InterVISTAS Airport Traffic Forecasting Workshop - Presentations, 10April2013

Page 1

Canadian Forecasting Workshop Session 1: Introductory Remarks on the Science and Art Forecasting

Dr. Mike Tretheway InterVISTAS Consulting Chief Economist


Today’s Workshop 1. Introductory Remarks on Forecasting 2. Transport Canada PODM/PTAM models 3. Alternative ApproachesSingle Airport Forecasts 4. Incorporating Uncertainty into Air Traffic Forecasts 5. Current Outlook

Realizing the 2 vision together


Today’s Workshop • Dr. Mike Tretheway •

Chief Economist, InterVISTAS Consulting Group

Technical Director, Business Line Aviation

• Ian Kincaid •

Vice President, Economic Analysis •

Head of Forecasting Practice

Realizing the 3 vision together


Background Report ACRP 76 Addressing Uncertainty about Future Airport Activity Levels in Airport decision making Undertaken by •InterVISTAS Consulting Inc. •

Mike Tretheway Ian Kincaid

•HDR Inc. •

David Lewis Stéphane Gros 4

Realizing the vision together


Airport Forecasting Record .

• Forecasting is an essential tool for airports • Medium to long term master planning • Financial forecasts • Operational Forecasts

5

Realizing the vision together


Airport Forecasting Record .

• But the track record has not always been good

6

Realizing the vision together


Actual and Forecast Total Passenger Enplanements at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport

Atlanta 55

53

51

Actual Traffic TAF 2001 TAF 2003 TAF 2005 TAF 2007 TAF 2009

49

47

45

) io t(M lm p rE g n e s a P

43

41

39

37

35 2000

2002

2004

2006

7

2008

2010

2012

2014

Realizing the vision together


Washington Dulles 25

Actual and Forecast Total Passenger Enplanements at Washington Dulles International

Actual Traffic TAF 2000 TAF 2001 TAF 2003

20

TAF 2004 TAF 2005 TAF 2009

15

) io t(M lm p rE g n e s a P

10

5

0 1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

8

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

2012

2014

Realizing the vision together


Airport Forecasting Record .

• But the track record has not always been good • Albeit with some learning

9

Realizing the vision together


Actual and Forecast Total Passenger Enplanements at Lambert-St. Louis International Airport

St. Louis 30

Actual Traffic TAF 1998 TAF 2001

25

TAF 2002 TAF 2003 TAF 2009

20 TWA declares bankruptcy for the second time

15

) io t(M lm p rE g n e s a P

10 TWA declares bankruptcy

TWA declares bankruptcy for the third time and AA buys TWA. Construction of new runway begins

5

AA reduces services at STL AA terminates its focus city at STL

0 1985

1990

1995

10

2000

2005

2010

2015

Realizing the vision together


Actual and Forecast Total Passenger Enplanements at Lambert-St. Louis International Airport

St. Louis 30

Actual Traffic TAF 1998 TAF 2001

25

TAF 2002 TAF 2003 TAF 2009

20 TWA declares bankruptcy for the second time

15

) io t(M lm p rE g n e s a P

10 TWA declares bankruptcy

TWA declares bankruptcy for the third time and AA buys TWA. Construction of new runway begins

5

AA reduces services at STL AA terminates its focus city at STL

0 1985

1990

1995

11

2000

2005

2010

2015

Realizing the vision together


Airport Forecasting Record .

• Sometimes the long run forecast has been good • but with short term variance • And different traffic mix than original forecast

12

Realizing the vision together


12

U.S. Airways "de-hubs"

Actual Traffic 1987 Master Plan Forecast (Baseline) 10

9/11 and recession Recession

8

6

Piedmont announces hub

Southwest Airlines launches services

4 First Gulf War and recession

) io t(M lm p rE g n e s a P 2

13

1 0 2

8 0 2

6 0 2

4 0 2

0 2

0 2

8 9 1

6 9 1

4 9 1

2 9 1

0 9 1

8 9 1

6 8 9 1

4 8 9 1

2 8 9 1

0 8 9 1

8 7 9 1

6 7 9 1

4 7 9 1

0

2 7 9 1

BWI

Actual and Forecast Total Passenger Enplanements at Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport

Realizing the vision together


Airport Forecasting Record .

• Sometimes unanticipated events dramatically change a market

14

Realizing the vision together


New Orleans 8

Actual and Forecast Total Passenger Enplanements at Louis Armstrong New Orleans International Airport Actual Traffic TAF 2001

7

TAF 2004 TAF 2005 TAF 2009

6

5

4 Hurricane Katrina

) io t(M lm p rE g n e s a P

3

2

1

0 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014

15

Realizing the vision together


Airport Forecasting Record .

