family_jewels_pt1_ocr by Infowar Books

--------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

""I~' . ~l'f:, ';' i e:

r (,

:"J , .... '-: .......

...I'·J ,.if u

.-! t. . . ~ ~ • . D, .

.}_------~-__ \l~~UnNG UBJI:CT: ,

...

(Optional)

AND

R~C~RD

SHEET

__..... - _.-_ .. --" .".'r===:\--" .--_. EXTENSION NO. Howa r d J. Osb'or n ( f--. ·Director of SCCUl'i t~) DATE ...

_~~-

FROM:

- ..

TO: (Office, delignolion, building)

....-

COliH

'HIAl

,,0#.-.. . . _-_._.

(_ ..

-'-"- ..

;(

._' ........~._ .._.:- ..- .-...-••_ ,,-- .--..:...----- - ._- ....:....-----.-

J._.......... -

_...-.- I

_._-r---~

number, and

((.10m

.-_...-

DATE

~EaIVED

fORWARDED

OfFICER'S INITIALS

_--------_.-

_.-.-. .-......-..-.-..

16 May 1973'

COMMENTS (Number each comment to .how ftom whom Draw Q line across column ofter -ecch comment}

to whom.

n~~5

C'P!'"lI

Executive Secretary, CIA Management Cornmitl.e..e....-.

tH: u ,"_00

U~·~ ... I

f--,

- - - - --_.- _._-

J "; I

(b)(1) (b)(3) (b)(5) (b)(6)

.. J

, 7.

APPROVE))' FOR RELEASE DATE: JUN 2007 "

10.

• 11-

00001

12. i

13.

,. ,

14.

15.

,. ~1 I

U~ClASSIHED

;

---------------MORl DoclD: l45l843

,'.

16 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR:

Executive Secretary, CIA Management Committee

SUBJECT

"Family Jewels"

1. The purpose of this memorandum is to forward for your personal review summaries of activities conducted either by or under the sponsorship of the Office of Security in the past which in my opinion conflict with the provisions of the National Security Act of 1947. 2. These activities cover 'the period from March 1959 to date and represent as accurate a record as is .ava i Lab Le in our files. Those activities which, took place prior to the date of my appointment as Director of Security on 1 ~uly 1964 have been developed to a certain extent through the recollection of the senior people in this Office who were involved or who had knowledge of the activities at the ~irne they occurred. . 3. I have gone back to March 1959 because I believe that the activities occurring since that time st'ill have a viable "flap potential" in that many of the people involved, both Agency and non-Agency are still alive and through their knOWledge of the activity represent a possible potential threat or embarrassment to the Agency. I would be glad to provide clarification or an explanation of any of these activities if desired. You have my assurance that unless otherwise stated each of these activities was approved by higher authority--the

'00002

r..'

_----------

- - - - - -....

MORl DoclD: l45l843

Director of Central Intelligence, the Deputy Director of Central Intelligence, the Executive DirectorComptroller, or the Deputy Director for Support.

Attachments

"00003

. I

-----------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

..,

-.- ..

_-_._

..'

.s r ,

00004

_.-

MORl DoclD: 1451843

(

Attachment A

"FAMILY JEWELS"

Johnny Roselli -- The use of a member of the Mafia in an attempt to assassinate Fidel Castro.

Project MOCKINGBIRD -- During the period from 12 March 1963 to 15 June 1963, this Office installed telephone taps on two l\Tashingtonbased newsmen who were suspected of disclosing classified information obtained from a variety of governmental and congressional sources.

Yuriy Ivanovich Nosenko -- A KGB defector who from the peri"6<t 13 August 1965 to 27 October 1967 was confined in a specially constructed "jail" atr He was literally confined in a cell oenIllU oars with nothing but a cot in it for this period.

Various Surveillance and Support Activities These are briefly summarized and range from the surveillance of newsmen to the provision of specialized support of local police officials in the Metropolitan area. I believe that each one is 'self-explanatory and, therefore, no further comment is needed here. .

Equipment Support to Local Police -- Attached is a iist provided me by ~he Director of Logistics (he will simply report these items in his report) which we have provided local police in the Metropolitan D. C. area over the past four or five years on indefinite loan. During the period when the Agency's installations in this area appeared to be a target of dissident elements

Sf ET E! S 01JlY

____路~O~0005

_ _I

-~------------.MORl DoclD: l45l843

a conscious decision was made by the Agency to utilize the services of local police to路 repel invaders in case of riot or dissension as opposed to utilization of our GSA guards, who are not trained in this type of activity. This equipment has been issued over the years to local police, principally Fairfax and Arlington County Police Departments. I do not believe that this is totally illegal under the provisions of the National Security Act of 1947, but I am including it since I am sure that it would be considered as such in light of the recent congressional fuss over our police training activities. 7.

Audio Countermeasures Support to the United States "Secret Service

Test of Specialized Equipment in Miami Immediately Prior to the Political Convention There

00006 2

"- ..

------------'.' MORl DoclD: 1451843

,.~

'-',/ /~

"./' .:,....:~.. .

... ;;;~ ~

••

'<,

It!

n' t IF

•

....

•

'.~

..:;

':"",

::.

00007

••

-".

-."-.-.::-:.::,

._.

_0 • • •

".·., •

••

_._

MORl DoclD: l45l843

00008

SEC T t~£S ~~t~

--......-----~-----_.MORl DoclD: l45l843 I

'.'

....

.; .. ~;,.{

00009 I. I

---------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

H; 7 nn

'117 !

,,,

.. ,

...

..:.;

¥"

-r-

"~'~"'a

~~\;'. .'

mIi., WSPS'E' P r

Ii'5

nusn

N"l!;

; 5

•

'i"

;ii.(,;

0001.0 3

----------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

~~~---_._-_.-_._._

'.. - ....

.._._._ .....-

" --

...

">.

.. :

000:11.

"," ~'.,

[

.......

. '

,.:. ~':

.._.;;

. ~.*G.ki:;;4S¥ ¥4g,,;n;y,IQM.;;:MlitU~~S4((JI U_I!tWli~~··f"t.r'~.o+·.~

.MORI DocID: 1451843 I

....

SUBJECT:

Johnny Roselli '

1. In Augus t 1960, Mr. Richard M.. Bissell approached Colonel Sheffield Edwards to determine if the Office of Security had assets that may as~ist in a sensitive mission requiring gangster-type action. The mission target was Fidel Castro. 2. Because o~ its extreme sensitivity, only a small group' was made privy to the project. The DCI was briefed and gave his approval. Colonel J. C. Kin~, Chief, WH Division, was briefed, but all details were deliberately concealed from any of the JMWAVE officials. Certain TSD and Communications personnel participated in the initial planning stages, but were not witting of the purpose of the mission. 3. Robert A. Maheu, a cleared source of the Office of Sec~rity, ,was contacted, briefed generally on the project, and requested to ascert~in iÂŁbe could develop an entree into the gangster elements as the first step toward accomplishing the desired goal. 4. Mr. Maheu advised that he had met one Johnny Roselli on several,oc~asions while visiting Las Vegas. He only knew him casually through clients, but was given to understand that he was a high-ranking member of the "syndicat:e" and controlled all of the ice-making machines on the Strip. Maheu reasoned that, if Roselli was in fact a member of the clan, he undoubtedly had connections leading into the Cuban gambling interests. 5., Maheu was asked to approach Roselli, who knew Maheu as a personal relations executive handling domestic and foreign accounts, and tell him that he had recently been retained by a client who represented several international business ÂŁirms which were suffering heavy financial losses in Cuba as a result of Castro's action. They were convinced that Castro's removal was the answer to their

MORl DocID: 1451843

problem and were willing to pay a price of $150,000 for its successful accomplishment. It was to be made clear to Roselli that the United States Government was not, and should not, become aware of this operation. 6. The pitch was made to Roselli on 14 September 1960 at the Hilton Plaza Hotel, New York City. Mr. James O'Connell, Office of Security, was present during this. meeting and was identified to Roselli as an employee of Maheu. O'Connell actively served as Roselli's contact until May ~962 at which time he phased out due to an ov e r se as assignment. His ini tia1 reaction was to avoid getting involved, but through Maheu's persuasion, he agreed to introduce him to a friend, Sam Gold, who knew the "Cuban crowd." Roselli made it clear he did not want any money for his part and believed Sam would feel the same way. Neither of these individuals were ever paid out of Agency funds. 7. During the week of, 25 September, Maheu was introduced to Sam who was staying at the Fontainebleau Hotel, Miami Beach. It was several weeks 'after h:i;s meeting with Sam and Joe"who was identified to him as a courier operating between Havana and Miami, that he saw photographs of both of these individuals in the Sunday .supplemental, "Parade." They were identified as Mama Salvatore~Giancani and Santos Trafficant, respectively. Both were on the list'of the Attorney General's ten mostwanted men. The former was described as the Chicago chieftain of the Cosa Nostra and successor to Al Capone, and the latter,' the Ces a Nostra boss of Cuban op e i-a.t i ons . Maheu called this office immediately upon ascertaining this information. . . 8. In discussing the possible methods of accomplishing this mission, Sam suggested that they not resort to firearms but, if he could be furnished some type of potent pill, that could be placed in Castro's food or drink, it would be a much more effective operation. Sam indicated that he had a prospective nominee in the person of Juan Ort a , a Cuban official who had been receiving kick-back payments from the gambling interests, who still had access to Castro, and was in a financial bind.

000:1.3 2

SEGI..: T

Eyr , ONLY

-------------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

9. TSD was requested to produce six pills of high lethal content. 10. Joe delivered the pills to Orta. After several weeks of reported attempts, OJ;ta·appar~l.1tly got cold feet and asked out of the assignment. He suggested another candidate who made several attempts without success. 11. Joe then indicated that Dr. Anthony Verona, one o f the pr Lnc Lpa L officers in the Cuban Exile Junta, had become disaffected with the apparent ineffectual progress of the Junta and was willing to handle the mission through his own resources. 12. He asked, asa prirequisite·to.the deal, that he be given $10,000 for organizational expenses and requested $1,000 worth of communications equipment. 13. Dr. Verona's potential was never fUlly exploited, as the project was canceled shortly after the Bay of Pigs episode. Verona was advised that the offer was 'vi thdrawn, and the p Ll l s were. retrieved. 14. Of significant interest was an incident which involved a request levied by Sam upon Maheu. -:'

. . - ,. At t he height of the proj ect negotiations, Sam expressed concern about his girl£riend, Phyllis McGuire, who he learned was getting much attention from Dan Rowan while both were booked at a Las Vegas night club. Sam asked Maheur t;o put a bug in Rowan t s : rbomto determine the extent of his intimacy with Miss McGuire •. The technician involved in the assignment was discovered in the process, arrested, and taken to the Sheriff's office for questioning. He called Maheu and informed him that he had been detained by the police. This call was made in the'presence of the Sheriff's personnel .. Subsequently, the Department of Justice announced its intention to prosecute Maheu along

s£cJ16

}YES ONLY

. 00014

MORl DoclD: 1451843

with the technician. On 7 February 1962~. the Director of Security briefed the Attorney General, Robert Kennedy, on the circumstances leading up to Maheu's involvement in the lviretap. At our request, prosecution was dropped. . 15. In May 1962, Mr. William Harvey took over as Case Officer, and it is not known by this office whether Roselli was used operationally from that point on. 16. It was subsequently learned from the FBI that Roselli had been convicted on six counts involving illegal entry into t.he United States. Our records do not reflect the date of conviction, but it is believed to have been s9metime during November 1967. 17. On'2 December i968, Roselli, along with four other individuals, was convicted of conspiracy to cheat members of the Friars Club of $400,~OO in路 a.rigged gin rl!-mmy g<;l.me. 18. Mr. Harvey reported to t.he Office of Security of his contacts with Roselli during November and December 1967 and January 1968. It was his belief that Johnny would not seek out the Agency for assistance in the deporta": tion proceedings unless he actually faced deportation. Roselli expressed confidence that he would win an appeal. 19. On 17 November 1970, Maheu called James O'Connell, Roselli's first Case Officer, to advise that Maheu's attorney, Ed Morgan, had received a call from a Thomas Waddin, Roselli's lawyer, who stated that all. avenues of appeal had been exhausted, and his client now faces deportation. Waddin indicated ~hat, if someone did not intercede on Roselli's behalf, he would make a cOmplete expose of his activities with the Agency. 20. On 18 November 1970, Mr. Helms was briefed on the latest development in this case, and it was decided that the Agency would not in any way assist Roselli. Maheu was sp a?vised of the Agency's position, and he was in

00015

-------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

' . ' ,.

complete agreement with our stand. He further adVised that he was not concerned about any publicity as it affected him personally should Roselli decide to tell all. 21. Subsequently, Roselli or someone on his behalf furnished Jack Anderson details of the operation. Attached are two Anderson columns dealing with" this matter. 22. The last known residence of Roselli was the Federal Penitentiary in Seattle, Washington.

Attachments

00016 5

SE T i路f.rS ONLY

MORl DoclD: 1451843

'"pm

. , ""

TRUW

un tt tlI

, 1%

't $1

...,

{

.~-~-~

-,..-

':~'.," ;"

..:

,-,"

, ~.:. : jt;

.......

.»

~-----------_.MORl DoclD: 1451843 ,',

i:' Tlf .u

rosr • .:

'c._' :::,rrr.'-(,·'[O' ".-~. _,

----------'.

• 1~ .''f Nl d"). ~.:;. ", I'?"l •

I I

B)' J(!t:k A nderson.

. (or

before the motley invad- iate 4,gabst President .r-n- \;nmp;ele wil h secr-et ;'Y~~5 at ers ];Ind"ci on the island. Their' ned}'. . ~ gmteri~g :'Iiiami Beach hotelsLocked in the darkest reo ~ arr-ival was expected to touch! To set up the Castro a~, \, ;j.: and rn i d n i g b t po... ~;boat, i cesses oC the Central Iotelli.! oif a general uprising, which i nation, the CIA enlisted h 0': dashes to ;>;>cret landin~ spots _ !;enre .-\gency is the story Of: (he Ccmmunist militia would: ert :i\I.:!heu, a former ;', '1; on l'::e C:.:~a:J coast, Once, no- " :six assasslnarlon attempts: have had more trouble ut"n"; agent with shadowy contac , I :~e;!i's boat was shoeout fro:>:! _ . against Cuba's -;"idel Castro. I': _. , . ,- ~ '"'.''' who had handled other undo \ : under him. m key I' aown without the charlsmatlc : cover asslsnments for the Ci \ ! For III ve ars onlv For the ~:r.t trv t'ne C"J.J"\..~. ' ~. . . ~;: a 'e i _ o f... J.'; J.;... ..." Ipeople have known the terri··Castro to lead them. :out of .his Washington public "urnlshed Roselll ';ith s'C~ci.!.l'~ l~le secret, Th~y. hav.e sworn After the iirst attempt jrela.tions oiIice; He ~ate~' '.'lison. capsules to ~!lP 'intO::r :ne\'er to talk. let ....e have] failed, iive more assassination jInO\:d. to .Las Vegas t o .r:ea~ ! astro s.rood. The porson was . [learned the details from! t _, t t C b 'I'h ; up billionaire Howard Hughes ' :pposed to take three i:'.ays 10 i sources whose credentials are! earns were sen o. u a. ".e: );i' v ada operations, '. \', By the time Castro died. i ~eyond question. ~ last team reporte-dly made It! :-'Iabeu recruited :!.~£:..:.h', system would t~row off all i We spoke to John :'IIcCone,~lO a rooftop within shooting;sell!, a ruggedly handSQmp.:;t; \ -es of ~he- poison, so he Iwho beaded the C:~A .at the! distance of ~astro b'efo~e they ;==gamo1er ,,:,Hll ,contacts In both l\'>. \ -d appeal' to be the victlm l time' of the assassinatlon at- I were apprehended. This hap·: the American and Cuban un·lo! ~, natural. if mysterious ail. tempts. He acknowledged the I pened around the Iast of Feb·; derworlds. to arrange the a5-1 me, \ : idea had been discussed inside ruary or first of March, 1%3. i sassinatlon. T.ne dapper, hawk-j R.-; -Tl arranged with a [the CIA but Insisted it had, Nine months later, Presl-: faced Roselli, formerly rnar-. Cub» '\ related to one of Cas. i been "r e j e c ted immedi-] dent Kennedy was gunned! ried to movie actress J:une: tro's " "$. to pl.ant the deadlv atelv," He vizorously denied: down in Dallas by Lee Harvey [Lang, was a power in, the !pe.lle!' .. the dictator's food. i1hat the crx had ever partici·l~swald. a fan~tic who pre·in:o\:ie ;n~usrry until hi~ _~0!1'!0!1 :'ILl ,., 1,3,1961, Roselli de' _ I paled in any plot on Castro's: v iously had agitated fpr Cas- vtction with racketeer '.\ Ill ie ] llvered ',. cansules to hlJ .con.' iffe. Asked whether the at·: tro in Xew O:leans f3nd J:ad BioCf ina mil1~oc:-d~lJ.ar HollY·l tacl at : . ,.:ni Be3ch's lilamor. Ilerr.pts <,ould ha"e heen madelmade a myslerIous trIp to ,hepvood labor snaKeaown; The1ou3 ?01l,1 nehle:!u Hotel. o of it~. ~osti A cou~:' ,·r ·... 21:1<:; later, just with his knowl~dse. he re'l C~ban Embassy iIi l\'Iexico crA assig!led i plied: "It could not have hap., CIty. I truslt>d operat.lves. WIllIam! about ,!::' ,·:;:tl lime ior the !pen;d." Among ~hose privy .to .the' H~r\'ey and••TaI?es (Bi~ Jim)! plot 10 ,.'... been !..!l-;-;l'd out, ~ 1,\ e have COlll.:Jl't:te conIl': CIA conspIracy, there IS still a OConnell, ,0 Lie husn.hush; a r;~po": '::1 oi H:a·.4~1'1 l'aid :dence, howe I; e r. in ourl nag gin g suspicion---:-unsup· murder mission. using poony: east~() • H ill. El:~ i,e reo !sources. !ported bY' the Warren Com· names. theY accompanied RO'/coven'd "~':ore the,Ra;. l)i ?igs ; The plot to knock off Castro !r.1ission·s iindings-lhat· Cas- ,.elli on trips to Miami to line ;im"asion .', \prilli, i!i~:I. 'began liS ;Ja,t -(;[ the Bay of! lro became aware uf the u.S, up the assassination teams. i Four n'·" att~m:l~~ '\',;ol't" ;Pi:;s HP~:·.li"n Th~ ;nu·nt.,,·as~rh)t apon. h~ ... U~·~ ~'!~c! .... t:':1~ The;f:zll story r~~ds ~jkl? t~p i:l3dp en .· .. l\t':"o·.~ :;~.a . . tv .t,,·ii:n!:l·~:"~ L~~e '·uoan CHeta·· huw :·t·t :-taH~r! l).. . ..A,a~ i ~~f a··la·.. ':.'j 'f": ::: ~1 Ja:nes ~)onC1 i:10".tJf? :: :':)';~. a...::. :.' 1::;-. ::,..:::-.. ::s.• :::.c i

.....

\1,

...

fl'

'.L

• .1

! I

I I

t:v

00018

MORl DoclD: 1451843

<..

.•

---_ _-----'1--1

. ..

- - ~ _ . -_.-.-.~

.- --_._---

'1-:\

.r: ."/ .........- -... l........,.i./·:':,·f ._ .... 1...I:v ;j'; :.......'J

'0001.9

Blt

_-_.- ._-

--------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

til!

III

W::: ras

m Pl. . . ::osrrmq!: 5

we.

nnr

~,.

:'-.~::'"

00020

MORl DoclD: 1451843 ~

...â&#x20AC;˘

....... '-... ... ... '..

PROJECT MOCKINGBIRD

Project Mockingbird, a telephone intercept activity, was conducted between 12 March 1963 and 15 June 196'3, and tar geted two Vfashingtonbased newsrnen who, at the time, had been publishing news articles based on, and -f'r eque nt ly quoting', classified 'materials of this Agency and others, including Top Secret and Special Intelligence. Telephone intercept connections were installed at the n ew m e n s office and at each of their homes, for a total of 3. The connections were established with the assistance of a telephone company official who responded to a personal request by the Director of Security, Col. Sheffield Edwa r d s, Col. Edwards' authority for the activity ~vas Mr. John A. McCone, Director of Central Intelligence. The latter conducted the activity in coordination with the Attorney General (Mr. Robert Kennedy), the Secretary of Defense [Mr , , Robert McNamara), and the Director of the Defense. Intelligence Agency (Gen. Joseph Carroll), In addition to Office of Security personnel directly involved in the intercepts and research of materials acquired therefrom, only 3., other Agency officials are on record as witting of the activity: the Deputy Director of Central Intelligence (General Marshall S. Carter), the Inspector General (Lyman Ki r kpa.tr i c k] and the General Counsel. (Mr. Lawrence Houston). t

The intercept activity was particularly productive in identifying contacts of the newsmen, their method of operation and many of their sources of information. For example, it was determined that during the period they received data from 13 newsmen, 12 of whom were identified; 12 senators and 6 members of Congress, all identified; 21 Congressional staff m errrb e r s , of whom 11 were identified; 16 government e mp Ioy ee s , including a staff member of the White House, members of the Vice President's office, an As s i s ta nt Attorney General, and other well-placed individuals. A number of other sources were partially or tentatively identified, but the short span of the activity ,precluded positive identification. It was observed that through these contacts the newsmen actually received more classified and official data than they could use, and passed some of'bhe stories to other newsmen for release, establishing that many "leaks'" appearing under other by-lines were actually from the sources of the target newsmen.

S~v.

-------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

n '1' .r.IRW

P HE n

$;0; ;W"RS".,. I

00_ ....0_

__0\'

17mll"l

000 ....

!..

••

•

.......

00022

..'

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.. c,

~...'

SUBJECT:

Yuriy Ivanovich Nosenko

Yuriy Ivanovich Nosenkq, an officer of the KGB, defected to -a representative of this-Agency in Geneva, Switzerland, on 4 February 1964. The responsibility for his exploitation 1vas assigned to the then SR Division of the Clandestine Service and he was brought to this country on 12 February 1964. After initial interrogation by representatives of the SR Division, he was moved to a safehouse in Clinton, Maryland, from 4 April 1964 where he was confined and interrogated until 13 August 1965 when he was moved to a s:e ci all y cons tru~t~d . "j ail" in a. r erno te wooded area atf ~ I The SR Dlvls10n was convlnced that he was a dlspa ched agent but even after a long period of hostile interrogation was unable to prove their contention and he was confined at lin an effort to convince him to "confess."

This Office together with- the Office of General CouIT?el became increasingly concerned with the illegali~y of the Agency's position in handling a defector under these conditions for such a long period of time.- Strong representations were made to the Director (Mr. Helms) by this Office, the Office of General Counsel, and the Legislative Liaison Couns~l, and on 27 October 1967, the responsibility for Nosenko's further handling was transferred to the Office of Security und~r the direction of the Deputy Director of Central Intelligence, then Admiral Rufus Taylor.Nosenko was moved to a comfortable safehouse in the Washington area and was int.erviewed--under---friendly, .sympa the t Lc conditions by his Security Case Of-ficer, Mr. Bruce Solie, for more than a year. It soon became apparent that Nosenko was bona fide and he was moved to more comfortable surroundings with considerable freedom of independent movement and has continued to cooperate fUlly with the Federal Bureau of Investigation and this Office since that time. He has proven to be the most

00023

MORl DoclD: 1451843

â&#x20AC;˘ L

â&#x20AC;˘

,".

v~luable and economical defector this Agency has ever had and leads which were ignored by the SR Division were ex lored and have resulted in the arrest and prosecution e curren lvorce from his Russian wife and remarried an American citizen. He is happy, relaxed, and appreciative of the treatment accorded him and states "while I regret my three years of incarceration, I have no bitterness and now und.erstand how it equId happen."

00024

Ol~lY

MORl DoclD: l45l843

. . :;.

. , .. ,.....~: ,_: '

. ,,:~. :

.. .. ,

-.. ..

•

.",

" 'r-

00025

~---------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

, "' t.

'1.

SURVEILLANCES

A路I__ During the periods 1-20 February~ 12 April-7 May~ and 9-20 Au~ust 1971, a surveillance was conducted of la former staff employee~ and Lrl-----------,."a".-r-;-;LJu-J..oan na ti on a1 wi th whom [be come professionally and emo~t~~~o~n~aTl.~lY~l'-n~v~o~IT~-v~e~ca~.~Surveillance was predicated upon information thatl I had beeri seeking from employees information ln Information Processing Division fi1es~ and that em~loyees were visiting a photographic studio operated by L ~n Fairfax City, Virginia. In addItIon to phYSIcal surveIllance,' one surreptitious entry of the photographic studio was made, and an attempt to enter the apartment ofl I was aborted because of a door lock problem.

B. Pursuant to a request from the CI Staff, approved by the DCI, surveillances were conducted ofl and her associates "at various times from May:--:it:-;o"":-'S"""e"""p=-=t""'e=-:m:;:-br::-e=r:::1971. ad long been a source 0 IV~Slon an '-,:;-....-::l.....,;;--:;--.~..-J information re.garding a, plot to assassinate kidnap Vice President Agnew and the DCI. Surveillances included coverage of the activities of Miss King during two visits to the United States; technical coverage of debriefings of her by WH Division representatives in New York City, and surveillance, including mail coverage, of several American citizens a.l Leg ed -to be part of the plot. Although most of the surveillance occurred in New York City, surveillance of one of the individuals included extensive coverage of a commune in Detroit. C.

CELOTEX I

At the direction of the DCI, a surveillance was conducted of Michael Get1er of the Washington Post- during

SE ET EY~

OlJLY

00026

MORl DoclD: 1451843

the periods 6-9 October, 27 October-IO December 1971 and on 3 January 1972. In addition to physical surveillance, an observation post was maintained in the Statler Hilton Hotel where observation could be maintained of the building housing his office. The surveillance was designed to determine Getler's sources of classified information of interest to the Agency which had appeared in a number of his columns.

CELOTEX II

At the direction of the DCI, surveillance was con~ ducted of Jack Anderson and at various times his "leg men., II Britt Hume ,.' Leslie Whitten, and Joseph Spear, from 15 February to 12 April 1972. In addition to the physical surveillance, an ob s erv a t i.on post was' maintained in the Statler Hilton Hotel directly opposite Anderson's office. The purpose of this surveillance was to attempt to determine Anderson's sources for highly classified Agency information appearing in his syndicated columns.

BUTANE

At路 the direction of the. DCI, a surveillance was conducted on Victor L. Marchetti from 23 March to 20 April 1972. The purpose of this surveillance was to determine his activities and contacts both with Agency employees and other individuals in regard to his proposed book and published magazine articles exposing Agency operations. II. POLICE SUPPORT A. During 1969, 1970, and 1971, on se.veral occasions, the Intelligence Division of the Metropolitan Police Department was prOVided a communications system to monitor major anti-Vietnam war demonstrations in the Washington area. This system consisted of a radio 路receiver and an Agent at the Intelligence Division. Headquarters and several automobiles from the Washington Field Office equipped with radiQ receivers and transmitters and manned by two WFO Agents, as well as a representative of the Intelligence Division, Metropolitan Police Department. The benefit to the Agency was, that the communications over this system were monitored at the Headquarters Building to provide instant notice of possible actions by the dissidents against Agency installations. .

0002.7 ..

MORl DoclD: 1451843

B. During the period from 1968 to 1973, several items of positive audio equipment consisti~g primarily of clandestine transmitters and touch-tone dial recorders were loaned to the Metropolitan Police Department, Fairfax County, Virginia, Police Department, Montgomery County, Maryland, Police Department, New York City Police Department, and the San Francisco, California, Police Department. III. GENERAL SUPPORT A.

SRPOINTER

Since 1953, this office has operated a mail intercept program of incoming and outgoing Russian mail and, at various times, other selective mail at Kennedy Airport in New York City. this operation included not only the photographing" of envelopes but also surreptitious opening and photographing of selected items of mail. The bulk of the take involved matters of internal security interest which was disseminated to the Federal Bure~u of Investigation. This program is now ~n a dormant state pending a decision as to whether the operation wilL be contiriued or abolished. B.

AELADLE

For several years the Office" of Security has provided support to Anatole Golitsyn, a Russian defector of interest to the CI Staff. I

REDFACE I

In July 1970, this office made a surreptitious entry of an office in Silver Spring, Maryland, occupied by a former defector working under contract for the Agency. This involved by-passing a contact and 3

SEt; tC T ONLY

00028

MORl DoclD: 1451843

sonic alarm system, entering a vault, and entering a safe within the vault. The purpose of the operation was to determine whether the individual had any unauthorized classified information in his possession. D.

BUREAU OF

NA~COTICS

AND DANGEROUS DRUGS

In January 1971, the Director approved a request from the Director, Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs, to provide covert recruitment and security clearance support to BNDD. This has been accomplished through the medium of a proprietary of the Office ofSecurit known as and 0 eratin as I

'----rS..,.u=p"..,p~o=r.."t-

~l'-n~c::--'"u::-:!d-=e-::s:---::c::-:o=-=v-=-e=-r=t---=y:-=e-=c:"::r::7u"""l"""t';:m=e-=n"%tC-,----=l"""l::-:w:-:-e=s=71 -:::g-:=a:"=-::1'-'0=-=n=-----:!,p 01 Ygraph ,

medical clearance, and training. It has been divided into three phases: (1) A CI operation to place individuals in BNDD field offices to monitor an il1e a1 activities of other BNDD employees; (2) )

ecru1tment 0 an 1n 1V1 by BNDD but actually employed by BNDD, although this fact is known only to the Director and Chief Inspector, BNDD. In this case, arrangements were made for all pay and other employee benefits to come from CIA on a reimbursable basis.

MERRIMAC

From February 1967 to November 1971,f I an Office of Security proprietary, recruite~ anu nallulbd several -Agents for the purpose of covertly monitoring-

00029

MORl DoclD: 1451843

• •

F~f \' O~:l.Y _ .\l dissiderit groups in· the Washington area considered to be potential threats to Agency personnel and installations. One of these Agents so successfully penetrated one dissident group that she wa~ turned over to the FBI for handling. In addition, during this period, the Office of Security field offices were tasked with collecting available'intelligence

on dissident groups. All such information was included in a periodic report distributed to appropriate parts of th~ Agency and to certain outside Government agencies.

G-.~

F.I

.----=======:::::::-_------'-----------,

00030

._1> .

... -

....

.<- ~~. :. .... !'

",'

, [I .

:.'

. ..

::,. ...

>:.>::~!

. . .'

00031. ..

-----------------MORl DocID: 1451843

MATERIAL REQUISITIONED FROM LOGISTICS BY SECURITY FOR ISSUANCE TO LOCAL POLICE ITEM

gUA_NITY

Gas Mask M-9

200

Gas Mask M-17

196

Steel Helmet and Liners

2'31

Vest and Groin Protector

Vest, Flak M-52

Vest, Protective

Vest, Grenade

105

Execuvest

Emergency Flashing Red Light

*Searchlight, Tear Gas

*Chemical Baton 6 1/2"

*Chemical Baton 12"

"*Chemical Baton 26"

*Mustang 35 Pistol

'~Searchlight

with" Shoulder Strap

*Stun Gun

*NOTE:

Various quantities and types of replacement chemical cartridges, loading kits, and batteries were also ordered for asterisk items.

'---

1032

MORl DoclD: 1451843

..1....

00033

------------MORI DocID: 1451843

SUBJECT":

Audio Countermeasures S~pport to the United States Secret Service

On 2S July 1968, and at the specific request of the United States Secret Service, this Office provided two audio countermeasures technicians to the United States Secret Service in connection路 with the Democratic National Convention held in Chicago, Illinois. This was not an official detail although both men were provided with temporary credentials identifying them as being affiliated with the United States Secret Service. On IS August 1968, we detailed the same two men to the United States Secret Service to cover the Republican National Convention in Miami, Florida~ On both occasions, the team members were debriefed upon, their return and it is clear that their activities were confined exclusively to.sweeping the candidates and potential candidates quarters.

00034

MORl DoclD: 1451843

00035 '--

MORl DoclD: 1451843

I 15 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR:

Mr. Howard Osborn' Director of Security

SUBJECT

Identification of Activities with Embarrassment Potential for the Agency

1. In responding on 7 May by memorandum to the DDO's request for the identification of any incident which might conceivably have an embarrassment potential for the AgencYt I cited the equipment test which is mentioned in the attached memo. The test in uestion was related to the development of

in and out of some four hotels in Miami, with radio equipment. This was shortly before the political conventions, and at least one of the hotels was within a block of the convention hall.

