LEGEND
AREAS VULNERABLE TO FLOODS
LEGEND
TYPES OF RI SKS AND THE CONDI TI ONS GENERATED BY THEM
LEGEND
LEGEND
LEGEND
“ L E GI S L A T I ONR E GAR DI NG B UI L DI NGS ’ S E I S MI CDE S I GN ( . . . ) ”
B UI L DI NGSAR EDE S I GNE DT O R E ZI S TA7 . 5-8MAGNI T UDE E AR T HQUAKE
1 6 bl ocks offlat s GF+4F ( 60 apart ment s) 81bl ocks offlat s GF+3F ( 1 296 apart ment s) 4 bl ocks offlat s GF+2F ( 24 apart ment s)
2 1 6 bl ocks offlat s GF+9F ( 640 apart ment s) 1bl ocks offlat s GF+5F ( 24 apart ment s) 48 bl ocks offlat s GF+4F ( 960 apart ment s)
3 29 bl ocks offlat s GF+5F ( 696 apart ment s)
4 29 bl ocks offlat s GF+4F ( 580 apart ment s) 3 bl ocks offlat s GF+5F ( 90 apart ment s) 3 bl ocks offlat s GF+8F ( 1 08 apart ment s)
5 5 bl ocks offlat s GF+8F ( 288 apart ment s) 1 9 bl ocks offlat s GF+4F ( 380 apart ment s)
6 1 9 bl ocks offlat s GF+4F ( 380 apart ment s) 8 bl ocks offlat s GF+9F ( 320 apart ment s)
7 1 1bl ocks offlat s GF+5F ( 264 apart ment s)
EDUCATI ONAL I NSTI TUTI ONS WI THI N W ALKABLE DI STANCE
Pr i mary/secondary school
LOCAL PLAYGROUNDS WI THI N W ALKABLE DI STANCE
Ar ea wi t h no pl aygr ound forchi l dr en
HEALTHCARE FACI LI TI ES WI THI N W ALKABLE DI STANCE
Pol ycl i ni c
PUBLI C TRANSPORT STATI ONS WI THI N W ALKABLE DI STANCE
Ar ea poor l y served by publ i ct r ansport
COMMERCI AL SPACES WI THI N W ALKABLE DI STANCE
Ar ea wi t h no commer ci albui l di ngs Commer ci alact i vi t i es
Met r o st at i on Ki nder gar den
Super mar ket
Di spensary Bus st at i on Far macy
Localshops
STRENGHTS
W EAKNESSES weakpedest r i anconnect i on
OPPORTUNI TI ES
LEGEND Si te l i mi ts
Col l ecti ve housi ng that needs rehabi l i tati on
Bucharest’ s boundary
Landscaped transparent fences
Arges Channel
Pl ayground
“Decent” housi ng Major defici ency of parki ng l ots
Metro stati on
Urban fabri c wi th major i ssues regardi ng l pl ot access Poorl y organi sed street network
Commerci alcl uster
Area accessi bl e to publ i c transport stati ons Pl ots that do not have di rect access to a vehi cul ar road I ndi vi dualhousi ng encl aves Rehabi l i ted col l ecti ve housi ng
Congested juncti on I ntense ai r and noi se pol l uti on (caused by i ntense traffic flow)
THREATS
I n201 5t h er egi onr et a i nsi t sr es i dent i a lc h a r a c t era c qui r ed7 5yea r sa go wh ent h eMi l i t a r i c ommunebec a meoneofBuc h a r es t ’ snei gh bor h oods . I nt h i s wa y , ec onomi ca c t i vi t i esdevel opedi nac ont r ol l edma nner , wi t h outa ggr es s i ve i nt er vent i onsupont h eur ba nf a br i c ,i ns pi t eoft h ef a c tt h a tt h eywer e s t i mul a t edbyt h er egul a t i onss t i pul a t edbyt h eZona l Ur ba nP l a n( i nt h enor t h pa r toft h es i t e– ami x edr egi on) . Th epopul a t i onc ons i s t sof1 6, 000 i nh a bi t a nt s , r egi s t er i ngagr owt hofr ough l y1 0%c ompa r edt o201 5 .
Ot h erdet er mi ni ngf a c t or si nt h epr oc es sofi mpr ovementof t h equa l i t yofl i vi ngc ondi t i onsa r et h et h er ma lr eh a bi l i t a t i onof t h ec ol l ec t i veh ous i nguni t sa ndt h eex i s t enc eofapr operpubl i c ut i l i t yi nf r a s t r uc t ur et h r ough outt h ewh ol er es ea r c h eda r ea .L a s t butnotl ea s t ,t h ef a c tt h a tt h epa r k i ngs pa c esper t a i ni ngt ot h e c ol l ec t i ve h ous i ng uni t s wer e ef fi c i ent l y or ga ni z ed pl a ys a s i gni fi c a ntpa r ti ns a t i s f yi ngt h eneedsoft h ei nh a bi t a nt s .
