9 minute read
The changing climate of risk allocation in infrastructure projects By Owen Hayford, Clayton Utz
By Owen Hayford, Clayton Utz
The changing climate of risk allocation in infrastructure projects
Whether you’re a climate change believer or sceptic, it is undeniable that there are real risks—not just weather-related, but regulatory and market risks—that prudent participants in the infrastructure sector must consider.
Weather-related risks
Weather-related risks refer to conditions including rising sea levels and severe weather events that directly and physically impact infrastructure projects. Severe weather events include heatwaves, frosts, heavy rainfall, droughts, fl oods, hail, thunderstorms, tropical cyclones, bushfi res and extreme winds. It seems that infrastructure located around our coastal fringes will be particularly exposed to these risks. A recent report by the Commonwealth Department of Climate Change suggests that a predicted 1.1m rise in sea levels by 2100 will threaten 250,000 houses, 120 ports, 1,800 bridges, fi ve power stations/substations and a number of water treatment plants, airports and industrial zones within 200m of the coastline.
As the number and severity of these events increase due to climate change, owners and operators of infrastructure will incur greater repair costs as well as business interruption costs. The industry is likely to respond to weather-related risks in several ways: 1. Investors in infrastructure projects will require more detailed risk assessments to be conducted on the impacts that climate change will have on the project. 2. Design consultants will be expected to adequately consider weather-related risks as part of the design process in order to discharge their duty of care. The standard of care expected of a reasonably competent designer of infrastructure will extend to the consideration of foreseeable climate change risks. Even so, owners are likely to impose express obligations on designers to consider such risks. We are also likely to see greater prescription in technical specifi cations for projects on the weather-related events that the facility must be capable of withstanding. 3. In the same vein, designers and builders will fi nd that the content of “fi tness for purpose” warranties will become more onerous going forward as the foreseeability of more severe weather events increases. 4. It is also likely that there will be a greater focus on weatherrelated events in force majeure, extension of time and relief event clauses, during the construction, operation and maintenance of infrastructure projects. For example, will damage caused by storms be covered? How violent must a storm be to fall within the defi nition of a covered event? Would a power outage during the operation phase be covered under one of these clauses? In this regard, it is likely there will be greater alignment between these sorts of relief provisions and the design requirements of a project. For example, if the design requirements require an alternative energy power supply to be provided, one would not expect force majeure relief to extend to power outages.
5. Finally, owners and operators of infrastructure will increasingly focus on weather-related risks in operating and maintenance plans and will seek alternative sources of power and other inputs needed to ensure continued operation of an infrastructure facility.
Regulatory-related risks
Regulatory-related risk is the possibility that government responses to climate change will negatively impact upon a piece of infrastructure. The Rudd Government’s proposed Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) is an example of a government’s response to climate change. Other examples include the recently enacted mandatory renewable energy targets and the introduction of new effi ciency and energy use standards.
It is clear that the CPRS will produce winners and losers. One of the greatest concerns of the CPRS is that it will increase the cost of doing business in Australia. In particular, the CPRS is likely to cause the price of emissions-intensive raw materials, such as cement and aluminium, to increase. Price increases are also expected for transport and power costs as businesses seek to pass on the cost of emissions permits.
Parties seeking to protect themselves in this regard may wish to include tailored “rise and fall” clauses in the contracts that entitle them to additional money on account of such price movements. However, one potential complication is the extent to which a change in law clause coupled with a rise and fall provision might give rise to double recovery.
Infrastructure located around our coastal fringes will be particularly exposed to severe weather events.
It is also likely that there will be attempts to allocate or share risks contractually, and attempts to pass on the costs associated with climate change regulations. Owners and operators of facilities requiring the purchase of permits under the CPRS will want to clearly allocate responsibility between themselves for the purchase and surrender of these permits. The party responsible for purchasing and surrendering the permits will want the other to cooperate to the greatest extent possible to minimise emissions and, hence, the number of permits which must be purchased.
Owners and purchasers of facilities may require warranties from their contractors and manufacturers in relation to the emissions that the facility or equipment will produce. Owners and purchasers may also want indemnities in respect of excess emissions or performance guarantees.
The allocation of risk arising from a change in law is likely to assume greater importance. Most operators of emissions-intensive facilities have already reviewed their sale contracts to assess their ability to pass to their customers the additional costs associated with the government’s proposed CPRS. Parties will want to ensure that new contracts clearly allocate the risk of increased cost due to regulatory changes arising from climate change. When negotiating change in law provisions, consideration will need to be given to whether increased costs should be passed through in their entirety, or whether there should be some “pain-share” arrangement to motivate both parties to minimise the additional cost.