~~~~~were

ject to to your that we ment of

~:1:~路:1 : . :":.,:"_":

h::,'l路: '.

2. Although this completely, innocent--although submisconstrual--activity may already have been drawn attention by your ,own staff,~it has occurred to us should ensure you are awar-拢 of it; given the involvea Security officer,

Att:

M/R dated 7 Ma: 73 by

qU1pmen ~ Test, M1am1,la., Aug 71

I SUb]: I

-r.

00036

<--I.

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.. ,.

7 May 1973

.1'ffiMORANDUM

SUBJECT

FOR

THE

A~gl;lst

RECORD IEquipment Test, Miami, Florida, 1971

, The following details concerning ther'~ ~ -=~ ments for Subject tests were provided by I I during a telephone cO路~n::;;v':;"";e::::r~s~路a=-;;---=-:::-='"":l=i. the unaers~gned, 7 May 1973. ~--~~~~~~~r~e~t~i~red, formerly

assigned to for the August 1971 Field l.c;;;r.:::===r====:::;:==;::::;::;::::o=:rL--------I.----------J--------~S ecurity arrangements or e es an e on ehalf of 1....---"'----and the2vis~tors b~1 llin conjunction witli the ~ _ ecur~t~ Off~cer r :vnq w搂}s ~ at the DUe. [ nas in daily contact ,-nth I IMiami ~OI ce the course of his officiaI IXaXSo I duties.

L-

Iwas

reluctant- to calli at home line. to inquire about the specifics arrangements at this point, and suggested 路1----.----ld'======iiSeco.rity Officer by', this time might have ack to Headquarters and be available for

~=-==~~t~e~lephone

l f

{ a.ons e

- . -~I,---_-----,. _ _I, The aboVe details were provided by telephone tor--l _______, Chief, Division D at 1650 hours this da~ Distribution: Orig - :

C.signedJ.1

! File

00037.

S--~,..... T L

. 0._-

__.-.

._~

1_-

---------------MORT DocTD: 1451843

(OI~fl

ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET -sU1ljEcr:lo;~:~ii--------------------·----·---------·------------1

FROM: "--" -----.-..----.--.-------------..--EY.Tit.,S~Ot~:.~~.~..==~~===~~_-_-_

.__._---Director

_[.j ._--_

of Securit

----_._---_._---~

TO: IO!i:<~r cI.,is-·"tion, teem ••umber, cOO building)

OrtlLtiC.

REalVEO

~------

I t

I !

fO~W AROEO

INIT!ALS

COMMn.nS (Number "och comment 10 :how From ...hem fa .",hom. Draw a [ine ccros s column after each c"mment.)

------------jf---.--- - - - - --.---+--------------------1

Ex. Dir. -Compt.

i t

DATE I+----------_---.:_------~

DATE ! - - --r-r-'- _ . -

-.. _ - - - 1

I I ~

6. /

,r ri

10.

11.

12.

00038 13.

14.

15.

_. .w"

~:: 610 us~Dr:.~~~us~

L. . -__ .__ .!

""UI \( : t ,)I.'

~&.~i!~{L-~:;::;

;__ ._.'~ . _

~~_

0 "._

CONFIDENTIAL __ . .., __.'

INTERNAL USE ONLY'

UNCLASSIFIED

------------------MORI DocID: 1451843

, "

(

. '. 15 FEB ';:372

MEMORANDUM FOR: Executive Director-Comptroller SUBJECT

ROSELLI, John

This memorandum is for your inforU1ation only.

2. Reference is made to our recent conver s ati on regarding the Agency's participation in political as sassinations. Attached hereto is a memorandum dated 19 November 1970 which was furnished to Mr. Helms setting forth the circumstances of the Subject's activities behalf of the Agency. Initially Roselli was unwitting of Government interest, but as time went on, he suspected that the U. S. Government was involved and specifically the CIA.

3. Roselli is presently serving a prison sentence for conspiracy in a Federal penitentiary in Seattle, Washington and awaits deportation upon completion of his current sentence â&#x20AC;˘

4. This Agency was aware that Roselli intended to exp9se" his participation in the plot should we not intervene on his behalf. The DCI decided to ignore his threats and take a calculated risk as to the consequences that may occur with the disclosure of his:" story. This was subsequently done by Roselli or someone on his behalf furnishing Jack Anderson details of the incident. Attached hereto are two of Anderson' s az-ti cl e s dealing with "Roselli. Anderson is also Editor of the Washington Bureau of the Washington Post, Sunday supplemental "Parade. " 5. Individuals who were aware of this project were: Messrs. Dulles, Bissell, Colonel J. C. King, Colonel Sheffield Edwards,

00039

--------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

.... ,": ""

William Harvey, and James P. O'Connell. Also include'd were Robert A. Maheu and'his attorneys Edward P. Morgan and Edward Bennett William s.

6. On 26 February 1971 arrangements were rna da with Immigration and Naturalization Service Comrl1issioner Raymond Farrell to flag any action that may be taken hy his o,rganization regarding deportation proceedings against Roselli. On26 January 1972 James F. Green, ASSociate Commissioner for I&NS, advised that they were deferring' any deportation action for another year and would again call it to Our attention upon expiration of the deferral.

Atts

SEC ET ES OttlY

00040

----------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

MEMORANDUM FOR: Executive Director-Con,ptroHer SUBJECT

ROSELLI, John

.. 1.

路i

This rnernoz-andurn is for your

_i.nf~rmation only.

z. Reference is made to our recent conversation regarding the .Agency's participation in politic;!.l assassinations. Attached he r-e to is a rn errro r-a.ndtrm dated 19 November 1970 which was furnished to Mr. Helms setting forth the circumstances of the Subject's activities on behalf of the Agency. Initially Roselli was unwitting of Government interest, but as time went on, he suspected that the U. S. Gove r nrne nt was involved and specifically the CIA. , 3. Roselli is presently serving a prison sentence for conspiracy in a Federal penitentiary in Seattle, \\Tashington and awaits deportation upon completion of his current sentence.

I .

4. This Agency was aware that Roselli intended to expose hiB participation in the plot should we not. intervene on his behalf. The DCI decided to ignore his threa.ts and take a calcuiated risk as to the consequences that may occur with the disclosure of his story. This wall subsequently done by Roselli or someone on his behalf furnishing Jack Anderson details of the incident. Attached hereto are two of Anderson's articles dealing with Roselli. Anderson is also Editor of the Vlashington Bureau of the Washington Post, Sunday supplemental "Parade. It 5. Individuals who were aware of this project were: Messrs. Dulles, Bissell. Colonel J. C. King. Colonel Sheffield Edwards.

'00041

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.....

WilliDm Harvey, and J'arne s P. O'Connell. Also included were Robert A. l..,.~C'\.heu and his attorneys Edward P. Morgan and Ed-ward Bennett Williams. 6. On路26 February 1971 arrangernents were made with I:mn:.igr~tion and N<:ituralization Service Commissioner Ra ymo nd Farrell to flag any action that may be taken b}r his o r ga ni aa tf on regarding deportation proceedings egainst Roselli.. On 26 .January 1972 James F. Creon, .A ssociate Commissioner for I&NS, advised that they were deferring any deportation action for another yea r and would again call it to -ouz- attention upon expfr atl on of the deferral.

nOWa ro J lXJsborn Director of Security

Atta

00042

MORl DoclD: l45l843 -.

-.- - ..-

.. -

Atts ... ~.

00043

\. ,

-------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

째

Co.

MI:n'fORANDUM FOR:

Director of Centz-a l Il1i;elligence

E-:UBJ.ECT

ROSFLLI, Johnny

This memorandum is for inf'onuation only.

2. In August 1960, Mr. Richard 1v'!:. ,Bissell approached Colonel Sheffield Edwards to determine if the Office of Security had assets that may assist in a sensitive mission requiring gangster-type action. The mission target was Fidel Castro. 3. Because of its extreme sensitivity, only a small group was made privy to the project. The ncr was briefed and gave his approval. Colonel J. C. King, Chief, \YH roivision, was briefed, but all details were de lfbez-at.el.y concealed from any of the JM\VAVEofficials. Certain TSD and Cornrno personnel participated in the initial planning stages, but were not witting of the purpose of the mission. , 4. Robert A. Maheu was contacted, briefed generally on the project. and requested to ascertain if he could develop an entree into the gangster elements as the first step toward accomplishing. the d~sired goal. 5. Mr. Maheu advised that he had met one Johnny Roselli on several occasions while visiting Las Vegas. He only knew him casually through clients, but was given to understand that he was a high-ranking member of the "syndicate" and controlled all of the ice-m.aking m.achines on the Strip. Maheu reasoned that, if Roselli was in fact a member of the clan, he undoubtedly had connections leading into the Cuban gambling interests.

00044

MORl DoclD: 1451843

6. Maheu wa s asked to approach Roselli, who knew MahC'u as a personal relations executive handling domestic and foreign' a.ccounts, and tell him that he had recently been retained by a client: who z-epr e s entcd several international busines s firms which were suffering heavy financial losses in Cuba as a result

I I

I i

of Castro's action. They were convinced that Castro's rernoval wa s the answer to their problern and w e r e willing to pay a price of $150,000 for its successful a c cornpIi shrn errt, It was to be made clear to ,Roselli that the U. S. Gove rnrrrent was not, and should not, become aware of this operation. ' 7. The ,pitch' wa s made to Roselli on 14 Septernber 1960 at the Hilton Plaza Hotel, New York City. His initial reaction was to avoid getting involved but, through Maheu's persuasion, he agreed to introduce him to a friend, Sam Gold, who knew the "Cuban crowd. II Roselli made it clear he did not want any money for his part and believed Sam' would feel the same way. Neither of these individuals was ever paid out of Agency funds. 8. During the week of 25 ,September, Maheu was in~roduced to Sam who was staying at the Fontainebleau Hotel, Miami Beach. It was several weeks路 after his meeting with Sam arid Joe, who was, identified to hiIn as a courier operating between Havana and Miami, that he saw photographs of both of these individuals in the Sunday supplemental "Parade.' 1 They were identified as Momo Salvatore Giancana and Santos Trafficant, respectively. Both were on the . list of the Attorney General's ten most-wanted men. The former was described as the Chicago chieftain of the Cos a Nostra and successor to Al Capone, and the latter, the Cosa Nostra boss of Cuban operations. Maheu called this .office-immediately,upon ascertai:ling this information. 9. In discussing the possible methods of accomplishing this mission, Sam suggested that they not resort to firearms but, if he could be furnished some type of potent pill, that could be placed in Castro's food or drink, it would be a much more effective operatton, Sam indicated that he had a prospective nominee in the person of Juan Orta, a Cuban official who had been receiving kickback payments from the gambling interests, who still had access, to Castro, and was in a financial bind.

00045

MORl DoclD: 1451843

'/····;·~

l..

JO. content.

TSD was z cque ate dt o produce six pills of high lethal

11. Joe delivered the pills to Orta. Af'te r several w e elcs of reported attempts, Orta apparently got cold feet and asked out of the a s s i gnrn errt, He suggested ariothe r- candidate who made ' several attempts wi thout suc ce s s s 12. Joe then indicated that Dr. Anthony Verona, one of the principal officers in the Cuban Exile Junta, had becorne disaffected with the apparent ineffectual progress of the Junta and was \viIling to handle the rrri s s'io n through his own r e sou r ce a, 13. He asked, as a prerequisite to the deal, that he be given $10,000 for organizational expenses and requested $1, 000 worth of cornrnuni ca.tions equipment. 14. Dr. Verona's potential was never fully exploited, as the project was canceled shortly after the Bay of Pigs episode. Verona was advised 'that the offer was withdrawn, and the pills were retrieved. 15. Of significant interest was an incident which involved a request levied by Sam. upon Mabeu.

