SOPAC/GEF/IWRM/RSC.2/12 Date: 18th June 2010 Original: English
Second Meeting of the Regional Project Steering Committee for the SOPAC/UNDP/UNEP/GEF Project: “Implementing Sustainable Water Resource and Wastewater Management in Pacific Island Countries” th rd Republic of Palau, 19 – 23 July 2010
CO-FINANCING OF PROJECT ACTIVITIES
SOPAC/GEF/IWRM/RSC.2/12
1.
INTRODUCTION TO PROJECT CO-FINANCING
Co-financing is a key principle underlying Global Environment Facility (GEF) efforts to have a significant positive impact on the global environment. GEF grants are intended to be “incremental”, i.e., adding value in terms of global environmental benefits to national/local investment in environmental projects. Co-finance for GEF projects is important because: a) With limited financial resources, increased capacity, and a growing demand for assistance, it is essential for the GEF to mobilise additional resources for the global environment. Cofinancing expands the resources available to finance environmental objectives; b) Co-financing is an important indicator of the strength of the commitment of the counterparts, beneficiaries, and Implementing and Executing Agencies to those projects; and c) Co-financing helps ensure the success and local acceptance of those projects by linking them to sustainable development, and thereby maximises and sustains their impacts. Co-financing Definition Co-financing is defined as “the project resources that are committed by the GEF agency itself or by other non-GEF sources and which are essential for meeting the GEF project objectives” 1 . In considering this definition it is important to note the following GEF rules: a) Finance for baseline activities is included in the definition only when such activities are essential for achieving the GEF objectives, as shown in the project logical framework within the project document; b) Finance for activities that are not essential for achieving the GEF objectives, but which are processed for transactional convenience in the same loan or technical assistance package of the GEF Agency, are excluded from the definition of “co-finance”; and c) Resources that are not committed as part of the essential financing package at the outset but which are mobilised subsequently are not included as “co-finance”. Such leveraged resources are nevertheless important and will also be tracked. Sources of Co-finance Sources of co-financing in GEF projects include: a) The agency’s own co-financing (i.e., from the GEF implementing agencies e.g. UNDP, UNEP) b) Government co-financing (counterpart commitments) e.g., for baseline or foundational activities upon which the project would build or without which the project could not be implemented; c) Contributions mobilised for the project from other multilateral agencies, bilateral development cooperation agencies, NGOs, the private sector, and beneficiaries. Related Financing In terms of GEF projects, cofinancing does not include either “associated financing” or “leveraged resources”, which are defined as follows: a) Associated financing. This is finance for other activities that are related to the project or to similar commitments but which not essential for the project’s successful implementation. Associated financing may be reported for information but commitments are not required and the financing is not monitored. b) Leveraged resources. Leveraged resources are the additional resources beyond those committed to the project itself that are mobilised later as a direct result of the project, e.g., for further replication or through programmatic influence. As such, leveraged resources do not form part of the committed financing plan at the outset and so they are not defined as “cofinance”. Leverage is nevertheless a very important indicator of GEF’s catalytic effect.
1
GEF/C.20/6/Rev.1
2
SOPAC/GEF/IWRM/RSC.2/12
2.
MONITORING AND REPORTING ON CO-FINANCING, ASSOCIATED FINANCING, AND LEVERAGED RESOURCES
It is a requirement of the project donor, the Global Environment Facility (GEF) that co-financing be reported and monitored by source, by type, and by the stage of the Project Cycle. The Project Implementing Agencies and Executing Agency are required to inform the GEF Secretariat whenever there is a potentially substantive co-financing change (i.e., one affecting the project objectives, scale, scope, strategic priority, conformity with GEF criteria, likelihood or project success, or outcome of the project). As such it is important for projects to develop a user-friendly system for tracking and reporting on co-financing. The co-finance estimates for Component 1 associated with the UNDP national demonstration projects is summarised by source in Table 1. Tables 2-14 provide detailed information relating to sources and types of co-financing for specific demonstration project activities in each country. Due to delays in final endorsement of the project it is likely that some sources of co-financing may not currently be available or require reprogramming by government Ministries and Departments, donor organisations, and other partners. A preliminary review undertaken by the Regional Project Coordinating Unit identified some co-financing commitments that may not be essential for meeting the GEF project objectives. Rather these commitments appear to relate to “associated financing”, i.e., funds for activities that are related to the project or to similar commitments but which not essential for the project’s successful implementation. Therefore, there is a need for each Lead Agency and Project Management Unit to undertake a critical review of the commitments and to derive updated estimates that can be used as targets for a co-financing monitoring and reporting systems.