• The forecasting record can also be one of underforecasting

16

Realizing the vision together


Bellingham WA 450

Actual and Forecast Total Passenger Enplanements at Bellingham International Airport

Actual Traffic TAF 2000

400

TAF 2003 Master Plan Forecast

350

300

250 Allegiant opens base at BLI in January 2008

200

) d u o h t(T lm p rE g n e s a P

150

100

50

0 1985

Allegiant enters in August 2004 and rapidly develops service

United Express / SkyWest exits in 2001

1990

1995

2000

17

2005

2010

2015

2020

Realizing the vision together


Guessing vs. Analysis Midway (1976)

18

Realizing the vision together


• Setting: Station Hypo •

Code breaking centre, Pearl Harbor Naval Base •

19

Early April 1942 (US fleet crippled after 7Dec1941)

Issue: forecasting Japanese naval fleet intentions for coming 2 months •

MG is fictional character (Matt Garth)

JR is historical character (Joe Roquefort, head of Honolulu code breaking unit)

Realizing the vision together


o MG: Now the boss is afraid Yamamoto's going to jump back at us. But where? JR: We got the latest intercepts here. Here's a list of Japanese ships we suspect will be assigned to amphib operations south of Rabaul. The Coral Sea! That's where we think they'll strike next. But something else is stirring, something out our way. o MG: We need facts, not guesswork. o JR: Matt, we cracked Yamamoto's code, but we can't just reel it off. We get a flicker here and a glimmer there. o MG: How much can you decipher? o JR: Hell, maybe... o MG: Really decipher. o JR: Ten percent. o MG: That's one word in . For Christ's sake, you're guessing! o JR: We like to call it analysis

20

Realizing the vision together


Types of Airport Forecasts .

• Passenger traffic • Total pax • Enplaned/deplaned • O/D vs Connecting • Cargo tons • E/D vs on-board

21

Realizing the vision together


Types of Airport Forecasts .

• Aircraft Movements • Commercial • Heavy jet, turboprops, piston • Typically driven by • base pax/cargo-freighter forecast • Pax/aircraft (cargo/aircraft) • General Aviation • See recent trend • Other • Military (Busan, new Beijing examples), • rescue, government, tech stop 22

Realizing the vision together


23

Realizing the vision together


Total GA Movements for Canada

Source: Statistics Canada, Table 401-007, 401-0015 and 401-0021. 24

Realizing the vision together


Types of Airport Forecasts .

• Operational Forecasts • Day by day, Hour by hour forecasts of a specific traffic type • E.g., volumes through a security point border process • Ex- Blackcomb Ski Corp. • Recognize effects of • Annual volume drivers • weather, • Interaction between the sessions • Increased local skiing today means less in 2 weeks 25

Realizing the vision together


Forecast Probability and Risk .

• Low-Central-High • What are the probabilities of each scenario? • Threshold • What is probability that traffic in each year will fall below 19mn pax? • Risk • What is the 20/80% range of the forecast 10 years from now?

26

Realizing the vision together


Thank You

Subscribe to Monthly Aviation Intelligence Report www.InterVISTAS.com

Realizing the 27 vision together


Transport Canada Forecasts InterVISTAS Consulting Group 10 April 2013


Outline • Overview of the Transport Canada Forecasts: •

Methodology

Data

Pros and cons

• Alternative Approaches: •

Single airport methodologies

Methodology

Addressing uncertainty

29

Realizing the vision together


Transport Canada Forecasts


Transport Canada Forecasts • Each year, Transport Canada generated medium and long term forecasts of Canadian air traffic •

Up to 14 years in the future

Forecasts of •

E/D passengers and passenger-kms

Air cargo tonnage

Aircraft movements (commercial and GA)

Breakdowns into domestic, transborder and international

Published forecasts provided national and regional forecasts (Atlantic, Ontario, Quebec, Prairies/Northern, Pacific) •

Most recent document was 2007

Forecasts for individual airports available for purchase

31

Realizing the vision together


Transport Canada Forecasts • Transport Canada forecasts based on two inter-connected models • Originally developed in 1976 • Generation of traffic and allocation of traffic: •

Generation: PODM-V2 (Passenger Origin-Destination Model) •

Forecasted Origin-Destination traffic

E.g., Vancouver-Montreal; Toronto – Los Angeles, etc.

Allocation: PTAM (Passenger Traffic Allocation Model) •

Allocates forecasted passenger traffic to air carrier operations

E.g., Forecast Vancouver-Montreal traffic allocated to direct service and to connections via Calgary, Toronto, etc.