1. I

At the height of the project negotiations, Sam expz-e s s ed concern about his girlfriend, Phyllis McGuire, who he learned was .getting much attention from Dan Rowan while both we~e booked at a Las Vegas night club. Sam asked Maheu to put a bug in Rowan' 8 room to determine the extent of his intimacy with Miss McGuire. The technician involved in the assignment was discovered in 'the process, arrested, and taken to the Sheriff's office for questioning. He called Maheu and inform.ed him that he had been detained by the police. This call was rna de in the presence of the Sheriff's personnel. Subsequently, the Department of Justice announced its intention to prosecute Maheu along with the technician. On 7 February 1962, the Director of

3 ~:: •• !

~ ~

'{.:

:.t'

00046'

MORl DoclD: 1451843

(

/ Security briefed the Attorney Gene r a l , Robert Kennedy, on the ci r cum stancc s leading up to 'Maheu's involvement in the wir etap, At our request, p r oa e cutdon wa s ch"oJ?ped. 16. In May 1962, Mr.· W·illiam Harvey took over' as Case Officer', and it is not known by this Office whether Roselli wa s used operationally £1'011.'1 that point on. 17. It was subsequently learned f'r orn the FBI that Roselli had been con.victed on six counts involving illegal en.try into the United States. Our records do not reflect the date of conviction, but it is believed to have been sornetfrne during November 1967. 18. On 2 December 1968, Roselli, along with four other individuals, was convicted of conspiracy to cheat members of the Friars Club of $400,000 in a rigged gin gummy game. 19. Mr. Harvey reported to the Office of Security of his contacts with 'Roselli durfng November and De'cernbe r 1967 and January 1968. It was his belief that Johnny would not seek out the Agency for assistance in the deportation proceedings unless he actually faced deportation. Roselli expressed confidence that he would win an appeal. ~ 20. On 17 November 1970, Maheu called James OIConnell, Roselli's first Case Officer. to advise that Maheu's att.orriey, Ed Morgan, had received a call from a Thomas Waddin, Roselli's Iawyer , who stated that .alLav:eriues of appeal had been exhausted, and his client now faces deportation. Waddin indicated that, if someone did not intercede on Roselli's behalf, he would make a complete expo s e of his activities with the Agency. 21. On 18 Novernbe r 1970, you were briefed on the latest development in this ca ae, and it was decided that the Agency would not in any way assist Roselli. Maheu was so advised of the Agency's position. and he was in complete agreement with our stand. He further advised that he was not concerned about

4 v-

~-': ~f

•• _ -

'. ~'!"'r:

~: L

..,'

~_., ~

_.' ~

00047 •

----------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

..... ,

. any publicity as it affected him personally s hou'ld Roselli decide to tell all. He stated he would advise us promptly of any developrnerrts that Ire may become aware of in this rnatte r ,

Howard J. Osborn Director of Security

... ...., r'

~":'.

'..

"";'.... .. __1."

;.,.,..,.- .:...-. ~..

.... ~

00048

MORl DoclD: 1451843

(

,~foudar,

THE WASUIXGTOX POST

It: . J{i

n .,.,,,.~ i n .fl.~

~ fil.Sd.,<GlJl!itIYltCl -"'-1't

Bj' ] acl: A lI(r.er.~on

.1111I.

18, 1?:1

------------_.....:.....:....:..._----- -rr7 "111 I(" 1f),7 f:l;A_ If). 7J ~ 7? .n: ~ (fr-x J.J t;1 . li~7L!l ~u~tL!f UI fU([JL{U!J!, u» 0Jil-1. ~ , I.

, I

: t(or before the motley im'ad',iale 'against President Ken-: complete wth secret trysts at. _

ers landed on the island, Their' nedy, . gllttering :\1iaml Beach hotels, ': Locked. in the darkest re- arrival was expected to touch To set up the Castro assassi- and mid it I g h t powerboat ~ cesse,s of the ?entral Intelll- off a general uprising. which nation, the CIA enlisted P..Qfl: I dashes to l'....crct i::ndln;: !;;lots :.gence Agency 15 the story of I the Communist militia would,....e~~~I~ a fc,rmc.'r -r~Bf\on the Cuhan coast. Once, no- : '\SiX. nss:.ssin:.t!,?n attempts ~ have had more trouble nulling l agent witn sh?dowy contacts, ~ sef li's boat was 0110.t out from:.: ,ilg:unst Cuba's 1'ldel Castro. i .' , _" who had handled other under-lunder him. . _:, For 10 years, only a few key I down WIthout the chartsrnatlc cover ass,lgnmen';S for the CI.A For the finf. try. the CIA:,;' people have known the terri-I Castro to lead them. out ?f hls Wa.shmgton public furnished Roselli with :;pecial'( ble secret. They have sworn After the first attempt relations office. He later Ipoison capsules to sllp IntO: ~'. never- to talk. Yet we have-lfalJed five more assas~ination moved to Las Vegas to head I! Castro's food. The polson Willi learned the details from '. . t C. b T' up billionaire Howard Hughes' supposed to take- :!lre:c cloys to sources whose credentials' are teams \I ere sent 0 u a. ne Xevada operations. act, By the time (';,:;1,0 died 'beyond question. jlast team reportedly marie it. Maheu recruited John ne- his system would t hrcw off ali .We spoke to John. McCone, to. a rooftop within shooting Iselli, a ruggedly handsome traces of the polson, so he ~ho headed the CIA .at the Idistance .of Castro befo~e they I gambler ~ith contacts In both would appear to be the viclim bme·of the assasslnation at'lwere apprehended. ThIS hap:lthe American and Cuban un"lo! a natural if mysterious ailtempts; He -acknowledged the pened around the last of Feb· derworlds. to arrange the as- ment. lldea had been discussed inside ruary or first of March, ]963. . sassination, The dapper. hawkRoselli arranged with . a - .~ ':Ie CIA .but insisted it had Nine months later, l>rcsI'.lfa.red Roselli. formerly mar-] Cuban, related to one of Cas. ' . ..een fir e j e c ted immedl- dent Kennedy was gunned! rled to movie actress JUne tro's .chefs, 10 plant the deadly' at ely," . He vigorously denied1down in Dallas by Lee Harvey'Lang, was a power in the pellets in the dictator's food. that the CIA had ever partlcl- Oswald, a fanatic. who pre- movie industry Until his con'l on 1Ilarch 13,1961. Roselli de. : . pated in any plot on Castro's viously 'had agitated ior Cas- viction 'With 'racketeer..Willie livered the capsules to his con: . life. Asked whether the at' tro in New Orleans and had Bioff ~n a million-dollar Holly-] tact at Miami Beach's glamor- , l tempts could have been madelmade a mysterious trip to the wood labor shakedown. The~ous Fontainebleau Hotel. : '.: with ~is knowledge. he re:lcuban Embassy in Mexico CIA assigned two of its mos t A couple of weeks later just plied: "It could not have hap- City. trusted operatives, William about the right .tirne !o; the pcned... Among those _priv~' to thelHar\'ey and James (Big Jlm>!'Plot to have been carrled OUI We have complete contl-] CIA conspiracy, there is still a O'Connell, to the hush-hush fa report out of Havana r.air/ 'I'dence, 11 0 we v e r, in our'l nag gin g suspi~ion-unsup. ,murder mission. Usin/(. phony Castro was ill. But he r I sources. ported by the \~arrE'n com'lnamE's, they accompanied ne- covered before the Bay of P;i~ The plot to knock off Castro : mission's fin.dings-that Cas- selli on trips to :Miami to line jim'asion'on April 17.1961. ; be:,:an as part of -the Bay of i tro became awa~e of the U ,5. up the assassination tea~s. I Four more attompts \. I. to i Pi~s op"I'::IiI'/1 The intent was, pld upon hls !l!,. aru! ~"m('ol The full story reads hk(' thp 'maet" on Castro's lire, ,III {'lhniu;.;" 'Ih(' Cuban clit'ta·Jllllw, rC'{'l'liitrcl (),\\:lld :.., :I'I;.!. s\'l'i·p~. of a ,lam{'s Bond movie,' ,'; 19~.,Brl:·M<Cluu;;) .. ~.. Llt /..r

_._

__ ....._--_.. _-._- -----------

00049

! ! L

r'. r i

r· r-

V ~

r-·

MORl DoclD: l45l843

(

( ,

THE \\'ASH1:\GTOX POST

---------------

B 11

TUI'$aa.,.,r~b,23,19il

---_._-----.:-

rfY1TA:

VJi

1", Jt,.,· 1\ ~'.I'

- he

I. Ccnt:. -al J

:(,l,T'~I"M-

.,.

Il~

l,~oh 1'" R':>0 "'r!. :,~;;ii':'I!.;;

,"'IL

•

n"-" .,t.

my;::lfry Tt•.i n ·'\/101il,hc'.0 15

~('ac;y

v·-;:h

?~:~(\;;'!;::

;::~i:l

on the CIA payrcll,

• ~ ';"_t'_ -·i-:· .... r· to 1"'. - .:,..: .... ~~ r,."\ j -..,:,a zs-r H .1#•••• :.. -' u. I , ,t •• ,.!· . - . . . .... 1"..... . •• jf t _ t,. .:" tlo" he l'-d j;--rlll'd un-t throuah a :,c: arive o·~ Castro's .,.l:". \',_,,:1 ':(... , •• : .Jl• • • ~:_ •• :f..... •

•

;:,·1..

1 :1

oQ. • •

"::"

.:,. ....

" ' - "",' :,\"1' .: \. I. IC1L H:I let..... I L.. .=-" . . •. to d:.".:c:..:~s f:1':':r CL\. ;:..·: .. ·.·H1.··S. ".f', 1~f' ••C(' • ~f'nc~ .t!"l"Co\·C'r asslcnmonrs for the chef to plant In the d;cta~ors:'1'rv ev said he \-'Id ,;,',1-;-;' ret ·• • l "I"C"';\'''' -" :. • ! , G '.'. ~ .

},ol

I ,('tIU"rn _ .. "

jnr·, ?("~,:,:li

j='\"':'l '""- "-r \t..•..",; • ":·-~p~ri· c·.·..... t::~.s .. J ~1/.t.". ., C· ••• ll"'- .... : t. :,."t .'.

- ... ar:ned'O'-"crTInt-cpt rI i. in~"irll'ltheC3:-' a r. .s hC":':l i~:<1 ri:·~.:~:;';" ~ r:" '(i~: rt·~i:;:rT;:~·:. i.~ ~ ~:~ ~ O:.:.~J\h" ;~~~:;.;:lj'''''' I~ :·;d B"("i;ia~ rl- ~ ~;t; Frk:r-',S ci';;!)' c;~~:~·~u. ·:J1;;:in sick ward Qf the Los; same ::\!;,J1CU, inclclt'nt.;;1i:;. who; flcs au ernpted to inliltrate [rap." Said Harvey: "The 0 ~.".""'~ .~."1

;'i, .3.("'': \

'fl"t

_{r't:"'~ '-"I'o'-V,:t,- io l'lP-

,;c~,..-

i'ij;s:- ...·~r"';::r.n

~ -r-, ..J r"" · r-

ror

It;·t

! is now involved in a IC':'31 Dat-: close enough 10 bun Castro I Friar's Club incli\:t:-:,('nt is

Anzelcs County jail.

Ire is har;(:~fi:-nc. h,1\',·k.f(s~(*rl: tl~ o ..· rr phantom hiii~rJIia~rC ;co\l,:n.

'. _. :r,!:r,ny·. RfJE~lli had no more to John Rosclh. once a (~a;:;hln:::: 1Ioward Iiughes' ~·~\"oca opcr-] ..\,~l t·):d. :.~x n:;"~"·.~i:"~lr.:l at"·d.) ..I:Hh t;;~~ than Lb ad." figurc. "round Hollywood .:in~lllillions. II;rr,pt5 :-n':-e .-:l;'I.:. t~e~~:'l !:li ·H~.:.~:;i's l::'.'Tilrs :,r~ now Las '\ e;;ils. now a gray, 6er Tlo!'clli was so Ilattereri overltne sprmz of l!lo3. Ihrou;n.·:lrying to 2':r c:li:mr::::::: ;!"ti" :rear.o}d inmate with a resPira'l being asked to perform a out this perio? Roseili wo~~ed! their client, citing our storie:; tory llllmcnt. eret mi~sion for L'1c U.S. gO\" under the d\:"ect supen'\slon!about his secret CL\ sCl'"\"kc•.: Co;;fid.~ntial FBI mcs idC'n-1 crnalent that he paid all his loi two SCCT(~t CIA a;;ents. Wil·' • tify him as ":,I top Alana fig-I ('xpc'IlSCS out of his own I:<1r:l Hilr:e-)' i\:Jd Ja:nes' (Bi,;1 Fl~'L':Inns Fi:l::'co urc" who \'::llc-hed oyer "thc! porkC't ;md risked his neck 10 :Jim) O·Connell. I 1,; I .' f concealed illlNC'sts in Lr.s; I,lnd the assassination teams i I)C er ;Jrcssurc Irom lie Ve~as casinos of the Chicago Ion the Cuban coast. IRo~cili's Rm..; arel . ,firearms lobbr. the Treasury undcrwo!"!d." ..' Tn Jamcs Bond fashion. he Th'e FBI 'which got wind ofiDepartment., has failed to en~~osclh has admll(cd to held whispcred meetin~s in the assassination plot. haS!force a vilal section of the friends ~b:t ,~c \~t1S a. r~m ~un'l ,\Iiami !3~ach hotels wilh, tried t·o pum;> Roselli for in- .lllGS federal fire;;rms act. ncr d\lrln,~ ,oe l\O;)rlll~ T\\('n·! bans wllhn~ to make an at·,formatir.n. But he was sworn I _. , ties. Opel""tin:: :alon:;: the Eal;d tC'mpt on Castro's life. Ont·C'.lto ~j:ence by the CIA and uo i H,e law was 'I'<Jsscd af,er Coast, he IC'arnec! ho\\" to evade; he called on Chiea~o racketj 10 this mcorrient he hasn't bro. i\i;e murders of Sen. Robert Coast Guard culters and po· hoss Sam Giancana to l!:le up iken it. • :r;:er.ned~· and Dr. :.Iartin Lu· licc patrols. a contact. The confidentiall )I~anwhile. the Ju~lIce De.! ther . King: It authorizes ~hc His name later becCime files report. t.hat Giancana had par::ment. as part'of its crack-I Tre;,sur;: Secrcta~' to rcqUJTi' linl_cd \\'it!t the bi;t:cst names "f:ambJing interest and an in-'ldown on pr"anized crime.liull r"'P?~ts of allllrearms and in the ChIC,l~O and Los Allec· tel'est in the shrimp businE'ss tried to nail Roseili. The FBIiammunlllon sales. . les underworld:::. He also de- in. Cuba." Howe\'cr the' Chi· di~co\'ered that his Chica.;o I :Cor the ".\'0 years that ~;;c veloped contac.ls in ,lhe CUba~ I ril!=O gar\~ste'l' tOOk' no direct i binh records had been jorge-d, i law i~;js hcen in for~e._ :~l': Ullden\·oTlcl br,lorc Cas.tr.o tOOh:lpilrt in the assassination plot. that his name was reaily Fi.ITrC'a;u.~·. ~epartmc::t, Ila~_:=-' O.\'C\· the lIa\"iwa ~itmLillllg ca·; Hoselli ·made midnit;ilt lippo Sacco and that he had 1J1()r('~ t'll1>. ,:;,c.y prO.... 51On. :;. :~: smos. ' dashes to Cuba with his hin.'d come to this country from ~un Jndu~try has cQmi'la.~('n, He. }lad the rir;ht back- assassins in twin powe.ooats. Italy as a child.' He was con. it . would be a bookkcc;Jlll~ ground {or a 11ush·hush mis'! Once a Cuban patrol ship victed for failing to register as Inightmare. . si,on~ t.hal 1.!le CIA was rlan·lturncd its !!uns on his, dark-Ian alien. .. I ..~h.e ..federal. . gO\'et:nm;~t~ ntn ... m ID.l1. As part. 0. thn!C'ncd boat. t(\re a hole :n thel He was also cl)n\'lct"d for,"n.rn \\ollici ha\(' to com", . B.3Y (1[ P;:5 j~\":::::;(\n. fhe CI:\ i h':l:lQ:n and ~:.tnk t:-:c 1'Qar. Ro.. '(,,(\::Si11rac~: t:j ri=:- card :jrJ~s: c~l the . ~:i:ps CHI::t" hn:\ :: '., t hopE'ci ':0. ;"i'~"~;':.Off C:lSirO and: f't'Hi ''''as- ilShccl OUt oi the ~ nt LO$ .-\~;eles.· £xi;l:l~i\'l: . ~~~~i r:~:u\."'~c~~: ,"~O .,sT'"!~~.....:~ ..~ 1c:-:... .·e Ll!::~1 j~~~.:.~JE: ..... c~s, 1\\·~IC'l.;.,\,.,.·""lI'\.:"\ . ~ . . ..... -;..:"".~t \I·f·.:c·n:~rl·~l"·~ C',~,~ :,,,,.1.") mu.:on 1...... :..')t.~(. (Ci.'\. I •• o .... "'•• "'''.14" a • "'.1 .. ,. . I cscapr.ct' imo the shadows.. Of Rt'lieUi's two CIA n!'.~O.!c(lmr~:r.~~ ;';ud Sl~;:: to 1'r.:.,:;. 1 H i':- k ~ .;~e('k. In p.ar!it'T ,roltlml1s. w~. Te·. dalC's, .H3nTX has ~(l••: r£'tirt'~~ 'lain the lIrc",rm", fl ..e.;;. . r.O~(!ill \t";l,S tecrllllrd fot' the I poned how t,1e Cl.\ furm:·ned I to Ind:ana;.~o;;s ana 0 Couac.l! ~ :~~!. S!::-~.:,~(':~r~ s:·~~:c:" •.• ,. . -' -.... _... .

se'l' i

, I

cu-l

•

>or'

''£'

••• . , .

.. ... , .

....

- •• '

•• -

"'7-.

.": - .:

·····:.;~"t"'.:-:~-:.--·-r.-

,",~.-~

. ;'"';:'-"-"':' ,.

'.--~--.

:--:;-." ..-..

_--:-.:;"'~"--_

_ - :: :- _..

:'l..----:'.~

---- '-'7''

00.050 , ,"

_.-.

MORl DoclD: l45l843

O·--(.

'£RNAl i. ONLY

[J CON(

_....

~NTfAl

SHEET

ROUTING AND RECORD

SUBJECT: (Optional)

---FROM:

_. ._._-~--_ ....

EXTENSION'

Howard J. Osborn . D~rector of Secu~

DATE

building)

-&,/

IG Staff Attn: I ..:zE=

r>: \"'~'

OMV

5. ~-'..

.~~

e&L~ ~

']'-(

~.l~~c..~~ 4

-·'0

.--

J~~

<).D~

COMMENTS (Number each commenl 10 show from wham to whom. Draw 0 line across column after each comment.)

T)(-p;77

" ,l

...

~L~ ~ ,*lf~

~,~ ~ -~ LA ~d .,- -rv ~ ·Wu~

: ~ ' I ;.t1,.1 , }':.._L.':-'" ...-.I. ...,.~ - ~ ("I .~-:. ".':,/.." ." _!,~:~ ....

;':-

17 December 1973

OFFICER'S INITIALS

FORWARDED

RECEIVED

.r>.

DATE

NO.

.-.

IHqs.

TO: [Officer designotion room number, and

. r--'--- - - - -

•

10.

11.

12.

13. "-'}

1....

00051:

15.

~~::'

....

_. -.

610 Us~Dm~~~us

-- ...... -_ . - ..

...... -

-~~

.... _-~_

CONFIDENTIAL .....- .. _.-..::.__...;:.. .. _.. '

~..

~_.

INTERNAL USE ONLY...,

._.---... - --_....;.._---_ ....

_-.-

. ,. -'--.'_00'-------------

--------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

. " f!o r:" 1:"1 ."'" ...., S;;''-9r;~ .' 'i.iL~;,;;i ri~.ft. 'r"

...'

Deca~er

1973

MEMORANDJM FOR TI1E RECORD SUBJECI':

Recent Activities of the Watergate Special Prosecution Staff

Early in the evening of 10 December 1973 I received.

,..;=a::...-.=:cte=l=eOF~h~efu~;~n~~e that he,

m tum, had'receJ.v: a call from ntelligence Division, Washington

'K1f.i1Fi"Rnnr~ffilPrIT~r-n;~'T"'rTl~

2. It SO""" that /had just spent an hour in conversation at his home WI: in the WashingtonMetropo1itanoll.ce DepartiTient Who had reportJ to him on his inteIView that afternoon wi.th a Mr. Martin and a lvfr. Horowitz'lrosecutors of the Watergate Special Prosecution Staff. had been subpoenaed for his appearance and he indicated Ithat the two prosecutors were princ::ipa1~y concerned WJ. h twO matters: . . .

S t:> \

l\11at type of training had. the Agency given members of the Washington Metropolitan Police Departmentf how long were the courses? and how often were they given? .

What support did the Agency provide to the , Washington Metropolitan Police Department during demonstrations occurring in the Washington area in late 1969 and early 19701

II I

I I

3. said that he had been shown a long list of names and asked if any of them had been involved either lilth the training given the Washington J-;Ietropolitan Police Department or the support to the Washington Jo.fetropolitan Polic~ Department during the demonstrations. lcou1d ranernber only three names on the ~ist! They werefl

00052

MORl DoclD: 1451843

4. The three individuals named by did in fact participate in both the training and support during the demonstrations. Ispecial They are only three among others of myl support group who were involved in these activities. Of extreme sensitivity is the fact that these same individuals were engaged in other highly sensitive activities which could cause :the Ag6J."1.C:Y severe embarrassment if they were surfaced. today in the current l'l\"atergate climate. II

s. I briefed the Director personally on this development and he indicated that if the training and demonstrations surfaced that he would' simply acknowl.edge that this had occurred but as he had assured members of Congress J we would not engage in this type of activity in the future â&#x20AC;˘. He agreed wi.th my suggestion that we have the Legislative Cotmsel brief Congressman Nedzi and Senator Stennis on this since they have already been briefed on all activities of this nature undertaken by the Agency in the past. I briefed Mr. Jo1m Warner, Acting General Counsel., and areed with him that we would make no effort to brief members of my tootH and if they are subpoenaed. }Vfr. l\Tamer or members of his Sta f will 1:;I1en cautdon them to only answer questions asked and not volunteer additional infonnation. I am making a copy of this memorandtun available to lof the Inspector General's Staff at the suggestion of the Inspector General, who I also briefed on this development. '

II .