Th et r a f fi cflowi ss moot h edes pec i a l l yt h a nk st ot h ef a c tt h a tI ul i uMa ni u Boul eva r di snol ongert h eonl yonec onnec t i ngt oA1h i gh wa y ,a not h er a l t er na t i vebei ngas egmentoft h eS pl a i ul I ndependent ei –Ci ur el penet r a t i on. Th eh i ghdegr ee ofa c c es s i bi l i t y oft h er egi on i sgi ven by t h e publ i c t r a ns por t a t i onwh i c hi sr ea di l ya va i l a bl ea ndt h eex i s t enc eofbi k el a neswh i c h c onnec tt h es pa c e wi t h i nt h es i t e wi t hot h ergr eens pa c esa l ong t h e Dâmbovi ț aRi ver( Th eBot a ni c a lGa r den,Th eCi ș mi gi uGa r dens )a ndwi t h uni ver s i t i ess uc ha sTh eP ol i t eh ni c aUni ver s i t yofBuc h a r es t .I na ddi t i on,t h e devel opmentoft h e Roș u vi l l a ge r egi on ( a sa c ons equenc e oft h e over c r owdi ngofMI l i t a r i nei gh bour h ooda ndofBuc h a r es ti t s el f )ma deanew busl i newh i c hc onnec t st h er ec ent l yer ec t eda r eawi t hL uj er ul ui–t h efi r s t i nt er moda l node–nec es s a r y .
F r om t h epoi ntofvi ew ofa r c h i t ec t ur ea ndur ba ndes i gnt h e vi ewi sa na gr eea bl eone,of f er i ngh omogenei t ybys t i c k i ngt oa c er t a i nc ol ors c h emei nt h efi ni s h i ngwor k soft h ec ons t r uc t i ons wh i c hi sc ompl ement edbyt h er i c hgr eener ya ndt h epl a c ement ofs t r eetf ur ni t ur ea c c or di ngt opedes t r i a nflows .
Th es ys t em ofpubl i cs pa c esi swel lor ga ni z eda ndc ont r i but est ot h e i mpr ovementoft h equa l i t yofl i vi ngc ondi t i onsi nt h ea r ea .I nwh a tgr een s pa c esa r ec onc er ned, t h er ei sar a t i oof24m2ofgr eens pa c eperc a pi t a . Api l otpr oj ec tt h a tf ul fi l l edi t spur pos et oi nc r ea s et h ea t t r a c t i venes soft h e publ i cs pa c e per t a i ni ng t ot h ec ol l ec t i ve h ous i ng uni t st h r ough t h e i nc or por a t i onofc ommuni t ys pa c es , pl a ygr oundsf orc h i l dr en, meet i ngpoi nt s wa sdr a f t ed. Duet ot h es oc i oec onomi cevol ut i onoft h enei gh bor h ooda nd t ot h ef a c tt h a tt h ei nh a bi t a nt sl a i dc l a i m ont h es pa c e,t h epr oj ec tc a nbe c ons i der edas uc c es s ,wh i c hma k esi tpos s i bl ef ori tt obeex t endedt ot h e nei gh bor i ngc ol l ec t i veh ous i nga r ea s .
LEGEND Si te l i mi ts Roadway A1 Hi ghway Cycl el ane New bus route I ndi vi dualhousi ng Col l ecti ve housi ng Mi xed use area Street vegetati on adapted to traffic flow Paci iPark Soci ali nterventi on on col l ecti ve housi ng area Di fferent urban typol ogi es (morphol ogy)
Publ i c space (pedestri an ori ented) under the bri dge
Church
Focalpoi nt
Communi ty centre
Devel opment of soci alcohesi on I ncr eased accesi bi l i t ybecauseoft hei nt er sect i onbet ween Mar gel el orSt r eetand t heexpr essway Maj ori nfluence oft he expr ess r oad on t he ur ban fabr i cconver si on t o mi xed use ar ea Opportuni ty to pr ovi de a connecti on between communi ty centr es
Cur r ent l y , t h er egi oni st h es a f es ti nBuc h a r es t , duet ot h ef a c t t h a tvi deos ur vei l l a nc es ys t emsh a vebeeni ns t a l l edi npl a c esof publ i ci nt er es ta ndt ot h ef a c tt h a ta l l s t r eet sh a ves t r eetl i gh t i ng.
