PERS,OHS. IDENTIFY BY "AME. ADDRESS', '.EX, RAC[. SOCIAL 'ECURITY "U~BER. DOB, [YES, ETC.' ....

r.:~5! 'lAME I

ell: ' RA,CE I

SEX

I, ,

1'.

.LAST IIAME

- 121, ,

ItACt

..I

IIEIGHT I

FIRST

Ht~~HT \

. I .

9. ARlltST'PD \

' ,WEIGHT ,I'

.. . '. " , - I

' SU.'1

FIRST'\

I,:';

W.EIGH!

10. ARREST NO.

HAIR

MIDDU:'\

EYES

.' D~T& 0':, BlllTH

ADDRESS

MIDDLE'

,HAIR

12. O"TE

16. F'II1AL CASC'DI$PC1S1T10H ,;

13. HOUR

,IS.'USSS-ID CASE NO.

"'8.tjCLD~ED ~ I

'It; C4 ."o.:,-f'

17~~~'IS?TUREI . z«, ,NZjI" " &(~

, ' uergeailt Stevens E. ,-

D"oh[",R£~ ,ii~ ~,;~E~T !

.CJ::J~"F~UHD£~ \

Ji)PEN' ~

,UATlD""'t. I'

.14. CURR(NT CASE D.lSPOSTIOH I " ' . Wj!£H

OfFICER ___,'No.1, __ , ,•.1• 11. ARREST . . ...{""ME _- .,A 'BADC:,E

IIA'i'lO"Al.I'

:SOC!AL S'ECURITr HO.

_._

• SOCIAL, SECURI:l'Y 110••

I'!i,n Of. ~1li.'j'H I

._E,~E,SJ

. ~..

n/«

,±ES,:";'

Butl~r

18., DATE \

0~-15-72

. ..

19,. APPROVED ISi)~"'TURE A TITltl

lilA ..

'00377 .~

. ,., \~\'\ \'\'\~'\ ;\.~L Captain Pete N. }~anthos

20. DATt

'05';'15,

MORl DoclD: 1451843 . i

.- r» ' :~

.._.. ' , ../ .... , ' . .

,'.' , , ·":,5

~. _ .. _~.. ·!:tC;';. _~: ~

,',

.:"

jam No/OR-'''RR,e~.E.O- PERSONS. IDEHTlFY BY llAME, ADDRESS, S.EX, RACE, Sue'Al SEcilillTY "U~9[R, DOS. EYES. ETC.'

a, SySPEC

FIRST

r .

•<

N!A·

.~IlOR·tsS' \

' .. MIl!DL't'\

1 ..(

., D~lE Of' BUITH I

EYES

• SOCIAl. SECURITY 110•• ,

llATIOllACl1'Y

.. I

ADDRESS "

(2) •

. ~------------------~---,---:,.....-----:--,,---------:,---------~----,:------RAce

HEI.~HT \

'::"'ElGH! \

. l!A1R,·l

.~ [y.ES. \

• DATE c~. ~lilHI

.SOCIAL ~ECURIT7 riD.

10. ARREST NO. I

9. ARREST PD I

12., DATE

13. HOUR

,IS. l,ISSS-ID CASE se,

I".'CURRENT CAS[ 015;>05110H ,

A~fr.N 1

.IiATIOliAl./n

. B~05ED • t

, NIA

'00378,

OPEN ~8. OATE.\

'05-15-7

19. /.P?ROVED IS{'~,''lATUfi\& TITLE)

fJru {\ \I\'\Q.. . .\

Captain Pete N. Manthos

}

W-'.

20. DATE

05-15-

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.'.

(1)

l>. I I "\'l

(2)

l? ._--------_._--_ ... __.--_._---"----_._-_....;,----._--_.._._-------------_._---;\::D o 26. t;.":.7Ur:~ OF U":;J..::::tES

lOCAT:O~ ON B~D-Y

28. TRANSPORTED BY ,

I" !

J,D:,~

/7/ /

.0 RELf. .....

•

I' I .j :

I ! ·'1 I ,.

· ·

I~EMI, r"J I 1.0. I (I~ :

~/-7/[-e~ I?Ad.5A-Xf>/ /J/f/~/f./du/:.r/ ~ r/,&Z;v;J5 Z;; /(-ed ;;TTA,.s

FuAL ;f'~&,.,T )~ ~L, 1.0LV. .4dJe.r",

'c.At/ ;;.yy s~TO:-:L.t.

;

Q.~ ,

)

s:» 7'/

IT. T. NUMBER·

...

39. REPORTINGOFi'IC::R UNIT l. SADGE: NO.

/125. /-(l j r/'~ZLA SL! :Y77C.

<:3. SE~Q~O OfFICE'R UNIT t.. BADGE NO.

O·!.. ,. Q..

/J"

UU/!/;"(///1/6-

/7J

/1/ ..S'·c·e/r/e/.

OFfICE USE· O:-ilY

IDAT:'.:&.TIt.~ THIS REPORT·· . .37. DATE/TIME TYPE NO. ·1 S -/~ '.7~ . /5dtl

:';0. STATUS (Check. Onel 0 UNfOUNDED ?-(OPEN.O CLOSED

~l. UNIT REFERRED TO

f(EP~ODUCE

/';0,

42. UCR DISPOSITiC

0 SUSPENDED

44. SUPERVISOR'APPROVING •

.c"'U~ &J!;DG~J"O/I' / . / I,Ll? ~ v c». cr: s; (..,,7

45. REVIEWER

.00379 .....

. PO 251 REVISED 3111

~..,I·

35;

MORl DoclD: 1451843

:i,- \

--- -~-------------_........---------------~ 154

UNCLASS I F" i'EO

PAGE ~I

~~-----,----~------r::.,...., , FlLE .

SANTJA 02473

G ',

'oJ }-'

-,CTlON ARA-db

S5.14 DODE·0~

...

'.J<~

~1622~4Z

CPRv~2

NSAE"e:::'l

INR.:06

uS5S~e0

SY-03 F' .. e s

RSC v01

; 1

USIA .. 1.2

/070 W

PRS ... ~I,

016973,

MAV 72

rt1 A~1E;!!?, 01, ss Y S A.NT I AGO TO SECsTATE WAS~DC ,123~ I

I i

i ' ... aLLC\~! NG I S OUR I NFORt1AL TR,h IfSL A T I ON OF ST ATEMENT, ·.t UN.:-IECESSARY l":O~r.S OM I TTED I FoNM iN UNDERSECRC' ARY PALMA GA V.E ,PRESS EVEN! ~G MAY 101 ,Q\.IOT:: r . CHILEAN A~1BA'SS,d~OR IN lISH!\S INFORMED ra i s

'MINrST~Y THAT OVER WEEKiNO CHANCERY OF 2MBASSY IN WA5~rNGT~~' WAS ErTE,~ED lLL~GALLY.~VIOLADA) aY UNKNO~~ INDIV[DU~LS ~H~ p~0~ tE(D~~ T3 ~ORCE' OPEN DESKS AND KARDE¥ES OF EMBASSYIS'POllTICAl Aj:"~.td RS

OFF' t cE·.

..: i

CG~~ER.C~A~ciERY ~FFJCES~ tN' ADDITION, WERE ENTERED ILLE~lL~~

A(SEIT ON LE;SER SCALE.

>,'

PRELI~I~~RY iNVESTIG~TI0N,OlSCLOStD~E~

HC.':IAL OF DOCl:MENTS.I BOOKS' RAD 108 , ETC. AS' R~sUL TTHE:'SE SERl iJUS ~crs; CH;LEA~ Ar.B TO US ADVISED STATE DEPT WHICH EXPR~SSED ;!T5 DEEp REGRET' AT WHAT HAD,OCCUREO, ' II Hi 1S .l\FTf.RNOO'N _ UNDERSC:C~ET AR\' CALLED iN US AMBASS'ADOR ~Q EXPRESS,GOe'.s 'CONCERN AeoUT SEcURITY OF iTS DIP~OMATIC ~rS~IG~ IN US3 ~EQUESTING RAPID ~ND RIGORCUS INVESTIGATION AS, t.. El..I. AS csr A6L I SHMENT OF POL I CE GUARD TO PREVENT REAL,I !AT I O~ OF THES['LAMENTM3LE.ABUSES lOESMANESlo ' ' 'u~OR ITS PART OUR'G6VT HAS ADOPTED MEASURES TO SAfEGUARD ".~

THESc;:';ORITY OF OlJR"COI-lMUNICATION$ AND OBLIGATORY :J.NV1:SrrGATTON .. CSUMAR!OI HAS BEEN ORDERED. UNQTE. . ~ . '.'

CD" ,

2 .. _viPTlJ,A,Ll.Y ALL SANJl'iAGO DAILiES ,THI'$ HORNING CAR.R" .TEX.T OR

: . : ...-r' '

.......•.....

~AIT~F~L SUMMARIES' PALMA STATEMENT ~ITHOUT tOM~ENT ~R FANtiFUL .UN CLA.§.SiuE 0

. ..on"

,,."

,'. :,', 00389 - ._----.. ':. ...~. ......

~ ~, ••

•• :.:

•

MORl DoclD: 1451843

....

.. -_

. .

'''.

Departme1lt of State

p;\.GE 02

SANTtA 02473

\623~tZ

~o 6,_, NES. S1 a RV BANNEREO:\CRGS S 'FRONT ,p AGE' ';. ~Cil'EV E,R , , e v

cO~"UNISTNEWS EL .SIGLO AND, INDEPENDE!lT LA TERcER.; GOV'r"f'v ~ETWDRK LAST EVENIN~ RAM ANNOUNCEME~T AGAINST BlCKDRdP GF 1T1 ExpdSE pos~ER~ 'DA~ IS

•

.. ...

. . ,

.. ,

• . "I

•

...

s: :

#~ ••

____ :"r.-r\

, .. 003~1

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.. ...---....... ....-

-~--_

'.' , ·~.~:·.··f5,~:7?·-a:p···;.·:US

...

JYepartment Of State YELEG~A~~ •

ACTl"'N

t.~A .. 1':"

Cl~~-e~

DODE-~P

PQS.~i

55-14

INR.-~6

NSC-10

.R~R~~l· l..-..•...;

008831

R It;?3~6~ MAY 77FM A~FMRA~SV SANTIA~O. TO ~ECsT~TE ~ASHDC 1218

....

c.b ~ F I ~ ~ N T I ~ L SANTIAGO ~4t;0 SUBJl="TTs

I.I N Ad T HOR l l ED

ENTF" ·TtJTO cHTLEAN

E~BASSY

I" I='f'PE.1G"" !.q"~·ISTRY SU::1·.Si:i:RETAl:?)' PALMA. AGlttD ME.·TO CALL ON .HIK TnOAY AT ~:~~ P.~~ ' .• 'r ~UST.R~AD 4P ST~RY FROM ~A~HINGTON ABOU: V!!"lIn'~)RI7.;.:r ~;.: f;:?'f t":-r~ CHILEAN EMBASSY - AND KNE.'·r .WH . . T TO EY.PFCT'. ~P.Ai..~1;' EMP·H!:.'~ _,:n Tk.\· At,c BA5 SAOI') R' S OFFICE SHOW:;:f) SU:NS o~ HAVl~G' BE~N .C~RrF~LLY S~A~CHI='D ~0R PAP~RS WHILE VALUARLE~ ~AD NOT ~fE'" .TOUCHED.HF SA!O CHtLFAN GOVERNMENT ~SSUME~ MOTTvr HAD cCE~ .. POLTTICAL. FRO~ HIS OWN RE~ENT tXP~~IE~CEl~ WASHINGTON; P~LM' S~ID, HE ~NE~~ROTECTr0N GIVE~ C~1LEAN'F~BASSY WAS L~~S EFF~rTIV~ T~AN IT ~TGHT BE~~~E '~A!ID CHIL~AN ~nVERNkFNT MACE· . SPECJAL 5FFh~Tp TO PRnT~CT u.Se. OFFI·CES AI\ID RESI;)F~CES p~ SANTIAGO ... . It" ?,',RT' 3FC A;)SE ~~F DELICACY ·')F nUR' QELAl !n~S - ANr} HE THOUGHT USG SHOlJl.D ·ALSO. ,STRIVE TO fiIVE CiJILFMi ,)FF~CE'S Ai':;) H':r~£S E\'E'TTER THAN. RUN-~F-TH~-MILL ~RdTEcTICN. PALMA ASSURED ~E THAT.GOC HAS ~~ . DFSl~F T~AT THIS I~CI~I='~T Bf ~AGNI~!ED. j~,FACTI H~ AP~CARE~. SLIG~TLY tA~~N ABACK WH~~ 1 ~ENTION~D THAt'lNGIDENT WAS ALRI='ADf SERVICF WIRES. . . . . '

.O~ P~FSS

2. T FXPq~SS~D PEGRFT T4A~ l~CI~ENT HAD OCCURRED AND THANKED

PAL~~ FO~ PR1TECTICN U.q. OFFICES A1~ QECEIVING. 'CARA8I~ERn~ 3 I

'I)?' OE"-I';NST~A1 fON I N FR'"l~H 0;:' SAJO' ! WOULD PASS C'IJ fiOt:: ~;:'QUFST

QO;<r.

:::ON~Ut,A"TE" A FEW ·80URS Asn., N

~OR INC RE' .6 SED pp.orEcTI.o. •

~'''.

C;TftTE ~46C;5 ARRIVS') A FEW Mo~ENT~ AGO~ F"AV1A MENTION OF P~OPEQTY DAM~GE oR THEFT OF RADIO •

.. (iyAVIO. \ -

._~

c01<!F I BplT J AI

....... ' ··00382 . ' ..:

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.")

.....

. . .I. , '. ,." ... ·i··

ARA/2C/C;:·LGIR.D.L£R

. 5/15/72 EXT.' 22575 .;.' .. .. .~:

. .

:~.

-2> :}.~;::.

. ,ARA/8 C :'~JWfTSHER ., ....~ ", :.~~ . I

S/CPR: HDAV,I-S ",

! ,,;..

i, i

.. :'

..:;..

... • . ... -

. .

;".

. . ~ . "

•

.~-

~ ":":". .··:·)3.~·::::~ .,:U~~'~·,;:··-.~;;.~t~:T·,.~;~:;. :·~SL~~r:~.AN" CHANCERy....

. ; . ' . '...

•

. , ' . ,'.

-.....,.:... .~

.. :~}/.

~." '. '., '.<. '. J':".::~1t{:f~~ .. , . . 't.~ jK . I

1.···~: CHILEf.;N ·t1I:~COur~s :VALDES. PHONED DEPT {FISliERlf'iORNING. . MAY '15 T.O,.REPORT ·THAT UPON ARRIVAL .SAME 110RNING THEY DISCO.vE·RE:J}:.;PE'RSO~J,:or: PERSONS UNKNOl:m HAD nrr'ERED CH'ANCERY, -•. ~··.:iAPP.AREN.TLY'''·SArUf~D·A·Y.:~·:·NI:GHT. OR. SUl'mAY· .NIGHTi-··AND··HAD SSARCHED .,:. ·:'SEVERAL .. Of.fJ.:CES· Mnr' :TAKEN sonc RADIOS ANl} scoxs. DE~T. .: .,

, rlttlEl>IATElY N·OTIFIED: APPROPRIATE AUTHO~ITIES THROUGH' ..• .. " PROTOGOL'. AN'l)·.·SY CHANt'llELS:1' AND, J)EPTOFF {GIRDLER} VISITED' .., '. CHANCERY' T.O·: vSXPRESS . CONCERN AND REGRET." ' ...::... :: .: :. '" •

•

.;'.

•

'."

•

<',

•

:.'

•

r::;,

..,:"

'::'..

i ,

~ ·;.t,:~

...."-: -.'

"..~"

":". ~::

' •

.' 2. ·;·'i.: DURING' V!SIT, . Ati8' LETELIER AND EMBOFFS DISMIsSED· .. ROBBERY.AS POSSIBLE MOTIVE, STATING IT IMPOSSIBLE CON. CEIVE TH~T'fOR~IG~ CHANCERY LOGrCAL·~ARGET·FOR STRAIGHT .. ROBBERY. AND 'CONCL~DING THAT REAL PURPOSE WAS SEARCH FOR' ·.{UNSPt·ClfIED} DOCUMENTS. WHILE TERC'1ING INCIDENT ·':DISAGREE-. '. ~'. A9LEn . THEY MADE NO HIN.T Of, OR REFEf.E~JCETO'l POSSIBLE PROTEST' OR tLAIM FOR PROPERTY DAMAGE. YY ; .~:

. . .. . .. ,

:~."

;~r

. ....• ..

r ,

r:;'

.. ;' . .~

i"J'./

:."

.)~'" .

DOCUMENT AS REFERRED'TO . .-' ~

•

'S'IAT£ j)~;J;: ~

.,. :'~ .

'·00:;83 -,

':':.:~

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.;~

':.

',:

:.:~~~;~·13.~0930

"~;~~~~~r1.973 .

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD" SUBJECT: Chblean Embassy Break In on 15 Ma.y.1972

1. On 24 May 1973 I telephoned Mr ~. James Robinson, Gene xa.I Cz-irne Section, Department of Justice and asked if he had ·any information as to c r im.ina.l, In~6secuti6'n>:di persons involved .·in' abzeak in at the: Chilean E:qlbas~y:,:.~j:i:W~l:1.J:lington,D. C. on 15 May 1972'. Mr.' Robins'onstated'h:e had.:rl6:.kriowledge ofthis but suggested that it would be betterfo .~h~ck,with"·Mr. ·G. Marvi~ Gentile, . Deputy A-ssistant Secretary f6rSecurtty,·~:;t>,~Eartrnentof State,. and ..,.:' :·.'the Secret Service' s Inc e they hadre'~p(;)ffi3;t~t;tltie's'fo r the .Executive .: ::: :Pr~tective Service' (EPS). Itelephoh'e'a:14~":JGenti1e.and he identified. two. State Department cables re:!ative:·to:'the in~identj one .from the embassy in Santiago' to the Depa:#;n.1.e~~,...No.·2450, ·d.3.ted· . ~ .15 May 1972, Subjects Unauthorize:,j:{Entry Outlining. the ~rotest , 'of the Chttean Goveznment pres'ent~¢;to theAme'rtcan Embassy• . and the State Department reply to:Sa:~iiago, No .. 084655, dated .. ' '.'15 May 1972 •. Mr. Genti1e·als~ide#~t'fie'd\tJ:ie.:E;PSnepoz-tof '., .. '.:. investigation and suggested thatt~Eie:a:GbPY:';fromthe Sect-et Servlc·e. .'.' . ' ~'I then. calle41 ~t'Secr:~t·S.etv~:ce and he had his liaison . man deliver me a copy of the EPS'report of. investigation. . •

. .-1

••

".' 'i" :;_. ~ • ••

•

On 25' May 1973 I recetveda-caflfz-om FBI Agent . lstating that he had received a- telephone call f~om Mr. Janies.Ropinson:.relative to :my inquiry about prosecution: f~gJc:at~d that. the·.FBI Washington. . :Field Offi.c e-ha.d reoncC;tctea tue i.,~~ropolita:n Police D.epartment (MPD) ·on 2",1: May and reviewed therepo.;;;:r:No:~ 248:"4l4'xiled with the 3rd . District. MPDo whi.ch states. ·that· ac;,bxEicik,i.n:-occurred the Chilean Emhassy between 5:00 'and '~:OO a~;iri~' on 15 May 1972;·

~ '~"',,~:,

...• .~

, ...... . ",.

.. :

, -._... \

,', . .

.: ~,,',

00 38fl:.

MORl DoclD: 1451843

'.,.

I:.:~" t

'" .

';:

Repoxted loss' at that· tirne consis"t~:4~~i£O,ur·am/frn 'radios chid one electric razor. The·po1i:c:~}~ifi.Yesttgationidentified .some late'?-t fingerp;rints' but ·i·d"etit~fibaiion:o.f·tho5e. prints' was made; . Since the reported lositw.as .unde'r $~J 000 and there was no ev.idence. of a crossing of stcite'boundries, :the FBI did" not make an inve.stigationof the incident.' The MPD reported th.iit:~1;J.ere had been no pros~cutionandno' suspect wa~ identified.

...

';';

,J":

'-.: .

.:. <».

""' ..

..,

. .":;1jts;tarl t ~~n~r~ .co~sel

c~: 'L.egislative. Cou~s~l' "

"'0':

"." ':::.1':

;

. In5p~ctor General :,. .' i .-

'.' .~.

i..

.: .'

r ,

r . I,·:

. ""

'<; .

I'·

I· . t

';.,'

.. -'. '.

. -,

MORl DoclD: 1451843 : ..;.",

-,;"" .:

.....

".;'.:

." .':',: ....

..:

..~

.~'

~;" . 1'""

r.:..)

..:..... 1..1

. : .: -.

\..~~

','

. ./ v-, ~•.

.~~ ~:v.~

i"J

._,.-:--

,=J,

.-Qo

(no v .01'S) L.....---_

Ne..'"aes revealed in Office of ..:Security repci"'1: p. 'Retiring .Tune 19"7~,

----------,--

~I I-

referred to.~Cord for job

Wanted 'to :i:'cise ~.cnd for EcCo:ro.

Whe:ce do we stan& \(1 th: ......... '

steve .Kuhn ) )

. Bruce Solie)

). PaulG9.ynor)

"rere to have been. interi"iewed

I think 'WVB' has' int.arvie·wed follo.!:ing:

. John 'Hart .

,I ).

'rlhose names appear itj,my notes .to see

. .

" ..

Ed Ryan

~ord

) )

l.feyer

SDB

OO~g6

MORl DoclD: l45l843

".,,'" ~~,:<:~;?;t".:"

! I

26 Mll.Y1973

;- ~"

MEMORANpUM FOR. TIm RECORD' ", . SUBJECT: ",DPI"Tra:p" . on 'Le~ks ofNarcotics Intelligence, .,.' . :~:,.,j ,\~,:*}r'~" ',:.':~"f:~';' ,1. In materiiil:I'rovid~d by the DDI on contacts with c~rtain'" persons on the White House Staff. there is a 9 September 1972 memorandum from Mr •. He1ID.s to Dr. Kissinger relating the identification of a 113;:..1<: to, th~ press as having been 41 the BNDD. The memorandum st~tes'in .part: . . ;,,;';)~';Z~:,.; ~ :", . 0,'

. -/' ,.. 2.

"After notingll:ha't,J'ackAnderson had a continuing source for classi£ied documents on narcotics, we arranged a:tl:,~p,so that recipient organizations of CIA Intelhg~l:e-Memoranda',(IM) on narcotics could be ietentifie.d. ": . '

. '".

".' ' .

,---------------~--'----~-------------.

3. This cour~~o'{'acittonwas at the' initiative'of theDirecta~a;e'f: of Int~lligence, without. consultation with persons elsewhere In' the government, except in reporting the results to Dr, Kiss.inger. It represents a welt-concetved aetempt to target on a possiblesoul'ce . of leaks. We doubt.that:it would be susceptible to miaunderstan,Ung if exposed to,!>ubllcYlew. 'but the fact is that it was something ·o[:.lin', attempt to trap 'so1'heon:~,.an:dit was. a part. of the gen'eral attempt,to : seal of[ a leak sinill,i'r to those 'leading to the "plumbing" operation., Because of the latter',con6ideration it is noted for the. record•., -,,',

Slclltll' j

<: CJ .'. oc:

\,.; ..- "

S. D. Breckinridge"';' ... : ~:":l~L,~'

MORl DoclD: 1451843

...... • '

",'

£···._1

'0'

.' '-.'

1·:,-:." •

.'" ~I,.·.i

. ~;e l.~i.Y~-;: l.::'w~;r e,:~:.\.,:,:·,~£.:·~.::Q ~'::;r;; ~;.'oJ.:~C",.4 .• ~:::,:; l·'='O;:::"~..~:l 1.,:;-- : r.(.~.l all,.], "i;.y C::~!i::';::'~';SG.:::;;~·l I;,:;;:h:.i

on. ,OU1" c:j::t.:;::r":::11 :·;·.·.;·t..:.::.5ic'4 ':.~:;-:; ~,~:·:L~:!.::-.:.s. ~1,'y::..;.:!·;.::lal i'1a:9 ,3 c~:::t vi.:t.:;.I~ s • 20.. tb~ ,;fc,1.:>,::-'';t-··!.Z:f':'J C··\··:·n. j'"':'-..l 0'::'1 ':::':J-~ e i"~;':'::-:'';:~::1"Jn . . l ) f 2':':· :·~:;:.~f 1 if·,: e ,:.;.,.=:;::.a: .,"'(~ie .:~·o·i.1.:.:, '5..:..::; 0"~ ':"::"; ;J :.;:-'~: ".?-'"'.·'·':'.::1 DJ? ;'25 ;'::..:r ~ II ?.:!c 4: A E.;:(:·:':'U::l p:l·a3::""2.r:~! (·!.1 ~,~1·3. I~;::·:~:.::.~:·.:;:...e L lc.::::c..t c2'S

(b.:=ac0:'ls) to '!::a};:,e it ICC::;"a: rd~pcr...'~~:!.ve to C0n,,;;r'~f:S:~~:;;u

Nedzi's que5ti~~.

I i

:L<?J) 16: J.."'::l e::::":liJ.o.21.9. '~:iOl1 cf -ti~3 :;::':1e;:l3;tl':'.'.:-;;~"i." making car:iiog::-al?hs.

r~-initiated

onl----::===='~hicb

Tab.1T: .1m :follo,t-up vas merely nc:-red on p~ge' 17 of t.b~ origina1 sellsit:Lve

s~ary.

rrab 18; T\;o IG-irJ..t·iat.ed i'0110;-:-u?s on itel!1s t~;at lle::L'~ included in :tbe in:i..tial Directo~'flte subwissions" but 't-rel."e" t'oa 7 f:ragEenta ry ~or·inclusion· in 'our c;;iginal s~a,:xY..

2ab 19: 'On~ cO::JplE(tely nex it.em that su!:"'feced in th'2 cour..a e of .C:...rr inq"ui:!'ies.

Tl:::e tabs are not arranged in anY' logicel Cl"a-:?r, because w~ chose to place' the bulkier' i teros on tha bottom o:f the file to !:lake :for easiar. llantlling of it. Tbe fo1101iing is a breakdown of the tabs by initiator of :follmr-up. (Both you and. l{edzi. asked: :for-a follOW-Up' on.:th~ item in Tab 2.) . .:

I, I

Dolby-initiated - l1edzi-initiated

-I

1 2

-I

12 13 14

!,ew submis.sion

If:l,llism V-; Brae Inspector Galleral·

I 1

89. 16'

2 4 10 II

IG-initiated

.:»

00388

MORl DoclD: 1451843

ji.~.:·:·~,;t <:.~.'::~.) f~.:_,·;~ .... :··t} : . , ' .:-; I'::':. ~·'''~.L1··.·d ''',s j.....: >'lf..~.:... $ -t~) ~.~ ;;',~~~.1 ~,. ......) ~:"~:·'5 ..:~·~ .-;',1. ::.._...... ..: -...: :'::1 ~3 ; ~,'~. ::·.· •.,,:l~ ~:_ ....;...).

G/DGI ) OS-~

)

OW WO'

) ),

DfiO

DDI

(

1J.l r.s.t.erlal is to bg reed by- COS 'tc1a:r. "o

.- ;

It is reluest-ad that material be cBroad on 3 x 5 cards 1"01" future possib1.~ USS o It shcr.11d shev (1) the nane or the e:-:ployea" in upper lei' hand corner,- (2) nane ot person bain!( reported on , (e.g. lfunt, ~ord, ete.)m (3) event raported, i1' significant,and the word wrouU.., e· if' not signif'icant, (4) identi1'T...n~ referen03 . wl:2mo ill which i."lfomat:l.on is reccrded. ' . If an &YnJlt reported in this material is siginfica."lt,. please. ,report it ir.:olediately for handling (either a "jevell Q or !lO~.thing connected with l-atergate and associated events) . . .' . . ..• l'lease reisEI any questions that o~cur as yO'.! gat into the material. Especiall~" as you get ideas as York progresses,pleaso put them for.mrd.

" ,.\-".

SDB

MORl DoclD: 1451843 '"".~

1;. .~.~:it:r.,;,;:'~"

•

, ti)··:·

. ,-

···f

~ ,:'~~, .' t· ~,

,~ .. ,;j

-. .:

'" : ".' ~ ~

.$ .-.~

. . "

.",-

\ ... ,~':

; I

25 May 1973 .;

BRO

~~f,' ,','-,

·:/:~;J1:"

-»,

c ".' ,From: .SbB~eckinridge

R!!.turn

;.. ,

., .c ,

ooa~~::~;

MORl DoclD: 1451843

...

.' '. ,

(

c 25 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. Broe : Reported Agency Fundixg of Heroin Study "

SUBJECT

. ' ....

•

" .,', I. 'ORD, in reporting 'association of employees with Egil : Krogh in connection with the gcveznmeat narcotics program, referred to an Ag~ncy funding ,action on 30 Jun~ 197~ whereby $37,500 was transferred to OST (the Office of Science Techl ' nology under the E:~ecutlve) from ORD's budget. The money was 'to fund a study proposed by IDA (r" am told this is the ID.stitute for. Defens: Analysis), and was approved by, the DDI. ADD/S&T, 1 rcting for the DDS, and Mr. C,.olby as Executive Director- , Comptrolle:r:' , ' ,'. '

. ;..

. . ;: -,

and

1=,.----,' " ' "

".,

,.,~,

~'.-

:-:. -. ... \.

; -~.,

-:':"." ':. ...~-~. . -",. .. ': '. .. :

.". . .... '

.. '"; "

. ,: ~,..,

- ..

'. ,;

. / ..

~" -,

S. D~ llreckinrldge .

" ,"

0',

. . . .: .' - :

..... ..; ' ..:..- .

.. - ."

• ,'f

" '

".'

.'.

(

.' ':' .

. . ' ..... ~. \,:

.. ".

, ..

-,_.-. ,._. - ":;"'-=---"._--..:..~"-' -'-'..:-.-"" -.~=::~.-: . '.

.- .-..-c-v-

MORl DocID: 1451843

. :-. I ,.

_ ';;

•• '1_

,': . : ro ", 1.. 1 ! I i\

','"'1-

." '.;;: !., J \i';' ',(" ,." , ... :;1..:",), .•. :1.1·).·) ...... ,'.:; __ ,.:

'.jfi:f E:.... _.-2. 4..i< ~y:_

rn .......__.." 4 ~ . 1.1':;1', ,,,) ~ tt .~~

HLF : ;;0. ._._ 'j·RfP,:J-ll0 I,!. ;1.~'

»cr ,J\)':I

DCI/IC DDI

Ji'I155 (CIA)

\~J\5HHIGTON (UP!) -- CIA OFFICIALS TESTIFIEiJ wEiJtiE::iUAY THEY FORGOT: ;)~ r- 'J"O f';) I \"rv., -'-'f'i"""''''~ TH;"'''''j'."y' c 1.1' ••,<-'O(;T[';_ ",:.. ;:,-, .~ ",'''1 ;;-""H;'~"R' .. VI :~, •• :t;::) 1:. ........ .• i\c,oJ..;J O·L> i\ _I ~ •• 12I:. tV oJ :1._ ..... ' •• , ~ ••• I',_~ .... n'__ '.,J_.l",,"l:., A"'QUT :..J

DiJO (2·AiiGNY;·iGU:i r":AiHjIi':GS riiEY HECEIVED TH.'\f THE ::HITE 1!OV3£ ;~AS TttYltlG TO PII~ BLAi'iE eN THE AGE,ICY fQH ml,: IvATER(jitTE SCAliiJAL. fiEP. LuCIErl I~Ej)t::1, D-l'ilCH.,G,~LLED·THIiEE OfFICIALS OF.THE CIA TO ONE EXPLAllJ wilY THE LETTERS -- WHICH HAVE BI,:EN TRACED TO WAIEiiGATE ~%' OSR ·CON.3PlilATGR JAi'JES j'JCCORD "- DID NOT SURFAGE UNTIL TWO DAYS ·AGO. c:~:,. ':i!.::" OSI (2 "OIlE Of THE REA~OriS THEY GAVE WIlS THE FANILIAR • I FOh60T,·" NEDZI ~'" Ch/O",,,,SAID. "T!1;;:y ALSO SAID II h'AS A foJ!lTTlCR 01' rU,WH4(:j IT ovrs TO SOl'iEONE t·:.':, "DB ELSE MIiJ AS:;Lii'iItJG HE lIOiJLD Pl,SS II O l i . " · · · . r INDICO THE SIX Ll;.TTERS -- ONE 01' THEN_SIGr.ED .. JIl'l' AND THE OTHERS .I.' 000/00 ANONYi'iOU,5 -- WERE SEH TO FORi'iEK C·IA DlftECTOR RICHAfW HELi'iS BETWEEN • r: JULY 1.972 AiW LAST JAI;UARY. ! ~ .J>" 1:.":;;,,1 SAID II HAl) bEEN "?i\'~TTY Dl::FINITELY ESTABLISHED" THAI i OSO i'/CCCiiD, A FOii~;ER CIA AGEiiT, WAS IHE AUTHOR OF ALL THE LETTERS. NEDZI ~,~.::; mea iJECLINED TO SAY WHAT WAS IN THEN, EUT REP. WILLIAI'i BRAY, R-IND., SAID;\~~ THEY wERE "CO~:FUSEiJ~ Arm "DISJOINTEO" WARNINGS IHAT THE WHITE HOUSE ~.:;:! ~~ WAS TilHNG TO NAKE THEbiA H':RGATE BilEAK-IN AS 'A CIA PLOT. eur ijOTH NEDZI AND BRAY SAID THEHE WAS NO EVIDENCE THAT CIA WAS 'IN ANY; WAY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE WATERGATE BREAK-IN. I TESTIFYIIlG AI THE SESSION WErlE PAUL GAYNOR, HOWARD OSBORNE.AND I ,-huermer WILLIAi'1 5RAUX, TO? CIA OFFICIALS WHO HAD CUSTODY 01' THE NCCORD . ~egco i-EHERS AI VARIOUS STAGES AfTER THEY WERE SENI. . '. tous ton NED~I INITIALLY SPELLED SRAUX'S NAME AS BROE AND SAID.HE DID NOT : )sborne KNOW IF II WAS IHE SAME MAN WHO TOLD THE SENATE COMMITIEE ABOUT . ~roe NE2TINGS HE HIID WITH I II PRESIDENT HAROLD GEI/EEN IO DISCUSS THE .aynozCR-EATION INTERNAL ECC1W1'IIC STRIFE IN CHILE. IIP105-24 05:12 PED' :,)D5/'1' D/OCI

(

< ' ... .... ~

Comment:

. .. ~

0039Z \

These comments represent the initiaZ 'and tentative .reaction of the Office of Current InteZligence to the attached item from the news services. . ... , .... - .. _...-._-_.._...- ._----_..... _.. .. _~--------..__.- ..- --'.---.-. --~-~

_--_

........,.

;. f

•

,'-

. . .'

"~:

MORl DoclD: 1451843

,-" r:;"- '.... ;'.

,.'

,·,0,

»> L '

I, :~

,~'

MORl DoclD: 1451843

r.....-..

=:;;<.J

(

'.'. ~:'I' .

'j~

.' Ie

. .,'" ~

-2

.-'._•...

_._-

MORl DoclD: 1451843

00395

MORI DocID: 1451843

. . '

i ,! I

, I

I I

.." .

00396

MORl DoclD: 1451843

:,0.'.'

.",,',

,",

, ....

.' :'"

24 May 1973 .'. c"',(''';;:<:-:'

••

'. "

·.•. . ·;III?t;:~l;"

=::~::Z~·::::.~:=

'.' -t '

,'...

Specificl,)l'om Parrotti.s Involvement with David YoUiig')~':,';:'i

':":,' .,.::....'.; '. ':.. ' . ..'

. ·:!":f:.';~~J,);~jii·:::.

We met with Tom Latimer this morning·toget from him the .only existing copy of the sens.itive attachment to our family jewelsi'ep9rt·:··, ' "'" ". in prder that wenughtiriake a temporary stayback burn copy~·'·.:·.I\i·that'/, "":'," .time', Latimer said he had a call 4do Broe to repa'rt that when >.:.... , Parrott was DCI dutY'officer some time in September 1972 he rec.eiyed ..:.'::..'

'Tom: :.:;'"

some calls frQm·'~~r..~d~~ung.;,:."

if;>' .

,:,~:~~§:;,fj;:.... ';:.':

':' I called Par:t:Qt.t's .home.(FE 7-35l2} at 0925. ,The perso:q; '.'~,~ ._ . answering, presumably Mrs. P.arrott, gave me his telephone.:hWhber ' at the EnvironmElntal.Protection .i\.gency (755~0533) •. I called :parrott;' ..... there and told him that I would like to meet. with him to debri~{.Ji~ on the sabstance .of .calls he received from the Whit e House :v-.rheii.:lr~·::.:5: .,'., r: was DCI duty offic:-er in 'September 1972 •. Tom 'said he would'.. b~'ha.ppy'·· .. to meet with me but that he saw. no reason why he coUld not give JP,e' the information. over the telephone, f::~i}f·;l;'·.· . "~ ~;~'.:i;;:Y~:\,;~~:;t:::; .;' . Tom received'a call from David Young at about rniddayori a.:::·-. :. Saturday. Young.was ~alling about that .morning's program oy:Dail:. ':. Rath~r .in which. i~ther Incfuded inaterial from a classified l:;~~'o.,-:I:.),;:. Young wanted to come out to the headquarters building to' see Pi!::t.:;r6tt. Parr'ott started ~hasing it down, <l:Je spoke with Bruce Clar~El:~hohad '";:;''' the DDI duty, ··It,turned out that'Rather's comment wastnade;ori;his.:.· .program of the pzevlcus day and that it was based on a repo:rJ ·th":{.i'::': carne out of George Carver's .shop, The report was distributed in ",' only seven or eight copies, and only two of them had gone. outside the .Agency-> both' to Kissinger. ." . .... . . ' .':: ,)t;i;..\,::·...

"/:C ':":' '.

:":;->.',.'

_. """ .,, ." ' .

.":

,,"

• / " , / '(. i",

•

.•

.,\~;:~(1·~~:';'·:~{:·~

Young gf'it lost trying to find the build' ng and did not 'arrive until .: about one. By ·then,. Parrott had identified the Carver report :and, had . a copy of the. distribution list. Young was shaken upon discovering..': . that the only e':tE;rn~l distribution was to Kissinger. He was. ''!'Xtremely

,. '.

., ".

,.""

. , ," " '. ~. <'-f~' .:... 1

.'.

'.. '";.'

.,':<,;'i:;:OO:m'7~'::

MORl DoclD: l45l843

q' ',I'

d' r.

~.j,

"I '

r,I~'"' . , '

, I,

,""

j i ··i·

i"!, ' t i 1'" ..

'. :

. ':

.. ":: , "

..':. '

. 1 . !"

~"~

. . .'

..':i

'.,

t:: j

,""

;;"ti.

~;)n

·V~.fJ:~

-. ~,,-": ~ ..._",~'--;_. ,. ",-~.

2·'" ,

po;

.. ..-,~.;

-,~,'

7~"

-.": ..

MORl DoclD: 1451843

". -,

.'",:.2~;+:· ,.

-, '~. ,;'. : !.:.?,}:'.~,('.: ',.;~ t.· ~.r ~,~ ~.:..<' ~ 'c .•:.•:. .'

,.-"

.•:.".;:.;,.:.....

.. MEM6·RANn6M;:~Bi;THE.RECORn·, , ;

',',::

SUl3J~~~:: :,~::j~f4~ Ofth~~peCia~ SUbco~ttee 6n:;~t~~~enc~" of ii!d'~S'e ~rr.n~d Services Conuirl.ttee

. ". /:

" .",

•

. . ""':';" ',,-. ,

. 1. :Thi8inohiing:Messr~. LaY/renee.HOuston, G.epel'al·Cpun.s.el:' . WilliaIn Broe.,'·fuSpeCi:~:rGen:era1.:,Ho~ai(iQsb~rn."Di~.e:cto;":o£·S~6ilrity;: . PaUl. GaYilor~,,;,q~~~!tS.:~~?~f~ty,~~e~earch Staff; aJi4\ Secretary:,to)Gen;e~ti .;a.~ers .. appeazed bc£ol."ethe~a.':!i~",e'S'ci11.eq~ttee ·ab.out, A.'g.in.e. ';,;.;ii."·irJ·'}-l'~' cti.ii' '··e.••:,.,.it: on·.y.1,e· .•. ·.e.. 1:S .r.·e . . l.'V.", ed...'*t. "':ifd.fu:~.' ~.~.':"i!!l.';§M ....' :p. . ;.o..6b.\i.•:~.}_ .·;,.'.;•..•-_. .'."t!;he . • '" ',"',,, • '"~''' ..,~,:.,'t.~ .,\.. .ce :-"',', ,..,·.~·,·J,_.. '~'...".:,'."'.l:-.:::-'~·,,-,.:~',.:}".:'.:'··.,~ meeting las,ted~,#ic) . . .. ~'hOUj,.f{-i:or2)j,5 ..h(jtiJi'$~· ::.'rh~~;~~VI'l-~«r~;;t~'c1jnic'al. . ., sweep 'o(thll:'l:oQ:mi"¢"Z:l?'Raybiwt Houae O£fic~ BJill.iWig;i~:·aIta;the·,rQom, , . . Was;;no·~~ept'~9~~<}~~~:&~IqalfgP;iliti:lring.:'iDiS cus~~S ,:' ". :;;j~~~;r#a.s,e 9i~~, -. ~eve~~ '..A.ti.an;!i,9,~I\~~*~~>t,jil<;El;~.~.nIl,3:Sonfi1.e Ul' :thEl: . J?t\'~;~gi,sl~ti:V-e.:·. ·Counsel. . . ,.. ,~. ,'"',:.. ;, . " . J . ,",,": .... ' 0 . .

' .

,'1'.. .: ,.

·t.

...

. '.

t··· .• ",

...... .. ~

3.Pres~nf from the staihvere; '.'

'I.

-v ", <-

, Ji'ral\k Sh.tins~ek•. Chief Counsel . ~W.illla.m":Hoian '. .

y .

"t'- •• ."

r: ."" " ..,". ' "'~',~'

...

.. . '~

"'~":':<"' . ':"': ..-, .".

. -.

;

....

. 'j

. ,,-'

","

... , ..

MORl DoclD: 1451843

....

.. '. "

'. '

',,: .

.'!I ' " '

" '. "" :-'

. :

.. .....

;. ".

"'-'.

.,~

....

• <' •

-: .:'.

.." ..

.•. :"'7

: .

.; .

..; "

, ,

....'.

:. "

......

','.'

: :.

)004'00'

-',

......

•

','

>•••

','

MORI DocID: 1451843

;

( \.

«rl-r: .:,J..>. . -,1 .... I\~~' '4; ~...

23 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR THE- RECORD

,-I"

On this date Mr. William E. Colby and the writer held a meeting with Congressman Lucien N. Nedzi. The reason for the nleeting was to review with the Congressman material sent us by the Directorates describing the Agency activities that had flap potential• . At the outset, Mr.· Colby advised that the Director had issued instructions to each directorate to come forward with descriptions of activities (especially involved in the domestic scene) that had flap potential. In addition, in a memorandum to all employees of the CIA, the Director had instructed all employees to report to him any activities the Agency was conducting that they construed as outside .the Agency charter. Congressman Nedzi requested a copy of this Agency notice be furnished to him. The full report, including the sensitive section, was: discussed with the Congressman item-by-itezn and in most cases he actually read the text. This took two hours .and the Congressman followed the material with great care. With regard. to the it~m concerning Mr. ·McCord's letters to the- . Agency iti July and December 1972 and January 1973, he expzesned . .astonishment that the material took so long to be surfaced and when . surfaced took so long to get to the Director. He was very outapoken in :l:S criticism of the people involved. . I will not try to set forth all his reactions to the material, which I believe he found sobering, but I will set out herel.,aIter the items in which he showed special interest: a. Alien documentation furnished to the Secret Service. He desired more information concerning the reason why issued, the use, and how controlled.

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.- ,"

• ~. . n.) ,",,,, .",,,,.

(

b. Financial support to the White House in connecticn with the replies to letters and telegrams as a result of the President's speecb on Carnbodia in 1970. He requested more information on this subject. c. Beacons furnished Ambassadors. He was interested in the number issued to Ambassadors and the position the State Department took on the use of these beacons. He was interested if the Department of State was pushing this program, as he ."" believed tlJ:ey should J;j,~.. ,'t. '"if"" d. Logfsttcs" acquisition of police equipment. He questioned whether LEAA, Department of Justice, should not be doing this rather than the Agency. e. He noted LogisticS furnished telephone analyzers, and desired to know what they were and how used.

g. OER's crasb project concerning Robert L. Vesco requested by the DCI. 'The Congressman was interested in who outside the Agency instigated the project and why was it stopped. h. Several ORD projects indicated research done without . knowtedge of the host system or on unwitting subjects. He was of the opinion that this was risky and recommended' it be terminated. He stated he would like to see a directive go out to the researche:rs concerning these practices. i. John Dean's request re Investors Overseas Service. He reviewed the six reports that had been furnished. He noted, however, that the item stated "there were multiple channels to the Agency from the White House" and request~d informatiol\ concerning these channels. Alien passports. Mr. Colby advised that he planned to review this whole subject and the Congressman agreed with the need to do so. j,

- Z -

00:402

MORl DoclD: 1451843

"j'" " .• " ,

( The' Congressman noted that in connection with .Tohn McCone's consultative role with the Agency the Director had stated some time in the past that he planned to take action regarding individuals in this category. The Congressman requested a report on what had been done.

't"'"

",~

Mr. Nedzi asked Mr. Colby if the Agency had considered how much of the information just reviewed with him could be made public. Mr. Colby stated this had ,not been done yet, and spoke to the question of s'~u"Ces, meth~s. an,d"t~'impacto,y,,~e instiftl,\1»Ii>n. The'~ngress~,.~, man stated that in the current climate he felt it was necessary to open up more information to help clear the air. Mr. Colby stated the Agency would give the matter deep consideration. and added he had been thtnking of a general statement along these lines to be used at his confirmation hearing. The meeting ended at 1Z o'clock noon.

,(Signed) William V., Brae:

WUliam V. Broe Inspector General

Distribution: Director of Central Intelligence Mr. Colby Office of Legislative Counsel

NOTE: The above listed' items, except for item j. are being pursued by the Office of the Inspector General.

- 3 -

00403

MORl DoclD: 1451843

. .