32

Realizing the vision together


Transport Canada Forecasts • The Generation-Allocation approach is similar approach to that used in urban transport modeling •

Road systems

Toll roads

Public transport

• It allows changes in the network to affect traffic flows • However, the Transport Canada model does not address congestion or other constraints •

This is often a major factor in urban models

33

Realizing the vision together


PODM (Passenger Origin-Destination Model) • PODM:

34

Realizing the vision together


PODM (Passenger Origin-Destination Model) • PODM (Translated): •

Based on a zonal system

PODM forecasts traffic between zones

Domestic zones:

Approximately 36 zones based around major airports

E.g., Toronto - Pearson, City Centre, Hamilton, Oshawa, Buttonville, Kitchener) Vancouver – Vancouver, Abbotsford, Vancouver Harbour

Transborder zones: •

Approximately 20 zones

E.g., Los Angeles, New York, etc.

International zones: •

Country (e.g., UK) or continental (e.g., Africa)

35

Realizing the vision together


PODM (Passenger Origin-Destination Model) • PODM (Translated): •

Gravity Model:

Zone B

Zone A •

Traffic between two zones is a function of: Attractors:

Impeders:

Population GDP Linguistic similarities Other factors

Air fare Level of direct service Travel time by car

Model was directional 36

Realizing the vision together


PODM (Passenger Origin-Destination Model) • Calibration/estimation required a lot of data: •

O/D passenger Data • Directional Origin-Destination Database • Based on 10% sample of all air tickets • Especially developed for the model by Statistics Canada • Also used U.S. data for transborder

Air Fare Data • Airfare Basis Survey • Quarterly survey of domestic, transborder and international air passengers

OAG schedule data • For determining direct services

Socio-Economic Data • Population, GDP, etc. 37

Realizing the vision together


PODM (Passenger Origin-Destination Model)

• Separate models for full economy and discount economy •

Proxies for trip purpose but also included cross-elasticities (switching between full and discount)

• Based on data from several years – 1995 to 2001 •

Panel data: based on variation over time and between routes

• Calibrated to ensure that the model reasonably matches historical data – backcasting

38

Realizing the vision together


PODM (Passenger Origin-Destination Model) • Forecasting Traffic •

Requires forecasts of input variables

GDP, population: •

Based on Conference Board of Canada and other sources

Air Fare: •

Required separate model (Cost and Fare Model)

Air fare based on input costs:

fuel, labour, aircraft equipment, other plus productivity improvements

39

Realizing the vision together


PTAM (Passenger Traffic Allocation Model) • Having established the O/D flows, these need to be allocated to airlines •

Moving from O/D to E/D

• Also attempts to address the impact of O/D traffic on airline services •

Development of direct services

Incremental frequencies

• Incorporates assumptions about future airline fleets, aircraft technology and load factors • Could require iteration of the PDOM model: •

Introduction of direct service could stimulate O/D traffic 40

Realizing the vision together


PTAM (Passenger Traffic Allocation Model) • Overall assumption of greater allocation of traffic to direct services:

Source: Transport Canada Assumptions Report (2006-20)

41

Realizing the vision together


PTAM (Passenger Traffic Allocation Model) • Contained specific assumptions about the development of new direct services:

Source: Transport Canada Assumptions Report (2006-20) 42

Realizing the vision together


Pros and Cons • Positives •

Arguably the most sophisticated air traffic forecasting system in the world •

The FAA approach is much more basic: National traffic model based on econometric analysis Plus separate forecasts for some individual airports (Terminal Area Forecasts)

Could model in a complex way the implication of changes to the airline network

E.g., O/D – Edmonton to Europe • Starts connecting through Toronto (and other hubs) • Direct start-ups which impacts on traffic flows through Toronto

Similarly, the gateway impacts on Vancouver: E.g., YOW-YVR-HK now moves YOW-YYZ-HKG 43

Realizing the vision together


Pros and Cons • Negatives •

Data! •

O/D Passenger and Air Fare Basis data generally not available due to confidentiality concerns • Used for national accounts requirements and other purposes • Raw data needs processing – Transport Canada had a bespoke data pulls to suit forecasting requirements

More restrictive than U.S. equivalents (available to U.S. citizens)

Alternative commercial sources are available – MIDT, DIIO, etc.