SOCI AL HOUSI NG FRAMEW ORKAND CO M PLEM ENTARY EQ UIPM ENT IDENTIFYING IDEAL AREAS TO PLACE CO M M UNITY SPACES CHARACTERI ZI NG COMMUNI TY SPACES CONSI DERI NG THE TARGETGROUPS
LEGEND Popul ati on densi ty 563 resi dents / ha 500 resi dents / ha 306 resi dents / ha 28. 4% bui l t -up area 27. 7 % bui l t -up area 17. 9 % bui l t -up area Poor street l i ghti ng orno street l i ghtni ng at al l Locall andmarks Apusul uicommerci al
Pl ayground Secondary school Smal lcommuni ty pl aces for el derl y peopl e
LEGEND Expr opr i at i on/ demol i t i on ofi ndi vi dual housesorgar ages( asment i oned i n t he ur ban pol i cy . . ) ,t hatdo not r espectr egul at i onsr egar di ng l and use and ar e al so i n a very bad physi cal condi t i on Pl ayground rel ocated on Bi nocl ul uiStreet ( N) 5bl ocksofflat spr oposed f ordemol i t i on i nor dert ol owert hedensi t yoft he bui l t up ar eaand obt ai ni ng a3000 sqm l ot Gr eatspacesf orcr eat i ng/pl aci ng communi t y spaces( mi ni mum ar ea-800 sqm) Gr eatspaces f orbui l di ng communi t y cent r es ( mi ni mum ar ea -2500 sqm)
LEGEND Outdoor communi ty space Communi ty gardens Pl ayground School ’ sbasket bal lcourtr edesi gned out si de t hatcan be used by r esi det s out si de schoolhour s
LEGEND Roadway
Communi ty gardens
Si dewal k
Pl ayground that creati vel y takes advantage of the exi sti ng trees by i ntegrati ng them wi thout damages
Shared space
Parki ng
Col l ecti ve housi ng
Parki ng (ground floor) and pl ayground/green space on top of i t
I ndi vi dualhousi ng area for whi ch sunl i ght studi es showed o probl ems
“Smart parki ng”
Apusul uicommerci alcompl ex
Mi nori nt er vent i onsongr eenspaces( t r eepr unni ng,pl ant i ng shr ubs and or nament alveget at i on)cont ai ni ng smal lcommuni t yspaces Veget at i on densi t yi ncr eased i n or dert o decr ease noi se and ai rpol l ut i on an i mpr ove t he at t r act i vi t y ofpubl i c space
I ndoor communi ty centre
Proposed communi ty centre
Outdoor communi ty centre
Secondary school Pl ayground
Major i nterventi ons on the poorl y mai ntai ned gr een spaces i n or der to obtai n sui tabl e publ i c spaces for housi ng ar eas I ncreasi ng densi ty of urban vegetati on
Recreati onalacti vi ti es
Urban communi ty gardens l ocated on the terraces of col l ecti ve houses
LEGEND (l eft i mage) Focalpoi nt generati ng i ntense commuti ng flow
Major juncti ons Area used by commuters Ci ti es l ocated al ong european road E60 Commerci alarea Adjoi ni ng l ocal i ti es area Bucharest’ s urban area Study area The urban area of Bucharest Major i nterurban arteri es Hi gh street that crosses si tedefini ng 2 subzones Col enti na l ake chai n
LEGEND (ri ght i mage) Second sector l i mi ts Bucharest N-E l i mi ts Major ateri es Anal yzed area Col enti na l ake chai n Centralarea of Bucharest - zone 1 Zone 2 Mai n urban arteri es FundeniHi gh Street - connecti on wi th the major arteri es
PLOTS ANALYSI S
Anal yzed area/si te l i mi ts
LEGEND
Col enti na “l ake chai n” Roadway Cl ose Si dewal k Green bel t provi di ng protecti on for the l ake (pedestri an access onl y) Street network not devel oped Dead-end deeper than 50 m
