Jared Dukes - Final Comprehensive Design Studio - University of Oregon

Page 1

Stitched Future:

Sustainable Urbanism + Inclusive Design

Jared Dukes



Stitched Future:

Sustainable Urbanism + Inclusive Design University of Oregon Comprehensive Design Studio Autumn 2018 - Srping 2019 Student: Jared Dukes Instructor: Kaarin Knudson



Table of Contents

1.0 Urban Design Framework

2.0 Community Center

23 - 24

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

1

BUILDING DESCRIPTION:

25 - 26

REGIONAL LOCATION:

2

PARTI + PROGRAM:

27 - 28

EXISTING CONDITIONS:

3-4

SITE PLAN:

29 - 30

PROJECT PRINCPLES:

5-6

FLOOR PLANS:

31 - 36

DESIGN ITERATIONS:

7-8

ENLARGED TOWER PLANS:

37 - 38

URBAN PLACE VIGNETTES:

9 - 10

BUILDING SECTIONS:

39 - 40

FINAL FRAMEWORK PLAN:

11 - 12

STRUCTURAL SYSTEM:

41 - 42

PERSPECTIVES:

13 - 14

BUILDING DIAGRAMS:

43 - 44

DESIGN DIAGRAMS:

15 - 16

FACADE DESIGN ITERATIONS: 45 - 46

STREET SECTIONS:

17 - 20

CLADDING + WALL SYSTEM: 47 - 48

SITE SECTION:

21 - 22

FACADES:

49 - 50

BUILDING SYSTEMS:

51 - 52

RENDERINGS:

53 - 56

PHYSICAL MODELS:

57 - 62


1.0 Urban Design Framework: A Study in Sustainable Urbanism * Designed in collaboration with Evon Calabrese and Gabe Haug

The Stitched Future Terminal Studio led by Kaarin Knudson sought to address sustainable urbanism, inclusive neighborhood design, and community-supporting architecture. The studio set out to redesign a roughly 134-acre site near the existing Expo Center and historic Vanport area along the Columbia River in the north end of Portland, Oregon. The current conditions of the site cater mainly to industrial uses, is not pedestrian/ bicycle friendly, and is well connected with proximity to Interstate 5, the Yellow Line of MAX light rail, as well as the Columbia River. The new design will feature mixed-use development with a variety of mixed-income housing options. The whole scope of the project lasted for three terms. The autumn term consisted of a seminar course to conduct case studies, evaluate and select the site, and develop the program. The studio itself was split between winter and spring terms. The master planning of the overall site was done in the winter term in a group with Evon Calabrese and Gabe Haug. The spring term focused on development of individual buildings inserted into the new master plan framework. Each group member designed a separate building individually. The work displayed in this book is my own unless otherwise noted.

1

URBAN FRAMEWORK


Portland Expo Center Site

downtown portland, or

REGIONAL LOCATION

2


Existing Conditions

Large Warehouses

Site Boundary

Good Transportation access w/ Light Rail and Interstate

3

URBAN FRAMEWORK

Heavy Traffic; Not Pedestrian Friendly


Existing Conditions hayden island

* Approximately 133.7 acres

columbia river

heron lakes golf course

Industrial

light rail

Commercial Civic/Institutional

vanport wetlands

Residential

EXISTING CONDITIONS

4


Project Principles HUMAN WELL-BEING AND EXPERIENCE • • • • •

Pedestrian only plazas and corridors Provide safety, security, and minimize air and sound pollution Access to green space for recreation and leisure Clear wayfinding to increase perceived and actual safety Surfaces and textures that present a positive balance of stimulation and distraction

CREATE CONNECTIONS TO IMPROVE RESILIENCY • • • • • • • •

5

URBAN FRAMEWORK

Housing and public space that foster community relationships Housing is located in close proximity to services, plazas, and green space Light Rail Transit Connectivity Connects Portland, Hayden Island, Vancouver, and the Portland Airport Transit hub adjacent to primary pedestrian plaza Bicycle Network Protected corridors linking site to downtown Portland Wetlands and riverfront trails connect to major pedestrian hubs


FOSTER DIVERSITY AS A MEANS OF PROMOTING INCLUSIVITY • • • •

Housing oriented towards low, middle, and high-income demographics Universal design - spaces designed for accessibility Spatial hierarchy not social hierarchy Prioritizing the public realm

A BUILT ENVIRONMENT THAT IS HARMONIOUS WITH NATURAL FORCES • • • •

De-fragmentation of existing land-use/land cover Intentional integration of human and ecological systems Local sourcing of materials, goods, and services with consideration of material life-cycle as well as minimizing waste Consideration & design for seasonal changes, specifically in public outdoor spaces

* Developed in collaboration with Evon Calabrese and Gabe Haug. Images produced by Gabe Haug.