.. '. , I.:

iI·;·.·.:iT

Directo

; :

~-_./

rity

"if5'404

~:ay

1973

-- -[!5"ArC>-'--

MORl DoclD: 1451843

:.:

q ;\

V I T

dsposes and says as follows: J.;

I n;n the Dil'ector of Security of the Ccnt.r-aL

Intelligenco Agency •. 2~

The purpose of this s tut enent; is to r-cco rd , \ •.

. to the best of my knowledge and l:ccollection, circui!!stafices

irtvolved in the receipt of a series of unsigned. co r r e spon-

denco raceivod by the Agency during the period from 1 August /,

1972 to 7 J~nllary lS73~

Tho si2uiBlcance of these lcttor~

is that by th:}ir conten.t and by the handt'lr'iting on tHO of them, they ar-e believed to have becn'wr-Lt t en by James W'. McCord,

Jr~,.

one of the de£cadants in th-e Watergate .trr inj.,

3..

By £ir.st involvcment in this matter occurred

on t.he 2nd or 3rd of August 1972 "hen an envelope addressed to ~lr. I~eln\s > then Director of the Central Intelligence Asency, with no return address, and postaarked 30 July ~972 ;

was routed to my desk fro~ the Director's office as a routine piece of "crank mail"..

The cnve.Lope contained a carbon copy

of a typewritten letter signed "Jim" j·lith the nane in the',

salutary address excised .. "Dear"

the letter as .a piece of crank J>lail"

I had second thoughts

and r~-cogl1izCcl the handwriting .on the enve Iope and the

signature "Jimlt on the lat:ter as beina similar to that of }'fr. McCord) Hho formerly worked fOT me as a security officer before hid retiroment fro.m the Agency ..

MORl DocID: 1451843

'.~.

"\'

,1..

C;1.:'-;-.h;:J: s;-:::";: J;'/JI \

.. ':~ '.d ~,,;',,:: :/;;1.:. ,: ':.:>

~tl"t"i!..~ ;.n~Q!)~.~b3.;.·;.:_y

l':I~''':'''''d... .}·~)r .. .......

~r .0' _.1"--

"'~

OV~l~

to tho Fcde ra.l. BUl'u,iU of ~n."""c$tisatioil.. Hr.

;:~l.L1.$,~

aitor

sone reflaction, doc i dcd that he r,'ould. like to have" a .l!ogal

GC'n~)Ta.l

Counsel of the Agency

roau tha letter.

to his office and hud hia

After he had finished reading the letter

thO) ensufrrg 'di~eussiunJl to t.he bos t of a}" rt1colloction,.

centered about whether,the A&oncy had any legal obligaia Ofi , to forHaI'd tho letter to tho Justice Depa'rtment; or the, Fc(!~·cal DU1"cau of -In.vestigation.

Both ;·jr. HeLms and Nr. Houst.on

f decided th~t there NO.$ no such obligation and I was to~d' to hold t)le let:1:er in a secure file in my office and take. no

further action on it.

Mr. Balms instructed t10 to restr;ict t...

knolflcdge of the existence of the letter to an absolute mini:aum number of poopke , 5.

The next envelope received was addressed 'to ,

, Nr. Paul Gayner, a staff chief in 1,1y office and a former, close friend of Mr. McCord's, on or about tho 23rd of Decembe-r 1972.

The next envelope received was addressed

to Mr. Gaynor's residence and \ins undated but posttlurkod 27 uecenber- 1972.

The t,.,o envelopes contained one or 130re

uns Lgncd typewritten pieces of correspondence \'Thich appear-ed ,

'I'

to relate to Mr. }fcCord's involvement in the 1:fa.tC:Fgat~."nff::\irli.

Bot h of these letters were handcar-rIed by rna to/Mrs. Elizab"ti,

)

" ::00406

MORl DoclD: 1451843

..... "

,.-

'.;'.: ~:::J)·s(,.lt"'il11y bYe-n."s ..

·~;l!~~;;;~iH"mt:ly,

(1.

<) .r:l:~~::ary J.973 ::.:v1

'.):1 Z:J ;;..~I:cr,jb..;r J.972 M". t ! on

? .]':;.::1:11'Y J.~)73) thl--.!!e .'li.dit.~. 'Hol .::n~-{.~J.0;''2:S

by t,ir~ Ga>'Tlor at h'is resi.donca and pro;;\ptly ·.~clivarecI t~o

ne for roJ:view and subs equen t Lnc Ius Lon in the SCCl.1ro: file.

but a week or so later dolivered to him a folder uith all

copies of the lotters we had received. l·UQUOS t

As I recall, my

to him was for guidance us to l:nnt action SilOU1,1 .

be taken with .egard to them in the light of his depatmlre ,frma the Agency incident to his nomination as United States _';"r:'!.bIlSSD.clo:'";,,dasigna.te tp Iran..

After rcviCH¥-ing .t.hem, lie-

i.nformed'me that he did not sed any. reason t.o ta.ke any ~ac1:ion

at that tiLle, but asked that I show them to Hr. Houston and if Hr-, Houston, had. no obj"ctio~, I "as to retain them in a Secure fi1'e and take no actio::> ,t!th rogard to t.i:.am.· As I recall, Mr. Houston ,.,0.5 out of t01ffi at the time and it was 'severnl day,s before I had an'opport.llnity to give him the fOlder· with the copies of the letters in it for "

review.

After rov.-iewing them, he informed DIe that he had

no objection to the instructions loll'. Helms had given me and I so informed /.Irs. Elizabeth Dunlevy, secre1;ary to Mr. Hel.ms~ 7.' On 14 f'lay 1973,

~{r.

William Broe, Inspector

General of tho Agency. and his Deputy, lolr. Kenneth Greer, met ,with me in my office in connoction with an investigation

thoy \.;ore undcz tnkdng at the'direction of .Mr. Schlesinger

to uotermine if anyone .in the Agoncy had any contact ,I}ith

()0407

MORl DoclD: l45l843

. '.

:':",

'.~.

:', C·..·,:l. .::; ,';} ~;!.j

-v • : ••: • • •

•. : •.. :: ,-;;.:.3 . :,:.,"::' .:"1

.; ,,':~ .';:'1:1 ::~-_

':.. 1

j,~r.

~ •••• :

'.',·:',1~"":~t

.::c ':'$:. ~:,,~ ..• ·I.,,::.i

:~,~

;'."':,~ •. j.'

·~.··~:·~:';t .... ~

McCord since tHe Watcrg;,.to 5.:;~cldc!1t..

! ' t tv

~..,,)

',:

(I )iu~scqm:::1tly

dctI31·r.\iiled from Nr .. Gaynnr' th3.t he l'H1S not seen or talked. to 1.1r~ McCord since his

1970.)

retireL.ent from. tho. Ag,r:;iH:y on 3;' ':\U2-ust

,I 'also told them thl't a Hr. Leo Rosenbaum, an e,"ployee

of tho Agency) had requested an ar>pointma:at t'1ith me to ,discuss the £:msibility of contributing to llr. r..!c:Co\'d's. defense. fund ,;

and that'I thought I had' convinced him that this wou'ld be

inimical, to the best interests of himself 1 the Agency and ;-,;1". :·!cCord."

I also stated that ;.Jr.

Rasen~aum.

lw.d calle"'d. -me

several weeks ago to say· that he was well kno~l as a clpse friend of Nr. r.icCord t 5 and r.!ight be called to testify at the ;'

current Senate Hearings.

I advised. him to seek gUidanJ~

in this regard from the Office of General Counsel. 'know that he did so.

I,do not

I then romembered the envelopes and

correspondence purportedly origi~ated by Mr. McCord.

I briefed

Hr. Broe and,Hr. Greer on the circumstances involved in the recoipt and SUbsequent Iland1ing of tlleT.! and made a cop~, of each of them and deliVered them to !-Jr. Broe the next day. I

0.150

gave a copy , at the same time, to my i.nme.diate supervdsor ,

1-ir. Harold B,ro.....ruaan ,

8. 'A £el< days after this, I nas contacted by Mr. John Gren,ney, Office of the General Counsel of the' Agency, who asked me about any official or unofficial ~Qntacts anyone in the Agency had had "ith Mr. HcCord.

I'mention"d

00408

MORl DoclD: 1451843

'.~.

, \

On this S:1J.:l:l date; I wns instructed by !·lr. Jnim~s R•.Schle:;iazer, Dlructor of tho Central IUf;elligcru.::a Agen.cy,.· to partic:t:p,iltc .).

in certain Congressional briefings on this matto'i" and tb

prepare this affidavit. 9.

Up to the 14th of f.ray 1973 when I

infol·m·~tl.

1·i1t , Bl·oe and l·fr. Gre(:r o~ the envelopes and their cont,Jilts" the only. p~r50ns knov l edgeab Le of the existence' of thCD t in addd ticn. to J:le ,,. t"'t.l:r~: !··ir. He1:,15 , Nr-s ,

Eli~abeth

Dunl'evy ~

, 'I' his. secretary, Mr .. Houston, Mr .. Paul Gaynor of my staff, <

Miss Kathryn Aldridge, my secretary ,.,ha prepared the £':(le,. i Mr.. Leo J. Dunn, my Executive Officer,. knew of the fil" If:. I

envolope and corrospondence but not of subsequent enVe ~pes. I'

10.

The ,only other matter pertinent to this··l:

particular matter was tho fact that an intennittent '50 .rce

·r

. of this Office, who vas a close personal friend of ~lr. 'McCord' 5 has relayed "to Mr. Gaynor and his staff certain information

concerning the poxsonak situation of Mr. and Hrs. McCord during and after the time he was. in jail and since he has been

released on bond.

This source has'boen utilized by thi~ office

for many yoars :,nd by "ly direction, no effort was r.lad".'to solicit info~:i:'Iation frOp.l h lrn about: Mr. HcCord and the information provic1ed HaS

done so purely gratuitously.

lImfa:rd IlY. Osborn Subs c r i.bed and sworn to before me) a Notary Public, in and for t.ho Couat y of Fairf.ax, Stato of Virginia, this ;13 day of '-2'!~'f-- -i?' }.!y coramLs s Lon e~pire9 ~_& %< ..!s"'~ /11'--, . 00409

MORl DoclD: 1451843

?~d"",

\l,"'tl

Bill ;c·o.;.l .·,j ,;,,' i·;·1·:·.I.:: to .,;,,;,.:: had told h irn thatl ] at the t irne he w as In chargo:= of narcotics rnat t o r-s for the DDP, knew Lid~y and w as priJ~)a::':ly :·~~·ol~··d \,,:~1, t!.. ·-··,1'""" t I ou CO''''''';'l'''~S cinc .

... .

;~~Vth'~;Vh~t~~ r-i;Ui;:a 2.l~~~~V.:-2~~Ae; t~ n1eet~~~"'n.~~~~ r~ ~~ ~ ['unt-

:"lo ....

•..

irue

_ _~_~lund"'J:stq.n<!i.ng~t may have introduced to Conein.

.',

Iqlleried as to what would be thj b:st, prrcedUJ:e . . The w it advised that we should interview his :-e!.a~ions with Liddy, Hunt, and Conein, an that this office would do so. r

c n c

n i

n g

0041.0

MORl DoclD: 1451843

As!. .1 STRATPlii

I NT!='RNh!

USE ON! Y

23 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: All Employees SUBJECT

Ag enc y Involvernent in the Wa te r-gate Case "

."-

","

. . . . .,

~~:.~

~ ::.~ ,L: .

••

-~~

1. The leadership of the Agency continues to make a determined effort to investigate all aspects of Agency involvement with the "Watergate" case or any of those persons connected with it. The results of these investigations have been given to the appropriate legislative, executive, and judicial elements of the Government investigating these rrre.ete r s ,

Each exnployee has been asked

and is directed to report to the Director any knowledge he or she has of the Watergate affa i z- and related matters, any persons connected with it, or any other illegal activity in which they believe the Agency was' involved in any way. 2.

In consonance with the foregoing, anyone who has had

any connection or contact wi th individuals on the attached list, or

anyone in their offices or anyone purporting to act for them or acting pursuant to their authority, should report these contacts fully. Activities of these and other individuals include not only the Watergate affair, but any investigative work on the Pentagon Papers/ Ellsberg case and any contacts relating to the Executive Branch and White House efforts to locate and stern leaks of classified information to the press starting as early as July 1970. 3. Any work done by anyone in the Agency on any of these subjects, or any knowledge related thereto, should be reported to the 10 through the appropriate Deputy Director, or directly and personally to the Director.

kB111111 STRoH I'IE

I HTI!iJUHL !lS E ON' Y

0041.1.

--------------MORl DoclD: l45l843

... ,

INTErNAl "SF (.

(

4. It ~s imperative that every piece of information bearing on these matters be reported immediately for evaluation by the senior rnanag ement of the Agency. The public interest requires that all information be produced and reported to our ,,,pversighl:<M;.ommittees,,,(on a clas~j.fied basis;)!,necessar;yJ so ./;';'" that the Agency's actual role will be clariIied with respect to various charges and speculation.

W. E. Colby Executive Secretar: , ' ,/ . CIA Management Commlttee

Attachment

(

APPROVED

_~Rj~~

C..James R. SChlesinge Director

2 ADMINISTRATIYE -

INTERNAl

"SF oN' ¥

MORI DocID: 1451843

., At

.Hf3T~ATlr/E

Itl·rE~)I\b Uf E

OW'Y'

Attachment.

H. R. Haldeman John D. Ehrlichman John Dean

Egil Krogh David Young Et"1i:oward H.i'rll ,,';;" O. Gordon Liddy James W. McCord Charles W. Colson John J. Caulfield Eugenio Rolando Martinez Careaga Juan Rigoberto Ruiz Villegas Bernard L. Barker Virgilio Gonzales Frank Anthony Sturgis

'NfIMI£TRATIVE

r-,

:,~

'NTERNAI USE aNI y

OOl.(. 1/ b

MORl DoclD: 1451843

MENORA!Jl)UM TO

Exflcutive

eOI.'1' olitar

CMA ¥~nagement C~ru~ittee

SUBJ&~T

Lean of Televiei,m System to Secret Service for Usa at De!l!01)X'atie and Republican National Conv'3ntiolls in 19'12 "..... . ::. ;~-... o~ . The attaehed;\suJnmary reports the loan of televisim

equip'/,lent by the Agency ta the Secret ;;ervtM for Use durIng the Domoeratia and Republican National Convent Ions last year.

The

equipment was for use in helicopter aeriel survo1l1ance, primarily f:r< CI'OW

control.

The assumpi:ion is that i t was used for that purpose ,

The eqUipment vas recovered in .l\~vember 1972.

The transaction seems a straightforward arrangement,

related to tho legal responsibility of the Secrat ~ervico. I1owever, the fact that the, AKeney proMdod th~ equipment for: usa in a domentic political situation c~~lrt be presented in a different light.

004:12

MORl DoclD: 1451843

: SUBJECT 1.

Executive Secretary CIA Joilnap'ement CQJJlmittee

Drue TestinR Program The attached sum~,ary trom ORO descrIbes research :t'i' ...

indicate that the repol'ted drug was part of a larger program in whioh ' ~ ,th" Agenoy had l."e1ation.~ ,rith com:nercial drug manufaoturers, WhereBY they paaaed on drugs rej ected because of unfavol'ab1e eide effects.

The drugs w~e soreened with the Use of ADP equipment,

and those selected for experimentation were tested atlLIUSing

---'na"'"v"'mmog~--------~-----------

___

monke~ end mioe. Materials

Df/further interest, as dem0!1strated by this testing, lIere then tested at Edgewood, usinR voltulteer members of the Armed Forces. 2.

The program WiS ter:nin'lted last fall.

nie computer progran

remaine in the machine, its final disposition not yet ha.ving been decided. 3.

Carl Duokett emphasdaes that the program was considered

as defensl'7.6, in the sensa that we would be able" to recognize certain behavior i f siJnilar materials were used against ArnerlcanBo

WVB

00413

MORl DoclD: 1451843

ORD-2550-73 23 May 1973

.:.,.

',:~.

...~' ..

\ ,

"'~'

..~.

MEMORANDUM FOR:

. Deputy Director for Science and Technology

SUBJECT:

ORD Involvement in Domestic Affairs

In surveying all of the people within the Office of Research and Development in search of specific contact or knowledge of . Messrs. Hunt, Krogh, Young, and Liddy, an additional incident in which ORO supplied equipment for domestic use was uncovered. It is attached. I have also provided the additional information you r-equested on Pr-oject] land project/,

I~~~-

Sayre Stevens Director of Research and Development

Attachments: As stated

l .

MORl DoclD: 1451843

22 May 1973 MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD

SUJ3JECT:

General; Specific:

The Family Jewels Sxercise Meeting wi,th Colby This Date

-Broe and met with Mr. Colby at' 1115 hours today. Colby asked that ve ~e him with fuller infonnation on the following items:

pt"'-6l!'b copieJi,.of cer's reports ou .!!.Ree-t-3::e13"5-¥eu+1:l

e-r-:

.Get d"ta;l,j;:r::pil

t6~

C1'yogaii£C04i!aSae4;Gma-t<w that

't> ~ ~ ¥ , --sub-je-c-nr:- -r o h;J i -

and Black Raaiea3:~

is used <in unwitting ":>

lone fotte: case .

./ .Give ColOIY eo copy of FR Dtvlsiuu's eentl?iba-ti-en;o

.' 0041.5

MORT DocTD: 1451843

...~

•

f';",\.L!O!;/v, ~

A C'~ .'

'>!

fJ:

ffi

~I~~

:-:

""z::

....QZ

BULLETIN

No. 359

21 ~Iay 1973

-"'<r>

ODCi STATEf-lENT ABOUT THE N,I-\TERGP1TE CASE

i. .~"

The fo11 ol'ii og statement was made by Li eutenant Genen 1 If ernon ,~" Ha Iters during a recent appearance before a Congressional COlWlittee . On 23 June 1972 I was ordered by a phone message from my office to be at the White House at about 1300 with Director Helms. I had lunch with Mr. Helms and we went to Mr, Ehr1ichman's office at the "Illite House. Present \1ere Nf'. Ehrlicr.;r:~!~~ ;";t. ~~~·1·j~';":"!1, :~,;-, :{·~'i.t:5 and myse l f , As I recall it, HI'. Haldeman said that the Hatergate incident wes c<1'.I5ing trouble and was being exploited by the opposition. It had been decided at toe Hllite HO'Jse that I ,,;ould go to Acting FaI Directo":'" Gray and tell hi'~: t':~": n0:'; that t:··~ f'!v~ ,::,I:~:".:.C'~."i were arres tsd, Yur'Cner enquiries into the I-lexican aspects of chi.> matter might jeopa'rdize some of the CIA's covert activities in t.hat area. An appointment was made for me to see HI' •. Gray at 1430 tlJ~t . same day. I \'1001; .over and told ili;n that I had been directed by top White Houseofftc t al s to tell hlm that fu)'th~i' in'!esti,:,~.l:ic~ int·~ th~ , Mex'kan aspects of the Watergate episode might jeopardize some of the Agency's covert actions in th~t area, He said that he understood the agr.::'tment between the FBI and the >lganey regarding t.heir .sour-ces butth;l t thi s ':JJ, ~ CCiliP 1 i catud case, H2 v.OiJ i d not 'I i OJ a te tile agreemen.t with CIA regal'ding sources. On my return to the Agency I 'checked to see whether there \1aS any danger in the Agency's covert sources if the 14ex i call part of the invest i gati on conti nued and ascerta i ned tha t no one bel ieved that this was the case. No one had any knoHled!le of the plan to bug the Democratic National COlr~1ittee. On June 26 the Counsel to the President John Dean called 'me and asked me to come and see him about the matter I had di scussed with, Haldeman and Ehrlicl1man. He si\id I could check with Ehrlichman and I did. He said I could talk to Dean so I went to Dean's office at 1145 on June 26. I informed Dean that I had checked careful ly to $"~~ ;"h"ther there was any jeopardy to the Agency's sources by a further investigrltion of thRfh:dc:!~ SOlP"C,?S of tri:- ;-;~.~A.''''' :~,i I.. ::,.! '~"":.:'J :;.,::;":. \·;E:.3 non€:.

l.;:.~;:dl J: i 1e:<1

es 1(0:'.1 Nnether ;:l;:~

erA ,:-;-:-:t·:t have t~:!~.::;'i y.:.rt iii ti:2

U,ltergate episode without my kno',ling it.

I said that this was not

00416

MORl DoclD: 1451843

,If,

I ... '

1='

-2r-

possible. I knew that the Agency had had no part in the operation against the Democratic National Cowmittee. I therefore could not say that further investigation would Jeopardtza Agency sources. I felt that someone had bungled badly and that the responsible parties should be fired. He asked, whether there was not soma way ia \'Ihich the Agency might.have be"n involved. I said that I had checked with Director Helms and was convinced it was not. Any attempt to stifle this investigation would destroy the effectiveness of the Agency and th o CRT and :'\,'r'HI"~-' r..~.• ,..:rtlr\:",,, ... r-.:-r's,":\yll! .... '")~0 til.:". ?'·:.'\~1'·;:-·~·· t t"'~l'lrl ' ·\"-'!';(.r~ :f;~~ _~11 '.'~_ ~. .,~,I r··::·.~ ',',; ~ .;':'.. i:~ f",... :. . -i- '; ':-':-:~..'3-. (I

':S

',,/.< • • 1.\ ..... ,

',,_

• 1

.,- .• ,""..

•

Ha a~;~~J ~hltii~r I h~t! f:> 'r i ,~:;:. s ..... ","

th,}~' ~:l, ..; ~.E" r",:sp{':l~';'i~11:;

Ii.';; c.

5;·';'.11d ~~

The fol1owing day I sa'..! Dean ag:<in in hi s office at his :'quest. He again reviewed the Watergate Case saying that some witnesses were get t ,i ng scared and were "wobhling", T ~,;<:! that no metter how scared they got, they could not involvs CIA because it was not involv~d in the bugging of the Haterq~te. He then asked if the CIA could not furnish bail and pay the suspects' salades while they were in jail, us1r:~: ;:·:n'~r't act i en fl1i":'.1S for 'i:rd s ri"I{[:C S0.

I repl ted that this was out of the question, It would implicate the ;).gency in something in which it was not implicated. Any such action D.]" the -Agency wou'id imply an order from the hiqh0St level and

r '".:dd :,C;'; :'~2 a ~h':~·~,Y ~c (.,'~)' S=.i;.:j'j ,~'::'~;)i:.

i.t ,':0djG 08 a 'grave d i s-

service to the President ad the country and would destroy the CIA's

credibility Nith th2 Congtsss and tne people. I Houid t~e$ign rather than do this and, if o:"':",:r:~d to do -it: : '. ~.:'.ild·~~,-;:: tc ':'2:: t;i;~ ?r'QsiJs;·,;.. to explai n the reasons for myrefusa 1. fur-thermor-e , when the Agency e;~;::;,:d.:.d fl~nd5 ~n t:12 U.S,:> ',.;,~ had ;;) (.:!;~~rtc c{ir::) co tile O\f2tsigt1t

Committees of the Agency in Congress. He was much taken aback by thi s and agreed that risks of iri'!}licating the CJ.1. ar:d FBI in tht s matt€r'

\'lould be enormous. r said that \':hat ~.J~O:; n.rv ~" ~\.:.dfA"·:l '."~!.'~~ cJ)lJld becene a morta l one. ~Jhat \'iaS now ~; "conve.it.ionat explosion could be -turned into a multi-magaton explosion". I again advised him to fire

the ~'espoI13ib'le parties.

Again Dean sent for me on the 2ath of Jl!'~e,1nd ! saw him at hi s off lee at 1130 that dey. H~ iH~qi.i1)~e·': ~·;i·::::t;;st' I "had learned anytil'ing more about CIA i nvo 1vement , I rep 1 ~ ~'Q ·th<:t tb.?"2 was no i nvollfe",,",,t of the Agency in the bugging of the ;':,'l'C8i'9·}te, He then asked ~Iiiether 1 had any ideas and I said that I had none which CQuld be.helpful. Perhaps the Cubans who were anti-Castro might have had a hand in it but the CIA did not.

GIl July 5 I re:eiv2d a call 1.;~ ~Gti~g U!~·2c~or of th~ far Gray

sayir.r; i:h;t he coul.l f'!'"):: ~h":: . . :.Trt"-~· ; ..... ;?"~f~':":~'>-': ::;..:: :~:2 =:2.~~:::;;~ aspecus of this matter ur.Iess he hf!d a fOi'.1ial lett€H' from th~. Oirector 0:f ~y~ .~<, :"': :,..• : ~-~ .. ,. . '..: . r 5';;;:: :i':;;; :~:t ~ "'~.1 :::l~' i"G;; ...... ,.:; .;;.}, {~ .. ,j.

D';:';:':\::, !:;'-:j

. ",

:;'...

"'<.

I;':;'

MORT DocTD: 1451843

......

10:

-3-

I told him"'that I could not tal1 him that further investigation would jeopardize the Agency's'covert sources. I had checKed on this and it was not so. I had ascertained that General Cushman had initially authorized the issuance of some equipment to Howard Hunt without knowirg its purpose other than it \'jZiS ClS I understood if, to shut off lllec.ks ' This was 'long b'1fore the Hdtergate bugging. Since then I had caraful Iy checked and there was no other i nvo 1vement of aliy sort by the CIA in the operation against the ~}atergat~.. L sai.r,l",t.Mt r felt.tpat attem.?"t,;.,t~,n CG'/~i" t:f~i:s u·: OJ'' r>,": 1 "',' ;," .,::-: :~,,-: C::\ 1:' ":.'::! :'.':';~.~ '.>:~ ~'.;;,':. !.'~ ..' ."? <: tL::~;- ·ll:·~?;:, ..':':J ::,,,.:; ~. ,.;,;:: '.;'.{;:(: ('~.1 (>.: t\-~::-';'j\k;nt ar:c '~,,;l:":\ ce':!:.:··'I, f ! .

~'mv'id h:::"i8. 110 ~"~:''l.

':n

,.:·.i:~ 't"': l~~ ~'!';;~:-: :_:uj~J:' p::;:;rHited t~)

res';qn (,; , ':'i::

' '\".: <..... : _ . . i t:.. i:,;' '.'i~~ .~ :',;:;._; . . \ l;:-:: .;':', '.' ,_",_,:,.1• ."~.: .• ; i.:~":'~J~i':j ct ~\'.:r ,-, ~i:.L":i·",:; :::~ •....: ;':~ ';:c::.:. ~;~:5 prt;::;:~r2Q to rcS}~;1: on :.n1-:; issue. I geve Gray a l'fst of t!ic 1?(";i.d;';r~e!1t the ligenc.y 'Jihl glv??1 Hf.H:~: i5'~t:~

H':~;'i"Li

and the account of our deaiings with the former CIA employees up to the termination of their employment with the Agency long before the ~!atsr~,t? epi sode , . I saw Gray again on the 12th of July and gave him one additional memorandum regard i ng t.he r:ont~ct fl)r'p- i shed !-!ur.t.

l'!2 rs'!i T';~C t~:.:! r;~.:.·~:: ·::r

the posi tlcn i,'~: l: .::d ;:~;'~-::;i }in:'Iiously. r said -;:[l?tt I had t,::-:c Dean that the best solution 'IOU 1(: b0. to "fire those responsible, GI'ay said

reib:::,.~ting

he had made the same recofmliendatlQ!I.

Once again we a9reed that anythtno

that migl)t damage the integrity of th.:- F3I and CIA ~...ou ld be a grave d is$c:r"/i~e to

'l:h~ ;:r'~:3idr~r.t

:F.d "'::...: :,: ,.~:.:-:;::C:r;-~ .•

In February 1973 shortly after ik. Schlesins~r beca~::2 fJ'ir<odor I tcld him of my conversat ionswtth Ha1c!eman, Eht'lichman and [)~an. In Febru(lry Deiln called Dr. Schlesinger 'Co see if the !,gency couid get back from the FBI the ma tsri al it. !'.:r!. se~t to ·t~-e ~~I.:S:i·':2 ;~::-·.1r'~;.-:·:-::r~ concern i ng our con tact ~Iith Hunt. Or. Schl esi nger and r agreed tha t this could not be done. I attempted to contact Dean but he \'las ·in Florida. On his return! saw Dea'(j at his office on February 21 and t~ld hir~ ~~~~t \.;~ CGu':d {tot esk tj",,::.: F2; J~0r' ~:j"Je material back. "(flat wou lo uniy serve impl icate the CIA and L'coul d not and would not do it. I had seen Acting FB! Director Gray that p.crning and to'le him of :Jean's l'eQu2st and our refusa l , He agreed sayin9 that he could not do such a thing. Si nce that date I have had no fur-ther contact with Dean. The abJ"2 represents my recot Iect ion of ~Ihat occurred and the dates are checked in my appointment book.

DISTRIBUTION:

~.LL

HIPLOYEES

MORl DoclD: 1451843

"X"C Ii" ~ )': i

CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WASHINGTON .. D,C, 20~O~

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR

9"May 1973 ',' ' ' ' ALL CIA EMPLOYEES MEMORANDUM FOR '

1. Recent press reports outline in detail certain alleged CIA activities witfi respect to Mr. Howard Hunt and other parties. The presently known facts behind these stories are those stated in the attached draft of a statement I will be making to the Senate Committee on Appropriations on 9 May. As can be seen, the Agency provided limited assistance in response to a request by senior officials. The Agency has cooperated with and made availa~le to the appropriate law enforcement bodies information about these activities and will continue'to do so. 2. All CIA employees should understand my attitude on this type of issue. I shall do everything in my power to confine CIA activities to those which fall within a strict interpretation of its legislative charter. I take this position because I am determined that the law shall be respected and because this is the best way to foster the legitimate, and necessary contributions we in CIA can make to the national security of the United States . 3. I am taking several actions to implement this objective: I have ordered all the senior operating officials of this Agency to report to me immediately on any activities now going on, or that have gone on in the past, which might be construed to be outside the legislative charter of this Agency. I hereby direct every person presently employed by CIA to report to me on any such activities of which he has knowledge. I invite all ex-employees to do the same. Anyone who has such information should call my secretary (extension 6363) and say that he wishes to talk to me about "activities outside CIA's charter."

ADflINI5TRYrrI'IE

INTERNAl IISF ONLy

---------MORl DoclD: 1451843

ADM!

;.t<-

Ro.TI'JE

HITERIMl ~3E tlllli

-4. To ensure that Agency activities are proper in the future, I hereby promulgate the following standing order for all CIA employees:

•

Any CIA employee who believes that he has received instructions Which in any way appear inconsistent with the CIA legislative charter shall inform the D.Jrector of Central .In~~lJ.igence)"diatel.Y:~.;;"'1.ili"":

•

~I~J~'

~~ James R. Schlesinger Director

ADMINISTRATIVE -

INTERNAl

"Sf ONI Y

,i;>~; ;":''':'~{~~!

MORl DoclD: l45l843

. .'

OCI STATEHENT BEFORE SENArE APPROPRIATIONS SUBCOMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS 9'NAY 1973

004:1.9

MORI DocID: 1451843

. OPENING STATEMENT

Mr. Chairmarr, I am here to discuss the questions which have.arisen

over CIA's real and alleged role in events that occurred in 1971 and 1972 . I have opened a detailed investigation into the precise nature of that role.

,'fit,

I canreport to you on what..Agency records, now being intensively reviewed, reveal at this juncture. However I do not yet know that I have all the facts in the matter. •

Nonetheless, I am pleased to present to you such facts

•

as are now available, arid I will certainly provide you with any further details as they come to my attention. let me start. with the Agency's relationship with Mr. Howard Hunt, whose testimony has recently been made public. Mr. Hunt was a staff employee of the Agency from 8 November 1949 to 30 April 1970. At that time n~

retired from the Agency.

He performed one editorial job of writing up

a recomnendatlon for an award for one of our officers. in .November 1970. He ~IaS not paid for these services; although the Agency placed the sums of $200.00 and $50.00 in two charitable~rganizations for. the service performed. .

In early July 1971,.General.Cushman, then the Deputy Director of

Central Intelligence, received a telephone call fro~ the Hhite House. He was informed that Nr. Hunt had become a consultant on security affairs for the Hhite House, and a request was 'made that Hr. Hunt receive assistance from the Agency. The minutes of the Agency Morning Meeting of 8 July 1971 indicate that

the DDCI (General Cushman) reported a call by John Ehrlichman

stating. that Howard Hunt had been appointed a Hhite House security consultant. On 22 July 1971 Nr. Hunt visited Generai Cushman at the CIA building. According to the records, Mr. Hunt stated" that he had been charged with a 'highly sensitive mission by the White House to visit and elicit information

00420

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.. ,.

-2-

from an individual whose ideology he was not entirely sure of, and for that

purpose he said he was asked to come to the Agency to see ifhe could get two things:

identification documents in alias and some degree of physical

disguise, for a one-time operation. He stressed that he wanted the matter ~. '.11;"

....

•

.' -

" .

:?11

•• _.J:;~V>

to be held as closely as possible and that he would like to meet the Agency people in an Agency safehouse. Agency records indicate that, in, the course of the conversation, Mr. ~unt referred to' Mr. Ehrlichman by name and General Cushman acknowledged an earlier call from Mr. Ehrlichman to him. The Committee may desire to query General Cushman whose knowledge would not

come from such secondary sources. General Cushman directed the appropriate technical service of the Agency to be of assistance to Mr. 'Hunt, based on the above request. On 23 July 1971 Mr. Hunt was given alias documents, including a Social Security card, driver's license, and several association membership cards, in the ,

name of "Edward Joseph Harren" simHar to material he had been furnished for operational use while he had been an Agency employee, under the name of "!,d\~ard V. Hamt l ton;" The same day Mr. Hunt was also given disguise materials (a wig, glasses, and a speech alteration device). By calling an unlisted telephone number given him, Mr. Hunt arranged several a~ditional meetings with Agency technical, officers, the dates of which cannot be provided with precision.

In these, he requested and was provided,

a commercial tape recorder (in a typewriter case) and a commercial Tessina camera disguised in a tobacco pouch.

He also brought in a then-unidentified

associate (later identified from press photos as Mr. G. Gordon Liddy) and secured for him a disguise (wig and glasses) and alias documents in the name .of "George F. Leonard."

-------------_...MORl DoclD: 1451843

. -3-

The Agency""technica1 officers met these requests despite the absence of the procedural steps and approvals normally required by Age~cy regulations .. However, they became increasingly concerned at the escalation of Mr. Hunt's request from Mr. Hunt to requests for.. assf ... , . stance , These finally included .. a , ~,~

be met on the morning of 27 August 1971, upon his return from California, to have a film developed and returned to bim. This was done the same day. ·He also asked for a New YOrk mail address and telephone-answering service for operational use. The technical officers raised- their concern with senior officers. who noted the possibility that these activities could involve the Agency in operations outside it~ proper functions.

As a result. again according to

Agency records, General Cushman telephoned Mr. Ehrlichman at the White House on 27 August 1971 and explained, that further such assistance could not be 'given. Mr. Ehrlichman agreed. The request for mail address and telephone answering service was not honored. On 31 August 1971, Mr. Hunt contacted the technical'Qfficers again. requesting a credit card.·but this was refused. Mr.·Hunt had also made 'a request on 18 August 1971 for the assignment of a secretary he had known during his Agency career. This was also refused.

The

earlier-furnished alias documents and other material were not recovered, however,except for the Tessina camera which was returned on 27 August as unsuitable. Since the end of August 1971. the Technical Services, Division has had no further association with Mr. Hunt. As a point of reference, I would note that the break-in of the office of Mr. El1sberg's psychiatrist took place on or about 3 September 1971.

00421.

MORl DoclD: 1451843

-4-

The Agency ~utlined the above events to Mr. Patrick Gray,< Acting Director of the FBI, in letters dated Sand 7 July 1972, and a meeting on 28 July 1972. A series of questions were asked the Agency on 11 October 1972

"" _"

by'l:!w Earl SilbeJ;<t, princ,.~l Assista:~. .. - "

Unite~ ~~tes At,~w;JJ,ey "

•....

for the .

District of Columbia. On 24 October 1972, Attorney General Kleindienst and ,Assistant Jll:torney General Petersen revie1ied the Sand 7' July transmittals together with additional, more detailed but undated materials, that had 'been provided to Acting FBI Director Gray on 18 October 1972. The Agency is< aware that this material was reviewed on 27 November 1972 by Mr. Silbert, who asked additional questions'on that date as well as on 29 November 1972. Written responses to the foregoing questions were provided on 13 December 1972. ,

An additional, submission was made to the Assistant Attorney'General Petersen on 21 December 1972. This material was discussedat a meeting held with Assistant Attorney General Petersen and Mr. Silbert on 22 December 1972. All of the foregoing materials can be made available to the Committee if it so desires. As a separate matter, which was not known by those \-,ho prepared the material for the Department of Justice in the fall of last year, the Office ~f Medical

Services of the Agency prepared and forwarded to the White House

two indirect personality assessments of Mr. Daniel Ellsberg.

The Agency has

had a program of producing, on a selective basis, such assessments or studies on' foreign.'leaders for many years.

In July 1971 Mr. Helms, then Director,

instructed Agency officers to work with Mr. David Young of the Hhite House Staff relative to security leaks in the intelligence community.

MORl DoclD: 1451843

•

-5-

. t

Hr. Young requested a study on Hr. Ellsbergin the latter part of July 1971, which Agency activity was apparently approved by Mr. Helms. At that time, i'lr. Young supplied ra~1 material consisting principally of newspaper and magazine articles together with some State Department and Justice Department papers. The fi rst assessment delivered to the Hhite House dated 9 August 1971, was judged insufficient. As a result, there were several meetings between pro f1a1loy, Mr. Hunt, and Mr. liddy, in which classified information of the Justice and State Departments was introduced. One such meeting occurred on 12 August 1971. Additional material ~~s transmitted by Mr. Hunt on 12 October, and another meeting was held on 27 October. " . These meetings led to a second version of the assessment, ~

dated 9 November 1971. This document was delivered to the Executive Office by Dr.,Malloy on 12 November 1971. Agency records 'indicate that Mr. Helms had previously communicated with Mr. Young indicating he had read both reports. ~

In another contact "about October 1971," an Agency officer arranged

to provide Mr. Hunt certain unclassified materials from CIA files relative to a 1954 French case of leakage of Government documents.

These were

delivered to'his office at the White House. In closing, I would like to stress several conclusions of my investigation so far: a. activities.

CIA had no awareness of the details of Mr. Hunt's The Agency's impression was that Mr; Hunt was engaged

in an activity related to identifying and closing off the security leaks that were so much a preoccupation of the GQvernment at the time.

00422

MORl DoclD: 1451843

....

-6-

The Agency clearly was insufficiently cautious in the

initiation of its assistance to ~Ir. Hunt.

later, when the nature of

Mr. Hunt's requests for assistance began to indicate a possible active involvement by the Agency'in activities beyond its charter, the Agency terminated the relationship and refused further assistance. c.

The preparation of a profile on an American citizen under

these circumstances lies beyond the normal activity of the Agency. ~

It shall not be repeated -- and I have so instructed the staff. This shall be made a part of the regulations governing such activities. d. As Director, I have called for' a review of all Agency activities and the termination of any which might be considered outside its legitimate charter.

In addition"to requesting this

review from my sUbordinates, I have directed each employee and invited each ex-employee to submit to me any cases which theY may question. I am determined that the Agency will not engage in activities outside of its ~arter but will concentrate its energies on its important intelligence mission.

MORl DoclD: 1451843

r (~

......

8 May 1973 DCI:

Sy Hersh's provocative teaser for the day: "I have information that Cushman knew exac t Iy what he was okaying when he

--~~aut~tentioned

'g ave approval to assist Hunt ..• "

__ Sy H. again to the statement 'e had given to the Times already, ,C 0 im I "noted" what he had to say today. He has calls in for you, Hous t onj and Colby.

))T

I i

I I I

. AMT

eCI.OGe

('If'

'lJ*. Coll>}:-

[ I·

! u· ..•.... .,..,p_ .~

~"","-"-

00423

MORl DoclD: 1451843

t :

•

RESPONSE TO PRESS INQUIRIES CONCERNING MR. HUNT'S GRAND JURY TESTIMONY

THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY HAD N9 ADVANCE NOTICE OF ANY SORT WHATSOEVER OF THE BREAK IN BY MR:' HUNT OF THE; OFFICE OF MR: ELLSBERG'S PSYCHIATRIST OR OF THE WATERGATE INCIDENT:" THE NEWSPAPER REPORTS OF THESE TWO EVENTS WERE THE FIRST NOTICE TO ANYONE IN THE AGENCY:" ALL AGENCY INFORMATION ON OJ R CONTACTS WITH ANY PERSONS INVOLVED IN THESE INCIDENTS HAS BEEN REPORTED FULLY TO THE DEPARTMENT Ol!- JUSTICE," AND AS INVESTIGATION OF THESE MATTERS IS IN THE HANDS OF THE COURTS AND THE GRAND JURY, ALLINQUrnIES SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE: "

00424

MORl poclD: 1451843

8 May 1913 MEMORANDUM FOR:

Executive Secretary, CrA Management COlIllIlittae

SUBJECT:

Potentially Embarrassing Agency Activities

The Office of the InspectDr General has records on the 1'ollD;ring sensitive subjects tbat either have been or might in the" future be tbe source of embarrassment to tbe Agency. The report of the Board of Inquiry in the case of Han~ To:rte. The To:rte affair ;ras fully exposed in pub.H c , of course, but the report itself is e.LoseLy be1d w:i:thin the Agency. This office ;,as designated as the' custodian of the report, and we have the onlY·S1.1rviving CDPY. An annex to the Izispector- General's "report D1' survey D1' the Technical Services Di visiDn done in 1963. The annex deals ;ritb experiments in influencing human behavior thrDugh the administratiDn oJ: mind or persDnality a;Ltering drugs to un1<itting subjects. An InspectDr General repDrt D1' investigation of a11egatiDns that the Agency vas instrumental in bringing about; the assassination of President Diem. The allegations ;rere determined tD be 1<itbout foundation. " An Inspector General report of investigatiDn D1' al1egatiDns that the Agency was instrumental in bringing about the assassination of President Trujillo. The investigation disclosed quite extensive Agency invDlveme~t ;,ith the plotters. An InspectDr General report of investigation of allegatiDns that the Agency conspfred to assassinate Fidel castro. The story first appeared in Drew Pearson I s column and has since appeared in Jack Anderson's column. \"1bile the columns contained many :factual errors, the allegatiDns are basically

true.

00425

MORI DocID: 1451843

Page 1

SDS and other student activillt groups

OCI produced in December 1967 at Ua1t Rostow's request a t;y:pescript lltudy of the SDS and its foreign ties.

30~page

In the sumn:er of 1968 OCI produced-o-agat.n at Rostmr'g requeab-» " paper on Restless Youth. The first, and most sensitive section, , "Wa's a phi'll1:>S"<!iphical· ti:ei:it'ment of' student unrelit, its m()j;i~tion, history, and tactics. It drew heavily on overt literature' and FBI reporting on SDS and affiliated groups. The second section cOmprised 19 chapters on foreign student dissidence. Pages 11 & 12

Black radicalism

OCI began following Caribbean black radicalism in earnest in 1968. Two papers uere produced on the subject, one in August 1969 aud the other in June 1970. OCI was asked in June 1970 to urite a memo with special attention to links between black l'Eldicalism ill' the Caribbean and advocates of black power in the US. The memo was produced in t;y:pescript and given to the DCI. OCI in 1968 wrote :Periodic ty:pescript memos on Stokely Carmichael's travels abroad dur-Ing a period whell he had dropped from PUblic view. .

00426

MORl DoclD: 1451843

........... ".- .~,--

.. .

...: ~ _~---_.

.--_.-. ..::,;: ..:..~

_.-

........:-.-~~

(

hobibition againat CCNIllT vs ~ US citbens

Page 23

In September 1972 I J = o to collduat hearabill:ty ercial telephone cirauits ' tests at certain RF lorl-g-w:scance c T'ne circuits carried drugbetween the US anr=d,--S::.0:cu:c~::::..cAm=e:.:ri:.::..::ca=-. ---==---"'=c:.::..::-'-'-_=::..c.:c....:::::..::::"-_ _--, re1f.lted traffic. no

was

1Iere,i~1.

: .~. :~".~.

,lie conduct an intercept opera,r-=t"'io=:n=--.:,in=

'on radio tele hone conversations e'

•

.. '.

tergeted' ' --L====---,

•.t·

::.

.,;~'.

:.:' :

"....

Testing in the US of ORD-developed electronic collection systems occnsion1!U:r result in the collection or domestic telephone conversations. When the tests are canplete.. ~e intercepted lllaterial is destroyed. '

CIa. )echn1cMns conducted tests in~e Miami ares in August :r.9(X or'IIF' gear il:rtended f~r use against a Sartel: agent :I.n South Vietnam. Wb:lle l1hoUy innocuous, the tests preceded the holding ot the conventions there lind could be construed as being :sGmeha/:'related to them. : . ,

In Fe~ry' 1972 CIA asked, an official of AT&T :t'or cop:l.<:s of telephone call slips relating to US-Chima' calls. The operation lasted -:for three or four months and then dr:l.ed up. CGC stated its belief that the collect:l.on of these 'slips did not violate the CC!mlUI11ca.-::iOIls'.(Ic't since eavesdropping was not inVOlved.

Page 29

Mail coverage

Since 1953, CIA bas operated a maii intarcept programot , incOlIiing and outgo:tng Russian lllail and, at various times, other selected ma:tl at Kennedy Airport :tn Irew York City. This prog:ram is now do=nt pend:tng decision on .'hether to continue or to abolish it.

I': I'

.. '.

/)J\~ 'QQ4Z7

\\~ \, \

-,,:

MORl DoclD: 1451843

CO~IPIB13HYIAL

8 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR:

Mr. W. E. Colby Executive Secretary, CIA Management Committee

FROM

Director, National Estlmates

SUBJECT

Co~n)ents on Proposed DCI Statement (Hunt Case)

Since you are aware that 1 have no facts bearing on the case, I .'take it tliat you asked fQr comment from the following point of view; w111 the proposed statement be well received by the committee? The main questions in the committee's mind will be: Did CIA 'cooperate wittingly in activities which were both illegal and outside its charter? Or did it only respond supinely to higher authority even though it had some reason for suspecting illegal conduct?

" Tactically, I think there would be advantage in coming to grips frankly with these questions in the statement itself. The text in its present form could be taken as a minimum factual response which doesn't quite get at the heart of the matter. I think it preferable, in the interest of the Agency 's reputation on the Hill, to proceed to candor directly rather -than to be drawn to it by subsequent questioning. Key follow-up questions which can be anticipated would include ".the following: Why is there no record of the initial Ehrlichman-Cushman contact? If Cushman recorded the conversation with Hunt, was he not already

suspicious of the latter's purpose and why didn't he ask? At a minimum, could he not have inquired Whether "the individual whose ideology we aren't entirely sure of" was an American citizen?