HEI GHT REGI ME
STREET NETW EORK ANALYSI S
LEGEND
Opportuni ty to i ncrease the wi dth of the si dewal k Si dewal k wi deni ng not possi bl e Mi ni mum di stance (acordi ng to regul ati ons) between juncti ons not respected Favorabl e di recti on for street wi deni ng
LEGEND
Si des rati o = 1: 1 |Number of l ots:23 Si des rati o = 1: 2 |Number of l ots:32
GF
Si des rati o = 1: 3 |Number of l ots:14
GF+1F
Si des rati o = 1: 4 |Number of l ots:10
GF+2F
Si des rati o = 1: 5 |Number of l ots:4
GF+3F
Si des rati o = 1: 6 |Number of l ots:2
Street al i gnment
Si des rati o = 1: 7 |Number of l ots:2 Si des rati o = 2: 1 |Number of l ots:4 I rregul ar shaped l ots |Number of l ots:22 Lot area < 200 sqm Lot area between 200 sqm and 300 sqm Lot area between 300 sqm and 500 sqm
Dead-ends that can be transformed i nto proper streets (conti nued)i n order to reduce thei r number and establ i sh a coherent street network Dead-ends that can be i ntegrated i nto the street network onl y through the expropi ati on of severalpl ots
Lot area > 500 sqm Lots merger
LEGEND Very good condi ti on Good condi ti on Medi um condi ti on Bad condi ti on Very bad condi ti on
LEGEND Commerci alspace Gas stati on Heal thcare centre Auto servi ce Car wash W arehouse I ndi vi dualhousi ng area Vacant l and
PERCENTAGE OF LAND OCCUPATI ON ANALYSI S
Pr i vat er oad -conver si on i nt o publ i cr oad can be easi l y achi eved
LAND OCCUPANCY RATE ANALYSI S
FUNCTI ONAL ANALYSI S
BULDI NGS PHYSI CAL CONDI TI ON ANALYSI S
Wi deni ng ofbr i dgenecessar yi fFundenist r eetbecomesl ar ger
LEGEND Land occupancy percentage, accordi ng to regul ati ons for M3a / M3b terri tori al refference uni t,not respected Land occupancy percentage, accordi ng to regul ati ons for L1a terri tori alrefference uni t,not respected Land occupancy percentage, accordi ng to regul ati ons for L1a terri tori alrefference uni t,respected Land occupancy percentage, accordi ng to regul ati ons for M3a / M3b terri tori al refference uni t,respected
By mer gi ng pl ot s( c ons i der i ng a l s o t h e bul di ngs ’ ph ys i c a l c ondi t i on)wei nt endedt oobt a i n ami ni mum of5 00s qm a r ea / l ot .
Mi n i mu m p l ot a r e a ( a c c or d i n gt or e g u l a t i on s ) n otr e s p e c t e d= >b u i l d i n g r e g u l a t i on sr e q u i r eme r g e r .
LEGEND Land use cœ ffici ent, accordi ng to regul ati ons for L1a terri tori alrefference uni t,not respected Land use cœ ffici ent, accordi ng to regul ati ons for M3a / M3b terri tori al refference uni t,not respected Land use cœ ffici ent, accordi ng to regul ati ons for M3a / M3b terri tori al refference uni t,respected Land use cœ ffici ent, accordi ng to regul ati ons for L1a terri tori alrefference uni t,respected
P l otwi t hb u i l d i n g si n v e r yg oodp h y s i c a l c on d i t i on= >i nc a s eof a n yf u r t h e r i n t e r v e n t i on s , b u i l d i n g r e g u l a t i on si mp os e me r g e rwi t ht h e n e i g h b ou r h r i n gl ot .
Ne i gh b ou r i n gl ot s t h a t , b yme r gi n g, wi l l p r ov i d e op p or t u n i t yt o b u i l d s e mi c ol l e c t i v e h ou s e s .
