Pol 303 week 5 dq 1 eminent domain

Page 1

POL 303 Week 5 DQ 1 Eminent Domain Click Here to Buy the Tutorial http://www.tutorialrank.com/POL/ASHFORD-POL-303/product-8670-ashfordpol-303-week-5-dq-1-eminent-domain For more course tutorials visit www.tutorialrank.com Tutorial Purchased: 2 Times, Rating: B+

POL 303 Week 5 DQ 1 Eminent Domain Political Science - General Political Science Eminent Domain. In 2005 the Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, upheld the constitutionality of a city taking private property, while paying the owner just compensation, and selling it to a private developer as part of a plan to stimulate the city's weak economy (Kelo v. City of New London). Respond to this 3-part question in your initial post: Explain the rationale of the Supreme Court's decision in Kelo (the majority opinion by Justice Stevens). Explain the rationale of Justice O’Connor’s dissenting opinion. Evaluate both the majority and minority rationales. Explain and justify your evaluation. Include consideration of these factors: ♣ The Supreme Court’s traditional approach to the “public use” requirement for takings ♣ The relative competence of the Supreme Court vs. local governments to determine what is a “public use” to justify the taking of private property.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.