But costs are high: • Tens of thousands of dollars per airport

Prohibitive for individual airports but might still be useful for systemwide purposes (e.g., Nav Canada, CATSA)

44

Realizing the vision together


Pros and Cons • Negatives •

Complexity

Resources •

Required a small full-time team to maintain

Costs of model maintenance, calibration and result production development beyond the capabilities of individual airports and most other organisations

45

Realizing the vision together


Alternative Approaches


Single Airport Forecasts • Range of methodologies available: •

Time series / trend analysis

Bottom-up / schedule based

Econometric models

Market share models

• A combination of these approaches can be used

47

Realizing the vision together


Single Airport Forecasts • Time series / trend •

Based on historical traffic growth rates •

Statistical techniques (ARIMA)

“Historically has grown at 3.5% per annum so will grow at similar rates in the future”

Can also reference global forecasts by Boeing, Airbus, FAA, IATA, etc.

48

Realizing the vision together


Single Airport Forecasts • Bottom-up •

Tend to be supply-side: •

Development of new routes

Increase in frequencies and changes in gauge

Route-by-route forecasts of air service and passenger volumes •

Can be based on announced schedules in the short term

Guided by fleet acquisitions in the medium term

Harder for long term forecasts

49

Realizing the vision together


Single Airport Forecasts • Econometric models •

Traffic as a function of: •

GDP (or GDP per capita)

Personal income

Population

Air fare

One-off factors: SARS, air failure, 9/11 (historical events)

Separate models can sometime be developed for individual markets (Domestic, transborder, international)

Can be seen as simplified version of the Transport Canada model: •

One zone (airport) to small number of destination zones

Dependent on the data available for airport

50

Realizing the vision together


Single Airport Forecasts • Econometric models •

Requires forecasts of explanatory variables

Generally good sources available for GDP, population, etc.

Inclusion of air fare can be problematic: •

Hard to obtain historical data especially for a long time series (need 10 years at least)

Technical issues – fares are an endogenous variable, affected by demand and supply conditions • Requires use of advanced statistical techniques (Two stage least squared regressions)

Air fares also need to be forecast, e.g., using a airline cost model

As a result, air fares are often not included in the analysis

51

Realizing the vision together


Single Airport Forecasts • Yield Trend (U.S.) 0.45

1958 Boeing 707 enters service

0.40

1970 Boeing 747 enters service

1978 U.S. Airline Deregulation Act

2001 September 11th terrorist attacks

0.30

0.25

0.20

0.15

0.10

0.05 Inflation Adjusted 2008 Dollars Nominal Dollars

52

2008

2005

2002

1999

1996

1993

1990

1987

1984

1981

1978

1975

1972

1969

1966

1963

1960

1957

1954

1951

1948

0 1945

Passenger Yield (US$ Per RPKM)

0.35

Realizing the vision together


Single Airport Forecasts • Market Share Model •

Generally involves forecasting the airport’s share of some aggregate measure of air traffic (national traffic, regional traffic)

Generally used where there are a number of airports realistically competing for the same traffic

E.g., UK – five airports compete for the same traffic in London alone (Heathrow, Gatwick, Luton, Stansted, London City)

New York market

San Francisco / Oakland

Few examples in Canada

53

Realizing the vision together


Concluding Comments Uncertainty


Addressing Uncertainty • Standard approach to uncertainty in both the Transport Canada forecasts and single airport forecasts •

Base case with low and high forecasts

55

Realizing the vision together


Addressing Uncertainty

56

Realizing the vision together


Addressing Uncertainty • High-Base-Low: •

Everything is bad or everything is good all at once

Variation tends to be arbitrary – why are these the outer bounds?

No information or assessment of likelihood

Often the range is not that large (+/- 25%) – history has shown us that bigger deviations are possible

Has little input into the planning process •

Low can be of interest for financing

57

Realizing the vision together


Addressing Uncertainty • Other approaches: •

“What-ifs”

Sensitivity tests

• These provide some information on the impact of specific factors or the outcome of certain events • Again, can be arbitrary without reference to the likelihood of such an outcome • More on advanced approaches to uncertainty this afternoon…

58

Realizing the vision together


Thank You! www.intervistas.com


Addressing Uncertainty in Air Traffic forecasting InterVISTAS Consulting Group 10 April 2013


Outline • Consequences of uncertainty • Causes of uncertainty • Identifying and evaluating risk • Incorporating risk into forecasting

61

Realizing the vision together


Consequences of Uncertainty


Washington Dulles International Airport 25

Actual Traffic TAF 2000 TAF 2001 TAF 2003

20

TAF 2004 TAF 2005 TAF 2009

15

) io t(M lm p rE g n e s a P

10

5

0 1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

2002 63

2004

2006

2008

2010

2012

2014

Realizing the vision together


Lambert-St. Louis International Airport 30

Actual Traffic TAF 1998 TAF 2001

25

TAF 2002 TAF 2003 TAF 2009

20 TWA declares bankruptcy for the second time

15

) io t(M lm p rE g n e s a P

10 TWA declares bankruptcy

TWA declares bankruptcy for the third time and AA buys TWA. Construction of new runway begins