S ma l l p l ot si n c l u d e di n d e s i g n a t e dmi x e d u s e a r e a s , wh i c ha r e oc c u p i e db y b u i l d i n g s / s ma l l wa r e h ou s e si nv e r y b a dp h y s i c a l c on d i t i on , a r ep r op os e df or me r g e r
TERRI TORI AL REFERENCE AND NATURAL ENVI RONMENT
ROAD I NFRASTRUCTURE LEGEND Wi deni ng of FundeniStreet Creati ng an appropi ate street l ayout for resi denti alareas Wi deni ng street i n order to obtai n a resi denti alstreet that respects the regul ati ons Converti ng the pri vate road i nto a publ i c one Street wi deni ng and establ i shment of a l i nk wi th Dobrœ stiStreet Bui l t -up area Two way street Proposed (resi denti al ) street
TRAFFI C ANALYSI S
Dead-end
BUI LT-UP AREA LEGEND Si te l i mi t Terri tori alrefference uni tl i mi ts Very good physi calcondi ti on Good physi calcondi ti on Average physi calcondi ti on
PARCELLI NG AND BUI LDI NS STATUS
Poor physi calcondi ti on Very poor physi calcondi ti on Lots that do not respect regul ati ons regardi ng l and occupancy percentage and l and use cœ ffici ent Lots that do not respect regul ati ons regardi ng l and use cœ ffici ent Lots that do not respect regul ati ons regardi ng l and occupancy percentage
BULDI NG LOTS LEGEND Si te l i mi t
FUNCTI ONAL DI STRI BUTI ON
Terri tori alrefference uni tl i mi ts Bui l t -up area Lot area too smal lconsi deri ng the terri tori alrefference uni t - L1a Lot area too smal lconsi deri ng the terri tori alrefference uni t - M3a Frontage < 10 m
LEGEND
Frontage < 12 m Protected green “bel t” near the l ake
Col enti na “l ake chai n”
Crossroad that al l ows turni ng both l eft and ri ght
Major artery Secondary streets
M3a area l i mi ts (mi xed-use area commerci aland housi ng)
Localstreets
“terri tori alreference uni t” l i mi ts Roadway Si dewal k
I ndi vi dualhousi ng area (l ow densi ty) I ndi vi dualhousi ng area (hi gh densi ty) Semi col ecti ve housi ng area Col l ecti ve housi ng area Heal t hser vi ces Commer ci alar ea
Vacant l and desti ned to l otti ng
I NTERVENTI ON (METHOD)
PROPOSAL
LEGEND
LEGEND Roadway
Bui l di ngs i n very poor physi calcondi ti on proposed for demol i ti on
Bui l di ngs i n good physi calcondi ti on,proposed for demol i ti on i n order to change the housi ng typol ogy
Si dewal k
Bui l di ngs i n good physi calcondi ti on proposed for demol i ti on i n publ i c purpose Bui l di ngs i n poor physi calcondi ti on proposed for demol i ti on because the mi ni malsetbacks were not respected Bui l di ngs i n good physi calcondi ti on proposed for demol i ti on because the mi ni mum setbacks were not respected
Demol i ti on of bui l di ngs i n poor physi calcondi ti on (urban) conversi on (L1->M3) Demol i ti on of bui l di ngs i n good physi calcondi ti on (regul ati ons not respected)
Bui l di ngs i n bad physi calcondi ti on,proposed for demol i ti on i n order to change the housi ng typol ogy
Bui l di ngs remai ni ng untouched after the urban i nterventi on
Acces gal l ery for row houses Expropi ati on for publ i c purpose (compul sory purchase)
Bui l di ngs proposed for demol i ti on because of the vi ol ati on of protected green area (near the l ake)
Maxi mum area that can be bui l t Merger
Bui l t -up area - L1a
Maxi mum area that can be bui l t - L1a
Si dewal k Pri vate acces for semicol l ecti ve houses Acces al l ey to row houses (property of the l ots that i t has been made through)
Green space l andscapi ng
Gal l ery provi di ng car acces to the l ots
Pr oposed l i mi t sf ornew l ot s
Pri vate wal kway
Parki ng l ots
Vacantl and pr oposed forl ot t i ng
Bul t -up area - M3a
I nfrastructure/street network
Street al i gnment L1a L1a1 L1a2 L1a3 M3a
LEGEND Anal yzed area / si te l i mi t Lake Si dewal k
Parki ng Spontaneous parki ng
Major artery - i nterurban i mportance Major i nterurban artery
Dead-ends - exceeded l ength
Di stance between juncti ons too smal l Street secti on not adapted to trafďŹ c ďŹ&#x201A;ow I neffecti vel y organi sed juncti on
I nappropri ate juncti ons
Col l ector road Cul -de-sac Pri vate road
Space percepti on Locall i nks
Col enti na l ake chai n
SYNTHESI S OF THE ANALYSI S
I ndi vi dualhousi ng area Col l ecti ve housi ng area Commerci alarea Green spaces/parks Vacant l and School s / area dedi cated to educati on Cul turalarea Area where publ i c transport i s i naccessi bl e Hi gh sl ope Protected green area surroundi ng the l ake (50 m depth)
Area vul nerabl e to flood ri sk
Compati bi l i ty between opposed frontages
I ncompati bi l i ty between di fferent functi onalareas
Great outl ooks
