Investigation into the Challenges and Benefits of Social Media in Higher Education Institutions

Page 1


An Investigation into the Challenges, Application and Benefits of Social Media in Higher Education Institutions

January 2010

1


Contents 1. Summary Of Findings

4

2. Introduction

7

3. Research Approach

7

4. Research Findings

8

4.1

Respondent profile

8

4.2

Respondent Website profile

8

4.2.1 Use of main institution websites versus microsites

8

4.2.2 Extent of social media technology integration with content

10

management systems 4.3

Key Challenges 4.3.1 Key challenges for HEI to date in adopting social media

11

4.3.2 Key Challenges for HEIs in future adoption of social Media

12

4.4

4.5

4.6

11

Social Media Usage

14

4.4.1 Access restrictions

14

4.4.2 Current usage of social media by department and students

15

4.4.3 Social media usage by student population

16

4.4.4 Current usage profile of social media by technology type

18

4.4.5 Future Usage of social media planned for 2010-2012

19

Impact and Benefits of social media

21

4.5.1 Current impact and benefit of social media on HEI activities

21

4.5.2 Future impact and benefit of social media on HEI activities

22

The Role of the Web team in supporting and developing the

23

social media strategy 5. Implications For Higher Education Institutions

2

25


Figures

Figure 1

Number of web sites and microsites within institutions

9

Figure 2

Current challenges for HEIs in adopting social

11

Figure 3

Challenges for future adoption of social media

13

Figure 4

Is access to the following social media restricted at your institution?

14

Figure 5

Department and student usage of social media

15

Figure 6

Social media usage by student population

17

Figure 7

Types of social media used

18

Figure 8

Planned adoption of social media 2010 -2012

20

Figure 9

Impact and benefits of social media to date

21

Figure 10

Comparison of areas identified as undergoing

22

‘significant improvement’ over the last three years and by 2012

Reference Sources

26

About Jadu Jadu is a market leading supplier of web content management systems (CMS) to higher education institutions, public sector and commercial organisations. Jadu was formed in 2001 to provide Content Management Systems (CMS) for government organisations. Since its first major implementation for BERR in 2002, Jadu has evolved and is now implemented within hundreds of public and private sector organisations and higher education institutions across the UK. Jadu provides a refreshing approach to web content management and offers groundbreaking functionality including integrated social computing, accessibility, compliance, integrated online forms, mash up page design, integrated Google search, personalisation, full statistical reporting, standards compliance, product and catalogue management. Jadu also provides a host of web productivity tools and unparalleled support service. Jadu is the first commercial Web Content Management provider to offer an integrated Twitter module within its CMS software to enhance brand management, customer service and knowledge management. Further information on Jadu can be found at: www.jadu.co.uk This research is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution licence http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/uk

3


1.

Summary of Findings

This research was conducted to gain a current picture of the rapidly changing area of social media and looks at the challenges, usage and benefits of social media within Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). The research consists of quantitative and qualitative research and was conducted between 28th July 2009 and the 6th September 2009. RESPONDENT PROFILE

60 unique responses were received from 44 HEIs across the UK, with 36 English Universities; 3 out of the 9 Welsh universities; 4 out of the 19 Scottish universities and an Irish university contributing.

Responses were received from respondents representing a wide range of departments and roles including - Web management, marketing, media and communications, learning and development, business, libraries and IT management and services.

KEY FINDINGS

The top three challenges - The top three challenges to date in implementing social media are developing the business case for its usage; overcoming cultural issues and dealing with current software compatibility issues. In the next three years, developing the business case for social media usage will remain the number one challenge, followed by the ability to respond to growing user demand and finally the ability to do this within budgetary constraints.

Limited restrictions on usage are in place - For the majority of institutions (over 90%), social media usage (Facebook, Twitter, Blogging, MySpace, YouTube, Flickr) is not restricted.

Usage by user type- The major users of social media are students followed by Alumni.

A relatively large number of Admissions departments make little usage

of social media in their activities.

4


Current usage by social media type - The two social media tools most frequently used by HEIs via internal solutions are Blogging (59%) and Online Forums (55%).

The two most frequently used external social networking tools

are Twitter (68.3%), YouTube (60.7%) followed by social networking tools such as Facebook and MySpace (57.49%).

Future usage by social media type - 47.3% of respondents intend to adopt Twitter over the next two years; 41.8% intend to use YouTube and 41.1% social networking tools such as Facebook and MySpace. A much smaller percentage of respondents intend to adopt ‘customised’ social networking tools such as Ning.com and Yammer.