Table 1
Country Cook Islands FSM Fiji Nauru Niue Palau PNG RMI Samoa Solomon I. Tonga Tuvalu Vanuatu
Summary of anticipated co-financing by source for National Demonstration Projects of the GEF Pacific IWRM Project Government 386,418 87,396 2,924,810 2,236,190 294,000 946,500 292,832 1,109,125 120,000 941,046 8,588,000 967,200 184,740 19,078,257
SOPAC EU-IWRM 141,888 50,000 200,000 50,000 75,000 60,000 11,000 165,000 ? 215,000 50,000 50,000 1,067,888
EU-HYCOS 56,754 76,400 220,177 68,791 60,000 303,000 150,000 66,833 100,000 233,440 79,000 50,000 28,796 1,493,191
SOPAC Other 369,374 20,000 80,000 100,000 273,500 1,166,625 ? 380,000 1,000,000 850,000 89,989 4,329,488
Other 700,000 8,620,000a 1,200,000 300,000 1,610,000b 590,000 32,434,553c 795,000 ? 174,311 3,000 1,200,000 7,385,836 55,012,700
Total 1,654,434 8,853,796 4,544,987 2,734,981 2,139,000 1,899,500 33,161,885 3,302,583 2,037,000 1,943,797 9,720,000 3,117,200 7,689,361d
82,798,524
(a) US$7,550,000 Asian Development Bank; (b) US$1,000,000 UNDP TRAC; (c) US$31,920,825 Eda Ranu Infrastructure; (d) US$7,100,000 JICA Infrastructure Project
Monitoring Co-Financing from Supporting Organisations A significant proportion of the anticipated project co-financing relates to planned activities of bilateral and multilateral projects and programmes. As these activities have largely been designed to directly complement the GEF project and are essential for meeting the GEF project objectives, there is a critical need for these inputs to be monitored and reported on. It is a requirement of the Memoranda of Agreement between SOPAC and the Lead Agencies that National Demonstration Projects submit financial and progress reports to the Regional Project Co-ordinating Unit on a quarterly basis, including detailed information on co-financing realised from supporting organisations. In considering a method for tracking inputs from supporting organisations, the true value of the outputs produced and outcomes achieved by organisations in the execution of supporting activities is
3
SOPAC/GEF/IWRM/RSC.2/12 perhaps impossible to determine 2 . This would require information about the time spent by staff of partner organisations on project activities, level of technical and administrative support provided, and some estimate of the value of the partners own network of supporting organisations that contributed to the successful of tasks. It is suggested by the Regional Project Co-ordinating Unit that, as this type of co-financing is included in individual project budgets against on-the-ground activities and deliverables, successful completion of the identified tasks and production of outputs should deem the co-financing commitment to have been met or “realised”. Such an approach will require effective in-country communication between Project Management Units and the in-country staff or focal points for the projects and programmes of supporting and partner organisations. This will be necessary for the timely reporting of information regarding the conduct and completion of supporting/complementary activities in quarterly demonstration project progress reports. Monitoring In-Kind Co-Financing from Governments, Communities, and other Stakeholders Experience of other GEF projects suggests that significant in-kind co-financing is contributed to 3 projects directly by individuals either through: participation in meetings ; organisation of project activities and networking with other projects and programmes; additional unpaid work required to get the job done; technical backstopping; and provision of specialised knowledge and information, particularly when working with communities in evening consultations and on weekends. As very few organisations or individuals maintain detailed timesheets, verifying such in-kind contributions is difficult if not impossible. Elements of such in-kind co-financing that are amenable to independent verification in the GEF Pacific IWRM Project include: • • • •
Costs of individual’s time in meetings of Demonstration Project Coordinating Committee Costs of individual’s time in expert and community consultations Costs of individual’s time in meetings of the Regional Project Steering Committee and project working groups Costs of individuals (non Project Manager Assistant) involvement in project technical and field activities (e.g. technical staff made available by partners)
Estimating the value of time spent by individuals on project activities is complicated by factors including the seniority or actual salaries of individuals and different economic conditions in the participating countries (i.e. an individual’s time in one country may be valued much higher or lower than an individual in a neighbouring country). The problem of how to value time of individuals has been addressed by other projects in the AsiaPacific region, namely the UNEP/GEF South China Sea Project and UNDP/GEF Yellow Sea Project. The approach adopted in these instances has been to establish a regional standard co-efficient as a value of 1 person day. The co-efficient agreed was an inclusive costing of salary and benefits, plus office support costs that was applied to all individuals, from all countries, regardless of their individual level of seniority or actual salary. The co-efficient or regional standard “daily rate” was agreed through consideration of: • • •
The government salary scales of the participating countries, Supporting costs in the participating countries, including social benefits, office and office facilities, and supporting systems of the institutions; and Average salary of staff of the project executing agencies.
An example of the approach used to the value the in-kind co-financing in terms of the time of 50 individuals spent in a 2 day community stakeholder workshop at a regional standard rate of US$140 is as follows: •
1 (workshop) x 2 (days) x 50 (persons) x US$140 (co-efficient)/person/day = US$14,000
2
Valuing outputs or outcomes would most likely be counter-productive as it is likely to result in extensive debate concerning the merits or otherwise of the ouputs 3 Time of individuals spent in meetings is not paid for in the GEF Pacific IWRM Project
4
SOPAC/GEF/IWRM/RSC.2/12
The use of a co-efficient obviously undervalues the real co-financing in some countries and overvalues it in others, but obviates the necessity for maintaining detailed records in national currencies, all of which float on the international currency exchange market. Developing such a co-efficient or standard daily rate for use in the GEF Pacific IWRM Project would require information regarding government salary scales from each participating country and agreement of the committee on a suitable rate. The Regional Project Coordinating Unit has developed a framework for reporting on in-kind contributions of individuals’ time to project activities as part of the quarterly progress report. Project Management Units are required to include in each quarterly report a listing of all meetings convened in the framework of the demonstration projects, their duration and location, agenda, report, and a list of participants. Similarly participation of support staff in the execution of technical and field activities will be reported in quarterly progress reports. Cash co-financing of meetings and activities will also be recorded on a quarterly basis.