North wi nd
South wi nd
Bl ocked access to the l ake
Major traffic juncti on
PROPOSAL FOR ESTABLI SHI NG THE LOTS
LEGEND
DETAI LED PROPOSAL PLAN
PROPOSAL- HI GHLY DETAI LED PLAN AND TRANSECTS
LEGEND Col enti na l ake chai n
Col l ecti ve housi ng area Commerci alarea Green spaces/parks Vacant l and School s / area dedi cated to educati on Cul turalarea Area where publ i c transport i s i naccessi bl e Hi gh sl ope Protected green area near / surroundi ng the l ake (50 m depth)
W ater stagnati on area
Compati bi l i ty between opposi ng frontages
I ncompati bi l i ty between di fferent functi onalareas
Great outl ooks
North wi nd
South wi nd
Bl ocked access to the l ake
Major traffic juncti on
A-A”ELEVATI ON
SYNTHESI S OF THE ANALYSI S
LakAI ndi vi dualhousi ng area
LEGEND Col enti na l ake chai n
Col l ecti ve housi ng area Commerci alarea
Vacant l and School s / area dedi cated to educati on Cul turalarea Area where publ i c transport i s i naccessi bl e Hi gh sl ope Protected green area near / surroundi ng the l ake (50 m depth)
W ater stagnati on area
Compati bi l i ty between opposi ng frontages
I ncompati bi l i ty between di fferent functi onalareas
Great outl ooks
North wi nd
South wi nd
Bl ocked access to the l ake
Major traffic juncti on
DETAI LED PROPOSAL GENERAL PLAN
SUNLI GHT STUDY
Green spaces/parks
A-A”ELEVATI ON
SYNTHESI S OF THE ANALYSI S
LakAI ndi vi dualhousi ng area
LEGEND Boundary of commune
PROPOSAL
Boundary of vi l l age Area permi ted to be bui l t Area proposed to be permi ted for bui l di ng A3 Hi ghway Regi onalroad Localroad Rai l way i nfrastructure Mai n vehi cul ar route (exi sti ng/proposed) Secondary vehi cul ar route (exi sti ng/ proposed) Proposed cycl e route Exi sti ng cycl el anes proposed to be redesi gned
Juncti ons i nvol vi ng rai l way i ntersecti on that requi re compl ex desi gn
Publ i c transport stati ons (exi sti ng/proposed)
Cycl e docki ng stati ons
Compl ex desi gn of a transport node that i ncl udes a trai n stati on,other publ i c transport stati ons,car
Restored rai l way i nfrastructure Exi sti ng bri dge Proposed vehi cul ar and pedestri an bri dge Proposed pedestri an bri dge
Forest Lakes and ri vers Agri cul turall ands I ndi vi dualhousi ng wi th l ow densi ty and hi gh standard,l ocated i n the proxi mi ty of val uabl e I ndi vi dualhousi ng wi th medi um densi ty and medi um standard I ndi vi dualhousi ng wi th hi gh densi ty and medi um standard,l ocated cl ose to the regi onalroad Col l ecti ve housi ng Area acti ng as a centre - mi xed-use (i ndi vi dual housi ng,commerci alspaces,communi ty ameni ti es Area acti ng as a centre - mi xed-use (col l ecti ve housi ng wi th commerci alground floor) Green areas dedi cated to sports or themati c parks
Recreati on and sports centre based mostl y on thermalspas
Recreati onalacti vi ti es
Mi xed-use area contai ni ng hotel s and l ei sure faci l i ti es
Educati onalacti vi ti es Heal thcare Cul turalacti vi ti es
Mi xed-use area contai ni ng housi ng and other touri sti c accommodati on faci l i ti es 20m/50m-deep green “bel t” (protecti ng the l ake) desi gned as a promenade and l i near park al ongsi de Green corri dors Afforestati on
Commerci alacti vi ti es Land wi th speci aluse
Snagov Monastery - l i sted bui l di ngs of nati onal i mportance
Churches and Cementeri es Commerci aland servi ces area i nsi de the l ogi sti c pl atform Storage area i nsi de the l ogi sti c pl atform
Snagov Pal ace - l andmark at a regi onaland l ocal l evel
“Snagov l ake” protected area “Snagov Forest” protected area Restri cted areas al ongsi de mai ni nfrastructure
CONCEPT
LEGEND Forest Commerci aland servi ces area i nsi de the l ogi sti c pl atform Lakes and ri vers Housi ng type 1,l ocated between the l ake shore and a mai n road Housi ng type 2:l ocated i n more depth of the bui l t fabri c and bounded by 2 mai n Acti vi ty pol es devel oped al ong green corri dors,l ocated strategi cal l yi n the 3 areas,namel y the touri sti c zone,ol d centre of the vi l l age and the i ntermodal node.
LEGEND
NATURAL LANDSCAPE AND GREEN I NFRASTRUCTURE ANALYSI S
LEGEND
Mai n vehi cul ar routes
Forest
Churches
Forest
Touri sti c regi onalpol e that i ncl udes regi onaland nati onalattracti ons, devel oped on both si des of Snagov Lake
Lakes and ri vers
Lands wi th speci aluse
Lakes and ri vers
Protected green “bel t” of the l ake desi gned to i ncl ude pedestri an and cycl i ng routes i n order to i mprove connecti ons between the opposi te shores of the l ake,as wel las the attracti veness of the touri sti c pol e.