Current benefits of social media- The main areas benefiting from a ‘significant improvement’ to date, as a result of social media usage, are the ‘Institution’s Profile’ and ‘Access to Information’ for all users.

Future benefits of social media- The main area identified as benefiting from social media in the future is ‘Access to Information’ with 61.8% of respondents identifying this area as undergoing ‘significant improvement’ by 2012.

The

Institution’s profile, reputation and student retention were also identified as benefiting from social media usage in the future.

Future role of the web team – 67.9% of respondents believed that the main factor influencing the development of HEI’s social media strategy is the user base, with the web team’s role being to respond to user demand. This compared to 44.6% of respondents who believed that the web team was driving strategy development.

Limited integration of social media with content management systems There is currently little if any integration of content management systems with social media technologies within those HEIs responding.

IMPLICATIONS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS The research has highlighted the considerable benefits being gained from social media usage in a wide range of areas.

However, the emerging nature of these technologies,

and their impact on established ways of working, raise a number of questions that have yet to be addressed.

5


HEI Management needs a stronger business case for investment- Building a business case for social media adoption is the number one challenge for HEIs both now and in the future. Whilst users are convinced of the benefits, HEI management need a stronger business case.

The strategic approach to managing social media is evolving – The strategic response to social media developments is unclear in many institutions. No firm conclusion appears to have been reached on the ownership and management of this new development. It is also not clear whether social media technologies should be treated as a separate strategy, or embedded in core operations? As social media technologies and usage mature over the coming years, it is likely that a more integrated approach to managing information and content will be required to protect the brand and reputation of institutions.

Can unrestricted use continue? -The low level of restriction currently applied to social media usage has implications for a wide range of areas including privacy, intellectual property to data protection. As usage grows it is likely that these issues will increase in profile and impact.

Increased awareness is needed to address cultural issues - Lack of awareness of the potential benefits of social media and its usage were identified as ‘generational issues’ by a number of respondents. The development of short programmes around the ‘benefits of social media technologies’ for HEIs, could address this situation and the cultural issues identified.

6


2.

Introduction

Social Media is growing in its adoption across all areas of society, including Higher Education. To gain a current picture of this rapidly developing area within UK Higher Education Institutions (HEIs), this research has been conducted to investigate the:

Challenges faced in managing this relatively new means of communication

Impact and benefit that social media is having and could have, on established ways of working within HEIs.

The output of this survey will provide HEIs with:

A current appreciation of the challenges and issues faced in implementing social media

Shared knowledge of how HEIs are capitalising on social media technologies to support strategic and operational activities.

Insight into the range of benefits that are currently being delivered and those that could be delivered.

The online survey was run between 28th July 2009 and the 6th September 2009. During that time 60 unique responses were received from 44 HEIs across the UK.

3.

Research Approach

The research conducted in this study includes both qualitative and quantitative investigations. A review of existing research has also been conducted into the adoption and usage of social media within Higher Education Institutions (Appendix 1).

This

knowledge was used to shape the structure and content of an online survey that was subsequently used to collect primary data. The survey was tested with a number of individuals who had a particular interest in the area of social media from within UK Universities and associated organisations (UKOLN).

The platform used to deliver the survey questions and to collect data was Survey Monkey.

No direct and unsolicited approaches were made to potential respondents.

Instead respondents were made aware of the survey and its objectives through the application of social media techniques (Twitter, Blogs) at the IWMW (Institutional Web

7


Management Workshop) in July 2009 and an Announce email issued by UCISA. This provided a web link to the survey for those interested in participation. The survey sought feedback from anyone who had an involvement in the development and/or usage of social media in a UK HEI.

In particular, feedback from those involved

in the management of web content was encouraged, as was feedback from individuals already using social media within an HEI environment, or who had a particular interest in the potential of social media. The quantitative data collected was analysed to develop the key trends emerging. In addition, quotations provided by respondents (anonymous) in response to the subject matter, have been used to develop and illustrate the key trends identified.

4.

Research Findings

4.1

Respondent profile

The majority of replies to the online survey were received from English Universities (36), with 3 out of the 9 Welsh universities, 4 out of the 19 Scottish universities and an Irish university also participating. Responses were obtained from five main areas within HEIs:

Web management

Marketing, Media and communications

Learning and development

Business and IT management and services

Libraries

4.2

Respondent Website profile

4.2.1 Use of main institution websites versus microsites The majority of HEIs (40.6%) operate a main web site but are unaware of the number and content of the microsites situated around the institution (Figure 1).