00428 •

MORl DoclD: 1452843

·. e 6 If FIB E H TIt- :r.

When Cushman told Ehrllchman on 27 August 1971 that -CIA was suspending support to Hunt, was it only on the ground that the latter had become "too demanding"? Why was the personality study on Ellsberg provided when it was obvious that this action transgressed the Agency's charter? Obviously most questions which will be raised can only he answered hy Helms and Cushman personaily• Nevertheless, I think the DCI would be well advised to provide a candid evaluation of these proceedings in his. initial - - statement. To do so voluntarily would make more persuasive the assurances the Committee will want that nothing of the sort will be done under his direction of the Agency.

-I :J..II JQliI}IJ1n~enga .

\'Y ---.

00429 - 2CONfiIBEUTIQ T

MORl DoclD: 1451843

1 .

',. ~..

....

, ". ---:.

........

, ,:

iJhll',d .i1

MEMORANDUM FOR ALL CIA EMPLOYEES

,vt"'i- f / ' . 1.

Recent press reports implicate CIA in certain

il~ .

activities allegedly committed in the United States. Without going into the details of these allegations i' I can assure' you that I intend to cooperate fully with the various law enforcement and Congressional investigations of these matters. 2.

All CIA employees. should understand my attitude toward

matters of this sort. I shall do everything in my power to confine CIA activities to those which fall within the strictest interpretation of its legislative charter. I take this position because I am determined that the law shall be r-espected and because this is the best way to foster the legitimate and necessary contributions we in CIA can make to the national security of the United States.

3. I am taking several actions to implement this objective:

I have ordered all the senior operating officials of this Agency to report to me immediately on any activities now going on, or that have gone on in the past, which might be construed by reasonable people to be outside the legislative charter of this Agency.

00430 CIA HF£EHI!fAIs UiiiF aNI y

MORl DoclD: 1451843

Gift IN'£ERffAL,,T:fSE Ctal' 7f

I hereby order every person presently employed by CIA to report to me directly on any such activities of which he has knowledge. I invite all ex-employees to do the same. - Anyone who has such information shall call my secretary (extension 6363) and say that he wishes to talk to me about "questionable CIA activities". I intend to name a highly respected person from outside the Government to review, investigate, and prepare reports for me on any apparent violations of the CIA legislative charter which are 'brought to his attention or may be uncovered on his own initiative. I shall give this person complete and unrestricted access to all records and per-sons in the Agency. •

4. To insure that Agency activities are proper in the future; I hereby promulgate the following standing order for all CIA employees: Any CIA employee who believes that he has received instructions which in any way appear inconsistent with the CIA legislative charter shall inform the Di.rector- of Central Intelligence immediately.

James R. Schlesinger Director

0043:1

MORI DocID: 1451843

Retirement Information - E. Howard Hunt

1. Date of retirement:

30 April 1970

CIA Retirement and Disability System

System:

Grade and salary at time of retirement:

Creditable civilian service used in computing annuity: 17 May 1948 to 8 June 1948

GS-15 , Step 8' - $28,226

- Economic Cooperation Administration

9 June 1948 to 19 Februa~ 1949 - State (ECA) 8 November 1949 to 30 April 1970 - CIA

Armuity: At retirement - $1,020 per month At present

- $1,181 per month (which includes cost-of-living increases since date of retire~ent)

6.' At the time of retirement ~fr. Hunt did not elect survivorship benefits. This meant that upon his death, his wife would not draw a survivorship allflUity.· By letter of 5 April 1971 he raised the question of changing his election but was' informed by the General Counsel on 6 ~lay 1971 that

.tlii'-s 'could not be done. By letter 'aated 5 May 1972 Mr. Hunt asked Mr.. Houston.to raise with the Director the possibility of being recalled to duty for a short period of time, after. which he could retire again and elect survivorship benefits.

By letter of 16 ~lay 1972 fu. Houston advised

Mr. Hunt that to call him back to duty solely for the purpose of permitting

him to change survivorship benefits would be in violation of the spirit of the CIA Retirement Act.

00432.

MORI DocID: 1451843

." :'. ,,-

Sl;:NOER-WILL. CHECK CLASSIFICATION TOP ANa BOTTOM

UNCLASSIFIED

-' '-:

I SECRET

CONFIDENTIAL

OFFICIAL ROUTING SLIP TO

DAn:

NAME AND ADDRESS

., .. •

INITJoAls

1571-5: II?

Inspector General

" '

.".

~..

, t>

2 3

";.,

. '. ..~~~_ .. .. ' ~",

5 I

•

DIRECl REPLY DISPATCN FILE INFORMATION

ACTION APPROVAL COMMENT CONCURRENCE

PREPARE REPLY RECOMMENDATION RETURN SIGNATURE

'~.

. Remarks.

..' :.

, Attached in, chronological order is that which MAG has produced and papers related to Management's reac~':>n thereto on :MAG's concern re domestic activities. It is provided for your review and conunent to Mr, Colby, This is our file copy and t would hope it could be retrieved if required,

".:' .,:.

, :

./7 FOLD HERE "1'6. .RETURN T9 SENDER

......;:;;1-' •

O/ES/CIA MClBen Evans

UNCLASSIFIED

.. ,o~:o. 237 Un previous edit/anI

. : .... •. ,

-. ..

<:ONFID ,

..... ., '. r

. : ~~ .' . .. ",

....•. ,

....

,.'..

~ ~.~.~

• .... C

" ~

.. :

SECRET

•

;

.~;

18Mav73 (040)

... :

O-'l,TE

FROM: N,Il,ME. AC01.RSS AND PHON'e NO.

•

.. • J

MORl DoclD: 1451843

... ,.~.~ _,... '"'::~__.s.::.:...: . . . .:',,:: '.~'

,-_.....

( -,

DIARY NOTES Executive

---_

DirE.ctor-comPtroller~

4.ranuary 1972

1. I met with the outgoing and Incoming MAG Cochairmen. We discussed a number of topics but concentrated particularly on their two most recent memoranda·concerning domestic activities. I expressed slight irritation with their second memorandum, which is a shotgun approach to the problem, and asked them to be specific if they have anything in mind. I said I understand they have heard that we sent a surveillance team to the Democratic National Convention. Mr., . Isaid that-he made this statement because an Office of Security employee' reported in his presence that he personally was a member of a team which went to the Convention.' (I subsequently raised this with Howard Osborn, who after investigating reported back that the Secret Servil;:e asked us for two technicians during the Democratic National Convention. These technicians were formally detailed to the Sec.ret Service and went to Chicago, where they did RF monitoring under the superVIsion of the Secret Service. The Secret Service apparently calls RF monitoring "audio suzvetf.lanc e , II· and it seems that, during the discussion whichtcok place at the Senior Seminar, those who heard this assumed that "surveillance" meant actual surveillance of the candidates, when actually the meeting rooms were' being checked to ensure they had not been bugged. I have reported all this to the Director and shall discuss it with MAG when I have dinp.er with the m on 11 January.) . : ..

., ... : , -r,

"'",

00434. "

MORl DoclD, 1451843 ab"

•

23 December 1971

MEMORANDUM FOR:

The Executive Director-Comptroller

SUBJECT

CIA's ·Domestic Activities

REFERENCE

MAG Memoranda on same subject dated March 1971 and November 1971 .

As requested, MAG met with the DDP on 21 December and discussed with him the referenced memoranda on CIA's covert domestic activities. Our.exchange consisted primarily of . the DDP responding to the MAG memoranda as they related.to. activities of the Clandestine Service alone. The DDP made it clear that he spoke only for his Service. Since MAG's initial concern over covert domestic activities extended to, while not being restricted to, the Clandestine Service, it recommends that the .referenced memoranda be also .brought to the attention of appropriate senior officials in other Agency components.

-I

The Management· Advisory Group

00435

MORI DocID: 1451843 U

~'.-

USE ONLY

ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET

SUBJ'1cr, (Oplianall

FROM.

IXTENSION

DDP

NO.

0...

22 Dec 71 TOl to'ffiear dui9notio." r/)(lm numbar, C1nd.

DATE

building)

kECfIVEO

OFFICER'S

fORW.AADE[)

INlTlALS

COMMENTS IN"mb'::_!!"~~ to ,hOW' ('om who.. to wh~ a ~no cetos'S

)

-I. Executive Director

mn ofr",.oddJ cornmlll\lJ

BY HAND

. 9.

10.

11. 0.' " .:

12.

, . ,

13.

14.

fORM 3-62

00436

. E3 EQIIFIBEtlTlAL

o HHERHAl OlllY USE

o UNCLASSIFIED

---------------MORl DoclD: 2451843

21 December 1971

.lv£EMORANDUM FOR: Executive Director-Comptroller SUBJECT:

Meeting with lvrAG Group

j I

1•

1. I met with the MAG group this morning for little over an hour, and I set forth as candidly as possible those counterintelligence and counterespionage responsibilities of ours ove r s ea s which make it mandatory for us occasionally to take an interest in American citizens overseas. I explained the r equd r erne nts placed on us by the Department of J'us ti ce for over s ea s checks, and also the fact that our normal oversea's operations against Soviets and others some times produce leads, to Americans in conspiratorial contact with our Communist targets. 2. I was asked about our having sent Agency representatives to the Democratic National Convention in Chicago in 1968 and I explained that I never hear.... of such a thing and did not believe it. I pointed out that, as they knew, the press had reported fully on the Agency I?articipation at the beginning of the 'sky marshalling program and I assumed they saw nothing wrong with this. They agreed. I also pointed out that, at President Kennedy's funeral, with scores of important foreign personalities here, the Agency lent some assistance to the Secret Service, and here again the group understood that this was a legitimate function. 3. The group made it clear that their concern was over the Agency image if the g eneral public were aware that some of our activities, 'wherever they took place, were targeted against Blacks. I said that we did not target against Americans of any color in this country, and that the 'Clandestine Service was color blind when it came to carrying out its overseas .CI, respunsibilities and it would continue to be so.

~" ....~-."

~ \,~t.j': '; t,;

.1 ....

------

00437

MORl DoclD:

. .. • ,

1~51843

4. . I agreed that the Director should be asked to speak a little more fully and clearly on whether we "target against American citizens" so that there is no am'biguity.

5. I told the group tha-t we must expect all kinds of irresponsible accusations in the press, ,such as the one in the January 1972 issue of RAMPARTS magazine in which Bob Kiley and Drex Godfrey, it is suggested, are still in the "lmploy of CIA working on a' crz, plan to improve police organizations in this country. I said that this, was palpably false as anyone who knows Kiley and Godfrey would . understand. The group mentioned Dick Ober's unit and said that there was a lot of scuttlebutt that the purpose of this unit was to keep book on Black Power adheren!"£". I denied this saying that our interest was as I had explained it previously.

6. I do not know whether this is a fair as sumption, but Dick Ober's machine program is 'not handled in the Clandestine Service and it is possible that someone is misreading and misinterpre~ingthe intent of Ober's program from fragmentary bits and pieces that may' be discernible from the handling of the machine program. I do not state this as a fact because I have not examined it that closely. 7. I told the group that: I had offered to enlighten it candidly on what We do so that they v "ju1d at least have the facts and I said that I assume you would take it :from here;

TlH~ ~. .:::-:-.

Thomas H. Karamessines Deputy Director for Plans

00438

MORl DoclD: 1451843 "

JJEMORANDUM FUR:

The Director

THROUGH:

The Execut~ve Director-Cbmptroller

SUBJECT:

CIA's Domestic Activities

REFERENCE:

MAG Memorandum, "CIA's Domestic Activities," March 1971

1-. MAG is seriously concerned about possible repercussions which may arise as the result of CIA's covert ,domestic activities •. Public revelation that CIA has become involved in collecting infonmation on U.S. citizens would likely redound to the Agency's ·discredit and jeopardize overall Agency programs;

2. MAG first expressed its concern-about' CIA's covert domestic activities in a memo for the DCI, transmitted through.the Executive Director-Comptroller in the Spring of 1971 (Attachment A). 'MAG's concern has increas~d recently because of such ar1::il.c,le!S 'as Vic lfarchett,i' s UPI interview (Attachment 'B). and the 10 October New York Times article concerning rupture 0:£ FBI-CIA relatiOiiS""(Attachment C). Both hint at extremely sensitive Agency involvement in domestic activities. ,Additionally, 'the DCI.addresses to the American Society of Newspaper Editors (Attachment D) and to the CIA Annual Awards ceremony (Attachment E) make rather categorical denials OI Agency covert targeting on U.S. citizens. Agency'employees aware of the various sensitive operations in question know that there is, qualify"ing language explaining CIA involvement. However, lfAG believes that in the event of an expose, ·such esoteric 'qualifiers will be lost on the American public and that there is probably nothing the Agency could say to alleviate a negative reaction from 'Congress and the U.S. ,pUblic. It 15 MAG's fear that ~uch a negative reaction.could seriously damage our Chngressional relations, effect our ,work against priority foreign targets and have significant impact on the viability of CIA. ' ,"

There are indications that the Agency, in responding

to'CE/eI requirements, is collecting information on selected

---,---_. .. _.-. ,"

,00439

...

MORl DocID: l45l843 "

7't)~l .1.. "

U.S. citizen; both at home and abroad. In operational areas which are highly sensitive and potentially explosive (e.g., domestic radical or racial groups) this Agency must carefully weigh the needs and pressures for collecting and maintaining this information against the risk and impac~ of revelation " should the operation become compromised or public knowledge. We therefore urge that all domestic collection and action programs be severely reviewed so that only those be continued which are of the highest priority and which absolutely cannot be undertaken by domestic agencies. CIA should not take on requirements.of this type by default. 4. Not all of the members of MAG are privy to CIA's direct or indirect involvement in domestic activities. Those who are aware probably know only parts of the whole picture. But our increasing concern and our intense interest in maximizing the Agency's abi1ity to do its proper job, impel us to bring our "serious apprehensions to your attention. ,

,THE MANAGE1IENT ADVISORY GROUP

" ": ~

.".

-: ..... , ,

.. "

, , "

. . ,. 2

. .," .,

•

".l.

. ,.

'"::.

00440

MORI DoclD: 1451843

Attachments B, C, D anq E .

..\

'Attachment J - Vic Marchetti's UPI Interview, from U.S. News ana-Wor1d Report, II October 1971:

. , .. '~Fear.ing: .today .that. .the .CIA may already have begun going against the eI)emy wi.thin '. .t ha..Unit.e,d. St.ates as they may. conc.eive .it.,...-ctha.t. .is.,.. .d issident student groups and civil-rights organizations ••• " I

"Because the men of the Agency are superpatriots, he said, it is only natural for them to view violent protest and dissidence as a major threat to the nation •.. ~he inbred CIA reaction,. he. said,..w,ould .be..t.o. .Launch a clandestine . operation to infiltrate dissident groups. That, said Marchetti, may already have started to happen. 'I don't have very much to go on,' he said. 'Just bits and pieces that indicate the U.S. intelligence community is already targeting on groups in this country that they.feer-to be subversive. 'I know this was being discussed in the halls of the CIA, and that there were a l't of people who felt this should be done.' " Attachment C - New York Times, 10 October, '.'FBI-CIA Relations:" .~'Information generally exchanged .bet.w.een ~he FBI. and the CIA might concern such subjects as offic.ers of ..t he .Black ... Panther party traveling overseas ••• and American youngsters cutting sugar cane in Cuba."

Attachment D ,.. DCI Address to the American Society of Newspaper Editors; "And may I emphasize at this point that the statute specifically forbids the Central Intelligence Agency to have any police, subpoena, or law-enforcement powers, or any domestic se~urity functions. I can dssure you that except for the normal responsibilities for protecting the physical sec~rity or our own personnel, our facilities, and our claSsified information, we do not have any such powers and functionj we have never sought any; we do not exercise any. In short, we do not target on American' citizens."

.- ---_._;.." -_.. .... ,,-._- . ~

00441. ..-

...

MORl DoclD: 1451843

. .- •..

, Attachment E - DCI Address to CIA Annual Awards Ceremony:

"1 gave a talk to the American Society of Newspaper Editors last' winter, as you know, and I did it for only one . purpose. Th~~ was to try and put in the record a few of these denials that we've all wanted to see put in the public record for some time. And you can rely on those denials. They're true, and you can use that as any text that you may need to demonstra.te. .that .w.e.'.r.e.. no.t. .in .the. dr.ug .tr.ai.fic., .and that we're not..tr.y.ing to do espionage on American citizens in the Unhed States. II

,. •

I -1

,:,"

...

•

0044Z .----- r--0' .

0"" ,.,

"",".

MORI DocID: 1451843 ,~

I +

'.(

,. '0

.'''._

25 March ~971 I

-v.: j

., -: -.\

'nffiO'J(;l-I

: '.'

, SUlJJECT

..,

WIG is concerned tho';:; CIA avoid 1nvolt";Jr;;:1l,"v 1n tIl<! om-rent C:tpODO or the (]o~5'~!Q in~1l1~1l~ cct1v1.ticll of t2~ ,A."-'..r!/ and

H~ b::;liev.~ t~t t..lJcl~~ C,;,.~ eli\. . .activittes s1r,:d1.e.r to tho.:=.;:] turr l;j"el~ -CCl~r:.iny il~C:l cou.ltl ~nt ct:ib<l.rrasG~nt ..~ \ib Jl!'~\)nc'J" U:!ccu.ao ~h;::.lu ~\..oc.z to .. eauso C""u 01 J ... . . cJ:caed tho'scapo o'Z the CLtl C}10r-~~. ~p~ ZO~ ~ Aeo~:r'o ",' statuto;ry Cr:./CI l:'€lSpoll':l'lbilit:tO:J. Jo".i!,G OP-p:JSall ,0..."7 ,!10~:; act.ivity which could be con~:rt~..:,:)a as ttU."~\:d o.(;:2~...at a:a:! porson 'Who enjoys the .P:;.<Otcc"~ion cft tr.:t US C~13tittr~:!CJ."1. -- , .

. othel" "fel1c.l:a.1. nzenc·lc3.

i I

;. I I

, I

-j !

l , , I

, !

•

'IIhcthor or no~ he :reo1dea m 'i;3o li<1i~d Sto:'1lO0. E;-.cO);i~,in' , , t.',03G callas cJ.eorly J.'Olate:!. to n:;'i;:!,on:U. G=ity. r..o US c:1t:t~cn sho'.LI.9- 00 tho ob.,cou c:? CIA OPOt'O~-:tCl19. l-To t'cclt!:O tho!; on ccceeton tho Jlscncy 'tim (iC'J'Ulop fm'o~~"::\;1cn 01:04";; SOr09 citi::c!n '",ho is ()!!~Il ill cc"(;:lvitioB in'Laical. 't~ too interests of: 't!P Unit:::f S'~:t. Su.c..":1 infortz.:::l.",ic;} C~,,"l qu1olt!J" l~ tUl"':'~ ove~ to "~ha pl"o~r C!&3l1C~05 o~ €pv'"a~Ii'~ '£O~ flJ.?t~er n(ltton~ even 11: So'/: IllOa::lO tUu'l; co=tiroa on occ;on1;:!,~ home--ol'iom:ad nzerlcy may b nol::Jd to ,psI.-i'= in 0 llmttcd operllttolla.l cll!?=1'1:.y OVO~·3CM.

I'! '

:r:e t~e do not puroua suell Q 00"....;'00 ~ <ma' day ~ pu?;>l1c " end the 'Cono;ro.s5 ",il1c:a~ 'to have (;l'OVU oau'l;l;s obou:';; cw,"l'Olo in (;OVCJ:'ll:,1Ont~ arrl ,.my lJovc:;;;JIy NlT.:,d.at C1ll" obU1t7 to pCl"tort I thoso to'll,,, p.-olPl-1y =<li~d 'to CIA. , "" , '-"

SEClli:,'X/SEl':SI'!' :t'

, L

'".':.. )1

:. :..":.. ; . ! , :..~ :

.. ..

••ro, • •

i ",~,

:.,'

00443.'

MORl DoclD: 1451843

, '. . . '

(

21 j\PR 1912

Depubf Db:aclor lOA Intellizencs Deputy Diredor for Plans Deputy Di.:ractar £01' Sttpport De;uty Director £o:r Science and Xechnolo,gy Hea,h ot ind"penden1: Offices

ME.:vroR.!\NDUM FOR:

(For Distribution to ome"/Division Chief L"v~l Only)

SUBJECT

CLI\. ~'1..ctivitias in !:he Unit..d States

1. Fro= tbna to t:i:ma S . = e of 0lU' employees express cOlJ<:ern. over various alhgatioJ:1s or :rumors of CI.'I.. activities b 1:>'l.a United States. Tile attached =-e=o:ra.nd= is designed to clarL'Y this subject 8-0 thatllU?"r-;isor", can aul:horita.tiV'~lyreply to any employa<>s ind,icatU1.g such conea=. It is 3. state=ent of the facts 01 the siJ:ua!:ion. Ii incidents or activities are reponed wbich app.aar to ~o.n:flict w.tfu this' st:Lt:a~',. they ~hould be :rapor~ed to appropria-ta.senior aUth.ority lor :;:esolution (or correction if unauthorized aeti'Vi!:i..s· r.night have occurred). " . '

2. Because of the" pos'sible 3=sitivi!:'.! oX-this dailc:dption ox ilie Agency's m.ethcdology~ this m~=r=d=is not being given the usual broad clrcula.iion 0.£ ilia "FYI -- Al.lagation3 and AnsWers" se'des. Ollice and DivLlion Chie!s are urgad, :however. to usa it to Worm Branch Chief" so tha.t its pOints can be ~ea.di.ly,available to supemso:rs to ~eact' to expres:ai ona of e=ployee C011~am. . '

E. Colby' E:;:e-eudve Director-Co=ptroller At'"..ach=ent

wEcll Distr~n: o 1

DDI . Each Other Addressee: DDP D/DCI/IC' DDS n!PPB DDS£<T ONE

A/DCI (Thue.rrner} SA VA USIa Secretary

aGe

OLC 1

MORl DoclD: 1451843

< ....

;... :~.;, . ;' j v .....· ~_""

. .: ~

.. "

•

(

ALLEG'\TION: L'1 a va.riety of ways it has been alleged that CIA is working within the United States, with particular attention to,e::d:remist groups. FACTS: 1.

Section 102 of the National Security Act of 1947, subparagraph

D3, states, liThe Agency shall have no police, 'subpoena, law-eniorcement

powers; or internal Steurity functions." .' In his speech to the American Society of Newspaper Editors on 14 April 1971. tha Director stated: "l can assure you that excapt for the no=! responsibilitias' for protec~g the physical 'securi~ of our own personnel; our facilities, and our classified inio:;:m.a.tion, we do not have any auch powers and functionsj we have never sought ~ny; we do not exercise any. In short,. we do not target on Arile:rican dHzens."

In the Dire;ccor l s t1S1:a.te of ina Agancy1J speech to employeea on .17 Septel'Ilbe,r. 1971, he sa.id: . "I gave a talk to the AIneri= Society of Newspauer Editors • • last winter. as you know, and I did it for' only one purpos e, That was to try and put in the record a few of these denials that we've all wanted to see put in the publie record for some time. And you can rely on those denials. They're true, and you can use that as any text that you = y need to demonstra.te that we're noj in the drug traffic. and that we're not trying to do espionage on AmezIcan citizens in the United Sb.te3~ and we're not tapuL7lf1 telephone lines, and that we're not doing a lot of other things which we're accused of doing. One of the things that tends to perpetuate some of these silly ideas are jokes t..~at a:;."e rnade about the=. particularly about dom-estie. espionage. Although the jokes have no ba ai s in fa ct they neverthela33 give us a, nama which we don't de s eeve, I don't say that that rnakes all tl--.-a.t much diff~rence, but it does ~ke some differenca,: and this tends to spill over, so I would like to suggest that if you have it in your hearts to do-ao that you speak up when the occasion arises and try and set the fa.ct~ straight. II •

_..

00445

MORl DoclD: 1451843

,J.. .

" 'j~l:j' t........ '

(

•

From ti=a to r;..=e aozne e:mployees have been concerned that .A;:s~:ncy activities mlght: conOid: vrith th.esa at.ataments... They can be a s sur-ed fhai: Agency activli:i:as do no~ For cla.rific3.ll01l? some a cti:vi. tie a ~vhicb m:a.y have bean subject to ~SU!lda:t:3tandin.gare listed as follows; -,

a, Do=~,..!:ic Contact". The Dome"tic Conb.ct Service establishes discreet but overt ralationshipa "\mt..~·.Arn,ericanpri~l?t~ citizen,:" cODXalercial3" acad.em.ie and other organizatfons and reslde:u:- allena for the pu.:rposes of collecting on a voluntary basis foreign ln~e11igenc", iniorrr'-ation OJ:' soliciting fueir cooperation in asslating the Agency to perloot"""" its mission. oversaas. Records of the ih.dividuah and o2'ganizations cooperating with the Agency are =a.intain-a4 as a necessary practical el==t o£ this: procesa. b. Security Investigations." SeCtU"ity investigations are con~ duceed on prospective e=plo~es, contractor", and consultants,". and on se.cu.rity p:robiem3 which arise, These investiga.tions invol..-e a wide :ta1'..ga of investigative pzccedus-ea; inc1ui!ing neighborhood inquiries, checks with othe.:l." ·Gove:rn=.ent agencies, renew of credit report.\!, and int==rviews :with .ronner employers and business a.ssociates. This is eS3ential to aS3tU"e that ouz- pe:t"son..""'lel po aae s s a high degree of pe::-sonal..integrity, sensa ot ·responsibillty~. and compet<mce and t~ protect classified iniorn-.ationa:ud sensitiv.. intelligence sources and :methods. The resu1l:in.g'illea ara held seo. arataly by the Office Of S0Cu..-i~/ 3J;ld are not merg';ld with omsr Agency files.. .

c.. Forei.g'U R-eaourcag. On some oc-c:asions.. f02"eign citizens ·of interest to CL.~ are contacted and :recr'llited in j\~-erica for '\VO:i:'k. abroad. The pu...-pose of this a(:tivityi~ entirely restricted to the AgenC'"f's foreign ~e:rati~3. ., d. Recruil::::nent. CIA. recruit<>rs maintain a wide vane!;!; of contacts within the Unibad States, assisting indi,,'idui.ls interested in employ:=ant ,nth CL"'- to 1"""," :more about it and. to jo1., its e:mp'loye e force.. . e. Contractin:;t. b the course of CIA bualnes s and operations,. a nu...1'llb~r 01 con~racts for'p:;:,ocurement", resea1:"ch, or analysis az-e made with a ',ari.ei:y of U.S. companies and individuals. This in no ""flay con3tltub~3 operations in the U. S. but :rather secures t-~e assistance o! fh ese groups i.::l carryL~g out th~ Gr.-\. mission ag3.insl: foreign targe~s.. . -2-

00446

MORl DoclD: 1451843 r ..... <~ • ,

• ....

(

....... "' ..

i.. Operati.:Ju3.. The 1967 Katze":1bach Cornzni.tce e report -was ", a.pp::oved by the Dh-e:;:to't' in Ma'rch 1967 and ig.bind;ng on any of our :tala:tio!ls willi American organizations today, It specifically proHbi~s ccvez-t :f5.narici3.1 assismnce or support. direct or L'ldil:"ecl;, to any U. S. educa.tional or priVate voluntary organizaHon•. Any . ' 'f' an _A ' reIa . tlons..t.J,.J"p or ope:ra~on th-e·A geney.nas w:u:a me:r1.can orgam• ... za.Hon :m.ust be and is within these guidelines..

l-'

g. Details or Loans. On rare occasions. details of technically qua1;6ed CL'\ personnel, technical advice , Or loans of CIA equipment have been znade available to o!:her U. S. agencies at their reqrn>st to as sis! them to carry out their responsibilitie,s. An example is the skymarshal program, in which. some CIA personnel were te=p<>rarUy detailed to th5 FAA in 9rder.to assist in a rapid init'l.ation of tha~ program. SUch personnel al:td. equipment are under the ope=til:>na.l control of the receiving agency. Assistance of this :nature in no way constitnl:eil an assumption of responsibilit>f or authodty by CIA for the progTa=.

h. Counterlntelliqence and,Drll,lls. To C3:t'ry out its responsibilities Ior counterintelligence. Cr.... is interested in th.. activities of foreign nations or intelligenC'e serric·es adznad a.t the U. S. To 't.':le ''e:<:l:ent that these activities lie outside the U. S•• including activities ai=-a<i at the U.S. utilizing U.S. citizens Or other a, they fall within 'CIA's reapo=ipilities. Responsibility for coverage oE the activities within the U. S. lie3 with the FBI. as an inte:rnal security function. CIA's responsibility and authority are limited to the foreign intelligence aspect of the prob1=. and any action o:f a law emorcement or internal security natm:e lie" \vith the FBI or local police fO:t'ces.· (CIA's, assistance to"the U.S. Gove:rnment p:rogr='agaj~st narcotics and drugs is handled in the sarrie fashion. ) i. Operational' Support.' To support Cr.'\. operations, 'arrange:rnents are :made wi~ various U. S .. busmess or other entities to provide cover or othar support for GL;\ personnel or activities abroad. Tills can include propriel:aries,formed Or conl:1:o11ed by CL-'\.. While these = y e..>ist wi!::bin tile U. S•• their purpose is to , conduct or s1..'ppon operations abr-oad, .. -. . j; Defectors. As provided by le.w8~.o<5iiiio~giresettles in the U. S. defectors and other foreign individuals of opeJ;'ational interest. This rese·~l-emen'c:tnayinvolve' a new identity, relocation, ernployrnent,P etc. Alj:hough this 'activi.ty f:q.kas place in this countr-y, its pU:-pOS6 is t:he support of operations abroad. '

-3-

00447'

MORI DocID: 1451843

j'-'('. c' F~"w ., .\. :•.-V"SIFU'O '10::' •

I S}:Crn:T

OFFICIAL ROUTIKG SUP D.~TJ;"

NAM=--' ANO ADDRESS

I 'ro

,l)E<-;TlAL

_.-.r- .. ~.-

'-;;.

INITIALS

MAG Co-Chairmen

i ,~

I I 5

APPROVAL

DIRECT REPLY DISPATCH

CO:riME~T

fiLE

to:iCUlHtEiiC~

INFORMATIOII

,~CTION

PREPARE REPLY RECOMIolEHOATIOII RETURN SIGIIATURE

II f

Remarks:

For MAG review and ret~rn·. Please

do not reproduce.

.-:

II I I'

:j I

FOL.D HS:RE TO Po:

",,..,'

FROM: HAMe. ADOR~SS AN

'O/Executive Directo

U~CLASSIFIED

237

I CONFIDENTIAL I

I SECRET

"i?

(40)

u~~ pravio'Ji editions

I ..i

00448

MORl DoclD: l45l843

(

· .. .'

.. :;

.~,

;...

J,).;}PUty D1 t"·~ctor io--:- In~-alli.'J~nc ..:! .2~!Juty DiJ":::c~or for 213::\3

D:'lpr.lty Dl.?~ct.,~ :lor Su?"por"t

Deputy Di:i:':?:c'z':)r for Sclenc e and ::rechnotoSj Ganeral COll.n3al I:ls'fH!ctO? Gene,rsl As ststant to the Di:cector

.i\.llag3!:ion of Agency Invoi:vem-enl: in the \1. s.

SU.3JSCT

1. The~ran;og"=,,nt Advisory Group, =008 oth"r:>,. has' creport'Od on ilia concezna of aorne employ"'''" t1:at tha Aga=y is vulnerabla to the cr.a.rge of having an operational inter'3'st in.U.S... citizens or organizations in viohtion oi fua National Sec=ity _'\ct. A~..3,ched is =y bast ~de r"t3:nding or the £acts. I! it is in ",;:ror 0:r)iicomp1"te. I ask tha.t you let-·m.!> know orally or in wrHiog..· ° °

2. ! h.,we d.."'afted til" attached with two pu~';;e9 in'mbd: First; ·::ts a basi:s tor some type o! Is suance t..~t 'J7ould ad"li.:le the command li:!e and senior sup~rv!ao:rs of policy and £ac-:a "and, se cond;" a"S a !!:.t~re i""ua 01. "FXI -- Allegations an;d .=\:::!.s·~e:ril."· 1 look lorY-lard to your co=enl: in tha not-too-ill sb.:J.l: futura befoxe it is fo.=lly <listrib.uted."·

.JiVE:C

vr. E. Colby E:'{e<:unve Dir·ector-Co~ptrollel"