Snagov I ntermodalnode- the most i mportant centralzone wi thi n the commune
Snagov Lake as a structuralaxi s for the fabri c A3 Hi ghway - i mportant factor i n the determi nati on of the character of former agri cul turall ands București- Snagov Rai l way rehabi l i ted, to serve the great number of commuters,as wel las the i ncreased number of vi si tors and touri sts
FUNCTI ONAL ANALYSI S
Logi sti c pl atform devel oped i n the proxi mi ty of A3 Hi ghway access, generati ng a great number of jobs and contri buti ng at the same ti me to the l ocalpopul ati on growth.
Agri cul turall ands
Educati on
Bui l t pl ots or pl ots to be bui l t
Vacant pl ots
Heal thcare
Land wi th no permi ssi on to be bui l t
I ndi vi dualhousi ng Col l ecti ve housi ng (maxi mum 3 floors hi gh)
Rai l way Stati on area
LEGEND Area wi th thermalwater resources provi di ng opportuni ty to devel op speci fic
Pl ane and hi gher l and,offeri ng perspecti ves over the l ake Lack of connecti ons between areas l ocated on opposi te si des of the l ake
Protected Snagov Lake area- 100 ha Protected Snagov Forest area - 10 ha
Navi gati on channelfor vessel s wi thout thermi c engi ne (20-25 m from the shore)
Major acti vi ty pol e of Snagov commune
Recreati onalforests
Themati c parks or forests
Navi gati on channelfor motori zed vessel s (mi ni mum 50m from the shore)
Commerci alacti vi ti es and other servi ces
Protected green “bel t” of the l ake not respected - 20 m/ 50 m
Snagov Monastery - touri sti c attracti on hardl y accessi bl e di nspre from the mai n
Encl aves of forests
Snagov Pal ace - attracti on at a regi onal l evel ,but not i ncl uded i n touri sti c route
Sports and l ei sure
W al kabl e di stance to school s
Uncontrol l ed deforestati on
STREET NETW ORK ANALYSI S
Forest
Mai nl ocalroads
Lakes and ri vers
Poor accessi bi l i ty towards the l ake
Land wi th no permi ssi on to be bui l t
Currentl y used cycl e routes
Bui l t pl ots or pl ots to be bui l t
Cycl i ng touri sti c route proposed through the Mobi l i ty Pl an
DJ 101B - mai n regi onalroute that provi des connecti on to the other vi l l ages of the commune,as wel las to other communes
Poorl y desi gned cycl el anes
Regi onalroads that provi de opportuni ty to establ i sh a connecti on between the areas l ocated on opposi te si des of the l ake,as wel las to enhance touri sti c aci ti vi ti es
Cycl e routes l eave no space for pedestri ans Area wi th good access to publ i c transport
A3 Hi ghway - mai n route to Snagov vi l l age
Snagov Rai l way Stati on - poor physi cal condi ti onaland not functi onalcurrentl y
București- Snagov rai l way i n poor physi calcondi ti on,but offeri ng a good opportuni ty to devel op a sustai nabl e way of transport to Bucharest
Juncti ons that requi re more compl ex desi gn Poorl y desi gned juncti ons
CONTEXT- STRATEGI C PLAN
PROPOSAL - ZONAL PLAN FOR CENTRAL AREA LEGEND Area to be bui l ti nsi de the vi l l age Boundary of ZonalPl an Maxi mum area to be bui l t/pl ot Exi sti ng bui l di ngs
Publ i c bui l di ngs
Hotelwi th commerci alground floor I nformati on centre - touri sti c profil e Nursery
I ntermodalnode
Mi xed-use area - housi ng wi th commerci alground floor I ndi i vdualhousi ng l ocated more i n depth of the fabri c wi th medi um densi ty and maxi mum 3 floors hi gh I ndi vi dualhousi ng faci ng the mai n road wi th hi gh densi ty and 3 floors hi gh Heal thcare faci l i ti es
I ntermodalnode contai ni ng the rai l way stati on, coach stati on,Park&Ri de,Bi ke&Ri de and bus Street vegetati on and green squares
Forest
Agri cul turall and
Pl ots not permi ted to be bui l t unti lthe devel opment of a more detai l ed pl ot pl an. Vehi cul ar routes Pedestri an routes Shared space Cycl el anes
Pl ot area (sqm) Setbacks
Car access
Car access to pl ots hosti ng publ i c bui l di ngs
I LLUSTRATI VE CONTEXT PLAN