8


Relatively few institutions operate a single main website only (18.8%), without utilising microsites for individual faculty or department use.

Figure 1

Number of web sites and microsites within institutions

“At least 60 other sites at separate URL's with no clear management structure, different CMS's (or flatfile html sites) and no common search function; all sites operate in total isolation from each other.” “We have over 100 microsites, over 200 sections on our main site, of which probably 20-30 are actively updated”

A key message from previously published research is the importance perceived by HEIs of developing a consistent brand to help build the institution’s internal and external profile. The fact that a large proportion of institutions are unaware of the number of microsites that exist within their organisation and are therefore unable to influence branding, would indicate a major potential to improve both the internal and external user experience.

9


The absence of an integrated approach to the provision of web services in many institutions and the lack of a common search function, also indicates a major opportunity to improve development and search effectiveness and efficiency. 4.2.2 Extent of social media technology integration with content management systems Although many institutions are establishing links and add-ons to provide a more integrated environment, there is currently little if any integration of content management systems with social media technologies within those HEIs responding (19.6% of those responding).

Are any social media technologies currently provided as an integrated component of your content management system - if so please identify the technology provided? “Social bookmarking. News is pushed out to Twitter and Facebook. Some active blogs partly integrated with websites.” “Moodle, Mahara, Wimba integrated into the teaching. Use Facebook and Twitter as appropriate.” “Flickr, YouTube, Twitter, RSS can be embedded in pages with pre-defined styles in the CMS. RSS is also auto generated on news pages.” “None as part of the CMS, although we have integrated Flickr, Twitter, Facebook. We have also piloted an internal social network for the department of Information Services.” “No; not seen as worthwhile (...YET): we have some pages that offer a single page at a glance mashup view of current social media activity - but that is a pull activity from the various platforms and not a publishing activity from within the CMS.” “Limited within the CMS, but we do provide WordPress, SharePoint, JOOMLA (to a limited extent).” “Facebook is being developed into the CMS of our Students' Union website.” “The platform uses PebblePad for blogs between students and tutors.” “Forums - but the functionality is poor so we use an open source PHP system instead share this functionality (third party code embedded via scripts at our request) RSS feeds for news and events.”

10


4.3

Key Challenges

4.3.1 Key challenges for HEI to date in adopting social media Respondents identified the top three challenges to date in adopting social media technologies (Figure 2) as:

Developing the business case for its usage

Overcoming cultural issues

Dealing with current software compatibility issues.

Figure 2

Current challenges for HEIs in adopting social

Rating Average

11


The following quotes illustrate the scale of the challenges identified:

What are key challenges that your institution has faced to date in adopting social media technologies? “Lack of technical skills of staff wanting to implement technologies.” “Lack of resources (staff and time) to develop adequate social media teaching tools such as wikis and blogs.” “For the Library - technical challenges and know how.” “Allocating staff resources.” “Highly devolved nature of user base, i.e., herding cats” “Content moderation and management - significant resourcing issue” “Data protection and privacy issues with using third party solutions. Very few new and innovative systems are signed up to the Safe Harbor agreement which covers the storage of data outside the European Economic Area (i.e. USA) required by the UK Data Protection Act. So it makes it impossible for us to pick up third party software or solutions.”

4.3.2 Key Challenges for HEIs in the future adoption of social media Respondents identified the top three challenges in adopting social media technologies in the future (Figure 3) as:

Developing the business case for its usage

Responding to growing user demand

Budgetary constraints

The development of a business case for social media remains the most significant challenge, followed by the ability to respond to growing user demand and being able to do this within budgetary constraints.