5
SOPAC/GEF/IWRM/RSC.2/12
Table 2 Country Cook Islands Cook Islands Cook Islands Cook Islands Cook Islands Cook Islands Cook Islands Cook Islands Cook Islands Cook Islands Cook Islands Cook Islands Cook Islands Cook Islands Cook Islands Cook Islands Cook Islands Cook Islands Cook Islands Cook Islands Cook Islands Cook Islands
Summary of co-financing identified for the National IWRM Demonstration Project in the Cook Islands Source Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government EU-SOPAC IWRM EU-SOPAC IWRM EU-SOPAC IWRM EU-SOPAC IWRM EU-SOPAC IWRM EU-SOPAC HYCOS NZAID-SOPAC WQM NZAID-SOPAC WDM SOPAC Water Safety SOPAC Reducing Vulnerabilities ADB
Amount (USD) 51,642 37,615 3,762 94,790 18,808 22,569 67,707 36,111 40,624 3,762 9,028 20,000 47,019 21,623 21,623 31,623 56,754 75,230 30,010 207,341 56,793
Cash or In-kind Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash
700,000
Cash
Description Cash co-financing for energy costs Cash co-financing for communications Cash co-financing for Inter Agency IWRM Meetings Mainstreaming policy support as part of policy and legislative review Awareness activities as part of communications strategy In-kind co-financing for vehicles In-kind co-financing for GIS Mapping – field survey, data capture, download In-kind co-financing for drilling borehole transects Mainstreaming policy support as part of policy and legislative review IWRM training workshops Water quality monitoring Cash co-financing for Project Manager Cash co-financing for Project Assistant Resource support for policy and legislative review Inter-agency consultation process as part of policy and legislative review Public consultation as part of policy and legislative review Groundwater pumping and testing Programme set up (lab assessment etc) Computer tool for knowledge transfer between agencies Strategy development as part of communications strategy Build on existing server to cater for capacity Groundwork policy as part of policy and legislative review
1,654,434
6
SOPAC/GEF/IWRM/RSC.2/12
Table 3 Country FSM FSM FSM FSM FSM FSM FSM FSM FSM FSM FSM FSM FSM FSM FSM FSM FSM FSM FSM FSM FSM FSM FSM FSM FSM FSM FSM FSM FSM
Summary of co-financing identified for the National IWRM Demonstration Project in the Federated States of Micronesia Source Government Government Government Government Government EU-SOPAC IWRM EU-SOPAC IWRM EU-SOPAC IWRM EU-SOPAC IWRM EU-SOPAC HYCOS EU-SOPAC HYCOS EU-SOPAC HYCOS EU-SOPAC HYCOS NZAID-SOPAC WDM CSP CSP CSP ADB ADB ADB ADB ADB ADB ADB ADB ADB ADB ADB ADB
Amount (USD) 20,000 20,000 17,396 10,000 20,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 20,000 10,000 10,000 6,400 50,000 20,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 1,050,000 380,000 30,000 6,500,000 200,000 30,000 50,000 25,000 10,000 145,000 25,000 85,000
Cash or In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash In-kind Cash Cash In-kind In-kind Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind
Description Community engagement for pollution assessment Community consultation and demonstration projects for mitigating pollution Construction of dry litter pens for pig management Water quality analysis equipment and training Establish committee and plan/Harbour Water Quality and Management Plan Policy support review teams Nested State IWRM and ICZM Capacity building in IWRM IWRM planning Community engagement using "Ridge to Reef" Support to CSP for extension of reserve and develop ecosystem service payment concepts Establishing watershed protection project in Chuuk Establish inspection for operation and maintenance of sewage treatment facilities Hydrological monitoring for water quality improvements in Nanpil River Hydrological monitoring for water quality improvements in Nanpil River Community engagement using "Ridge to Reef" Support to CSP for extension of reserve and develop ecosystem service payment concepts Community engagement and training/trial new toilets Stakeholder engagement, water safety planning Support to water quality lab and monitoring Establish inspection for operation and maintenance of sewage treatment facilities Establish committee and plan/Harbour Water Quality and Management Plan Policy support review teams PM and PA salary Office space Office equipment Community engagement and training/trial new toilets Biogas consultations, construction, and demonstrations Stakeholder engagement, water safety planning
8,853,796
7
SOPAC/GEF/IWRM/RSC.2/12
Table 4 Country Fiji Fiji Fiji Fiji Fiji Fiji Fiji Fiji Fiji Fiji Fiji Fiji Fiji Fiji Fiji Fiji Fiji Fiji Fiji Fiji Fiji Fiji Fiji Fiji Fiji Fiji Fiji Fiji Fiji Fiji Fiji Fiji Fiji Fiji Fiji Fiji
Summary of co-financing identified for the National IWRM Demonstration Project in Fiji Source Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government EU-SOPAC IWRM EU-SOPAC IWRM EU-SOPAC IWRM EU-SOPAC IWRM EU-SOPAC IWRM EU-SOPAC IWRM EU-SOPAC IWRM EU-SOPAC IWRM EU-SOPAC HYCOS EU-SOPAC HYCOS EU-SOPAC HYCOS IUCN IUCN Live and Learn Live and Learn Live and Learn Live and Learn USP USP USP USP USP USP
