Referencias 1 Pisa: Evaluación de las competencias lectoras para el siglo XXI. (2011). Santiago, Chile: Ministerio de Educación, Unidad de Currículum y Evaluación, SIMCE. 2 Todorov, T. (2009). La literatura en peligro. Barcelona: Galaxia Gutenberg. 3 Nussbaum, M. (2005). El cultivo de la humanidad. Una defensa clásica de la reforma en la educación liberal. Barcelona: Paidós. 4 Gayathri, S. (2012). Developing literary competenceThe role of reading: implications for classroom teaching. En Language in India, 12, 2012. 5 Álvarez, I. (2010). Leer, analizar, interpretar, juzgar: cuatro operaciones básicas de los estudios literarios. Recuperado 3 de julio de http://www.academia.edu/1746206/ Leer_analizar_interpretar_juzgar_cuatro_ operaciones_basicas_de_los_estudios_literarios 6 Álvarez, I. Op. cit. 7 Marzano, R. (2004). Building background knowledge. Research on what works in schools. Alexandria: ASCD. 8 Keene, E. O. y Zimmermann, S. (2007). Mosaic of Thought. Portsmouth: Heinemann. 9 National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for English Language ARTS & Literacy. Washington D.C.: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. Hiebert, E. (2011). Using Multiple Sources of Information in Establishing Text Complexity. Reading Research Report. Santa Cruz, CA: TextProject. RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Chapter 4. En Snow, C. (Pdte.). Reading for Understanding: Toward a R&D program in Reading Comprehension. Arlington, VA: RAND. Lee, C. D. y Spratley, A. (2010). Reading in the disciplines: The challenges of adolescent literacy. New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
46
10 National Governors Association Centre for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards English Language Arts. Apendix A. Washington D.C.: National Governors Association Centre for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. 11 Carnegie Council on Advancing Adolescent Literacy. (2010). Time to Act: An agenda for advancing adolescent literacy for college and career success. New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York. 12 Prior, P. (2006). A sociocultural theory of writing. En MacArthur, C.; Graham, S. y Fitzgerald, J. (Eds.). Handbook of writing research. New York: The Guilford Press. 13 National Writing Project y Nagin. C. (2006). Because writing matters. Improving student writing in our schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 14 Bromley, K. (2007). Best Practices in teaching writing. En Gambrell, L. y otros (Eds.) Best Practices in Literacy Instruction. New York: The Guilford Press. 15 Bereiter, C. y Scardamalia, M. (2009). The psychology of written composition. New York: Routledge. 16 Hayes, J. R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. En Levi, C. M. y Ransdell, S. (Eds.) The science of writing: theories, methods, individual differences and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Rijlaarsdam, G. y Van den Bergh, H. (2006). Writing process theory. A functional dynamic approach. En MacArthur, C., Graham, S. y Fitzgerald, J. (Eds.) Handbook of writing research. New York: The Guilford Press. 17 Björk, L. y Blomstrand, I. (2000). La escritura en la enseñanza secundaria. Los procesos del pensar y del escribir. Barcelona: Graó. 18 National Writing Project y Nagin. C. (2006). Because writing matters. Improving student writing in our schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bases Curriculares 2015 | 7° básico a 2° medio | Lengua y Literatura