12


Figure 3

Challenges for the future adoption of social media

Rating Average

What are the key challenges in encouraging future adoption of social media technologies within your institution? “As user demand ramps up, the infrastructure may not cope. Getting EFFECTIVE content is perhaps the biggest Challenge.” “SEVERE cultural issues: no one in charge selected their Uni from a website - and so they fail to see why they are important for today’s target audiences.” “Figuring out feasible support model that doesn't constrain users, yet respects University obligations (e.g., dpa, foi, hr, etc)”

13


4.4

Social Media Usage

4.4.1 Access restrictions For the majority of institutions (over 90%) social media usage (Facebook, Twitter, Blogging, MySpace, YouTube, Flickr), is not generally restricted (Figure 4). Within university domains and within the directorate, some restrictions exist and there are concerns over disclosure of intellectual property. There is also evidence however that in some institutions, restrictions would be removed, if a work related case could be generated for the use of social media. Figure 4

Is access to the following social media restricted at your institution? Yes

No

Don’t Know

Facebook

4.9%

91.8%

3.3%

Twitter

4.9%

91.8%

3.3%

Blogging

4.6%

90.3%

4.6%

MySpace

4.9%

90.2%

4.9%

YouTube

5.0%

90.0%

5.0%

Flickr

1.6%

95.1%

3.3%

“The restrictions are there by default but are removed for members of staff who can show a genuine work related reason for needing access to the sites. There is talk of removing the restriction for everyone (students and staff) however this has so far been a very long battle!!” “Blogs not allowed via university domains. Those via external blogging sites unrestricted” “We require people to be sensible and if there are people waiting to use open access computers then only course work and research should be done on them.” “I don't know about student systems but within our directorate these sites are blocked. I had to have IT unblock them for me!” "There are very few restrictions on the usage of social media by students within the institutions responding. Where restrictions do exist they tend to be related to reducing server load." “Purely to keep the server load down and not for censorship.”

14


Â

4.4.2 Current usage of social media by department and students The major users of social media are students followed by Alumni (Figure 5).

A relatively

large number of Admissions departments have little or no usage of social media in their activities.

Figure 5 Department and student usage of social media

Â

15 Â


In which areas do you currently see the greatest use of social media within your institution? “Take up depends on the drive of individuals and where departments see that there is value rather than being dictated by specific institutional policy.” “The demand for Facebook interaction is clearly the heaviest on Admissions. Though our Institution's admissions office does not actively respond to prospective student questions on Facebook, Twitter, etc, students from the University have stepped into the void.” “Development office actively using social media, other departments do not have anyone with enthusiasm for/expertise in social media.” “Academic staff are very mixed in their use! We have Uni run Twitter / Facebook pages & others are using it with students for teaching; however, the central eLearning staff would far rather everyone used WEbCT Vista - as they feel that it's confusing for students to have too many things to think about (which I'm not sure I agree with) and/ or that off campus resources can never be guaranteed to be here tomorrow (which is a fair point).” “I note an age/ignorance factor with Alumni and faculty that limits these technologies usage in these sections.” “Some staff have set up blogs on their University hosted websites. “ “It's being used most in the marketing of our institution to prospective students.”

4.4.3 Social media usage by student population Undergraduates are perceived to be the heaviest users of social media. However, a high lack of awareness exists within HEIs on how social media usage differs between different student populations (undergraduates, postgraduates, prospective, International) (Figure 6).

16


Figure 6

Social media usage by student population

“All students use it! - even if you are not an undergrad you use it: internationals use it as they cannot travel here in person in advance!” “Have only just started using Social Media.” “PhD students appear to make much heavier use of social media than current researchers who began their careers years ago.” “Not really my area of expertise, but I think it differs less between these audiences and more along the generational issues (digital natives / digital immigrants). The majority of our students are mature and part time students not 18-year old undergraduates.”

17


4.4.4 Current usage profile of social media by technology type The two social media tools most frequently used by HEIs via internal solutions are Blogging (59%) and Online Forums (55%). The two most frequently identified external social networking tools currently used are Twitter (68.3%), YouTube (60.7%) and social networking tools such as Facebook and MySpace (57.49%). There was a low level usage of customised social networking tools Ning.com and Yammer (Figure 7). Figure 7

Types of social media used

18


What forms of social media do you currently use within your department/institution? “No local use in departments, all efforts done centrally and from the Students' Union.” “We are currently investigating the use of collaborative tools. As a smaller institution, it can be hard to find the resources (time or money) to put into internal solutions for projects like this.” “Our customised social network has been built in-house so we own our data.” “Applicant community blends social networking with more traditional forums and blogs in a managed environment.” “No co-ordinated policy.” “Primarily Plone CMS. Growing use of Diigo. Rare/limited mashing with Ning. Rare, disorganised, un-coordinated use of Flickr. Very rare use of YouTube (sadly ignoring the CMS). Forums are a tricky question.”