At):;\CC,.-;:icN () I

.!5XUI:r I .0 Evan.s

Dis ,,,ibution: O-DDI 1 - Each other a.ddz-e s s ee (]I- £.:·:Di_r 1 - ER

~~~ -, ~ ~~l... vv--' ..:r y<: v ;. l>-<- It..

0.. v-. ~

~ "" 0"., v--e. cI. .,'" J;'~ \roc;.1 ~"...v---' ";;)-. \.

.... .... "

••.,• .. . . . " - . ~.I

Cs"'-.,

v"\ \"'- \. ),-

\-\ <11,

00449

MORl DoclD: 1451843

(

';! YI -~;iarch 1972

.AL 'LEGA 'TIO:N:

1."1 a --l'a.:-iety of ways it haa be an all.e.:5ed that Cl.'\ is worki.ag ·vvithin the A :cacent axam -cl.e wa a in the O..lick3ilvar Times of. 20 JaRUa:i:;'( 1972 (attached)*. . '.

"U~"'I.it-ed States,) \vit~ par ctculaz- attention to ext:'amist gz-oup s,

F.ACTS: 1.. Saction 102 oi tha National Secu:t"ity Act of 1947;t 3ubpa:ragra::>A D3, states, "Th·~ Agency shall have no police, subpoena.. law-eruorczmen't powers, or interr.af secFity func:t~ons. "

1nhis speech to the American Society of Newapaper Editors. on 14 l\prU 1971, the Director stated:

"I can as;iu:;:e you that except for the normal reaponsiblliti,es for protaciing the physical secu:dty of our own pe:rilonnel, our . facilitias" and our clasailiad information, we do not have any such powez-a and functionsj we hava nevar sought any; we do not ex·arc:\ae any. 1.7], short.,. we do not targe"c on AmezIcan citizens. fI Ln the Di:;:ector 1s '~3tate of tha Agency-II Speech to ernpkoye e a on 17 September 1971. he daid;

"r gave a taLl,; to the American Society of Newspaper Editors rast ""inter, as you know, and I did it for only one purpose, That was to try and put in the record a few 01 these denials that we've all wantedto 'see put in the public record for some ti.--ne. And you can r~ly On thosa demafa, Th'ey're true,; "and you can use that as any te:tt that you may need to.d~r.non$trate tha.t \va1re not in the drug tozaffic .. and that .\ve'xe not trying to do espionage on Amez-Ican. citi-. zeus i:l the United States" and \v'e're not tapping telephone lines, arid that \~elre not doing a lot of other thing3 which '\ve.Jre accused of doing.. One of the thinga that tends to parpetuate some 01 thsse

::;CO~/i~!E.NT:

The two gentLerrren cited a r e foz-rnez- CI:.~ employees.. ::T..:).\~:ter th·~r nor the organizatiou3 with whtch they a r a cur z enrl.y associa.ted ~'::.l.,;.... :~ any operational cormect ion wtth the £-\~~nc1..

".00450

•

MORl DoclD: 1451843

(

•

~i~~y :.c.l:af; a r e jc.:,..-:.1 t:tat et~'L: =~-~':t.c...~ i:.~';jt:.i: th~:"J.1J· p:::'i.-::ict:b.1.7:1r about do me st l c e spio na ge , Altho~1gll ::h~ joke s ha.vo .1.0 ba s i s in £G:.ct· t~ey i ... ,~\··~::·~h~tC:ss give us a narr;e '\;:'!.... iCi.1 \ ..:~ con't dC:38:!."Ve. I coc t ;: ~iar ::hr.l~ th;.t.~ mak a.11 d.ifi.:.::=~:l"'.. i;: t:\ak~ c:H:£fereace l , and 'this t e nd s to spin 0\"(;:-, 50 I would like to S\.1gg~3t tha.t if '/01,.1., have it in your he;;l..ri:$ to do so that you speak up when the oc ca s ion arises and try and S6t: the fa.ct s straight.. II cs

.thn.:';;

much

bat

oe s

so m

Fr-orn time to time some: e:nployca:3 have been. conce rn..e n that

..~\gi};".CY' activities might conflict vJ-ith t-:tc Nationa L Security Act. ana the

Ag13ncy ls staterne nt s , They can b e a s s ured that Agency activities do not , For clarification~ 50n1.~ activities wb.Lch may ha.v~ been subject to mi.aunderstanding are listed as £0110\'/5: a) Security rnvestigatio~s. Security investigations are conducted On prospectiy~e employees" contz-a.ctoz-s , and consultants. They involve neighborhood checks on the ba.ckg::-ound of th.ese indivich,lals. This is essential to. meat the se cuz-Ity r-eou.iz-erne nte of the Agency, . 0 The :resulting information is held in separate security office files and not m.erge.~ in other Agency :iiies. ~

b) Domestic Contacts.. On a n overt ba.sis the" Domestic Concact Service m ako s visits to Arner ica.n pz-Ivat;e citizens,) firrns~. and othe r or ganiaat'iona, soliciting tr a.nsmts s ion to the Govern:ment of iciormation they ha.ve learned ab r oad , The purpose and content of the information are restricted .to,for:eign intelligence:) i ... e ... ,) inte~ligence on devalouments abroad. The records of the firms and individuals as . . . . sources are mainta.ined as a purely practical element of this collection process. °

c) Foreign Re s our ce s , A VZ11.·lGr.y of .foreign citizens of inter~'st to CIA visit 0::: on oc ca s ion reside in Amez-Lca, Occasionally they- a;e contacted and rec~uited for woz-k abroad in th.::: course of travels to their homeland oz- for continuing collaboration w ith t4e, Agency in t~eir homeland ct.Eter their return from the U. S~ Tha .purpo5e of this c.ctivit:y is entirely r e ste lcted to the collection of fo r e ign intalligence .. d) Rc c r uitrme nt , CIA recruiters maintain a \vicic. ·-.. ·;:~:.·iety of contacts v/ifhin the U:-.. itad Sta~es end..::avoring to assist individuals interested in. employment w ith CLI\ to Lea r n rno r e about ir. and to join its e mp'loyc e fo r c e ,

-2.-

00451.

MORI DocID: 1451843

(

, " "

. .

" ,

(

Co.:':tr;l(:1:i:n.~..

In the CQU.:;>3a oi CL\. busine s a ~}.nd o~~:::ai:l:>n3" oi c o nt r a.c t s £0:- p:tocuri:tma,n.t, ~e3ea.rch, or ana.ly::l13 aze lnai~ voJith a va~iety o.{ U...~~ companle a a~d incli·,.idua.13.. 'I'hi3 in no t,VJly ~:::Jrt-=Jtitute9 o~~a.HO!!3 in the U.5. but :t'n.t;le~ secuz-e a tha L133i3t:).":'l.:a oi the ae ~p·OU?:; in ca'CI'yi.':l:~ ouc tha CL~ rn i s a iori of ior~ign i:1tel.:!. :1~l:nba:r'

i) Ope::atlona.. The 1967 X<atzanbach Com::n.ittee rep0:l:"t "';:Fa:) .=3.??.l~o...,~d by the Dt~ecto:r i:l i'Aarcb. 1967 ana is bi~ding on an'! at ouJ: :raln:tio.n.s '.vHh American o:ga.'-';·,t;atio·na today, It speciiic?lly probibiG3 cover t financial .r),-33i.:;.ta,"ce O~ support;, direct 0::: ir::.dlrec1:" to anY' U .. Sa

ec.ucational or priyat.a volunta.ry o:gacizacion. A-:ay ~el:?.tionsbip o» op-e,,'"ation. the: .Agen.cy has with a!?' _!\r:lal"ican orga:::.i3a.tion rnust be and is \vithi.:l these guicl~li:J.es~ ~

g) Details 0,," Loaeaa, On rare occasions, details or technically. quali£bd CIA par'3oncel or loan" oi CL~ equipm.em have bean rnad e to othe~ "GO' s. agenci~3 to a'Sais'l: ilJ. the ca.~:ryi:o.g out of ~~ai:r res"p<>::t.sibili __ tiS3.. .An ej(~-nple is the skyr;::.arshal prog:rmn to which some CL-\ personn~l ,,"V"s·re detalled in order to assist in a :rapid initiation· or ,t"P...ai: .. prog!:Xtn.. A~si3tance of this nature in no ';:lay cona.titute9 a3sumption. of respo.tl.3ibility or authority by CLt\ io::: tha p:rogl"anl'~

a..n

h}. !":.ounterL'ttelligence. To carry out its respon3ibilllia 3 :for cott:li:::1rini:alli:,z-a;cca'. CL~ i3 intaxa3ted in tha activities of ior.ei"7D. na., '" ~ion3 or intelligence saryices a.L-nad at tha U. S•. To the e:'(tant that the acth-itias Ii", outside the' U. 5., including adimid" ah;aed at the U.S..." utiliz.ing U. S.. citizan3 or oi:heJ:s, it :fall3 wit'hin CL.~ 13 :responsibilinas. Re3pon"ibiUty fdr cove rage of L'le <\ctivitias wil:1lin the U. 3.' lias with the FBI,. it iJ:!.-;01v33 an int:ernal· gecu:dty function. CIl\ 13 :respc.n3ibllity and authority a2:'8 limited t·o tea: foreign int.alligence a apect of tha problem and any action a law enforcement OJ:"

interu.a.l $ecu~ity na.tuze lieSl \vith the FBI.or lo_ca.l police fOl"ces ... i) .Deredo.ea. As provided by law,' CIA occ:aaionall:r >:esattle" in the U. S~ d~fector5 and othar forei3n individual3 of operational ip.ta~ast, Thia r8:.:rettleme!lt m.ay in-.,rolve their aS3ump.tion of a new identity, loca-tion of employment, e tc; Although thi3" activity takes place i:a. this country, its pUXp03.03 i.:; the suppoZ't a! ope-ratio!la abroad..

3. -

00452

MORl DoclD: .1451843 "

(

As a pal"t of GLi\ o:;>al"i.\tions abroad, a>:rallg,.m~i1t~ a r e l\1~\cla vJit'b. a numbe z- of U~ 3 .. enti.i::e.a to Se?v~ as tha ost:.::n.3ibl.aj)

GOY"~.

..,

·.00453 ,. ....

MORl DoclD: 1451843 "'.... ,,!.;...."'•• .u.i-l.l., J;:';;'\

",~'="'"

•

.l,..J.....~

20 Jan 1972

(

j ....~_.J:._. -.- "'--":.'""r~,";''''';~'!"'''•. ~ ..... - •

..e

~'.:

•

..-.} . ...... ..-..... r

:'-.

.:;; of

. .;. ~....:: ... "

." J

1 yalL d

\\',,-f1A) D baC(~ (l I"~

CIA\ The .. Central ihtellige;:~c Agency c lvays insists its non. aren't in- .

T:..:() rcar s :l$:v etA C;:"~I\Ort!::'$ ....cr.c

":'''·l";"i ';,' l ',.1::;: ;::~·::h:.:r~ of til c r:hlc:;\~~:a

~.,:

po lie';: Bct.h pe!.·so.:nel shifts a

They I:l'!:l: aher-e tlith·Hel::\s. cere

shown around, a:;d ::aken to the secret .cited by agency peo?le to boHt t~aining cn~rs. ~~at was ~he beginni~g fronts in the US, this time, ~v of 'rumor-s \oOlthin the agency that; "the

into lias given a nev :i.:le z-ecc

CIA ha~be~n.gi~an ~ne go 3h~~d to

oa~ing hi~ head of ell intelli~

srove into dcmes t Ic police operntdons ... end p resunab Iy pro\:'idtn2, htr.: Hi ~~ile everyone d~ni~d it, th~ t~eor/' ~lc~iti~~tc interest in in:arn3! W3S that l:he.CI~ was told

to get the

xadl cnj s ,

.opc~ations. But such sugges=ic~

-bd arcr-Iy denfed all around,

. Two recent personne l changes inc:c~scd s?~culation.

rna second p~rson'nel shift ·lnv.;)!v~d nrexe l G~:dfrt!)·: who ,7:l.s. bud' of the ClA's Ofrtcc cf Cur-rene In:t.:Uir:.::\c~. He quit this hif.r. r.:;;;dn~: jo~.• turuc.l ~~? 1:1 the nar-co t Ics bureau of the .rcs e tce Co:::~t~5if)i~ at l!J.tTio:b"I::~. I'u , T!:~ co:,:·::t~.,t!l:-l i.~ .\::(,l:~cr ncs

_..,•.•.. : 4'" _; .... •••._ ~

"_.

Onc.in~ol~ed

wotved in dceest Ic police work. But in. t-es Ignat Ion of flr:lr.!.'s spcc lu.l es s l stunr , f.:abert Kilo:l:Y. Kiley hand led the Chicn~o CIA nZcn~s have b~cn ~orking studc~t operations through N3tio~~1 v i fh the r:nr and -Trusury. men in an Scudcnt ASSQci:ltio~ fnc:ldes ••fa reeffort to pin the bank bo~~inis on cently turned uc as assoc l ate director' r.dical grot/pi. .. . Ilcrct ofo recc.lundes t Ine CIA pot Ice of the Po l tcc f~ur:d<!t.i.onJ nne..., g:rOU:l ~ lmrk ~i thin the us was center-ed e rcund Idunched ~ita n $30 cillioa F~rd Fo~r.ci~clo~·gr~n~~ ~ne c~ncy is neant counter csp.ion:.l.~c .~f'fOl·t~ ~!;'\.~-!- at~ to be u,ud ~o,i~,rovc local p~licc.

301:i:::t ~Gi;.C tA l.~ili.ntains· sccre e bases in .a1!·:.I~~jCt" US cit.ies.ThP.' agency a.l$Jo has t:-air::r:~: cunps {n Virl:":l~ia and the C.:\I·o! i nas , T:;~~~ at-e e.askcd as regu lc r nl tl::tr:-· b:t.5~$.Sp~okS nee tl"1.i:l~,1 f;")1' <!:\!;j' at h'llli:l.::$h:q:.:"3.

'-.

;_.~

...... 1 ... __ 1

•I

00454

MORI DocID: 1451843

TABLE OF CONTENTS

East Asia Division

Placing Agents in Leftist Milieu _ Cleared with FBI

Central Cover Staff

Statistics on Alias Documentation and Other Cover Support

European Division

Research on Vesco Case

Soviet Bloc Division

Relations with FBI and Local Police

NARCOG

Support to Law Enforcement Agencies Including Information on American Citizens

Division D

International Telephone Links

Foreign Intelligence Staff

Security and Exchange Commission and Vesco Case

Counterintelligence Staff

Agency Funds Made Available to FBI .... Vesco Case t·

Intelligence Evaluation Committee and Staff

"',MHCHAOS CI!Police Group. Foreign Resources Division

International PoFce Academy .Lcc a.t i on s , Recruitments, Use Alias Documents

00455

MORl DoclD: 1451843

B Y

HAN D

5 t---+----~-------------

-----.- - - - -

ACTION APPROVAL COMMENT CONCURREHCE

'FILE IHFORMATIOH

PREPARE REPLY RECOMMENOATION RETURN SIGHATURE

Remarks:

00456 FOLD HERE TO RETURN TO SENDER FROM: NAME. ADDRESS AND PHON£" NO_.

DATE

1 Jun 1973 SECIlET rORI{ HO. 1_0

237

Uso ~"

,u"'...... , ""' .... """, •••

(4<

MORI DocID: 1451843

" . , ' •. f-

';'1}

;

;' ~

"'1":· -- ~-.

-It.·... ~·._,,~ $

''':-

l I L' _- .. \. i.t~.: ~ e II b i:'R ... , .... i

1 June 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR:

Mr. William E. Colby

SUBJECT:

Special Activities

1. Following our recent conversation, I have searched my memory and Mr. Mc Coriet s files for examples of activities which to hostile observers or to someone without complete knowledge and with a special kind of motivation could be interpreted as examples of activities exceeding CIA's charter. 2. First, as we discussed, on 7 March 1962, DCI McCone, under pressure from Attorney Genera 1 Robert F. Kennedy, agreed to tap the telephones of COlumnists Robert S. Allen and Paul Scott in an effort to identify their sources for classified information which was appearing in their columns. Because 'the primary source appeared to be in ·the Department of Defense, McCone ordered me personally to brief General Joe'Carroll, Director of DIA, orally, which I did. I understand more complete information on this operation is available from the Director of Security. I, personally, managed to avoid gaining any knowledge of what precise actions were taken, what information was gained, what was done with it, and when' the operation was terminated. 3.

00457

MORl DoclD: 1451843

. ' ."

n.~t'?

f·

OiU l'

4. Although certain activities never got beyond the planning stage, there are, I believe, three examples of such planning which could be subject to misinterpretation. One involved chemical warfare 0 eratiohs againstl . A e on i vo ed a param1 1 ary s r1 e aga1ns Outside the United ta es overnmen, enera ~&~1~s~e~n~no~w~er was briefed on such planning. A third, which assumes a new significance today, involved a proposal by Angleton and Helms for a greatly increased intelligence collection effort against foreign installations in this country. This planning also involved a scheme for selected

00458

MORI DocID: 1451843

.... ~-~ lot.', c

exposure of KGB activities and counteractions against the Soviet intelligence service, The reasons are still unclear to me as to why the FBI chose to brief the PFIA8 to the effect that CIA was planning to wiretap extensively and indiscriminately' in this country, to greatly increase the Agency representation in the Moscow Embassy, and generally to use KGB-type tactics, also extensively and indiscriminately. This led to a heated exch'a nge between DCI McCone and Mr. Belmont of the FBI, one s~ch meeting taking place in the presence of the Attorney General. It is clear that the FBI was opposed to any such proposal then, as now, 'and the plan never went forward. 5. During the period when Des FitzGerald was in charge of the Cuban Task Force, DCI McCone's office learned, quite by accident, that FitzGeraid had secured the cooperation of several prominent US business firms in denying economic items to Cuba. There was no question but that the businessmen were glad to cooperate, but knowlepge of this operation had to be rather widespread. 6.

1.0 connec ~on nnnC;s"1Cin'--'r<h'1"'-"e'.-"7Tnn-"'''''''''a''y''---T<1cmJHt a mee tin g 0 f ';;.WU'1rF"1'0l0i>F1'o the 303 Committee, it was decided that the offers of American business could not be accepted, it being neither a'secure way nor an honorable way of doing such business. This declaration of policy at this time bears on the recent ·ITT hearings, but I am not surprised that McCone has forgotten thathe helped to set the prec~dent of refusing to accept such collaboration between the Agency's operations and private business.

7. At the direction of Attorney General Robert Kennedy and with the explicit approval of President Kennedy, McCone injected the Agency, and particularly Cord Meyer,

00459

•

MORl DocID: l451843

,6', r; r~ ~~, ~'T' t.!I.·=.~yj;li...<l L

'",:i .~ ~•. ;::' :'",; !i;

6 . . .;·;"M... .: .....,...:.. b ~ .....

C ~. i 'r' l;:~":"!~ . ' .. 5 _ .. 4

into the US labor situation, and particularly to try to ameliorate the quarrel between George Meany and Walter Reuther. Cord Meyer steered a very skillful course in this connection, but the Agency could be vulnerable to charges that we' went behind Meany's back, or were somehow consorting with Reuther against Meany's wishes, 8, There are three examples of using Agency funds which I know to be controversial. One was the expenditure of money under Project MOSES in securing the release of Cuban Brigade 'prisoners. Details of this operation are best known to Larry Houston, Mike Miskopsky, George MacManus, and James Smith. Second, as you well know, when Lou Conein received his summons to report to the Joint General Staff Headquarters on 1 November 1963 a large amount of cash went With him. My impression is that the accounting for this and its use has never been very frank or complete. Th~rd, at one of the early Special Group meetings attended by McCone he took strong exception to proposals to spend Agency funds to improve the economic viability of West Berlin, and for an investment program in Mali. His general position was that such expenditures were not within the Agency's charter, and that he would allOW such spending nnly on the direct personal request of the Secretary of State or the Secretary of Defense, or the White House. 9. r raise these issues of funding because r remember the Agency's being severely criticized by the ,House Appr opr-La t Lons Subcommittee for having spent $3,000 for stamps in connection with a program to buy tractors to secure the release of prisoners from Cuba. 10. Under the heading of old business, r know that anyone who has worked in the Director's office has worried about the fact that conversations within the offices and over the telephones were transcribed. During McCone's

00460

MORI DocID: 1451843

tenure, there were microphones in his' regular office, his inner office, his dining room, his office in East Building, and his study at his residence on White Haven Street. I do not know who would be willing to raise such an issue, but knowledge of such operations tends to spread, and certainly the Agency is vulnerable on this 'score. II.

Also under the headinlr of old business,

I Sh or t Ly after the Cuban missile cr i.s i s , there was

~a~a~:~~s~p~osition in Washington to reexamine the Bay of Pigs,

and the fact that several'Alabama National Air Guard officers lost their lives in the Bay of Pigs was surfaced with surprisingly little excitement at the time. 12. During my stint on the 7th floor there was a special arrangement with the Office of Communications whereby the Director's office gained access to non-CIA traffic. This surfaced eriefly at one point shortly after Admiral Rayborn became DCI. He had visited the Signal Center and removed a copy of a telegram from the Embassy in the Dominican Republic for Under Seqretary George, Ball, Eyes Only. He returned to his office and proceeded to discuss this telegram with George Ball who was naturally quite curious as to how Rayborn knew about it, and also as to how Rayborn had it in his possession before Ball did. Ben Read in the Secretary of State's office and I spent several weeks putting this one to, rest. 13. Finally, DCI McCone, as you and I well know, operated on a very lofty plane, and I think certain of 'his acti vi ties could be misunderstood. One example was his decision in July of 1964 to have Aristotle Onassis and Maria Callas flown from Rome to Athens on Air Force KC 135. Their arrival in Athens in this airplane attracted the attention of the local press and in due course Mr. John

......,." ...

00461

MORl DoclD: 1451843

t._

I .. ,

1. "

. . . , 't'", I' j' r. • .' I. -~"h , ,"rr. .'t.' r~. f~ , 1t'''*'h'l!\'.,' 1::•• c Io:! ,:11.....:.

Hightower, Chief of the Associated Press Bureau for Washington, came to see me to ask about the propriety of this action. 14.

15. McCone dealt quite extensively with newsmen in Washington. In fact, they gave him a gift and a luncheon when he left Washington, which is perhaps indicative of the press's relations with him. However, in the case of the Ross and Wise book, The Invisible Government, he did try to bring pressure on the publisher and the authors to change things. They did not change a comma, and I doubt that this old saw will ever sing again. 16.

17. The above listing is uneven, but I have a sinking feeling that discipline has broken down, and that allegations from any quarter which cast these things in the'wrong light would receive great publicity and attention, and no amount of denial would ever set the record straight. If I may be of any assistance in 'tracking down further details, r am of course at your disposal, ,but I would point

00462

MORl DoclD: 1451843

•

If'

~ ~>:~ ••• ..l\:... i:I .. ,-" t { v ..·...;'f\l~·~ ~,~ ;1

- ' \ • -: ;" ,.. _ :• •

•

'/ 1"" \ ' "

"• •

•

out that I was very much in the position of the enlisted man who knew that the commissioned officers were aware of these activities and better able to jUdge their propriety and possible impact or misinterpretation.

ELDER

i .

~16llu~\\1k W v~U dt!'U Ii Ii li'

00463

MORT DocID: 1451843

1-. '.

--lJ :--. '-~ ... . I

• . _.

J ; .. !:

I--'::'::"~

..- .."..., ... .., ...;. -\ \

•

..: '-'. '-"

l-fE:llORANDUM FOR THE RECORD:

In November 1962 Mr.! ladvised Hr. Lyman Kirkp2trlck that he had, at one time, been directed by /1r. Richard Bissell to assume responsibility for a project involving the assassination of Patrice Lum"f'ba, then Premier, Republic of congo.,' According tol J)oison was to have been tJ.1e vehicle as he _ made reference to having been instructed to see 'J!r. Sidney GottlieJD., in order procure the appropriate vehicle.

\ '".'. "

00461/:

{ .~

," . 0_..

..~,,

0 __._,.

.. ,

MORl DoclD: 1451843

BALTll.!Cf1E 1::::I\,S A~.!ERICP:i1

12 APR 1973

...-."

. The current imbroglio over- the role that" "1he Central InteWge!ls:e Agenr;X tI.rli{ih~ in;'

ternntlcnal Telephone -and Telegraph Co. played (or considered playing) in trying to. block, ~he.' election of Chilean President AI;',

-"ShoUlo 'we protect democratic. (or even un~' democratic) nations "from toralltarian inva.

sian 9r subversion? Should we utilize cunforeign aid to nourish d~rnoctai!~ po!itic-al development :"..as is provldedrn the. Fraser

Jende ~as jrs tanlalizj~z and perplexing as-: .•" Amendment·.tu· the" foreign aid -blll pec~:'Was the erA's cash balance so low' it .' should .we "take astrkrly hands-off ap- J

needed a million dollars from rr.~·T? Did the'.. proach? • , i efA and l!S·Y r~alry. think. they could pu.ll : ',,' . It. asat this point that the lT8·T fracas off some of the stunts contemplated without. . ~ comes -back Jruc focus, and as Ileological the word genlng out and working jnasstvejy- ,'.. shambles- occurs. Let us suppose for a "mo~ in favor, of . ,AJi.t·nde? But unde:rlY.ing this>.':. >-rnent ·th.a.Clhe Chase "'fai1hattan Bank. influbrawl are a series cf very difficult questlon, . enced by.the World Council of Churches and o.r.pr.incipl~, to say nothing ?fdelipltiol1., : . ~~;, black ~i1!(ants•. decided 10 pr01,:ide a cnndult . First" of .alt. -what consntutes. American- . - rc black-Iiberatlon mo v emems m SOUlh Afd·· (publ~c. priyate) lnrerventton In thE.-ioter..,::,. ca, using- itS.busin,:ss connections [~ pro,·ide.; e nal ' affairs ,of .anorher state?· Obviously.,,·' . arms and ether- aid to the revolutionaries, , sponsoring a-revrilutlon (as.Tfddy'Roosevelf. :: ;WnuJd this .be. a·' ebad'' thing? Was it. a -'" .-:-----did to break' Panama loose froni Colombia)'· : "bad" (hmg. when the efA, using a business ~L _ '7 Isat one pole. B,u~ b&!,,":(:en"s:pon~t)rjng revc- . ·.cover. sl!!Pp~d~·i~[O Santo· Domingo the. 1-~ juuons ~n.d tOI,allf eJim. il)ati.n~ ~Il~' Ame.ri::_ .; . ~ea ons use.d to kill the ~rutal dictator. J ru., ~ tan acnvny outside of"the UQHed Slates;" ')1 ~.. (1 don t ·now oW'ne feels about It to. ~ there is a long line on the spectrum, a line . day, Dut m 1901 inc Dommlcan stClt('sman ' -"lhat geLS fU~l:i~r and fuzzler·the- fimher 'you '. ;TUan Bosch thought that intervention was go. ' . ,',' . . - . -'. .' :. tfie greatest -thlng since the discovery DC . Moreover, even doing nothing can be. can:': Amerlca.L" . . , - ", strued as, Interventionr .Egypt's President ",'. . What this comes down to is that Inrerven-. Nasser throught that SecretaryDulles' te:.· , tibn is a "geed' thing when yo~ happenjn ' Iusal to help finance-the "S\~'d; Dam was Javor the cause Involved, but is noickf:'d ,and form of: intervention. and Some years 'ago ' :.: :!ffi.m,?ral.. if )'O.U disappro\'e:of tlie goalS-. A-'. six confee-prccuctng rrations in Latin Amerl-:" . perfectly human response; but hardly one on-, caprorested to the Orgarnzanon of Amerl-' ... \~'hich souryd pubiic policy can be Iclmuiatcan Slates that our refusal to )i~ .coffee. . ed.The thought of :lT8·.T losing its Chilean prices Intervened in their iJifernjl ~f(airs. .'. assets doe-s"~ot bring tears to my eyes at" I would 'argue 1hal Ih~ very eXistence o~ . - lead me to. Wish noe sufi had a supply of ~uil the United SlateS as the ·most powerful" n.a:' poafs in stock. Capitalism. I'm told. invol\:es Hon in Ine world ,aucomatlcallr imervenes·jn '. lakihg ris~s. and Ihe corporation may in the the affairs of every other sHne. N<i5Ser and . end .be re)mbutsed by ,a federal agency set the coffee producers ucre- right: Inaction an op to proride imurance for·such conlingen. our part can hal;e as great an impact as ac~ des. . tion. To take a vivid inslal)ce, if W~ had not 1'\0, ,"-hat bo!he:-s me is Ihe wholh' ad IlflC ~hipned military equipmeAt ID Brhain be~ reaction or Ihc Se:-nme- committee in~·esti,ga[. rore Pe3r.f Harbor, the war for EuroP.e.~ouJd.· ing the maUer. We' would be far beuer' :havf been lost. served by Sen. Church and his col!('a~ucs if f: If wt: accept (hat proPosilion. the futile they spen·t less time b~mg oU[ra~('d "ilnd a arRument over whether .we should intervene little' more :rying to fommialC gC'i1entl ..<-lmom,Hkally goes by Ihe boards. Then W~ guidelines. guid~hn('s Which \~'ould apply 10 ,turn to the hard one: To what (:-nds should South·l\me-rica and SO\llh Africa. to the: just -we (oubliclr ;md privatel)') inrernne? ·and the unjust alike, hqwc\-er defined. '

t.d-1

a"· .

00465

MORl DoclD: 1451843

-0 t;NClASSIFIED

o SECRET

o CONFIL.H1Al

I~ .NAl O USt ONLY

ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET SUBJeCT:

(Optional)

E>/E-fJ o IU'L' 7 I

FROM,

j) rY/ WHj)

DA:7,0~'

v,h£, 1i7

TO: IOfficor dClignolion. room numbe" and building) .

DATE

OFFICER'S INITIALS

RECEiveD

COMMENTS (Numbel eoch CQmment 10 show from whom 10 whom. Orgw 0 line across colVnln ollcr each commenl.)

fORWAlfOED

l.-LG.

!-L--~4--t~~

(Jaw 2.

..-

-:J.

J..~ ~) 11 '1 ~

---.:4.

\ n1',IO! 5.

"'0.

~'~b

~afi"

rI-

E1es ~

I\o\.~ht

Th7$.

1."\ \) C/t.vlt

..!(t. ...-....J e "J,AJ ~l

.l.......

(C-.

\::.t;et.

, 10.

"'- ~ ~ \f\V 7

.lQ.WQ.("3

\~f>\.- i " u - h

-t./t. a..-n:.~

I.A,llU

\.ok ch c:l .....l: }:.."-6..... " ~ lt~.( ~ S ....\,_~~

11.

12:

~l-

~lo1.~

-po~\.0ir\Js. ';

'M,.~·."1tl

~~~.

,. ~ Va,s c.o-. lv-t.. .t..o:.\: ~~ I.~n V'(.CA,., ~..l- .H'W'--

13.

14.

"t..

C\.t ~~ "\ vet~

~~~~.t ~~ ft

IS.

OO~ 66 r FORM 3-62

61 0 uSio:~~"i,~us 0

SECRET

o CONFIDENTIAL O

1.Vv..~~~

l ' ltec-~ w-.. IWU.~ ;;.

If/TERf/ Al USE Of/lY·.

....

o UNClASSIFIED

MORl DoclD: 1451843

: ..... ,;

. , 1.,.

•

. '. ,

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD SUBJECT: Bobert L; Ve s c 0

•

I. 'On 31 JUly 1972!'y/wHD]was contacted by Mr. Jorden • Latin American referent at the NSC. by telephone in order to determine if@KHERALf?!hadany information on Vesco. Mr. Jorden was advised that a check would be made. A file review uncovered \\Q/WHi:'Jcalled Mr. Jorden (31 July 1972) and ihformed him of the rollowing:

a) Vesco was known to us as head of IDS. had recently visited Costa Rica and expressed a desire to settle there. Iii addition. it was known that Vesco V

\'-----------------------~ - b) 19/w1m7also advised Mr. Jorden-that Vesco had come to the attention of1 ~nd they were aware that he was President of the International Control Corporation of Fairfield. N.J. [:.!ubsequently ~as advised that the NSC was making inquiries DDne ve~co. -

---

3.\

k-/-----==-----~-----~---

00467

;

---

MORl DoclD: 1451843

....

o. 00-

.. t, I

. .. 0

, :01 ;

~o I

... 00468 , :..~

. .... -. -.

•

, MORl DoclD: 1451843 ',:..

.; .".

_. .',

YL-Vi\L-1

•. r L __ .......... ~J!.c

-2-

I i

00469 .: ~~-

_0-

•

MORl DoclD: l45l843

.. .'.-.. .

. . ...... ~ I . . Ttt

.->.-

<L.·.;...H :'

-3-

• .,

~~-~-'-

.j ! !

-00470

MORl DoclD: l45l843

'. . -' .

SEC II E T •

0047.1

/ -I

MORl DoclD: 1451843

. ..

J..

'S "-\" h "" \.e.....

H' 7 J

DATE

CHM-f££RbkIN""

.~REGK1NRlDGE-O

'S.;;"'~\II

\;"", l."".t - ~l>\ .... 1:: s\::vJ.'1 o.v..~

""" ..,!'".....

"'rr~.,J

. \.~

"'-ON

U J) A.\&.s W4.>

'~~-t1:,

:;~"~ \

. 'C::{-·::'C.,",,"'·l~

<:to

~).

L\ \.U~ (

.......'" ~~c.{-

1)vo,,'

1) J) SKI

I..'l.>

.r~..A""b--et.-.. .

D RETURN TO:

St!,fI( :,

~~ ~'7 '~,dL

~+-~,~~

00472 L - - _ - - - '

MORI DocID; 1451843

--II

21 AUG 1973

! I

MEMOR~qDUM

FOR:

Director of Central I~telliGence

FROM

Inspector General

SUBJECT

Use and Control of Disguise and Alip-s Documents

Action Reouested:

--_._~---

1. 2~e attached report resulted from our general inquiries into Waterg~te-re1ated issues and contains recommendations in paragraph 9 for your approval. Background:

. ,'.

2. In the course of collecting information on various activities of the Agency with flap potential, we received a number of reports on issuance and use of disguise and alias documentation. The Executive Secretary, CIA Management Committee noted on the face of the ,sUlIllIlary submitted by the Office of Technical Services (OTS) on materials issued by it that it would be interesting to check the reports of other components to see if they matched with OTS issuances. In fact, OTS is not the only compone~t to issue alias documentation, and the review was broadened to include the other issuing components and their procedures for controlling the materials. The attached report summarizes the findings. .

DOnald E. Ch8!D.oerlaln

Inspector General Attachment As Stated Above

APPROVED;

&-r£dl,

DATE; 24 AUG 1973 DATE:

DISAPPROVED:

00473 /

---------------MORI DocID: 1451843

.. .

,\ :l:...--t-

~ .

USE AND eO,/TROL OF DISGUISE AND AlIAS DOCmlE:HTS

1. ~1e policy~ responsibilities, and procedures concerning U.S. docamentation issued to authenticate a f~lse ide~tity used in the Directorate of Onerations &re set forth in CSI (now DOl) 240-)1 dated 23 AUgtl"t 1972. Tnis instruction, a revision of CSI 220~7 dated 12 J.:sy 1959, repr"sents an extens ive uPbrading in the definition of responsibilities a~d in establishing procedures ensur-Ing that each r-equesf has the apj__ roval of a dcs i gnat.ed senior oi'ficial in the component. The current instruction" rur-thezmor-e , requires that each request be routed through Cover and COh'!!ercia1 Staff, Official Cover Branch (eeS/OCB) for concurrence, "Which, in effect, makes CCS/OCB the one component retai~ing complete records and details of eve~ request. There are no other regulatior.s applying to this subject, but i t currently is observed by all compcnent.s , Issuing R~§]?onsihilities and P)'oceoures . 1

Three major componenfis are responsible for issuing alias) disguise. The specific responsibilities are:

doc~~entation and/or

t 18 of lee ssues non acrs oppe acumen S In L-----"rl;naOs-Uw~l~C·h are used exclusively for flash identification purposes. Birth certificates in alias are considered to be a special document and require a uniquely prescribed approval procedure and control. This Br-anch a.l so responds to requests for.disguises.

b·1

issue S ""U"l"'l"v"'e"r>'T'So-'.L"l."c"e"'n"s"e"s'---'w"'n"l"'cb""ar""'e.,t'u':rrryrv-o"a""cJ(v.os'<'tro"'p'"p"'e"d,---;a"'S.--..w"'e""ITlr-as fully backstopped investigative credentials!

c ./

00474

~----------_...MORI DocID: 1451843

3. P~l requests to any of the above three cOF.ponents for ali as document.at.i on or disguise must be by memorandum end must be s~[.lled by one of t,m authorized officers designated by the requesting component. The inst.ruction requires that this approval authority be confined to the chief of the division or staff, or to a senior operations officer specifically designated uy the division or staff chief to exercise this function. Tne request is routed through CCS/OCB for concurrence at which time the requesting signature is verified as being on the approved list and a1.l of the doclli~ents requested are recorded in the OCB file. All requests for, documents to be used in CONUS are then routed to Office of Security, Operational Support Division" Special iictivit.ies Branch for approval and then are forwarded to the componel't which is to issue the documents. I~suing components are required to maintain "controls on ac count.abdLi ty and establish conditions for use of documerrts that they issue. OTS is developing a new computerized system which is scheduled to bec~ne operational in November 1973. Every six mrnlths each component will be given a complete listiQ£ of all documentation and disguises issued to them and they will be required to either justify the continued retention o~ the docrunents or return the~. Compcnent.~on~rols

4. There is no established procedure prescribing how each component is to control the documents issued to it. The instructions do require, hovever-, that the documents will be h""dled as controlled aocuments from t1~ time of issue until thefr ultimate disposition. The general practice is to maintain a record of all doc~ents received within the component, but to issue the documents to the appropriate officers who assume responsibility for hand.l i.ng tbem'properly. There is no evidence of periodic spot checking. At least one area division of the Directorate of Operations follows a procedure which requires that the documents be retained in the front office until needed for an operation, being returned a:rter the operation is completed. On the surface this may appear to be a strict control) but in actuality the documents are retained in "individual packages for each senior officer, and are never Lnspect.ed before they are issued nor after they are returned; in effect, no record accoQ'ltability by the officer is required. Ultimate Document Retrieval

5. Every employee using alias documents is now required to process tbrough CCS as part of his exit-out process for either resignation or retirement. It is at this time that he is given a list of all alias documentation issued to him and is requested to return all such documents. If there are any of these documents

- 2

00475

MORI DocID: 1451843

vhi ch ho is unab.Le to produce , th~ employee mus t. sub:..j t a signed vritten statement describing, to t.he best of his abiUtJ', the conditions under which the document or documents l1e::t'e either lost or destroyed. ~11e controls that now exi.st were not in ops r-atd on when Hovar-d Hunt was an employee, which lliay explain how he vas ailJ.e to retain documents issued in the 19605. Nor do these controls o:pply effectively to non-employees over whom the A3ency has no con~rol. Most disguise material -- other than docu.lTIent,s -- is a-ege.r-ded ee pE:1'iehable and non-s ens i tdve and OTS is not too concerned if dis~~tse material

is not returned.

6. A new coinput erd zed system is being readied ca'lLed CEliBAD (Gentral Badge m1d Credential System). Initially this system will Lnc.lude al.l of the Lssuances of the badge office, CCS, Central Pr.ocessing 811d the motor 'pool. . The system will provide a monthly listing to these four components of all credentials issued and could b€ used to request outst~nding credential.s at the time of checkou-t. As a follow-up the sys t em will provide a weekly credential status of all employees who have s epaz-abed but for whom Cm'IBAD still shows outstanding credentials. Q.~nc]usions_

7. Since the issuance of DOI 240-4 there has been a very defini"t.e ir~iDrovement in the controls exercised over- alias documeatation. B)·- requiring that every request be routed through CCS/OGB for concurrence, a veri COIQ1.~ ete file of all alias documents issued has been compiled. The probability is sJ,ight that an Agency employee could resign or retire without having been queried about all the alias documents which had been issued to him. 'This procedure, "hile cur-rent.Iy observed in the Agency, has no standing as a general requirement arid exists only as an administrat.ive instruction in one of the Agency's directorates. 8. The OTS ~omputerized system, "hen operational, shoul.d tend to reduce the number of outstanding documents since-oa justificatio.n every six months will be required for their retention. The CENBAD system will not only make the CCS/OGB control even more effective by mechand zd ng the up-to-date listing but in the rare instances when an officer might depart without turning in his dOcllillents, CENBAD will provide this ..data weekly to al.Lov for a follm·l-up .

- 3 -

00476

---------MORl DoclD: 1451843

, " ..

9. a. That an Agency Headquart".,.s Regulation' be issued ~ormalizing the requirement for a central ft-fJ,ency control over- issuance, account_ ability and recovery of alias docuroentation. b.

That each component designate an alias

documentation control officer ~ho would retain ell docmaents, issuing them only for specific operations and institute a policy of signed receipts a~d return of documents upon the completion of the operation.

. •.

- 4-

MORl DocID: l451843

..··cl· U'~ClASSlmD

[£] . SECReT ,

SUBJECT: (Optional)

ACTVITIES OF FROM, D....TE

25 May 1973'

TO: IOffiur designation, room numb.r. ond

DATE

~_~

building)

_ _-I OffICER'S INiTIALS

REQIVED

fOAWARDfD

COMMENTS (Humber ecch comment' 10 show fro.rA whom 10 whom. DraW' 0 line octon column ofte, each commen'.)

SIlt. I

\ "

~-rl:

1',3/

;'\ I

"''I

•

I i

il...<.

12.

LC·o.,.? Is er

~,ORj)(D,ilSdiT

.,..\.'l-<,~l~

13,

:;",-<{

' '-r-..~J

c.. >tl"'I l::b

14.

'';

.~ 10 U'io::'b"~~U' 0 SECRET r

'{.._ . '" ........~

00478

CONFIDENTIAL

•._-:.........._.: _~~':"~" •• '._ -

0- ~"' __ """~' •._ .. __

INTERNAL', USE QNlY

o .. UNCLASSIFIED .. ..

-,_•.__ ....- :,.

....

~-.

...•.

--------------~ MORI DocID: 1451843 .'.

7-' l')C>~ CD/O.!.;)........... .--....- / - {./ -•...•.

t-_ _-.----

24 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR:

Acting Chief,I

SUBJECT:

Activities of Possible Interest to the Director

1. A few years ago thel ' !Branch was asked to support a test program and feas1b111ty study being conducted by DD/S&T/ORD.

en 1S proJec conc u e , e was g1ven permission by DD/S&T/ORD to retain-Dm",=m~'ra and TV image transmission syst~m for further experimentation. lr--------~------------

I_~-----:--~;::::::'==========;~~------:-I 2. In early Jun~ 1972 lDD/S&T/ORD, who had been the Project OfficeI' Xli evaxuacxlig cnis TV data link system, phoned thel I Branch. He stated that the U.S. Secret Service had a requ1rement for this TV camera and data .Li nk system. It was our understanding that the camera would be carried in a helicopter and would be used for crowd surveillance during the Democratic and Republican Conventions at Miami Beach, Florida. Mr! _ rsked that we make the equipment available for the per10d desired by the Secret Service and indicated that the equipment would be returned to us when no longer needed. On 19 June 1972, Mr. Michael T. Cas ey, accompanied by Mr lri sit ed ~o pick up the equipment. Mr. Casey Of Secret SerV1ce was not made witting of t~e fact that 's an Agency facility • .--------,

~. On 13 November 1972, the equipment, as a result of a phone call from~I~ lwas picked up at Secret Service Headquarters by 1 1 A few 6f the system's

'----_I

00479

MORI DocID: 1451843

{

•

components were missing when it was returned. These components handle, tripod and electrical adapter. Later the m1ss1ng components were returned to us·by the Secret Service. w~re . the

4. A few months ago, Mr. ~called me about this equipment and said that S&T wo~ to get the equipment off its books since none of it would be needed in the.future b S T. He offered to transfer the equipment at no cost to ranch. A short time later the necessary paper , ormed to reflect the receipt of this equipment into the Branch inventory . .

\Ja.L.,.L, I

"" an-en

Special b.~~.~~.~.~uy~ Division

--------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

00481

MORl DoclD: 1451843

... 6EGRiT

SUBJECT:

SENSITIyE

---.J

prOjectl

liS a Headquarters initiated program

which has as its fundamental objective the long term rnanipulations of s.electedagent assets operating against EA Division difficult targets in the leftist and communist milieu in various parts of the world.

Although targetted overseas these agents are

often exposed to and directed against American radical, leftist, and communist targets to gain a practical'\nowiledge of the leftwing, radical, communist world.

There is a possibility that an asset

might become suspect and be accused of being an employee of the Agency or the Bureau; or it might happen some asset would, for some reason, become disenchanted with his role and expose-his Agency relationship and his activities, with resultant embarrassment.

To minimize potential problems, therefore, each

case is cleared with the FBI and through CI/SO the Bureau is kept informed on a regular basis.

~BCPFT

SENSITIVE

00482

-----------.......MORl DoelD: 1451843

!~.

()' ll>

1:", " ""'j 1". Ii ,,) .}

"! ,,. ~.

o0 <:

~.:. !:

l'Jl

'. r;

00483

MORl DoclD: 1451843

-'SbSR;;;T - EiES AIsi'bw ~

Subject:

Cover Support

Bill: 1. In addition to the matters listed in the CCS memorandum on CCS Cover Support Within the United States the follo.ling bigoted cases should be noted:

7 May 1973

00484

----

MORl DoclD: 1451843

r:- ...·(i~.'(l'\SSIFIED rl . - - ------ - - - - _- ----.'~

H'IAL .. 'J)[ O::LY

CON. ,f'l TI ,\l I!J SE(;:ET IJ ------ --_.- - - ----flOUTII'G .\ND R::CO;W $HECT . . - -'-"--- -- .,._- .. ---- .. --.."-- --- --

.--.,. '~JEcr.

.. lOp' "QIJ

'--'-~

Al ias P.l:-;. ..· :,.'rt:-:

-----_. FROM,

- ._-

.. C;~T ;"~F' I

._-

-- .....

DATE RECEIVED

---- ..!

OffICER'S INITIALS

fORWARDED

COMMENTS (Number each comment '0 shoW' hom , ,: w"orn. O'OW 0 linlt ceron cotuml'l of,o' .oeh (e... r,t".' •

-'_. ..

---

..1;:,'

Mr. Colby, 2.

-- - ..

. -_.-

.. "lit'. ",""

...... :li,ng)

---

I'-;~Tf .. 8 MAY 1973

GCS

-10, (ORice, deligl'lotion. ',"'l'I •

---.

_.- r .i..:;ENSIOI"" r"'.' ..

bflif~-

i'tl//:

- - .-'_."

-,-~-

-- ._-7,

.. - ---

.... -' -

I! _._-_. --'_.,i

•

~~~'!'o.~,H-;;:.

'6.

'.f../

•

- -- -

- '.

10. "

II.

13.

12.

, ..

.. 1~,

----,.----15.

forM l .,

I SECEf

•

CQi:rIQEiJTlt.L

00485

MORl DoclD: l45l843 )j

8 May 1973

1.1E), ~ORANDUM FOR:

Deputy Director for Operations

SUBJECT:

Allas Passports

villeI, Centr'at L:over;'!all .

1 i

nil L U;.',T GQ?¥ 99 NQi" R!!:LEASE , \t, ':,.

'~~

\ \;

\ .i'J;.

00486

-----------_....MORl DoclD: 1451843

8 May 1973

MfMORANCUM FOR:

Deputy Director for Operattons-

SUBJECT:

Alias Paasporta .

Chief., Central Caver Staff

I \

1:'1" I

"~',""

00487

MORl DoclD: 1451843

. ! ..J,

,.......

~"II·."-""'.·"ll

._---._0

SI".l!l,r(Y

U~l

1.J

L:~l' •

, -- -. __._-_._------_._--- , - - ROUm~G AND RECORD SHEET ,- -.- -----.. ---- -- ----- - ----'~--

,Or' "011

----_._---~--

COttJ\i-J-

- ._.. .- - ._-------fROM,

I. UTlNsiO'N'""

I C/CCS

TO, 10!lice' del;gnolion. '~m numbar, ond

U~ E

DDO

, 'Z r.~AY

-;''"':7~

OffiCER'S

COM..v.(~TS (Numb.r ~""ch commenl 10 show r'Qm

INITIALS

It) ....hom.

O'OW 0 Ii", acron column ohol .och cor.

fO.l:WAliOfO

o' . 0 t · • 0

,-; : './

-'-,---" 3_

f---- ---'

-o'

-- ..

ptJ-- -/ I

I R~CElVED

--_ ..-

NO•

CAolf

building)

--_ ...... _.. _. 2_

-_.~-

---- - " - -

-. '_. .4

_ _ _ _ _ _

'~~'i'C,

-----, '---'--,-- - - - 7_

•

_.-

, 10_ -,

11_

12_

13_

IJ.(.-

,o-

--1J V v

AI.

kdVJ....

-H7

."",

Ppnyctf[) (tir'»

f 1~_

004eB

IS_ o

FOP""

a-e,

",,,ou'~ r.;r'4-l;.\,~+- __ n a'10 ""(OIlIONr. r:::r COrlfl DIi:UTIO'

INIERIIAl . USE ONLY

o urlClASSlr

----------

MORl DoclD: 1451843

7 May 1973 (Revised)

MEMORANDUM FOR:

SUBJEcr

Deputy Director for Operations CCS Cover Support Provided Within the United States

1. ~he following specific information regarding domestic cov~r support ,provided by Central Cover Staff is submitteq in ,response to your request;

Aliases Used in Conjunction with Documenta,

NOTE:

~he al>ove figures are based on the CCS record-

keeping system initiated in April 1972.

• , , » _:" {!J04Il83 ,~~:

....• ...~

- ._,.

. -",,-

~-"

...

. , I

MORl DoclD: l45l843

Alias U.S. Birth Certificates.

Alias Credit Cards.

-2-

~te1ift---

00490

MORI DoclD: l45l843

Alias Social Security Cards.

-3-

00491

MORl DoclD: 1451843

-4-

0049.<':

------------_....MORl DoclD: 1451843

(

Support to Bh~D Activities.

2. The following general information pertains to domestic cover support activities outside the purview of CCS:

Alias U. S. dr.i vers licenses \

Alias erA credentials \

-5-

00493

-----------_....MORl DoclD: 1451843

7 May 1973 (Revised) MEMORANDUM FOR:

Deputy Director for Operations'

SUBJECT

CCS Cover Support Provided Within the United states

1. The following specific information regarding domestic cover support provided by Central Cover Staff is submitted in response to your request: a.

Aliases Used in Conjunction with Documenta-

tion.

NOTE:

The above figures are based on the CCS record-

00494

----------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

. c.

Alias U.S. Birth certificates.

Alias .Credit cards.

-2-

00495

........-

~_--------_

MORl DoclD: 1451843

Alias Social Security cards.

r----.......,..,."...,..,~--------------------" "

-3-

00496

MORl DoclD: 1451843

00497

MORI DocID: l45l843 ...

Support to Bh~D Activities.

2. The following general information pertains to domestic cover support activities outside the purview of CCS:

Alias U.S. drivers licenses I

..~

..,,,, I

Chief, Central Cover Staff

-5-

00498

MaRl DoclD: l451843 {

CSI240-4

'--

--'1 CLANDESTINE SERVIL;);!, INSTRUCTION 240-4

COVER 23 August 1972

ALIAS U.S. DOCUMENTATION

I uv. _... ------:-----------_._----- ... ._..-_.

.._~,_.

I, I I

t ,.•_~

MaRl DoclD: 1451843

SE~ CSI240-4

CLANDESTINE SERVICE INSTRUCTION 240-4

COVER 23 August 1972

.-. '--'

--- .

.-----

00500

MaRl DoclD: 1451843

SE~

II I

CSI 240--4 COVER 23 August 1972

CLANDESTINE SERVICE INSTRUCTION 24()-4

I !,

I .~ I

3 s~

0050.1. "

. - ....- ..----- ._,---,-_._--_._-------_ ...

. '.

•••

~ '.

.. ,

•• _

.....

MORl DoclD:' 1451843 j

- SFQR'Bf

CSI240-4 COVER 23 August 1972

CLA:\DESTI1\E SERVICE Il'iSTHUCTION 240--4

rr>

r:-.

'......

Thomas H. Karamessines Deputy Director for Plans

00502

MORl DoclD: l45l843

(

SEC~ CSI 240--4 Attachment 1 23 August 1972

1 r

I ,

I, !

D0503

1 !

..........- 00_.-"_' L .. _

MORl DoclD: 1451843 ;

CSI 240-4 Attachment 1 23 August 1972

00504

MORl DoclD: 1451843

CSI NO. 220-7

TECHNICAL SUPPORT 12 May 1959

CLANDESTINE SERVICES INSTRUCTION NO. 220-7

. U. S. DOCUMENTATION IN CLANDESTINE SERVICES OPERAT""I""O""N"S..--------

o o

00505

MORl DoclD: 1451843

o \

CSI NO. 220-7

TECHNICAL SUPPOR1\ 12 May 1959'

CLANDESTINE SERVICES INSTRUCTION NO. 220-7

o .,

o o !

01 .

oo-s( 6

_._--

MORl DoclD: 1451843

. '.

:CLANDESTINE SERVICES INSTRUCTION NO. ·220-7

SfCPBI ~

csr NO. 220-7 TECHNICAL SUPPORT 12 May 1959

RICHARD M. BISSELL, JR. Deputy Director (Plans)

o o

Released by: Richard Helms Chief of Operations

10 10 I

o 00507 \

----....,...,-,--..._.........:......,...~------------

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.• 7 May 1973

~mMORANDUM FOR:

Deputy Director for Operations

SUBJECT

CCS Cover Support Provided Within· the United States

1. The following specific information regarding domestic cover support provided by Central Cover Staff is submitted in response to your request: ' ar:._..:A:::l:::i:.:a=s::.:e::.:s=-U:::s=e.::d'-=i:::n:....;:C::.:o:.:n;:,J~' u::n::c:..t:;~:,·o:;n:::..w::.:::i,:;t.::h~D;;:o;;;c;;;u;,;m:;,;e;;;n;;"t;;a;;-

tion. I

00508

MORl DoclD: 1451843

(

b. \

, ;, I

Alias

tT R

1=tir-l:h ('..,.... -1: i 1'i P." +O~

I d.

Alias r.redit f'arc'ls

-2-

....i .,. '~

.. _.',. ' -

.. : ,-

00509

MORl DocID: 1451843

A1ias Social Security Cards.

I I I

h. I

-3-

Sf11f[T

·0051.0

MORl DoclD: 1451843

-4-

0051.1

MORl DoclD: 1451843

other Special Arrangements. (1)

Alias U.S. drivers licenses

-5.~ ~'~.'C'

0051.2

MORI DocID: 1451843

(5)

Alias CIA credentials I

Chief, Central Cover Staff

0051.3

MORl DoclD: l45l843

CORPORATE COVER

0051.4

MORI DocID: 1451843

DEVISED FACILITIES COVER

-I

00515

MORI DocID: 1451843

( \

S~r.l PROPRIETARY ENTITY COVE~

005:16

~-------

[

MORl DoclD: 1451843

'J-

I,xJ

. 'f;. ,. '

f('. ~

i-,

,~,.

0051.7

...<::

Il'

t:!

<:'", ... '

m ... ' 0 1:l

MORl DocID: 1451843

, \

....

.. #'

• f·

-r ',' .. •

7 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR:

Deputy Director for Operations

SUBJECT

Research Project on Robert L. Vesco

1. In mid-October 1972 Office of Economic Research a~"~s~e~r-------------------~~~~~ par ~c~pa e 1n a me~t~ng with a=Jumber of OER officers. During the meeting,.~ _ explained that the Director of CentralnteII1gence had levied a crash project on Dr. Edward Proctor, the Deputy Director for Intelligence, to produce a paper on international financier Robert L. Vesco. Since the Director had specificallY requested contributions from the field.l ~sked our Division to help in procuring them.

"""

2. We thereu:cn cabled various questions suggested by OER to~: ~~ ~nd asked for replies by 19 Octo e£. ReL~V nt answers were turned over to OER in' memorandum form. i-In the case of a brief reference in one of the field messages-to an earlier high-level American intercession on behalf of Mr. Vesco, we asked Mr. Helms through his secretary whether this was relevan~ information. The response, again,_received through the secretary~ was that it was not relevant. 1

i "'

Soon after our memoxanda "had been submitted, ladviseel ~hat the Director wanted everyone to forget the Vesco project. This was communicated to.all DDP Headquarters personnel who had had a hand in the project or had been made aware of it.

I \\ /

0051.8

MORl DoclD: 1451843

- 2 4. We never had any indication as to the reason for or the purpose of the project. 5. We understand that OER has recently written a memorandum on this matter for the DCI.

Archibald B. Roosevelt Chief, European Division

005.19 .' 0 •••••••• _

• • 0. _ _

••

0_ _

MORl DoclD: 1451843

CJl~ 0.'

....CD

..;"

e-t-

00520

MORl DoclD: 1451843

" ...

7 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR:

Deputy Director for Operations

SUBJECT:

Items for Possible Use in Briefing the DCI ,

1. This Memorandum is submitted in order to identify to you for possible briefing of the Director activities which in certain contexts could be construed as delicate or inappropriate. 2.

At the request of the Director of Security, from appro~imrt::: ::':-.:Jtober 1972 t? mi.d-Januar y 1973 safes~te k'as made ava~lable to the U,S. Marshal' v I~ use as a secure residence by an Assistant U.S. Attorney wao reportedly was under threat of assassination by organized criminal elements. . 3.

S. Since late 1972 CIA has taken part in seven FBI training courses at Quantico, Virginia in response to requests from the FBI. We have shared with them through lectures and discussions lessons we have learned which are relevant to their counterespionage responsibilities.

'-------

0052.1

MORl DoclD: 1451843

. I

- 2 -

6. As a means of sharing more fully our operational experience we have invited three FBI officers to be students in ourl '.' _ ' Icourse from -14 to '25 May 1973. 7. The Soviet defector Yuriy NOSENKO was ,confined at a CIA facility from April 1964 to September 1967 while efforts were being made to es tab lish whether he was a bona fide defector. _ Although his' present attitude toward the Agency is quite satisfactory, the possibility exist~ that the press could cause undesirable publicity if it were to uncover the story.

DaVId n. Blee

Chief Soviet Bloc Division

r. _

___•

.:..- .' __'. : _ ~ J

00522

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.'.

ro, 1~:

;

r l:d~

;~;

.':1..*<

':, ....:'

.-[-

00523

0 0

MORl DoclD: 1451843

00524

---

MORI DocID: 1451843

:I 7 Mfr'; ,. \,.,3

MEMORANDUM- FOR:

Deputy Director for Operations

SUBJECT:

CIA Narcotics Activities Having Domestic Implications

1. This ~emorandum is in response to your request for a review of activities and relationships that might have domestic implications. 2. We occasionally report on the activities of American citizens involved in narcotics trafficking abroad. This information is normally-disseminated to U.S. law enforcement agencies and other recipients of our reports. We also- occasionally request U.S. law enforcement agencies for name traces on U.S. citizens who are known or suspected to be involved-in narcotics trafficking abroad.

00521

00525

MORl DocID: 1451843

•.

~ffiMORANDUM FOR:

Deputy Director for Operations

SUBJECT:

CIA Narcotics Activities Having Domestic Implications

1. This memorandum is in response to your request· for a review of activities and relationships that might have domestic implications. 2. We occasionally report on the activities of American citizens involved in narcotics trafficking abroad. This information is normally disseminated to U.S. law enforcement agencies and other recipients of our reports. We also occasionally request U.S. law enforcement agencies for name traces on U.S. citizens who are known or suspected to be involved in narcotics traffickin g abroad .

I··

Ior : 5. We have occasionally received reques1:s enforcement law alias documentation for U.S. narcotics

005ZSGI-

MORl DoclD: 1451843

,..