5

AA reduces services at STL AA terminates its focus city at STL

0 1985

1990

1995

2000

64

2005

2010

2015

Realizing the vision together


Louis Armstrong New Orleans International Airport 8

Actual Traffic TAF 2001

7

TAF 2004 TAF 2005 TAF 2009

6

5

4 Hurricane Katrina

) io t(M lm p rE g n e s a P

3

2

1

0 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014

65

Realizing the vision together


Bellingham International Airport 450

Actual Traffic TAF 2000

400

TAF 2003 Master Plan Forecast

350

300

250 Allegiant opens base at BLI in January 2008

200

) d u o h t(T lm p rE g n e s a P

150

100

50

0 1985

Allegiant enters in August 2004 and rapidly develops service

United Express / SkyWest exits in 2001

1990

1995

2000

66

2005

2010

2015

2020

Realizing the vision together


Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport 12

U.S. Airways "de-hubs"

Actual Traffic 1987 Master Plan Forecast (Baseline) 10

9/11 and recession Recession

8

6

Piedmont announces hub

Southwest Airlines launches services

4

) io t(M lm p rE g n e s a P

First Gulf War and recession

2

67

1 0 2

8 0 2

6 0 2

4 0 2

0 2

0 2

8 9 1

6 9 1

4 9 1

2 9 1

0 9 1

8 9 1

6 8 9 1

4 8 9 1

2 8 9 1

0 8 9 1

8 7 9 1

6 7 9 1

4 7 9 1

2 7 9 1

0

Realizing the vision together


Causes of Uncertainty


Causes of Uncertainty • Economics •

Recessions and booms

Regional conditions (closure of a local business)

Fuel prices

• Airline Strategy •

Start, expand, contract or shut service

Transit traffic is fungible

• Airline failure/collapse •

Canadian, TWA, Swiss, Sabena

• Regulatory / policy •

Deregulation contributed to hubbing, changes in aircraft size, LCCs

Also taxes, security, bilaterals 69

Realizing the vision together


Causes of Uncertainty • Technology •

More economical aircraft make new routes possible

Implications for cargo – smaller aircraft reduce bellyhold; A380 has relatively small cargo space

• Airport Competition •

New airports emerge as competitors, e.g., on the U.S. border

• Social / cultural •

Concerns about environmental impacts

Use of new communications media (+ve or –ve impact?)

• Shock events •

9/11

SARS 70

Realizing the vision together


Identifying and Evaluating Risk


Identifying and Evaluating Risk • Develop a risk register •

Identify and evaluate various risks affecting the airport

What is the particular risk?

What is its likelihood?

What is the impact if it occurs (short and long term)

• Information can be elicited from the airport team •

Strategy

Marketing

Facilities

Finance

• Can also examine historical examples •

What was the impact of SAR on Toronto; how long was the recovery? 72

Realizing the vision together


Identifying and Evaluating Risk • Presenting the results – Heat diagram Very High

Likelihood

High Moderate

Low Very Low Very Low

Low

Moderate

High

Very High

Impact on Activity

73

Realizing the vision together


Identifying and Evaluating Risk 35%

Key: Macroeconomic Market

Use of internet for meetings

Regulatory/Policy

30%

Technology Social/Cultural High Speed Rail Competition

25%

Fuel price spikes

Loss/failure of Carrier X

New FAA taxes

Terrorist attack

-5

-4

20%

Increased security requirements

Economic recession

-3

Pandemic

-2

New aircraft technology

15%

ilty a b ro P

Shock Event

Economic boom

Open Skies Liberalization

Major tourism event

10%

Entry of new carrier (e.g., LCC)

5%

-1

0 Impact

< Threat 74

1

2

3

4

5

Opportunity > Realizing the vision together


Incorporating Risk into Forecasting


Incorporating Risk into Forecasting • Risk analysis augments not replaces traditional forecasting Original Forecast

r g s P d e la p n E

Traffic impact of carrier exit and partial recovery

Time 76

Realizing the vision together


Incorporating Risk into Forecasting • A simple approach: •

Scenario analysis based on the risk register

Development scenarios based on the high probability and high impact events (both positive and negative)

Similar to high/low approach, but:

Based on comprehensive assessment of risk

Scenario can be produced to examine extreme events – stress testing

Should be a focus of planning decisions

However, the approach still lacks information on likelihood or probability

77

Realizing the vision together


Incorporating Risk into Forecasting 450 Actual Traffic 1980-2000 Post-Masterplan Traffic (2000-2010)