4.4.5 Future Usage of social media planned for 2010-2012 The two social media tools most frequently identified for planned adoption over the next two years by HEIs via internal solutions are Blogging (52.7%) and Online Forums (50.9%). The two most frequently identified external social networking tools planned for the next two years are Twitter (47.3%), YouTube (41.8%) and social networking tools such as Facebook and MySpace (41.1%). The low level usage of customised social networking tools, such as Ning.com and Yammer, looks set to continue with a high level of respondents either stating a definite intention not to use these solutions or being undecided about their usage (Figure 8).

19


Figure 8

Planned adoption of social media 2010 - 2012

“Because of the data protection issues we will bring social networking inside so we can control the storage and use of data. YouTube like video will come internally because of a requirement to not make the majority of our videos public - there's a reticence for this from the academic community. Blogging undecided by senior management as yet but there is strong demand for it.” “There will almost certainly be both internal and external solutions in place for some activities (e.g. online forums.” “There is limited ability to co-ordinate adoption or use between institutions and (more or less autonomous) departments.”

20


4.5

Impact and Benefits of social media

4.5.1 Current impact and benefit of social media on HEI activities The main areas benefiting from a ‘significant improvement’ to date, as a result of social media, are the ‘Institution’s profile’ and ‘access to information’ (Figure 9). Figure 9

Impact and benefits of social media to date

“Website in particular has had a significant effect on student conversion.” “Access to information is on demand. Students or Sabbatical officers respond within hours of a question being asked. The "personal" feeling of interacting with a student far surpasses any interaction the University could deliver. There is only so far institutions can go to shout about their own glory, students from those institutions are the biggest, most effective and most honest tool to deliver a true reflection of life at a HEI.” “Social media has only started being used over the past month within our institution.”

21


4.5.2 Future impact and benefit of social media on HEI activities Respondents believed that the most significant impact of social media in the future will be from its ability to improve ‘Access to information' for all users with 61.8% of respondents identifying this as undergoing ‘significant improvement by 2012.

The

Institution’s profile, reputation and student retention will also benefit from social media usage (Figure 10). Figure 10

Comparison of areas identified as undergoing ‘significant

improvement’ over the last three years and by 2012 Area of impact

In the last

By 2012

year Institution Profile

21.4%

55.4%

Access to information (staff, prospective

18.5%

61.8%

Institution reputation

12.5%

44.6%

Student retention

5.4%

34.5%

students, existing students, administration)

NB: Figures represent % of respondents identifying a significant improvement being anticipated through the use of social media.

“X is quickly becoming the most receptive HEI to one to one Facebook/Twitter contact with prospective students and troubled current students alike. Each and every question is answered by a friendly student response and this reputation is beginning to build – profile will follow.” “Too much high level dragging of feet, and at lower levels: visions to narrow to take best advantage of social media.” “Reputation issues depend on how much we decide to use it for promotion, and to a large extent we don't have control over how much people are talking about us or why, e.g. a recent event (anonymised).......... will have increased our profile, but not necessarily in ways that enhance our academic reputation.” “Put bluntly - if we don't use them we will start losing applicants.” “Difficult to say as no policy on adoption yet....” “Too hard to tell; the way they're used is, in my opinion much more important than whether or not they're used.”

22


4.6

The Role of the Web team in supporting and developing the social media strategy?

Respondents were asked to identify which of the following statements applied to their Institutions or whether both applied.

Web 2.0/Social Media Strategy instigated by the web team who are driving social media user engagement across the institution

Social media users are driving adoption - the web team supports user request for any new development

67.9% of respondents believed that the main driver influencing the development of HEI’s social media strategy was the user base, with the web team responding to this demand. This compared to 44.6% of respondents who believed that the web team is driving the strategy for social media development. Some HEIs are taking a collaborative approach to social media strategy development involving many departments, others do not treat social media as a separate strategic area but an integrated component of the overall IT strategy.

What role does the web team play in developing and supporting the Institution's social media strategy? “The development of strategy in this sphere is very much a collaborative approach mixing local initiatives with institutional programmes depending on the nature of the content, the audience and the channel.” “We in the web team try our best - but we are over-ruled by people who do not even understand what Twitter is, or what social media even means.” “Social media development is driven by individual departments not the IT team.” “Our e-learning team drives implementation rather than the web team.” “The institution's social media strategy is currently being determined with involvement from several departments including the web team whose primary role will be helping users to integrate appropriate social media with the institution's official web sites.” “It's not just the web team but the whole Centre for Educational Development and Media who is driving this through the University IT strategy. It's not a separate strategy specifically because it needs to be embedded in the core business and if it’s in a separate strategy it tends to get treated as separate.”