•

officials working abroad on foreign narcotics investigations. The present method of handling such requests. is for us to request the approval of the Deputy Director for Operations prior to asking the Technical Services Division to comply. We insist on knowing the true identity of the persons to use such documentation and limit them to staff officers of the U.S. 'Law enforcement agencies. We also require that we know the purpose and intended use of the documents. Finally, we require. receipts from the headquarters of the agency involved and the individual, and also require these documents to be returned to us for destruction after they have fulfilled their use. We have turned down requests from BNDD for alias documentation for domestic use. There are some indications in the files that there have been requests from BNDD for domestic documentation in connection with their domestic investigations. These predate NARCOG, and we are unable to determine how these requests were handled. 6. We periodically receive requests for technical assistance in the form of photographic and audio devices or guidance for use of such items by U.S. law enforcement agencies in connection with their foreign investigations of illicit narcotics activities. We require these agencies to adhere to' the same procedures we require in our own operations. From time-to-time we have honored these requests and have provided sterile equipment when the requests have been properly presented and approved. Our records show evidence that Several such requests were made prior to. the existence of NARCOG in connection with narcotics law enforcement investigations in the . United States. We are unable to determine whether the requests were fulfilled.

ehlef, DDO/NARCOG

00526

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.»

·,

0052'7

MORIDocID: 1451843

- ", • . , ! . ' ;ft' t :C;:D' - k~ ",l. '"~ i

•

T~RET CRET

)

.'1.', ~ ~ ~ • '-l'!.o};

CONF

'r'"...

NUMBER OF PAGES:

•

CONTROL NUMBER: _ DATE DOCUMENT RECEIVED:

l.OGGEO BY: 1

S-1,;;,9 /7~

hD'"e...

Division D/CIB

DATE:

TO OFFICE

NAME

'vJ V

29 Mav 197::1 SIGNATURE

~9<-'

Inspect r General

'5oe.e" -

Room

DATE

6~ ,I

' ,

I I

5 ,

o o o q o o

DOCUMENT N

NUMBER OF ATTACHMENTS: FROM:

'1),,,, 'J:) • DATE OF DOCUMENT: a C\, 'f\rI,~ \ q 73SOURCE: ~

;).

. , -_0_.

REGISTRY

DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION

\eI, ')..'

", "7"•••.• :'.}

COpy NUMBER (5):

ENTIAL

Approval

REMARKS

Action

FVN ONLY -~ ·B

Comment Concurrences

Information Direct Reply

o Preparation of Reply o Recommendation

o o

Signature

\\ - - - -

Return

o Disp~tch o File

""'"

'c.. __, . _" .,.

J_.

'~005~8 "

MORl DoclD: 1451843 ;

, .

,r '

•

i UP 5ESRI;+-.

FYeE GnUI ,.

i'nT> 3EEiRFT EYES ONI Y

~'"

._.

---

29 May 1973

I I"/~"

.........,

_,-, ~.n"'l

. ,,~

•

_ . .._--

....

.,,'

00529 .~

.. -

._-_.~.-

--,

MORl DoclD: 1451843

. /,.,

MORl DoclD: l45l843

.. .. .

•

29 Nay 1973

[ :

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.... • . •

." ~

2Jl Nay 1973

'''' ... """~~,, I

00532

MORT DocID: 1451843

(

..---.-_.

REGISTRY

DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION SOURCE:

CONTROL NUMBER:

DATE OF DOCUMENT:

DATE DOCUMENT RECEIVED:

COPY NUMBER (S):

LOGGED BY:

NUMBER OF PAGES:

DOCUMENT NO:

NUMBER OF ATTACHMENTS: ..

FROM:

Chief, Division D TO OFFICE

- 7B44 Hqs - R e d O

NAME

DATE:

7 May 1973

SIGNATURE

DATE

I-3

--- ._--

o Approval o Action

o o

REMARKS

Comment Concurrences

0 Information 0 Diract Reply 0 Preparation of Reply 0 Recommendation 0 Signature 0 Return 0 Dispatch 0 File

00533

----------------MORI DocID: 1451843

(

7 Ma'y 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR:

Deputy Director for Operations

FROM

Chief, Division D

SUBJECT

Potentially Embarrassing Activities Conducted by Division D

REFERENCE

Your staff meeting, 7 May 1973

1. There is one instance of an activity by Division D, with which you are already familiar, which the Agency General Counsel has ruled to be barred to this Agency by statute: the collection [ lof international commercial radio t e Leprrorre COllversa [lolls De tWeen several Latin American ci ties and New York, aimed at the interception of drug-related commu~ications. The background on this is briefly as follows:

ere ore on Dlvlslon D would take over the coverage, and on 12 October 1972 we agreed to do so. On 14 October a team of intercept operators from the~ I lbegan the coverage exp rlmentally. on :tJ <Jalluary J:5'1 J, NoR wrxit;e to say that- the test r e su Lt s were good, and that it was hoped this coverage could continue. 1

Because a question had arisen within Division D as to the legality of this activity, a query was add!essed to 'the General Counsel on this score (Attachment A hereto). With the receipt of his reply (Attachment B), the intercept activity was immediately terminated. There has been a subsequent series of exchanges between Division D and the General Counsel as to the legality of radio intercepts made outside the U.S., but with one terminal being in the U.S., and the General Counsel

00534-

-"-----I

MORl DoclD: 1451843 ,

has ruled that such intercept 'is also in violation or CIA's' statutory responsibilities. Z. We are carrying out at present one intercept activity which falls within this technical limitation--i.e., of having one terminal in the U.S.

a arge number of totally unrelated conversations, the operators do intercept other traffic, frequently involving U.S. citizens--for example, BNDD staffers talking to their agents. I have described this situation to the General Counsel, and his informal judgment was that, as long as the primary purpose of the coverage is a foreign target, this is acceptable. He suggests, however, that it might be desirable to inform the Attorney General of the occasional incidental intercept of the conversations of U.S. citizens, and thus legalize this activity. We will pursue this with Mr. ,Houston.

4. An incident which was entirely innocent but is certainly subject to misinterpretation has to do with an equipment test run by CIA\ ~echnicians in Miami in August 1971. At that time we were working jointly to develop shortrange agent DF equipment for use against a Soviet agent in South Vietnam. I . land a field test was agreed upon. the Mlaml area was chosen, and lPersonnel went a team consisting of Division D, Commo,1 to Miami during the second week of ,August. Contact was made with a Detective Sergeant I lof the Miami Beach Police Department, and tests were mane nOli! four different hotels, one a block away from the Miami Beach Auditorium ~nd Convention Hall, A desk clerk in this hotel volunteered the comment that the team was .part of the official security checking process of all hotels prior to the convention. (The Secret Service had already been checking for possible sniper sites.) As the team's report notes, "The cover for the use of the hotel is a natural."

{)0535

MORl DoclD: 2451843

Another subject worthy of mention is the following: In February 1972, I on t a et..s,......,lnn"'Orr-.,,~.----"C""e"I"e"'C"'O"'n"'Ill"'lan!'r[lnc"'a"""-c"'-ro7'm"n""S-"C-"O"'U"i-"--or copIes 0