Amount (USD) 501,000 20,000 500,000 20,000 376,380 25,900 1,000,000 350,000 5,000 20,000 4,000 3,950 98,580 50,000 50,000 50,000 25,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 10,000 20,177 100,000 100,000 10,000 10,000 26,250 26,250 26,250 26,250 90,000 90,000 550,000 115,000 115,000 115,000
Cash or In-kind Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash In-kind Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash
Description Training Infrastructure and current plan assessment Recommendations for future activities Asset maintenance plan development Develop GIS mapping for riparian zones Socio-economic assessment on benefits of flood warnings Construct warning system, include telecommunications, siren warnings Draft basin flood management plan Project Manager and Assistant Office rental, communications, utilities Redesign of project design Salaries for PM and PA Infrastructure, ecological and channel geometry survey Communications and awareness strategy for flood warning system Development of flood preparedness and response plans Determine most appropriate institutional setting Drafting ToR for the Nadi Basin Catchment Committee Map institutional setup and location of Nadi Basin Catchment Committee Identify options for sustainable financing of Basin Catchment Committee Develop 5, 10, and 15 year Nadi Basin Catchment Committee duties Open plan contents through BCC to wider stakeholder consultation Assessment of equipment needs to upgrade hydro-climate monitoring network Equipment sourcing and procurement for upgrade hydro-climate monitoring network Installation and training for hydro-climate monitoring network Establish Nadi Basin Basin Catchment Committee Draft contents of basin flood management plan Stakeholder engagement and consultation/awareness raising Stakeholder workshops Guidelines development and drafting Stakeholder workshops and consultations on the draft guidelines Data source and capture Model development and integration Use of local farms to pilot approaches Awareness raising for the Nadi basin catchment committee Stakeholder consultation for the Nadi basin catchment committee Basin tours for BCC
4,544,987
8
SOPAC/GEF/IWRM/RSC.2/12
Table 5 Country Nauru Nauru Nauru Nauru Nauru Nauru Nauru Nauru Nauru Nauru Nauru Nauru Nauru Nauru Nauru Nauru Nauru Nauru Nauru Nauru Nauru Nauru
Summary of co-financing identified for the National IWRM Demonstration Project in Nauru Source Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government EU-SOPAC IWRM EU-SOPAC IWRM EU-SOPAC IWRM EU-SOPAC HYCOS NZAID-SOPAC WDM NZAID-SOPAC WDM FAO
Amount (USD) 50,000 1,539,190 600,000 12,000 1,200 9,000 1,200 3,500 9,000 2,000 2,000 3,000 1,500 2,000 600 20,000 20,000 10,000 68,791 60,000 20,000 300,000
Cash or In-kind In-kind Cash In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash
Description Not included Not included UNFAO RPFS Expansion Phase - construction of water reservoirs Office rental @ US$200/month Telephone @ US$20/month Utilities @ US$150/month Fuel @ 30 litres/week Publishing and printing Technical support and materials for installation of chambers Scientific investigation on sewage pipelines Investigation of borehole treatment of wells Technical and legal support for water sanitation and hygiene policy and planning Technical and legal support for drafting of a national plan Training for 2 officers re installation of twin chambers Meetings and workshops (15 meetings @US$1000/workshop) Technical and legal support for water sanitation and hygiene policy and planning Technical and legal support for drafting of a national plan Training for 2 officers re installation of twin chambers Technical support and materials for installation of chambers Technical support and materials for installation of chambers Scientific investigation on sewage pipelines Investigation of borehole treatment of wells
2,734,981
9
SOPAC/GEF/IWRM/RSC.2/12
Table 6
Summary of co-financing identified for the National IWRM Demonstration Project in Niue
Niue Niue Niue Niue Niue Niue Niue Niue Niue Niue Niue Niue Niue
Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government
Amount (USD) 96,000 48,000 4,800 7,200 8,000 4,000 4,000 1,500 10,000 2,000 2,000 10,500 19,000
Niue Niue Niue
Government Government Government
10,000 5,000 3,000
In-kind In-kind In-kind
Niue Niue Niue Niue Niue Niue Niue
Government Government Government Government Government Government Government
15,000 5,000 20,000 3,000 2,000 2,000 2,000
In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind
Niue Niue Niue Niue
Government Government Government EU-SOPAC IWRM
4,000 5,000 1,000 20,000
In-kind In-kind In-kind Cash
Niue Niue Niue Niue Niue
EU-SOPAC IWRM EU-SOPAC IWRM EU-SOPAC IWRM EU-SOPAC HYCOS EU-SOPAC HYCOS
20,000 30,000 5,000 20,000 20,000
Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash
Country
Source
Cash or In-kind Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash In-kind