400

401

Masterplan Forecast Extreme Upside Scenario

354

Extreme Upside with New Carrier Exit

350

Extreme Downside Scenario

329

300 280

250

255

242 195

200 162

150

151

123

110

100

61 68

50

40 28 25

78

1 0 2

9 1 0 2

7 1 0 2

5 1 0 2

3 1 0 2

1 0 2

9 0 2

7 0 2

5 0 2

3 0 2

1 0 2

9 1

7 9 1

5 9 1

3 9 1

9 1

8 9 1

7 8 9 1

0

5 8 9 1

) d u o h t(T lm p rE g n e s a P

114

152

150 136

Realizing the vision together


Incorporating Risk into Forecasting • A more advanced approach: •

Monte Carlo simulations

Uses randomisation / probabilities to explore uncertainty

Model inputs are probability distributions rather than fixed numbers

Using computers, the models can be run multiple times, each time with the inputs randomly generated

With enough iterations, the range of outcomes can be determined and probabilities applied to them

Historical note: first used at Los Alamos in design of shiled for nuclear reactors

Has also been used in finance, project planning, telecoms design, medicine,… 79

Realizing the vision together


Incorporating Risk into Forecasting

Probability

• Normal distribution

10% to 90% Range

-8%

-7%

-6%

-5%

-4%

-3%

-2%

-1%

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

8%

Deviation from Long-Term Economic Growth Rate

80

Realizing the vision together


Incorporating Risk into Forecasting

Probability

• Pert Distribution

10% to 90% Range

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

Loss of Enplaned Passengers (Thousands)

81

Realizing the vision together


Incorporating Risk into Forecasting Density Function

Description UNIFORM – a distribution where all values within a range of potential outcomes have the same probability. For example, a uniform distribution should be used to characterize the impacts of a threat that may lead to a 10 percent reduction in airport activity, a 20 percent reduction, or any value in between, with the same probability. The uniform distribution is fully specified with a minimum value and a maximum value.

DISCRETE – a distribution where each potential outcome is represented by a single value and a corresponding probability. A discrete distribution is defined by a list of possible, discrete values and corresponding probabilities, where the sum of all probabilities is equal to 1.

GENERALIZED TRIANGULAR – a distribution that uses the median, lower percentile (such as 10%), and upper percentile (such as 90%) as input parameters. Based on these parameters, a triangular distribution is fitted to the data, and the absolute minimum and maximum are calculated as a function of the distribution. This distribution is often used for event risks, where there is equal probability of an input parameter being lower or higher than the median.

82

Realizing the vision together


Incorporating Risk into Forecasting • Determining the distribution (data based): 70 Histogram of GDP Growth Data Fitted Distribution 60

50

y c n u q re F

40

30

20

10

0 -1.5%

-0.5%

0.5%

1.5%

2.5%

3.5%

4.5%

5.5%

6.5%

7.0%

GDP Growth Rate (Mid-Point)

83

Realizing the vision together


Incorporating Risk into Forecasting • Other events based on judgement (or combination of judgement and data) • Can involve a complex set of connected inputs • E.g., exit of a carrier: •

Probability of exit

Impact of exit – loss of traffic (can be randomised)

Extent of recovery (also can be randomised)

Time to recover (also can be randomised)

84

Realizing the vision together


Incorporating Risk into Forecasting • Running the Monte Carlo (Sample)

85

Realizing the vision together


Incorporating Risk into Forecasting 35 Most Likely Forecast 25th / 75th Percentile Range 30

10th / 90th Percentile Range 5th / 95th Percentile Range

25

20

) io r(M g s P d e p lE a u n A

15

10

5

0 Year 0

Year 5

Year 10 86

Year 15

Year 20

Realizing the vision together


Incorporating Risk into Forecasting 14%

100% Probability Density (Left Hand Scale) Cumulative Probability (Right Hand Scale)

12% 80% 10%

60%

6%

y b ro P e tiv la m u C

40%

4% 20% 2%

0 ,5 7

0 ,5 7

0 5 ,2 7

,0 7

0 5 ,7 6

0 ,5 6

0 5 ,2 6

,0 6

0 ,7 5

,0 5

0 ,2 5

,0 5

0 5 ,7 4

0 ,5 4

0 5 ,2 4

,0 4

0 5 ,7 3

0 ,5 3

0 5 ,2 3

,0 3

0%

0 5 ,7 2

0%

0 ,5 2

ilty a b ro P

8%

Passenger Enplanements (Thousands) 87

Realizing the vision together


Incorporating Risk into Forecasting • Can answer questions like: •

What is the probability that passenger traffic growth will exceed 4% per annum over the next 20 years?