PROJECT PRINCIPLES

6


Early Design Iterations

7

URBAN FRAMEWORK


DESIGN ITERATIONS

8


Initial Urban Place Vignettes

9

URBAN FRAMEWORK


PLACE VIGNETTES

10


Residential VIRE O ST .

WAR BL

ER S T.

LOON

Type

SITE STATISTICS Square Footage

Residential

685,363

Commercial

650,002

Manufacturing

397,770 7,272,537 Total

5.5 %

The final site design is made up of four interlocking districts. Each one features mixed-use development but with one overarching use. These four districts consist of the Commercial District bisecting the site right of center, the two mainly Residential Zones that flank it on each side, and the Arts District with Light Manufacturing to the far left.

8.9 % 9.4 %

* 250 sf per person * Estimate = 22,158 people

76.2 %

Residential

11

URBAN FRAMEWORK

ST.

SITE STATISTICS

5,539,402

Office Space

8TH AVE.

Arts District + Light Manufacturing

.

11TH

12T

13T HA VE

.

E

9TH AVE.

IV

10TH A VE

DR

AVE .

E

HA VE.

IN

AV E.

AR

15 TH

M

VIREO ST.

14 TH

AV E

.

16TH AVE.

17TH AVE.

Final Urban Framework

Office Space

Commercial

Manufacturing

Marine Drive has been pulled away from the river to allow for other functions along the water. Several traffic slowing mechanisms were implemented including the center vegetated median. A new transit/ pedestrian bridge extends from the Public Plaza and brings the light rail line more into the heart of the development and across the river.


* Designed in collaboration with Evon Calabrese and Gabe Haug. * Produced by Evon Calabrese and Gabe Haug.

M AR

.

IN E

TH 15

E AV

E IV DR

.

E AV

AV E.

13 TH

AV E

.

TH 14

12T H

VIR

AVE .

J

AV 7TH

E.

E

Columbia River

E

MA

ST. KET

RIN

ST.

3RD AVE.

ST.

2ND

AVE .

IKE

ST.

2ND AVE.

SHRIKE

SHR

3RD AVE. . AVE

SPARROW

ST.

.

SPA

1S TA VE

4TH AVE.

DRIVE

4TH

MARINE

RRO WS T.

Residential

LONGSP

UR ST.

LON

GSP

UR

SPARRO W

AVE .

MLK BL VD.

1ST

3RD AVE.

ST.

ST.

2ND AVE.

SHRIKE

. AVE 4TH

E KINGBIRD

DS T.

D ST.

ST. KET MAR

DRIVE

RIV

GBIR

KINGBIR

Commercial District

ED

KIN

MAR

MARKET ST.

E

. AVE 6TH

ST.

6TH AVE.

MARINE

LOON

I-5

8TH AVE.

ER ST .

9TH AVE.

E.

WAR BL

G

ML

KB

LVD .

I-5

ST.

J

I-5

VIREO

7TH AVE.

J

10TH AV

G

AVE .

12T H

Public Plaza

NS T.

G

8TH AVE.

LO O

1ST AVE .

E.

ST .

9TH AV

ER

10T H

.

13T HA VE .

E

BL

11TH

IV

WA R

AVE .

DR

. AVE 6TH

E

AV E

IN

. AVE 7TH

AR

15 TH

M

14 TH

AV E.

11T

H

AV E.

EO ST .

ST.

0’

LONGSP

UR ST.

50’

Wide-load Truck Route Light Rail Stops

0’

50’

150’

MLK B

LVD.

FINAL FRAMEWORK PLAN

550’

12

150


16TH AV

E.

17TH AV

E.

1. Main Plaza

VIREO ST.

M AR

.

E

IN

E AV

.

TH 14

E AV

3 AV E.

VIR

12T H

EO ST .

LO O

NS T.

3. Boardwalk

13

URBAN FRAMEWORK

Site Plan Scale 1” = 200’

* Produced by Evon Calabrese and Gabe Haug.

8TH AVE.

ST .

E.

ER

9TH AV

BL

10T H

WA R

AVE .

11T

H

AV E.

2. Pedestrian/Light Rail Bridge

13 TH

4

AV E

.

E

IV DR

TH 15


4. Park Blocks

G

5. Outdoor Amphitheater

5

J

6

E

MA

MARKET ST.

RIN

ED

RIV

E

KIN

GBIR

SHR

IKE

ST.

2ND AV

E.

3RD AVE.

SPA

RRO WS T.

GSP

UR

I-5

4

LON

6. Marine Drive

.

4TH AVE.

DS T.

1S TA VE

1

6TH AVE.

7TH AVE.

2

ST.

ML

KB

LVD .