Description Project Manager $2000/month Office rental 48 months @ $1000/month Communications @ $100/month Utilities @ $150/month Workshop/meeting costs (8 SC meetings @ $1000 per meeting) Office equipment (computers and equipment) Software and licences Data processing 4-wheel drive vehicle Computer maintenance Camera equipment maintenance Vehicle fuel and servicing Groundwater and coastal water quality analysis equipment Piggery fencing, effluent treatment beds, solid waste composting facility at landfill for piggery effluent management Oil interceptors, curbing, drains and pipework for road run-off management (oil interceptors) 7 water storage tanks to reduce peak demand abstraction rates Leakage reduction surveys, repairs, bulk meter usage as part of leakage reduction programme Community engagement activities/Conservation and awareness campaign Bore tests and analysis Land and marine monitoring, surveys and analysis Fencing, sheds, cement plinths, flages etc for Borehold Headworks Protection Technical and legal support to review and update relevant national legislation Technical and legal support to enforce environmental protection regulations Technical and legal support to introduce land use planning and groundwater protection zones Technical and legal support to implement abstraction licensing and water rights Technical and community support for education and community awareness Technical and legal support to enforce environmental protection regulations Technical and legal support to introduce land use planning and groundwater protection zones Technical and legal support to implement abstraction licensing and water rights Technical and community support for education and community awareness Groundwater and coastal water quality analysis equipment Observation borehole drilling and analysis
10
SOPAC/GEF/IWRM/RSC.2/12
Table 6 (cont.) Summary of co-financing identified for the National IWRM Demonstration Project in Niue
Niue Niue Niue Niue Niue Niue
EU-SOPAC HYCOS NZAID-SOPAC WQM NZAID-SOPAC WQM NZAID-SOPAC WDM NZAID-SOPAC WDM NZAID-SOPAC WDM
Amount (USD) 20,000 5,000 25,000 5,000 30,000 5,000
Niue Niue Niue Niue Niue Niue Niue Niue Niue
NZAID-SOPAC WDM NZAID-SOPAC WDM NZAID NZAID UNDP TRAC UNDP TRAC UNDP TRAC UNDP TRAC UNESCO
25,000 5,000 150,000 100,000 100,000 50,000 1,000,000 5,000 15,000
Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash
Niue
FAO
50,000
Cash
Niue Niue
FAO FAO Government of Venezuala Government of Venezuala Government of Venezuala
25,000 25,000
Cash Cash
25,000
Cash
25,000
Cash
Bore tests and analysis Groundwater and coastal water quality analysis equipment Land and marine monitoring, surveys and analysis Computer modelling equipment and software Data loggers, transducers, listening sticks, flow meters for leakage detection Publishing and printing Leakage reduction surveys, repairs, bulk meter usage as part of leakage reduction programme Community engagement activities/Conservation and awareness campaign Oil interceptors, curbing, drains and pipework for road run-off management (oil interceptors) 6 water storage tanks to reduce peak demand abstraction rates New tanks, effluent treatment for septic tank improvements Collection bins, composting for solid waste improvements Cement bunds, tanks, pads for fuel oil storage improvements Waste separation and security for hazardous waste improvements Technical and legal support to review and update relevant national legislation Cement bunds, tanks, sheds, stores, applications, disposal as part of agro-chemical storage and usage Piggery fencing, effluent treatment beds, solid waste composting facility at landfill for piggery effluent management Irrigation efficiency systems and crop trials Piggery fencing, effluent treatment beds, solid waste composting facility at landfill for piggery effluent management Composting and leaching trials, crop quality studies as part of fish processing facility effluent waste usage
40,000
Cash
Irrigation efficiency systems and crop trials
Country
Niue Niue Niue
Source
Cash or In-kind Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash
Description
2,139,000
11
SOPAC/GEF/IWRM/RSC.2/12
Table 7 Country Palau Palau Palau Palau Palau Palau Palau Palau Palau Palau Palau Palau Palau Palau Palau Palau Palau Palau Palau Palau Palau Palau Palau
Summary of co-financing identified for the National IWRM Demonstration Project in Palau Source Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government EU-SOPAC IWRM EU-SOPAC IWRM EU-SOPAC HYCOS EU-SOPAC HYCOS US Forestry Service Palau National Museum Palau National Museum Palau Conservation Society Palau Conservation Society
Amount (USD) 30,000 30,000 15,000 129,600 30,000 100,000 25,000 5,000 140,400 120,000 5,000 30,000 281,500 5,000 50,000 10,000 298,000 5,000 280,000
Cash or In-kind Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind Cash Cash Cash In-kind Cash
Communications Utilities Office supplies 25% of full-time salary of water quality lab staff 10% of full-time salary for administrative support staff 10% of full-time salary for intake support staff Monitoring and travel for pollutant surveys Chemical survey of river water Monthly water quality monitoring Rental of office space @$2000/month Equipment Monitoring and travel for pollutant surveys Monthly water quality monitoring Mapping and modelling of ecosystem health Legislation for watershed protection Water safety plan Development of a water quality monitoring programme Development of a water quality monitoring programme Connections between forests and rivers