tete ep one ca SIpS perThese were then obtained regularly by Domestic Contact Service in New York, pouched to DCS Washington, and turned over to Division D for passage to FE/China Operations. The DDP was apprised of this activity by Division D in March 1972, and on 28 April 1972 Division D told DCS to forward the call slips to CI Staff, Mr. Richard Ober. Soon thereafter, the source of these slips dried up, and they have ceased to come to Mr. Ober. In an adVisory opinion, the Office of General Counsel stated its belief that the collection of these slips did not violate the Communications Act, inasmuch as they are a part of a normal recordkeeping function of the telephone company. which does not in any way involve eavesdropping. .'.

~~~~~~o~~.~~ina calls.

Atts:

A. Dtv D memo to ~GJ 26 Jan 73

B. 0 C memo to DIVD 29 Jan 73

~--------

lL_----3

00536

MORl DoclD: ,1451843'

r«

26 .J-snuar.r 1973

),!E~!ORANj)lN FOR:

SUBJECT

General Counsel Intercept of Communications in the U. S.

CIA is j.ntercepting at our comnunications s i t e D

righ frequency, international radio te_~phone calls or1g1naLingJ~ :l~ New York and being broadcast to South FBer!Cd UL UC1 b directed to ~ew York fra~ South America. Some calls are relay calls througb New York but not originating or terminating there.

The

calls involve both U. S. citizens and foreign nationals. 2.

o n CIAl1n

:/ J I

e epnone

'"'

.:>

the traffic from

3. I would appreciate your very early vie~s as to where this intercept activity falls wit3 respect to U. S. law. Even if it is legal or ~e can secure the neccssar/ authoriz3tions, it seems to me there is e x t r a flap p o t . e n t La.L associatec

with reports going into the BNDD mechani5m~ particu12rly

since they may well becpme the basis for executive action.

:f.Signed.l.

Acting Ln t e.r

Distribution: Orig & "- Addressee

, t!1Ll j (is I COPt ... DO NO) RELEASE

00537 r

MORl DoclD: 1451843

/ ./

- ".

~C~r',.,.J: f':cy:>.!.-O:=?~, 2'-~

I 29 .Ia nu a r y 1973 ''1.'

. MEMORANDUM :E:"OR:- Acting Chid, Division D .,

. . '-. .:

. '.

SUBIECT,

Irrte r c ept; of Co mrnurrications in the U.

REFERENCE:

26 San 73 Me rno for GC fr .... ;.C/Div·ision D, Same Subj ecj

I. In referent you request 01.1r v.i ews as to the legal aspects of a radio telephone intercept activitv carried on 2.t our communications site I -

.. ,

2 .. The basic Ie-\V is conta.i ne d in section 605 of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U. S. c. 605, \vhich prohibits intel;ccption of any radio cornrnurri.cat.lon without the a.uthorization of the sender and also prohibits di.vuIg irig the substance the:ceof to any person. Chapte r 119 of Title 18, U. S. C., rna.k e s the interception of an~l wire or oral communica.tion a crime punishable by $10. 000 or five years' imprisonment, 0'0 both. There are two exceptions to thes e pr ohibi.tions : .a.. The fi z-s t provides for application through the Department of :rustice to a Federal court for a court order authoz-lzin« o s uch interc~ption for 5 pe.ci£ic _ purposes in c orme cci.on w i th Law-ce nfor-c o ment du tt ea , Since this Agency is prohibited by statute 'from any police or Ia....v -enforcement activities,. obv ious Iy we .. ' . , ., .cannot ope rat e under- this ex cep'ti.on, . b, The other excep!:Lon is containod in section 2511 of Title 18, U. s. C., at subsection (3).. TIlls pr ovidcs that tho pro1~l"bH\on cited above On intcrceptio:a shan not

005 38

MORl DoclD: 1451843

",'

ir'

Limi.t the con stitutiona.l o ow e r of th e President to b~ke such rrrca s u r e s as he d e c rns !H;cC:~;5a.:ry to protect .;-~~~ftiI!st a ttn.c k, to obta.i.n foreign in::ellifr?ne~c: information d e c me d essential to the s c.cuz it y of tee United Stn.te s or to protect s u c h Lnfo r-rrta.t i.o n , a n d <to protect t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s a g a i n s t , ove r th r ow hr fo r c e o,r' ?th'er UP~2.\,,;!fu~ rnea.ns or against any .,,:.,'.'\ ';":;:"othEn;- clear and p-re's'ent Clang-cr'to'-ihe'strUCl21r'e :esl'stenc-e-

of the Government~ 3.. The type of i:.1.£orlu2.tion ;"01.1. de s c r ib e in your rne mor-andu m do es not appear to .fall wi tlrin 2.ny of ~hest=; c2.tegories and since its ultimate destinatio~ is BNDD 7 it appea.r s to be collection for law"c nfo r c e rrrent; purposes 7 wh'i ch 2..5 noted above ;is barred to this Agency by s ta.tute; 4. For your i.nfo r rna tf orr, in most c'as e s wb e r e there is a criminal p cos ecutrcn for violation of the narcotics Law-s J the Department of Justice queries us 25 to \vhe.the~ vre have engaged in any interception in c onne ction with the d eferrdarits , If a case should involve the intercepti~n b~ing m.ad~ ~t would be deemed to be -un a'u tb.oz-Lz e d and an all P.l.OOC:::U1.LLCY LJ.!e p .... osecution w ouId have to be ~ropped by the GO,vernment.. It is our vi.ew, therefc r e , that such interception shculd be carried ,on by app r opr iate 12:\I-;r-enforce~entagencies in a c c cz-darrc e w ifh th.e authority of chapter 119 of Title 18, U. S. C.

·~r-'2.LL('i:..~~=C=:-

! .~

Dis tribution: COP}' -I-Addressee Copy 2,;"Gener.al Counsel .,

LAWRENCE R. HOUSTON G erie z-a.I Couris el

,'.

0053S

...

;

MORl DoclD: 1451843

005110

MORl DoclD: 1451843

(

7 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR:

Deputy Director for Operations

SUBJECT:

Item for the List of Delicate Matters

The Securities and Exchange Commission has asked CIA to provide information on any foreign connections with organized crime in the United States. The record indicates that Mr. David Young, of the White House Staff, asked Mr. Colby to set up a contact for Mr. T. C. Barreaux, of SEC. Mr. Barreaux discussed the matter with Mr. Paul V. Walsh, of 001, and on 4 April 1973, Mr,.Barreaux and Mr. Timmeny came to a meeting at CIA with Mr. Lawrence Houston (General Counsel) fChief, FI Staff, 000).

Since that meeting, we have received no specific requirements from Mr. Barreaux, but have provided ,him Wijh one Pilce of information involving a banking transaction of, a associate of Robert Vesco.

Cruet

Foreign Intelligence Staff

00541.

MORl DoclD: 1451843

00542 ,

MORl DoclD: 1451843 ..

---.~_

.. )

" )TTQM

I SECRET

OFFICIAL ROUTING SLIP TO

:-r

NAME AND ADDRESS

DATE

Inspector General

"Je.~ h

:"~:.

.'-~,:

-.:":"

'./.. ~:".';'{. :.

.:.

"i .,

':, ~>:~,If') . '~'''7~l.;.

,":;~:. ,

.... 4, --

..... : '. I--+-~----------+-----I~--,',

OIRECT REPLY DISPATCH FILE INFORMATION

A.CTlOH • ,APPROYAl " COMMENT'" CONCURRENCE

. .

PREPARe REPLY RECOMMEHDATl.OH RETUR.H . . ,., .. SIGHATURE

, .....

..;

...

, "t..~: "

"-,, ••? , .",',

'.'r ,

-~"

.;:

':.~-

..... .,-'-,< .\, _:;:'-,t?:.~.. . - '-' -::::.'. .~,".. ' f.;"~' .-, "

·,·;;~~;~:;t'§i:::: I. "

'. ,': ."<~~4:¥~\', " ::.

, '.

-, :"r,,: ~:,~~:

.7.',

_........."';:.... ~,

..c'-"-------'-;

, \- ~~~;: '

".I'

., .',,":

FOLD

..: ,

URN TO SENOER

FROM: "'AMI;

DAn:

.. ~.

,...."

. '- , :~

O/ES/CIA MC/.I!.-=~~...,.J -r UNCLASSIFIED I

FOlliN NO.

1-61

..:,,-, ,. ......

237

6J'une73

SECRET (<to)

Us. previous editions

,..

. .,,'".. -'.',--

MORl DoclD; 2452843

l$ May 197J

f''';''''~,::,::"",,;:::-"""11;;1$1:1

rear Bill)

Prior to my assignment to Nha Trang I was assigned to the OI Starr ror IRJUe I was with the Starr 1 was led to believe

approximately 20 months.

that one or their "Group's" on the ground noor,Dwas involved in

I ~hi.f ~d

domestic CperatioM.

The

I believe tl,eir t"'get (e} .were minority group (e),

reputy Chie!' of the Group at that time were Dick Ober and

spent aver 50% or his tim. TDY Within the UnHed States.

It was my under-;

espectively.

One o~ their Case Orricers,

standing they reported onl" to the White House and to Dick Helms.

Other

members or the Starr, including myseU, had limited acce'ss to t h e D area, only when neceasar,y and escorted at all times. are now aware or what the operations are.

Perhaps you Were Or

However, I believe I would be

remiss in not responding to the book cable (hO?l90).

And perhaps their

operations might have been outside the legislative charter,

~~,

".~

_ •• m• •e 0 _ ' ( ' ' ' ' " ' ' " ' ( " _ .• launched someone into Vietnam while you and were there.

believe this was without the kn,owledge or approval or Ohier,D (rr I recaU, the Case Orricer was because or the rOUOWing:

I mention the lotter Cnly

When they learned thatOas being reassigned

rrcm Saieon to Ohier, Operations, FE, they also learned that I was a rriend or

end rrom, the same ar-ea

I i

me not to discuss any or their operations With

result, they ceutioned This I did not do.

o 44 --\

Sincerely.

MORl DoclD: 1451843 ..

r-:

'. - .

:' . .j

TRANSMITTAL MANIFEST TO

ITEM NO.

1. ·1··

No.446603

FROM \

Chief, BKHliRALD

DESCRIPTiON

USE

. " envelope under separate cover for Chief, BKHERALD

From

lin responser:...

to DIREX;TOR 40;7190 (BOOK CABLE)

00545 <, ;~M 1236 uSE PREVIOUS EDITION

;~I{'l I .S~ I --~

(13-47)

MORI DocID: 1451843

-. . ,

r -----------c--

ME/40Rn .•DUM FOR:

Mr. Colby

Attached is the material we requested of Di Ober:

i, j

•

A. Ten Reports" Subj: Foreign Support for Activities Planned to Disrupt or Harass the Republican National Convention' . B •• Five Reports, Subj: Foreign Support,lfo., Activit~"JClannedto Disrupt or Harass the. Democratic National Convention . C. Two Memoranda re Agency support to Secret Service for Democratic and Republican Conventions Ober advises that the only ~'~an we report on to the lEC is Rennie Davi (14 May 73)

DATEb FORO '00,

t AUG 54

10I REPLACES fOR~ 10-101 WHICH MAY

8E U$ED.

OS4'@ ,

.. _--_ ...... -.-._...

~-------_.MORl DoclD: 1451843

SEND~~~

CHECK c,l,sSlFlCATION TOP AND

lJN(;L :SIFIED

"F'- r CONFIDENTIAL I

SECIlET

OFFICIAL ROUTING SLIP TO 1

DATE

NAME AND ADDRESS

INITIALS

Inspector General

. ., , ,

•

5 6

ACTION APPROYAl COMMENT CONCURRENCE

OIRECT REPLY OISPATCH filE INfORMATION

PREPARE REPLY RECOMMENDATION RETURN SIGNATURE ,',

,Remarks:

Mr. Broe: Dick Obe r- has been advised that this package is being sent to you. Since knowledge of the existence of this Committee has been strictly limited, I've asked that it be delivered to you unopened. Although it has an ER number on it, it has not been sent through that office - - I gave them only the day, subject, and originator.

I 00547 FOLD HERE TO RETURN TO SENDER FROM: NAUE

5 May 7~

OIES/Mcl I

UNCLASSIFIED

DATE

Use previous ed.!lons

I CONFIDENTIAL I

SECRET (40)

MORl DoclD: 1451843

-~----.

. ',.

i ~. ;:~I Al [1 J~[ O:IlY ... ._0 _,__ _, ______

_._-----_. __ .- ._- ...--- "

-_. - _."- ..... -~t .. 3JECT: to;.·.·~n.,11

r.OUTING AND Ri:CO;;D S:·jEtT .... - .- .. --'-'.' .._-- .--------_.-

ExTENSION

Richard Ob e r TO, IOffie", delignoHQn. ,oom numb.t, orO

'---- -- 1.

_.. 2. ~"

._._-_ _. ..

DATE

aecaveo

fQRWAIIDfO

OffICER'S

INJnAtS

-_FROM: ... _-

bvildi"g}

•

.. ...

~O.

OAfE

14 May 197"3

.---

Hr. Evans --.o/ncr .- .... "-_. -

Attached are: ldiZ'l }{~k, - note on the 1. ground ~J -' I h\ .;, ~" r b.~_._ S.l,,-! .=~~:> .L --- -_.. --<::ommi ttee per your request of this morning. ..• . . ----

4. -'

'[(; -

- - - . -,----- - - - -

2. Copies of memoranda con cerning Agency support to Secret Service (7 April and 23 June ].972).

.. .. '

.-..r...~~'Ii"k,

- - ..-

EYES .. _- ' . '

' - 1.-----.

ONLY

----

• !~

,-\-

-h

-\ \.-- "'" v ~ "-

. Cl.\·... '"\ v-c ~ ;~'\ .....-. e..I..

'9.

10•

.' 11.

12.

13..

I~.

00548 t "'f>t9d • 4

. :. 5,

il r..:J SECRET 61 0 ust " ..'"", l.:J fi:o:I'ONS

etk . o Ull(l~.SS(F.P Vi

I E3

• (QjJ~1 QrJiTI n,L

COMMENTS (Number eoch commenl to Ihow rrom who 10 ",hom. O'Q"" 0 line aCtoSS CQlumn ok., eoch commen'·1

IImRllAl OV._ousr O:/lY ..

p""-..--:.

•

MORl DoclD: 1451843

C()IM1+1 Do -c2~

14 MAY EiI3

-,'

'SUBJECT:

Intelligence Evaluation Committee and Staff

., 1. "Background: Formed December 1970' to produce fully-evaluated national domestic intelligence studies, including studies on demonstrations, subversion, extremism and terrorism. !.rembership: Department of Justice (Chairman); Federal Bureau of Investigation; 'Department of Defense; Secret Service; National Security Agency; Central In t e l Lig en ce Agency; and as ne ce s s ary rep res en t at i ves of . other Departments or Agencies (following have participated: Treasury and State). Staff: IES, Executive Director John Dougherty and later Bernard Wells supplied by Department of Justice with title of Special Assistant to the Attorney General reporting to the Assistant Attorney General for Internal Security Robert Mardian and later William Olson. IES has received re uirements directl from and delivered re ort d trec.t lfuite House. The lfuite House"n~s.insisted that the e x i s tence of this Commi tteebe kept s e c re t , J!J~areness of its existenc wi in this Agency has been limited ,to 1[C~-DDO .JDDPr; eTC"!:ana: four ofITcers of this office:

2. CIA Participation: Contributions on foreign aspects (by memorandum with no Agency letterhead or attribution). Contributions occasionally include foreign intelligence provided by FBI and NSA. The Chief of the Special Operations Group serves as the Agency 'representative on the Intelligence Evaluation Committee Staff and as the alternate to t~ Agency representative on the ."\. Committee (who is the~ief, Counter Intelligence Staf~)

3. Special Report: The Unauthorized Disclosure, of Classified, Information, November 1971. Tlus study was lnitiated in July 1971 by' the White House as a consequence of 'the President's concern about the release of the Pentagon Papers by Daniel Ellsberg, Both Robert Mardian and G. Gordon Liddy initially involved in tasking the IES to produce this evaluation. Drafting done by IES Staff members from Justice and FBI. Only Agency participation was editor' yiew.

00549

'''

MORl" Docl"D: 1451843

C ..

.'.

,r .,. ._,-' , C "1 11 ' I t f. 2) 4

4. Republican National Convention (21-24 August 1972): At the request of the White House, a series of estimates was prepared by the- lES on "Potential Dis1"'-;.: , -: ., _. r'uptions at the 1972 Repub 1 i c an National Convention, L'..::.. I· Miami Beach, Florida." ,The Agency provided from February through August 1972 periodic; contributions for these estimates concerning foreign support for activities planned to disrupt or harass the Republican National Convention (copies attached). 5. De~ocratic National convention (10-13 July 1972); At the request of the White House, a series of estimates was prepared by the lES on "Potential Disruptions at the 1972 Democratic National Convention, Miami Beach, Florida." The Agency provided b e.twe en Nar ch and July 1972 contributions on foreign support for activities planned to disrupt or harass the Democratic National Convention (copies attached).

Attachments:

roO, ~

a/s

-s-"

OOS$O

'.,

----------_.~ MORl DoclD: 1451843

"•

',.

\ \

,,'

00551

MORl DoclD: 1451843

( r------"'-'='-'=~---

.:IL---~-

...

SUBJECT:

~I 'Do J-4

., ':"

~ 3 FEB ;972.

Foreign Support For Activities Planned to Disrupt or Harass the Republican National Convention

1. There are only limited indications thus far of foreign efforts to inspire, support or take advantage of activities designed to disrupt or harass the National Convention of the Republican Party in San Diego, 21-23 August 1972.

2. Some American participants at the Soviet-controlled World Assembly for Peace and Independence of the Peoples of Indochina, held 11-13 February 1972 .i,n Paris/Versailles, attempted unsuccessfully to include a call for international demonstrations to take place at the time ,0£ the Republican National Convention. A representative of the San Diego Convention Coalition (SDCC), one of the domestic action groups targetting on the Republican Convention, requested the American.Delegations' Steering Committee at the World' Assembly to include. a specific call for international support of activities against the Republican convention in their proposal to the Action Commission of the World Assembly. This request·, howeve r , was dropped as too divisive by the Steering Committee, despite initial indications that the proposal would be taken to the floor of the Assembly.

. I

3. John LENNON, a ·British subject, has provided financial support to Project "YES", which in turn paid <. the travel expenses to the World Assembly of .a representative of leading antiwar activist Rennie DAVIS.. (DAVIS' r epr-e sentative is tentatively planning to assist in preparations for disruptive actions at the San Diego Convention.) . Project "YES" is an adjunct to another LENNON-supported project, the Election Year Strategy Information ~enter (EYSIC), of which Rennie DAVIS is a key leader, which was set up to direct New Left protest activities at the Republican National Convention. In Paris Rennie DAVIS' ';representative to the I'lorld Assembly met at least once with «iff i c i a Ls of the Provisional Revolutiona~y Government of'South Vietnam; it is not known if the Republican National C~nvention was discussed.

00552

MORl DoclD: 1451843

, ' '"

~·I_-

" ",',

4. The SDCC is planning, for 'foreign support for its harassment of the Republican convention. A working draft plan of the SDCC includes proposals for (a) the use of a specialte~evision network to broadcast video-taped messa~es P, from other countries, including coverage of sympathetic demonstrations elsewhere; and (b) broadcasts over public address systems of live telephone calls from, the Vietnamese in Paris and from the Communist Chinese and others at the United Nations.

,.,

,',

:-"

00553

MORl DoclD: 1451843

. I

L Foreign Support for Activities Planned to Disrupt ~r Harass the Republican National Convention

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION: Indications remain limited, thus far, of foreign efforts ---to' inspire, support or take advan t age of act ivi ties designed to disrupt or harass the National Convention of the Republican ~~rty in San Diego, 21-23 August 1972. The concept of coordinated international support for domestic activities in the United States was generally endorsed at the Fecent World Assembly for Peace and Independence of the Peoples of Indochina; however, the Conference issued no specific call for internatfonal support of dis:uptive actions at the American national po~~tical conventions. J3ACKGROUND: At the Soviet-controlled World ..Assembly for Peace and Independence of the Peoples of Indocb1na~ held in Versailles .from 10-13 February 1972, there was mention of American plans for demonstrations at both the Republican and Democratic National Conventions. The final draft resolution from the Conference's "Action Commission" contains an append ix submitted , by American delegates whose goal was to secure. global coordination £or domestic actions in the United States. It calls for international support to six weeks of domestic antiwar.actions and d~monstrations, from 1 April to 15 May 1972, and concludes wit~ the statement: "This campaign will lead up to the Democratic Party_Convention at Miami on July 9, 1972, and the Republican Party Convention in Sa~ Diego on August 21, 1972." . The final "Resolution of the' Paris World Assembly for the' f---P"'eace-a:nd'Independence of. the Indochinese People" of 13 February 1972, drafted by the "Pol itical Commd s's i on " states: :'

"In the United States particularly, the protest against the war is voiced more and more strongly, under various '/. forms, such as draft evasions, desertions, resistance, demon-,' ---.-strations which now affect even the soldiers. The Assembly ,~alls for support to these progressive and antiwar forces in ~he United States, and asks the governments to grant asylum ·to deserters and to support their right to repatriation. , All together, the peoples of the world will efficiently help to impose on the U.S. Government the restoration of peace, and independence and freedom in Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia."

00554

MORl DoclD: 1451843

DEVELOPMENTS:

t·

The San Diego Convention Coalition (SDCC)', one of the 'domestic action groups targetting on the Republican Con'vention; is planning, in addition to demonstrations, for a "large exposition in the campsights (sic) called Expose 72, which with movies, exhibits, displays will portray the struggles of people allover the world." Plans for activities at .R~pose 72 are believed to include (a) the use of a special television network to broadcast video-taped messages from other countries, including coverage of sympathetic demonstrations elsewhere; and (b) broadcasts over public address systems of live telephone calls from the Vietn~mese in Paris and from the Communist Chinese and others at the United Nations, In addition, the SDCC has suggested that, in order to "outflank NIXON domestically and internationally," international opposition can be expressed "by obtaining the authority of other countries and liberation movements to carry their flags in SDCC demonstrations." ' . • 'r ,

•y~ ·"I';~'V·"·t

, ,

\ '

.' "

•

. 00555

'.,

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.......

2·4, APR 1972

cowai-I

Foreign Support' 'for Activities Planned to Disrupt or Harass the Republican National Convention

bo--'J

SID-L\IARY:

There is lit't'lEl<cnew evidence of foreign plans or efforts to inspire, support, or take advantage of actions designed to disrupt or harass the Republican National Convention in San Diego, 21 to 23. August 1972. The Students for a Democratic Society, in joining the ranks of domestic groups, planning acti ons at the Republican Convention, has adopted a proposal to cooperate with Mex i c an workers and students in a demonstra·tion in Tijuana, Mexico, during the Convention. The San Diego Convention Coalition (SDCC), another domestic group targetting on the Convention, has received a letter.of solidarity from the North Vietnamese. The letter is of interest as an indication of North Vietnamese contact with the SDCC; such contact will be required for the SDCC to implement its earlier-reported 'plans for broadcasts over public address systems during the ,Convention of live telephone caLls from. the Vietnamese in ,, Paris. • -f'''''~"'!'(:(

I .

! '

DEVELOPMENTS: . At its recent convention in Cambridge, Massachusetts, • held 30 March to 2 April 1972, the students for a Democratic ,Society (SDS) adopted a proposal to hold demonstrations at the San Diego-Tijuana border during the Republican National Convention. The proposal included a call for SDS to cooperate with Mex i can workers and students in an action to occur during a fiesta in Tijuana, where Convention delegates will be entertained. The North Vietnamese have given their endorsement to the San Diego Convention Coalition (SDCC) in the form of a letter from the Vietnam Committee for Solidarity with the American People (VCSWAP), a'quasi-official organ of the North Vietnamese Government. The letter, which has been circulated by the SDCC and is dated 27 January 1972, -expr es se s "great delight" with the formation of the SDCC, and conveys the Committee I s "best wishes of militant soli, darity and friendship." The VCSWAP requests that the SDCC .1 write often and "send us materials you have. n :".

~,'t:'S~

f'{ " ae liM fleet.' ~ "

J -nil:'" - !.E.~TJ6 ,-,-

•

,r-----------,--------,

00556 !:';'::;o-,

, ...-

--------

MORI DocID: 1451843

!L,---_I

"./

j. '!' ';".

-. Foreign Support for Activities Planned to Disrupt -----------no~l'~H~a~l=·ass the Republican National Convention -}..+, , :

~ ,,,~,

. . ",

SUMMARY:

I. ----

Indications remain' limited of foreign plans or attempts .',to inspire, support, influence, or exploit actions designed I: to' disrupt or harass the Republican N tional Convention in i!i--- --.. .~ami Florida 21-2 Au ust 1972.

Ii I

i: !'

he British-based Internae er on or lsarmament and Peace (ICDP) has distributed IISpring Offensive Calendar" of activities '._.. in the United States against the ,war based on 'a submission ----oy-ffle- Peoples' Coalition for -Peac e and Justice (PCPJ). i It The calendar includes actions'~lan~ed in' connection with the Republican Convention. Ii

I..

DEVELOPloIENTS:

--;-

-----------l\

The International Confederation for Disarmament and antiwar organization and one of the more prominent member organizations of the Stockholm Conference, has attached a IISpring Offensive Calendar ll to the ." . . April-May 1972 issue of its regular international publication Vietnam International. The calendar had been furnished .by the People's Coalition for Peace and Justice (PCPJ) and ---i_Q~l~ded the following entry:

'~--------~P~ace, a B~i~~sh-based

II ;1

August; 21-23

'Republican Convention, San Diego. Demonstrations organized by the San Diego Convention Coalition, Box 8267, San Diego, Ca. 92103.

F~LLnXT_~BPY_88 NQT im EASE OOSS7

MORl DoclD: 1451843

• ~.I .;

_ .

'Co-

----

The ICDP commentary on the PCPJ calendar urges demonstrations in support of some of the dates listed but does not specifically call for actions in connection with the Republican Convention.

',/

,5:

,. "

.- .

.' . .

,.• '

~~.:;.~>i,i'

.- ~.:i·

•

-.-

_.-

HILL TDlT ~ :!-=-

00558 --

..... •.-- ··v_ .. ,_......_ .

~'-'-',"'

MORl DoclD: 1451843

. , ••••• - • • • • _. &..: ....

14 JUN 1972

.....

., ....

. CO~t1/~l

Foreign Support for Activities Plan~ed to Disrupt . or Harass the Repu~lican National Convention

Do-3<

SUMMARY: 'The only new indication of foreign plans or efforts to inspire, support, influence, or exploit actions designed to disrupt or harass the Republican National Convention in Hlami, Florida, 21-23 August.1912, is an expression of int~rest by a member of the North Vietnamese Delegation to the Paris Peace Talks in the plans of the major antiwar organizations in the United States for demonstrations in connection with the political conven t Lonsiof both maj or parties. . .

DEVELOPMENTS:

,I In mid-May 1972, a membe~ of the North Vietnamese Delegation to the Paris Peace ·'1'alk.s invited a visitor to contact him again when the visitor'returned from an imminent trip to the United States. The North Vietnamese official gave the visitor the New York City addresses of the People's Coalition for Peace and Justice (PCP3) and the National Peace Action Coalition (NPAC), and asked the visitor to inquire at their offices regarding their plans for demonstrations during the coming summer. The. North Vietnamese official stated that he was·especially interested in plans for actions in connection with the Democratic and Republican National Conventions •

•

.' ii

•

.;.

l··~'t· tLe

.. -,

;~1~~{TJ . I

00559

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.. ----,;.';-.,-------'

<0'

•

·t>..:<.; ~I/:".:'::': ~-:~. ~'.

~----~----c--.~. -.-c.:;-:-!,. ~

-.~

...!:, :. .• ~~~.T •• ::.~.~;~ .~. '; '.:::: . : ·••.;l:;;~1:-"~~

Ir---,

---,--.-----j'

-.".

,Z 8 JUrn9i2'

: :~. "~:';~;.:.j:::' :~::::'~~".:~:.::7~~~': "'::"'-"-:::-".:- '". : -... ; .. ~.: -" "

Foreign Support for Activities Plannec(to'Disrupt .- or Harass the Republican Nati9nal Convention

• • There are no additional indications of any substantial foreign plans or efforts to inspire.'support, or take advantage of,activities designed to disrupt or harass the National "Convention of the Republican Party in Miami, F19rida, 21-24 August 1972.

I'i I

.. ';

'.".""

.,.~""

.•...:

,, !

•

-.,~ I

00560

,. ---".--,.- .....- """,-.,.

.,"'-"

MORl DoclD: 1451843

" j

. '. • . . '..

,~.

-C()(,l;'+1

26 JUL 1972

t».. . ,I Foreign Support for Activities Planned to Disrupt or Harass the Republican National Convention

,' !

S1J1.lMARY:

-".- .

Nell indications of foreign plans or efforts to inspire,

support. influence, or exploit activities designed to dis..upt or harass the Republican National Convention in Miami, Plol·ida. 21-24 August 1972, consist of the Fo L'low ing t A leader of the People's Coalition for Peace and Justice (PCPJ) has stated that demonstrations will be organized to take place at United States ,and allied military installations abroad during the period. immediately Before and 'during the Republican Convention. The PCPJ leader also stated that representatives of the Stockholm Conference'on Vietnam will' "participate in activities in connection with the Convention. "'The Anti-War Union (Al'iU), a domestic organization which has . i been active in planning demonstrations in connection with the , Republican National Convention ..·.J1,as,.sent a delegation to ' Paris, France, to meet with officials of the Democratic Repub-, lie of Vietnam (DRV) and the Provisional Revolutionary Government of South Vietnam (PRG). No information is presently available, however, indicating that actions at the Republican i Convention have been discussed at these·meetings. .

DEVELOPMENTS: In an early July 1972 m~eting with prominent members 'of .• foreign antiwar organizations, a representative of the People's Coalition for Peace and Justice (PCPJ), who occupies an impor-'\ tant 'position within that organization, discussed the plans . of thePCPJ in connection with the upcoming election campaign in the United States. The PCPJ representative stated that during t.he pe r i od 14 -'23 August, a :"Peoples Campaign Against Bombing" would be waged in U.s. cities involved in the manu,,' facture and shipping of materials for use in Vietnam, and that similar actions will be organized at United States and allied military installations abroad. The PCPJ representa~ tive further stat~d that "dramatic demonstrations" in protest

.0056.1

MORl DoclD: 1451843

, , ?"

.-:.

----===

r.:.=;:;:

of the bombing in Vietnam are being organized by" the "Republican Party National Convention Coalition" to occur on 21 August 1972. In an apparent reference to the 21 August actions, the PCPJ leader added that representatives of the Stockholm Conference on Vietnam will speak on the subject of the alleged ,American bombing of dikes in North Vietnam. (Comment: We have no present information concerning plans of Stockholm Conference representatives to travel to the United States during the Republicnn National Convention; nor do we have any aqditional information concerning plans of Stockholm Conference representatives to pa~ticipate in activities connacted with the Republican Convention~) The Anti -War .Iln ion CAI'lU), a domes tic group engaged in organizing counter-activities at the Republican National Con~ vention, has sponsored the travel of a delegation of activists to Paris, France, to mee~ with officials of the Democratic Republic of North Vietnam (DRV) and'the Provisional Revolu,::tionary Government of South Vietnam (PRG). An advance party ~'has already met with DRV and PRG representatives to discuss , the agenda for meetings with' the ,full AWl1 delegation. Although no information is presently ava'N"ab.~e indicating that actions ' at the Republican Convention have been discussed or are sched-, uled to be discussed at meetings between the AWU delegation and the DRV/PRG officials, it is known that members of the AIIV advance party have asked for advice from the PRG officials I regarding the stance the AliU should take on certain questions' relating to the presidential elections. It is also known ,that the DRV officials have questioned the AI'lU advance party 'about the political mood in the United States. One of the AWU delegation members has s ta t ed that upon their return to the United States about 26 "July 1972, soae of the members "-, will speak at rallies, over the ra'dio, and on television, \ ,to "educate the 'American people about the consequences of 'voting "for Nixon, and the need' to end the' war and defea t . 'Nixon." The del ega tion member added that the demonstrations at· the Republ.Lcan Convention ,will 'be "unique."

," -,

,I "

00562 "

MORl DoclD: 1451843

'2 AUG 1972 ,

(l8~nrJ

Do -,:3c1

Foreign Support for Activities Planned to Disrupt or Harass the RepubHcan National C~mvention i ,

SUMMARY:

There are no new indications of specific foreign plans or efforts to inspire. suppor-t, influence. or exploit activities designed to disrupt or harass the Republican National Convention in Miami, Florida. 21-24 August 1912. Although meetings have been held recently in Paris. France, between American antiwar activists and representatives of the Democratic Republic of North Vietnam (DRV) and the Provisional Revoluttonary Government of South Vietnam (PRG). currently available Infoi-mation indicates that the DRV!PRG officials made no efforts to encourage or give guidance to the American participants with respect to the upcoming Republican National Convention. Private discussions, separate from the meetings with the entire Ame:rican delegation. 'were conducted b~~!f the DRV and the PRG officials; ,at present. we have no information regarding the substance of these private ,exchanges. A second group of activists. considered' more important than the first dcl.egation , is scheduled to travel to Paris on or about 1 August.1972 _ for further consultations with the PRG and DRV representatives. i

DEVELOPMENTS:

, ';i '!'

In recent meetings in Paris, France. with members of an American delegation sponsored by the Anti-War Union (AWU). representatives of the Democratic Republic qf Vietnam (DRV) and the Provfsfonal Revolutionary \ Government of South' Vietnam (PRG) were very guarded with respect to discussing activities at the Republican National Convention. Although the Vietriam-' ese repeatedly questioned the Americans concerning the mood of the antiwar movement in the United States. they made"no direct reference to the Republican Convention. except for one instance when PRG Deputy Chief Nguyen Van TIEN accused President Nixon of using the private and public sessions of the Paris peacetalks as "propaganda for the Republican Convention.'" TIEN then urged the Americans to promote and propagandize the Seven .Polnt Plan offered by the PRG. The Americans. too. for the most part. ~efrained from discussing the Convention. other than to esfimate that demon, strators will number about 10.000 at the Convention.

r--,..

~.~" ,.

,..x-

, Fl:JLL~T COPX

gQ Nef RE~EA8t"

.• ..."._.-

.__.-

-;'

..- ., .. ..

-_.~,.,-

00563

---------------MORI DocID: 1451843

., Following their meeting on 22 July 1972 with the AWU delegation. the PRG officials held additional talks with sub-gr'cups of the delegation. Additionally. at least one of the American participants was invited by the DRV officials to return for further discussions. At present. there is no information available concerning the substance of these private exchanges. . ~

.- A second. more important delegation of Americans connected with the Anti-War Union is scheduled totr avel to Paris' circa 1 August 1972 for further consultation with DRV and PRG representatives. This second group is scheduled to be led by Rennie DAVIS. founder and leader of the . AWU. Thi~ will be DAVIS' second trip to Paris within recent months for. discussions with DRV and PRG representatives. Upop his return from his first trip. DAVIS publicly stated that the AWU would demonstrate at both the Democratic and the Republican Convention, but that the AWU's chief target would be the Republican Conve:>tion.

'..

"'~

(

. '.

• :

. , .'

. eBf" - 138 1461 "ttO?sr ._'nJ!:IJQ~T:-L--' -,--__ . . ------- -",-'" .,.--_ •........,.....,'_.... . "

_..... ~

---,

00564

MORl DoclD: 1451843

J==:--~~_I

"('t>t.a n-'I-r I

9 AUG 1'372

bD- 3'3 "Foreign Support for Activities Planned to Disrupt or Harass the Republican National Convention.

There are no new indications, as .of this date. of foreign plans or efforts to inspire, support, or take advantage of activities designed to disrupt or harass the National Convention of the Republican Party in Miami. "Florida. 21-24 August'1972.

.. .

,'"

'~1-f'.' ~.

(

•

....":

·00565

-- -

-----------~ MORl DoclD: 1451843

. -.

b Co1::>~ ...f"yI "'It

\ '--------=~__.J

':.

1 6 AUG 1972

Foreign Support for Activities Planned to Disrupt or Harass the Republican National Convention , There are no new indications, as of this date, of foreign plans or efforts to inspire, support, or take ~dvantage of activities designed to disrupt or harass the National Convention of the Republican Party, in IUami, Florida, 21-24 August 1972. ,

:: .

-.. .... : r~:. .

, " . :.

.', '

... I'

•

\. -."

.' "

. "

. ...

.......

I - .Fl!bb' tEx:I"-e8~'(· l')~ 1m RECEPSfJ r

001:"'66 oJ

......

".~

..•

- ..

_.~.-

_._ .

.,.---_..

0.r::f'QfT

-~.'-

. -

' '-,-

- ...

- _.-. . -

.. - ...!·......

w".

.'.

',-,--

.. ...

MORl DoclD: 1451843

. ...

, '

) ... ··r- ) "'c·' T

1 to.: '.. ..~." _.~.~_

~f.S' :U.Y

.. .... '::"';.'. .'.;

, ,

\. ",

00567

MORl DoclD:

.....:O' . , "''

r .'.

145184~

,I---;-----,-------,---o========:r-I,' .'. '0 6"MAil i972 •

. . . . . . ':

.. O'..

•

.'O'"

•• '

Foreign Support for Activities Planned to Disrupt Or Harass the Democratic National Convention " S~mARY AND CONCLUSION:

I I, I

There are no direct i~dications thus far of foreign efforts to inspire, support or take advantage of activities designed to disrupt or harass the National Convention of the Democratic Party in MiAmi"10-13 July 1972. The concept. of coordinated international support,for domestic activities in the United States was generally .endor3ed at the recent World Assembly for Peace and Independenc~ of the Peoples of Indochina; however, the Conference i?sued no specific call for international support of disruptive actions at the American national political conventions. "

.': -

BACKGROUND:

. :""t"~...,\.;.t:.,

At-the Soviet-controlled World Assembly for Peace 'and ,Independence of the Peoples' of Indochina, held in Versailles from 10-13 February 197.2, there was'mention of', American plans for demonstrations at both the Republican and Democratic National Conventions. The final draft resolution from. the conference's "Action Commission" contains an appendix supmitted by American delegates whose . goal was to secure global coordination for domestic actions ,in the United States. It calls for international support to six weeks of domestic antiwar actions and demonstrations, from 1 April tO,lS May 1972, and conclude~ with the state- '\ ment: . "This campaign will lead up to the Democratic Party , Convention at Miami on July 9, 1972, and the Republican' . Party Conven t Lcn Ln San Diego"~>n August 21,1972." i

:.;~;. ~

"In the United 'States particularly, the protest against the war is voiced more and more strongly,

-c-:.... =.

·.Io~

The final "Resolution of the Paris World Assembly for the Peace and Independence of the Indochinese People'.' of 13 February 1972, drafted by the '.'Political Commission" states: '

,, ,

. '"

fltl HOi RELEA~

Ell! .'._l~~rr 88l:> a -

.--------~------

00568

-----------~ MORl DoclD: 1452843

., ". ~·~·..:·"'-·-·"·~·--·~·;·:·~-t~--==---t . . .. ,

... '.

................... ,

'.'

•• :

.....

~i • • • • • • • • • • •

"0.

.•.•

.•..

. • . • • . ,.....

••.•••

• •••

,..,

under various .forms, such as draft evastcns ;_.. -- . desertions, resistance, demonstrations which now affect even the soldiers. T~~ Assembly calls for support ~o theseprogtessive and ;',- . antiwar forces in the United States, and asks the governments to grant a~ylum to deserters .' and to support their right to repatriation • . ,....... . .: . . All together, the peoples of the world will ::~ : . 'efficiently help to impose on the u.s. Govern:". (,;,: ..: ment the"Testora tion of peace, independence .:..... and freedom in Vie tnam; Laos and Cambodia." . : -." I

:.".

II II I:

;', "

...:~..' '

0' •

',:: . "

I i

•

",:: ".:

",;-, ~ .. .:.' .. . ."', .- ..

','

., ':.

',' ~:

::'

•••-

•

. -" .•.:.-.. ;...... 0'

•

:'.

. ,. ...

,'_•

. ;" . ,": -:i ..

'j'

'.'

.. ..

•• "

;.,'

-, :

-; .

.»--,

r , ',': •

,.•

'. . .-.

' ..

, . e,

:. "

• • ,t

.. ' ,..

r •

•

.. : ..

. -.: .... •

" ..

. "

" '

! r

•

• ........v",

. i-...•

I·!

. '.

. ':

00569

. .. ', .

MORl DoclD: 1451843

_ .--"_,-.-'-,---_._--

M.'~'

, .C()(). "

.... . : .

: : . ':': .

09 MAY i972

l'"

t./ .

. l>d·_·.;;1b

•

Foreign Support for Activities.Planned to Disrupt or Harass the' Democratic National Convention "

.~,.

SUMMARY: "

New.indications of foreign efforts or plans to inspire, support,. influence, or exploit actions designed to disrupt·· or harass the Democratic National Convention in Miami, 10-13 July 1972, ~re limited to a reiteration by a member of the Secretariat of the Stockholm Conference on Vietnam of'a statement previously issued by the World Assembly for Peace and Independence of the Peoples of Indochina. The Assembly's 'prono~ncement generally endorsed the concept of international support to a campaign of anti-Vietnam War,'activities in the United States leading up to the Democratic and Republican Conventions, but made no -sp ec Lf i c call for support of disruptive actions at the conventions themselves. •

DEVELOPMENTS:

....

.-.~

-. ~ "

The World As~embly for Peace and Independence of the ~ Peop l e s of Indochina, of which the Stockholm Conference was \. a major organizer, had earlier enunciated a similar s t a t emerrt"., in an appendix to the final draft resolution'of the Assembly's "Action Commission." The app eridLx' called for international support to six weeks of domestic antiwar 'actions and demonstration~, from I April to 15 May 1972, and concluded with ·the statement: "This campaign will lead up to the Democratic Party Convention at Miami on July 9, 1972; and the Republican Party Convention in San D.ie~o on August 21, 1972."

I. '0.f:.';.': ""1'..

00570

MORl DoclD: 1451843

'..

.. 23 MAY 1972

C~t\+ I Foreign Support for Activities pianned to Disrupt 1>0-,:37 -,,(IT Harass

the Democratic National Convention

SilllMARY:

Indications remain limited of foreign plans or attempts to inspire, support, influen~eJ or. exploit actions designed to d~srupt or harass the D3mocratic National Convention in ul 1972,

The British-based Interna-

~t~~~o~n~a,-rr~~~e~r~a~t~i~o~n~~o~r~D~~~s~a~m-amentand, Peace (ICDP) has

distributed a "Spring Offensive Calendar" of activities in the United States against the war based on a submission by the Peoples' Coalition for_ Peace and .Jus t Lce ,(PCP.:T) , , The calendar. includes actionsttPJ.~~nned in connection with the Democr a t Lc Convention. '" DEVELOPNENTS:

The International Confederation for Disarmament and Peace. a British-based antiwar organization and one of t~e more prominent member organizations of,the Stockholm Conference, has attached a "Spring Offensive Calendar" to the Apri1-?>laY,1972 issue of its regular international publication Vietnam International. The calendar had been furnished by the People's Coalition for Peace and .:Tustice (PCP.:T) and included the following entry: "

Ju1y.9 - 12

'/ 1

Democratic Convention, Miami Beach. ' Demonstrations organised by Florida People's Coalition, Box 17521, Tampa, Florida' 33612.

0057.1.

,i I

MORl DoclD: 1451843

;: ..... .;-. '.

•

The'ICDP commentary on the PCPJ calendar urges demonstrations in support of some of the dates listed but does'not specific~lr: "call for actions in connection with the Democratic Convention, ' .. .. . . ,-

.'•

-, '

, '

...." . . .

•

'.,

\ "

:.,

.•

..~

'-.

;

0057Z

MORl DoclD: "1451843

-----_ : . -'

. ...

~,~

~---_.

~--

.' . .

- .. ..' ....

Foreign Support for Activities Planned to Disrupt or Harass the Democratic National "Convention S{J1.1J'.IARY:

The only new indication of foreign plans or efforts . to inspire, support, influence, or exploit actions designed to disrupt or harass the Democratic National Convention in . ,Miami, Florida, 10-13 July 1972, is an expression of int~rest . by a member of the North Vietnamese Delegation to the Paris 'Peace Talks in the plans of the major antiwar organizations :in the United States for demonstrations ip connection with the political conventions of both major parties. "

DEVELOPMENTS: In mid-May 1972, a member 'of the. North Vietnamese DeLe gation to·the Paris Peace TalK~~'invited a visitor to contact him again when the visitor returned f'r om an imminent" trip to the United States. The North Vietnamese official gave the visitor the New York City addresses of the People's Coalition for Peace and Justice (PCP3) and the National Peace Action Coalition (NPAC), and asked the visitor to inquire at ·their offices regarding their plans for d emonstrations during the coming summer. The North Vietnamese -official stated that'he was especially interested in plans for actions in connection with the Democratic and National Conventions. >

• "

j '.

.'~tf~~' ;,t ~

00573

-------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

~.. ~"

~~()~~"t .1..

----'--.-.--'-------. '~l = • l

7 '

. '.-#'

•.•..

',;':':'~~ ".~!.o~

--~•• :..

...-

,....:.

.. \

:.. • • • •..,

,</"._

-""'

«-,C ... , ' ,

2 1 :lUN 1972

Foreign Support for A~tivities Planned to Disrupt or Harass the Democratic National Convention

.: !

•.

. ."

There are no additional indi~ations. as of this date, of foreign plans or e1torts to inspire, support, or take advantage of activities designed to disrupt or harass the National Convention of the .Democrati~ Party in Miami, Florida, 10-13 July 1972, '

~ ~

;.".

-:' .

\ ;: ,.. "

•

.-iULb T~FJ!Q¥1;.Qg ~IQI R6br-E_i\O"'.•~-

---,

t f.e.._

.....

'-_....

.,..--....-~

-._ . .~- -----

....

'-""'-"'-.~'" ,~

00574

MORl DoclD: 1451843

005'75

MORl DoclD: 1451843 ,...

'. "

. _. . 1

\.,.,.

a:z:

) UN 23 J197Z

l·JE.klOR.\~lDt.il-f FOR:

Executive Director/Co:l:ptrollcr

VIA

Acting Deputy Director for' Plans

SUBJECT

Agency Sllpnort to the ti.S, ~ccrct Service' (USSS) for'l,ationai"'!)'c'!'locratic (iO-14 .Ju l y 1972) and ~;ationa1 Republican: (21-24 :\Uf,u::;t 1972) Conventions

1. This ~'1cporl1ndu<l is Dircctor/Co~ptrol1er_

for the Ln fo rraa t Lon of the Executive

2. Authorization for CIA sunnort to t~c U.S. Secret Service for t he Dcnocra t Lc and ':c,:,u'Jlic:.m· ~;aticnal Convcn t i ons is cont'llined in a PlcrJornndtO. 0[" 7 ,:'\nrll 1972 frolrl Ch Le f , CI Sta.ff to the ilCI "hiC;l \,'3$ concurred in hy t he ADDl> and approved .by··the ncr on 10 April l!J72 (copy attac!-.ed). .'. 3. On 13 ,.I.l'ril 197Z the mei; r.iththe "iami USSS r cpr-oscn t c t Ivo and '·;r. ~"3do:larters ro discuss p'l"cli;:ii::l:lry plnunill~ 's~~port to the USSS [lriOT to :l:lti Ih.!"!,!.::~ ~ ...:b;~~': .... vuW't,;I1L.lUns. t.:nl'l ~'lI!lri! 1~~72 t·!:lo I land I~~ct \lith !!e.ldquartars to tr::ple',ll·nt t he prcll:illn:Iry p.Ia.Jl'lir.g a,_:l,"CO uyon in ··!b:~i a nd to de t orn Lne the cx t e n t of Headquarters support: r cqu Lr ed b y the USSS. ' . . -

"'I". I

lat

4. The basic 3greeneni ~utua1ly concurred in by the USSS and Headquarters representatives proviced that:

a. J'-OUld co nduc t name traces on all CUh... lS OL .weer-cst t tho USSS.

b. CIA Headquarters would conduct TI<!;r"e tr~ces on all other foreign born persons.or interest tQ the VS5S. c. CIA ~ou1d keep the USSS inforncd Ot a~y events in the Caribbean and Latin American ~rcas thnt ~culd have any !Je.1rin?; on the IlSSS. pr orcc t Ive ,"iss:ion dur Inz

the convention Dcriods.

This would incl~de briefin~s

on Cuba and Cuban no LLc i es toward the l!nitet! Sta t e s and

on actiVities of c~~an intclli~cncc op~r3tiocs which

could affect the socurity of the conventions.

...

. .. .-..

....

••

•

....

00576

MORl DoclD: 1451843

v v

d. Coverage of Latin Ancrican exile ~roups in the United States wauld be tbe responsibility of the rBr since CIA had c;,ased the extensive coverage for::Jcrly targeted against thC$C Rroups since it ~a5 now con3iuercd internal security function. ,

', .1lP.

...

s.1

6.1 I has a r-r anz ed the r e n t a L of a s a r e nous o abou t five n i nu t e s f r oei convention center ti:licn ~;ill provide a and. f.leC''tin::r i t for t!SSS and ~~cncv This safchou$o w~ll be 3~ai13~lc just prior t~ an~ ~urin~ ~otJ) conventions. :\ Headquarters officer ,.,-ill TDY to ~'i.::si nr Lor to the conventions and rC:;:,J.in until the cOllvention5 adjc~l'n to assist I lin p r ovLd Lng the suppo r t dc sc'r i.bcd in pa ru graph four anave. s e c u r o

e a

r b v

n c

s c

n o

L ,

7. . Station 1I1V~4ia",i is in daily contact with tho iJSSS ion utilizin.:: J:iFi\LCb~1 as a ne e t Lnc site wl~en ncc c s su ry , ';le Lnca't Lon of Stntian ''iH!r·:ial!1i (J:'CO::1'"A) has not b e e n r cvca Lcd to the tiSSS. (J:,;C0l;RA is located s orae distance fro::: J:lJ:.\LCOS.) Additionally. t~e !!iami Security Fiold Office gaintai~s nornal l1nis9n wi tll the local liSSS -"liami' unit. ~lilU.,i.

8. Th{

Imder~tand~ tha~ no p!'::rsonn7~ ~ill bo':>rosent

at the conVCli<XC .... Jil. toat tJ~cy "'111 not p rov i o e any c qu i pracrrt

unique to the Agency. nor "ill it provide the use of any o t iie r facili tics o t hcr than the saf'ehou se described in pnragraph six.

•

00577

MORl DoclD: l45l843

.. •• • ."f....

-3-

5Lr·

, ,....,

TNt-odore G. Shackley Chief Western Ilc~ispherc Division At t achmerrt;

Distribution: Orig & 1 -

EXec. Dir/Comptro11er

2. - Acting DDP

_________________________tTYPed 23 June 1972)

00578 •

MORl DoclD: 1451843

. . ,

".... ' ....

\. J .

.-;. ...

•

• 7 APR ut: •

•

• ~lI::NORANDUH

FOR:

Director of Central Intellir;ence

VIA:

Deputy Director for Pla~s

SUBJECT:

CIA Support to thc Secrct'Service

...

for the Democratic Uational Convention in i·jiami, Fl·orida JUly 9 - 15. 1972

1. This memor-andum describes the support wh Lch the Sccret Service has r-ecucc t ed rrom CIA ~litll r-cr.ar-d to the Dcnocr-at Lc liationai Convention. It is rec": ommendod that the A::;ency l'urnish the nuppor-t; out lined in paraGr<!pn 3 of this memorandum and :four ap9roval .1s reques ted. . 2. By memor-andum 1-30-610.53 or 30 i·jarch (attached as rcr~rcncc), toe 5ec~ct S=:~ice b~3 requented a GeetinG wi~h ap~ropri~te AGency cflicc~z to discU3~ the A~cncyrs ~upport to the Secret ~~~vic~ prior to ann durin.; the Der.;ocratic ;·jational ccnvcnt Lon , The Secret Service plans to send an aGent to ;·11':',,11 on 11 April to cO~~cnce 9rep~rations for the conven~ion and wishes to have the meeting with AGency Headquarters officers prior to the agenis depurture lor Ni~~i •

3. : While details rCGardinG the type of Gupport Which the Secret Service will request OL the A~ency •

'. \

\., \ . \

will not be known until. there hao been·a ~ee~in5 with the Secret Se:ovice.on thiS,;;;.:l;;~er, it is evident from the Secret ;;ervice memor-andum and 1:00m our experience in s upp or-tLnr; t ne Secret Service at the Repub Ldc an Convention in Nia.'01i in 1968 that the Secret Service desires: A) BriefinG3 on Cuba and Cuban policy towards the United Stateu. Counterintelli~ence information on Cuban operations asain3t the United States Which could affect the security of the convention.

',i

0579

MORl DoclD: 1451843

, • ;

(, _.'

\..,

B) Bricfin~~ on CUban exile in the United 3tate~ •

•

a~~ivitie$

•

. C) Name checks on hotel and convention employeell; na,";;e checj~::; on tho:;e peril ens in the Hiar.:d area l'lhom the Secret Service considers a threat to its protective mission~

./twatchliot of oer:wns \"Il'iOJ:l the Agency

considers a potential threat to the security or the conVention.

r----='-'~L=i-=a_=i_=:;'_'o""'n~with a dcsisr:ated officer I I

"~~;J~~=:r--;;C:T.~;-;f::-:f""er:c:~;O-""~-;;~::::~C:;i-=~;-::'~~for the Dur~05eI ofi ) econ"u~ ~ I

',n d

4. 'Agency SUpport tr the Secret Service 'for the converl;ion ,;~ill be ':cn4ra~,ized at nc:;~doua!'ter:;'ttl;': wi],], be contl'olleC: by iieau(Juarter:;. [f5hief: under the cc:neral Iluoerv!:;lon of '.he@ Sta r:;:s will serve as the Cooroinator of this support.

ames Anr;leto;', Chi:ef'.

. J. Attachment co:

cr 5~~,lT

DDCI

•

\ ,,'

The recor.~endatiJn contained 1n paraGraph 1 i~ a~proveG:

~ trect ~r Central in~e~libenc, 5 APR 1971 I I \

•

-'-/'''-I'\..A..",\.",-U-l_'LA ~\

'r etlru ..•

--~._

_---

l'ltl HSf RELEASE .•

'...- .

:_---~

., . ,

~.. -~.,

, '- ' ""''-

00580

MORl DoclD: l45l843

T:-:iE j,-"/drr~,iEi'fr OF TI:E TREi,SU,lY

omC1l

WASlllNOTO~. 11.0. 20226

cr n." I>IUCTOIl

./ i I . I.·

•

1-:30-610.53

Central

AT'J.'N:

Intelltge~cc Aacncy

IL-

'--

--.J

JTJ>IES J. RO;'lLIrr - DIRECTOR

Derr.ocratic ;~ational Convention Miami, Floridn - JUly 9-15, 1972

In view of our

re~!,on5ibilitics rCC;ilrc1ir.<]

of p:..,..os i.d on c i a L c nrici i ci e c e s ,

the protection

we h avo__ ini.ti~tcd --Gccur.l.l:.Y

?reparations to:' -:'!H:~ DCr.iocratic Hntional Convc n t.a o n , which w~ll oe neld in Mi~~i, Florida. between July 9-15, 1972.

We request il meeting as soon as possible between repregenta.tivc9 of our !n"Cclligcncc Division and your agency to disc:lsS intell.icc;)ce StlDoort . - . -~rior to and durinq- t~2 Democratic ~';ation~l Convention. ;';e arc sp~cifical~y inte~es~eci in di~cussinq the npp=opriu~e ch~nncls for routing na-ne checks of j,otel and convention erap Lcy cc s , as well as other indiviauals of protective in~erest to this Service. We antici~ate·there will be sev~rnl ~~ousand n~~eg to be che~kcd. We would also like to discuss the current C~Dan situation, p~rticularly any existi~g reiutio~sh~P5 0etwcen pro-Cubiln gro.~ps in the Hia~i area s~ci m~i~l~nd eu~a! si~ce we ccnsia~r ches~ ~:=cp~ ~o

bo a Fot~n~~~~ th~cu~ to ou= prG~cc~~va ~laaion.

• •• ~.J "iI.

00581 .,

MORl DocID: 1451843

, (

7 May 1973 ",

.t'l[

SUBJECT:

Request for Information on Sensitive Activities ;,'" .-

You will recall that in Fiscal YeaB1971 and 1972, I believe, Agency funds were made available to th~ FBI. These funds may still be possibly held in a special account for that use.

This is one of the areas where

TSD has been very much involved.

Chuck Briggs would "~.

have the details as this was handled through the Executive Director's office and of Course Angleton would have additional information. _-

'.' ~.'

••~

{ J._

Edward L. Sherman Chief Missions and Programs Staff

00582

MORl DoclD: 1451843

8 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR

Deputy Director for Operations

SUBJECT

. ", "', Areas of Possible Embarrassment to the Agency

1. Sometime in the spring or early summer of 1971, Mr. John Dean levied the requirement on the Agency for information relating to the Investors Overseas Service (lOS). The original request was non-specific but it gradually emerged that Dean was concerned with ,the possible adverse publicity that might develop regarding the President's nephew, who w~s employed by lOs, 2. There were multiple channels from the White House to the Agency on this subject: a.

Presumably Haldeman and/or Ehrlichman to Director Helms.

Someone (unnamed) in the White House to the DDC1, General Cushman (see attached telephone conversation). Note that Ehrlichman is mentioned, and

John Dean to the CI Staff. These various channels were sorted out in time and six reports were passed by the CI Staff to Mr. Fred Fielding for Mr. John Dean.

3. The telephone call of General Cushman's is of interest since it gives the flavor of White Hous e concern. It took several days to uncover the fact that the White House interest centered on the involvement of the President's nephew with lOS and possible adverse publicity. The reports submitted to De aris office were routine-in nature and were coordinated with the DCI. After a few months, interest in this subject died down and we did not pursue it further. 4. Please return the attachments when they have served your purpose.

00583 '

MORl DoclD: 1451843

5. I also include a short note on the Intelligence Evaluation Committee and Staff prepared by Richard Obe r , The original meetings were held in the office of .John Dean at the White House and the principal sparkplug for this gr-oup 'activitY'wa-s...t1?e then Assistant Attorney General for Internal Security, RobertlvIa-1<djan and then later his assistant, William Olsen. It is noted that M ~ Mardian is »o w appearing before the Grand Jury 'antl"i1:is always ---------______., possible that he might draw in the Agency. 6. Before appointing Ober .to the IES Staff as the Agency representative, I had attended various inter-agency meetings presided over by Mardian. I expressed the view to Director Helms that Mardian would require very careful handling due to his inexperience. Furthermore, Mardian was de ep'l ydnvol ved in the' split between Bill Sulli van and Mr. Hoover. On a confidential basis one or two senior FBI officials stated that Sullivan was secretly passing files' to Mardian without Mr. Hoover's permission. This. was one of the important reasons why Sullivan was dismissed from the. Bureau.

{YaCes Angleton Chief, Counter Intelligence Staff

Attachments (5)

00584

MORl DoclD: 1451843

( Telephone conversation of General Cuslunan and someone in White House, 23/7/71"

Bob, how are you.

. "'.

DDCI: Just fine; I just talked to Jack Sherwood and he suggested I give you a buzz• ......-.. I deeply appreciate" it. 1 asked Jack to call you. I spoke to Rose yesterday, .and told her "I had a little project here for John Ehrliclunan and I need very discreet assistance from the Company, and I should· like to touch base with Bob. I met him at Jack Sherwood's. ".

DDCI: That's right. That's right and beyond' that I would like to just establisha relationship because from time to time we have a few needs in your area. Let me tell you what we need to know here. yo';r Agency would be the only one to help. I have checked with the Bureau, Bob, and they have nothing on this fellow. Just a mere name check but it apparently has some significance, of c our s e. Ray Finkelstein; born in Belgium about 1940; moved to Brazil about age 12 with his family. This mightie helpful. He now is working with one" Gilbert Straub, apparently Straub is hooked up with that Kornfeld outfit: lOS. .We have a need to know what Finkelstein is all about. DDCI: We will do our. best, of course; we have some counterintelligence files which sometimes turn up people but ordinarily, of course, we don't s'urveil any Americans but this fellow might have come to our notice. , , He may not. be an American, just a European Jew; ..that is the problem, the Bureau has come up with zero. DDCI: Do you know where he is physically located? He may be in Geneva; Straub is apparently in Geneva. _.. " ........ ~,

DDCI: Well, let me get on this and I wi.l.Lget 'back to you.

00585

MORl DoclD: 1451843

rlll; WASIlIi'iGTOX POST W,"wJ.r,r,~.16.1m . , .ft

J. • !

Ii7

CJU7!, Il:'Je ar.7t.J[J[i5... Br<!J~her ,

TIl• .Ttlt"" .. LJ,f,'rJr"lI

!il\'Oid rl(,:1I:; that. might.. rr-Ilr-r-l hln brotncr- nul of Irnuble, "I have establlshed, are .... lridl" unfnvru-nhly on the I'rcstrlr-nt, want (0 he sure that Don 'has untrue. . . Pl'r·;jII~1I1 XI,nl' 11M 1'1\'('1} ." " Not Ionl: iltl,C'I"Wnnf. Dnn.,jl) no drnlln;::J WJLh the federal Ehrltchmon ,,1"0 r.;)\'~ Dr.n. ." "~irlr John Ei,rJlII .,,\:111 n lh-li· IH'~;)n ,Jlf'Rc-rlm: wllh .lnbn novermncnt," Stud the Proal- II)1' ( ::I non, JJOl1illrl Jr. it Jr£". JI f',11ro Jlrr:;I II1.11. '0,' 1~:l):l1r:'( In IJiII-.p Itosf nn mnnufnctnrcr or rfrllL "I want to be sure that t.ut:c before the iJOY ~\"':lIl If) ; J:;rr)l the J'rc-511Irl:I:. II P'l'l -s- }l1:1.\·.~' ound equlnment, who Don b never asked t do any- Swltzcr-lnnd bsl summer If) ~Ihh' In-other, Donald, (lIIL »r \\':'IulC'1I the novr-rumcnt to . 0 work for Jnternntlonnl Conhoi w;l!rr.. cnnshlcr iml;dtinJ: hi~ prml- th~lI(: thot wo~Jd embarr-ass trola. The company has now \ Donald Nixon hns It weak- nets in urban riot nrcns. Hill thts offh-e," transferred young Nlxun to I1r~!'; {m' (;'tllC'nlll~ rocds [lilt! told U~ DOl1:'1Jd merely wantr-rl TIH'J1 the Prc::;hicnl added n.'i the Bnhnmas. C':l}:Y.monC'J'. Itc u-lr-d to ~,1lh;ry 10 he the company's W('!'l:m a O('rlhIJuJ.;i1l: "Don is the' His father, l=lHdn~ 10 a fcw llnlh appl"lIh'$ in the l!1:iOs hy Coast rcnrcscntntive, ilnll did hr.!'l :-ah sman in the I)ixon vjsttors, inchnllnq my i1~.'iUci.llll' hMl'mdnc ~~O;\,onO from hll- not want to put'!n the fix for !;llllily." . George Clifford, con~idcrrrJ lh:al llonalrc Howard Hughes to op- (edernI money. But Eln'llchThe M"rrlof.t~ anrced to Donald. Jr.• was snmcthinq of crate it rcstnurrmt chnin, the man quietly vetoed the pro} watch over Donald, and they a disnppnintmcnl to the JamBolTIC' or t11(' Nixnnburger, in eel, and the President's have scrupulously kept liirn jJy. He had been 0(£ in tile Southern Cnllfornla. brother wrote to Hill sJyjn~ away from wnsblngtcn, There mountains associating with hipTwo months aft('[' the 10:1n he WOlS no longer interested has been only one awkward in- pies before the overseas jOD W;l5 made, some oC Hu,::hcs' in the company. crdcnt. Dpnnld Jlcw to Greece was arranged, IClp n~!<:i~t;ll1l~ :;nt down with, T • ,150_'1:': oC the three-man team '!hc boy had said he was Dnnnld 10 survey the rh;lo:- or No 1.nl1gcr Allnf'cr thOlL orfttrcd,.MarrloU·s airline- gomg to work for Investors hi .. accounts. NO:lh Dir-trlcb, Donald also made coutnet (':ltninl; service to .Artstotle Ovcrse a5 Service, which has \' ho then dlrcctcd the rlav-to- wlth Elmer Stone,'), Jawycr for Olln!i:sis' Olympic Airlines. been in Iinanclnl diffirull.\'. cktr opernllous oC Hu~hr s• em- the fly.-,n Acrnnnutir-al Com' . 1").. "I told him not to say IIt;)l:' uln-, rnrup! ..tnod thnt Dnnnld p,111~', But in acrcrcncc to hi" Gl'cdts J.1curJ1J~ Glfls said l.?ona)d, a ,nole of eXil~jl('r' I h:ld ~'lItr thl'ouc:h the money brolher, Donald toolt ::;Iolle Th" Greeks, who!>c fililifilry!.alfon In hJS '·olce. "1I th;tl '~(,l" \\ i1hnul v.l)·ln&" oft important (hrou{!h the gunnlcd White ~O\'(,rJlml'nt is unpopul;lr in around, he's goinJ; to hI'" in .. rrrrlilors. House :::..1('5 to :;cc-· Ehrlich- the U,S .• Tolled out the red lot of trouble. I told him h~ Rut it WAS too)ate. Donald's man. Afterward, a ~poJH'$m;tn eill'pel for the President's WilS to say he \\'fI~ IJ'iinC to rc~laur.1nls w('ot bankrupt, for Ryan Aeronnutical e'x~ bl'olhr.-r. Tom P<lppas. a bi~ work for JnlcrnJl!on,,1 Con· anrl Iht' KixollburJ:er was lost p)nincd th:1t the pnjr hnd just Republiciln Jnoney raiser with Irok IDS nod Inleru:atioJ1.ll til mankind. dropped by to Jet it be knllwn oil intC'fC':;ts in. Greece threw Controls arC" illlied compnnic$. Thc story of the ~205,OOO that Stone \VilS no Jon~cr net• ., J:wi!;h dinner for DoililJd in but h~'s not ~lIP}1o.':;p.d to t.ay lo..n lrnkC'd nul durinJ::: Rich- iog ns Donald's ler.:ill ildvisr:r. AlhC'ns imd in\'ited members hc's workin,:: (or 'IDS. You ill'd Nlxon"s ]9GO ('nmpillJ;n for Whcn Donald fin ..lly joined oC 1he Greek mlIltnry junta. know whO'll would h<lllpen if lhe prc:;lncncY. causing bim the l\Iflrriolt COrj10rilllon in J\nfl Onnssis, the husband of that hot around. .. lJolilk:11 :p..in. January, ]970. EhrJichnmn thc widow of the miln who de"ThJt dumb so·and·~o." DOliJ\t onr. 111nr, Don:l1d Incor. .summoned J. WJl1..rd :i\larrioll (e;llcd Hichard NIxon for PrC's- aId silid or his ::;00. "John Ehr~_ l'tlri1lrd hlmsrlC :mrt bc,::an ~cl- nod his son, Bill, to lhe Whit" itknt in lDGO. sent long· 1Jchm.tn tnlked lo him fo~ a line _~h..r('..; 10 ('ill7.r.n~ who IIouse for an audience with ~l~mm('d roses to Don:tld's couple or homs nnd lold him michl h.we nn lnl(,l'csl In his the Prc~ldcnl Marriott h:lrl hold room. .. to beh:\Ve lJimself over lhel·c. hlnnd Jin~. Ehrlichn1:ln ex- been ch<lirman of the Nixnn Wn:-hln~ton wllIspcrs thnt You know, he told nirn he w"s pl.'llllf'd !!('nUy 10 Donnlrl thnt Innu:::uinl nnd Is truslcd' by Dnn:lld used his While J[ouse the President's nephew and ."llrh ,,('ntures C'ould cmh;lrrMs the President. . Influence to ,::ot cnlt'rJnn- eon- couldn't do nn),thlnc to emonrhi." brother nod thnt, lor his Delicately. the President trncts for :MarrioU'wlth Amer- r;lss Ute Prcshlcnt" hrolhcr\, snke. he IIhould asked the MarrJolls to keep Jc:m .J\lrlincs and TWA, we • 01912.Dtll.MC~LJI't01"dll'.t •

I -.

;:;,;s UUIJ: h) UU .Jr'~i Ifp)"fY jlJ

~\:IflUE~1 P'!PX -: I !~{tvw t;'f:: :-jc;l7Jf

./ I

·U·

Ii_;~i_~.... Q.~Q ~~~.~1L_:~rl

Jil

.._ .

... '.-

'.'~~'-o',.._."

•

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.......

, ...... . IJIS. .t"J :.~":; . \---==-===. ,~

:7.";.;":. i-r-, -:-""71,.--;:- --;:;_ ;::=<;;:,--".- -;

r:;:-~-;':~--::"':":_

Pre his It lhe , scarcl

Vesco's business hcadquarters in Fairfield, N.J., anor Edward C. Nixon, brother a helicopter fli;1ht. from New of the President, is keeplnu "York Cily. Hl)w':::~,crl Scars WS silence in the f ace of said" he didn't ~trii'!;njr'f'tb~ court testimony t hat bo mectlug among Nixon, Vesco played a role In arr-anging a and business ossociatca. The Securities and E:~.. $'100,00 campaign coutrlbu(ion in ';<15h Irom a Iinanclse change Cormnlsston 112$ filed a civll suit a!:,~iIl5t Vesel) acaccr.ied of fraud, '·No comment (hot Is news- cusing him c; a ~:;:·1 million worthy, 'Thank you. Good- Irnud in Jr.:Jlin:.; ti,", ncsets of bye," NixOD said y-:hen final- his Swlb-:J;.;l'"-:u li]S. L1d.• ly reached yesterday at his rnulnnl fund nvtwortc, By JAilJES R. POLK i:..roNews 51.:!U l\"rILor

preble roo value l 11. \", in~

snbl th aion 0

0 )

unlisted telephone

number

Edwnrtl Nixon, -; ~IO Saara

In Edmonds, \Vnsh., afler a week of calls. Then he hUIl~ up, A New Jersey campaign oICicial, Harry L. Scars, has teslified he was told tho

.»

said is a Iornicr di. -. ':tI':" of a vescc (,()Jap:Jl~Y. is Ihc ::-cnnd member or tin J': ~::oi:knl's family to be Ih!:;!'ri to tho financier. Donald A. Nb:on 1 , '3 son of the Prcshlcnt's ctbar Nixon brother made a call brother, is Vesco's personal to Washington to confirm that administrative assistant, usuthe donation by" financier ally bcscd in N:lSSal1J the Ba.1\('Iberl L. Vesco was wanted hamas. in cash, The S.zC pruhe his JndI· Scars sald under oath hg- catcd the. ~;·3CO.r.CO cash donaW<lS present when the 42- tlon carne from Iunds at vcsyear-old 1\L..;on arrived at co's Bahamas Commonwealth

Trensur' Shultz, . man A

;tgclJ1 nn 1:ln\":\I\O c. h·IXO;'1

Ilnnk if) N;I;;~il~l_ The rnon:y was Ilcwn to Wil:;~lillr,t:iQ April 10, .::lll.houZh t~~ Nj::~n cmnrnign Iailcd to report the donalion under 1J1'3 new dis-

closure law.

A federal court hearing Is scheduled Monday in New York City on the SEC's bid for DR injunction ~Jjninsl vicIation (of sccurltlcs laws,' Scars' testimony came in a pretrial deposition in the SEC case,

:)/'ar<- 5.7,73

r r r... n .·.-.,r.... o r '..-.n ·c>

I'll ll;.,

·""I

jJ Uh 1iU .\...~jJ "

~cl

u ...... ll..

r.'iltP~ I

Lo~D n~'·

Ho)' As; bert Sb

Eeonemi tcnd--l t

ranz;c ",C Jli~~l C

closed do bllffclill<:T

\p;:;k ill-} mlll"I;"!<;,

to new , currenci-

Fran 1:ClI and To' day to Iervcr,

Nixor-

!\.P.

OOS87

MORl DoclD: 1451843

·".-THE WALL STREET JOURNAL 1

i '\'sco A rrest '''arrant !1.)sllecl by Federal Juche 'For Grand Jury Inqui;y Finllnder Husn't Been in fhe U.S. For. )Ionths; His Lawyer Feurs Panel Produce Indictment

'''ill

~ ':-ALL 5TRE£~'AL Sttl!J Reporter

.BY _ ?\~\~. '\ ORK -

Federal JUdo;:e Edmund L.

i P .. l:1m"ll Issued a Warrant {or the arr-est or e

: ?:!T!!ed N'ew Jerse.y financier Robert V(,h~~: !,n ~.-der to b.ring h.lm ~s witness before a grand. 1 r • .1. ) here In\'eshgatrng his acli\'itil'~ ,\Ir J ~ \ r-sco has been out of the U.S. for :~"';rai I ~, 1 , rnombs.

I J:io

crJmlnal charges have been bmu<>ht Ii against ~lr. Vesco. But the U,S. Attorney's ~f f~~e. which reql.:ested the bench warrant, re\ Iously had asked the judge to lind )£r. V~<;co in contempt ot court lor Jatllne- to heed a subpoena ordering him to appear- before the gr""and Jury. The gcrermnent lI'led to serve the subpoena on April 15 in Nassa.u, B:'\hama Islands. The grand jur)' Js underslood to be Investj, gating the, c.lrclI.mstances of 7lfr. Vesco's $::50•• o~ in conlrlbuhons to President N'b.:on's lOi2 r.(election cAmpaign. At the time. the Sccurj, ttcs nnd E:o-:chnngc Commission was condncttna a well publicized Inqulry into Mr. Vesco's busT-/ n:~s nff~lrs. The SEC 1I1e ~uge civil suit "~,.!n~~ hUll ;]~~ 4J ether men aiiCfConcC'I'm; on I . J ov. ._1. T~.1C' !\J:o-:~n finance committee returned / ]o.lr. \ es~o s ("ontnbuUol;ls to him on Jan. 31. t ' Mr.., V("I'>~'O'S .ulprney. Edward Bennett WIl. Jlams, told the jUdge ~..e sterrtay he had rvescn I to bctievc tkn :'\-ir. Vesco would be jndie-ted bv J the gmnd jury, Mr. Wiliams said tbnt if forced 10 appear, :;\J)'. Vesco would Invoke his constttn, tiona! llri~'i1C'ga ngainst sctr-lncrtmrnnuon, un]e~~ he ~'~l'e grunted immunity ngulnsr Jll'ose'l CUtl,on. ].:.1'. WiI!Jams added thdt the U.S. Attor, nt'y S OUll'C had nJrcacfy rcpllcd to him that it wouldn't (lfI~r immunity,

May 4, 1973

---5

Mr. \VUUams, who eerller- had asked the judge to dismiss the contempt application on technical grounds. sald the ctrcumstancea didn't call for :?lir, Vesco'S arrest. After- the court was adjourned. Mr, Williams declined to discuss reports that the at-year-old Mr. Vesco intended to renounce his U.S. eiUzenshlp, even though the attorney at an earlier hearing had said he would raise the question of cltlzcnshtp, #. James W. Rayhtll, an assistant U.S. attorney, brought lhe matter up in court, saying the "I go v ernment had information that :;\(r. Vesco was "currenUy attempttng to renounce his U.S., citizenship in Costa Rica:' where he last year took up le-gal residence. It's understood that 'Mr_ RayhiU wasn't referring to a disclosure ·ma~e late Wednesday by Costa Rica's president, Jose Ftgucres, President Figueres, on e. two-day visit to this countr-y, said that Mr, Vesco in an audio ence two or three weeks ago formally announ... ed his Intention to renounce U.S. citizen. ship. In washtngton, the Stale Department said Mr. Vesco has: lold Costa Rican authorttlcs that he already has renounced American citizenship before two notaries, with his lawyer's help, However, the U.S. Embassy in Costa Rica contended that didn't count, because it wasn't done before a consular officer. The State Department's legal experts are checking to determine whether that view Is correct. The U.S. has a 1922 extradition treaty with Costa Rica, covering 21 crimes. including robbery. forgery, cmbezalement, and fraud. 'The U.S. considers ils 1931 extradition treaty with Br-itain to apply to the Bahamas, but it isn't "clear whether the Bahamas agrees. Thc British treaty covera such' crimes as fraud and misrepresentation, but the warrant issued yesterday for a g rnrrd-jury appearance isn't a matter for which cxtraditton is possible. Mr. Vesco has a home and family in Boonton, N.J., but has bases oC operations in Nassau and in San Jose, Costa Rica. Government prosecutors d.cclined to comment when asked whnt steps the)' would take to have Mr. Vesco nrrested it he were Iccatcd in either of throe J countries. I

I I

The SEC's ctvn suit accuses :Mr. Vesco J dtrcctlng the "footing" of S~2J million in nsscts '; of four foreign mutual funds mnnngcd by 1.O,S.: Ltd. Mr. Vesco formerly hcndcd both .l,O,S.! nnd Jutcrnatlonal Controls Corp" of Fairfield.: N.J_

00S88

MORl DoclD: 1451843

7 MAY 1913

SUBJECT:

Intelligence Evaluation Committee and Staff

Background: Formed Dece~ber 1970. Membership: Justice (Chairman); FBI (active staff participation agreed to only in May 1971); Department of Defense; Secret Service; National Security Agency~ CIA and any necessary representatives of other Departments or Agencies. (Following have pu rt i.c i pa t e d: Treasury, State.) Staff: IES Executive Director John pougherty and later Bernard Wells supplied by Department of Justice with title of Special Assistant to the Attorney General in reporting through the Assistant Attorney General for Internal Security Robert Mardian and later William Olsen. IES has received requirements directly from and delivered reports directly to John Dean of the White House. 1.

D~partm~nt of

2. CIA Participation': ~~o'ntributions 'on foreign aspects (by memorandum with no*lig'i!ncy Le t t e'rh e a d or attribution). Contributions occasionally include foreign intelligence provided by FBI and NSA. 3. Special Report: The Unauthorized Disclosure of Classified Information, November 1971. Initiated July 1971 by the liffi~te House as a consequence of the President's concern about ,the release of the Pentagon Papers by Daniel Ellsberg. Both Robert Nar di.an and G. Gordon Liddy initially involved in tasking the IES to produce this evaluation. Drafting d~ne' by IES Staff members from Justice and FBI. Only Agency participation was editorial review. "

(Table of contents attached).

__ _

..:-....0.-

00583 -,

MORI DocID: 1451843 "

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction

Problems Relating to the Disclosure of Classified Information

3 "

Executive Orders and Related Directives

1 I

Effectiveness of Existing Security' "'t.:gulations.

',-

.....f.-"~w.(-\

Lessons of the "Pentagon Papers"

Ii J

Conclusions and Recommenda tions

i I I

I j

;

,I' .-'-

, "

00590

MORI DoclD: 1451843

SUBJECT:

Thel£n$:HAOS 'Program

1. The~HAOS program is a.worldwide program for clandestine collection abroad of Lnf'o rma t Lon on foreign efforts to support/encourage/exploit/manipulate domestic U.S. extremism, especially by Cuba, Communist China, North Vietnam, the Soviet Union, ~orth Korea and the Arah fedayeen.

2. The r;;jilcHAOS program has not and is not conducting efforts ~mestically for internal domestic collection purposes. Agency efforts are foreign. Foreign-oriented activity in the United States has been of two types: a. Selected FBI domestic ~ources who travel abroad in connection with their extremist activity and/or affiliations to make contact with hostile foreign powers or with for.eign extremist groups have been briefed and debriefed by Headquarters officers. The briefing has included appropriate operational gllid1nce, including defensive advice. b. Americans with existing extremist credentials have been assessed, recruited, tested and dispatched abroad for PCS assignments as contratt agents, primarily sourceS offered for such use by the FBI. When abroad they collect information responsive toffiBJeHAOS program requirements, as well as other Agency requirements. They are thus used primarily for targeting against Cubans, Chinese Communists, the North Vietnamese, etc., as their back-· ground and their particular access permits. It should be note~ that the! .::asp~c~· ?ft~e ~ /proJe!=t of thb ~5C J\ -ia DIVISI0!iJ IS 5 1~1I at to the Ltlij}::HAOS PROGRAM. .

:3. I\.s indicated earlier, [fr@:HAOS is a foreign program, conducted overseas, except for the limited activity described above. The 'program is and has been managed so , as to achieve the maximum feasible utilization of existing resources of the 0Eerations Directorate •. No assets --.f,LIII n)fUO~ = D° NS)l af! E~E

00591

MORl DoclD: 1451843

·1I

have been recfited and ruJ.! eXc1usi~elY for the lBii'cHAOS program. Instead, emphasIs has been placed on tfie exploitation of new and old Agency assets who have a by-product capability or a concurrent capability for provision of information responsive to the program's requirements. This has involved the provision of custom-tailored 'cb'llection requirements and operational guidance. this collection program is viewed as an in~gral part of the recruitment and collection programs oflJ;,.l<ina Opelations, Vietflam 0F-erat ions Cuban OpeTations, Seviet Bloc IJi lI'i-s-ron-op-eratwn s and Korean Ilranch opelatiolls;J Agents who have an American "Movement" background or who have, known connections with the American "Movement" dre useful as access agents to obtain biographic and personality data, to discern possible vulnerabilities and susceptibilities, and to develop operationally exploitable relatjonships with recruitment targets of the above programs. These assets are of interest to our targets because of their connections with and/or knol'/l~'!,ge of the American "Movement." Over the course of the2E~HAOS p~ogram, there have been -app r cx i.ma t e Ly 20 important a r e a s ,of operational interest" h i C h at the present time have "b e'en reduced to about ten: Paris, Stockholm, Brussels, Da~-1rs'Salaam, Conakry, Algiers, Mexico City, Santiago, Ottawa and Hong Kong. ------------

4. The~HAOS program also utilizes audio operations, two of which have been implemented to cover targets of special interest. a

b I

00592

MORl DoclD: 1451843

SJiNSITlVr

,'.