What is the probability that passenger traffic will be greater than 20 million in five years time?

What is the probability that passenger traffic in 2020 will be less than 25 million?

• Obvious applications for financial analysis • But can also be incorporated into planning…

88

Realizing the vision together


Incorporating Risk into Forecasting

89

Realizing the vision together


Thank You! www.intervistas.com


Canadian Forecasting Workshop Session 5: Current Outlook

Dr. Mike Tretheway InterVISTAS Consulting Chief Economist


Economic Update


Econo-geek Vocabulary If there is a recovery, will it be? • V-shaped •

A rapid recovery back to previous level •

Most recessions are V-shaped

• U-shaped •

A period of stagnation, with a slow recovery

• L-shaped •

An extended period of stagnation •

Japan 1990s. Great Depression

• W-shaped •

A V-shaped recovery, followed by another recession •

US, 1970s 93

Realizing the vision together


US Real GDP Growth (Historical)

Sources: Historical – Bureau of Economic Analysis; Recessions as defined by the National Bureau of Economic Research 94

Realizing the vision together


US Real GDP Growth (Historical)

W WW Sources: Historical – Bureau of Economic Analysis; Recessions as defined by the National Bureau of Economic Research 95

Realizing the vision together


US Real GDP Growth (Historical)

V V V W WW Sources: Historical – Bureau of Economic Analysis; Recessions as defined by the National Bureau of Economic Research 96

Realizing the vision together


US Real GDP- recent Recession begins

Recession has ended

Source: NBER 27May2010, BEA 23Mar2013 97

Realizing the vision together


Annualized Y-O-Y Growth Rate

US Real GDP Growth - Forecast

Forecast Data

Source: 2007-2012 U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis 2013-2017 International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2011 98

Realizing the vision together


US Real GDP - Risk

• The recent recession had V-shaped recovery

• But there is still risk in the recovery •

Managing contraction of Fed Assets •

Without 2nd recession

Without inflation

will be a challenge

Risk: less than 50%, more than 25% 99

Realizing the vision together


US Real GDP (Historical)

Recessions are wiggles in a steadily growing economy

Sources: Historical (1946 to 2012) – Bureau of 100 Economic Analysis;

Realizing the vision together


Canada Real GDP (Historical)

Recessions are wiggles in a steadily growing economy

Sources: Historical Canada GDP (1961 to 2012) 101– Statistics Canada.

Realizing the vision together


Canada Real GDP Growth

Annualized Y-O-Y Growth Rate

Historical Data

Forecast Data

Sources: Historical and Forecast Data from International Monetary Fund, World Economic Database, October 2012. Realizing the vision together 102


Real GDP Growth - Mexico

2 Recessions Sources: Historical Data: Mexico: International Monetary Fund Forecast Data: Mexico: International Monetary Fund 103

Realizing the vision together


Fuel Prices


Fuel Cost per Litre for Canadian Air Carriers

Source: 1980-1990- Statistics Canada, Aviation in Canada 2006-2011- Statistics Canada, 51-004-X 105

Realizing the vision together


Fuel Cost Percentage of Operating Expense Canadian Air Carriers

Source: 1980-1990- Statistics Canada, Aviation in Canada 2006-2011- Statistics Canada, 51-004-X 106

Realizing the vision together


Fuel Litres per RPK

Source: 1970-1990- Statistics Canada, Aviation in Canada 2006-2011- Statistics Canada, 51-004-X. Transport Canada 107

Realizing the vision together


Fuel Prices - historical

108

Realizing the vision together


Fuel Prices 2 year dramatic swing Prices rose by 250% Then crashed to 66% of original price

109

Realizing the vision together


Crude Oil Price Futures

110

Realizing the vision together


Oil Price Forecast

111

Realizing the vision together


Oil Price Consensus Forecast

•Its not down •Its not back to $145

112

Realizing the vision together


2 Sigma Range of Forecasts Forecast 95% ranges $120 $100 $80 upper 2 sigma $60

average low er 2 sigma

$40 $20 $2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

113

2015

2016

Realizing the vision together


2 Sigma Range of Forecasts Forecast 95% ranges $120 $100 $80 upper 2 sigma $60

average low er 2 sigma

$40

•Everyone seems to agree

$20 $2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

114

2015

2016

Realizing the vision together


2 Sigma Range of Forecasts Note the scale

Forecast 95% ranges

$120 $100 $80 upper 2 sigma $60

average low er 2 sigma

$40

•Everyone seems to agree

$20 $2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

115

2015

2016

Realizing the vision together


If History Repeats the Swing‌. Oil Price with Full Historical Range

Note the scale

$300 $250 $200

Upper range $150

Base price forecast Lower range

$100 $50 $2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

116

2015

2016

Realizing the vision together


Forecast Components


Average Fare: Canada Nominal: Not Adjusted for Inflation

Source: Statistics Canada Average Fare data, Cat. 51 -004-X p = preliminary Major Air Carriers include Air Canada (mainline & AC Jazz), WestJet, Air Transat and Canada 3000