50,000
Cash
Bioindicators and monitoring ecosystem health
100,000
In-kind
Bioindicators and monitoring ecosystem health
35,000
Cash
Awareness raising materials, community workshops
125,000
In-kind
Awareness raising materials, community workshops
Description
1,899,500
12
SOPAC/GEF/IWRM/RSC.2/12
Table 8 Country
Summary of co-financing identified for the National IWRM Demonstration Project in Papua New Guinea Source
PNG PNG PNG PNG
Government Government Government Government
PNG PNG PNG PNG PNG PNG PNG PNG PNG PNG PNG PNG PNG PNG PNG PNG PNG PNG PNG
Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government EU-SOPAC IWRM EU-SOPAC IWRM EU-SOPAC HYCOS EU Eda Ranu Rehabilitation Project Eda Ranu Water Supply Project Eda Ranu Eda Ranu Eda Ranu Eda Ranu EU-SOPAC Reducing Vulnerabilities EU-SOPAC Reducing Vulnerabilities
PNG PNG PNG PNG PNG PNG PNG PNG
Amount (USD) 200 2,000 1,000 2,000
Cash or In-kind Cash Cash Cash Cash
2,000 2,000 3,000 30,000 60,000 1,000 42,000 500 500 5,000 5,000 20,000 2,000 98,400 6,232 10,000 5,000 6,000 150,000
Cash Cash Cash In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind Cash Cash In-kind Cash Cash Cash
20,000
Cash
98,270 272,680 31,920,825 112,778 10,000
Cash Cash Cash Cash In-kind
Installation of five priority village water supply Development and implementation of a water quality monitoring program Upgrade the existing intake structure, water treatment plan and pipeline Upgrade Koiari rural water supply Development and implementation of a water quality monitoring program
257,500
In-kind
In-situ testing and surveying; field reconnaissance
16,000 33,161,885
In-kind
In-situ water quality testing and sampling
Description Stationary Airfares and DSA for stakeholders One-off stakeholder meeting Fuel Sensitise local community and stakeholders on ongoing water resources assessment and management activities; public awareness Socio-economic survey Identification of locations for additional hydrometric network in the catchment Officers from each agency as and when needed Office set up and rental Tables, chairs, and cabinets Utilities at $700/month Binding machine, photocopier Camping advance; field allowance Hydro-geological survey, baseline foundation surveys Biodiversity (flora and fauna) surveys Identification of locations for additional hydrometric sites in the catchment Development of hydrological model for the catchment Implementation of appropriate methods and technologies for disposal of various waste types Review all agricultural and industrial land use practices Develop a land use plan Review of all relevant policies and legislation and make necessary adjustments Development of a water use and waste disposal policy Establish stations and collection of data, also train local data collectors Data collection and evaluation of the station's operations
13
SOPAC/GEF/IWRM/RSC.2/12
Table 9 Country RMI RMI RMI RMI RMI RMI RMI RMI RMI RMI RMI RMI RMI RMI RMI RMI RMI RMI RMI RMI RMI RMI RMI RMI RMI RMI RMI RMI RMI RMI RMI RMI RMI RMI RMI RMI RMI
Summary of co-financing identified for the National IWRM Demonstration Project in the Republic of Marshall Islands Source Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government EU-SOPAC IWRM EU-SOPAC IWRM EU-SOPAC IWRM EU-SOPAC IWRM EU-SOPAC IWRM EU-SOPAC IWRM EU-SOPAC HYCOS EU-SOPAC HYCOS NZAID-SOPAC WQM NZAID-SOPAC WDM SOPAC WHO EU-SOPAC Red. Vuln. M.A. Waste Company M.A. Waste Company M.A. Waste Company M.A. Waste Company M.I. Visitors Authority M.I. Visitors Authority US Dep. of Agriculture US Dep. of Agriculture US Dep.of Agriculture
Amount (USD) 9,000 628,125 34,250 188,750 45,000 30,000 50,000 18,000 12,000 20,000 20,000 10,000 5,000 20,000 10,000 9,000 10,000 80,000 25,000 25,000 10,000 15,000 56,833 10,000 76,000 32,000 30,000 1,028,625 300,000 40,000 20,000 20,000 5,000 20,000 300,000 40,000 50,000
Cash or In-kind Cash Cash Cash Cash In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash In-kind Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind
Description Workshop costs and DSA Install additional toilets, construction of toilets and water catchments Regular water tests of the underground lens Construction materials, etc as part of Sewage Disposal Septic Tanks Project manager salary Project assistant Office rental ($1,000/month) Communications ($300/month) Utilities ($200/month) Computers and peripherals Truck, bins, solid waste equipment Reports to Steering Committee Sensitise local, tourist and policy makers Workshops, Radio and Journal Advertisments Pesticides practices review Workshop costs and DSA Full Laura Water Lens Management Plan Study and recommendations, Policy and Regulations Review Study and recommendations, Monitoring and Compliance Mechanisms Identification of long-term funding, Financial Sustainability Mechanisms Community awareness meetings, Public Awareness Full Laura Water Lens Management Plan Hydro-geological survey as part of baseline surveys of site Natural resource and ecosystem survey as part of baseline surveys of site Regular water tests of the underground lens Water Demand Project, inspection of pipes and survey Plan to detect sources of pollution and provide response as part of Water Safety Plans Household tanks Trailer etc, solid waste equipment Trailer etc, solid waste equipment Design and planning for solid waste management Options for recovery and recycling, separation of wastes plan Sensitise local, tourist and policy makers Workshops, Radio and Journal Advertisments Install additional toilets, construction of toilets and water catchments Equipment and tools for leak repair Design and planning consultations for septic tank plan
