![](https://static.isu.pub/fe/default-story-images/news.jpg?width=720&quality=85%2C50)
9 minute read
Employment status
Rates of pay
The ISM’s annual fees surveys show that the lowest minimum hourly rate reported by self-employed teachers working in schools has fallen by over £10 since 2016 to £16 per hour. However, the highest reported hourly rate has risen by over £20 in the same period. Despite these changes, the average rate remained the same at £32 between 2016 and 2019, rose by £2 in 2020 and again in 2021 to £36.
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Lowest rate £26.64 £27 £10 £11.33 £15 £16 Average rate £32 £32 £32 £32 £32 £36 Highest rate £38 £39 £40 £57 £57 £60
For employed teachers working in schools, the figures are slightly lower for the average and highest rates, but higher for the lower rate:
2019 2020 2021
Lowest rate £10.23 £22.88 £23 Average rate £30.06 £30 £33.85 Highest rate £60 £40.50 £42.50
In a 2021 survey of over 350 peripatetic teachers, 33% of respondents reported that their annual gross income from peri teaching was less than £10,000 compared with 15% earning more than £25,000.
less than £10,000 (33%) £10,000-20,000 (34%) £21,000-25,000 (18%) situation to balance as increasing fees may lead to a reduction in pupils and, as a result, teachers’ overall income.
Some schools and music services are charging parents more than teachers are being paid, in some cases almost double:
more than £25,000 (15%) ‘I know the school charge parents £45 per hour whereas I am paid £28.’
Many peripatetic teachers had not seen an increase in their wages for a number of years and some were reluctant to charge higher prices either due to their location (believing that there was a limit to what parents would pay) or circumstances of the children they were teaching. It is often a difficult ‘My four schools charge parents between £44 and £76 an hour for music lessons and I get between £28.85 and £30.30 for this which includes holiday pay!!’ ‘Fees parents pay are almost double of what peris get…’
Many teachers also feel that there is no recognition of either their qualifications or experience when it comes to their rates of pay. The ISM’s annual fees survey data from 2018 – 2021 shows that the majority of respondents have been teaching for more than 15 years, yet there are often no clear pay progression routes unlike those of classroom teachers.
2018 2019 2020 2021
0-5 years 15% 14% 13% 11% 6-15 years 24% 24% 24% 25% Over 15 years 61% 60% 63% 63%
‘The hourly rate of about £31 reflects neither my experience nor my qualifications including my doctorate.’ ‘I feel we should be paid as a member of staff the same as a class teacher. I know many VMTs or peris who drive taxis or similar in order to actually afford to pay bills etc as they don’t earn enough during the year. I think this is a real shame that such highly qualified people often Masters and above qualifications are reduced to having to work several jobs in order to survive.’
Unpaid work
While the hourly rates of pay for peripatetic staff may seem much higher than the National Minimum or National Living Wage, many teachers report a large amount of ‘invisible’ work which effectively reduces this rate. ISM survey data shows that on a typical day, including evenings, almost half of respondents (47%) spent between 30 minutes and 1 hour on essential administrative tasks such as answering emails from parents, with just over a quarter of respondents (26%) spending more than an hour on these tasks. And 93% of respondents were required to write reports as part of their role but were not necessarily paid for the time to write them.
‘This is becoming a serious problem impacting on antisocial hours and time I should be spending with my children. The work is unpaid but expected by the Director of Music.’ ‘However many students I have, I have to allocate a day at each school as I have to operate a rotating timetable in two schools so that children miss different lessons each week.’
Many teachers are working more hours than they are actually paid for as a result of large gaps in their day due to timetabling restrictions or having to re-arrange lessons at short notice. This can also result in a loss of income where lessons are unable to be re-arranged.
‘I lose money trying to coordinate my hours around different schools. If they give notice of changes to timetable in advance, it’s manageable, but they often don’t and put the onus on me to rearrange or insist you make up the time or don’t get paid.’ ‘If they are on a trip no pay, often Director of Music tells parent pupil doesn’t need to attend but I don’t get paid, so he’s giving away my income’
‘It takes me 40 hours to earn 20.’
Some peripatetic teachers were even working for free to support their pupils and schools.
Holiday pay
The ISM has always maintained that the annual holiday entitlement of VMTs and peripatetic teachers should be calculated in the same way as for any other worker – by taking a week’s pay and multiplying it by 5.6 – yet many employers are calculating holiday pay based on term-time teaching hours only. In November 2021, the Supreme Court heard the case of Harpur Trust v Brazel which is a landmark case on holiday pay.56 ISM member Lesley Brazel brought a formal grievance against her employer in 2013 after they pro-rated her holiday pay to term time only as she didn’t teach during school holidays. Harpur Trust based its calculations on Acas guidance, which was designed to work out the holiday pay of casual workers and which has since been withdrawn.
In March 2015, Mrs Brazel launched an employment tribunal claim under the Working Time Regulations. Although she lost her initial case, she appealed and the Employment Appeal Tribunal found in her favour. The case was appealed by Harpur Trust and the Court of Appeal found in Mrs Brazel’s favour in August 2019. The Supreme Court dismissed the Harpur Trust’s appeal on 20 July 2022. The judgment states that, ‘The amount of leave to which a part–year worker under a permanent contract is entitled is therefore not required to be, and under domestic law must not be, pro–rated to be proportional to that of a full–time worker.57
ISM’s peripatetic survey data found that respondents had a very mixed experience of how their holiday pay was calculated if they did receive it. ‘Every drop in pay affects my holiday pay and pension contributions.’
‘I have never received holiday pay in my 20 years of working at schools and for a music service. I once questioned an employer about this early in my career. He told me that holiday pay was wrapped up in the hourly rate. I pointed out that this was no longer allowed but he would not budge so I left the school where I had two full days of teaching.’
holiday pay is pro-rated to term time only (16%)
not sure, but fairly certain holiday pay is pro-rated to term-time only (15%)
no, I get 5.6 weeks holiday pay a year, not pro-rated (4%) not sure, but fairly certain holiday pay is not pro-rated to term-time only (3%)
don’t know how holiday pay is calculated (19%)
not paid any holiday pay (36%) other (7%)