Howard J. Osborn Director of Security

.......-~c:

IG Staff Attn: 1"-

00053

---------~~MORl DoclD: 1451843

.. -

.:.

..... :.,

..:: ..

...... B.

. -- . .. . "

-. -. -

":".

·~1EMORANQUN FOR:

I10.J -.- - - - : T _ \

1:.

' 11- - - - - - - - T \

12.

13.

14.

15.

(DATE) FORM J-62

61 0

00054

rxl

USE PREVIOUS ~ EDITIONS ~ •• _.

FORM NO. I

AUG 54

101

REPLACES FORM \0-10\ WHICH MAY 8E USED.

MORl DoclD: 1451843

..... -

0: 'UNCLI\SSIFJE'D' r

'~"

J'''?~At

~. IlY

'-- . . .~

.::

. ''":.-

.... -_ .._...:-.: ..

···~r

~h.. ~'

• • M_

OM_

.~' --::::;.~_---. '.

D .emn (-_'H_'A...,..l----.;

. '.,

:'''-:-~

:';

ROUTING AND ~ECORD SHEET

Ii---------:---------:--~---------_._r . SU5JECT: (Optional)

L fROM:

EXTENSION

Howar~ J.

Osborn Director of Security TO: (Orr;co, designatio,n. room numb.,. ar>d bu;lding)

; :

D.;.rE

ReCEIVED

'fORWARDtD

DATe

INITIALS

. ..

1-----=':,.....-----4 OFFicER'S

••.•

NO.

·d,fo

77 L:.:...:...--J

.»

25 MAY 1973

COMMENTS (Numbe, 'each camme,,1 to show from ""ho"" Ora", a line across calum" aff&t eoc" com",,,,,'.)

Icl ...ham.

}.----..:.-:---,.,-,----~--_t_---+_-'-.:..:...-f_---....::_j

! 9.

•••••

..'

:":~;:i"

',"

.-. '0'"

.-:::

..,

1--------------+----l----I----t .. ... - ... ." ..::. 110.

.. .

.:»

......

,.,:'

r--

~ Q

.'..

'. "

I 11.

-+-_ _i - - _ - I -_ _-1

/12. i

~;..=----------------f_---f_---I_---_1

13.

--1-

I •

--1

14.

, I

.00055

1-..

lb.

CONFJDfNTJAl

INTE:lNAl

.1Il;F O)JIY

UNCLASSIfIED ;

----------------MORl DoclD: l45l843

(

MErdORANDUM FOR: Executive Secretary, CIA Management Committee SUBJECT

Project TWO-FOLD

1. This memorandum sets forth a recommendation for your approval in paragraph 5.

2. For the past several years, this office has been supporting the Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs (BNDD) by spotting, assessing, and recruiting personnel to form an internal security unit whose primary mission is the detection of corruption within -the BNDD. Subsequent to the recruitrn.entand" training stage, the individuals selected are turned over to the Chief In sp e cto r of BNDD for operational guidance and handling in their various dome stic as sigv.ments. 3. Recently, this Agency has e xterided this activity by supporting BNDD in the covert acquisition of individuals who are hired as Staff Agents utilized under nonofficial cover and directed against the principal international drug traffickers â&#x20AC;˘. These individuals are true employees of the BNDD and, although all administrative details relative to their employment are handled within the Agen cy,' they' are: unaware of any Agency involvement. 4. It is ~elt at this time that a reaffirmation of our support to BNDD in Project TWO-FOLD is necessary and desirable. 5. Therefore, it is recommended that. appr-oval, be granted for the continuation of Project TWO-FOLD. as originally approved by the Director of Central Intelligence on 12 February 1971.

~,9~~ Director oa;:rity

00056

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.° E

'-'y" .···1· '-: .....

(

• "'. ' . '•

. ' ;~ .• JJ ~

,;:.

SUBJ.ECT: Project TWO-FOLD

APPROVED:

>0"

------=---------..,----..,-----

DISAPPROVED:

----------

Di stribution: Orig. - Return to OS 1 - ER

1 - IG

Per Mr. Colby's recommendation and DCI concurrence, terminate para~raph 2 activity and continue paragraph 3 only as the -activity pertains to foreign assignments to collect narcotics intelligence abroad. Copy furnished IG.

00057

MORl DoclD: l45l843

r:J

- I ' _.

J .

. -'.

- .-

- -IJ .. _

~.. ,

.._

- ..·l

(;'.lY '~

- --. -

._ -

1.1 - _.--

.. i t.l

~--_

ROUrfNG AND RECORD $HEET

_._

\~.,.

_...

L _: .

-~.

,. ,~r

. ..-

. ... ;

J-----.---.----....------..----------------. --------.-------....,_. "'--'SUBJECT: (Op!;onoll .__ ......

_-----.-._.

FROM:

_- -_.

.._._ ....---.._-----_ ....

....

---- - --..,-

.-.-._.

EXTtt~S'ON

NO. -00

-----_._._._----...._-

..._ . _ .

•

_._

. . . .- - _ .

DATE

1-_..!=========::!'--

f - - _ _ f-

"r"

TO: (Officer d.';9MHon, 'Dam number, and

DATE

___ .__.._ r ......- .____

building)

RECEIVED

FQ&WA~DED

l~::....:o.;M..::..a_<..y_"1:...:9...;;.7..;:3

-..,

COMMENTS (Number each comment 10 show I,om whom to whom. Draw a line aero .. column after each comment.)

OffICER'S INITIALS

J----------------.-----t--- +------+----+----------------------1 1.

Broe

-----------_._----_._- ------+--_.- +----~

00058 ro.R¥.3~ 6.1"1 Oiu'S!: PREVIOUS ~.r<i2 ....: i ." ,.... :EOITIONS ..

'tor'

~. ....

S;~ET •

CONFIDENTIAL

INTERNAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED

MORT DocTD: 1451843 i, ,..

"".

., .

.,~'May 1973

'.'

MEMORANDUM FOR "THE RECORD

SUBJECT: . G~neral: .. Office of Security Surv.ey . ·1.

-:--......-:--:.. --:;.~."

-:-."

.." ..

,. .

",--:-",--:-..~'.--:-~~---.

. . . ' .'::'. ".". '. .

-:-:::-.

;':,.

. "'" ..'f"····

•..

'...

., .

1. At the Director's instruction, and with the concurrence

.. of the thenDD/P, the Office of Security devedopedInfozmanrs in : ".:::~:... RID to report on the activities of RID er.q.ployees on whom security .. :':'~ questions had arisen.... This program, which included upwards of a ... ·· .' dozen informants at its peak, has declined to its present level.of three, only one of whom is reporting regularly on matters of ~urrent . interest. . ':': .~; ....: /..,~~;".:., '. ; ..' . :':' ' '.:. :':'>. '. . .. , ....

l.:.

f j

_c.

":'.'

"'.:

••

'..._

••

•

,:; . . . . . . .: • • •

•

:, •••

_~.~,.

";'

•••••

-",

Z. 'The principal object of Security's interest. through this .~~.-"":" informant is a female who was em.ployed in RID for..a nu.mber oi'yea:r's . until she r·esigned in 1969. Her r~s~gn?Ltion coincid~d with the iniq.ation of a security review on her by the Office of Security, but Security does .not know whether the e:m.ploy~~ waa aware of tbis..~:eC:~t.Y review Jat.,",:.: '.'

-i

the tUne

o_~ber r~Si;:::on•. '.,,, ~ :'~~':r~.;~~~:~:~,;;--:.:+:F'

3. Securit y ' s interest in this em..ploye~ was··occasionedby,. '" ... : reports that she had developed an increasing~y in'f::iixiate a.cquaintance,.,.;:>.:: with a Cuban na.tional. .Reporting. by one in.form.ant~ who Was also.~;·.;. ·¥":;;:~:· be~g de:elope~ bY.the-·~~b~; suggested that. the· ~.uban·migh~h~~e::~;~:~·::),L~;.:.·,. an mtelli'gence lIlteres~.lD. the fem.al~.~.T~e .s~.~. ~~~mant·a~so.;,.s.ub- ~.;·~kY: .' ..", sequently reported that. the Cuban had nl.J:l?3.eroq,s· other:contacts aInong . ;:., ," ". .

.:. ::1 '. '.;::~!

· :~~:!...;.,...

.•,: .•

.,.

:';~~}~; ~; ;::_;~::;;~;;t:;;::~e;;:::::~;~:;:C:::::~~~iP~!~Wilf~~~:_ . . ~;:: .c. ~.-::;::'~;'. :.'. ._.. :: ';'. · '.' :-<. ;.

• ->,

•

.,: -..

· ~i . I'·', :.~ 'f ..:..;. .

the ex-IUD -..1':;:;'''';';,'.;.:. . :4.:: .. ,'. Subsequent~:to.herdeparture . . . . :.... lrom . . the. Agency,'" . . .·employee entered' into a common-Law :marital relc:tion~hip"with.~he~ ',:" ;¥"'; Cuban and jo~ned hini·a'S. parbier in' photographic..· b·usiiess.<. :r.n thi~:·';;':i':~:C··. ·.·.1 t . capacity. she s.oli.cite~ .busin~ss .. ~mong ·CfA- ~:t;lployees; ·"especi.ally; ;i.~'-";·~·:·:::·; ::..... :.' .:.those requi;ring'p<:tssport photos.:.,' Recently, $he 'and the' Cubansought':-.;·;:;<. ! " ". . '.. .' t.o eznp.loy Security~s informan~ in. this busine;ss 'on ·a.part-tim.e b.asis; ';. . :.~:~ ..

':: . •:.::...' ••. .,,:.·.: c

".~~.".''':.'

•

~...

•

.1"

";.:-

• .\.

':.

•

,_.

' . . . ,.

'• • "

••••

.•

....

":, .. 1

~...

'."

~I'

•

:r.,,:';

•• '

:_~'" · '., ~. ;' ':.: ".'.': .·.;:.~E; :t.; .~ ·.'[:~ :.~ , ;.: ' ;.: ·~ . · :. ~.· :'_ ".~ ;.i: > ~:. ;:'. ,~O:.~ _ :."'.t.';_i';~.l.~-·~.;:~·':~ • :~• • 'li::~;~": .' ~~~.·~_.,~",-:.,~._:. 1,·.: ~. ~;' ~-. -

.. :.·:. ..._.·:

.. ... ':., .- :--.' .::.:~--

;.~

~ ~.. ....- ~ :. ~ '.

. -:;.'•.:.-t rc - -

••

:. -~~:. "'..;:.... :-:.

. ... .' ..... '. -, ".' :; .• :.,~-':::;>;;~~.;), 'SECa ..--".",,:~, .":

":.'

-.~-~~;.',.,.:_: ·:::;"i~~~·t~~;¢~i~1~:~i:i12~:~;;~~~h;i:~~t:.,.c~~rJff~:;.:~,., . .:

MORl DoclD: 1451843

. yJ ".

(

• .:.•

5. Inforrnation on the backgr oun d of the Cuban is fairly ex! cn s iv e , but it is inconclusive. He is known to have been a rn crn.be r of antiCastro organizations in this countr y, There are also reports that his' rno the r was i mp r i son ed in Cuba at one time, There are other episodes ·in his life that suggest intelligence Involv ernent all. his part with some hostile service, but this is not yet definitely establi.shed.

6. The Office of Security has had at ti me s a second informant in this case. His reporting has tended to confi r m reporting by the principal info r mant,

8. The Offi de of Security has been running this operation for over two years, in an effort to obtain conclusive proof of its intelligence nature. CI Staff has been kept informed.. The FBI, which was informed of the case at an early stage, has declined to take responsibility for it, on grounds that it concerns CIA's internal security. As a result, the Office ofSecurity has been inhihited in the actions it can take against the: Cuban susp-ect. On the other hand, Security has not taken any action against Agency em.ployees for fear of comprorni s ing the operation. 9. It would appear to me that the, Office of Security has dallied with this case long enough. Apparently unable through positive measures to resolve doubts about the case, O/S has followed the course of watchful waiting, hoping the Cuban would take precipitaif action himself that would give us the evidence we seek. In the m.eantim.e, our knowledge of the relationship between the Cuban and the several other current Agency employees with whom he is known to have contact continues

- 2 -

~ .

.,',

......

...;

00060

~~-----------_.MORl DoclD: 1451843 â&#x20AC;˘

."'- r.....

The possibility that the employee. In t)J:) DIVISIon may oe passIng information on CIA's Soviet operations is too great to warrant further delav in moving against her. I

- 3 -

.;;:zr. ,.....-~

, '. ".: t.. . __ ,_" ..

00061.

MORI DocID: 1451843

i路

. "' ....

Hemorandum to: Subject:

Offj.ce of Security Survey - Office of Security Support to

B~DD

1. In D~cember 1970 Robert Ingersoll, head of the Bureau of ~ar颅 cotics and Dangerous Drugs, asked Hr. Helnis if the Agency could give him scir:-e ass ist.ance in shoring up the internal integrity of the BUDD. According to Ingersoll, the old Federal Bureau of Narcotics had been heavily infiltrated by dishcnest and corrupt <elements, ,~o were believed to have ties with the narcotics smuggling industry. Ingersoll w~nted us toh~lp him recruit some thoroughly reliable people who could be used, . not only as special agents in his various office~ arotmd the country, but also to serve as informants on the other BNDD employees in these offices.

MORl DoclD: 1451843 .

...

... /

--: '" ..... .. ',o.,f':' /

"'"

-.. ;

JOLawrence

00063

MORl DoclD: 1451843 r'

----_.

""""

-_.

[J CO.. DtJHIf:\l .. ---_. ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET

._--------

SECRET

SUBJECT: (Optional)

_--_.__._--_.-._---- '--_:'----'---._--_.' _._-- _._----.-_.-.------

.. FROM,

EXTENSION·

Howard J. Osborn Director of Security TO,

._-~

I-

(Offiter desJgflolion. room number, and

----------------------D"TE

I DATE

buildin!!l

9 May 1973

COMMENTS (Number each comment

OFFICER'S INITIALS

FORWARDED

RECEIVED

._--_.-.

NO.

to whom.

Oro ....

10 show from whom

tine octose column after eoch comment.}

._---

Deputy Director for Maria g emen t & Service'

---,..

3.~c; ,\ ......---

'-"

--;..-::: ;;"_-r::..;;..'

'-_._-".......

......

10.

11.

12.

13. 14.

00064

15.

ADMIN FORM 3-62

61 0 '.

JIll'

USE PREVIOUS EDITIONS

-.....

SECRET "- ..... ". - ..... '.'

0 '

M ......

CONFI DENTIAL ... .,..

"0"

. :

.... -

I!J E ONLY .~Al

..... _

.... ,

.~.....

•

UNCLASSIFIED_

• _ • __ ._~.....""'i,.."• .;;.........:.i:c...,I'W.._:.w....._~:.H::a.·.:

MORI DocID: 1451843

9 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR:

Deputy Director for Management &' Services

SUBJECT

Press Allegations re Use of, Agency Polygraph

1. This memorandum is fOT'youT information only and confirms a report I made to you by telephone earlier today.

"., , .

2. On 22 July 1971, an article was carried on American proposals relative to the SALT talks in The New York Times over the by-line of William Beecher. It was devastatingly accurate and contained direct quotes from a Presidential advisory memorandum the White House had sent to Mr. Gerard'Smith, Director, Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, a few days. earlier. The President was alleged to be furious with this unauthorized disclosure of classified information and directed a. sweeping investigation within the United States Government to determine the source of the disclosure.. Investigation was conducted under the. di.r,ectton. ..Q~. Mr. Egil Krogh and Mr. David Young, Staff Assistanf~ fo路Mr. John Ehr1ichman, Counsel to the President for Domestic Affairs. 3. On the basis of investigations conduc~ed by State Security and Defense officials,' four' Tndividuals-"'one individual in the Department of Defense and three individuals in the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency-were tabbed as leading suspects. Mr. Egil Krogh contacted me on 26 July 1971 and requested' that we arrange to polygraph the three suspects in the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency and volunteered the information that the Federal Bureau of Investigation would be asked to polygraph the. one suspect in the Department of Defense.

0-0065

MORl DoclD: 1451843

••

\; ,:\

JJ( bi~Lf

4. I informed Mr. Krogh that from time to time in matters involving the national security the Agency had detailed to Mr. G. Marvin Gentile~ Director of State, Security. a polygraph operator and a polygraph machine for his use in polygraphing State Department employees '~10 were recipients of allegations concerning their loyalty. I emphasized that this procedure had the Director's approval and that State 'clearly understood that the examination was their total responsibility. I further informed him that this was the only way we could undertake to entertain his request and that even then it would require the specific approval of the Director. Mr. Krogh asked me to obtain such approval and work out such arrangements with Mr. Gentile.

s. Later that same day, Mr. Krogh called Mr. Gentile and inquired as to whether the arrangements had been made. Mr. Gentile indicated they had and suggested that the same ' polygraph operator'be used to examine the Defense suspect. Mr. Krogh informed Mr. Gentile that he considered this an excellent idea and that he, would instruct Defense officials to make their man available to Mr. Gentile for 'a polygraph, examination. 6

The' four individual~ werel

I The polygraph '--..e""x'""acwm"'1-:;:n....anl:=-=.1,. . ,o"'n""""'s==--"'r"""e=sU.....l. . -:r:.tl:'",e""'" a """1-:::n:----';c:'-.:tr:,e=a=r=1""'n=g=-~l:rn'""'e'--="" :ro"'udr men and th e resu~ts of the examinations were forwarded over my signature to Mr. Gentile on 29 July 1971. A copy of my covering memorandum is attached. 7., Mr. Murrey Marder, a staff writer for The Washington Post, in ,an article dated 3 September 197T, stated that a State Department spokesman had acknowledged at a news briefing that agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation had polygraphed State Department employees suspected of leaking information on ,the SALT talks in July •. Mr. John Edgar Hoover, then ,Director of the Federal

,SE ONLY

MORl DoclD: 1451843

. .... r

(

•

Bureau of Investigation, denied this allegation in a letter to The Washington Post and said that the polygraph examinations had been conducted by another agency. Speculation centered around the Agency, but after a day or 50 7 press speculation in this regard died away_

-S. Mr. Marder apparently has never been satisfied and has been pressing Mr. Charles BraY7 State Department spokesman, for confirmation of Agency involvement. Mr. Bray learned today that Mr. Marder plans to use a press conference to be held at 2:00 p.m. this afternoon to press this point further. Mr. Bray has been given guidance by Mr. Gentile to avoid confirmation but if this is impossible he will indicate the examinations were conducted by State Department Security officials utilizing an operator and a machine detailed to the Department for this purpose. I do not know whether or not the fact that the government-wide investigation was directed by Mr. Egil Krogh is known to Mr. Marder but I suspect that it is and that this is the reason why the matter has been raised again. Mr. David Young was instrumental in pushing my office to conduct an internal Agency investigation of this disclosure and the ·White House was satisfied that no Agency employee was the source.

Directo.r Attachment

00067

•

------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

....

-'1C

.. •

.... '

_._.~._

.....- ..-

..... .... --

.. ..

... -- ..

..'

. - ...-.-- .._-

---.

...

. (

''';:'

'.'

:'.~"

-:'.:

I i'

00068 --

-.-

.. '\ ......

. .. ".-

MORl DoclD: 1451843

:;'~:?",)i.:y ..~~$i·5t3.;1t,

io:

5.ecret;::.ry

::)~.c';..1=l~y

~". '_""o_i .:...:.-:-. ~_ ......... ::::"' _~:..:

.-. -... ':0 J_''':.;':.::::1.:':~_~;:-::'.~.L.~

'2....

.:=~....:::

!.:::t o;:£le.r c a s e-s

i;n.~;nl-vl·2.:5

i=r:.Fi.~::.-ati7·e ~":O I::£.:;:::~nce~:e rna de ~:~~3e

1::'1.2 1~3e o ; P0~Y~;:"~?~.1' i::;'3

r~ls ";\:1.~.llCY'3 1:l:.:,::)1··:".::1::1:~·~t

i::l

.a ct i on s ,

3. 1\.5 you i;"?"il1 not a, the :L3?O~t.:J 3.Z"-:: not ~1.:::t3:;i£i.:;d :2::!.U I 3;"'..a11 de.f.er to jrao.: j~dJn:t~nt i::l !'''e;ard to tb'~ l~·J~~i of cla':;3iiic~tio~.

- - "'"

...".

-- .... - -'"

" = -. ;: ....-

~.;).

. ....-

..- ......

00069

MORl DoclD: 1451843

5 June 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Inspector General SUBJECT

Items in John Clarke Me m o r aridurn to the Director of Central Intelligence, dated 9 May 1973

I. Two items in the attached rne mo r andurn had not previously been reported. The first: "_- Use of CIA funds and facilities to for FBI and provision of technica equlpmen s or use against a l.-.. ----' 2. In a follow-up meeting with Mr. Clarke, he advised that involved here was the use of funds appropriatedfor CIA bein iven to the FBI in cashiers checks for the ur ose of There was also gency help given in Further, other CIA ~ cashiers checks were given to NSAwho. with some ssistance, was working on Mr. Clarke said he thought the only problem here was in the use of funds, not in the operation. He thought the only source of additional information on this subject was Mr.1 lof the DDO/CI Staff. .

3. The second item: "_- Use of CIA funds to help State Department defer Presidential representational expenses of President Lyndon B. Johnson's trip to Southeast Asia. II 4. Mr. Clarke said the total amount of TIlOney requested by State Department was $3, 000, 000 but that the Director would not agree to this amount. The Director did supply funds in tho s e instances where some operational activity was involved or could be inferred, I, e , , "...JI Mr. C larkL.e-w-a-s-n-o""t-s-u-r-e-o'f:-;-;th;---e-a-m-o-u-n--;t-o"f-A"'--:-g=-e-n-c-y--

00070

S[CRET [YES QNt짜-

------------MORl DoclD: l45l843

funds used. He felt that only Colonel White could" supply adrlitional details. He said Senator Russell and Representative Mahon were advised of this Agency activity but asked not to be briefed in detail.

Inspector Attachmen t

00071.

MORl DoclD: 1451843

..../

__ J ..._ A

"-;

I._I.