14
SOPAC/GEF/IWRM/RSC.2/12
Table 10 Country
Summary of co-financing identified for the National IWRM Demonstration Project in Samoa Source
Samoa Samoa Samoa Samoa Samoa Samoa Samoa Samoa
Not indicated Not indicated Not indicated Not indicated Not indicated Not indicated Not indicated Not indicated
Samoa Samoa Samoa Samoa Samoa Samoa Samoa Samoa Samoa Samoa Samoa
Not indicated ADB Sanitation Proj. Not indicated Not indicated Not indicated Not indicated Not indicated Not indicated Not indicated Not indicated Not indicated
Samoa Samoa
Not indicated Not indicated
Amount (USD) 15,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 20,000 40,000 20,000 30,000
Cash or In-kind Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash
60,000 1,500,000 40,000 100,000 50,000 30,000 25,000 37,000 6,000 4,000 10,000
Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind
10,000 10,000
In-kind In-kind
Description Administration Equipment Develop a land use plan Review of the watershed management plan (Vaisigano and Fuluasou) Develop watershed conservation Policy and Plan Develop a water safety plan for underground and surface water Review National Water Resources Policy and finalise national water service policy Data collection and update of National Water Resources Information Management System Assess impacts of land use (including agricultural, infrastructural developments) on water, soil and biodiversity quality Implementation of pilot priority mitigation measures Soil, water, and land use monitoring programme Development of appropriate eco-tourism activities Water demand management Awareness, education and capacity development towards watershed users Salaries/Allowances Administration Equipment Review National Water Resources Policy and finalise national water service policy Data collection and update of National Water Resources Information Management System Assess impacts of land use (including agricultural, infrastructural developments) on water, soil and biodiversity quality Implementation of pilot priority mitigation measures
2,037,000
Government = 120,000; EU = 235,000; ADB = 1,500,000; JICA = 100,000; HYCOS = 100,000
15
SOPAC/GEF/IWRM/RSC.2/12
Table 11 Country Solomon Islands Solomon Islands Solomon Islands Solomon Islands Solomon Islands Solomon Islands Solomon Islands Solomon Islands Solomon Islands Solomon Islands Solomon Islands Solomon Islands Solomon Islands Solomon Islands Solomon Islands Solomon Islands Solomon Islands Solomon Islands Solomon Islands Solomon Islands Solomon Islands Solomon Islands Solomon Islands Solomon Islands Solomon Islands Solomon Islands Solomon Islands Solomon Islands Solomon Islands Solomon Islands
Summary of co-financing identified for the National IWRM Demonstration Project in the Solomon Islands Source Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government EU-SOPAC IWRM EU-SOPAC IWRM EU-SOPAC HYCOS EU-SOPAC HYCOS EU-SOPAC HYCOS EU-SOPAC HYCOS EU-SOPAC HYCOS NZAID-SOPAC WDM NZAID-SOPAC WDM Australian Water Research Facility Australian Water Research Facility Australian Water Research Facility Australian Water Research Facility
Amount (USD) 15,960 7,980 10,000 11,970 25,000 10,000 12,500 10,000 10,000 10,000 45,000 60,000 165,000 115,000 220,000 60,000 152,636 85,000 130,000 25,000 25,000 50,000 75,000 58,440 220,000 160,000
Cash or In-kind Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash
50,000
In-kind
Design and planning consultations for preliminary plans
50,000
In-kind
Policy and legislative review
50,000
In-kind
Reports and guidelines
24,311
In-kind
Awareness and education
Description Office space rental Communications Quarterly stakeholder meetings Utilities Water quality equipment, analysis 4 wheel drive vehicle Fuel and servicing Natural resource and ecosystem survey Honiara waste disposal Sewage disposal Design and planning consultations for preliminary plans Adoption of Protected Zones Adoption of Honiara watershed/aquifer management plan Policy and legislative review Monitoring and compliance mechanisms Reports and guidelines Not indicated Review Water Safety Plan for Honiara City Develop Water Safety Plan for Honiara and Solomon Islands Computers, software, office equipment and backup services Water level, rain-guage, flow and pressure loggers Hydrogeological survey Kongulai catchment studies Water balance study Wastage and leakage detection survey Develop Water Use Efficiency Plan for Honiara
1,943,797
16
SOPAC/GEF/IWRM/RSC.2/12