SI TE PLAN - TRAI N STATI ON
FACADES AND SECTI ONS - TRAI N STATI ON
LAND USE PROPOSAL
LEGEND Resi denti al
Mai n streets
Mi xed Use - resi denti aland commerci al
Secondary streets
Mi xed Use - ofďŹ ce and commerci al
Localstreets
Transport stati on
Pedestri an streets
Educati onal
Bri dges
Sports
Overground rai li nfrastructure
Canal / pond
Underground rai li nfrastructure
Green space Acti ve frontage
STREET NETW ORK PROPOSAL
LEGEND
LEGEND Mai n streets
Green space
Localstreets
Forest
Pedestri an streets
Green corri dors
Bri dges
Secondary streets
Urban agri cul ture/ gardens Publ i c pl aza/ squares Mai n streets
Overground rai l i nfrastructure Underground rai l i nfrastructure Cycl i ng routes
Localstreets Pedestri an streets Bri dges Overground rai li nfrastructure Underground rai li nfrastructure
Secondary streets Cycl i ng routes Nodes Transport stati ons
AI MS AND OBJECTI VES
I mage produced wi th the hel p of Rajendra Menari a duri ng the group project phase
CONCEPT PLAN LEGEND Exi sti ng roads Proposed roads Exi sti ng pedestri an l i nks Proposed pedestri an l i nks Acti ve frontage - predomi nantl y cul turalacti vi ti es Acti ve frontage - predomi nantl y commerci aland retai l Cul tural / educati onalpol e acti ng as communi ty spaces Cul turalhubs’i nfluence wi thi n wal ki ng di stance New devel opment of office bui l di ngs wi th commerci alground floor Proposed connecti ons between publ i c spaces Di rect pedestri an l i nks through the open ground floor space of the bui l di ng Resi denti alareas connected to communi ty spaces Hi stori c urban fabri c hosti ng retai land office spaces,proposed for renovati on Major changes proposed i n bui l t frontage (mostl y demol i ti on) Green spaces Hard surface of publ i c spaces/ squares and pl azas Vi suall andmarks Landmark areas
GREEN I NFRASTRUCTURE
LAND USE
CULTURAL AXI S
CONCEPTUAL PROPOSED SCHEME
LEGEND Proposed cul turalaxi s whi ch i ncl udes outdoor and i ndoor communi ty spaces - educati onal ,cul tural , recreati onaland sports acti vi ti es Mai n communi ty centres Mai n pedestri an l i nk on the cul turalaxi s Proposed area of i nfluence of each communi ty space - consi deri ng accessi bi l i ty and resi denti al densi ti es
LEGEND Mi xed use - predomi nantl yl ocalshops, restaurants,cafes etc. Mi xed use - predomi nantl y offices Resi denti alarea - hi gh densi ty,6-8 storeys Resi denti alarea - medi um densi ty,up to 4 storeys Green spaces Educati onalfaci l i ti es
LEGEND Exi sti ng l i nks Proposed l i nks I mportance of green spaces for the resi denti al areas Proposed area of i nfluence of each green space consi deri ng accessi bi l i ty and resi denti aldensi ti es
CULTURAL AXI S
PROPOSED LAYOUT PLAN
LEGEND VEHI CULAR MOVEMENT
ACTI VE FRONTAGES
PEDESTRI AN MOVEMENT
Proposed i mportance of vehi cul ar roads
Proposed i mportance of pedestri an streets
Cycl e super -hi ghway Mai n cycl i ng routes at a nei ghbourhood/borough l evel Servi ce al l ey for shops Resi denti al Educati onal Cul tural Green space Office Mi xed use - resi denti aland retai l / commerci al / office Mi xed use - office and retai l / commerci alspace Squares and pl azas Tube stati on Green corri dors wi th dense vegetati on Green corri dors on mai n vehi cul ar routes Landmarks Mai n access to acti ve frontages
LEGEND Vehi cul ar routes Pedestri an routes Two-way street One-way street
Hi gh to l ow vehi cul ar flow
LEGEND Acti ve frontage type 1: commerci al ,retai l , cafes,restaurants faci ng the street or pl aza Acti ve frontage type 2:acti ve vi sual engagement where mai n entrances are open towards the street
LEGEND Vehi cul ar routes Pedestri an routes
Squares and pl azas Acti vi ty pol es generati ng hi gh pedestri an movement
HI gh to l ow pedestri an traffic flow
LEGEND Ci rcul ati on OfďŹ ces Studi o 1 bedroom apartment 2 bedroom apartment 3 bedroom apartment