How annuities optimize retirement income

Research shows how adding guaranteed income to a retirement plan can help retirees generate adequate income from their assets.

By Susan Rupe

Financial advice often focuses on the accumulation phase of retirement planning. But the decumulation phase — when households seek to generate suf ficient income in retirement to meet their spending needs — requires an equal focus.

Research from BlackRock and the Bipartisan Policy Center showed how a comprehensive approach to retirement planning that includes annuities can help individuals generate adequate income from their accumulated assets and ac complish two critical retirement plan ning goals. The research was presented during a recent webinar from the National Association for Fixed Annuities.

Retirement savers benefit from a holistic approach to retirement income that focus es on three principles of decumulation, said Kate Tan, BlackRock quantitative re searcher for retirement solutions. Those principles are:

1. Maximize spending ability.

2. Maximize spending certainty.

3. Address longevity risk.

Adding guaranteed income and delaying retirement (and delaying Social Security claiming age) can boost total annual spending in retirement and reduce downside risk, the research showed.

“We looked at how to strike a balance with maximizing spending ability and maximizing spending certainty,” Tan said. “Then we added in the longevity risk and asked, are there better ways to do this than have been done in the past? Things such as annuities and guaranteed lifetime income can address all three of these principles.”

A case study

BlackRock developed a case study showing how adding annuities to a retirement plan optimizes the amount of money a retiree has available to spend in retire and claim Social Security at age 65. itself,” Tan said. “They do two things. They deploy other tools: Strategy 1 and Strategy 2. They also take a holistic view in Strategy 1, where they see that changing one element may require them to change another element.”

In the base case, the saver allocates 40% of their retirement assets to equities and 60% to fixed income but does not include a guaranteed income product.

Strategy 1 is to have 50% of the saver’s retirement assets allocated to equities and 50% allocated to fixed income and include a guaranteed income product.

“Because they have some future income needs that are now guaranteed by adding the annuity, they can increase the percentage of equity allocation in their portfolio,” Tan said.

Strategy 2 is to maintain the same retirement asset allocation and include the guaranteed income product but delay the age of retirement and claiming Social Security to 67.

The study findings showed that adding the annuity to the saver’s retirement strategy increases the amount of spending from that saver’s retirement savings, Tan said.

By incorporating guaranteed income in their strategy, the saver is able to spend 35% more in their first year of retirement than they would without the guaranteed income product. In addition, the saver is able to have a 29% average spending increase over their retirement span.

Adding an annuity also raises the floor on the retiree’s spending, the study showed. The addition of guaranteed lifetime retirement income provided an annual spending floor of $46,170 in the first 15 years of retirement.

This represents a 33% increase over the $34,598 annual spending floor that the retiree would have had in the first 15 years of retirement if they had used their 40/60 allocation in their original plan and did not add an annuity.

Adding guaranteed lifetime income to the plan accomplishes two client goals, Tan said:

1. It reduces the pressure to underspend early in retirement and save for later years, allowing more flexibility in spending earlier in retirement.

2. It provides a higher and more reliable spending floor in retirement.

Meanwhile, an even higher level of spending in retirement is possible from adding guaranteed lifetime income to the retirement plan while delaying retirement and delaying Social Security, Tan said.

“This strategy increases the size of the retirement nest egg, shortens the retirement period and increases the Social Security benefit,” she said.

Susan Rupe is managing editor for InsuranceNewsNet. She formerly served as communications director for an insurance agents’ association and was an award-winning newspaper reporter and editor. Contact her at Susan.Rupe@innfeedback.com. Follow her on X @INNsusan.

Employers worried about their workers’ mental health

An increasing number of large employers are reporting a need for mental health services among their workforce, according to the Business Group on Health’s 2024 Large Employer Health Care Strategy Survey. More than 7 in 10 large employers surveyed (77%) reported an increase in mental health needs among their workers, a jump from the 44% who saw an increase in employee mental health concerns in 2022.

As employers see a greater need for mental health services among their workers, more employers report their health and well-being strategy is an integral part of their workforce strategy. About two-thirds of employers surveyed said health and well-being is an integral part of their workforce strategy, as opposed to 42% who said the same in 2021.

Employers are most concerned about employee burnout, access to mental health services and quality of mental health care, the survey showed. In addition to increased mental health issues, 30% of employers reported their workers are seeing more challenges in accessing health care because of a shortage of health professionals and 28% said they are seeing an increase in medical services used because of worsening employee health from obesity and other conditions.

accept help from a robot for activities such as toileting, dressing and transferring. Nearly the same percentage (32%) said they would talk to robots/AI if they are feeling lonely.