9 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR:

Director of Central Intelligence

SUBJECT

Per your instructions

1. I have no recollection of specific contacts with the Ellsberg c as e, Watergate, or Young. Dick Helms' instructions at the time regarding discussion of Hunt's previous employment s h ou'[d be a matter of record. 2. Other activities of the Agency which could at some point raise public questions should they be exposed and on which Bill Colby is fully conversant are: --

CI act ivftyof Dick Ober 3 DO/D.

I.,

investments and accumulation of Government capital.

Use of CIA funds and facilities to acquire U. S. real estate for FBI and provision of technical equipments by NSAI p o r use against

t' ./'Y

Use of CIA funds to help State Department defer v', Presidential representational expenses of L. B. J . trip to S E A . . G

L . -_ _

f~....-----..--\ dhn M. Clarke

0007Z

MORl DoclD: 1451843

5 June 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Inspector General IteIns in John Clarke Me m o r-aridurn to the Director of Central Intelligence, dated 9 May 1973

SUBJECT

1. Two items in the attached memorandum had not previously been reported. The first: It __ Use of CIA funds and facilities to acquire U.S. real estate for FBI and provis~on of technical equipments by NSAS ~or use againat a ',-__ .

Z. In a follow-up meeting with Mr~ Clarke, he advised that involved here was the use of funds appropriatedfor CIA belo iven to the FBI in cashiers checks for the purpose of

\ '11ere was also I \ Further, other L..-_.------. CIA monies in cashiers chec s were given to NSA who, with some ~Ssistance, was working onl . '. Mr. Clarke said he thought the only problem here wastnte .us e of funds, not in the ope rat ion. He thought the only source of additional inforxnation on this subject was Mr. the DDO/CI Staff. ~ _

p£

3. The second item: "-- Use of CIA funds to help State Department defer Presidential representational expenses of President Lyndon B. Johnson's trip to Southeast Asia. n 4. Mr. ·Clarke said the total amount of money requested by State Department was $3,000, 000 but that the Director would not agree to this amount. The Director did supply funds in those £nstanceswhere some operational activity :vas involved or could be inferred, i. e •• 1 Mr. Clark-e-w-a-.s-n-o-t'--s-u-r-e-o"'f the amount of Agency

00073

--------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

">".

j I

funds used. He felt that only Colonel 'White could supply additional details. He said Senator ~ussell and Representative Mahon were advised of this Agency activity but asked not to be briefed in detail.

J.nspector Attachmmt

f f

. I

I I

i !

I I

'."

- 2 -

00074

MORl DoclD: l451843 ,

rt:,i:Al r ;~H (llN IL~ f! t:.L X LJ dE .__.. ------ -.. -....-.. . .-LJ... ._ -- -_.-<..- -----.-_._---_------- ........ _... _._--_._.. . __.OlilY

I1 ...

:.H:(L',SSlfiEO

ROUTlNG

SUSJECT:

.....

_._._-.. ----_._-- ----._,-E).!ENSION

D.irector of Finance 1212 Key Building and .

TO:

1"'0 ..

fROM:

(Ollicer design02fion, 'oom number, buildingl

~.~

AND RECORD SHEET

(Optional)

f- - - - - - - - - -.._ - - - - -

I DATE

r--RECEIVED

----- . --_.... .. ---- -"--"-' ---_ ..

NO.

DATE

---""'-'--' ------

~1973

d.ow (,am whom COMMENTS (Numbe, each comment 10 whom. Drow a line acron column afler each cemrnent.]

OFfICER'S INITIALS

FORWARDED

Deputy Director. for Mana ement &Services .- ---

Director of Central Inte 1igenc e I Headquart€ rs I

.. .. 7.

. ..

10.

..,.' .

...

11.

12.

...

.v: ....

. .. -". ,. '"

13.

1.4.

15.

v-,

. .' "

, ..;.:.

-. .'

...

":'.

............

....... :

..,

~ i~fF8a

p:·I'.rl'i'i

.. .' .. .. ~,-

~ ~: _~; :.~

~.~

.. .' .' .

.. ......":

....... . .. , .-

':.,c.· .~

. ,

..'

00075.. ... ....

-c-

';';4 •

,-' "

.. ..

...... ..

"'-

-,:..:._.

..:~

;

r'"-.11 liG0 .tt-'~ ~ ~i';:~i:s " .....

., 0

* ....

~::"

IIIIIIIIIIIIIII

MORl DoclD: 1451843

-;"

? s:

.. ;

MORl DoclD: l45l843

'..

orl MAY

1973

MEMORANDUM FOR:

Director路of Central Intelligence

VIA

Deputy Director for Management and Services

FROM

Director of Finance

SUBJECT

Special Other Government Agency Activities

IColonel White, Executive Director-

r---_--'2~.'--1,-------...:....---------------=--..:

. 3. Detailees - The Agency has reimbursable and nonreimbursable agreements with the White House, Department of Justice, Defense'Agencies, etc., based on signed memoranda between the Director 'of Personnel and the various Agencies.

4.. pro~ect TWOFOLD - Reimbursement from Bureau of Narco.tics an Dangerous Drugs' for 路training of BNDD agents by a domestic Agency Security proprietary. 5.

l...-----I] 00077

MORl DoclD: 1451843 ,!

......

- 2 -

SUBJECT:

Special Other Government Agency Activities

6. Payment to White House - Reimbursement to White House as approved by Executive Director-Comptroller for $33,655.68 representing cost of postage, stationery and addressing of replies to letters and telegrarn~'received by the White House as a result of the President's speech on Cambodia in May 1970.'

Ie inance

00078

MORl DoclD: 1451843

;

. J.{Ej·l0r~'mm,1 FOR:

VIA

.'. ..' ...i": -'. .

. '::. '~."':: <: ::':.:: '., ::';'~'g~"

'0'1 MAY i373

.:.. . :-:.'

Diroctor of

. . Ce~tr~l Intclli~cncc

••

Deputy Director for Ha:l<li:e::l.Cnt and

Director of

Financ~

;:..,

.• .,.,.:.1" .'., .: ~_ .......... _~ .... 1...•• ~ •., .~

2. L I -,

~3. Detailees - 'Tho Agency 'has reimbursable anu'nonrel~btirsablc a:;rcc:ncnts \-li t!l the i'lid.tc r:ouse, Dc~)nrt;:lcnt of

Justice, :;~fe~sc Ag cnc i e s , e tc, , based on s i~~~led' r.i~;.~~r:m;,!a be twe en the Direcr.or of Personnel and .t he various Agencies.

4. Proj oct :r~JFtlL!) • Reimbur-s ement; fron sur-eau of'· Nar.cotics---ailJ. Dangerous Drugs for traini:lg' of B;iDb agents by

do~estic

Agency

Security'propri~taI"y'~

't ..:.

s£Crrtl •\ -L-_'--

-...:..

-,,=-~ (l:\H V (1[\1... ~.

---'

-----_... _-.-_..- ---- --_._:,-_.-_. --.----_........ __ ......,.-_ - _.. _._.,.._.. ."

".:.'- _.," .- --

MORl DoclD: 1451843

- 2 SUBJECT:

Special Other Government Agency Activities

6. Payment to White House - ReLmburs eracn t to \'fhite House as approved by Executive Director-COl:lptroller ÂŁor $33.655.68 representing cost of postage, stationery and addressing of replies t~ letters and telegrams received by the White House as a result of the President's speech on Cambodia in May 1970.

(signed) Thomas B. Yale Thomas B. Yale Director of Finance

.....

.00080

MORl DoclD: l45l843

7- ::J.- ;:\ ~

f..; '_'

! ., .'..•• i 'J

07 MAY 1973

~lEl·:QRA"iDU}.1

FOR:

Director of Central Intolligenco

VIA

Deputy Director for j·!anagemcnt and Services

FROt·!

Director of

SiJDJ!;CT

Special Other Government Al;ency Activities

rin~nce

I Colon0l

l';hi te. Lxecutive Director-

---------------------

3. Detailees - The Agency has reimbursable and nonreimbursable ag reemen t s with the 11hite House. Depar-tment; of Justice, Defense Agencies. etc •• based on signed memoranda between the Director of'Personnel and the various ~gencies.

4. Pro~ect tWOFOLD - Reimbursement from Bureau of Narcotics an Dangerous Drugs for training of BNDD agents by a domestic Agency Security proprietary.

s. I

L-

--;-

I~·,

00081.

--------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

- 2 -

SUBJECT:

Special Other Government Agency Activities

6. Payment; to White House - HeinburSGHcnt to h'hite Iiouse as apl)TQved by Executive Director-ColJptrollcr for $33,655.68 representing cost of postage, stationery and addressing of replies to letters and telegrams received by the White House as a result'of the President's speech on Cambodia in Mdy 1970.

(signed) Thomas B. Yale

Thomas B. Yale Director of Finance

00082

-----------------_.. MORI DocID: 1451843

p ." .u~~lA~SSI FI-ED

--:IlAl 0 U ONLY ._-----

SU8JECT: (Oplional)

*----.._--_.-,----_..'------ .----

EY.T~NSION

Deputy Director of Finance 1212 Key Building TO: (Officer building)

'..''"0'....

room

"0';;'.

0""

. -----~

"'---

OFFICER'S INITIALS

24 May

1973~ '0

,how from whom COMMENTS (Number each comment Draw a line ocross column af'er each comment.)

10 whom,

__J

IWE'-'-~'-';--'-

FORWARDED

-----

·rNQ."-------···-------·----··_- -

IHe a4qua r t e r ,s

- - -~~" ----REalVED

._---_.....

FROM:

~'ET

CONFI" ''lTIAl --.' ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET

~---.-

1lI~

Attached are pertinent d ocumen ts and papers r e La t mj

to Para 6 of the Director of Finance I S memo to the DCI

dated 7 May 1973, Subject : 5.

"Special Other Government -

Agency Activities tl

I I Warren D. MagnussoI

......

Atts

'.'

...

10.

--.

... "

.' .,'

12.

13.

"'"

.. .":

.- ."

~~~o ~10 u~Jft~v~~us

':.;-

- .-

. ':;:}"

. '

:...

~\: ~~:;.:i ..

:.; .....

- r'

r ,

r7t'.'

........ .. .

7~~: t. !!~~':I n""'f1J"1T -

~\: fl

' ..•-~"

0 CONFIDENTiAl

.-:-" .

.- :

~; :-I;-:::.~:' ..':

...::..

.. :.:.. -::::...'~ .'.

'.'

;."

:. ''''''0008 . ' .~- /~~:~~g~~ ;'~~1~!j: .~ .

.. .::.:.....: '. ... ~ D' INTERNAL :,' .

~~"" ;: .~:~':,~?~.:~~.: ~..:;~>;.-;;:~. ·~·Z ~~":'.~}".". \~~;~~~:. ~:i~}~?~;. :"

r;;~'~

t.; .'

.. ...... ;

-;'

15. -,

~~. . ··':/t~. ~:"' :: ·~~~~2"::i:i~.:~

14. ...'.,

.. .."' ..;.

.. -:

. -.:

03';;:'

D'-' U·NCLASSI.FIED·?:~;':.~ .

~~~~,..:~:'t~,; .;-:.i.:~~"._~·.::,:~~LL;l;...:.c"":::~...;i;~:2>,,:;;-;~U?;~!'it-~:.~t;i:.~."'"_; ....,:.,.,,'~~~:;;~~~I:~<·~,~:..r~V~~1~ 2:~~~t.~i\·dt

------------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

'.'

..,. '.

/ 141'. Nagnusson' s phone conver satzlon ,'lith on 26 May 19'10:

;.~r.

John Brown at approxfmat.e.Iy 10: 20

13:

Guess we're back together again!

Got more problems?

Yes, don't know how much Watts told you.

I didn't talk to Watts.

Let me explain background. As a result of the Cali'lbodia speech, we I re getting relatively inundated with correspondence and normally all of this is sent to the Department of state for answering. What we're doing -- we're continuing to sen~l1._c..2.!:~ co:r.r_e_i:!pg!!.cl.~!!£~_t.9.~at~ However , the President made, determination he'd like to answer support over his signat~re here and 'we asked the Department of state to support us on this effort. They're in' a position wnere they can provide only limited support at this time. They're committed for $10,000 which would probably handle' in the area of maybe 60;00~ r~_~ponses.' -

How many responses altogether counting pros and cons?

The cons are quite a large group

Are they going to be handling pros too?

Think he called Colonel vJhite.

tha~

they're handling themselves also.

....>-$.10 J 0Q'?2:.s .J'~:r:.. J?r_o.s-=- They're doing cons. On pros they c~n pi ck up only ~10,000 wort1i-;-We estimate it will be arounCL~&g.Q....~E 50,~d it looks like at present time we've got over 100,000 responses in and it could go upwards of -150,000 or greater. Looks like we'll need a minimum. of another $l(),c)6o;:p:rotra01.yrnareaoF $15,000z additional. This covers cost of printing, :postage and addressing:'

Just printing, postage and addressing? or anything like that?

Not any overtime for any salaries

13:

No, the posting of the things we'll do ourselves -- by hand. No problem. We're talking about physical costs of job _..:. cost of stamps, cost of envelopes and cards, and cost of having them 'addressed by outside firm. We'll handle putting stalllp on, inserting, and sealing and mailing. Only talking about cost associated with three aspects of the operation.

Postage, address~ng and printing.

Yes, reason I asked NS/f. to see if they could arrange -- depending on how volume goes -- probably another §?10,000 to £],000 ... _

T.i;l.ese are just pros?

state is handling all cons themselves?

(continued)

00084 I

• _

...

MORI DocID: 1451843

â&#x20AC;˘ e,

, -,

....

Messrs. Magnusson and Bl'OiVU (continued - Page 2)

Yes, this is just portion of pros we're talking about. My understanding get in touch -,d.th you to vlOrk out mechahics O!~ how we woul.d l1cuid.le the .billing to make sure it's straight and we do i t properly so it fits in with your accounting system.

This is only portion o:f pros.

State doing some too?

Th~~re~QD~'ibuting~~lO.OOO to the pros as well as doing all the C~S. They're picking up quite a load as a 1~t-ofth1S:-0neh-eu of a lot of response c~ning in on this.

Bound to be. Tell you, John, let me give you a call back later today if I may. Have to take a look about where I would fit this stuff in. Al'e you going to be in this afternoon?

I'll be around. as I come back.

I'll give you a call then.

Can't be real definite -- not sure how we're going to peak out. Not sure what backlog is. I'll check into that so When we talk this afternoon I can be little more def'inite. Probably run into that are~, I think.

Okay, 1

Okay, thank you, Warren.

111

1f I'm not in my of:fice I'll get back to you as soon

get back in touch'with you.

, End of Conversation

00085 I .;

!.. ,.'.,

- ..

----------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

". -'

â&#x20AC;˘

Nr. Magnusson's phone conversation with Col. vJhite at 15: 40 on 26 Hay 1970: M:

I talked 'vith John Brown today and it seems like -- as you mentioned -as' a result of Ca:rnbodia, inquiries going 'into 1'r'11ite House. The state Depar'tmerrt is doing 'all the work on the, cons -- there are pros and cons. The state Department is going to answer all the cons and the President has determined that he warrt s to answer personally all the pros. However, the state has agreed to pick up some of those too in the amount of $10,000. That. will cover maybe 60,000 of' the arrswez-s, They estimate there I s going to be from 100,000 to 150,000 answers that will have to be put out by the lvnite House. Estimate it's going to cost about $8,000 per 50,000. Think it might go to 150,000. $10,000 to $15,000 additional which the White House will have to pay for. The charges are only going to be. for printing, postage and addr-easd.ng by an outside firm. No salaries for overtime or anything like that. They're going to lick the stamps in the 1voite House, paste the stamps on and insert the message into the envelopes. John Brown said he had requested NSC to see if t.hey could arrange, . presUDlably with us, I guess, for another $10,000 to $15,000 depending on volume. He was tailing as more or less foregone conclusion we would do it. I made no commitment. Told him I'd look into it.

How would we do this?

We would do it by asking them to pay amount and then send over 1080 to us with bill for the postage, bill for the addressing of the envelopes and bill for the printing' accompanying this and we woul.d just send check back. They would send short memorandum lvith it certifying these are the charges. . . .

I think we want to know what we spend our money for but I 'don't think we want tlfe public records to' show' that we paid for it.

What we can do, Sir -- I can ask them to send over a 1080 with certification that these are the charges for classified services per our conversation, and if you're willing to take that we can certainly do it that way.

Will this be an outside firm? .be better? 1 1m not sure.

CouIdn't we just pay the firm?

What would

I think a short memo just saying attached 1080 is for charges previously agreed to between this Agency and themselves and that's all and then we send them. check for that. otherwise, there's always chance that an outside firm might rea1:ize it was us paying for i t ~.

I guess it I s the best way to do it. I'd like to have in our records -nobody else has 'access to -- exactly what it was for -- all about it; their records, which are audited by the General Accounting Office, as' little as possible.

(continued)

00086

MORl DoclD: 1451843 "

. Mr. l'1a;gnusson and Col. vrnite (continued - Page 2)

. M:

Think I can taJ.k to them and arrange that so he just sends unclassified 1080â&#x20AC;˘.

ahead and do it. I'll have to sign off on it, I suppose. You go ahead and arrange it in way that will give us full record. As far as any records of their's are concerned, I would prefer to have minimtun.

I can write memo and John Brown can refer to this and our phone conversation in a memo accompanying the 1080.

Okay, go ahead and do it. said $10,000.

He said $10,000 to $15,000 because they're just pouring in. above $10,000.

Approximately $10,000 but in no case will 'it exceed $15,000 like that. . Okay. .

All right, Sir.

Thank you, Warren.

Put limit on it.

vlhen they talked to me they Might run something

End of Conversation

/t-/11 -

",Âˇf b7

00087

MORI DocID: 1451843

,: '- ...... ~-

\ )

:i ..: ;..,

~.~

gr. 1-1agnusson' s phone conversation with Kr. John Brown at approximately 17: 00 on 26 May 1970: M:

Think we can go ahead and do this. Have' to be careful as to way this is documented -- that I s the only thing. Would like to suggest that I ivrite memo for the record -- kind of co-sign it -- agreeing to amount and so forth and the vlay vie do this. Memo would have in it what it I S for and then you wou.Id send us a 1080 for this, referencing this memo an~ our conversation.

You're thinking in terms of reimbursing us aga.i.n? better for us to have direct charge ~o you?

No, because of public record. In order to have all the things in our hands. It wouldn't look good for us to pay the bills direct for this sort of thing.

It would not?

No, if you people pay the bills

(interrupting) Even to pay a large postage fee? be postage.

Bub we have to document what it's for . then we'll give you money for. it.

i'iouldn't it be

Bulk of expense will

if you people can just pay it,

What would our memo say?

Say attached is 1080 referencing memo dated such and such.

. What does the memo say -- that we're making reference to? ..

I'll write that up and bring over to you.

What, basically, are we going to say'it's about? .

.Have $10,000 with limit of $15,000 and would be for printing, of these' things and so on..

Just wondering if you have direct biliing it seems to me that serves purpose of memorandum.

The direct billing from, let's say, the printer, the addressograph company or something like that, to us might raise questions ?utside and I think powers that be don't want to have fact that we Ire paying for this sort Qf thing anyplace where it can be dug up. Easiest and cleanest way to do this is you people go ahead and pay and we' 11 rei~burse you immediately.

Do we have to have this memo? (continued)

.' .

----

tb ". .. I ~

00088 i..

-'1

MORI DocID: 1451843

Messrs. Magnusson and Brown (continued - Page 2) rr~

I'd keep in

safe here.

vlouldn I t i t be adequate to send 1080?

Don't forget, you people keep copies of 1080's -- you have to by law. 1080· would have to cite what billing is for because of that, then that would open up to GAO or somebody else as to who I spaying

for this sort of thing.

1ve have to cite what, it's for?

Let I s say it 's "XYZ Printing Company" and you pay bill. This looks like you're paying it. You send us 1080 which says nothing and we give you money for this. We ourse.Ive s have to have on our records what we're paying for for our 01-vn ~uditors which doesn't get outside of our Agency.

It's for your internal auditors? that sounds all right.

Illl draw the memo up and bring it over there and you can see it.

That sounds good, Warren.

Would next Monday be all righ:t with that memo?

Yes, we'll go ahead and order.

You can get going and so on.

Don It know what final cost is going to be. Hate to restrict ourselves. We figure total cost is going to be around $25,000.. Got over 100,000 already that are just pro. 200,000 that haven It been analyzed yet. Of 200,000· ·they estimate possibly upwards of 50,000 or 60,000 could pertain to Cambodia. Of the backlog of 200,000, 60,000 could be of .type that will be answered in this mailing. Our best estimate would be it. may run over.

I Ive got instructions, John, to indicate in memo that it I S for approximately $10,000 but not to exceed $15,000. If· and when it exceeds $15,000, we'll start over again and 1'11 inquire further as to whether we can cover the other -- okay?

Okay.

Open to negotiation if it runs higher.

It wou.ld' not

~et

outside?

Okay,

(continued) F;:~

5 1.

r-»

•

00089

MORI DocID: 1451843 "' â&#x20AC;˘ â&#x20AC;˘ t

-~,~-----.~--Messrs. Magnusson and Brown (continued - Page 3)

It rr.ay run higher. If' 60,000 letters come out being pro, will taJ~e . ~s ,to $26,000 or somewher-e in that vicinity.

Then I I d have to go back and inquire to see if' powers that be will cover the other part. I think it's best to wait I til that happens ,

Okay, good enough ,

'''nat time Monday?

B:Wny don't you give us call here Monday? M:

Okay.

Thank you', Warren.

My secretary will line it ,up.

End of' Conversation

--i:

Y' ::--';') j . 7 '"'.

r - . .,\-':,. ~-:

00090

MORI DocID: l45l843

\"'L:.I'

.i~L., i,\j-j

.:..,_;_iG._, ... \..-;:::

WASHINGTON,

D.C.

hl:>..:. • ., ..... I

20505

JUN ;970

MEMORAi'illl.jM FOR l '} fE RECORD SUBJ"''&CT:

Reimbursement to the White House £or Certain Printing, Postage and Addressing Expenses

.L, Reference is made to the telephone conversataon between 14r. John Brown, Staff Secretary, Wnite House, and the undersigned concerning the accounting and the reimbursement procedure ~or \fl1ite House expenditures in connection with the printing, postage and addressing of replies to certain mail addressed to the President.