Wide-load Truck Route Light Rail Stops

0’

50’

150’

550’

PERSPECTIVES

14


Design Diagrams

Street Network

15

URBAN FRAMEWORK


Open Public Space

Block Structure

DESIGN DIAGRAMS

16


Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.

12’

10.5’

10.5’

18’ 84’ Right-of-Way

17

URBAN FRAMEWORK

10.5’

10.5’

12’


Marine Drive

12’

5’

2.5’

10’

10’

10’

10’

10’

2.5’

5’

12’

89’ Right-of-Way

STREET SECTIONS

18


Typical Park Block Street

12’

9’

10’

87’ 149’ Right-of-Way

19

URBAN FRAMEWORK

10’


Typical Residential Street

9’

12’

12’

8’

10’

10’

8’

12’

60’ Right-of-Way

STREET SECTIONS

20


* Produced by Gabe Haug.

21

URBAN FRAMEWORK


SITE SECTION

22


2.0 Vanport Place Tower An Inclusive Community Center in North Portland * Designed solely by Jared Dukes

Site Location within Urban Design

23

COMMUNITY CENTER


VANPORT PLACE TOWER - AERIAL VIEW

24


Vanport Place Tower, standing 207’ tall, consists of the combination of neighborhood focused spaces and private residential units. They are split between a 4-story podium and a 15-story tower. The building sits on the northeast corner of a large public plaza and is adjacent to the Columbia River to the north, a pedestrian/transit bridge to the west, and a light rail line to the east. These are the main reasons for the selection of this location. The principles of the project focus on several dierent types of resiliency. This includes resiliency to natural forces such as ooding or a major earthquake. The goal is for the building to perform well in any natural disaster, remain standing safely, and still be occupied in the aftermath. It will then serve as a gathering point for the neighborhood as an initial refuge while the authorities work to bring relief and aid. There will be a backup energy/communication system within the building as well as a store of extra water/food that will be essential during a major disaster event. Environmental resiliency includes the use of sustainable building materials, such as wood, along with passive strategies such as natural ventilation, daylighting, rainwater collection and use, stormwater filtering, and solar collection ability. The idea is to minimize the impact on the environment the building will have through construction and its ongoing operation. Finally, social resiliency will be achieved through the program elements of the community center in terms of educational/advancement opportunities. It will also be achieved through providing good housing options to those within a lower income bracket.

25

COMMUNITY CENTER


BUILDING DESCRIPTION

26


Parti + Program EDUCATION + LEARNING

AUDITORIUM

ART + PERFORMANCE + PHYSICAL ACTIVITY

The community center is open to all members of the public and features a program that centers around education in one component and art/performance in another. This program radiates around a large central auditorium that can be used for both learning functions as well as performances. The bars on the north and west sides of the auditorium will hold the educational program and contain a city library branch and studios/classrooms. The south and east bars hold spaces highlighting the performance, art, and physical activity elements of the program. However, there will be some overlap between the two diering functions. On top of the northeast corner of the podium, the residential tower ascends.

27

COMMUNITY CENTER


auditorium gallery spaces library studios + classrooms daycare physical activity residential units

PARTI + PROGRAM

28


Site Plan 3 1. vanport place tower J

2. columbia river

7TH AVE.

G

5

3. boardwalk 4. pedestrian bridge MA

RIN

MARKET ST.

5. bioswale

ED

RIV

E

KIN

GBIR

DS T.

6. reflecting pool SHR

IKE

ST.

2ND

AVE .

3RD AVE.

4TH AVE.

6TH AVE.

E

7. light rail station RRO WS T.

8. amphitheater LON

GSP

UR

I-5

1S TA VE .

SPA

5

ST.

9. courtyard parking ML

5

KB

LVD .

The building sits on the northeast corner of a large public plaza and is adjacent to the Columbia River to the north, a pedestrian/transit bridge to the west, and a light rail line to the east.

Wide-load Truck Route Light Rail Stops

0’

50’

150’

550’

9 29

COMMUNITY CENTER

6

9


4

2

3

1

7

8

9 SITE PLAN

30


Boardwalk Level

loading dock

library

back of house

tower lobby

daycare

31

COMMUNITY CENTER


Plaza Level

library

auditorium

gallery

cafe

sculpture gallery

FLOOR PLANS

32


2nd Level

lounge craft center

library

studio

studio studio

dance studio balcony

classroom

33

COMMUNITY CENTER


3rd Level

lounge

studio

studio studio

fitness center

classroom

FLOOR PLANS

34


Tower Floors

Mechanical 18th Floor

terrace

terrace

Resident Lounge + Observatory 17th Floor

Residential Units 4th - 16th Floors

35

COMMUNITY CENTER


Auditorium

stage

balcony above

FLOOR PLANS

36


Residential Units one bedroom 775 sf

There will be three units per oor consisting of (2) one-bedroom units and (1) two-bedroom unit that can be converted into a threebedroom unit. The larger unit will target families within the 60-80% range of the median income for Portland while the one-bedrooms will be sold at market rate.