5_ frUjcHAOS reporting from abroad relating to the program originates in two way s : Individuals Who are noted in contact with Cubans, the Chinese Communists, etc., and who appear to have extremist connections, interests or background are reported upon. Other individuals are repqrted upon in response to: specific Headquarters requirements received from the FBI because such individuals are of active investigatory security interest to the FBI. , 6. All cable and dispatch traffic related to the ~n1CHAOS program is sent via 'restricted channels. tit is ,not processed by either the-fable Secretariat or the Information Services Division~ The control and retrievability of information obtained, includin~ information received from the FBI, is the responsibillty of the Special Operations Group. 7. Information responsive to specific FBI requirements is disseminated to the FBI via special controlled dissemination channels, i.e., by restricted handling cable traffic or via special pouch and specially numbered b Li nd memoranda. '

8. Information of particular significance, when collected, has been disseminated by special memorandum over the signature of the Director of Central Intelligence to the White House (Dr. Kissinger and John Dean), as well as' to the Attorney General, the Secretary of State and the Director of the FBI.

00593

MORI DocID: 1451843

00594

MORl DoclD: 1451843

SFNDER WILL CHECK CctiFICATION TOP AND "SOTTOM

r -bNCLASSIFIED r

CONFIDENTIAL

I SECRET

OFFICIAL ROUTING SLIP TO

NAME AND ADDRESS

DATE

INITIALS

IIr. Halpern

'2 3

"•

t\'l::-w~!.'t·,..

. 6

OIRECT REPLY OISPATCH FILE INFORMATION

ACTION APPROVAL COMMENT CONCURRENCE

Remarks: "r ""

PREPARE REPLY RECOMMENOATION RETURN SIGNATURE

Sam:

,~".

Attached are the following:

l-hackground paper on TIC #7 2-comments on facts and statisti cs 3..comments on AID by Mr. ~chlesinger 1963 (wh I ch Mr. Colby might find ." of Ln t.e re s t )

.. ".' '..'''.

00595

FOLD HERE TO RETURN TO SEN.DER

FROM: NAME. ADDRESS AA'D PHONE;. NO.

DATE:

I 25/4/73 UNCLASSIFIED

.. '

· f CONFIDENTIAL

SECRET (40

MORl DoclD: 1451843

,., ';

00596

---------------

MORl DoclD: 1451843

•

, -»

~,~

~'_"Ll>t_J

. ,

, •

~.la,lORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director for Operations

Counter Intelligence Staff, Police Group Activities

SUBJECT

1. Counter Intelligence Staff, Police Group (CI/PG) is responsible for Staff coordination within the Office of the Deputy Director for Operations for activi ties and programs involving assistance to foreign police/security forces for the purpose of exploiting such activities and programs for intelligence purposes. 2. Safety, I"--------iand its IPA

n a

CI/PG maintains Li a i son wi t h the Office of- Public Agency for International Develop~ent (OPS/AID) training facility, the International Police Academy CI PG also administers and supervises Project

1.t1.on,

coor 1.na e Central Intelligence J,.----,--~eeccn.lnn~l~c:;arr_rnnvv'ee;ss:t:1.i:'go;\a ti ons Cours e . CI / PG Provi de s gu1. an ce i, and counsel to the Area Divisions in matters pertaining to police/security functions and activities. Specific details of these functions are as follows: LIAISON l'lITH OPS/AI D CI/PG liaison with OPS/AID and IPA is conducted on a daily basis and consists principally of: A. exchange of information on IPA partic1pants, some of whom later attend I Icourses I

I '1-,--

B. arranging for inclusion of Agency sponsored participants in IPA/OPS/AID training programs, C; arranging for IpA/OrS/AID briefings and tours for foreign police/securi ty representatives sponsored by CIA Area DiViSio~ns 00597 ~l:'

\Jl.

,r:r

MORl DoclD: 1451843 ; :

. j

-..

•• 2~ •

2 -

,, ..i

,.i "'!

F. coordinating the Agency's participation in the. Tecllnical Investigations Course designed to familiari2e the trainees '.ith the technique required to properly investigate terrorist activities wherein explosives have been utilized, G.

,,,

H. PROJECT

ln trainin~ forei ngage prlnclpa~~~~~~~~h-~~~~, o lce security personnel under and selling pOlice/sech-rFyv-pe~q~u~l~pun",le~lnlr-~tno"~o~rNe~llg~n po a ce security personnel and organizations. I 11!lso provides special training programs and briefinnng~s~t~o' foreign police/securit nersonnel of interest to A ency o erating divisions. acqulre e capa 1 1 Y 0 provl police/security personnel in VIP for Chiefs of State.

*IL-

las

-----:-__ 00598

MORl DoclD: 1451843

..- .

- 3 -

COlUlENT

~does not maintain direct contact or liaison

lqit~w enforcement organization, local or federal,

<>",

at home, or abroad. When the need arises, such Con tact is sometimes made on our behalf by

an r o a »e c au s e a e na t u r e of its activities (training of foreign police/security personnel at home and abroad), and its Public Safety programs around the wo r l d , Ihas such contacts at home - local and federal level - hecause its personnel are personally acquainted with Law enforcement dfficers thro.U:hout the Uni ted States. fJemhers of the I 1h ave, a ppear e d as guest 'rIl'e'TC-:1L-rurlr1e.-rl"s-"aCTL~S"U=IITI-rll'e'TCl"enI"'a'l"'I'--Inst:lcutions as the U.S. Park Police, IPA", the U.S. Secret Service; and the U. S. Treasury Enforcement Divis-ion.

3. In addition to the liaison mentioned in the previous paragraph, the Agency maintains liaison in varying degrees wi t h foreign police/security organizations through its field stations. The existence and extent thereof, however, is a decision to be made~ Area Division, and is not the responsibility of ~

4. wi. t uan '-;;;;'lcrltt"r"l"o:;;n~e",,,;r,-;;--;="====~='"ffiC"---TT;u"p"'aiiim"a"rr.o"s"-. --,.\, an !·ii t r i on e , an experienced and respected law enforcement officer, was a bona fide DPS/AID officer assigned to the AID missipn in Uruguay, and was never a CIA employee or agent.

LOll

hllgle Irt t e Ll i pen ce

Staff

00599

MORl DoclD: 1451843

-,...

___ ?i>O-7:5 -(~7, ./

n'1 "'f\~1973 / ,

ILl cu. c..R-:.

•

J: ft. ~-<'1n c "-

- ~lE:·jORA:-IDUN FOR: Deputy Director for Operations -SUBJEq

Joint CIA/USAID Terrorist (T~ch~ical) Investigations Course 17 (English language) CI Staff's Project

1. This effort is a joint CIA/USAIO'training program for foreign police/securi ty personnel. The initial phase of the training will be conducted at the International Police Academy (IPA), Washington,- D.C. during the period 2-27 April 1973. The following subject matter is covered in this phase of the training: investi~~tive techniques, collection and preservation of evidence, records, files, and reporting, gathering of information on terrorist groups and thei r acti vi ties. a student s e rri na r dcvoted to discussions on terrorist and other hostile activities currently existing in e'cir rcsnective countries. etc. This phase of the-training is concluded by a two day orientation hy the 8oIr.!) Squad of the Dade Coun ty Police, Departnent in Florida.

of this training will be conducted durin~ 30 April - 25 l~y 1973. t e cnn r c i ans u t i l Lze cove. The ob j ec t i ve 0 f th i:~s~prrjnls:ns,-,e.,-,...O....t---...c."ll-"e'-.t"'rAa"l.nn"l"n""'g-,l."s--.t"o---develop individual student technical capability to realistically conduct ihvcstir,ations into known or suspected incidents of sabotage/terrorist bombings by:

a. P'r-cv'i d i n g trainees wLth basic kn owIe dge -Ln tho uses of commercial and military demolitions and incendiaries as they may he, applied in terrorism and indus trial sabotage operations. ,_. b. Introducing the trainees to corunc r ci a Ll.y available materials and home laboratory t.e chn Lque s. Li ke Iy . to be used in the -mnnuf'a c tu rc of explosives and incendiaries by terrorists or saboteurs.

00600

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.... • - 2' •

c. Familiarizing the trainees with the concept of target analysis and operational planning that a saboteur or -t.e r ror-Is t must enp Loy , d. Introducing the trainees to booby trapping devices and techniques g i vinR practfcal experience wi th I:oth manuf'ac turo d and improvised devices t.h rough actual fabrication. E~phasize the necessity of alertness for detecting and countering Dooby'traps placed by s ab o to urs or terrorists. c. Conducting several field exercises to give each trainee the opportunity for detecting . and neutralizing various e xp l o s Lve and . incendiary devices likely to be used by terroris ts or s ab o te ur-s , Lnc LudLna letter bombs, packages, attache cases, etc.

f. Conductinr. seVeral investip.atlve fIeld exercises of exnlosive incidents to alert the trainee to the need for and manner in which to colloct, identify, and preserve legally admisable eviJc~ce for prosecutive action. 3. The program provides the trainees ~d.th ampLe opportunity to develop basic fa!!liliarity and use proficiently through handling, preparin~ and a~?lying the various explosive .charges, incendiary D.f:ents, terrorist devices and s ab o t age techniques. t;SAIO, International Police Academy (IP;\)~las received reports from Fo ree r fo r e i gn . police/security personnel who participated in the .pr-og ram indicating that they :<ore ca Ll e d upon to utilize tIle skills they a cqu i red rh rough this training in the handling of explosive devices in their respective countr Attnc~ed is a letter from a particioant in TIC 16 stating that he de ac t i v a t e d 11 letter bkco"'p'"',"-=O"V"l'C"'c"---'=="-!was 'h'.11CI sent to the Embassy in 1 ----'1

4. Subject course will have 26 participants from ten (10) foreign countries. ~ine (9) are financed by AID, cight((e.) by CIA and nine (9) hy tho Lr own gove rnncn t.s ,

00601.

MORl DoclD: 1451843

..,

- 3 -

" J

5. Separate end of course reports will be prepared by . USAID and CIA, TSD personnell

. '

James Angleton

Chief, Counter Intelligence Staff

•

00602

MORT DocTD: 1451843

•.., ......

FACTS k~D STATISTICS

AID/ors TRAINING ~ID/OPS, International Police Academy sponsors some seven hundred (700) foreign police officers for training in the United States each year. These officers are selected from underdeveloped countries. I

TRAINING

L,.,,---=="T~O"T"'i"~-'z"'e.-rr~aO'Fe""a"s----;o,f

some . 1aw en for ce men t .

tra~ns

During PY 1973r-1sunnorted two of our field stations by providi~ni~g in VIP protective secvrity for I'--.J~e rs onnel . " AID/OrS-CIA TRAINING During FY 1973 two joint USAID/OPS/CIA 'I'echn i cal Inves ti" police/security 'personnel representing~countries. The purpose of the training is to develop ~idual student technical capability to realistically conduct investigations into known or suspected' incidents of sabotage/terrorist bombing or other activities.

-ga t i on s training programs were conducted for Dforeign

______10'06-03

MORl DoclD: 1451843 : "

,. ~..

."-

NATIONAL SECURITY Political, Military, and Economic Strategies in the Decade Ahead

Edile4 by

David M. Abshire and Richard V. Allen

Aqrniral Arleigh Burke•. pire'lo~ TIlE CENTER FOR STRATEGIC STUDIES, GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY "

pubr;sh~J

/0' Ibtl

HOOVER INSTITUTION ON WAR, REVOLUTION . AND PEACE by FREDERICK A. PRA,EGER, Publish~r

New York· London

00604

,'.

MORl DocID: 1451843

• '~'J

•~

.. ,

•• •

Strategic Leverage Irorn Aid'and. T rade" -JAMES R. SClILESliYGER

Summary The analysis' of this' paper rests" on the' assumption. that American poUcy-inakers should not be so concerned unth: the purs,,;t of hard-to-obtain ideological objectives that they exhaust the power potential implicit in trade and aid, relationships. Rather the trade and aid programs should be managed so, as to preserve an environment 'in which pressures can be brought to bear to sert'e the national interest at a later, and perhap« 'more critical, date. This emphasis on power considerations implies both (a) that the assistance prottrani ca-nno! be based pl"imm'ily on humanitarian 0" idealistic goals, and (b) that economic ties with other nations should not be severed simply because of onr disapproval of other social systems, including those based on communism. Thouoh. typically public opinion vastly overstates the strategic leverage that can be gai,,!ed through economic , weapons, 'this leverage is still not negligible. One can arguri that in the past the United States-has failed to take advantage of the power potential 'implicit in aid and trade through its failure to develop concepts and mechanisms of dete'''''",ce in ,uays akin to what has been done in the military field. Much of the dif]ic;dty 'may be ascribed. to ,a failure to develop sanctions, ,ahich discouraoe actions unfavorable to" olir interests, as well as incentives, which encourage cooperation, No system of deterrence can exclusively stress the carrot and itmore the stick. },fore is being demanded of the aid program than it can reasonably «chiece, Assltming that the primary emphasis of the aid program is to encourage social and economic dcreiopment rather than to' elicit direct SUpp01't for American foreign policy

687

00605

:',':

',"

~.J i, !'" ~ ~,

- _.._---~. -- ----_. f 688

MORl DocID: 1451843

---:'-.:--~:.'~~----'-'-'-- -.-,~

JAMES R. SCHLESCNGER

obj~cU1;e8. it is argued that n-e ehonld aftt"mpt 10 dct'd",) stable ~oc;al and paUlital conditions by strm!Jtllrni710 tile "[('gitimacy" of the del'clopi1/U social order in the rUNI of the rrsuectiee publics-rather than attempting to (':rIJDr! tlie trappings 01 Amen'can demormcu,

. ·1

Technological change. the easy f{1'nilabilily o!,.::ub,'lfilllf('s. and the [l!Ugllly prrioc1 for adjwltllll'nt tw It JJrOlollgrd strlt!Jnlf' lwre

all reduced thr impact of th" "supply cljret" J/"Mch 11'(18 at one time)he lila in wcapon of economic wflrfa)"r. If till' economic wenji61if' 0/: straltOy are to be at all ('fjrcth:" under todny's eonditkms, the "influellce ef!rct" mnst rise corr;.~'Potldinl}ly· in imparlance. This implies that we slumlfl be in a. position to threaten to do damage to other economies throllgh tlle' curtailment 01 access to lVcsffTn markets. In order to kerp tllis threat a.'" ever-present onl', tee mustv.luncceer, continue to tredr in t:"olu.me with other cOllnt)"i('s, inclltdiflf] Communist ones. Partie+rlu" in dealing with the tmderdt!vl'loped nations Ihe potential 'i'l'lctiveness of such threats may p'·ove to be cotl$iderable.

00606

MORl DoclD: 1451843 '.

696

-. SCHLESINGER

One final consideration-it would be unwise to use potential weapons of this sort for niggling purposes. The balance of pay. ments has been, troublesome. and is properly an object of concern in wasbtngton, but surely it is not a first-order consideration in our relations with the underdeveloped nations. Suggestions have been bruited about that we should make use of the aid program to force recipients to bu~: from us in ways that go beyond tied aid. Under the best of circumstances, our bargainingpower is limited, and shooting away strategic ammunition for so paltt')" an economic goal would seem to reflect a poor sense of -r- _proportion. .

'I\!.

Aid

Within an over-all framework designed to discourage hostile or predatory attitudes toward the West, the aid program may seek to foster the maximum rate of economic and socinl progress. In the basic policy of AID. the Kennedy Admlnlstration has, explicitly adopted this goal. As. has been indicated there are costs to this decision. Outsiders are not likely to be much liked even under the best of circumstances, which hardly apply to the underdeveloped countries, and their Intervention in whatever direction will in the long run excite antagonism based on' real or fancied wrongs. Nevertheless, the basic decision has been made. Let us examine in what war we may proceed so that the good effects clearly outweigh the ill effects, There aretwo initial postulates: (1) our bargaining. power will be limited. and (2) American notions of social reform and of equity are neither necessarily applicable in the underdeveloped lands, nor need we assume jthat those whose cooperation we must win will find them appealing. These postulates are interrelated. Joint1~· they impl)' that we cannot press forward on all fronts to create a society in which a good American democrat will feel at home, but must instead ccncenu-ata our energies on those social changes which will spur economic growth even ir the immediate results an; more consistent with the cultural genius of the peoples Involved rather than our own tastes. \Ve ought not expect them to make the same choices as we would. 01", if they make the same choices, to achieve in a ten-year period whnt it look us (!if!hl~· real's to achieve. Finally, in "reaching judgments on social processes in other lands, we cannot apply \};'hat are our own-or, in reality, higher.-=standards of purity. As outsiders, we will be unable to perceive the social function of behavior which is "superliciall~' corrupt, and will t~nd to Jump

00607

MORT DocTD: 1451843 '.

697

it together with thal which is purely pnrasiilcal. With respect

to our Q\\'U history, retrospectivelj- we have come to find merit in what once were r~gal'ded as the disreputable procedures of an organization like Tammany HaJJ in that it provided a kind of social security and a welcome for the newly arrived. Immigrant. We are accustomed to "the daily dangling of new post offices. good committee assignments. and br-idges over creeks in the outback before wavering Congressmen, and warm approval is given, for its tine sense of political realism, to whatever ad. ministration is doing the dangling by those who agree with its goals. Toward simjlar procedures abroad we are inclined tq take a simple mucklitk'ing"attitude. We look askance at the" higgling of the political mArket-with a naivete that would do credit both to missionaries and old-style political reformers, If we hope to achieve a fairmeasure of success, '\:e,shalJ have to sharpen our critical fncuIties lind learn to distinguish between unappetizing social devices which arc funelional and those which are simple barriers t~ progress. The statement of objectives by AID is a very ambitious one. The purposes of the assistance program include stimulation . of self-help. encoul"-:,~ement of progressive forces. and achievement of governments based on consent, which recognize the dignity. and worth of individuals who are expected to participate in determinirig the nation's goals.: No doubt, a statement of aspirations is in large part Window dressing; but the criteria by which self-help is moving toward social and political progress are more specific: a more ef}uitable distribution 'of Income, a more equitable tax system "'ith Incr-eased yields, expanded welfare programs, increased political pm-tlcfpatfon and clvil Hberttes, and so on. Several points-may be made regarding the objectlves r nrst, there are too many; second, they are to some extent in. consistent: and third, they ignore the real resources available. There is, in -the first place. the long-perceived clash between economic progress, on the one hand, and the combined goals of equitable distribution of income, immediate. Improvement in Jiving standards, and security 011 the other. This underlying conflict spiJIs o...er into a tension between rapid economic pro-gress and the introduction of democratic processes, On this issue there appears to have been a revolution in informed opinion in the Uni~ed States during the past fi v-e years. During the Jate fiCties. it had become almost an axiom that authoritartan, if not totalitarian, governments had innate ndvnntngcs in gulding economies toward rapid growth. The prevailing v'jew was

00608

MORl DoclD: 1451843

698

•

JAMES R. SCHl£SIN~

based. no doubt, on an assessment of the record of the Soviet regime, and an exaggerated notion of how much the Chinese "Great Leap Forward" would accomplish. Perhaps the earlier "pessimism" regarding the relative performance potential of "free" and "controlled" economies was overdone, but have we not gone too far in the now prevailing "optimism" that any clash between economic progress and the democratic institutions which Insm-e-ths dominance of the t·o~ populi is minimal? The average clttaen-c-parttcularly when he is ill-housed," Illclothed, ill-fed, and ilI-educated-seems most likely to be interested in the here and now, A government which is responsive to the desires of the public will continually be tempted to mortgage the future for the present. The "abstinence" or "waiting" which classical and neoclassical economics state to lie necessnrv ingredients in economic progress will be hard to require, as will be the inccnti v e schemes (and the accompanying conspicuous consumption) which are likely to strike the a.... erage voter as inequitable, We rna)' TecNI that the Peron regime was (and still may be"!) the most popular regime in recent Latin American history. Or we may observe the economic consequences of Brazilian democracy. and have our doubts. The tnfto\\" of American resources may be able to make showpieces out of several small, recentJ)--demflcrntized nattons like the Dominican Republic, but we ought nol assume either that demccracyasstata in economic development, or that the Dominican example is wid(>J~' applicable. This is not to sa:r that some judicious prodding in the direction of democracy may not be a wise policy. but it must be iudiaione, nnri cannot be based on the assumption that democracy necessarily fosters the political stability essential growth. One of the criteria by which self-help can be judged as justify. ing additional aid is an improvement in the savings ratio, Some students of the aid program Would put major emphasis on cbnngos in the SAYings .l'ntio in tbnt it provides a relatlvebobjective standard b)' which an improvement in economic, per. fOI'Ill:mc:e can be ju(J~eCl.· If we apply an objective standard. complaints about the distribution of aid nnd subjectivity in the

• CharJe5 Wolf, Jr, of RA~D hD.l< been atlempting to drvelop.an eecncmeldc model which will pro\'ide nn ohjel."ti\'e measure the performance sl,"lf.helll. The criterion is the ~a\'jn,l':'S ratio. In the"rnodel the :Jttt'mpt. is made to t,!limintlte the influence ot other \,::Iria:'lo:,:<, such as per npita ineeme, income distribution, and dt~ of urLan';tution. which JJ<;<;ollnt {or a !:'OM IItol of the observed \':lriotian in the ~avinbS ':.3tla as between naucns nnd bel ween different periods .at Um~ of air! recipients in terms

00609

MORl DoclD: 1451843

00610.

MORl DoclD: 1451843

(

8 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director for Operations SUBJECT:

Foreign Resources Division Oper-afi onaI Activities with Possible Flap Potential

REFERENCE:

FR Memorandum.I-r-' 1973. same subject

1 dated.7

May

The answers to your que'stions are as follows: a.

Question:

Do we recruit Americans?

Answer: Yes, we recruit Americans to be used ~upport assets and access agents .. These Americans. are used for spotting. and assessment purposes only and do not perform any recruitments.

asl

b. Question: Do we use alias documents on Americans in course of operations? Answer.: Yes, we do Use alias documents when recruiting American support assets. The great majority of these recruitments are done in alias. All recruitments of foreign targets are done in alias.

c. Question: What disciplihary controls do we have over alias documents? . Answer: We maintain a current list in FR Division Headquarters offhe alias documents issued to each Base.

~1.

00611

MORl DoclD: 1451843

- - U...... 1 r f

(

_ : ttt~t'-,./2/

More importantly, each Base Chief is responsible for supervising and maintaining control over the alias documents used by the case officers on his Base.

Answer:

I::J-'A.-cn=Y"'c~Ie"'a=-=r=a~n~c~e~s~o~r~p~r"'o~h~l~b~lTt~lo"'n~s~?-------

Question:

If you have further questions, please let me know.

Acting Chief Forei-gn Resources Division

0061~

MORl DoclD: 1451843

WIAl

CQH.·;ENHAI: u,£ O:ilY ROUTING AND R::CO~D SHEET

EA!DDO I

.. _ ·..__ . _ . _...

...

/ "

.........

...c _.... -_.~.. - - - - . - - - -

~'Cro::;;":i"'I~~1\~RH7~'.f..:: =, J "'"' ·u' • ,. ,~,

••

. I

1 I

000

- - - -..- - - - - - - - - - 4 - - - - l - - - c .. - - -

Conversation 5,

He indicated

FR Di v

Uk.

(R-I

I I

intlroduct ry and "closing' paragraphs

113,

-i

I· 1~,

I !

fO~M

3-62

IHH<HAL ntHY O IIU

MORl DoclD:

____I 7 May 1973

1~51843

j) () .1'1

MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director"fo,,' Operations \2roreign Res~urces Divisio-'i})Operationat Activities with Possible Flap Potential

SUBJECT:

1. At thr risk of stating the obvious, almost,all of the operational activities carried on by<'rR Division I ~un the risk that unauthorized disclos-;;'re could create erriba r r a s srn.errt to the Agency. We have accepted this as a condition p r e c e de nttand ha.ve proceeded with our operational activities in the most professional rrrarin e r- possible under the circumstances. There are certain r-a th e r- unusual activities in which 'fR DivisioIL.1as participated and/or is participating'that conta~n somewhat greater possibility for embarrassment if discovered. I have listed these below, not necessarily in brder of embarrassment potential:

~rovides iairly considerable amount of support to Dr. Klssmger in his contacts with the Chinese. This support was authorized by Mr. Ka r arrie s s'i n e s and Mr. Helms. Thus far there has been no problem other' than the inordinate amount of time spent byl personnel, not to mention the fairly sizeable"'a"m'ruo"u"'nn'tF<o"l~------'- money that has been expended in support of these efforts.

a_I

',.

MORl DoclD: 1451843

/2/

c. Alias Documentation: Clearly, FR Division does the great majority of its operational work by having its case officers utilize alias documents. All recruitments are done in alias. Thus, the alias documentation is a prerequisite for effective operations I IFurthermore, our case officers have btilized fully backstopped alias credit cards for renting automobiles, rriot eI rooms, hotel rooms for operational rrre etf.ng s , etc. These credit cards are backstopped by accounts in alias w.hich are promptly paid at the appropriate time. I see no problem in the continued use of alias documentation ,and moreover, I feel it fs absolutely essential to continue using alias documentation wherever and 'whenever possible.

,-"", ",C;& .... - .. I;; 1

.-..... '- ..~~.. ..

MORl DoclD: 1451843 ,

,',

, ".

/3/ 2. Summarizing the above, I believe that all of the activities outlined are clear! within the acce table risk frame.

The

'--:o~t"h~e~r=-:a~c=t;:;i;::v:;iC;:t7ie::-:::s-,--:-a'1t;:;hco=u-=g:;:h--:c~l,-=e-=a-=r"l=y"'in=v=o'lv-=··in=-=gC-::-s-=o-=m=-=e-d=e-=g=r-=e-:eO-:o:-ifC=r'i-=s"k-:a:-:r.Je necessary and valuable and in my opinion should be continued.

Acrtng Ctu e t Foreign Resources Division

..."

_, ....,.,\ .. '""" '

~ -"

006i6 f3xp'>tf't' (p)(,!) ( b){1/

MORl DoclD: 1451843 S E ;.J'E T

DRAFT OUTLINE FOR DDO BRIEFING T.

Statement of Organization and Functions

°11.

Official TIO

III

.,' Location of Field Units

IV.

Cover

Targets

VI.

Methodology

VII.

Budget

VIII.

Coordination

Internal

External

Statistics:

Recruitments

General Support Assets

Positive Intel~i~~nce '~eporting

MORl DoclD: 1451843

FOREIGN RESOURCES DIVISION

Statement of organization and. Functions

MORl DoclD: 1451843

E T

S.E~

00620

MORl DoclD: 1451843

S E~E T

SE~T

MORI DocID: 1451843

MORl DoclD: 1451843

err

R ......T

----------MORl DoclD: 1451843

SE~T

MORl DoclD: l45l843

SE~T

MORl DoclD: 1451843

;

..... - ---

MORl DoclD: 1451843

006Z7

MORl DoclD: 1451843

00628

MORl DoclD: 1451843

-------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

SJ C !l e- T.

MORl DocID: 1451843 S~T

O()63j

MORl DoclD: 1451843

MORl DoclD: 1451843 J

•

, - : . _............

•

. '(~

.' ':F

6 JUN 1973

MEMORANDUl\i1 FOR: Director of Central Intelligence

THROUGH

: Executiv.e Secretary. CIA Management Committee

SUBJECT

: Alleged CIA Involvement in the Ballou Cas e

1. .By rrrerrior arid urn "dated 25 May 1973. I informed you of the results of .an int';rview of Mr.1 Iwho reported that Mr., rn employee of the Office of Security. had ,stated dunng a diSCUSSlOn period at Adv-anced Intelligence Seminar No. 6 in Septeznber 1971 that the Office of Security had been involved in the "Ballou case. " (The residence of Mr. Ballou. an antique gun collector in Silver Spring. Maryland. was raided oil 7 June 1971 by Montgomery County Police and Federal law enforcement officers. When the offic e r s , 'dressed in civilian clothes. forced their way into the house. Ballou picked up an antique pistol. The officers opened. fire and seriously wounded Ballou. He was hospitalized for ·several months and was left partially paralyzed. I believe he is now sUing over the incident. l.

2. We inter':'iewed Mr[ Fertain other employee; who attended the Seminar. arid the DIrector of Security to determine just what was said at the Seminar and the extent of any Agency involvement in the Ballou case. We find that partitipants in the Seminar were . encouraged to discuss the details of their work and ,\ssociated p roblerns , Mr.1 Fe'ntioned an as~ignment he h~d been wi~h. the ~' Secret SerVl,ce at the 1968 Nahonal Conventions and hIS Ha'i s on acbin.hes with the Montgomery County Police.

_. i ,I

U: ....

0".

3. Ireports th~t in .disc,ussing the latter, subject he " related a conversanonhe had WIth Inspector ~ the Montgomery County pqlice. sometime in June 197 after the Ballou incident chad been r ep; r ted in the newspapers. According t o l . . Ithe ' police inspector had thanked him for some amplifying eqUlprnertt rne Agency had given to the Montgomery CountyPolfce and r ernaz-ked that

'I I

I II

•

1of

00634

)

MORl DoclD: 1451843 U1.G.tet

qlo '--..i'~-

•

• this equipment bad probably saved a police=.an's life.

The inspector com.mented that the account of the Ballou incident appearing in the press was not the whole story. With the aid of the equipment the .: Agency had provided, the police had intercepted a telephone call from Ballou to a friend in which Ballou outlined plans to "kill a co!'." I" 'The police then staged a raid to forestall Ballou's plan, and it was . dnring this raid that Ballou was shot.

I I,

1, •

I, 1

4. Jsaid that he bas no other lmowledge of th~ Ballou case, except lOr wna: he bas read in the newspapers, and that he has not had any other conversations about the case with any members of the Montgomery County Police. We learned nothing from our inquiries that would indicate any other Agency involve=ent in the Ballou case.

5. The following are related excerpts from the "Family Jewels" submission of the Director of Security on,16 May 1973: During the period from 1968 to 1973, several items of Positive audio equipment consisting primarily of clandestine . transmitters and touch-tone dial recorders were loaned to the Metropolitan Police Department; Fairfax County. Virginia, Police Deparl.Inent; Montgomery Countv, Maryland, Police Department; New York City Police Department; and the Sal). Francisco, California, Police Departrnent.

On 25 July 1968, and at the specific request of the United States Secret Service, tbis Office provided two audio . countermeasures technicians to the United States Secret Service in connection with the Democratic National Convention held in 'Chicago, Illinois. Tbis was not an official detail although both rrren were proVided with temporary credentials identifying them as being affiliated with the United States Secret Service.

1 I

On 15 August 1968, we detailed the same two men to the .' United States Secret Service to cover the Republican National Convention in Miami, Florida. On both occasions, the team rnembea-s were debriefed upon their return and it is clear that their activities were confined exclus ive'ly to sweeping the candidate,,' and potential candidates' quarters.

William V. Broe Inspector General

O I G : I I ( 6 Jane 197'3)

DllSt~

Orig lot 1 - Addressee 1 - ExecSccj . . . _CIA .•.;- M~ ( ..

• _ 2 _

:'~~_'t-.

00635

MORl DoclD: 1451843

( -',

.~.

MEMORAI

v-,

JM FOR: The Record

Mr. F. P. Bishop is fOllowing up per para 7 of IG memo to DCI dtd 25 May.{ ]

cm/31 May

00636 (DATE) fOR ... HO. I

AUG .54

REPLACES fOR~ 10- 101 '0 I WHICH NAY 9£ US£D.

MORl DoclD: l45l843

o UNCll\SSI FI ED

rr-;>-

B mRET'

. ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET

SUBJECT, tOplional)

""""'ON

fROM,

Inspector General

25 May 1973

TO, (Offiur d.tignalion. room n... mb.-t, and

DAlE

OffiCER'S

building) RfaMD

NO.

{I~

Mr. Wm. E. Colby ..

fORWARDED

INITIALS

COMMENTS (Numb.' eo(h commen' ro .how hom whom Ctaw 0 lin. oClon column oh.r .ach comment.)

l'O whom.

:. {/D.' L·

The Director 3.

~'-I

\.--\ i0~~ •

-c \-'l. \ l-·Ll c- ",

(!,,-(,-\ \ \ ,t Y .

~(.f

L-G

~\.)---::

I 7. 0

_.-

10: 11.

12.

13.

14.

IS.

00637 /

raut'p'''TIA'

NTERNAL

n UNClASSIFIED

MORl DoclD: 1451843

,-'

. 25 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Central Intelligence THROUGH

: Mr. William E. Colby

~as

1. On 17 May the narne of referred to this office as having attempted to contact the Director concernin "activities outside the Agency." I attempted to contact on 21 and 22 May, but he was on leave. On 23 May '--<:-=e'--;::s""t""a·te=,;-::c'e wanted to check a portion of his information and asked if he could come to my office on 24 May. 2. in October to the Soviet/EE Section.

came into the A enc

as a JOT ssigned He has a'o-:.v::e::-r::::y=-s""t"r""o""n=g-Cp=e-=r-=s-=o-=n-=n=Ceo-l file.

3.1

~dvised that in August 1971 he attended the Advanced Intelligence Se rni nar , On the-Hr s t evening of the seminar the students had a "getting acquainted" session where each one ave a brief descri tion of his duties: One of the students, / I of the Office of .Security,. however, c~on '-;;.,=e"r""t""e"'s"'e""""sos"-l"o""n:-w=a'-'!s over and expanded on the briefing he had given. He claimed that CIA was cooperating with the Montgomery County Police, stating that the Office of Security gave electronic and other support to that organization. 4. He further indicated that the Office of Security had been involved in the "Ballou case"~ lescribed the Ballou case as follows: The residence of Mr. Ballou, an antique gun collector in Silver Spring, Maryland, was raided on 7 June 1971 by the Montgomery County Police and some Federal law enforcement officers. After the officers, dressed in civilian clothes, had forced their way into the house Ballou picked up an antique pistol. The officers immediately .opened fire and wounded Ballou seriously. He spent a long time in the hospital and is partly paralyzed at the present time.

00638

MORl DoclD: 1451843

SIA INfEr.:'" "BE SPllY

His case was given much publicity in the Washington Post at the time. There was additional publicity in the last several months when Ballou instigated a lawsuit against the raiding officers.

_ _ _ _"'-5~ "'

I Identified another student, Iwho was assigned to lAS, as a friend of

~fl"e'--"s·t"a.te-.,.--thatl . case.

lalso seemed to know the Speci1lcs of the barlou

6. I thankedl rnd told him this was just the type of information we wanted to receive so that it can be investigated and appropriate action taken if the information is borne out. 7. This office will follow up on this allegation and advise the Director concerning our findings.

yy Dliam y. 010e

Inspector General

- 2 -

CIA IN+t:llriAt !::leE 8r1lY

0063.9

MORl DoclD: 1451843

. ( ,

:'.;

•

.; . ,

~,'.

... ~

.. • •• ~.

:..l..

•

Nofed

on~B

Mr [ called the Director l6'ay at. ~:u:, re "act~vities outside the Agency". I told him Director was out of the I office but we would return his call. Mr. , called back that day and said he was g01ng J0 Fubini lecture and would call us ba~k. He never did call back. Mr, Colby sa1d to turn over to Mr, Brae .

I 00640 '~l

';'

" , ,""":

• •: .. '

.- •...

MORl DoclD: 1451843 .....

.,. I ...

(

r0 -----

6ll

MORI DacID: 1451843

, -.

."0

(

00642

MORl DocID: 1451843

0, U~(I.ASSIFIED

It',r AL

O U. uNLY ROUTING AND RECORD SHEEr

SUBJECTI (OpliOI'lQI)

FROM,

0.,.,

Inspector Gene ral TO: IOfficl' designation, room numb.t~ ord building)

DATE

I-_~.-_--j OffiCeR'S INITIAlS

22 May 1973

COMM..ENTS (Numb.r loch commlnl 10 show from whom '0 whom. Drow 0 line oeton column aFt.r loch comlMnl.)

Mr. Wm. E. Colby 2.

The Director

10.

11.

12.

0064::

61 0 U~;~Cf·1S R

SEERET

EBI/flIlElmAl

n INTERNAL

lice nUlv

UHClAS'SJ FJ ED

MORI DqcID: l451843

. .-

22 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Central Intelligence THROUGH

Mr. William E. COlb~.

e---

. Mr. Colby advised me thatl !extensionO had called the Office of the Director m rme wlth the Director memorandum to all employees' dated 9 May 1973, requesting all employees to report activities which might be construed to be outside the legislative charter of the Agency.

employed as a GS-S clerk in the Cable SecreLanat. fie Jomeu t e Agency in September 1967 and worked in the Office, of Security for 3-1/2 years before transferring to the Cable Secretariat in 1970. While in the Office of Security he was assigned to a suppor:t desk, SD3. The primary function of this desk was tol0-7_ _---O,.During his assignment L.,,""""l"s"'-'''e'''sOC'-,,-----"s'"'u"'p"'p=o.".r""'e,..--a"'p"'r=oJ"e"c~ enti tie d SRPOINTER- . I ;-.=;;-r ---'-d_e_s_c_r_ib_e_d_th-,e project as follows. The .'0 had a unit at the JFK International Airport th'=a"Lt-p="oLto=g"rc:accp=-e=-m=a"i"'l-c:'going to Soviet Bloc countries. This work was done by Agency staff employees. The mail' was placed in bags by the regular Post Office employees and stacked. After their departure for the night, the Agency employees would open the mail and photograph it. Both incoming and outgoing mail, including postcards, were photographed. A watch list was maintained and priority was given to the names listed, but generally all mail was processed. The results of the operation were sent to Washington Headquarters where they were handled byl ~e would receive a teletype advising him of the registry number and the number of items. He would check to see if the number of items received was correct and route the material to the appropriate offices. Generally about 1/4 of

°9644

MORl DoclD: 1451843

(

•• . .

the material was separated into bundles bound with rubber bands. This portion was sent to TSD for technical processing. The remaining material was sent to the CI Staff,

Aboue twtce a month the GI Staff would add names to or delete names from the list. Fould send the changes in the list to the field office. The watch 11st was made up primarily o f B tho were in the United States. WHen lett the UInce 01 l5eeurlty in 1970, the project was still activ

Iwas in no way emotional or belligerent. He presented the facts quickly and clearly and said he had no other Infor-rnation, He stated he would have come forward with the information sooner but he had only recently had time to read the Director's rn e rnor-andurrr, The writer thanked him for his interest•

.~1am ~/;/fiw {J:~ V. Broe Inspector General

- z00645.

MORl DoclD: 1451843

6 JUN 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Central Intelligence THROUGH

: Executive Secretary, CIA Management Committee

SUBJECT

: Alleged CIA Involvement in the Ballou Case

By memorandum dated 25 May 1973, I informed you of the results of an interview of Mr.! !who reported that Mr. \ an employee of the Ulllce of Secur-ity; had stated during a dISCUSSIon period at Advanced Intelligence Seminar No. 6 in September 1971 that the Office of Security had been involved in the "Ballou case. " (The residence of Mr. Ballou, an antique gun collector in Silver Spring, Maryland, was raided on 7 June 1971 by Montgomery County Police and Federal law enforcement officers. When the office r s , dressed in civili';'n clothes, forced their way into the house, Ballou picked up an antique pistol. The officers opened fire and seriously wounded Ballou. He was hospitalized for several months and was left partially paralyzed. I believe he is now s uing over the incident. )

Icertain other ~mployee;who Z. We "interviewed Mr. 'I attended the Seminar, and the Director of Security to determine just what was said at the Seminar and the extent of any Agency involvement in the Ballou' case. We find that participants y"the Seminar were erico ura ed to discuss the details of their work and associated pr-oblerns , -Mr. mentioned an assignment he had been on with the U. S. Secre e r vi c e at the 1968 National Conventions and his liaison activities with the Montgomery County Police • .

3. reports that in discussing the latter subject he related a conversahon he had with Inspe cto r] pf the Montgomery County Police, sometime in June 1971 after the Ballou incident had been repc..rted in the newspapers. According tol fhe Ihad thanked him for some amplifying equipment the Agency had gIven to the Montgomery County Police and remarked that

00646

MORl DoclD: 1451843

- .,- -

this equipment had probably saved a policeman's life. The inspector conunented that the account of the Ballou incident appearing the press was not' the whole story. With the aid of the equipment the Agency had provided, the police had intercel'ted a telephone call from Ballou to a friend in which B~}lR\': ,outlined plans to "kill a cop. II The police then staged a raid to forestall Ballou's plan, and it was during this raid that Ballou was shot.

4./ said that he has no other knowledge of the Ballou case, except for what he has read in the newspapers, and that he has not had any other conversations about the case with any members of the Montgomery County Police. We learned nothing from our inquiries that would indicate any other Agency invo1vem=t in the Ballou case.

5. The following are related excerpts fz orn the "Family Jewels" submission of the Director of Security on 16 May 1973: During the period from 1968 to 1973, several items of positive audio equipment consisting primarily of clandestine transmitters and touch-tone dial recorders were loaned to the Metropolitan Police Department; Fairfax County, Virginia, Polic.e Department; Montgomery County, ~rary1and, Police Department; New York City" Police Department; and the Sal} Francisco, California, Police Department. On 25 July 1968, and at the specific request of the United States Secret Service, this Office provided two audio countermeasures technicians to the Urrit e'd States Secret Service in connection with the Democratic National Convention held in 'Chicago, Illinois. 'This was not an offiCial detail although both men were provided with temporary credentials identifying them as being affiliated with the United States Secret Service.

On 15 August 1968,we detailed thesa.m.e two men to the United States Secret Service to cover the Republican National Convention in Miami, Florida. On both occasions, the team members were debriefed upon their return and it is clear. that their activities were confined exclusively to sweeping the candi.dat e s I and potential candidates' quarters.

OIG~ (6 June 197'3) Dis;~

Willia= V. Broe Inspector General

Orlg & 1 - Addressee 'I

"C" _ _

.-«:__ I rT A

_ 2 _ lvf~

oor;f7

MORl DoclD: 1451843

•

....

'4 June 1973 Date

BRaE' Follow-up interview re Mr.LI xxx to see DC I. , --_. -.

Irequest

, .

FROM:

FPBishop

I. l"V13.

RE'J;'U~N TO:..(¥i1e,on Interviews held on behalf of DCI re Wate r g ate Z.Iewe ls

00648 ... :

MORl DoclD: 1451843

. . . '.'.''., : ':'.:':"

.'.

.:':,.'. ~, .

'.:

. : . :: . . ", " .: .' .': .':,: : ..: .:.... . ~.> .. . .. ". , ~:.. . .',.' ..:: . . .::. ~ '.'

" :

. . '

... ' .

1. On 31 May 1973 I questioned labout what he had said at the Advanced Intelligence Seminar No. 6 and the extent and nature of the relations he had had with the Montgomery County Police. He said that he and others had been encouraged to discuss their work and the problems related thereto with other Seminar members and told that what they said would be "non-attributable." In this context he had discussed the Office of Security's relatio,.s with local Police Forces including the Police Force in Mp~tgGmery County. He said he mentioned the "Ballou Case" as an example of how the Montgomery County Police had used equipment provided by the Agency in their work, but denied that he had said or implied that the Agency was "involved" in the Ballou case. He said that he had-alae related to the other Seminar members the fact that the Agency had provided assistance to the Secret Service in connection with the protection of the,President and Vice President and that he and others had been detailed to work with the Secret Service on counter-audio activities at the 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago and the Republican National Convention in Miami. I JWhO was on the Chicago detail, if he was , . asked detailed to protect'e Viceo,President. He said that he was detailed to Tom Kelly, Deputy Chief of the Secret Service and worked in effect as a member of the Secret Service under Mr. Kelly.

Z. I questionedl as to whether his relations with . the Montgomery County Police was training oriented, equipment orient.ed, or if he had engaged in any operations or activities with the police. He said his relations with the Police had been entirely equipment oriented and had 'been limited to the Chief of Police and one or two senior Inspectors. The extent of assistance given consisted of the Agency providing the Police w lth surplus technical

00649

MORl DoclD: 1451843

equipment which was of no further use to the Agency" and briefing them as to its use. He said he would not define these briefings as training, but admitted that it might be so construed. '.

3. said that his only knowledge of the "Ballou Case", except what he had read in the papers, came from one telephone conve r sa.ti on he had with Inspector pf the Montgomery County Police sometime after accounts of the Ballou shooting had appeared in the press. He said the Inspector called to thank him for some amplifying equipment the Agency had given the Police and mentioned that it had probably saved the life of a policeman. He said that the Inspector explained to him that the account of the incident appearing in the press was not the whole story, that with the aid of the equipment the Agency had provided the Police had been able to intercept a telephone call from Ballou to a friend in which Ballou had outlined plans to "kill a cop' ." The Police had then staged a raid to forestall Ballou's plan and it was during this raid that Ballou was shot. Isaid that he had had no other conversations with the Montgomery County Police on that subject. He said he had mentioned it at the Seminar as an example of the sensitivity involved in the Agency's dealings with domestic Police Forces. He said he recalled that there was quite a bit of discussion and argument by the Seminar members about the propriety of the Agency assisting local police forces and working with the Secret Se r v icedn the, U.S., but that he did not recall any extensive discussion about the Ballou Case and that at no time had he said that the AgenCoas direct! involved. jsaid he remembered that eemed partlcularly concerned about the Agency 0 veL,Tmn.;eTn"--"m;;-;~omestic activities and that sometime later, around January or February 1972, 1 falked to Colonel White about his concern and Colonel White in turn talked to the Director of Security. Since that date, he said, he has not had any further direct contact with the Montgomery County Police, based upon orders of the Director of Security.

ox • I • DISlIOP

Inspector

Q0650

MORl DoclD: 1451843

(

31 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD 1Office o! Security

SUBJECT: Interview with "'

1. On 31 May 1973 I questioned }bout what he b&d said at the Advanced Intelligence Semmar No. b nd the extent and nature of the relations he had had with the Montgomery County Pollce. He said that he and others had been encouraged to discuss their work and the problems related thereto with other Seminar members and told that what they said would be "non-attributable." In this context he had discussed the Office of Securlty's relations with local Police Forces including the Police Force in Montgomery County. He s atd he mentioned the "Ballou Case" as an example of bow the MontgQmery County Pollee had used equipment provided by the Agency In their work, but denied that he had said or implied that the Agency was "involved" in the Ballou case; He said that he had also related to the other Seminar rne mb e r s the fact that the Agency had provided a s s Is t anc e to the Secret Service in connection with the protection of the President and Vice President and that he and others had been detailed to work with the Secret Service on counter-audio activities at the 1968 Democratic National Convention in Cbicago and the Republican National Convention in Miami. I askedl rho was on the Chicago de ta il, if he was detailed to protect the Vice President. He said that he was detailed to TOITI Kelly, Deputy Chief of the Secret Service and worked In effect as a member of the Secret Service under Mr. Kelly.

2. I questioned rs to whether his relations with the Montgomery County Pollce was training oriented, equipmont oriented. or if he had engaged in any operation. or activities with the police. He said his relations with the Police had been entlroly equipment oriented and had been limited to the Chief of Police and one or two senior Inspectors. The extent of aae iatanc e given con.bted of the Agency providing the Police with surplus technical

00651

~ .....

'"'- -'.. " .• '..

• I

I '----:--------

MORl DoclD: 1451843

(

equipment which was of no further use to the Agency. and briefing them as to itll use. He said he would not de!fne these brieClngs as training. but admitted that it might be 80 construed.

3.1

!sald that his only knowledge of the "Ballou Case", except what he bad read in the papers, came from one tel.ephone conversation he had with Inspector ff the Montgomery County Police sometime after accounts of the Ballou shooting had appeared in the press. He said the Inspector called to thank him for some amplifying equipment the Agency had g~ven the Police and mentioned that it had probably saved the Ilfe of a policeman. He s~ld that the Inspector explained to blm that the account of the incident appearing in the press was not the whole story, that with the aid of the equipment the Agency had provided the Police had been ahle to intercept a telephone call from Ballou to It friend In which Ballou had outlined plans to "kill a cop:." The Police had then staged a raid to fo'restall Ballou's plan and it was durlrig this raid that Ballou was shot. Isaid that he had had no other conversations with the Montgomery County Police on that subject. H" said he had mentioned it at the Seminar as an example of the sensitivity involved In the Agency's dealings with dorneatte Police Forces. He s aid he recalled that there was quite a bit of discussion and argument by the Seminar members ,about the propriety of tbe Agency assisting local police forces and working with the Secret Service in the U. S., but that he did not recall any extensive discussion about the Ballou Case and that at no time bad he said that the Agency was directly involved. lsaid he remembered that ~ reem:d partiCularlY cdncerned about tbe Agencylsuivor've'-=m=-e=-n=-t...-r£ri=-oar.!omestlc activiliesand tbat aornet lme later. around 'January or February 1972, Dtalked to Colonel White about his concern and Colonel White in turn talked to tbe Director of Security. Since that dat.., he said, he has not had any further direct contact witb the Montgomery County Police, based upon orders of the Director of Security.

•

F. P. Bishop Inspector

- 2-

00652

MORl DocID: 1451843

(

31 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD SUBJEC T: Interview withl

IFMSAC

1. Isaid he recalledl . Italking about the 0 flee of Secunty's liaison with the Pollee Forces in the Metropolitan Area and that the Ballou case was mentioned. He also recalled that Ihad mentioned that the Agency had provided assistance to the Secret Service in connection with surveillance work against radical groups at the 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago.' He said that he could not remember exactly whatl Isaid, but he did recall that there was considerab e d,Scusslon and debate among the class members about the propriety of the Agency engaging in such activities.

~~2;.,.~~Later in January or February 1972,

at a time when Iwas Chairman of the Management Advisory Group L-.(TMA~~G~),~J:1-e~s~a~ld he discussed these matters, and questioned the extent to which the Agency should become involved in domestic intelligence activities, with Colonel White and later with Mr. Colby. The MAG also raised the general problem in a couple of their papers, but without citing specific detailed -exampl e s , He said he understood that Colonel White had taken the matter up with the Director of Security and that some changes had been made as a result. . ' r-

Orig - File w jL

~terview

..._ 8Nl'f

00653

MORl DoclD: 1451843

(

11"

_t'

29 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD SUBJECT: Possible Agency Involvement in Outside Activities on Basis of Information Provided bvl

"L.-.- - -

----

On 29 May 1973 I talked to Mr. who was a cla ssmate o f l l a n d at the Advanced Intelligence Semina~hel on ep em er 1971. Mr.! said that each student was asked to describe and talk about his-w=o:-Or"k::-~ in the Agency and he recalled that Mr'l ,jhad talked about the Office of Security's liaison with, and assIStance given to and received from, the Police Departments in the' Washington Metropolitan area. He said he could not recall specifically what was said. but to the best of, his memory Mr. I i d e s c r i b e d training given to either the Prince George's or Mont~Count.yPolice concerning surveillance methods and electronic techniques. He 'said that he did not recall any discussion of the "Ballou case" and that he had no knowledge of that case other than what he had read in the riewspape r s ,

Of. 1"'. DISIlOP

006~

MORl DoclD: 1451843

. (.

(

30 : .z;," 1~73 1.3::0 CF ~~o~:

'::.:: c··',....~ ti.T :J?:

-i-...._.._._-~---"l

- -

c=JR...:~o.rt 'o£' St.::l t€l~~nts r.:g{le

st.2te:::::nts ccnc('.t1"'in~ r3::-:ar!:s Y",;;c~e ~,. . ~-: •

...••c, ... ~-~IUI,. -h.;.'I"r.~on

'.rt=:>~ hr d boon -.ar.o·..... 7 Ln . "'r. ~\ _~."" ed t.o t~· . . . -·.... Ai_ _.~ :<'-"L"'"'' ~ TPo":'\1 r. 1 -

', "'"

1.0

•• _

•.

• .:.; . •

\i:;)

::emo datr,d 16 :"..<y 1?73. o',t t:::.t h", hcd no 1:no"1ed::;e of t:,e ":.o l J ou cc:::nC'ction :rit:: :,.;....'] CtSG.

:'.,~......:::l'.:,·:n.c:-+.,-:-.",i. .".:."; +... -.!: .....,- ...... -'~'''l~(', •. "\.~'-~ 7.... --. 1'- +-o'r D"'C~ '''1'':>+ ""----_ ... : .. .... .. ..._- .........

,.r·1- - -~

t er :liJ;self. ::0 rc:'p.r;:eG 'i:.h:.t

;:ro.1- - -I;;:=.s e vel,'

:;000 Crio.fer, ::l:t il:clincd to oe ov:">r-e;~:--.:1Sive 2.1:. tines 2.;.(1. tr.lk

to nuch,

MORI DocID: 1451843

., . 25 May 1973 ." MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Central Intelligence THROUGH

: Mr. Wl1l1am E. Colby

1. On 17 May the narne ofl }-aa referred to this office as having altempted to contact the Director concerning "activities outside the Agency." I attempted to contact jon 21 and Z2 May, but he wa" on leave. On 23 May . -':hc::e:-:::,,"'ta"'t"e"'drL"h-=e wanted to check a portion of his information and asked I! he couI'd com" to my office on 24 May. 2. ClUne into the Agency as a JOT in October a n " current y sslgned to the Soviet/EE Section. He has a very s rong personne fUe.

. 3. ladvlsed that In August 1971 he atteuded the Advanced Intelligence Seminar. On the first evening of the seminar the students had a "getting acquainted" session where each one gave a brief description of his duties. One of the students1 I 1of the Office of Security, however, carried on Altor tne 8eSSIon was over and expanded on the briefing he.had given. He claimed that CIA was cooperating with the Montgomery County Pollee, stating that the Office of Security gave electronic and other support to that organization•

.c. He further indicated that the Office of Security had been Involved in the "Ballou case"'J Idescrlbed the Ballou caee as follows: The residence o f r . Ballou, an antique gun collector In Silver Spring, Maryland," was raided on 7 June 1971 by the Montgomery County Police and some Federal law enforcement officers. Mter the officers, dressed In civilian clothes, had forced their way Into the house Ballou picked up an antique pistol. The officers immediately opened fire and wounded Ballou seriously. He spent a long time in the hospital and is partly paralyzed at the present time.

OOG56

MORl DocID: l451843

- ""-v"'* c." -....

aia cue ""a. given much publicity in the Washington Post at the time. There wa.s additional publicity in the lout sevez-al month. when Ballou insUgated a laW8uit against the rOliding officers.

____"'5

r oil

ldentIIied another student, 1 WhO was Rsalgned as a friend ----"n...c......llrtt-..alCtaR'i'f" : that als 0 8 e e med to kn ow the 8 pee un'T!"'c,,-.,--;o"'f..--.-th=e-S=arnl au case. . CL

c=J

toO

6. t thankedl ~d told him tMa was just the typ<! of tn:Cormation ""e wanted to receIve so that it can be investigated and appropriate action taken II the information is borne out. 7. Thb office wll1 follow up on this allegation and advise the Director concernini our finding•• 0

WUllJUn V. Broe Inspector General

-2-

00657

---

MORl DoclD: 2452843

A'iiVI\~ , (

INTELLIGENCE SE'/IINAR 'N, (

~ .-;;2.<{ ~;V~ ?/. ..

List of Students

'Office

Na1ne

Room No.

Extension

7/ ,,r

s .. _.~:~ - .- -:"'.. - ._. ....'. ------ ..... ._- .. :-:t- ~;"':-;_. '-".

00658 --

--------...-.":.;~ -.-';'----r.-;:--.~---

MORl DoclD: 1451843

(

v-,

MEMORANIAlM FOR:

f\ ve,

O,<,~ i .... bl \.,.~W

1)",.

M «. w l\'1 lA~' Q...>

..... J.

0«"1 ~ k

_l<.o

\N~~

b::>

\.fh.~~

C!ta...... ~l~ .....

UJo.. "'-\.~.h.. lk ,-,tt;t,........t l~

<lC------.4!:L======;---

\.;, f\.- G- 11 > (DATE)

006 rORloI NO.

AUG 54

101

REPLACES FOR\! 10·101 WHICH MAY BE USED.

MORl DoclD: 1451843

,. i. :

. (-' .

•

5317 Briley Place, N. W. Washingt~n, D. C; 20016 29 February 1972 .

Mr. Lloyd Shearer Editor-at- Large Parade Magazine 140 N. Hamilton Drive Beverly P.ills, California 90211 Dear Mr. Shearer: Thank you for your letter of February 7, 1972, and its kine! words about rric, As you can Irnagfne, your cha Hcng e set rnc to work to rn c'et it. As a rcsult I can say, under oath if need be, that CIA has never carried out a political assassination, nor has it induced, cmployed or suggested one which oc cu rr ed, Whether this fully rri e et s your challenge, I cannot s a y (it t a ke s two to tango), but it is a long way f'r orn the' original s tat erncnt in Mr. Scott's c o lurnn that CIA "us cs pol iti ca.l a s s a s s ina ti on as a weapon." Perhaps I am too sensitive, but I would hope yOll could B,;,t the record straight for your readers. ' Sincerely,

W. E. Colby

00660

• MORl DoclD: 1451843

( , "

Parade publications, Inc.

OL 3·207J

/.40 N.l1olnilton Drive BntT1v mu«, Calif. 90211

llOYD SHEARER

Eii'w.... ·1Arl'

,(.' •

February 7, 1972

•i

Mr. W.E. Colby 53.17 Brney Pl. Washington, D.C. 20016

I c.

Dear Hr! Colbyi'

Thank you for your kind and inrormative letter or January 11 concerning Operation Phoenix.

I don't want to get into a running word-batt.le \':ith you on the subject or political assassination in Indo-Ch~na

•~.

.. ~

or the role or CIA and other or our agencies in Operation "

Phoenix. ,~

. ,, . "

that the CIA has never'used political assassination in

. ,

Indo-Chinlil- or elsewhere and has nev;er induced, ernp.Loy ed , or

.' ;

s'ltggested to others that such tactics or devices be employed •

.' :

l r

'. ,j .~.

.... i i

I am just ~ondering iilr yolt would care to say flatly

Ir you :will make that rlat statement under oath, I 1-:i11 not only apologize, I will tango with Dick Helms in Garrinckel's largest show ~lindow at 14th and F--providing" of course, Mrs. Helms gives her permission.

" "

Again, I thank yOlt for your interest and commend you

for the really outstanding service you have rendered the country. You are. indeed one of Helms l finest.

u e c t ffHr '

, C"LJ~ '.:.a-P<-~

LLO

Sl!EARER

00661

• MORI DocID: l45l843

(

.. &.

•<'

I·

SZoNDER WJLL... CHECK ci.xs

exec.. . SS1F·I:~D

'CATION 'TOP AND BOTTOM

""J:-;FIDE;\TIAL

S··..·.. ·· .....

r~\...n('_J.

OFFICIAL HOUTIi\'G SUP TO

NAME AND ADDRESS

1)c

T:>'~

r .

77(" f

2 3 •

<~t1\-

0--

INITIALS

DATE

FVr

T4.ue r/.upr-

•

DIRECT REPLY DISPATCH filE . INfORMATION

ACTION APPROVAL COM.~ENT

CONCURREHCE

Remarks:

-I

~APA

ln :t. fL . S1 ex

P~EPA3E ::IEPlY P'E"COMiiiE:m.tTJOH

RnUR~

SIGNATURE

u.r-e

~ ".

FROM:

DATE;

.E~c';l:~i·;e I;!.r·:;"~..)r

U:-;CL.·\SSIFIEO

237 Un pruiofJl

rdilion~

4 l.!AY i~;2 CO:XFJDE:iTr,\l..

SECIt~:T

0066.2

MORl Doc l D ; 1451843

( :,

,r-.

; I

:.: lD

.... 0

-.J

» IT 0

I-'

.... 1:3 l1>

t>:I

•

'<l

(")

'tl H lD

:;: '<l

\.»

.....

[J)

ttl

•

l1>

N 0 0

.....

;;;::

>j'

:>;

I-j

-"">;

(")

f.it-'

:>:

(/)

• :>;

•

-'-

••

--.. ,I

~''''

00663 . .'

--------------MORI DocID: 1451843

, .

.... . ,.

•.~

Parade Publications, Inc. llO N. Hamiltan D,.i,', llOYD SHEARER

• ..

OL 3-20i3

DUf!TIV Hills. Calif. 90211

Eililor.al.LltTg•

April ,30, 1972

Dear General Colby: (1) Thank you for your article. "Should Lesbians Be To Play Professional Football?" I :found it intriJ:!uinlZ', and we plan to run it in a :future issue under your by-line, o:f course.

Al101~ed

(2) Thank you :for arran~in", a tan~o with me and Dick Helms o:f Her ~raJestyls Tel Aviv Rifles. Even At Williams, Dick was one of the ",reat tan",6-irtists of our time. Garfinkels,! Wood rop-Lathrop, even Hechts---in fact,any place and time of your choosin~ is O.K. with me. ' (J) One sad notel Will you tell An~us we cannot use his ne» car bumper sticker: LICK DICK in "72, because it is ,open to misinterpretation. In addition, wa try to remain politically neutra~. •

(4) As to your wlllinQness to say under oath tha~ the CIA has ,never been party to political assassination, If o:f late, have been 'travellin~ a ",ood deal. In the course of roy travels r happened to encounter OLe c- Penkovsky--not your Ole~---but Penkovsky, a bartendeIj in Cleveland ,··Ohio. Penkovsky told me tha~ you signe~a secrecy atrreement, For~ 270, witnessed by Victor L. }~rchetti. Under the terms of this atrree;nent you are pledp,ed to eternal. silence COl1cerninrr CIA activities. Unless you have a special Papal dispensatioJl--the kind ~iven Allen Dulles and Lyman Klrkpatric]c, Jr. , it seems to me you are lip-sealed. Perhaps this does not apply to heaz-t nc-s before the Senate Forei"n Relations Co~mittee or the prestiaious Council 0:' Foz-et c-n ReLatn ons , lf this is so, please let me know; and we wilL take it from there.

(5) .r will be in Washin~ton shortly stayin<r. ~t the home of Jack Anderson out in Silver Sprlnrr. Perhaps ~e can meet there :for a small suam; t , I will have 1'1i th me severEd :former Green Beret members Viho want to discuss with you the subject of CIA imposters in South Vietnam, who lied to them and me, too. Let me hear fruw you.

Al~the

\..( \

best,

00664

MORl DoclD: 1451843 ."

•

I •

•

5317 Briley Place, N. W. Washington, D. C. 20016 29 February 1912

Mr. Lloyd Shearer' Editor-at-Large Parade Magazine 140 N. Hamilton Drive Beverly Hills, California 90211 Dear Mr. She axexr Thank you for your letter of February 7, 1912, and ita kind words about me. As you can imagine, your challenge set me to work to rneet it. As a result f can say, under oath if need be, that CIA haa never carried out a political assassination, nor has it induced, employed or .suggested one which occurred. Whether this fully meets your challenge, I cannot say (it tnkun two to tango), but it is a long way from the original statement in Mr. Scott'o column that CI,A "u s e s political a a sa s a lnat lon a s a weapon." Perhaps I am too sensitive, but I would hope you could aet the record straight Ior your readers. Sincerely,

! ~i~ w., .E, J:;olby, W. E. Colby

VH •.\5

00665

MORl DoclD: 1451843

(

Parade Publications. Inc. l~O N.HamilCon Drive LLOYD SHEARER EtliJ~·d.Large.

OL J-2013

Bl'DtTlll Hills, Calif. soen

February 7, 1972

Mr. W.E. Colby 5317 Briley Pl. Washington. D.C. 20016 Dear Hr.

Colby~

Thank you for your kind and informative letter of 'January 11 concerning Operation Phoenix. I don't want to get into a running word-battle 1'1ith, you on the SUbject of political assassination in Indo-China or the role of CIA and other of our agencies in Operation Phoenix. I am just ~ondering ~f you would care to say flatly that the CIA has never used political assassination in Indo-China or elsewhere and has never induced', employed, or suggested to others that such tactics or devices be employed. If you ~lill make that flat statement under oath, I will not only apologize, I wi 11 tango ~Ii th Dick HeIms in

',-

Garfinckel's largest show window at 14th and F--providing, of course, Nrs. Helms gives her permission. AgE in. I thank you for your i~terest and cqmmend you for the really outstanding service you have rendered 'the country. You are indeed one of Helms' finest.

00666

MORI DoclD: 1451843

. , t··· .•

, , ..

,. •

• 5317 Briley Place Washington, D. C. 20016

Januarr 11, 197Z

Mr. Lloyd Shearer Editor at Large Parade Magazine 733 Third A venUe New York, New York 10017

'"1

•••

Dear Mr. Shearor: In your iaBue of Jiinuary 9th, one of Walter Scott's Per60nallty Parade

r eapons e s ntated that CUI. "\1$e8 political assassination ao a weapon " and that Operation Phoonix "run by the CIA e etab Hahod a new high for U. S. political assasoinationc in Vietnam. IJ Since I bave held responsible pos itfons in CIA for many yeau and was a Is o (during detached service from CUll res pona lble for U. s. support to Operation Phoenix, I believe I arn uniquely' qualified to testify (a s I have in public session under oath to Senate and House Committees) that: ' a. CIA does net nnd bas not used political a s ea s s Inatf on as a. weapon. b. Operation Phoenix Was run not by tho CIA but by the Government of Vietnam, with the suppozt o! the CORDS clement of the U. S. Military Assistance Command in coordination with severnl U. S. agencte e Inc ludtng CIA.' . c. Ope xatfon Phoenix in not and was not a p rogr arn of ac aa s s lna ; tfon, It countered the Viet Cong apparatus attempting to overthrow the Governmeut of Victnazn by targettlng its Iea.dez-e , Wherever possible, t he ae were apprehended or invited to defect, but a c ubs tant la I number were killed in firefighta during Inilitary operations or rcdating capture. There is a vast diHercncc in kind. not merely in. degree, between t hca e combat ca aua It i ea (even including the few abus ee which occurred) and the victims of the Viet Cong's synt emattc carnpa Ign of terroris,ID to which Mr. Scott quite accurately referred. In order to c.~!'ify this Important queBti{.·.l to the millions of concerned Americana who read P"rade, I should appreclate your publishing thin,letter. Sinceroly,

lsi w. E. Colby W. E. Colby WEC:blp 00667 • Distribution: 1 - ExDtr 1 - Mr. Tnue ... ma.,Ori" - Addrp.RRPn t - E1:1t I - William Sullivan of Stafe (via SAVA - 12 Janl I - Colonel Farnham !()sn/rS,!'

MORI DoclD: 1451843

5317 Briley Place Washington, D, C. 20016 January 11, 1972.

Mr. Lloyd Shearer Editor a,t Large Parade Magazine 733 Third Avenue New York, New York 10017 " Dear Mr', Shearer: In your issue of January 9th, one of Walter Scott's Personality Parade responses stated that ClA "uses political assassination as a weapon" and that Operation Phoenix "run by the CIA established a new high for U. S. political assassinations in Vietnam." Since I have held .r es pon sfb Iepos itf one in CIA for many years and was also (during detached s e r vi c e f'r orrr CIA) responsible for U.S, s uppo r-t to Operation Phoenix, I believe I am uniquely qualified to testify (as I have in public s ea s i on under oath to Senate and Houn e Committe es ] that: a. CIA doe s not and ha s not used political a a s a s e Inatf on a s a wea pou , b. Operation Phoenix WaB run not by the ClA but by the Government of Vietnam. with the support of the CORDS clement of the U, S. Military Aa afs ta nc o Comrna nd in coordination with e e ve r-aI U. S. a g encf e e including CIA. e. Operation Phoenix is not and wa s not a program of assasBination. It countered the Viet Cong apparatus attempting to overthrow the Government of Vietnam by targetting its Jea de r s , Wherever possible, thc e e were apprehended or invited to defect, but a substantial number Were killed in firefightB during military operations or resisting capture. There is a vast difference in kind, not merely in degree, between these combat casualties (even including the few abu a es which occurred) and the victims of the Viet Cong' s systematic ea:mpaign of terrorism to which Mr. Scott quite accurately referred. In order to clarify t hi s i:mportant question to the millions of conce rnca Axnericans who read Parade, I should appreciate your publishing t his letter. Sincerely,

....

rA)j

W. E. Colby

00668

MORl DoclD: 1451843 •

. ~ ".-. , ,' j :

,qUC~H'O.

Vo:unu: 01

Q. Iour yC',1rs: "'1:0 .1C"C~S HC'dy l:un.lIr hold a m.m

, I ii,1nwd nomldllly/I. j.ikd

(or itttl'lJJpt('tI r.lpc. lIe " c1.1imC'd .11 Ille lime ,hift I kdy Iwl invited Mm 10 sI,mr h"r "ed. Wl",l <:;rr happenrd /0 11",1 D.L., luMmck, Tex. 'palrman (n~ the los Angeles , the ch,uRe and sued Hedy g that she had willingly ac-

O~; .: :~' . :

c",.,,-

." - .". o

aid 01 girls and marriagel'-, C. ly 100 engrossed in his wok !Jape and doc, he ,rill 1001 Chicago, 1/1. . n in Eliham, England. on July ~ hi' zest (or living it up.

•

,an is one with whom you on ·k.," Who said' thall-louise if.

~'ery.

'.'

~ ••

L:" . l!r~~.-.-_

.:.... ' ,

In wear lifts in his shoes? And rth Taylor, rule (he roos£?-

t:2.. .'

, ..... _

0 ';

•

~'e, Ariz.

• ;;. " lilt, 10 make him taller, Yes, • , ., hot, in the (amily. or .the two , r ••' Jcr and more responsible. II'is • :::; ....: .. : scripts they do, which may " ':', sof recenl naps. ' ~.

....:"," '

• ,:. ,,0': 0

._------,

•

.' .,J ..

'.'

,. I

....

~~;

. .'

•

\·\.,::~:0 .' \

~.J ': J'~ l:_~.~~.,

AaOR [RN[ST DORGNINE WITH HIS fOURTH wns,

Q. How many tjmcs hilS aclor Ernesi Borgnine been married, and is he a wile·bealer?-E.T.R., Springfield, Mass. . , ' A. Borgnlnc has been married four limes. His last' wife, Donna, has charged him with beating her, Js seeking a divorce.

Q. Is rhere any agency o/lhe U.S. Covemmcn! whi;;h , has been aulhorizct!lo include polHical assassination in its practices?-M. 'A'ilso.n, Au.slin, Tex. ~ ~ A:The one U.S. agency which uses political assassination as: a weapon is the Central Intelligence Agency, Many of its men 'in Vic-to am have assassfnatcd civilian Communists in an effort 10 destroy the Vietcong infrastructure. Operation Phoenix run by the CIA e",bli,hed a new hlgh (or U.S. polilical assassfnatlons in Vietnam, larscly in response 10 enemy terrorist tactics which also include assassination, kidnapping, terrorism of all sorts,

:.....-_ _

Q. How long docs il rake. radioactive fallout from . Chincse nuclear tests to reach the US.I-M.1fk Cbeseboto, sarsrow, Cali/. A. Approximately three days depending on the Wind. J

.:......_.:..-.-JL~_-'-

or, CAMPSELL CE(SUN

edttcr, JESS GORKIN IC'niot editor, DAVID PAlEY

publbbcr, WARUN J. RfYNOLDS

'nod.lt" editors, lINo.A GUlSTON, HERO(RT KUPHRBERG, MARTIN ....V.R.CUUES, JOHN c.. ROGERS

: " .... t;.

•

.:: '..::~:o. ':.:.' relldent. DANIEL o, KINlEY 0···-

PC,...,IJ' .... n:vuc.:»

Q. Does Richard Nixon have his m':"n privale goll course at Key Biscayne-lEmma R,cynolds, Orlando, Fla. A. Not at Key Biscayne. He 'owns a six-hole pitch-andputt course on his San Clemente, Calif... estate.

'/'

··0 •• ,

vcral weeks ;')~o Miss Lamarr urt to answer Blylh's charges, dered her to pay him $15.000 lenouncing him as a rapist

/I loo'It..'lvt.:u It I.'''''''::'

) 'F. MllKUHN atl ;iUsociOlIC', At TaO'A.NI I.ulsl.nll, MARY HODOROWSlI, SUZANNE CURLEY. DORIS SCHOPTMAN . 3, OEMI:TJUA 1J.YlO~ fOOion. VIRGINIA POPE cartoon educr, tA\;"'R[NCf lARIAJt • BWMfr.HItAL, OP/.l GINN

MORl DoclD: 1451843

( .'

5317 Briley Place Washington, D. C. 20016 January 11, 1972

Mr. Lloyd Shearer Editor at Large Parade Magazine 733 Third Avenue New York, New York 10017 Dear :Mr. Shearer: In your issue of January 9th, one of Walter Scott's Personality Parade responses stated that CIA Ji us e s political assassination as a 'weapo~' and that Operation Phoenix "run by the CIA established a new high for U. S. political assassinations in Vietnam." Since 1 have held respon'sible positions in CIA for many years and was also (d.uring detached service from CIA) responsible for U. S. support to Operation Phoenix, I. b c ldc ve I am uniquely. qualified to testify (as I have in public session under oath to Senate and House Corrunittees) that:

a. CIA does not and has not used political assassination as a weapon. b. Operation Phoenix .wa s run not by the CIA but by the Government of Vietnam with the support of the CORDS clement of the U. S. Military Assistance Corrunand in coordination with several U. S. agencies including CIA. '

Operation Phoenix is not and was not a program o£ assassina-

tion. It countered th,e Viet C~t;H=~~~~'i\h~~Cl:a~~lerj~til~~. to ~verthrow 1/.". _ t the Gove~nrncnt of Vi etnarn OY o--p~B;el.lCPd:ng'~0trllieC:;:j7t-g Its leaders. 6J.... J'..Lr~ 1! tf,~l~ ...sen~ __ f,t~ were killed in firefights du.ri ng military operations or I resisting capture. There is a va s t difference in kind, not merely in degree, between these c ornbat ca s ua lt i e s (even including the few .Labuses which occurred) and the victims of the Viet Cong's systematic eA - / .campaign of terrorism to which Mr. Scott quite accurately referred.

oMU

:,..fl

In order to clarify this important qu e s t ir n to the millions of c cn c ern cd Americans who r~ad Parade, I should appreciate your publishing this letter. Sincerely,

~69c.(C:i?2z. = W.

Colby

00670-

MORl DoclD: 1451843

, "i

..•. ('

• •

5317 Briley Place Washington, D. C. 20016 January 10, 1972

Mr, Lloyd Shearer Editor at Large Parade Magazine 1",1 733 Third Avenue New York, New York 10017 Dear Mr. Shearer: In your issue of January 9th, one of Walter Scott's Personality Parade responses stated that CIA "uses political assassination as a weapon" and that Operation Phoenix "run by the CIA established a new high for U. S. political assassinations in Vietnam." Since I have held responsible positions in CIA Jor many years and was also (during detached service {roln CIA) responsible for U. S. support to Operation Phoenix, I believe I am uniquely qualified to testify (as i have in public session under oath to Senate and House Committees) that: a.

CIA .does not and has not used political assassination as

a weapon.

b. Operation Phoenix wa s run not by the CIA but by the Government of Vietnam with the support of the CORDS element of the U. S. Military Assistance Command in coordination with several U. ~. agencies including CIA. . e.' Operatio!,.Phoenix is not and was not a program of assassination:btit::..rather .eJJ.deavp.!.~ocounte~,i:he Viet Cong apparatus lea-d4ng=t~le attempt;to overthrow the Government of Vietnam by apprehending or defecting its Some of these were killed in firefights during military operations or resisting capture. There ,is a vast difference in kind, not merely;"D. f! " , .,\degree, between these combat casualties (even including .[",' .• , ..,':" ..J,<•.(,j ~~}occasi onn L",..and.ie.w,..",.-.·abuses and the victims of the vree , . Cong's systematic campaign of terrorism r-ei;e':"',,<>d-to-by-M,r,·:Scott. .

:r1.embers..'

__~ vr- \..-.....l.r- I\,",.~"~ (_."~'\.,,,

c..., ,.,., .\

In order to clarify this important question to the millions of.; con- I , cerned Anlericans who mig-ht be mjsled...b.y...MJ.......sc.ott!~~luml).JI should ( ' ( ..• appreciate your publishing this letter. .---,,, ,,-'

(~r~'JLj .....

_-_.----

~incerely.

W. E. Colby

0067.1

MORl DoclD:' 1451843

(

• y

. (

::;'EN DEft 'IN) LL CH ECK CLA,

......

ljNCLASSIFIED

-~~

'ICATION TOP AND BOTTOM

I CONfIDE:'iTIA., I

OFFICIAL ROUTli'iG SLIP

SECRET ,

'1,

NAME AND ADDRESS

INITlAl..S

DATE

Colonel White

2 ~ ~

6 OIRECT R(PlY OISPATCH filE

ACTION I,PPROVAl COPf,MEHT CONCURI;EHCE

It:fORP~ATI0H

PREP/,RE ~EPlY RfCOr.H.iE1iDAflO/'l

P.ETUP.1I SIGNATURE

Rcrnurks e

Mr. Colby asked that the attached be sent to you for comments.

~rtY ~ ~~cJ'UL

-/~~~

er::- c/l~~