2. It was estimated and agreed that these expenditures would amount to approximately $10,000, but not exceed $l5,000, and the request for reimbursement to this Agency would. be based upon receipt o£ a memorandum categorizing the expenses.and certifying to their validity. The memorandum Will also transmit a Standard Form 1081 and copies of the vendors' invoices where applicable.

3. Upon receipt of the above memorandum, Standard Form 1081 and copies of vendors' invoices, a. U. S. Government Treasury check will be drawn and forwarded to the Wnite House.

~'-~-rr---------' Deputy Dire·ctor for Liai'~on and Planning Office of Finance

CONCUR:

.. 0009.1

-------------------MORl DoclD:

24 I~UG lQ/ u" .

SUBJECT:

l45l8~3

Re~nbursement

to the ~fnite House for Certain Printing, Postage and Addressing Expenses

1. On 18 August 1970,' the undersigned received a telepl10ne call from Mr. John Brown (145-2167) advising that the mailing had been heavier than anticipated (increased to 250,000 pieces) and that the dollar requirement for subject purpose had. increased from $15,000 to $25,000. 2. I apologetically advised 1'IJr. Brown that since our records showed that 'prior approval was limited to $15,000 I would have to advise and confirm with my superiors that the increase to $25,000' was acceptable, as I was sure it was.

3. In the absence of Col. White (on leave), Mr. Bush immediately contacted Mr. Clar.ke, r--l who was not in his office. On 19 August, Mr. Clarke telephonicaI:ty--approved the increased level and Mr. Brown was duly informed. .

Chief,

0009Z

MORl DoclD: 1451843

... )

â&#x20AC;˘

THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON,

September 10,

Dear Vrr.

1970'

V~gnusson:

Pursuant to your telephone call to V~. John Brown regarding the breakdown of costs in connection with the mailing of the Acknowledgement Cards concerning The President's Speech on T!1e Situation in Southeast Asia, the following costs were incurred: Computer Marketing Industries, Inc. Acknowledgement Cards Envelopes Total -

:I>

12,7 46.15 3,185.07 . 1,,051.20 16,982.42

Sincerely yours,

Carson M. Howell . Officer

Administrat~ve

Mr.. Warren D. Magnusson

Deputy Director for Liaison and Planning Office of Finance Central Intelligence Agency Washington, D. C.

00093

-----------------. MORl DoclD: 1451843

tlf..

f '. .

• •

1-..._ o

· 0

I • . .. .. .

. "

i:e::10l"i.:".~:I.-:.1 :~~).&.~ t:).:: ;\ . . ~';(i:."'"(~) (i~. . t..:::d.· 2'~ /.U.:;iJ.:. t l:./r,:,~ t: :-\;a~ :-;1.':) ~ ~ct

i'tW

1. ki:;l;'v::hed h'.::ce-co is m::l.iling exponncs ,

is l"Cc:':.t1CS.lc£:d

t~l::~l; tIle' o7:."5.~:~naJ. voucher- be l1~l:r:ir~L:·i;:""~.. "~~i~i!,,'l.:t

r'l')l"ov-::d and ~~.~rt.i:rie(l ac ..co t!.10 <:'Y':;':L:i.~~bili".:.;:r oJ: i'u~::(J.G fli~ u rctu:;'-IlCtl ~u')

~o;;lfi

o:.:'.fica 'J::Ol" pC.yrr.ST!'{;.

;

;,J'....i....:.~..Ji e • .1) •

LV. .~: ":'.\..'""f

DG]iu'~y Dircet:o:r 'fo.. •. Jsinif;Oil ,md :·l::.."·l1r.~

or.rice:

of' Fil'l:lm:e

t l l !)!1=:) fi·or.1 I\!r. Ibi.. .e ll O

(ltd. 10of;cJ:?'~ 1970 f..Ii' 1001 (oris and 2)

00094

MORl DoclD: 1451843

1 5 SEP :070

JV.iEMORAI\'DUM FOR:

Director of Planning, Progrmruning and Budgeting

SUBJECT

Reimbursement to the Vlhite House for Certain Printing, Postage and Addressing Expenses

REFERENCE

Memorandum for the Record; dated 24 August 1970, same sUbJect

1. Attached hereto is accounting submitted from the Vlhit.e House for mailing expenses.

2. It is requested that the original voucher be administratively approved and certified as to the availability of fUnds and returned to this office for payment.

HARREN D. MAGIIJlJSSON

Deputy Director for Liaison an Office of Finance

lanning ~ '. i,l

Attachments

Memo from Mr. Howell dtd 10 Sept 1970 SF 1081 (orig and 2)

00095

MORI DocID: 1451843

.. Sh'nl,iHI~: I'" 'r,u""r.. o, lutil

V~LC:':;:fi '::.:~D

7 I; \0 WIO 1/'')·101-}0

SCHEDULE

D. O. X o..... '

'100

.__

I'AID DY

(D. O. 0i'mbo!) .

\0 iSDUiSWi: OGJCCL

You are authorized to effect tho withdrawals and credits indicated below,

-=o.m..... .,"•.Jo~01L·

300

-----L-,':Du'P.iI.:tl101rJriiSJ1SiilTl: lllm cc:r i 1&0'Om

(D, O. Sj"llbol)

.•.

------~--_._-_.

DEl'AilTl.!ii:NT

DEPARTMENT

DI,;HEAU

I I

AnDRESS nUiiltAU RlITi:RENCI:

SU~UURY'

AIolOUNT

ArrllOPRIATION OR FIINO SnlBoL

Bunr..r..u 11.;>;)1:1:88

Executive Office of the P.... cs i.

The vrnite House Office 11-01-0001 Hashin!3 t on t D. c. 20500

BURE&l1 REFERENCE

ArPROrat.a.TION OR.

--_. -

- -

St;UiIAR\' :

Fusn

S't"UBOL .

A1l0UNT

~a6t982 •.

1100110.001 ,.

. TOT.LL

TOUL

Dctails of charges or reference to attached supporting

sis, 9(12.

documen~

For the printing of ACKnowledgment Cards~ Envelopes, and to Keypuncn names & acidl' and place on magnetic tape ana the preparation of heat transfer labels and affixi to envelopes, in connection with the acknowledging of mail concerning the" Preside speech on the Situation in Southeast Asia.

For use of billing office:

For use of office billed:

I certify F.\N FICATE OF OFFICE BILLED I certify that the iI.ellls llsterl herein arc correct and proper Cor p,t"'UJ.t:JJ..k...LIJuw'-!o.!!!<""!ll!.Io!..!:.!!I!!.~:!.!!.!~v:.~!!i!..!~::!.!:._...,

(AUlhorized admlulstrativc or

Paid by check No.

I I

* u: s,

- ---- .._.-. _..__.-..

_.~~

GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE' 11161-607821 ~~

_~_

~._--

olticer'

.dat!J0096

C/D :!\o.

ccrlll)'iD~

-------".--

MORl DoclD: l451843

i'· .~ ,,\.. C"'....1.,.... .L :t

It j.n

:l."(.':.1:::~r:~":·." ·~:·I.:-.t \-~

l~~~; ..i:~;ll l\··::.,·~n'".~l·:; ~:I.) t.~i.0 ::e..:.·..:::.:.~l~'-· .:1.·

r...::-.---. oi

.~: ~:

iT~ ~.~' . c; r .,: :,':,:tc

:.-·{.::.. -:.d

e,r ".ltJ,:·').;l.!iz:'

:··t,:-:~.t;:;.

FAH

3. Isll

l·iC::;;

COI;~·Il.-

(1oc·l:r.:G;-"l C1xt ·;.·:',.:l CG:j·::'~::i:"'=1::.':1': -::.;lir; tI': l~f~:1ct:Lon in 1)0'111:" ~",::""lL: in t.llis CJifica fo:.... soc..-.:,~·i:~:/· :i.'W~~~:::C;l:; t~:::l iz ~~-lll~:i:r::;.)la to tl\c Ar '_~lCY CH.l!}i '(,or Il •

Flc~~~ fOl"'tiard. "th.::! c11C':ck

n?proD~~utc

office for

c~~iciaL.

Kl\r:r.:: ::r D. l·:AGI-;U:':::',CCi DiTcc.l,,-=>r :rc~ I'~uif;Ci"l r:r.d 7·J.rr:.. ni';~r:

D:.;r:l:rt,~r

00097 '.

':;zt-., . . ..,.'

.~;.~ ••. :' -t ::' ~. ,'Po.

••••••

t......

of .....

,•• _~_.

MORl DoclD: 1451843

...

!" ;

i.·~r. John Drown ,S'L"U S~~cretal'Y The Y/liite Ho u s o Office "!ushingt-on, D. C. 20500

z.-- Enclosed is U. S. Treasury Check No. ' -

of $16,982.42 wh ich repi:cse:1tG rcii1-;bursemcnt of I

No·IL__-.:..._I.copy

1in the a rn o ur.t nUl"CaU

enclose~./ThiS sC!lcdule wa9·.fo~·warded to tilis

·1

10 September 1970. Your-s very truly,

.1JAHREN D. 'lv!.A

Enclosures

OFI

Schedule

ll Oct. 70)

·1----I

00098

USSON

MaRl DoclD: l45l843 e.

THE WHITt: HOUSE WASHINGTON

Decem.ber 7. 1970 l'

CONFIDENTIAL

MEMORANDUM FOR:

WARREN MAGNUSON

We have finally received the cost breakdown for acknowledging the mail in connection with the President1s speech on the situation in Southeast Asia. By copy of this InemOrandUlTI I am requesting our administrative office to forward that portion of the bill applicable to you. If there are any p r obl.erns in handling this, please let me know.

Thank you.

.:::InA. JOHN R. BROWN III cc: . Carson Howell

00099

..... ... *-~

.._'--.-

._'-~"

"~'

-._.~

.... .. ~_

MORl DoclD: 1451843

- ......

----

.- ...... ~

_--~_

_- .. __. . _-

Keypunch names, place on magnetic tape prepare 'and affix to envelopes heat ' transfer labels, and furnish printout. , Print acknowlecgment Cards Print Envelopes.

$7,410.35 2,244.27 . 728.00

Postage

6,290.64· $16,673.26

.. . . ... ..

-._--_..._. __.__ .._-_ ... - .....

_---_._-----~_

... --- --- . _------------_._---_ .. _.. -

--,

"""0'0._. __ 0_"

'"_' _

••. _ •••

" _

._. _ _ •

MORI DocID: 1451843

5,'

I>iEJvJORAl'IDUM FOR:

Director of Planning, ?rogramming and Budgeting

SUBjECT

Reimbursement to the wnite House for Certain Printing, Postage and Addressing Expenses

RE7iRENCE

Memorandum for the Record, dated 24 August 1970, same subject

...

1. Attached hereto is the second acc0U11ting, in the amount of $16,673.26, submitted from the vfnite House for mailing expenses .. Ciieck for the first accounting in the amourrt of $16,982.42 was forwarded to the White House on 2 October 1970. 2. It is requested that the or'Lgd.na.L voucher be administratively approved and certified as to the availability of funds and returned ~o this office for payment.

Deputy Director for Liaison Office of Finance Attachments . SF 1081 (orig & 2 wiatt) Memo from the White House dated 7 Dec 1970 Memo to D/pPB, transmitting - 1st accounting, dated 15 Sept 70 Copy of 1st 1081 Memo from the White House dated 10 Sept 70 Memo for the Record dated 24 Aug 70

Planning

»<. c:J,

..:,.

001.0.1. _","0

• • •- .

~_.

~._• • • • •

•

_..

•••

_ _ •••••• _._

.~_ • •

•

• • •_

••• _

•••

MORl DoclD: 1451843

....."

.' )"11.';'

.'n.

... :~t I .usu

\:~UGi":~.{ ;~.:·:ZJ SC;·,;::['~i..E

j(lhl

C? W!TI-I;jRAV.'J::S

JO·II-lt'~·U

.~i\D

D. O. No.

n«. No.

au.

No.

--.--·-t(}:·~::::J.;i!i~:i;-·

-~.j .. -·---CiJ:r;;~~(:n:;;;-

)I).) (D.

GREDlrS

PAID BY

o.•;;·."bo)

You are authorized to e/Teet tho withdrawnls find credits indicated below,

300__._

(D. O. ~jllIl'lJ-o-J)----

Dr.I'..... nTllENT

Executavo (jf.,.·ice o.c blrc ."n::;L, The

~';h'i t,:!

ilou s e (;;.:.::.c';

1.L-01-0~)()1

Annneas SumIAR" APrRorRIATION OR'Fu"" SVltlJOL

..... rrnorRI...nON OR FUND SnlDOL

110

1110110

-,; 16,6·.. .:;02/,

0001

I i

TOTJ.L

TOT4L

Deto.ils of charges or reference to attached supporting documents

For the prtintdng of Aclm01'1lecigement Cares, Envelppes and PO;3tage f'oz- mnilin:,;, and to Keypunch names, place on magnetd.c t.ane , prepare and afl.·ix to envo Lt.!)OS heat transfer LabeLa, and ;furnish' printout,9 in connection tvi th· the .ad\.noW'led,~;:;.;'Ji... of mail concerning the President1s Second. speech on the Situatton in ::)ou"neast ;'.3iE See attached list ;for breakdoYI.n of cos~s~

For use of office bllled: '- '1" ~ fy funds j" •

For use of billing office: Cl);)E

ERTIFICATE OF OFFICE BILLED

J cortif.)' thnt tho il.cms lister! hereln are correct and proper for payment from tho appropriation's) designated;

l,.-,Yi-U.:-O""'Ili-Cl:-rl----

I·

I I

Paid by check No.

* u.

C/D

~o,

• dated

001.02 _

S. GOVERNMENT pAINTING OFFICE: 1516\-60782\

I J

MORl DoclD: l45l843

...

..-, "

1. it i6 l·cql.C~~"::~ ~~l;:~t a cllcc:~ 'il:" ~b.c ;·.r..n our.t 01- ~~lo, &73. 26 be dr-awn paynbl c to the "Erc;::.;.. Ul"C:;: of t:1C t.r:'''iitcc~· Si;~tC5.

CuJCI

3. .1\11 t1oC~·.1'lC~·r~2:~io).. c c . .icc~"~i~";.~; ~~ji:, tl.·:Lj::.~.;.~ctic,.n ia l~ci . ·&; i;'I.:j thl s olfice-fol" s ecu:.. . ity ~(12::;G:.10 c:=-. .d iz r,_"\'~il~blc to the t,~cjJ,-;~r ru.:..

~ ~:'j ::..rJ:·~;.

4. Pl.ca ne £or\·~ard ti"~e' C}-iCC~-;' ~.o ·~:1.i::l o~ri.~e .for tr~nGn1it!;f.~i tl:'; ·,i'l ap?l'opl"iate o':liciC:i.l.

OF 1

00103

MORl DoclD: l45l843

...

Mr. John R. Drown III ,S( c r ctar y The "'{hite House Office W..• s h ington , D. C. 20500

St;l£[

Enclosed is U. S . TTeasury Check

No.1

fn the

amount of $16,673.26 whi ch represents r e irnbur sc mcnt of Bur e au

Schedule

No.

D c o py enclosed. Yours very t r ulv ,

I Dt'

If)ir~~t~r

for Liaison and PI .nn inn Office of F'In.i nc e

Enclosures

I '.' _.__.__..

l"-" .

001.04

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.• \' ;.')7)

MEMORANDUM FOR:

Deputy Director for Management and Services

SUBJECT

Special Report

1. This memorandum is in re~ponse to a request to provide information on situations or associations that might appear to be irregular on the surface. 2. Details to the lVhi te House and Government Agencies Background: For many years the Central Inte-filgence.AgencY~as detailed employees to the immediate office of the White House per se and to components associated intimately with the immediate office of the President such as the Council on International Economic Policy and the President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board. We have furnished secretaries, clerical employees and certain professional employees on a reimbursable and non-reimbursable basis. At the present time, we have no clericals or professionals assigned to the immediate White House office, but we do have one young man detailed to their Communications Section. There are detailees to PFIAB and CIEP. I might point out that we had detailed to the White House as late as the fall of 1970 couriers, telephone operators, a laborer assigned to the grounds and a graphics man who designed invitations for State dinn~rs. By October of 1970, more funds were apparently available to run the White House and most of our detailees were hired as bona fide White House employees. 'CIA is not the only Agency furnishing the White House with detailees. ·Levies have been made by this Administration and others on Defense and State and other Government entities whose employees have Top Secret cLeazances • Professional officers have been and are at the present time assigned~ the National Security Council and we have seven clericals on detail to NSC on a reimbursable basis. In addition to the above, we have technical specialists detailed ,to NSA, an instructor at the National War College and security officers detailed to the Department of State to

001.05 .

MORl DoclD: 1451843

-G-\Q' ~! 1--IIJ1_1-'r . I~~ ",' '18."\ __ 1.\, I

I (

_J"",il-l.l~;:'

protect foreign visitors. Recently, lwas detailed to the Secretary of the Treasury alohg With. IO r other Agency cmp'Loyee s . We have cven, in rare insta.nces, detailed our people to Congressional Staffs for short periods of time. 3. petails to the White House and Governm~nt Agencies Discussion: Details to NSC, the White House, NSA and the National War College are probably qu~te defensible. On the other hand, there may be those who would ques tion Agency employees currently working at the Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs and Mr. Peter Peterson having an Agency employee as路his . secretary when he was the .Secretary of Commerce (she also made a trip with him tb Moscow). She is still with him in his present assignment but we expect that she will report to NSC for a new detail sometime this month. r I served for over ten years as Director of the Offlce of PubI1C Safety for AID. This information has been kept "close to the vest" during that entire period of time. He has been approved for disability retirement and is presently on sick leave and will retire automatically at the expiration of this leave. Each detail of an Agency employee to the White House or other Government agency has been carefUlly considered and approval at a higher level obtained when professionals were involved. 4. Project TWOFOLD: I believe the support we are providing to Project TWOFOLD is an activity that should be reported under your guidelines. Since this is an extremely sensitive Project and the Office of Security is reporting on it, I will not repeat the details in my memorandum. 5. Individuals Engaged in Domestic Activities: In a more general sense, Contract Personnel Division prepares and executes contracts with individuals engaged by the Agency to carry out domestic activities. We also process Staff Agents who are domestically assigned. None of these assignments are decided in OP. I really have no way of knowing with any degree of certainty what the specific duties of these individuals will be. 6.

00.10G

-----------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

(

~\L

8. Hunt Requests a Lockpicker: This is a record of External Employment Assistance Branch's action,on a request from Howard Hunt for a lockpicker who might be retiri~g or resigning from the Agency. Sometime in the spring of 1972, Frank O'Malley of EEAB received a call from Howard Hunt who asked Frank if he had a retiree or resignee who was accomplished at picking'locks. Mr. O'Malley sent him a resume on Thomas Amato who retired 31 July 1971. Mr. O'Malley did not document his EEAB record to show the date of this eichange, but I ~who also works in EEAB) opines that it occurred sometlme between March and May 1972. All of the above information was reported to the Office of Security on 4 October 1972 following the FBI's contact with the Agency regarding Howard Hunt.

9. Resume Sent to McCord~, k contract employee who retired in September 19/I, was a client of the E~ternal Employment Assistance Branch in his search for a job as after retirement. One of the leads given tol James McCord's security business. EEAB sent a Iesume to McCord, but Iwas not hi~ed.

In mid-summer 1972,f ~telePhoned EEAB from Chicago. (He had a job there wlth t e Hallfax Securlty Co., a lead provided by EEAB, but until this telephone call he had

00107

MORl DoclD: 1451843

â&#x20AC;˘

ÂˇA '

not notified EEAB that he had the job and had moved from the D.C. area.) He said he had been. visited by a Special Agent of the FBI who told I ~hat his resume had been found among McCord's papers. Ine :Agent wanted to know if pad any connection with McCord. I Expla.ined how the resume got to McCord. After the Agent left him, Ios were notlfled ~el7P~lOne~ EEA~. lof OP and lof lmmedlately.

... :'

Harry B.Flsner Director of Personnel

001.08

------------------MORl DoclD: l45l843

-_...._.. ...-_ ..........-- ......- - ._ -- _-_ ....... --_. -_ .., ...

.__._ _ . _ .._ ...._ SUB.JECT: (OptiMol)

....

.....

_.~

.~.

... ...... __.... '

._---_.

-----

fROM:

_ _ _ _ . _ ._ _ _ _ _ 0-

• __

(Officer designation, room number, and

building I

DATE

OFFICER'S

'----

Deputy Director·for Hanagement and Services .--

INITIALS

FORWARDED

REceiVED

-_._..

NO.

f-.------------..------------DATE 1973 14 MAY 2551

Director gf Logis!j.cs . TO:

Logistics

_ _ _ _ • _ _•

._.-.~-_

EXTENSION

__._----

ROUTfNG A~'~D RECORD SHEET

.._ _._ ...___..__..__.._r __.___

i t ive Activities Perfor.ned by the Office of ..._- ...... - .. ._-- -'- _ . - _.._.. - r------ -----Sens .. ---.. _--_._-~

__.._.-

--- .----- ... _--_.__ ..

COMMENTS (Number e oeh comment 10 s.how from whom Draw a line acton column ofleor each comment)

10. whom,

--------

'f!/ ;.:~: !j;c/- f]II./. ..-.... I

--_.-~_

EYES ONLY

. " i_ ..,'---'

..-

----- ----

----

Director of Central Intelligence -

10.

c·,

. 11.

12.

13. .' _.

14. .,.

15.

00109·, . '.

.,'

. -. ,

I .~~~ 61 0 U5~Dr~~~~us D. . _....._. SECRET 0 1. _.. .:..... _....-........"'. _. __ ... _:.. ...;;..:;... ~_ ~~_

.CONFID~NT,IA~... 0 ~~lE~N,ttv

:a..:-..:;..__ .••

I 0

L .

UNCLASSIFIED .