Market-related risks
Market risks arise from the market’s response to weather and regulatory risks, including: • higher costs for property damage and business interruption insurance; and • higher costs for certain goods and services as businesses seek to pass on the costs caused by government regulation.
Demand for more comprehensive property damage and business interruption insurance will increase. Expect greater detail in infrastructure contracts on these weather-related events that the property damage and business interruption insurances must cover. The issue of liability for insurance cost increases is also likely to assume greater attention, together with provisions entitling relief from insurance obligations where insurance ceases to be available on commercial terms.
The infrastructure industry is likely to undertake more detailed risk assessment of the impact that climate change may have on a project’s revenue and costs. For example, parties considering whether to invest in a port facility may want to consider the impact which climate change might have on demand for the goods that are expected to pass through the port.
Finally, it is likely that a scheme similar to the Green Star Scheme for buildings will be developed in relation to infrastructure. If this occurs, we will see similar issues in relation to contractual allocation of responsibility for achieving a particular rating, as we presently see within the commercial building industry. This is because no single party in the contractual structure is likely to have the ability to guarantee a particular rating without the cooperation of the other parties involved in the design, construction, operation and maintenance of the facility.
The changing climate of risk allocation in infrastructure projects
Conclusion
Climate change creates new risk for infrastructure projects and as a result of these different risks, industry practice and contractual risk allocations will evolve.
It is important that the infrastructure sector starts to consider these risks. Only then can it begin to protect itself against the serious fi nancial and commercial consequences that may fl ow as a result of climate change.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specifi c circumstances.
AURECON –DELIVERING WORLD CLASS INFRASTRUCTURE ACROSS AUSTRALIA
Aurecon provides world class engineering, management and specialist technical services for public and private sector clients globally. In a significant endorsement from our clients, Aurecon has been named a finalist in the 2010 Business Review Weekly (BRW) Client Choice Awards.
We believe that infrastructure development over the next decade will underpin a strong economic future for Australia. As professional consultants, we are committed to working with our clients to create world leading infrastructure that enables our nation to compete sustainably in a global economy.
We partner closely with our clients to improve asset design and optimise client investment in a project while maintaining a focus on reliability, safety and sustainability. We also work closely with many clients in reviews and strategic assessments of existing infrastructure and assets, delivering significant cost savings and operational and process improvements.
Our sectors and our expertise
Aurecon has over 6,000 professionals providing technical expertise and innovative solutions on projects in more than 70 countries. We deliver expert project design and management across six key sectors: • Community development and infrastructure • Energy • Mining and industrial • Property • Transport • Water
We provide a full business consultancy on infrastructure planning, design, development and operation across all areas of infrastructure.
Whether we are designing major transport hubs, modelling people movement for public spaces, designing vital energy supplies for the economy or developing water assets that address future needs, Aurecon seeks to foster human achievement in all aspects of our work.
Cost effective asset management
With extensive ‘end to end’ project experience, Aurecon supports clients with every stage of the project lifecycle – from modelling, planning and design, to project delivery, operation and maintenance.
Our expertise in advanced 3D modelling and simulation means we maximise clients’ investment spend and reduce timelines on infrastructure planning.
Aurecon’s front-end modelling capabilities include detailed supply and demand forecasts for strategic planning, route and site selection, operational costs and project design solutions. This reduces costs and project lifecycle delivery time and provides clients with flexible, cost effective future asset management and expansion planning options.
Delivering smart infrastructure solutions
Aurecon combines multiple talents to successfully execute urban transport projects. In urban environments, Aurecon offers more than just transport infrastructure – we deliver wholly integrated community solutions. Roads and bridges, transport systems for vehicles, passenger and light rail, busways, airports and marine infrastructure are covered under the transport sector.
Our mining and industrial business includes designing pit infrastructure, materials handling, seaboard facilities, heavy haul rail, oil and gas, agriculture, processing, transport warehousing and sales/distribution. This capability is complemented by the Aurecon Hatch joint venture, established in 2002 to focus on the delivery of infrastructure for coal export.
In the energy sector, Aurecon is known for delivering energy civil infrastructure construction, power generation, transmission and distribution systems, traction power and renewable systems. Services range from inception through development, commissioning and operation, with the group geared to delivering “whole of project” services to the market.
In the water market, Aurecon has extensive project management, design expertise and turnkey capability for projects of any size. Our water group delivers specialist services including water and wastewater management, water resource planning, tunnelling, geotechnical surveys and river, coastal and environmental engineering.