23


Â

As the tendency for social media usage increases, the ability to efficiently manage content will become a more significant challenge. The fact that only 19.6 % of respondents believed that their current content management system supported social media transactions raises a strategic issue for the immediate and longer term future.

Â

24 Â


5.

Implications for Higher Education Institutions

This research has identified a number of strategic implications for HEIs in developing their future approach to social media. Building a business case for social media adoption is the number one challenge now and in the future for HEIs The research has identified that social media developments have to date been mainly user driven. The primary challenge has been in establishing a business case to support this user driven development. The pressure from the user base for social media tools and facilities, continues into the future. This reinforces the need for HEI management to be able to see a valid business case for investment in this area. What is the future HEI strategy for social media – ‘Top down, bottom up – collaborative?’ Whilst there is a high level of social media usage in some institutions, in others it is a new experience with a steep learning curve. A key question that has emerged is how a strategy for social media should be developed and who should own and manage this.

Is

it a top down development, collaborative or bottom up approach? How will social media usage be managed in the future – if it can be managed? “It's not just the web team but the whole Centre for Educational Development and Media who are driving this through the University IT strategy. It's not a separate strategy specifically because it needs to be embedded in the core business and if it’s in a separate strategy it tends to get treated as separate.”

“It is all very new and more thought is needed as to how we precede with the SM phenomena. After all, the people that use it should be the people that create it as opposed to the people that manage it.”

“The institution's social media strategy is currently being determined with involvement from several departments including the web team, whose primary role will be helping users to integrate appropriate social media with the institution's official web sites.” “Social media (even more than the web) allows potential students to see what their possible lecturers are like before they even start. We MUST realise that we can NOT control the conversation like we did in the days of the megaphone monologue media. People WILL talk and rate us, regardless of what we try and do.”

25


Can unrestricted use continue? - There is currently limited restriction on the use of social media outside of the directorate. As usage continues to grow, issues raised by this research which include - data protection and privacy issues, intellectual property concerns, content management and ownership issues and impact on server load, are likely to increase in profile. “We don't officially restrict anything but the senior management have serious issues with intellectual property issues of using social media. So it tends to be done under the radar

Is there a case for programmes to raise awareness of social media benefits? The research produced considerable verbal evidence that variation in usage between student populations and departments was a ‘generational issue’ rather than anything else.

The development of short programmes around the ‘benefits of social media

technologies’ for HEIs could address this situation and the cultural issues identified. “Not really my area of expertise, but I think it differs less between these audiences and more along the generational issues (digital natives / digital immigrants). The majority of our students are mature and part time students not 18-year old undergraduates.”

Should social media technologies be treated as a separate strategy or embedded in the core operations? What is the future role of the web team? In the majority of institutions the web team is in ‘response mode’ to users and management. As social media technologies and usage mature over the coming years, it is likely that a more integrated approach will be required to monitor and record conversations over social media networks about the institution and to maintain the consistency and integrity of the institutions brand.

26


Reference Sources Anderson, P. (2007). What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education: JISC. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/techwatch/tsw0701b.pdf Armstrong, J., & Franklin, T. (2008). A review of current and developing international practice in the use of social networking (Web 2.0) in higher education: Franklin Consulting http://www.franklin-consulting.co.uk/ Hughes A (May 2009) ‘Higher Education in a Web 2.0 World’ http://www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/documents/heweb2.aspx McKinsey and Company (2009) How companies are benefiting from Web 2.0 https://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/ghost.aspx?ID=/Business_Technology/BT_Strategy /How_companies_are_benefiting_from_Web_20_McKinsey_Global_Survey_Results_2432 McKinsey and Company (2008) Building the Web 2.0 Enterprise https://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/ghost.aspx?ID=/Building_the_Web_20_Enterprise_ McKinsey_Global_Survey_2174 Owyang, J. (April 2009) The Future of the Social Web, Forrester Research http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2009/04/27/future-of-the-social-web/ Williams P (October 2009) Drop the silo approach, IWR Blog http://blog.iwr.co.uk/2009/10/drop-the-silo-a.html

Vadim Lavrusik, (July 2009) 10 Ways Universities Share Information Using Social Media http://mashable.com/2009/07/15/social-media-public-affairs/

27


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.