Table 12 Country
Summary of co-financing identified for the National IWRM Demonstration Project in Tonga Source
Tonga Tonga Tonga Tonga Tonga Tonga Tonga Tonga Tonga Tonga Tonga Tonga
Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government
Tonga Tonga Tonga Tonga Tonga Tonga Tonga Tonga Tonga Tonga Tonga Tonga Tonga Tonga Tonga
EU-SOPAC IWRM EU-SOPAC IWRM EU-SOPAC IWRM EU-SOPAC IWRM EU-SOPAC IWRM EU-SOPAC IWRM Not indicated EU-SOPAC HYCOS EU-SOPAC Red. Vul. Not indicated Not indicated Not indicated Not indicated Not indicated Not indicated
Amount (USD) 19,440 7,560 30,000 900 12,000 1,000 3,600 4,500 8,000 1,000 2,500,000 6,000,000
Cash or In-kind Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash In-kind Cash
15,000 3,000 12,000 12,000 6,000 2,000 3,000 79000 1,000,000
Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash
Description Project manager salary Project assistant salary Office rental Utilities Laptop, printer, desktop Software and licenses Stationary Maintenance of computers etc PMU travel Travel to meetings Not indicated Not indicated Establish and implement resource management legislation and Neiafu Water Management Plan Develop effective enforcement system Identification of long-term funding/financial sustainability mechanism Financial and sustainability training for all water communities Monitoring and evaluation undertaken by stakeholders within the project Monitoring and evaluation of project activities Agricultural practices review Not indicated Not indicated Wastewater practices review Identification of leakages, survey water wastage and leaks, On-site demonstrations to minimise impacts of sewage and liquid waste practices Literature review and set-up database of information/health statistics Participatory ecological and socio-economic surveys Community consultations
9,720,000
17
SOPAC/GEF/IWRM/RSC.2/12
Table 13 Country Tuvalu Tuvalu Tuvalu Tuvalu Tuvalu Tuvalu Tuvalu Tuvalu Tuvalu
Summary of co-financing identified for the National IWRM Demonstration Project in Tuvalu Source Government Government Government EU-SOPAC IWRM EU-SOPAC HYCOS EU-SOPAC Reducing Vulnerabilities AusAID AusAID Alofa Tuvalu Association
Amount (USD) 67,200 400,000 500,000 50,000 50,000 850,000
Cash or In-kind In-kind Not clear Not clear Cash Cash
585,000 415,000 200,000
Cash Cash In-kind
Description Office rental and utilities Not clear Not clear
Construction and installation of household rainwater tanks Implementation of Tuvalu's Water and Sanitation Strategy Training centre support
3,117,200
18
SOPAC/GEF/IWRM/RSC.2/12
Table 14 Country
Summary of co-financing identified for the National IWRM Demonstration Project in Vanuatu Source
Vanuatu Vanuatu Vanuatu Vanuatu Vanuatu Vanuatu Vanuatu Vanuatu Vanuatu Vanuatu Vanuatu Vanuatu Vanuatu Vanuatu Vanuatu Vanuatu Vanuatu Vanuatu Vanuatu Vanuatu Vanuatu Vanuatu Vanuatu Vanuatu Vanuatu Vanuatu Vanuatu Vanuatu Vanuatu
Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government Government EU-SOPAC HYCOS NZAID-SOPAC WQM NZAID-SOPAC WDM NZAID NZAID NZAID NZAID AusAID JICA Live and Learn Live and Learn Live and Learn Live and Learn Live and Learn Not indicated Not indicated
Vanuatu
Not indicated
Amount (USD) 63,050 2,400 8,639 31,820 11,749 5,759 622 58,589 192 960 192 480 288 28,796 17,998 71,991 33,025 33,025 33,025 33,025 29,099 7,100,000 5,790 13,330 47,400 36,000 2,470 4,912 9,823
Cash or In-kind Cash Cash In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind In-kind Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash In-kind In-kind Cash Cash
4,912
Cash
Description Repair pipes, leak detection to be actioned Gazette and implement water protection zones Office rental at 15000vt/month Salaries Subsistence allowance Office rental Communications Vehicle in Santo Data processing and preparation of report Data processing and preparation of maps Planning strategies and mechanisms Identify policies and plans Identify monitoring, evaluation, reflection and learning strategies Equipment, installation, monitoring, travel for upgrade telemetric monitoring system Water quality monitoring capacity building for PICs Training given by DGMWR during development and installation of all water supplies Establish and implement legislation and Sarakata watershed management plan Compensation policy and delivery Local resource use policy and plans Develop effective enforcement system Train the trainer workshops Installing third turbine to provide for sustainable hydro power Regional education and awareness program as part of river care awareness Regional education and awareness program to improve safety of water supply Community education for building sustainable futures Regional education and awareness program as part of river care awareness Regional education and awareness program to improve safety of water supply Train communities - sustainable farming practices, soil erosion control, organic fertiliser Deforestation for cattle ranching, reforestation awareness Finding new land uses eg water intensive taro, promoting land uses that reduce impact on water quality, ecology and biodiversity
7,689,361
19