118

Realizing the vision together


Real Average Fare: Canada

Sources: Statistics Canada Average Fare data, Cat. 51 -004-X Statistics Canada Consumer Price Index p = preliminary air fare data Major Air Carriers include Air Canada (mainline & AC Jazz), WestJet, Air Transat and Canada 3000 119

Realizing the vision together


Commercial Aircraft: Canada

Source: Transport Canada Registered Commercial Aircraft database

120

Realizing the vision together


Passengers per Aircraft- Canada 1980-2011

Source: InterVISTAS Calculations with data from: Aviation in Canada (1980-1990) and Table 401-0009, Statistics Canada and Air Carrier Traffic at Canadian Airports. Statistics Canada 121

Realizing the vision together


Seats per Aircraft- Canada 1980-2011

Source: InterVISTAS Calculations with data from: Aviation in Canada (1980-1990) and Table 401-0009, Statistics Canada and Air Carrier Traffic at Canadian Airports. Statistics Canada and Transport Canada. 122

Realizing the vision together


Total GA Movements for Canada

Source: Statistics Canada, Table 401-007, 401-0015 and 401-0021. 123

Realizing the vision together


Cargo Tonnes Reporting: Statistics Canada vs. Actual Site Statistics Actual Statistics Airport Canada Statistics Site to Stats (Tonnes) (Tonnes) Can Ratio

Airport

Calgary Intl, Alta.

83,524

116,000

1.39

Edmonton Intl, Alta.

22,955

36,112

1.57

MontrĂŠal/Mirabel Intl, Que.

66,899

95,518

1.43

MontrĂŠal/Pierre Elliott Trudeau Intl, Que.

76,623

105,113

1.37

Toronto/Lester B Pearson Intl, Ont.

339,065

492,171

1.45

186,385

223,878

1.20

Source: Statistics Canada, 51-203-X. Individual Airport reports.

Vancouver Intl, B.C.

124

Realizing the vision together


Cargo Tons Gap: Site Stats to Stats Can

Source: InterVISTAS calculations with data from: Statistics Canada, 51-203-X. Individual Airport reports. 125

Realizing the vision together


US vs Canada Pax Traffic 1990-2012

Source: InterVISTAS Calculations with data from: Canada-Air Carrier Traffic at Canadian Airports. Statistics Canada US- 1960-2006 ATA , 2007-2012 BTS . 126

Realizing the vision together


Load Factor- Canada

Source: Aviation in Canada, Statistics Canada. Transport Canada 127

Realizing the vision together


Commercial Aircraft Movements

Source: Aviation in Canada (1980-1990) and Table 401-0009, Statistics Canada. 128

Realizing the vision together


Scheduled Flight Frequency: Domestic Canada

Annual Turboprop + Regional Jet Percentages 79%

72%

74%

75%

Source: Official Airline Guide Schedule Data, full year data for 1998, 2002, 2007, and 2012. 129

Realizing the vision together


Scheduled Seat Capacity: Domestic Canada

Annual Turboprop + Regional Jet Percentages 49%

37%

42%

50%

Source: Official Airline Guide Schedule Data, full year data for 1998, 2002, 2007, and 2012. 130

Realizing the vision together


Domestic Canada Scheduled Flight Frequency by Aircraft Body Type

Legend:

Widebody

Narrowbody

Regional Jets

Turboprops

Domestic Canada Scheduled Seat Capacity by Aircraft Body Type

Source: Official Airline Guide Schedule Data, full year data for 1998, 2002, 2007, and 2012.

131

Realizing the vision together


Canadian Air Carrier Total Revenue and Expenses

Source: Statistics Canada, 51-004-X 132

Realizing the vision together


Return on Assets for Canadian Air Carriers

Source: Statistics Canada, 1980-1985- Aviation in Canada. 2005-2011, 51-004-X. 133

Realizing the vision together


Accidents for Canadian Commercial Aircraft

Source: 2001-2011 Statistics Canada, 51-004-X. Transportation Safety Board of Canada 1970-1990 Statistics Canada, Aviation in Canada 134

Realizing the vision together


Thank You

Subscribe to Monthly Aviation Intelligence Report www.InterVISTAS.com

Realizing 135 the vision together


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.