~~~~

~~c:..r~ FOLD HERE: TO RETURN T

FROH: NAME. A~CRESS ANO PliONt. NO.

O/ExDir

I 10114 "D. 1-67

l'i'iCI.AS ''''IY,''.

237

Uu p"Y10UJ.

.I ,d'hlltn

DATE:

10 Jan 72 CO:-;VIIJENTIAL

S,:CIlET

00672

MORI DocID: 1451843

(

"'5317 Briley Place Washington, D. C. 20016 10 January 1972

Mr. Lloyd Shearer Editor at Large Parade Magazine 733 Third Avenue New York, Now York 10017

Dear Mr. Shearer:

i I

I•

In your issue of January 9th, one of Walter Scott's Personality Parade responses stated that CIA "uses 'political a s sa e s inat.ion as a weapon" and that Operation Phoenix "run by the CIA established a new high for U. S. political assassinations in Vietnam." Since I have held responsible positions in CIA for many years and w.as also (during detached service from CIA) responsible for U. S. support to Operation Phoenix, I believe I am uniquely qualified to testify (as I have in public' 'session under oath to Senate and House Committees) that: a.

CIA does not and has not used political assassination as

a weapon. b. Operation P'hoerrix was run not by the CIA but by the Govermnent of Vietnam with the support of the CORDS element of the U. S. Military Assistance Command. c. Operation Phoenix is not a program of assassination. Members of the Viet Cong apparatus were k i Il cd in the course of military op er attons or resisting police arrest. There is a vast difference in kind, not merely degree, between these (even including occasional -- and few - - abuses) and the Viet Cong's conscious campaign of terrorism referred toby Mr. Scott. In order to clarify.this important question to the millions of concerned Americans who might be misled by Mr. Scott's column, I ahould appreciate your pubHs hing this letter.

Sincerely,

Vf. E. Colby

00673

MORl DocID: 1451843

•

.( l·'

"-'--'~~-

SENDER WILL CHECK Cl.~S

U,;CLASSIFIED

...

.::..

-"--.'-

'CATION TO? AND BOTTOM

I ",'-'NFlDEKTIAL I

I SECRET

OFFICIAL ROUTI.'iG SLIP ..

-;-:-. TO

IlAME AND ADDRESS

OA'f£

INITIALS

Mr. George Carver

2 ";..

3 4

t i

, ACTION APPROVAL COMMENT CONCURRENCE

DIRECT PoULY OISPATCH FILE mrORMATIOIl

FREPAr.E REPLY RECGWUNDATION RETUPoH SIGIIATURE

Remarks s

Mr. Colby asked that the attached be sent to you for comments. If possible, we should appreciate receiving. your response tips after-

noon.

F'OL,O HERE TO I:zETURN TO SENDER FROM: NA ....E. AOORESS ANO P ..t"'\NE Nn

DATE

o Jan 72

O/ExecuHve Director1

UKCLASSIFIED

.. 101M)to. 237 Un prrvlous edliions lw61

COKFIDE:-iTIAL

5 ECIlI;T

l \

,. MORl DoclD: 1451843

5317 Briley Place Washir.gton, D. C. 20016

10 Jm,"y 1 si: ~;:t Mr. Lloyd Sheare Editor at Large Parade Magazine 733 Third Avenue New York, New York 10017

-~ /<§ATf--O

Dear }..[r. Shearer:

n:~.tJ--- ~

. -.,

tb .' ~~' 0-1\.' (,<. ,

In your issue of January 9th, ne of"\ nIter Scott's Personahty Parade responses stated that CIA "u e s politi al assassination as a _.• weapon,,'a'nd that Operation Phoenix' un by the CIA established a new . ~ high for U. S. political assassination in Vietna ." Since I have held / . responsible positions in CIA for many ears and s also (during detached service from CIA) responsible' r U. S. sup .zrt to Operation Phoenix, I believe I am uniquely qualified to teatify (a I have in public session under oath to Senate and House Committees) t t:

a. CIA does not and has not u ed political assas a weapon. b. Operation Phoenlxwas run at by the CIA but by he Government of Vietnam with the su port of the CORDS1 ele nen, t~. ~' • • of the U. s, Mi1it~,ry !,-s.istance mand.!C ~ ",~ uS ~ ...........,.x.~e.tfl', ~ ~ ."L~:L

,rf J.P., ~ ..,.sA..:.operation.7hoe:,~.,i;'~~~ ogram ~f as~as~ination, f-;,-e(;.'lh C·JZ... , "'"" :I w. .e·~~C'l./trl.tl·(·_. r.e ki lle d m.~llc ee"r~_ .) OI-"""Murooers of~';=~g~1 as----i v·.... "'';)::xrl" milita ry op cr-ations :or ,.•'C"i~"'.'~·1'1\,\!{'\ s'&Dilg-,."'*'i"'......,.."...::;H;Jr There is ,

vast difference in kind, not merelylJegr.ee., be.~wcen thes even Inc ludin g occasional and few -- abu.eB)and~thc1'ijiet Cobg" ~fe...>.u-l\..il'L~""Campaign of t e r r o r i s rn referred to by'in-. 's,;;ltt.

.1.

toft~ns

In order to clarify this important question of concerned Americans who might be misled by ~~ttls column, I should appreciate youc publishing this letter. Sincerely,

W. E. Colby

.-"~-

00675

MORl DoclD: 1451843

_; _-.:.:'~o.:_.". 0.\ 0......0.... ·. ( :

•I

.- '

'----.

....,:.,.,. { "'._-.-

-oy"'....

_..

~ Ct»

•

I.. iJ

Ij e vc r

G."

...

o:;lJ r'~ • .ll·._

·~l1/ult.•/

. (,. r I

'\1

'" .;.re..

~().SSt.1JJf'~'~11."

• •

;c~ .. ~~e

f- ...., rio e(.rI, ft~lnJ-I" .'>1 i Icr ;~ . . u ..., "/'HJ.··/.'J-t Pp,~t ",) ,~.... I

"",'fl. .. "

r..•.t.~I-I'..

e...."

\ C..

0 I:> ~~ .. p. ~

l~t~'1

Ot..

I', ,,,

I . . Jtl

v.J t,.tJotvlr

P<t. 10,"1

pr'I""'1

,0.(1)'·''1

l'\.1-

.fJI'.,~I'~"

.. .,/

"P~.t""'l' II

.0.("

O.JJ •

f-t.t

s t., •. r/-'·! Q,,'( (u.rOJ C.", ......... t ...t «> ~V,'r~'4c~

[-.,

c ....... "O ... I .. ~1

1"'\I'VI"do'Nl __ w~o

P.. t"teo

1'o\1'I.'t.,"\o

~rt

~ .... t

vut

i~fl.t1- t.

e- Vlr-'-e. .. "'"

1(> (. , 6. r""s '

T ,,~

:P.. t~1 ~l'c,. ~t~t I

:r~~

,.. .

C.I\VI""'~

0\1/

t> P

Vo1tuJI>'"

I\tH'

/I'~

I> " ; "

f 4<:. ('6 "'7" ..,\ ,'{l-

C> oF-

"-~~ !-\'L Vtt!-C,.,? -- -

o.,'{ ~I'("''''~''J ;.. ",,"I,.d

i It IF o./"'''J'f. ! 1-10\

i'I-I e ""! t,.,I

r:...ce{.J

t 1 /0 ~(e

(;.'" vt • ., '" I'" t'

t .. .. I.j.

f-'rt

",R

!~JfC>"I,'Jr'\"J..1 f·t CI>.f""J WI'/-", Vo..~,'" ~<>{: 'f-~t V ,'to J.. .......'H ( . NWi <>"'; f f·.I'/.1 '.J c

~ ',)

Ij pH r

I11-~'.;~t. v.>~I'CI, f-~~ ~ h." '?"dt •. ltv ·CO(JI,!,\.h t-v« '''dr..'",'/-,,,) ",r: e...11 .Ii'{')

I .. f·

,'"

..,

I"~ .. 'f-<> ff~htlo

I:. ....

I'.. VI> ..' .. HI

!~'1I\H

;y·

kc.l>v...

I'.\t"'lhVJ

c~ .. t Q

..... ,

a.:~...,; r! ,

fit- l).t

0-,,'/ tiS v~

00676

1/1

MORl DoclD: 1451843

(

~~~... "ltl

(.t

\ ~"~'f(\I.ttl · .:

~"'",f /

"-t\

S"~'f

Ul.l.'!-,

P..

'(Vj1""~·'1

~'f

;

:~I'nr/

.,.f'

iVI't ~

Co "'d

0..(> f ",.i o",

,\.,

ll..,'\ If ~

,'''\

t-~~

<=0.

H..

ff~j"O.~\'H~

~ \'"~t"

0,...

.'l J....

:~,\fi.tf"tMt

V~?.1 t\'le .... ~~.J

w~.'I~ Ii .. J!=

.\ k,',,'1

0 f.

J '01 V

,'0'0)'1 :>

e f-

w..' "'/-,-;.

p~{llle o.nfJJ.

t-tJI';?"V

41'- !lhj~ vO

h~1- ""'t~'y

f-~l..

0...

<J."~

:!:'{il-t~\/.I'fr

I o- 'I

e, "!VI f<!

t,j,\i- c.. ~!J

CI>.."I/''''J''

of (\0 fl • C" M h n·.." ~)

VoIJ I-

r:/tj rre-)

!h~t ~"'I ...... I~"tJ ·.t1'<1..t,\Y""'/ f, •.,. Q..,...."tt! ;Cevt,\ .1'.ttlVC{"KJ 0 (("J/~ ... ql -- Q.lt{ .[.tw1()"~uJV)

~Q..,to

1Cr./-..,'/J

(-"it

Or-

o./{.I"I~f. fo f,,!-,'IV{,r1'1, fo.,Al

r-~1 (Yl<:"Ilf~J <sI', \,' II~b"r~t,11 : b 5fi'tt '",rJ$ o.-\v')eo t II\Jlo ,,'ll! ')'

'e>-t-rcsf.

~S 1.. ,1-

L\twlI~ Cf;1w,1,dG."vIVH>::,I"J-

COli! 0;. I'''":,

rU1oflJ"';' I' c.f. t r I'"j

ijClI1HJf

fell

('I

! ft1r, !:t<>(-/-· !

00677

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.~.

,..._-_._--.-.-_ ..__ ... _------

._- ..... -..

.., ' .~

----~---,

C.:::NOC~ WILL CHECK eLM

UNCLASSIFIED

ICATION TOP AND BOTTOM

,-ONFID~YfIAI..

I SECIlET

JFFICIAL ROUTli\'G SLIP .. ~.NAME AND ADDRESS

DATE

ttP JAN 1972

D~/I

9"...J

(~.(}v-1

)

•

(

.__ .

6 ACTIOil AFPROVAl COII).IENT COHCURP.£NC£

OIRECT REPLY DISPATCH FILE INfORMATION

PP.EPARE REPLY RECOIIMENUATION RETllRN SIGr:ATUR£

Hemnrkar

Mr. Colby asked that the attached be sent to you for comments. I! pos sible, we should appreciate your--==. response this aft er noon, . . . . . . . _,,'».l':...... t,. ...... __ ••• ........... .. ~

~~ ~~",

r "

ICQ:I>

---

FOL.D HERE TO RETURN TO SE:NC£R FROM: NAW,E. ADDRESS AND PHONE NO.

O/Executive Directorl

I" FOIlN NO.

1-67

UNCLASSIFIED

237

•

o Jan 72 SEC1U:T (...0)

Us. previous tdilions

, /

DATE"

1 !

MORl DoclD: 1451843

. .. .... ";

(

~ ,

L;!Jir LC.Y~",!,:'

5317 Briley Place - - - Washington, D. C. 20016 10 January 1972

Mr. Lloyd.. Shearer Editor at Large Parade'Magazine 733 Third Avenue New York, New York 10011

I':

Dear Mr. Shearer: ,

.I,, l· '/ i

In your issue of January 9th, one of Walter Scott's PCTsonality Parade responses stated that CIA "uses political assassination as a weapon" and that Operation .Phoenix "run by the CIA established a.. new high for U. S. political assassinations in Vietnam. II Since I have held responsible positions in CIA for many years and was also (during detached service from crA) responsible for U. S. support to Operation Phoenix, I believe I a1UG;niquely]qualifi~d to testify (as I have in public' session under oath to Senate and House Committees) that: a. CIA does not and has not used political a s s a a e i n at i on as a weapon.

'-i

b. Operation Phoenix was run not by the CIA but by t Government of Vietnam with the support of the CORDS el r--"'"'- ' -,,--. of the 11. S. MilitarY,Assistance Command. ' .

I i

. c,. Operation Phoenix is not a program of a s s a s sination. Members of the Viet Cong apparatus were killed in the c ou r s e of military opcr atton a or resisting police arrest. 'I'he r eLs a ___ . vast difference in kind, not merely degree, between thes,o/ (even including occasional -- and few -- abuses) and the Viet-Cong's oonscious campaign of terrorism referred to by Mr. Scott.

.....--

In order to clarify this important question to the millions of concerned Arne r icans who might be misled by Mr. Scott's column, 1 should appreciate your publishing this letter. Sincerely,

E. Colby

00679

I) ,

MORl DoclD: 1451843

( - -',

.-.,

Mr. Houston . Mr. Warner

£\

::b °

g~h1SCOmens .• 1

I ha ve as k;.9-j over and

10",0,.,..-_..,5

r I

·00680

MORl DoclD: 1451843 e,

,, "

(

:::ENDER WIl.L CHECK eLM

UNC'.ASSlfiED

ICATION TO? AND BOTTOM

...ONFIDE:\TIAL

I SECRET

OFFI~\L ROUTI.:'\G SLIP

O....TE

NAME AND ADDRESs

INITIALS

Gene/al/OUDs el

3 ~

. _.. _.

~CTION

OlP.ECT REPlY

PREPJRE REPLY

~FPROVAl

OISP~TCH

RECOrr~M£tlOA.T10n

COMMENT COHCURREf.CE

AlE INfORMATION

RETURN SIGNATURE

Hcmurkar

r.:

Mr. Colby asked that the attached be sent to you for cornrnents. If possibl<:.......Yl.~'!llL appreciate your response this afternoon.

----

. -

FOLD Hr::.RE TO RETURN TO SENDER

FROM:

NAM~. AoonESs AND PHONE NO.

O/ExDir~ I U:-;CLASSIF'I!;O fOJW MO.

''''' 237

OA,TE

10 Jan n

..I

1 coxrtnzxrt.u.

SECln:T ("0)

Un PltYIOUS tdlhons

, I

00681

MORl DoclD: 2452843

(

.... ~.. .r _.: "

., 5317 Briley Place Washington, D. C. 20016 10 January 1972

Mr. Lloyd Shearer Editor at Large Parade Magazine . 733 Third Avenue New York, New York 10017

I. "_ ' .

Dear Mr. Shearer:

In your issue 01 January 9th, one 01 Walter Scott's Personality Parade responses stated that CIA "uses political.assassination as a weapon" and that Operation Phoenix "run by the CIA established a new high 10r U. S. political assassinations in Vietnam. II Since I have held responsible positions in CIA 10r many years and was also (during detached service from CIA) responsible for U. S. support to Operation 'Phoenix, I believe I am uniquely qualified to testify (as I have in public session under oath to Senate and Hous e Co.:nmittees) that: .

,j. J

I I·

a. CIA docs not and has not used political assassination as a weapon.

b. Operation Phoe ix was run not by the CIA but by the Government of Vietnam with the support of the CORDS eleme.ft . • 1:.[\o£the U. S. Milit;c'?o,;;ssistance Cornmand~·L..., LOc.rrJ l'~\ ,I~

C.(17

,,-..

os O-o~.

c •. Operation Phoenix is not a program of assassination. Members of the Viet Cong apparatus vres:e killed in the course 01 military operations or resisting police arrest. There is a vast diHerenc'e in kind, not merely degree, between these (even including occasional -- and few - - abuses)" and the Viet Cong's conscious campaign of terrorism referred to by Mr. Scott. In order to clarify this important question to the millions of concerned Americans who might be misled by Mr. Scott's column, I should appreciate your publishing this letter. Sincerely,

W. E. Colby

·00682

MORl DoclD: 1451843

. .

SENDER WILL CHECK CL..

U1\CLASSIFIED ,

(

.,.

FICATION TOP AND OOTTOM

T 1 CONFIDESTIAL I

I SECIlET

OFFICIAL. ROUTING SLIP // TO

NAME AND"ADORESS

Mr. Andqhhuermer

INITIALS

DATE ,

10 JU7a A"

PI ILea-fRv 7

3 4

6 ACTIO II APPROVAL COMMENT COHCURREHCE

OIRECT REPLY DISPATCH FILE IHFDRPIoAllOH

i f

Pr.EFARE REPLY Kt.C{m.MEHDAlIOIi RfTlI;lK

SIG~ATUP.£

Remnrkar

Mr. Colby asked that the attached be sent to you for cornm., .it s , If possible. we should appreciate receiving your response this after-. noon. .

I• I

.~:

. ".:'

FOLD HERE TO HETURN . 0 SENDER FROM:

NAME:, ADDRE:SS Af.lO PHONE: NO.

a/Executive Director

USCLASSIFJED

237

Ust pltvi:luS tdilions

I l-O:\.'JIH:.\ j ) , L I

DATE

10 Jan 72 SE(;IU;T (.(,O)

00683

MORl DoclD: 1451843

';'

;..

(

The noted phrases should, in my opbion;;.

• I

.----:-7 be cut out. ~ They arc the kind that lead to the

italticized "Editor's Nobn't "t the end, of the letter which rebuts

~e whole ~oi~~ being made by

the letter writer.

"R<lsisting po ':c" arrest "will get you, with thr- pre~s, nothing but sni",e ~llickillg cracks ••• and as we're really not going to :II win too much in ruch a shor-b letter anyway. ~he

"Ihy not skip

occassional abuses bit. Them's my thots.

ANT

Al\ .n

00684

MORl DoclD: 1451843

-.0 . .,.'. . ..

( !>H7 Briley PIa';" Washington, D. c ..:: ~';) 10 January 19"12

Mr. Lloyd Shearer Editor at Large Parade Magazine 733 Third Avenue New York, New York 10017 Dear Mr. Shearer: In your issue of January 9th, one of Waller ScoU's Per~ona.!.i!Y. Parade responses stated that CIA "uses political assassination as a weapon" and that Operation Phoenix "rnn by the CIA established a new high for U. S. political assassinations in Vietnam." Since I have held responsible positions in CIA for many years and was also (during detached s e r vi c e from CIA) responsible for U. S. support to Operation Phoenix, I believe I am uniquely qualified to testify (as I have in public' session under oath to Senate and House Committees) that: a.

CIA does not and has not used political assassination as

a weapon. b. Operation Phoenix was run not by the CIA but by the Government of Vietnam with the support of the CORDS clement of the U. S. Military Assistance Command.

...

e. Operation Phoenix is not a program of assassination. Members of the Viet Cong apparatus were killed in the course ;'f military operations i(,J:-l'es isting-p' olice~arr·c.J·;:t:J· _ ..... "':;.0, There is a vast difference in kind, not rno r ely degree, between these (£y.c.u. ~l\\ding.:}.oQ.cag.iona.l ..........-e.:and.-:fewA-=:'".:..abuBe~ ana the Viet Gong' 6 conscious campaign of terrorism referred to by Mr. Scott. ~

. In o nd e r to clarify this important question to the mi.\!ions of concerned Atnericans who might be rn i s l e d by Mr. Scott's col~ I should appreciate your publishing this letter. Sincerely,

W. E. Colby

00685

MORl DoclD: 1451843

. . :- .' ."--. ,"

MORl DoclD'. 1451843

. .' ..

'.,

• • _.

4"";

_ _ ••

.'-:.,

, __. _ . _ . _

. _. ..., .. _-

.. . .- ..

MORl DoclD: l45l843

.,. ' ".. rr-»:»

;

{

, ..'

-..-.-.-.- - .-.- - . -.-. - - .- - - .- - - . .-.- - ,-,- -'--.

--~---'-I-~--'~--'

7;f~(~

.~&~( <

MORl DoclD: 2452843

. . :, . -r~'

I, '._'.' -

. , .""' •

. '

~'.

. .: I ./

MORI DocID: 1451843 '. ' .

!,"

I /

!'.

MORI DocID: 1451843

I~ ,

· .. '. . \ I

•

I .

;

MORI DocID: 1451843

::: '.

.: .

, •

• -<..

- .-'-

••• •_......",- •

MORl DoclD: 1451843

. ./' ... . . •

.,~

.. <-

r. .Ct..-<-A-

()-d-V\' o.-"-'-'....u..~A...<.,