5 minute read
California Lawmakers: Smarter Policy Can End Poverty
By Lila Brown | California Black Media
A group of progressive California lawmakers – including three members of the California Legislative Black Caucus (CLBC) -- have pledged to end poverty in California by advancing more effective policy during the next legislative session – and beyond.
Newly appointed Assembly Majority Leader Isaac Bryan (D-Los Angeles) announced the formation of the End Poverty in California Caucus last month at a Los Angeles screening of the documentary “Poverty and Power.” The film features former Stockton Mayor Michael Tubbs, an anti-poverty advocate who founded a non-profit that shares a name with the caucus, End Poverty in California (EPIC).
“We’re headed towards the end of the legislative session, but we’re in the process of recruiting members to the poverty caucus,” Bryan, who is the chair of the new caucus, told California Black Media.
“We’ve got about a half dozen members already,” Bryan continued. “As we continue to do outreach in the legislature, I expect that number to grow. By the time we come back together in January to introduce new legislation we should have everything ready to go, to focusing on criminal justice reform and the housing crisis’ systemic nexus to poverty in the state.” around key votes and issues and build power in order to advance bold policy change.”
Bryan is the treasurer of the CLBC.
Other CLBC lawmakers who are members of the newly formed poverty caucus are Sen. Lola SmallwoodCuevas (D-Ladera Heights) and Assemblymember Mia Bonta (D-Alameda).
“Part of the reason over a quarter of our state’s residents live at or below the poverty level is because of California’s failed public policies,” said Smallwood-Cuevas in a statement. “Our State Legislature must fight for California’s working families by creating equitable access to quality jobs and doubling down on what Californians earn across the board, particularly for residents from marginalized communities of color.”
Bonta said bills she introduced this year have prioritized the needs of children and families, but she looks forward to working with her colleagues to take bolder and broader action to address those problems.
It’s clear that we need to advance stronger policies that will coordinate effective, place-based delivery of wrap-around services for people most in need to make significant progress in the fight against poverty,” Bonta said.
“I look forward to joining forces with our End Poverty Caucus to ensure that we strengthen our safety net and tackle the racial and economic inequities in our communities.”
Other members of the Caucus are Senators Nancy Skinner (D-Oakland) and Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco)
The End Poverty Caucus says it will aim to “help lawmakers organize life.”
There are a few possibilities of relief that can be granted by the court under SB 1437. This includes vacating the conviction or resentencing. Spencer is praying that his conviction is vacated, and he will be released from prison. SB 775 is also related to this matter.
The recanted testimony from the witness against Spencer is extraordinary. In the declaration, that will be presented in Spencer’s pending court appearance, and has been delivered to INGLEWOOD TODAY, the statements include:
“Because of me, Brandon Sencer received a sentence that was 40 years to life for a crime he didn’t do. Because of me, the district attorney convicted a man who did not do what they say he did. For my part in that conviction, I am sorry, but I must now set the record straight.”
“I did not see Mr. Spencer leave the party and come back later with a gun. I did not see Mr. Sencer shoot a gun into the crowd or at Mr. Hall. I only said that I saw Mr. Spencer come back with the and Assemblymembers Rebecca Bauer-Kahan (D-Orinda), Matt Haney (D-San Francisco), Ash Kalra (D-Fresno), Buffy Wicks (D-Oakland) and Luz Rivas (D-Arleta).
Some critics have cautioned, however, that creating a caucus focused on poverty is political showmanship by Democrats that will have little impact on actual poverty reduction.
Tim Anaya, vice president of the conservative leaning Pacific Research Institute, says “The new End Poverty in California legislative caucus is not going to foster a serious discussion about helping Californians climb the economic ladder. Rather, EPIC promotes policies that don’t work and would trap more Californians perpetually in poverty.” gun because the DA prosecuting the case told me that she needed me to say those things or else she could not make her case for premeditation. “
Instead, Anaya proposes, lawmakers should support free market reform to support entrepreneurship and small business growth.
In an op-ed titled “Ending poverty in California Requires Good Policy, Not Platitudes,” that several California news outlets published last week, the author, Steven Greenhut, Western Region Director for the R Street Institute, compared the California Legislature to a high school student council setting unrealistic goals they cannot achieve.
“Ending poverty is a large promise – and the Legislature is much better at passing laws that exacerbate poverty (minimum wage, anti-competitive union work rules, onerous licensing requirements) rather than reduce it,” Greenhut writes.
Although poverty, overall, in California has decreased over the last four years, the numbers are still dire. About 28 % of state residents (4.5 million people) are poor or nearpoor, according to the Public Policy Institute of California. The state’s homeless and housing affordability crises also compound problems poor and low-income families face in the state, according to policymakers.
Bryan says he looks forward to working with leaders like Tubbs, who has been a leading proponent of progressive economic policies like Guaranteed Basic Income and Baby Bonds.
“The best policy solutions come from listening to the people who are the most affected. I am proud to lead a caucus that is dedicated to doing exactly that,” said Bryan.
“I did what the DA said because I was threatened by the detectives investigating the case, and by the DA prosecuting the case that if I did not say what they needed me to say that the DA would intervene in my own pending criminal case and cause me to be harmed or sentenced more severely”.
In addition, the witness indicates that the Detective involved in the matter showed him three, six pack lineup pictures where Spencer’s picture was twice the size of the others. He states when he was brought to court, he was told that he would be held in contempt if he did not testify as a witness, even though what the prosecution wanted him to say was not true, and he would receive a violation of his probation. Finally, he also stated that he lied to Spencer’s attorney when asked on the stand if he had received any special deals from the prosecution in exchange for his testimony.
The witness had been charged with stealing $26,000 in merchandise from his employer and would have otherwise been sentenced for that crime. He ended his declaration by stating, “I feel horrible for what I did and it was wrong. But now is the time for the truth to come out. I only ask for Mr. Spencer’s forgiveness and for the opportunity for the complete story to be told, so that Mr. Spencer can receive the justice that we all deserve.