_~""'-I;;....::",...;4.:···_·;.:.3'J~;;c......~.:.::::·._J :::_;:.r.,;...:....:...~.~:;...... .._ ... .;L..,;,;,••~,.".:..::~::.._~,-..... ~~-

MORI DocID: 1451843

" '

14. MfW 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR:

Director of Central Intelligence

THROUGH

Deputy Director for Man agemen t and Services

SUBJECT

Sensitive Activities:'?erformed by the Office of Logistic~

1. This memorandum contains information for the Director of Central Intelligence. 2. This memorandum is submitted pursuant to advice given by the Deputy Director for Management and Services on 7 May that Office Directors report on activities, either under their cognizance or otherwise known to them, the nature of which could possibly need explanation or justification when viewed within the statutory responsibility and authority of the Director of Central Intelligence. The responsibilities of the Office of Logistics (OL) are such that in all matters herein reported, except two, the actions unde.rtaken were at the request of another Agency component. We have prepared a brief description of each action involved and then have included the name of the sponsoring component. The substantive reason for the requests for action by.this Office will have to be determined by inquiry to the designated sponsori~g component. 3. Facts pertaining to both actions undertaken at the initiative of this Office are as follows':

00:11.0

MORl DoclD: 1451843

l"t

-1) it.... 路{..Jl tl..,.-

-f楼fS '-'l-IL"I - . Un SUBJECT:

Sensitive Activities Performed by the Office of Logistics

\ Il

CJ CJ .VlvLf

00:11.1.

---------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

SUBJECT:

Sensitive Activities Performed by the Office of Logistics

'the DD/O, we will not honor any requisition for surveillance equipment unless it has been approved by the CI Staff of the DD/O. 4. Within the,area of contractual responsibilities, the following items ara p~rtinent: ?: a. In February 1971, Colonel L. K. \'fhite, the then Executive Director-Comptroller, called me to attend a 'meeting in his office, also attend~d by Mr. William Colby. Colonel White explained that the Technical Services Division (TSD) had been requested to provide assistance to the FBI for a sensi ti ve proj ect designated I I(currently designatedl IColonel White did not dis~lose the purpose of the asslstance bei~g provided by TSD but did instruct me to assist TSD on purely contractual matters. Since the Office of Logistics has no information conce rn.irig the mission or pu rpo s e of Proj ect I I substantive questions concerning the subject should be addressed to TSD. Other procurement actions accomplished for the FBI are re orted below. Specific, ment i.on ,is made, however, of ecause of the dollar. magnitude, approximately mll lon, ,and the complex technical equipment that h~s been involved in the undertaking. b. The Procurement Division, OL~ currently has two requisitions in hand from TSD which would involve reimbursable sales ,to the FBI. One such requisition in the ,amount of $36,900 is for two Westinghouse television cameras. The second requisition in the amount of $11,200 is for two wide-angle surveillance probes manufactured by Bausch and Lomb. 'No action is being taken on either of these requirements pending further' instructions which . will be sought from the Deputy Director for Management and Services. c. Over the years, this Agency has often supported other Government agencies from a contractual or materiel standpoint. Upon the. submission of an officially approved request, supported by a transfer of funds, the Agency would either enter into "accommodation procurements" for the requesting agency or support the requesting agency by the issuance'of'materiel from stock. Such actions are legally accomplished under the Economy Act of 1925. This Ac~ authorizes one ~gency to support the needs of, or provide a service for, another Government ~gency when such

001.1.2

MORl DoclD: l45l843

.i"

~r" t J [0 lJTTl:"t--

SUBJECT:

Sensitive Activities Performed by the Office of Logistics

action would be more economical and eliminate the need for one agency of the Government to duplicate facilities readily available from another. A typical example of this procedure is purchasing photointerpretation gear for the Defense Intelligence Agency element located at NPIC. In connection with the current repor;:.!:;ing requirement, however, I have had our records researched for tha past 2 years and Attachment 1 reflects those transactions which appear to be relevant to the subject of this memorandum. d. In connection with the disclosures during the summer of 1971 that the Rand Corporation was not properly safeguarding classified documents, this Office undertook路 two acts. I directed the Security Officer from our West Coast Procurement Office at the Moffet Naval Air Station in California to visit the Rand Corporation and satisfy himself tha~ classified material furnished them by the Agency was both properly safeguarded and accounted for. His report was affirmative. On 23 August 1971, the senior Security Officer assigned to this Office forwarded a letter to the Rand Corporation stressing and reaffirming the procedures Rand must follow in safeguarding classified information furnished them by the Agency. Of residual interest in this matter, there is summarized the contents of a memorandum of 2 July 1971 to the Executive DirectorComptroller from the DD/I which is in our possession. Th'is memo r'andum reports that FBIS regularly disseminated reports to the Rand Corporation but that instructions had been issued to cease distribution of classified reports. While no 'other direct diss~mination went to Rand, other USIB agencies, primarily USAF, were passing. "many" copies of DDtI products to Rand as' authorized under USlB regulations. The memorandum also states that Rand personnel had requested searches and document retrieval from the CRS facility. 5. In connection with action taken for the Office of Security, there are three relevant items: a. The Printing Services Division, OL, was requested by the Office of Securi~y to print a book written by Harry J. Murphy, Office of Security. The book was prepared by Mr. Murphy under a Brooki~gs Institution Federal

0011.3

MORl DoclD: 1451843

SUBJECT:

Sensitive Activities Performed by the Office of Logistics

-Executive' Fellowship. The book is entitled "Where's What -- Sources of Info.rmation for Federal Investigators. 1I It is a full treatise on the existence of sources of information that may be useful to an investigator. The book's ÂŁirst printing of 300 copies was made in June 1967. Due to demand, a se~ond printing~Qf 600 copies was made in September 1968. The title pate of. the book gives attribution to Mr. ~furphy, Office of Security, Central Intelligence Agency, and the Brookings Institution Federal Executive Fellowship. The book is classified ,Confidential, and it is our unde~standing that the distribution was made to appropriate agencies of the Federal Government. A copy of Mr. Murphy's book can be made available for review if desired. Sometime in 1972, a representative of the Law Enforcement Assistance Administratio~ (LEAA) requested that the Agency give consideration ~o our publishing, at LEAA expense, an unclassified version of this volume. It was the' intent of LEAA to make broad-scale distribution to Police Dep~rtments throughout the country. The Director of Security and I consu1t~d on this matter and jointly determined that the LEAA request should not be honored because the AgenGY should 'not put itself in the position of publishing law, enforcement material for,g~neral and unclassified purposes, and it would be an abuse of our printing facilities. b. On 5 January 1971, the Director of Security requested that I approve his leasing up to eleven motor vehicles for use in connection with a,specia1 support .operation which would last approximately 3 months. The Director. of Security informed me, in his requesting memo. randum of 5 January 1971, that "This support. activity has been undertaken at the specific instruction of the Director .and has his personal approval. II The request was app r oved ; c. From 1968 to date, the Office of Security has requisitioned from this Office a considerable amount of materiel which we understand 'was to be given or loaned,by them to local Police Departments. In certain cases some of this materiel was issued from Agency stocks and, in other cases, direct procurement of the materiel was made by funds furnished by the Office of Security. A' complete 1i~ti~g of such materiel is found in Attachment 2.

_.. .u+'.f.-

0011.4

MORl DoclD: 1451843

SUBJECT:

Sensitive Activities Performed by the Office of Logistics

b. This Office is aware~ although it had no cognizance nor responsibility, that -an apartment was rented in Miami Beach~ Florida, during the period of the Democratic National Convention, 10-14 July 1972, and the Republican National Convention, 21-24 August 1972. The apartment was used as a meeting place I_---.-__---,;-,_._---,=---~_=_-__._--___._--_.____;_---足 in liaison with members of the Secret Service and rendering

00:11.5

MORl DoclD: l45l843

SUBJECT:

Sensitive Activities Performed by the Office of Logistics

"assistance in connection with the political conventions that were qeing held. l\'H Division is the cognizant operating component on this matter. 7. The above recitation of facts represents, to the best of my knowledge and memory, those ma'!:tf?rs \Vhich appear to be relevant to subject tasking given by Yhe Director.

I~-=-=--=--2 Atts

cc:

DD/M&S

001.:16

MORl DoclD: 1451843

',:

••

•

::.

..: .~...

<;;

...

-: . .~.

-~:~

'~""-

...

__ \,

OOtl7 .

- -...

... -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ . - -._-_ ...• _•..... -_ -

...... . ...

'-""-"--'-'

._---

--stttrr

I YES 0f\H:-¥ -

Requesting Office

0 0

t:OJ

Date of Request

Item

Quantity

Unit Cost

Receiving U.S. Department or Agency

3/23/72

Telephone Analyzer

1,350

BNDD

TSD

5/16/72

Transmitters, Radio Beacon

313

BNDD

3/23/72

Telephone Analyzer

1,350

White House Communications Agency

as as as

3/23/72

Telephone Analyzers

1,400

'Air Force

3/23/72

'Te1ephone

Ana1yzer~

1,350

State

3/23/72

Telephone Analyzers

1,375

AEC

TSD

11/16/72

Camera Sets

656

FBI

TSD

. 4/17/72

Camera Sets

zOO

FBI

TSD

11/18/71

Actuators, Recorders

'1. ' 488

TSD

4/19/72

Tes s i.na Cameras

700

TSD

12/ 7/72

Camera, Video

18,045

FBI

TSD

10/13/72

Tube, Image, Burn-Resistance, Equivalent6f W L 30691

4,639

FBI

TSD

3/26/71

Tubes, Image, W L 30691

·4,607

FBI

TSD

4/20/73

Cameras, Television

18,300

FBI

FBI BNDD ~

t:l 0

t:l

f-l

lJ1 f-l 00

L----

8*LY EnS o 0 f;T I. l-f"\

•

.UW::' ~ ~Rg,

Receiving U.S. Departmerit or Agencr

Requesting Office

Date of Request

TSD

12/14/72

Transmitters, Radio

313

BNDD

TSD

10/20/72

Actuators J Recorder

591

FBI

TSD

10/13/72

Tube, Image, Burn-Resistance, Equivalent of W L 30691

4,639

FBI

TSD

5/26/71

Tube, Image, W L 30691

4,639

. FBI

TSD

4/22/71

Transmitters

'1,372

FBI

TSD

4/22/71

Module, Plug-In

1,247

FBI

TSD

4/22/71

Power Supply - UWP-39A

568

FBI

2/25/71

Telephone Analyzers

1,350

Treasury

1/30/71

Telephone Analyzers

1,4 50

Trea~ury

Item

Quantity

Unit Cost

1·'1; ;

8/12/70

Cable, Special-Purpose Electrical

5,000 ft.

White House Communications Agency

.42

:s: 0

TSD

TSD 0 0

~ ~

TSD

1/10/73

6/28/72

7/26/71

Ink, Special Formula

1 lot

Ink, Special Formula

1 lot

Transmitteri Radio Beacon

1,825

Immigration and Naturalization Service

3,700

728

::cJ H

Immigration and Naturalization Service

..t1

U.S. Forestry

I-' !Po U1 I-'

JP.

c.c

•

_._,._--

-------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

t'I

001.20 .

----------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

-lJ 1路路..1\L" . I .". I

EYES MATERIAL REQUISITIONED FROM LOGISTICS BY SECURITY FOR ISSUANCE TO LOCAL POLICE ITEM Gas Mask M-9

QUANITY' 200

Gas Mask M-17

196

Steel Helmet and Liners

231

Vest and Groin Protector

Vest, Flak M-52

Vest, Protective

Vest, Grenade

105

Execuvest

Emergency Flashing Red Light

*Searchlight, Tear Gas

*Chemical Baton 6 1/2"

1iChemical Baton 12" *Chemical Baton 26 *Mustang 35 Pistol *Searchlight with Shoulder Strap *Stun Gun

*NOTE:

6 36 3

Various quantities and types of replacement chemical cartridges, loading kits, and batteries .were also ordered for asterisk items.

00:12.1

MORl DoclD: l451843

14 MAY 1973 !路fj;i'路IOHAMIUH FOR:

Director of Central Intelligence

TiJJ"OlJGH

Doputy Director for !'路fa;I!'l[.ement and Se rv i ce s

~3UBJECT

Sensitive Activities Performed by the Office of Lo~istics

1. This memorandum contains information for t he Jiroctor of Ccn t r a l In t c L'l Lg cn ce , ---------2. This mer.'oran.dulllis submd tted pursuant to advice g i ven by the Deputy Director for Management and Services on 7 t.iay .

that Office Directors report on activitiBs, either under their cognizance or o t.he rwds e known to t.hem, the n a t ure of l.rhich could liossibly need explanation or justificati.on \f:)en viewed \d thin the statutory responsibility and author! ty of the Director of Central Intcl1i~encc. The responsibilities of the Office of Logistics (OL) are such that in ~ll matters herein reported, except two, the actions undertaken were at the request of another Agen~y component. We have prepared a brief description of each action involved and than have Inclua~d the llama of the sponsoring component. The substantive reason for the requests for action by this Office will have to be cleterr.lined by inqu1ry to the designated sponsoring component. 3. Facts pertaining ti both, actions undertaken at the initiative of this Office are as follows:

001.22

--------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

&UHJECT:

Scn5itive Activities Lo g Ls t Lcs

rerfnrw~d

by the Office of

00:123

~------------_.MORl DoclD: 1451843

~y SUBJ~CT:

Sensitive Activities Logistics

Perfo~m~d

by the Office of

·.tho DD/O, 1V'O will not honor any requisi tian for surveillance equipment unless it has beeri"approved by the CI Staff of the DD/O. 4. Within the area of contractual responsibilities, the following it0ns ~re pertinent: a. In February .1971. C91one1 L. K. Khite, the then Executive Director-C()mptroller, called me to attend a meeting in his office, also attended by Mr. William Colby. Colonel White explained that the Technical Services Div·Isian (TSD) had been requested to provide assistance to the FBI for a sensitive project designatedJ I(current1y designated I ICo1onel White di not disclose the purpose of the ass1stance being provided by TSD but did instruct me to assist TSD on purely contractual matters. Since the Office of Logistics has no information concerning the mission or purpose of Project I I substantive questions concerning the subject should be addressed to TSD. Other procurement actions accomplish~d for the.FBI aTe reo orted below. SpeGific mention is made, however, of ~ca~se of the dollar magnitude, approximately m1 10n,. and the complex technical equipmen t that has been involved in the undertaking. b. The Procureinent Division, OL, currently has two requisitions in hand ·from TSD wh i ch would involve reimbursable sales to the FBI. One such requisition in the amount of $36,900 is for two Westinghouse television c ame r as , The second requisition in the amount of $11,200 is for tlVowide-angle surveillance probes manufactured by Bausch and Lomb. No action· is being taken on either of these requirements pending further instructions which will be sought from the Deputy Director for Management and Services. c. Over the years, this Agency has often supported other Government agencies from a contractual or materiel standpoint. Upon the submission of an officially approved request, supported by a transfer of funds, the Agency lV'ould either enter into "accommodation procurements" for the requesting agency or support the requesting agency by the issuance of materiel from stock. Such actions are legally accomplished under the Economy Act of 1925. This Act authorizes one agency to support the needs of, or provide a service ·for, another Government agency when such

001.24:

-------------MORl DoclD: l45l843

SUBJDCT:

Sensitive Activities rarformed by the Office of Logistics

action would be more economical and eliminate the need for "one agency of the Government to duplicate fac.ilities readily available from another. A typical example o路路f this procedure is purchasing photointerpretatiol1 gear for the Defense Intelligence Agency element located at NPIC. In connection with the current reporting requirement, however, I have had our records researched for the past 2 years and Attachment 1 reflects those transactions wh i.ch anne ar to be relevant to the subject of ihis memorandum. 0-

d. In connection with the disclosures during the sumof 1971 that the Rand Corporation was not. properly sa fe gua r-df.ng classified documents, t.hi s Office undertook two acts. I directed the Security Officer from our West Coast Procurement Office at the Hoffet Naval Air Station in California to visit the Rand Corporation and satisfy himself that classified material furnished them by th.e Agency was both properly safeguarded and accounted for. His report was affirmative~ On 23 August 1971, the senior Security Officer assigned to t hLs Office fo rwa rded a letter to the Rand Corporatiop stre$sing and reaffirming . . the procedures Rand must follow' in s afe guardIng classified information furnished them by the Agency . . Of residual interest in this mat t er-, there is sumnar i aed the 'contents of a memorandum of 2 July 1971 to the Exec~tive DirectorComptroller from the DD/I which is in our possession. me~

This memorandUm reports that FRIS regularly disseminated reports to the Rand Corporation but that instructions had been issued to cease distribution of classified reports. 1\'hile no other direct dissemination went to' Rand, other USIa agencies, primarily USAF, were passing "many" copies of DD/I products to Rand as authorized under USIB regulations. The memorandum also states that Rand personnel had requested searches and document retrieval from the CRS fac~lity. 5. In connection with action taken for the Office of Security, there are three relevant items: a. The Printing Services Division, OL, was requested by the .Office of Security to print a book written by Harry J. Murphy, Office of Security. The book was prepared by Mr. Murphy under a Brookings Institution Federal

OOi:z5

-----------------_. MORI DocID: l45l843

I..

SUBJECT:

Sensitive Activities Performed by the Office of Logistics

Executive Fcl101~·sh.ip,. The,book is entitled "Where's "WIlat -- Sources of Information for Federal Investigators. II It is a f~ll treatise on the existence of sources of informatio~ that may be useful to an inv.estigator. The book's first printing of 300 copies was made in June 1967. Due to demand, a second printing o£ 600 copies was made , in September 1968. The title page" of the book gives attribution to Mr. Hurphy, 9ffice of Security, Central Intelligence Agency, and, the Brookings Institution Federal Executive Fellowsnip. The book is classified'Confidential, and:it is our understanding that the distr,ibution was made ·to "appropriate agencies of t he Federal Government. A copy of l>Ir. Murphy's book can be made ava i LabLe for review' if desired. Sometime in 1972, a representative of the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (bEAA) requested that the Agency give consideration. to our publishing, at LEAA expense, an unclassified version of'this volume. It was the intent of LEAA to make broad-scale distribution to Police Departments throughout the .courrt ry , The Dd r ec t or of Security and I consulted on this matter and jointly determined that the LEAA. reques't should·not be.hollored because the Agency shoul d- not put itself in :the positLon of publishing law enforcement material for general·~nd un-· . classified purposes. and it would be an abuse of our printing..facili ties. " b. On 5 January 1971, the Diractor.of Security requested that I approve his leasing up to eleven motor vehicles for use in connection with a special support operation which ,...ould last app roxfmatiefy 3 months , The Director of Security informed me~ ,in his r~questing memorandum of, 5 January 1971, 'that' .HThis .suppor-t; activity has been undertaken at the specific jn~tructi6n Df the Director and has his personal approval." The request was approv.ed.· c. From 19'68 to date, the Offi~e of Security 'has , requisitioned from this Office a considerable .amount of materiel which we understand was to be given or loaned by them to local Police Departments. In certain cases some of this materiel' was issued from Agency stocks and, in other cases, direct procurement of the materi~l was made by. funds furnished by the Office of Security. A complete listing of such materiel is found in Attachment 2 •

. ONLY

~[(\.:-"'"

v l·r"·· 0L"':' u,

00126

MORl DoclD: 1451843

SUBJECT:

路1

Sensitive Activities Performed by the Office of Logistics

b: This Office is ~qare~ although it had no cognizance nor responsibility,路 that an apartment was rented in Miami Beach, Florida, during the period of the Democratic National Convention, 10-14 July 1972~ and the Republican National Convention, 21-24 August 1972. The a~artment was used as

tnm~~;~~~nP;~~~ II~eilloe~:

OJ:

tone

5e:re ;~e:

v::e :IlCl

l:l1UelollIg

EYES HEY

001.27

-----------------MORl DoclD: 1451843

SUBJECT:

Sensitive Activities Petformcd by the Office of Lo~istics

assistance in connection with the political conventions 't ha t wer e being held. WI{ Division is the cogn i aan t operating cOl:lponent on this matter. 7.

The above recitation of facts represents t to the best

of my know'l erig e and memory t those matters wh i ch appear to be

relevant to subject tasking given by the Director â&#x20AC;˘.

JOlll1

1'.

BIaJ_e

Director of Logistics 2 Atts

cc:

:.;

DD/M&S

iâ&#x20AC;˘ I

:I1 I i

-i

1 I

, I

:: I

..j

I :

ONLY SECRE

00128

MORl DoclD: 1451843

(

11" J,!

..il.l .·. -

a,~I

~l'

i'.

'1 ,i I

:i .J

........

_-_ ..

.... -...

001.29" .

...........

.....

•

,;i

.~ ;:! ;

.';

.. .... -

.. :~".'

---"--------------.;

Requesting Office

Quantity

Unit Cost

Receiving U.S. Department or Agency

Telephone Analyzer

TSD

1,350

5/16/72

BNDD

Transmitters, Radio Beacon

313

BNDD

Telephone Analyzer

1,350

White House Communications Agency

Telephone Analyzers

1,400

Air Force

Ana~yzers

1,350

State

Telephone Analyzers'

1,375

ABC

Camera Sets

656

4/17/72, , Camera Sets

FBI

700

FBI

488

FBI

Tessina Cameras

700

BNDD

Camera, Video

18,045

FBI

4,639

FBI

.3/23/72

3/23/72

TSD

11/16/72

TSD

11/18/71

TSt>

4/19/72

TSD

12/ 7/72

TSD TSD TSD

10/13/72 3/26/71 .

4/20/73

OJ C

Item

3/23/72

TS,D

â&#x20AC;˘

OS OS

0 0

Date of Request

Telephone

Actuators, Recorders

Tube, Image, Burn-Resistance, EqUivalent of WL 30691

:;0 H

t:J

TUbes, Image, WL 30691

4,607

FBI

Cameras, Television

18,30,0

FBI

, I

t:f

I f-l

fl::.

f-l

co fl::. w

Requesting Office

Date of Request

Item

. Quantity

Unit Cost

Receiving U.S. Dep ar cme;nt or Agency.

TSD

12/14./72

Transmitters, Radio

313

BNDD

TS1)

10/20/72

Actuators, Recorder

591

FBI

TSD

10/13/72

Tube, Image, Burn-Resistance, Equivalent of W L 30691

4,639

fBI

TSD

5/26/71

Tube, Image, W L 3Q691

4,639

FBI

TSD

4/22/71

Transmitters

1,372

FBI

TSD

4/22/71

Module, Plug-路In

1,247

FBI

TSD

4/22/71

Power Supply - UWP-39A

568

FBI

路2/25/71

Telephone Analyzers

1,350

Treasury

1/30/71

Telephone Analyzers

1,350

Treasury

'OL

8/12/70

Cable, SpecIal-Purpose Electrical

I I I

TSD

TSD 0 0

... C'J.)