37

COMMUNITY CENTER

one bedroom 775 sf

two or three bedroom 1,550 sf


Resident Observatory + Lounge

roof terrace

roof terrace Tower Services + Plumbing: connected to core for efficiency

ENLARGED TOWER PLANS

38


North-South Section

39

COMMUNITY CENTER


East-West Section

BUILDING SECTIONS

40


Structural System

The community center and adjoining residential tower features a hybrid structural system. This system consists of mostly mass timber elements but also steel reinforced concrete in specific locations. The building foot print follows an 18’ x 18’ grid so the typical bay unit between columns will roughly be that with a little variation in some areas. Mass timber consisting of glulam columns and beams are the prominent structural element in the building. It will be used for all floors of the podium and tower except for the floors that meet the ground, the structure of the auditorium, and the core of the tower. Cross laminated timber (CLT) panel units will be used for the flooring over the beams. This system with be exposed to provide a warm and welcoming atmosphere within the building. Mass timber was selected for a number of reasons including its aesthetic appeal, fire performance, carbon sequestration, and lightweight nature leading to improved seismic performance. The foundation and boardwalk level will be constructed with concrete. This is due to the higher risk of flooding along the river as well as being in line with typical construction practices. The walls of the auditorium in the center of the podium and the shear walls of the tower core are also concrete and serve as lateral resistance. The auditorium roof is held up with exposed wood glulam beams that are roughly 7 feet in depth and includes operable openings to allow daylight in if desired. The façade of the tower is meant to specifically express a timber look. There are wood louvres on each side that are operated separating within each residential unit. The façade of the podium has a terracotta style look with composite panels and the timber aesthetic will mostly be internalized.

41

COMMUNITY CENTER


Column Layout 12’ x 12’ columns

14’ x 14’ columns

16’ x 16’ columns

18’ x 18’ columns

STRUCTURAL SYSTEM

42


Circulation

tower vertical circulation podium vertical circulation

43

COMMUNITY CENTER


Shear Wall Diagram

clt shear walls

concrete shear walls

overhead beams auditorium glulam beams

concrete wall section

• • • •

4” concrete 3 1/2” rigid insulation 4” concrete gypsum/sound panels

BUILDING DIAGRAMS

44


Early Facade Designs (hand drawn)

45

COMMUNITY CENTER


FACADE DESIGN ITERATIONS

46


Facade

• • •

• • • •

Cladding System

47

COMMUNITY CENTER

composite cladding air gap rigid insulation clt wall panel

Wall Section

finish flooring sound resistant flooring clt floor panel


Wall Section Detail

• • • •

composite cladding air gap rigid insulation glulam column

CLADDING + WALL SYSTEM

48


South Facade 49

COMMUNITY CENTER


East Facade

FACADES

50


Natural Ventilation

stale air fresh air

Daylighting

light on two sides

51

COMMUNITY CENTER


CHARRING STRUCTURAL DIAGRAM: (in the event of a fire)

1. Sacrificial Layer (NO structural capacity) 2. Residual Section (structural capacity retained) 3. Size of Timber Prior to Charring

1

1 2

2 3

Benefits of Building with Wood • • • • • • • •

Lower impact on the environment, Carbon sequestered throughout lifetime of the building Can be reclaimed at the end of the buildings life and recycled or reused Less energy to manufacture Shorter jobsite construction period Less deliveries, Simplified jobsite logistics Less jobsite waste Up to 75% lighter than a concrete building Reduced foundation sizes, easier material handling, and better seismic performance BUILDING SYSTEMS

52


Lobby - Public Gallery

53

COMMUNITY CENTER


Library

RENDERINGS

54


Residential Unit

55

COMMUNITY CENTER


Auditorium

RENDERINGS

56


Urban Framework Model

57

URBAN FRAMEWORK


PHYSICAL MODELS

58


Site w/ Massing Model

59

COMMUNITY CENTER


Structural Model

Northwest View

Northeast View

Southwest View

Southeast View PHYSICAL MODELS

60


Facade Relief Model

61

COMMUNITY CENTER


PHYSICAL MODELS

62



Special Thank You to Kaarin Knudson, Evon Calabrese, & Gabe Haug !

STITCHED FUTURE: SUSTAINABLE URBANISM + INCLUSIVE DESIGN University of Oregon Comprehensive Design Studio Autumn 2018 - Srping 2019

Student: Jared Dukes Instructor: Kaarin Knudson • •

Book designed and edited by Jared Dukes The Urban Framework was designed in collaboration with Evon Calabrese and Gabe Haug


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.