1/10/73

6/28/72

Ink, Special Formula

5,090 ft. 1 lot

1 lot

.42 1,825

3,700

TSD

7/26/71

Transmitter, Radio Beacon

728

White Hou s c路 Communications Agency Immigration and Natural.ization Service

3: 0

t:J

Immigration and Naturaliza.tion Service U.S. Forestry

t:J I-' fi:> U1

I-' 00

fi:> W

-- ---_. --- --------._----------

MORI DocID: 1451843 \.

.. ...

(

','

I /.

00:132 ... ..

... .. . ...

...

..----.- . .

" • ---'-" _

- .

. r- -:

MORl DoclD: 1451843

路

~~TERIAL

REQUISITIONED FROM LOGISTICS BY SECURITY FOR ISSUANCE TO LOCAL POLICE

ITEM

QUANITY

Gas Mask M-9

200

G~s

196

Mask M-17

Steel

Helm~t

and Liners

Vest:and Groin Protector

Vest, Flak M-52

Vest, Protective

Vest, .Grenade

105

Execuvest j

231

Emergency

6 F1ashi~g

Red Light

*Searchlight; Tear Gas

*Chemical Baton 6 1/2"

*Chemical Baton 12"

*Chemical Baton 26" *Mustang 35 Pistol *Searchlight with Shoulder S.trap *Stun Gun

*NOTE:

24 24 6

Various quantities and types of replacement chemical cartridges, loading kits, and batteries were also ordered for asterisk items.

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.._-

.....

_-_ .... -.- -LJ

:.~.:;Al

_--------- - -

... 5E

Oi~lY

- . - ...

...

;;HHIAl LJ .. crh.. - ---------_. _--

--_ ..__. ----- -

SUBJECT: [OP':",·"II

-----FROM:

-'-"--

---..__.. -

D!OJCS,

- - - ---_.-- _.-

!Hq. ~

TO: (Officer de-s;gnofion.. room number. and

DATE

building)

RECEIVED

-...

fORWARDfD

.....

_---~-

ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET

_-._------

---

_--- - ' ,-----------_ .. ---.__ . ------- ... NO. OJC~ ._._.J -- 11 vs« iS73 - ._-

~1.TENSION

OffICER'S INITIALS

PATE

COMMENTS (Numbe, eoch comment 10 lhow f,om whom 10 whom, Draw Q line eeross corumn o'fer each comme-r1f.)

nn!M&.S

IRq.

I ~CI

Hq.

~, 5.

tPf'1 ~l.o,MI J'U ( ,Je;..t. ( ~e\ &s\:-

~?"'bo7.

ft-or fu

(,\.~........)

\It

C. ~t"-

",b,N~

10.

11.

~~-t

vJ 01\1-

O\CS

~I\J~~

m:fil,*"

t"--r .

.~ '1..3

12.

13.

14.

• f

001.34

15. I

., tl ....... ~~ 61 0 ~J&OUS.... 0 _.. . . _-..-....-_ ..

4 _ J . ... _

SECRET

CONFIDENTIAL'

INTERNAL

USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED

MORl DoclD: 1451843

orcsl 11

r\~AY

1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Director, Central Intel1i'gence Agency THROUGH

Deputy Director for Management and Se rvl ce s

SUBJECT

Activities whichrnight be considered sensitive issues.

I have listed below computer processing p roj ect s which the Office of Joint Computer Support has participated in or is aware' of and which might be considered sensitive issues. Most Sensitive Projects OJCS Project'Officer Project Organization, & Identification Telephone HYDRA

SANCA

Richard Ober CI Staff

'I los

[L.....------L.uRn

Nature of Project

OJCS Reason for Listing

A specfa.l project initiated by DCI

Type of data being collected.

Machine Ind'ex to security files

Type of data in index.

Information sto.rage & retrieval of drug related data (ORO's project OFTEN)

Type of data in files.

Computer file of drug data.

Type of data in file.

Sensitive Projects

00135

路1

MORl DoclD: 1451843

Sensitive Projects (Continued) OJCS Project Off'ic e r Project Organization, & Identification Telephone

'I'SD

1---1 Sensitivity Unknown, but Pos sibly

Nature . of

OJCS Reason for Listing

Proj~ct

Statistical. analysis of psychological data.

a Matter for

Source of . data. Contractors are involved with project.

Concern Nature of data. Techniques of system discussed with FBI.

SPYDER

I---==--OS

DMVREC

Data on radio frequencies used for support of IrrPlace Morrito r-; ing System, a system to identify unauthorized transmitters. File of automobile license numbers.

Nature of data.

File of Agency applicants who were not hired.

Nature of data.

00.1..36

MORl DoclD: 1451843 (

Sensitivity Ul1kn~~.!._~ut Possihly a Matter for Concern (Continued) Project Officer OJCS OJCS Organization, & Reason for Project Listing Id Cl1tification l' el~hon_CL_ Association with the named organization.

fq..... JOHl'r D. IAMS Director of Joint Computer Support

Ii I

}EYE搂

路ILY ~Ell

001.37

MORI DocID: 1451843

.,. f'l \;t.l.t·t..~j .; I J..-.. cc: -'._ ... _--. .. ...._........ - .- ... --- --'-'''-- ---ROUHNG f.·J'\~O rU:CORD SHEET --_._--_... .. ---_.,- -- -- _._--- --_.... _-- --- ----_._.- -------SUBJECT: \C',:.I::,-.ol)

(] ...

_--- . -_....... _.

'''-'

,:.. ' ',L

l.J ...iE .m:LY .......... _---......... _.. . .. --_.-

---_

_-_

-.-.

'---'--"

fPOM:

I_..

nl.l~Le"

to~rn

ond

DATE RECEIVED

NO.

fORWARDED

DATE

10 May' 1973

COMMENTS (N"mber each comment 10 show f,om whom 10 whom. O'OW Q line ouoss column af'er eeeh comm~n'.1

OFFICER'S INITIALS

\DDM&S IHq r s ,' .

-- 2.

-'-'--

1---._-----_.__..__....

Director of Communications Hqrs. .\ TO: (Officer c!sig",ofion, building)

._--

---c-'

EXTENSION

~Ref

SCi 1- The attached ~s ~n further response to your request.

_ _ 0.

.c. 5.

10.

11.

12. 13. ,

u. ..

001.38

15.

FORM 3-62

610 U~J~~~US 0 SECRET ......

_'0

__. ._ •.•• _ _ ~

CONFIDENTIAL -.

__ .

..1-:.-.._

-~._-

INT£RNAL

USE ONLY .. _.#

- ._" .. -

o UNCLASSIFIED . _ .........__.. . . . . _-----.

#.~

MORl DoclD: 1451843

DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION

oci

SOURCE:

REGISTRY

CONTROL NUMBER:

8 May 1973

DATE OF DOCUMENT:

LOGGED BY:

NUMBER OF PAGES: two

DOCUMENT NO:

NUMBER OF ATTACHMENTS:

Special Programs DiVision, OC

DATE: 10 May, 73

. NAME

Mr. Jack J

'DICO

one

TO OFFICE

OATE D.OCUMENT RECEIVED:

COpy NUM8ER (8):

FROM:

SCI

SIGNATURE

IIAtl

Kei'tb

I\n""t ~

DATE

o o o Comment o o Information o Direct Replv o Preparation o Recommendation '0 Signature o Return o o Approval

Action

Concurrences

of Repi y

•

Oispatd1 File

.00139

MORl DoclD: l45l843

·~

-_ ... . ~

.. SCI

8 May 1973 MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD SUBJECT:

Summary, Special Programs Division (SPD), 'Office of Communications, Operational Contacts with Other u.S. Government ~gencies o

1. Prior to 1969 the OC COMINT.. intercept unit, which was then in Miami, had relatively frequent contact with the Miami bureaus of the FBI and FCC, Miami Police and the Miami Beach Police. The staff provided support to these activities in monitoring, identification and DB of specific illegal agent transmissions conducted by foreign nationals and American citizens in the greater· Miami area. Arrangements for' this support were made thro~gh the. DDO' s'l I 2. In late Septe~ber 1972, NSA, through Division DI DDO. 'requested that the Special Programs Division initiate a hearability survey of certain HP' long-distance commercial telephone circuits between the U.S. and South America. The circuits carried'drug related long-distance calls of interest to the BNDD and other U.S. agencies. Because of the availabilit of ersonnel and technical ca abilities

....

·3. The Chief and Deputy Chief. SPD and SPD/Special Electronic Operations Branch· have been engaged in·informal technical liaison with operating components 'of the FBI . for a.number of years. Initial contacts and arrangements . for support ·of. specific activities have been made by the Division D/DDO. Support has been provided in the form of

'~JiB""no

~!e\TllL

.: 1----.

SECRET

OF ATTACHMENT

_---JI

JJJHft1lfi

, .·:'~~'b~i40

MORI DocID: 1451843

. .".

8 May 1973

exchanges of technical information on techniques, technical assistance and training, and the loan of Agency equipment. r r bJS been r~nd;rjd to In t~e.past sever~l ye!:; sens1t1ve FBI proJects _andl ~ _ Si:port-, has been and is ·presen D g g1ven to FBI pro ects I I These projects are'described in the attache . , sealed envelope. (

:::nn

4. An operational test of an F/DF Iconducted n DO and system was r~ OC-SPD pers nnel 1n the earl ar.o the summer of 1972. A location in Miami Beach, Florida was selected for the tests because of similarity to the actual' target site and environment in Saigon. Receiving antennas were placed on the roof of the hotel being used as the receiving/DF site. A hotel employee asked why the materiel was placed on the roof. A team member in effect told him that the group was an'advance security s~gment for the Democratic National· Convention. No further questions were asked; the tests' were completed and the equipment was returned to the Washi~gton area. .:

Att •

••

------'".~-----, '00"14'1

MORl DoclD: 1451843

..-.

9 May 1973

• .

--.Ji

T~ .

.001.42

MORl DoclD: 1451843

...

..---------------,~..A

...-

....

9 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD SU~JECT:

Organizational United States

Deali~gs

with Activities Inside the o

1. This MFR records organizational dealings with activities inside the United States known to this office. z , In September 1972, I . Irequested secure communications in the Miami Area w1th local offices of BNDD

commun1cat10ns 1n was never 1ns a e advised in April 1973 that there were plans 4un~~e~rw~aY=-1"-n~.·MEi~a~mTi to combine various Federal agencies antidrug efforts under a new Justice Department Division, and at this time' it was not known where the new anti-drug office would be located. I

,~~~e

1_ _- - - - - - - - - - - - , - - - -

I •

During :he Democratic and Republican conventions, Jsupported requirements levied by ~he Secret Service concerning name traces and other intelligence information relating to subversive influences which might affect those conventions.\ provided some'technical advice and procedural assista~ce 1n establishing a useful means of com-. municating between the two correspondents. WHD should be able' ,. to provide a detailed resume of activities supported in' this matter. 3.

•

~E. /f/7I

'5J

. Thomas 5'~~11 "Chief, America$ Staff, OC

MORl DoclD: 1451843

,. .

_._---_ .....

.'. -.. .......

_--_._

....

,.. f...

......

_-----------_..__ _-----.--'rop •..

;·ND ~jO"i'OM

SENDeR. WILL CHECK CL"'.SSIF1C<,\TICN

- r.... ~ :~.~~ ... z: ;:.;-.. ~;-;::-.;:;:-- . '--'-r' -;':-.~::::--:-".:::-- -"-r~'" j ....: •.-.:-.--;.:' --. _L.. _.....I. .. .- - - 1 ... -.- ...,. _.... ..- ...J._.::::...::.L: .• ___ • .'----~_.

OFFICIAL HOUTI;,\G SLIP

._--_._----

NAME ANb ADDRESS

7 1 '

Colby Mr. William E. -_._.. "-

_0_-

...-- ------------

....

\:\1;..1.)\ .

_. _ _ _ a~~

W.-

&11

-l'=-'~

~.~!"I~.~

DATE

.."...

.) 7 r: t: -----_ _----" C/ ---- --.. .. ( -, -; _-

f·,.A

"'"

_'-...~..:..._..~-.".9'

....

ACTION APPROVAL COMMENT COliCURREHCE

~ ..._ ••" .~ -7"- /:,;..

: ~-

...

'.,

...

DIRECT

.. .

DISPATCH

•

··r

r.: •

... '

PREPAlIE

..t.

.. /"-

REI'lY

IlECOMr~EHDATIOIi

SIG~ATlIRE

-t, '-

....~,,-~v- .,.--

.....

. -

----;-

-_ ....--

". ~:~J:.

RETURN

. filE ll;fORMATlon

Bill:

.. s: ~ ...........-

-'. Remarks:

'--'r':""~ 'A

-, .r-,.

..........\.

'---

""'''"

---

f ~

The attached memorandum identifies the funds referred to in Chuck Briggs' notes of 13 and 20'January 1972.

~ .'

FOLD HERE TO RETURN TO SENDER FROM: NAMe:, ADDRESS AND PHONE NO_

Inspector General "

rORM NO, 1-67

237

'"'~ . . .

£L· ... t

DATE "

30 May 7~

(40)

Use previous editions

** "$ince-these note ss ar e on a' tctally' separate -sensit.ive subject, • pl~"pull'then) from this file '-_: :vEC."

CNo'te t9 C!MPS),'

'.': 001.44

" ~

. .'. ,

MORI DocID: 1451843

,I I

29 May 1973 MEMORANDUM FOR: Inspector General SUBJECT

REFERENCE

: Mr. Colby's Request to Inspector General to Determine Subject Referred to by Two Notes . in a PP/B Memo to DD!M&S D/PPB Memo to DD/M&S dated 23 May 1973, Subject: Watergate Principals - Direct or Indirect Involverrrent

(

I I

001.45 i.

- '----r-'--

MORI DocID: l45l843 .......

•• '

........ --' .-. _..

_._~~.

'-'

... ~ :.

......:..

---"---"--":,_

~l:L.4.SSIFU:D

_ 0 ' " _• •:

_ _. , _ . _

_ _ w.

_ _ ••••

.. _

I I

r. SECRET

CONFiDENTIAL

OFFICIAL ROUTING SLIP

-'..... 1';" ,

:OC'";·:.,~~ #l

... :;

t : ...

• -/.

/:;2.. of

...

6· i--

ACTIOH

DIRECT fiEPlY

APPROVAl

DISPATCH'

CO'MMEHT CONCURRENCE

IlfFORMATIOH

'A..J..A c-. ~

PREPARE REPLY RECOMMEHDAT1Olf RETURN SIGHATUIlE

. fl,.t4

c,.l-, ~n

Ii.

fiLE

Remarks:.

..y~~./ r r~7..,') " :;>

-3

INITIAl':::

DATE

NAME AND ADDRESS :

.e;.,;" .., . ~~"J

·l-·

I 7- "6 1

00:146 FOLD HERE TO RETURN TO SENOER

DAY,.

FROM: N"MIi:. "ODRE:SS AND PHONE; NO.

w. fOllM NO,

1-61

Z3May73

E. Colby

U:,\CLASSIFI ED

237

CO:'iFIDENTIAL

SECRET (40)

Us. pr,v;ous ,dilio/ls

',' "

••••••,

_.....

nON TOP AND BOTTOM

b£:"'\fOER. WILL CHECK CI..ASSIF..

• I

..... ~

." .

;

...... ".

MORl DoclD: 1451843

.. 1.,_.

.It

•

....

" "

;

.....

~ ~

...

~.,

.. " ."... !.. " \'

"'--'----

~ .:

•

-MEMORANDUM FOR: '.

gt-

~ ILJ

•

.' 'r :

,-- .

1- ~

,, I

'.'

• ._ .....•

.. .__ .... _~

....

_•

q)-0J

-.~

...

......

·1 !

. Co. _ -"~23 MAY 'i~73

(DATE)

'f I

•

101 REPl"C~AY

5 _ FORt.! 10-101 FOR"! NO, WHICH _ ._, USED:•. '.•" . BE ,_,.,_ .•• 1 _J'":' 54 I'~ ',-r- ...., . . _.... .... _~.'~ ,

~ ... AUG ~"

_~ __

'.~'_'_

-(47)

. .. :"',

. "

.. ' \. ...;-: " .. ,,-. '" ", .

......... ...

~. "

. .. "

..,.

. :"

,....

MORI DocID: 1451843

, .. \

•

•r

." ..

. ---.-

c--·'--------·-.~·--'-----·------··

"'...._L..._. .'. ·-::1~(j:-~~~1·ii~~7,E~T-S:J:~7:i~·;;{iii~~~?i~i: ._____ ..... _._._.._. _ ...__.."_.' __._'_._.~I-'~:r~~~~ii-El:' _. __._____.

. ' '<;.

.:....i

OFFICIAL nOCTI:\G SLIP .. -'.....0 . -- .

_-_._--_._-_

_.----------_...

DA.....E

NAME AND ADDRESS

~--

1--._---

~-~---

._ V\T!.-E!~olby _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ti~~

-- ------

·~~U --

.-..

-..... IALS _._INI . ._----

._---- -_.

--_.~_.-

-----

......

_ 6 ..

._..

_---~---

DIRECT j·:EFLY "-'OlSPt.TCli fILE

l,CTlON APPROVAL COMMENT COHCURREHCE

,........•

._-

PREPl.iIE REPLY RECOMMENDATlOI{ RETURH SIGIUTURE

IHFaRMATIOH

I .t

Remarks:

S-Ul.'

. lj et..\,.'(' n.~J ~-.),!

:pc. \ -

t""(..IQ-k \

""'0

~~.\J

'(' ... (;1/ e,

Lu.. O-A-..... '"

v.J4·

rJO-,

r ~ ~ .'-\.u..t'"~

lolj .(.

11-..;

.- Or r s cc..

J!..¥

.....

v.::. . " . .\ r k""".. . . .

·.A

lI..Jb-l

A.'f

Y\O \ J-::>

(c,-\:- Q<' ~(V-(. v, Q)

c::4;

c..~'j

. 6~ -

')l-, e .t\-

c:;..e C. <.'V' ~

FOLD HERE .....O RETURN TOSENDER

FROM: NA",e:. ADDRESS AND PHONE NO.

DATE

5/23/73

Charles A. Briggs, n/PPB

UNCLASSIFIED •

. fORM NO, 1-67

23",

CO~FI[)ENTIAL

SECRET (40)

Use previous edilions

.jJ-

.... , ., .

• :

........ a-

....."

...

.. ..,

.. ,

·00:148

-r

. ',NT

MORl DoclD: 1451843

~LI

23 May 1973

Do -76 MEMORANDUM FOR:

SUBJECT:

. i

·1 1 I 1

I i.

I·

I have had none with Hunt •. Liddy or Young.

3·. My McC~rd contact was indirect and occurred sometime during the late 1960's when I ws s Director. Office of Computer Services. I opposed plans .for Technical Di viaion , Office of Security (under Mr. McCor d) to acquire a separate computer f(;r pf DD/S&T (then ORD) . its In-Place Monitoring System. r W<.1.S the computer individual woLcmg wIllI Ib ClIld,· I think, would have details. .

I .j

Management and Services

Watergate Pr-incipnls - Direct or Indirect Involvement

]01'

1. This memor-an durn responds to the Director's request ~or a r epor t of any Involvement in ;my c apucity since 1 .Iarmar y 1969 with Messrs. Hunt. McCord Liddy Young. or Krogh.

I .I

Deputy Director

4. The Krogh contact also was indirect and involved his request. first through 6MB, that CIA fund foreign travel on behalf of the Cabinet Committee on International Narcotics Control. Individual phone discussions are noted in the attachad , The Agency {oecil points werel land I understand forwarded relevant documentation. Copies of memoranda. from :Messrs. Krogh, land Colby are attached also •

ras

5. I held a staff meeting yesterday to pass the request to all OPPB employees. One officer who was attending a funeral will not be available urrtll vtomor-row ,

O\bhB\Cv·p"q88'z\l:n:.:r: ':~2~(S3V·i!J.i\.1~) J - D\:&bb' EJ,G;:O OJJJJ~ SHG lsI Charles A. Brisgs J - N.' E' COLO)... Charles A. Briggs O~;a f J - ~qq~Ga2GG Dn-ector of Planning. D! 2+x..~p.;Hon: Programming, and Budgeting Attachment As stated

00149

•

MaRl DoclD: 1451843

.'J-

~ .. I

",.

I Attachment 23 May 1973 Call [rom Jim Taylor ~ OMB r-e If Bud" Krogh arrd his deputy, \'h.ltCl~ Minnick. of the Dorneatlc Councfl who p lan foreign

4 Feb 72

travel in connection with thetr nar-cotics interests. Jim was alerting us to their Intention, to ask us for funds for the tr avcl ,

7 Feb

Follow-up from Taylor: Plan 3-5 trip s fer 3 individuals-all in FY n. Cost probably $JOK. Minnick ready to make first trip. lis plugged in. E:-:Dir said OK r-e 'I'chrxn visit.

7 Feb

12(?) May

'23 Jun

See attached memo frcm Egil Krogh. Jr. to Bill Colby and follow-on memos from 1(21 Jul 72) and Colby (2 Aug 72).

John Hurley, 01',15 called. menticning possible Krogh/ Minnick attendance at a Latin American (Station Chief?) conference on narcotics. He a)50 said eif ~he}herd. ' .h r \ 'J"h'tte II. ouse , was l ayrng on a-t.v,' .£:¥~~ WIt • . ror hi:nself, Shepher-d arid Mark Algor. OM to Europe.

Icommented on Krogh/Minnick interest

in getting CA- activities, including large-scale PM, on narcotics front. Ipu&hing small-scale PP.

6 Jul 72

Aug

Ic<l1led. Notes say only: We will send. If

Icalled re Colby letter (attached). Said,..tra-vel onders ready; need money this PM (No record in my notes as to who was tr aveltng when, but have faint recollection of its bein{; to Mexico City). and

1 Nov 72

"Minnick-Hurley film.

Icontacted by

I ------

JCall. Again notes are cryptic: b1~~;braceL I Survey BNDD problems/ R._:ilated1

001.50

MORl DoclD: 1451843

...

~DC". vL~

13 Jan 72

Ex])ir (Colby) said DCI had approved $30K for sensitive CS proj ect - no details.

20 Jan 72

Reminded ExDil" r-e $32K,he said DCI OK'd.

I !

'-.c::::. -.

.... _-~--

00:151 . ........_. __ .. _--

---~._

~._

..-

...

-._. . .

--~

-::::::